Spinal administration of selective opioid antagonists in amphibians: evidence for an opioid unireceptor

Single Amino Acid Variation Underlies Species-Specific Sensitivity to Amphibian Skin-Derived Opioid-like Peptides

It has been suggested that the evolution of vertebrate opioid receptors (ORs) follow a vector of increased functionality. Here, we test this idea by comparing human and frog ORs. Interestingly, some of the most potent opioid peptides known have been isolated from amphibian skin secretions. Here we show that such peptides (dermorphin and deltorphin) are highly potent in the human receptors and inactive in frog ORs. The molecular basis for the insensitivity of the frog ORs to these peptides was studied using chimeras and molecular modeling. The insensitivity of the delta OR (DOR) to deltorphin was due to variation of a single amino acid, Trp7.35, which is a leucine in mammalian DORs. Notably, Trp7.35 is completely conserved in all known DOR sequences from lamprey, fish, and amphibians. The deltorphin-insensitive phenotype was verified in fish. Our results provide a molecular explanation for the species selectivity of skin-derived opioid peptides.

Bioinformatics and evolution of vertebrate nociceptin and opioid receptors

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are ancestrally related membrane proteins on cells that mediate the pharmacological effect of most drugs and neurotransmitters. GPCRs are the largest group of membrane receptor proteins encoded in the human genome. One of the most famous types of GPCRs is the opioid receptors. Opioid family receptors consist of four closely related proteins expressed in all vertebrate brains and spinal cords examined to date. The three classical types of opioid receptors shown unequivocally to mediate analgesia in animal models and in humans are the mu- (MOR), delta- (DOR), and kappa-(KOR) opioid receptor proteins. The fourth and most recent member of the opioid receptor family discovered is the nociceptin or orphanin FQ receptor (ORL). The role of ORL and its ligands in producing analgesia is not as clear, with both analgesic and hyperalgesic effects reported. All four opioid family receptor genes were cloned from expressed mRNA in a number of vertebrate species, and there are enough sequences presently available to carry out bioinformatic analysis. This chapter presents the results of a comparative analysis of vertebrate opioid receptors using pharmacological studies, bioinformatics, and the latest data from human whole-genome studies. Results confirm our initial hypotheses that the four opioid receptor genes most likely arose by whole-genome duplication, that there is an evolutionary vector of opioid receptor type divergence in sequence and function, and that the hMOR gene shows evidence of positive selection or adaptive evolution in Homo sapiens.

Analgesia in amphibians: preclinical studies and clinical applications

Preclinical studies of analgesia in amphibians or recommendations for clinical use of analgesics in amphibian species are extremely limited. This article briefly reviews the issues surrounding the use of analgesics in amphibians, starting with common definitions of pain and analgesia when applied to nonhuman animals. Nociceptive and endogenous opioid systems in amphibians are reviewed, and results of preclinical research on opioid and nonopioid analgesics summarized. Recommended opioid and nonopioid analgesics are summarized, and practical recommendations made for their clinical use.

The evolution of vertebrate opioid receptors

The proteins that mediate the analgesic and other effects of opioid drugs and endogenous opioid peptides are known as opioid receptors. Opioid receptors consist of a family of four closely-related proteins belonging to the large superfamily of G-protein coupled receptors. The three types of opioid receptors shown unequivocally to mediate analgesia in animal models are the mu (MOR), delta (DOR), and kappa (KOR) opioid receptor proteins. The role of the fourth member of the opioid receptor family, the nociceptin or orphanin FQ receptor (ORL), is not as clear as hyperalgesia, analgesia, and no effect was reported after administration of ORL agonists. There are now cDNA sequences for all four types of opioid receptors that are expressed in the brain of six species from three different classes of vertebrates. This review presents a comparative analysis of vertebrate opioid receptors using bioinformatics and data from recent human genome studies. Results indicate that opioid receptors arose by gene duplication, that there is a vector of opioid receptor divergence, and that MOR shows evidence of rapid evolution.

A pharmacological comparison of the cloned frog and human mu opioid receptors reveals differences in opioid affinity and function

This study presents a direct comparison of the ligand binding and signaling profiles of a mammalian and non-mammalian mu opioid receptor. Opioid ligand binding and agonist potencies were determined for an amphibian (Rana pipiens) mu opioid receptor (rpMOR) and the human mu opioid receptor (hMOR) in transfected, intact Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. Identical conditions were employed such that statistically meaningful differences between the two receptors could be determined. Identifying these differences is an important first step in understanding how evolutionary changes affect ligand binding and signaling in vertebrate opioid receptors. As expected, the rank of opioid ligand affinity for rpMOR and hMOR was consistent with the ligands' previously characterized type-selectivity. However, most of the opioid ligands tested had significant differences in affinity for rpMOR and hMOR. For example, the mu-selective agonist, DAMGO ([d-Ala(2), N-Me-Phe(4), Gly(5)-ol]-enkephalin), had a 10.9-fold greater affinity (K(i)) for hMOR (K(i)=268 nM) than rpMOR (K(i)=2914 nM). In addition, differences in signaling between these receptors were found by measuring inhibition of cAMP accumulation by morphine or DAMGO. DAMGO was significantly more potent (13.6-fold) in CHO cells expressing hMOR versus those expressing rpMOR. In addition, a significantly greater maximal inhibition was elicited by both opioid agonists in cells expressing hMOR. In summary, this study supports an ongoing effort to better understand how vertebrate evolution has shaped opioid receptor properties and function.

Cloning and bioinformatics of amphibian mu, delta, kappa, and nociceptin opioid receptors expressed in brain tissue: evidence for opioid receptor divergence in mammals

Opioid agonists produce analgesia in humans and other mammals by binding to three distinct types of G protein-coupled receptors; mu (MOR), delta (DOR), and kappa (KOR) opioid receptors. A fourth member of the opioid receptor family is the nociceptin or orphanin FQ receptor (ORL), however the role of the ORL receptor in analgesia is less clear. In the Northern grass frog, Rana pipiens, systemic and central administration of morphine and selective MOR, DOR, and KOR agonists produced dose-dependent antinociceptive effects blocked by the general opioid antagonist, naltrexone. The present study reports on the sequence, expression, and bioinformatics of four opioid receptor cDNAs cloned from Rana pipiens; rpMOR, rpDOR, rpKOR, and rpORL. These were the first opioid receptors cloned from a species of Class Amphibia, are selectively expressed in brain tissue, and show 70-84% identity to their homologous mammalian opioid receptors. Comparisons within species showed that MOR, DOR, and KOR proteins are significantly less divergent in earlier-evolved vertebrates compared to humans and other mammals. Among the four types of opioid receptors, MOR proteins show the least sequence variation among the six vertebrate species. Additionally, phylogenetic analysis supports the hypothesis that the family of opioid receptor proteins are coded by four genes that arose from two gene duplications of a single ancestral opioid receptor gene.

Xendorphin B1, a novel opioid-like peptide determined from a Xenopus laevis brain cDNA library, produces opioid antinociception after spinal administration in amphibians

Prodynorphins (PDYNs) from the African clawed frog (Xenopus laevis), originally described as 'proxendorphins', are novel members of the family of opioid-like precursor polypeptides and were recently discovered based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) isolates from a Xenopus brain cDNA library. This amphibian prodynorphin was found in two isoforms, (Xen)PDYN-A and (Xen)PDYN-B, consisting of 247 and 279 amino acids, respectively. Each prepropeptide contains five potential opioid-like peptides, collectively named xendorphins. One of these, xendorphin B1 ((Xen)PDYN-B sequence 96-111: YGGFIRKPDKYKFLNA), is a hexadecapeptide that displaced [3H]naloxone and the radiolabelled kappa opioid, [3H]dynorphin A (1-17), with nanomolar affinity from rat brain membranes. Using the acetic acid pain test, the present study examined the antinociceptive effects of spinally administered xendorphin B1 in amphibians. Xendorphin B1 produced a long-lasting and dose-dependent antinociceptive effect in the Northern grass frog (Rana pipiens) with an ED50 value of 44.5 nmol/frog. The antinociceptive effects of xendorphin B1 were significantly blocked by pretreatment with the non-selective opioid antagonist, naltrexone. This is the first report of the in vivo characterization of a non-mammalian prodynorphin-derived peptide and suggests that xendorphin peptides may play a role in the modulation of noxious information in vertebrates.

Systemic and spinal administration of the mu opioid, remifentanil, produces antinociception in amphibians

Remifentanil is a relatively new opioid analgesic related to the fentanyl family of mu opioid receptor agonists and is used clinically for its unique property of having an ultra-short duration of action. However, there is little preclinical data on the analgesic (antinociceptive) effects of remifentanil and none obtained in non-mammalian animal models. The antinociceptive effects of remifentanil were assessed by using the acetic acid test in amphibians. Systemic and spinal administration of remifentanil was made by subcutaneous and intraspinal injections in the Northern grass frog, Rana pipiens. After administration, remifentanil produced dose-dependent and long-lasting antinociceptive effects which persisted for five hours after systemic administration but gave a shorter duration of action after spinal delivery. The antinociceptive effects of remifentanil were significantly blocked by pretreatment with systemic naltrexone. Systemic and spinal administration of remifentanil produced log dose-response curves which yielded ED50 values of 7.1 nmol/g and 3.2 nmol/animal respectively. The relative antinociceptive potency of remifentanil compared to other opioids administered to amphibians is similar to that found in mammalian models.

Opioid research in amphibians: an alternative pain model yielding insights on the evolution of opioid receptors

This review summarizes the work from our laboratory investigating mechanisms of opioid analgesia using the Northern grass frog, Rana pipiens. Over the last dozen years, we have accumulated data on the characterization of behavioral effects after opioid administration on radioligand binding by using opioid agonist and antagonist ligands in amphibian brain and spinal cord homogenates, and by cloning and sequencing opioid-like receptor cDNA from amphibian central nervous system (CNS) tissues. The relative analgesic potency of mu, delta, and kappa opioids is highly correlated between frogs and other mammals, including humans. Radioligand binding studies using selective opioid agonists show a similar selectivity profile in amphibians and mammals. In contrast, opioid antagonists that are highly selective for mammalian mu, delta, and kappa opioid receptors were not selective in behavioral and binding studies in amphibians. Three opioid-like receptor cDNAs were cloned and sequenced from amphibian brain tissues and are orthologs to mammalian mu, delta, and kappa opioid receptors. Bioinformatics analysis of the three types of opioid receptor cDNAs from all vertebrate species with full datasets gave a pattern of the molecular evolution of opioid receptors marked by the divergence of mu, delta, and kappa opioid receptor sequences during vertebrate evolution. This divergence in receptor amino acid sequence in later-evolved vertebrates underlies the hypothesis that opioid receptors are more type-selective in mammals than in nonmammalian vertebrates. The apparent order of receptor type evolution is kappa, then delta, and, most recently, the mu opioid receptor. Finally, novel bioinformatics analyses suggest that conserved extracellular receptor domains determine the type selectivity of vertebrate opioid receptors.

Spinal delivery of analgesics in experimental models of pain and analgesia

Systemic administration of analgesics can lead to serious adverse side effects compromising therapeutic benefit in some patients. Information coding pain transmits along an afferent neuronal network, the first synapses of which reside principally in the spinal cord. Delivery of compounds to spinal cord, the intended site of action for some analgesics, is potentially a more efficient and precise method for inhibiting the pain signal. Activation of specific proteins that reside in spinal neuronal membranes can result in hyperpolarization of secondary neurons, which can prevent transmission of the pain signal. This is one of the mechanisms by which opioids induce analgesia. The spinal cord is enriched in such molecular targets, the activation of which inhibit the transmission of the pain signal early in the afferent neuronal network. This review describes the pre-clinical models that enable new target discovery and development of novel analgesics for site-directed pain management.

Opioid receptors mediate a postsynaptic facilitation and a presynaptic inhibition at the afferent synapse of axolotl vestibular hair cells

This study was designed to determine the effects of opiate drugs on the electrical activity of afferent neurons and on the ionic currents of hair cells from semicircular canals. Experiments were done on larval axolotls (Ambystoma tigrinum). The multiunit spike activity of afferent neurons was recorded in the isolated inner ear under both resting conditions and mechanical stimulation. Ionic currents were recorded using voltage clamp of hair cells isolated from the semicircular canal. In the isolated inner-ear preparation, microperfusion of either non-specific opioid receptor antagonist naloxone (10 nM to 1 mM), mu receptor agonist [D-Ala(2), N-Me-Phe(4),Gly(5)-ol]-enkephalin (1 pM to 10 microM), or kappa receptor antagonist nor-binaltorphimine (10 nM to 100 microM) elicited a dose-dependent long-lasting (>5 min) increase of the electrical discharge of afferent neurons. The mu receptor agonist funaltrexamine (1 nM to 100 microM) and the kappa receptor agonist U-50488 (1 nM to 10 microM) diminished the basal spike discharge of vestibular afferents. The delta receptor agonist D-Pen(2)-D-Pen(5)-enkephalin (1 nM to 10 mM) and the antagonist naltrindole (1 nM to 10 mM) were without a significant effect. The only drug that displayed a significant action on hair-cell ionic currents was trans-(+/-)-3,4-dichloro-N-methyl-N-(2-[1-pyrrolidinyl]-cyclohexyl) benzeneacetamide methanesulfonate (U-50488) that reduced the Ca(2+) current in a dose-dependent fashion. On its own, mu receptor agonist [D-Ala(2), N-Me-Phe(4),Gly(5)-ol]-enkephalin (0.01 and 10 microM) significantly potentiated the response of afferent neurons to the excitatory amino acid agonist (+/-)-alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid (0.1 microM), while synaptic transmission was blocked by the use of high-Mg(2+), low-Ca(2+) solutions. Our data indicate that the activity of vestibular afferent neurons may be regulated in a complex fashion by opioid receptors: mu opioid receptors mediating an excitatory, postsynaptic modulatory input to afferent neurons, and kappa receptors mediating an inhibitory, presynaptic input to hair cells.

Characterization of mu, kappa, and delta opioid binding in amphibian whole brain tissue homogenates

Opioid agonists produce analgesia in mammals through the activation of mu, kappa, or delta opioid receptors. Previous behavioral and binding studies from our laboratory using an amphibian model suggested that mu, kappa, or delta opioid agonists may activate a single type of opioid receptor in the grass frog, Rana pipiens. In the present study, kinetic, saturation, and competitive binding profiles for three opioid radioligands, [(3)H]DAMGO ([D-Ala(2),N-Me-Phe(4),Gly(5)-ol]-enkephalin) (mu-selective), [(3)H]U65953 [(5 alpha, 7 alpha,8 beta)-(+)-N-methyl-N-[7-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-1-oxaspiro[4.5]dec-8-yl]-benzeneacetamide] (kappa-selective), and [(3)H]DPDPE ([D-Pen(2),D-Pen(5)]-enkephalin) (delta-selective) were determined using frog whole brain homogenates. Kinetic analyses and experimentally derived values from saturation experiments gave affinity constants (K(D)) in the low nanomolar range. The density of opioid binding sites (B(max)) was 224.4, 118.6, and 268.9 fmol/mg for mu, kappa, and delta opioid radioligands, respectively. The affinity values did not significantly differ among the three opioid radioligands, but the kappa radioligand bound to significantly fewer sites than did the mu or delta radioligands. K(i) values for unlabeled mu, kappa, and delta competitors, including highly selective opioid antagonists, were consistent with each radioligand selectivity profile. The present data suggest that mu, kappa, and delta opioid radioligands bind to distinct opioid receptors in amphibians that are surprisingly similar to those found in mammalian brain.

Fish, amphibian, and reptile analgesia

Pain perception and appropriate behavioral responses are important for survival. The conservation of the opioid ligand and receptor suggests evolution of opioid receptors mediating antinociception throughout vertebrate phylogeny. Fish, amphibians, and reptiles have appropriate neurologic components, display the appropriate behavior in response to a painful stimulus, and possess antinociceptive mechanisms to modulate pain. Because pain perception in these species is therefore likely to be analogous to that of mammals, invasive and painful procedures should always be accompanied by appropriate analgesia and anesthesia. Although specific doses have not been established in clinical trials, clinicians should attempt to provide lower vertebrates with appropriate analgesia during painful procedures. Further experimental and clinical investigations are necessary to expand the current veterinary literature in the area of pain and analgesia in lower vertebrates such as fish, amphibians, and reptiles.

Selective opioid agonist and antagonist competition for [3H]-naloxone binding in amphibian spinal cord

Opioids elicit antinociception in mammals through three distinct types of receptors designated as mu, kappa and delta. However, it is not clear what type of opioid receptor mediates antinociception in non-mammalian vertebrates. Radioligand binding techniques were employed to characterize the site(s) of opioid action in the amphibian, Rana pipiens. Naloxone is a general opioid antagonist that has not been characterized in Rana pipiens. Using the non-selective opioid antagonist, [3H]-naloxone, opioid binding sites were characterized in amphibian spinal cord. Competitive binding assays were done using selective opioid agonists and highly-selective opioid antagonists. Naloxone bound to a single-site with an affinity of 11.3 nM and 18.7 nM for kinetic and saturation studies, respectively. A B(max) value of 2725 fmol/mg protein in spinal cord was observed. The competition constants (K(i)) of unlabeled mu, kappa and delta ranged from 2.58 nM to 84 microM. The highly-selective opioid antagonists yielded similar K(i) values ranging from 5.37 to 31.1 nM. These studies are the first to examine opioid binding in amphibian spinal cord. In conjunction with previous behavioral data, these results suggest that non-mammalian vertebrates express a unique opioid receptor which mediates the action of selective mu, kappa and delta opioid agonists.

Selective opioid receptor agonist and antagonist displacement of [3H]naloxone binding in amphibian brain

Opioid receptor ligands have been shown to elicit antinociception in mammals through three distinct types of receptors designated as mu, delta and kappa. These opioid receptors have been characterized and cloned in several mammalian species. Radioligand binding techniques were employed to characterize the sites of opioid action in the amphibian, Rana pipiens. Naloxone is a general opioid receptor antagonist which has not been characterized in R. pipiens. Kinetic analyses of [3H]naloxone in the amphibian yielded a K(D) of 6.84 nM while the experimentally derived K(D) value from saturation experiments was found to be 7.11 nM. Density data were also determined from saturation analyses which yielded a B(max) of 2170 fmol/mg. Additionally, K(i) values were calculated in competition studies for various unlabelled mu-, delta- and kappa-opioid receptor ligands to isolate their site of action. Highly selective antagonists for mu-, delta- and kappa-opioid receptors yielded nearly identical K(i) values against [3H]naloxone.

Receptor binding and G-protein activation by new Met5-enkephalin-Arg6-Phe7 derived peptides

Met5-enkephalin-Arg6-Phe7 (Tyr-Gly-Gly-Phe-Met-Arg-Phe, MERF) is a naturally occurring heptapeptide that binds to opioid and non-opioid recognition sites in the central nervous system. Four synthetic analogs with single or double amino acid substitutions were prepared by solid phase peptide synthesis to achieve proteolytically more stable structures: Tyr-D-Ala-Gly-Phe-Met-Arg-Phe (I), Tyr-D-Ala-Gly-Phe-D-Nle-Arg-Phe (II), Tyr-D-Ala-Gly-Phe-L-Nle-Arg-Phe (III) and Tyr-Gly-Gly-Phe-L-Nle-Arg-Phe (IV). In this study receptor binding characteristics and G-protein activation of MERF and its derivatives were compared in crude membrane fractions of frog and rat brain. Synthetic MERF-derived peptides were potent competitors for [3H]MERF and [3H]naloxone binding sites with the exception of analog (II) which turned to be substantially less active. The presence of 100 mM NaCl or 100 microM 5'-guanylylimidodiphosphate, Gpp(NH)p, decreased the affinity of the peptides in [3H]naloxone binding assays, suggesting that these ligands might act as agonists at the opioid receptors. Some of the compounds were also used to stimulate guanosine-5'-O-(3-[gamma-[35S]thio)triphosphate ([35S]GTPgammaS) binding in rat and frog brain membranes at concentrations of 10(-9)-10(-5) M. The EC50 values of analog (II) were the highest in both tissues. Analog (I) was as effective as MERF in rat brain membranes, but showed lower maximal stimulation in frog brain preparation. Again, analog (II) seemed to be the least efficacious peptide that stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding only by 59%. Specificity of the peptides was further investigated by the inhibition of agonist-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding in the presence of selective antagonists for the opioid receptor types. The mu-selective antagonist cyprodime displayed the lowest potency in inhibiting the effects of the peptides, whereas norbinaltorphimine (kappa-selective antagonist) and naltrindole (delta-selective antagonist) were quite potent in both tissues. We concluded that MERF and its derivatives are able to activate G-proteins mainly via kappa- and delta-opioid receptors.

Characterization of [3H]-diprenorphine binding in Rana pipiens: observations of filter binding enhanced by naltrexone

Initial studies were undertaken to examine the properties of [3H]-diprenorphine binding to Rana pipiens whole brain tissue using naltrexone for the definition of nonspecific binding. Saturation analysis demonstrated the binding of [3H]-diprenorphine to be saturable with a K(D) value of 0.65 nM and a Bmax value of 287.7 fmol/mg protein. Unlabeled diprenorphine dose-dependently displaced [3H]-diprenorphine from a single noninteractive site in competition studies which yielded a Ki of 0.22 nM. However, control studies in the absence of tissue revealed significant binding of [3H]-diprenorphine to the filter alone. Interestingly, [3H]-diprenorphine in the presence of unlabeled naltrexone as well as with unlabeled naloxone showed significantly greater binding to the filter than did [3H]-diprenorphine alone. Given this observation of increased nonspecific binding, an artificially low Bmax value would be expected. It is our hypothesis that the unlabeled nonspecific drug forms a complex with [3H]-diprenorphine preventing it from being effectively washed through the filter or the unlabeled drug itself is blocking the flow of [3H]-diprenorphine through the filter. The latter is unlikely however as other binding studies done in our lab using the radioligand [3H]-naloxone with unlabeled naltrexone do not show significant binding to the filter.