Impact of donor age on long-term graft survival in living donor kidney transplantation

Consequences of kidney donation by age in Japanese living kidney donors: a single-center study

BACKGROUND

Elderly living kidney donors (LKDs) are becoming increasingly important in countries with a high prevalence of living-donor kidney transplants and an aging society. This study explored the features of elderly LKDs, focusing on their subsequent outcomes.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective, observational study included eligible LKDs who donated their kidneys between April 2008 and July 2022. LKDs were categorized into an elderly (≥70 years at donation) or a non-elderly group (<70 years). We examined pre-operative characteristics and post-operative outcomes, such as kidney function, complications, development of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), and mortality.

RESULTS

Of the 188 LKDs observed for a median of 5.7 years, 31 were in the elderly group (16.5%) and 157 (83.5%) were in the non-elderly group (mean age 72.5 ± 2.7 and 58.2 ± 7.3 years, respectively). No significant differences were observed in hospital stay length or peri-operative complications between groups. Both groups experienced a similar decline in post-donation estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)-approximately 37%. In the elderly group, four LKDs died, and one progressed to ESKD. In the non-elderly group, two LKDs died, and none progressed to ESKD. The cause of death was not strongly suspected to be associated with the donation.

CONCLUSIONS

eGFR was maintained even in elderly LKDs post-donation. Prioritizing LKDs' safety is paramount; however, donations from elderly people would be acceptable, considering their life expectancy. This can expand the pool of living kidney donors and address the growing demand for kidney transplants.

Recommendations for living donor kidney transplantation

This Guide for Living Donor Kidney Transplantation (LDKT) has been prepared with the sponsorship of the Spanish Society of Nephrology (SEN), the Spanish Transplant Society (SET), and the Spanish National Transplant Organization (ONT). It updates evidence to offer the best chronic renal failure treatment when a potential living donor is available. The core aim of this Guide is to supply clinicians who evaluate living donors and transplant recipients with the best decision-making tools, to optimise their outcomes. Moreover, the role of living donors in the current KT context should recover the level of importance it had until recently. To this end the new forms of incompatible HLA and/or ABO donation, as well as the paired donation which is possible in several hospitals with experience in LDKT, offer additional ways to treat renal patients with an incompatible donor. Good results in terms of patient and graft survival have expanded the range of circumstances under which living renal donors are accepted. Older donors are now accepted, as are others with factors that affect the decision, such as a borderline clinical history or alterations, which when evaluated may lead to an additional number of transplantations. This Guide does not forget that LDKT may lead to risk for the donor. Pre-donation evaluation has to centre on the problems which may arise over the short or long-term, and these have to be described to the potential donor so that they are able take them into account. Experience over recent years has led to progress in risk analysis, to protect donors' health. This aspect always has to be taken into account by LDKT programmes when evaluating potential donors. Finally, this Guide has been designed to aid decision-making, with recommendations and suggestions when uncertainties arise in pre-donation studies. Its overarching aim is to ensure that informed consent is based on high quality studies and information supplied to donors and recipients, offering the strongest possible guarantees.

Long-Term Consequences of Complex Living Renal Donation: Is It Safe?

INTRODUCTION

As there is a paucity of literature regarding the long-term outcomes of complex living donors, we conducted this study to assess the effect of kidney donation on the complex living kidney donor.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted in Narayan Health Hospital, Kolkata, Eastern India. The cohort consisted of complex living kidney donors who donated kidneys between the years 2007 and 2012. All donors were 60 years old or older, or were younger than 60 years and had comorbidities like hypertension and obesity. After a minimum follow-up of 5 years, all donors underwent evaluation. Data pertaining to hypertension, new-onset diabetes, body mass index (BMI), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and albuminuria, and cardiac events were compared from the time of donation till 5 years post-transplant.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

We found a statistically significant increase in blood pressure, number of antihypertensives used, and mean BMI at follow-up. Diabetes mellitus was developed in 22.3% of donors. The mean GFR also decreased significantly at follow-up. There were 42 elderly donors (≥60 years) and 23 ≤ 59 years of age. There was a significant fall of eGFR in both groups, but the percentage fall was similar in both groups. A significant percentage of donors developed proteinuria, the majority being hypertensives.

CONCLUSION

Procurement of kidneys from marginal donors should be done cautiously, and donors should be assessed for morbidity and mortality in the future, as we found a statistically significant deterioration in renal function, blood pressure, and BMI over long-term follow-up.

Renal transplantation from elderly living donors

Acceptance of elderly living kidney donors remains controversial due to the higher incidence of comorbidity and greater risk of postoperative complications. This is a review of publications in the English language between 2000 and 2013 about renal transplantation from elderly living donors to determine trends and effects of donation, and the outcomes of such transplantation. The last decade witnessed a 50% increase in living kidney donor transplants, with a disproportionate increase in donors >60 years. There is no accelerated loss of kidney function following donation, and the incidence of established renal failure (ERF) and hypertension among donors is similar to that of the general population. The overall incidence of ERF in living donors is about 0.134 per 1000 years. Elderly donors require rigorous assessment and should have a predicted glomerular filtration rate of at least 37.5 mL/min/1.73 m(2) at the age of 80. Though elderly donors had lower glomerular filtration rate before donation, proportionate decline after donation was similar in both young and elderly groups. The risks of delayed graft function, acute rejection, and graft failure in transplants from living donors >65 years are significantly higher than transplants from younger donors. A multicentred, long-term, and prospective database addressing the outcomes of kidneys from elderly living donors is recommended.

Impact of donor and recipient age difference on long-term allograft survival after living donor renal transplantation: analysis of 478 cases

INTRODUCTION

Either deceased or living-related renal transplantation constitutes the best therapeutic option for patients with end-stage renal disease. In this retrospective study, an attempt to identify parameters that affect allograft survival in living donor renal transplantation was made.

METHODS

Between January 2000 and July 2012, 478 adult patients received a renal transplant from a living-related donor in our center and their records were retrospectively reviewed in November 2012. Data concerning donor age, recipient age, donor/recipient age difference, donor/recipient gender, and ABO compatibility/incompatibility were recorded and associated with renal allograft survival rate.

RESULTS

Renal allograft survival rate was 96%, 89.5%, and 77.7% in the first, fifth, and 10th yr after transplantation, respectively. Only the difference between donor and recipient age was statistically significant in relation to graft survival. In cases with age difference >13 yr, graft survival rate was lower from the third yr onward.

CONCLUSIONS

Only the age difference between donor and recipient exerts an adverse impact on graft outcome after living donor renal transplantation, whereas donor age, recipient age, donor/recipient gender, and ABO incompatibility do not significantly influence renal allograft survival.

Patient and graft outcomes from older living kidney donors are similar to those from younger donors despite lower GFR

BACKGROUND

Donor age adversely affects deceased-donor kidney transplant outcomes, but its influence on living-donor transplantation is less well characterized.

METHODS

Living-donor kidney transplants at a single center between 1998 and 2000 were reviewed. Data were abstracted for 52 transplants from donors aged > or =50 years and for a matched group of 104 transplants from donors aged <50 years. Survival indices were compared during the first three years' post-transplantation. Functional indices, including serial iothalamate clearances, were compared at 1, 12, and 24 months.

RESULTS

Predonation glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was lower among older donors (94 +/- 12 vs. 108 +/- 17 mL/min/SA) but post-transplant compensatory hypertrophy was similar (11.7 +/- 26.3% vs. 7.7 +/- 31.4%). Recipients of older-donor grafts were older (52.8 +/- 16.5 vs. 46.1 +/- 15.1 years) and more frequently unrelated to the donor (54% vs. 39%). Trends toward higher frequency of slow graft function, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, and polyomavirus nephropathy were observed for older-donor grafts. Three-year recipient, graft, and death-censored graft survivals were > or =90% for both groups. At 1, 12, and 24 months, serum creatinine was higher and GFR was lower among recipients of older- compared with younger-donor grafts. Other functional indices (urine total protein, serum potassium and uric acid, hemoglobin, and number of antihypertensives) were not different. Donor age correlated with graft GFR at 1, 12, and 24 months for the entire study cohort by linear regression.

CONCLUSION

Older donor age does not preclude excellent results from living-donor kidney transplantation but should be appreciated as being associated with relatively lower GFR.

Predicting creatinine clearance by a simple formula following live-donor kidney transplantation

The outcome after live-donor kidney transplantation is influenced by many parameters. The aim of our study was to establish a multivariate prognostic model for calculating the recipient's creatinine clearance after transplantation. Basic immunological, donor-, recipient- and process-related variables were assessed in a series of 18 live-donor kidney transplant patients with an uncomplicated postoperative course. Multivariate analysis was carried out with automated forward and backward selection. The following four parameters were included in the predictive model: recipient age, recipient BMI, graft clearance and degree of relationship. The coefficient of determination (R(2)) was 0.67. It could be shown that a significant prediction of creatinine clearance after living related kidney transplantation can be made, based on simple variables. Therefore, this formula could help to detect early complications in the post-transplantation course if the recipient's creatinine clearance drops below the predicted result.

The use of expanded criteria cadaver and live donor kidneys for transplantation

The use of expanded criteria donors (non-traditional donors) can help lessen the current shortage of kidneys available for transplantation. The use of older donors has accounted for a large measure of the increase in the organ donation rate; however, the most significant factors found to impact on transplant success negatively traditionally have been shown to be extremes of donor age and last-hour urine output. Less significant variables affecting success rates are average systolic blood pressure, terminal serum creatinine, and days of hospitalization. With the appropriate selection of organs from expanded donors, acceptable outcomes can be obtained. When living donors are selected properly, kidneys with anatomic variants without pathologic significance can be used safely. Kidneys with a heightened potential for the development of progressive disease should not be transplanted. Efforts to decrease the cold ischemia time by increasing the use of kidneys from expanded criteria donors may improve the outcome of transplantation further. Advances in surgical techniques, preservation solutions, and methods for predicting eventual long-term renal function in kidneys from expanded donors will be critical in allowing precise selection criteria for kidneys for transplantation, resulting in the optimum use of a scarce and precious resource. Until options such as xenotransplantation become clinically feasible, the challenge will be to identify which donor organs previously considered suboptimal can be used safely to expand the organ donor pool.

Time-dependent risk factors influencing the long-term outcome in living renal allografts: donor age is a crucial risk factor for long-term graft survival more than 5 years after transplantation

BACKGROUND

Most investigations have revealed that the improvement in early graft survival has not resulted in a corresponding improvement in long-term graft survival. The risk factors for long-term graft survival should be clarified.

METHODS

A single-center experience of 1100 consecutive renal transplant recipients who received kidneys from living donors from 1983 to 1998 was reviewed to clarify the time dependency of risk factors for long-term graft survival. We examined various possible risk factors, including HLA-AB and -DR mismatches, ABO-blood group incompatibility, graft weight, donor age and sex, recipient age and sex, and the presence or absence of acute rejection by using the time-dependent, nonproportional Cox's hazards model.

RESULTS

Acute rejection episode, donor age, HLA-AB 4-antigen mismatches, ABO-incompatible transplantation, smaller kidney weight compared with the patient's body weight (Kw/Bw ratio less than 2.67), and transplantation from an unrelated living donor were risk factors for long-term graft outcome. Multivariate analysis for time-dependent risk factors showed that donor age of more than 60 years was the most important risk factor for long-term graft failure after 5 years posttransplantation (hazard ratio: 2.57). In contrast, acute rejection, ABO incompatibility, and nonrelated donors were significant risk factors for short-term graft failure within 5 years after kidney transplantation (hazard ratios: 2.68, 1.57, and 1.69, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Donor age of more than 60 years was a crucial risk factor affecting long-term graft survival. In contrast, acute rejection, ABO incompatibility, and nonrelated donors were significant risk factors for short-term graft failure.