Lack of tolerance or sensitization to the effects of chronic d-amphetamine on substantia nigra self-stimulation

The basolateral complex of the amygdala mediates the modulation of intracranial self-stimulation threshold by drug-associated cues

Learning and memory appear to be critical aspects of drug abuse; presumably playing an especially important role in craving and relapse. Thus, understanding the interaction of learning- and memory-related brain areas with the classical reward circuitry is of importance. Toward this goal, the effect of drug-associated contextual cues on intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) behaviour was assessed in rats. We used a method that allows the establishment of baseline behaviour, the pairing of drug exposure with unique cues, and testing the effect of cue exposure within the same apparatus. ICSS thresholds were decreased by morphine (5 mg/kg, i.p.) or cocaine (10 mg/kg, i.p.) during five days of paired drug-cue training sessions. Subsequent presentation of the drug-associated cues decreased thresholds in the absence of drug. Cues associated with saline had no effect. These results suggest a Pavlovian conditioning phenomenon in which the functioning of brain reward circuitry is modulated by drug-associated cues. In a second experiment, we tested the hypothesis that the mechanism by which conditioning affects ICSS thresholds may include the basolateral complex of the amygdala (BLC) due to its known role in conditioning and anatomical linkage with classical reward circuitry. Lesions of the BLC abolished the ability of cocaine-associated cues to lower ICSS threshold. Lesions did not alter response capability or the unconditioned effect of cocaine. We conclude that the BLC is necessary for cues associated with previous drug exposure to modulate activity within or downstream from the classical reward circuitry of the medial forebrain bundle.

Modulation of drug-induced sensitization processes by endogenous opioid systems

Behavioural sensitization involves progressive increases in behavioural responses to repeated intermittent administration of drugs of abuse. Behavioural sensitization is observed to the locomotor stimulant, rewarding and discriminative effects of a drug. These are effects which seem to be essential in the initiation, expression and maintenance of a drug-seeking behaviour. Therefore the phenomenon of behavioural sensitization may have important implications for the understanding of addictive processes. Findings given in this review demonstrate the involvement of endogenous opioid systems in the initiation of sensitized responses on the neurochemical level, i.e., within the mesolimbic dopaminergic system, as well as on the behavioural level. Specifically, it is shown that behavioural sensitization to morphine and cocaine is modulated by endogenous kappa-opioid systems.

The effect of chronic cocaine on self-stimulation train-duration thresholds

The effect of chronic cocaine treatment on brain stimulation reward was assessed by examining self-stimulation train-duration thresholds. Following a predrug, saline injection period, cocaine hydrochloride (10 or 15 mg/kg) was injected (IP) across 18 consecutive days of testing. Cocaine lowered thresholds across the entire period of drug administration, with the magnitude of cocaine's effect remaining stable during this time. The subjects returned to predrug, saline levels during a postdrug test conducted immediately following chronic cocaine treatment. In a final attempt to modify cocaine's effects, the subjects received 25 mg/kg cocaine HCl three times/day for three consecutive days. Subsequent testing at the original dosage levels revealed no change in the magnitude of cocaine's effect. It was concluded that cocaine's effect on brain stimulation reward does not show tolerance or sensitization with chronic use. Similar effects have been reported for morphine and amphetamine's effect on brain stimulation reward.

Associative factors in the effects of morphine on self-stimulation

These experiments tested the hypothesis that the suppressing and facilitating effects of morphine on intracranial self-stimulation (ICS) (measured 1 h and 3 h post-injection, respectively) are influenced by associative, non-pharmacological factors. Experiment 1 confirmed previous demonstrations that the facilitation of ICS by morphine (10 mg/kg) develops with repeated drug exposures. Once ICS facilitation had developed, the effect was mimicked by saline injection in most subjects. In a separate group of animals, previous exposure to morphine in the home cage prevented drug-induced facilitation of ICS. Tolerance to ICS suppression developed after repeated pairings of the drug and the ICS chambers, but not when the drug had previously been received in the home cage. Experiment 2 examined the effect of low (0.3, 1, 3 mg/kg) doses of chronic morphine on ICS. Facilitation was observed with 1 and 3 mg/kg, but only after repeated testing. Naloxone (0.1 and 1 mg/kg) failed to reverse facilitation in a number of these subjects. In Experiment 3, animals receiving their daily injections of morphine were allowed to self-stimulate only at 3 h post-injection (when ICS facilitation is usually maximal), rather than at 1 h and 3 h post-injection. ICS facilitation was not observed, even with repeated testing. These data indicate that the facilitation of ICS by morphine is the outcome of a learned association between drug administration and the ICS procedure, rather than the invariable result of opiate receptor activation. Repeated exposure to morphine is required for the initial establishment of ICS enhancement, but the subsequent expression of this behavior is not directly related to opiate receptor activity.

Sensitization to the effects of repeated amphetamine administration on intracranial self-stimulation: evidence for changes in reward processes

The effects of daily administration of 1.0 mg/kg of D-amphetamine for 20 consecutive days on self-stimulation responding from the substantia nigra, and nucleus accumbens were evaluated at several current intensities. Raising current intensity increased rates of responding when electrodes were situated in these areas, and amphetamine significantly enhanced rates of responding from both brain regions. Moreover, the drug-induced response enhancements were facilitated further after repeated drug/test pairings. Although response sensitization was observed at several current intensities, it developed sooner at the lower current levels indicating that the sensitizing effect of repeated drug administration on self stimulation responding was not due to variations in locomotor activity or arousal levels induced by amphetamine treatment. Furthermore, sensitization was observed at current levels that engendered both high and low levels of responding, suggesting that the sensitization was unrelated to the rate dependent effects of the drug. Rather, it was argued that repeated amphetamine treatment sensitized animals to the rewarding properties of electrical brain stimulation. Possible neurochemical and behavioral mechanisms that may be involved in the development of reverse tolerance after repeated amphetamine treatment were discussed.

Intracranial self-stimulation in relation to the ascending dopaminergic systems of the midbrain: a moveable electrode mapping study

Chronically implanted moveable electrodes were used to map the midbrain and caudal diencephalon for intracranial self-stimulation in relation to the ascendindg dopamine systems as revealed by fluorescence histochemistry. In the diencephalon the lowest self-stimulation thresholds and the highest response rates were in the areas traversed by the dopamine fiber bundles. In the midbrain, self-stimulation was restricted to the layer of dopamine containing cell bodies. Self-stimulation current thresholds and responses rates were proportional to the density of dopaminergic elements surrounding the electrode tip; the lowest thresholds and highest response rates were associated with the densest packing of dopaminergic neurons. However, not all portions of the dopamine cell groups supported self-stimulation. Self-stimulation was not obtained from the caudal poles of the A9 and A10 groups, nor from the A8 cell group. These findings suggest that a certain population of dopaminergic neurons directly participates in what is probably a multiple-link circuitry subserving positive reinforcement.

Involvement of norepinephrine in startle arousal after acute and chronic d-amphetamine administration

Treatment with d-amphetamine produced a dose-dependent increase in startle amplitude in response to a buzzer. This increase appeared to be a reflection of a sensitization effect, i.e., enhanced responsivity as a function of repeated stimulus presentations. Treatment with alpha-methyl-p-tyrosine, which reduced whole brain concentrations of dopamine (DA) and norepinephrine (NE), or treatment with FLA-63, which reduced only NE, antagonized the effects of d-amphetamine on the startle reflex, suggesting a role of NE in this behavior. Startle amplitude was also reduced following chronic d-amphetamine treatment. The effect of d-amphetamine on startle was found to be independent of changes in drug-induced locomotor excitation. The data of the present investigation, together with earlier reports, suggests that tolerance occurs to those behaviors that involve a noradrenergic component.

Abatement of stimulus perseveration following repeated d-amphetamine treatment: absence of behaviorally augmented tolerance

Acute administration of d-amphetamine results in animals perseverating between two compartments when placed in a free running Y-maze exploratory situation. Experiment 1 indicated that perseverative behavior was attenuated by making the arms of the maze distinctively different. Experiments 2 and 3 demonstrated that repeated amphetamine treatment reduced arms of the maze distinctively different. Exeriment 2 and 3 demonstrated that repeated amphetamine treatment reduced stimulus perseveration. Drug-induced locomotor activity and stereotypy were not affected by chronic drug administration. The course of the tolerance effect was not altered by pairing the repeated drug experience with Y-maze exposure. It was concluded that although stimulus factors are involved in the perseverative response, conditioning factors are not of primary relevance in determining the tolerance. It was also suggested that the mechanisms which subserve stimulus perseveration are different from those which mediate locomotor activity and stereotypy.

Cocaine: acute effects on reinforcement thresholds for self-stimulation behavior to the medial forebrain bundle

Reinforcing thresholds for self-stimulation behavior to the medial forebrain bundle were determined in rats by means of rate-free psychophysical method. The acute administration of cocaine lowered the reinforcing thresholds independent of motor stimulatory effects. These results indicate that cocaine affects the sensitivity of the reward pathways in the brain, and further demonstrate the utility of rate-independent methods in the assessment of drug effects on self-stimulation behavior.

Interaction between morphine and reinforcing lateral hypothalamic stimulation

The interaction between morphine and lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation in rats was investigated in three experiments. In nonaddicted animals injections of moderate doses of morphine (8 mg/kg) resulted in a short-lasting increase in the self-stimulation threshold. Injections of low doses (2 mg/kg) did not alter the self-stimulation threshold significantly. In addicted animals self-stimulation thresholds were significantly lower 2 h compared to 22 h after injection of 200 mg/kg morphine hydrochloride (calculated as the salt). A 16 mg/kg injection of morphine in non-addicted rats suppressed self-stimulation. However, when the animals were administered noncontingent priming stimulation and were hand-shaped toward the lever whenever they left it, they continued to lever-press throughout the entire 90-min postinjection testing period. The animals that were neither primed nor shaped (and therefore remained unstimulated), however, showed a significantly better recovery when tested 90 min after the injection; i.e., their response rate was higher than that of the primed and shaped animals, which were engaged in bar-pressing throughout the entire testing procedure.

Differential effects of morphine and D-amphetamine on self-stimulation from closely adjacent regions in rat midbrain

The effects of morphine were investigated on self-stimulation from numerous electrode placements in the area of the substantia nigra or in the ventral half of mesencephalic central gray matter. Before pharmacological testing, current intensity was reduced to yield stable, submaximal rates of self-stimulation. Rats were then injected daily with morphine for 10 days, and were tested three hours after injection. Between days 5 and 10 of treatment, many rats self-stimulated at more than 150% of baseline, but some others reduced self-stimulation to as little as 3% of baseline. Histological evaluation revealed that morphine facilitated self-stimulation when the electrode tip was located more than 0.3 mm from substantia nigra or more than 0.2 mm from the midline of central gray. In rats with electrode tips closer to substantia nigra or to the midline of central gray, morphine often reduced or failed to alter self-stimulation rates. The effects of a low dose of D-amphetamine (0.1 mg/kg) were investigated on electrode placements in the substantia nigra area. Placements close to the dorsal border of substantia nigra yielded less facilitation of self-stimulation by D-amphetamine than did placements located more dorsally or medially. Possible catecholaminergic substrates of these differential effects are discussed.