1
|
Fischer S, Gillessen S, Stalder O, Terbuch A, Cathomas R, Schmid FA, Zihler D, Müller B, Fankhauser CD, Hirschi-Blickenstorfer A, Kluth LA, Seifert B, Templeton AJ, Mingrone W, Ufe MP, Fischer N, Beyer J, Woelky R, Omlin A, Vogl U, Hoppe K, Kamradt J, Rothschild SI, Rothermundt C. First Indicator of Relapse in Testicular Cancer and Implications for Follow-up: Analysis of the Swiss Austrian German Testicular Cancer Cohort Study (SAG TCCS). EUR UROL SUPPL 2024; 68:68-74. [PMID: 39308640 PMCID: PMC11416594 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/14/2024] [Indexed: 09/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and objective Follow-up for patients with testicular cancer should ensure early detection of relapses. Optimal schedules and minimum requirements for cross-sectional imaging are not clearly defined, and guideline recommendations differ. Our aim was to analyse the clinical impact of different imaging modalities for detection of relapse in a large prospective cohort (Swiss Austrian German Testicular Cancer Cohort Study, SAG TCCS). Methods Patients with seminoma or nonseminoma were prospectively enrolled between January 2014 and February 2023 after initial treatment (n = 1175). Follow-up according to the study schedule was individualised for histology and disease stage. Only patients who had received primary treatment were considered. We analysed the total number of imaging modalities and scans identifying relapse and the timing of relapse. Key findings and limitations We analysed data for 1006 patients (64% seminoma, 36% nonseminoma); 76% had stage I disease. Active surveillance was the most frequent management strategy (65%). Recurrence occurred in 82 patients, corresponding to a 5-yr relapse-free survival rate of 90.1% (95% confidence interval 87.7-92.1%). Median follow-up for patients without relapse was 38.4 mo (interquartile range 21.6-61.0). Cross-sectional imaging of the abdomen was the most important indicator of relapse 57%, abdominal CT accounting for 46% and MRI for 11%. Marker elevation indicated relapse in 24% of cases. Chest X-ray was the least useful modality, indicating relapse in just 2% of cases. Conclusions and clinical implications On the basis of findings from our prospective register, we have adapted a follow-up schedules with an emphasis on abdominal imaging and a reduction in chest X-rays. This schedule might provide additional guidance for clinicians and will be prospectively evaluated as SAG TCCS continues to enrol patients. Patient summary We analysed the value of different types of imaging scans for detection of relapse of testicular cancer. We used our findings to propose an optimum follow-up schedule for patients with testicular cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie Fischer
- Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Silke Gillessen
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland
- Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Odile Stalder
- Department of Clinical Research, CTU Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Angelika Terbuch
- Division of Clinical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Comprehensive Cancer Center Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Richard Cathomas
- Division of Medical Oncology/Haematology, Cantonal Hospital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | - Florian A. Schmid
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Deborah Zihler
- Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Beat Müller
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Luzern, Luzern, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Luis Alex Kluth
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Bettina Seifert
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Liestal, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Arnoud J. Templeton
- Department of Medical Oncology, St. Claraspital/St. Clara Research and Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Walter Mingrone
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Olten, Olten, Switzerland
| | | | - Natalie Fischer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Jörg Beyer
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Regina Woelky
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Frauenfeld, Frauenfeld, Switzerland
| | - Aurelius Omlin
- Onkozentrum Zurich und Uro-Onkologisches Zentrum, Hirslanden Klinik Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ursula Vogl
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland
- Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | | | - Jörn Kamradt
- Urologie Zentrum Bern und Hirslanden Bern, Bern Switzerland
| | - Sacha I. Rothschild
- Department of Medical Oncology and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Medical Oncology/Hematology and Comprehensive Cancer Centre Cantonal Hospital Baden, Baden, Switzerland
| | - Christian Rothermundt
- Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fischer S, Rothermundt C, Stalder O, Terbuch A, Hermanns T, Zihler D, Müller B, Fankhauser CD, Hirschi-Blickenstorfer A, Seifert B, Kluth LA, Ufe MP, Mingrone W, Templeton AJ, Fischer N, Rothschild S, Woelky R, Gillessen S, Cathomas R. The Value of Tumour Markers in the Detection of Relapse-Lessons Learned from the Swiss Austrian German Testicular Cancer Cohort Study. EUR UROL SUPPL 2023; 50:57-60. [PMID: 36874175 PMCID: PMC9976201 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.01.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
The tumour markers alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), beta human chorionic gonadotropin (βHCG), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) have established roles in the management and follow-up of testicular cancer. While a tumour marker rise can serve as an indicator of relapse, the frequency of false-positive marker events has not been studied systematically in larger cohorts. We assessed the validity of serum tumour markers for the detection of relapse in the Swiss Austrian German Testicular Cancer Cohort Study (SAG TCCS). This registry was set up to answer questions on the diagnostic performance and impact of imaging and laboratory tests in the management of testicular cancer, and has included 948 patients between January 2014 and July 2021.A total of 793 patients with a median follow-up of 29.0 mo were included. In total, 71 patients (8.9%) had a proven relapse, which was marker positive in 31 patients (43.6%). Of all patients, 124 (15.6%) had an event of a false-positive marker elevation. The positive predictive value (PPV) of the markers was limited, highest for βHCG (33.8%) and lowest for LDH (9.4%). PPV tended to increase with higher levels of elevation. These findings underline the limited accuracy of the conventional tumour markers to indicate or rule out a relapse. Especially, LDH as part of routine follow-up should be questioned. Patient summary With the diagnosis of testicular cancer, the three tumour markers alpha-fetoprotein, beta human chorionic gonadotropin, and lactate dehydrogenase are routinely measured during follow-up to monitor for relapse. We demonstrate that these markers are often falsely elevated, and, by contrast, many patients do not have marker elevations despite a relapse. The results of this study can lead to improved use of these tumour markers during follow-up of testis cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie Fischer
- Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Cantonal Hospital St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland
- Corresponding author. Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Cantonal Hospital St Gallen, Rorschacherstrasse 95, 9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland. Tel. +41 71 494 9701.
| | - Christian Rothermundt
- Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Cantonal Hospital St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland
| | | | - Angelika Terbuch
- Division of Clinical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Comprehensive Cancer Center Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Thomas Hermanns
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Deborah Zihler
- Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Beat Müller
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Luzern, Luzern, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Bettina Seifert
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Liestal, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Walter Mingrone
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Olten, Olten, Switzerland
| | - Arnoud J. Templeton
- Department of Medical Oncology, St. Claraspital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Switzerland
| | - Natalie Fischer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Sacha Rothschild
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Regina Woelky
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Frauenfeld, Frauenfeld, Switzerland
| | - Silke Gillessen
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland
- Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
- University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Richard Cathomas
- Division of Medical Oncology/Haematology, Cantonal Hospital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pashankar F, Hanley K, Lockley M, Stoneham S, Nucci MR, Reyes-Múgica M, Elishaev E, Vang R, Veneris J, Rytting H, Olson T, Hazard K, Covens A, Arora R, Billmire D, Al-Ibraheemi A, Ulbright TM, Frazier L, Hirsch MS. Addressing the diagnostic and therapeutic dilemmas of ovarian immature teratoma: Report from a clinicopathologic consensus conference. Eur J Cancer 2022; 173:59-70. [PMID: 35863107 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2022] [Revised: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Ovarian immature teratoma is a rare subtype of germ cell tumour that can be pure or associated with non-teratomatous germ cell tumour elements and is graded based on extent of the immature neuroectodermal component. Immature teratoma (IT) can also be associated with somatic differentiation in the form of sarcoma, carcinoma, or extensive immature neuroectodermal elements and may produce low levels of serum alpha-fetoprotein. Variable interpretation of these issues underlies diagnostic and management dilemmas, resulting in substantial practice differences between paediatric and adult women with IT. The Malignant Germ Cell International Consortium (MaGIC) convened oncologists, surgeons, and pathologists to address the following crucial clinicopathologic issues related to IT: (1) grading of IT, (2) definition and significance of 'microscopic' yolk sac tumour, (3) transformation to a somatic malignancy, and (4) interpretation of serum tumour biomarkers. This review highlights the discussion, conclusions, and suggested next steps from this clinicopathologic conference.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farzana Pashankar
- Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Krisztina Hanley
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Michelle Lockley
- Department of Medical Oncology, University College Hospital, University College London Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Centre for Cancer Genomics and Computational Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Sara Stoneham
- Department of Pediatrics University College Hospital, University College London Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Marisa R Nucci
- Department of Pathology, Women's and Perinatal Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Miguel Reyes-Múgica
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburg Medical Center, Pittsburg, PA, USA
| | - Esther Elishaev
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburg Medical Center, Pittsburg, PA, USA
| | - Russell Vang
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Heather Rytting
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Thomas Olson
- Department of Pediatrics, Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Kim Hazard
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Al Covens
- Division of Gyneacologic Oncology, University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, ON
| | - Rupali Arora
- Department of Gyneacology, University College Hospital, University College London Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Deborah Billmire
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Alyaa Al-Ibraheemi
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Pathology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Thomas M Ulbright
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Lindsay Frazier
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Dana Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michelle S Hirsch
- Department of Pathology, Women's and Perinatal Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gilligan T, Lin DW, Aggarwal R, Chism D, Cost N, Derweesh IH, Emamekhoo H, Feldman DR, Geynisman DM, Hancock SL, LaGrange C, Levine EG, Longo T, Lowrance W, McGregor B, Monk P, Picus J, Pierorazio P, Rais-Bahrami S, Saylor P, Sircar K, Smith DC, Tzou K, Vaena D, Vaughn D, Yamoah K, Yamzon J, Johnson-Chilla A, Keller J, Pluchino LA. Testicular Cancer, Version 2.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2020; 17:1529-1554. [PMID: 31805523 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 169] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Testicular cancer is relatively uncommon and accounts for <1% of all male tumors. However, it is the most common solid tumor in men between the ages of 20 and 34 years, and the global incidence has been steadily rising over the past several decades. Several risk factors for testicular cancer have been identified, including personal or family history of testicular cancer and cryptorchidism. Testicular germ cell tumors (GCTs) comprise 95% of malignant tumors arising in the testes and are categorized into 2 main histologic subtypes: seminoma and nonseminoma. Although nonseminoma is the more clinically aggressive tumor subtype, 5-year survival rates exceed 70% with current treatment options, even in patients with advanced or metastatic disease. Radical inguinal orchiectomy is the primary treatment for most patients with testicular GCTs. Postorchiectomy management is dictated by stage, histology, and risk classification; treatment options for nonseminoma include surveillance, systemic therapy, and nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. Although rarely occurring, prognosis for patients with brain metastases remains poor, with >50% of patients dying within 1 year of diagnosis. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for Testicular Cancer focuses on recommendations for the management of adult patients with nonseminomatous GCTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy Gilligan
- 1Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
| | - Daniel W Lin
- 2University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Will Lowrance
- 14Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah
| | | | - Paul Monk
- 16The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
| | - Joel Picus
- 17Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Daniel Vaena
- 24St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center
| | - David Vaughn
- 25Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zong X, Yang JX, Zhang Y. Persistently elevated alpha-fetoprotein associated with chronic hepatitis B during chemotherapy for malignant ovarian germ cell tumors: a case series and a review of the literature. J Ovarian Res 2019; 12:124. [PMID: 31836006 PMCID: PMC6911275 DOI: 10.1186/s13048-019-0598-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2019] [Accepted: 12/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) plays a crucial role in the management of malignant ovarian germ cell tumors (MOGCTs) and is an important reference index for chemotherapy termination. However, a high level of AFP can also be caused by several benign diseases, causing confusion and impacting treatment decisions. Case presentation We described four patients who were diagnosed with MOGCTs; the histologic subtype in two of them was mixed MOGCTs (yolk sac tumor with mature teratoma), while the rest was immature teratoma. The serum AFP level of each patient was abnormal before surgery, but it was still persistently elevated around 300 ng/ml even after additional cycles of chemotherapy. All patients were thoroughly evaluated, but we did not find any evidence of disease progression or residual tumors. Liver function tests were normal, whereas serum assays revealed positive of hepatitis B surface antigen, and two patients had a high level of HBV-DNA. They were chronic carriers of hepatitis B virus and never received relevant treatments. Then they were managed with tumor surveillance and the antiviral treatment. Thereafter, the AFP levels presented a slowly decreasing trend. Conclusions False elevation of AFP in MOGCTs is a rare condition and should be assessed with a comprehensive evaluation to avoid unnecessary treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuan Zong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 1 Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Jia-Xin Yang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 1 Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
| | - Ying Zhang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 1 Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Serum Tumour Markers in Testicular Germ Cell Tumours: Frequencies of Elevated Levels and Extents of Marker Elevation Are Significantly Associated with Clinical Parameters and with Response to Treatment. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2019; 2019:5030349. [PMID: 31275973 PMCID: PMC6558624 DOI: 10.1155/2019/5030349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2019] [Accepted: 05/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Although serum tumor markers beta human chorionic gonadotropin (bHCG), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) are well-established tools for the management of testicular germ cell tumours (GCTs), there are only few data from contemporary cohorts of primary GCT patients regarding these biomarkers. Our aim was to evaluate marker elevations in testicular GCTs and to document their associations with various clinical characteristics. Patients and Methods A total of 422 consecutive patients with GCTs were retrospectively analysed regarding serum levels of bHCG, AFP, and LDH during the course of treatment. Additionally, the following characteristics were recorded: histology, age, laterality, clinical stage (CS), pT-stage, and tumour size. Marker elevations were first tabulated in dichotomized way (elevated: yes/no) in various subgroups and second as continuous measured serum values. Descriptive statistical methods were employed to look for differences among subgroups and for associations of elevations with clinical parameters. Results In all GCT patients, the frequencies of elevated levels of bHCG, AFP, LDH, and bHCG or AFP were 37.9%, 25.6%, 32.9%, and 47.6%; in pure seminomas 28%, 2.8%, 29.1%, and 30.3%; and in nonseminoma 53.0%, 60.1%, 38.7%, and 73.8%. Significant associations were noted with pT-stages >pT1, clinical stages >CS1, tumour size, and younger age. Frequencies of marker elevations dropped significantly after treatment, but LDH levels remained elevated in 30.5%-34.1%. Relapsing patients (n=27) had elevated levels of bHCG, AFP, and LDH in 25.9%, 22.2%, and 29.6%, respectively, thirteen of whom with a changed marker pattern. Conclusions The classical GCT-biomarkers correlate with treatment success. Clinical utility is limited due to proportions of < 50% of patients with elevated levels and the low specificity of LDH. The elevation rates are significantly associated with histology, clinical and pT-stages, tumour size, and younger age. Individual marker patterns may change upon relapse. Clinically, ideal biomarkers are yet to be found.
Collapse
|
7
|
Marshall C, Enzerra M, Rahnemai-Azar AA, Ramaiya NH. Serum tumor markers and testicular germ cell tumors: a primer for radiologists. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2019; 44:1083-1090. [PMID: 30539249 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-018-1846-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Serum tumor markers (STMs) play a critical role in the diagnosis, staging and follow-up of both seminomatous and nonseminomatous testicular germ cell neoplasms. Levels of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), especially those measured after orchiectomy, also have implications for patient prognosis. Given that testicular germ cell tumors represent the most common solid tumor in men aged 20-34, radiologists must have familiarity with the clinical utilization and implications of these STMs. This article will review the classical patterns of STM elevation most commonly seen in pure seminomatous and nonseminomatous germ cell tumors while also providing case-based examples highlighting the importance of STM correlation with imaging. The role of STMs in clinical staging and disease surveillance will also be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colin Marshall
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Michael Enzerra
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
| | - Amir Ata Rahnemai-Azar
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Nikhil H Ramaiya
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ferraro S, Trevisiol C, Gion M, Panteghini M. Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Assays for Testicular Tumors: Closing the Gap between Clinical and Laboratory Practice. Clin Chem 2018; 64:270-278. [DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2017.275263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2017] [Accepted: 09/14/2017] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Clinical practice guidelines recommend the measurement of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and/or hCGβ in serum for management of testicular germ cell tumors (GCTs). These guidelines, however, disregard relevant biochemical information on hCG variants to be detected for oncological application. We set out to provide a critical review of the clinical evidence together with a characterization of the selectivity of currently marketed hCG immunoassays, identifying assays suitable for management of GCTs.
CONTENT
Evidence sources in the available literature were critically appraised. Most instances of misdiagnosis and mismanagement of testicular GCTs have been associated with hCG results. According to the clinical evidence, 36% of patients with seminoma show an exclusive hCGβ increase, and 71% of patients with nonseminomatous GCTs (NSGCTs) show an increase of intact hCG and/or hCG + hCGβ, whereas the hCGβ increase in NSGCTs is variable according to the tumor stage and histology.
SUMMARY
hCG + hCGβ assays that display an equimolar recognition of hCG and hCGβ, or at least do not overtly underestimate hCGβ, may be employed for management of testicular GCTs. Assays that underestimate hCGβ are not recommended for oncological application. In addition to the hCG + hCGβ assay in service, an additional assay with broader selectivity for other hCG variants should be considered when false-negative or false-positive results are suspected on the basis of clinical data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simona Ferraro
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences “Luigi Sacco,” University of Milan, and Clinical Pathology Laboratory, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Massimo Gion
- Regional Center and Program for Biomarkers, Department of Clinical Pathology and Transfusion Medicine, Venice, Italy
| | - Mauro Panteghini
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences “Luigi Sacco,” University of Milan, and Clinical Pathology Laboratory, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Shaikh F, Cullen JW, Olson TA, Pashankar F, Malogolowkin MH, Amatruda JF, Villaluna D, Krailo M, Billmire DF, Rescorla FJ, Egler RA, Dicken BJ, Ross JH, Schlatter M, Rodriguez-Galindo C, Frazier AL. Reduced and Compressed Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy in Children and Adolescents With Intermediate-Risk Extracranial Malignant Germ Cell Tumors: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35:1203-1210. [PMID: 28240974 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.67.6544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To investigate whether event-free survival (EFS) can be maintained among children and adolescents with intermediate-risk (IR) malignant germ cell tumors (MGCT) if the administration of cisplatin, etoposide, and bleomycin (PEb) is reduced from four to three cycles and compressed from 5 to 3 days per cycle. Patients and Methods In a phase 3, single-arm trial, patients with IR MGCT (stage II-IV testicular, II-III ovarian, I-II extragonadal, or stage I gonadal tumors with subsequent recurrence) received three cycles of PEb. A parametric comparator model specified that the observed EFS rate should not be significantly < 92%. As recommended for trials that test a reduction of therapy, a one-sided P value ≤ .10 was used to indicate statistical significance. In a post hoc analysis, we also compared results to the EFS rate of comparable patients treated with four cycles of PEb in two prior studies. Results Among 210 eligible patients enrolled from 2003 to 2011, 4-year EFS (EFS4) rate was 89% (95% confidence interval, 83% to 92%), which was significantly lower than the 92% threshold of the comparison model ( P = .08). Among 181 newly diagnosed patients, the EFS4 rate was 87%, compared with 92% for 92 comparable children in the historical cohort ( P = .15). The EFS4 rate was significantly associated with stage (stage I, 100%; stage II, 92%; stage III, 85%; and stage IV, 54%; P < .001). Conclusion The EFS rate for children with IR MGCT observed after three cycles of PEb was less than that of a prespecified parametric model, particularly for patients with higher-stage tumors. These data do not support a reduction in the number of cycles of PEb from four to three. However, further investigation of a reduction in the number of cycles for patients with lower-stage tumors is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Furqan Shaikh
- Furqan Shaikh, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; John W. Cullen, Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children-Presbyterian Saint Luke's Medical Center, Denver, CO; Thomas A. Olson, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, and Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Farzana Pashankar, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Marcio H. Malogolowkin, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento; Doojduen Villaluna and Mark Krailo, Children's Oncology Group, Monrovia; Mark Krailo, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; James F. Amatruda, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Children's Medical Center Dallas, Dallas, TX; Deborah F. Billmire and Frederick J. Rescorla, Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, IN; Rachel A. Egler and Jonathan H. Ross, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, OH; Bryan J. Dicken, Stollery Children's Hospital, and University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Marc Schlatter, Helen DeVos Children's Hospital at Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; and A. Lindsay Frazier, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - John W Cullen
- Furqan Shaikh, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; John W. Cullen, Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children-Presbyterian Saint Luke's Medical Center, Denver, CO; Thomas A. Olson, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, and Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Farzana Pashankar, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Marcio H. Malogolowkin, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento; Doojduen Villaluna and Mark Krailo, Children's Oncology Group, Monrovia; Mark Krailo, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; James F. Amatruda, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Children's Medical Center Dallas, Dallas, TX; Deborah F. Billmire and Frederick J. Rescorla, Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, IN; Rachel A. Egler and Jonathan H. Ross, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, OH; Bryan J. Dicken, Stollery Children's Hospital, and University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Marc Schlatter, Helen DeVos Children's Hospital at Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; and A. Lindsay Frazier, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Thomas A Olson
- Furqan Shaikh, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; John W. Cullen, Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children-Presbyterian Saint Luke's Medical Center, Denver, CO; Thomas A. Olson, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, and Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Farzana Pashankar, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Marcio H. Malogolowkin, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento; Doojduen Villaluna and Mark Krailo, Children's Oncology Group, Monrovia; Mark Krailo, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; James F. Amatruda, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Children's Medical Center Dallas, Dallas, TX; Deborah F. Billmire and Frederick J. Rescorla, Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, IN; Rachel A. Egler and Jonathan H. Ross, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, OH; Bryan J. Dicken, Stollery Children's Hospital, and University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Marc Schlatter, Helen DeVos Children's Hospital at Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; and A. Lindsay Frazier, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Farzana Pashankar
- Furqan Shaikh, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; John W. Cullen, Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children-Presbyterian Saint Luke's Medical Center, Denver, CO; Thomas A. Olson, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, and Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Farzana Pashankar, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Marcio H. Malogolowkin, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento; Doojduen Villaluna and Mark Krailo, Children's Oncology Group, Monrovia; Mark Krailo, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; James F. Amatruda, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Children's Medical Center Dallas, Dallas, TX; Deborah F. Billmire and Frederick J. Rescorla, Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, IN; Rachel A. Egler and Jonathan H. Ross, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, OH; Bryan J. Dicken, Stollery Children's Hospital, and University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Marc Schlatter, Helen DeVos Children's Hospital at Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; and A. Lindsay Frazier, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Marcio H Malogolowkin
- Furqan Shaikh, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; John W. Cullen, Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children-Presbyterian Saint Luke's Medical Center, Denver, CO; Thomas A. Olson, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, and Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Farzana Pashankar, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Marcio H. Malogolowkin, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento; Doojduen Villaluna and Mark Krailo, Children's Oncology Group, Monrovia; Mark Krailo, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; James F. Amatruda, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Children's Medical Center Dallas, Dallas, TX; Deborah F. Billmire and Frederick J. Rescorla, Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, IN; Rachel A. Egler and Jonathan H. Ross, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, OH; Bryan J. Dicken, Stollery Children's Hospital, and University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Marc Schlatter, Helen DeVos Children's Hospital at Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; and A. Lindsay Frazier, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - James F Amatruda
- Furqan Shaikh, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; John W. Cullen, Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children-Presbyterian Saint Luke's Medical Center, Denver, CO; Thomas A. Olson, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, and Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Farzana Pashankar, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Marcio H. Malogolowkin, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento; Doojduen Villaluna and Mark Krailo, Children's Oncology Group, Monrovia; Mark Krailo, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; James F. Amatruda, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Children's Medical Center Dallas, Dallas, TX; Deborah F. Billmire and Frederick J. Rescorla, Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, IN; Rachel A. Egler and Jonathan H. Ross, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, OH; Bryan J. Dicken, Stollery Children's Hospital, and University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Marc Schlatter, Helen DeVos Children's Hospital at Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; and A. Lindsay Frazier, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Doojduen Villaluna
- Furqan Shaikh, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; John W. Cullen, Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children-Presbyterian Saint Luke's Medical Center, Denver, CO; Thomas A. Olson, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, and Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Farzana Pashankar, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Marcio H. Malogolowkin, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento; Doojduen Villaluna and Mark Krailo, Children's Oncology Group, Monrovia; Mark Krailo, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; James F. Amatruda, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Children's Medical Center Dallas, Dallas, TX; Deborah F. Billmire and Frederick J. Rescorla, Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, IN; Rachel A. Egler and Jonathan H. Ross, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, OH; Bryan J. Dicken, Stollery Children's Hospital, and University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Marc Schlatter, Helen DeVos Children's Hospital at Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; and A. Lindsay Frazier, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Mark Krailo
- Furqan Shaikh, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; John W. Cullen, Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children-Presbyterian Saint Luke's Medical Center, Denver, CO; Thomas A. Olson, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, and Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Farzana Pashankar, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Marcio H. Malogolowkin, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento; Doojduen Villaluna and Mark Krailo, Children's Oncology Group, Monrovia; Mark Krailo, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; James F. Amatruda, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Children's Medical Center Dallas, Dallas, TX; Deborah F. Billmire and Frederick J. Rescorla, Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, IN; Rachel A. Egler and Jonathan H. Ross, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, OH; Bryan J. Dicken, Stollery Children's Hospital, and University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Marc Schlatter, Helen DeVos Children's Hospital at Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; and A. Lindsay Frazier, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Deborah F Billmire
- Furqan Shaikh, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; John W. Cullen, Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children-Presbyterian Saint Luke's Medical Center, Denver, CO; Thomas A. Olson, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, and Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Farzana Pashankar, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Marcio H. Malogolowkin, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento; Doojduen Villaluna and Mark Krailo, Children's Oncology Group, Monrovia; Mark Krailo, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; James F. Amatruda, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Children's Medical Center Dallas, Dallas, TX; Deborah F. Billmire and Frederick J. Rescorla, Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, IN; Rachel A. Egler and Jonathan H. Ross, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, OH; Bryan J. Dicken, Stollery Children's Hospital, and University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Marc Schlatter, Helen DeVos Children's Hospital at Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; and A. Lindsay Frazier, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Frederick J Rescorla
- Furqan Shaikh, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; John W. Cullen, Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children-Presbyterian Saint Luke's Medical Center, Denver, CO; Thomas A. Olson, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, and Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Farzana Pashankar, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Marcio H. Malogolowkin, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento; Doojduen Villaluna and Mark Krailo, Children's Oncology Group, Monrovia; Mark Krailo, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; James F. Amatruda, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Children's Medical Center Dallas, Dallas, TX; Deborah F. Billmire and Frederick J. Rescorla, Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, IN; Rachel A. Egler and Jonathan H. Ross, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, OH; Bryan J. Dicken, Stollery Children's Hospital, and University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Marc Schlatter, Helen DeVos Children's Hospital at Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; and A. Lindsay Frazier, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Rachel A Egler
- Furqan Shaikh, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; John W. Cullen, Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children-Presbyterian Saint Luke's Medical Center, Denver, CO; Thomas A. Olson, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, and Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Farzana Pashankar, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Marcio H. Malogolowkin, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento; Doojduen Villaluna and Mark Krailo, Children's Oncology Group, Monrovia; Mark Krailo, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; James F. Amatruda, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Children's Medical Center Dallas, Dallas, TX; Deborah F. Billmire and Frederick J. Rescorla, Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, IN; Rachel A. Egler and Jonathan H. Ross, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, OH; Bryan J. Dicken, Stollery Children's Hospital, and University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Marc Schlatter, Helen DeVos Children's Hospital at Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; and A. Lindsay Frazier, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Bryan J Dicken
- Furqan Shaikh, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; John W. Cullen, Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children-Presbyterian Saint Luke's Medical Center, Denver, CO; Thomas A. Olson, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, and Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Farzana Pashankar, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Marcio H. Malogolowkin, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento; Doojduen Villaluna and Mark Krailo, Children's Oncology Group, Monrovia; Mark Krailo, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; James F. Amatruda, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Children's Medical Center Dallas, Dallas, TX; Deborah F. Billmire and Frederick J. Rescorla, Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, IN; Rachel A. Egler and Jonathan H. Ross, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, OH; Bryan J. Dicken, Stollery Children's Hospital, and University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Marc Schlatter, Helen DeVos Children's Hospital at Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; and A. Lindsay Frazier, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Jonathan H Ross
- Furqan Shaikh, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; John W. Cullen, Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children-Presbyterian Saint Luke's Medical Center, Denver, CO; Thomas A. Olson, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, and Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Farzana Pashankar, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Marcio H. Malogolowkin, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento; Doojduen Villaluna and Mark Krailo, Children's Oncology Group, Monrovia; Mark Krailo, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; James F. Amatruda, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Children's Medical Center Dallas, Dallas, TX; Deborah F. Billmire and Frederick J. Rescorla, Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, IN; Rachel A. Egler and Jonathan H. Ross, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, OH; Bryan J. Dicken, Stollery Children's Hospital, and University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Marc Schlatter, Helen DeVos Children's Hospital at Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; and A. Lindsay Frazier, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Marc Schlatter
- Furqan Shaikh, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; John W. Cullen, Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children-Presbyterian Saint Luke's Medical Center, Denver, CO; Thomas A. Olson, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, and Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Farzana Pashankar, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Marcio H. Malogolowkin, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento; Doojduen Villaluna and Mark Krailo, Children's Oncology Group, Monrovia; Mark Krailo, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; James F. Amatruda, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Children's Medical Center Dallas, Dallas, TX; Deborah F. Billmire and Frederick J. Rescorla, Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, IN; Rachel A. Egler and Jonathan H. Ross, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, OH; Bryan J. Dicken, Stollery Children's Hospital, and University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Marc Schlatter, Helen DeVos Children's Hospital at Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; and A. Lindsay Frazier, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo
- Furqan Shaikh, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; John W. Cullen, Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children-Presbyterian Saint Luke's Medical Center, Denver, CO; Thomas A. Olson, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, and Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Farzana Pashankar, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Marcio H. Malogolowkin, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento; Doojduen Villaluna and Mark Krailo, Children's Oncology Group, Monrovia; Mark Krailo, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; James F. Amatruda, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Children's Medical Center Dallas, Dallas, TX; Deborah F. Billmire and Frederick J. Rescorla, Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, IN; Rachel A. Egler and Jonathan H. Ross, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, OH; Bryan J. Dicken, Stollery Children's Hospital, and University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Marc Schlatter, Helen DeVos Children's Hospital at Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; and A. Lindsay Frazier, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - A Lindsay Frazier
- Furqan Shaikh, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; John W. Cullen, Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children-Presbyterian Saint Luke's Medical Center, Denver, CO; Thomas A. Olson, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, and Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Farzana Pashankar, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Marcio H. Malogolowkin, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento; Doojduen Villaluna and Mark Krailo, Children's Oncology Group, Monrovia; Mark Krailo, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; James F. Amatruda, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Children's Medical Center Dallas, Dallas, TX; Deborah F. Billmire and Frederick J. Rescorla, Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, IN; Rachel A. Egler and Jonathan H. Ross, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, OH; Bryan J. Dicken, Stollery Children's Hospital, and University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Marc Schlatter, Helen DeVos Children's Hospital at Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; and A. Lindsay Frazier, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Drozynska E, Bien E, Polczynska K, Stefanowicz J, Zalewska-Szewczyk B, Izycka-Swieszewska E, Ploszynska A, Krawczyk M, Karpinsky G. A need for cautious interpretation of elevated serum germ cell tumor markers in children. Review and own experiences. Biomark Med 2015; 9:923-32. [PMID: 26329804 DOI: 10.2217/bmm.15.42] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Protocols for pediatric germ cell tumors (GCT) allow for chemotherapy (CHT) initiation without histological diagnosis, based on typical clinical and radiological picture and increased alphafetoprotein (AFP) or beta-human chorionic gonadotropin serum levels. Such strategy may result in misdiagnoses in rare cases. We present two patients with abdominal tumors and high serum AFP levels, diagnosed as GCT. In both, no tumor shrinkage and increasing AFP was observed after first cycles of multidrug CHT for pediatric GCT. Histological examination of biopsied tumor tissues revealed metastatic cholangiocarcinoma in patient 1 and pancreatoblastoma in patient 2, which implicated immediate change of therapy. Presented cases support the necessity to consider the tumor biopsy when patients diagnosed with GCT based on typical clinical presentation and elevated AFP do not respond to CHT with AFP decrease and tumor size reduction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elzbieta Drozynska
- Department of Pediatrics, Hematology & Oncology, Medical University of Gdansk, Poland
| | - Ewa Bien
- Department of Pediatrics, Hematology & Oncology, Medical University of Gdansk, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Polczynska
- Department of Pediatrics, Hematology & Oncology, Medical University of Gdansk, Poland
| | - Joanna Stefanowicz
- Department of Pediatrics, Hematology & Oncology, Medical University of Gdansk, Poland
| | - Beata Zalewska-Szewczyk
- Department of Pediatrics, Oncology, Hematology & Diabetology, Medical University of Lodz, Poland
| | | | - Anna Ploszynska
- Department of Pediatrics, Hematology & Oncology, Medical University of Gdansk, Poland
| | - Malgorzata Krawczyk
- Department of Pediatrics, Hematology & Oncology, Medical University of Gdansk, Poland
| | - Gabrielle Karpinsky
- The English Division Pediatric Oncology Scientific Circle, Medical University of Gdansk, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Masterson TA, Rice KR, Beck SDW. Current and future biologic markers for disease progression and relapse in testicular germ cell tumors: a review. Urol Oncol 2013; 32:261-71. [PMID: 24035725 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2013] [Revised: 04/30/2013] [Accepted: 05/15/2013] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Testicular germ cell tumors represent a biologically unique disease process. These tumors are exquisitely sensitive to platinum-based chemotherapy, can be cured with surgical metastasectomy, and are known for the integration of biologic markers to stage and assign risk. Exploring further biologic markers that offer insight into the molecular mechanisms that contribute to disease biology is important. In this review, we attempt to summarize the utility of the current and some future biologic markers for disease monitoring and relapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kevin R Rice
- Department of Urology, Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Stephen D W Beck
- Department of Urology, Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Burgio SL, Menna C, Papiani G, Casadei Gardini A, De Luigi N, Corsi R, Rosti G. Alpha-fetoprotein surge following high-dose chemotherapy in germ cell tumours. J Chemother 2013; 25:119-22. [PMID: 23684360 DOI: 10.1179/1973947812y.0000000044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
In patients with non-seminomatous germ cell tumours (NSGCTs) who receive chemotherapy and have residual disease, a persistently elevated serum marker level after induction chemotherapy indicates active and progressive disease. High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) is the standard treatment for patients with relapsed NSGCT. We present a case of a patient with residual disease from NSGCT who showed an increase in serum alpha-fetoprotein levels after HDCT, mimicking progression. Resection of the mass did not show viable cells in the tumour specimen, thus suggesting that the elevated level of the marker was expression of hepatic reconstitution after drug-induced liver damage. HDCT is increasingly used in cases of relapsed NSGCT, and the possibility of treatment-induced alpha-fetoprotein elevation must be taken into account in patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salvatore Luca Burgio
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST), Meldola, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Vesprini D, Chung P, Tolan S, Gospodarowicz M, Jewett M, O'Malley M, Sweet J, Moore M, Panzarella T, Sturgeon J, Sugar L, Anson-Cartwright L, Warde P. Utility of serum tumor markers during surveillance for stage I seminoma. Cancer 2012; 118:5245-50. [PMID: 22517478 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.27539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2011] [Revised: 02/13/2012] [Accepted: 02/21/2012] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The serum tumor markers α-fetoprotein (AFP), β-human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) are often measured as part of surveillance protocols in patients with stage I seminoma. In this study, the authors evaluated the utility of routine measurement of these markers in the detection of disease relapse. METHODS Data were gathered from a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent surveillance for stage I testicular seminoma diagnosed between 1982 and 2005 at Princess Margaret Hospital. Patients were followed on a predefined schedule with physical examination (PE), serum tumor markers, abdominopelvic computed tomography, and chest x-rays. The records of patients who relapsed were examined for details of imaging and serum tumor markers throughout the period of follow-up until the time of relapse. RESULTS Of the 527 patients who were managed by surveillance, 75 patients (14%) relapsed at a median follow-up of 72 months. Of these, 65 patients relapsed within the first 3 years and had routine serum tumor markers measured. In total, 11 patients had abnormal tumor markers at the time of relapse (AFP, 0 patients; HCG, 6 patients; LDH, 4 patients; and HCG and LDH, 1 patient). Only 1 patient had an elevated tumor marker (LDH) before relapse, as defined by an abnormal imaging study (n = 64) or physical examination (n = 1), for which the treatment and outcome were not affected. CONCLUSIONS Serum tumor marker levels did not aid in the early diagnosis of disease relapse in patients with stage I seminoma who were managed with surveillance. The current results indicated that routine measurement of serum tumor markers can be discontinued safely in seminoma surveillance schedules.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danny Vesprini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Krege S, Albers P, Heidenreich A. [The role of tumour markers in diagnosis and management of testicular germ cell tumours]. Urologe A 2011; 50:313-21. [PMID: 21327901 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-010-2414-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), human choriogonadotropin (hCG) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) are established tumour markers of testicular germ cell tumours (TGCT) which are used according to the guidelines for primary diagnosis, staging, monitoring of therapeutic response and follow-up. Placental alkaline phosphatase and neurone-specific enolase play no role at all in the diagnosis and management of TGCT.Metastasized TGCT are classified according to the IGCCCG classification system into tumours with good, intermediate and poor prognosis depending on their serum concentration. The risk classification has a direct impact on therapy and determines the intensity of chemotherapy. In rare cases AFP and hCG might be elevated due to non-testicular reasons which have to be taken into consideration for the differential diagnosis especially if marker concentration and clinical presentation do not match. Response to chemotherapy is monitored with AFP and hCG which are determined the day before initiation of the next treatment cycle. Marker increases during or shortly after discontinuation of chemotherapy indicate a poor prognosis and make the immediate initiation of salvage treatment regimes necessary. Only 40-50% and 30% of relapses in patients under active surveillance for clinical stage I disease and after systemic chemotherapy are associated with marker increases. The remainder will be diagnosed by imaging studies or clinical symptoms. Marker increases have to be validated by imaging studies. However, about 10% of all relapsing patients have marker increases only without any imaging evidence of metastatic disease. Residual masses of any size and location have to be treated by postchemotherapy resection once the marker concentration is normalized or once it has reached a stable plateau. So-called desperation surgery in the presence of rising tumour markers is only indicated if no curative chemotherapy is available, all residual masses are completely resectable and no hCG elevation are observed. For follow-up, AFP, hCG and LDH should be evaluated for advanced TGCT and clinical stage I nonseminomas, whereas clinical stage I seminomas should be monitored without any markers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Krege
- Klinik für Urologie, Krankenhaus Maria Hilf, Krefeld, Deutschland
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ehrlich Y, Beck SDW, Foster RS, Bihrle R, Einhorn LH. Serum tumor markers in testicular cancer. Urol Oncol 2010; 31:17-23. [PMID: 20822927 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2010] [Revised: 04/23/2010] [Accepted: 04/26/2010] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Testicular cancer has become a model for a curable neoplasm, where biochemical markers play a critical role. Serum tumor markers are integral in patient management and contributes to the diagnosis, staging, and risk assessment, as well as evaluation of response to therapy and detection of relapse. We review their biochemistry, biology, and clinical use in the setting of localized and metastatic disease. The integration of tumor markers in prognostic models as well as the significance of marker kinetics during chemotherapy is discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaron Ehrlich
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN 46292, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gilligan TD, Seidenfeld J, Basch EM, Einhorn LH, Fancher T, Smith DC, Stephenson AJ, Vaughn DJ, Cosby R, Hayes DF. American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline on Uses of Serum Tumor Markers in Adult Males With Germ Cell Tumors. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28:3388-404. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2009.26.4481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 192] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
PurposeTo provide recommendations on appropriate uses for serum markers of germ cell tumors (GCTs).MethodsSearches of MEDLINE and EMBASE identified relevant studies published in English. Primary outcomes included marker accuracy to predict the impact of decisions on outcomes. Secondary outcomes included proportions of patients with elevated markers and statistical tests of elevations as prognostic factors. An expert panel developed consensus guidelines based on data from 82 reports.ResultsNo studies directly compared outcomes of decisions with versus without marker assays. The search identified few prospective studies and no randomized controlled trials; most were retrospective series. Lacking data on primary outcomes, most Panel recommendations are based on secondary outcomes (relapse rates and time to relapse).RecommendationsThe Panel recommended against using markers to screen for GCTs, to decide whether orchiectomy is indicated, or to select treatment for patients with cancer of unknown primary. To stage patients with testicular nonseminomas, the Panel recommended measuring three markers (α-fetoprotein [AFP], human chorionic gonadotropin [hCG], and lactate dehydrogenase [LDH]) before and after orchiectomy and before chemotherapy for those with extragonadal nonseminomas. They also recommended measuring AFP and hCG shortly before retroperitoneal lymph node dissection and at the start of each chemotherapy cycle for nonseminoma, and periodically to monitor for relapse. The Panel recommended measuring postorchiectomy hCG and LDH for patients with seminoma and preorchiectomy elevations. They recommended against using markers to guide or monitor treatment for seminoma or to detect relapse in those treated for stage I. However, they recommended measuring hCG and AFP to monitor for relapse in patients treated for advanced seminoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy D. Gilligan
- From the Taussig Cancer Institute and the Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Indiana Cancer Pavilion, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Patient Representative; University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; and Cancer Care Ontario, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario,
| | - Jerome Seidenfeld
- From the Taussig Cancer Institute and the Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Indiana Cancer Pavilion, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Patient Representative; University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; and Cancer Care Ontario, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario,
| | - Ethan M. Basch
- From the Taussig Cancer Institute and the Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Indiana Cancer Pavilion, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Patient Representative; University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; and Cancer Care Ontario, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario,
| | - Lawrence H. Einhorn
- From the Taussig Cancer Institute and the Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Indiana Cancer Pavilion, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Patient Representative; University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; and Cancer Care Ontario, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario,
| | - Timothy Fancher
- From the Taussig Cancer Institute and the Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Indiana Cancer Pavilion, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Patient Representative; University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; and Cancer Care Ontario, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario,
| | - David C. Smith
- From the Taussig Cancer Institute and the Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Indiana Cancer Pavilion, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Patient Representative; University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; and Cancer Care Ontario, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario,
| | - Andrew J. Stephenson
- From the Taussig Cancer Institute and the Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Indiana Cancer Pavilion, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Patient Representative; University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; and Cancer Care Ontario, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario,
| | - David J. Vaughn
- From the Taussig Cancer Institute and the Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Indiana Cancer Pavilion, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Patient Representative; University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; and Cancer Care Ontario, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario,
| | - Roxanne Cosby
- From the Taussig Cancer Institute and the Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Indiana Cancer Pavilion, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Patient Representative; University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; and Cancer Care Ontario, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario,
| | - Daniel F. Hayes
- From the Taussig Cancer Institute and the Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Indiana Cancer Pavilion, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Patient Representative; University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; and Cancer Care Ontario, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario,
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the predictive value of undulant alpha fetoprotein (AFP) course in recurrence of germ cell tumors (GCT). PATIENTS/METHOD A retrospective file search of 491 patients with GCT was performed and 18 patients who had an undulant course of AFP levels (increased and spontaneously decreased) without any demonstrable tumor on radiological images were selected for the study. RESULTS The median age of the 10 boys and 8 girls was 2 years (1.1-16 years). All the patients were disease-free for a median of 16.2 months (8.4-132 months). At follow-up, radiologically proven tumor recurrences were diagnosed in 8 patients in median 12.2 +/- 3.2 months from the initial diagnosis (8.4-18.2 months) and 7.4 +/- 2.2 months from the last normal level of AFP (5.0-11.2 months). The mean peak AFP values within the first 90 days were 24 +/- 38.1 ng/mL and 11.1 +/- 10.9 ng/mL in patients who did and did not have recurrent disease, respectively (p = .0051). The patients whose AFP levels were higher than 10 ng/mL were likely to have recurrent disease (p = .02). CONCLUSION Without a demonstrable tumor, the small amplitude undulations may only require careful follow-up. However, it should be kept in mind that despite the decrease in AFP levels, there still might be a risk of recurrence, especially in patients who have greater amplitude undulations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Burca Aydin
- S.B. Ankara Diskapi Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatric Oncology, Ankara, Turkey.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Sturgeon CM, Duffy MJ, Stenman UH, Lilja H, Brünner N, Chan DW, Babaian R, Bast RC, Dowell B, Esteva FJ, Haglund C, Harbeck N, Hayes DF, Holten-Andersen M, Klee GG, Lamerz R, Looijenga LH, Molina R, Nielsen HJ, Rittenhouse H, Semjonow A, Shih IM, Sibley P, Sölétormos G, Stephan C, Sokoll L, Hoffman BR, Diamandis EP. National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines for Use of Tumor Markers in Testicular, Prostate, Colorectal, Breast, and Ovarian Cancers. Clin Chem 2008; 54:e11-79. [DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2008.105601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 458] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Updated National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry (NACB) Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines for the use of tumor markers in the clinic have been developed.
Methods: Published reports relevant to use of tumor markers for 5 cancer sites—testicular, prostate, colorectal, breast, and ovarian—were critically reviewed.
Results: For testicular cancer, α-fetoprotein, human chorionic gonadotropin, and lactate dehydrogenase are recommended for diagnosis/case finding, staging, prognosis determination, recurrence detection, and therapy monitoring. α-Fetoprotein is also recommended for differential diagnosis of nonseminomatous and seminomatous germ cell tumors. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is not recommended for prostate cancer screening, but may be used for detecting disease recurrence and monitoring therapy. Free PSA measurement data are useful for distinguishing malignant from benign prostatic disease when total PSA is <10 μg/L. In colorectal cancer, carcinoembryonic antigen is recommended (with some caveats) for prognosis determination, postoperative surveillance, and therapy monitoring in advanced disease. Fecal occult blood testing may be used for screening asymptomatic adults 50 years or older. For breast cancer, estrogen and progesterone receptors are mandatory for predicting response to hormone therapy, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 measurement is mandatory for predicting response to trastuzumab, and urokinase plasminogen activator/plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 may be used for determining prognosis in lymph node–negative patients. CA15-3/BR27–29 or carcinoembryonic antigen may be used for therapy monitoring in advanced disease. CA125 is recommended (with transvaginal ultrasound) for early detection of ovarian cancer in women at high risk for this disease. CA125 is also recommended for differential diagnosis of suspicious pelvic masses in postmenopausal women, as well as for detection of recurrence, monitoring of therapy, and determination of prognosis in women with ovarian cancer.
Conclusions: Implementation of these recommendations should encourage optimal use of tumor markers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catharine M Sturgeon
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Michael J Duffy
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, St Vincent’s University Hospital and UCD School of Medicine and Medical Science, Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ulf-Håkan Stenman
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Hans Lilja
- Departments of Clinical Laboratories, Urology, and Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Nils Brünner
- Section of Biomedicine, Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Daniel W Chan
- Departments of Pathology and Oncology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - Richard Babaian
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Robert C Bast
- Department of Experimental Therapeutics, University of Texas Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Francisco J Esteva
- Departments of Breast Medical Oncology, Molecular and Cellular Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX
| | - Caj Haglund
- Department of Surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Frauenklinik der Technischen Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Daniel F Hayes
- Breast Oncology Program, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Mads Holten-Andersen
- Section of Biomedicine, Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - George G Klee
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
| | - Rolf Lamerz
- Department of Medicine, Klinikum of the University of Munich, Grosshadern, Germany
| | - Leendert H Looijenga
- Laboratory of Experimental Patho-Oncology, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, and Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rafael Molina
- Laboratory of Biochemistry, Hospital Clinico Provincial, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Hans Jørgen Nielsen
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Hvidovre Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Axel Semjonow
- Prostate Center, Department of Urology, University Clinic Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Ie-Ming Shih
- Departments of Pathology and Oncology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - Paul Sibley
- Siemens Medical Solutions Diagnostics, Glyn Rhonwy, Llanberis, Gwynedd, UK
| | | | - Carsten Stephan
- Department of Urology, Charité Hospital, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lori Sokoll
- Departments of Pathology and Oncology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - Barry R Hoffman
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, and Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eleftherios P Diamandis
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, and Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
False‐Positive Serum Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG) in a Male Patient with a Malignant Germ Cell Tumor of the Testis: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Oncologist 2008; 13:1149-54. [DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2008-0159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
|
20
|
Gilligan T, Kantoff PW. Testis Cancer. Oncology 2007. [DOI: 10.1007/0-387-31056-8_49] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
21
|
Kobayashi T, Kawakita M, Terachi T, Habuchi T, Ogawa O, Kamoto T. Significance of elevated preoperative α-fetoprotein in postchemotherapy residual tumor resection for the disseminated germ cell tumors. J Surg Oncol 2006; 94:619-23. [PMID: 17111392 DOI: 10.1002/jso.20418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The purpose of the study is to determine the significance of elevated serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) in the setting prior to residual tumor resection (RTR) following chemotherapy for metastatic germ cell tumor in terms of the prediction of histology of the specimen and postoperative survival. METHODS We conducted a retrospective review of 68 patients undergoing RTR for metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell tumor or extragonadal germ cell tumor after at least a first-line chemotherapy. Pretreatment and postchemotherapy serum markers were evaluated in association with other clinical findings including results of pathological examination of RTR specimen and surgical outcome. RESULTS Of the 68 study patients, 54 (79%) and 45 (66%) had positive AFP and beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-HCG) in pretreatment settings. Rates of presence of residual malignant cell in RTR specimen were similar between patients with normal AFP (7/28 or 25%) and with mildly elevated (10-30 ng/ml) AFP (3/11 or 27%). In 26 patients who had residual viable malignancy in RTR specimen, patients with preoperative positive AFP had significantly better survival (P = 0.02) compared to those with preoperative positive beta-HCG. CONCLUSIONS Sole and mild elevation of AFP is not always associated with postoperative poor prognosis. It should be carefully considered individually whether a mild elevation of AFP after chemotherapy represents residual malignancy or benign pathogenesis.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adolescent
- Adult
- Biomarkers, Tumor/blood
- Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
- Child
- Child, Preschool
- Chorionic Gonadotropin, beta Subunit, Human/blood
- Combined Modality Therapy
- Humans
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Neoplasm Metastasis
- Neoplasm, Residual/blood
- Neoplasm, Residual/pathology
- Neoplasm, Residual/surgery
- Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/blood
- Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/pathology
- Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/surgery
- Prognosis
- Retrospective Studies
- Survival Analysis
- Testicular Neoplasms/blood
- Testicular Neoplasms/pathology
- Testicular Neoplasms/surgery
- Treatment Outcome
- alpha-Fetoproteins/metabolism
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takashi Kobayashi
- Department of Urology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Hereditary persistence of alpha-fetoprotein is a rare disorder which exists with no simultaneous disease. The tenth case in the world (two brothers with seminoma and their father) is documented and a complete literature review was done. EXEGESIS It is transmitted as an autosomal dominant; a disease point mutation has been identified. The failure to recognize hereditary persistence of alpha-fetoprotein sometimes involves unjustified treatments. CONCLUSION The occurrence of this situation is probably underestimated and it could explain residual levels of alpha-fetoprotein.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Platini
- Service de radiothérapie et d'oncologie médicale, hôpital Notre Dame de Bon-Secours, CHR de Metz-Thionville, 1, place Philippe-de-Vigneulles, BP 81065, 57038 Metz, France.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Affiliation(s)
- P N Schlegel
- Department of Urology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
Tumour markers are substances developed in or induced by tumour cells and secreted into body fluids in which they can be quantified by non-invasive analyses. The malignant transformation of cells leads to increased concentrations of tumour markers and thus they can indicate malignant diseases. It appears, however, that other proliferative processes, i.e. inflammatory and benign transformations are also able to induce the rise of tumour marker levels. Due to their low sensitivity and specificity, tumour markers--except for PSA--are not useful in diagnosis and screening. Though disseminated malignant disorders are associated with high tumour marker levels, a correlation between their concentration and the tumour volume is not clearly approved. The use of tumour markers seems established for the follow-up after curative surgery and for the treatment and monitoring of palliative therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Fiebiger
- Klinische Abteilung für Onkologie, Universitätsklinik für Innere Medizin I, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090 Wien.
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Mazumdar M, Bajorin DF, Bacik J, Higgins G, Motzer RJ, Bosl GJ. Predicting outcome to chemotherapy in patients with germ cell tumors: the value of the rate of decline of human chorionic gonadotrophin and alpha-fetoprotein during therapy. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19:2534-41. [PMID: 11331333 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2001.19.9.2534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 110] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The prognostic significance of the rate of decline of the serum tumor marker alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) during the first two cycles of chemotherapy in germ cell tumor (GCT) patients was initially reported by us, but its value has been debated. We re-examined this issue in the context of the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) risk classification system and investigated the role of including in the analysis patients whose markers normalized early. PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred eighty-nine GCT patients with elevated AFP/HCG marker values treated with platinum-based chemotherapy between 1986 and 1998 were included in this analysis. Patients were classified as good, intermediate, or poor risk by the IGCCCG criteria and as having satisfactory or unsatisfactory marker decline. Risk and marker decline were correlated with response, event-free survival, and overall survival. RESULTS Satisfactory marker decline predicted improved complete response (CR) proportion and event-free and overall survival (P <.0001). The CR proportion, 2-year event-free, and 2-year overall survival rates for patients with a satisfactory and unsatisfactory marker decline were 92% versus 62%, 91% versus 69%, and 95% versus 72%, respectively. Marker decline remained a significant variable for all three end points when adjusted for risk (P <.01) with the outcome differences most pronounced in the poor-risk group. CONCLUSION The rate of marker decline during chemotherapy has prognostic value independent of risk and may play a significant role in the management of poor-risk patients. It is appropriate to include patients whose markers normalized early.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Mazumdar
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and the Genitourinary Oncology Service, Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|