A randomized comparison of a computer-based dosing program with a manual system to monitor oral anticoagulant therapy

Application of eHealth Tools in Anticoagulation Management After Cardiac Valve Replacement: Scoping Review Coupled With Bibliometric Analysis

BACKGROUND

Anticoagulation management can effectively prevent complications in patients undergoing cardiac valve replacement (CVR). The emergence of eHealth tools provides new prospects for the management of long-term anticoagulants. However, there is no comprehensive summary of the application of eHealth tools in anticoagulation management after CVR.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective is to clarify the current state, trends, benefits, and challenges of using eHealth tools in the anticoagulation management of patients after CVR and provide future directions and recommendations for development in this field.

METHODS

This scoping review follows the 5-step framework developed by Arksey and O'Malley. We searched 5 databases such as PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Embase using keywords such as "eHealth," "anticoagulation," and "valve replacement." We included papers on the practical application of eHealth tools and excluded papers describing the underlying mechanisms for developing eHealth tools. The search time ranged from the database inception to March 1, 2023. The study findings were reported according to the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews). Additionally, VOSviewer (version 1.6.18) was used to construct visualization maps of countries, institutions, authors, and keywords to investigate the internal relations of included literature and to explore research hotspots and frontiers.

RESULTS

This study included 25 studies that fulfilled the criteria. There were 27,050 participants in total, with the sample size of the included studies ranging from 49 to 13,219. The eHealth tools mainly include computer-based support systems, electronic health records, telemedicine platforms, and mobile apps. Compared to traditional anticoagulation management, eHealth tools can improve time in therapeutic range and life satisfaction. However, there is no significant impact observed in terms of economic benefits and anticoagulation-related complications. Bibliometric analysis suggests the potential for increased collaboration and opportunities among countries and academic institutions. Italy had the widest cooperative relationships. Machine learning and artificial intelligence are the popular research directions in anticoagulation management.

CONCLUSIONS

eHealth tools exhibit promise for clinical applications in anticoagulation management after CVR, with the potential to enhance postoperative rehabilitation. Further high-quality research is needed to explore the economic benefits of eHealth tools in long-term anticoagulant therapy and the potential to reduce the occurrence of adverse events.

Telemedicine-based management of oral anticoagulation therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis (Preprint)

BACKGROUND

Oral anticoagulation is the cornerstone treatment of several diseases. Its management is often challenging, and different telemedicine strategies have been implemented to support it.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to systematically review the evidence on the impact of telemedicine-based oral anticoagulation management compared to usual care on thromboembolic and bleeding events.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials were searched in 5 databases from inception to September 2021. Two independent reviewers performed study selection and data extraction. Total thromboembolic events, major bleeding, mortality, and time in therapeutic range were assessed. Results were pooled using random effect models.

RESULTS

In total, 25 randomized controlled trials were included (n=25,746 patients) and classified as moderate to high risk of bias by the Cochrane tool. Telemedicine resulted in lower rates of thromboembolic events, though not statistically significant (n=13 studies, relative risk [RR] 0.75, 95% CI 0.53-1.07; I²=42%), comparable rates of major bleeding (n=11 studies, RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.82-1.07; I²=0%) and mortality (n=12 studies, RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.78-1.20; I²=11%), and an improved time in therapeutic range (n=16 studies, mean difference 3.38, 95% CI 1.12-5.65; I²=90%). In the subgroup of the multitasking intervention, telemedicine resulted in an important reduction of thromboembolic events (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.08-0.48).

CONCLUSIONS

Telemedicine-based oral anticoagulation management resulted in similar rates of major bleeding and mortality, a trend for fewer thromboembolic events, and better anticoagulation quality compared to standard care. Given the potential benefits of telemedicine-based care, such as greater access to remote populations or people with ambulatory restrictions, these findings may encourage further implementation of eHealth strategies for anticoagulation management, particularly as part of multifaceted interventions for integrated care of chronic diseases. Meanwhile, researchers should develop higher-quality evidence focusing on hard clinical outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and quality of life.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42020159208; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=159208.

Warfarin-Induced Rapid Rise in INR Post-Cardiac Surgery Is Not Associated With Increased Bleeding Risk

Background: Post-cardiac surgery bleeding can have devastating consequences, and it is unknown if warfarin-induced rapid international normalized ratio (INR) rise during the immediate postoperative period increases bleed risk. Objective: To determine the impact of warfarin-induced rapid-rise INR on post-cardiac surgery bleeding. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective chart review of post-cardiac surgery patients initiated on warfarin at Mayo Clinic Hospital, Rochester. Patients were grouped based on occurrence or absence of rapid-rise INR (increase ≥1.0 within 24 hours). The primary outcome compared bleed events between groups. Secondary outcomes assessed hospital length of stay (LOS) and identified risk factors associated with bleed events and rapid rise in INR. Results: During the study period, 2342 patients were included, and 56 bleed events were evaluated. Bleed events were similar between rapid-rise (n = 752) and non-rapid-rise (n = 1590) groups in both univariate (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.22; P = 0.594) and multivariable models (HR = 1.24; P = 0.561). Those with rapid-rise INR had longer LOS after warfarin administration (discharge HR = 0.84; P = 0.0002). The most common warfarin dose immediately prior to rapid rise was 5 mg. Risk factors for rapid-rise INR were low body mass index, female gender, and cross-clamp time. Conclusion and Relevance: This represents the first report to assess warfarin-related rapid-rise INR in post-cardiac surgery patients and found correlation to hospital LOS but not bleed events. Conservative warfarin dosing may be warranted until further research can be conducted.

Randomised comparison of a simple warfarin dosing algorithm versus a computerised anticoagulation management system for control of warfarin maintenance therapy

Excellent control of the international normalised ratio (INR) is associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients receiving warfarin, and can be achieved by anticoagulation clinics but is difficult in general practice. Anticoagulation clinics have often used validated commercial computer systems to manage the INR, but these are not usually available to general practitioners. It was the objective of this study to perform a randomised trial of a simple one-step warfarin dosing algorithm against a widely used computerised dosing system. During the period of introduction of a commercial computerised warfarin dosing system (DAWN AC) to an anticoagulation clinic, patients were randomised to have warfarin dose adjustment done according to recommendations of the existing warfarin dosing algorithm or to those of the computerised system. The study tested if the computerised system was non-inferior to the existing algorithm for the primary outcome of time in therapeutic INR range of 2.0–3.0 (TTR), with a one-sided non-inferiority margin of 4.5%. There were 541 patients randomised to commercial computerised system and 527 to the algorithm. Median follow-up was 159 days. A dose recommendation was provided and followed in 91% of occasions for the computerised system and in 90% for the algorithm (p=0.03). The mean TTR was 71.0% (standard deviation [SD] 23.2) for the computerised system and 71.9% (SD 22.9) for the algorithm (difference 0.9% [95% confidence interval: –1.4% to 4.1%];p-value for noninferiority=0.002;p-value for superiority=0.34). In conclusion, similar maintenance control of the INR was achieved with a simple one-step dosing algorithm and a commercial computerised management system.

Evaluation of a mobile electronic assistant to aid in fluindione prescription: the INRPlus cluster randomized trial

INTRODUCTION

Regular monitoring of the international normalized ratio (INR) is crucial for dose adjustment of vitamin K antagonists (VKA) to maximize time in therapeutic range (TTR). We compared the use of a mobile electronic assistant INRPlus which proposes patient-specific fluindione doses, to standard fluindione management in a cluster randomized controlled study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty clusters of six general practitioners were randomized to adjust fluindione doses in VKA-treated patients either using INRPlus or according to routine practice. TTR was measured over 6 months, along with time spent above or below the recommended INR range, frequency of measurements and related complications.

RESULTS

Of the 595 included patients, 551 were assessable (259 INRPlus, 292 control) and had a mean of 1.6 INR measurements/month. TTR was not significantly different between the two groups, 72.7% [Q1: 58.1%; Q3: 90%] in INRPlus patients and 71.2% [Q1: 54.8%; Q3: 88.2%] in control patients (p=0.445). At least 60% time within reference ranges was reported in 73.4% of INRPlus patients and 67.1% of control patients (relative risk 1.09, 95%CI 0.98-1.22, p=0.115). No significant differences were reported between the two groups for time outside reference ranges, frequency of measurements or complications. Eighty-two percent (82%) of patients complying with INRPlus-proposed doses spent more than 60% of TTR versus 66.9% of non-compliant patients and 67.1% of reference patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In this trial, the use of the INRPlus electronic assistant resulted in a non-significant improvement in TTR that may be due to a higher than expected TTR in the control group.

Prediction of optimal warfarin maintenance dose using advanced artificial neural networks

BACKGROUND

In recent years, pharmacogenetic algorithms were developed for estimating the appropriate dose of vitamin K antagonists.

AIM

To evaluate the performance of new generation artificial neural networks (ANNs) to predict the warfarin maintenance dose.

METHODS

Demographic, clinical and genetic data (CYP2C9 and VKORC1 polymorphisms) from 377 patients treated with warfarin were used. The final prediction model was based on 23 variables selected by TWIST® system within a bipartite division of the data set (training and testing) protocol.

RESULTS

The ANN algorithm reached high accuracy, with an average absolute error of 5.7 mg of the warfarin maintenance dose. In the subset of patients requiring ≤21 mg and 21-49 mg (45 and 51% of the cohort, respectively) the absolute error was 3.86 mg and 5.45 with a high percentage of subjects being correctly identified (71 and 73%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

ANN appears to be a promising tool for vitamin K antagonist maintenance dose prediction.

Computerized advice on drug dosage to improve prescribing practice

BACKGROUND

Maintaining therapeutic concentrations of drugs with a narrow therapeutic window is a complex task. Several computer systems have been designed to help doctors determine optimum drug dosage. Significant improvements in health care could be achieved if computer advice improved health outcomes and could be implemented in routine practice in a cost-effective fashion. This is an updated version of an earlier Cochrane systematic review, first published in 2001 and updated in 2008.

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether computerized advice on drug dosage has beneficial effects on patient outcomes compared with routine care (empiric dosing without computer assistance).

SEARCH METHODS

The following databases were searched from 1996 to January 2012: EPOC Group Specialized Register, Reference Manager; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Ovid; EMBASE, Ovid; and CINAHL, EbscoHost. A "top up" search was conducted for the period January 2012 to January 2013; these results were screened by the authors and potentially relevant studies are listed in Studies Awaiting Classification. The review authors also searched reference lists of relevant studies and related reviews.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, controlled before-and-after studies and interrupted time series analyses of computerized advice on drug dosage. The participants were healthcare professionals responsible for patient care. The outcomes were any objectively measured change in the health of patients resulting from computerized advice (such as therapeutic drug control, clinical improvement, adverse reactions).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed study quality. We grouped the results from the included studies by drug used and the effect aimed at for aminoglycoside antibiotics, amitriptyline, anaesthetics, insulin, anticoagulants, ovarian stimulation, anti-rejection drugs and theophylline. We combined the effect sizes to give an overall effect for each subgroup of studies, using a random-effects model. We further grouped studies by type of outcome when appropriate (i.e. no evidence of heterogeneity).

MAIN RESULTS

Forty-six comparisons (from 42 trials) were included (as compared with 26 comparisons in the last update) including a wide range of drugs in inpatient and outpatient settings. All were randomized controlled trials except two studies. Interventions usually targeted doctors, although some studies attempted to influence prescriptions by pharmacists and nurses. Drugs evaluated were anticoagulants, insulin, aminoglycoside antibiotics, theophylline, anti-rejection drugs, anaesthetic agents, antidepressants and gonadotropins. Although all studies used reliable outcome measures, their quality was generally low.This update found similar results to the previous update and managed to identify specific therapeutic areas where the computerized advice on drug dosage was beneficial compared with routine care:1. it increased target peak serum concentrations (standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.79, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.13) and the proportion of people with plasma drug concentrations within the therapeutic range after two days (pooled risk ratio (RR) 4.44, 95% CI 1.94 to 10.13) for aminoglycoside antibiotics;2. it led to a physiological parameter more often within the desired range for oral anticoagulants (SMD for percentage of time spent in target international normalized ratio +0.19, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.33) and insulin (SMD for percentage of time in target glucose range: +1.27, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.98);3. it decreased the time to achieve stabilization for oral anticoagulants (SMD -0.56, 95% CI -1.07 to -0.04);4. it decreased the thromboembolism events (rate ratio 0.68, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.94) and tended to decrease bleeding events for anticoagulants although the difference was not significant (rate ratio 0.81, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.08). It tended to decrease unwanted effects for aminoglycoside antibiotics (nephrotoxicity: RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.06) and anti-rejection drugs (cytomegalovirus infections: RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.40);5. it tended to reduce the length of time spent in the hospital although the difference was not significant (SMD -0.15, 95% CI -0.33 to 0.02) and to achieve comparable or better cost-effectiveness ratios than usual care;6. there was no evidence of differences in mortality or other clinical adverse events for insulin (hypoglycaemia), anaesthetic agents, anti-rejection drugs and antidepressants.For all outcomes, statistical heterogeneity quantified by I(2) statistics was moderate to high.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review update suggests that computerized advice for drug dosage has some benefits: it increases the serum concentrations for aminoglycoside antibiotics and improves the proportion of people for which the plasma drug is within the therapeutic range for aminoglycoside antibiotics.It leads to a physiological parameter more often within the desired range for oral anticoagulants and insulin. It decreases the time to achieve stabilization for oral anticoagulants. It tends to decrease unwanted effects for aminoglycoside antibiotics and anti-rejection drugs, and it significantly decreases thromboembolism events for anticoagulants. It tends to reduce the length of hospital stay compared with routine care while comparable or better cost-effectiveness ratios were achieved.However, there was no evidence that decision support had an effect on mortality or other clinical adverse events for insulin (hypoglycaemia), anaesthetic agents, anti-rejection drugs and antidepressants. In addition, there was no evidence to suggest that some decision support technical features (such as its integration into a computer physician order entry system) or aspects of organization of care (such as the setting) could optimize the effect of computerized advice.Taking into account the high risk of bias of, and high heterogeneity between, studies, these results must be interpreted with caution.

Evidence-based management of anticoagulant therapy: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

BACKGROUND

High-quality anticoagulation management is required to keep these narrow therapeutic index medications as effective and safe as possible. This article focuses on the common important management questions for which, at a minimum, low-quality published evidence is available to guide best practices.

METHODS

The methods of this guideline follow those described in Methodology for the Development of Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis Guidelines: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines in this supplement.

RESULTS

Most practical clinical questions regarding the management of anticoagulation, both oral and parenteral, have not been adequately addressed by randomized trials. We found sufficient evidence for summaries of recommendations for 23 questions, of which only two are strong rather than weak recommendations. Strong recommendations include targeting an international normalized ratio of 2.0 to 3.0 for patients on vitamin K antagonist therapy (Grade 1B) and not routinely using pharmacogenetic testing for guiding doses of vitamin K antagonist (Grade 1B). Weak recommendations deal with such issues as loading doses, initiation overlap, monitoring frequency, vitamin K supplementation, patient self-management, weight and renal function adjustment of doses, dosing decision support, drug interactions to avoid, and prevention and management of bleeding complications. We also address anticoagulation management services and intensive patient education.

CONCLUSIONS

We offer guidance for many common anticoagulation-related management problems. Most anticoagulation management questions have not been adequately studied.

Oral anticoagulant therapy: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

BACKGROUND

The objective of this article is to summarize the published literature concerning the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral anticoagulant drugs that are currently available for clinical use and other aspects related to their management.

METHODS

We carried out a standard review of published articles focusing on the laboratory and clinical characteristics of the vitamin K antagonists; the direct thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran etexilate; and the direct factor Xa inhibitor, rivaroxaban

RESULTS

The antithrombotic effect of each oral anticoagulant drug, the interactions, and the monitoring of anticoagulation intensity are described in detail and discussed without providing specific recommendations. Moreover, we describe and discuss the clinical applications and optimal dosages of oral anticoagulant therapies, practical issues related to their initiation and monitoring, adverse events such as bleeding and other potential side effects, and available strategies for reversal.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a large amount of evidence on laboratory and clinical characteristics of vitamin K antagonists. A growing body of evidence is becoming available on the first new oral anticoagulant drugs available for clinical use, dabigatran and rivaroxaban.

Computerized clinical decision support systems for therapeutic drug monitoring and dosing: a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review

Background

Some drugs have a narrow therapeutic range and require monitoring and dose adjustments to optimize their efficacy and safety. Computerized clinical decision support systems (CCDSSs) may improve the net benefit of these drugs. The objective of this review was to determine if CCDSSs improve processes of care or patient outcomes for therapeutic drug monitoring and dosing.

Methods

We conducted a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review. Studies from our previous review were included, and new studies were sought until January 2010 in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews, and Inspec databases. Randomized controlled trials assessing the effect of a CCDSS on process of care or patient outcomes were selected by pairs of independent reviewers. A study was considered to have a positive effect (i.e., CCDSS showed improvement) if at least 50% of the relevant study outcomes were statistically significantly positive.

Results

Thirty-three randomized controlled trials were identified, assessing the effect of a CCDSS on management of vitamin K antagonists (14), insulin (6), theophylline/aminophylline (4), aminoglycosides (3), digoxin (2), lidocaine (1), or as part of a multifaceted approach (3). Cluster randomization was rarely used (18%) and CCDSSs were usually stand-alone systems (76%) primarily used by physicians (85%). Overall, 18 of 30 studies (60%) showed an improvement in the process of care and 4 of 19 (21%) an improvement in patient outcomes. All evaluable studies assessing insulin dosing for glycaemic control showed an improvement. In meta-analysis, CCDSSs for vitamin K antagonist dosing significantly improved time in therapeutic range.

Conclusions

CCDSSs have potential for improving process of care for therapeutic drug monitoring and dosing, specifically insulin and vitamin K antagonist dosing. However, studies were small and generally of modest quality, and effects on patient outcomes were uncertain, with no convincing benefit in the largest studies. At present, no firm recommendation for specific systems can be given. More potent CCDSSs need to be developed and should be evaluated by independent researchers using cluster randomization and primarily assess patient outcomes related to drug efficacy and safety.

"Zeus" a new oral anticoagulant therapy dosing algorithm: a cohort study

The demand for oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) has constantly increased during the last ten years with an extended use of computer assistance. Many mathematical algorithms have been projected to suggest doses and time to next visit for patients on OAT. We designed a new algorithm: "Zeus". A "before-after" study was planned to compare the efficacy and safety of this algorithm dosing OAT with manual dosage decided by the same expert physicians according to the target of International Normalized Ratio (INR). The study analysed data of 1876 patients managed with each of the two modalities for eight months, with an interval of two years between them. The aim was to verify the increased quality of therapy by time spent in INR target and efficiency and safety of Zeus algorithm. Time in therapeutic range (TTR) was significantly (p < 0.0001) higher during the algorithm dosing period in comparison with the TTR during manual management period (62.3% vs 50.3%). The number of PT/INR tests above 5 was significantly (p < 0.001) reduced by algorithm suggested prescriptions in comparison with manual those (254 vs 537 times). The anticoagulant drug amount prescribed according to the algorithm suggestions was significantly (p < 0.0001) lower than that of the manual method. The number of clinical events observed in patients during the algorithm management time was significantly (p < 0.05) lower than that in those managed with the manual dosage. This study confirms the clinical utility of the computer-assisted OAT and shows the efficacy and safety of the Zeus algorithm.

The role of standardized data and terminological systems in computerized clinical decision support systems: literature review and survey

INTRODUCTION

Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) should be seamlessly integrated with existing clinical information systems to enable automatic provision of advice at the time and place where decisions are made. It has been suggested that a lack of agreed data standards frequently hampers this integration. We performed a literature review to investigate whether CDSSs used standardized (i.e. coded or numerical) data and which terminological systems have been used to code data. We also investigated whether a lack of standardized data was considered an impediment for CDSS implementation.

METHODS

Articles reporting an evaluation of a CDSS that provided a computerized advice based on patient-specific data items were identified based on a former literature review on CDSS and on CDSS studies identified in AMIA's 'Year in Review'. Authors of these articles were contacted to check and complete the extracted data. A questionnaire among the authors of included studies was used to determine the obstacles in CDSS implementation.

RESULTS

We identified 77 articles published between 1995 and 2008. Twenty-two percent of the evaluated CDSSs used only numerical data. Fifty one percent of the CDSSs that used coded data applied an international terminology. The most frequently used international terminology were the ICD (International Classification of Diseases), used in 68% of the cases and LOINC (Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes) in 12% of the cases. More than half of the authors experienced barriers in CDSS implementation. In most cases these barriers were related to the lack of electronically available standardized data required to invoke or activate the CDSS.

CONCLUSION

Many CDSSs applied different terminological systems to code data. This diversity hampers the possibility of sharing and reasoning with data within different systems. The results of the survey confirm the hypothesis that data standardization is a critical success factor for CDSS development.

Do computerised clinical decision support systems for prescribing change practice? A systematic review of the literature (1990-2007)

BACKGROUND

Computerised clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) are used widely to improve quality of care and patient outcomes. This systematic review evaluated the impact of CDSSs in targeting specific aspects of prescribing, namely initiating, monitoring and stopping therapy. We also examined the influence of clinical setting (institutional vs ambulatory care), system- or user-initiation of CDSS, multi-faceted vs stand alone CDSS interventions and clinical target on practice changes in line with the intent of the CDSS.

METHODS

We searched Medline, Embase and PsychINFO for publications from 1990-2007 detailing CDSS prescribing interventions. Pairs of independent reviewers extracted the key features and prescribing outcomes of methodologically adequate studies (experiments and strong quasi-experiments).

RESULTS

56 studies met our inclusion criteria, 38 addressing initiating, 23 monitoring and three stopping therapy. At the time of initiating therapy, CDSSs appear to be somewhat more effective after, rather than before, drug selection has occurred (7/12 versus 12/26 studies reporting statistically significant improvements in favour of CDSSs on = 50% of prescribing outcomes reported). CDSSs also appeared to be effective for monitoring therapy, particularly using laboratory test reminders (4/7 studies reporting significant improvements in favour of CDSSs on the majority of prescribing outcomes). None of the studies addressing stopping therapy demonstrated impacts in favour of CDSSs over comparators. The most consistently effective approaches used system-initiated advice to fine-tune existing therapy by making recommendations to improve patient safety, adjust the dose, duration or form of prescribed drugs or increase the laboratory testing rates for patients on long-term therapy. CDSSs appeared to perform better in institutional compared to ambulatory settings and when decision support was initiated automatically by the system as opposed to user initiation. CDSSs implemented with other strategies such as education were no more successful in improving prescribing than stand alone interventions. Cardiovascular disease was the most studied clinical target but few studies demonstrated significant improvements on the majority of prescribing outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Our understanding of CDSS impacts on specific aspects of the prescribing process remains relatively limited. Future implementation should build on effective approaches including the use of system-initiated advice to address safety issues and improve the monitoring of therapy.

Computerized advice on drug dosage to improve prescribing practice

BACKGROUND

Maintaining therapeutic concentrations of drugs with a narrow therapeutic window is a complex task. Several computer systems have been designed to help doctors determine optimum drug dosage. Significant improvements in health care could be achieved if computer advice improved health outcomes and could be implemented in routine practice in a cost effective fashion. This is an updated version of an earlier Cochrane systematic review, by Walton et al, published in 2001.

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether computerised advice on drug dosage has beneficial effects on the process or outcome of health care.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group specialized register (June 1996 to December 2006), MEDLINE (1966 to December 2006), EMBASE (1980 to December 2006), hand searched the journal Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (1979 to March 2007) and the Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (1996 to March 2007) as well as reference lists from primary articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials, controlled trials, controlled before and after studies and interrupted time series analyses of computerized advice on drug dosage were included. The participants were health professionals responsible for patient care. The outcomes were: any objectively measured change in the behaviour of the health care provider (such as changes in the dose of drug used); any change in the health of patients resulting from computerized advice (such as adverse reactions to drugs).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed study quality.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-six comparisons (23 articles) were included (as compared to fifteen comparisons in the original review) including a wide range of drugs in inpatient and outpatient settings. Interventions usually targeted doctors although some studies attempted to influence prescriptions by pharmacists and nurses. Although all studies used reliable outcome measures, their quality was generally low. Computerized advice for drug dosage gave significant benefits by:1.increasing the initial dose (standardised mean difference 1.12, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.92)2.increasing serum concentrations (standradised mean difference 1.12, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.82)3.reducing the time to therapeutic stabilisation (standardised mean difference -0.55, 95%CI -1.03 to -0.08)4.reducing the risk of toxic drug level (rate ratio 0.45, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.70)5.reducing the length of hospital stay (standardised mean difference -0.35, 95% CI -0.52 to -0.17).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review suggests that computerized advice for drug dosage has some benefits: it increased the initial dose of drug, increased serum drug concentrations and led to a more rapid therapeutic control. It also reduced the risk of toxic drug levels and the length of time spent in the hospital. However, it had no effect on adverse reactions. In addition, there was no evidence to suggest that some decision support technical features (such as its integration into a computer physician order entry system) or aspects of organization of care (such as the setting) could optimise the effect of computerised advice.

Improved control of oral anticoagulant dosing: a randomized controlled trial comparing two computer algorithms

BACKGROUND

Efforts to improve dosing quality in oral anticoagulant control include the use of computer algorithms. As current algorithms are simplistic and give dosage proposals in a small fraction of patients, we developed an algorithm based on principles of system and control engineering that gives proposals in nearly all patients.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the new algorithm in clinical practice.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a double-blind randomized controlled trial among 712 patients with an indication for long-term anticoagulant treatment at the Leiden Anticoagulation Clinic. We compared oral anticoagulant dosing supported by the new algorithm (ICAD) with the standard algorithm (TRODIS).

RESULTS

The percentage of time spent in the therapeutic range was similar for the new and standard algorithm groups, 79.8% vs. 80.2% (difference 0.4%, 95% CI: -1.7-2.6%). The new algorithm produced a dosage proposal in 97.5% of visits, and the standard algorithm in 60.8% (difference 36.7%, 95% CI: 35.4-38.0%). Of proposals of the new algorithm, 79.3% were accepted by the physician vs. 90.9% for the standard algorithm (difference 11.6%, 95% CI: 10.2-13.0%). This implies that the new algorithm gave an acceptable proposal in 77.4% of all patient visits vs. 55.3% for the standard algorithm (difference 22.1%, 95% CI 20.4-23.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Substantially more dosage proposals were generated and accepted with the new than with the standard algorithm, and the new algorithm will therefore improve the efficiency of anticoagulant monitoring without loss of quality.

A taxonomic description of computer-based clinical decision support systems

OBJECTIVE

Computer-based clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) vary greatly in design and function. Using a taxonomy that we had previously developed, we describe the characteristics of CDSSs reported in the literature.

METHODS

We searched PubMed and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English between 1998 and 2003 that evaluated CDSSs. We coded each CDSS using our taxonomy.

RESULTS

58 studies met our inclusion criteria. The 74 reported CDSSs varied greatly in context of use, knowledge and data sources, nature of decision support offered, information delivery, and workflow impact. Two distinct subsets of CDSSs were seen: patient-directed systems that provided decision support for preventive care or health-related behaviors via mail or phone (38% of systems), and inpatient systems targeting clinicians with online decision support and direct online execution of the recommendations (18%). 84% of the CDSSs required extra staffing for handling CDSS-related input or output.

CONCLUSION

Reported CDSSs are heterogeneous along many dimensions. Caution should be taken in generalizing the results of CDSS RCTs to different clinical or workflow settings.

A model-based algorithm for the monitoring of long-term anticoagulation therapy

It has been shown that computerized algorithms for the prescription of coumarin derivates can improve the quality of long-term anticoagulation treatment. These algorithms are usually based on an empiric relationship between dosage and International Normalized Ratio and do not quantify the delaying effect of the drug's pharmacokinetics or the effect of alternating doses that are used to approximate a certain average dosage. Our objective was to develop a mathematical model that takes into account these effects and to develop a new algorithm based on this model that can be used to further optimize the quality of long-term anticoagulation treatment. We simplified a general model structure that was proposed by Holford in 1986 so that the parameters can be estimated using data that are available during long-term anticoagulation treatment. The constant parameters in the model were estimated separately for phenprocoumon and acenocoumarol using data from 1279 treatment courses from three different anticoagulation clinics in the Netherlands. The only variable parameter in the model is the sensitivity of the patient, which is estimated during the course of each treatment. A total of 194 dosage and appointment intervals that were proposed by the new algorithm were scored as 'good', 'acceptable', or 'bad' by two dosing experts. One hundred and seventy-eight (91.8%) proposals were considered good by at least one expert and bad by none. In 39 cases the experts disagreed. We believe that this algorithm will allow further improvement of anticoagulation treatments.

Home prothrombin time monitoring: a literature analysis

The anticoagulant activity of warfarin sodium is monitored by the prothrombin time (PT) using the international normalized ratio (INR). Standard oral anticoagulant therapy monitoring requires frequent patient visits to physicians' offices and/or laboratories to optimize warfarin dosage. Home PT monitoring by patients can increase testing frequency and may thus decrease complications associated with oral anticoagulant therapy. Clinical studies suggest that home PT monitoring is more effective than uncoordinated management and is as effective as care through specialized anticoagulation clinics for keeping INRs within a therapeutic range. There are accurate and reliable instruments available, but paramount to the success of home PT monitoring is sound patient selection, appropriate patient training, and consistent quality control.

Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: From Evidence to Application

This chapter about implementation strategies for practice guidelines is part of the 7th ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: Evidence Based Guidelines. Grade 1 recommendations are strong and indicate that the benefits do, or do not, outweigh risks, burden, and costs. Grade 2 suggests that feasibility, acceptability and cost related to implementation strategies may lead to different choices depending on the practice setting (for a full understanding of the grading see Guyatt et al, CHEST 2004; 126:179S-187S). To encourage uptake of guidelines to reduce thrombosis, we recommend that appreciable resources be devoted to distribution of educational material (Grade 2B). We suggest that few resources be devoted to educational meetings (Grade 2B), to audit and feedback (Grade 2B), or to educational outreach visits (Grade 2B) to encourage uptake of the guidelines. We suggest that appreciable resources be devoted to computer reminders (Grade 2A) and to patient-mediated interventions (Grade 2B) to encourage uptake of the guidelines. This review suggests that there are few implementation strategies that are of unequivocal, consistent benefit, and that are clearly and consistently worth resource investment. Fully informed decisions will require additional research to identify effective guideline implementation strategies to optimize antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy.

The initial phase of oral anticoagulation with warfarin in outpatients with deep venous thrombosis

Patients with deep venous thrombosis (DVT) treated out of hospital usually start warfarin with the recommended 5 mg loading dose and have their International Normalized Ratio (INR) test performed every 2-3 days. Thus, achievement of the therapeutic range may be more difficult than for inpatients, possibly resulting in extended duration of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) treatment. We retrospectively examined the charts of 55 DVT outpatients (mean age, 61.4 years; 30 males) to assess the actual duration of LMWH treatment and to identify predictors of a slow achievement of the INR range. Thirty patients (54.4%) reached the therapeutic INR range and stopped LMWH within 7 days, and 25 patients (45.6%) had to continue for an average of 10.5 days. The latter group was significantly younger than the former (57 and 65 years, respectively; P = 0.039). Patients younger than 60 years old had an odds ratio for an extended treatment of 4.92 (P = 0.0057). Algorithms with different loading doses of warfarin according to age should be proposed for outpatient treatment of DVT.

Anticoagulation therapy

Despite refinements and standardization in the use of anticoagulants, many problems remain for clinicians. Dr. Crowther describes appropriate starting and maintenance doses of warfarin, factors accounting for inter- and intra-observer variability and importantly, the management of the over-anticoagulated patients and bleeding patients. Dr. White compares unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and addresses whether there truly are differences in the efficacy and safety of different LMWH's for both arterial and venous indications. Dr. Ortel discusses the management of the problem patient who requires anticoagulants, the management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, the pregnant patient, the obese patient, patients who have renal insufficiency and/or liver disease, patients with malignant disease, and other challenging patient populations.

Establishing and running an effective telephone-based anticoagulation service

Observational studies and randomized controlled trials have revealed improvement in international normalized ratio (INR) control and reduced thrombotic and hemorrhagic events in patients taking warfarin who are managed by an anticoagulation service (ACS) compared with traditional physician care. In this article, we describe how to establish a multidisciplinary telephone-based ACS to monitor INRs, dose warfarin, and heparin therapy, and to educate patients by telephone. We address how to improve ACS efficiency by using an electronic medical record, charting by exception, holding group-based education, communicating by telephone, and conducting quality assurance. We also make recommendations for improving the quality of care of patients taking anticoagulants that can be implemented in any setting and we discuss how to apply these guidelines to other remote disease-state management programs (eg, diabetes).

Management and dosing of warfarin therapy

When initiating warfarin therapy, clinicians should avoid loading doses that can raise the International Normalized Ratio (INR) excessively; instead, warfarin should be initiated with a 5-mg dose (or 2 to 4 mg in the very elderly). With a 5-mg initial dose, the INR will not rise appreciably in the first 24 hours, except in rare patients who will ultimately require a very small daily dose (0.5 to 2.0 mg). Adjusting a steady-state warfarin dose depends on the measured INR values and clinical factors: the dose does not need to be adjusted for a single INR that is slightly out of range, and most changes should alter the total weekly dose by 5% to 20%. The INR should be monitored frequently (eg, 2 to 4 times per week) immediately after initiation of warfarin; subsequently, the interval between INR tests can be lengthened gradually (up to a maximum of 4 to 6 weeks) in patients with stable INR values. Patients who have an elevated INR will need more frequent testing and may also require vitamin K1. For example, a nonbleeding patient with an INR of 9 can be given low-dose vitamin K1 (eg, 2.5 mg phytonadione, by mouth). Patients who have an excessive INR with clinically important bleeding require clotting factors (eg, fresh-frozen plasma) as well as vitamin K1.

Advances in Therapy and the Management of Antithrombotic Drugs for Venous Thromboembolism

This review focuses on antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolism and covers a diverse range of topics including a discussion of emerging anticoagulant drugs, a renewed focus on thrombolytic agents for selected patients, and an analysis of the factors leading to adverse events in patients on warfarin, and how to optimize therapy. In Section I Dr. Weitz discusses new anticoagulant drugs focusing on those that are in the advanced stages of development. These will include drugs that (a) target factor VIIa/tissue factor, including tissue factor pathway inhibitor and NAPc2; (b) block factor Xa, including the synthetic pentasaccharide and DX9065a; (c) inhibit factors Va and VIIIa, i.e., activated protein C; and (d) block thrombin, including hirudin, argatroban, bivalirudin and H376/95. Oral formulations of heparin will also be reviewed.

In Section II, Dr. Comerota will discuss the use of thrombolysis for selected patients with venous thromboembolism. Fibrinolytic therapy, which has suffered from a high risk/benefit ratio for routine deep venous thrombosis, may have an important role to play in patients with iliofemoral venous thrombosis. Dr. Comerota presents his own results with catheter-directed thrombolytic therapy and the results from a large national registry showing long-term outcomes and the impact on quality of life.

In Section III, Dr. Ansell presents a critical analysis of the factors responsible for adverse events with oral anticoagulants and the optimum means of improving outcomes. The poor status of present day anticoagulant management is reviewed and the importance of achieving a high rate of “time in therapeutic range,” is emphasized. Models of care to optimize outcomes are described, with an emphasis on models that utilize patient self-testing and patient self-management of oral anticoagulation which are considered to be the ultimate in anticoagulation care. The treatment of venous and arterial thromboembolism is undergoing rapid change with respect to the development of new antithrombotic agents, an expanding list of new indications, and new methods of drug delivery and management. In spite of these changes, many of the traditional therapeutics are still with us and continue to play a vital role in the treatment of thromboembolic disease. The following discussion touches on a wide range of therapeutic interventions, from old to new, exploring the status of anticoagulant drug development, describing a new intervention for iliofemoral venous thrombosis, and analyzing the critical factors for safe and effective therapy with oral anticoagulants.

Advances in Therapy and the Management of Antithrombotic Drugs for Venous Thromboembolism

This review focuses on antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolism and covers a diverse range of topics including a discussion of emerging anticoagulant drugs, a renewed focus on thrombolytic agents for selected patients, and an analysis of the factors leading to adverse events in patients on warfarin, and how to optimize therapy. In Section I Dr. Weitz discusses new anticoagulant drugs focusing on those that are in the advanced stages of development. These will include drugs that (a) target factor VIIa/tissue factor, including tissue factor pathway inhibitor and NAPc2; (b) block factor Xa, including the synthetic pentasaccharide and DX9065a; (c) inhibit factors Va and VIIIa, i.e., activated protein C; and (d) block thrombin, including hirudin, argatroban, bivalirudin and H376/95. Oral formulations of heparin will also be reviewed.

In Section II, Dr. Comerota will discuss the use of thrombolysis for selected patients with venous thromboembolism. Fibrinolytic therapy, which has suffered from a high risk/benefit ratio for routine deep venous thrombosis, may have an important role to play in patients with iliofemoral venous thrombosis. Dr. Comerota presents his own results with catheter-directed thrombolytic therapy and the results from a large national registry showing long-term outcomes and the impact on quality of life.

In Section III, Dr. Ansell presents a critical analysis of the factors responsible for adverse events with oral anticoagulants and the optimum means of improving outcomes. The poor status of present day anticoagulant management is reviewed and the importance of achieving a high rate of “time in therapeutic range,” is emphasized. Models of care to optimize outcomes are described, with an emphasis on models that utilize patient self-testing and patient self-management of oral anticoagulation which are considered to be the ultimate in anticoagulation care. The treatment of venous and arterial thromboembolism is undergoing rapid change with respect to the development of new antithrombotic agents, an expanding list of new indications, and new methods of drug delivery and management. In spite of these changes, many of the traditional therapeutics are still with us and continue to play a vital role in the treatment of thromboembolic disease. The following discussion touches on a wide range of therapeutic interventions, from old to new, exploring the status of anticoagulant drug development, describing a new intervention for iliofemoral venous thrombosis, and analyzing the critical factors for safe and effective therapy with oral anticoagulants.