Use of localised intracoronary beta radiation in treatment of in-stent restenosis: the INHIBIT randomised controlled trial

Comparative efficacy of interventional therapies and devices for coronary in-stent restenosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

In-stent restenosis (ISR) has become a significant obstacle to interventional therapy for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The optimal percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) strategy for patients with coronary ISR remains controversial. This network meta-analysis (NMA) was aimed to compare and estimate the effectiveness of different PCI strategies and commercial devices for the treatment of patients with coronary ISR.

Methods

In present study, we systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from database inception to October 20, 2022, to identify randomized controlled trials. We included studies comparing various PCI strategies for the treatment of any type of coronary ISR. The study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD 42022364308.

Results

We included 44 eligible trials including 8479 patients, 39 trials comparing the treatment effects of 10 PCIs, and 5 trials comparing the efficacy between different types of drug-eluting stent (DES) or drug-coated balloon (DCB) devices. Among the PCIs, everolimus-eluting stent was the optimal strategy considering target lesion revascularization (TLR), percent diameter stenosis (%DS), and binary restenosis (BR), and sirolimus-coated balloon was the optimal strategy considering late lumen loss (LLL). In the comparison of commercial devices, the combination strategy excimer laser coronary angioplasty plus SeQuent Please paclitaxel-coated balloon showed promising therapeutic prospects.

Conclusions

DCB and DES remain the preferred treatment strategies for coronary ISR, considering both the primary clinical outcome (TLR) and the angiographic outcomes (LLL, BR, %DS). Personalized combination interventions including DCB or DES hold promise as a novel potential treatment pattern for coronary ISR.

Coronary intravascular brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis: A review of the contemporary literature

Intracoronary stent restenosis (ISR) is a clinically relevant challenge in the modern era. Heterogeneity in patient- and lesion-specific factors can further compound this clinical challenge. Coronary intravascular brachytherapy (IVBT) was the standard therapeutic approach for ISR prior to the advent of drug-eluting stents (DES). Despite prospective data describing the superiority of DES over IVBT for treating de novo ISR, IVBT remains a treatment option for patients with complex disease. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the historical and contemporary literature surrounding IVBT in order to elucidate its role in modern cardiac care and to describe opportunities for future investigations to improve patient selection. Herein, we provide a review of the contemporary literature describing IVBT as a safe and effective treatment option for patients with recurrent, refractory ISR after multilayer DES and no good surgical or mechanical option. Combination therapy with emerging technologies such as DCBs may further increase efficacy.

Is Coronary Brachytherapy Staging a Comeback for the Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The catheter-based coronary intervention has become a well-established therapeutic modality for obstructive coronary artery disease. However, in-stent restenosis remains a significant limitation of coronary intervention despite the use of newer devices. Intravascular brachytherapy was introduced to treat recurrent in-stent restenosis but only modestly adopted. This review will discuss the mechanism of intracoronary brachytherapy, available clinical evidence of brachytherapy in recurrent in-stent restenosis treatment, and the future of coronary brachytherapy in coronary intervention.

RECENT FINDINGS

Drug-eluting stents have an inherent limitation as they leave a permanent metal layer inside an artery when deployed. Recently, drug-coated balloon technology has emerged to treat coronary artery disease as a combination of balloon angioplasty and local drug delivery without leaving a metal layer behind. Recent European guidelines recommended using drug-coated balloons when treating in-stent restenosis treatment, while the US guidelines have not yet addressed the use of drug-coated balloons in such cases. Coronary brachytherapy is a valuable addition to treat these challenging diseases despite several logistic issues. If there are newer technologies with easier setup, such as drug-coated balloons, coronary brachytherapy resurgence is improbable in the contemporary era, although it may not become obsolete.

Long-term outcome of brachytherapy treatment for coronary in-stent restenosis: Ten-year follow-up

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to determine the long-term major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients treated with intracoronary brachytherapy (ICBT) for coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR).

BACKGROUND

ICBT was commonly used to treat coronary ISR prior to the availability of drug-eluting stents (DES). The long-term outcomes of ICBT for ISR remain unknown.

METHODS

Six hundred and eighty consecutive patients who underwent ICBT treated for ISR between September 1998 and April 2005 were included in the study. Clinical and angiographic data were collected and the long-term MACE were measured for all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 10-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Patients were 63 ± 11 years old (66% male). The majority of patients were treated with a bare metal stent 670/680 (99%) prior to ICBT. Significant baseline clinical findings include high incidence of smokers 479/680 (70%), hyperlipidemia 638/680 (94%), and multivessel disease 526/680 (77%). The majority of target lesions were diffuse 407/680 (60%), and either in the left anterior descending 258/680 (38%) or right coronary artery 215/680 (32%). At 10-year follow-up, the rate of death was 25%, MI was 22.4%, and TVR was 48%.

CONCLUSION

MACE at 10-year follow-up following ICBT for ISR indicates steady rate of death and MI and declining rate of TVR after 5 years.

Advances in Vascular Brachytherapy over the Last 10 Years: Focus on Femoropopliteal Applications

Restenosis and the need for repeated interventions after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) remain major drawbacks limiting a widespread application of this minimally invasive technique in the femoropopliteal segment. During the last decade, vascular brachytherapy (BT) emerged as a promising, novel technology with the potential to reduce the rates of restenosis. Meanwhile, several randomized controlled trials have suggested beneficial short and midterm effects of BT in the femoropopliteal arteries. However, despite substantial advances, many questions remain regarding the utility of vascular BT and its dissemination as a practical tool to prevent restenosis. The risk of complications, such as late stent thrombosis, edge effect, catch-up late restenosis, and potential aneurysm formation, as well as the logistical issues associated with the use of this technology in the catheterization laboratory, are delaying the acceptance of BT for routine use. This article reviews the developments of BT for restenosis prevention during the past decade, focusing on implications for peripheral endovascular treatment.

Biocompatibility and Biostability of Metallic Endovascular Implants: State of the Art and Perspectives

This work was partly supported by the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada.

More than a million metallic endovascular devices are implanted each year, but the quest for the perfect material continues. The importance of interfacial properties in the overall biocompatibility of metals and alloys has been recognized for a long time. In particular, these properties modulate the hemocompatibility of devices in contact with blood and, in turn, strongly influence implantation outcomes. In this article, the relative properties of metallic materials commonly used in endovascular applications are reviewed. Particular emphasis is given to the corrosion behavior of metallic endovascular materials and the specific surface treatments used in the production processes. Issues relative to corrosion assays will also be reviewed in terms of their relevance to in vivo applications. The potential adverse effects of degradation products with respect to endovascular applications will be described. Finally, this review addresses future perspectives of metallic devices in endovascular procedures in view of the recent promises of antiproliferative strategies that are likely to profoundly modify current procedures.

Vascular brachytherapy versus drug-eluting stents in the treatment of in-stent restenosis: A meta-analysis of long-term outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Clinical trials have shown a short-term benefit of drug-eluting stents (DES) compared to vascular brachytherapy (VBT) for treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR). The long-term benefits of DES vs. VBT are conflicting in the literature. This study aimed to do a meta-analysis of long-term outcomes of DES compared to VBT for treatment of ISR.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central and unpublished data were searched for cohort studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that directly compared VBT to DES for the treatment of ISR. We evaluated the following outcomes at 2-5 years of follow-up: target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel revascularization (TVR), myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis, cardiovascular (CV) mortality, and overall mortality. Heterogeneity was defined as I(2) values > 25%. Review Manager 5.1 was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

We included 1,375 patients from five studies, of which three were RCTs. VBT was used to treat ISR in 685 (49.8%) patients. After a 2-5 year follow-up, no significant differences were found between treatment groups regarding MI (P = 0.49), stent thrombosis (P = 0.86), CV mortality (P = 0.35), and overall mortality (P = 0.71). TLR (OR 2.37; CI 1.55-3.63; P < 0.001) and TVR (OR 2.23; CI 1.01-4.94; P = 0.05) were significantly increased in patients who received VBT.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that DES are associated with decreased long-term revascularization procedures when compared to VBT for the treatment of ISR. This benefit does not appear to be associated with a significant reduction in mortality or myocardial infarction.

Late results (>10 years) of intracoronary beta brachytherapy for diffuse in-stent restenosis

INTRODUCTION

Until the development of drug-eluting stents (DES), diffuse in-stent restenosis (ISR) was the main limitation of bare-metal stents in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Among the different treatments available, intracoronary brachytherapy (BT) emerged as one of the most promising, although it was almost abandoned with the increasing use of DES.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the Portuguese experience with 90Sr/90Y beta brachytherapy for the treatment of diffuse ISR regarding long-term (>10 years) major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and angiographic restenosis.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective, observational study included 12 consecutive patients treated between January and June 2001, mean age 58.6±9.9 years (range 43-77 years), 11 male. All had chronic stable angina, 75% had dyslipidemia, 58% had hypertension, 50% had peripheral arterial disease, 42% had diabetes and 50% had multivessel disease. Recurrent ISR was present in half of the patients and 11 had normal left ventricular function. After balloon dilatation, BT was performed using an Sr90/Y90 (Novoste Beta-CathTM) beta radiation source. All patients remained under dual antiplatelet therapy until scheduled nine-month follow-up angiography. Patients were followed for the occurrence of death (all-cause and cardiovascular), non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), revascularization, stent thrombosis and angiographic restenosis. MACE were defined as the combined incidence of cardiac death, MI and urgent target vessel revascularization.

RESULTS

In all cases there was both clinical and angiographic success. In a mean follow-up of 10.9±2.5 years, 19 events occurred in seven patients: death in three (25%), only one cardiac (8.3%); ST-elevation MI in one (related to a non-target vessel) (8.3%); and 15 revascularizations in five (42%), of which nine were of the target vessel (mainly in the first two years). There was only one case of probable stent thrombosis. Angiographic restenosis at nine months was 27% (three out of 11 patients), of which two were total occlusions. Ten-year MACE-free survival was 42% (5 patients).

CONCLUSIONS

Intracoronary beta brachytherapy for the treatment of diffuse ISR in this small cohort of patients proved to be safe and efficacious, with no late adverse events related to intracoronary radiation.

Endovascular brachytherapy using liquid Beta-emitting rhenium-188 for the treatment of long-segment femoropopliteal in-stent stenosis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of endovascular brachytherapy with liquid beta-emitting rhenium-188 (Re-188) in patients with long-segment in-stent stenosis in the femoropopliteal segment.

METHODS

From July 2009 to April 2011, 90 consecutive patients (59 men; mean age 68.3±10.3 years, range 43-86) with symptomatic in-stent stenosis/occlusion (24.6-cm mean lesion length) of the femoropopliteal segment underwent angioplasty and subsequent endovascular brachytherapy. The liquid beta-emitting Re-188 was applied to the target lesion within an angioplasty balloon using a dose of 13 Gy at a depth of 2 mm into the vessel wall. Clinical and angiographic follow-up data were collected up to 2 years. The main study endpoints were the 6- and 12-month primary patency rates defined as <50% in-stent stenosis as detected by duplex ultrasound. Clinical endpoints were the cumulative rates of death, amputation, and bypass surgery, as well as improvement in the Rutherford category and the ankle-brachial index. Results were correlated with patient and lesion characteristics.

RESULTS

Primary technical success was achieved in all patients, with 1 early stent thrombosis, but no other complications related to the irradiation. Eighty-eight patients reached the 6-month and 82 the 12-month examinations; the primary patency was 95.2% and 79.8%, respectively. In-stent stenosis occurred in 9 patients, while 10 patients had reocclusion of the treated segment. During follow-up, there were 2 late acute thrombotic occlusions, both after discontinuation of clopidogrel. The clinical status improved in 67.0% and 62.2% of the patients after 6 and 12 months, respectively. No patient, lesion, or procedure variables were predictive of restenosis after EVBT.

CONCLUSION

EVBT with liquid beta-emitting Re-188 was safe and effective in preventing restenosis in long-segment femoropopliteal ISS.

Serial greyscale and radiofrequency intravascular ultrasound assessment of plaque modification and vessel geometry at proximal and distal edges of bare metal and first-generation drug-eluting stents

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the correlation between modifications in plaque composition at stent edges and the changes in vessel geometry. This study sought to evaluate, by serial greyscale intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and Virtual Histology intravascular ultrasound (VH-IVUS), the modifications in plaque composition at the edges of drug-eluting and bare metal stents and the correlation of these findings with changes in the measurements of vessel, lumen and plaque area at those segments.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Single-centre, prospective and randomised (1:1) evaluation of 40 patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with bare metal (Driver; Medtronic, Santa Clara, CA, USA; n=20 patients) or drug-eluting stents (Cypher; Cordis, Miami Lakes, FL, USA; n=20 patients). IVUS and VH-IVUS assessments were done post-procedure and at nine months. Primary endpoint included the modification in vessel, lumen and plaque area and in the composition of the plaque in the mean time between the baseline and follow-up procedure. At the proximal edge of the vessel treated with the Cypher stent, a trend toward positive vessel remodelling (D=+0.6 mm², p=0.06) was observed while at the distal edge, less plaque growth (D=+0.2 mm² vs. D=+1.1 mm², p<0.001), resulted in a larger lumen area at follow-up. By VH, there was a marked reduction in the percentage of fibrotic tissue and necrotic core at the edges of both stents and a positive correlation was seen between increase in percentage of fibro-fatty component and increase in plaque area (r=0.78, p=0.01).

CONCLUSION

Patients treated with drug-eluting stents (DES) experienced less plaque growth, especially at the distal edge of the stents. Modifications in plaque composition, with increase in fibrofatty tissue component, may partially explain these findings.

Radiation therapy for dialysis access stenosis: unfulfilled promise or false expectations

Hemodialysis vascular access dysfunction is a major cause of morbidity and hospitalization in the hemodialysis population at a cost of well over $1 billion per annum. Venous stenosis (due to venous neointimal hyperplasia [VNH]) is the most common cause of polytetrafluroethylene PTFE) dialysis access graft and arteriovenous fistula (AVF) failure. Despite the magnitude of the clinical problem, however, there are currently no effective therapies for this condition. We and others have previously demonstrated that VNH in PTFE dialysis grafts and AVF is composed of smooth muscle cells/myofibroblasts, endothelial cells within neointimal microvessels, and peri-graft macrophages. Radiation therapy blocks the proliferation and activation of all these cell types. The current review will dissect out the available in vitro, experimental, and clinical data on the use of radiation therapy for vascular stenosis in general, and for dialysis access dysfunction in particular. It is important to try and identify whether there is still a role for radiation therapy in this specific clinical setting. We believe that this is a critically important question to answer in view of the huge unmet clinical need that is currently associated with hemodialysis vascular access dysfunction.

Restenosis after PCI. Part 2: prevention and therapy

The techniques and materials used during percutaneous coronary intervention have advanced considerably over the past 3 decades, yet restenosis remains one of the major drawbacks of this procedure. Many innovative technologies, including drug-eluting stents, with or without specific polymers, and fully biodegradable stents have been and continue to be developed in the search for a safe and effective antirestenosis therapy. Remarkable advances in stent design and nanoparticle delivery systems ('nanovehicles') have already fueled revolutionary changes in the prevention and treatment of in-stent restenosis. In this Review we provide an overview of the latest innovations for optimizing outcomes of coronary stenting, and up-to-date information about prevention and treatment of in-stent restenosis.

Preliminary studies of an 18-crown-6 ether modified magnetic cation exchange polymer in rapid (90)Sr bioassay

A cation exchange polymer resin embedded with magnetic nanoparticles and modified with crown ether was developed for urinalysis to rapidly monitor levels of (90)Sr exposure in humans who have been involved in a nuclear event. Invention of the resin matrix of 2-acrylamido-2-methyl-1-propanesulfonic acid cross-linked with divinylbenzene incorporated a Sr(2+) chelating agent, di-tert-butyl-cyclohexano-18-crown-6 through surface immobilization using a molecular modifier 1-octanol. The performance of these magnetic cation exchange resin particles was investigated by separating (90)Sr in the presence of (90)Y progeny. Masking agents and precipitants were examined to ascertain that sodium hydroxide at pH 7.5 was capable of selectively removing 89 ± 2% (90)Y before subsequent (90)Sr uptake. Preliminary investigations in rapid urinalysis were successful in isolating 83 ± 2% (90)Sr when pH was optimized to 9, with a sample turnover time <2 h, which is promising for radiological emergencies.

Drug-eluting stents vs. intracoronary brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

It has been reported that drug-eluting stents (DES) were superior to intracoronary brachytherapy (ICBT) in patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR). However, it is unknown whether there might be differences between DES and ICBT in terms of efficacy and safety in large sample size and long-term follow-up.

HYPOTHESIS

The aim of this study was to determine whether DES implantation remains favorable in large sample size and long-term follow-up when compared with ICBT among patients with ISR.

METHODS

We conducted a search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials without language restrictions. A meta-analysis of 1942 cases from 12 controlled trials of DES vs ICBT for ISR was performed.

RESULTS

Drug-eluting stents were significantly more effective in reducing target-vessel revascularization (TVR) (odds ratio [OR]: 0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.23-0.81, P = 0.009) and binary restenosis (OR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.26-0.46, P<0.00001) compared with ICBT at midterm follow-up. There were no significant differences between DES and ICBT in cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and late stent thrombosis at midterm follow-up. A statistical significance has been found between the 2 groups in TVR (OR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.43-0.86, P = 0.005) at long-term follow-up. There were no significant differences in cardiac death and MI between the 2 groups at long-term follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings provide evidence that DES is superior to ICBT for the treatment of ISR in TVR and binary restenosis reduction, but not in cardiac death, MI, and late stent thrombosis reduction. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Yong-Guang Lu, MD, and Yan-Mei Chen, MD, contributed equally to this work. The authors have no funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.

Drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents for treatment of bare-metal in-stent restenosis

OBJECTIVES

We compared the long-term outcomes of drug-eluting stents (DES) versus bare-metal stents (BMS) for treatment of bare-metal in-stent restenosis (ISR).

BACKGROUND

There are no randomized trials or observational studies directly comparing the safety and efficacy of DES versus BMS for treatment of bare-metal ISR.

METHODS

We examined data on all patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ISR at Cleveland Clinic between 05/1999 and 06/2007. We compared the efficacy and safety of DES to BMS for treating bare-metal ISR. The primary end point was a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), or target lesion revascularization (TLR). The secondary endpoints were individual components of the primary endpoint.

RESULTS

Of the 931 patients identified over 8 years, 706 had bare-metal ISR and met our study criteria. Of the 706 patients with bare-metal ISR, 362 were treated with DES and 344 with BMS. There were 230 cumulative events for a median follow-up of 3.2 years. After adjusting for 27 variables, DES were associated with lower primary endpoint compared to BMS for treatment of bare-metal ISR (21% vs. 45%, adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.42-0.95; P = 0.03). The individual secondary endpoint of death (8% vs. 24%, P = 0.005) favored DES, but MI (3% vs. 8%, P = 0.31), and TLR (13% vs. 20%, P = 0.23) failed to reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

In our multivariate analysis of patients with bare-metal ISR, DES use was associated with significantly lower death, MI, or TLR when compared to BMS.

In-stent restenosis

The introduction of coronary stents marked a major turning point in the practice of interventional cardiology. Whereas the efficacy of balloon angioplasty was challenged both by immediate mechanical complications and by a high incidence of restenosis, coronary stents offered cardiologists a means by which to not only augment immediate procedural success, but also to reduce the incidence of restenosis following coronary intervention. However, despite technological advances and an improved understanding of the restenotic process, the overall rate of in-stent restenosis following bare metal stent implantation remains high. Although the introduction of drug-eluting stents has further reduced the incidence of restenosis, the "real-world" application of drug-eluting stents in increasingly complex lesion and patient subsets has given way to the even greater clinical challenge of managing drug-eluting stent restenosis. Although the standard treatment of bare metal stent restenosis typically involves placement of a drug-eluting stent, the optimal therapeutic approach to drug-eluting stent restenosis remains less defined. The issue of in-stent restenosis (especially following implantation of a drug-eluting stent) remains a clinical challenge, and investigation into therapeutic options remains ongoing. As technology evolves, such investigation will likely incorporate novel approaches including drug-coated balloons novel stent designs.

Clinical safety and efficacy of a novel thin-strut cobalt-chromium coronary stent system: results of the real world Coroflex Blue Registry

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this registry was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of the Coroflex Blue cobalt-chromium stent in real-world practice.

BACKGROUND

The development of cobalt-chromium bare-metal stents (BMS) with thinner struts has lead to better deliverability and lower target-lesion revascularization rates compared with stainless steel BMS.

METHODS

The Coroflex Blue Registry was an international, prospective, multicenter registry enrolling patients with symptomatic ischemic heart disease attributable to single de novo or restenotic nonstented lesions of a single vessel amenable for percutaneous stenting. The primary end point was clinically driven target-lesion revascularisation (TLR) 6 months after enrolment, secondary endpoints were technical/procedural success, in-hospital outcome, definite stent thrombosis and major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, or TLR) after 6 months.

RESULTS

The registry included 2,315 patients (mean age 64.3 +/- 11.1 years, 19.8% diabetes, 37.3% acute myocardial infarction). Although a complex lesion cohort with 60.3% Typ B(2)/C-lesions, the technical success rate was 99.1% and the procedural success rate 98.5%. The incidence of TLR after 6 months was 5.5% and the cumulative 6-month acute/subacute stent thrombosis rate was 1.6%. After 6 months cumulative event-free survival was 90.8% in all patients and 87% in patients with acute PCI for acute myocardial infarction.

CONCLUSIONS

This registry demonstrates the safety and efficacy of the Coroflex Blue cobalt-chromium stent platform in real-world practice. In the era of drug-eluting stents (DES), these results raise the serious question if the use of DES for primary prevention of restenosis and TLR is really justified.

Beta endovascular brachytherapy using CO2-filled centering catheter for treatment of recurrent superficial femoropopliteal artery disease

BACKGROUND

Recurrent disease (restenosis) after endovascular treatment of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) remains a major problem. We evaluated the efficacy of beta-endovascular brachytherapy using the CORONA centering catheter in patients with SFA restenosis in a single-arm Phase II trial.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 28 patients (mean age 70 years; 16 female, 12 male) with recurrent SFA stenosis were treated, and in-stent restenosis was present in 17 patients (61%). Brachytherapy was performed with strontium-90 beta source using a 7-French CO(2)-filled one-segment centering catheter. New stents had to be applied in two cases. Mean interventional length was 129 mm (range 20-240 mm). A dose of 14 Gy in vessel radius (postinterventional) plus 2 mm was applied in 24 patients and 18.4 Gy in four patients. Treatment time was 7 min 32 s per radiation segment. No major adverse events occurred. Patients were followed by ankle-brachial index and duplex sonography for a median of 42 months. Cumulative restenosis rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 9%, 28%, and 40%, respectively. Target vessel revascularization was performed in seven cases (25%).

CONCLUSIONS

In comparison to literature data, the treatment of SFA restenosis with beta brachytherapy may improve long-term patency.

Intracoronary β‐irradiation enhances balloon‐injury‐induced tissue factor expression in the porcine injury model

Intracoronary brachytherapy (ICBT) effectively reduces restenosis but is associated with late thrombosis. Since tissue factor (TF) is an important mediator of arterial thrombosis, we tested the hypothesis that ICBT results in persistently augmented TF expression. Coronary arteries from 12 pigs were randomized to: control (C; no injury), oversized balloon injury (BI), or BI followed by ICBT. Animals were sacrificed at 1, 7, 14, or 60 days postprocedure, and coronary arteries collected for expression analyses and immunostaining. ICBT-treated arteries had higher TF antigen and activity at all time-points compared to BI arteries (Western blot: 16 571 +/- 2090 vs 10 135 +/- 2939 densitometric units, p = 0.001; ELISA: 0.42 +/- 0.13 nM vs 0.25 +/- 0.14 nM, p = 0.001; TF activity assay: 0.303 +/- 0.11 nM vs 0.18 +/- 0.07 nM, p = 0.01; immunohistochemical staining: 30.6 +/- 6.6% vs 11.5% +/- 3.2%, p = 0.01). TF expression increased following BI, increased further following ICBT, and persisted for the duration of the study. We conclude that TF expression increases after BI, but is further increased and persists for a longer duration following ICBT, suggesting that a TF-mediated mechanism may play a role in late thrombosis following ICBT.

3-year follow-up of the SISR (Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Vascular Brachytherapy for In-Stent Restenosis) trial

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term outcome of patients treated for in-stent restenosis of bare-metal stents (BMS).

BACKGROUND

Treatment of restenosis of BMS is characterized by high recurrence rates. Vascular brachytherapy (VBT) improved outcome although late catch-up events were documented. Drug-eluting stents tested against VBT in this setting were found superior for at least the first year; superiority at longer follow-up is uncertain.

METHODS

We evaluated 3-year outcome of the multicenter SISR (Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Vascular Brachytherapy for In-Stent Restenosis) trial, which randomized patients with restenosis of BMS to either a sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) or VBT.

RESULTS

Target vessel failure (cardiac death, infarction, or target vessel revascularization [TVR]) at 9 months as previously reported was significantly improved with SES. Kaplan-Meier analysis at 3 years documented that survival free from target lesion revascularization (TLR) and TVR continues to be significantly improved with SES: freedom from TLR 81.0% versus 71.6% (log-rank p = 0.018), and TVR 78.2% versus 68.8% (log-rank p = 0.022), SES versus VBT. At 3 years, target vessel failure and major adverse cardiac events (death, infarction, emergency coronary artery bypass grafting, or repeat TLR) remained improved with SES, but did not reach statistical significance. There was no statistically significant difference in definite or probable stent thrombosis (3.5% for SES, 2.4% for VBT; p = 0.758).

CONCLUSIONS

At 3 years of follow-up, after treatment of in-stent restenosis of BMS, patients treated with SES have improved survival free of TLR and TVR compared with patients treated with VBT. Stent thrombosis rates are not different between the 2 groups but are higher than reported in trials of treatment of de novo lesions.

Use of 'sham' radiotherapy in randomized clinical trials

The objective of this systematic review was to identify quality trials that use sham radiotherapy in their design and review them to determine its potential value. The Cochrane Library, Pubmed and a Reference Search served as data sources. Trials were included if they met a minimum quality score of 3 on a validated assessment instrument (which assesses randomization, control and blinding) and if they compared sham radiotherapy to active treatment. External beam therapy and brachytherapy trials were considered. Twenty-six trials were identified, collectively including 2663 participants in the period of 1970-2004. All the trials studied the value of radiotherapy for treatment or prevention of benign diseases, including multiple sclerosis, coronary artery restenosis, age-related macular degeneration and Graves' ophthalmopathy. There were no trials relating to the use of radiotherapy in the treatment of malignancy. This review showed that it is possible to carry out sham radiotherapy with due regard for ethical concerns, with effective blinding and high levels of patient acceptance. Large sample sizes with multicentre trial designs were achievable. Although the statistical philosophy for using sham radiotherapy in trials is legitimate, it is no longer routinely used.

Prolonged application of clopidogrel reduces inflammation after percutaneous coronary intervention in the porcine model

OBJECTIVE

We determined the effect of prolonged treatment with clopidogrel on C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations and blood thrombogenicity after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty followed by intracoronary brachytherapy in the porcine model. ANIMAL MODEL: All 48 pigs received antiplatelet therapy, including aspirin (325 mg, daily) and clopidogrel (300 mg, loading dose) 1 day before PCI, followed by a daily dose of clopidogrel (75 mg/day) in addition to aspirin. During PCI, one of two balloon-injured arteries was randomly assigned to receive immediate radiation treatment. Animals were sacrificed after 24 h, 1 month, and 3 months post-PCI. The pigs, which were sacrificed 3 months post-PCI, were divided into two groups. The first group received clopidogrel in addition to aspirin for 3 months, and the second group received clopidogrel in addition to aspirin for only 1 month after PCI and then aspirin alone.

METHODS

Blood was taken from all pigs before intervention, immediately after intervention, and before sacrifice. Serum CRP was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. To analyze the procoagulant effects of PCI on blood thrombogenicity, a one-stage clotting assay was performed.

RESULTS

Clopidogrel treatment for 3 months reduced CRP levels more than did clopidogrel therapy for 1 month only at 3 months post-PCI (27.9+/-3.9 vs. 56.6+/-11.3 microg/ml; P=.019). Baseline CRP levels were found to be 50.4+/-4.8 microg/ml. Plasma clotting was not affected by prolonged clopidogrel therapy (322.8+/-59.3 s vs. 295.2+/-52.5 s; P=ns).

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged treatment with clopidogrel reduced CRP levels post-PCI.

Use of sirolimus-eluting stents for treatment of in-stent restenosis: long-term follow-up

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to assess (i) the feasibility, safety and efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) in treating in-stent restenosis (ISR), (ii) the risk factors for recurrent ISR, and (iii) the long-term major adverse cardiac events (MACE).

METHODS

Between May 2002 and April 2004, 100 consecutive patients with evidence of myocardial ischaemia and 112 ISRs in native coronary arteries were treated using SESs. We evaluated the rate of procedural and clinical success, the incidence of in-hospital and long-term MACE, the recurrence rate of ISR after 6-8 months, and the risk factors for recurrent ISR and follow-up MACE.

RESULTS

Forty-five percent of the lesions were directly stented. After stent implantation, the minimal lumen diameter increased from 0.51 +/- 0.32 to 2.50 +/- 0.32 mm in the stents and to 2.30 +/- 0.35 mm in the lesions (acute gain 1.99 +/- 0.37 mm). The procedural success rate was 99%. The clinical success rate was 88%. MACE occurred in 2.0% of patients during hospitalisation and in 12.8% after a median follow-up of 15.1 months (interquartile range 8.4-19.7). The recurrence rate of ISR was 11.8% after a median follow-up of 7.7 months (interquartile range 7.4-8.4). The risk for recurrent ISR was significantly higher in patients with diabetes or hypertension, in those aged more than 65 years and in female patients, as well as in the lesions with a small minimal lumen diameter. Three-vessel disease and age were risk factors for MACE.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of using SESs to treat ISR, and identifies a risk profile for recurrent ISR and MACE.

Neointimal progression and luminal narrowing in sirolimus-eluting stent treatment for bare metal in-stent restenosis: a quantitative intravascular ultrasound analysis

BACKGROUND

Recurrent restenosis may occur after drug-eluting stent implantation for in-stent restenosis (ISR) of bare metal stents (BMSs), especially in areas involving drug-eluting stent gaps.

METHODS

To investigate the details of neointimal progression and luminal narrowing after the treatment of ISR using sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs), serial intravascular ultrasound analysis was performed in 65 patients with ISR at postintervention and at 6-month follow-up. The total stented segment was categorized into 3 compartments: new SES (N), new SES and old BMS overlap (N/O), and old BMS (O). In each of the 190 compartments, serial intravascular ultrasound parameters were analyzed at the cross section of the maximum change in neointimal area (delta neointimal area) from postintervention to follow-up or the minimum lumen area at follow-up if delta neointimal area was 0. Minimum lumen area in each compartment was also investigated serially.

RESULTS

At postintervention, lumen area was the smallest in compartment N/O (N 5.8 +/- 1.5, N/O 5.1 +/- 1.3, O 6.0 +/- 1.4 mm2, P = .005). Not only the average of maximum delta neointimal area (N 0.2 +/- 0.4, N/O 0.2 +/- 0.4, O 0.8 +/- 1.0 mm2, P < .0001) but also the frequency of minimum lumen area decreasing from > or = 4.0 mm2 at postintervention to < 4.0 mm2 at follow-up (N 4.0%, N/O 5.1%, O 23.5%, P = .012) was the largest in compartment O.

CONCLUSIONS

Neointimal progression and consequent luminal narrowing tend to occur where BMS is uncovered with SES in treatment of ISR, even in the absence of an obvious stenosis at postintervention.

Paclitaxel-eluting stents for the treatment of complex coronary lesions: immediate and 12-month results

OBJECTIVE

One of the drug-eluting stents that have been introduced into clinical practice is the paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES). Several randomised, controlled clinical trials have already been conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this stent, but data regarding clinical practice are still lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of PESs in a 'real-world' population.

METHODS

Two hundred and seventy-three patients with a high cardiovascular risk profile and complex coronary lesions were treated with PESs. Each patient was categorised using the following parameters: cardiovascular risk factors, clinical history, clinical presentation, angiographic pattern, and procedural characteristics. Primary endpoints were major adverse cardiac events (cardiovascular death, coronary artery bypass grafting, myocardial infarction, stroke, target vessel revascularisation, target lesion revascularisation, and remote revascularisation).

RESULTS

A low rate of intraprocedural and periprocedural complications was observed. During the clinical follow-up period (mean 10.5 +/- 4.2 months), 78% of patients were event-free. Twenty-six patients (9.8%) underwent target vessel revascularisation, but only 11 of them (4.2%) had target lesion revascularisation. Seven patients (2.7%) had myocardial infarction, and cardiac death occurred in two patients (0.76%). Only one case (0.37%) of subacute stent thrombosis and one case of late stent thrombosis were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study demonstrates that the use of PESs is safe and effective also in patients with a high cardiovascular risk profile and complex coronary lesions.