PNU-96391A (OSU6162) antagonizes the development of behavioral sensitization induced by dopamine agonists in a rat model for Parkinson's disease

Analysis of the actions of the novel dopamine receptor-directed compounds (S)-OSU6162 and ACR16 at the D2 dopamine receptor

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE; The two phenylpiperidines, OSU6162 and ACR16, have been proposed as novel drugs for the treatment of brain disorders, including schizophrenia and Huntington's disease, because of their putative dopamine stabilizing effects. Here we evaluated the activities of these compounds in a range of assays for the D(2) dopamine receptor in vitro.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

The affinities of these compounds for the D(2) dopamine receptor were evaluated in competition with [(3) H]spiperone and [(3) H]NPA. Agonist activity of these compounds was evaluated in terms of their ability to stimulate [(35) S]GTPγS binding.

KEY RESULTS

Both compounds had low affinities for inhibition of [(3) H]spiperone binding (pK(i) vs. [(3) H]spiperone, ACR16: <5, OSU6162: 5.36). Neither compound was able to stimulate [(35) S]GTPγS binding when assayed in the presence of Na(+) ions, but if the Na(+) ions were removed, both compounds were low-affinity, partial agonists (E(max) relative to dopamine: ACR16: 10.2%, OSU6162:54.3%). Schild analysis of the effects of OSU6162 to inhibit dopamine-stimulated [(35) S]GTPγS binding indicated Schild slopes of ∼0.9, suggesting little deviation from competitive inhibition. OSU6162 was, however, able to accelerate [(3) H]NPA dissociation from D(2) dopamine receptors, indicating some allosteric effects of this compound.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

The two phenylpiperidines were low-affinity, low-efficacy partial agonists at the D(2) dopamine receptor in vitro, possibly exhibiting some allosteric effects. Comparing their in vitro and in vivo effects, the in vitro affinities were a reasonable guide to potencies in vivo. However, the lack of in vitro-in vivo correlation for agonist efficacy needs to be further addressed.

LINKED ARTICLES

This article is part of a themed section on Analytical Receptor Pharmacology in Drug Discovery. To view the other articles in this section visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.2010.161.issue-6.

Effects of the dopamine stabilizers (S)-(-)-OSU6162 and ACR16 on prolactin secretion in drug-naive and monoamine-depleted rats

Dopaminergic stabilizers may be conceptualized as drugs with normalizing effects on dopamine-mediated behaviours and neurochemical events. (S)-(-)-OSU6162 (OSU6162) and ACR16 are two structurally related compounds ascribed such properties, principally because of their stabilizing effects on motor activity in rodents. Reports in the literature indicate possible partial D2 receptor agonist effects using various in vitro systems. This study aimed to measure D2 receptor antagonist and agonist effects of OSU6162 and ACR16 in vivo. To address this, we have studied the effects of both compounds on prolactin secretion in drug-naive and dopamine-depleted rats; dopamine depletion was induced by pretreatment with reserpine plus α-methyl-DL: -p-tyrosine. We find that OSU6162 and ACR16 both stimulate prolactin secretion in drug-naive rats with OSU6162 being considerably more potent and efficacious. Both compounds show a non-significant trend towards reversal of the increased secretion caused by dopamine depletion, whereas the D2 receptor antagonist haloperidol further increased prolactin secretion. Thus, this study suggests that OSU6162 and ACR16 act as D2 receptor antagonists under normal conditions in vivo, possibly with minor agonist effects in a state of dopamine depletion.

The dopaminergic stabilizers pridopidine (ACR16) and (-)-OSU6162 display dopamine D(2) receptor antagonism and fast receptor dissociation properties

A new pharmacological class of CNS ligands with the unique ability to stimulate or suppress motor and behavioral symptoms depending on the prevailing dopaminergic tone has been suggested as "dopaminergic stabilizers". The molecular mode-of-action of dopaminergic stabilizers is not yet fully understood, but they are assumed to act via normalization of dopaminergic signaling, through interactions with the dopamine D(2) receptor. Here we have evaluated the dopaminergic stabilizers pridopidine (ACR16) and (-)-OSU6162, as well as the new compound N-{[(2S)-5-chloro-7-(methylsulfonyl)-2,3-dihydro-1,4-benzodioxin-2-yl]methyl}ethanamine (NS30678) in a series of cellular in vitro dopamine D(2) receptor functional and binding assays. Neither ACR16, (-)-OSU6162, nor NS30678 displayed detectable dopamine D(2) receptor-mediated intrinsic activity, whereas they concentration-dependently antagonized dopamine-induced responses with IC(50) values of 12.9microM, 5.8microM, and 7.0nM, respectively. In contrast to the high-affinity typical antipsychotics haloperidol and raclopride, the dopaminergic stabilizers ACR16 and (-)-OSU6162 both displayed fast dopamine D(2) receptor dissociation properties, a feature that has previously been suggested as a contributing factor to antipsychotic atypicality and attributed mainly to low receptor affinity. However, the finding that NS30678, which is equipotent to haloperidol and raclopride, also displays fast receptor dissociation, suggests that the agonist-like structural motif of the dopaminergic stabilizers tested is a critical dissociation rate determinant. The results demonstrate that dopaminergic stabilizers exhibit fast competitive dopamine D(2) receptor antagonism, possibly allowing for temporally variable and activity-dependent dopamine D(2) receptor occupancy that may partly account for their unique stabilization of dopamine dependent behaviors in vivo.

Pharmacological treatment of Parkinson's disease: life beyond dopamine D2/D3 receptors?

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a multisystemic disorder in which several neurotransmitters other than dopamine are affected. Drugs acting on non-dopaminergic systems are envisaged as promising agents to treat PD and levodopa-induced dyskinesias (LID). However, compounds targeting glutamate, adenosine, noradrenaline, 5-hydroxytryptamine, cannabinoid, and opioid transmitter systems have been assessed in human studies showing negative, inconsistent or unsatisfactory results. Most of these drugs had been tested previously in 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine-lesioned monkeys, as well as in the classic 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rat model. These failures raise several questions and concerns about the true reliability of animal studies, the adequacy of the working hypotheses and design of clinical trials, the validity of tools in current use to evaluate a particular effect, and the selectivity of the drugs used. More importantly, observed discrepancies between the results in models and patients, could challenge the validity of current ideas about the pathophysiology of parkinsonism and LID.

A new application of pre-normalized principal component analysis for improvement of image quality and clinical diagnosis in human brain PET studies—Clinical brain studies using [11C]-GR205171, [11C]-l-deuterium-deprenyl, [11C]-5-Hydroxy-l-Tryptophan, [11C]-l-DOPA and Pittsburgh Compound-B

Principal component analysis (PCA) is one of the most applied multivariate image analysis tool on dynamic Positron Emission Tomography (PET). Independent of used reconstruction methodologies, PET images contain correlation in-between pixels, correlations in-between frame and errors caused by the reconstruction algorithm including different corrections, which can affect the performance of the PCA. In this study, we have investigated a new approach of application of PCA on pre-normalized, dynamic human PET images. A range of different tracers have been used for this purpose to explore the performance of the new method as a way to improve detection and visualization of significant changes in tracer kinetics and to enhance the discrimination between pathological and healthy regions in the brain. We compare the new results with the results obtained using other methods. Images generated using the new approach contain more detailed anatomical information with higher quality, precision and visualization, compared with images generated using other methods.

The Dopamine Stabilizers (S)-(-)-(3-Methanesulfonyl-phenyl)-1-propyl-piperidine [(-)-OSU6162] and 4-(3-Methanesulfonylphenyl)-1-propyl-piperidine (ACR16) Show High in Vivo D2Receptor Occupancy, Antipsychotic-Like Efficacy, and Low Potential for Motor Side Effects in the Rat

"Dopamine stabilizers" are a new class of compounds that have the ability to reverse both hypo- as well as hyperdopaminergia in vivo. This class, exemplified by the phenylpiperidines (S)-(-)-3-(3-methanesulfonyl-phenyl)-1-propyl-piperidine [(-)-OSU6162] and 4-(3-methanesulfonyl-phenyl)-1-propyl)-piperidine [ACR16] although lacking high in vitro binding affinity for dopamine D2 receptor [(-)-OSU6162, Ki = 447 nM; ACR16, Ki > 1 microM], shows functional actions, suggestive of their interaction. Hence, we evaluated in vivo D2 occupancy of these agents in rats and correlated it to observed effects in a series of behavioral, neurochemical, and endocrine models relevant to the dopamine system and antipsychotic effect. Both (-)-OSU6162 and ACR16 showed robust dose-dependent striatal D2 occupancy with ED50 values of 5.27 and 18.99 mg/kg s.c., respectively, and functional assays showed no partial agonism. Over an occupancy range of 37 to 87% (3-60 mg/kg) for (-)-OSU6162 and 35 to 74% (10-60 mg/kg) for ACR16, we observed both inhibitory (amphetamine-induced locomotor activity) and stimulatory effects (in habituated rats). Haloperidol, over a similar occupancy range (33-78%), potently inhibited psychostimulant activity and induced catalepsy, but it failed to activate habituated animals. In the conditioned avoidance response assay, ACR16 was clearly more efficacious than (-)-OSU6162. In addition, both these compounds demonstrated significant preferential Fos induction in the nucleus accumbens compared with the dorsolateral striatum, a strong predictor of atypical antipsychotic efficacy. The results suggest that dopamine stabilizers exhibit locomotor stabilizing as well as antipsychotic-like effects, with low motor side effect liability, in a dose range that corresponds to high D2 in vivo occupancy.

Hypertrophy of medial globus pallidus and substantia nigra reticulata in 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats treated with L-DOPA: Implication for L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia in Parkinson's disease

The medial globus pallidus plays a crucial role in generation of L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia in patients with Parkinson's disease. The 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rat exhibiting behavioral sensitization to L-DOPA is one useful animal model for examining L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia. To determine neuropathological abnormality responsible for behavioral sensitization, the medial globus pallidus and the substantia nigra reticulata in 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats treated with L-DOPA were examined. Intermittent L-DOPA treatment induced hypertrophy of the lesioned-side of medial globus pallidus and substantia nigra reticulata of 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats with behavioral sensitization to L-DOPA. Additionally, coadministration of a 5-HT1A receptor agonist, 8-hydroxy-2(di-n-propylamino)tetralin with L-DOPA, alleviated the hypertrophy with improvement of the behavioral sensitization. These results suggest that hypertrophy of the medial globus pallidus and substantia nigra reticulata is associated with induction of behavioral sensitization to L-DOPA in 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats. Therefore, neuropathological changes corresponding to hypertrophy might underlie L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Recent failures of new potential symptomatic treatments for Parkinson's disease: causes and solutions

One major goal of current research in Parkinson's disease (PD) is the discovery of novel agents to improve symptomatic management. The object of these new treatments should be to provide effective symptom control throughout the course of the disease without the development of side effects such as motor and psychiatric complications. Results of several clinical trials of new treatment options reported in the past 2 years have shown negative or unsatisfactory results. Most of the drugs and surgical procedures used in these studies had been tested previously in 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) monkeys as well as in the classic 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rat model. They raise several questions about the true reliability of animal studies, the adequacy of the working hypotheses and design of clinical trials, the validity of tools in current use to evaluate a specific effect, and the selectivity of the drugs used. All these factors may explain failure. This review focuses on pharmacological and surgical treatments tested to improve the management of patients with motor fluctuations and dyskinesias. Some of the recent trials and possible reasons for their lack of success are critically analysed. Finally, some suggestions to avoid further failures and improve results are proposed.