Role of immunosuppressive drugs in the development of tissue-invasive cytomegalovirus infection in renal transplant recipients

Role of mTOR inhibitors for the control of viral infection in solid organ transplant recipients

Appropriate post-transplant immunosuppressive regimens that avoid acute rejection, while reducing risk of viral reactivation, have been sought, but remain a chimera. Recent evidence suggesting potential regulatory and antiviral effects of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi) is of great interest. Although the concept of an immunosuppressive drug with antiviral properties is not new, little effort has been made to put the evidence together to assess the management of immunosuppressive therapy in the presence of a viral infection. This review was developed to gather the evidence on antiviral activity of the mTORi against the viruses that most commonly reactivate in adult solid organ recipients: cytomegalovirus (CMV), polyomavirus, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), human herpesvirus 8 (HHV8), and hepatitis C virus (HCV). A rapid review methodology and evaluation of quality and consistency of evidence based on the GRADE system was used. The existing literature was variable in nature, although indicating a potential advantage of mTORi in CMV, polyomavirus, and HHV8 infection, and a most doubtful relation with EBV and HCV infection. Several recommendations about the management of these infections are presented that can change certain current patterns of immunosuppression and help to improve the prognosis of the direct and indirect effects of viral infection in solid organ recipients.

Small bowel transplantation complicated by cytomegalovirus tissue invasive disease without viremia

We report on a small bowel transplant patient, donor/recipient seropositive (D+/R+) for cytomegalovirus (CMV), with a clinical course complicated by CMV disease. Anti-CMV prophylaxis was given for 100 days. Immunosuppression consisted of alemtuzumab, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and prednisolone. Five months posttransplant, CMV tissue invasive disease of the upper gastrointestinal tract was evident without the presence of viremia, tested by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Complete viral load suppression was achieved with intravenous ganciclovir, followed by valganciclovir for secondary prophylaxis. Mycophenolate mofetil and prednisolone were discontinued. Shortly thereafter the patient presented with recurrent CMV and candida esophagitis. While on ganciclovir and caspofungin, the patient developed CMV tissue invasive disease of the ileal graft, with persistent absence of viremia. Foscarnet and CMV immunoglobulin were added. Viral load declined to undetectable levels; however, clinical improvement did not occur due to occurrence of graft rejection. Despite infliximab and high dose prednisolone, graft rejection was progressive, requiring surgical explantation of the graft. This case highlights the importance of additional diagnostic tools such as endoscopy including PCR analysis of tissue samples. Extension of primary antiviral prophylaxis interval up to 6 months and prolonged retreatment for recurrent CMV disease may be useful to avoid severe CMV-related complications.

CMV Viremia is associated with a decreased incidence of BKV reactivation after kidney and kidney-pancreas transplantation

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) and BK virus (BKV) infections can cause significant morbidity after kidney and kidney-pancreas transplant. There are limited data on the epidemiology and interactions between these two viral pathogens.

METHODS

We prospectively screened 609 kidney or kidney-pancreas transplant recipients from January 2007 to June 2011 for BKV and/or CMV viremia. This included 7453 quantitative BKV polymerase chain reaction and 15,496 quantitative CMV polymerase chain reaction tests. We evaluated risk factors and timing of these infections and the impact of treatment of one infection on the other.

RESULTS

Among 609 recipients, 108 (17.7%) developed CMV viremia, of which 95 (88%) were asymptomatic, 5 (5%) had CMV syndrome, and 8 (7%) developed CMV tissue invasive disease at a median of 5.6 months after transplantation. Risk factors for CMV infection using multivariable analysis were D+R- serogroup (P≤0.0001), donor age >50 years (P=0.013), and higher mean tacrolimus (P=0.0009) and mycophenolate mofetil (P=0.01) blood levels. The incidence of BKV infection in the total population was 163 of 609 (26.7%), of which 150 (92%) occurred in patents without antecedent CMV viremia. Such patients demonstrated a higher rate of subsequent BKV viremia than patients with antecedent CMV viremia (P=0.003; hazard ratio, 2.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-3.4). Moreover, we found that only symptomatic CMV viremia had a significant negative impact on graft survival when compared with asymptomatic CMV viremia and those without CMV viremia (relative risk, 3.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-8.9; P=0.04).

CONCLUSION

CMV viremia may indirectly protect against subsequent BK viremia possibly due to a reduction of intensity of immunosuppression after diagnosis of CMV viremia.

Cytomegalovirus disease in African-American kidney transplant patients

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease is a serious infection after kidney transplantation. The risk factors and the impact of CMV disease in African-American (AA) kidney transplant patients have not been well characterized.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis on 448 AA patients transplanted between 1996 and 2005. A 3-month universal chemoprophylaxis with ganciclovir or valganciclovir was administered to CMV donor-positive/recipient-negative (D+/R-) patients and to those treated with anti-thymocyte globulin for rejection, but not routinely to those with other D/R serostatus.

RESULTS

A total of 31 AA patients (7%) developed clinical CMV disease. Compared with other D/R serostatus groups, the D+/R- group had the highest 3-year cumulative incidence of CMV disease (16.9% vs. 6.3% in D+/R+, 4.9% in D-/R+, and 2.4% in D-/R-). The D+/R- group also had the worst 3-year death-censored allograft survival (75% vs. 92% in D+/R+, 94% in D-/R+, and 96% in D-/R-, log-rank P = 0.01). Multivariate analysis found that D+/R- serostatus (odds ratio [OR] 5.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.6-48.2, P = 0.003) and donor age > 60 years (OR 9.1, 95% CI 1.3-65, P = 0.03) were independent risk factors for CMV disease.

CONCLUSION

The D+/R- group has the highest incidence of CMV disease and the worst 3-year renal allograft survival despite 3-month universal prophylaxis. Prolonged chemoprophylaxis may be needed to prevent the late development of CMV disease and to improve allograft survival in the high-risk group of AA kidney transplant recipients.

Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes associated with cytomegalovirus disease in small bowel transplant recipients

Despite improved prophylaxis, monitoring, and more efficient immunosuppression, CMV infection remains a common opportunistic infection in transplant recipients. We assessed the incidence of CMV disease in pediatric SBT recipients, the timing of CMV disease after transplantation, and its impact on patient outcome. The medical records of 98 SBT recipients were reviewed. We performed descriptive analysis, regression analysis, and Kaplan-Meier curves to determine the time-to-event after transplantation. Fifty-three percent patients were male and 47% female, with a mean age of 38.3 months. Thirty-five percent of patients received prophylactic VGC, 55% GCV, 10% a combination of GCV/VGC, and 99% CMV immunoglobulins. A total of 24.5% recipients were CMV D+/R- (CMV serostatus donor positive/recipient negative). Seven (c. 7%) patients developed CMV disease. CMV disease was associated with 2.5 times (0.52-12.1; p = 0.25) higher rate of CMV mismatch and 11.1 times (1.3-95.9; p = 0.03) higher risk of death. CMV prophylaxis increased time-to-death (p = 0.074). Time-to-CMV disease was shorter in patients with enteritis (p < 0.0001), and CMV disease was associated with shorter time-to-death after transplantation (p = 0.001). CMV disease in SBT recipients was associated with an 11-fold mortality increase and a fourfold faster time-to-death. Time-to-death was significantly shorter with CMV enteritis.

Colorectal complications of end-stage renal failure and renal transplantation: a review

AIM

End-stage renal failure (ESRF) and renal transplant recipients are thought to be associated with an increased risk of colorectal complications.

METHOD

A review of the literature was performed to assess the prevalence and outcome in both benign and malignant colorectal disease.

RESULTS

No prospective randomized studies assessing colorectal complications in ESRF or renal transplant were identified. Case series and case reports have described the incidence and management of benign colorectal complications. Complications included diverticulitis,infective colitis, colonic bleeding and colonic perforation. There was insufficient evidence to associated iverticular disease with adult polycystic kidney disease.Three population-based studies have shown up to a twofold increased incidence of colonic cancer but not rectal cancer for renal transplant recipients. Bowel cancer screening (as per the general population) by faecal occult blood testing appears justified for renal transplant patients; however, evidence suggests that consideration of starting screening at a younger age may be worthwhile because of an increased risk of developing colonic cancer.Two population-based studies have shown a threefold and 10-fold increased incidence of anal cancer for renal transplant recipients. A single case–control study demonstrated significant increased prevalence of anal human papilloma virus (HPV) and intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN)in patients with established renal transplants.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the lack of high-level evidence,ESRF and renal transplantation were associated with colorectal complications that could result in major morbidity and mortality. Bowel cancer screening in this patient group appears justified. The effectiveness of screening for HPV, AIN and anal cancer in renal transplant recipients remains unclear.

Cytomegalovirus immunoglobulin decreases the risk of cytomegalovirus infection but not disease after pediatric lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) has been associated with morbidity, including chronic allograft rejection, in transplant recipients. Data from adult centers suggests that CMV hyperimmune globulin (CMVIG) and ganciclovir together are superior in preventing CMV viremia than ganciclovir alone.

METHODS

A retrospective review of pediatric lung transplant recipients at 14 sites in North America and Europe was conducted to evaluate the effect of adding cytomegalovirus immunoglobulin (CMVIG) prophylaxis to at least 3 weeks of intravenous ganciclovir therapy in pediatric lung transplant recipients. Data were recorded for the first year after transplantation. Associations between time to CMV and risk factors, including CMVIG use, were assessed by multivariable Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Of 599 patients whose records were reviewed, 329 received at least 3 weeks of ganciclovir, with 62 (19%) receiving CMVIG. CMVIG was administered more frequently with CMV donor-positive/recipient-negative serostatus (p < 0.05). In multivariable models, patients who did not receive CMVIG as part of their prophylaxis were 3 times more likely to develop CMV infection (hazard ratio, 3.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-9.5) independent of CMV serostatus. However, CMVIG administration was not associated with decreased risk of episodes of CMV disease. Receipt of CMVIG was not associated with decreased risks of post-transplant morbidities (acute rejection, respiratory viral infection or early bronchiolitis obliterans) or morbidity within the first year after pediatric lung transplantation.

CONCLUSION

The use of CMVIG in addition to antiviral prophylaxis in pediatric lung transplantation requires further evaluation.

The risk, prevention, and outcome of cytomegalovirus after pediatric lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

A retrospective review of pediatric lung transplant recipients at 14 centers in North America and Europe was conducted to characterize the epidemiology and the risk factors for cytomegalovirus (CMV) and to explore the impact of preventative antiviral therapy.

METHODS

Data were recorded for 1 year posttransplant. Associations between CMV and continuous and categorical risk factors were assessed using Wilcoxon rank sum and chi-square tests, respectively. Associations between time to CMV and risk factors or survival were assessed by multivariable Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Within 12 months posttransplant, 172 of 577 subjects (29.8%) developed 218 CMV episodes (90 asymptomatic infection, 25 syndrome, and 103 disease). Forty-one subjects developed more than one episode of CMV. Donor or recipient CMV seropositivity was associated with increased risk of CMV episodes. Except for decreased prophylaxis in CMV D-/R- subjects, duration of prophylaxis did not vary by D/R serostatus. For CMV D+ subjects, not being on prophylaxis at the time of CMV episode increased the risk of CMV (D+/R+ hazard ratio 3.5, 95% confidence interval 1.4-8.4; D+/R- 1.9, 1.02-3.7). CMV was associated with increased mortality within the first posttransplant year among those with donor or recipient CMV seropositivity (hazard ratio 2.0: 95% confidence interval 1.1-3.6; P=0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

CMV remains a serious complication after pediatric lung transplant, and the impact of prophylaxis is complex.

Infectious Complications of Cancer Therapy

Advances in the management of cancer, particularly the development of new chemotherapeutic agents, have greatly improved the survival and outcome of patients with hematologic malignancies and solid tumors; overall 5-year survival rates in cancer patients have improved from 39% in the 1960s to 60% in the 1990s.1 However, infection, caused by both the underlying malignancy and cancer chemotherapy, particularly myelosuppressive chemotherapy, remains a persistent challenge.

Management of cytomegalovirus infection in lung transplant recipients: evidence-based recommendations

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) continues to cause significant morbidity and mortality in lung transplant recipients. This article presents recommendations based on available evidence for the optimal management of CMV in lung transplant recipients, which have been developed by an expert committee of transplant physicians-surgeons and infectious disease specialists.

Cytomegalovirus prophylaxis with valganciclovir in African-American renal allograft recipients based on donor/recipient serostatus

There is a paucity of data examining the efficacy of valganciclovir (VGC) for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in kidney transplant patients, particularly with regard to utilization of a risk-stratified dosing regimen. Eighty adult African-American (AA) renal allograft recipients transplanted from November 3, 2001 to May 28, 2003 and followed for 22 +/- 8 months received VGC once daily for 90 d post-transplant dosed according to donor/recipient (D/R) serostatus: high risk (D+/R-) received 900 mg (n = 12); moderate risk (D+/R+, D-/R+) received 450 mg (n = 60); and low risk (D-/R-) received no prophylaxis (n = 8). Thymoglobulin or basiliximab was used for induction, and mycophenolate mofetil, prednisone, and either tacrolimus or sirolimus for maintenance immunosuppression. Only six patients (7.5%) developed symptomatic CMV infection diagnosed by pp65 antigenemia, three in the high-risk (25%) and three in the moderate-risk (5%) group (p = 0.02). All patients were on tacrolimus for at least 3 months prior to diagnosis. There were no cases of tissue-invasive disease, resistance to treatment, or recurrence. D+/R- serostatus was the only significant independent predictor for CMV infection using multivariate analysis (odds ratio 10.5; p = 0.04). Thymoglobulin induction was not associated with CMV infection. None of 43 patients who were exposed to sirolimus for >30 d developed CMV infection, vs. six of 37 who were not (p = 0.006). We conclude that VGC dosed according to D/R serostatus provides safe and effective CMV prophylaxis in AA renal allograft recipients.

Sepsis associated with immunosuppressive medications: an evidence-based review

OBJECTIVE

In 2003, critical care and infectious disease experts representing 11 international organizations developed management guidelines for sepsis associated with immunosuppressive medications that would be of practical use for the bedside clinician, under the auspices of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign, an international effort to increase awareness and improve outcome in severe sepsis.

DESIGN

The process included a modified Delphi method, a consensus conference, several subsequent smaller meetings of subgroups and key individuals, teleconferences, and electronic-based discussion among subgroups and among the entire committee.

METHODS

The modified Delphi methodology used for grading recommendations built on a 2001 publication sponsored by the International Sepsis Forum. We undertook a systematic review of the literature graded along five levels to create recommendation grades from A to E, with A being the highest grade. Pediatric considerations to contrast adult and pediatric management are in the article by Parker et al. on p. S591.

CONCLUSION

Immunosuppressed patients, by definition, are susceptible to a wider spectrum of infectious agents than immunologically normal patients and, thus, require a broader spectrum antimicrobial regimen when they present with sepsis or septic shock. Special expertise managing immunosuppressed patient populations is needed to predict and establish the correct diagnosis and to choose appropriate empiric and specific agents and maximize the likelihood that patients will survive these microbial challenges.

Benefit-Risk Assessment of Sirolimus in Renal Transplantation

Sirolimus (rapamycin) is a macrocyclic lactone isolated from a strain of Streptomyces hygroscopicus that inhibits the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)-mediated signal-transduction pathways, resulting in the arrest of cell cycle of various cell types, including T- and B-lymphocytes. Sirolimus has been demonstrated to prolong graft survival in various animal models of transplantation, ranging from rodents to primates for both heterotopic, as well as orthotopic organ grafting, bone marrow transplantation and islet cell grafting. In human clinical renal transplantation, sirolimus in combination with ciclosporin (cyclosporine) efficiently reduces the incidence of acute allograft rejection. Because of the synergistic effect of sirolimus on ciclosporin-induced nephrotoxicity, a prolonged combination of the two drugs inevitably leads to progressive irreversible renal allograft damage. Early elimination of calcineurin inhibitor therapy or complete avoidance of the latter by using sirolimus therapy is the optimal strategy for this drug. Prospective randomised phase II and III clinical studies have confirmed this approach, at least for recipients with a low to moderate immunological risk. For patients with a high immunological risk or recipients exposed to delayed graft function, sirolimus might not constitute the best therapeutic choice--despite its ability to enable calcineurin inhibitor sparing in the latter situation--because of its anti-proliferative effects on recovering renal tubular cells. Whether lower doses of sirolimus or a combination with a reduced dose of tacrolimus would be advantageous in these high risk situations remains to be determined. Clinically relevant adverse effects of sirolimus that require a specific therapeutic response or can potentially influence short- and long-term patient morbidity and mortality as well as graft survival include hypercholesterolaemia, hypertriglyceridaemia, infectious and non-infectious pneumonia, anaemia, lymphocele formation and impaired wound healing. These drug-related adverse effects are important determinants in the choice of a tailor-made immunosuppressive drug regimen that complies with the individual patient risk profile. Equally important in the latter decision is the lack of severe intrinsic nephrotoxicity associated with sirolimus and its advantageous effects on arterial hypertension, post-transplantation diabetes mellitus and esthetic changes induced by calcineurin inhibitors. Mild and transient thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, gastrointestinal adverse effects and mucosal ulcerations are all minor complications of sirolimus therapy that have less impact on the decision for choosing this drug as the basis for tailor-made immunosuppressive therapy. It is clear that sirolimus has gained a proper place in the present-day immunosuppressive armament used in renal transplantation and will contribute to the development of a tailor-made immunosuppressive therapy aimed at fulfilling the requirements outlined by the individual patient profile.

Decreased Cytomegalovirus infection after antilymphocyte therapy in sirolimus-treated renal transplant patients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is highly prevalent in transplant patients, especially in those submitted to a more intense immunosuppression. We monitored CMV infection in 34 patients during 60 days after antilymphocyte therapy without CMV prophylaxis. Six patients received sirolimus and 28 received no sirolimus as immunosuppression. During 60 days of follow-up time, 24/28 (86%) patients who did not use sirolimus developed CMV infection at a mean time of 32.43+/-13.67 days after antilymphocyte treatment. In contrast, no patient on sirolimus had CMV infection during the same follow-up (p<0.001). During a further 4-month follow-up, six patients on sirolimus-free therapy had recurrence of CMV, 46.5+/-18.5 days after the first episode. During this same period, one patient receiving sirolimus had one positive cell for CMV antigenemia, 169 days after antilymphocyte therapy. In conclusion, the use of sirolimus significantly reduced the incidence of CMV infection in patients treated with antilymphocyte antibodies.

Risk Factors for Cytomegalovirus Viremia and Disease Developing after Prophylaxis in High-Risk Solid-Organ Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) D+/R- solid-organ transplant (SOT) recipients carry increased risk of developing CMV disease; however, other risk factors in these patients have not been delineated.

METHODS

We examined 20 demographic and clinical variables for their association with the development of CMV disease, as defined by an independent endpoint committee (IEC) and also by the investigator (investigator treated [IT]), or CMV viremia within 12 months of transplant in D+/R- transplant recipients who received prophylaxis with valganciclovir or oral ganciclovir for 100 days.

RESULTS

Recipients with low creatinine clearance (Ccr,<40 mL/min) at screening had a significantly increased hazard of developing IEC-defined CMV disease (hazards ratio [HR]=4.28, confidence interval [CI] 1.69, 10.83). Females were twice as likely (HR=2.19, CI .21, 3.99) to develop IEC-defined CMV disease than males. These variables were associated with an increased risk of IEC-defined CMV disease in time-dependent models. Recipients with blood group A were also more likely to develop IEC-defined CMV disease than those with group O (HR=2.36 CI 1.24, 4.51) in the logistic regression model only. Prophylactic drug, organ type, recipient age, rejection episodes, and maintenance immunosuppression regimen were not associated with IEC-defined CMV disease. Female sex was the only variable associated with the development of CMV viremia (odds ratio [OR]=1.65; CI 1.03, 2.65) and IT CMV disease (OR=1.78; CI 1.08, 2.93).

CONCLUSIONS

Low Ccr at screening and blood type A are risk factors for IEC-defined CMV disease, and female sex was a risk factor for IEC- and IT-defined CMV disease and viremia in high-risk SOT recipients. These variables should perhaps be considered when optimizing treatment.

Time-related clinical determinants of long-term tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in combination therapy with mycophenolic acid and corticosteroids: a prospective study in one hundred de novo renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus is an efficient primary immunosuppressive drug in renal transplantation but its long-term use is associated with calcineurin-inhibitor-related toxicity. The specific characteristics of the inter-relationship between dose, concentration and clinical (side-)effects for tacrolimus have not yet been identified and extensive long-term pharmacokinetic studies are presently lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To establish the characteristics of the long-term pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus, to determine the time-dependent factors that influence the pharmacokinetics within the first critical post-transplant year and to identify a more appropriate way of monitoring drug exposure in clinical practice.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective pharmacokinetic study of tacrolimus was conducted in 100 de novo renal allograft recipients during the first year post-transplantation.

METHODS

Area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) blood samplings for tacrolimus were performed on days 7, 42, 90, 180 and 360 for all patients. Model-independent pharmacokinetic parameters for tacrolimus were calculated and dose-corrected when appropriate: AUC12, peak plasma concentration (Cmax), pre-dose trough concentration (C0), time to Cmax, average steady-state blood concentration, steady-state total body clearance, terminal half-life, volume of distribution and an estimate for tacrolimus bioavailability was derived from additional steady-state intravenous clearance data. The association between tacrolimus pharmacokinetic parameters and different clinical variables was evaluated on days 7, 42, 90, 180 and 360. The clinical variables were either donor-related (e.g. donor age), transplantation-related (e.g. delayed graft function), recipient-related (e.g. bodyweight), biochemical (e.g. serum albumin), therapeutic variables (e.g. corticosteroid dose) or disease variables (e.g. liver dysfunction).

RESULTS

Long-term tacrolimus dose-corrected exposure (AUC12, C0) is characterised by a late significant increase towards the end of the first year post-transplantation as the result of a significant increase in tacrolimus bioavailability (p < 0.05) and a slow decrease in tacrolimus steady-state clearance. Consequently, tacrolimus dose-requirements corrected for bodyweight decrease significantly in the first postoperative year (p < 0.05), in part because of the simultaneous tapering of the corticosteroid dose which significantly affects tacrolimus bioavailability (p < 0.05). Other clinical variables that significantly influenced tacrolimus administration, exposure and bioavailability in a time-related fashion were identified in this study (renal allograft function [p < 0.05], liver dysfunction [p < 0.05], diarrhoea [p < 0.05]), while the clinical relevance of other variables was considerably moderated by our findings (serum albumin, haematocrit). Time-unrelated variables proved to be of significant continuing clinical importance for tacrolimus dose-exposure pharmacokinetics throughout the first post-transplant year (recipient age [p < 0.05], gender [p < 0.01] and donor-receptor gender mismatch [p < 0.05]), while donor hypotension (p < 0.05) and cold ischaemia time (p < 0.05) also proved significant although at present the reasons for this are unknown. Finally, using multiple stepwise regression analysis we demonstrated that classical assessment of tacrolimus exposure by monitoring pre-dose trough blood concentration (or any other single concentration sampling timepoint) is not the most reliable method and that abbreviated AUC measurements may constitute a more accurate clinical tool for (therapeutic) monitoring of drug exposure.

CONCLUSION

Tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in the first year after renal transplantation are characterised by a specific time-dependent evolution. The identification of clinical variables that determine tacrolimus pharmacokinetics is an important aid in the development of reliable drug monitoring strategies using abbreviated AUC measurements.