Comparison of pharmacokinetics and systemic effects of inhaled fluticasone propionate in patients with asthma and healthy volunteers: a randomised crossover study

The Pharmacokinetics of Inhaled Drugs

The pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of a drug after inhalation may differ quite markedly from that seen after dosing by other routes of administration. Drugs may be administered to the lung to elicit a local action or as a portal for systemic delivery of the drug to its site of action elsewhere in the body. Some knowledge of PK is important for both locally- and systemically-acting drugs. For a systemically-acting drug, the plasma concentration-time profile shares some similarities with drug given by the oral or intravenous routes, since the plasma concentrations (after the distribution phase) will be in equilibrium with concentrations at the site of action. For a locally-acting drug, however, the plasma concentrations reflect its fate after it has been absorbed and removed from the airways, and not what is available to its site of action in the lung. Consequently, those typical PK parameters which are determined from plasma concentration measurements, e.g., area under the curve (AUC), Cmax, tmax and post-peak t1/2 may provide information on the deposition and absorption of drugs from the lung; however, the information from these parameters becomes more complicated to decipher for those drugs which are locally-acting in the lung. Additionally, the plasma concentration profile for both locally- and systemically-acting drugs will not only reflect drug absorbed from the lung but also that absorbed from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract from the portion of the dose which is swallowed. This absorption from the GI tract adds a further complication to the interpretation of plasma concentrations, particularly for locally-acting drugs. The influence of physiological and pathological factors needs to be considered in the absorption of some inhaled drugs. The absorption of some hydrophilic drugs is influenced by the inspiratory maneuver used during initial inhalation of the drug, and at later times after deposition. Similarly, the effects of smoking have been shown to increase lung permeability and increase the absorption of certain hydrophilic drugs. The effects of different disease states of the lung have less defined influences on absorption into the systemic circulation.

Pharmacokinetic considerations surrounding triple therapy for uncontrolled asthma

INTRODUCTION

Solid pharmacological rationale and clinical evidence support the use of a combination of an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), a long-acting β2-agonist, and a long-acting muscarinic antagonist in severe asthma, which clinically results in increased lung function, improved symptoms, and decreased exacerbation rates.

AREAS COVERED

We examined the pharmacokinetic issues associated with triple therapy for uncontrolled asthma. We considered the pharmacokinetic characteristics of the three drug classes, the role of inhalers in influencing their pharmacokinetic behavior, and the impact of severe asthma on the pharmacokinetics of inhaled drugs.

EXPERT OPINION

The pharmacokinetics of ICSs and bronchodilators are not affected to a great extent by severe asthma, according to a detailed review of the currently accessible literature. Compared to healthy people, patients with severe asthma show only minor variations in a few pharmacokinetic characteristics, which are unlikely to have therapeutic significance and do not require particular attention. However, the difficulty of obtaining pharmacokinetic profiles of the three drugs included in a triple therapy suggests that the clinical response should be followed over time, which can be considered a good surrogate indicator of whether the drugs have reached sufficient concentrations in the lung to exert a valid pharmacological action.

iBCS. 2: Mechanistic Modeling of Pulmonary Availability of Inhaled Drugs versus Critical Product Attributes

This work is the second in a series of publications outlining the fundamental principles and proposed design of a biopharmaceutics classifications system for inhaled drugs and drug products (the iBCS). Here, a mechanistic computer-based model has been used to explore the sensitivity of the primary biopharmaceutics functional output parameters: (i) pulmonary fraction dose absorbed (F_abs) and (ii) drug half-life in lumen (t_1/2) to biopharmaceutics-relevant input attributes including dose number (Do) and effective permeability (P_eff). Results show the nonlinear sensitivity of primary functional outputs to variations in these attributes. Drugs with Do < 1 and P_eff > 1 × 10^-6 cm/s show rapid (t_1/2 < 20 min) and complete (F_abs > 85%) absorption from lung lumen into lung tissue. At Do > 1, dissolution becomes a critical drug product attribute and F_abs becomes dependent on regional lung deposition. The input attributes used here, Do and P_eff, thus enabled the classification of inhaled drugs into parameter spaces with distinctly different biopharmaceutic risks. The implications of these findings with respect to the design of an inhalation-based biopharmaceutics classification system (iBCS) and to the need for experimental methodologies to classify drugs need to be further explored.

Inhaled Medicines: Past, Present, and Future

The purpose of this review is to summarize essential pharmacological, pharmaceutical, and clinical aspects in the field of orally inhaled therapies that may help scientists seeking to develop new products. After general comments on the rationale for inhaled therapies for respiratory disease, the focus is on products approved approximately over the last half a century. The organization of these sections reflects the key pharmacological categories. Products for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease include β -2 receptor agonists, muscarinic acetylcholine receptor antagonists, glucocorticosteroids, and cromones as well as their combinations. The antiviral and antibacterial inhaled products to treat respiratory tract infections are then presented. Two "mucoactive" products-dornase α and mannitol, which are both approved for patients with cystic fibrosis-are reviewed. These are followed by sections on inhaled prostacyclins for pulmonary arterial hypertension and the challenging field of aerosol surfactant inhalation delivery, especially for prematurely born infants on ventilation support. The approved products for systemic delivery via the lungs for diseases of the central nervous system and insulin for diabetes are also discussed. New technologies for drug delivery by inhalation are analyzed, with the emphasis on those that would likely yield significant improvements over the technologies in current use or would expand the range of drugs and diseases treatable by this route of administration. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This review of the key aspects of approved orally inhaled drug products for a variety of respiratory diseases and for systemic administration should be helpful in making judicious decisions about the development of new or improved inhaled drugs. These aspects include the choices of the active ingredients, formulations, delivery systems suitable for the target patient populations, and, to some extent, meaningful safety and efficacy endpoints in clinical trials.

Systematic review on long-term adverse effects of inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of COPD

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are indicated for the prevention of exacerbations in COPD; however, a significant proportion of patients at low risk of exacerbations are treated with ICSs. We conducted a systematic review including a diversity of types of study designs and safety outcomes with the objective of describing the risk of adverse effects associated with the long-term use of ICSs in patients with COPD.A total of 90 references corresponding to 83 studies were included, including 26 randomised clinical trials (RCTs), 33 cohort studies, and 24 nested case-control (NCC) studies. Analysis of 19 RCTs showed that exposure to ICSs for ≥1 year increased the risk of pneumonia by 41% (risk ratio 1.41, 95% CI 1.23-1.61). Additionally, cohort and NCC studies showed an association between ICSs and risk of tuberculosis and mycobacterial disease. There was a strong association between ICS use and local disorders such as oral candidiasis and dysphonia. The association between ICSs and the risk of diabetes and fractures was less clear and appeared significant only at high doses of ICSs.Since most patients with COPD are elderly and with frequent comorbidities, an adequate risk-benefit balance is crucial for the indication of ICSs.

Serum Inhaled Corticosteroid Detection for Monitoring Adherence in Severe Asthma

BACKGROUND

Daily inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are fundamental to asthma management, but adherence is low.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate (1) whether LC-MS/MS could be used to detect ICSs in serum and (2) whether serum levels related to markers of disease severity.

METHODS

We collected blood samples over an 8-hour period from patients with severe asthma prescribed at least 1000 μg daily of beclomethasone dipropionate equivalent. Following baseline sampling, patients were observed taking their usual morning dose. Subsequent blood samples were obtained 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours postinhalation and analyzed by LC-MS/MS. Correlations between serum ICS levels and severity markers were investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients were recruited (41 females; 39 prescribed maintenance prednisolone; mean age, 49 ± 12 years; FEV₁, 63 ± 20 %predicted). Eight hours postinhalation, all patients using budesonide (n = 10) and beclomethasone dipropionate (15), and all but 1 using fluticasone propionate (28), had detectable serum drug levels. Fluticasone furorate was detected in 2 patients (of 4), ciclesonide in none (of 7). Low adherence by repeat prescription records (<80%) was identified in 43%. Blood ICS levels correlated negatively with exacerbation rate, and (for fluticasone propionate only) positively with FEV₁ %predicted.

CONCLUSIONS

Commonly used ICSs can be reliably detected in the blood at least 8 hours after dosing, and could therefore be used as a measure of adherence in severe asthma. Higher exacerbation rates and poorer lung function (for fluticasone propionate) were associated with lower blood levels.

Drivers of absolute systemic bioavailability after oral pulmonary inhalation in humans

There are few studies in humans dealing with the relationship between physico-chemical properties of drugs and their systemic bioavailability after administration via oral inhalation route (Fpulm). Getting further insight in the determinants of Fpulm after oral pulmonary inhalation could be of value for drugs considered for a systemic delivery as a result of poor oral bioavailability, as well as for drugs considered for a local delivery to anticipate their undesirable systemic effects. To better delineate the parameters influencing the systemic delivery after oral pulmonary inhalation in humans, we studied the influence of physico-chemical and permeability properties obtained in silico on the rate and extent of Fpulm in a series of 77 compounds with or without marketing approval for pulmonary delivery, and intended either for local or for systemic delivery. Principal component analysis (PCA) showed mainly that Fpulm was positively correlated with Papp and negatively correlated with %TPSA, without a significant influence of solubility and ionization fraction, and no apparent link with lipophilicity and drug size parameters. As a result of the small sample set, the performance of the different models as predictive of Fpulm were quite average with random forest algorithm displaying the best performance. As a whole, the different models captured between 50 and 60% of the variability with a prediction error of less than 20%. Tmax data suggested a significant positive influence of lipophilicity on absorption rate while charge apparently had no influence. A significant linear relationship between Cmax and dose (R² = "0.79) highlighted that Cmax was primarily dependent on dose and absorption rate and could be used to estimate Cmax in humans for new inhaled drugs.

A novel approach to improve detection of glucocorticoid doping in sport with new guidance for physicians prescribing for athletes

The systemic effect of glucocorticoids (GCs) following injectable routes of administration presents a potential risk to both improving performance and causing harm to health in athletes. This review evaluates the current GC antidoping regulations defined by the World Anti-Doping Agency and presents a novel approach for defining permitted and prohibited use of glucocorticoids in sport based on the pharmacological potential for performance enhancement (PE) and risk of adverse effects on health. Known performance-enhancing doses of glucocorticoids are expressed in terms of cortisol-equivalent doses and thereby the dose associated with a high potential for PE for any GC and route of administration can be derived. Consequently, revised and substance-specific laboratory reporting values are presented to better distinguish between prohibited and permitted use in sport. In addition, washout periods are presented to enable clinicians to prescribe glucocorticoids safely and to avoid the risk of athletes testing positive for a doping test.

Nebulized dexamethasone sodium phosphate in the treatment of horses with severe asthma

Background

A study reported low systemic availability of injectable dexamethasone nebulized to healthy horses using the Flexineb mask. When used in horses with severe asthma and a different nebulizer, lack of efficacy and cortisol suppression were observed.

Hypothesis

Nebulized dexamethasone is as effective as PO administration for the treatment of severe asthma in horses.

Animals

Twelve horses with severe asthma from a research herd.

Methods

Randomized clinical trial. Horses were divided into 2 groups and received 5 mg of dexamethasone sodium phosphate by nebulization using a Flexineb mask (NE, n = 6) or PO (OR, n = 6) q24h for 7 days. Lung function and serum cortisol concentrations were evaluated at baseline, after 4 days of treatment (D4) and 1 day after the last treatment (D8). Data were analyzed using linear mixed models with Benjamini‐Hochberg adjustments.

Results

Lung resistance significantly improved at D4 (mean decrease ± SD, −1.5 ± 0.45 cm H₂O/L/s; 95% confidence interval [CI], −2; −0.6) and D8 (−1.4 ± 0.45 cm H₂O/L/s; 95% CI, −2.4; −0.5) compared to baseline in the OR group only (P = .004 and .01, respectively). Serum cortisol concentration was significantly decreased at D4 and D8 for both groups (maximum decrease, −1.2 ± 0.3 μg/dL; 95% CI, −1.9; −0.6 at D4 for NE group and −2.2 ± 0.3 μg/dL; 95% CI, −2.8; −1.6 at D8 for OR group; P < .001).

Conclusions and Clinical Importance

Oral, but not nebulized dexamethasone is an effective therapy for horses with severe asthma and both treatment modalities inhibit the hypothalamic‐pituitary‐adrenal axis.

Safety of anti-inflammatory drugs in children with asthma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are widely used as the first-line treatment of asthma. When the disease is not controlled by standard doses of ICS, other anti-inflammatory drugs should be considered. The aim of this report is to review the main adverse events induced by anti-inflammatory drugs in children with asthma and discuss possible actions to prevent or mitigate these effects.

RECENT FINDINGS

Proper interpretation of ICS safety studies requires knowledge of the pharmaceutical properties and delivery device systems of the different ICS available. Genetic variants affecting susceptibility to corticosteroid-induced adrenal suppression were found in children and adults who use ICS to treat their asthma. There is evidence of the association between montelukast use and neuropsychiatric events.

SUMMARY

Benefits of ICS, properly prescribed and used, outweigh their potential adverse effects. There is substantial evidence that the combination of ICS with long-acting beta2 agonists is safe for asthmatic children. Awareness of the potential risks of neuropsychiatric events in children taking montelukast should inform the clinicians' prescribing practices. Omalizumab is generally well-tolerated, but the evidence on the safety of other biologic agents in children is scanty. The risk of systemic adverse events with anti-inflammatory drugs must be balanced against the risks of uncontrolled asthma and/or frequent oral steroid use.

What makes flunisolide different among inhaled corticosteroids used for nebulization: a close look at the role of aqueous solubility

Evidence-based management of bronchial asthma and wheezing in children and adults recommends the employment of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs). Difficulty in using some inhalation devices for ICS delivery, such as pressurized metered-dose and dry-powder inhalers, is common among young children and in the elderly, and for that reason, they are replaced with nebulizers. We reviewed comparative studies that evaluated funisolide with other ICSs currently available on the market, including beclomethasone dipropionate, fluticasone propionate, and budesonide. Moreover, we assessed the physicochemical properties of these ICSs in determining drug fate in the lung. Data indicate that the flunisolide output in respirable particles by any type of pneumatic nebulizer (traditional, open breath or breathenhanced) is superior to the output of other ICSs. This is principally attributed to the higher water solubility of flunisolide. Furthermore, in vivo simulation studies demonstrate that the intersubject variability of the inhaled dose among asthmatic children was much greater for suspensions of fluticasone propionate and beclomethasone dipropionate than for those of flunisolide. The physicochemical properties and pharmacokinetic profile of flunisolide favor its employment in nebulization.

Oral and nasal probiotic administration for the prevention and alleviation of allergic diseases, asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Interaction between a healthy microbiome and the immune system leads to body homeostasis, as dysbiosis in microbiome content and loss of diversity may result in disease development. Due to the ability of probiotics to help and modify microbiome constitution, probiotics are now widely used for the prevention and treatment of different gastrointestinal, inflammatory, and, more recently, respiratory diseases. In this regard, chronic respiratory diseases including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma and allergic rhinitis are among the most common and complicated respiratory diseases with no specific treatment until now. Accordingly, many studies have evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of probiotic administration (mostly via the oral route and much lesser nasal route) on chronic respiratory diseases. We tried to summarise and evaluate these studies to give a perspective of probiotic therapy via both the oral and nasal routes for respiratory infections (in general) and chronic respiratory diseases (specifically). We finally concluded that probiotics might be useful for allergic diseases. For asthmatic patients, probiotics can modulate serum cytokines and IgE and decrease eosinophilia, but with no significant reduction in clinical symptoms. For COPD, only limited studies were found with uncertain clinical efficacy. For intranasal administration, although some studies propose more efficiency than the oral route, more clinical evaluations are warranted.

Addressing the risk domain in the long-term management of pediatric asthma

There is growing concern regarding the long-term outcomes of early and poorly controlled childhood asthma, either of which can potentially lead to the development of severe asthma in adults and irrecoverable loss of lung function leading to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. These outcomes of inadequately controlled asthma should prompt a change in practice to better and/or earlier identify children at risk of adverse respiratory outcomes of asthma, to monitor disease progression, and to design intervention strategies that could either prevent or reverse asthma progression in children. The careful follow-up of spirometry over time-in the form of lung function trajectories, the application of biomarkers to assist in the diagnosis of early asthma and medication selection for these patients, as well as methods to identify patients at risk of asthma attacks-can be used to develop individualized management strategies for children with asthma. It is now time for asthma specialists to communicate this information to patients, parents, and primary care physicians and to incorporate them into routine clinical assessments of children with asthma. In time, these concepts of risk management and prevention can be refined to provide a more comprehensive approach to asthma care so as to prevent adverse respiratory outcomes from poorly controlled childhood asthma.

The Tempest: Difficult to Control Asthma in Adolescence

Severe asthma is associated with significant morbidity and is a highly heterogeneous disorder. Severe asthma in adolescence has some unique elements compared with the features of severe asthma a medical provider would see in younger children or adults. A specific focus on psychological issues and adherence highlights some of the challenges in the management of asthma in adolescents. Treatment of adolescents with severe asthma now includes 3 approved biologic phenotype-directed therapies. Therapies available to adults may be beneficial to adolescents with severe asthma. Research into predictors of specific treatment response by phenotypes is ongoing. Optimal treatment strategies are not yet defined and warrant further investigation.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of revefenacin in subjects with impaired renal or hepatic function

Purpose

Revefenacin, a long-acting muscarinic antagonist for nebulization, has been shown to improve lung function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Here we report pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety results from two multicenter, open-label, single-dose trials evaluating revefenacin in subjects with severe renal impairment (NCT02578082) and moderate hepatic impairment (NCT02581592).

Subjects and methods

The renal impairment trial enrolled subjects with normal renal function and severe renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73 m²). The hepatic impairment trial enrolled subjects with normal hepatic function and moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class B). Subjects received a single 175-µg dose of revefenacin through nebulization. PK plasma samples and urine collections were obtained at multiple time points for 5 days following treatment; all subjects were monitored for adverse events.

Results

In the renal impairment study, the maximum observed plasma revefenacin concentration (C_max) was up to 2.3-fold higher and area under the concentration–time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC_inf) was up to 2.4-fold higher in subjects with severe renal impairment compared with those with normal renal function. For THRX-195518, the major metabolite of revefenacin, the corresponding changes in C_max and AUC_inf were 1.8- and 2.7-fold higher, respectively. In the hepatic impairment study, revefenacin C_max and AUC_inf were 1.03- and 1.18-fold higher, respectively, in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment compared with those with normal hepatic function. The corresponding changes in THRX-195518 C_max and AUC_inf were 1.5- and 2.8-fold higher, respectively.

Conclusion

Systemic exposure to revefenacin increased modestly in subjects with severe renal impairment but was similar between subjects with moderate hepatic impairment and normal hepatic function. The increase in plasma exposure to THRX-195518 in subjects with severe renal or moderate hepatic impairment is unlikely to be of clinical consequence given its low antimuscarinic potency, low systemic levels after inhaled revefenacin administration, and favorable safety profile.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of inhaled corticosteroids for asthma treatment

The differences in the pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) critically influence the profile of each of them, but also the significant differences in glucocorticoid receptor selectivity, potency, and physicochemical properties are critical in defining the pharmacodynamic (PD) profile of an ICS. The PK and PD properties of ICSs used in asthma and the importance of their interrelationship have been reviewed. The differences among the ICSs in PK and PD must be considered when an ICS should be prescribed to an asthmatic patient because a better understanding of the PK/PD interrelationship of ICSs could be important to better fit with the between-patient variability and within-patient repeatability in the response to ICSs that often complicate the therapeutic approach to the asthmatic patient. The role of the device in influencing the PK profile of an ICS must be always considered because it is crucial. Also patient-related factors and disease severity affect pulmonary deposition of ICS.

Pathophysiological Mechanisms of Asthma

The recent Lancet commission has highlighted that "asthma" should be used to describe a clinical syndrome of wheeze, breathlessness, chest tightness, and sometimes cough. The next step is to deconstruct the airway into components of fixed and variable airflow obstruction, inflammation, infection and altered cough reflex, setting the airway disease in the context of extra-pulmonary co-morbidities and social and environmental factors. The emphasis is always on delineating treatable traits, including variable airflow obstruction caused by airway smooth muscle constriction (treated with short- and long-acting β-2 agonists), eosinophilic airway inflammation (treated with inhaled corticosteroids) and chronic bacterial infection (treated with antibiotics with benefit if it is driving the disease). It is also important not to over-treat the untreatable, such as fixed airflow obstruction. These can all be determined using simple, non-invasive tests such as spirometry before and after acute administration of a bronchodilator (reversible airflow obstruction); peripheral blood eosinophil count, induced sputum, exhaled nitric oxide (airway eosinophilia); and sputum or cough swab culture (bacterial infection). Additionally, the pathophysiology of risk domains must be considered: these are risk of an asthma attack, risk of poor airway growth, and in pre-school children, risk of progression to eosinophilic school age asthma. Phenotyping the airway will allow more precise diagnosis and targeted treatment, but it is important to move to endotypes, especially in the era of increasing numbers of biologicals. Advances in -omics technology allow delineation of pathways, which will be particularly important in TH2 low eosinophilic asthma, and also pauci-inflammatory disease. It is very important to appreciate the difficulties of cluster analysis; a patient may have eosinophilic airway disease because of a steroid resistant endotype, because of non-adherence to basic treatment, and a surge in environmental allergen burden. Sophisticated -omics approaches will be reviewed in this manuscript, but currently they are not being used in clinical practice. However, even while they are being evaluated, management of the asthmas can and should be improved by considering the pathophysiologies of the different airway diseases lumped under that umbrella term, using simple, non-invasive tests which are readily available, and treating accordingly.

Pharmacokinetics of Salmeterol and Fluticasone Propionate Delivered in Combination via Easyhaler and Diskus Dry Powder Inhalers in Healthy Subjects

BACKGROUND

Easyhaler^® dry powder inhaler (DPI) containing salmeterol and fluticasone propionate was developed for the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Three different Salmeterol/fluticasone Easyhaler test products (Orion Pharma, Finland) were compared against the reference product Seretide^® Diskus^® DPI (GlaxoSmithKline, United Kingdom) to study whether any of the test products are bioequivalent with the reference.

METHODS

Open and randomized pharmacokinetic four-period crossover study on 65 healthy volunteers was performed in a single center to compare the lung deposition and total systemic exposure of salmeterol and fluticasone propionate after administration of single doses (two inhalations of 50/500 μg/inhalation strength) in fasting conditions. Blood samples were drawn before dosing and at frequent time points between 2 minutes and 34 hours after dosing for determination of drug concentrations. The primary variables for total systemic exposure and lung deposition of fluticasone propionate were maximum concentration of the concentration-time curve (C_max) and area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the last sample with quantifiable concentration (AUC_t). For salmeterol, the primary variables for total systemic exposure were C_max and AUC_t and for lung deposition C_max and AUC up to 30 minutes after study treatment administration (AUC_30min).

RESULTS

One of the Easyhaler test products met all the criteria for bioequivalence with the reference. The 96.7% confidence intervals (CIs) for the test/reference ratios of fluticasone propionate C_max and AUC_t were 0.9901-1.1336 and 0.9448-1.0542, respectively. Ninety percent CIs for salmeterol C_max, AUC_30min, and AUC_t ratios were 1.0567-1.2012, 1.0989-1.2255, and 1.0769-1.1829, respectively. Median salmeterol time to maximum concentration (t_max) was 4.0 minutes. Median fluticasone propionate t_max was from 1.5 to 2.0 hours. Terminal elimination half-life was 11 hours for salmeterol and 9-10 hours for fluticasone propionate.

CONCLUSIONS

Salmeterol/fluticasone Easyhaler was shown to be bioequivalent with the reference product.

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Determine the Effect of Inhaled Corticosteroid on Intraocular Pressure in Open-Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension: The ICOUGH Study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine the risk of a steroid pressure response from inhaled corticosteroids.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial included 22 adults with well-controlled open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Consenting participants were randomized to a 6-week course of twice-daily fluticasone propionate 250-μg metered-dose inhaler or saline placebo metered-dose inhaler. Biweekly clinic visits included masked Goldmann applanation tonometry and assessment to identify adverse effects. Primary outcome was mean intraocular pressure (IOP) at week 6. Secondary outcomes included IOP elevation of >20% at 2 consecutive visits, adherence, side effects, and logMAR visual acuity.

RESULTS

A total of 10 patients in each arm completed the study. There were no statistically significant differences in IOP between groups at baseline (14.3±3.0 and 15.6±3.6 mm Hg in steroid and placebo groups, respectively, P=0.39) or at week 6 (14.7±2.4 and 14.8±3.8 mm Hg in steroid and placebo groups, respectively, P=0.92). Adherence was >80% for all participants. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in any secondary measures. One patient in the steroid group met the secondary end point of >20% elevation in IOP (IOP increased from baseline of 9 to 11 mm Hg at weeks 2 and 4).

CONCLUSIONS

We found no clinically significant increase in mean IOP in patients with well-controlled open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension after 6 weeks of twice-daily inhaled fluticasone propionate compared with inhaled placebo. No participants exceeded their individualized target IOP. There were no differences in secondary outcomes.

Advances in experimental and mechanistic computational models to understand pulmonary exposure to inhaled drugs

Prediction of local exposure following inhalation of a locally acting pulmonary drug is central to the successful development of novel inhaled medicines, as well as generic equivalents. This work provides a comprehensive review of the state of the art with respect to multiscale computer models designed to provide a mechanistic prediction of local and systemic drug exposure following inhalation. The availability and quality of underpinning in vivo and in vitro data informing the computer based models is also considered. Mechanistic modelling of local exposure has the potential to speed up and improve the chances of successful inhaled API and product development. Although there are examples in the literature where this type of modelling has been used to understand and explain local and systemic exposure, there are two main barriers to more widespread use. There is a lack of generally recognised commercially available computational models that incorporate mechanistic modelling of regional lung particle deposition and drug disposition processes to simulate free tissue drug concentration. There is also a need for physiologically relevant, good quality experimental data to inform such modelling. For example, there are no standardized experimental methods to characterize the dissolution of solid drug in the lungs or measure airway permeability. Hence, the successful application of mechanistic computer models to understand local exposure after inhalation and support product development and regulatory applications hinges on: (i) establishing reliable, bio-relevant means to acquire experimental data, and (ii) developing proven mechanistic computer models that combine: a mechanistic model of aerosol deposition and post-deposition processes in physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models that predict free local tissue concentrations.

Inhaled glucocorticoid treatment prevents the response of CD8+ T cells in a mouse model of allergic asthma and causes their depletion outside the respiratory system

The principal objective of this research has been to determine the safety of inhaled glucocorticoids (GCs) in respect of their effect on CD8⁺ T cells within respiratory and extra-respiratory tissues, and to compare it with systemic GC treatment. Another purpose has been to identify whether inhaled and systemic GCs affect the CD8⁺ T cell response in the mediastinal lymph nodes (MLNs) and lungs in a mouse model of ovalbumin (OVA)-induced asthma. Ciclesonide and methylprednisolone were used as a model for inhaled and systemic GCs, respectively. The CD8⁺ T cell response was observed in untreated OVA-immunized mice, manifesting itself by the proliferation of these cells and their recruitment into the lower respiratory tract. Inhaled and systemic GC treatment fully prevented this response. This suggests that one of the elements contributing to the anti-asthmatic efficacy of inhaled and systemic GCs could be the inhibition of the effector CD8⁺ T cell response which accompanies the disease. The anti-asthmatic effect of GCs was rather not mediated through the generation or/and increased recruitment of Foxp3⁺CD25⁺CD8⁺ regulatory T cells into the MLNs and lungs. Inhaled and systemic GCs produced comparable depletions of normal CD8⁺ T cells in the MLNs, the head and neck lymph nodes and in peripheral blood, and this effect, at least to some extent, resulted from the proapoptotic action of GCs towards these cells. These results suggest that inhaled GC therapy might not be safer at all than treatment with systemic GCs in respect of the undesirable effects on CD8⁺ T cells residing within and outside the respiratory tract.

Application of a One-Dimensional Computational Model for the Prediction of Deposition from a Dry Powder Inhaler

BACKGROUND

Accurate prediction of the regional deposition of inhaled dry powders as a function of powder properties and breathing pattern is a long-term research goal for pulmonary drug delivery. In the present work, deposition along the respiratory tract of dry powders of Fluticasone propionate and Salmeterol is predicted.

METHODS

A one-dimensional particle transport and deposition model is used, whose novelty is in the treatment of the alveolar space of each airway generation as an efficient mixing chamber. This assumption has been supported by simulations and measurements during the last 20 years. The model is applied to two popular pulmonary tree geometries, to investigate the effect of particle size on localized deposition and to estimate the uncertainty due to variations in airway size.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Application of the model for the specific particle size distribution measured by a cascade impactor in the marketed product ELPENhaler, predicts the whole lung deposition (WLD), as well as the split between pulmonary (PU) and tracheobronchial (TB) deposition. Introduction in the model of modified particle size distributions with increased fractions of fine particles, indicates that the fine-particle dose is a satisfactory predictor of WLD but not of the PU/TB ratio.

Route of Administration Affects Corticosteroid Sensitivity of a Combined Ovalbumin and Lipopolysaccharide Model of Asthma Exacerbation in Guinea Pigs

Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) contributes to asthma exacerbations and development of inhaled corticosteroid insensitivity. Complete resistance to systemic corticosteroids is rare, and most patients lie on a continuum of steroid responsiveness. This study aimed to examine the sensitivity of combined ovalbumin- (Ova) and LPS-induced functional and inflammatory responses to inhaled and systemic corticosteroid in conscious guinea pigs to test the hypothesis that the route of administration affects sensitivity. Guinea pigs were sensitized to Ova and challenged with inhaled Ova alone or combined with LPS. Airway function was determined by measuring specific airway conductance via whole-body plethysmography. Airway hyper-responsiveness to histamine was determined before and 24 hours post-Ova challenge. Airway inflammation and underlying mechanisms were determined from bronchoalveolar lavage cell counts and lung tissue cytokines. Vehicle or dexamethasone was administered by once-daily i.p. injection (5, 10, or 20 mg/kg) or twice-daily inhalation (4 or 20 mg/ml) for 6 days before Ova challenge or Ova with LPS. LPS exacerbated Ova-induced responses, elongating early asthmatic responses (EAR), prolonging histamine bronchoconstriction, and further elevating airway inflammation. Intraperitoneal dexamethasone (20 mg/kg) significantly reduced the elongated EAR and airway inflammation but not the increased bronchoconstriction to histamine. In contrast, inhaled dexamethasone (20 mg/ml), which inhibited responses to Ova alone, did not significantly reduce functional and inflammatory responses to combined Ova and LPS. Combined Ova and LPS–induced functional and inflammatory responses are insensitive to inhaled, but they are only partially sensitive to systemic, dexamethasone. This finding suggests that the route of corticosteroid administration may be important in determining corticosteroid sensitivity of asthmatic responses.

Clobetasol propionate causes immunosuppression in zebrafish (Danio rerio) at environmentally relevant concentrations

Synthetic glucocorticoids (GCs) are potential endocrine disrupting compounds that have been detected in the aquatic environment around the world in the low ng/L (nanomolar) range. GCs are used as immunosuppressants in medicine. It is of high interest whether clobetasol propionate (CP), a highly potent GC, suppresses the inflammatory response in fish after exposure to environmentally relevant concentrations. Bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenge was used to induce inflammation and thus mimic pathogen infection. Zebrafish embryos were exposed to ≤1000nM CP from ~1h post fertilization (hpf) to 96 hpf, and CP uptake, survival after LPS challenge, and expression of inflammation-related genes were examined. Our initial experiments were carried out using 0.001% DMSO as a solvent vehicle, but we observed that DMSO interfered with the LPS challenge assay, and thus masked the effects of CP. Therefore, DMSO was not used in the subsequent experiments. The internal CP concentration was quantifiable after exposure to ≥10nM CP for 96h. The bioconcentration factor (BCF) of CP was determined to be between 16 and 33 in zebrafish embryos. CP-exposed embryos showed a significantly higher survival rate in the LPS challenge assay after exposure to ≥0.1nM in a dose dependent manner. This effect is an indication of immunosuppression. Furthermore, the regulation pattern of several genes related to LPS challenge in mammals supported our results, providing evidence that LPS-mediated inflammatory pathways are conserved from mammals to teleost fish. Anxa1b, a GC-action related anti-inflammatory gene, was significantly down-regulated after exposure to ≥0.05nM CP. Our results show for the first time that synthetic GCs can suppress the innate immune system of fish at environmentally relevant concentrations. This may reduce the chances of fish to survive in the environment, as their defense against pathogens is weakened.

Effect of inhaled and systemic glucocorticoid treatment on CD4+ regulatory and effector T cells in a mouse model of allergic asthma

To achieve a better understanding of mechanisms underlying the anti-asthmatic action of inhaled and systemic glucocorticoids (GCs) and to provide more data regarding the risk of a negative effect of inhaled GCs on CD4⁺ T cells, a study was conducted on the effect of ciclesonide and methylprednisolone on CD4⁺ effector (Teff), regulatory (Treg) and resting (Trest) T cells within respiratory and extra-respiratory tissues in a mouse model of allergic asthma. The study indicated that one, and possibly a key mechanism, underlying the anti-asthmatic action of inhaled and systemic GCs is the prevention of the activation and clonal expansion of CD4⁺ Teff cells in the mediastinal lymph nodes (MLNs), which consequently prevents infiltration of the lungs with CD4⁺ Teff cells. The beneficial effects of GCs in asthma treatment were not mediated through increased recruitment of Treg cells into the MLNs and lungs and/or local generation of Treg cells. The results demonstrated that inhaled and systemic GCs induced comparable depletion of normal CD4⁺ Teff, Trest and Treg cells in the MLNs, head and neck lymph nodes and peripheral blood. Furthermore, inhaled, but not systemic GC therapy, led to the loss of these cells in the lungs. Thus, the study suggests that inhaled GC therapy may not be safer at all than systemic one with respect to the adverse effect on CD4⁺ T cells present within and outside the respiratory tract. Moreover, administration of inhaled GCs can produce negative effects on lung-residing CD4⁺ T cells.

Pharmacokinetic Bioequivalence of Two Inhaled Tiotropium Bromide Formulations in Healthy Volunteers

Background and Objective

A novel tiotropium bromide monodose capsule dry powder inhaler (DPI) formulation and device have been developed. The formulation was based on a spray-dried matrix that enhances the aerosolizaton properties, allowing a less active tiotropium metered dose (13 µg/capsule) while maintaining the same delivered dose (10 µg/actuation). This study describes the pharmacokinetic bioequivalence to the reference product.

Methods

This randomized, two-stage, crossover, semi-replicate (three-way) study was performed in healthy volunteers. In each study period, subjects received a single dose of two capsules (20 μg delivered dose) of the study medication, separated by a 14-day washout period: tiotropium 10 μg delivered dose (Laboratorios Liconsa, Spain) and Spiriva HandiHaler^® (Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co KG, Germany). Blood samples were obtained up to 48 h post-dose to evaluate the comparative bioavailability. Tiotropium was measured in plasma by means of dual stage liquid–liquid extraction followed by the two-dimensional ultra-high performance liquid chromatography sensitive sub-pg/mL bioanalytical method. The main pharmacokinetic parameters were maximum plasma concentration (C_max), area under the concentration–time curve (AUC) from time zero hours to the last observed concentration at time t (AUC_t), and AUC from time zero hours to 30 min (AUC_0.5). Bioequivalence was accepted if the 90.20 % confidence interval (CI) for the ratio test/reference of the primary pharmacokinetic parameters lay within the acceptance range of 80–125 %. Safety assessment was a secondary endpoint.

Results

A total of 30 subjects were randomized and bioequivalence was demonstrated for all primary pharmacokinetic parameters: C_max (CI 87.26–106.60 %), AUC_t (CI 101.33–111.64 %), and AUC_0.5 (CI 97.95–113.49 %). Both study treatments were well tolerated (four non-serious adverse events [AEs] were reported in four subjects: one AE before any product administration, two AEs after test product administration; and one AE after reference product administration).

Conclusions

Both products containing tiotropium 10 µg delivered-dose DPI were bioequivalent and showed good tolerability and a similar safety profile.

Pharmacokinetic characteristics of fluticasone, salmeterol and tiotropium after concurrent inhalation

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a type of progressive, obstructive lung disease characterized by long-term poor airflow. The symptoms of COPD may be relieved and its progression delayed by fluticasone (FTS), salmeterol (SM), and tiotropium (TTP). The aim of this study is to investigate pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics of inhaled FTS, SM, and TTP after co-administration. An open-label, single-arm, three-period, simple ascending dose study was conducted in 10 healthy male subjects. A single dose of FTS/SM (250/50 µg) and TTP (18 µg) were concomitantly inhaled in period 1, and the dose of each drug was escalated to two- and three-fold in periods 2 and 3, respectively, with a 2-week washout between periods. Activated charcoal was co-administered before and after inhalation to block gastrointestinal absorption. Blood samples for PK analysis were collected up to 24 hours. PK parameters were obtained by non-compartmental analysis. FTS, SM, and TTP rapidly reached maximum plasma concentration after inhalation (0.08–3.00 h, 0.03–0.10 h and 0.03–0.10 h, respectively) and were eliminated with mean half-lives of 9.29–10.44 h, 6.09–12.39 h and 0.25–47.42 h, respectively. PK assessment of the lowest dose of TTP was limited due to relatively low systemic exposure compared to the lower limit of quantification. In conclusion, PK characteristics of FTS, SM, and TTP by pulmonary absorption were evaluated after concurrent inhalation. FTS and SM showed dose-proportional PK profiles between 250–750 µg and 50–150 µg, respectively, while TTP presented dose-proportionality in the early phase exposure between 18-54 µg.

Predicting Exposure After Oral Inhalation of the Selective Glucocorticoid Receptor Modulator, AZD5423, Based on Dose, Deposition Pattern, and Mechanistic Modeling of Pulmonary Disposition

BACKGROUND

Exposure following oral inhalation depends on the deposition pattern of the inhaled aerosol, the extent and rate of oral and pulmonary absorption, as well as systemic distribution and clearance. For lipophilic inhaled compounds with low water solubility and high permeability, the extent and rate of pulmonary absorption can be assumed dependent on deposition pattern as well as dissolution rate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A mechanistic model of airway deposition, mucociliary clearance, dissolution, absorption, and dissipation was applied to simulate systemic exposure of the novel selective glucocorticoid receptor modulator, AZD5423, when dosed to healthy volunteers using two different nebulizers and two different dry powder inhalers in combination with two different primary particle size distributions. Results from simulations were compared with observed pharmacokinetic data.

RESULTS

Variations in systemic exposure (plasma concentration profile, AUC, and C_max) resulting from variations in dose, deposition pattern, and dissolution rate could not be predicted solely from variations in delivered dose or predicted lung dose (as assessed using an anatomical mouth-throat model), suggesting incomplete pulmonary bioavailability. However, simulated systemic exposure well predicted observed systemic exposures for all tested formulations and devices. Furthermore, simulations of airway tissue exposure suggested that it was not directly linked to systemic exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

Results support the initial hypothesis that systemic exposure of poorly soluble inhaled drugs is a complex but predictable function of dose, deposition pattern, and rate of dissolution. Furthermore, simulations indicate that local exposure for these types of drugs is not well correlated with systemic exposure. Hence, equivalence with respect to local exposure, and thus with respect to pharmacodynamic effect, cannot be fully inferred from systemic pharmacokinetic equivalence alone.

Inhaled corticosteroids and HPA axis suppression: how important is it and how should it be managed?

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are established as a cornerstone of management for patients with bronchoconstrictive lung disease. However, systemic absorption may lead to suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis in a significant minority of patients. This is more likely in 'higher risk' patients exposed to high cumulative ICS doses, and in those treated with frequent oral corticosteroids or drugs which inhibit cytochrome p450 3A4. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression is frequently unrecognized, such that some patients, notably children, only come to light when an adrenal crisis is precipitated by physical stress. To minimize this risk, 'higher risk' patients and those with previously identified suppressed cortisol responses to Synacthen testing should undergo an education programme to inform them about sick day rules. A review of ICS therapy should also be undertaken to ensure that the dose administered is the minimum required to control symptoms.

Model-based evaluation of pulmonary pharmacokinetics in asthmatic and COPD patients after oral olodaterol inhalation

AIMS

Olodaterol is an orally inhaled β2 -agonist for treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The aims of this population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis were: (1) to investigate systemic PK and thereby make inferences about pulmonary PK in asthmatic patients, COPD patients and healthy volunteers, and (2) to assess whether differences in pulmonary efficacy might be expected based on pulmonary PK characteristics.

METHODS

Plasma and urine data after olodaterol inhalation were available from six clinical trials comprising 710 patients and healthy volunteers (single and multiple dosing). To investigate the relevance of covariates, full fixed-effect modelling was applied based on a previously developed healthy volunteer systemic disposition model.

RESULTS

A pulmonary model with three parallel absorption processes best described PK after inhalation in patients. The pulmonary bioavailable fraction (PBIO) was 48.7% (46.1-51.3%, 95% confidence interval) in asthma, and 53.6% (51.1-56.2%) in COPD. In asthma 87.2% (85.4-88.8%) of PBIO was slowly absorbed with an absorption half-life of 18.5 h (16.3-21.4 h), whereas in COPD 80.1% (78.0-82.2%) was absorbed with a half-life of 37.8 h (31.1-47.8 h). In healthy volunteers absorption was faster, with a half-life of 18.5 h (16.3-21.4 h) of the slowest absorbed process, which characterized 74.6% (69.1-80.2%) of PBIO.

CONCLUSIONS

The modelling approach successfully described data after olodaterol inhalation in patients and healthy volunteers. Slow pulmonary absorption was demonstrated both in asthma and COPD. Absorption characteristics after olodaterol inhalation indicated even more beneficial lung targeting in patients compared to healthy volunteers.

Batch-to-batch pharmacokinetic variability confounds current bioequivalence regulations: A dry powder inhaler randomized clinical trial

Current pharmacokinetic (PK) bioequivalence guidelines do not account for batch‐to‐batch variability in study design or analysis. Here we evaluate the magnitude of batch‐to‐batch PK variability for Advair Diskus 100/50. Single doses of fluticasone propionate and salmeterol combinations were administered by oral inhalation to healthy subjects in a randomized clinical crossover study comparing three different batches purchased from the market, with one batch replicated across two treatment periods. All pairwise comparisons between different batches failed the PK bioequivalence statistical test, demonstrating substantial PK differences between batches that were large enough to demonstrate bio‐inequivalence in some cases. In contrast, between‐replicate PK bioequivalence was demonstrated for the replicated batch. Between‐batch variance was ∼40–70% of the estimated residual error. This large additional source of variability necessitates re‐evaluation of bioequivalence assessment criteria to yield a result that is both generalizable and consistent with the principles of type I and type II error rate control.

Pharmacometric Models for Characterizing the Pharmacokinetics of Orally Inhaled Drugs

During the last decades, the importance of modeling and simulation in clinical drug development, with the goal to qualitatively and quantitatively assess and understand mechanisms of pharmacokinetic processes, has strongly increased. However, this increase could not equally be observed for orally inhaled drugs. The objectives of this review are to understand the reasons for this gap and to demonstrate the opportunities that mathematical modeling of pharmacokinetics of orally inhaled drugs offers. To achieve these objectives, this review (i) discusses pulmonary physiological processes and their impact on the pharmacokinetics after drug inhalation, (ii) provides a comprehensive overview of published pharmacokinetic models, (iii) categorizes these models into physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) and (clinical data-derived) empirical models, (iv) explores both their (mechanistic) plausibility, and (v) addresses critical aspects of different pharmacometric approaches pertinent for drug inhalation. In summary, pulmonary deposition, dissolution, and absorption are highly complex processes and may represent the major challenge for modeling and simulation of PK after oral drug inhalation. Challenges in relating systemic pharmacokinetics with pulmonary efficacy may be another factor contributing to the limited number of existing pharmacokinetic models for orally inhaled drugs. Investigations comprising in vitro experiments, clinical studies, and more sophisticated mathematical approaches are considered to be necessary for elucidating these highly complex pulmonary processes. With this additional knowledge, the PBPK approach might gain additional attractiveness. Currently, (semi-)mechanistic modeling offers an alternative to generate and investigate hypotheses and to more mechanistically understand the pulmonary and systemic pharmacokinetics after oral drug inhalation including the impact of pulmonary diseases.

Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of fluticasone furoate/vilanterol in healthy Chinese subjects

Study Objective

To investigate the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles of fluticasone furoate (FF)/vilanterol (VI) – a fixed‐dose combination of an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and a long‐acting β₂‐agonist for the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease – after single and repeat administration in healthy Chinese subjects.

Design

Double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, single‐site, randomized, four‐way crossover study.

Setting

The Clinical Pharmacological Research Centre at Peking Union Medical College Hospital [PUMCH]) in Beijing, China.

Subjects

Sixteen healthy, nonsmoking Chinese adults.

Intervention

Subjects were randomized to receive FF/VI 50/25, 100/25, or 200/25 μg, or placebo once/daily in the morning, delivered by the Ellipta dry powder inhaler, for 7 consecutive days. The subjects then received the other three treatments, with each treatment period separated by a 7‐day washout period.

Measurements and Main Results

The co‐primary outcome measures reflected pharmacodynamic responses relating to recognized class effects of the two drug classes: reduced serum cortisol level (ICSs), and increased Fridericia's corrected QT interval (QTcF) and reduced serum potassium level (long‐acting β₂‐agonists). Co‐primary pharmacodynamic endpoints were 0–24‐hour weighted mean serum cortisol level on day 7 (cortisol_{0–24 hr, Day 7}), and 0–4‐hour weighted mean and maximum QTcF and weighted mean and minimum serum potassium level on days 1 and 7. Fluticasone furoate and VI plasma concentrations, derived pharmacokinetic parameters, and safety were also assessed. Of the 16 subjects randomized, 15 completed the study. Reductions in cortisol_{0–24 hour, Day 7} of 15% and 25% were observed with FF/VI 100/25 and 200/25 μg, respectively, versus placebo. Minor increases (< 10 msec) in maximum QTcF on day 7 were seen with FF/VI 50/25 and 100/25 μg but not with 200/25 μg. Slight decreases in serum potassium level were only observed in subjects receiving FF/VI 50/25 μg on day 1 and FF/VI 50/25 and 200/25 μg on day 7. Fluticasone furoate accumulation (day 7 vs day 1) for FF/VI 50/25–200/25 μg ranged from 38 to 54% for maximum observed concentration and 63–71% for area under the concentration‐time curve from 0 to 4 hours. Fluticasone furoate pharmacokinetics were less than dose proportional. The VI pharmacokinetic profiles were similar for all three FF/VI doses. Adverse events were all mild in intensity and were reported by 13 (81%) of the 16 subjects.

Conclusion

In healthy Chinese subjects, minimal and non–clinically relevant β‐adrenergic pharmacodynamic effects were observed with FF/VI doses ranging from 50/25 to 200/25 μg. FF dose‐dependent reductions in serum cortisol levels of 15–25% were seen after administration of FF/VI 100/25 and 200/25 μg. FF/VI was safe and well tolerated in these subjects at doses ranging from 50/25 to 200/25 μg.

Inhaled corticosteroids: potency, dose equivalence and therapeutic index

Glucocorticosteroids are a group of structurally related molecules that includes natural hormones and synthetic drugs with a wide range of anti-inflammatory potencies. For synthetic corticosteroid analogues it is commonly assumed that the therapeutic index cannot be improved by increasing their glucocorticoid receptor binding affinity. The validity of this assumption, particularly for inhaled corticosteroids, has not been fully explored. Inhaled corticosteroids exert their anti-inflammatory activity locally in the airways, and hence this can be dissociated from their potential to cause systemic adverse effects. The molecular structural features that increase glucocorticoid receptor binding affinity and selectivity drive topical anti-inflammatory activity. However, in addition, these structural modifications also result in physicochemical and pharmacokinetic changes that can enhance targeting to the airways and reduce systemic exposure. As a consequence, potency and therapeutic index can be correlated. However, this consideration is not reflected in asthma treatment guidelines that classify inhaled corticosteroid formulations as low-, mid- and high dose, and imbed a simple dose equivalence approach where potency is not considered to affect the therapeutic index. This article describes the relationship between potency and therapeutic index, and concludes that higher potency can potentially improve the therapeutic index. Therefore, both efficacy and safety should be considered when classifying inhaled corticosteroid regimens in terms of dose equivalence. The historical approach to dose equivalence in asthma treatment guidelines is not appropriate for the wider range of molecules, potencies and device/formulations now available. A more robust method is needed that incorporates pharmacological principles.

Severe asthma in children

Severe asthma in children is characterized by sustained symptoms despite treatment with high doses of inhaled corticosteroids or oral corticosteroids. Children with severe asthma may fall into 2 categories, difficult-to-treat asthma or severe therapy-resistant asthma. Difficult-to-treat asthma is defined as poor control due to an incorrect diagnosis or comorbidities, or poor adherence due to adverse psychological or environmental factors. In contrast, treatment resistant is defined as difficult asthma despite management of these factors. It is increasingly recognized that severe asthma is a highly heterogeneous disorder associated with a number of clinical and inflammatory phenotypes that have been described in children with severe asthma. Guideline-based drug therapy of severe childhood asthma is based primarily on extrapolated data from adult studies. The recommendation is that children with severe asthma be treated with higher-dose inhaled or oral corticosteroids combined with long-acting β-agonists and other add-on therapies, such as antileukotrienes and methylxanthines. It is important to identify and address the influences that make asthma difficult to control, including reviewing the diagnosis and removing causal or aggravating factors. Better definition of the phenotypes and better targeting of therapy based upon individual patient phenotypes is likely to improve asthma treatment in the future.

In Vitro Testing for Orally Inhaled Products: Developments in Science-Based Regulatory Approaches

This article is part of a series of reports from the "Orlando Inhalation Conference-Approaches in International Regulation" which was held in March 2014, and coorganized by the University of Florida and the International Pharmaceutical Aerosol Consortium on Regulation and Science (IPAC-RS). The goal of the conference was to foster the exchange of ideas and knowledge across the global scientific and regulatory community in order to identify and help move towards strategies for internationally harmonized, science-based regulatory approaches for the development and marketing approval of inhalation medicines, including innovator and second entry products. This article provides an integrated perspective of case studies and discussion related to in vitro testing of orally inhaled products, including in vitro-in vivo correlations and requirements for in vitro data and statistical analysis that support quality or bioequivalence for regulatory applications.

[A new fixed dose combination of fluticasone and formoterol in a pressurised metered-dose inhaler for the treatment of asthma]

The combination of an inhaled corticosteroid and a long acting beta-2 agonist is indicated for the regular treatment of persistent moderate-to-severe asthmatics whose asthma is not controlled by inhaled corticosteroids and the occasional use of a short acting beta-2 agonist. The aim of this review is to give an overview of the rationale of combining formoterol and fluticasone and to analyze the clinical data concerning a new fixed combination of fluticasone and formoterol in a pressurised metered-dose inhaler with a dose counter (Flutiform(®)) that was approved for the treatment of asthma in France in 2013. The clinical studies provide evidence that combined fluticasone/formoterol is more efficacious than fluticasone or formoterol given alone, and provides similar improvements in lung function to fluticasone (Flixotide(®)) and formoterol (Foradil(®)) administered concurrently. The combination of fluticasone/formoterol gave a more rapid bronchodilatation than the combination fluticasone/salmeterol. As a whole, the combination of fluticasone/formoterol had similar efficacy and tolerability profiles to the combinations of either budesonide/formoterol or fluticasone/salmeterol.

The effect of ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of inhaled fluticasone furoate and vilanterol trifenatate in healthy subjects

AIM

To investigate the effects of the cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) inhibitor ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics of fluticasone furoate (FF) and vilanterol trifenatate (VI).

METHODS

Two double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, two-way crossover studies in healthy subjects. In study 1, subjects received single doses of ketoconazole (400 mg) or placebo on days 1-6, with a single dose of inhaled VI (25 μg) on day 5. Pharmacodynamic and PK data were obtained up to 48 h following the VI dose. In study 2, subjects received once daily ketoconazole (400 mg) or placebo for 11 days, with FF/VI (200/25 μg) for the final 7 days. Pharmacodynamic and PK data were obtained up to 48 h following the day 11 dose.

RESULTS

In study 1, there was no effect of co-administration of ketoconazole and VI on pharmacodynamic or PK parameters. In study 2, co-administration of ketoconazole and FF/VI had no effect on 0-4 h maximal heart rate or minimal blood potassium {treatment difference [90% confidence interval (CI)] -0.6 beats min(-1) (-5.8, 4.5) and 0.04 mmol l(-1) (-0.03, 0.11), respectively}, whilst there was a 27% decrease in 24 h weighted mean serum cortisol [treatment ratio (90% CI) 0.73 (0.62, 0.86)]. Co-administration of ketoconazole increased [percentage change (90% CI)] FF area under the curve (0-24) and maximal plasma concentration by 36% (16, 59) and 33% (12, 58), respectively, and VI area under the curve (0-t') and maximal plasma concentration by 65% (38, 97) and 22% (8, 38), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Co-administration of FF/VI or VI with ketoconazole resulted in a less than twofold increase in systemic exposure to FF and VI. There was no increase in β-agonist systemic pharmacodynamic effects, while serum cortisol was decreased by 27%. Co-administration of FF/VI with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors has the potential to increase systemic exposure to both fluticasone furoate and vilanterol, which could lead to an increase in the potential for adverse reactions.

Inhaled and systemic corticosteroid response in severe asthma assessed by alveolar nitric oxide: a randomized crossover pilot study of add-on therapy

AIMS

Alveolar nitric oxide (CA(NO)) is a potential biomarker of small airway inflammation. We investigated effects on CA(NO) of the addition of coarse and fine particle inhaled corticosteroids to standard therapy in severe asthma.

METHODS

Severe asthmatics taking ≥1600 µg day(-1) budesonide or equivalent performed a randomized open-label crossover study. Subjects with FEV(1) < 80%, gas trapping and CA(NO) ≥2 ppb entered a 6 week dose-ramp run-in of fluticasone/salmeterol(FPSM) 250/50 µg twice daily for 3 weeks, then 500/50 µg twice daily for 3 weeks. Patients then received additional HFA-beclomethasone diproprionate (BDP) 200 µg twice daily or FP 250 µg twice daily for 3 weeks in a crossover. Participants then received prednisolone(PRED) 25 mg day(-1) for 1 week. Nitric oxide, lung function, mannitol challenge, systemic inflammatory markers and urinary cortisol were measured.

RESULTS

Fifteen completed per protocol: mean (SD) age 51 (12) years, FEV(1) 58 (13)% predicted, residual volume 193 (100)% predicted and mannitol(PD10) 177 (2.8) µg. There was no significant difference between FPSM and add-on therapy for CA(NO). FPSM/BDP and FPSM/PRED suppressed broncial flux (Jaw(NO)) and FE(NO) compared with FPSM alone, but there was no significant difference between FPSM/BDP and FPSM/FP. ECP, e-selectin and ICAM-1 were suppressed by FPSM/PRED compared with FPSM and FPSM/FP but not FPSM/BDP. Plasma cortisol was significantly suppressed by FPSM/PRED.

CONCLUSION

In severe asthma, CA(NO) is insensitive to changes in dose and delivery of inhaled corticosteroids and is not suppressed by systemic corticosteroids. Additional inhaled HFA-BDP reduced FE(NO) and Jaw(NO) without adrenal suppression. There was a trend to reduction in FE(NO) and Jaw(NO) with additional FP but this did not reach statistical significance. PRED reduced FE(NO) and Jaw(NO) with suppression of systemic inflammatory markers and urinary cortisol.