Early prostate-specific antigen failure following radical perineal versus retropubic prostatectomy: the importance of seminal vesicle excision

Location of positive surgical margin and its association with biochemical recurrence rate do not differ significantly in four different types of radical prostatectomy

Purpose

To analyze the location of the positive surgical margin (PSM) and its association with the biochemical recurrence (BCR) rate in cases of radical prostatectomy (RP) according to the type of surgery.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 1,880 cases of RP. Baseline characteristics were analyzed. Locations of the PSM were recorded in the four surgery groups as apex, anterior, posterolateral, and base and were analyzed by using chi-square test. The association of the location of the PSM with the BCR rate was analyzed by using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis according to the type of surgery, which included radical perineal prostatectomy (RPP, n=633), radical retroperitoneal prostatectomy (RRP, n=309), laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP, n=164), and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP, n=774).

Results

A PSM was found in a total of 336 cases (18%): 122 cases of RPP (18%), 67 cases of RRP (17%), 29 cases of LRP (17%), and 119 cases of RALRP (15%). The PSM rate did not differ significantly by surgical type (p=0.142). The location of the PSM was the apex in 136 cases (7.2%), anterior in 67 cases (3.5%), posterolateral in 139 cases (7.3%), and base in 95 cases (5.0%), and showed no significant difference according to surgical type (p=0.536, p=0.557, p=0.062, and p=0.109, respectively). The BCR rate according to the location of the PSM did not differ significantly for the four types of surgery (p=0.694, p=0.301, p=0.445, and p=0.309 for RPP, RRP, LRP, and RALRP, respectively).

Conclusions

The location of the PSM seemed to be unrelated to type of RP. There was no significant correlation between the BCR rate and the location of the PSM for any of the RP types.

Radical perineal prostatectomy: Our initial experience

OBJECTIVE

Radical prostatectomy is the standard treatment modality for localized prostate cancer. Minimally invasive surgery, especially robotic surgery, has attracted interest in the last 10 years, and open surgery has been less preferred. Among the open surgical procedures, the perineal approach is the least preferred by urologists, which may be related to their perception of its overall difficulty. In this study, we aimed to present our initial experience with learning and performing radical perineal prostatectomy (RPP) and to draw attention to this method.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

After a short training period between November 2011 and May 2013, RPP was performed on 9 patients with localized prostate cancer. The patients were evaluated as for medical, and perioperative and major postoperative complications.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 60.4±5.3 (50-68) years, the mean preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value was 5.8±1.3 (4.0-7.6) ng/mL and the mean prostate volume was 38.8±7.7 (28-54) cc. The biopsy Gleason score ranged from 5 to 7. The median follow-up period was 14 (3-30) months. Anastomotic stricture did not occur in any of the patients. Of the 9 patients, 4 (44%) were immediately continent after catheter removal, while the remaining patients were continent at the end of three months. Of the 7 patients who underwent nerve-sparing surgery, 2 had postoperative spontaneous erections. Erectile function was maintained with phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE-5) inhibitor treatment in 3, and with intracavernosal injection in 1 patient. Penile prosthesis implantation was performed in 1 patient.

CONCLUSION

RPP has been a promising procedure at the start with its favorable oncologic and functional outcomes. This method should be considered by urologists, although it has been previously perceived as a challenging surgical procedure to perform.

Seminal vesicle biopsies: an useful staging procedure-exposure of seminal vesicle biopsies protocol and review of the literature

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Although new MRI techniques have a high sensitivity but varying specificity with regard to diagnosing the seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) of prostate cancer, the low availability and high cost involved demands incorporating an inexpensive and accessible technique that might support adequate staging. Currently, uniformity does not exist with regard to the indication criteria of seminal vesicle biopsies (SVBs). Our objective is to analyse the protocol of SVBs at Morales Meseguer Hospital and conduct an exhaustive review of the literature in this field.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

SVBs were performed in patients who were amenable to a curative treatment and who showed at least one of the following indication criteria: prostate-specific antigen greater than or equal to 15 ng/ml, a prostate cancer nodule in the base of the prostate, or ultrasound abnormalities suggestive of vesicular involvement. SVBs were performed in 70 patients.

RESULTS

These results revealed a rate of SVI of 15.7 and 25.58 % among all patients and patients diagnosed with prostate cancer, respectively. All biopsied patients who tested positive for the three indication criteria had T3b prostate cancer. Patients with a prostate cancer that altered the base of the prostate according to either digital rectal examination or ultrasound showed a T3b rate of 53.8 %.

CONCLUSIONS

SVBs should be considered a complementary procedure for prostate cancer staging because provide important information and it is easy, inexpensive and has few complications.

Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: an athermal anterior approach to the seminal vesicle dissection

The seminal vesicles, particularly the lateral aspect and tips, are among the closest structures to the cavernous nerves and pelvic plexus. Given this proximity it is essential that the seminal vesicle dissection be performed in an athermal and atraumatic fashion during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). Traditionally the seminal vesicle dissection during RALP is performed by dividing the vas deferens and following it proximally to locate the tip of the seminal vesicle. Here we describe a modification to the traditional anterior approach to seminal vesicle dissection. Our modification allows the dissection to be performed athermally and efficiently with use of minimal traction. The dissection proceeds medially between the two terminal vas deferens to identify the medial surface of one of the seminal vesicles. This medial surface is avascular and can be developed easily along the length of the vesicle using blunt dissection. Once its tip is identified it is elevated with the fourth arm medially between the two vas deferens. The ipsilateral vas can then be clipped and divided below the level of the elevated seminal vesicle. The vascular supply to the seminal vesicle is then simply identified entering the lateral aspect of its tip. A hemolock clip is placed directly beneath the tip of the seminal vesicle to control its vasculature. The remainder of the dissection can be performed with sharp dissection. Using this technique the seminal vesicle can be excised entirely with minimal traction and no thermal energy. By elevating the tip medially away from the location of the pelvic plexus and cavernous nerves, inadvertent damage to these neural structures is avoided when placing the hemolock clips.

Retropubic versus perineal radical prostatectomy in early prostate cancer: eight-year experience

BACKGROUND

Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy in men and the second leading cause of cancer death. A randomized study was performed on patients with localized prostate cancer and treated with radical prostatectomy using the perineal or the retropubic approach comparing oncological outcomes, cancer control, and functional results.

STUDY DESIGN

Between 1997 and 2004, in a randomized study 200 patients underwent a radical prostatectomy performed by retropubic (100 patients) or perineal (100 patients) approach.

RESULTS

Differences between hospital stay, duration of catheter drainage, intraoperative blood loss, and transfusion requirements were statistically significant in favor of perineal prostatectomy. Differences between positive surgical margins and urinary continence in the two groups were not statistically significant at 6 and 24 months. Differences between erectile function at 24 months were statistically significant in favor of retropubic prostatectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Radical perineal prostatectomy is an excellent alternative approach for radical surgery in the treatment of early prostate cancer.

Complete Resection of Seminal Vesicles at Radical Prostatectomy Results in Substantial Long-Term Disease-Free Survival: Multi-institutional Study of 6740 Patients

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the disease-specific survival of patients with complete removal of the seminal vesicles (SVs) at radical prostatectomy and to develop a nomogram for the prediction of SV invasion (SVI).

METHODS

An analysis of 6740 patients from three institutions was performed. The primary outcome was biochemical failure analyzed according to the presence or absence of SVI using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model. The variables analyzed included age, biopsy Gleason score, clinical T stage, margin status, extracapsular extension, SVI, surgical Gleason score, initial prostate-specific antigen level, and institution. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the preoperative factors predicting for SVI and create the model for the nomogram.

RESULTS

Of the 6740 patients, 566 (8.4%) had positive SVs. The median follow-up was 33.4 months (range 1 to 239). The 5 and 10-year biochemical relapse-free survival rate was 38.0% and 25.6%, respectively, for patients with positive SVs and 85.7% and 77.2%, respectively, for patients with negative SVs (P <0.0001). In the multivariate model, all variables, except for biopsy Gleason score and T stage, were significant predictors of biochemical failure (P <0.05), and all variables, except for age, were predictors of SVI. The nomogram achieved an area under the curve of 0.80.

CONCLUSIONS

These results have demonstrated that a substantial number of patients with SVI are disease free at 5 and 10 years after complete excision without adjuvant therapy. These findings suggest the therapeutic efficacy of complete SV excision and can identify those with a nomogram-predicted increased risk of SVI who might benefit from complete excision.

Development and split-sample validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of seminal vesicle invasion at radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVES

Seminal vesicle preservation may have a beneficial impact on erectile and urinary function after radical prostatectomy (RP). We hypothesized that contemporary patients, at very low risk of seminal vesicle invasion (SVI), can be highly accurately identified with an equally contemporary SVI nomogram.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A nomogram predicting SVI was developed in a cohort study of 666 men diagnosed with 10 or more biopsy cores and treated with RP. Biopsy Gleason sum, prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and percentage of positive cores represented predictors in multivariable logistic regression models and formed the basis for the nomogram. The regression coefficient-based nomogram was then externally validated in a split-sample cohort of 230 patients. This cohort also served for a head-to-head comparison of external validity of the novel nomogram with two existing tools, namely Partin's SVI predictions and Koh's SVI nomogram.

RESULTS

Split-sample validation of the novel SVI nomogram demonstrated 79.2% accuracy versus 75.6% for Partin versus 77.7% for Koh. Our nomogram cutoff of 3% or less had 96.2% negative predictive value for identifying men at very low risk of SVI. This cutoff could have safely allowed omitting the removal of seminal vesicles in 45.2% of RP candidates, if incorrect classification of 1.7% of patients was judged acceptable.

CONCLUSIONS

The potential benefits of SV preservation can be safely accomplished in virtually 50% of contemporary men subjected to RP, if our tool's predictions are applied.

Preoperative parameters, including percent positive biopsy, in predicting seminal vesicle involvement in patients with prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Complete dissection of the SVs during RP can contribute to increased morbidity including erectile dysfunction and incontinence. Therefore we evaluated the clinical parameters associated with a positive SV finding on final pathology and identified those patients with a minimal risk of SV involvement for potential SV sparing surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our RP database from 1991 to 1999 to evaluate the incidence and clinical correlates of SV invasion. Variables studied included preoperative total serum PSA, percent positive biopsy cores, DRE and biopsy Gleason score. Statistical analysis included univariate, multivariate regression analysis and ROC curves.

RESULTS

Of our 1,056 patients 79 (7.4%) had SV involvement. Of the 356 patients with less than 17% positive biopsies, only 2 (0.5%) had SV involvement on final pathology. Preoperative PSA, biopsy Gleason score and percent positive biopsies were all highly predictive of SV invasion on multivariate analysis. Percent positive biopsy was found to be the single best predictor of seminal vesicle invasion (p <0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In our series percent positive biopsy was the single best predictor of SV invasion at the time of RP. An analysis of preoperative parameters including percent positive biopsy, biopsy Gleason score and preoperative PSA may define a subset of patients in which prospective studies could be used to determine the value and safety of SV sparing surgery.

Contemporary appraisal of radical perineal prostatectomy

PURPOSE

In the age of minimally invasive surgery there has been renewed interest in the perineal approach for the surgical treatment of prostate cancer. We reviewed recent publications regarding radical perineal prostatectomy (RPP) in an effort to define its role in the current management of localized prostate malignancy. At the same time we reviewed the relevant perineal anatomy and surgical approach necessary to perform this operation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a review of the literature with respect to RPP and included our own extensive experience with this operation, emphasizing patient selection, the current role of pelvic lymph node dissection, surgical anatomy, oncological outcomes and complications.

RESULTS

RPP is an effective treatment for localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate with oncological outcomes similar to those of the retropubic technique. In comparison to RRP, patients undergoing RPP have less postoperative discomfort, more rapid return of bowel function, more rapid return to work and a decreased transfusion rate. In addition, RRP is now often performed with cavernous nerve sparing. Prostate specific antigen screening has made the rate of lymph node metastasis low enough to omit lymphadenectomy in many cases.

CONCLUSIONS

There is still a role for RPP in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Erectile dysfunction after nerve sparing and incontinence rates are similar to those of RRP. In addition, it is less morbid then RRP without being as technically challenging as laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Is seminal vesicle ablation mandatory for all patients undergoing radical prostatectomy? A multivariate analysis on 1283 patients

OBJECTIVE

With a shift in prostate cancer stage and a majority of patients operated nowadays with PSA levels <10 ng/ml, rates of seminal vesicle (SV) invasion found on radical prostatectomy specimens have decreased as compared to historical data. Since SV-sparing surgery may possibly have an influence on post-operative erectile dysfunction and urinary recovery, we tried to determine which patients could be safely spared SV excision during radical prostatectomy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We used preoperative data from 1283 patients operated by radical retropubic prostatectomy--777 with serum PSA <10.0 ng/ml--to predict SV invasion on final pathological examination. Variables analyzed included age, digital rectal examination, serum PSA, biopsy Gleason score and percentage of biopsy cores invaded by prostate cancer. Statistical analysis included univariate, multivariate logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

Out of 1283 patients, 137 (10.6%) had SV involvement, 41/777 (5.2%) with PSA <10.0 ng/ml, 16.1% in the 10-20 ng/ml range and 26.2% when PSA was >20 ng/ml. Percentage of biopsies affected by prostate cancer and biopsy Gleason score were significant predictors of SV invasion in multivariate analysis, both in the entire population and in the subset of patients with PSA <10.0 ng/ml (p < 0.0001). Probability graphs created for patients with PSA <10 ng/ml indicate a risk of seminal invasion <5% when Gleason score on biopsy is <7 or when the percentage of biopsies affected by cancer is <50%.

CONCLUSIONS

Resection of SV might not be "oncologically" necessary in all patients undergoing RP when PSA levels are below 10 ng/ml except when biopsy Gleason score is > or =7 or when more than 50% of prostate biopsy cores show cancer involvement. SV-sparing surgery could be prospectively compared to standard retropubic prostatectomy in selected individuals analyzing potential benefits on erectile function and urinary continence.

Clinical strategies in the management of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy

Prostate cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death in men, following lung cancer. Although radical prostatectomy continues to be a curative treatment for most patients diagnosed with prostate cancer, nearly 25% of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy will have biochemical recurrence as defined by an increase in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level to >0.4 ng/mL after prostatectomy or a rapid doubling of the PSA over a 10-year follow-up period. The clinical challenges, an overview of available data, and a framework for the integration of this information for clinical management of biochemical recurrence postprostatectomy for prostate carcinoma are presented in this article. Therapeutic options, in addition to conservative management and watchful waiting, include radiation therapy and androgen deprivation. These options are discussed herein along with expected outcomes.

Prostate cancer: radical prostatectomy

Today, more men than ever before are being followed after radical prostatectomy. Prognosis and follow-up should be based on the pathologic specimen. Measurable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after surgery defines failure, with time to detectable PSA and rate of PSA rise being useful prognostic factors. The natural history of untreated biochemical failure is protracted, a fact to be considered in discussions of adjuvant treatment. Early in disease recurrence, imaging studies to locate residual disease rarely are useful clinically. Both adjuvant and salvage radiation to the prostate bed have benefits and risks, but neither is superior in overall prostate cancer survival. The timing of hormone therapy remains largely empiric. The promise of effective cytotoxic chemotherapy still is greater than its actual benefits, although novel cytostatic agents are being developed. The future management of this disease will improve with better molecular definition of risk and therapeutic response.

A centralized comparison of radical perineal and retropubic prostatectomy specimens: is there a difference according to the surgical approach?

PURPOSE

We performed a central review of pathology specimens from radical perineal and radical retropubic prostatectomies performed by a single surgeon. We determined whether differences exist in the 2 approaches in regard to the ability to obtain adequate surgical margins around the tumor and adequate extracapsular tissue around the prostate, and avoid inadvertent capsular incision.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The review included whole mount prostates from 60 patients who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy and 40 who underwent radical perineal prostatectomy. The pathologist (N. S. G.) was blinded to the surgical approach. All prostatectomies were consecutive and performed by the same surgeon (H. J. K.). To ensure consistency of the pathological measurements patients were excluded from analysis if they had undergone preoperative androgen ablation or a nerve sparing procedure, leaving 45 retropubic and 27 perineal prostatectomy specimens for further evaluation. Pertinent clinical parameters were assessed and a detailed pathological analysis of each specimen was performed.

RESULTS

In the retropubic and perineal groups 78% of the tumors were organ confined (stage pT2) with extracapsular extension (stage pT3) in the majority of the remaining patients. There was no significant difference in the positive margin rate for the retropubic and perineal procedures (16% and 22%, p = 0.53) or for Gleason 6 and 7 tumors only in the 2 groups (10% and 17%, respectively, p = 0.47). The capsular incision rate was 4% in each group. The distance of the tumor from the posterolateral margins and the amount of extracapsular tissue excised were equivalent in each group. Subgroups of patients with a prostate of less than 50 gm. and containing only low grade, low stage neoplasms were also analyzed. Subgroup analysis showed no difference in any variable.

CONCLUSIONS

Radical perineal prostatectomy is comparable to radical retropubic prostatectomy for obtaining adequate surgical margins, avoiding inadvertent capsular incisions and excising adequate extracapsular tissue around tumor foci. Additional patient accrual and prostate specific antigen followup would further help validate the similar efficacy of the 2 surgical approaches as treatment for prostate cancer.

Relative advantages and disadvantages of radical perineal prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy

In recent years prostate cancer has become the predominant malignancy in men. With the introduction of prostate specific antigen (PSA) the disease can be diagnosed at an early stage, at which surgical therapy can be curative. In the past century, the retropubic and the perineal routes were established as alternatives of surgical access to the gland for clinically localized prostate cancer. The selection of the operative route is mostly decided individually on the basis of surgical training and experience. The revived interest in perineal radical prostatectomy is explained by the fact that this technique has been associated with low morbidity. The differences of both surgical approaches of radical prostatectomy are elucidated and compared regarding tumor control and short and long term complication rates. Taking these results into consideration, specific advantages and disadvantages of radical perineal prostatectomy are emphasized.

The treatment of prostate cancer: an overview of current options

PURPOSE

The purpose of this report is to discuss the current treatment options available to the patient with prostate cancer in all stages of the disease.

OVERVIEW

With the exception of skin cancer, prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men in the United States. Most patients in the current era will present with organ-confined disease, amenable to curative treatment. Treatment for organ-confined disease includes watchful waiting, radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy, and cryosurgery in selective cases. Hormone therapy is the cornerstone of treatment of patients with advanced prostate cancer. There is no curative treatment for hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The availability of several therapeutic options for localized prostate cancer warrants careful consideration when planning treatment with curative intent. Patients need to be active participants in decision making, and they must be aware of the benefits and possible complications of the different types of treatment. Patients with advanced prostate cancer need to be aware that hormone treatment will provide temporization and palliation in the majority of cases. Hormone-resistant prostate cancer is refractory to most forms of conventional and experimental therapy.

Surgical and postoperative factors affecting length of hospital stay after radical prostatectomy

BACKGROUND

Radical prostatectomy continues to comprise the mainstay of therapy for localized prostate carcinoma. However, caring for radical prostatectomy patients accounts for approximately half of the $1.7 billion annual cost of prostate carcinoma treatment. Length of stay (LOS) after surgery appears to be one of the main components of this cost. The first step in reducing cost is to identify those variables associated with LOS. Radical prostatectomy can be performed using two very different surgical techniques and with each technique different costs are incurred. The objective of the current study was to identify factors associated with LOS as a function of surgical approach. To reduce potential biases due to patient requests for longer hospitalization or physician preferences in that regard, secondary objectives were to identify factors associated with time to fluid intake (TTF) and time to consume solid foods (TTS).

METHODS

An institutional-based, retrospective chart review of 313 men with clinically localized prostate carcinoma who underwent either a perineal (RPP) or retropubic (RRP) prostatectomy at a single university center from March 1988 to October 1996 was undertaken. Information regarding LOS was available for 311 patients. Linear regression models were used to assess the association between covariables and LOS. Poisson regression models for count data were used to assess associations between covariables and the secondary endpoints of TTF and TTS. Covariables included: preoperative (age, race, prostate specific antigen, Gleason score, clinical stage, lymph node resection, comorbidity, and admission time), intraoperative (surgical approach, surgeon, operative time, estimated blood loss, transfusion requirement, anesthetic approach, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score), and postoperative (pain management complications and transfusions) parameters.

RESULTS

The median LOS was 4 days (range, 1-19 days) for RPP and 5 days (range, 3-16 days) for RRP approaches. The final model included six main effects and three interaction terms. Overall, LOS decreased over time with LOS decreasing at a faster rate in patients who underwent RPP. In general, patients who underwent RRP had an increased LOS compared with patients who underwent RPP. Complications from surgery and age increased the LOS for all patients; however, the increase was greater in patients who underwent RPP. In addition, the use of intraoperative epidural anesthesia and the increased use of postoperative narcotics were associated with increased LOS for patients undergoing both surgical approaches. TTF and TTS were significantly longer for patients who underwent the retropubic approach compared with those patients who underwent the perineal approach. After adjustment for surgical approach no other covariables were found to be associated with TTF. After adjustment for surgical approach, the occurrence of complications was found to be associated with TTS, indicating that patients who experienced complications took longer before they could tolerate solid foods.

CONCLUSIONS

In view of the importance of clinical care pathways in reducing medical expenditures from radical prostatectomy, the results of the current study may contribute to the further refining of these pathways by highlighting the differences and similarities among the variables affecting LOS as a function of surgical approach.

Seminal vesicle-sparing radical prostatectomy: a novel concept to restore early urinary continence

OBJECTIVES

Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy continues to be a distressing problem, even with preservation of the neurovascular bundles and meticulous apical dissection. Recent studies suggest that motor and sensory components of the pelvic nerve may be affected by surgery, since both components are anatomically located in intimate contact with the seminal vesicles. We propose seminal vesicle-sparing radical prostatectomy to preserve pelvic innervation and improve the rate of urinary continence.

METHODS

Fifty-four patients were enrolled in this prospective study. A standard retropubic radical prostatectomy was performed in 34 patients. A seminal vesicle-sparing radical prostatectomy was performed in a pilot series of 20 consecutive patients. The seminal vesicle tip and surrounding tissue were preserved and carefully handled. In all patients, a modified pad test and posterior urethral sensory threshold test were performed preoperatively and 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively and correlated with urinary continence.

RESULTS

The intraoperative preservation of the seminal vesicle tip was possible in all patients in this pilot series (n = 20). In the seminal vesicle-sparing radical prostatectomy group, the continence rate was 60% after 6 weeks and 95% after 6 months. These rates were significantly higher than the continence rates in the standard prostatectomy group (18% and 82% at 6 weeks and 6 months, respectively). The sensory threshold levels in the seminal vesicle-sparing group were similar to the preoperative values and were significantly lower than the postoperative threshold levels in the standard prostatectomy group.

CONCLUSIONS

Seminal vesicle tip-sparing radical prostatectomy may be a surgical option to preserve pelvic innervation and maintain urinary continence after radical prostatectomy. Further randomized studies are necessary to elucidate the impact of seminal vesicle-sparing radical prostatectomy on restoration of urinary continence.

Urinary function after radical prostatectomy: a comparison of the retropubic and perineal approaches

OBJECTIVES

Urinary continence is one of the most significant outcomes after radical surgery for prostate cancer. Although both retropubic and perineal approaches to radical prostatectomy are commonly used, they have not yet been compared with respect to urinary continence and voiding function in a single-institution study using a validated patient-administered instrument. This study had two primary objectives: first, to assess whether differences exist between these two procedures with respect to the overall prevalence and resolution of postoperative urinary incontinence, and second, to determine the impact of the urinary incontinence on patient lifestyle in this patient population.

METHODS

A written instrument composed of the Urinary Function Questionnaire for Men after Radical Prostatectomy, the American Urological Association (AUA) Symptom Score, and seven items querying urinary retention and urinary function bother were mailed in February 1996 to 209 men who underwent radical prostatectomy by either the perineal (43%) or retropubic (57%) approach between January 1990 and December 1995. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the prevalence of urinary incontinence and urinary function bother as reported from this cross-sectional questionnaire. Logistic regression models were used to assess the association between reported urinary incontinence and surgical approach, AUA symptom scores, and treatment of incontinence after adjusting for possible confounders (eg, the time between surgery and questionnaire, and patient age).

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-seven men (80%) responded to the questionnaire. The median age of the participants at questionnaire administration was 68 years (range 43 to 80). Overall, 57% (95% confidence interval [CI] 50% to 63%) of the responders reported complete urinary continence at the time of the questionnaire, with a median time between surgery and the questionnaire of 2.7 years (range 0.3 to 5.4). When continence was defined as either complete dryness or minimal urinary leakage, 75% (95% CI 69% to 81%) of the responders reported being continent. In men who responded to the questionnaire within 2 years of surgery, the probability of experiencing complete urinary continence was similar between the two surgical approaches. In men who responded to the questionnaire more than 2 years after surgery, patients who had undergone perineal prostatectomy were more likely to report complete continence than those who underwent retropubic surgery. However, this observed difference disappears when continence was defined as either complete dryness or minimal urinary leakage. The major impact of urinary incontinence on patient lifestyle was observed in patients with more than just minimal leakage.

CONCLUSIONS

Radical perineal and radical retropubic prostatectomy have similar outcomes when patients with minor degrees of incontinence are grouped together with continent patients. Since the impact of a minimal degree of urinary incontinence on the patient's lifestyle after radical prostatectomy seems to be minor, currently we do not believe that postoperative continence status is a major factor in choosing one procedure over the other.