Biochemical recurrence without PSA progression characterizes a subset of patients after radical prostatectomy. Prostate-specific antigen

Prostate-Specific Antigen as an Ultrasensitive Biomarker for Patients with Early Recurrent Prostate Cancer: How Low Shall We Go? A Systematic Review

Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) needs to be monitored with ultrasensitive PSA assays (uPSAs) for oncologists to be able to start salvage radiotherapy (SRT) while PSA is <0.5 µg/L for patients with prostate cancer (PCa) relapsing after a radical prostatectomy (RP). Our systematic review (SR) aimed to summarize uPSAs for patients with localized PCa. The SR was registered as InPLASY2023110084. We searched for studies on Google Scholar, PUBMED and reference lists of reviews and studies. We only included studies on uPSAs published in English and excluded studies of women, animals, sarcoidosis and reviews. Of the 115 included studies, 39 reported PSA assay methods and 76 reported clinical findings. Of 67,479 patients, 14,965 developed PSA recurrence (PSAR) and 2663 died. Extremely low PSA nadir and early developments of PSA separated PSAR-prone from non-PSAR-prone patients (cumulative p value 3.7 × 1012). RP patients with the lowest post-surgery PSA nadir and patients who had the lowest PSA at SRT had the fewest deaths. In conclusion, PSA for patients with localized PCa in the pre-PSAR phase of PCa is strongly associated with later PSAR and survival. A rising but still exceedingly low PSA at SRT predicts a good 5-year overall survival.

Early salvage radiotherapy in patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: Its impact and optimal candidate

AIM

We aimed to identify the optimal candidates for early salvage radiotherapy (SRT) among patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP).

METHODS

This multi-institutional retrospective study included 371 patients treated using SRT after RP. The median (range) PSA level at BCR was 0.36 (0.10-2.00) ng/mL. The association between early SRT (ie, starting PSA level < 0.50) and BCR after SRT was tested in each subgroup according to our own risk stratification.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 51 months. By multivariate analysis, pT3b, Gleason score ≥ 8, negative surgical margins, PSA doubling time < 6 months, and non-early SRT were associated with BCR after SRT. Patients were stratified by four risk factors other than non-early SRT: (1) low risk (0 risk factor), (2) intermediate risk (1 risk factor), and (3) high risk (≥2 risk factors). The BCR-free survival was higher in the early SRT group than the nonearly SRT group in the high-risk subgroup (P = 0.020), whereas that was similar between two groups in the low-risk and intermediate-risk subgroups (P = .79 and .18, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that early SRT was beneficial for the high-risk subgroup (P = .032), whereas early SRT was not associated with improved outcomes in the low-risk and intermediate-risk subgroups (P = .92 and 1.0, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggested that early SRT seemed to contribute to better biochemical control for patients with more adverse features, whereas no benefit was observed in men with no adverse features.

Radiotherapy for recurrent prostate cancer: 2018 Recommendations of the Australian and New Zealand Radiation Oncology Genito-Urinary group

The management of patients with biochemical, local, nodal, or oligometastatic relapsed prostate cancer has become more challenging and controversial. Novel imaging modalities designed to detect recurrence are increasingly used, particularly PSMA-PET scans in Australia, New Zealand and some European countries. Imaging techniques such as MRI and PET scans using other prostate cancer-specific tracers are also being utilised across the world. The optimal timing for commencing salvage treatment, and the role of local and/or systemic therapies remains controversial. Through surveys of the membership, the Australian and New Zealand Faculty of Radiation Oncology Genito-Urinary Group (FROGG) identified wide variation in the management of recurrent prostate cancer. Following a workshop conducted in April 2017, the FROGG management committee reviewed the literature and developed a set of recommendations based on available evidence and expert opinion, for the appropriate investigation and management of recurrent prostate cancer. These recommendations cover the role and timing of post-prostatectomy radiotherapy, the management of regional nodal metastases and oligometastases, as well as the management of local prostate recurrence after definitive radiotherapy.

Correlation between postoperative prostate-specific antigen and biochemical recurrence in positive surgical margin patients: Single surgeon series

Background

To evaluate the relationship between postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy, especially in patients with positive surgical margins (PSMs).

Materials and methods

A total of 144 patients who underwent radical prostatectomies performed by a single surgeon without any neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment were analyzed. Differences in clinicopathological factors were compared by surgical margin status, and the relationship between postoperative PSA level and BCR in patients with PSMs was evaluated.

Results

Fifty of the 144 patients (34.7%) had PSMs. Of these, 74% experienced BCR. The negative surgical margins and PSMs groups differed significantly in terms of PSA level at diagnosis, clinical T stage, and risk group by the cancer of the prostate risk assessment score (P = 0.002, P = 0.002, and P = 0.004, respectively). Also, the nadir PSA level, tumor volume, and BCR rate differed between the two groups (P = 0.007, P = 0.015, and P = 0.005, respectively) On Kaplan–Meier analysis, BCR-free survival was better in the negative surgical margins than the PSMs group (64.1 vs. 55.4 months, log-rank test, P = 0.011). BCR-free survival did not differ significantly in PSMs patients according to whether PSA level was or was not detectable at 1 month postoperatively. However, BCR-free survival improved when the nadir PSA level was undetectable (compared to detectable) in PSMs patients (64.3 vs. 26.1 months, log-rank test, P < 0.001). In PSMs patients belonging to the high risk group by cancer of the prostate risk assessment score, BCR-free survival was significantly better when the PSA level attained the nadir within 3 months, compared to > 6 months, postoperatively (64.2 vs. 29.5 months, log-rank test, P = 0.022).

Conclusion

If PSA is detectable in PSMs patients until 1 month after operation, cautious observation may be possible. If the nadir is attained within 3 months postoperatively in high-risk patients with PSMs, better BCR-free survival may be expected.

CAPRA-S predicts outcome for adjuvant and salvage external beam radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to evaluate the predictive value of the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment Postsurgical Score (CAPRA-S) for patients treated with radical prostatectomy followed by subsequent external beam radiotherapy (EBRT).

METHODS

A total of 373 patients treated with EBRT between January 2000 and June 2015 were identified in the institutional database. Followup and complete CAPRA-S score were available for 334 (89.5%) patients. CAPRA-S scores were sorted into previously defined categories of low- (score 0-2), intermediate- (3-5), and high-risk (6-12). Time to biochemical recurrence (BCR) was defined as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >0.20 ng/mL after EBRT. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and comparisons were made using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Overall median time from surgery to EBRT was 18 months (interquartile range [IQR] 8-36) and median followup since EBRT was 48 months (IQR 28-78). CAPRA-S predicted time to BCR (<0.001), time to palliative androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) (p=0.017), and a trend for significantly predicting overall survival (OS, p=0.058). On multivariate analysis, the CAPRA-S was predictive of time to BCR only (low-risk vs. intermediate-risk; hazard ratio [HR] 0.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.043-0.48, p=0.001). The last PSA measurement before EBRT as a continuous and grouped variable proved highly significant in predicting all outcomes tested, including OS (p≤0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

CAPRA-S predicts time to BCR and freedom from palliative ADT, and is borderline significant for OS. Together with the PSA before EBRT, CAPRA-S is a useful, predictive tool. The main limitation of this study is its retrospective design.

Radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy: A single-centre radiation oncology experience in trends of referral and treatment practices

INTRODUCTION

Our objective was to assess whether referral and treatment practices have changed since publication of the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) 8794 Trial in 2009, the first randomized study to demonstrate an overall survival advantage of adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) after radical prostatectomy (RP).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all medical charts of men who received RT at our institution between 2004 and 2014 following RP. All RT was conducted by a single radiation oncologist (DT). We divided the cohort into 2 groups according to first referral date before or after the SWOG 8794 trial publication (i.e., before 2010 and after 2010).

RESULTS

Medical charts were available for 161/165 patients (97.6%). RP was performed at the same institution in 58% of cases. The median time between surgery and first referral for RT decreased significantly from 672 days (interquartile range [IQR] 295-1449) before 2010 to 300 days (IQR 225-1023) after 2010 (p = 0.04). This trend was associated with lower median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at RT referral (0.26 μg/L [IQR 0.17-0.48] vs. 0.46 μg/L [IQR 0.25-0.90], respectively; p = 0.001). Androgen-deprivation therapy with RT nearly tripled over time from 13% before 2010 to 37% after 2010 (p = 0.003). Throughout the study period, the time interval between surgery and RT initiation was positively correlated with pT-stage (p = 0.001), Gleason score (p = 0.005) and PSA doubling time (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

At our tertiary-referral academic institution, post-RP patients are notably referred earlier for RT and at lower PSA values compared to men treated prior to 2010. Further study is necessary to evaluate this impact on biochemical recurrence-free survival.

Genomic prostate cancer classifier predicts biochemical failure and metastases in patients after postoperative radiation therapy

Purpose

To test the hypothesis that a genomic classifier (GC) would predict biochemical failure (BF) and distant metastasis (DM) in men receiving radiation therapy (RT) after radical prostatectomy (RP).

Methods and Materials

Among patients who underwent post-RP RT, 139 were identified for pT3 or positive margin, who did not receive neoadjuvant hormones and had paraffin-embedded specimens. Ribonucleic acid was extracted from the highest Gleason grade focus and applied to a high-density-oligonucleotide microarray. Receiver operating characteristic, calibration, cumulative incidence, and Cox regression analyses were performed to assess GC performance for predicting BF and DM after post-RP RT in comparison with clinical nomograms.

Results

The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the Stephenson model was 0.70 for both BF and DM, with addition of GC significantly improving area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to 0.78 and 0.80, respectively. Stratified by GC risk groups, 8-year cumulative incidence was 21%, 48%, and 81% for BF (P<.0001) and for DM was 0, 12%, and 17% (P=.032) for low, intermediate, and high GC, respectively. In multivariable analysis, patients with high GC had a hazard ratio of 8.1 and 14.3 for BF and DM. In patients with intermediate or high GC, those irradiated with undetectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA ≤0.2 ng/mL) had median BF survival of >8 years, compared with <4 years for patients with detectable PSA (>0.2 ng/mL) before initiation of RT. At 8 years, the DM cumulative incidence for patients with high GC and RTwith undetectable PSA was 3%, compared with 23% with detectable PSA (P=.03). No outcome differences were observed for low GC between the treatment groups.

Conclusion

The GC predicted BF and metastasis after post-RP irradiation. Patients with lower GC risk may benefit from delayed RT, as opposed to those with higher GC; however, this needs prospective validation. Genomic-based models may be useful for improved decision-making for treatment of high-risk prostate cancer.

Low detectable prostate specific antigen after radical prostatectomy--treat or watch?

PURPOSE

We determined whether the pattern of low detectable prostate specific antigen during the first 3 years of followup after radical prostatectomy would predict subsequent biochemical recurrence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An institutional database was queried to identify 1,136 patients who underwent open retropubic or robot-assisted radical prostatectomy between January 5, 1993 and December 29, 2008. After applying exclusion criteria we used serum prostate specific antigen and the prostate specific antigen pattern during the first 3 years of followup to divide 566 men into 3 groups, including 1) undetectable prostate specific antigen (0.03 ng/ml or less), 2) low detectable-stable prostate specific antigen (greater than 0.03 and less than 0.2 ng/ml, no 2 subsequent increases and/or prostate specific antigen velocity less than 0.05 ng per year) and 3) low detectable-unstable prostate specific antigen (greater than 0.03 and less than 0.2 ng/ml, 2 subsequent increases according to NCCN criteria and/or prostate specific antigen velocity 0.05 ng per year or greater). The primary end point was biochemical recurrence, defined as prostate specific antigen 0.2 ng/ml or greater, or receipt of radiation therapy beyond 3 years of followup.

RESULTS

Seven-year biochemical recurrence-free survival was 95%, 94% and 37% in the undetectable, low detectable-stable and low detectable-unstable groups, respectively (log rank test p <0.0001). On multivariate analysis the prostate specific antigen pattern during 3 years postoperatively (undetectable vs low detectable-unstable HR 15.9 and vs low detectable-stable HR 1.6), pathological T stage (pT2 vs greater than pT2 HR 1.8), pathological Gleason score (less than 7 vs 7 HR 2.3 and less than 7 vs 8-10 HR 3.3) and surgical margins (negative vs positive HR 1.8) significantly predicted biochemical recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of prostate specific antigen velocity and NCCN criteria for biochemical recurrence separated well men with low detectable prostate specific antigen after radical prostatectomy into those who required treatment and those who could be safely watched.

Adjuvant and salvage radiation therapy after prostatectomy: American Society for Radiation Oncology/American Urological Association guidelines

PURPOSE

The purpose of this guideline was to provide a clinical framework for the use of radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy as adjuvant or salvage therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A systematic literature review using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane database was conducted to identify peer-reviewed publications relevant to the use of radiation therapy after prostatectomy. The review yielded 294 articles; these publications were used to create the evidence-based guideline statements. Additional guidance is provided as Clinical Principles when insufficient evidence existed.

RESULTS

Guideline statements are provided for patient counseling, use of radiation therapy in the adjuvant and salvage contexts, defining biochemical recurrence, and conducting a restaging evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians should offer adjuvant radiation therapy to patients with adverse pathologic findings at prostatectomy (ie, seminal vesicle invastion, positive surgical margins, extraprostatic extension) and salvage radiation therapy to patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) or local recurrence after prostatectomy in whom there is no evidence of distant metastatic disease. The offer of radiation therapy should be made in the context of a thoughtful discussion of possible short- and long-term side effects of radiation therapy as well as the potential benefits of preventing recurrence. The decision to administer radiation therapy should be made by the patient and the multidisciplinary treatment team with full consideration of the patient's history, values, preferences, quality of life, and functional status. The American Society for Radiation Oncology and American Urological Association websites show this guideline in its entirety, including the full literature review.

Adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy after prostatectomy: AUA/ASTRO Guideline

PURPOSE

The purpose of this guideline is to provide a clinical framework for the use of radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy as adjuvant or salvage therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature review using the PubMed®, Embase, and Cochrane databases was conducted to identify peer-reviewed publications relevant to the use of radiotherapy after prostatectomy. The review yielded 294 articles; these publications were used to create the evidence-based guideline statements. Additional guidance is provided as Clinical Principles when insufficient evidence existed.

RESULTS

Guideline statements are provided for patient counseling, the use of radiotherapy in the adjuvant and salvage contexts, defining biochemical recurrence, and conducting a re-staging evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians should offer adjuvant radiotherapy to patients with adverse pathologic findings at prostatectomy (i.e., seminal vesicle invasion, positive surgical margins, extraprostatic extension) and should offer salvage radiotherapy to patients with prostatic specific antigen or local recurrence after prostatectomy in whom there is no evidence of distant metastatic disease. The offer of radiotherapy should be made in the context of a thoughtful discussion of possible short- and long-term side effects of radiotherapy as well as the potential benefits of preventing recurrence. The decision to administer radiotherapy should be made by the patient and the multi-disciplinary treatment team with full consideration of the patient's history, values, preferences, quality of life, and functional status. Please visit the ASTRO and AUA websites (http://www.redjournal.org/webfiles/images/journals/rob/RAP%20Guideline.pdf and http://www.auanet.org/education/guidelines/radiation-after-prostatectomy.cfm) to view this guideline in its entirety, including the full literature review.

NADiA ProsVue prostate-specific antigen slope is an independent prognostic marker for identifying men at reduced risk of clinical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVE

To validate the hypothesis that men displaying serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) slopes ≤ 2.0 pg/mL/mo after prostatectomy, measured using a new immuno-polymerase chain reaction diagnostic test (NADiA ProsVue), have a reduced risk of clinical recurrence as determined by positive biopsy, imaging findings, or death from prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 4 clinical sites, we selected a cohort of 304 men who had been followed up for 17.6 years after prostatectomy for clinical recurrence. We assessed the prognostic value of a PSA slope cutpoint of 2.0 pg/mL/mo against established risk factors to identify men at low risk of clinical recurrence using uni- and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses.

RESULTS

The univariate hazard ratio of a PSA slope >2.0 pg/mL/mo was 18.3 (95% confidence interval 10.6-31.8) compared with a slope ≤ 2.0 pg/mL/mo (P <.0001). The median disease-free survival interval was 4.8 years vs >10 years in the 2 groups (P <.0001). The multivariate hazard ratio for PSA slope with the covariates of preprostatectomy PSA, pathologic stage, and Gleason score was 9.8 (95% confidence interval 5.4-17.8), an 89.8% risk reduction for men with PSA slopes ≤ 2.0 pg/mL/mo (P <.0001). The Gleason score (<7 vs ≥ 7) was the only other significant predictor (hazard ratio 5.4, 95% confidence interval 2.1-13.8, P = .0004).

CONCLUSION

Clinical recurrence after radical prostatectomy is difficult to predict using established risk factors. We have demonstrated that a NADiA ProsVue PSA slope of ≤ 2.0 pg/mL/mo after prostatectomy is prognostic for a reduced risk of prostate cancer recurrence and adds predictive power to the established risk factors.

The elevated expression of a mismatch repair protein is a predictor for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE

The inability to predict clinical outcome of prostate cancer is a major impediment to effective treatment decisions and patient counseling. New markers of recurrence are needed to improve the accuracy of risk assessment and treatment of prostate cancer. Our previous studies identified a mismatch repair protein, PMS2, to be elevated in prostate cancer; here, we investigate the prognostic potential of this marker. We hypothesized that the elevation of PMS2 would correlate with disease outcome.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Retrospective quantitative immunohistochemistry was done to measure PMS2 in high-grade cancers of 166 men treated by radical prostatectomy with a biochemical recurrence rate of 56%. Associations between PMS2 levels, pathologic variables, and biochemical recurrence over time were determined.

RESULTS

The mean level of PMS2 protein was consistently higher in both cancer-associated benign epithelium and cancer cells of patients who recurred, compared with nonrecurrent patients. PMS2 was an independent predictor of time-to-recurrence in Cox multivariate analyses and significantly stratified patients based on outcome. PMS2 was able to improve the sensitivity of total percent Gleason 4/5 as a risk factor for recurrence in this cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

PMS2 protein levels were shown to be a predictor of time-to-recurrence after surgery. This study is the first to document that the elevation of a mismatch repair protein negatively correlates with prognosis and has implications in patient diagnosis and molecular profiling.

Prostate specific antigen nadir determined using ultra-sensitive prostate specific antigen as a predictor of biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy in Japanese males

OBJECTIVES

We examined whether the prostate specific antigen (PSA) nadir is a good predictor of biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed clinico-pathological data in 257 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. Twenty-nine patients of whom PSA nadir did not reach 0.1 ng/mL and three patients in whom second line therapy was started before biochemical failure were excluded, and 225 patients were subject to this study. We evaluated the changes in PSA value at very low (from less than 0.01-0.10 ng/mL) levels using an ultra-sensitive PSA assay after radical prostatectomy. Biochemical failure was defined as three consecutive elevations of PSA to above 0.1 ng/mL.

RESULTS

Biochemical failure-free survival was attained by 89.9% of patients at 1 year, 83.0% at 2 years, and 81.0% at 5 years. PSA nadir more than 0.01 ng/mL was strongly associated with biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy (P < 0.0001). Mean time to reach PSA nadir was 3.1 months. Preoperative PSA > 20 ng/mL (P = 0.0013), clinical T stage = T2 (P = 0.0462), Gleason score 8-10 (P = 0.0243) were also independent predictors of biochemical progression.

CONCLUSIONS

Prostate specific antigen nadir determined by ultra-sensitive PSA assay is an important parameter that is objective, reliable, and easily measured, and useful for predicting the subgroups of patients both most likely and unlikely to exhibit biochemical progression.

Efficiency of Ultrasensitive Prostate-specific Antigen Assay in Diagnosing Biochemical Failure After Radical Prostatectomy

BACKGROUND

Ultrasensitive prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a significant serum biomarker for identifying the PSA nadir and early biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy (RP). We assessed the efficiency of ultrasensitive PSA assay in the follow-up after RP.

METHODS

We generated longitudinal ultrasensitive PSA data using a computer program assuming that patients experienced biochemical failure after RP. The simulation experiments, based on several different scenarios, were performed to assess the sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of biochemical failure using ultrasensitive PSA values and to estimate the lead time, which is the time advantage of detecting positivity for biochemical failure using the ultrasensitive PSA values compared with conventional PSA assay. We validated the sensitivity, specificity and lead time using actual follow-up data of 182 patients receiving RP.

RESULTS

It was suggested that the sensitivity obtained from the actual data was more similar to that obtained using ultrasensitive PSA with an exponential increase than with a linear increase in the simulation experiments. Diagnosing biochemical failure based on two consecutive increases in the ultrasensitive PSA values was not recommended. Of non-biochemical failure patients, 9.4% showed four consecutive increases in their ultrasensitive PSA values. Average lead time in the actual data was 11.2 months (SD: 10.1).

CONCLUSIONS

For an accurate diagnosis of biochemical failure, our findings suggest the importance of a certain duration of follow-up and exclusion of false-positive results afterwards.

Clinicopathological features of patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy without progressive rise in serum prostate-specific antigen

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study was to characterize clinicopathological features of patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy who did not exhibit a progressive rise in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) during the follow-up period.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed data from 162 consecutive patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for clinically organ-confined prostate cancer without neoadjuvant hormonal therapy and were followed postoperatively for at least 1 year. The serum PSA value was measured using an ultrasensitive PSA assay system (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany), and biochemical recurrence was defined as a serum PSA of >or=0.1 ng/ml.

RESULTS

A total of 32 patients (19.8%) were diagnosed as having biochemical recurrence. Among these patients, we identified 10 (31.3%) with a serum PSA>0.1 ng/ml who had not shown PSA or clinical progression during a median follow-up of 34 months after radical prostatectomy. In these 10 patients, the median time to biochemical recurrence was 17 months, the median PSA velocity after biochemical recurrence was 0.034 ng/ml/year, and there was no patient whose serum PSA value became >0.4 ng/ml. There were no clinicopathological parameters except for PSA velocity that were significantly associated with the features of these 10 patients.

CONCLUSION

Because of the presence of a subset of patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy who will not show a progressive increase in serum PSA value, the indication for adjuvant therapy for such patients should be cautiously determined considering several factors, such as PSA kinetics.

Usefulness of the nadir value of serum prostate-specific antigen measured by an ultrasensitive assay as a predictor of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study was to determine whether the nadir value of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measured by an ultrasensitive assay could be a useful predictor of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included 127 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer without neoadjuvant hormonal therapy and were pathologically diagnosed as negative for lymph node metastasis. The serum PSA value was measured using an ultrasensitive PSA assay system (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany), and the findings were analyzed with respect to several clinicopathological factors. In this series, biochemical recurrence was defined as PSA persistently >0.2 ng/ml.

RESULTS

Based on the nadir PSA value, we divided 127 patients into three groups as follows: group A (n=99):<or=0.01 ng/ml; group B (n=16): 0.01-0.05 ng/ml, and group C (n=12): >or=0.05 ng/ml. The nadir PSA value was significantly associated with preoperative PSA value, but not other conventional clinicopathological prognostic parameters. During the observation period (median 31 months, range 6-75 months), biochemical recurrence occurred in 16 patients, that is, 1 in group A (6.3%), 4 in group B (25.0%), and 11 in group C (91.7%). Multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards regression model indicated that the nadir PSA value was an independent predictor for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that the nadir serum PSA value measured by an ultrasensitive assay could be a useful predictor of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer, and that careful follow-up should be considered in cases demonstrating a nadir PSA value>0.01 ng/ml because of the significantly higher probability of biochemical recurrence in such cases.

Conduite à tenir devant une ascension du PSA après rémission complète postprostatectomie ?

Between twenty and to forty percent of patients will develop an isolated PSA failure after a radical prostatectomy. Pelvic irradiation is a therapeutic option with curative intention. It is the best therapeutic option for young people with good prognostic factors. Combined radiation with hormonal or chemotherapy should be evaluated in patients with poor prognostic factors. For patients with a short life expectancy, hormonotherapy or a watch and see policy are acceptable options.

Is preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen level significantly related to clinical recurrence after radical retropubic prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the influence of preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and other clinicopathological variables on the probability of biochemical failure and clinical recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP) for localized prostate cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study was a retrospective survival analysis in 211 patients undergoing retropubic RP for clinically localized prostate cancer in the period 1988-2000. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method; survival endpoints were biochemical failure, defined as a PSA level of > or = 0.5 ng/mL or clinical recurrence consisting of palpable tumours in the prostatic fossa or distant metastases. In 58 patients with biochemical failure after surgery, we assessed the impact of the doubling time of serum PSA level (PSADT) on the risk of developing skeletal metastases or local recurrence.

RESULTS

The median (range) observation period was 66 (9-160) months. Biochemical failure occurred in 92 patients (44%) of whom 39 (42%) had local recurrence or skeletal metastases. There was a highly significant association (P < 0.001) between clinical T stage, histological grade, capsular penetration, surgical margin status, seminal vesicle invasion, preoperative serum PSA level and the probability of biochemical failure-free survival. By contrast there was no statistically significant association between preoperative serum PSA level, clinical T stage, surgical margin status, and clinical recurrence. There was a significant relationship between age (P = 0.021), histological grade (P = 0.025), capsular penetration (P = 0.018), seminal vesicle invasion (P = 0014), and clinical recurrence. Cox regression analysis showed that only histological grade and seminal vesicle invasion were independent predictors of clinical recurrence. In a subgroup of 58 patients with a rising serum PSA level after RP, a PSADT of < or = 12.8 months conferred a significantly higher risk (P = 0.015) of developing skeletal metastases than a PSADT of >12.8 months.

CONCLUSION

In the present patients undergoing RP the preoperative serum PSA level was not associated with the clinical outcome, whereas it was significantly related to biochemical failure rate. The probability of skeletal metastases was significantly associated with the PSADT after biochemical failure.

Multidisciplinary management of advanced prostate cancer: Changing perspectives on referring patients and enhancing collaboration between oncologists and urologists in clinical trials

Prostate cancer traditionally was managed by monotherapy, and treatment was almost exclusively provided by the urologic surgeon. As ongoing clinical trials in advanced disease identify novel agents or combination therapies with good tolerability and potential survival benefits, multidisciplinary management may offer optimal care for men with high-risk prostate cancer, as it does for women with breast cancer. Patients with high-risk recurrent or metastatic disease should be informed of clinical trials for which they may be eligible.