The Role of Antisense Transcription in the Regulation of X-Inactivation

m6A modification of non-coding RNA and the control of mammalian gene expression

The biology of non-coding RNA (ncRNA) and the regulation of mammalian gene expression is a rapidly expanding field. In this review, we consider how recent advances in technology, enabling the precise mapping of modifications to RNA transcripts, has provided new opportunities to dissect post-transcriptional gene regulation. With this has come the realisation that in the absence of translation, the modification of ncRNAs may play a fundamental role in their regulation, protein interactome and subsequent downstream effector functions. We focus upon modification of RNA by N⁶-methyladenosine (m6A); its readers, writers and erasers, before considering the differing role of m6A modified lncRNAs MALAT1 and Xist. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: mRNA modifications in gene expression control edited by Dr. Soller Matthias and Dr. Fray Rupert.

MOF-associated complexes ensure stem cell identity and Xist repression

Histone acetyl transferases (HATs) play distinct roles in many cellular processes and are frequently misregulated in cancers. Here, we study the regulatory potential of MYST1-(MOF)-containing MSL and NSL complexes in mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and neuronal progenitors. We find that both complexes influence transcription by targeting promoters and TSS-distal enhancers. In contrast to flies, the MSL complex is not exclusively enriched on the X chromosome, yet it is crucial for mammalian X chromosome regulation as it specifically regulates Tsix, the major repressor of Xist lncRNA. MSL depletion leads to decreased Tsix expression, reduced REX1 recruitment, and consequently, enhanced accumulation of Xist and variable numbers of inactivated X chromosomes during early differentiation. The NSL complex provides additional, Tsix-independent repression of Xist by maintaining pluripotency. MSL and NSL complexes therefore act synergistically by using distinct pathways to ensure a fail-safe mechanism for the repression of X inactivation in ESCs.

DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02024.001

Gene expression is controlled by a complicated network of mechanisms involving a wide range of enzymes and protein complexes. Many of these mechanisms are identical in males and females, but some are not. Female mammals, for example, carry two X chromosomes, whereas males have one X and one Y chromosome. Since the two X chromosomes in females contain essentially the same set of genes, one of them undergoes silencing to prevent the overproduction of certain proteins. This process, which is called X-inactivation, occurs during different stages of development and it must be tightly controlled.

An enzyme called MOF was originally found in flies in two distinct complexes—the male-specific lethal (MSL) complex, which forms only in males, and the non-specific lethal (NSL) complex, which is ubiquitous in both males and females. These complexes are evolutionary conserved and are also found in mammals. While mammalian MOF is reasonably well understood, the MSL and NSL complexes are not, so Chelmicki, Dündar et al. have used various sequencing techniques, in combination with biochemical experiments, to investigate their roles in embryonic stem cells and neuronal progenitor cells in mice.

These experiments show that MSL and NSL complexes engage in the regulation of thousands of genes. Although the two complexes often show different gene preferences, they often regulate the same cellular processes. The MSL/NSL-dependent regulation of X chromosome inactivation is a prime example of this phenomenon.

The MSL complex reduces the production of an RNA molecule called Xist, which is responsible for the inactivation of one of the two X chromosomes in females. The NSL complex, meanwhile, ensures the production of multiple proteins that are crucial for the development of embryonic stem cells, and are also involved in the repression of X inactivation.

This analysis sheds light on how different complexes can cooperate and complement each other in order to reach the same goal in the cell. The knowledge gained from this study will pave the way towards better understanding of complex processes such as embryonic development, organogenesis and the pathogenesis of disorders like cancer.

DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02024.002

Transcriptional interference networks coordinate the expression of functionally related genes clustered in the same genomic loci

The regulation of gene expression is essential for normal functioning of biological systems in every form of life. Gene expression is primarily controlled at the level of transcription, especially at the phase of initiation. Non-coding RNAs are one of the major players at every level of genetic regulation, including the control of chromatin organization, transcription, various post-transcriptional processes, and translation. In this study, the Transcriptional Interference Network (TIN) hypothesis was put forward in an attempt to explain the global expression of antisense RNAs and the overall occurrence of tandem gene clusters in the genomes of various biological systems ranging from viruses to mammalian cells. The TIN hypothesis suggests the existence of a novel layer of genetic regulation, based on the interactions between the transcriptional machineries of neighboring genes at their overlapping regions, which are assumed to play a fundamental role in coordinating gene expression within a cluster of functionally linked genes. It is claimed that the transcriptional overlaps between adjacent genes are much more widespread in genomes than is thought today. The Waterfall model of the TIN hypothesis postulates a unidirectional effect of upstream genes on the transcription of downstream genes within a cluster of tandemly arrayed genes, while the Seesaw model proposes a mutual interdependence of gene expression between the oppositely oriented genes. The TIN represents an auto-regulatory system with an exquisitely timed and highly synchronized cascade of gene expression in functionally linked genes located in close physical proximity to each other. In this study, we focused on herpesviruses. The reason for this lies in the compressed nature of viral genes, which allows a tight regulation and an easier investigation of the transcriptional interactions between genes. However, I believe that the same or similar principles can be applied to cellular organisms too.

Combining resources to obtain a comprehensive survey of the bovine embryo transcriptome through deep sequencing and microarrays

While most assisted reproductive technologies (ART) are considered routine for the reproduction of species of economical importance, such as the bovine, the impact of these manipulations on the developing embryo remains largely unknown. In an effort to obtain a comprehensive survey of the bovine embryo transcriptome and how it is modified by ART, resources were combined to design an embryo-specific microarray. Close to one million high-quality reads were produced from subtracted bovine embryo libraries using Roche 454 Titanium deep sequencing technology, which enabled the creation of an augmented bovine genome catalog. This catalog was enriched with bovine embryo transcripts, and included newly discovered indel type and 3'UTR variants. Using this augmented bovine genome catalog, the EmbryoGENE Bovine Microarray was designed and is composed of a total of 42,242 probes, including 21,139 known reference genes; 9,322 probes for novel transcribed regions (NTRs); 3,677 alternatively spliced exons; 3,353 3'-tiling probes; and 3,723 controls. A suite of bioinformatics tools was also developed to facilitate microrarray data analysis and database creation; it includes a quality control module, a Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS) and microarray analysis software. Results obtained during this study have already led to the identification of differentially expressed blastocyst targets, NTRs, splice variants of the indel type, and 3'UTR variants. We were able to confirm microarray results by real-time PCR, indicating that the EmbryoGENE bovine microarray has the power to detect physiologically relevant changes in gene expression.

Comprehensive cross production system assessment of the impact of in vitro microenvironment on the expression of messengers and long non-coding RNAs in the bovine blastocyst

In vitroproduction (IVP) of cattle embryos over the past two decades has revealed several negative impacts that have been attributed to the artificial microenvironment. Studies on embryos producedin vitroclearly point to aberrant gene expression levels. So far, the causal association between phenotype and measured gene expression has not led to substantial improvement of IVP systems. The aim of this study was to generate a unique dataset composed of microarray-derived relative transcript abundance values for blastocysts produced in tenin vitrosystems differing primarily in culture medium formulation. Between-group comparisons determine the level of overall similarity among systems relative toin vivoreference embryos. The use of the dataset to contrast allin vitrotreatments with thein vivoblastocysts pointed to a single common gene network. The ‘boutique’ array contained a panel of novel uncharacterized transcripts that were variably expressed depending on the medium in which the blastocysts were produced. These novel transcripts were differentially expressed in blastocysts even as carryover from conditions encountered 7 days earlier during oocyte maturation. All of the selected novel candidates thus expressed were from intergenic regions. The function of this long non-coding RNA remains unknown but clearly points to an additional level of complexity in early embryo development.

Uncoupling antisense-mediated silencing and DNA methylation in the imprinted Gnas cluster

There is increasing evidence that non-coding macroRNAs are major elements for silencing imprinted genes, but their mechanism of action is poorly understood. Within the imprinted Gnas cluster on mouse chromosome 2, Nespas is a paternally expressed macroRNA that arises from an imprinting control region and runs antisense to Nesp, a paternally repressed protein coding transcript. Here we report a knock-in mouse allele that behaves as a Nespas hypomorph. The hypomorph mediates down-regulation of Nesp in cis through chromatin modification at the Nesp promoter but in the absence of somatic DNA methylation. Notably there is reduced demethylation of H3K4me3, sufficient for down-regulation of Nesp, but insufficient for DNA methylation; in addition, there is depletion of the H3K36me3 mark permissive for DNA methylation. We propose an order of events for the regulation of a somatic imprint on the wild-type allele whereby Nespas modulates demethylation of H3K4me3 resulting in repression of Nesp followed by DNA methylation. This study demonstrates that a non-coding antisense transcript or its transcription is associated with silencing an overlapping protein-coding gene by a mechanism independent of DNA methylation. These results have broad implications for understanding the hierarchy of events in epigenetic silencing by macroRNAs.

Genomic imprinting is a process resulting in expression of genes according to parental origin. Some imprinted genes are expressed when paternally derived and others when maternally derived. Thus imprinted genes are monoallelically expressed and one copy has to be silenced. There is evidence that some long non-coding RNAs, acting in cis, have a role in silencing. We investigated the role of Nespas, a gene for a non-coding RNA that is only expressed from the paternally derived chromosome in the Gnas cluster and runs antisense to its sense counterpart, Nesp. Expression of Nespas is associated with silencing of Nesp and a repressive methylation mark on the Nesp DNA. We generated a Nespas mutant with reduced levels of activity and showed that it down-regulated its sense counterpart Nesp, in the absence of a DNA methylation mark, but in the presence of an altered chromatin mark. We conclude that Nespas can repress Nesp by a mechanism independent of DNA methylation, by modulating a chromatin mark.

When one is better than two: RNA with dual functions

The central dogma of biology, until not long ago, held that genetic information stored on DNA molecules was translated into the final protein products through RNA as intermediate molecules. Then, an additional level of complexity in the regulation of genome expression was added, implicating new classes of RNA molecules called non-coding RNA (ncRNA). These ncRNA are also often referred to as functional RNA in that, although they do not contain the capacity to encode proteins, do have a function as RNA molecules. They have been thus far considered as truly non-coding RNA since no ORF long enough to be considered, nor protein, have been associated with them. However, the recent identification and characterization of bifunctional RNA, i.e. RNA for which both coding capacity and activity as functional RNA have been reported, suggests that a definite categorization of some RNA molecules is far from being straightforward. Indeed, several RNA primarily classified as non-protein-coding RNA has been showed to hold coding capacities and associated peptides. Conversely, mRNA, usually regarded as strictly protein-coding, may act as functional RNA molecules. Here, we describe several examples of these bifunctional RNA that have been already characterized from bacteria to mammals. We also extend this concept to fortuitous acquisition of dual function in pathological conditions and to the recently highlighted duality between information carried by a gene and its pseudogenes counterparts.

X chromosome inactivation in the absence of Dicer

Dicer is central to the RNA interference (RNAi) pathway, because it is required for processing of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) precursors into small RNA effector molecules. In principle, any long dsRNA could serve as a substrate for Dicer. The X inactive specific transcript (Xist) is an untranslated RNA that is required for dosage compensation in mammals. It coats and silences 1 of the 2 X chromosomes in female cells and initiates a chromosomewide change in chromatin structure that includes the recruitment of Polycomb proteins, but it is largely unknown how Xist RNA mediates these processes. To investigate a potential link between the RNAi pathway and X inactivation, we generated and analyzed Dicer-deficient embryonic stem (ES) cells. In the absence of Dicer, coating by Xist RNA, initiation of silencing, and recruitment of Polycomb proteins occur normally. Dicer ablation had modest effects on the steady-state levels of spliced Xist RNA. Together our data indicate that the RNAi machinery is not essential for the initiation of X inactivation.

Regulation of the mammalian epigenome by long noncoding RNAs

Genomic analyses have demonstrated that although less than 2% of the mammalian genome encodes proteins, at least two thirds is transcribed. Many nontranslated RNAs have now been characterized, and several long transcripts, ranging from 0.5 to over 100 kb, have been shown to regulate gene expression by modifying chromatin structure. Functions uncovered at a few well characterized loci demonstrate a wide diversity of mechanisms by which long noncoding RNAs can regulate chromatin over a single promoter, a gene cluster, or an entire chromosome, in order to activate or silence genes in cis or in trans. In reviewing the activities of these ncRNAs, we will look for common features in their interactions with the chromatin modifying machinery, and highlight new experimental approaches by which to address outstanding issues in ncRNA-dependent regulation of gene expression in development, disease and evolution.

Processing of naturally occurring sense/antisense transcripts of the vertebrate Slc34a gene into short RNAs

Overlapping sense/antisense RNAs transcribed in opposite directions from the same genomic locus are common in vertebrates. The impact of antisense transcription on gene regulation and cell biology is largely unknown. We show that sense/antisense RNAs of an evolutionarily conserved phosphate transporter gene (Slc34a2a) are coexpressed in a short time window during embryonic development of zebrafish at 48 hours postfertilization (hpf). To address the mechanism by which coexpressed sense/antisense transcripts are processed, we injected sense/antisense RNAs in various combinations into Xenopus oocytes. In the cytoplasm RNAs were stable in whatever combination expressed. In the nucleus coinjected sense/antisense transcripts were degraded into short RNAs of approximately 23 bases within 4 h. A homologous transcript from toad or another isoform (Slc34a2b) from zebrafish failed to trigger processing. In oocytes that were primed with nuclear sense/antisense RNA coinjections, a reporter RNA was rapidly degraded. We produced evidence that the observed processing of complementary transcripts was not restricted to Xenopus oocytes, because Slc34a-related short RNAs were detected in zebrafish embryos by Northern blotting. Signals were observed at stages that showed coexpression of sense/antisense transcripts. Remarkably, strand-specific probes revealed that the orientation of short RNAs was developmentally regulated. In addition, RNA from zebrafish embryos 48 hpf was able to induce degradation of reporter constructs in Xenopus oocytes. Our findings may give important clues to understanding the physiological role of the widespread antisense transcription.

Annotating noncoding RNA genes

Noncoding RNA genes produce a functional RNA product rather than a translated protein. More than 1500 homologs of known "classical" RNA genes can be annotated in the human genome sequence, and automatic homology-based methods predict up to 5000 related sequences. Methods to predict novel RNA genes on a whole-genome scale are immature at present, but their use hints at tens of thousands of such genes in the human genome. Messenger RNA-like transcripts with no protein-coding potential are routinely discovered by high-throughput transcriptome analyses. Meanwhile, various experimental studies have suggested that the vast majority of the human genome is transcribed, although the proportion of the detected RNAs that is functional remains unknown.

Lack of Gnas epigenetic changes and pseudohypoparathyroidism type Ib in mice with targeted disruption of syntaxin-16

Pseudohypoparathyroidism type Ib (PHP-Ib) is characterized by hypocalcemia and hyperphosphatemia due to proximal renal tubular resistance to PTH but without evidence for Albright's hereditary osteodystrophy. The disorder is paternally imprinted and affected individuals, but not unaffected carriers, show loss of GNAS exon A/B methylation, a differentially methylated region upstream of the exons encoding Gsalpha. Affected individuals of numerous unrelated kindreds with an autosomal dominant form of PHP-Ib (AD-PHP-Ib) have an identical 3-kb microdeletion removing exons 4-6 of syntaxin-16 (STX16) (STX16del4-6), which is thought to disrupt a cis-acting element required for exon A/B methylation. To explore the mechanisms underlying the regulation of exon A/B methylation, we generated mice genetically altered to carry the equivalent of STX16del4-6 (Stx16(Delta4-6)). Although the human GNAS locus shows a similar organization as the murine Gnas ortholog and although the human and mouse STX16/Stx16 regions show no major structural differences, no phenotypic or epigenotypic abnormalities were detected in mice with Stx16(Delta4-6) on one or both parental alleles. Furthermore, calcium and PTH levels in Stx16(Delta4-6) mice were indistinguishable from those in wild-type animals, indicating that ablation of the murine equivalent of human STX16del4-6 does not contribute to the development of PTH resistance. The identification of a novel intragenic transcript from within the STX16/Stx16 locus in total RNA from kidneys of Stx16(Delta4-6) mice and lymphoblastoid cell-derived RNA of a patient with AD-PHP-Ib raises the question whether this transcript contributes, if deleted or altered, to the development of AD-PHP-Ib in humans.

Tsix-mediated epigenetic switch of a CTCF-flanked region of the Xist promoter determines the Xist transcription program

Initiation of X inactivation depends on the coordinated expression of the sense/antisense pair Xist/Tsix. We show here that a precisely defined Xist promoter region flanked by CTCF is maintained by Tsix in a heterochromatic-like state in undifferentiated embryonic stem (ES) cells and shifts to a pseudoeuchromatic structure upon Tsix truncation. We further demonstrate that the epigenetic state of the Xist 5' region prior to differentiation predicts the efficiency of transcriptional machinery recruitment to the Xist promoter during differentiation. Our results provide mechanistic insights into the Tsix-mediated epigenetic regulation of Xist resulting in Xist promoter activation and initiation of X inactivation in differentiating ES cells.

Natural antisense and noncoding RNA transcripts as potential drug targets

Information on the complexity of mammalian RNA transcription has increased greatly in the past few years. Notably, thousands of sense transcripts (conventional protein-coding genes) have antisense transcript partners, most of which are noncoding. Interestingly, a number of antisense transcripts regulate the expression of their sense partners, either in a discordant (antisense knockdown results in sense-transcript elevation) or concordant (antisense knockdown results in concomitant sense-transcript reduction) manner. Two new pharmacological strategies based on the knockdown of antisense RNA transcripts by siRNA (or another RNA targeting principle) are proposed in this review. In the case of discordant regulation, knockdown of antisense transcript elevates the expression of the conventional (sense) gene, thereby conceivably mimicking agonist-activator action. In the case of concordant regulation, knockdown of antisense transcript, or concomitant knockdown of antisense and sense transcripts, results in an additive or even synergistic reduction of the conventional gene expression. Although both strategies have been demonstrated to be valid in cell culture, it remains to be seen whether they provide advantages in other contexts.

X-tra! X-tra! News from the mouse X chromosome

X chromosome inactivation (XCI) is the phenomenon through which one of the two X chromosomes in female mammals is silenced to achieve dosage compensation with males. XCI is a highly complex, tightly controlled and developmentally regulated process. The mouse undergoes two forms of XCI: imprinted, which occurs in all cells of the preimplantation embryo and in the extraembryonic lineage, and random, which occurs in somatic cells after implantation. This review presents results and hypotheses that have recently been proposed concerning important aspects of both imprinted and random XCI in mice. We focus on how imprinted XCI occurs during preimplantation development, including a brief discussion of the debate as to when silencing initiates. We also discuss regulation of random XCI, focusing on the requirement for Tsix antisense transcription through the Xist locus, on the regulation of Xist chromatin structure by Tsix and on the effect of Tsix regulatory elements on choice and counting. Finally, we review exciting new data revealing that X chromosomes co-localize during random XCI. To conclude, we highlight other aspects of X-linked gene regulation that make it a suitable model for epigenetics at work.

RNA regulation and cancer development

Cancer is viewed as a genetic disease. According to the currently accepted model of carcinogenesis, several consequential mutations in oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes are necessary for cancer development. In this model, mutated DNA sequence is transcribed to mRNA that is finally translated into functionally aberrant protein. mRNA is viewed solely as an intermediate between DNA (with 'coding' potential) and protein (with 'executive' function). However, recent findings suggest that (m)RNA is actively regulated by a variety of processes including nonsense-mediated decay, alternative splicing, RNA editing or RNA interference. Moreover, RNA molecules can regulate a variety of cellular functions through interactions with RNA, DNA as well as protein molecules. Although, the precise contribution of RNA molecules by themselves and RNA-regulated processes on cancer development is currently unknown, recent data suggest their important role in carcinogenesis. Here, we summarize recent knowledge on RNA-related processes and discuss their potential role in cancer development.

Random X-chromosome inactivation: skewing lessons for mice and men

The mammalian X-chromosome exists in two flavors, active and inactive, in each cell of the adult female. This phenomenon originates from the process of random choice occurring early in development in a small number of progenitor cells in which the decision is made to inactivate either one or the other X chromosome on a cell-autonomous basis. Once made, this initial decision is irreversible, although exceptions exist in specific chromosomal territories and cell lineages. Recent findings implicate various factors, including non-coding RNAs and chromatin modification complexes, as effectors in the initiation and maintenance of X-chromosome inactivation. The functional redundancy of such factors almost certainly plays an important role in the stability of the inactive X. Studying skewing or bias opens an important opportunity for understanding facets of the random choice process.

The Drosophila microRNA iab-4 causes a dominant homeotic transformation of halteres to wings

The Drosophila Bithorax Complex encodes three well-characterized homeodomain proteins that direct segment identity, as well as several noncoding RNAs of unknown function. Here, we analyze the iab-4 locus, which produces the microRNAs iab-4-5p and iab-4-3p. iab-4 is analogous to miR-196 in vertebrate Hox clusters. Previous studies demonstrate that miR-196 interacts with the Hoxb8 3' untranslated region. Evidence is presented that miR-iab-4-5p directly inhibits Ubx activity in vivo. Ectopic expression of mir-iab-4-5p attenuates endogenous Ubx protein accumulation and induces a classical homeotic mutant phenotype: the transformation of halteres into wings. These findings provide the first evidence for a noncoding homeotic gene and raise the possibility that other such genes occur within the Bithorax complex. We also discuss the regulation of mir-iab-4 expression during development.

Tsix transcription across the Xist gene alters chromatin conformation without affecting Xist transcription: implications for X-chromosome inactivation

X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) is highly dynamic during early mouse embryogenesis and strictly depends on the Xist noncoding RNA. The regulation of Xist and its antisense partner Tsix remains however poorly understood. We provide here the first evidence of transcriptional control of Xist expression. We show that RNA polymerase II (RNAPolII) preinitiation complex recruitment and H3 Lys 4 (H3-K4) methylation at the Xist promoter form the basis of the Xist expression profiles that drives both imprinted and random XCI. In embryonic stem (ES) cells, which are derived from the inner cell mass where imprinted XCI is reversed and both Xs are active, we show that Xist is repressed at the level of preinitiation complex (PIC) recruitment. We further demonstrate that Tsix, although highly transcribed in ES cells, is not itself responsible for the transcriptional down-regulation of Xist. Rather, Tsix induces efficient H3-K4 methylation over the entire Xist/Tsix unit. We suggest that chromatin remodeling of the Xist locus induced by biallelic Tsix transcription renders both Xist loci epigenetically equivalent and equally competent for transcription. In this model, Tsix, by resetting the epigenetic state of the Xist/Tsix locus, mediates the transition from imprinted to random XCI.