The role of Certican (everolimus, rad) in the many pathways of chronic rejection

Drug-eluting stents for coronary artery disease in the perspective of bibliometric analysis

Drug-eluting stents (DES) play a crucial role in treating coronary artery disease (CAD) by preventing restenosis. These stents are coated with drug carriers that release antiproliferative drugs within the vessel. Over the past two decades, DES have been employed in clinical practice using various materials, polymers, and drug types. Despite optimizations in their design and materials to enhance biocompatibility and antithrombotic properties, evaluating their long-term efficacy and safety necessitates improved clinical follow-up and monitoring. To delineate future research directions, this study employs a bibliometric analysis approach. We comprehensively surveyed two decades' worth of literature on DES for CAD using the Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC). Out of 5,778 articles, we meticulously screened them based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Subsequently, we conducted an in-depth analysis encompassing annual publication trends, authorship affiliations, journal affiliations, keywords, and more. Employing tools such as Excel 2021, CiteSpace 6.2R3, VOSviewer 1.6.19, and Pajek 5.17, we harnessed bibliometric methods to derive insights from this corpus. Analysis of annual publication data indicates a recent stabilisation or even a downward trend in research output in this area. The United States emerged as the leading contributor, with Columbia University and CRF at the forefront in both publication output and citation impact. The most cited document pertained to standardized definitions for clinical endpoints in coronary stent trials. Our author analysis identifies Patrick W. Serruys as the most prolific contributor, underscoring a dynamic exchange of knowledge within the field.Moreover, the dual chart overlay illustrates a close interrelation between journals in the "Medicine," "Medical," and "Clinical" domains and those in "Health," "Nursing," and "Medicine." Frequently recurring keywords in this research landscape include DES coronary artery disease, percutaneous coronary intervention, implantation, and restenosis. This study presents a comprehensive panorama encompassing countries, research institutions, journals, keyword distributions, and contributions within the realm of DES therapy for CAD. By highlighting keywords exhibiting recent surges in frequency, we elucidate current research hotspots and frontiers, thereby furnishing novel insights to guide future researchers in this evolving field.

Evolutionary perspective of drug eluting stents: from thick polymer to polymer free approach

Background

Introduction of Bare Metal Stents (BMS) was itself a revolutionary step in the history of the medical industry; however, Drug Eluting Stents (DES) maintained its superiority over BMS in every aspect from restenosis rate to late lumen loss. The reason behind the magnanimous position of the DES in the stent market is the degree of improvement with which it evolves. New and better stents come into the market every year, surpassing their predecessors by many folds.

Literature review

This review paper discusses the journey of DES with supporting clinical trials in detail. In the first generation, there were stainless-steel stents with thicker coatings. Although they had superior results compared to BMS, there was still room for improvement. Afterward came the second-generation stents, which had superior metal platforms with thinner struts and thin coatings. The drugs were also changed from Paclitaxel and Sirolimus to Zotrolimus and Everolimus. These stents performed best; however, there was an issue of permanent coating, which remained intact over the stent surface after complete drug elution and started to cause issues in longer-term studies. Hence, an improved version of DES was introduced to these permanent coatings called the third generation of drug eluting stents, which initially utilized biodegradable polymer and ultimately moved towards polymer free drug coatings. This generation has introduced a unique amalgam of technologies to achieve its polymer free coatings; however, researchers have numerous prospects of growth in this field. This review paper highlights the major coups of stent technology evolution from BMS to DES, from thick polymeric coatings to thin coatings and from durable polymers to polymer free DES.

Conclusion

In conclusion, though the medical industry promptly accepted BMS as the best treatment option for cardiovascular diseases; however, DES has provided even better results than BMS. In DES, the first and second generation has ruled the technology for many years and are still on the shelves. Still, the issues aroused due to durable polymer shifted the attention towards biodegradable drug eluting stents, the third generation growing rapidly. But the scientific community has not restricted themselves and is investigating bioresorbable stents that completely eliminate the polymer intervention in drug eluting stent technology.

Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Inhibitors Vs Calcineurin Inhibitors in Chronic Graft Rejection After Lung Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The number of lung transplantations has been rising constantly. However, use of this therapeutic resource is limited by several issues that are difficult to resolve, such as chronic graft rejection and complications secondary to immunosuppression.

METHODS

This systematic review compared mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor immunosuppression associated with low-dose calcineurin inhibitors with isolated calcineurin inhibitor immunosuppression on the new-onset chronic rejection development and mortality 12 months after lung transplantation. Three controlled randomized clinical trials (SHITRIT, NOCTET, and 4EVERLUNG) were selected from electronic databases.

RESULTS

Meta-analysis of the data at 12 months postintervention showed that only 4EVERLUNG assessed chronic graft rejection, with a higher incidence in the control group; however, the difference was not statistically significant (P = .197). Significant data were related to an increase in the number of adverse events (P = .0064) and improved renal function (P < .0001) in the mTOR inhibitor-based scheme. The other outcomes indicated a trend toward greater risk of death and acute graft rejection with the use of mTORs.

CONCLUSIONS

The researchers suggest considering the use of mTOR inhibitors, whose greatest benefit is felt by patients with renal dysfunction, in association with the use of calcineurin inhibitors, because of the imminent risk of death among patients with renal failure.

Everolimus-coated tympanostomy tube on rat tympanic membrane

OBJECTIVES

Everolimus is an immunosuppressant and an antiproliferative macrolide agent which is used for coronary stent coating for local inhibition of in-stent restenosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of everolimus-coated tympanostomy tubes in rat tympanic membrane.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective controlled animal study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-one Sprague-Dawley rats were included in the study. They were bilaterally myringotomized. An everolimus-coated fluoroplastic tympanostomy tube was inserted into one ear of each of the rats (everolimus-coated TT Group; n=21) and a standard fluoroplastic tympanostomy tube was applied to the contralateral ear of the same rats (Standard TT Group; n=21). Tympanic membranes and tubes were routinely examined otomicroscopically every other day for two months. Then the membranes were harvested and evaluated histologically.

RESULTS

In everolimus-coated tubes, the tube obstruction was found to be significantly lower than in standard tubes (p<0.05). The tube extrusion rate was less for everolimus-coated tubes than for standard tubes, but no statistically significant difference was observed between the two tubes. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of otorrhea between two tubes. Histopathological examination under light microscope revealed that everolimus-coated tubes resulted in less fibrosis and less inflammation in tympanic membranes than standard tubes (p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

The study shows the potential role of everolimus-coating of tympanostomy tubes in reducing tube obstruction. In addition, inflammatory reaction and fibrosis were observed to be significantly less with these tubes.

Influence of Everolimus on Steady-State Pharmacokinetics of Cyclosporine in Maintenance Renal Transplant Patients

To investigate possible interactions of the novel immunosuppressant everolimus with cyclosporine, a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalating phase I study was performed. Everolimus regimens (0.75-10 mg/d) were administered for 28 days to stable renal allograft recipients receiving the microemulsion form of cyclosporine. Steady-state cyclosporine profiles were assessed at baseline on day 0 (cyclosporine alone) and on day 21 with everolimus on steady state. By day 21, mean dose-normalized cyclosporine AUC0-12 increased by 15% in patients receiving placebo. In everolimus-treated patients, mean increases in cyclosporine AUC0-12 ranged from 7% to 43%, which were not significantly different across all dosing cohorts including placebo. Linear regression of everolimus AUC on day 21 versus the increase in cyclosporine AUC0-12 yielded a slope not significantly different from a horizontal line (P = ns). In conclusion, these results suggest that steady-state everolimus exposure over the wide range assessed in this study did not affect steady-state cyclosporine pharmacokinetics.

Post-renal transplant surgical complications with newer immunosuppressive drugs: mycophenolate mofetil vs. m-TOR inhibitors

PURPOSE

To compare the incidence of immediate surgical complications after renal transplantation between mycophenolate mofetil (MMF group)-based and mTOR inhibitors (mTOR group)-based immunosuppressive regimens.

METHODS

The preoperative parameters in the recipients, rejection rates and surgical complications within 12 months in the recipients were analyzed in 80 patients who had live related renal transplantation. The immunosuppressive regimen was based on MMF (MMF, prednisolone, cyclosporine) in 40 patients and mTOR inhibitors (sirolimus/everolimus, prednisolone, cyclosporine) in 40 patients.

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Infective complications (urinary tract infections, pulmonary infections and superficial wound infection) occurred in 27.5% (11/40) and 12.5% (5/40) of patients from MMF and mTORI groups, respectively (P = 0.096). Patients in mTORI group had significantly more wound dehiscence (8/40 i.e., 20%) than in MMF group (1/40 i.e., 2.5%) (P = 0.014). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of clinically significant or symptomatic lymphoceles that needed intervention (3 vs. 2). The hospital stay was significantly prolonged in mTORI group mainly because of wound-related problems (35 vs. 24 days).

CONCLUSION

In the post-renal transplant setting, use of mTORI results in significantly higher wound complications compared to that of MMF leading to prolonged hospital stay. There is no significant difference in infective complications or lymphocele incidence between these two immunosuppressive regimens.

The use of everolimus in renal-transplant patients

Despite advances in immunosuppressive therapy, long-term renal-transplantation outcomes have not significantly improved over the last decade. The nephrotoxicity of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) is an important cause of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN), the major driver of long-term graft loss. Everolimus is a proliferation signal inhibitor with a mechanism of action that is distinct from CNIs. The efficacy and tolerability of everolimus in renal-transplant recipients have been established in a wide range of clinical trials. Importantly, synergism between everolimus and the CNI cyclosporine (CsA) permits CsA dose reduction, enabling nephrotoxicity to be minimized without compromising efficacy. Currently, everolimus is being investigated in regimens where reduced exposure CNIs are used from the initial post-transplant period to improve renal function and prevent CAN. By inhibiting the proliferation of smooth muscle cells, everolimus may itself delay the progression or development of CAN. Although everolimus is associated with specific side effects, these can generally be managed. By targeting the main causes of short- and long-term graft loss, everolimus has a key role to play in renal transplantation, which is being explored further in a number of ongoing Phase III–IV trials.

Optimal dosing and duration of oral everolimus to inhibit in-stent neointimal growth in rabbit iliac arteries

BACKGROUND

Everolimus is an orally active derivative of sirolimus. Oral administration of rapamycin is efficacious in the reduction of neointima formation and clinical restenosis; however, its optimal dose and duration have not been determined.

METHODS

New Zealand White rabbits were divided into three groups. The first (low-dose) group received 1.5 mg/kg everolimus 1 day before stenting, followed by 0.75 mg/kg/day everolimus for 28 days. The second (high-dose) group received 6 mg/kg everolimus 1 day before, on the day of, and on the day after stenting, followed by 2 mg/kg/day for 4 days. The third (placebo) group received a matching volume of vehicle similar to that of Group 2. Twenty-eight days after stenting, animals were euthanized and morphometry was performed.

RESULTS

In the high-dose group, circulating everolimus levels corresponded with administrated dose levels; by Day 12, no circulating everolimus could be detected. In the low-dose everolimus group, levels remained constant up to 28 days. When compared with placebo, low-dose everolimus was associated with a significant reduction in medial thickness (32%), neointimal area (60%), and percent stent stenosis (33%); however, high-dose everolimus had no significant effect.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, oral everolimus suppresses in-stent neointimal growth in rabbit iliac arteries. Four weeks of low-dose everolimus is more effective than 7 days of high-dose everolimus.

Everolimus treatment downregulates renocortical cyclooxygenase-2 expression in the rat kidney

Based on recent evidence that renal cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) gene expression is suppressed by immunosuppressive agents such as cyclosporin A (CsA), tacrolimus and dexamethasone, this study aimed to characterize the effect of the new immunosuppressant everolimus on COX-2 expression in the rat kidney. Oral application of everolimus (3 mg kg(-1) day(-1)) to male Sprague-Dawley rats (175-200 g; n=8) for 7 days lowered COX-2 expression in the rat renal cortex and outer medulla, while COX-2 expression in the inner medulla as well as COX-1 expression remained unaltered. Furthermore, everolimus decreased renocortical prostaglandin (PG) E(2) concentration. Everolimus also attenuated the stimulation of renocortical COX-2 expression by furosemide (12 mg day(-1) for 7 days; s.c. via osmotic minipumps), by low salt intake (0.02% NaCl, wt wt(-1)) or by a combination of low salt intake with the AT(1)-receptor antagonist valsartan (30 mg kg(-1) day(-1); oral). In line with these findings, everolimus decreased renocortical PGE(2) concentration during these treatment maneuvers. Everolimus moderately increased natriuresis and diuresis, while the urinary excretion of PGE(2), 6-keto PGF(1alpha) and thromboxane B(2) was decreased. These findings suggest that everolimus inhibits basal and also stimulated expression of renocortical COX-2 and of tissue prostanoid formation. Since inhibition of renal prostanoid formation by everolimus was associated by an increased rather than decreased natriuresis and diuresis, it appears as if everolimus also inhibits tubular salt and water resorption.

Three-year efficacy and safety results from a study of everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil in de novo renal transplant patients

Everolimus 1.5 or 3 mg/day was compared with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 2 g/day in a randomized, multicenter 36-month trial in de novo renal allograft recipients (n = 588) receiving cyclosporine microemulsion (CsA) and corticosteroids. The study was double-blind until all patients had completed 12 months, then open-label. By 36 months, graft loss occurred in 7.2, 16.7 and 10.7% of patients in the everolimus 1.5, 3 mg/day, and MMF groups, respectively (p = 0.0048 for everolimus 1.5 mg/day vs. 3 mg/day); efficacy failure (biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss, death or lost to follow-up) occurred in 33.0, 38.9 and 37.2% of patients (p = 0.455 overall), respectively. Mortality and incidence of BPAR were comparable in all groups. Creatinine values were higher in everolimus groups, requiring a protocol amendment that recommended lower CsA exposure. Diarrhea, lymphocele, peripheral edema and hyperlipidemia were more common among everolimus-treated patients, whereas viral infections, particularly cytomegalovirus infection, increased in the MMF group. Overall safety and tolerability were better with MMF and everolimus 1.5 mg/day than with everolimus 3 mg/day. In conclusion, at 36 months, an immunosuppressive regimen containing everolimus 1.5 mg/day had equivalent patient, and graft survival and rejection rates compared with MMF in de novo renal transplant recipients, whereas everolimus 3 mg/day had inferior graft survival. Renal dysfunction in everolimus cohorts necessitates close monitoring.

The Role of Therapeutic Monitoring of Everolimus in Solid Organ Transplantation

Everolimus is a novel proliferation signal inhibitor used in immunosuppressive therapies for the prevention of acute and chronic rejection. A role for everolimus drug monitoring has been suggested because of the potential for improving efficacy and reducing adverse effects. Everolimus has proven efficacy for prevention of rejection in adult de novo renal and cardiac transplant recipients. Similar effects have been shown in pediatric renal transplant patients. Several analytic methods are available to quantify everolimus concentrations. A good relationship exists between everolimus concentration and pharmacological response. Mere clinical monitoring of efficacy is insufficient because clinical presentations of graft rejection vary for each patient and are nonspecific. Thus, the authors have used a previously published 9-step decision-making algorithm to evaluate the utility of therapeutic drug monitoring for everolimus. The recommended therapeutic range for everolimus is a trough concentration of 3 to 8 ng/mL, as concentrations over 3 ng/mL have been associated with a decreased incidence of rejection, and concentrations >8 ng/mL with increased toxicity. Everolimus exhibits interindividual pharmacokinetic variability. African American patients have higher apparent clearance, whereas patients with hepatic dysfunction or those on concomitant medications with potent cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 inhibitor or inducer properties have lower or higher apparent clearance, respectively. Solid organ transplant recipients will likely be maintained on immunosuppressant therapy for the life of the graft and/or recipient and thus are likely to benefit from clinical pharmacokinetic monitoring. Based on the available evidence, therapeutic drug monitoring for everolimus may provide additional information on efficacy and safety than sound clinical judgment alone. Patients on everolimus who have problems with absorption, who take concurrent cytochrome P450 inhibitors or inducers, or are noncompliant will attain the greatest benefit from drug monitoring.

Clinical experience with Certican (everolimus) in maintenance heart transplant patients at the Medical University of Vienna

Innovations in immunosuppressant therapy often transfer from renal transplantation to heart transplantation. Accordingly, there is growing interest in calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)- and steroid-sparing regimens for heart transplant patients. The novel proliferation signal inhibitor, Certican (everolimus), has been shown to allow reduced CNI exposure in renal transplant recipients without loss of efficacy. It has also demonstrated efficacy for reducing biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) in de novo heart transplantation. The present study reports early clinical experience of introducing everolimus as maintenance immunosuppression in heart transplant recipients whose previous regimen had failed. A 58-year-old woman received an organ from a 56-year-old female donor. She was prescribed cyclosporine for micromemulsion (CsA; Neoral), azathioprine, prednisolone and atorvastatin. After 3 months, azathioprine was switched to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). At Month 27, the patient experienced Grade 3A BPAR, had a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 20%, and compromised renal function. After steroid boluses to control BPAR, everolimus 3.0 mg/day was prescribed, while CsA and prednisolone doses were reduced. One month later, the patient contracted herpes labialis and pneumonia, and creatinine was elevated; CsA was stopped, everolimus dose was reduced to 1.5 mg/day and prednisolone reduced further. After another month, LVEF recovered to 50% and creatinine was 1.29 mg/dl. There was evidence of hyperlipidemia, which responded to atorvastatin 10 mg. For maintenance immunosuppression after heart transplantation, everolimus may allow CsA dose reduction and could be efficacious in combination with MMF. Further studies are required to confirm its efficacy and effects on CAV.

From clinical trials to clinical practice: an overview of Certican (everolimus) in heart transplantation

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is the primary cause of late morbidity and mortality in heart transplant patients and remains a major challenge to further improvements in long-term graft survival in this population. Clearly, there is a need for immunosuppressive regimens that reduce the risk of CAV. Certican (everolimus) is a proliferation signal inhibitor developed for the prevention of acute and chronic rejection after solid-organ transplantation. Pre-clinical studies suggest that everolimus prevents vascular remodeling and neointimal proliferation, which are key components of CAV. In a pivotal trial in heart transplantation, everolimus at 1.5 or 3.0 mg plus standard-dose cyclosporine (CsA; Neoral) and corticosteroids demonstrated superior efficacy to azathioprine (AZA) by decreasing the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) and the composite end-point, efficacy failure. Importantly, in this trial, everolimus was also associated with a significant reduction in both the incidence and severity of CAV in recipients of heart transplants. Furthermore, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection rates were significantly lower with everolimus than with AZA. The study suggests that everolimus has the ability to target the primary causes of chronic allograft dysfunction by reducing acute rejection and CMV infection, and preventing CAV. Moreover, these findings indicate that use of everolimus as part of the primary immunosuppression regimen, could provide a major benefit for heart transplant patients, offering a real hope of alleviating CAV in the long term. Few large-scale trials have been conducted in heart transplant patients, so their value must therefore be maximized with findings being effectively translated into clinical practice.

Prevention of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy With Certican® (Everolimus): The Stanford University Experience Within the Certican Phase III Clinical Trial

A large Phase III clinical trial with the novel proliferation signal inhibitor, Certican (everolimus), has shown this agent to be associated with lower rates of acute rejection, cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection when compared with azathioprine (AZA) at 12 months post-transplant. Given that CAV is the main risk factor for mortality after the first year post-transplant, and that acute rejection and CMV infection play a key role in the development of this disease, the findings suggest that everolimus has an important role as part of the primary immunosuppression of this population. Consideration of the presentation and outcome of patients from Stanford University who were enrolled in the pivotal trial with everolimus in heart transplantation has highlighted the efficacy of everolimus in this setting. Analysis of the angiographic outcome data of these patients demonstrates that the efficacy of everolimus observed in the large, multicenter trial involving heart transplant patients was replicated in the findings of a single center. This finding is important for the interpretation of clinical trial data, offering reassurance that data from large trials are applicable to an individual center. The results from Stanford also reveal an important difference between everolimus and AZA with regard to intimal thickening and the incidence of abnormal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), suggesting that everolimus may improve left ventricular function. Because abnormal LVEF has been associated with greater risk of vascular rejection and allograft vascular disease, use of everolimus could well improve long-term outcomes in heart transplant recipients.

Clinical Experiences Using Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

Despite the growing use of drug-eluting stents, restenosis remains to occur especially in high risk subgroups like patients with diffuse in-stent restenosis. This observation is supporting the search for new and potentially even more effective drug eluting stent systems. Everolimus has been used in conjunction with a new bioabsorbable polymer and gave promising results in initial clinical studies. In FUTURE I, a single-center, single-blinded randomized safety and feasibility study enrolling 15 patients with bare metal stents and 27 patients with everolimus-coated stents, 30-day MACE rate was 0% in both groups. In-stent late loss at six months was 0.83 mm in the control group and 0.10 mm in the everolimus group (p < 0.0001). In FUTURE II, a randomized multi-center study, a total of 64 patients were enrolled confirming safety and feasibility. After 6 months late loss was 0.85 mm in the control group and 0.12 mm in the everolimus group (p < 0.001).

Therapeutic drug monitoring for everolimus in heart transplant recipients based on exposure-effect modeling

Everolimus, a proliferation signal inhibitor, is an immunosuppressant that targets the primary causes of progressive allograft dysfunction, thus improving the long-term outcome after heart transplantation. The present study investigated whether therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of everolimus would benefit heart transplant patients. Data from a twelve-month phase III trial comparing everolimus (1.5 or 3 mg daily) with azathioprine were used to evaluate everolimus pharmacokinetics, exposure-efficacy/safety and TDM prognostic simulations. Everolimus trough levels were stable in the first year post-transplant and averaged 5.2 +/- 3.8 and 9.4 +/- 6.3 ng/mL in patients treated with 1.5 and 3 mg/day, respectively. Cyclosporine trough levels were similar in all treatment groups. Biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) was reduced with everolimus trough levels > or =3 ng/mL. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) analysis showed evidence of reduced vasculopathy at 12 months with increasing everolimus exposure. Unlike cyclosporine, increasing everolimus exposure was not related to a higher rate of renal dysfunction. The TDM simulation, which was based on two everolimus dose adjustments and an initial starting dose of 1.5 mg/day, showed that the simulated BPAR rate (with TDM) was 21% versus 26% in the group with fixed dosing. Therefore, TDM in heart transplantation could optimize immunosuppressive efficacy and reduce treatment-related toxicity.

Everolimus (Certican) 12-Month Safety and Efficacy Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil in de Novo Renal Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Everolimus is a proliferation inhibitor designed to target chronic rejection, including prevention of acute rejection. Everolimus blocks growth factor-mediated transduction signals, preventing organ rejection by a mechanism different than that of calcineurin inhibitors and of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). METHODS.: Everolimus (1.5 mg or 3 mg daily) was compared with MMF (2 g daily) in a randomized, multicenter, multinational, 12-month double-blind, double-dummy and 2-year open-label, phase 3 trial in de novo renal allograft recipients (n = 588) who also received cyclosporine and corticosteroids as part of a triple immunosuppressive regimen.

RESULTS

At 12 months, there were no statistically significant differences between doses of 1.5 and 3 mg/day everolimus and MMF (2 g/day) in incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (23.2%, 19.7%, and 24.0%, respectively), graft loss (4.6%, 10.6%, and 9.2%), or death (5.2%, 4.0%, and 2.6%), respectively. Everolimus 1.5 mg/day and MMF were generally equally well tolerated. Both were better tolerated than everolimus 3 mg/day. The incidence of cytomegalovirus infection was significantly lower in patients receiving either 1.5 or 3 mg/day everolimus than in those receiving MMF (5.2% and 7.6% vs. 19.4%, respectively) (P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Everolimus is effective in preventing acute rejection and graft loss in de novo renal allograft recipients receiving a triple immunosuppressive regimen. Prevention of acute rejection, along with reduction in cytomegalovirus infection, addresses two factors known to contribute to chronic rejection in such patients.

Tolerability and steady-state pharmacokinetics of everolimus in maintenance renal transplant patients

BACKGROUND

Current immunosuppressant regimens need to be improved to prevent acute and chronic graft rejection. The novel macrocyclic immunosuppressant everolimus (Certican, RAD) is currently in clinical development to address this issue.

METHODS

The primary objective of this multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalating phase 1 study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of everolimus at four dose levels (0.75, 2.5, 5 and 10 mg/day) in maintenance renal transplant patients receiving cyclosporin and steroids. The secondary objective was to assess the pharmacokinetic profile of two different formulations (capsule and tablet) of everolimus.

RESULTS

Fifty-four subjects were randomized for 4 weeks treatment with everolimus (n = 44) or placebo (n = 10). Dose levels of everolimus between 0.75 and 5 mg daily were well tolerated, permitting dose escalation to the highest everolimus dose of 10 mg daily. At this dose, everolimus was associated with a higher incidence and severity of adverse events, most notably thrombocytopenia. Pharmacodynamic assessment showed a relationship between drug exposure and thrombocytopenia. Notable reversible elevations of cholesterol were also observed at the 10 mg/day dose. Other changes in laboratory evaluations, including triglycerides, were minor, reversible and did not appear to be dose dependent. The bioavailability of the tablet formulation was 2.6-fold higher compared with the capsule, with evidence for dose proportionality over the dose range tested. Within-subject pharmacokinetic variability was low (coefficient of variation: 10-19%); however, between-subject variability ranged from 34 to 60% for AUC and C(max).

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that up to 5 mg/day everolimus results in a dose-proportional exposure, and is adequately well tolerated in renal transplant recipients receiving cyclosporin and steroids.

Optimizing the immunosuppressive regimen in heart transplantation

The use of immunosuppression regimens containing a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), an adjunct immunosuppressant (e.g., azathioprine, everolimus or mycophenolate mofetil) and corticosteroids has effectively reduced the risk of early graft loss due to acute rejection in heart transplant recipients. At present, late graft loss due to cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) remains a major challenge for transplant teams. CAV is characterized by intimal hyperplasia as a result of endothelial cell injury. Factors relating to the transplant procedure itself (e.g., ischemic time and reperfusion injury), cardiovascular risks (e.g., donor age, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, pre-existing diabetes and new-onset diabetes after transplantation), immunologic risks (e.g., acute rejection episodes, anti-HLA antibodies) and the side effects of immunosuppression with CNIs or corticosteroids (e.g., cytomegalovirus infection, nephrotoxicity) have all been implicated in the development of CAV. The 2 main approaches to the prevention of CAV are modification of underlying risk factors (e.g., treatment with anti-hypertensive agents and lipid-lowering drugs, and optimizing the immunosuppressive regimen) and improvement in immunosuppression. CNIs remain the cornerstone of immunosuppressive regimens in heart transplantation, but new parameters for monitoring CNI exposure and new immunosuppressive regimens hold the promise of reduced overall CNI exposure with consequent reductions in vascular toxicity and improved clinical outcomes. Traditionally, trough levels of cyclosporine (C(0)) have been used to monitor exposure to cyclosporine and to assess the need for dose adjustment. However, optimal cyclosporine exposure can now be achieved through monitoring of cyclosporine levels 2 hours after dosing (C(2) monitoring). Furthermore, in a pivotal trial in heart transplantation, the new proliferation signal inhibitor, everolimus, plus full-dose cyclosporine and corticosteroids, has been shown to have improved impact on prevention of biopsy-proven acute rejection (and other efficacy end-points) and longer term on the prevention of CAV. In addition, there is evidence from studies in renal transplant recipients that everolimus plus reduced exposure cyclosporine is effective and well tolerated-with the regimen having a reduced potential for CNI-related nephrotoxicity and for other CNI-related cardiovascular side effects.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of everolimus

Everolimus is an immunosuppressive macrolide bearing a stable 2-hydroxyethyl chain substitution at position 40 on the sirolimus (rapamycin) structure. Everolimus, which has greater polarity than sirolimus, was developed in an attempt to improve the pharmacokinetic characteristics of sirolimus, particularly to increase its oral bioavailability. Everolimus has a mechanism of action similar to that of sirolimus. It blocks growth-driven transduction signals in the T-cell response to alloantigen and thus acts at a later stage than the calcineurin inhibitors ciclosporin and tacrolimus. Everolimus and ciclosporin show synergism in immunosuppression both in vitro and in vivo and therefore the drugs are intended to be given in combination after solid organ transplantation. The synergistic effect allows a dosage reduction that decreases adverse effects. For the quantification of the pharmacokinetics of everolimus, nine different assays using high performance liquid chromatography coupled to an electrospray mass spectrometer, and one enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, have been developed. Oral everolimus is absorbed rapidly, and reaches peak concentration after 1.3-1.8 hours. Steady state is reached within 7 days, and steady-state peak and trough concentrations, and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), are proportional to dosage. In adults, everolimus pharmacokinetic characteristics do not differ according to age, weight or sex, but bodyweight-adjusted dosages are necessary in children. The interindividual pharmacokinetic variability of everolimus can be explained by different activities of the drug efflux pump P-glycoprotein and of metabolism by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, 3A5 and 2C8. The critical role of the CYP3A4 system for everolimus biotransformation leads to drug-drug interactions with other drugs metabolised by this cytochrome system. In patients with hepatic impairment, the apparent clearance of everolimus is significantly lower than in healthy volunteers, and therefore the dosage of everolimus should be reduced by half in these patients. The advantage of everolimus seems to be its lower nephrotoxicity in comparison with the standard immunosuppressants ciclosporin and tacrolimus. Observed adverse effects with everolimus include hypertriglyceridaemia, hypercholesterolaemia, opportunistic infections, thrombocytopenia and leucocytopenia. Because of the variable oral bioavailability and narrow therapeutic index of everolimus, blood concentration monitoring seems to be important. The excellent correlation between steady-state trough concentration and AUC makes the former a simple and reliable index for monitoring everolimus exposure. The target trough concentration of everolimus should range between 3 and 15 microg/L in combination therapy with ciclosporin (trough concentration 100-300 microg/L) and prednisone.

Current immunosuppressive agents: efficacy, side effects, and utilization

Advances in immunosuppressive therapy over the past decade have led to dramatic improvements in graft survival. With the development of new agents, the focus of the transplant community is to establish regimens that maintain excellent graft survival rates but with fewer toxicities including infection, nephrotoxicity, malignancy, and cosmetic effects. Examples include the use of steroid-free protocols and calcineurin avoidance regimens, which are currently being studied by NAPRTCS. The ultimate goal of transplant immunosuppressive therapy is the induction of tolerance. As we learn more about immune function from basic and clinical research, tolerance to allografts seems a more reachable goal.

Everolimus in de novo cardiac transplantation: pharmacokinetics, therapeutic range, and influence on cyclosporine exposure

We evaluated exposure, safety, and efficacy data from an international Phase 3 trial of everolimus in de novo heart transplantation to characterize the longitudinal pharmacokinetics of everolimus and cyclosporine and to identify a therapeutic concentration range for everolimus. We randomized 634 patients to receive either 0.75 mg everolimus twice daily, 1.5 mg everolimus twice daily, or azathioprine in addition to corticosteroids and cyclosporine. At 8 visits during the first 6 months after transplantation, we obtained 2,328 everolimus trough levels (Cmin) and 129 area-under-the-curve (AUC) profiles over the dosing interval in patients treated with everolimus; we collected 3,258 cyclosporine trough concentrations and 174 profiles in all 3 treatment arms. We used median-effect analysis to characterize exposure-response associations between everolimus average Cmin vs freedom from biopsy-confirmed acute rejection; maximum cholesterol, low density lipoprotein, triglyceride, and creatinine levels; and minimum leukocyte and platelet counts. Everolimus Cmins averaged 5.2 +/- 3.8 ng/ml and 9.4 +/- 6.3 ng/ml at the lower and upper dose levels. A 17% underproportionality was noted in Cmins; however, peak exposure and AUC were consistent with dose proportionality. Everolimus exposure was stable during the 6-month period. Interindividual variability was 37% for AUC and 40% for Cmin. The latter parameter was not influenced to a clinically relevant extent by sex, age, or weight. The Cmin was well correlated with AUC (r2 = 0.81). Everolimus Cmin was significantly related to freedom from rejection (p = 0.02) with 3 ng/ml being an informative lower threshold for efficacy. Thrombocytopenia, defined as <75 x 10(9)/liter, was related significantly to Cmin (p = 0.03); however, the incidence in this study was too low to establish an upper end for the therapeutic range. Lower doses of cyclosporine (by 15% to 19%) were used in patients treated with everolimus to achieve cyclosporine Cmins and AUCs similar to those in patients treated with azathioprine. Everolimus exposure was dose proportional and stable during the first 6 months after transplantation. Interindividual pharmacokinetic variability was high but not influenced by common demographic covariates. We observed a significantly increased risk of acute rejection at everolimus trough levels <3 ng/ml, which constitutes the lower therapeutic concentration limit when everolimus is used with conventionally dosed cyclosporine. Everolimus-related adverse events were manageable up to the highest troughs (22 ng/ml) observed in this population. We could not derive a precise upper therapeutic concentration limit from these data.

Survival of acute myeloid leukemia cells requires PI3 kinase activation

The mechanisms that regulate the growth and survival of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells are largely unknown. We hypothesized that constitutive activation of phosphatidyl-inositide 3 kinase (PI3 kinase) could regulate survival in primary cells from patients with AML. Here we demonstrate that Akt, a critical substrate of PI3 kinase, is activated in AML blasts. In a short-term culture system, most AML patient samples showed a dose-dependent decrease in survival after incubation with the PI3 kinase inhibitor LY294002. This decrease in survival was partially due to the induction of apoptosis. Furthermore, we have shown that p70 S6 kinase and 4EBP-1, downstream mediators of Akt signaling, also are phosphorylated in AML blasts. Phosphorylation of these proteins is inhibited by the mTOR inhibitor RAD001. Incubation of AML blasts with RAD001 induces only a small decrease in survival of the cells; however, when combined with Ara-C, RAD001 enhances the toxicity of Ara-C. These results demonstrate that constitutive activation of the PI3 kinase pathway is necessary for the survival of AML blasts and that targeting of this pathway with pharmacologic inhibitors may be of clinical benefit in treatment of AML.

Angiotensin II induces connective tissue growth factor gene expression via calcineurin-dependent pathways

Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) is a polypeptide implicated in the extracellular matrix synthesis. Previous studies have provided evidence that angiotensin II (Ang II) promotes collagen synthesis and regulates collagen degradation. We investigated whether or not CTGF mediates the profibrotic effects of Ang II in the heart and kidneys and the role of calcineurin-dependent pathways in CTGF gene regulation. In transgenic rats harboring human renin and angiotensinogen genes, Ang II induced an age-dependent increase in myocardial CTGF expression, which was 3.5-fold greater compared to normotensive Sprague Dawley (SD) rats. CTGF overexpression correlated closely with the Ang II-induced rise in blood pressure. CTGF mRNA and protein were located predominantly in areas with leukocyte infiltration, myocardial, and vascular lesions and co-localized with TGFbeta(1), collagen I, and collagen III mRNA expressions. Ang II induced CTGF mRNA and protein to a lesser extent in the kidneys, predominantly in glomeruli, arterioles, and in the interstitium with ample inflammation. However, no expression was found in the right ventricle or pulmonary arteries. Blockade of calcineurin activity by cyclosporine A completely normalized Ang II-induced CTGF overexpression in heart and kidney, suppressed the inflammatory response, and mitigated Ang II-induced cell proliferation and apoptosis. In contrast, blockade of mTOR (target of rapamycin) pathway by everolimus, further increased the expression of CTGF even though everolimus ameliorated cell proliferation and T-cell-mediated inflammation. Our findings provide evidence that CTGF mediates Ang II-induced fibrosis in the heart and kidneys via blood pressure and calcineurin-dependent pathways.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressive drugs in kidney transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Drug monitoring has become an accepted adjunct to optimizing therapy with immunosuppressive drugs. This review assesses publications that relate to the analytical techniques used to measure cyclosporin, tacrolimus, mycophenolic acid, sirolimus and everolimus, as well as the clinical data obtained for these drugs. For all of these drugs there has been a substantial and continuing investment in assessing the clinical value of drug monitoring.

RECENT FINDINGS

Fundamental controversies still persist regarding which time point to use for monitoring. The most significant single development has been the move towards using a timed blood sample 2 h after drug administration (C2) to monitor cyclosporin therapy with the Neoral formulation. The favourable clinical results obtained with this approach have had an impact on reevaluating monitoring data for some of the other drugs. The newest drugs to reach clinical evaluation, sirolimus and everolimus, have been studied in the context of concentration-controlled dosing and there is a good rationale for their measurement. There have also been developments in the analytical techniques used, mostly to improve the selectivity of the assays or to adapt them to new monitoring strategies.

SUMMARY

Interpretation of drug concentration data is becoming ever more complex in this field as the number of potential drug combinations expands. The relatively narrow therapeutic index of these agents and the ever-present risk of clinically significant pharmacokinetic drug interactions makes drug monitoring an important aspect of their prescription.