5-HT(1A) and 5-HT(1B/1D) receptors are involved in the modulation of the trigeminovascular system of the cat: a microiontophoretic study

Effects of somatostatin, a somatostatin agonist, and an antagonist, on a putative migraine trigger pathway

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether somatostatin (SST) could be a cortico-brainstem neurotransmitter involved in producing the headache of migraine.

BACKGROUND

There is evidence to support the idea that a cortico-brainstem-trigeminal nucleus neuraxis might be responsible for producing migraine headache; we have suggested that SST may be one of the neurotransmitters involved.

METHODS

Rats were anesthetised and prepared for recording neurons in either the periaqueductal gray matter (PAG) or nucleus raphe magnus (NRM), as well as the trigeminal nucleus caudalis (TNC). The dura mater and facial skin were stimulated electrically or mechanically. SST, the SST agonist L054264 and the SST antagonist CYN54806 were injected intravenously, by microinjection, or by iontophoresis into the PAG or NRM. Cortical neuronal activity was provoked by cortical spreading depression (CSD) or light flash (LF) and was monitored by recording cortical blood flow (CBF).

RESULTS

Intravenous injection of SST: (a) selectively decreased the responses of TNC neurons to stimulation of the dura, but not skin, for up to 5 h; (b) decreased the ongoing discharge rate of TNC neurons while simultaneously increasing the discharge rate of neurons in either brainstem nucleus and; (c) prevented, or reversed, the effect of CSD and LF on brainstem and trigeminal neuron discharge rates. CSD and LF decreased the discharge rate of neurons in both brainstem nuclei and increased the discharge rate of TNC neurons. These effects were reversed by L054264 and mimicked by CYN54806. Injections of L054264 into the PAG or NRM reduced the response of TNC neurons to dural stimulation and skin stimulation differentially, depending on the nucleus injected. Injections of CYN54806 into either brainstem nucleus potentiated the responses of TNC neurons to dural and skin stimulation, but without a marked differential effect.

CONCLUSIONS

These results imply that SST could be a neurotransmitter in a pathway responsible for migraine pain.

Naratriptan Has a Selective Inhibitory Effect on Trigeminovascular Neurones at Central 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B/1D Receptors in the Cat: Implications for Migraine Therapy

The triptans are agonists at serotonin(5-HT) 1B/1D receptors; however, they are also active at 5-HT1A and 5-HT1F receptors. We conducted this series of experiments to further elucidate the site of action of naratriptan using a well-established animal model of trigeminovascular stimulation. Following electrical stimulation of the superior sagittal sinus of the cat, single cell responses ( n = 83) were recorded in the trigeminal nucleus caudalis. Most cells (91%) also responded to electrical and mechanical stimulation of cutaneous or mucosal facial receptive fields. The micro-iontophoretic application of naratriptan resulted in a significant suppression of the response to sagittal sinus stimulation (response suppressed by 47 ± 4%, P < 0.001). The effect of naratriptan was significantly attenuated by application of either the 5-HT1B/1D receptor antagonist GR-127935 ( P < 0.001) or the 5-HT1A antagonist WAY-100635 ( P < 0.05). The response of single cells to receptive field stimulation was also suppressed by microiontophoretic application of naratriptan, but by only 20 ± 3%. Intravenous administration of naratriptan resulted in a similar selective suppression of sagittal sinus vs. receptive field responses in trigeminal neurones. These results indicate that naratriptan has a central effect in the trigeminovascular system, selectively inhibiting afferent activity in craniovascular neurones, via both 5-HT1B/1D and 5-HT1A receptors.

Stimulation of dural vessels excites the SI somatosensory cortex of the cat via a relay in the thalamus

Aim

We carried out experiments in cats to determine the thalamo-cortical projection sites of trigeminovascular sensory neurons.

Methods

1) We stimulated the middle meningeal artery (MMA) with C-fibre intensity electrical shocks and made field potential recordings over the somatosensory cortical surface. 2) We then recorded neurons in the ventroposteromedial (VPM) nucleus of the thalamus in search of neurons which could be activated from the skin, MMA and superior sagittal sinus. 3) Finally, we attempted to antidromically activate the neurons found in stage 2 by stimulating the responsive cortical areas revealed in stage 1.

Results

VPM neurons received trigeminovascular input, input from the V1 facial skin and could also be activated by electrical stimulation of the somatosensory cortex. VPM neurons activated from the cortex responded with short and invariant latencies (6.7 ± 7.7 msec mean and SD). They could follow high rates of stimulation and sometimes showed collision with orthodromic action potentials.

Conclusions

We conclude that somatosensory (SI) cortical stimulation excites trigeminovascular VPM neurons antidromically. In consequence, these VPM neurons project to the somatosensory cortex. These findings may help to explain the ability of migraineurs with headache in the trigeminal distribution to localise their pain to a particular region in this distribution.

Orexin 1 Receptor Activation Attenuates Neurogenic Dural Vasodilation in an Animal Model of Trigeminovascular Nociception

The pathophysiology underlying the pulsating quality of the pain of a migraine attack is not fully understood, although trigeminal vascular afferents containing the sensory neuropeptide calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) must have a role. Antimigraine drugs, such as triptans, serotonin 5-hydroxytryptamine(1B/1D) receptor agonists, reproducibly block neurogenic vasodilation associated with CGRP release. We examined the effects of the hypothalamic neuropeptides orexin A and orexin B on neurogenic dural vasodilation, dissecting out the receptor pharmacology with the novel orexin 1 (OX1) receptor antagonist N-(2-methyl-6-benzoxazolyl)-N''-1,5-naphthyridin-4-yl urea (SB-334867). Electrical stimulation of dural afferents (50-300 microA) resulted in reproducible dural vasodilation of 136 +/- 9%. Orexin A 30 microg kg(-1), but not 3 and 10 microg kg(-1), inhibited the dilation brought about by electrical stimulation over 60 min and maximally after 15 min by 60% (t7= 7.138; P < 0.001; n = 8). This response was reversed by pretreatment with the OX1 receptor antagonist SB-334867. Addition of CGRP(8-37) at the point of maximal effect of orexin A produced a further significant decrease in neurogenic dural vasodilation compared with orexin A only. CGRP administration (1 microg kg(-1)) produced a reproducible dural blood vessel dilation of 145 +/- 7% that was not inhibited by intravenous administration of orexin A (30 microg kg(-1)). Orexin B had no significant effect even at the highest dose. The current study demonstrates that orexin A is able to inhibit neurogenic dural vasodilation via activation of the OX1 receptor, resulting in inhibition of prejunctional release of CGRP from trigeminal neurons.

Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Antagonists as Treatments of Migraine and Other Primary Headaches

Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is a potent neuromodulator that is expressed in the trigeminovascular system and is released into the cranial circulation in various primary headaches. CGRP is released in migraine, cluster headache and paroxysmal hemicrania. The blockade of its release is associated with the successful treatment of acute migraine and cluster headache. CGRP receptor blockade has recently been shown to be an effective acute anti-migraine strategy and is non-vasoconstricting in terms of the mechanism of action. The prospect of a non-vasoconstricting therapy for acute migraine offers a real opportunity to patients, and perhaps more importantly, provides a therapeutic rationale to reinforce migraine as a neurological disorder.

Preclinical neuropharmacology of naratriptan

The basic CNS neuropharmacology of naratriptan is reviewed here. Naratriptan is a second-generation triptan antimigraine drug, developed at a time when CNS activity was thought not to be relevant to its therapeutic effect in migraine. It was, however, developed to be a more lipid-soluble, more readily absorbed and less readily metabolized variant on preexisting triptans and these variations conferred on it a higher CNS profile. Naratriptan is a 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonist with a highly selective action on migraine pain and nausea, without significant effect on other pain or even other trigeminal pain. Probable sites of therapeutic action of naratriptan include any or all of: the cranial vasculature; the peripheral terminations of trigeminovascular sensory nerves; the first-order synapses of the trigeminovascular sensory system; the descending pain control system; and the nuclei of the thalamus. Naratriptan may prevent painful dilatation of intracranial vessels or reverse such painful dilatation. Naratriptan can prevent the release of sensory peptides and inhibit painful neurogenic vasodilatation of intracranial blood vessels. At the first order synapse of the trigeminal sensory system, naratriptan can selectively suppress neurotransmission from sensory fibers from dural and vascular tissue, while sparing transmission from other trigeminal fibers, probably through inhibition of neuropeptide transmitter release. In the periaqueductal gray matter and in the nucleus raphe magnus, naratriptan selectively activates inhibitory neurons which project to the trigeminal nucleus and spinal cord and which exert inhibitory influences on trigeminovascular sensory input. Naratriptan has also a therapeutic effect on the nausea of migraine, possibly exerting its action at the level of the nucleus tractus solitarius via the same mechanisms by which it inhibits trigeminovascular nociceptive input. The incidence of naratriptan-induced adverse effects in the CNS is low and it is not an analgesic for pain other than that of vascular headache. In patients receiving selective serotonin uptake inhibitors (SSRIs) naratriptan may cause serotonin syndrome-like behavioral side effects. The mechanism of action involved in the production of behavioral and other CNS side effects of naratriptan is unknown.

Nitrergic and glutamatergic neuronal mechanisms at the trigeminovascular first-order synapse

Nitric oxide (NO) donors such as glyceryl trinitrate cause headache, which suggests involvement of NO in trigeminovascular sensory processing. Sensory transmission at first-order synapses is believed to involve glutamate and the question arises as to whether it is also involved in trigeminovascular sensation and whether it might interact with nitrergic mechanisms. We investigated these questions at the first central synapse in the trigeminovascular sensory system of the cat. Neuronal action potentials in the trigeminal nucleus were recorded while the superior sagittal sinus (SSS) or facial receptive field (RF) were stimulated electrically. Drugs, including the neuronal excitant glutamate, were applied to neurons via microiontophoresis. Results were obtained from 152 neurons activated with A-delta latencies by SSS stimulation and by glutamate. The NO donor S-nitrosoglutathione (SNOG, 50 nA) was applied iontophoretically to 41 neurons during SSS stimulation and 13 neurons during pulsatile glutamate ejection. Responses to both modes of stimulation were enhanced by SNOG; the proportion of neurons enhanced was 56% to SSS stimulation and 59% to glutamate. The inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase (NOS), N(omega)-propyl-L-arginine (p-ARG, 50 nA) was applied iontophoretically to 17 neurons during stimulation of SSS and to 10 neurons during pulsatile glutamate ejection. Responses to both stimuli were suppressed by p-ARG: The proportion of neurons suppressed were: to SSS stimulation 59% and to glutamate 80%. Microiontophoretic ejection of eletriptan (50 nA) reversibly suppressed responses of neurons to SSS stimulation, to RF electrical stimulation and to pulsatile iontophoretic application of glutamate. This suppression of responses was antagonised by the concurrent local iontophoretic application of the 5-HT1B/1D receptor antagonist GR127935 or by concurrent iontophoretic application of the selective 5-HT1D receptor antagonist BRL155732. These results suggest that glutamatergic mechanisms are important in sensory transmission in the trigeminovascular system and that they can be modulated by nitrergic and serotonergic mechanisms.

The 5-hydroxytryptamine1B/1D/1F receptor agonists eletriptan and naratriptan inhibit trigeminovascular input to the nucleus tractus solitarius in the cat

Migraine pain arises in the trigeminovascular system and is often associated with nausea and sometimes with vomiting. In this study, an in vivo cat model of trigeminovascular stimulation was used to determine first whether there is a functional connection between the trigeminovascular system and the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS), which is involved in regulating vomiting, and second whether anti-migraine drugs have any effect on such a connection. Chloralose-anaesthetised cats (n=16) were prepared for single neuron recording. The superior sagittal sinus (SSS) was isolated and stimulated electrically. The brainstem near the obex was exposed and a metal microelectrode equipped with six glass barrels for microiontophoresis was placed in the NTS. Recordings were made from 44 NTS neurons which responded to SSS stimulation with A-delta latencies. Iontophoretic ejection (50 nA) of eletriptan or naratriptan suppressed the response in 75% (15/20) and 78% (11/14) of cells and caused an average suppression of cell firing of 42+/-5% (n=20) and 54+/-8% (n=14), respectively. This suppression could be antagonized by the concurrent ejection (20-50 nA) of the 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor antagonist GR127935. We conclude that activation of the trigeminovascular system excites cells in the NTS that can be inhibited by eletriptan and naratriptan through activation of 5-HT(1B/1D) receptors. It is possible that in patients having a migraine attack trigeminovascular activation triggers nausea and vomiting, and that the alleviation of these symptoms by anti-migraine compounds may be via an action at 5-HT(1B/1D) receptors in the NTS.

5-HT1F receptor agonists in acute migraine treatment: a hypothesis

Serotonin-1F receptor (5-HT1F) agonists may relieve acute migraine without vasoconstriction. We conducted a review of preclinical and clinical data that assessed the potential link between migraine and 5-HT1F activation. (i) A high correlation exists between the potency of various 5-HT1 receptor agonists in the guinea pig dural plasma protein extravasation assay and their 5-HT1F receptor binding affinity. (ii) 5-HT1F receptors are on the trigeminal system, and may participate in blocking migraine pain transmission through the trigeminal ganglion and nucleus caudalis. (iii) 5-HT1F receptors are located on glutamate-containing neurones and their activation might inhibit glutamate release; glutamate excess may play a role in migraine. (iv) Selective 5-HT1F receptor agonists (LY334370; LY344864) are effective in preclinical migraine models and are non-vasoconstrictive. (v) LY334370 is effective in acute migraine, and does not cause any symptoms/signs of coronary vasoconstriction. Preclinical experiments and clinical observations argue for a role of selective 5-HT1F agonists in migraine.

Evidence for serotonin (5-HT)1B, 5-HT1D and 5-HT1F receptor inhibitory effects on trigeminal neurons with craniovascular input

Development of serotonin (5HT(1B/1D)) agonists for the acute attack of migraine resulted in considerable interest in their action. The superior sagittal sinus (SSS) was isolated in alpha-chloralose (60 mg/kg, i.p. and 20 mg/kg i.v.i. supplementary 2 hourly) anaesthetised cats. The SSS was stimulated electrically (100 V, 250 micros duration, 0.3 Hz) and neurons of the trigeminocervical complex monitored using electrophysiological methods. To test 5-HT(1B) receptor-mediated activity common carotid blood flow (CCF) was monitored with a transonic flow probe placed around the vessel. Naratriptan (5-HT(1B/1D/1F) receptor agonist) and alniditan (5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonist) produced reductions in carotid blood flow of 38+/-5% and 42+/-6%, respectively. These effects were attenuated by the 5-HT(1B) receptor antagonist SB224289 (P<0.05). LY344864 (5-HT(1F) receptor agonist) had no effect on CCF. Naratriptan inhibited SSS-evoked activity (61+/-7%), an effect partially inhibited by the 5-HT(1B) receptor antagonist SB224289 (30+/-5%), or by the 5-HT(1D) receptor antagonist BRL-15572 (37+/-6%). There remained an inhibitory effect of naratriptan after both 5-HT(1B) and 5-HT(1D) receptor blockade (22+/-5%). Alniditan inhibited SSS-evoked trigeminal activity (53+/-6%), an effect abolished after 5-HT(1B) and 5-HT(1D) receptor blockade. LY344864 (5-HT(1F) receptor agonist) inhibited SSS-evoked trigeminal activity (28+/-5%), an effect unaltered by either SB224289 or BRL-15572. It can be concluded that there are inhibitory 5-HT(1B), 5-HT(1D) and 5-HT(1F) receptors in the trigeminocervical complex of the cat. 5-HT(1B) receptor-mediated inhibition is the most potent of the three in terms of inhibition of trigeminovascular nociceptive traffic.

Suppression by eletriptan of the activation of trigeminovascular sensory neurons by glyceryl trinitrate

The effect of intracarotid arterial infusions of glyceryl trinitrate (GTN), a substance known to precipitate vascular headache, on the spontaneous activity of trigeminal neurons with craniovascular input was studied in cats. Cats were anaesthetised with alpha-chloralose, immobilised and artificially ventilated. The superior sagittal sinus (SSS) was isolated and stimulated electrically. Facial receptive fields (RF) were also stimulated. Single neurons were recorded from the trigeminal nucleus caudalis with a metal microelectrode equipped with six glass barrels for microiontophoresis. Infusions of GTN were administered via a catheter inserted retrogradely into the common carotid artery through the lingual artery. Infusions of GTN (mean rate 19+/-7, range 5-100 microg kg(-1) min(-1), in a volume of 2 ml min(-1)) increased the spontaneous discharge rate of second-order neurons which received dural and facial sensory input to 429+/-80% of control. Iontophoretic application of the 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonist eletriptan (50 nA) at the peak of the response decreased the discharge rate of neurons towards pre-GTN control levels. In the presence of continuous iontophoretic application of the 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor antagonist GR127935, the decrease in discharge rate caused by eletriptan was antagonised. We conclude (1) that GTN activates craniovascular sensory pathways at a site at, or peripheral to, the second-order neuron and that such an action may account for at least the acute-onset headache induced by GTN and (2) that the antimigraine agent eletriptan is able to selectively suppress noxious sensory information from the dura, induced by GTN, via an action at 5-HT(1B/1D) receptors.

The role of 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D receptors in the selective inhibitory effect of naratriptan on trigeminovascular neurons

The importance of 5-HT(1B) and 5-HT(1D) receptors in the actions of the anti-migraine drug naratriptan was investigated using the relatively selective 5-HT(1) receptor ligands SB224289 and BRL15572. Electrical stimulation of the superior sagittal sinus (SSS) in cats activated neurones in the trigeminal nucleus caudalis. Facial receptive fields (RF) were also electrically stimulated to activate the same neurones. Responses of these neurones to SSS stimulation were suppressed by iontophoretic application of naratriptan (5-50 nA). There were two distinct populations of neurones in the nucleus--those in deeper laminae in which the responses to SSS and RF stimulation were equally suppressed by naratriptan ('non-selective') and more superficial neurones in which only the SSS responses were suppressed by naratriptan ('selective'). Concurrent micro-iontophoretic application (50 nA) of the 5-HT(1D) antagonist BRL15572 antagonised the suppression by naratriptan of the response of 'selective' cells to SSS stimulation. Iontophoretic application of SB224289 (50 nA), a 5-HT(1B) antagonist, antagonised the suppression by naratriptan of responses of 'non-selective' cells to RF stimulation and, to a lesser extent, also antagonised the suppression of responses to SSS stimulation. Intravenous administration of SB224289 antagonised the suppression only of RF responses of "non-selective" neurons by naratriptan and intravenous administration of BRL15572 antagonised the suppression only of SSS responses of "selective" neurons by naratriptan. These results suggest that the response of nucleus caudalis neurons to stimulation of the sagittal sinus can be modulated by both 5-HT(1B) and 5-HT(1D) receptor activation, with the 5-HT(1D) receptors perhaps playing a greater role. The response to RF stimulation is more influenced by 5-HT(1B) receptor modulation with 5-HT(1D) receptors being less important. Therefore, this suggests that selective 5-HT(1D) agonists may be able to target the neuronal population, which is selectively involved in the transmission of dural inputs. We conclude that the central terminals of trigeminal primary afferent fibres contain 5-HT(1B) and 5-HT(1D) receptors. Primary afferents from the dura mater may predominantly express 5-HT(1D) receptors, while facial afferents may predominantly express 5-HT(1B) receptors. Activation of 5-HT(1D) receptors in particular may be important in the anti-migraine effect of naratriptan.