Pharmacokinetic profile of a low-molecular weight heparin (reviparin) in pregnant patients. A prospective cohort study

Anticoagulation Regimens in Pregnancy

This article explores current recommendations for anticoagulation therapy in pregnancy, including antepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum guidelines. The authors review various screening strategies used to assess whether a patient is an appropriate candidate for anticoagulation during pregnancy and the postpartum period. The article includes dosing regimens, optimal surveillance, and medication reversal. The authors also address the challenges of transitioning between low-molecular-weight heparin and unfractionated heparin. Finally, there is a discussion of intrapartum anticoagulation management, especially as it relates to the administration of regional anesthesia, and the indications for and timing of thromboprophylaxis following delivery.

ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 196: Thromboembolism in Pregnancy

Women who are pregnant or in the postpartum period have a fourfold to fivefold increased risk of thromboembolism compared with nonpregnant women (). Approximately 80% of thromboembolic events in pregnancy are venous (), with a prevalence of 0.5-2.0 per 1,000 pregnant women (). Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is one of the leading causes of maternal mortality in the United States, accounting for 9.3% of all maternal deaths ().The prevalence and severity of this condition during pregnancy and the peripartum period warrant special consideration of management and therapy. Such therapy includes the treatment of acute thrombotic events and prophylaxis for those at increased risk of thrombotic events. The purpose of this document is to provide information regarding the risk factors, diagnosis, management, and prevention of thromboembolism, particularly VTE in pregnancy. This Practice Bulletin has been revised to reflect updated guidance regarding screening for thromboembolism risk and management of anticoagulation around the time of delivery.

Adjustment of therapeutic LMWH to achieve specific target anti-FXa activity does not affect outcomes in pregnant patients with venous thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality in the developed world. Low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) are routinely used to provide therapeutic anticoagulation during pregnancy for women with VTE, with measurement of plasma anti-FXa activity used to guide dosing in certain patient groups. There is limited evidence to support the use of anti-FXa monitoring in pregnant patients. This study seeks to ascertain whether anti-FXa monitoring of pregnant patients with VTE influences patient outcomes. We performed a single-centre case series including two consecutive groups of pregnant patients treated with LMWH for VTE sustained in the index pregnancy with and without monitoring of anti-FXa levels. 35,394 patients delivered during the study period in a large urban stand-alone maternity hospital, with 26 cases of VTE eligible for inclusion. There was no significant difference between the two groups in any clinical outcome; including maternal blood loss at delivery, recurrent thromboembolic events or rates of planned delivery. These data provide clinical evidence to support current international guideline recommendations that measurement of plasma anti-FXa activity in the majority of patients receiving therapeutic-intensity antenatal LMWH is not warranted.

Pharmacokinetics of Low Molecular Weight Heparin and Unfractionated Heparin in Pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

Little pharmacokinetic data are available for either low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) or unfractionated heparins (UFHs) in pregnancy. The objectives of this study were to determine whether differences exist in the pharmacokinetics of dalteparin and UFH before and during the first, second, and third trimesters of pregnancy in women with the antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS). Adjustments in our dosing protocol would be made if differences existed.

METHODS

Women with APS who were contemplating pregnancy were randomized to dalteparin 2500 U, 2500 U, 5000 U, and 7500 U daily, or UFH 5000 U, 5000 U, 7500 U, and 10,000 U every 12 hours, prior to pregnancy and the first, second, and third trimesters, respectively. Serial plasma concentrations of heparin were measured during 4 blood sampling days by determining anti-factor Xa activity.

RESULTS

Fifteen (n = 9 receiving dalteparin and n = 6 receiving UFH) completed all four sampling periods. For dalteparin, significant differences (P <.05) were detected, using area under the curve (AUC), between pre-pregnancy versus third trimester, first versus second trimester, first versus third trimester, and second versus third trimester. No significant differences were detected in the UFH group.

CONCLUSION

In APS, our original dosing protocol of dalteparin yielded significant differences (P <.05) in drug exposure throughout pregnancy. Based on these results, we recommend a prophylactic dalteparin dosing regimen of 2500 U every 24 hours pre-pregnancy (and for 6 weeks postpartum), and 5000 U every 24 hours during the first, second, and third trimesters. Due to lack of significant differences in AUC throughout pregnancy for UFH, we recommend continuing with our original dosing protocol.

Guidance for the treatment and prevention of obstetric-associated venous thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), which may manifest as pulmonary embolism (PE) or deep vein thrombosis (DVT), is a serious and potentially fatal condition. Treatment and prevention of obstetric-related VTE is complicated by the need to consider fetal, as well as maternal, wellbeing when making management decisions. Although absolute VTE rates in this population are low, obstetric-associated VTE is an important cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. This manuscript, initiated by the Anticoagulation Forum, provides practical clinical guidance on the prevention and treatment of obstetric-associated VTE based on existing guidelines and consensus expert opinion based on available literature where guidelines are lacking.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Enoxaparin During the Antenatal Period

Background—

The optimal dosing strategy of low-molecular-weight heparins for the treatment of antenatal venous thromboembolism is not known. The physiological changes associated with pregnancy alter the pharmacokinetic profile of low-molecular-weight heparins, which has led to controversy and subsequent variation in practice, when pregnant women with venous thromboembolism are treated with low-molecular-weight heparins. Our objective was to develop a robust pharmacokinetic model of enoxaparin during the antenatal period to address this problem.

Method and Results—

Women prescribed antenatal enoxaparin were eligible to enroll in the study. Recruited women were reviewed monthly and had up to 3 anti-Xa activities (trough and 1 and 3 hours after dose) drawn at each clinic attendance. Compartmental pharmacokinetic modeling was conducted using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. One hundred twenty-three patients contributed 795 anti-Xa activities for pharmacokinetic modeling purposes. Both enoxaparin clearance and volume of distribution were increased during pregnancy. Simulations of once- versus twice-daily enoxaparin administration demonstrated that both dosing regimens would reach target 3-hour plasma concentrations throughout the duration of the pregnancy. When trough anti-Xa activity was simulated, both once- and twice-daily regimens exhibited an increase in trough anti-Xa activity with the progression of pregnancy. This is explained by the significant increase in volume of distribution observed during pregnancy.

Conclusions—

The half-life of enoxaparin is prolonged with the progression of pregnancy, and our work provides compelling evidence for prescribing once-daily enoxaparin for the treatment of antenatal venous thromboembolism. National and international guideline recommendations should be reconsidered.

Venous thromboembolism associated with pregnancy and hormonal therapy

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major cause of maternal morbidity and mortality during or early after pregnancy and in women taking hormonal therapy for contraception or for replacement therapy. Post-thrombotic syndrome, including leg oedema and leg pain, is an unrecognized burden after pregnancy-related VTE, which will affect more than two of five women. Women with a prior VTE, a family history of VTE, certain clinical risk factors and thrombophilia are at considerably increased risk both for pregnancy-related VTE and for VTE on hormonal therapy. This review critically assesses the epidemiology and risk factors for pregnancy-related VTE and current guidelines for prophylaxis and treatment. We also provide information on the risk of VTE related to hormonal contraception and replacement therapy.

The risk of postpartum hemorrhage in women using high dose of low-molecular-weight heparins during pregnancy

BACKGROUND

Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH) are the most commonly used anticoagulant during pregnancy for prevention or treatment of VTE. However, the size of the associated risk of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the bleeding risk of high dose LMWH, also in relation to time between last dose LMWH and delivery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From 1999 to 2009, we followed 88 pregnant women who were started on therapeutic anticoagulation. Controls were pregnant women without LMWH, matched 1:4 for parity, mode of delivery, age, gestational age and delivery date. PPH was defined as >500 ml blood loss for vaginal delivery (severe PPH in vaginal delivery as >1000 ml) and >1000 ml for cesarean section (CS). Women were divided into subgroups by the interval between last dose of anticoagulation and delivery (<12, 12-24 hrs, >24 hrs).

RESULTS

Risk of PPH after vaginal delivery was 30% and 18% for LMWH-users and non-users, respectively (OR 1.9, 95%CI 1.1-3.5). Risk of severe PPH after vaginal delivery was not different (5.6 vs 5.0%; OR 1.1; 0.4-3.6). Risk of PPH after CS was 12% in LMWH-users and 4% in non-users (OR 2.9; 0.5-19.4). Both events of LMWH-users occurred after emergency CS. The risk of PPH associated with delivery within 24 hours after last dose of LMWH was 1.2 fold higher (95%CI 0.4-3.6) compared to a larger interval.

CONCLUSION

High dose LMWH carries an increased risk of more than 500 mL blood loss after vaginal delivery. However, this results not in more clinical relevant severe PPHs. The interval between last dose of LMWH and delivery does not influence the risk of PPH.

Pregnancy-associated venous thromboembolism: prevention and treatment

Pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and this condition remains an important cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. The use of anticoagulant therapy for treatment and prophylaxis of VTE during pregnancy is challenging because of the potential for fetal, as well as maternal, complications. Although evidence-based recommendations for the use of anticoagulants have been published, given the paucity of available data, guidelines are based largely upon observational studies and from data in nonpregnant patients. This article reviews the available literature and provides guidance for the management and prevention of VTE during pregnancy.

VTE, thrombophilia, antithrombotic therapy, and pregnancy: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

BACKGROUND

The use of anticoagulant therapy during pregnancy is challenging because of the potential for both fetal and maternal complications. This guideline focuses on the management of VTE and thrombophilia as well as the use of antithrombotic agents during pregnancy.

METHODS

The methods of this guideline follow the Methodology for the Development of Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis Guidelines: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines in this supplement.

RESULTS

We recommend low-molecular-weight heparin for the prevention and treatment of VTE in pregnant women instead of unfractionated heparin (Grade 1B). For pregnant women with acute VTE, we suggest that anticoagulants be continued for at least 6 weeks postpartum (for a minimum duration of therapy of 3 months) compared with shorter durations of treatment (Grade 2C). For women who fulfill the laboratory criteria for antiphospholipid antibody (APLA) syndrome and meet the clinical APLA criteria based on a history of three or more pregnancy losses, we recommend antepartum administration of prophylactic or intermediate-dose unfractionated heparin or prophylactic low-molecular-weight heparin combined with low-dose aspirin (75-100 mg/d) over no treatment (Grade 1B). For women with inherited thrombophilia and a history of pregnancy complications, we suggest not to use antithrombotic prophylaxis (Grade 2C). For women with two or more miscarriages but without APLA or thrombophilia, we recommend against antithrombotic prophylaxis (Grade 1B).

CONCLUSIONS

Most recommendations in this guideline are based on observational studies and extrapolation from other populations. There is an urgent need for appropriately designed studies in this population.

How I treat pregnancy-related venous thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) complicates ∼ 1 to 2 of 1000 pregnancies, with pulmonary embolism being a leading cause of maternal mortality and deep vein thrombosis an important cause of maternal morbidity, also on the long term. However, a strong evidence base for the management of pregnancy-related VTE is missing. Management is not standardized between physicians, centers, and countries. The management of pregnancy-related VTE is based on extrapolation from the nonpregnant population, and clinical trial data for the optimal treatment are not available. Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in therapeutic doses is the treatment of choice during pregnancy, and anticoagulation (LMWH or vitamin K antagonists postpartum) should be continued until 6 weeks after delivery with a minimum total duration of 3 months. Use of LMWH or vitamin K antagonists does not preclude breastfeeding. Whether dosing should be based on weight or anti-Xa levels is unknown, and practices differ between centers. Management of delivery, including the type of anesthesia if deemed necessary, requires a multidisciplinary approach, and several options are possible, depending on local preferences and patient-specific conditions.

Use of high intensity adjusted dose low molecular weight heparin in women with mechanical heart valves during pregnancy: a single-center experience

The use of standard dose low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) to anticoagulate women with mechanical valves in pregnancy is associated with morbidity and mortality. We conducted a prospective audit of the use of adjusted dose high intensity LMWH in 12 pregnancies in 11 women with prosthetic heart valves. LMWH +/- low-dose aspirin was started at therapeutic-dose with monitoring of anti-Xa levels to achieve a target level of 1.0-1.2 IU/mL (0.8-1.2 in the first 3/12 pregnancies). This necessitated a mean increase in the dose of LMWH of 54.4% (SD+/-33.2) over initial dose. Eleven of 12 pregnancies resulted in live births, with one intrauterine fetal death at 37 weeks. One non-fatal valve thrombosis occurred at 26 weeks gestation associated with subtherapeutic anti-Xa levels. Three patients experienced major bleeding. This regime provides a therapeutic option for women with mechanical heart valves during pregnancy, provided anti-Xa levels are kept within the target range. These patients require close surveillance for bleeding and thrombotic complications within a multi-disciplinary setting.

Venous thromboembolism, thrombophilia, antithrombotic therapy, and pregnancy: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition)

This article discusses the management of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and thrombophilia, as well as the use of antithrombotic agents, during pregnancy and is part of the American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Grade 1 recommendations are strong and indicate that benefits do, or do not, outweigh risks, burden, and costs. Grade 2 recommendations are weaker and imply that the magnitude of the benefits and risks, burden, and costs are less certain. Support for recommendations may come from high-quality, moderate-quality or low-quality studies; labeled, respectively, A, B, and C. Among the key recommendations in this chapter are the following: for pregnant women, in general, we recommend that vitamin K antagonists should be substituted with unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) [Grade 1A], except perhaps in women with mechanical heart valves. For pregnant patients, we suggest LMWH over UFH for the prevention and treatment of VTE (Grade 2C). For pregnant women with acute VTE, we recommend that subcutaneous LMWH or UFH should be continued throughout pregnancy (Grade 1B) and suggest that anticoagulants should be continued for at least 6 weeks postpartum (for a total minimum duration of therapy of 6 months) [Grade 2C]. For pregnant patients with a single prior episode of VTE associated with a transient risk factor that is no longer present and no thrombophilia, we recommend clinical surveillance antepartum and anticoagulant prophylaxis postpartum (Grade 1C). For other pregnant women with a history of a single prior episode of VTE who are not receiving long-term anticoagulant therapy, we recommend one of the following, rather than routine care or full-dose anticoagulation: antepartum prophylactic LMWH/UFH or intermediate-dose LMWH/UFH or clinical surveillance throughout pregnancy plus postpartum anticoagulants (Grade 1C). For such patients with a higher risk thrombophilia, in addition to postpartum prophylaxis, we suggest antepartum prophylactic or intermediate-dose LMWH or prophylactic or intermediate-dose UFH, rather than clinical surveillance (Grade 2C). We suggest that pregnant women with multiple episodes of VTE who are not receiving long-term anticoagulants receive antepartum prophylactic, intermediate-dose, or adjusted-dose LMWH or intermediate or adjusted-dose UFH, followed by postpartum anticoagulants (Grade 2C). For those pregnant women with prior VTE who are receiving long-term anticoagulants, we recommend LMWH or UFH throughout pregnancy (either adjusted-dose LMWH or UFH, 75% of adjusted-dose LMWH, or intermediate-dose LMWH) followed by resumption of long-term anticoagulants postpartum (Grade 1C). We suggest both antepartum and postpartum prophylaxis for pregnant women with no prior history of VTE but antithrombin deficiency (Grade 2C). For all other pregnant women with thrombophilia but no prior VTE, we suggest antepartum clinical surveillance or prophylactic LMWH or UFH, plus postpartum anticoagulants, rather than routine care (Grade 2C). For women with recurrent early pregnancy loss or unexplained late pregnancy loss, we recommend screening for antiphospholipid antibodies (APLAs) [Grade 1A]. For women with these pregnancy complications who test positive for APLAs and have no history of venous or arterial thrombosis, we recommend antepartum administration of prophylactic or intermediate-dose UFH or prophylactic LMWH combined with aspirin (Grade 1B). We recommend that the decision about anticoagulant management during pregnancy for pregnant women with mechanical heart valves include an assessment of additional risk factors for thromboembolism including valve type, position, and history of thromboembolism (Grade 1C). While patient values and preferences are important for all decisions regarding antithrombotic therapy in pregnancy, this is particularly so for women with mechanical heart valves. For these women, we recommend either adjusted-dose bid LMWH throughout pregnancy (Grade 1C), adjusted-dose UFH throughout pregnancy (Grade 1C), or one of these two regimens until the thirteenth week with warfarin substitution until close to delivery before restarting LMWH or UFH) [Grade 1C]. However, if a pregnant woman with a mechanical heart valve is judged to be at very high risk of thromboembolism and there are concerns about the efficacy and safety of LMWH or UFH as dosed above, we suggest vitamin K antagonists throughout pregnancy with replacement by UFH or LMWH close to delivery, after a thorough discussion of the potential risks and benefits of this approach (Grade 2C).

Thrombelastography monitoring of resistance to enoxaparin anticoagulation in thrombophilic pregnancy patients

The anticoagulant effect of enoxaparin is readily observed by Thrombelastography (TEG), particularly on the reaction time (R) to form a clot, and is completely reversed by heparinase. In this study, recalcified citrated whole blood with heparinase (CNHR) and without (CNR), along with TEG R time, was used to derive a delta R (CNR-CNHR). This delta R (DeltaR) was then used to measure enoxaparin anticoagulation, which was correlated by linear regression (r(2)=0.806) with plasma anti-Xa in 48 thrombophilic pregnancy patients. In a follow up study whole blood from 15 thrombophilic and 15 normal pregnancy subjects was titrated ex vivo with enoxaparin and TEG DeltaR determined. Linear dose responses (all r(2)>0.9) of DeltaR versus plasma enoxaparin concentration were obtained for each subject. A large variation in slope was observed for both thrombophilic (>7 fold, 217 to 1,588 s DeltaR/unit anti-Xa) and normal (>3 fold, 788 to 2,758) pregnancy subjects. The average slope for the thrombophilic group (710 s DeltaR/unit anti-Xa) was significantly (P=0.002) lower than the normal pregnancy group (1,354 s), indicating resistance to enoxaparin anticoagulation in the thrombophilic group. This technique may help gauge the appropriate dose of enoxaparin for each individual, check for residual anticoagulation before invasive procedures, and perhaps help screen for thrombophilic subjects.

Management of Pregnant Women with Thrombophilia or a History of Venous Thromboembolism

Pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), and this condition remains an important cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. Approximately 50% of gestational VTE are associated with thrombophilia. Recent studies suggest that there is also a link between thrombophilia and pregnancy loss, as well as other gestational vascular complications. Although the most compelling data derive from women with antiphospholipid antibodies, the use of anticoagulation for prevention of these complications in women with heritable thrombophilia is becoming more frequent. This article reviews the management and prevention of VTE and other complications related to the heritable thrombophilias during pregnancy, an area that remains particularly challenging because of the potential for anticoagulant-related fetal as well as maternal complications and the paucity of good-quality data upon which to base clinical decisions.

Anticoagulants in Pregnancy

Venous thromboembolic (VTE) complications are a leading cause of maternal mortality in the developed world. To reduce the incidence of VTE in pregnancy, and improve outcomes, a wider understanding of the risk factors involved and a better identification of women at risk of thrombosis coupled with effective thromboprophylaxis and treatment of VTE are required. As coumarin is unsuitable for use in pregnancy because of problems with embryopathy and risk of fetal bleeding, anticoagulation therapy in pregnancy centres on the use of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and unfractionated heparin (UFH). There is now extensive experience of the safety and efficacy of LMWH in pregnancy. LMWH's, such as enoxaparin and dalteparin, have clinical and practical advantages compared with UFH in terms of improved safety (significantly lower incidence of osteoporosis and heparin induced thrombocytopenia), and patient convenience with once daily dosing for the majority of women. Such therapy is not restricted only to prevention and treatment of VTE but is now being assessed in additional clinical situations such as the prevention of pregnancy complications.

The second trimester Doppler ultrasound examination is the best predictor of late pregnancy outcome in systemic lupus erythematosus and/or the antiphospholipid syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To examine the predictive value of clinical examination, laboratory tests and Doppler ultrasound examination in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and/or antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) pregnancies.

METHODS

A prospective study of 116 pregnancies followed in a single tertiary referral centre. Outcomes analysed were fetal/neonatal death and adverse pregnancy outcome. Univariate analysis was performed for: (i) medical and obstetric history; (ii) medical and obstetric clinical examination; (iii) biological data; (iv) Doppler ultrasound examination. Variables significantly associated with the outcomes in the univariate analysis were entered into a logistic regression model.

RESULTS

Sixteen out of 116 pregnancies ended in 12 fetal deaths and 4 embryonic losses. Hence, data for 100 pregnancies were analysed. Seven fetal deaths and one neonatal death occurred, associated with abnormal end-diastolic umbilical artery Doppler flow at the second trimester (P < 0.006), a history of thrombophlebitis (P < 0.001) or notched uterine artery and growth restriction at the second trimester (P < 0.002). Multivariate analysis retained abnormal end-diastolic umbilical artery Doppler flow (P = 0.047) and history of thrombophlebitis (P = 0.018) as significant predictors. Thirty-one adverse pregnancy outcomes occurred, associated with notched uterine artery (P < 0.00003), abnormal end-diastolic umbilical artery Doppler flow (P < 0.0006) and fetal growth restriction at the second trimester (P < 0.008), growth restriction (P < 0.00001) and notched uterine artery at the third trimester (P < 0.0008), use of heparin (P < 0.05) and history of thrombophlebitis (P < 0.04). Notched uterine artery at the second trimester remained the only predictor in multivariate analysis (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Results of the second trimester Doppler ultrasound examination are the best predictors for late pregnancy outcome in SLE and/or APS.

Low-molecular-weight heparins for thromboprophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism in pregnancy: a systematic review of safety and efficacy

To assess the safety and efficacy of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) for thromboprophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in pregnancy, a systematic review of studies to the end of 2003 was undertaken. Data on VTE recurrence and side effects were extracted and cumulative incidences of VTE and adverse effects calculated. Of 81 reports identified, 64 reporting 2777 pregnancies were included. In 15 studies (174 patients) the indication for LMWH was treatment of acute VTE, and in 61 studies (2603 pregnancies) it was thromboprophylaxis or adverse pregnancy outcome. There were no maternal deaths. VTE and arterial thrombosis (associated with anti-phospholipid syndrome) were reported in 0.86% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55%-1.28%) and 0.50% (95% CI, 0.28%-0.84%) of pregnancies, respectively. Significant bleeding, generally associated with primary obstetric causes, occurred in 1.98% (95% CI, 1.50%-2.57%), allergic skin reactions in 1.80% (95% CI, 1.34%-2.37%), heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in 0%, thrombocytopenia (unrelated to LMWH) in 0.11% (95% CI, 0.02%-0.32%), and osteoporotic fracture in 0.04% (95% CI, < 0.01%-0.20%) of pregnancies. Overall, live births were reported in 94.7% of pregnancies, including 85.4% in those receiving LMWH for recurrent pregnancy loss. LMWH is both safe and effective to prevent or treat VTE in pregnancy.

Use of Antithrombotic Agents During Pregnancy

This chapter about the use of antithrombotic agents during pregnancy is part of the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: Evidence Based Guidelines. Grade 1 recommendations are strong and indicate that the benefits do, or do not, outweigh risks, burden, and costs. Grade 2 suggests that individual patients' values may lead to different choices (for a full understanding of the grading see Guyatt et al, CHEST 2004; 126:179S-187S). Among the key recommendations in this chapter are the following: for women requiring long-term vitamin K antagonist therapy who are attempting pregnancy, we suggest performing frequent pregnancy tests and substituting unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for warfarin when pregnancy is achieved (Grade 2C). In women with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE), we recommend adjusted-dose LMWH throughout pregnancy or IV UFH for at least 5 days, followed by adjusted-dose UFH or LMWH for the remainder of the pregnancy and at least 6 weeks postpartum (Grade 1C+). In patients with a single episode of VTE associated with a transient risk factor that is no longer present, we recommend antepartum clinical surveillance and postpartum anticoagulants (Grade 1C). In patients with a single episode of VTE and thrombophilia or strong family history of thrombosis and not receiving long-term anticoagulants, we suggest antepartum prophylactic or intermediate-dose LMWH or minidose or moderate-dose UFH, plus postpartum anticoagulants (Grade 2C). In patients with multiple (two or more) episodes of VTE and/or women receiving long-term anticoagulants, we suggest antepartum adjusted-dose UFH or adjusted-dose LMWH followed by long-term anticoagulants postpartum (Grade 2C). For pregnant patients with antiphospholipid antibodies (APLAs) and a history of two or more early pregnancy losses or one or more late pregnancy losses, preeclampsia, intrauterine growth retardation, or abruption, we suggest antepartum aspirin plus minidose or moderate-dose UFH or prophylactic LMWH (Grade 2B). We suggest one of the following approaches for women with APLAs without prior VTE or pregnancy loss: surveillance, minidose heparin, prophylactic LMWH, and/or low-dose aspirin, 75 to 325 mg/d (all Grade 2C). In women with prosthetic heart valves, we recommend adjusted-dose bid LMWH throughout pregnancy (Grade 1C), aggressive adjusted-dose UFH throughout pregnancy (Grade 1C), or UFH or LMWH until the thirteenth week and then change to warfarin until the middle of the third trimester before restarting UFH or LMWH (Grade 1C). In high-risk women with prosthetic heart valves, we suggest the addition of low-dose aspirin, 75 to 162 mg/d (Grade 2C).

Inherited thrombophilias and anticoagulation in pregnancy

Thromboprophylaxis, primary or secondary, should be considered in selected pregnant women with inherited thrombophilias; such women may be divided into high-, medium- and low-risk categories on the basis of the specific thrombophilic defect and any personal or family history of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Women at high risk of VTE should receive treatment doses of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) throughout pregnancy and should remain on anticoagulation for 6 weeks postpartum, or, where appropriate, long-term. Women at moderate risk should be treated with prophylactic fixed-dose LMWH throughout pregnancy and for 6 weeks postpartum. Women at low risk should receive prophylactic fixed-dose LMWH for 6 weeks postpartum, and low-dose aspirin LDA should be considered during pregnancy. LWMH offers important advantages over unfractionated heparin (UFH); heparin-induced thrombocytopaenia (HIT) and osteopaenia are rarely seen. For treatment doses of LMWH, dosage adjustment based on anti-Xa levels is usually required as pregnancy progresses. Warfarin should be avoided throughout pregnancy. LMWH, UFH and warfarin are safe for breast-feeding mothers.

Dose-finding and pharmacokinetic profiles of prophylactic doses of a low molecular weight heparin (reviparin-sodium) in pediatric patients

INTRODUCTION

The low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), reviparin-sodium was studied in dose-finding and pharmacokinetic studies in children with central venous lines (CVLs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The dose-finding study was performed in 24 patients aged 3 days to 16 years. Dose adjustments were made using a nomogram based on anti-factor Xa levels (units (U)/ml) (target of 0.1-0.3 U/ml). The pharmacokinetic study was performed in 19 patients, 9 less than or equal to 5 kg (7 of whom were less than 3 months) and 10 greater than 5 kg (all more than 3 months).

RESULTS

The dose-finding study demonstrated that children over 5 kg required 30 International Units (IU)/kilogram (kg), subcutaneous (SC) twice daily (BID), and children less than or equal to 5 kg required 50 IU/kg, SC BID, to achieve target levels. The pharmacokinetic study demonstrated that 80% of anti-factor Xa levels were within the target range with both patient groups having similar peak (average=0.26 U/ml) and trough (average=0.13 U/ml) levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Peak anti-factor Xa levels (0.1-0.3 U/ml) using reviparin-sodium are achieved by administering 50 IU/kg in children greater than 3 months of age and 30 U/kg in children less than 3 months of age.

How we manage venous thromboembolism during pregnancy

During pregnancy, physiologic and anatomic changes can complicate the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) as well as the management of patients with a high risk of or established VTE. As in nonpregnant subjects, clinical diagnosis of VTE by itself is unreliable and accurate objective testing is essential. Few diagnostic studies of VTE have been performed in pregnant women and, therefore, approaches are largely extrapolated from those used in nonpregnant subjects with modifications to limit the radiation exposure and overcome the limitations of diagnostic testing in pregnancy. Therapy of established VTE during pregnancy consists of therapeutic doses of unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), generally given throughout pregnancy subcutaneously and for 4 to 6 weeks after childbirth. A key unresolved issue includes the optimum dosing of LMWH therapy. Maternal warfarin can be safely used after childbirth because it is safe to use in the breast-fed infant of a mother receiving warfarin. Finally, pregnant women with prior VTE (with or without a hypercoagulable state) have an increased risk of recurrent venous thrombosis. A recent study has demonstrated that for women with a single episode of prior VTE, many can be managed without anticoagulants. However, for many, anticoagulant therapy with prophylactic UFH or LMWH is a reasonable option.

The use of low-molecular-weight heparin for the management of venous thromboembolism in pregnancy

Thromboembolic disease is a rare, but important, complication of pregnancy that remains a leading non-obstetric cause of maternal death. The prevention and management of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in pregnant women is a complex area of medicine: a balance must be found between protecting the health of the mother and minimizing the risk to the unborn fetus. Until now, unfractionated heparin has been regarded as the drug of choice for the prevention and treatment of VTE during pregnancy. However, because of its significant side effects (osteoporosis and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia), the inconvenient mode of administration and need for monitoring, unfractionated heparin is now being replaced by low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). There is a convincing body of clinical evidence from well-designed studies and prospective case series that supports the efficacy and safety of LMWH in pregnant women. There are also encouraging observations on the efficacy of LMWH in the prevention of severe obstetric complications, which are frequently associated with inherited or acquired thrombophilias. The recently-published guidelines of The American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP), summarized in this review, allows the development of higher clinical standards. However, there is concern over the greater cost of LMWH compared with unfractionated heparin and oral anticoagulants, and cost-effectiveness studies are needed.

Low molecular weight heparins: a guide to their optimum use in pregnancy

The incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) is higher in pregnant patients than in non-pregnant patients. The incidence of thrombosis in all pregnancies is reported to be between 0.05 and 1%, and an incidence as high as 3% may be present in women after caesarean section. Anticoagulant medication is prescribed during pregnancy in patients presenting with VTE, thrombophilia abnormalities, or a history of PE or VTE. Since unfractionated heparin (UH) does not cross the placental barrier, it has become the gold standard anticoagulant therapy during pregnancy. Oral anticoagulants may also be prescribed during the second trimester but they cross the placental barrier. Low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) are effective, easy to use and have good safety profiles. The practical conditions of use have yet to be validated for pregnancy settings. In the absence of an approved indication, LMWH use during pregnancy is therefore the responsibility of the practitioner. However, several studies on LMWH as prophylaxis for PE or VTE have shown that such products are effective with good safety. Moreover, LMWH use is associated with reduced frequencies of thrombocytopenia and osteoporosis compared with UH use. Very few studies on LMWH use for the treatment of PE or VTE during pregnancy have been published, but the safety of LMWH use in this setting appears to be good. The review of the use of LMWH in pregnancy settings includes recommendations on the practical conditions of use. In the absence of large-scale, randomised, double-blind trials in such settings (which are needed), we propose the use of LMWH as prophylaxis for PE and VTE during pregnancy, but not for the treatment of these conditions. In prophylaxis settings, dalteparin sodium and enoxaparin sodium have been the most widely studied LMWH and we believe that priority should therefore be given to those products. Pending approval of LMWH for use in pregnancy, the use of LMWH off-label is the practitioner's responsibility.

Reviparin sodium - a new low molecular weight heparin

Reviparin sodium (Clivarine), Knoll AG) is a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) with a mean peak molecular weight of 3900 Da. It is characterised by a narrow molecular weight distribution profile, with an anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa):anti-factor IIa (anti-IIa) ratio of >or=3.6. In healthy human volunteers, plasma anti-Xa activity was up to five times higher and lasted three times longer with reviparin compared with unfractionated heparin (UFH). Unlike UFH, reviparin has negligible effects on global clotting tests. Reviparin has been shown to be as effective as UFH in different prophylactic indications and causes fewer injection-site haematomas. At a daily dose of 1750 IU anti-Xa it was as effective as UFH in preventing deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in moderate risk surgery (general and abdominal) and significantly reduced DVT in patients with brace immobilisation of the legs. At a daily dose of 4200 IU anti-Xa reviparin was as effective as UFH or enoxaparin in preventing DVT in high risk orthopaedic surgery and as effective as UFH in prevention of DVT and/or pulmonary embolism (PE) and/or mortality in high risk orthopaedic surgery. In patients with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE), reviparin was more effective than UFH in thrombus reduction and at least as effective as UFH in the prevention of clinical recurrence of DVT and/or PE. The use of reviparin is associated with a similar or lower incidence of bleeding complications than UFH.

Reviparin: a review of its efficacy in the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism

Reviparin (reviparin sodium) is a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) that catalyses the inactivation of factors Xa and IIa by binding to antithrombin, which ultimately leads to the inhibition of the clotting cascade. It is administered subcutaneously. Reviparin 7,000 to 12,600 anti-XaIU/day was found to be as effective as intravenous unfractionated heparin in preventing the clinical recurrence of acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and/or pulmonary embolism in 1 large randomised, multicentre trial (COLUMBUS) and was significantly more effective than intravenous unfractionated heparin in the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in another large randomised, multicentre trial (CORTES). Reviparin has also been compared with unfractionated heparin in children with established DVT. However, the trial was under-powered and no conclusion could be made regarding comparative efficacy. As prophylaxis, reviparin 1,750 anti-XaIU once daily was as effective as unfractionated heparin 5,000IU twice daily in 1,311 patients undergoing abdominal surgery and, in a once daily dosage of 4,200 anti-XaIU, was as effective as subcutaneous enoxaparin sodium 40 mg/day or acenocoumarol in patients undergoing hip replacement surgery. Reviparin 1,750 anti-XaIU also effectively prevented DVT. compared with no treatment, in patients undergoing knee arthroscopy. It was also more effective than placebo in patients with brace immobilisation of the lower extremity. Reviparin was compared with 'standard care' in children with central venous lines. However, the trial was too small to make conclusions regarding its efficacy. Comparative data indicate that reviparin is at least as well tolerated as heparin and enoxaparin sodium. However, in a large (n = 1,279) trial there were significantly fewer major bleeding episodes in patients receiving reviparin than in patients given the oral anticoagulant acenocoumarol. The most commonly reported adverse events in therapeutic trials have been intraoperative blood loss and postoperative bleeding complications such as wound haematoma, bruising and injection site haemorrhage. Reviparin was also well tolerated in 2 studies in children aged < or = 16 years.

CONCLUSION

Reviparin has shown efficacy in the treatment of established DVT and in the prevention of postoperative DVT after moderate and high risk surgery and was as effective as enoxaparin sodium or acenocoumarol in patients undergoing hip replacement surgery. As an effective and well tolerated antithrombotic agent, reviparin is likely to assume a significant role in the treatment and prevention of DVT, as it appears to have a preferable tolerability profile to subcutaneous heparin after moderate risk surgery and is at least as effective as intravenous heparin in the treatment of established DVT.

Pharmacology of low molecular weight heparins

Although intravenous heparin has been the treatment of choice for acute VTE disease, LMWHs are gaining wider recognition and support as not only a new option but also as the standard of care. Each LMWH is viewed as a unique drug by regulatory agencies because of their differing physical and pharmacokinetic attributes. LMWHs have high absorption, high bioavailability, and long half-lives enabling once- or twice-daily dosing with predictable dose-response relationships. These factors enable the LMWHs to be used without laboratory monitoring and at home for acute DVT management. Studies continue to show that LMWH preparations are as at least as effective as heparin in a variety of settings, including VTE disease prophylaxis, management of acute VTE disease, unstable angina, and NSTEMI. They are at least as safe as heparin relative to hemorrhagic complications. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is less of a problem with LMWHs. Use of LMWHs has resulted in cost benefits in the treatment of acute DVT, unstable angina, and NSTEMI as well as in prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism. Emergency physicians, because of their unique position at the forefront of acute care, will soon regularly use LMWHs.

Venous thromboembolism and pregnancy

Venous thromboembolism remains a major cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. Pregnancy is a thrombogenic state; therefore, clinicians must be familiar with the diagnosis and treatment of acute VTE. It is of paramount importance when caring for pregnant women to understand which patients are at risk for VTE and to use thromboprophylactic heparin accordingly.

Accumulation of low molecular mass heparin during prophylactic treatment in pregnancy

A history of thromboembolism is associated with an increased risk of new thromboembolic events during pregnancy. Prophylaxis with heparin during pregnancy implicates long-term treatment with daily injections with either unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low molecular mass heparin (LMMH). Prolonged treatment with heparin may result in endothelial absorption and drug accumulation. In order to test this hypothesis, anti-FXa activity during pregnancy was measured in four women allergic to conventional UFH, who were treated with LMMH (dalteparin; Pharmacia). It was found that, at the commencement of treatment, it took more than 8 days to reach a steady maximum peak value, located 3 h after the given dose. One daily dosage of 5,000 IU anti-Xa resulted in a measurable level of FXa for 24 h in pregnancy week 40, compared with 17h at pregnancy week 37. The implications of an elevated anti-FXa activity during pregnancy, especially during the third trimester and at partus, are discussed. We present a reduced dose regime near term and during delivery.

Use of antithrombotic agents during pregnancy

Anticoagulant therapy is indicated during pregnancy for the prevention and treatment of VTE; for the prevention and treatment of systemic embolism in patients with mechanical heart valves; and, often in combination with aspirin, for the prevention of pregnancy loss in women with APLAs or thrombophilia and previous pregnancy losses. Several questions concerning anticoagulant therapy remain unanswered. It appears that LMWH will largely replace UFH. Oral anticoagulants are fetopathic, but the true risks of the warfarin embryopathy and CNS abnormalities remain unknown. There is considerable evidence that warfarin embryopathy occurs only when oral anticoagulants are administered between the sixth week and the 12th week of gestation and that oral anticoagulants may not be fetopathic when administered in the first 6 weeks of gestation. Oral anticoagulant therapy should be avoided in the weeks before delivery because of the risk of serious perinatal bleeding caused by the trauma of delivery to the anticoagulated fetus. The safety of aspirin during the first trimester of pregnancy is still a subject of debate. There is a concern about the efficacy of UFH in the prevention of arterial embolism in pregnant women with mechanical heart valves. Finally, the optimum management of pregnant women with thrombophilia (and prior pregnancy loss and/or prior VTE) is unknown, but trials of anticoagulant therapy are ongoing. Because it is safe for the fetus, LMWH (or UFH) is the anticoagulant of choice during pregnancy for situations in which its efficacy is established. There is some doubt that heparin is effective for the prevention of systemic embolism in patients with mechanical heart valves. Low doses of heparin or poorly controlled heparin therapy are not effective in preventing systemic embolism in patients with mechanical heart valves.