Resistance and allergy to recombinant human insulin

Rational Engineering of Islet Tolerance via Biomaterial-Mediated Immune Modulation

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) onset is characterized by an autoimmune attack on β islet cells within the pancreas, preventing the insulin secretion required to maintain glucose homeostasis. Targeted modulation of key immunoregulatory cell populations is a promising strategy to restore tolerance to β cells. This strategy can be used to prevent T1D onset or reverse T1D with transplanted islets. To this end, drug delivery systems can be employed to transport immunomodulatory cargo to specific cell populations that inhibit autoreactive T cell-mediated destruction of the β cell mass. The rational engineering of biomaterials into nanoscale and microscale drug carriers can facilitate targeted interactions with immune cells. The physicochemical properties of the biomaterial, the delivered immunomodulatory agent, and the target cell populations are critical variables in the design of these delivery systems. In this review, we discuss recent biomaterials-based drug delivery approaches to induce islet tolerance and the need to consider both immune and metabolic markers of disease progression.

Adaptive tolerance: Protection through self-recognition

The random nature of immunoglobulin gene segment rearrangement inevitably leads to the generation of self-reactive B cells. Avoidance of destructive autoimmune reactions is necessary in order to maintain physiological homeostasis. However, current central and peripheral tolerance concepts fail to explain the massive number of autoantibody-borne autoimmune diseases. Moreover, recent studies have shown that in physiological mouse models autoreactive B cells were neither clonally deleted nor kept in an anergic state, but were instead able to mount autoantibody responses. We propose that activation of autoreactive B cells is induced by polyvalent autoantigen complexes that can occur under physiological conditions. Repeated encounter of autoantigen complexes leads to the production of affinity-matured autoreactive IgM that protects its respective self-targets from degradation. We refer to this novel mechanism as adaptive tolerance. This article discusses the discovery of adaptive tolerance and the unexpected role of high affinity IgM autoantibodies.

Memory IgM protects endogenous insulin from autoimmune destruction

The enormous diversity of antibody specificities is generated by random rearrangement of immunoglobulin gene segments and is important for general protection against pathogens. Since random rearrangement harbors the risk of producing self-destructive antibodies, it is assumed that autoreactive antibody specificities are removed during early B-cell development leading to a peripheral compartment devoid of autoreactivity. Here, we immunized wild-type mice with insulin as a common self-antigen and monitored diabetes symptoms as a measure for autoimmune disease. Our results show that autoreactive anti-insulin IgM and IgG antibodies associated with autoimmune diabetes can readily be generated in wild-type animals. Surprisingly, recall immunizations induced increased titers of high-affinity insulin-specific IgM, which prevented autoimmune diabetes. We refer to this phenomenon as adaptive tolerance, in which high-affinity memory IgM prevents autoimmune destruction by competing with self-destructive antibodies. Together, this study suggests that B-cell tolerance is not defined by the absolute elimination of autoreactive specificities, as harmful autoantibody responses can be generated in wild-type animals. In contrast, inducible generation of autoantigen-specific affinity-matured IgM acts as a protective mechanism preventing self-destruction.

Exogenous insulin antibody syndrome (EIAS): a clinical syndrome associated with insulin antibodies induced by exogenous insulin in diabetic patients

Insulin has been used for diabetes therapy and has achieved significant therapeutic effect. In recent years, the use of purified and recombinant human insulin preparations has markedly reduced, but not completely suppressed, the incidence of insulin antibodies (IAs). IAs induced by exogenous insulin in diabetic patients is associated with clinical events, which is named exogenous insulin antibody syndrome (EIAS). The present review is based on our research and summarizes the characterization of IAs, the factors affecting IA development, the clinical significance of IAs and the treatments for EIAS.

Can a faulty injection technique lead to a localized insulin allergy?

Insulin allergy is a rare occurrence which can present diagnostic and management dilemmas for the clinician. Three types of reaction have been reported: Localized, generalized (systemic), and insulin resistance. All need to be considered in cases of suspected insulin allergy. Adverse reactions to insulin have significantly decreased since the introduction of recombinant human insulin preparations. However, cases with insulin allergy continues to present in the clinic. Symptoms range from local injection site reactions to severe generalized anaphylactic reactions. The case study presented here describes an event of suspected insulin allergy arising out of faulty insulin injection technique.

Plain and mono-pegylated recombinant human insulin exhibit similar stress-induced aggregation profiles

PEGylation has been suggested to improve the stability of insulin, but evidence for that is scarce. Here, we compared the forced aggregation behavior of insulin and mono-PEGylated insulin. Therefore, recombinant human insulin was conjugated on lysine B29 with 5-kDa PEG. PEG-insulin was purified by size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) and characterized by mass spectrometry (MS). Next, insulin and PEG-insulin were subjected to heating at 75 °C, metal-catalyzed oxidation, and glutaraldehyde cross-linking. The products were characterized physicochemically by complementary analytical methods. Mono-PEGylation of insulin was confirmed by SEC and MS. Under each of the applied stress conditions, insulin and PEG-insulin showed comparable degradation profiles. All the stressed samples showed submicron aggregates in the size range between 50 and 500 nm. Covalent aggregates and conformational changes were found for both oxidized products. Insulin and its PEGylated counterpart also exhibited similar characteristics when exposed to heat stress, that is, slightly changed secondary and tertiary structures, covalent aggregates with partially intact epitopes, and separation of chain A from chain B. Both glutaraldehyde-treated insulin and PEG-insulin contained covalent and noncovalent aggregates with intact epitopes, showed partially perturbed secondary structure, and substantial loss of tertiary structure. From these results, we conclude that PEGylation does not protect insulin against forced aggregation.

Insulin signaling pathways in a patient with insulin resistance of difficult management - a case report

Insulin signalling pathways were investigated in a 33 year-old woman with immunologic insulin resistance. Her past medical history was remarkable for intermittent use of insulin and allergic reactions to several drugs, and measure of plasma anti-insulin antibodies level corroborated the clinical suspicion of immune mediated insulin resistance (8074 nU/ml - RIA - Ref value: <60). Treatment with several immunosuppressive regimens was tried, however the results were disappointing. Possible subcellular mechanisms of insulin resistance were investigated by performing analysis of insulin receptor and post receptor signaling in skeletal muscle biopsy. The expression of insulin receptor (IR), insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS-1) and glucose transporter 4 (GLUT-4) was evaluated in total extract from muscle tissue by Western blotting. Basal IR, IRS-1 and GLUT-4 expression was detected, however receptor autophosphorylation was not observed. A study of translocation of GLUT-4 to plasma membrane showed that tissue presented low levels of membrane-associated GLUT-4. When in vitro stimulation was undertaken, tissue was capable to be responsive to insulin. Our results suggest that even though IR expression was normally occurring, IR beta-subunit tyrosine kinase activity in muscle was down-regulated leading to alterations in insulin post receptor signaling. Consistent with normal insulin receptor and post receptor signaling, our results were compatible with decreased insulin binding to IR probably due to neutralization by anti-insulin antibodies. In conclusion, this patient has immunologic insulin resistance and treatment should be based on immunosuppressive drugs as tolerated.

Circulating insulin antibodies: influence of continuous subcutaneous or intraperitoneal insulin infusion, and impact on glucose control

The purification of animal insulin preparations and the use of human recombinant insulin have markedly reduced the incidence, but not completely suppressed, the development of anti-insulin antibodies (IAs). Advances in technologies concerning the mode of delivery of insulin, i.e. continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII), continuous peritoneal insulin infusion (CPII) and more recently inhaled insulin administration, appear to significantly increase circulating levels of immunoglobulin G (IgG) anti-IAs in diabetic patients. However, the increase is usually moderate and mostly transient as compared to previous observations with poorly purified animal insulin preparations. The clinical impact of these circulating anti-IAs remains unclear. Nevertheless, several studies have suggested that antibodies could retard insulin action, leading to a worsening of postprandial hyperglycaemia and/or serve as a carrier, thus leading to unexpected hypoglycaemia. CPII may be associated with more marked and sustained increase in IAs levels, possibly related to the use of an unstable insulin and the formation of immunogenic aggregates of insulin. The possible clinical consequences of these high levels of IAs remain to be evaluated because a low-glucose morning syndrome or severe insulin resistance with ketone bodies production have been reported in some cases. In conclusion, even if CSII and CPII may promote the development of circulating IAs, this increase does not lead to immunological insulin resistance, compared to that previously described with animal non-purified insulin preparations, and seems to have only marginal influence on blood glucose control or complications in most diabetic patients.

Severe insulin resistance secondary to insulin antibodies: successful treatment with the immunosuppressant MMF

We have evaluated the use of the immunosuppressant mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in the treatment of severe insulin resistance caused by neutralising anti-insulin antibodies in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). A 12-yr-old boy with a 5-month history of T1DM developed severe immunological insulin resistance secondary to human insulin antibodies. Various different treatment modalities, including lispro insulin, intravenous insulin, prednisolone and immunoabsorption, were tried, all without a sustained response to treatment. Although the introduction of the immunosuppressant MMF only resulted in a small reduction in haemoglobin A1c (from 10.9 to 9.8%), it did result in a significant reduction in insulin requirements from 6000 to 250 U/d (75 to 3.1 U/kg/d), disappearance of the severe nocturnal hypoglycaemia associated with high titres of insulin antibodies and a reduction in the level of these antibodies from 34.6 to 2.7 mg/dL. MMF may be considered as a means of immunosuppression in patients with markedly raised insulin antibodies whose diabetes cannot be controlled with insulin alone.

Immunological responses to exogenous insulin

Regardless of purity and origin, therapeutic insulins continue to be immunogenic in humans. However, severe immunological complications occur rarely, and less severe events affect a small minority of patients. Insulin autoantibodies (IAAs) may be detectable in insulin-naive individuals who have a high likelihood of developing type 1 diabetes or in patients who have had viral disorders, have been treated with various drugs, or have autoimmune disorders or paraneoplastic syndromes. This suggests that under certain circumstances, immune tolerance to insulin can be overcome. Factors that can lead to more or less susceptibility to humoral responses to exogenous insulin include the recipient's immune response genes, age, the presence of sufficient circulating autologous insulin, and the site of insulin delivery. Little proof exists, however, that the development of insulin antibodies (IAs) to exogenous insulin therapy affects integrated glucose control, insulin dose requirements, and incidence of hypoglycemia, or contributes to beta-cell failure or to long-term complications of diabetes. Studies in which pregnant women with diabetes were monitored for glycemic control argue against a connection between IAs and fetal risk. Although studies have shown increased levels of immune complexes in patients with diabetic microangiopathic complications, these immune complexes often do not contain insulin or IAs, and insulin administration does not contribute to their formation. The majority of studies have shown no relationship between IAs and diabetic angiopathic complications, including nephropathy, retinopathy, and neuropathy. With the advent of novel insulin formulations and delivery systems, such as insulin pumps and inhaled insulin, examination of these issues is increasingly relevant.

Systemic allergy to human insulin and its rapid and long acting analogs: successful treatment by continuous subcutaneous insulin lispro infusion

Since the introduction of highly purified human recombinant insulin, allergy to insulin has become a very rare clinical situation, encountered in less than 1% of patients. It results in potentially life-threatening immediate or delayed, local and general manifestations. Different treatments of unequal efficiency have been proposed, the use of insulin analogs showing benefits in certain situations. We report the case of a type 2 diabetic patient who presented local reactions and then an anaphylactic shock after the introduction of insulin analog premixes. Intra-dermal reactions performed with porcine, human and insulin analogs preparations (aspart, lispro, glargine) were all positive, as well as the specific anti-insulin IgE measurement. Because we could not achieve normoglycaemia with maximal oral treatment and low caloric diet, we decided to attempt a desensitisation by continuous subcutaneous infusion of insulin lispro, since the lowest skin reaction was obtained with this insulin. We were able to induce a tolerance, by means of very low basal rate, very slowly increased, without any boluses, and maintaining antihistamine therapy. Six months later, the patient remains free of any symptom and has achieved a quite good glycaemic control. We describe for the first time a case of allergy to human insulin and to all available rapid and long acting analogs. We show the interest of a treatment with CSII of analogs in order to induce tolerance.

Effect of long-term exposure to insulin lispro on the induction of antibody response in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

To determine the long-term effects of insulin lispro on inducing lispro-specific, insulin-specific, and cross-reactive (reactive with both insulin lispro and human insulin) antibodies.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A multinational, multicenter combination of controlled and noncontrolled, open-label studies of 4.5 years' duration was designed to evaluate the long-term immunologic profile of subcutaneously administered insulin lispro. A total of 1,221 patients (men and women; 12-81 years of age) with type 1 or type 2 diabetes were enrolled. Circulating anti-insulin antibodies were measured using radioimmunoassays.

RESULTS

Insulin-specific and lispro-specific antibody responses were within the background noise levels of the assays. Significant elevations of antibody were confined to a cross-reactive antibody response. Antibody levels resulting from prior exposure to long- and short-acting insulins changed little after transfer to insulin lispro and remained within or near the baseline levels. De novo exposure to insulin lispro resulted in increases in cross-reactive but not insulin- or lispro-specific antibody levels. Cross-reactive insulin antibodies developed more readily in patients with type 1 diabetes than in those with type 2 diabetes. Long-term antibody responses tended to decrease over time and returned to baseline or near-baseline levels by the end of the long-term studies. No evidence of an anamnestic antibody response could be found in individuals treated intermittently with insulin lispro.

CONCLUSIONS

The immunogenic profile of patients treated with insulin lispro was comparable to that of patients treated with recombinant human insulin. Inductions of significant levels of specific or cross-reactive antibodies were not observed in patients who had received insulin previously. No significant antibody-dependent increases in insulin dosage requirements were noted in these patients. The incidence of insulin allergy was not different from that in patients treated with recombinant regular human insulin.

Effects of PEG conjugation on insulin properties

The goal of this research was to determine whether the site-specific attachment of poly(ethylene glycol) to insulin could enhance the physical and pharmacological properties of insulin without negatively affecting its biological activity or immunological properties. Electrophilically activated derivatives of low-molecular-weight monomethoxypoly(ethylene glycol) (mPEG) were chemically coupled to insulin via its amino groups at positions phenylalanine-B1 or lysine-B29, with an amide bond being formed between the polymer and protein. The site-specific attachment of mPEG to insulin did not substantially alter insulin's secondary/tertiary structure, self-association behavior, or potency in vivo. However, mPEG attachment did significantly enhance insulin's resistance to aggregation. In addition, the pegylation of insulin almost completely eliminates the resultant conjugate's immunogenicity, allergenicity, and antigenicity. Finally, the conjugates were observed to remain in the systemic circulation for longer periods of time than unmodified insulin after subcutaneous administration.

Insulin desensitization with insulin lispro and an insulin pump in a 5-year-old child

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Allergic reactions to insulin, though rare, can have serious consequences in children with type I diabetes mellitus. We report a case of insulin allergy in a 5-year-old child in whom insulin desensitization was accomplished using an insulin pump.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A 5-year-old girl with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) developed progressive reactions to insulin and was found to have positive intradermal skin tests to regular and NPH insulin. Addition of oral antihistamine and co-administration of subcutaneous dexamethasone along with the insulin failed to control her symptoms. The patient was therefore hospitalized and desensitized to insulin using an insulin pump and insulin lispro.

CONCLUSION

An insulin pump can be used for insulin desensitization in selected children. The slow constant infusion rate provided by the pump may be an ideal means of achieving insulin desensitization. In addition, insulin lispro, a synthetic insulin analog, should be considered for use in insulin-allergic individuals.

Hypoglycaemia induced by exogenous insulin--'human' and animal insulin compared

AIMS

A systematic review of the literature was carried out to examine whether published evidence suggests a difference in the frequency and awareness of hypoglycaemia induced by 'human' and animal insulin.

METHODS

The review identified randomized controlled trials and studies of other designs including observational comparisons, case series and case reports in which the use of 'human' insulin was compared to animal insulin in people with diabetes. These were identified from bibliographic databases and hand-searches of key journals. The main outcome measures were frequency, severity, awareness and symptoms of insulin induced hypoglycaemia.

RESULTS

Fifty-two randomized controlled trials, 37 of double-blind design, were identified which included one or more of the relevant outcome measures. Of these, 21 specifically investigated hypoglycaemic frequency and awareness as primary outcomes (six in people with previously reported reduced hypoglycaemic awareness). The remainder of the identified trials reported hypoglycaemic outcomes as a secondary or incidental outcome during comparative investigations of efficacy or immunogenicity. Seven of the double-blind studies reported differences in frequency of hypoglycaemia or awareness of symptoms, although none of the studies which selected subjects on the basis of previously reported impaired awareness demonstrated significant differences between insulin species. Four of the unblinded trials reported differences in hypoglycaemia. This reached statistical significance in two of the studies. A further 56 studies of other designs and case reports were considered. In addition to the 10 case reports describing individuals with impaired hypoglycaemic awareness, nine studies reported differences in the incidence and manifestation of hypoglycaemia during 'human' insulin treatment. Notably, none of the four population time trend studies found any relationship between the increasing use of 'human' insulin and hospital admission for hypoglycaemia or unexplained death among those with diabetes. The largest case series could find no support for the hypothesis that an influence of treatment with 'human' insulin on hypoglycaemia had contributed to any of the 50 deaths investigated. When all types of studies considered are ranked in order of rigour (according to the accepted 'hierarchy of evidence'), it is the least rigorous which lend most support to the notion that treatment with 'human' insulin has an effect on the frequency, severity or symptoms of hypoglycaemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence does not support the contention that treatment with 'human' insulin per se affects the frequency, severity or symptoms of hypoglycaemia. However, a number of studies, mainly those of less rigorous design, describe an effect when people are transferred from animal insulin to 'human' insulin. It is not possible to state how common this is or whether the phenomenon is specific to 'human' insulin or an effect resulting from stricter glycaemic control (perhaps compounded, in some cases, by neurological complications in long-standing diabetes). This remaining uncertainty makes it essential that insulin from animal sources continues to be available so that clinicians and patients may retain this choice of treatment.

Glucose monitoring and insulin therapy during pregnancy

Excellent blood glucose control is necessary to reduce the excess fetal morbidity and mortality associated with the diabetic pregnancy. This article outlines the roles of glucose monitoring and insulin therapy in intensive treatment regimens during gestation. The discussion includes recommended monitoring frequency, glycemic standards, types of insulin and mechanism of action, goals and timing of insulin therapy, as well as the complications of insulin therapy.

A case of primary and generalized allergy to human insulin with no history of any prior insulin exposure

A generalized hypersensitivity reaction against human insulin was demonstrated in a non-insulin dependent diabetic man treated with only human insulin. The patient had no history of previous insulin exposure or atopy. Because of negative reactions to intracutaneous tests of constituents of the formulation and the presence of insulin-specific IgE antibody, this generalized allergic reaction seems to have been caused by the human insulin itself. Although desensitization was not effective, this allergic reaction was improved both by the treatment with oral antihistamines and desensitization. Cases of generalized and primary allergy against human insulin have been rarely reported making this a very rare case.

Immunological resistance to human biosynthetic insulin--effects of immunosuppression and plasmapheresis

A 55-year-old gentleman, after being treated for a short time with a diet and with Chlorpropamide, was switched to purified porcine insulin due to ketonuria and ketoacidosis. After a year the patient developed immunological insulin resistance (mean daily insulin dose: 3.72 U/kg body weight; anti-insulin antibodies 78%). In order to lower anti-insulin antibodies human recombinant DNA insulin was introduced into further therapy. Contrary to expectations, the patient did not reduce whatsoever his anti-insulin antibodies and his daily insulin dose increased up to 5.63 U/kg body weight. Introduction of combined immunosuppressive therapy (prednisone plus azathioprine) together with plasmapheresis resulted in rapid lowering of daily insulin requirement and reduction in anti-insulin antibodies. Immunosuppressive therapy was continued with 10 mg of prednisone and a year later the patients insulin daily requirement was 0.66 U/kg BW while his antibodies were 18%. The possible causes of insulin resistance to human recombinant DNA insulin are discussed as well as the advantage of combined immunosuppressive therapy together with plasmapheresis that was used for rapid lowering of insulin daily requirement and anti-insulin antibodies titer.

Regulatory concerns in human gene therapy

Gene therapy in humans is now being undertaken in an investigational setting. Such therapy involves the administration of biological products to human patients. A document entitled, "Points to Consider in Human Somatic Cell Therapy and Gene Therapy" has been prepared by the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and is published elsewhere in this issue. This paper provides explanatory material about the CBER regulatory process and the scientific and regulatory basis for the requests for data in that document.