Characterization and localization of prostatic alpha 1 adrenoceptors using radioligand receptor binding on slide-mounted tissue section

Role of α- and β-adrenergic signaling in phenotypic targeting: significance in benign and malignant urologic disease

The urinary tract is highly innervated by autonomic nerves which are essential in urinary tract development, the production of growth factors, and the control of homeostasis. These neural signals may become dysregulated in several genitourinary (GU) disease states, both benign and malignant. Accordingly, the autonomic nervous system is a therapeutic target for several genitourinary pathologies including cancer, voiding dysfunction, and obstructing nephrolithiasis. Adrenergic receptors (adrenoceptors) are G-Protein coupled-receptors that are distributed throughout the body. The major function of α1-adrenoceptors is signaling smooth muscle contractions through GPCR and intracellular calcium influx. Pharmacologic intervention of α-and β-adrenoceptors is routinely and successfully implemented in the treatment of benign urologic illnesses, through the use of α-adrenoceptor antagonists. Furthermore, cell-based evidence recently established the antitumor effect of α1-adrenoceptor antagonists in prostate, bladder and renal tumors by reducing neovascularity and impairing growth within the tumor microenvironment via regulation of the phenotypic epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). There has been a significant focus on repurposing the routinely used, Food and Drug Administration-approved α1-adrenoceptor antagonists to inhibit GU tumor growth and angiogenesis in patients with advanced prostate, bladder, and renal cancer. In this review we discuss the current evidence on (a) the signaling events of the autonomic nervous system mediated by its cognate α- and β-adrenoceptors in regulating the phenotypic landscape (EMT) of genitourinary organs; and (b) the therapeutic significance of targeting this signaling pathway in benign and malignant urologic disease. Video abstract.

Autoantibodies directed against α1-adrenergic receptor and endothelin receptor A in patients with prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

For prostate cancer, signaling pathways induced by over-boarding stimulation of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCR) such as the endothelin, α1- and β-adrenergic, muscarinic and angiotensin 1 receptors were accused to support the carcinogenesis. However, excessive receptor stimulation by physiological receptor ligands is minimized by a control system that induces receptor sensitization and down-regulation. This system is missing when so-called "functional autoantibodies" bind to the GPCR (GPCR-AAB). If GPCR-AAB were found in patients with prostate cancer, uncontrolled GPCR stimulation could make these autoantibodies an additional supporter in prostate cancer.

METHODS

Using the bioassay of spontaneously beating cultured rat neonatal cardiomyocytes, GPCR-AAB were identified, quantified and characterized in the serum of 25 patients (aged 56-78 years, median 70 years) with prostate cancer compared to 10 male patients (aged 48-82 years, median 64) with urinary stone disorders (controls).

RESULTS

Of the cancer patients, 24 (96%) and 17 (68%), respectively, carried autoantibodies directed against the α1-adrenergic receptor (α1-AAB) and endothelin receptor A (ETA-AAB). No patient was negative for both GPCR-AAB. In contrast, ETA-AAB and α1-AAB were absent in all (100%) and 9 (90%) of the 10 control patients, respectively. While α1-AAB targeted a specific epitope of the first extracellular loop of the α1-adrenergic receptor subtype A, an epitope of the second extracellular loop of the ETA receptor was identified as a target of ETA-AAB. As demonstrated in vitro, the functional activity of both autoantibodies found in prostate cancer can be neutralized by the aptamer BC007.

CONCLUSIONS

We hypothesized that α1-AAB and ETA-AAB, which are highly present in prostate cancer patients, could by their functional activity support carcinogenesis by excessive receptor stimulation. The in vitro demonstrated neutralization of α1- and ETA-AAB by the aptamer BC007 could open the door to complement the treatments already available for prostate cancer.

Repurposing of α1-Adrenoceptor Antagonists: Impact in Renal Cancer

Renal cancer ranks twelfth in incidence among cancers worldwide. Despite improving outcomes due to better therapeutic options and strategies, prognosis for those with metastatic disease remains poor. Current systemic therapeutic approaches include inhibiting pathways of angiogenesis, immune checkpoint blockade, and mTOR inhibition, but inevitably resistance develops for those with metastatic disease, and novel treatment strategies are urgently needed. Emerging molecular and epidemiological evidence suggests that quinazoline-based α1-adrenoceptor-antagonists may have both chemopreventive and direct therapeutic actions in the treatment of urological cancers, including renal cancer. In human renal cancer cell models, quinazoline-based α1-adrenoceptor antagonists were shown to significantly reduce the invasion and metastatic potential of renal tumors by targeting focal adhesion survival signaling to induce anoikis. Mechanistically these drugs overcome anoikis resistance in tumor cells by targeting cell survival regulators AKT and FAK, disrupting integrin adhesion (α5β1 and α2β1) and engaging extracellular matrix (ECM)-associated tumor suppressors. In this review, we discuss the current evidence for the use of quinazoline-based α1-adrenoceptor antagonists as novel therapies for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and highlight their potential therapeutic action through overcoming anoikis resistance of tumor epithelial and endothelial cells in metastatic RCC. These findings provide a platform for future studies that will retrospectively and prospectively test repurposing of quinazoline-based α1-adrenoceptor-antagonists for the treatment of advanced RCC and the prevention of metastasis in neoadjuvant, adjuvant, salvage and metastatic settings.

Silodosin 8 mg improves benign prostatic obstruction in Caucasian patients with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic enlargement: results from an explorative clinical study

Background

To preliminary investigate the effects of silodosin 8 mg once daily on obstruction urodynamic parameters and subjective symptoms in Caucasian patients with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic enlargement.

Methods

We performed a single-center, open-label, single-arm, post-marketing interventional clinical trial. Inclusion criteria were: Caucasian subjects aged ≥50 years waiting to undergo surgery for lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic enlargement, international prostate symptom total score ≥ 13, international prostate symptom-quality of life score ≥ 3, prostate volume ≥ 30 ml, maximum urine flow rate ≤ 15 mL/s, bladder outlet obstruction index > 40. Eligible subjects received one capsule of silodosin 8 mg once daily for 8 weeks. Invasive urodynamic evaluations were performed at baseline and at 8-weeks follow-up. International prostate symptom questionnaire was administered at baseline, after 4-weeks and 8-weeks of treatment.

Results

Overall, 34 subjects were included. Mean bladder outlet obstruction index significantly decreased from 70.6 to 39.2 and bladder outlet obstruction index class improved in 16 patients (53.3%). Statistically significant improvements of mean total international prostate symptom score, mean storage sub-score, mean voiding sub-score and mean quality of life sub-score were evident after 4-weeks of treatment with further improvements after 8-weeks. At the end of the treatment, all patients declared that their condition improved enough to spare or delay surgery.

Conclusions

Silodosin 8 mg once daily significantly improves benign prostatic obstruction in Caucasian patients with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic enlargement waiting for surgery.

Trial registration

EudraCT n. 2015-002277-38 Date of registration: 15th December 2017.

Benign Prostatic Obstruction Relief in Patients with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Suggestive of Benign Prostatic Enlargement Undergoing Endoscopic Surgical Procedures or Therapy with Alpha-Blockers: A Review of Urodynamic Studies

Benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) contributes to the genesis of lower urinary tract symptoms as well as to pathologic remodeling of the lower and upper urinary tract in patients with benign prostate enlargement. Urodynamic studies demonstrate that both medical therapy with alpha-blockers (ABs) and endoscopic surgical procedures provide BPO relief. However, the magnitude of improvement is higher after surgery. Among ABs, silodosin is associated with the highest improvement of bladder outlet obstruction index (BOOI). A complex relationship exists between BOOI improvement and variations of both maximum urinary flow (Q _max) and detrusor pressure. When the reduction of BOOI is small, the improvement of Q _max is clinically irrelevant and the BOOI is mainly influenced by a decrease of detrusor pressure. In contrast, when the magnitude of BOOI reduction is robust, a meaningful improvement of both detrusor pressure and urinary flow is evident. When clustering ABs according to their receptor pharmacologic selectivity and urodynamic efficacy, three subgroups can be identified,with silodosin being the only member of a subgroup characterized by the highest levels of BOOI improvement and α-1A/α-1B receptor affinity ratio.

Medical and Surgical Treatment Modalities for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in the Male Patient Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Review

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) is one of the most common ailments affecting aging men. Symptoms typically associated with BPH include weak stream, hesitancy, urgency, frequency, and nocturia. More serious complications of BPH include urinary retention, gross hematuria, bladder calculi, recurrent urinary tract infection, obstructive uropathy, and renal failure. Evaluation of BPH includes a detailed history, objective assessment of urinary symptoms with validated questionnaires, and measurement of bladder function parameters, including uroflowmetry and postvoid residual. In general, treatment of LUTS associated with BPH is based on the effect of the symptoms on quality of life (QOL) and include medical therapy aimed at reducing outlet obstruction or decreasing the size of the prostate. If medical therapy fails or is contraindicated, various surgical options exist. As the elderly population continues to grow, the management of BPH will become more common and important in maintaining patient's QOL.

Benign prostatic hyperplasia

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), which causes lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), is a common diagnosis among the ageing male population with increasing prevalence. Many risks factors, both modifiable and non-modifiable, can increase the risk of development and progression of BPH and LUTS. The symptoms can be obstructive (resulting in urinary hesitancy, weak stream, straining or prolonged voiding) or irritative (resulting in increased urinary frequency and urgency, nocturia, urge incontinence and reduced voiding volumes), or can affect the patient after micturition (for example, postvoid dribble or incomplete emptying). BPH occurs when both stromal and epithelial cells of the prostate in the transitional zone proliferate by processes that are thought to be influenced by inflammation and sex hormones, causing prostate enlargement. Patients with LUTS undergo several key diagnostic investigations before being diagnosed with BPH. Treatment options for men with BPH start at watchful waiting and progress through medical to surgical interventions. For the majority of patients, the starting point on the treatment pathway will be dictated by their symptoms and degree of bother.

Prostatic Artery Embolization (PAE) for Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH): Part 2, Insights into the Technical Rationale

Rationale of prostatic artery embolization (PAE) in the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia is conventionally believed to include two parts: shrinkage of the enlarged prostate gland as a result of PAE-induced ischemic infarction and potential effects to relax the increased prostatic smooth muscle tone by reducing the number and density of α1-adrenergic receptor in the prostate stroma. This review describes new insights into the likely mechanisms behind PAE, such as ischemia-induced apoptosis, apoptosis enhanced by blockage of androgens circulation to the embolized prostate, secondary denervation following PAE, and potential effect of nitric oxide pathway immediately after embolization. Studies on therapeutic mechanisms in PAE may shed light on potentially new treatment strategies and development of novel techniques.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of tolterodine 2 mg and 4 mg combined with an α-blocker in men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and overactive bladder: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-dose (2 mg) tolterodine extended release (ER) with an α-blocker compared with standard-dose (4 mg) tolterodine ER with an α-blocker for the treatment of men with residual storage symptoms after α-blocker monotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study was a 12-week, single-blind, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial that included men with residual storage symptoms despite receiving at least 4 weeks of α-blocker treatment. Inclusion criteria were total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ≥12, IPSS quality-of-life item score ≥3, and ≥8 micturitions and ≥2 urgency episodes per 24 h. The primary outcome was change in the total IPSS score from baseline. Bladder diary variables, patient-reported outcomes and safety were also assessed.

RESULTS

Patients were randomly assigned to addition of either 2 mg tolterodine ER (n = 47) or 4 mg tolterodine ER (n = 48) to α-blocker therapy for 12 weeks. Patients in both treatment groups had a significant improvement in total IPSS score (-5.5 and -6.3, respectively), micturition per 24 h (-1.3 and -1.7, respectively) and nocturia per night (-0.4 and -0.4, respectively). Changes in IPSS, bladder diary variables, and patient-reported outcomes were not significantly different between the treatment groups. All interventions were well tolerated by patients.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that 12 weeks of low-dose tolterodine ER add-on therapy is similar to standard-dose tolterodine ER add-on therapy in terms of efficacy and safety for patients experiencing residual storage symptoms after receiving α-blocker monotherapy.

Randomized Crossover Comparison of the Short-Term Efficacy and Safety of Single Half-Dose Silodosin and Tamsulosin Hydrochoride in Men With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of single half-dose silodosin and single full-dose tamsulosin in Japanese men with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH).

METHODS

Japanese men aged ≥50 years with LUTS/BPH and an International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) of ≥8 were enrolled in the randomized crossover study and divided into silodosin-preceding (S-T) and tamsulosin-preceding (T-S) groups. The S-T group received 4 mg silodosin once daily for 4 weeks followed by 0.2 mg tamsulosin once daily for 4 weeks. The T-S group received the reverse treatment sequence. A washout period prior to drug crossover was not included. Subjective and objective efficacy parameters including IPSS, quality of life (QOL) index, uroflowmetry, and safety were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Thirty of 34 men (S-T group n = 16; T-S group n = 14) completed the study. Both drugs significantly improved all IPSS items and QOL index in the first treatment period. Subjective improvement in nocturia by silodosin was observed in both the first and crossover treatment periods. Objective improvement in maximum flow rate by silodosin was only observed in the first treatment period. Adverse events occurred more frequently with silodosin than with tamsulosin; however, none of the adverse events required treatment discontinuation. Ejaculation disorders occurred in three participants (10%) and were associated with silodosin use.

CONCLUSION

Single half-dose silodosin has a similar efficacy to full-dose tamsulosin in Japanese men with LUTS/BPH and thus, may represent an effective, safe, and affordable treatment option.

Efficacy of Long-Term Daily Dosage of Alfuzosin 10 mg upon Sexual Function of Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy Patients: Two-Year Prospective Observational Study

Purpose

To identify sexual function improvement associated with alfuzosin (10 mg daily for 2 years).

Materials and Methods

We enrolled 30 men with lower urinary tract symptom (LUTS) who visited Gyeongsang National University Hospital between 2010 and 2012. At first visit, urinalysis, prostate specific antigen, transrectal ultrasound, and uroflowmetry were performed. The nternational Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), and Male Sexual Health Questionnaire Ejaculation Function Domain (MSHQ-EjFD) questionnaires were administered, and the subjects answered the same questionnaires at 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years of follow-up.

Results

Twelve men completed of the entire study. After administration of alfuzosin, the median IPSS at first visit, 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years was 18.00 (interquatile range [IQR]: 14.00~29.75), 20.00 (IQR: 11.50~30.00), 15.50 (IQR: 8.50~25.25), 14.50 (IQR: 9.25~19.50), and 11.50 (IQR: 5.00~17.75), respectively, which showed an improvement. The median QoL at the same times was 4.50 (IQR: 4.00~5.00), 4.50 (IQR: 4.00~5.00), 3.00 (IQR: 2.00~4.00), 3.50 (IQR: 2.25~4.00), and 3.00 (IQR: 1.00~3.00), respectively, and also showed improvement. Likewise, the median IIEF was 36.50 (IQR: 24.50~46.75), 37.50 (IQR: 26.75~47.25), 45.50 (IQR: 35.00~59.75), 48.50 (IQR: 34.75~62.75), and 47.50 (IQR: 43.25~61.00), while the median MSHQ-EjFD was 19.00 (IQR: 12.0~24.75), 19.50 (IQR: 13.50~27.75), 23.00 (IQR: 19.25~32.25), 26.50 (IQR: 18.25~34.50), 27.00 (IQR: 21.50~32.50), respectively, with both showing improvement.

Conclusions

After administration of alfuzosin (10 mg daily for 2 years), the IPSS, QoL, IIEF, and MSHQ-EjFD all improved significantly. This means long-term administration of 10 mg of alfuzosin daily would be effective not only for LUTS but also erectile function and ejaculation.

Alpha 1-adrenoceptor blocker may improve not only voiding but also storage lower urinary tract symptoms caused by (125) I brachytherapy for prostate cancer

Purpose. To assess changes in lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) within 1 year after brachytherapy in patients receiving alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonists. Methods. We retrospectively evaluated 116 patients who underwent ¹²⁵I prostate brachytherapy in our institute. Seventy-one patients were treated with a combination of external beam radiation therapy and brachytherapy. Alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonists were prescribed to all patients after brachytherapy. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) forms and postvoid residual urine volume were recorded at all follow-up visits. Results. Forty-nine patients were given tamsulosin hydrochloride, 32 were given silodosin hydrochloride, and 35 were given naftopidil for up to 6 months after seed implantation. Patients given tamsulosin or naftopidil tended to show a higher peak IPSS and slower recovery to baseline values than those given silodosin. The patients given naftopidil showed an insufficient recovery in storage symptoms in naftopidil group in comparison with tamsulosin group at 3 months and with silodosin group at 6 and 9 months. Conclusions. In the management of LUT after brachytherapy, silodosin may provide a more favorable improvement. Silodosin and tamsulosin may have an advantage in improving not only voiding but also storage lower urinary tract symptoms after brachytherapy.

Tamsulosin modulates, but does not abolish the spontaneous activity in the guinea pig prostate gland

AIMS

To examine the effects of the α1A -adrenoceptor antagonist, tamsulosin, on spontaneous contractile and electrical activity in the guinea-pig prostate gland.

METHODS

The effects of tamsulosin (0.1 and 0.3 nM) were investigated in adult and ageing male guinea pig prostate glands using conventional tension recording and electrophysiological intracellular microelectrode recording techniques.

RESULTS

Tamsulosin reduced spontaneous activity, and had different age-dependent effects on adult and ageing guinea pigs at different concentrations. 0.1 nM tamsulosin caused a significantly greater reduction of spontaneous contractile and electrical activity in ageing guinea pigs in comparison to adult guinea pigs. In contrast, 0.3 nM tamsulosin had a significantly greater reduction of spontaneous contractile and electrical activity in adult guinea pigs in comparison to ageing guinea pigs.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that tamsulosin can modulate spontaneous myogenic stromal contractility and the underlying spontaneous electrical activity; tamsulosin does not block spontaneous activity. This reduction in spontaneous activity suggests that downstream cellular mechanisms underlying smooth muscle tone are being targeted, and these may represent novel therapeutic targets to better treat benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Benign prostatic hyperplasia: a brief overview of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and therapy

Benign prostatic hyperplasia is a common condition, causing symptoms in 75% of men over the age of 70. To understand the role of a novel treatment for this condition, an understanding of the pathology, approach to diagnosis, and range of existing therapies are important. This article provides a general overview of benign prostatic hyperplasia evaluation and management.

Advances in the design and discovery of drugs for the treatment of prostatic hyperplasia

INTRODUCTION

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common medical problem in nearly 80% of geriatric male population severely affecting the quality of life. Several strategies has been suggested in the past for the management of BPH, but only α-blockers and 5α-reductase inhibitors are in clinical use. This review aims to give deep insight into advances in the design and discovery of newer chemical entities as 'druggable' molecule for the management of BPH.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the authors cover various classes of drugs that have shown their potential for management of BPH. These drugs include α-adrenergic antagonists, 5α-reductase inhibitors, phytochemical agents, phosphodiesterase inhibitor, luteinizing hormone releasing hormone antagonists and muscarinic receptor antagonists. Literature searches were carried out using Google Scholar, SciFinder and PubMed.

EXPERT OPINION

The exact etiology of BPH is unknown; however, several mechanisms may be involved in the progression of the disease. Beside surgery and watchful waiting, medical therapies to treat BPH include α-adrenergic antagonist and 5α-reductase inhibitors. Phytotherapeutic agents are also used in some countries. Various other chemical classes of drugs are proposed for the treatment of the disease, but none of them have reached the clinic. Many classes of drugs are currently undergoing clinical trials such as phosphodiesterase inhibitors, luteinizing hormone releasing hormone antagonists and muscarinic receptor antagonists. The current need is to develop a potent, efficacious and highly selective drug for the treatment of BPH.

Effect of Transurethral Resection of the Prostate on Storage Symptoms in Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia of Less than 30 ml

Purpose

Many patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) have not only voiding symptoms but also storage symptoms. Despite the many types of treatment that have been developed for BPH, storage symptoms persist. We conducted an assessment of the efficacy of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and the change in the International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) storage sub-score after the procedure according to prostate size in patients with BPH.

Materials and Methods

Men aged 50 years or older who had BPH were enrolled in this study. 186 patients were divided into two groups according to prostate size measuring using transrectal ultrasonography: In group 1, prostate size was less than 30 ml (51 patients), and in group 2, prostate size was greater than 30 ml (135 patients). All of the patients underwent TURP. We examined whether the degree of change in the IPSS, voiding symptoms, storage symptoms, and quality of life (QoL) differed before and after TURP and according to prostate size.

Results

After three months of TURP, the subjects in both groups showed significant improvement in the IPSS, voiding symptoms, storage symptoms, QoL, and maximum flow rate (p<0.05). The scores for the IPSS, voiding symptoms, storage symptoms, and QoL of group 1 and 2 after three months of TURP were 16.36, 14.25 (p=0.233), 8.21, 8.24 (p=0.980), 8.11, 5.16 (p=0.014), 2.89, and 2.10 (p=0.030), respectively.

Conclusions

TURP is an effective treatment for patients with BPH, regardless of prostate size. However, while the improvement in the storage symptoms of patients with a prostate size of less than 30 ml was not significant, it was in patients with a prostate size greater than 30 ml.

Analysis of energy loss mediated by an alpha-1 blocker in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia using a virtual urethra processed from an endoscopic video image

PURPOSE

To examine the efficacy of an alpha-1 blocker and its correlation to structural alteration of the prostatic urethra and the loss of energy in the urine flow using a virtual urethra processed from an endoscopic video image.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Video images of the prostatic urethra were recorded during cystourethroscopy in 11 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) before and after treatment with an alpha-1 blocker, naftopidil. The three-dimensional (3D) structure of the prostatic urethra was reproduced from video files. Fluid dynamic analysis and hydraulic energy calculations were performed using the "virtual" 3D urethral images.

RESULTS

In 9 of 11 patients studied, an 11% improvement in the loss of energy (range, 1%-82%) was seen. Alpha-1 blocker treatment mediated the disappearance or decrease of the bulky vortex formation in seven patients, which led to an improved urinary stream. A positive correlation was found between improved energy loss and residual urine volume (P=0.0312).

CONCLUSION

Alpha-1 blocker therapy led to a decreased energy loss in the urine flow in the prostatic urethra in relation to the improvement of clinical symptoms. The cystourethroscopy could be a tool to assess the urethral resistance in patients with BPH using image processing methodology.

α-Blockers for benign prostatic hyperplasia: the new era

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

α1-Adrenoceptor blockers are the most frequently prescribed medical therapy in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptom suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH). The purpose of this review is to highlight the evolution of adrenoceptor blockers with emphasis on newly approved drugs.

RECENT FINDINGS

Over the past years new formulations of several α1-adrenoceptor blockers were introduced to the market. Five long-acting α1-blockers are currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treatment of symptomatic LUTS/BPH: terazosin, doxazosin, tamsulosin, alfuzosin and silodosin. Silodosin is the only adrenoceptor blocker that exhibits true selectivity for the α1-adrenoceptor subtypes. This unique adrenoceptor selectivity profile likely accounts for the very favorable cardiovascular safety profile.

SUMMARY

Tamsulosin, alfuzosin slow release and silodosin do not require dose titration. Alfuzosin, terazosin, doxazosin and silodosin have all been shown to be effective in relieving LUTS/BPH independent of prostate size. Low incidence of orthostatic hypotension has been reported for silodosin, but abnormal ejaculation is the most commonly reported adverse effect.

α(1)-Adrenoceptors in the urinary tract

α(1)-Adrenoceptors have been identified and characterized extensively by functional, radioligand-binding, and molecular biological techniques. Molecular clones have been isolated for three α(1)-subtypes (α(1a), α(1b), and α(1d)), and these subtypes are also functionally characterized. α(1)-Adrenoceptors are present in the prostate, urethra, bladder (urothelium, smooth muscle, and afferent nerves), ureter, vas deferens, peripheral ganglia, nerve terminals, vascular tissues, and central nervous system (CNS), and they could all potentially influence overall urinary function and contribute to both the therapeutic and adverse effects of α(1)-adrenoceptor antagonists in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). This review aimed to discuss the relevant physiological and pharmacological roles and molecular biology of α(1)-adrenoceptor subtypes in the prostate, urethra, bladder, ureter, and CNS.

Competitive displacement binding assay on rat brain sections and using a beta-imager: application to mu-opioid ligands

A new approach of competitive displacement binding assay using brain sections and a beta-imager is presented to estimate binding parameters such as affinity and selectivity of new compounds or to characterize receptor families or subtypes of receptors in small brain regions. This method includes a preliminary saturation assay intended to define the optimal concentration of displaceable radio-labeled ligand followed by the determination of displacement constants (IC(50) and K(i)) in cerebral regions rich in studied receptor. The technique application was demonstrated in seven rat brain structures, using displacement of the selective tritiated mu-opioid ligand [(3)H]-DAMGO by six opioid ligands: a specific agonist (DAMGO), less specific agonists (morphine, remifentanil), a non-specific antagonist with good affinity for mu receptors (naloxone) and ligands specific of other opioid subtypes (naltrindole, U50.488). Radioactivity counts were collected during 48 h. The assay-validation was performed by measuring intra- and inter-assay variation on determinations and by comparing presently obtained K(i) values with data from recognised methodologies. Both prove the accuracy of the proposed method.

Can smooth muscle represent a useful target for the treatment of rapid ejaculation?

Rapid ejaculation is probably the most common form of male sexual dysfunction. Current research into the treatment of the condition has focused on centrally acting or topical desensitizing agents; however, no treatment has yet been approved. An alternative approach could be to develop drugs that act directly upon the target organ itself and our increasing knowledge of the molecular biology of the accessory sex organs makes this a realistic possibility. This review analyzes the information in the literature that would support such a hypothesis. Particular emphasis has been placed on articles that have investigated smooth muscle cell relaxation. A critical review of the literature has revealed that there are potentially a myriad of targets through which rapid ejaculation can be treated.

Treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia in hypertensive men

As the proportion of the US population over the age of 65 continues to rise, it is likely that the number of individuals with concomitant benign prostatic hyperplasia and hypertension will also increase. To reduce morbidity and mortality, it is important to treat patients with hypertension optimally. Evidence from outcome trials suggests that alpha1 blockers should not be used as first-line antihypertensive therapy. Although some clinicians previously recommended alpha1 blocker monotherapy for patients with both hypertension and benign prostatic hyperplasia, the most recent American Urologic Association and Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure guidelines recommend independent treatment with the most appropriate pharmacologic agents for each condition. When treating patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia, clinicians should be aware of the potential impacts that alpha1 blockers may have on blood pressure and potential adverse events in patients who are normotensive as well as in patients with treated hypertension.

alpha1-Adrenoceptor subtype selectivity and lower urinary tract symptoms

Benign prostatic hyperplasia is a common cause of urinary flow obstruction in aging men and may lead to lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Benign prostatic hyperplasia has 2 physiological components: a static component related to increased prostate size and a dynamic component related to increased prostate smooth muscle tone. alpha1-Adrenoceptors (alpha1ARs) maintain prostate smooth muscle tone; hence, alpha1-antagonists (blockers) relax prostate smooth muscle and decrease urethral resistance, ultimately leading to relief of LUTS. This review focuses on alpha1AR subtypes and their location in lower urinary tract tissues involved in LUTS (prostate, bladder, spinal cord); it also summarizes major clinical trials published to date on the efficacy of alpha1AR blockers for LUTS. Benefits and adverse effects of clinically available alpha1AR antagonists are reviewed, followed by recent information on interactions between alpha1AR subtype antagonists and type 5 phosphodiesterase inhibitors used for impotence. alpha1-Adrenoceptor antagonists have become the mainstay of therapy for LUTS; knowledge about specific alpha1AR subtypes should facilitate rational choice of alpha1AR blocker therapy by clinicians.

Role of the newer alpha, -adrenergic-receptor antagonistsin the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia-related lower urinary tract symptoms

BACKGROUND

Although initially introduced for the management of hypertension, alpha(1)-adrenergic-receptor antagonists (alpha1-blockers) have become the standard of care for the medical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)-related lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). However, these agents have the potential to produce orthostatic hypotension and other blood pressure-related adverse effects in normotensive patients and in those receiving concurrent treatment with other antihypertensive agents. As a result, more "uroselective," less vasoactive alpha(1)-blockers have been developed.

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews current information on the role of alpha(1)-blockers in the treatment of BPH-related LUTS. The focus is on tamsulosin and alfuzosin, newer "uroselective" agents in this class that have a decreased potential for cardiovascular adverse effects.

METHODS

Relevant articles were identified through a search of the English-language literature indexed on MEDLINE and the proceedings of scientific meetings from 1976 to 2003. The search terms were benign prostatic hyperplasia treatment, alpha(1)-adrenergic-receptor blocker, uroselectivity, lower urinary tract symptoms, complications, and cardiovascular.

RESULTS

Tamsulosin has selectivity for the a alpha(1) and alpha(1d) receptor subtypes. Alfuzosin, although not receptor subtype selective, is clinically "uroselective" and does not significantly affect vascular alpha-adrenergic receptors. Both agents are efficacious in relieving LUTS and have a decreased potential for such cardiovascular adverse effects as postural hypotension. Common adverse events with these agents include dizziness and asthenia.

CONCLUSION

Based on the available data, "uroselective" alpha(1)-blockers should be considered over older, more vasoactive agents for the medical management of LUTS, particularly in patients with BPH and hypertension.

Categorización de receptores α1-adrenérgicos en el detrusor de pacientes con hbp obstructiva. estudio inicial en modelo animal de experimentación

INTRODUCTION

The action of alpha 1-adrenergic receptor antagonists in ameliorating irritation and obstruction in patients with bladder outlet obstruction (due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia-BPH) has been demonstrated. Although it is well known that alpha 1-a receptors are responsible for prostate smooth muscle relaxation, the mechanism by which irritative bladder symptoms are improved is unknown. Different alpha 1 receptor subtypes may be involved. The objective of this study is to investigate the changes in the alpha-adrenergic receptor populations in the obstructed detrusor, and to determine which subtype is proportionally increased in this situation (bladder outlet obstruction).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was an in vivo study in an experimental model: male NZ (New Zealand) rabbits. The bladder neck of one group of rabbits was obstructed surgically using the technique proposed by Levin et al. Subsequent to bladder catherization with a 8Fr catheter, the bladder neck was exposed by means of a low medial abdominal incision. The bladder neck was tied with a 2/0 silk thread below the ureteral orifices. The catheter was taken out at the end of the intervention. The rabbits were sacrificed after 4 weeks using intracardiac pentothal and cystectomy was performed. A control group that did not undergo bladder obstruction were also sacrificed at this time, for the comparative study. Part of the detrusor was used for a pathological study and the rest for a physio-pharmacological study in which the organ was placed in a bath of adrenoceptor agonists (phenylephrine and noradrenaline) and antagonists WB101, AH11101A and BMY7378 (antagonists of the alpha 1a, b, d, respectively).

RESULTS

The findings of the pathological study show that the bladder wall was thicker in the rabbits that underwent bladder obstruction. The physio-pharmacological studies demonstrate that the detrusor response to the selective alpha-1 adrenergic agonist was greater in the rabbits that underwent bladder obstruction, however detrusor contractility was decreased (KPSS). With bladder obstruction the alpha 1d receptors were increased.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Receptor-binding studies (Malloy et al) aim to differentiate the alpha-adrenoreceptor populations. These studies identify and quantitate the different receptor subtypes in tissue without taking into account their activity. The isometric and physio-pharmacological tests evaluate active receptors, i.e. those that respond to agonist and antagonist stimuli. This enables detrusor activity to be evaluated accurately. The results obtained in this investigational study support the hypothesis that there is a high statistically significant increase in the alpha 1 adrenergic receptors in the obstructed detrusor. Furthermore, in agreement with previous molecular studies, during prostate obstruction alpha 1d is the predominate sub-population in the bladder. These findings may have patho-physiological, clinical and pharmacological implications. If this hypothesis which has been demonstrated in an experimental model, is also demonstrated in studies in humans, pharmacological development should not only be focussed on selective alpha 1a receptor antagonists (prostate) but also on those of alpha 1d, for relieving symptoms in patients with bladder outlet obstruction (BPH and prostatism).

Terazosin, doxazosin, and prazosin: current clinical experience

Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction are common in aging men. Nearly 25% of men >40 years of age have LUTS. Medical therapy with alpha-blockade is the most common method of medical therapy for benign prostatic obstruction. Multiple methods of minimally invasive surgical therapies have been introduced in the last decade. These methods include balloon dilatation, temporary and permanent urethral stents, various laser techniques, microwave thermotherapy, transurethral needle ablation, electrovaporization, and high-intensity focused ultrasound. alpha-Receptor blockers to reduce the sympathetic tone of the prostate are considered as first-line therapy to relieve the symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Selective alpha(1)-receptor blockers relax prostatic smooth muscle, relieve bladder outlet obstruction, and enhance urine flow with fewer side effects. In addition, it was determined that treating patients with alpha-blockers increases prostatic apoptosis. Pharmacokinetic activity, mode of action, clinical efficacy, and side effects of the selective alpha(1)-receptor blockers terazosin, doxazosin, and prazosin are reviewed.

Alpha adrenoceptor antagonists in the year 2000: is there anything new?

Selective alpha1-adrenergic blockade is now a well accepted and widely used therapeutic treatment for patients presenting with symptomatic bladder outlet obstruction thought to be associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia. This review summarizes the recent developments in this field relating to the subject of receptor subtype selectivity and the potential relevance of this to clinical usefulness of existing drug therapy. Whilst a number of unanswered questions remain as to the exact mechanisms of both drug action and side-effect profile, nevertheless it is clear that existing clinically available alpha1-antagonists provide a safe, effective and generally well tolerated therapy for patients with lower urinary tract symptoms thought to be associated with benign prostatic obstruction. The implications of the ALLHAT study are discussed.

In vitro alpha-adrenoceptor autoradiography of the urethra and urinary bladder of the female pig, cat, guinea-pig and rat

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the distribution of alpha1- and alpha2-adrenoceptors in the urethra and urinary bladder of the female pig, cat, guinea-pig and rat.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The binding distributions of an alpha1-adrenoceptor ligand (3H-prazosin) and an alpha2-adrenoceptor ligand (3H-rauwolscine) were determined using in vitro autoradiography. Autoradiograms were analysed by combining computer-based image analysis and light microscopy.

RESULTS

In the pig, guinea-pig and rat urethra 3H-prazosin binding was highest in the muscle layer. In the cat urethra 3H-prazosin binding could not be analysed due to a negative chemography artefact. In the pig, cat and guinea-pig urethra 3H-rauwolscine binding was highest in the urothelium, followed by the sub-mucosa, with low levels in muscle. Little 3H-rauwolscine binding was observed in the rat urethra. In the urinary bladder of all species 3H-prazosin binding was low. In the rat bladder, binding was higher in the trigone than in the dome. In the pig, cat and guinea-pig bladder 3H-rauwolscine binding was highest in the mucosa. with little binding in muscle or lamina propria. In the rat bladder, there was little binding and no regional differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Alpha1-adrenoceptors were predominantly located in urethral smooth muscle, indicating their contractile importance in maintaining continence. Alpha2-Adrenoceptors were present in the urethral submucosa and bladder mucosa, but not in muscle, suggesting a role in regulation of blood flow, urethral lubrication and tumescence, but not in contraction.

A comparative study of terazosin and tamsulosin for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia in Japanese patients

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of an incremental-dose regimen of terazosin (1-2 mg daily) and a fixed-dose regimen of tamsulosin (0.2 mg daily), on Japanese patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This multicentre, single-blind, randomized trial compared terazosin and tamsulosin over 4 weeks, in 61 patients with symptomatic BPH randomly assigned to terazosin (n = 31) or tamsulosin (n = 30). Terazosin 0.5 mg twice daily was administered for 2 weeks, followed by 1 mg twice daily for 2 weeks. Tamsulosin (0.2 mg) was administered once daily for 4 weeks. Symptoms were evaluated using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), and quality of life (QOL) was assessed subjectively before treatment, and again after 2 and 4 weeks of treatment. Objective measurements taken before and after the treatment period were the maximum (Qmax) and average (Qave) urinary flow rates, and the percentage residual urine volume. Improvement was defined as a 25% decrease from baseline in IPSS, > 1 point increase in QOL score, and > 2.5 mL/s increase in Qmax. Adverse reactions potentially related to the study drugs were recorded throughout the treatment period.

RESULTS

Both terazosin and tamsulosin produced statistically significant improvements in subjective and objective variables. Neither treatment affected systolic or diastolic blood pressure or pulse rate. Adverse reactions were noted in four patients (three in the terazosin group and one in the tamsulosin group). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse effects between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the limitations of small sample size and relatively short treatment periods, terazosin and tamsulosin were equally effective in the treatment of symptomatic BPH in Japanese patients, using relatively lower doses than those used in Western countries.

Alpha-blockade therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: from a nonselective to a more selective alpha1A-adrenergic antagonist

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is very common in older men, causing symptoms that can markedly impair quality of life. Surgical treatment, typically transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), is highly effective but can be costly and is associated with the risk for significant morbidity. Medical treatments for BPH are targeted toward reducing bladder outlet obstruction either by androgen blockade to reduce prostatic volume or alpha-adrenergic blockade to relax the smooth muscle tone of the prostate. In recent years, understanding of the sympathetic innervation of the prostate has improved. This has been paralleled by the development of alpha-adrenergic blocking agents, from nonselective alpha-antagonists, to selective alpha1-antagonists, to the more selective alpha1A-antagonists. It is anticipated that more specific agents will optimize the therapeutic effectiveness of alpha-adrenergic blockade in the prostate while reducing the side effects associated with alpha-adrenergic blockade in other areas of the body, such as the vascular system. This article reviews the evolution of alpha-blockade therapy in management of BPH, focusing on tamsulosin, an agent targeted toward the alpha1A-adrenoceptor that predominates in the prostate. Clinical trials in Europe and the United States have provided evidence that tamsulosin is effective at doses of 0.4 and 0.8 mg/day. At both doses, tamsulosin is associated with significant improvements in the American Urological Association symptom score and the mean and peak urinary flow rates as compared with placebo. This once-daily alpha1A-adrenergic antagonist is well-tolerated, with a minimal potential for the side effects associated with alphas-blocker therapy.

Influence of prostate size on terazosin efficacy

BACKGROUND

While the rationale for the use of alpha1-adrenoreceptor antagonists in the treatment of bladder outlet obstruction is well established, not all patients have either objective or subjective improvement. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of prostatic size on the changes of peak flow rate, average flow rate and residual urine in symptomatic BPH patients undergoing terazosin treatment.

METHODS

Thirty-five patients with symptomatic BPH received terazosin, 5 mg once a day for 3 weeks after a 2-week dose escalation period. Peak and average flow rates as well as residual urine were assessed before and after treatment. The patients were stratified in 3 groups by prostate size, which was estimated by transabdominal ultrasonography and a digital rectal examination.

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics for age, peak flow rate and average flow rate did not vary between the 3 groups, however, the pretreatment volume of residual urine was greater in patients with large prostate adenomas. Terazosin treatment resulted in significant changes in flow rate and residual urine, however, changes in flow rates were not influenced by prostate size, while a marked decrease in residual urine was found in patients with large prostates.

CONCLUSION

Patients treated with terazosin obtained similar improvement in peak and average uroflow, independent of the size of the prostate.

Effect of terazosin on prostatism in men with normal and abnormal peak urinary flow rates

OBJECTIVES

To determine if men with normal peak urinary flow rates (PFR) and prostatism respond to terazosin.

METHODS

Forty-one men over the age of 50 years with an American Urological Association (AUA) symptom score greater than 8, postvoid residual urine volume (PVR) less than 300 mL, and no clinical or biochemical evidence of prostate cancer were treated with terazosin independent of the baseline PFR. The effect of terazosin on the AUA symptom score and PFR were compared for subjects with a PFR of 15 mL/s or less (group I) and those with a PFR greater than 15 mL/s (group II).

RESULTS

The baseline age, AUA symptom score, prostate volume, and PVR were not significantly different between the two groups. The mean changes in AUA symptom score were -45.0% and -49.5% for groups I and II, respectively. The mean changes in PFR were 7.0% and -26.6% for groups I and II, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The effect of terazosin on AUA symptom score is independent of baseline PFR, indicating that the mechanism of action of terazosin is not exclusively mediated by reduction of bladder outlet obstruction. Randomized controlled studies are required to confirm this provocative observation.

Prostatic alpha 1-adrenoceptors and uroselectivity

BACKGROUND

alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonists (blockers) are now commonly used in the treatment of the symptoms of lower urinary tract obstruction. Originally phenoxybenzamine, a non-selective antagonist at both alpha 1- and alpha 2-adrenoceptors, was used by Marco Caine. In an attempt to minimize side effects, selective alpha 1-antagonists, e.g. prazosin, were subsequently developed. More recently, agents such as alfuzosin, doxazosin, terazosin, and tamsulosin have been introduced and claims of "uroselectivity" and "prostate" selectivity have emerged.

METHODS

This review attempts to put these claims into perspective and represents a comprehensive analysis of all pre-clinical and clinical data including several papers from the Japanese literature. An attempt is made to define what is meant by selectivity at various levels including the test tube, in the laboratory animal and, most importantly, in the clinical context of the whole patient.

CONCLUSIONS

The conclusions are interpreted within the context of the subdivision of the alpha 1-adrenoceptor into alpha 1A, alpha 1B, and alpha 1D subtypes.