Impact of Moderate Dose of Postoperative Radiation on Urinary Continence and Potency in Patients with Prostate Cancer Treated with Nerve Sparing Prostatectomy

Radiotherapy after Prostatectomy

Aims and background

The role of radiotherapy after prostatectomy is controversial. This paper tries to give some guidelines for everyday practice through an analysis of literature data.

Methods

The potential role of radiotherapy in the adjuvant and salvage setting is discussed. We also report and interpret available literature data for both settings.

Results

As regards an increase in or detectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after radical prostatectomy, about 40–50% of patients are rendered bNED with local salvage radiotherapy, but only 10–50% are long-term (5 years) biochemically controlled. A timely salvage treatment is crucial to optimize control probability. As regards adjuvant radiotherapy for undetectable postoperative PSA in patients at high risk of failure as judged on pathology, results are more encouraging. Recent data report bNED rates ≥70% at 5 years.

Conclusions

Although results are far from satisfactory, salvage radiotherapy should be considered for every patient with an increased or detectable PSA after surgery. Adjuvant radiotherapy seems preferable to salvage radiotherapy for patients at high (>30%) risk of failure.

Early Postoperative Radiotherapy is Associated with Worse Functional Outcomes in Patients with Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE

The effect of time between radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy on postoperative functional outcomes is still unclear in patients with surgically managed prostate cancer. We hypothesized that a shorter time between radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy might be associated with worse functional recovery rates after radical prostatectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 2,190 patients treated with radical prostatectomy and stratified according to radiotherapy schedule (adjuvant radiotherapy, salvage radiotherapy, no radiotherapy). We examined recovery rates for erectile function and urinary function according to adjuvant radiotherapy, salvage radiotherapy and no radiotherapy, and according to time from surgery to radiotherapy. Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate the impact of these predictors on functional outcomes.

RESULTS

Median followup was 48 months. The 3-year erectile function recovery rates were 35.0%, 29.0% and 11.6% in patients who received no radiotherapy, salvage radiotherapy and adjuvant radiotherapy, respectively (p <0.001), and differed significantly according to time to radiotherapy (11.7% vs 34.7% for less than 1 year vs 1 year or more, respectively, p <0.001). The 3-year urinary continence recovery rates were 70.7%, 59.0% and 42.2% in patients who received no radiotherapy, salvage radiotherapy and adjuvant radiotherapy, respectively (p <0.001), and differed according to time to radiotherapy (43.5% vs 62.7% for less than 1 year vs 1 year or more, respectively, p <0.001). Cox regression analyses confirmed the negative impact of early radiotherapy on recovery rates for erectile function and urinary continence.

CONCLUSIONS

Time from radical prostatectomy to radiotherapy has an important role in the recovery of erectile function and urinary continence. Delayed radiotherapy is preferred to improve functional outcomes after surgery.

Late toxicity after postprostatectomy salvage radiation therapy

PURPOSE

To evaluate late toxicity in patients who received salvage external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for a detectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level after radical prostatectomy (RP).

METHODS

A cohort of 308 consecutive patients underwent salvage EBRT from July 1987 through June 2003 for a detectable PSA level after RP. All were treated with high-energy photons (6-20 MV) to a median dose of 64.8 Gy (range: 54.0-72.4 Gy) in 1.8- to 2.0-Gy fractions.

RESULTS

Median follow-up from the completion of EBRT was 60 months (range: 1 day-174 months). Late toxicity occurring more than 90 days after EBRT completion was identified in 41 patients (13%). Twelve patients (3.9%) had grade 2 urethral strictures and were treated with urethral dilation, 3 patients had grade 3 cystitis, and 1 had a grade 4 rectal complication. These numbers correspond to an estimated 0.7% (95% confidence interval, 0.0-1.6%) of patients experiencing a grade 3 or 4 complication by 5 years after the start of EBRT.

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage EBRT for a detectable PSA level after RP is the only curative treatment in this setting. This treatment can be administered in a manner that results in a low likelihood of late complications.

Health-Related Quality of Life Results in Pathologic Stage C Prostate Cancer From a Southwest Oncology Group Trial Comparing Radical Prostatectomy Alone With Radical Prostatectomy Plus Radiation Therapy

Purpose

To compare short- and long-term effects of adjuvant treatment versus observation after surgery on health-related quality of life (HRQL) of prostate cancer patients.

Patients and Methods

The Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) intergroup trial compared radical prostatectomy (RP) plus observation versus RP plus adjuvant radiation therapy (RT). Two-hundred seventeen of 425 therapeutic trial patients were eligible and registered to the HRQL study. Patients completed the SWOG Quality of Life Questionnaire (emotional, physical, social, and role function; general symptom status; treatment/disease-specific symptoms; and global HRQL [GHRQL]) at baseline, 6 weeks, 6 months, and annually for 5 years. Prespecified outcomes were three genitourinary symptoms (bowel function tenderness, frequent urination, and erectile dysfunction [ED]) and measures of physical and emotional function. Adjustments were made for the baseline score.

Results

Patients receiving adjuvant RT reported worse bowel function (through approximately 2 years) and worse urinary function. There were no statistically significant differences for ED. GHRQL was initially worse for the RP+RT arm but improved over time and was better at the end of the period than the GHRQL reported for RP alone (treatment arm × time interaction, P = .0004). Symptom distress was significantly worse for the RP+RT arm compared with the RP alone arm, but the treatment arms did not differ with respect to other general measures of HRQL.

Conclusion

The addition of RT to surgery resulted in more frequent urination, as well as early report of more bowel dysfunction, although bowel function differences disappeared over the 5-year period. The addition of RT did not negatively impact ED.

Predictive factors for late genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity in patients with prostate cancer treated with adjuvant or salvage radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To determine the rate and magnitude of late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities after salvage or adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer, and to determine predictive factors for these toxicities.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A large multi-institutional database that included 959 men who received postoperative RT after radical prostatectomy (RP) was analyzed: 19% received adjuvant RT, 81% received salvage RT, 78% were treated to the prostate bed only, and 22% received radiation to the pelvis.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 55 months. At 5 years, 10% of patients had Grade 2 late GU toxicity and 1% had Grade 3 late GU toxicity, while 4% of patients had Grade 2 late GI toxicity and 0.4% had Grade 3 late GI toxicity. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that adjuvant RT (p = 0.03), androgen deprivation (p < 0.0001), and prostate bed-only RT (p = 0.007) predicted for Grade 2 or higher late GU toxicity. For GI toxicity, although adjuvant RT was significant in the univariate analysis, no significant factors were found in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the number of high-grade toxicities for postoperative RT was low. Therefore, adjuvant and salvage RT can safely be used in the appropriate settings.

External beam radiotherapy as curative treatment of prostate cancer

External beam radiotherapy (RT) has been used as a curative treatment of prostate cancer for more than 5 decades, with the "modern" era emerging more than 3 decades ago. Its history is marked by gradual improvements punctuated by several quantum leaps that are increasingly driven by advancements in the computer and imaging sciences and by its integration with complementary forms of treatment. Consequently, the contemporary use of external beam RT barely resembles its earliest form, and this must be appreciated in the context of current patient care. The influence of predictive factors on the use and outcomes of external beam RT is presented, as is a selected review of the methods and outcomes of external beam RT as a single therapeutic intervention, in association with androgen suppression, or as a postoperative adjunct. Thus, the "state of the (radiotherapeutic) art" is presented to enhance the understanding of this treatment approach with the hope that this information will serve as a useful resource to physicians as they care for patients with prostate cancer.

Use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy to prevent or delay recurrence of prostate cancer in patients undergoing surgical treatment for prostate cancer

There have been improvements in the outcome of patients with clinically localized prostate cancer treated by radical prostatectomy. However, some patients treated with radical prostatectomy will have clinical or biochemical progression. These men are at increased risk of dying of their disease. Identification of patients with adverse features at the time of radical prostatectomy may permit the use of additional multimodality therapies to improve outcomes. Whether this additional multimodality therapy should be administered in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting remains controversial. Further, whether a patient at increased risk for progression after radical prostatectomy requires additional therapy before the development of documented progression remains controversial. This article reviews the potential multimodality approaches to prevent or delay recurrence of prostate cancer in patients undergoing surgical treatment for prostate cancer.

Predictive factors of radiation therapy for patients with prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of salvage/adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) for patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1997 and 2001, 52 patients were treated in our institution with RT for PSA recurrence after RP. The mean (range) delay between RP and RT was 30.5 (0.16-105.6) months. Eighteen patients received no hormonal therapy before RT. The failure of RT was defined as three consecutive increases in PSA levels with intervals of > or = 6 weeks.

RESULTS

Within a mean (range) follow-up of 27.7 (6-69) months, 18 patients presented with biochemical progression. The 3-year biochemical progression-free survival was 51%. Using univariate analysis, an age < 65 years (P = 0.0262), a Gleason score on the RP specimen of > or = 8 (P = 0.0024), stage pT3 (P = 0.02), a detectable nadir PSA after RT (P < 0.001) and the absence of hormonal therapy (P = 0.0359) were associated with a lower biochemical progression-free survival. However, only the Gleason score (P = 0.0395) and nadir serum PSA after RT (P = 0.028) remained independent predictive factors on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Half of the present patients treated with RT for an isolated high serum PSA level after RP were free of biochemical relapse at 3 years of follow-up. RT may be proposed to selected patients with mild morbidity. However, definitive evidence of the beneficial effect of adjuvant RT for patients with PSA recurrence after RP awaits the conclusion of randomized clinical trials.

Postoperative radiotherapy in 423 patients with pT3N0 prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the treatment outcome in pT3N0 patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate treated with an elective course of postoperative irradiation (RT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

During a 22-year period, a total of 423 pT3N0 prostate cancer patients were treated at a single medical center with prostatic fossa RT, which was the only adjuvant therapy given. The patient characteristics were as follows: median age 66 years; Stage pT3aN0 in 296 (70%) and pT3bN0 in 127 (30%); Gleason score 2-4 in 12 (2.8%), 5-6 in 157 (37.1%), 7 in 151 (35.7%), and 8-10 in 100 (23.6%); and the median and mean preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was 10 and 15.9 ng/mL, respectively. Radiotherapy consisted of a median dose of 48 Gy delivered to the prostatic fossa and its immediate vicinity. The median follow-up was 7 years.

RESULTS

The 5- and 10-year actuarial survival rate was 92% and 73%, respectively, and the 5- and 10-year disease-free survival rate (PSA <0.05 ng/mL) was 69% and 51%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, the Gleason score was the most important predictor for survival (p = 0.00005), and pathologic stage and Gleason score were independently predictive of disease-free survival (p = 0.00007 and 0.0003, respectively). The worst prognostic category was represented by pT3bN0, Gleason score 7-10 patients who had a 5.3 times greater risk of tumor recurrence than those with pT3aN0, Gleason score 2-6. A high (>25 ng/mL) preoperative PSA level was also a predictor of tumor recurrence (p = 0.03). A total of 43 patients (10.2%) developed clinical recurrence. This included 30 patients (7%) with distant metastases alone and 13 (3%) with local recurrence, which included 2 patients who also had distant disease. An additional 88 patients (20%) had PSA elevation (>0.05 ng/mL). This treatment program was well tolerated, with acute toxicity common (62%) but of no clinical significance. No late or severe toxicity was recorded.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant radiotherapy, as given in this study, appears to substantially reduce the expected incidence of local tumor recurrence in pT3N0 prostate cancer patients. The treatment outcome was poor in pT3bN0 and Gleason score 7-10 patients, with >80% showing evidence of clinical or PSA recurrence at 10 years after therapy. This group should be the target of a prospective trial of systemic therapy.

[Post-prostatectomy radiotherapy: for which patients and when?]

Biochemical relapse after radical prostatectomy is not exceptional, ranging from 10 to 40% in the literature. To prevent this biochemical failure, adjuvant radiotherapy was proposed to patients with a high risk of relapse. No phase III trial has actually validated this attitude. Best indications for adjuvant irradiation seem to be patients with an extensive extracapsular extension or multiple positive margins. Historical comparisons seems to confer, in these case, a benefit in biochemical control for adjuvant irradiation versus observation. Others authors prefer immediate post-operative irradiation, a delayed treatment, when biochemical relapse has occurred. This attitude has spared some patients irradiation useless. This salvage irradiation lowered the PSA level in 40 to 70% of the cases, but long-term efficiency is obtained only in the case of a low value of the PSA before irradiation. Delayed radiotherapy is, therefore, justified only if a close follow-up is performed, with repeated dosage of PSA. Whatever the case, it is important to differentiate between local and distant relapse: patients with positive nodes at the time of surgery are most likely at risk of distant relapse. It seems that patients with seminal vesicles involvement are also at high risk for distant relapse, but this must be confirmed.

Nonrandomized comparison of surgery with and without adjuvant pelvic irradiation for patients with pT3N0 adenocarcinoma of the prostate

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of radical prostatectomy alone and compare it with that of surgery followed by planned adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with pT3N0 prostate cancer (CaP). A total of 402 patients with CaP were treated with prostatectomy, including 311 (77%) who received a planned course of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) (surgery [S] + RT) to the prostatic fossa (median dose: 48 Gy) and 91 (23%) who had surgery alone. Patients in the former group had worse risk factors than those in the latter group, such as a higher clinical and pathologic stage (p = 0.001), higher Gleason score (p = 0.09), and higher preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level (p = 0.0001). PSA failure was defined as more than 0.05 ng/ml. Median follow-up was 59 months. The 5- and 10-year overall survival for the 311 S+RT patients was 91% and 81%, respectively, and it was similar for those 91 in the surgery-alone group, p = 0.59. The 5- and 10-year probability of freedom from PSA and/or clinical failure for the former group was 70% and 53%, respectively, whereas it was 66% and 46%, respectively, for the latter group, p = 0.72. Any recurrence developed in a total of 96 (31%) patients in the S+RT group as compared with 23 (25%) in the surgery-alone group. Local recurrence was noted in 10 (3.2%) S+RT and in 6 (6.6%) surgery-alone patients (N.S.). The time to clinical or chemical recurrence was also similar for both treatment groups (median time: 3.0 versus 3.8 years). Patients with pT3b tumors had relatively poor 5- and 10-year disease-free survival (53% and 32%, respectively, for S+RT and 38% and 0%, respectively, for surgery alone, p = 0.82). In multivariate analyses, pathologic stage and Gleason score were independent predictors of recurrence, each with p < 0.001 after controlling for the other. The worst prognostic category included patients with pT3bN0, Gleason score 7-10 disease who had 5.0 times the risk of recurrence as compared with pT3aN0, Gleason score 2-6 patients. No significant difference in disease-free survival by the treatment group was seen in Cox regression analysis controlling for pathologic stage (p = 0.59), Gleason score (p = 0.99), and PSA (p = 0.28). S+RT patients were predicted to have disease recurrence at 83% the rate of surgery-alone patients, p = 0.42. Preoperative PSA (>25 ng/ml) was predictive of recurrence (2.0 x risk) in univariate analysis, but it was not a significant predictor in multivariate analysis. It appears that moderate-dose, localized fields postoperative irradiation reduced the incidence of local recurrence in patients who were at a higher risk of recurrence as compared with those treated with surgery alone. New treatment strategies need to be developed to manage pT3bN0, Gleason score 7-10 patients whose 10-year disease-free survival was poor.

Update on impact of moderate dose of adjuvant radiation on urinary continence and sexual potency in prostate cancer patients treated with nerve-sparing prostatectomy

OBJECTIVES

Adjuvant radiotherapy to the prostatic bed at moderate doses of 45 to 54 Gy achieves results comparable to higher doses. We studied the effect of moderate doses of postoperative radiation therapy on urinary continence and sexual potency in prostate cancer patients who had undergone nerve-sparing prostatectomy.

METHODS

Between November 1983 and December 1992, 255 prostate cancer patients were selected to undergo nerve-sparing prostatectomy. A total of 94 (37%) patients had received adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy, 45 to 54 Gy to the prostatic bed, based on microscopic positive margins, seminal vesicle involvement, and/or Gleason score. Subjective patient reports regarding the potency and urinary continence status were recorded during a semistructured telephone interview at 3 or more years after treatment. The findings in irradiated and nonirradiated patients were compared and correlated to those obtained from the same patients preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively.

RESULTS

At 3 or more years of follow-up no significant difference among irradiated and nonirradiated patients was detected. Most patients described optimal urinary continence and approximately one third had maintained potency after bilateral nerve-sparing prostatectomy. None of the patients who had undergone unilateral nerve-sparing surgery remained potent. Using a multivariable analysis, the significant predictors for maintaining potency were the status at 1 year postoperatively and bilateral versus unilateral nerve-sparing procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Doses of adjuvant radiation therapy in the range used (45 to 54 Gy) did not affect the long-term pattern of maintenance of either function.

Preliminary results of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy as salvage treatment for a rising prostate-specific antigen level postprostatectomy

The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy delivered to the fossa of the prostate and seminal vesicles as salvage treatment for a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level that becomes undetectable and subsequently begins to rise postprostatectomy. Between August 1994 and December 1997, 14 patients with prostate cancer whose PSA became undetectable after a radical prostatectomy subsequently developed a rising PSA, had no evidence of metastatic disease, and were treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy at the University of California, Davis Cancer Center. Gleason scores ranged from 4 to 9 (29% of the patients had a Gleason score > or =8). The seminal vesicles were involved in three (21%) cases and the surgical margins were involved in seven (50%) cases. PSA values ranged from 0.3 to 6.7 (median: 0.7) ng/ml at the start of radiotherapy. Daily 1.8-2.0-Gy fractions were administered to total doses at isocenter ranging from 60.6 to 74.2 (median: 64.9) Gy. None of the patients received hormonal therapy. Follow-up ranged from 13 to 36 (median: 22) months. For patients with a preradiotherapy Hybritech PSA < or = 1.0 ng/ml, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of the 2-year biochemical disease-free survival rate is 67%, whereas for patients with a preradiotherapy PSA more than 1.0 ng/ml, the 2-year biochemical disease-free survival rate is 20% (p = 0.17). Because of the small number of patients, the difference is not statistically significant. A positive microscopic margin had no impact on the results obtained with salvage radiotherapy. Only one of four patients with a poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma remains free of disease. Acute toxicity was mild and did not require medication (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grade I): four (29%) patients experienced genitourinary morbidity and three (21%) patients experienced gastrointestinal morbidity. With regard to late toxicity, one (7%) patient developed a urethral stricture requiring dilatation (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grade III). All five patients who were potent at the start of radiotherapy remain potent. Medicare's median reimbursement for salvage three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in this study ($7,512 in 1999 U.S. dollars) is equivalent to its reimbursement for a 17-month course of goserelin hormonal therapy. Patients with prostate cancer who develop an undetectable followed by a rising PSA postprostatectomy should be referred for salvage treatment with radiotherapy when their PSA is still less than or equal to 1.0 ng/ml. Salvage three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy is well tolerated and is less expensive than more than 17 months of goserelin.

Comparison of outcomes of radical prostatectomy with and without adjuvant pelvic irradiation in patients with pathologic stage C (T3N0) adenocarcinoma of the prostate

Patients with localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate gland (CaP) are frequently (approximately 50%) found at radical prostatectomy to have extracapsular disease or positive surgical margins. The management of these patients is a subject of controversy because some question the impact of this manifestation of CaP on patient survival or disease-free survival. Between 1976 and 1991, 241 patients with pathologic stage C (T3N0) were treated in this medical center. Of these 241 patients, 201 (83%) received a planned postoperative pelvic irradiation consisting of 48 Gy given to the prostatic fossa, whereas 40 (17%) patients were treated with radical prostatectomy alone. The two study urologists selected these patients not to receive postoperative irradiation based on intraoperative findings and important prognostic factors. Comparison of treatment outcomes in these two treatment groups is a subject of this report. The 201 patients treated with surgery-radiotherapy (S+RT) combination had a higher pathologic stage, greater incidence of seminal vesicle involvement, p = 0.002, and higher mean and median preoperative prostate-specific antigen level, p < 0.0001, than the 40 surgery (S) alone patients. There was no significant difference in the incidence of higher Gleason's score by the treatment group, p = 0.14. In univariate analysis, there was no significant difference in survival, disease-free survival, and time to failure between the two treatment groups. In multivariate analysis after controlling for pathologic stage and Gleason's score, the 201 adjuvant radiotherapy patients were predicted to have recurrence at 68% (95% confidence interval 39%-118%) the rate of the 40 surgery-alone patients. Local recurrence with or without metastatic disease was found in 10% of surgery-alone patients as compared to 5% in those also receiving postoperative irradiation. Treatment tolerance was very good with minor radiotherapy complications only. There was no significant difference in the incidence of incontinence between the two treatment arms. In summary: (a) The use of moderate-dose postoperative radiotherapy was of low toxicity and it did not increase the incidence of incontinence. (b) Local recurrence was 5% in S+RT and 10% in S-alone patients. (c) In multivariate analysis, S+RT patients had 68% rate of recurrence of S-alone patients. (d) Adjuvant RT probably reduces the risk of recurrence in patients with poor prognostic factors. (e) These data need to be interpreted with caution because of the nonrandomized nature of the study.

13-year survival comparison of percutaneous and open nephroureterectomy approaches for management of transitional cell carcinoma of renal collecting system: equivalent outcomes

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the renal collecting system traditionally has been managed by open nephroureterectomy with en bloc resection of a bladder cuff. However, for a select patient population with a solitary kidney or bilateral disease, the morbidity and mortality associated with chronic renal insufficiency and dialysis is deterring. In these situations, a more conservative approach such as antegrade percutaneous resection should be considered. The long-term disease-free outcome of percutaneous management in comparison with open nephroureterectomy has not been previously reported. We evaluated our experience with two surgical approaches to treat upper tract TCC: percutaneous resection and nephroureterectomy/nephrectomy to assess the clinical efficacy of these surgical modalities.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively identified 162 patients who had clinically localized TCC of the upper urinary tract. Records were reviewed to identify those with 13-year follow-up (N = 110) in respect to tumor grade, stage, disease-free status, length of cancer-specific survival, and overall survival. Statistical analysis of the results of open nephroureterectomy/nephrectomy (N = 60) and percutaneous resection (N = 50) was performed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Student's t-test.

RESULTS

All patients had disease in clinical stage Ta through T3. During a mean follow-up of 46.6 (range 6-150) months, grade 1 disease demonstrated little invasive potential. Of the disease-specific deaths, 60% (17/26) were of patients with grade 3 lesions, with a mean cancer survival period of 15.2 months after the initial procedure. Disease-specific survival rates after open and percutaneous approaches for grade 2 disease were 53.8 and 53.3 months, respectively (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor grade appeared to be the most important prognostic indicator in patients with renal TCC regardless of the surgical approach. Grade 3 tumors were more aggressive, presenting in an advanced stage with invasion, and recurrences were usually associated with metastasis. In this population, nephroureterectomy is warranted if the patient is a surgical candidate. The percutaneous option for grade 1 or 2 disease may be extended beyond the population with solitary kidneys and a risk of chronic renal failure to be offered to healthy individuals with normal contralateral kidneys who are willing to abide by a strict and lengthy follow-up.

Evaluation and management of the man who has failed primary curative therapy for prostate cancer

The recurrence of prostate cancer after potentially curative local therapy is becoming a significant urologic problem. There are few prospective randomized trials, and the optimal diagnostic and treatment strategies for men who fail potentially curative therapy are not known. The experience to date seems to suggest the following as a reasonable approach. A detectable serum PSA level (> or = 0.4 ng/mL) after radical prostatectomy is evidence of residual or recurrent prostate cancer. Men with low- or moderate-grade cancers (Gleason score < 7), with capsular penetration, or with positive surgical margins in whom disease recurs more than 2 years after radical prostatectomy with a PSA doubling time greater than 12 months seem likely to harbor a local recurrence and are the only good candidates for salvage therapy. Unless there is a palpable recurrence, transrectal ultrasound and biopsy are generally not recommended, and CT scanning and bone scintigraphy usually do not provide helpful information. The role of monoclonal antibody scanning is currently investigational. Men with high-grade tumors (Gleason score > or = 7) or with seminal vesicle or lymph node involvement in whom disease recurs within 2 years of radical prostatectomy are most appropriately observed or treated with early hormonal therapy. Men who do not achieve a PSA nadir of 0.5 ng/mL or less within 2 years of radiotherapy are very likely to harbor residual disease. For young healthy men who are willing to accept a substantial risk of impotency, urinary incontinence, and bladder neck contractures, salvage radical prostatectomy is a reasonable option if the preradiation tumor characteristics are acceptable (PSA < 10 ng/mL, Gleason score < or = 6) and if the current PSA is less than 10 ng/mL. Salvage cryotherapy may result in substantial morbidity and should only be offered on an investigational basis. Other men failing radiation may be observed or treated with hormonal therapy. There is seldom a role for repeat biopsy. Because the optimal time to begin hormone therapy is still not known, early or delayed treatment are both reasonable options. Testicular androgen ablation by orchiectomy or LHRH agonists is considered standard therapy. Combined therapy with an antiandrogen does not seem to be beneficial for all patients and should not be routinely used. Sexually active men in whom preservation of potency is important can be offered an investigational regimen such as a 5-alpha-reductase inhibitor combined with an oral antiandrogen or intermittent LHRH agonist therapy. It is hoped that the results of ongoing randomized trials and future research will establish efficient and effective practice guidelines to evaluate and treat men who have failed potentially curative therapy for localized prostate cancer. This remains a very important and controversial topic that will challenge many practicing urologists.

Adjuvant radiation therapy does not cause urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: results of a prospective randomized study

PURPOSE

We analyzed the potential influence of adjuvant radiotherapy on urinary continence after radical prostatectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 100 patients with N0M0 prostate cancer randomized in a prospective study on postoperative radiotherapy for locally advanced disease (positive surgical margin, capsular perforation and/or seminal vesicle infiltration) were studied. Objective pad weighing tests corroborated by direct personal interviews were used to evaluate urinary continence at regular postoperative intervals.

RESULTS

Of the patients 48 received 60 Gy. external radiotherapy with 18 MV photon beams between 12 and 16 weeks postoperatively, and 52 were followed expectantly. Risk factors were similar in both groups. With a mean followup of 24 months, no difference in complete urinary continence was observed. Of the irradiated group 77% and of the surveillance group 83% were totally dry. The fate of the bladder neck had no significant influence on final continence status, although there was a trend for faster recovery when the bladder neck was preserved.

CONCLUSIONS

In this prospective randomized study 60 Gy. external radiation therapy administered between 3 and 4 months after radical prostatectomy for pathologically locally advanced prostate cancer had no significant influence on urinary continence.

Radical retropubic prostatectomy outcomes at a community hospital

PURPOSE

We reviewed a 6-year experience performing radical retropubic prostatectomy at 2 community hospitals (for-profit and not-for-profit) to assess outcomes and to compare them to the published literature reflecting outcomes from major academic hospitals.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Charts of 116 patients who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy (nerve sparing in select cases) between 1990 and 1996 were reviewed for clinical and pathological outcomes as well as hospital charges. Subjective patient reports of urinary continence, potency and satisfaction were evaluated postoperatively.

RESULTS

Average patient age was 66.6 years and average preoperative prostate specific antigen level was 9.6 ng./ml. Of the patients 43% had T1c disease, 63% pT2 and 37% pT3. Positive margins were present in 17.2% of the specimens and 66% of the patients had Gleason scores of 5 and 6. No deaths occurred. Major complications occurred in 5.4% of patients and included deep venous thrombosis (1.8%), pulmonary embolism (1.8%), rectal injury requiring ileostomy (0.9%) and fascial dehiscence (0.9%). Mean blood loss was 872 cc and mean blood transfusion rate was 1.7 units (almost exclusively autologous blood). Hospital charges decreased at the not-for-profit hospital to $13,233 in 1996 from $17,743 in 1990 to 1995, whereas charges increased at the for-profit hospital to $25,979 in 1996 from $24,481 in 1990 to 1995. Mean length of stay decreased from 5 days in 1990 to 1995 to 3 days in 1996. Of the patients 80% were totally continent (pad-free), 12% wore a protective pad once per day for minimal incontinence and 8% wore 2 or more pads. Of the men who were potent preoperatively 18% retained potency and 46% remained sexually active postoperatively either spontaneously or with assistance. Of the patients 84% were satisfied with surgical outcomes, 11% were somewhat satisfied and 5% were dissatisfied.

CONCLUSIONS

Radical retropubic prostatectomy can be performed safely and with acceptable clinical and pathological outcomes at a community hospital. Impotence continues to be one of the most bothersome morbidities, particularly in older men. Increasing cost awareness, coincident with the proliferation of managed care, has led to reductions in length of hospital stay and charges at certain hospitals.

Preirradiation PSA predicts biochemical disease-free survival in patients treated with postprostatectomy external beam irradiation

PURPOSE

To assess the clinical outcome and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response and to determine prognostic factors for biochemical disease-free survival in patients treated with external beam radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy without hormonal therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Forty-eight patients were treated after prostatectomy with radiotherapy between March, 1988 and December, 1993. Seven patients had undetectable PSA (<0.2) and the remainder had detectable PSA at the time of irradiation (overall: median 2.7, range 0-24.9). Nine patients had biopsy proven local recurrence, palpable local disease, or positive preirradiation imaging. No patients received hormonal therapy prior to irradiation. Median follow-up was 55 months. A median dose of 60 Gy (range 58-66) was given to the prostate bed. Survival was analyzed using the life-table method. Actuarial biochemical disease-free survival was the primary endpoint studied.

RESULTS

In patients with detectable PSA, 51% had levels return to undetectable after irradiation. The actuarial 5-year freedom from biochemical failure for all patients was 24%. A significant difference in biochemical disease-free survival was seen for patients irradiated with preirradiation PSA that was undetectable (p < 0.001), or preirradiation PSA that was < or =2.7 (p = 0.002), vs. preirradiation PSA that was >2.7. Five-year actuarial biochemical disease-free survival values were 71, 48, and 0%, respectively, for the three groups. Biochemical disease-free survival was not affected by preoperative PSA level, clinical stage, Gleason's score, pathologic stage, surgical margins, presence of undetectable PSA after surgery, surgery to radiation interval, total dose, or presence of clinically suspicious local disease. Based on digital rectal exam, there were no local failures.

CONCLUSION

Biochemical disease-free survival after postprostatectomy radiation is predicted by the PSA at the time of irradiation. Clinical local control is excellent, but distant failure remains a significant problem in this population. The addition of concomitant systemic therapy should be investigated in patients with PSA >2.7.

[Radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy: indications, results and side effects]

BACKGROUND

Radiation therapy following radical prostatectomy in locally progressed prostate carcinoma has become increasingly important in the last few years as both adjuvant therapy in patients with pT3-tumors with or without positive margins and treatment for a PSA increase in local recurrence of disease. The background for this is the knowledge gained by using PSA that up to 60% of the patients with histopathologically confirmed pT3/4 tumors or involvement of the lymph nodes are systemically and/or locally progressive after 3 to 5 years if only surgical or radiation therapy was performed.

RESULTS

A number of studies, albeit exclusively retrospective, substantiated a significantly high local tumor control by radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy. This holds true for adjuvant therapy with a PSA in the "zero range" as well as with a PSA increase from the "zero range", whereby it must be taken into consideration that a certain percentage of treated patients with a PSA in the "zero-range" with or without positive margins actually do not need further therapy. Two retrospective studies demonstrated a significant better lengthening of "freedom from treatment failure" that is local and systemic progression of disease. Lengthening the survival time has, however, not yet been proven. With an increase in the PSA from the "zero range" after radical prostatectomy, there are indications that systemic metastatic spread already occurs with values higher than 2.5 to 4 ng/ml and the radiotherapy no longer has any curative intention.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant RT following radical prostatectomy gives better local control rates and probably better rates of "freedom from treatment failure" in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer with positive margins and probably in patients with negative margins. However, in retrospective studies no advantage in overall survival was shown.

Serum prostate-specific antigen elevation in the post-radical prostatectomy patient

The management of postprostatectomy serum prostate-specific antigen elevation is hampered by the inability to determine the location of the recurrence accurately and the lack of data demonstrating a survival advantage from any of the available therapies. Treatment must be individualized for each patient.