Initiation of transcription by RNA polymerase II: a multi-step process

Interplay between the transcription preinitiation complex and the +1 nucleosome

Eukaryotic transcription starts with the assembly of a preinitiation complex (PIC) on core promoters. Flanking this region is the +1 nucleosome, the first nucleosome downstream of the core promoter. While this nucleosome is rich in epigenetic marks and plays a key role in transcription regulation, how the +1 nucleosome interacts with the transcription machinery has been a long-standing question. Here, we summarize recent structural and functional studies of the +1 nucleosome in complex with the PIC. We specifically focus on how differently organized promoter-nucleosome templates affect the assembly of the PIC and PIC-Mediator on chromatin and result in distinct transcription initiation.

Structural visualization of transcription initiation in action

Transcription initiation is a complex process, and its mechanism is incompletely understood. We determined the structures of de novo transcribing complexes TC2 to TC17 with RNA polymerase II halted on G-less promoters when nascent RNAs reach 2 to 17 nucleotides in length, respectively. Connecting these structures generated a movie and a working model. As initially synthesized RNA grows, general transcription factors (GTFs) remain bound to the promoter and the transcription bubble expands. Nucleoside triphosphate (NTP)-driven RNA-DNA translocation and template-strand accumulation in a nearly sealed channel may promote the transition from initially transcribing complexes (ITCs) (TC2 to TC9) to early elongation complexes (EECs) (TC10 to TC17). Our study shows dynamic processes of transcription initiation and reveals why ITCs require GTFs and bubble expansion for initial RNA synthesis, whereas EECs need GTF dissociation from the promoter and bubble collapse for promoter escape.

Structures of +1 nucleosome-bound PIC-Mediator complex

RNA polymerase II-mediated eukaryotic transcription starts with the assembly of the preinitiation complex (PIC) on core promoters. The +1 nucleosome is well positioned about 40 base pairs downstream of the transcription start site (TSS) and is commonly known as a barrier of transcription. The +1 nucleosome-bound PIC-Mediator structures show that PIC-Mediator prefers binding to T40N nucleosome located 40 base pairs downstream of TSS and contacts T50N but not the T70N nucleosome. The nucleosome facilitates the organization of PIC-Mediator on the promoter by binding TFIIH subunit p52 and Mediator subunits MED19 and MED26 and may contribute to transcription initiation. PIC-Mediator exhibits multiple nucleosome-binding patterns, supporting a structural role of the +1 nucleosome in the coordination of PIC-Mediator assembly. Our study reveals the molecular mechanism of PIC-Mediator organization on chromatin and underscores the significance of the +1 nucleosome in regulating transcription initiation.

RPAP2 regulates a transcription initiation checkpoint by inhibiting assembly of pre-initiation complex

RNA polymerase II (Pol II)-mediated transcription in metazoans requires precise regulation. RNA Pol II-associated protein 2 (RPAP2) was previously identified to transport Pol II from cytoplasm to nucleus and dephosphorylates Pol II C-terminal domain (CTD). Here, we show that RPAP2 binds hypo-/hyper-phosphorylated Pol II with undetectable phosphatase activity. The structure of RPAP2-Pol II shows mutually exclusive assembly of RPAP2-Pol II and pre-initiation complex (PIC) due to three steric clashes. RPAP2 prevents and disrupts Pol II-TFIIF interaction and impairs in vitro transcription initiation, suggesting a function in inhibiting PIC assembly. Loss of RPAP2 in cells leads to global accumulation of TFIIF and Pol II at promoters, indicating a critical role of RPAP2 in inhibiting PIC assembly independent of its putative phosphatase activity. Our study indicates that RPAP2 functions as a gatekeeper to inhibit PIC assembly and transcription initiation and suggests a transcription checkpoint.

Structures of the human Mediator and Mediator-bound preinitiation complex

The 1.3-megadalton transcription factor IID (TFIID) is required for preinitiation complex (PIC) assembly and RNA polymerase II (Pol II)–mediated transcription initiation on almost all genes. The 26-subunit Mediator stimulates transcription and cyclin-dependent kinase 7 (CDK7)–mediated phosphorylation of the Pol II C-terminal domain (CTD). We determined the structures of human Mediator in the Tail module–extended (at near-atomic resolution) and Tail-bent conformations and structures of TFIID-based PIC-Mediator (76 polypeptides, ~4.1 megadaltons) in four distinct conformations. PIC-Mediator assembly induces concerted reorganization (Head-tilting and Middle-down) of Mediator and creates a Head-Middle sandwich, which stabilizes two CTD segments and brings CTD to CDK7 for phosphorylation; this suggests a CTD-gating mechanism favorable for phosphorylation. The TFIID-based PIC architecture modulates Mediator organization and TFIIH stabilization, underscoring the importance of TFIID in orchestrating PIC-Mediator assembly.

Structural insights into preinitiation complex assembly on core promoters

Transcription factor IID (TFIID) recognizes core promoters and supports preinitiation complex (PIC) assembly for RNA polymerase II (Pol II)-mediated eukaryotic transcription. We determined the structures of human TFIID-based PIC in three stepwise assembly states and revealed two-track PIC assembly: stepwise promoter deposition to Pol II and extensive modular reorganization on track I (on TATA-TFIID-binding element promoters) versus direct promoter deposition on track II (on TATA-only and TATA-less promoters). The two tracks converge at an ~50-subunit holo PIC in identical conformation, whereby TFIID stabilizes PIC organization and supports loading of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)-activating kinase (CAK) onto Pol II and CAK-mediated phosphorylation of the Pol II carboxyl-terminal domain. Unexpectedly, TBP of TFIID similarly bends TATA box and TATA-less promoters in PIC. Our study provides structural visualization of stepwise PIC assembly on highly diversified promoters.

A 50 year history of technologies that drove discovery in eukaryotic transcription regulation

Transcription regulation is critical to organism development and homeostasis. Control of expression of the 20,000 genes in human cells requires many hundreds of proteins acting through sophisticated multistep mechanisms. In this Historical Perspective, I highlight the progress that has been made in elucidating eukaryotic transcriptional mechanisms through an array of disciplines and approaches, and how this concerted effort has been driven by the development of new technologies.

The global regulator Ncb2 escapes from the core promoter and impacts transcription in response to drug stress in Candida albicans

Ncb2, the β subunit of NC2 complex, a heterodimeric regulator of transcription was earlier shown to be involved in the activated transcription of CDR1 gene in azole resistant isolate (AR) of Candida albicans. This study examines its genome-wide role by profiling Ncb2 occupancy between genetically matched pair of azole sensitive (AS) and AR clinical isolates. A comparison of Ncb2 recruitment between the two isolates displayed that 29 genes had higher promoter occupancy of Ncb2 in the AR isolate. Additionally, a host of genes exhibited exclusive occupancy of Ncb2 at promoters of either AR or AS isolate. The analysis also divulged new actors of multi-drug resistance, whose transcription was activated owing to the differential occupancy of Ncb2. The conditional, sequence-specific positional escape of Ncb2 from the core promoter in AS isolate and its preferential recruitment to the core promoter of certain genes in AR isolates was most noteworthy means of transcription regulation. Together, we show that positional rearrangement of Ncb2 resulting in either activation or repression of gene expression in response to drug-induced stress, represents a novel regulatory mechanism that opens new opportunities for therapeutic intervention to prevent development of drug tolerance in C. albicans cells.

The OsHAPL1-DTH8-Hd1 complex functions as the transcription regulator to repress heading date in rice

Heading date is an important agronomic trait related to crop yield. Many genes related to heading date have already been identified in rice (Oryza sativa), and a complicated, preliminary regulatory genetic network has also already been established, but the protein regulatory network is poorly understood. We have identified a novel heading date regulator, Heme Activator Protein like 1 (OsHAPL1), which inhibits flowering under long-day conditions. OsHAPL1 is a nuclear-localized protein that is highly expressed in leaves in a rhythmic manner. OsHAPL1 can physically interact with Days To Heading on chromosome 8 (DTH8), which physically interacts with Heading date 1 (Hd1) both in vitro and in vivo. OsHAPL1 forms a complex with DTH8 and Hd1 in Escherichia coli. OsHAPL1, DTH8, and Hd1 physically interact with the HAP complex, and also with general transcription factors in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae). Further studies showed that OsHAPL1 represses the expression of the florigen genes and FLOWERING LOCUS T 1 (RFT1) and Hd3a through Early heading date 1 (Ehd1). We propose that OsHAPL1 functions as a transcriptional regulator and, together with DTH8, Hd1, the HAP complex, and general transcription factors, regulates the expression of target genes and then affects heading date by influencing the expression of Hd3a and RFT1 through Ehd1.

Analysis of the sericin1 promoter and assisted detection of exogenous gene expression efficiency in the silkworm Bombyx mori L

In genetics, the promoter is one of the most important regulatory elements controlling the spatiotemporal expression of a target gene. However, most studies have focused on core or proximal promoter regions, and information on regions that are more distant from the 5′-flanking region of the proximal promoter is often lacking. Here, approximately 4-kb of the sericin1 (Ser1) promoter was predicted to contain many potential transcriptional factor binding sites (TFBSs). Transgenic experiments have revealed that more TFBSs included in the promoter improved gene transcription. However, multi-copy proximal Ser1 promoter combinations did not improve gene expression at the transcriptional level. Instead, increasing the promoter copy number repressed transcription. Furthermore, a correlation analysis between two contiguous genes, firefly luciferase (FLuc) and EGFP, was conducted at the transcriptional level; a significant correlation was obtained regardless of the insertion site. The ELISA results also revealed a significant correlation between the transcriptional and translational EGFP levels. Therefore, the exogenous gene expression level can be predicted by simply detecting an adjacent EGFP. In conclusion, our results provide important insights for further investigations into the molecular mechanisms underlying promoter function. Additionally, a new approach was developed to quickly screen transgenic strains that highly express exogenous genes.

Parcs/Gpn3 is required for the nuclear accumulation of RNA polymerase II

Parcs/Gpn3 is a putative GTPase that is conserved in eukaryotic cells from yeast to humans, suggesting that it plays a fundamental, but still unknown, cellular function. Suppression of Parcs/Gpn3 expression by RNAi completely blocked cell proliferation in MCF-12A cells and other mammary epithelial cell lines. Unexpectedly, Parcs/Gpn3 knockdown had a more modest effect in the proliferation of the tumorigenic MDA-MB-231 and SK-BR3 cells. RNA polymerase II (RNAP II) co-immunoprecipitated with Parcs/Gpn3. Parcs/Gpn3 depletion caused a reduction in overall RNA synthesis in MCF-12A cells but not in MDA-MB-231 cells, demonstrating a role for Parcs/Gpn3 in transcription, and pointing to a defect in RNA synthesis by RNAP II as the possible cause of halted proliferation. The absence of Parcs/Gpn3 in MCF-12A cells caused a dramatic change in the sub-cellular localization of Rpb1, the largest subunit of RNAP II. As expected, Rpb1 was present only in the nucleus of MCF-12A control cells, whereas in Parcs/Gpn3-depleted MCF-12A cells, Rpb1 was detected exclusively in the cytoplasm. This effect was specific, as histones remained nuclear independently of Parcs/Gpn3. Rpb1 protein levels were markedly increased in Parcs/Gpn3-depleted MCF-12A cells. Interestingly, Rpb1 distribution was only marginally affected after knocking-down Parcs/Gpn3 in MDA-MB-231 cells. In conclusion, we report here, for the first time, that Parcs/Gpn3 plays a critical role in the nuclear accumulation of RNAP II, and we propose that this function explains the relative importance of Parcs/Gpn3 in cell proliferation. Intriguingly, at least some tumorigenic mammary cells have evolved mechanisms that allow them to proliferate in a Parcs/Gpn3-independent manner.

Structure and basal transcription complex of RNA polymerase II core promoters in the mammalian genome: an overview

The mammalian core promoter is a sophisticated and crucial component for the regulation of transcription mediated by the RNA polymerase II. It is generally defined as the minimal region of contiguous DNA sequence that is sufficient to accurately initiate a basal level of gene expression. The core promoter represents the ultimate target for nucleation of a functional pre-initiation complex composed of the RNA polymerase II and associated general transcription factors. Among the more than 40 distinct proteins assembling the basal transcription complex, TFIID plays a central role in recognizing and binding specific core promoter elements to support creating an environment that facilitates transcription initiation. Several common DNA motifs, like the TATA box, initiator region, or the downstream promoter element, are found in a subset of core promoters present in various combinations. Another class of promoters that is usually absent of a TATA box is constituted by the so-called CpG islands, which are associated with the majority of protein-coding genes within the mammalian genome.

Transcription factors in long-term memory and synaptic plasticity

Transcription is a molecular requisite for long-term synaptic plasticity and long-term memory formation. Thus, in the last several years, one main interest of molecular neuroscience has been the identification of families of transcription factors that are involved in both of these processes. Transcription is a highly regulated process that involves the combined interaction and function of chromatin and many other proteins, some of which are essential for the basal process of transcription, while others control the selective activation or repression of specific genes. These regulated interactions ultimately allow a sophisticated response to multiple environmental conditions, as well as control of spatial and temporal differences in gene expression. Evidence based on correlative changes in expression, genetic mutations, and targeted molecular inhibition of gene expression have shed light on the function of transcription in both synaptic plasticity and memory formation. This review provides a brief overview of experimental work showing that several families of transcription factors, including CREB, C/EBP, Egr, AP-1, and Rel, have essential functions in both processes. The results of this work suggest that patterns of transcription regulation represent the molecular signatures of long-term synaptic changes and memory formation.

RNA stability regulates differential expression of the metastasis protein, osteopontin, in hepatocellular cancer

BACKGROUND

Osteopontin (OPN) is a potential therapeutic target in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), because it is a critical mediator of metastatic function. The molecular mechanisms that determine expression of OPN in HCC, however, are unknown. In this study, we examine differential OPN expression in the 2 HCC cell lines: HepG2 and Hep3B.

METHODS

OPN expression, metastatic function, OPN promoter activity, and active transcription of OPN mRNA and its decay were assessed in the 2 HCC cell lines using standard techniques. RNA gel-shift assays were performed to determine binding of cytoplasmic proteins to OPN mRNA.

RESULTS

Expression of OPN cellular/secreted protein and mRNA was greater in HepG2 than Hep3B cells (P < .01). Transient transfection of the OPN promoter construct demonstrated equivalent luciferase activities in the 2 cell lines; the rate of transcription was also equivalent as determined by chromatin immuno-precipitation assay. OPN mRNA half-life was 21 +/- 1 h and 3 +/- 1 h in HepG2 and Hep3B, respectively (P < .02). In HepG2 and Hep3B, the nucleotide sequence of OPN and its 5'-UTR, 3'-UTR, and poly (A) tail lengths were identical. A luciferase construct coupled in line with OPN-5'-UTR and OPN 3'-UTR presented greater expression in HepG2 (P < .01 vs Hep3B). Deletion of nt 10-57 of the OPN 5'-UTR restored luciferase and HA-tagged OPN protein expression in Hep3B but not in Hep G2. RNA gel-shift assays demonstrate different patterns of protein binding to OPN 5'-UTR between the 2 HCC cell lines.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that RNA stability is a new, previously unrecognized mechanism that regulates OPN expression in HCC to convey metastatic function.

Heterogeneity of transcription factor expression and regulation in human airway epithelial and smooth muscle cells

Transcription factors represent a major mechanism by which cells establish basal and conditional expression of proteins, the latter potentially being adaptive or maladaptive in disease. The complement of transcription factors in two major structural cells of the lung relevant to asthma, airway epithelial and smooth muscle cells, is not known. A plate-based platform using nuclear extracts from these cells was used to assess potential expression by binding to oligonucleotide consensus sequences representing >300 transcription factors. Four conditions were studied: basal, beta-agonist exposure, culture under proasthmatic conditions (IL-13, IL-4, TGF-beta, and leukotriene D(4)), and the dual setting of beta-agonist with proasthmatic culture. Airway epithelial cells expressed 70 transcription factors, whereas airway smooth muscle expressed 110. High levels of multiple transcription factors not previously recognized as being expressed in these cells were identified. Moreover, expression/ binding patterns under these conditions revealed extreme discordance in the direction and magnitude of change between the cell types. Singular (one cell type displayed regulation) and antithetic (both cell types underwent expression changes but in opposite directions) regulation dominated these patterns, with concomitant regulation in both cell types being rare (<10%). beta-Agonist evoked up- and downregulation of transcription factors, which was highly influenced by the proasthmatic condition, with little overlap of factors regulated by beta-agonists under both conditions. Together, these results reveal complex, cell type-dependent networks of transcription factors in human airway epithelium and smooth muscle that are dynamically regulated in unique ways by beta-agonists and inflammation. These factors may represent additional components in asthma pathophysiology or potential new drug targets.

Differential cellular requirements for activation of herpes simplex virus type 1 early (tk) and late (gC) promoters by ICP4

The herpes simplex virus type 1 immediate-early protein, ICP4, activates the transcription of viral early and late genes and is essential for viral growth. It has been shown to bind DNA and interact with components of the general transcription machinery to activate or repress viral transcription, depending upon promoter context. Since early and late gene promoters have different architectures and cellular metabolism may be very different at early and late times after infection, the cellular requirements for ICP4-mediated activation of early and late genes may differ. This hypothesis was tested using tk and gC as representative early and late promoters, respectively. Nuclear extracts and phosphocellulose column fractions derived from nuclear extracts were able to reconstitute basal and ICP4-activated transcription of both promoters in vitro. When examining the contribution of the general transcription factors on the ability of ICP4 to activate transcription, the fraction containing the general transcription factor TFIIA was not essential for ICP4 activation of the gC promoter, but it was required for efficient activation of the tk promoter. The addition of recombinant TFIIA restored the ability of ICP4 to efficiently activate the tk promoter, but it had no net effect on activation of the gC promoter. The dispensability of TFIIA for ICP4 activation of the gC promoter required an intact INR element. In addition, microarray and Northern blot analysis indicated that TFIIA abundance may be reduced at late times of infection. This decrease in TFIIA expression during infection and its dispensability for activation of late but not early genes suggest one of possibly many mechanisms for the transition from viral early to late gene expression.

Quantitative assessment of in vitro interactions implicates TATA-binding protein as a target of the VP16C transcriptional activation region

Models of mechanisms of transcriptional activation in eukaryotes frequently invoke direct interactions of transcriptional activation domains with target proteins including general transcription factors or coactivators such as chromatin modifying complexes. The potent transcriptional activation domain (AD) of the VP16 protein of herpes simplex virus has previously been shown to interact with several general transcription factors including the TATA-binding protein (TBP), TBP-associated factor 9 (TAF9), TFIIA, and TFIIB. In surface plasmon resonance assays, a module of the VP16 AD designated VP16C (residues 452-490) bound to TBP with an affinity notably stronger than to TAF9, TFIIA or TFIIB. Moreover, the interaction of VP16C with TBP correlated well with transcriptional activity for a panel of VP16C substitution variants. These results support models in which the interactions of ADs with TBP play an important role in transcriptional activation.

In vivo interactions of the Acanthamoeba TBP gene promoter

Transcription of the TATA box binding protein (TBP) gene in Acanthamoeba castellanii is regulated by TATA box binding protein promoter binding factor (TPBF), which binds to an upstream TBP promoter element to stimulate transcription, and to a TATA proximal element, where it represses transcription. In order to extend these observations to the in vivo chromatin context, the TBP gene was examined by in situ footprinting and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP). Acanthamoeba DNA is nucleosomal with a repeat of approximately 160 bp, and an intranucleosomal DNA periodicity of 10.5 bp. The TBP gene comprises a 220 bp micrococcal nuclease hypersensitive site corresponding to the promoter regulatory elements previously identified, flanked by protected regions of a size consistent with the presence of nucleosomes. ChIP data indicated that TPBF is associated with the TBP, TPBF and MIL gene promoters, but not to the CSP21, MIIHC, 5SrRNA or 39SrRNA promoters, or to the MIL gene C-terminal region. Binding by TPBF to the TPBF and MIL gene promoters was confirmed by in vitro assays. These results validate the in vitro model for TBP gene regulation and further suggest that TPBF may be autoregulated and may participate in the regulation of the MIL gene.

Repression of the luteinizing hormone receptor gene promoter by cross talk among EAR3/COUP-TFI, Sp1/Sp3, and TFIIB

Transcription of luteinizing hormone receptor (LHR) gene is activated by Sp1/Sp3 at two Sp1 sites and is repressed by nuclear orphan receptors EAR2 and EAR3 through a direct-repeat (DR) motif. To elucidate the mechanism of the orphan receptor-mediated gene repression, we explored the functional connection between the orphan receptors and Sp1/Sp3 complex, and its impact on the basal transcription machinery. The Sp1(I) site was identified as critical for the repression since its mutation reduced the inhibition by EAR2 and abolished the inhibition by EAR3. Cotransfection analyses in SL2 cells showed that both Sp1 and Sp3 were required for this process since EAR3 displayed a complete Sp1/Sp3-dependent inhibitory effect. Functional cooperation between Sp1 and DR domains was further supported by mutual recruitment of EAR3 and Sp1/Sp3 bound to their cognate sites. Deletion of EAR3 N-terminal and DNA-binding domains that reduced its interaction with Sp1 impaired its inhibitory effect on human LHR (hLHR) gene transcription. Furthermore, we demonstrate interaction of TFIIB with Sp1/Sp3 at the Sp1(I) site besides its association with EAR3 and the TATA-less core promoter region. Such interaction relied on Sp1 site-bound Sp1/Sp3 complex and adaptor protein(s) present in the JAR nuclear extracts. We further demonstrated that EAR3 specifically decreased association of TFIIB to the Sp1(I) site without interfering on its interaction with the hLHR core promoter. The C-terminal region of EAR3, which did not participate in its interaction with Sp1, was required for its inhibitory function and may affect the association of TFIIB with Sp1. Moreover, perturbation of the association of TFIIB with Sp1 by EAR3 was reflected in the reduced recruitment of RNA polymerase II to the promoter. Overexpression of TFIIB counteracted the inhibitory effect of EAR3 and activated hLHR gene transcription in an Sp1 site-dependent manner. These findings therefore indicate that TFIIB is a key component in the regulatory control of EAR3 and Sp1/Sp3 on the initiation complex. Such cross talk among EAR3, TFIIB, and Sp1/Sp3 reveals repression of hLHR gene transcription by nuclear orphan receptors is achieved via perturbation of communication between Sp1/Sp3 at the Sp1-1 site and the basal transcription initiator complex.

Giardia lamblia RNA polymerase II: amanitin-resistant transcription

Giardia lamblia is an early branching eukaryote, and although distinctly eukaryotic in its cell and molecular biology, transcription and translation in G. lamblia demonstrate important differences from these processes in higher eukaryotes. The cyclic octapeptide amanitin is a relatively selective inhibitor of eukaryotic RNA polymerase II (RNAP II) and is commonly used to study RNAP II transcription. Therefore, we measured the sensitivity of G. lamblia RNAP II transcription to alpha-amanitin and found that unlike most other eukaryotes, RNAP II transcription in Giardia is resistant to 1 mg/ml amanitin. In contrast, 50 microg/ml amanitin inhibits 85% of RNAP III transcription activity using leucyl-tRNA as a template. To better understand transcription in G. lamblia, we identified 10 of the 12 known eukaryotic rpb subunits, including all 10 subunits that are required for viability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The amanitin motif (amanitin binding site) of Rpb1 from G. lamblia has amino acid substitutions at six highly conserved sites that have been associated with amanitin resistance in other organisms. These observations of amanitin resistance of Giardia RNA polymerase II support previous proposals of the mechanism of amanitin resistance in other organisms and provide a molecular framework for the development of novel drugs with selective activity against G. lamblia.

Yeast and Human RNA polymerase II elongation complexes: evidence for functional differences and postinitiation recruitment of factors

Immobilized DNA templates, glycerol gradient centrifugation, and native gel analysis were utilized to isolate and compare functional RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) elongation complexes from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and human cell nuclear extracts. Yeast elongation complexes blocked by incorporation of 3'-O-methyl-GTP into the nascent transcript exhibited a sedimentation coefficient of 35S, were less tightly associated to the template than their human counterparts, and displayed no detectable 3'-5' exonuclease activity on the associated transcript. In contrast, blocked human elongation complexes were more tightly bound to the template, and multiple forms were identified, with the largest exhibiting a sedimentation coefficient of 60S. Analysis of the associated transcripts revealed that a subset of the human elongation complexes exhibited strong 3'-5' exonuclease activity. Although isolated human preinitiation complexes were competent for efficient transcription, their ability to generate 60S elongation complexes was strikingly impaired. These findings demonstrate functional and size differences between S. cerevisiae and human RNAPII elongation complexes and support the view that the formation of mature elongation complexes involves recruitment of nuclear factors after the initiation of transcription.

FCP1, a phosphatase specific for the heptapeptide repeat of the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II, stimulates transcription elongation

FCP1, a phosphatase specific for the carboxy-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II (RNAP II), was found to stimulate transcript elongation by RNAP II in vitro and in vivo. This activity is independent of and distinct from the elongation-stimulatory activity associated with transcription factor IIF (TFIIF), and the elongation effects of TFIIF and FCP1 were found to be additive. Genetic experiments resulted in the isolation of several distinct fcp1 alleles. One of these alleles was found to suppress the slow-growth phenotype associated with either the reduction of intracellular nucleotide concentrations or the inhibition of other transcription elongation factors. Importantly, this allele of fcp1 was found to be lethal when combined individually with two mutations in the second-largest subunit of RNAP II, which had been shown previously to affect transcription elongation.

Association of herpes simplex virus type 1 ICP8 and ICP27 proteins with cellular RNA polymerase II holoenzyme

Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) infection causes the shutoff of host gene transcription and the induction of a transcriptional program of viral gene expression. Cellular RNA polymerase II is responsible for transcription of all the viral genes, but several viral proteins stimulate viral gene transcription. ICP4 is required for all delayed-early and late gene transcription, ICP0 stimulates transcription of viral genes, and ICP27 stimulates expression of some early genes and transcription of at least some late viral genes. The early DNA-binding protein, ICP8, also stimulates late gene transcription. We therefore investigated which HSV proteins interact with RNA polymerase II. Using immunoprecipitation and Western blotting methods, we observed the coprecipitation of ICP27 and ICP8 with RNA polymerase II holoenzyme. The association of ICP27 with RNA polymerase II was detectable as early as 3 h postinfection, while ICP8 association became evident by 5 h postinfection, and the association of both was independent of viral DNA synthesis. Infections with ICP27 gene mutant viruses revealed that ICP27 is required for the association of ICP8 with RNA polymerase II, while studies with ICP8 gene deletion mutants showed no apparent role for ICP8 in the association of ICP27 with RNA polymerase II. The association of ICP27 and ICP8 with RNA polymerase II holoenzyme appeared to be independent of nucleic acids. We hypothesize that the interaction of ICP27 with RNA polymerase II holoenzyme reflects its role in stimulating early and late gene expression and/or its role in inhibiting host transcription and that the interaction of ICP8 with RNA polymerase II holoenzyme reflects its role in stimulating late gene transcription.

Biology of mammalian L1 retrotransposons

L1 retrotransposons comprise 17% of the human genome. Although most L1s are inactive, some elements remain capable of retrotransposition. L1 elements have a long evolutionary history dating to the beginnings of eukaryotic existence. Although many aspects of their retrotransposition mechanism remain poorly understood, they likely integrate into genomic DNA by a process called target primed reverse transcription. L1s have shaped mammalian genomes through a number of mechanisms. First, they have greatly expanded the genome both by their own retrotransposition and by providing the machinery necessary for the retrotransposition of other mobile elements, such as Alus. Second, they have shuffled non-L1 sequence throughout the genome by a process termed transduction. Third, they have affected gene expression by a number of mechanisms. For instance, they occasionally insert into genes and cause disease both in humans and in mice. L1 elements have proven useful as phylogenetic markers and may find other practical applications in gene discovery following insertional mutagenesis in mice and in the delivery of therapeutic genes.

Regulation of mammalian gene expression

The expression of mammalian genes is regulated primarily at the level of initiation of transcription. The regulatory structure of the mammalian genes consists of the sequence coding for a protein, a proximal upstream promoter sequence which binds the general (basal) transcription factors and a distant enhancer sequence which binds the inducible transcription factors. The general transcription factors are proteins which combine with the RNA polymerase at the promoter to form the initiation complex. Binding of the inducible transcription factors at short DNA sequences, named response elements, mostly enhances or rarely represses the formation of the initiation complex. Transcription factors share common structural motifs; the most frequent are zinc finger, leucine zipper and helix-loop-helix structures. Inducible transcription factors are activated to bind their target response elements on DNA by protein kinases, by binding of activating or removal of inhibitory factors, or by de novo protein synthesis. Inducible transcription factors are activated by hormones or growth factors addressing a number of genes which share common response elements. Steroid and thyroid hormones combine with intracellular receptors to form active transcription factors. Other transcription factors are activated by protein kinases which are themselves activated by hormones through cell membrane receptors and further cellular signaling paths. Whereas the main level of transcriptional control is the initiation of RNA synthesis, in some instances genes are also regulated by alternative splicing of the primary transcript or control of translation into proteins. Large-scale silencing of genes is mediated by the packing of DNA in highly condensed heterochromatin structures and DNA methylation at cytosines in defined guanine-cytosine (GC)-sequences.

RNA polymerase I holoenzyme-promoter interactions

In plants and animals, RNA polymerase I (pol I) can be purified in a form that is self-sufficient for accurate rRNA gene promoter-dependent transcription and that has biochemical properties suggestive of a single complex, or holoenzyme. In this study, we examined the promoter binding properties of a highly purified Brassica pol I holoenzyme activity. DNase I footprinting revealed protection of the core promoter region from approximately -30 to +20, in good agreement with the boundaries of the minimal promoter defined by deletion analyses (-33 to +6). Using conventional polyacrylamide electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA), protein-DNA complexes were mostly excluded from the gel. However, agarose EMSA revealed promoter-specific binding activity that co-purified with promoter-dependent transcription activity. Titration, time-course, and competition experiments revealed the formation or dissociation of a single protein-DNA complex. This protein-DNA complex could be labeled by incorporation of radioactive ribonucleotides into RNA in the presence of alpha-amanitin, suggesting that the polymerase I enzyme is part of the complex. Collectively, these results suggest that transcriptionally competent pol I holoenzymes can associate with rRNA gene promoters in a single DNA binding event.

Kinetic analysis of Sp1-mediated transcriptional activation of the human DNA polymerase beta promoter

In the present studies, we have examined the effect of Sp1 on the activation of the human DNA polymerase beta (beta-pol), a TATA-less promoter. A HeLa cell nuclear extract (NE) based in vitro runoff transcription system of core beta-pol promoter human DNA (pbetaP8) three-step kinetic model of transcription initiation were used to describe the kinetic effect of Sp1. The results showed that distal Sp1-binding sites in the core beta-pol promoter are important for transcriptional activation of the pbetaP8 promoter. A detailed kinetic analysis showed that Sp1 stimulates the activity of the pbetaP8 promoter through distal Sp1-binding sites by increasing the amount of recruitment, instead of stimulating the apparent rate of RPc assembly (k1). There was no significant effect of Sp1 on the apparent rate of open complex (RPo) formation (k2) or on the apparent rate of promoter clearance (k3) of the pbetaP8 promoter. These studies define the kinetic mechanisms by which Sp1 may regulate the rate of transcript formation of the pbetaP8 promoter, and these results may have implications for Sp1 regulation of TATA-less promoters.

Repressed expression of the human xanthine oxidoreductase gene. E-box and TATA-like elements restrict ground state transcriptional activity

Studies were initiated to address the basis for the low xanthine oxidoreductase (XOR) activity in humans relative to nonprimate mammalian species. The expression of the XOR in humans is strikingly lower than in mice, and both transcription rates and core promoter activity of the gene are repressed. Analysis of human XOR promoter activity in hepatocytes and vascular endothelial cells showed that the region from -258 to -1 contains both repressor and activator binding regions regulating core promoter activity. The region between -138 and -1 is necessary and sufficient for initiating, and the region between -258 and -228 is critical for restricting core promoter activity. Within the latter region, site-directed mutations identified a consensus sequence "acacaggtgtgg" (-242 to -230) that contains an E-box that binds a repressor. In addition, the TATA-like element is also required to restrict promoter activity and TFIID binds to this site. The results demonstrate that both an E-box and TATA-like element are required to restrict gene activity. A model is proposed to account for human XOR regulation.

Linker scanning analysis of TBP promoter binding factor DNA binding, activation, and repression domains

The transcription activator TATA box-binding protein promoter-binding factor (TPBF) is both an activator and repressor of TBP gene expression in Acanthamoeba. TPBF bears little similarity to previously characterized families of factors. In order to identify domains that are involved in DNA binding, activation, and repression, we constructed several alanine linker scanning mutants and tested them for their ability to function in a variety of assays. The DNA binding domain comprises a large 100-amino acid domain within the central third of the protein, suggesting that DNA recognition is accomplished by interactions derived from several structural units within this domain. Surprisingly, transcription activation and repression are impaired by mutations within either of two discrete amino acid sequences located on either side of the DNA binding domain. These data suggest that TPBF activation and repression are accomplished by interactions with the same target. Since TATA elements can function bidirectionally, and in solution TBP can bind to TATA elements in either orientation, we propose that TPBF functions in part by orienting TBP or TFIID correctly on the TATA box.

Transactivation activity of the human cytomegalovirus IE2 protein occurs at steps subsequent to TATA box-binding protein recruitment

The IE2 protein of human cytomegalovirus transactivates viral and cellular promoters through a wide variety of cis-elements, but the mechanism of its action has not been well characterized. Here, IE2-Sp1 synergy and IE2-TATA box-binding protein (TBP) interaction are examined by artificial recruitment of either Sp1 or TBP to the promoter. It was found that IE2 could cooperate with DNA-bound Sp1. A 117 amino acid glutamine-rich fragment of Sp1, which can interact with Drosophila TAF(II)110 and human TAF(II)130, was sufficient for the augmentation of IE2-driven transactivation. In binding assays in vitro, IE2 interacted directly with the C-terminal region of Sp1, which contains the zinc finger DNA-binding domain, but not with its transactivation domain, suggesting that synergy between IE2 and the transactivation domain of Sp1 might be mediated by other proteins such as TAF or TBP. It was also found that TBP recruitment to the promoter markedly increased IE2-mediated transactivation. Thus, IE2 acts synergistically with DNA-bound Sp1 and DNA-bound TBP. These results suggest that, in human cytomegalovirus IE2 transactivation, Sp1 functions at an early step such as recruitment of TBP and IE2 acts to accelerate rate-limiting steps after TBP recruitment.

TATA-Binding protein-interacting protein 120, TIP120, stimulates three classes of eukaryotic transcription via a unique mechanism

We previously identified a novel TATA-binding protein (TBP)-interacting protein (TIP120) from the rat liver. Here, in an RNA polymerase II (RNAP II)-reconstituted transcription system, we demonstrate that recombinant TIP120 activates the basal level of transcription from various kinds of promoters regardless of the template DNA topology and the presence of TFIIE/TFIIH and TBP-associated factors. Deletion analysis demonstrated that a 412-residue N-terminal domain, which includes an acidic region and the TBP-binding domain, is required for TIP120 function. Kinetic studies suggest that TIP120 functions during preinitiation complex (PIC) formation at the step of RNAP II/TFIIF recruitment to the promoter but not after the completion of PIC formation. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays showed that TIP120 enhanced PIC formation, and TIP120 also stimulated the nonspecific transcription and DNA-binding activity of RNAP II. These lines of evidence suggest that TIP120 is able to activate basal transcription by overcoming a kinetic impediment to RNAP II/TFIIF integration into the TBP (TFIID)-TFIIB-DNA-complex. Interestingly, TIP120 also stimulates RNAP I- and III-driven transcription and binds to RPB5, one of the common subunits of the eukaryotic RNA polymerases, in vitro. Furthermore, in mouse cells, ectopically expressed TIP120 enhances transcription from all three classes (I, II, and III) of promoters. We propose that TIP120 globally regulates transcription through interaction with basal transcription mechanisms common to all three transcription systems.

Dynamic regulation of the proinflammatory cytokine, interleukin-1beta: molecular biology for non-molecular biologists

Interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta) is a key mediator and modulator of a wide array of physiological responses important for survival. It is created by a variety of cell types, including immune cells, glia, and neurons. It is a very potent biological molecule, acting both at the periphery as well as within the central nervous system. The production and release of IL-1beta is tightly regulated by far more complex processes than previously thought. An appreciation of this complexity is necessary for proper interpretation of apparent contradictions in the literature where different aspects of IL-1beta expression are measured. Given that many researchers are not molecular biologists by training, yet need an appreciation of the controls that regulate the function of key proteins such as IL-1beta, this review is aimed at both: (a) clarifying the multiple levels at which IL-1beta production is modulated and (b) using IL-1beta regulation to explain the dynamics of gene regulation to non-molecular biologists. Three major topics will be discussed. First, regulation of IL-1beta production will be examined at every level from extracellular signals that trigger gene activation through release of active protein into the extracellular fluid. Second, regulation of IL-1beta bioavailability and bioactivity will be discussed. This section examines the fact that even after IL-1beta is released, it may or may not be able to exert a biological action due to multiple modulatory factors. Last is the introduction of the idea that IL-1beta regulation is, at times, beyond the direct control of host; that is, when IL-1beta production becomes dysregulated by pathogens.

An interaction between the N-terminal region and the core domain of yeast TFIIB promotes the formation of TATA-binding protein-TFIIB-DNA complexes

The general transcription factor IIB (TFIIB) plays an essential role in transcription of protein-coding genes by eukaryotic RNA polymerase II. We previously identified a yeast TFIIB mutant (R64E) that exhibited increased activity in the formation of stable TATA-binding protein-TFIIB-DNA (DB) complexes in vitro. We report here that the homologous human TFIIB mutant (R53E) also displayed increased activity in DB complex formation in vitro. Biochemical analyses revealed that the increased activity of the R64E mutant in DB complex formation was associated with an altered protease sensitivity of the protein and an enhanced interaction between the N-terminal region and the C-terminal core domain. These results suggest that the intramolecular interaction in yeast TFIIB stabilizes a productive conformation of the protein for the association with promoter-bound TATA-binding protein.

Effect of oxidative DNA damage in promoter elements on transcription factor binding

Reactive oxygen species produced by endogenous metabolic activity and exposure to a multitude of exogenous agents impact cells in a variety of ways. The DNA base damage 8-oxodeoxyguanosine (8-oxodG) is a prominent indicator of oxidative stress and has been well-characterized as a premutagenic lesion in mammalian cells and putative initiator of the carcinogenic process. Commensurate with the recent interest in epigenetic pathways of cancer causation we investigated how 8-oxodG alters the interaction between cis elements located on gene promoters and sequence-specific DNA binding proteins associated with these promoters. Consensus binding sequences for the transcription factors AP-1, NF-kappaB and Sp1 were modified site-specifically at guanine residues and electrophoretic mobility shift assays were performed to assess DNA-protein interactions. Our results indicate that whereas a single 8-oxodG was sufficient to inhibit transcription factor binding to AP-1 and Sp1 sequences it had no effect on binding to NF-kappaB, regardless of its position. We conclude from these data that minor alterations in base composition at a crucial position within some, but not all, promoter elements have the ability to disrupt transcription factor binding. The lack of inhibition by damaged NF-kappaB sequences suggests that DNA-protein contact sites may not be as determinative for stable p50 binding to this promoter as other, as yet undefined, structural parameters.

A conserved motif present in a class of helix-loop-helix proteins activates transcription by direct recruitment of the SAGA complex

The class I helix-loop-helix (HLH) proteins, which include E2A, HEB, and E2-2, have been shown to be required for lineage-specific gene expression during T and B lymphocyte development. Additionally, the E2A proteins function to regulate V(D)J recombination, possibly by allowing access of variable region segments to the recombination machinery. The mechanisms by which E2A regulates transcription and recombination, however, are largely unknown. Here, we identify a novel motif, LDFS, present in the vertebrate class I HLH proteins as well as in a yeast HLH protein that is essential for transactivation. We provide both genetic and biochemical evidence that the highly conserved LDFS motif stimulates transcription by direct recruitment of the SAGA histone acetyltransferase complex.

A protein phosphatase functions to recycle RNA polymerase II

Transcription is regulated by the state of phosphorylation of a heptapeptide repeat known as the carboxy-terminal domain (CTD) present in the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II (RNAPII). RNAPII that associates with transcription initiation complexes contains an unphosphorylated CTD, whereas the elongating polymerase has a phosphorylated CTD. Transcription factor IIH has a kinase activity specific for the CTD that is stimulated by the formation of a transcription initiation complex. Here, we report the isolation of a cDNA clone encoding a 150-kD polypeptide, which, together with RNAPII, reconstitutes a highly specific CTD phosphatase activity. Functional analysis demonstrates that the CTD phosphatase allows recycling of RNAPII. The phosphatase dephosphorylates the CTD allowing efficient incorporation of RNAPII into transcription initiation complexes, which results in increased transcription. The CTD phosphatase was found to be active in ternary elongation complexes. Moreover, the phosphatase stimulates elongation by RNAPII; however, this function is independent of its catalytic activity.

The biology of eukaryotic promoter prediction--a review

Computational prediction of eukaryotic promoters from the nucleotide sequence is one of the most attractive problems in sequence analysis today, but it is also a very difficult one. Thus, current methods predict in the order of one promoter per kilobase in human DNA, while the average distance between functional promoters has been estimated to be in the range of 30-40 kilobases. Although it is conceivable that some of these predicted promoters correspond to cryptic initiation sites that are used in vivo, it is likely that most are false positives. This suggests that it is important to carefully reconsider the biological data that forms the basis of current algorithms, and we here present a review of data that may be useful in this regard. The review covers the following topics: (1) basal transcription and core promoters, (2) activated transcription and transcription factor binding sites, (3) CpG islands and DNA methylation, (4) chromosomal structure and nucleosome modification, and (5) chromosomal domains and domain boundaries. We discuss the possible lessons that may be learned, especially with respect to the wealth of information about epigenetic regulation of transcription that has been appearing in recent years.

RNA polymerase II as a control panel for multiple coactivator complexes

1999 marks the 30th anniversary of the reported discovery of sigma factor and the bacterial RNA polymerase holoenzyme. In 1994, an RNA polymerase II complex was discovered in yeast - mammalian complexes were subsequently identified. Recent developments regarding the composition and function of RNA polymerase II complexes suggest, however, that the concept of the holoenzyme, as defined in bacteria, might not be relevant to eukaryotes.

Histone acetyltransferase and protein kinase activities copurify with a putative Xenopus RNA polymerase I holoenzyme self-sufficient for promoter-dependent transcription

Mounting evidence suggests that eukaryotic RNA polymerases preassociate with multiple transcription factors in the absence of DNA, forming RNA polymerase holoenzyme complexes. We have purified an apparent RNA polymerase I (Pol I) holoenzyme from Xenopus laevis cells by sequential chromatography on five columns: DEAE-Sepharose, Biorex 70, Sephacryl S300, Mono Q, and DNA-cellulose. Single fractions from every column programmed accurate promoter-dependent transcription. Upon gel filtration chromatography, the Pol I holoenzyme elutes at a position overlapping the peak of Blue Dextran, suggesting a molecular mass in the range of approximately 2 MDa. Consistent with its large mass, Coomassie blue-stained sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels reveal approximately 55 proteins in fractions purified to near homogeneity. Western blotting shows that TATA-binding protein precisely copurifies with holoenzyme activity, whereas the abundant Pol I transactivator upstream binding factor does not. Also copurifying with the holoenzyme are casein kinase II and a histone acetyltransferase activity with a substrate preference for histone H3. These results extend to Pol I the suggestion that signal transduction and chromatin-modifying activities are associated with eukaryotic RNA polymerases.

Structure of the rat glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor gene

The Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GIPR) is a member of the secretin-vasoactive intestinal polypeptide family of G-protein coupled receptors possessing seven transmembrane domains. We report here the cloning and the exon-intron structure of the rat GIPR gene, along with the identification and characterization of its 5'-flanking region. The coding region of the GIPR gene spans approximately 10.2 kilobases and contains 13 exons. Three additional exons, two encoding either 5' or 3' untranslated sequences and one contained in a novel alternatively spliced mRNA, were identified. The 5'-flanking sequences contained a number of transcription factor binding motifs, including a cAMP response element, an octamer binding site, three SP1 sites and an initiator element. However, neither a CAAT motif nor TATA box were found. Transient transfection assays demonstrated that the 5'-flanking region of the GIPR gene can efficiently promote transcription in RIN38 cells and that deletion of 50 base pairs containing a potential SPI binding sites leads to a 2.4-fold loss of transcriptional activity. In addition, transient transfection experiments comparing the relative promoter activities of 5'-flanking sequences of the GIPR gene in RIN38 and rat-2 cells suggests that distal negative regulatory sequences may control cell-specific expression.

Oestrogen receptor facilitates the formation of preinitiation complex assembly: involvement of the general transcription factor TFIIB

The action of oestrogen hormones is mediated through the oestrogen receptor (ER), a member of a large superfamily of nuclear receptors that function as ligand-activated transcription factors. Sequence-specific transcription factors, including the nuclear receptor superfamily, are thought to interact either directly or indirectly with general transcription factors to regulate transcription. Although numerous studies have focused on the identification of potential co-activators interacting with isolated trans-activation domains of ER, few have investigated the mechanisms by which ER transmits its signal to the basal transcription machinery. We show that ER does not stabilize the binding of the TATA-box binding protein (TBP) of the TFIID complex, or of TFIIB to the promoter, although a stable ER-TBP-TFIIB-promoter complex was detected, suggesting that ER, TBP and TFIIB might interact with each other to form a complex to the promoter. We also demonstrate that ER binds specifically to TFIIB, a key component of the preinitiation complex. Affinity chromatography with immobilized deletion mutants of ER maps a TFIIB interaction region that encompasses the DNA-binding domain. The addition of excess TFIIB to transcription reactions in vitro did not, however, affect the magnitude of transcriptional activation by ER. These results indicate that, in contrast with current models, ER does not activate transcription by increasing the rate of assembly of TFIIB into the transcription complex. An increased concentration of TFIIB was unable, by itself, to overcome the requirement for ER. By using an immobilized promoter-template assay employing nuclear extract from HeLa cells, recombinant human ER increased the stable association of subsequent components of the transcription machinery (TFIIE and TFIIF), in correlation with ER-induced transcription. Our results suggest that ER acts, in an early step, during or immediately after the formation of template-committed complexes containing TFIIB, favouring the recruitment of one or more components of the basic transcription machinery as well as co-activators.

Methylation in the initiation region of the first exon suppresses collagen pro-alpha2(I) gene transcription

Our previous studies demonstrated that the collagen alpha2(I) gene is hypermethylated in the promoter/first exon region after chemical transformation and the alpha2(I) promoter/first exon is sensitive to methylation in transfection studies. In this paper, we demonstrate that a minimum collagen promoter containing the preinitiation region (-41 to +54) driving luciferase reporter gene was inactivated by DNA methylation as judged by transfection assays. All the methylation sites within the preinitiation region were located in the first exon, not in the promoter. Methylation of the promoter construct inhibited transcription as determined by an in vitro assay, only if proteins were extracted from nuclei using 500 mM NaCl. Gel mobility shift analysis suggested that methylation within the first exon decreased the formation of the largest preinitiation complex while increasing the formation of faster migrating protein-DNA complexes. Competition gel mobility shift analysis indicated that the faster migrating protein-DNA complex could be competed by a smaller initiator probe which did not contain TATA binding region. A protein-DNA complex with increased affinity to methylated sequences was detected using the initiator probe, which contained two methylation sites and no TATA sequence (-25 to 30) suggesting that a separate repressor complex binds to the methylated sequences. Mutations at the methylation sites (+7, +23) in the first exon also increased the protein-DNA complex formation in gel shift analysis and inhibited collagen alpha2(I) transcription as judged by transient transfection and in vitro transcription assays. Therefore, these methylation sites in the preinitiation region are important for transcription of alpha2(I) gene and the protein responsible for the repression of transcription is extractable using high salt nuclear extracts.

A functionally distinct TATA box required for late progression through the Epstein-Barr virus life cycle

During EBV infection, lytic DNA replication activates late gene expression in trans via an uncharacterized pathway. In this study, we mapped the target of this regulatory cascade to a variant TATA box (TATTAAA) and the 3' flanking region within the core promoter of the BcLF1 gene. The inherent late activity of this core promoter is, surprisingly, disrupted by a heterologous enhancer, suggesting that late gene expression is regulated through core promoter sequences located in a transcriptionally inert environment.

Structure of the human transcription factor TFIIF revealed by limited proteolysis with trypsin

In this study, the human general transcription factor IIF (TFIIF), a heteromeric complex of RAP74 and RAP30 subunits, was subjected to limited proteolysis with trypsin. The central region of RAP74 was demonstrated to be highly sensitive to trypsin while both the N- and C-terminal regions contained trypsin-resistant structures. In contrast, RAP30 digestion occurred after proteolysis of RAP74. The digestion pattern of RAP74 recruited into the preinitiation complex showed no marked difference from that of IIF, while RAP30 in the complex was protected from trypsin. These results indicate that RAP74 apparently contains three structural domains, the central one of which is externally surfaced and unstructured, but RAP30 is internally wrapped by RAP74. Furthermore, the accessibility of the central region of RAP74 is unaltered in the minimal preinitiation complex, while RAP30 is involved in promoter recognition through its DNA binding activity.