Antiphospholipid antibodies other than lupus anticoagulant and anticardiolipin antibodies in women with recurrent pregnancy loss, fertile controls, and antiphospholipid syndrome

[Seronegative antiphospholipid syndrome: Myth or reality?]

The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by thrombosis and/or obstetrical manifestations and the persistent presence, at least 12 weeks apart, of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) such as lupus anticoagulant (LA) and/or anticardiolipin antibodies (ACL) and/or anti-β2 glycoprotein I antibodies (aβ2GPI). The finding of patients with clinical profile highly suggestive of APS but who are negative for conventional biological criteria has led to the concept of seronegative APS. In the last few years, new antigen targets and methodological approaches have been employed to more clearly identify this syndrome in patients with thrombosis or obstetrical complications without conventional aPL. Although seronegative APS is still controversial, there is increasing recognition of the existence of this subgroup. However, clinical relevance of non conventional aPL need to be confirmed by efforts toward standardizing new biological tools and longitudinal studies involving large cohort of patients.

Antiphosphatidylserine antibodies and reproductive failure

Some cases of reproductive failure with autoimmune background are characterized by the involvement of autoantibodies. This occurs mainly in patients having systemic lupus erythematosus or antiphospholipid syndrome. The autoantibodies associated with reproductive failure include: a) antibodies which directly bind phospholipid (e.g., cardiolipin, phosphatidylserine, phosphatidylethanolamine); b) antiphospholipid Abs which bind the phospholipid via phospholipid-binding glycoproteins such as b2glycoprotein-I, annexin V and prothrombin; c) autoantibodies directed to laminin-I, actin, thromboplastin, the corpus luteum, prolactin, poly (ADP-ribose), thyroglobulin and mitochondrial antibodies of the M5 type. This paper will focus on the association of antiphosphatidylserine autoantibodies and reproductive failure. Future studies are likely to help to identify peptides resembling the epitope specificities associated with the specific clinical manifestations.

Recurrent Miscarriage Syndrome and Infertility Due to Blood Coagulation Protein/Platelet Defects: A Review and Update

Three-hundred fifty-one women were referred for thrombosis and hemostasis evaluation after suffering recurrent miscarriages. All patients were referred by a high-risk obstetrician or reproductive medicine specialist after anatomic, hormonal or chromosomal defects had been ruled out. These patients were assessed over a three year period. The mean patient age at referral was 34 years and the mean number of miscarriages was 2.9 (2-9). All patients underwent a thorough evaluation for thrombophilia and, when indicated, a hemorrhagic disorder. Of the 351 patients, 29 (8%) had no defect. Of the remaining 322 patients, 7 (2%) had a bleeding disorder: 3 with platelet dysfunction, 1 with Factor XIII deficiency, 3 with von Willebrand’s and 3 with Osler-Weber-Rendu. The remainder of the patients had a thrombophilia as follows: 195 (60%) had antiphospholipid syndrome, 64 (20%) had Sticky Platelet Syndrome, 38 (12%) had MTHFR mutation, 23 (7.1%) had PAI-1 polymorphism, 12 (3.7%) had Protein S deficiency, 12 (3.7%) had Factor V Leiden, 3 (1%), had AT deficiency, 3 (1%) had Heparin-Cofactor II deficiency, 3 (1%) had TPA deficiency, and 6 (2%) had Protein C deficiency. There were a total of 364 defects found in the 312 patients harboring thrombophilia; thus, several harbored two and a few harbored three separate defects. All patients with thrombophilia were treated with preconception ASA at 81 mg/day with the immediate post-conception addition of heparin or LMW heparin (Dalteparin). Both ASA and heparin/LMW heparin were used to term. The first 120 patients were treated with unfractionated heparin at 5,000 U every 24 hours, subcutaneously and the last 192 have been treated with Dalteparin at 5,000 U/day subcutaneously. The patients with MTHFR were also treated with folate at 5 mg/day + pyridoxine at 50 mg/day. All patients were carefully monitored with CBC and platelet counts, anti-Xa levels, frequent ultrasounds and physical exams. Only 2 of the thrombophilia patients suffered another miscarriage; all others had a normal term delivery. There were no pregnancy-related thromboses, no delivery complications and no episodes of post-partum thrombosis. The only bleeding consisted of 1-4 cm bruises at injection sites. No episodes of thrombocytopenia (HIT) were noted. In our experience, thrombophilia is a common cause of recurrent miscarriage and all patients with no anatomical, hormonal or chromosomal defect should be evaluated for thrombophilia or a bleeding disorder. The success rate of normal term delivery in these 312 patients was 94% using ASA + heparin or Dalteparin. In addition, side effects of therapy were minimal.

Association of anticardiolipin, antiphosphatidylserine, anti-β2 glycoprotein I, and antiphosphatidylcholine autoantibodies with canine immune thrombocytopenia

Background

In humans, the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) is frequently found in immune thrombocytopenia. The present study investigated whether aPL and any aPL subtypes are associated with canine thrombocytopenia, in particular, immune-mediated thrombocytopenia (immune thrombocytopenia) that usually manifests with severe thrombocytopenia.

Results

Sera were collected from 64 outpatient dogs with thrombocytopenia (Group I, platelet count 0 – 80 × 10³/uL), and 38 of which having severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 30 × 10³/uL) were further divided into subgroups based on the presence of positive antiplatelet antibodies (aPLT) (subgroup I_A, immune thrombocytopenia, n =20) or the absence of aPLT (subgroup I_B, severe thrombocytopenia negative for aPLT, n =18). In addition, sera of 30 outpatient dogs without thrombocytopenia (Group II), and 80 healthy dogs (Group III) were analyzed for comparison. Indirect ELISAs were performed to compare serum levels of aPL subtypes, including anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL), antiphosphatidylserine antibodies (aPS), antiphosphatidylcholine (aPC), and anti-β₂ glycoprotein I antibodies (aβ₂GPI), and antiphosphatidylinositol antibodies (aPI), among different groups or subgroups of dogs. Among outpatient dogs, aCL, being highly prevalent in outpatient dogs with thrombocytopenia (63/64, 98 %), is an important risk factor for thrombocytopenia (with a high relative risk of 8.3), immune thrombocytopenia (relative risk 5.3), or severe thrombocytopenia negative for aPLT (relative risk ∞, odds ratio 19). In addition, aPS is a risk factor for immune thrombocytopenia or severe thrombocytopenia negative for aPLT (moderate relative risks around 2), whereas aPC and aβ₂GPI are risk factors for immune thrombocytopenia (relative risks around 2).

Conclusions

Of all the aPL subtypes tested here, aCL is highly associated with canine thrombocytopenia, including immune thrombocytopenia, severe thrombocytopenia negative for aPLT, and less severe thrombocytopenia. Furthermore, aPS is moderately associated with both canine immune thrombocytopenia and severe thrombocytopenia negative for aPLT, whereas aβ₂GPI, and aPC are moderately relevant to canine immune thrombocytopenia. In contrast, aPI is not significantly associated with canine immune thrombocytopenia.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12917-016-0727-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Clinical significance of nonspecificity of antiphospholipid antibodies in recurrent abortions and unexplained infertility

Background:

Antiphospholipid antibodies (APLA) are acquired autoantibodies directed to phospholipids which are associated with slow progressive thrombosis and infarction of placenta. Infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss may occur because of impaired trophoblast function, placental infarction, and abnormal blood clotting.

Aim:

To evaluate APLA (IgG and IgM) in cases of infertility and recurrent abortions.

Materials and Methods:

A prospective study comprising 70 subjects was carried out. Fifty cases of unexplained infertility and recurrent abortions (25 each) constituted the study group. Twenty healthy multipara females of same reproductive age group constituted the control group. Venous blood samples were collected, and serum was analyzed for two types of APLA (IgG and IgM) by ELISA method.

Results:

The mean IgM and IgG levels in recurrent abortions group were 8.10 MPL-U/ml and 6.17 GPL-U/ml, respectively whereas in control group, the levels were 4.67 MPL-U/ml and 4.53 GPL-U/ml, respectively. The difference was statistically nonsignificant. The mean IgM and IgG levels in unexplained infertility group were 7.30 MPL-U/ml and 6.12 GPL-U/ml, respectively whereas in control group, the levels were 4.67 MPL-U/ml and 4.53 GPL-U/ml, respectively. Again the difference was statistically nonsignificant.

Conclusions:

The present study concludes that there is no significance of raised APLA in cases of infertility and recurrent abortions.

Antiphospholipid syndrome and the relevance of antibodies to negatively charged phospholipids in diagnostic evaluation

The presence of lupus anticoagulant, moderate-to-high levels of IgG and/or IgM antibodies to beta-2 glycoprotein I or cardiolipin in association with at least one of the two major clinical manifestations (thrombosis and/or pregnancy-related morbidity) are required for a diagnosis of definite antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). The realization that certain negatively charged phospholipid (PL) autoantibodies broadly react with antibodies directed against cardiolipin and may be more reliable and specific markers for APS has led to the search for diagnostic assays with greater predictability for disease evaluation and management. This review focuses on the state-of-the-art analytical and clinical performance of IgG and IgM antibodies directed against negatively charged PLs, specifically phosphatidic acid (aPA), phosphatidylinositol (aPI), and phosphatidylserine (aPS), as well as the APhL assay, which contains a proprietary mixture of phospholipid antigens.

"New" antigenic targets and methodological approaches for refining laboratory diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome

Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) are a heterogeneous group of antibodies directed against phospholipids or protein/phospholipid complexes. Currently, aPLs are assessed using either "solid-phase" assays that identify anticardiolipin antibodies and anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies or "liquid-phase" assay that identifies lupus anticoagulant. However, in the last few years, "new" antigenic targets and methodological approaches have been employed for refining laboratory diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). In this review the potential diagnostic value of antibodies to domains of β2-GPI, prothrombin/phosphatidylserine, vimentin/cardiolipin, protein S, protein C, annexin A2, annexin A5, and phospholipid antigens is discussed. Moreover, new technical approaches, including chemiluminescence, multiline dot assay, and thin layer chromatography (TLC) immunostaining, which utilize different supports for detection of aPL, have been developed. A special focus has been dedicated on "seronegative" APS, that is, those patients with a clinical profile suggestive of APS (thromboses, recurrent miscarriages, or foetal loss), who are persistently negative for the routinely used aPL. Recent findings suggest that, in sera from patients with SN-APS, antibodies may be detected using "new" antigenic targets (mainly vimentin/cardiolipin) or methodological approaches different from traditional techniques (TLC immunostaining). Thus, APS represents a mosaic, in which antibodies against different antigenic targets may be detected thanks to the continuously evolving new technologies.

14th International Congress on Antiphospholipid Antibodies Task Force report on obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome

Pregnancy morbidity is one of the clinical manifestations used for classification criteria of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). During the 14th International Congress on Antiphospholipid Antibodies (aPL), a Task Force with internationally-known experts was created to carry out a critical appraisal of the literature available regarding the association of aPL with obstetric manifestations present in actual classification criteria (recurrent early miscarriage, fetal death, preeclampsia and placental insufficiency) and the quality of the evidence that treatment(s) provide benefit in terms of avoiding recurrent adverse obstetric outcomes. The association of infertility with aPL and the effectiveness of the treatment of patients with infertility and positive aPL was also investigated. This report presents current knowledge and limitations of published studies regarding pregnancy morbidity, infertility and aPL, identifying areas that need better investigative efforts and proposing how critical flaws could be avoided in future studies, as suggested by participants of the Task Force. Except for fetal death, there are limitations in the quality of the data supporting the association of aPL with obstetric complications included in the current APS classification criteria. Recommended treatments for all pregnancy morbidity associated to APS also lack well-designed studies to confirm its efficacy. APL does not seem to be associated with infertility and treatment does not improve the outcomes in infertile patients with aPL. In another section of the Task Force, Dr. Jane Salmon reviewed complement-mediated inflammation in reproductive failure in APS, considering new therapeutic targets to obstetric APS (Ob APS).

Pregnancy and thrombophilia

The physiological changes that occur during pregnancy create a hypercoagulable milieu. This hypercoagulable state is thought to be protective, especially at the time of labor, preventing excessive hemorrhage. The presence of hereditary or acquired causes of thrombophilia during pregnancy tilts the balance in favor of unwanted venous thromboembolism and adverse pregnancy outcomes due to vascular uteroplacental insufficiency. These adverse pregnancy outcomes include recurrent pregnancy losses, intrauterine fetal death, intrauterine growth retardation, preeclampsia and placental abruption. Much of the current data with regards to the association of the different thrombophilias and pregnancy-related complications are based on retrospectively designed studies. This lack of randomization, in-homogeneity of patient populations, varying case definitions, selection biases and inadequately matched control populations, have given rise to conflicting data with regard to screening for, and treatment of, pregnant women with suspected thrombophilias. The limited data that we have support the use of anticoagulant drugs for the prevention of pregnancy-related complications in the setting of thrombophilia. Heparin and low-molecular-weight heparins are the anticoagulant drugs of choice as they do not cross the placental barrier and, hence, do not cause fetal anticoagulation or teratogenicity. Warfarin can be used from the 12th week of gestation onwards but is preferably reserved for the postpartum period.

Seronegative antiphospholipid syndrome

APS is an autoimmune disease that leads to arterial and/or venous thrombosis, recurrent pregnancy loss and persistently positive aPLs. Patients with clinical manifestations highly suggestive of APS but persistently negative conventional aPLs are classified as having seronegative APS. Ongoing research has revealed the existence of non-criteria antibodies proposed to be relevant to APS and that can be potentially included in the disease's classification criteria. We present a literature review on the most promising antibodies of this heterogeneous aPL family, which includes antibodies to a zwitterionic phospholipid, namely phosphatidylethanolamine, phospholipid-binding plasma proteins, phospholipid-protein complexes and anionic phospholipids other than cardiolipin. Although these molecules can increase the diagnostic yield of APS, their clinical relevance is still debatable and needs to be confirmed by interlaboratory efforts toward standardizing diagnostic tools, in addition to experimental data and larger longitudinal studies.

'Non-criteria' aPL tests: report of a task force and preconference workshop at the 13th International Congress on Antiphospholipid Antibodies, Galveston, TX, USA, April 2010

Abstract: Current classification criteria for definite APS recommend the use of one or more of three positive standardized laboratory assays, including anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL), lupus anticoagulant (LA), and antibodies directed to β(2)glycoprotein I (anti-β(2)GPI) to detect antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) in the presence of at least one of the two major clinical manifestations (i.e., thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity) of the syndrome. Several other autoantibodies shown to be directed to phospholipids and/or their complexes with phospholipids and/or to proteins of the coagulation cascade, as well as a mechanistic test for resistance to annexin A5 anticoagulant activity, have been proposed to be relevant to APS. A task force of worldwide scientists in the field discussed and analyzed critical questions related to 'non-criteria' aPL tests in an evidence-based manner during the 13th International Congress on Antiphospholipid Antibodies (APLA 2010, 13-16 April 2010, Galveston, Texas, USA). This report summarizes the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of this task force.

Prevalence of anticardiolipin antibodies in pregnancies with history of repeated miscarriages

AIM

This study aimed at evaluating the prevalence of high anticardiolipin antibody and lupus anticoagulant levels in women with histories of at least two miscarriages.

METHODS

The presence of high anticardiolipin antibody and lupus anticoagulant levels were evaluated in 52 patients with ages between 17 and 41 (mean 26.7 years old) who had histories of repeated miscarriages.

RESULTS

High anticardiolipin antibody levels were identified in 55.77% and lupus anticoagulant levels in 2% of the individuals.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, women who suffer from repeated miscarriages present with a high prevalence of anticardiolipin antibodies. Further studies on this issue are crucial as these antibodies are associated with hypercoagulability and thus increased the risk of thromboembolic events.

Prevalence and significance of antiphospholipid antibodies in selected at-risk obstetrics cases: a comparative prospective study

In a prospective comparative study we screened 112 women with a past history either of pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, recurrent abortion, IUGR, IUFD or abruptio placentae, with no apparent aetiology and a demographically matched cohort of 106 women having a past history of uncomplicated pregnancy outcome for the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and their significance. In the former group, the prevalence of aPL ranged from 10-46.87% compared with 8.49% in the later group. In women with the presence of aPL, the incidence of pre-eclampsia, early onset pre-eclampsia and abruptio placentae were 25%, 14.58% and 18.75%, respectively. In the same group, the abortion rate was 25% and live-birth rate was 64.58% with IUFD rate of 10.42%. Fetal morbidity rates were also higher in the mothers with aPL positivity, the incidence of IUGR was 27.08% and oligohydramnios was 33.33% in them. All these complications were statistically significant when compared with those of aPL negative mothers.

Clinical relevance of multiple antibody specificity testing in anti-phospholipid syndrome and recurrent pregnancy loss

We wanted to evaluate whether testing for anti-phosholipid antibodies other than anti-cardiolipin (aCL) and anti-beta-2 glycoprotein I (abeta2GPI) immunoglobulin (Ig)G and IgM identifies patients with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) who may be positive for anti-phospholipid syndrome (APS). In a cross-sectional study comprising 62 patients with APS, 66 women with RPL, 50 healthy blood donors and 24 women with a history of successful pregnancies, we tested IgM and IgG antibodies to phosphatidic acid, phosphatidyl choline, phosphatidyl ethanolamine, phosphatidyl glycerol, phosphatidyl inositol and phosphatidyl serine with and without beta-2 glycoprotein I (beta2GPI) from a single manufacturer as well as aCL and abeta2GPI antibodies. Diagnostic accuracies of individual and combined anti-phospholipid (aPL) assays were assessed by computing sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values and negative predictive values together with their 95% confidence intervals. There was a general trend for increased sensitivities in the presence of beta2GPI co-factor with significant effect for certain specificities. The overall combined sensitivity of the non-recommended aPL assays was not significantly higher than that of the aCL and aB2GPI tests. Multiple aPL specificities in RPL group is not significantly different from controls and therefore of no clinical significance.

A protocol for determination of anticardiolipin antibodies by ELISA

The anticardiolipin (aCL) test has been widely used by physicians since the mid-1980s for diagnosing patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Establishment of this diagnosis has enabled effective management of patients with recurrent thrombosis or recurrent pregnancy losses. The test was first established in 1983 as a radioimmunoassay and soon thereafter converted into ELISA. There have been numerous efforts to standardize the aCL test, but precise reproducible measurement of aCL levels is difficult and the use of semiquantitative measurements (high, medium and low) is recommended as this is probably sufficient for clinical diagnosis. Using validated ELISAs for measuring aCL Abs offers greater reproducibility, would reduce interlaboratory variations and limit discrepancies in results between different laboratories. This article details a procedure that takes approximately 2 h and summarizes the information available on the aCL ELISA test.

Controversies and unresolved issues in antiphospholipid syndrome pathogenesis and management

While much is understood concerning the clinical features of patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), many issues remain. The proper designation of patients with "definite" APS and the correct categorization of patients by both laboratory and clinical features are matters of ongoing debate. Recent proposals have identified new subsets of patients who have many typical features of APS but either do not fit the criteria for a "definite" diagnosis or have initially negative laboratory tests for antiphospholipid antibodies. Meanwhile, decisions about laboratory tests are based on expert opinion, rather than the results of controlled trials. As for treatment, many guidelines are offered, but few are backed by data from strong clinical trials. This article summarizes the clinical questions remaining to be answered and debates concerning pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management.

Antiphospholipid syndrome in pregnancy

During the past 5 years the author and his colleagues have assessed carefully 351 women referred for evaluation of thrombosis and hemostasis after they had suffered recurrent miscarriages. This article describes the flow protocol the author and associates follow to maximize success and keep the costs of evaluation of recurrent miscarriage syndrome/infertility at a minimum while providing the best chances for defining a cause and thus providing optimal therapy for successful term pregnancy outcome. It presents the outcomes of the author's protocol and those of others in treating women who have antiphospholipid syndrome and who have suffered recurrent miscarriages.

Lupus anticoagulant and antibodies to β2-glycoprotein I, annexin V, and cardiolipin as a cause of recurrent spontaneous abortion

The prevalence of lupus anticoagulant (LAC), anticardiolipin (ACA), anti-beta(2) glycoprotein I (beta(2)GPI), and antiannexin V antibodies were determined in 200 recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA) patients and 200 age-matched control women. ACA IgG was associated with early, while antiannexin V IgG and LAC were associated with late, and ACA IgG, antiannexin V IgG, and LAC were associated with combined early + late RSA, thereby recommending inclusion of their screening in RSA workout.

Antiphospholipid syndrome and thrombosis

The antiphospholipid syndrome is an autoimmune condition in which venous or arterial thrombosis is a primary clinical feature. The other primary clinical feature is adverse pregnancy outcome, specifically recurrent miscarriage, fetal death, or preterm delivery due to severe preeclampsia or placental insufficiency. The diagnostic autoantibodies for antiphospholipid syndrome are lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin, or anti-beta2-glycoprotein I.

Management of the antiphospholipid syndrome

Antiphospholipid antibodies are associated with a hypercoagulable state leading to a wide variety of systemic manifestations and obstetric complications. The different pathologic manifestations can be a result of arterial and venous thrombosis, microthrombotic angiopathy, embolization, obstetric disease, and non-thrombotic phenomenon. Presently, the treatment centers on anticoagulation. Two randomized prospective studies in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome with initial thromboembolic event support the target international normalized ratio of 2.0 to 3.0 for the prevention of future thrombotic events. With pregnancy, the combination of aspirin and heparin is still the standard of care. In addition, non-thrombotic features and any associated autoimmune disease may need to be treated. Underlying risk factors precipitating the thromboembolic phenomenon need to be addressed as well.

Antiphospholipid Syndrome: Review

Antiphospholipid syndrome spans many medical disciplines. Classic criteria include the presence of anticardiolipin antibody or lupus anticoagulant with typical complications of thrombosis or pregnancy loss. Other common associated manifestations include livedo reticularis, thrombocytopenia, valvular heart disease, and nephropathy with renal insufficiency, hypertension, and proteinuria. Treatment of serious complications with anticoagulation is standard; generally warfarin for thrombosis and aspirin/heparin for pregnancy prophylaxis. Detailed recommendations regarding precise intensity and duration of anticoagulation are still a subject of debate.

Evaluation of fusogenic trophoblast surface epitopes as targets for immune contraception

Syncytial trophoblast fusion is an essential step in the process of implantation. This project is aimed at the immunological inhibition of syncytial trophoblast fusion as a novel approach to contraception. Fusion-inhibiting recombinant antibodies were generated and used together with autoantibodies from patients with repetitive in vitro fertilization (IVF) failure that were shown to inhibit syncytial fusion and are expected to inhibit implantation, to generate anti-idiotypic peptides. These peptides mimic trophoblast epitopes essential for syncytial fusion and are, therefore, considered specific immunogens for the generation of antibodies that will inhibit implantation. To verify their physiological role in humans, 300 anti-idiotypic peptides were tested for their binding capacity to patient autoantibodies associated with repetitive IVF failure, habitual abortion and preeclampsia. Of these, only three peptides were found to selectively bind to autoantibodies of patients with repetitive IVF failure and were considered safe and efficient enough for evaluation in preclinical and clinical studies required for the development of immune contraceptives. When used as immunogens, these peptides are expected to elicit an antibody response inhibiting syncytial fusion and thus implantation. Furthermore, the action of these antibodies needs to be restricted to the stage of syncytium formation at the time of implantation so as not to cause complications of pregnancy in those cases where they fail to have a contraceptive effect. To exclude potential side effects on other systems, toxicological experiments in animals are in progress.

Thrombophilias and recurrent pregnancy loss: a critical appraisal of the literature

Thrombophilias are suggested to play a role in recurrent miscarriage. The aim of this study was to evaluate the literature of the past 10 years regarding the association between thrombophilias and recurrent miscarriage. We concluded that there is a large variety in applied study methodology. Therefore, we defined criteria for an adequate study on the relationship of thrombophilias on recurrent pregnancy loss: (i) no exclusion criteria for patients or at least the same criteria for patients and controls; (ii) a clear definition of the gestational age at previous losses; (iii) a well-described control group; (iv) clear description of the test methods and moment of testing; and (v) a clear description of the (non) significant differences or odds ratio between cases and controls. Eleven out of 69 studies fulfilled these criteria. Their results show significant higher serum homocysteine levels among women with a history of recurrent miscarriage. No relation was found between recurrent miscarriage and the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C667T mutation. No relation was observed for the levels of antithrombin, protein C and protein S. Seven studies on the association of factor V Leiden (FVL) and/or pathologic activated protein C ratio (pAPCR) showed that FVL may play a role in second trimester losses, as do antiphospholipid antibodies. Studies on the prothrombin gene mutation yielded conflicting results. Consequently, large prospective studies according to the aforementioned criteria are needed to establish if there is a relationship between thrombophilias and recurrent miscarriage at all. At present, there is only justification for testing for homocysteine levels, antiphospholipid antibodies and FVL in women with a history of recurrent miscarriage.

Association of anticardiolipin antibody and C677T in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase mutation in women with recurrent spontaneous abortions: a new path to thrombophilia?

CONTEXT

Recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA) has been associated with venous thrombosis in the mother. Acquired and inherited thrombophilia factors are possible causes.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between thrombogenic factors and recurrent spontaneous abortion.

TYPE OF STUDY

Case-control study.

SETTING

Centro de Atenção Integral à Saúde da Mulher, Universidade Estadual de Campinas.

METHODS

40 ml of blood was collected from 88 women attending an RSA clinic and 88 fertile women attending a family planning clinic, to evaluate the presence of acquired and inherited thrombophilia factors. Anticardiolipin antibodies (ACA), lupus anticoagulant and deficiencies of proteins C and S and antithrombin III were evaluated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), dilute Russell Viper Venom time (dRVVT), coagulometric and chromogenic methods. DNA was amplified by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to study factor V Leiden and G20210A mutations in the prothrombin gene and C677T mutation in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene. Data were analyzed using odds ratios and a regression model for age adjustment. Fishers exact test was used to evaluate statistical relationships between associated factors and RSA.

RESULTS

ACA was detected in 11 women with RSA and one fertile woman. Heterozygous C677T was detected in 59 women with RSA and 35 fertile women. Concomitant presence of ACA and C677T was found in eight women with RSA and no fertile women (p < 0.01).

DISCUSSION

The meaning of the association between C677T mutation in the MTHFR gene and ACA is still not clear. It is possible that an inherited factor that alone would not strongly predispose a woman to thrombosis could, when associated with an acquired factor, start the process and increase the likelihood of thrombosis expression.

CONCLUSIONS

ACA and C677T in the MTHFR gene are statistically associated with RSA. The association of these two conditions is a new finding in thrombogenic factors and RSA.

Current debates in antiphospholipid syndrome: the acquired antibody-mediated thrombophilia

Antiphospholipid (APL) syndrome is the most common form of acquired thrombophilia. It can cause significant morbidity and even mortality. The term "APL antibodies" represents a heterogeneous group of antibodies associated with this disorder. Currently no single assay can identify every APL antibody. Clinically relevant APL antibodies are mainly anticardiolipin antibodies (ACA) detected by solid phase enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and lupus anticoagulants (LA) demonstrated by in vitro coagulation assay. However, there are some other antibodies associated with the APL syndrome (i.e., subgroup APL antibodies). ACAs, LAs, and subgroup APL antibodies represent intersecting, but non-identical, subsets of autoantibodies. Thus, those autoantibodies may coexist or may occur independently. Any organ system and any size of vessel can be affected during the clinical course of the disease. Therefore, the APL syndrome can manifest itself in a wide variety of clinical thrombotic features. Fetal loss and pregnancy morbidity represent a specific challenge. Despite tremendous advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis of APL syndrome during the past decade, the mainstay of management is still anticoagulation. However, there is no general agreement regarding the duration and intensity of anti-coagulant therapy. In this review, we focused on the current dilemmas and their present clarifications in the wide clinicopathologic spectrum of APL syndrome and APL antibody-related distinct pathologic conditions.

Immunologic manipulation for the threatened fetus

Management of the pregnant woman with the antiphospholipid syndrome (APLS) has improved over the last 10 years. The recurrent pregnancy loss that is associated with this disease is managed with prophylactic low dose aspirin and heparin therapy. This therapy leads to a 40% absolute risk reduction in pregnancy loss. However, many women still fail to deliver a live infant despite this therapy so immunologic manipulation of the mother's disease in this group needs to be considered. Intravenous immunoglobulin and plasma exchange may have a role. New immunosuppressive drugs such as tacrolimus have yet to be tried. Monoclonal antibodies to B cells, B-cell growth factors, complement proteins and integrin molecules, all of which appear to play a role in the disease process, may also offer patients some hope. Similarly, biologics such as C1 esterase inhibitor protein, cell surface complement regulator proteins or interleukin-3 need to be tried given their efficacy in models of antibody-induced cell injury.

Assessing the variation in antiphospholipid antibody (APA) assays: comparison of results from 10 centers

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to determine the variability of antiphospholipid antibody (APA) assay results of cardiolipin and other frequently tested phospholipids. Study design Ten centers performing APA assays submitted samples that were positive in their assay. Twenty samples were identified to cover a broad range of APA results. Samples were distributed to the 10 participating centers for evaluation of immunoglobulin G (IgG), IgM, and IgA antibodies to phospholipids.

RESULTS

Of 20 patients, 9 (45%) were identified as positive by all 10 centers and 2 of 20 patients (10%) were identified as positive by 8 or 9 centers. However, 9 of 20 samples (45%) returned with mixed results. The average percent of positive samples was 29%, but results from the 10 centers ranged from a low number of positives (13%) to a high number of (37%).

CONCLUSION

When considering a clinical diagnosis of APA syndrome, laboratory concordance of results from 20 patient samples among the 10 centers was only 55%. However, when considering a single phospholipid of a single immunoglobulin isotype, agreement of test results was 83.8%. Isolated positive APA results should be correlated with the clinical history and confirmed by repeat testing.

Autoimmune disease in pregnancy: systemic lupus erythematosus and antiphospholipid syndrome

Autoimmune diseases most commonly occur in women of childbearing age. Although some conditions such as ankylosing spondylitis are more common in men, over 70% of individuals with autoimmune diseases are women. This article focuses on SLE,which is often considered to be the "classic" autoimmune disease,and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), which is associated with pregnancy loss and placental insufficiency.

Antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with lupus nephritis

The aim of this study was to compare the prevalence of anticardiolipin antibodies with other types of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) (antiphosphatidylserine--aPS, antiphosphatidylinositol--aPI, antiphosphatidylethanolamine--aPE) in patients with lupus nephritis and to find if the examination of a panel of various aPL is valuable for further diagnosis of patients. Additionally we determined the levels of autoantibodies against beta2-glycoprotein I (beta2GPI) and oxidized low-density lipoprotein (anti-oxLDL) and also investigated the relationship between antibodies against beta2GPI and oxLDL, which were assessed by ELISA methods. Twenty-two patients with lupus nephritis were studied. The control group consisted of 62 healthy blood donors. A statistically significant higher occurrence of all aPLs in the patients with lupus nephritis in comparison to the control group was found. The prevalence of polyspecific antibodies, which reacted with at least two various phospholipids, was 82% in the group of SLE patients. Significantly higher levels of IgG anti-beta2GPI in the sera of SLE patients (p = 0.0003) was detected. The levels of anti-oxLDL in the sera of the patients group did not differ significantly from the control one. Some positive samples for anti-beta2GPI and negative for aCL or anti-oxLDL and vice versa were found. It ca be concluded that the production of aPL including anti-beta2GPI and anti-oxLDL in the lupus nephritis patients is higher in comparison with healthy blood donors. We assume that the estimation of various types of aPL may be important in the selection of the group patients with renal diseases. The synthesis of aPL can reflect the spreading of the autoimmune response for several antigens modified on the vessel wall.

Therapeutic Potential of Toleragens in the Management of Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Autoantibodies to beta2-glycoprotein I (beta2GPI) are believed to be the primary cause of coagulation abnormalities in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Clinical features include a range of life-threatening thrombotic events and microangiopathies affecting multiple organ systems. Current standard of care relies on long-term, high-intensity anticoagulation and is associated with a high risk for serious bleeding events. The relation between autoantibodies and the pathophysiology of APS is not clearly understood, but numerous in vitro studies have characterized the effects of antiphospholipid autoantibodies on various components of the coagulation cascade, including tissue factor and the protein C pathway. The fine specificity of autoantibodies to beta2GPI is a subject of considerable debate; however, a body of evidence may offer resolution by integrating concepts of antibody affinity and assay sensitivity with carefully designed molecular studies. An investigational new therapy for APS is based on the approach that pathogenic antibodies may be reduced via depletion of circulating autoantibodies and induction of immune tolerance at the B-cell level. Preliminary results from a phase I/II clinical trial with LJP 1082, a B-cell toleragen, indicate the drug was well tolerated and may warrant further development for reduction of thrombotic events in patients with APS.

Thrombophilia and pregnancy

Pregnancy is hypercoagulable state. The field of thrombophilia; the tendency to thrombosis, has been developed rapidly and has been linked to many aspects of pregnancy. It is recently that severe pregnancy complications such as severe preeclampsia intrauterine growth retardation abruptio placentae and stillbirth has been shown to be associated with thrombophilia. Recurrent miscarriage and has also been associated with thrombophilia. Finally, thromboembolism in pregnancy as in the non-pregnant state is linked to thrombophilia. In this review all aspects of thrombophilia in pregnancy are discussed, and also all prophylactic and therapeutic implications.

Autoimmune disease as a cause of reproductive failure

High-risk pregnancy is the most common clinical association with antiphospholipid antibodies; the principal manifestations are pregnancy loss and early preeclampsia. Membership in this family of antibodies is continually growing and includes antibodies against a variety of phospholipids, phospholipid-protein complexes, and phospholipid-binding proteins. The current information in the literature is inadequate to clearly implicate a subgroup of antiphospholipid antibodies or a particular pathophysiologic mechanism as being responsible for poor pregnancy outcomes. It is clear, however, that prevalent diagnostic tests for LA and aCL are extremely useful to identify many of these patients, but are inadequate for diagnosis of all patients with autoimmune pregnancy loss or to elucidate the pathophysiology. Many patients who present clinically with autoimmune-like pregnancy complications currently are negative in tests for LA or aCL, but have antibodies against annexin V, phosphatidylserine, or other relevant antigens. The greatest risk for a complicated pregnancy is conveyed by a subgroup of antibodies that affect the normal function of placental trophoblast. As clinical laboratory tests designed to detect more members of the antiphospholipid antibody family become available, understanding of this complicated disease (APS) will increase.

Immune testing in fertility practice: truth or deception?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Much attention has been paid to the role of immunology in reproductive success or failure. Every step in the establishment of normal pregnancy has been implicated as a possible site of immune-mediated reproductive failure. The widespread testing of antiphospholipid, antinuclear, antithyroid, and antisperm antibodies, as well as generalized immune testing, have thus been employed to diagnose patients with otherwise unexplained infertility or recurrent pregnancy loss. Controversial data surrounding the widespread and variable use of immune testing in current fertility practice is reviewed to determine which tests are warranted based on sound scientific evidence. Because it is postulated that early miscarriage, when occult, could represent a failure of embryo implantation indistinguishable from unexplained infertility, this analysis of immune testing includes a discussion of patients with recurrent pregnancy loss.

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite the increased prevalence of abnormal immune testing associated with early reproductive failure, the most rigorous studies have not proven a cause and effect between these phenomena. There is wide variation and inconsistency regarding this association, depending upon which test(s) are employed, the study methodology used, and the patient population under study. The significance of selected immunological test abnormalities associated with early reproductive failure is uncertain.

SUMMARY

Great variability exists in identifying candidates for immune testing, determining which tests to order, interpreting the test results, and offering immunologic treatments. This review argues that the use of widespread immune testing in clinical practice can not be supported by existing data. The resulting therapies are similarly of unconfirmed benefit and may cause harm.

Antiphospholipid antibodies: discovery, definitions, detection and disease

Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) are immunoglobulins of IgG, IgM and IgA isotypes that target phospholipid (PL) and/or PL-binding plasma proteins. Detection of aPL in the laboratory is done currently by both immunoassays and functional coagulation tests. Convention defines aPL specificity in immunoassays according to the particular PL substrate present, for example aPS represents antiphosphatidylserine antibodies. This may be technically incorrect inasmuch as a particular PL may be responsible for binding and highly concentrating a specific plasma protein, the latter then becomes the target for the aPL. The binding of beta(2)GP-I (apolipoprotein H) to the negatively charged PL, cardiolipin (CL) provides a good example of this circumstance. In contrast, aPL which specifically prolong coagulation times in in vitro are called lupus anticoagulants (LA). The precise PL target(s) of the aPL responsible for LA activities are unknown and often debated. The persistent finding of aPL in patients in association with abnormal blood clotting and a myriad of neurological, obstetrical and rheumatic disorders often compounded by autoimmune diseases has led to an established clinical diagnosis termed antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). The common denominator for these APS patients is the presence of circulating aPL on two or more occasions and the observation of events attributable to abnormal or accelerated blood clotting somewhere in vivo. The purpose of this review is to collect, collate, and consolidate information concerning aPL.

Antiphospholipid antibodies (APA) and recurrent pregnancy loss: treating a unique APA positive population

BACKGROUND

Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) has been associated with antiphospholipid antibodies (APA) including anticardiolipin and lupus anticoagulant. Therapy using heparin and aspirin has been shown to significantly improve the live birth rate. We evaluated whether other APA should be considered as a basis for treatment in women with RPL. We also assessed the efficacy of heparin and aspirin therapy compared with aspirin alone in these women.

METHODS

A two-centred, prospective, cohort evaluation of 79 women with two or more consecutive pregnancy losses who underwent a complete evaluation for RPL that was negative except for positive APA. Women with RPL and APA to cardiolipin (CL), phosphatidyl serine (PS) and/or lupus anticoagulant (LAC) treated with heparin and aspirin (group 1) were compared with those with other positive APA (to phosphatidyl inositol, phosphatidyl glycerol and/or phosphatidyl ethanolamine) treated with heparin or aspirin (group 2) or treated with aspirin alone (group 3).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in patients' demographics between groups. There were 19 viable infants born to 25 women (76%) in group 1, 18 viable infants born to the 28 women (64%) in group 2, and 12 viable infants born to the 26 women (46%) in group 3. Only the comparison between group 1 and group 3 reached statistical significance (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

APA other than CL, PS and LAC may be associated with RPL.

Risk factors in miscarriage: a review

Miscarriage is one of the most frequent problems in human pregnancy. The most widely accepted definition is that proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 1977. The incidence among clinical pregnancies is about 12-15% but including early pregnancy losses it is 17-22%. The only two etiologic factors recognized by all authors are uterine malformations and parental balanced chromosomal rearrangements. There have been many other suggested risk factors. In this revision we discuss these.

Thrombophilia and pregnancy loss

Thrombophilia is defined as a tendency to thrombosis. The association between specific thrombophilic defects--both inherited and acquired--and pregnancy loss is a rapidly developing field. However, apart from antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), an acquired thrombophilic defect, the role of other defects in the haemostatic pathways remains to be established. In this invited review we discuss the recent advances in our understanding of aPL related pregnancy loss, the association between genetic thrombophilic mutations and pregnancy outcome and the role of whole blood haemostasis testing in the investigation of women with recurrent miscarriage.

Update on the management of the pregnant patient with antiphospholipid antibody

Management of the pregnant patient with antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) is reviewed, with emphasis on recent randomized controlled clinical trials. These support the use of subcutaneous heparin and low dose aspirin, current standard therapy for women with aPL and a history of fetal loss. Prednisone is rarely used due to high risk of maternal and fetal morbidity. Intravenous immunoglobulin may represent an important additional therapy for women who fail aspirin and heparin. Patients with a history of thrombosis require full, therapeutic anticoagulation during pregnancy. Recommendations are less clear for newly described antibodies to phospholipid-binding protein, for low titer antibodies, and for infertility treatment in the setting of aPL.

A literature review on the antiphospholipid syndrome and the effect on childbearing

OBJECTIVE

to review the literature on antiphospholipid antibodies and their significance to midwifery practice.

METHOD

databases using the keywords anticardiolipin antibodies, antiphospholipid antibodies, lupus antibodies, antiphospholipid syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosis, pregnancy loss, pre-eclampsia were searched, 548 articles were generated and 52 were used in the review.

FINDINGS

anticardiolipin antibodies are detrimental to successful pregnancy being implicated in failure of implantation, loss of the embryo and the fetus. There is also a risk of prematurity, intrauterine growth retardation and neonatal embolism. The risks to the mother are of pre-eclampsia and embolic complications. If diagnosed and treated early in pregnancy with low-dose aspirin and subcutaneous heparin the outlook for a successful pregnancy is much improved.

KEY CONCLUSIONS

much research remains to be undertaken. Researchers need to standardise their criteria so that findings are comparable and larger sample groups are necessary.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

antiphospholipid syndrome is an important disorder and a preventable cause of pregnancy loss. Midwives need to encourage women to persevere with therapy to preserve pregnancy and maybe prevent pre-eclampsia or thrombosis. When pregnancies are lost one of the hardest things is when the parents cannot understand why. Midwives need to understand the syndrome to collaborate with doctors in explaining it and supporting grieving parents.