Whole brain radiation therapy with or without stereotactic radiosurgery boost for patients with one to three brain metastases: phase III results of the RTOG 9508 randomised trial

Does Time to Retreatment Matter? A Normal Tissue Complication Probability Model to Predict Radionecrosis After Repeat Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Recurrent Brain Metastases Incorporating Time-dependent Discounted Dose

PURPOSE

To develop and compare normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models for recurrent brain metastases (BMs) treated with repeat single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), considering time-dependent discounted prior dose.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We developed three NTCP models (M0, M1-retreat, and M1-combo models) of BMs treated with GammaKnife-based SRS. The maximum dose is 0.2 cc (D0.2cc) of the lesion-specific brain, and the 1-year radionecrosis risk is modeled using a logistic response with doses converted into equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2) based on a linear quadratic linear model. The M0 and M1-retreat models, respectively, predicted radionecrosis risk after SRS to 1029 nonrecurrent lesions (patients, 262) and second SRS to 149 recurrent lesions (patients, 87). The M1-combo model accounted for the second SRS and time-dependent discounted first SRS dose for recurrent lesions estimated using a modified Gompertzian function.

RESULTS

All 3 models fitted the data well (χ2, 0.039-0.089, and P = 0.999-1.000). The fitted EQD250 was ∼ 103 Gy for the M0 model, ∼ 88 Gy for the M1-retreat model, and ∼ 165 Gy for the M1-combo model. The fitted γ50 exhibited a progressively flatter dose-response curve across the three models, with values of 1.2 per gray for the M0 model, 0.6 per gray for the M1-retreat model, and 0.4 per gray for the M1-combo model. For the brain D0.2cc of 29 and 19 Gy, the steepest to shallowest dose-response or largest change in NTCP values, ie, NTCP29Gy - NTCP19Gy, was observed in the M1-retreat (0.16), M0 (0.14), and M1-combo (0.06) models.

CONCLUSIONS

The model-fitted parameters predicted that recurrent BMs would have a lower threshold dose tolerance and a more gradual dose response to the second SRS than nonrecurrent BMs. This gradual dose-response becomes even more apparent when considering the time-dependent discounted first SRS as a cumulative second SRS. Tailoring SRS retreatment protocols based on NTCP modeling can potentially enhance therapeutic efficacy.

Total brain dose estimation in single-isocenter-multiple-targets (SIMT) radiosurgery via a novel deep neural network with spherical convolutions

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Accurate prediction of normal brain dosimetric parameters is crucial for the quality control of single-isocenter multi-target (SIMT) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatment planning. Reliable dose estimation of normal brain tissue is one of the great indicators to evaluate plan quality and is used as a reference in clinics to improve potentially SIMT SRS treatment planning quality consistency. This study aimed to develop a spherical coordinate-defined deep learning model to predict the dose to a normal brain for SIMT SRS treatment planning.

METHODS

By encapsulating the human brain within a sphere, 3D volumetric data of planning target volume (PTVs) can be projected onto this geometry as a 2D spherical representation (in azimuthal and polar angles). A novel deep learning model spherical convolutional neural network (SCNN) was developed based on spherical convolution to predict brain dosimetric evaluators from spherical representation. Utilizing 106 SIMT cases, the model was trained to predict brain V50%, V60%, and V66.7%, corresponding to V10Gy and V12Gy, as key dosimetric indicators. The model prediction performance was evaluated using the coefficient of determination (R2), mean absolute error (MAE), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE).

RESULTS

The SCNN accurately predicted normal brain dosimetric values from the modeled spherical PTV representation, with R2 scores of 0.92 ± 0.05/0.94 ± 0.10/0.93 ± 0.09 for V50%/V60%/V66.7%, respectively. MAEs values were 1.94 ± 1.61 cc/1.23 ± 0.98 cc/1.13 ± 0.99 cc, and MAPEs were 19.79 ± 20.36%/20.79 ± 21.07%/21.15 ± 22.24%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The deep learning model provides treatment planners with accurate prediction of dose to normal brain, enabling improved consistency in treatment planning quality. This method can be extended to other brain-related analyses as an efficient data dimension reduction method.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery Dose Reduction for Melanoma Brain Metastases Patients on Immunotherapy or Target Therapy: A Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Better local control but higher rates of adverse radiation events (ARE) have been reported when combining American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO)-guideline-suggested dose (SD) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with immunotherapy or targeted therapy for melanoma brain metastases. The objective of this study is to explore the efficacy and safety of lower prescription doses compared with ASTRO guidelines for single-fraction SRS for patients with melanoma metastases who are concurrently receiving immunotherapy or targeted therapy.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, single-center study on 194 patients who underwent SRS between 2009 and 2022. After propensity score matching, 71 patients with 292 metastases were included in the ASTRO-SD (20-24 Gy for <2 cm, 18 Gy for ≥2 to <3 cm) group and 33 patients with 292 metastases in the reduced dose (RD, <20 Gy for <2 cm, <18 Gy for ≥2 to <3 cm) group.

RESULTS

The median diameter (5.4 vs 5.2 mm, P = .6), prescription volume (0.2 vs 0.2 cm 3 , P = .2), and radiographic follow-up (11 vs 12 months, P = .2) were similar in the 2 groups. The cumulative incidence of progressing metastases was significantly higher in the SD compared with the RD group ( P = .018). Higher prescription volumes and ASTRO-suggested radiation doses were associated with local progression in multivariable analysis. Radiographic AREs were significantly more common in the SD compared with the RD group (8.6% vs 3.1%, P = .005). BRAF and other tyrosine kinase inhibitors' concurrent use, higher prescription volumes, and ASTRO-suggested radiation doses were associated with an increased risk of radiographic ARE.

CONCLUSION

This study provides evidence that RD SRS could offer reduced toxicity rates, while maintaining high local control as compared with the current guideline-SDs for the treatment of melanoma brain metastases.

Treatment strategies and prognostic insights for lacrimal gland adenoid cystic carcinoma: a review

Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is the most common type of malignant tumor in lacrimal gland cancer. The primary treatment approach involves eye-preserving surgery combined with adjuvant radiotherapy, which has proven effective in maintaining visual function and achieving favorable local control with minimal toxicity. However, the 5-year survival rate for ACC of the lacrimal gland remains below 60%. Recently, novel adjuvant therapies, including neoadjuvant intra-arterial chemotherapy, proton radiotherapy, and neutron radiotherapy, have significantly improved survival outcomes. Despite these advances, the rarity of lacrimal gland adenoid cystic carcinoma (LGACC) limits comprehensive studies on long-term survival and the potential for late toxicity, underscoring the need for further research. Additionally, recent findings on pathogenic mechanisms and proteomic abnormalities in LGACC offer a foundation for developing targeted therapies, paving the way for more personalized treatments. This article reviews contemporary treatment strategies and prognostic insights for LGACC, focusing on recent advancements and their implications for patient survival.

ENDOCAN-TUTHYREF guidelines. Locoregional therapies for locally advanced and/or metastatic thyroid cancer

This article presents consensus recommendations by a multidisciplinary panel of endocrinologists, medical oncologists, pathologists, radiation oncologists, surgeons and nuclear medicine physicians. The recommendations specifically address iodine-refractory well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma and locally advanced and/or metastatic medullary thyroid carcinoma. Treatment algorithms based on risk-benefit assessments of various multimodal therapeutic approaches are proposed for each clinical scenario. Given the limited data available on the management of these rare but aggressive forms of thyroid cancer, these consensus recommendations provide essential guidance for multidisciplinary teams to ensure optimal care for patients with these complex thyroid carcinomas.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with brain metastases: current principles, expanding indications and opportunities for multidisciplinary care

The management of brain metastases is challenging and should ideally be coordinated through a multidisciplinary approach. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been the cornerstone of management for most patients with oligometastatic central nervous system involvement (one to four brain metastases), and several technological and therapeutic advances over the past decade have broadened the indications for SRS to include polymetastatic central nervous system involvement (>4 brain metastases), preoperative application and fractionated SRS, as well as combinatorial approaches with targeted therapy and immune-checkpoint inhibitors. For example, improved imaging and frameless head-immobilization technologies have facilitated fractionated SRS for large brain metastases or postsurgical cavities, or lesions in proximity to organs at risk. However, these opportunities come with new challenges and questions, including the implications of tumour histology as well as the role and sequencing of concurrent systemic treatments. In this Review, we discuss these advances and associated challenges in the context of ongoing clinical trials, with insights from a global group of experts, including recommendations for current clinical practice and future investigations. The updates provided herein are meaningful for all practitioners in clinical oncology.

MRI distortion correction is associated with improved local control in stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases

Distortions in brain MRI caused by gradient nonlinearities may reach several millimeters, thus distortion correction is strongly recommended for radiotherapy treatment planning. However, the significance of MRI distortion correction on actual clinical outcomes has not been described yet. Therefore, we investigated the impact of planning MRI distortion correction on subsequent local control in a historic series of 419 brain metastases in 189 patients treated with stereotactic radiotherapy between 01/2003 and 04/2015. Local control was evaluated using a volumetric extension of the RANO-BM criteria. The predictive significance of distortion correction was assessed using competing risk analysis. In this cohort, 2D distortion-corrected MRIs had been used for treatment planning in 52.5% (220/419) of lesions, while uncorrected MRIs had been employed in 47.5% (199/419) of metastases. 2D distortion correction was associated with improved local control (Cumulative incidence of local progression at 12 months: 14.3% vs. 21.2% and at 24 months: 18.7% vs. 28.6%, p = 0.038). In multivariate analysis, adjusting for histology, baseline tumor volume, interval between MRI and treatment delivery, year of planning MRI, biologically effective dose and adjuvant Whole-brain radiotherapy, use of distortion correction remained significantly associated with improved local control (HR 0.55, p = 0.020). This is the first study to clinically evaluate the impact of MRI gradient nonlinearity distortion correction on local control in stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases. In this historic series, we found significantly higher local control when using 2D corrected vs. uncorrected MRI studies for treatment planning. These results stress the importance of assuring that MR images used for radiotherapy treatment planning are properly distortion-corrected.

Multidisciplinary management strategies for recurrent brain metastasis after prior radiotherapy: An overview

As cancer patients with intracranial metastatic disease experience increasingly prolonged survival, the diagnosis and management of recurrent brain metastasis pose significant challenges in clinical practice. Prior to deciding upon a management strategy, it is necessary to ascertain whether patients have recurrent/progressive disease vs adverse radiation effect, classify the recurrence as local or distant in the brain, evaluate the extent of intracranial disease (size, number and location of lesions, and brain metastasis velocity), the status of extracranial disease, and enumerate the interval from the last intracranially directed intervention to disease recurrence. A spectrum of salvage local treatment options includes surgery (resection and laser interstitial thermal therapy [LITT]) with or without adjuvant radiotherapy in the forms of external beam radiotherapy, intraoperative radiotherapy, or brachytherapy. Nonoperative salvage local treatments also range from single fraction and fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS/FSRS) to whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT). Optimal integration of systemic therapies, preferably with central nervous system (CNS) activity, may also require reinterrogation of brain metastasis tissue to identify actionable molecular alterations specific to intracranial progressive disease. Ultimately, the selection of the appropriate management approach necessitates a sophisticated understanding of patient, tumor, and prior treatment-related factors and is often multimodal; hence, interdisciplinary evaluation for such patients is indispensable.

Optimizing normal tissue objectives (NTO) in eclipse treatment planning system (TPS) for stereotactic treatment of multiple brain metastases using non-coplanar RapidArc and comparison with HyperArc techniques

PURPOSE

To optimize NTO parameters in non-coplanar RapidArc (RA) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for multiple brain metastases and compare them with HyperArc (HA) plans.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty patients with multiple brain metastases, receiving 21 Gy prescriptions, were retrospectively enrolled, with lesions ranging from two to eight and volumes between 0.27 and 10.56 cm3. Non-coplanar RapidArc plans utilized manual NTO (RA-mNTO) with varying dose fall-off values (0.1 mm-1, 0.5 mm-1, 1.0 mm-1, 2.0 mm-1, 3.0 mm-1) and end doses (50%, 25% & 10%). Additionally, two HyperArc plans were generated: HA-ALDO used Automatic Lower Dose Objectives with SRS NTO, while HA-mNTO used the same beam geometry with manual NTO parameters optimized from RA-mNTO plans. TrueBeam with High-Definition Multi-leaf Collimators (HDMLC), 6 MV Flattening Filter Free (FFF) Beam at a maximum dose rate of 1400 MU/min, and Eclipse version 16.1 TPS were used. Plans were assessed for Paddick Conformity Index (CI), Gradient Index (GI), Homogeneity Index (HI), normal brain doses (V18Gy, V15Gy, and V12Gy), Monitor Units (MUs), and delivery accuracy using aS1200 Digital Megavolt Imager (DMI) with 2%/2 mm gamma criteria. Statistical analysis utilized integrated scoring and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

RESULTS

RA-mNTO plans with 0.5 mm⁻1 dose fall-off and 10% end-dose showed superior dosimetric outcomes: CI (0.85 ± 0.08), GI (3.63 ± 0.87), and HI (0.36 ± 0.06) compared to HA-ALDO (CI 0.84 ± 0.09, GI: 3.97 ± 0.85, HI: 0.39 ± 0.07) and HA-mNTO (CI 0.83 ± 0.08, GI: 3.60 ± 0.93, HI: 0.40 ± 0.06). MUs were comparable: RA-mNTO (9679 ± 1882), HA-ALDO (9509 ± 1315), and higher for HA-mNTO (10,457 ± 1980). RA-mNTO plans exhibited significantly lower normal brain doses (V18Gy: 1.78 ± 1.23, V15Gy: 3.54 ± 2.37, V12Gy: 6.21 ± 4.09) compared to HA-ALDO (V18Gy: 2.02 ± 1.34, V15Gy: 4.09 ± 2.66, V12Gy: 7.15 ± 4.56) and HA-mNTO (V18Gy: 1.85 ± 1.20, V15Gy: 3.68 ± 2.33, V12Gy: 6.36 ± 3.97). All techniques achieved > 98% gamma pass rate.

CONCLUSION

Non-coplanar RA plans with optimized mNTO settings outperformed HyperArc plans in all studied dosimetric parameters for SRS treatment of multiple brain metastases.

Dosimetric impact of arc simulation angular resolution in single-isocentre multi-target stereotactic radiosurgery

This study evaluates the dosimetric impact of arc simulation angular resolution in VMAT-based Single Isocentre Multiple Target (SIMT) SRS, focusing on their dependence on target size, isocentre distance, number of arcs, and arc type. A phantom study analysed angular resolution (0.5°, 1°, 2°) effects on dosimetric accuracy for PTVs of 0.5 cm, 1 cm, and 2 cm at distances of 2.5 cm, 5 cm, and 7.5 cm from the isocentre using conformal arc and VMAT plans. Clinical validation involved 32 patients with 2-8 brain metastases, comparing plans recalculated at 1° and 2° resolutions. Dosimetric parameters included: Dnear-Min, Dnear-Max, Dmean, Dmedian, TVPIV, CIPaddick, GI, and Brain-GTV 12 Gy. For the 0.5 cm diameter target located at 7.5 cm distance from isocentre, phantom results showed TVPIV, Dmean, and GI deviations of 7.91%, 1.8%, and 0.85 for single-conformal arcs, which decreased to 4.84%, 1.3%, and 0.77 with 4-conformal arcs, and 3.4%, 0.96%, and 0.5 for 4-arc VMAT. Deviations varied based on target size, isocentre distance, number of arcs, and arc type. Clinical results mirrored the phantom study, with maximum TVPIV and GI deviations of 2.76% and 0.65 for the smallest target (0.6 cm) located at 7.5 cm distance for four-arc VMAT. Other dosimetric parameters showed minimal variations (< 1%). Correlation analysis revealed strong associations between dosimetric differences, target size, and distance (r = 0.6-0.78 for small targets). MANOVA identified TVPIV as the only significant parameter (p = 0.01). A 1° angular resolution significantly improves dosimetric accuracy for small, distally located targets in SIMT SRS.

Cancer brain metastasis: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic strategies

Brain metastases (BMs) are the most common intracranial tumors in adults and the major cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality. The occurrence of BMs varies according to the type of primary tumors with most frequence in lung cancer, melanoma and breast cancer. Among of them, lung cancer has been reported to have a higher risk of BMs than other types of cancers with 40 ~ 50% of such patients will develop BMs during the course of disease. BMs lead to many neurological complications and result in a poor quality of life and short life span. Although the treatment strategies were improved for brain tumors in the past decades, the prognosis of BMs patients is grim. Poorly understanding of the molecular and cellular characteristics of BMs and the complicated interaction with brain microenvironment are the major reasons for the dismal prognosis of BM patients. Recent studies have enhanced understanding of the mechanisms of BMs. The newly identified potential therapeutic targets and the advanced therapeutic strategies have brought light for a better cure of BMs. In this review, we summarized the mechanisms of BMs during the metastatic course, the molecular and cellular landscapes of BMs, and the advances of novel drug delivery systems for overcoming the obstruction of blood-brain barrier (BBB). We further discussed the challenges of the emerging therapeutic strategies, such as synergistic approach of combining targeted therapy with immunotherapy, which will provide vital clues for realizing the precise and personalized medicine for BM patients in the future.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for 1-10 brain metastases to avoid whole-brain radiotherapy: Results of the CYBER-SPACE randomized phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an emerging alternative to whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for treating multiple brain metastases (BM), reducing toxicity, and improving tumor control. The CYBER-SPACE trial compared SRS based on either SPACE or MPRAGE MRI sequence for avoiding or delaying WBRT in patients with 1-10 BM.

METHODS

Patients with 1-10 untreated BM were randomized 1:1 to receive SRS of all lesions based on either SPACE or MPRAGE MRI sequences. If subsequently new BM occurred, SRS was repeated. WBRT was indicated upon occurrence of >10 new BM, leptomeningeal disease, or exhausted SRS-radiotolerance. The primary outcome was freedom from WBRT indication (WBRTi). Secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS), safety, and quality of life.

RESULTS

A total of 202 patients were randomized; SPACE n = 99, MPRAGE n = 103. Twelve-month WBRTi-free survival was 77.1% (95% CI: 69.5%-83.1%) overall, 78.5% (95% CI: 66.7%-86.5%) for SPACE, and 76.0% (95% CI: 65.2%-83.9%) for MPRAGE (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.43-1.63, P = .590). Patients with 5-10 BM had shorter WBRTi-free survival (HR = 3.13, 95% CI: 1.53-6.40, P = .002). Median OS was 13.1 months overall, 10.5 months for SPACE, and 15.2 months for MPRAGE (HR = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.78-1.56, P = .585). Neurologic death rate was 10.1%. Predictors for longer OS included Karnofsky Performance Status >80% (HR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.33-0.77, P = .002) and concurrent immunotherapy (HR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.23-0.52, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The more sensitive SPACE sequence did not improve outcomes over MPRAGE. SRS with thorough monitoring and immediate re-treatment for new lesions decreases the need for WBRT and achieves low neurologic death rates. SRS should be considered a favorable alternative to WBRT for patients with 1-10 BM.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Choriocarcinoma Brain Metastases: Illustrative Case Presentation and Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Choriocarcinoma (CC) is a rare and aggressive form of germ cell tumor. There is limited evidence describing clinical outcomes in patients with primary CC and brain metastases (BM). Only a few single case reports have documented the use of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for CC BM.

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed patients who were treated with SRS for pure CC BM from 1998 to 2024. Lesion follow-up sizes and local tumor control status were evaluated after SRS treatment using response evaluation criteria in solid tumors criteria. A comprehensive literature search was performed for CC BM in accordance with PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

In our series, 3 patients with 7 CC BM underwent SRS. Two were male with testicular CC and one was female with gestational CC. The median diameter of the lesions was 8 mm, with a median volume of 0.14 cm3 at treatment. Magnetic resonance imaging at 3 and 6 months showed reductions in median diameters to 6 mm and 4 mm, respectively. At the last follow-up visits, one lesion had local progression at 15 months after SRS and 1 lesion had sustained complete response. The systematic review yielded 249 articles. After screening, 18 reports were identified for CC BM. Among these reports, only 3 single case reports document outcomes of SRS for CC BM.

CONCLUSIONS

SRS is a feasible and viable approach for CC BM, particularly in cases where immediate surgical management is not necessary. This is the largest report to date evaluating the outcome of CC BM treated with SRS.

Survival and quality of life after first-time diagnosis of brain metastases: a multicenter, prospective, observational study

Background

A major concern in anticancer treatment (ACT) of brain metastases (BM) is exposing patients with short expected survival to treatments that negatively impact on quality of life (QoL). Such futile ACT at the end of life is time-consuming and burdensome for patients and their families and entails unnecessary healthcare costs. Refraining from ACT is challenging for both physicians and patients. This study aimed to provide real-life data on survival after BM diagnosis and patient reported outcomes (PROs) after ACT to identify risk factors for futile treatment and to support BM treatment decisions.

Methods

This multi-center, prospective, observational study recruited consecutive patients with first-time BM from November 2017 to March 2021. Patients were followed until death or study end (October 1st, 2023). Clinical factors associated with survival were analyzed by the Cox' proportional hazards model. Changes in PROs after BM treatment were described according to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, survival, and treatment groups.

Findings

For the total cohort (N = 912), median overall survival (mOS) after BM diagnosis was 5.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.2-6.7). ECOG 2-4, uncontrolled extracranial metastases, and ≥5 BM were associated with short survival. In patients treated with radiotherapy, survival for patients with ECOG 2 and those with ECOG 3-4 was similar and particularly short for the whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) group (ECOG 2: 2.9 months [95% CI 2.3-3.5]; ECOG 3-4: 2.1 [1.5-2.7]). Patients surviving <6 months after BM diagnosis reported worse QoL scores two months after ACT; patients surviving >6 months reported stable scores over time.

Interpretation

Patients with ECOG 2-4, especially those with uncontrolled extracranial metastases and ≥5 BM, are at risk for futile ACT. BM treatment guidelines should strongly caution against ACT to patients with expected survival <6 months and specifically advise against WBRT.

Funding

The South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority; The Norwegian Cancer Society.

The Role of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Oligoprogressive Malignant Disease (RADIANT): Oncologic Outcomes From a Phase 2 Nonrandomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE

In oligoprogressive (OP) cancer, there are a limited number of metastatic areas progressing on a background of stable or responding to widespread cancer. Although the standard of care for OP is changing systemic therapy (ST), stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is being explored as an alternative local therapy targeting the sites of progression.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

RADIANT (NCT04122469) was a single-center phase 2 study of patients with metastatic genitourinary (GU), breast, and gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, receiving ST for ≥3 months, with radiographic OP disease in ≤5 sites. Patients received SBRT for all OP disease in 1 to 5 fractions and were maintained on ST. The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of change in ST, which was estimated using the Aalen-Johansen method. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, as well as toxicity and health-related quality of life. Comparisons between diagnosis groups were done using the log-rank test. A 2-sided p value <.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Seventy patients were analyzed, with a median age of 69 years; 32 patients (46%) were women; the median number of lines of prior ST was 3. Primary sites were GU (n = 32; 46%), breast (n = 23; 33%), and GI (n = 15; 21%). The median follow-up was 12.3 months (IQR, 8.2-21.6 months). At 1 year, change in ST occurred in 47% (95% CI, 36%-61%) (GU 45%, breast 41%, and GI 60%; p = .23). PFS at 1 year was 32% (95% CI, 23%-45%), and median PFS was 4.7 months (95% CI, 3.8-8.1) (GU 4.8, breast 6.5, and GI 3.2), which significantly differed by disease type (p = .006). Overall survival was 75% at 1 year (95% CI, 65%-87%), which significantly differed between cancer types (GU 86%, breast 96%, and GI 22%; p < .001). The cumulative incidence of late grade ≥2 toxicity was 1.2%, with 1 patient experiencing late grade 3 toxicity and no grade 4 to 5 acute or late toxicities. Health-related quality of life declined from the mean (SD) of 66.9 (20.2) at baseline to 60.5 (22.2) at 6 months, which did not meet the threshold for a minimal clinically important difference.

CONCLUSIONS

SBRT for OP metastases delayed change in ST in approximately half of patients, warranting investigation in randomized trials.

Progress in immunotherapy for brain metastatic melanoma

Melanoma is highly aggressive, with brain metastasis being a significant contributor to poor outcomes. Immunotherapy has emerged as a crucial treatment modality for melanoma, particularly for addressing brain metastases. This review explores recent developments in immunotherapy for patients with melanoma brain metastasis, with such treatments encompassing immune checkpoint inhibitors and various immunotherapy combination approaches, such as dual immunotherapy, immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy, immunotherapy combined with targeted drugs, and immunotherapy combined with radiotherapy. This article also discusses existing treatment obstacles and potential future avenues for research and clinical practice.

Brain Metastasis in Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases (BMs) from endometrial cancer (EC) are rare and challenging to treat, with limited standardized guidelines. This systematic review aims to evaluate the incidence, therapeutic strategies, and outcomes associated with brain metastases in EC patients, offering insights for clinical practice and future research.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PRISMA guidelines, including PUBMED up to October 2024. Reports reporting individual or aggregate data on EC brain metastases were included. Descriptive and quantitative analyses were performed on incidence, treatment modalities, and survival outcomes. Three reports that used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results and National Cancer Database were used only to assess the incidence of brain metastases from endometrial carcinoma.

RESULTS

From 911 reports identified, we included 99 reports, identifying 594 cases; these and the case of a patient with brain metastasis from endometrial carcinoma followed at our center were used for analysis of disease characteristics; incidence; and treatment modalities, such as surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and combinations. Survival outcomes were influenced by treatment type and disease characteristics, with multimodal approaches showing improved outcomes.

DISCUSSION

This review underscores the rarity of EC brain metastases and highlights the need for tailored, multimodal treatment strategies. Future research should focus on prospective trials and molecular profiling to optimize management.

Stereotactic radiosurgery versus whole-brain radiotherapy for intracranial metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Brain metastasis has a negative influence on the morbidity and mortality of cancer patients. Conventionally, whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) was favored as the standard treatment for brain metastases. However, it has been linked to a significant decline in neuro-cognitive function and poor quality of life. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has recently gained prominence as an alternative modality, considering that it provides targeted high-dose radiation while minimizing adverse effects. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of SRS versus WBRT in patients with intracranial metastases.

Methods

According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement, through July 2024, we searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for articles comparing WBRT and SRS in patients with intracranial metastases. Outcomes included local and distant recurrence, leptomeningeal disease (LMD), and survival. We also used a random-effect model to perform a meta-analysis.

Results

The findings revealed no significant differences in local (risk ratio [RR] = 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.46, 1.06]) or distant recurrence rates (RR = 0.83, 95% CI [0.54, 1.28], P = 0.41) between WBRT and SRS. However, SRS was associated with a greater risk of post-radiation LMD (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.09, 95% CI [1.47, 6.49], P = 0.003). Survival rates at 1 year (RR = 1.03, 95% CI [0.83, 1.29], P = 0.76) and 5 years (RR = 0.89, 95% CI [0.39, 2.04], P = 0.78) demonstrated no significant differences.

Conclusion

SRS and WBRT exhibited similar recurrence rates and overall survival (OS) at 1 and 5 years, with WBRT being more effective in managing post-radiation LMD. SRS patients, on the other hand, had longer OS when measured in months.

Whole-Brain Radiotherapy Simultaneous Integrated Boost Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Combined With Anlotinib in the Treatment of Brain Metastases

INTRODUCTION

Whole-brain radiotherapy simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy (WBRT + SIB-IMRT) is a potential treatment approach for brain metastasis (BM) that may result in improved overall survival (OS). However, the safety and efficacy of WBRT + SIB-IMRT combined with anlotinib for BM treatment remain uncertain.

METHODS

We retrospectively compared the safety and efficacy of anlotinib + WBRT + SIB-IMRT with those of WBRT + SIB-IMRT in patients with BM from 2019 to 2022. The adverse reaction type and grade, intracranial objective response rate (iORR), intracranial disease control rate (iDCR), OS, and intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) of anlotinib + WBRT + SIB-IMRT were compared with those of WBRT + SIB-IMRT alone.

RESULTS

In total, 63 patients received either anlotinib + WBRT + SIB-IMRT or WBRT + SIB-IMRT alone (n = 31 and 32, respectively). No significant clinical differences were found between the two groups. The iORR and iDCR were higher in the anlotinib + WBRT + SIB-IMRT group than in the WBRT + SIB-IMRT group. The median iPFS and median OS of the 31 patients who received anlotinib + WBRT + SIB-IMRT were 14.5 and 18.9 months, respectively, whereas the median iPFS and median OS for the 32 patients who received WBRT + SIB-IMRT alone were 11.4 and 14.9 months, respectively. Thus, anlotinib combined with WBRT + SIB-IMRT increased the duration of iPFS, but not OS. iPFS was influenced by the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score, age, extracranial distant metastasis, and addition of anlotinib to treatment, whereas OS correlated with age, extracranial distant metastasis, and KPS score. No treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Anlotinib combined with WBRT + SIB-IMRT is effective for BM and is well tolerated by patients.

Validation of the graded prognostic assessment and recursive partitioning analysis as prognostic tools using a modern cohort of patients with brain metastases

Background

Prognostic indices for patients with brain metastases (BM) are needed to individualize treatment and stratify clinical trials. Two frequently used tools to estimate survival in patients with BM are the recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) and the diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment (DS-GPA). Given recent advances in therapies and improved survival for patients with BM, this study aims to validate and analyze these 2 models in a modern cohort.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with BM were identified via our institution's Tumor Board meetings. Data were retrospectively collected from the date of diagnosis with BM. The concordance of the RPA and GPA was calculated using Harrell's C index. A Cox proportional hazards model with backwards elimination was used to generate a parsimonious model predictive of survival.

Results

Our study consisted of 206 patients diagnosed with BM between 2010 and 2019. The RPA had a prediction performance characterized by Harrell's C index of 0.588. The DS-GPA demonstrated a Harrell's C index of 0.630. A Cox proportional hazards model assessing the effect of age, presence of lung, or liver metastases, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of 3/4 on survival yielded a Harrell's C index of 0.616. Revising the analysis with an uncategorized ECOG demonstrated a C index of 0.648.

Conclusions

We found that the performance of the RPA remains unchanged from previous validation studies a decade earlier. The DS-GPA outperformed the RPA in predicting overall survival in our modern cohort. Analyzing variables shared by the RPA and DS-GPA produced a model that performed analogously to the DS-GPA.

Real-World Experience in Hispanic Patients With Breast Cancer and Brain Metastases Using Different Prognostic Tools

PURPOSE

Only a small percentage of Hispanic patients have been included in studies that developed prognostic models for breast cancer and brain metastases. Therefore, there is a clear need for tools tailored to this demographic. This study assesses the efficacy of common prognostic tools in a Hispanic population.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively analyzed a data set of Hispanic patients with breast cancer and newly diagnosed brain metastases from 2009 to 2023 at a single referral center. For each prognostic tool, Kaplan-Meier curves were built. The performances of the models were compared using the area under the curve (AUC), C-statistic, and Akaike information criteria (AIC).

RESULTS

Of 492 patients, the median time from breast cancer to brain metastasis diagnosis was 22.7 months (IQR, 12.1-53.3). The median overall survival was 11.6 months (95% CI, 9.9-13.4). All models were validated as prognostic tools (P < .001). The model with the better performance was the breast graded prognostic assessment (GPA; AIC, 402; AUC, 0.65), followed by the modified GPA (AIC, 406; AUC, 0.64), the disease-specific GPA (AIC, 407; AUC, 0.62), recursive partitioning analysis (AIC, 421; AUC, 0.62), and GPA (AIC, 422; AUC, 0.60).

CONCLUSIONS

The breast GPA demonstrated superior accuracy in prognosticating outcomes for Hispanic patients with breast cancer and brain metastases. This underscores the critical importance of incorporating racial and ethnic diversity in creating and validating medical prognostic tools.

Ablative Radiation Therapy to Restrain Everything Safely Treatable (ARREST): A Phase 1 Study of Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy for Polymetastatic Disease

PURPOSE

This phase 1 study aimed to assess the safety and feasibility of SABR therapy delivery to all sites of polymetastatic disease (>10 metastases).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A 3 + 3 study design was used with 5 dose levels from 6 Gy (6 Gy × 1) to 30 Gy (6 Gy weekly × 5). Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as any grade 4 or 5 toxicity or more than 3 grade 3 toxicities within 6 weeks of treatment. The primary endpoint was the maximal tolerated dose, defined as the dose level where ≥2/6 of patients experienced DLT. Secondary endpoints included quality of life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General and European Quality of Life 5 Dimension 5 Level) at 6 weeks posttreatment, progression-free survival, and overall survival.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients were accrued: 12 Gy (n = 3), 18 Gy (n = 3), 24 Gy (n = 4), and 30 Gy (n = 3), and 207 lesions were treated. Nine patients (69%) had acute toxicity: grade 1 (n = 6, 46%), grade 2 (n = 2, 15%; n = 1 pneumonitis and n = 1 fatigue), and grade 3 (n = 1, 7.7% neutropenia). There were no grade 4 or 5 toxicities. Mean ± SD quality of life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General and European Quality of Life 5 Dimension 5 Level health state) was 80.4 ± 21.9 and 77.4 ± 20.9 at baseline versus 76.4 ± 21.8 and 68.0 ± 24.2 at 6-week follow-up, respectively (p = .009 and p = .055, respectively). With a median follow-up of 8.7 months posttreatment (IQR, 2.4-24 months), 8 of 13 patients had disease progression (62%). The median and 12-month progression-free survival were 3.6 months and 11.3%, respectively. The median and 12-month overall survival were 13.8 months and 62%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this phase 1 trial, SABR therapy for polymetastatic disease was technically feasible with acceptable acute toxicity at dose levels up to 30 Gy (6 Gy weekly × 5). DLT was not observed.

Treatment of metastatic breast cancer by stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The role of local ablative radiotherapy (stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT)/stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)) in the management of metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of SBRT/SRS in oligometastatic and oligoprogressive breast cancer patients.

METHODS

Totally 80 mBC patients with oligometastatic disease (OMD) and 80 with oligoprogressive disease (OPD) to ≤5 metastatic lesions were retrospectively analyzed. The endpoint was overall survival and progression-free survival, and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for survival analysis.

RESULTS

Totally 160 mBC cases (80 OMD and 80 OPD cases) were analyzed, with a total of 291 treated metastases. In the study of OMD, we analyzed 30 cases with oligo-recurrence and 50 cases with sync-oligometastases. The median follow-up time was 46 months, and 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates for all patients were 89.8%, 77.6%, and 67.3%, respectively, and the 1-, 2-, and 3-year PFS rates were 71.4%, 44.9%, and 34.7% respectively. In multivariate analysis (MVA), treatment for oligometastases and non-triple-negative status predicted favorable OS. In patients with oligometastases, median OS was 58 months, and 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 100%, 91.7%, and 83.3%, respectively; median OS in patients with oligoprogression was 35 months, and 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 80%, 64%, and 52%, respectively. In mBC cases with limited brain metastases administered SRS, poor OS was detected in patient age under 45 years (P = 0.041), triple-negative cases (P = 0.025), and those with OPD (P = 0.022). In OMD, a significant improvement in PFS was observed in the oligo-recurrence group compared to the sync-oligometastases group (P = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

Patients administered local ablative radiotherapy (SBRT/SRS) for oligometastases have better overall survival than those treated for oligoprogression. SBRT/SRS may be beneficial for young and non-triple-negative mBC cases. The presence of oligo-recurrence can predict a favorable prognosis of oligometastases in patients with mBC treated with SBRT/SRS.

Advancements and challenges in brain cancer therapeutics

Treating brain tumors requires a nuanced understanding of the brain, a vital and delicate organ. Location, size, tumor type, and surrounding tissue health are crucial in developing treatment plans. This review comprehensively summarizes various treatment options that are available or could be potentially available for brain tumors, including physical therapies (radiotherapy, ablation therapy, photodynamic therapy, tumor-treating field therapy, and cold atmospheric plasma therapy) and non-physical therapies (surgical resection, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy). Mechanisms of action, potential side effects, indications, and latest developments, as well as their limitations, are highlighted. Furthermore, the requirements for personalized, multi-modal treatment approaches in this rapidly evolving field are discussed, emphasizing the balance between efficacy and patient safety.

Radiotherapy in patients with brain metastases with and without concomitant immunotherapy: comparison of patient outcome and neurotoxicity

BACKGROUND/AIM

Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have been added to the treatment of brain metastases. While combining radiotherapy and ICI can enhance therapeutic effects, it might also increase the risk of severe autoimmune adverse events. This retrospective study aims to compare treatment responses and neurotoxicity in patients treated with radiotherapy alone versus those receiving a combination of radiotherapy and ICI.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients with brain metastases who received radiotherapy at Hannover Medical School from 2017 to 2019 were included. The medical reports of all study participants were evaluated. Patients who received radiotherapy alone and those who received a combination of radiation and ICI were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 248 patients were analyzed, with the most common tumor types being non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and malignant melanoma. Half of the patients received whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and the other half stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). Of these, 29 patients received concurrent immunotherapy and radiotherapy, 30 completed immunotherapy before radiotherapy, and 29 started ICI after completing radiotherapy. Two cases lacked information on the duration of immunotherapy. Overall survival post-initial tumor diagnosis within the total cohort was 52 months, with significantly worse survival for patients with multiple brain metastases (p = 0.020). No significant differences in survival or incidence of neurological adverse events were observed between patients with or without ICI.

CONCLUSION

Combining radiotherapy and ICI did not significantly increase neurotoxicity or improve survival in this cohort, though the heterogeneity of the subgroups limits the generalizability of these findings.

Advances in the Management of Lung Cancer Brain Metastases

Lung cancer, both non-small cell and small cell, harbors a high propensity for spreading to the central nervous system. Radiation therapy remains the backbone of the management of brain metastases. Recent advances in stereotactic radiosurgery have expanded its indications and ongoing studies seek to elucidate optimal fractionation and coordination with systemic therapies, especially targeted inhibitors with intracranial efficacy. Efforts in whole-brain radiotherapy aim to preserve neurocognition and to investigate the need for prophylactic cranial irradiation. As novel combinatorial strategies are tested and prognostic/predictive biomarkers are identified and tested, the management of brain metastases in lung cancer will become increasingly personalized to optimally balance intracranial efficacy with preserving neurocognitive function and patient values.

Reactive astrocytes promote tumor progression by up-regulating tumor protocadherin 1 expression in lung cancer brain metastasis

Brain metastasis (BM) is one of the main causes of death in patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma. The specific pathological processes of BM, which are inextricably linked to the brain tumor microenvironment, such as the abundance of astrocytes, lead to limited treatment options and poor prognosis. Reactive astrocytes are acquired in the BM; however, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. This study aimed to explore the mechanisms by which astrocytes promote BM development. We determined the crucial role of reactive astrocytes in promoting the proliferation and migration of brain metastatic lung tumor cells by upregulating protocadherin 1 (PCDH1) expression in an in vitro co-culture model. The overexpression of PCDH1 was confirmed in clinical BM samples using immunohistochemical staining. Survival analysis indicated that high-PCDH1 expression was associated with poor survival in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. In vivo assays further showed that silence of PCDH1 effectively inhibited the tumor progression of brain metastases and prolonged the survival of animals. RNA sequencing has revealed that PCDH1 plays an important role in cell proliferation and adhesion. In conclusion, the present study revealed the promoting role of astrocytes in enhancing the aggressive phenotype of brain metastatic tumor cells by regulating the expression of PCDH1, which might be a biomarker for BM diagnosis and prognosis, suggesting the potential efficacy of targeting important astrocyte-tumor interactions in the treatment of patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma with BM.

Brain metastases reirradiation

The advances in cancer screening and therapies have allowed the improvement of metastatic patients' survival, including those with brain metastases. This led to a substantial shift in brain metastases patients' management for whom whole-brain radiation therapy, formerly widely used, has given way to a more focused management in which single- or multifractionated stereotactic radiation therapy now plays a predominant role. Although stereotactic radiation therapy offers excellent local control rates (70 to 90%), it does not prevent brain recurrence outside the radiation field, which is all the more frequent the higher the number of initial metastases and the longer the patient's survival. In the case of brain recurrence after irradiation, therapeutic options will depend both on the previous treatment and on the features of the recurrence. This article aims to review the available data on the efficacy and tolerability of various reirradiation schemes in different clinical situations.

A Randomised Phase II Trial of Hippocampal Sparing Versus Conventional Whole Brain Radiotherapy After Surgical Resection or Radiosurgery in Favourable Prognosis Patients With 1-10 Brain Metastases

AIMS

To assess in patients with 1-10 brain metastases, each of which has been treated by neurosurgery or stereotactic radiosurgery, whether hippocampal sparing whole brain radiotherapy (HS-WBRT) better spares neurocognitive function (NCF) than standard WBRT. Further, to assess whether a phase III randomised trial of HS-WBRT would be feasible in the UK.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A multicentre, randomised, open label phase II trial was undertaken, randomising patients to 30Gy in 10 fractions of WBRT or HS-WBRT. The primary endpoint was decline in Total recall using Hopkins Verbal Learning Test Revised (HVLT-R) at 4 months post treatment. To assess this, we aimed to recruit 84 patients over 3 years. Secondary endpoints included further measures of NCF, quality of life, duration of functional independence, local control of treated metastases, development of new metastases, disease control within the hippocampal regions, overall survival, steroid and antiepileptic medication requirements, and toxicity.

RESULTS

The trial closed prematurely due to slower than anticipated recruitment. From April 2016 to January 2018, 23 patients were randomised. Follow up was a median of 25 months. Fifteen patients (6 WBRT, 9 HS-WBRT) were assessed for the primary endpoint; of these, 1 in each arm experienced significant decline in the 4-month HVLT-R Total recall score (p = 0.8). Patients in the HS-WBRT arm experienced less insomnia (p < 0.01) and drowsiness (p < 0.01). There were no differences in other secondary endpoints.

CONCLUSION

A phase III randomised trial of HS-WBRT was shown not to be feasible at this time in the UK. As most randomised trials of HS-WBRT reported to date share common endpoints, including NCF, an individual patient data meta-analysis should be undertaken.

Treatment of brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer: preclinical, clinical, and translational research

Lung cancer is the second most common type of cancer and is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. Approximately 10-40% of patients with solid tumors develop brain metastases, with non-small cell lung cancer accounting for approximately 50% of all cases of patients with brain metastases. Many management options are available which can include surgery, radiation, and systemic therapy. A variety of factors go into the selection of management of brain metastases. In this review, we will focus on the treatment strategies and optimizing the management of brain metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Intracranial Breast Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

To determine the impact of stereotactic radiosurgery on outcomes of metastatic breast cancer with intracranial metastases.

METHODS

We systematically searched the PubMed and EMBASE databases for studies published between 1 January 1990 and 1 August 2024. Primary research articles evaluating the outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery on intracranial metastases from breast cancer were included. Adverse events were defined as leptomeningeal disease, radiation necrosis, seizure, and headache. The pooled estimate was calculated using the DerSimonian and Laird approach.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies encompassing 1228 patients met the inclusion criteria. Our analysis revealed a median survival duration of 13.1 ± 3.8 months and a pooled 1-year overall survival rate of 53.1% after SRS treatment. There was a 29% local recurrence rate at 1 year and a 35% overall distant recurrence rate. In addition, our analysis found a relatively low rate of acute adverse events at 15.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

SRS demonstrates promising efficacy and safety in managing intracranial metastases from breast cancer, with a favorable toxicity profile.

Patterns of Care for Brain Metastases in Asia: A Real-World Survey Conducted by the Federation of Asian Organizations for Radiation Oncology

PURPOSE

To report the patterns of care for brain metastases (BMs) in the Federation of Asian Organizations for Radiation Oncology (FARO).

METHODS

Overall, 37 questions were prepared. The survey was conducted online using Google Forms, and the URL was distributed to members of the FARO research committee. Radiation oncologists associated with FARO responded to the questionnaire between May 2023 and June 2023, and their answers were analyzed.

RESULTS

Responses were received from 32 radiation oncologists in 13 countries participating in FARO. Twenty-six physicians (81.3%) were affiliated with academic centers, and 22 (68.8%) were able to perform stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (fSRT) for BMs at their institution. The most typically used prognostic index for BM was the recursive partitioning analysis classification (17 physicians, 53.1%). The maximum number of BMs indicated for SRT/SRS was ≤three (11 physicians, 34.4%), whereas eight (25.0%) physicians answered for 6-10 BMs. The maximum size of BMs considered for SRS/fSRT was ≤3 cm (14 physicians, 43.8%), whereas nine (28.1%) answered that SRS/fSRT was preferred if the maximum size was >4 cm. When whole-brain radiotherapy (RT) was indicated, hippocampal avoidance and memantine usage were limited to 50.0% and 25.0% of patients, respectively. The most typical RT modality after BM resection was SRS/fSRT alone, regardless of whether the margin was positive (19 physicians, 59.4%) or negative (13 physicians, 40.6%).

CONCLUSION

We report the survey results of the patterns of care for BMs in the FARO. This survey was conducted only among a limited number of FARO members. Since many respondents were affiliated with relatively large-scale academic centers, large-scale surveys, including community hospitals, are warranted for future initiatives.

Melanoma Brain Metastasis: Biology and Therapeutic Advances

Metastasis to the brain is a frequent complication of advanced melanoma. Historically, patients with melanoma brain metastasis (MBM) have had dismal outcomes, but outcomes have improved with the development of more effective treatments, including stereotactic radiosurgery and effective immune and targeted therapies. Despite these advances, MBM remains a leading cause of death from this disease, and many therapies show decreased efficacy against these tumors compared with extracranial metastases. This differential efficacy may be because of recently revealed unique molecular and immune features of MBMs-which may also provide rational new therapeutic strategies.

Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis: A Comprehensive Review

The mechanisms underlying breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM) development are complex, and its clinical presentation varies depending on the number, location, and size of brain metastases. Common symptoms include headache, neurologic deficits, and seizures. Diagnosis of BCBM typically relies on neuroimaging techniques, such as magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography scans. Local therapies, such as surgery and stereotactic radiosurgery, can be used to control tumor growth and relieve symptoms. Whole-brain radiotherapy has been a mainstay of treatment for BCBM, but its use has been associated with cognitive decline. Systemic therapy with chemotherapy and targeted agents plays an increasingly important role in the management of BCBM. Novel agents, such as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted therapies and tyrosine kinase inhibitors, have shown promising results in improving survival for patients with HER2-positive and triple-negative BCBM. This comprehensive review synthesizes current knowledge, clinical insights, and evolving paradigms to provide a robust understanding and roadmap for optimizing the diagnosis and management of BCBM.

Comparative effectiveness of frame-based and mask-based Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery in brain metastases: A 509 patient meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) is the primary treatment for patients with limited numbers of small brain metastases. Head fixation is usually performed with framed-based (FB) fixation; however, mask-based (MB) fixation has emerged as a less invasive alternative. A comparative meta-analysis between both approaches has not been performed.

METHODS

Databases were searched until August 28th, 2023, to identify studies comparing MB and FB SRS in the treatment of brain metastases. Our outcomes of interest included local tumor control (LTC), radiation necrosis (RN), mortality, and treatment time (TT). Mean difference (MD), risk ratio (RR), and hazard ratio (HR) were used for statistical comparisons.

RESULTS

From 295 articles initially identified, six studies (1 clinical trial) involving 509 patients were included. LTC revealed comparable RR at 6-months (RR = 0.95[95%CI = 0.89-1.01], p = 0.12) and a marginal benefit in FB SRS at 1-year (RR = 0.87[95%CI = 0.78-0.96], p = 0.005). However, in oligometastases exclusively treated with single-fraction SRS, LTC was similar among groups (RR = 0.92 [95%CI = 0.89-1.0], p = 0.30). Similarly, in patients with oligometastases treated with single-fraction SRS, RN (HR = 1.69; 95%CI = 0.72-3.97, p = 0.22), TT (MD = -29.64; 95%CI = -80.38-21.10, p = 0.25), and mortality were similar among groups (RR = 0.62; 95%CI = 0.22-1.76, p = 0.37).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that FB and MB SRS, particularly oligometastases treated with single-fraction, are comparable in terms of LTC, RN, TT, and mortality. Further research is essential to draw definitive conclusions.

Stereotactic radiosurgery and radiotherapy for brainstem metastases: An international multicenter analysis

Brainstem metastases (BSM) present a significant neuro-oncological challenge, resulting in profound neurological deficits and poor survival outcomes. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) offer promising therapeutic avenues for BSM despite their precarious location. This international multicenter study investigates the efficacy and safety of SRS and FSRT in 136 patients with 144 BSM treated at nine institutions from 2005 to 2022. The median radiographic and clinical follow-up periods were 6.8 and 9.4 months, respectively. Predominantly, patients with BSM were managed with SRS (69.4%). The median prescription dose and isodose line for SRS were 18 Gy and 65%, respectively, while for FSRT, the median prescription dose was 21 Gy with a median isodose line of 70%. The 12-, 24-, and 36-month local control (LC) rates were 82.9%, 71.4%, and 61.2%, respectively. Corresponding overall survival rates at these time points were 61.1%, 34.7%, and 19.3%. In the multivariable Cox regression analysis for LC, only the minimum biologically effective dose was significantly associated with LC, favoring higher doses for improved control (in Gy, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.86, p < .01). Regarding overall survival, good performance status (Karnofsky performance status, ≥90%; HR: 0.43, p < .01) and prior whole brain radiotherapy (HR: 2.52, p < .01) emerged as associated factors. In 14 BSM (9.7%), treatment-related adverse events were noted, with a total of five (3.4%) radiation necrosis. SRS and FSRT for BSM exhibit efficacy and safety, making them suitable treatment options for affected patients.

Assessing survival in non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases after stereotactic radiosurgery: before and after the start of the targetable mutation era

PURPOSE

Targeted treatment options for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) brain metastases (BMs) may be combined with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to optimize survival. We assessed patient outcomes after SRS for NSCLC BMs, identifying survival trajectories associated with targetable mutations.

METHODS

In this retrospective time-dependent analysis, we analyzed median overall survival of patients who received ≥ 1 SRS courses for BM from NSCLC from 2001 to 2021. We compared survival of patients with and without targetable mutations based on clinical variables and treatment.

RESULTS

Among the 213 patients included, 87 (40.8%) had targetable mutations-primarily EGFR (22.5%)-and 126 (59.2%) did not. Patients with targetable mutations were more often female (63.2%, p <.001) and nonsmokers (58.6%, p <.001); had higher initial lung-molGPA (2.0 vs. 1.5, p <.001) and lower cumulative tumor volume (3.7 vs. 10.6 cm3, p <.001); and received more concurrent (55.2% vs. 36.5%, p =.007) and total (median 3 vs. 2, p <.001) systemic therapies. These patients had lower mortality rates (74.7% vs. 91.3%, p <.001) and risk (HR 0.298 [95%CI 0.190-0.469], p <.001) and longer median overall survival (20.2 vs. 7.4 months, p <.001), including survival ≥ 3 years (p =.001). Survival was best predicted by SRS with tumor resection in patients with non-targetable mutations (HR 0.491 [95%CI 0.318-757], p =.001) and by systemic therapy with SRS for those with targetable mutations (HR 0.124 [95%CI 0.013-1.153], p =.067).

CONCLUSION

The presence of targetable mutations enhances survival in patients receiving SRS for NSCLC BM, particularly when used with systemic therapies. Survival for patients without targetable mutations was longest with SRS and surgical resection. These results inform best practices for managing patients with NSCLC BM based on driver mutation status.

Frameless stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) delivers a high dose of radiation to a specific brain area while limiting radiation to nearby healthy tissue. While most SRS has traditionally been performed with a stereotactic frame-based approach, this study aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of frameless radiosurgery in patients with brain metastases. Our study followed the recommended guidelines summarized in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist. The electronic databases of PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science (WOS) were searched from inception to 10 October 2023. The pooled rate of outcomes was calculated using random effect model and Restricted maximum-likelihood (REML) method. All statistical analysis was performed by STATA V.17. A total of 499 studies were recruited from the electronic databases. After removing duplicates (n = 117), 382 studies were used for title/abstract, and 329 were removed from the study selection process. A total of 53 articles were used for full-text assessment, and 35 studies were included for data extraction. Our analysis revealed a significant increase across all pooled survival rates and local control rates by initiating the radiosurgery for patients, estimating the pooled 6-month OSR of 75% (95% CI: 68-81%), 1-year overall survival rate (OSR) of 60% (95% CI: 51-69%), 18-month OSR of 48% (95% CI: 10-85%), 2-year OSR of 39% (95% CI: 19-58%), 1-year progression-free survival rate (PFSR) of 68% (95% CI: 39-98%), 2-year PFSR of 75% (95% CI: 58-91%), 6-month local control rate (LCR) of 93% (95% CI: 90-96%), and 12-month LCR of 86% (95% CI: 82-90%). Our meta-analysis findings confirm the efficacy of frameless radiosurgery in treating brain metastases. Using data from several trials, we were able to demonstrate stereotactic radiosurgery's effectiveness as a therapy option for brain metastasis patients, demonstrating local control and reasonable overall survival.

Laser interstitial thermal therapy followed by consolidation stereotactic radiosurgery (LITT-cSRS) in patients with newly diagnosed brain metastasis

INTRODUCTION

The efficacy and safety of laser interstitial thermal therapy followed by consolidation radiosurgery (LITT-cSRS) was previously studied in brain metastasis that recurs locally after initial radiosurgery (BMRS). Here, we characterize the clinical outcome of LITT-cSRS in patients with newly diagnosed brain metastasis.

METHODS

Between 2017 and 2023, ten consecutive cancer patients with newly diagnosed brain mass of unclear etiology who underwent stereotactic needle biopsy (SNB) and LITT in the same setting followed by consolidation SRS (cSRS) with > 6 months follow-up were identified retrospectively. Clinical and imaging outcomes were collected.

RESULTS

The histology of the BM were: breast cancer (n = 3), melanoma (n = 3), non-cell cell lung cancer (n = 3), colon (n = 1). There were no wound or procedural complications. All patients were discharged home, with a median one-day hospital stay (range: 1-2 days). All patients were off corticosteroid therapy by the one-month follow-up. cSRS were carried out 12-27 days (median of 19 days) after SNB + LITT. There were no subsequent emergency room presentation, 30-day or 90-day re-admission. The Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) remains stable or improved at the 3 months-follow-up. With a median follow-up of 416 days (13.8 mo; range: 199-1,096 days), there was one local recurrence at 384 days (12.8 mo) post-LITT-cSRS. With exception of this patient with local recurrence, all patients showed decreased FLAIR volume surrounding the LITT-cSRS treated BMRS by the six-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

To our awareness, this case series represent the first to describe LITT-cSRS in the setting of newly diagnosed BM. The results presented here provide pilot data to support the safety and efficacy of LITT-cSRS and lay the foundation for future studies.

Comprehensive analysis of stereotactic Radiosurgery outcomes in triple-negative breast cancer patients with brain metastases: The influence of immunotherapy and prognostic factors

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer stands as the second most common solid tumors with a propensity for brain metastasis. Among metastatic breast cancer cases, the brain metastasis incidence ranges from 10 % to 30 %, with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) displaying a heightened risk and poorer prognosis. SRS has emerged as an effective local treatment modality for brain metastases; however, data on its outcomes specifically in pure triple-negative subtype remain scarce.

METHOD

We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records of all brain metastasis (BM) TNBC patients treated with SRS. Patient, tumour characteristics and treatment details data were collected. This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate local control (LC), distant brain metastasis free survival (DBMFS), and overall survival (OS) outcomes in TNBC patients undergoing SRS for brain metastases while identifying potential prognostic factors.

RESULT

Forty-three patients with TNBC and brain metastases treated with SRS between January 2017 and 2023 were included. The study found rates of LC (99 % at 1 year) and DBMFS (76 % at 1 year) after SRS, with brain metastasis count (p = 0,003) and systemic treatment modality (p = 0,001) being significant predictors of DBMFS. The median OS following SRS was 19.5 months, with neurological deficit (p = 0.003) and systemic treatment modality (p = 0.019) identified as significant predictors of OS.

CONCLUSION

SRS demonstrates favourable outcomes in terms of local control and distant brain metastasis-free survival in TNBC. Neurological deficit and systemic treatment significantly influence overall survival, emphasizing the importance of personalized treatment approaches and (magnetic resonance imaging) MRI surveillance based on these factors.

Brachytherapy in Brain Metastasis Treatment: A Scoping Review of Advances in Techniques and Clinical Outcomes

Brain metastases pose a significant therapeutic challenge in the field of oncology, necessitating treatments that effectively control disease progression while preserving neurological and cognitive functions. Among various interventions, brachytherapy, which involves the direct placement of radioactive sources into or near tumors or into the resected cavity, can play an important role in treatment. Current literature describes brachytherapy's capacity to deliver targeted, high-dose radiation while minimizing damage to adjacent healthy tissues-a crucial consideration in the choice of treatment modality. Furthermore, advancements in implantation techniques as well as in the development of different isotopes have expanded its efficacy and safety profile. This review delineates the contemporary applications of brachytherapy in managing brain metastases, examining its advantages, constraints, and associated clinical outcomes, and provides a comprehensive understanding of advances in the use of brachytherapy for brain metastasis treatment, with implications for improved patient outcomes and enhanced quality of life.

Whole-brain radiation therapy plus simultaneous integrated boost for brain metastases from breast cancers

Background

The effect of whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) plus simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) in brain metastasis from breast cancers has not been demonstrated.

Method

In this single-center retrospective study, we reviewed consecutive breast cancer patients who developed brain metastasis and were treated with hypofractionated radiation therapy plus WBRT using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)-SIB approaches. We analyzed clinical outcomes, prognostic factors and patterns of treatment failure.

Result

A total of 27 patients were eligible for analysis. Four (14.8%) patients achieved clinical complete response and 14 (51.9%) had partial response of brain lesions. The other nine patients were not evaluated for brain tumor response. The median brain progression-free survival was 8.60 (95% CI [6.43-13.33]) months and the median overall survival was 16.8 (95% CI [13.3-27.7]) months. Three patients had in-field failure, five had out-field failure and two had in-field and out-field failure.

Conclusion

WBRT plus SIB led to improved tumor control and clinical outcome in breast cancer patients with brain metastasis.

Protocol for a systematic review with prospective individual patient data meta-analysis in EGFR-mutant NSCLC with brain metastases to assess the effect of SRS+osimertinib compared to osimertinib alone: the STARLET Collaboration

BACKGROUND

Patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene are a heterogeneous population who often develop brain metastases (BM). The optimal management of patients with asymptomatic brain metastases is unclear given the activity of newer-generation targeted therapies in the central nervous system. We present a protocol for an individual patient data (IPD) prospective meta-analysis to evaluate whether the addition of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) before osimertinib treatment will lead to better control of intracranial metastatic disease. This is a clinically relevant question that will inform practice.

METHODS

Randomised controlled trials will be eligible if they include participants with BM arising from EGFR-mutant NSCLC and suitable to receive osimertinib both in the first-line and second-line settings (P); comparisons of SRS followed by osimertinib versus osimertinib alone (I, C) and intracranial disease control included as an endpoint (O). Systematic searches of Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), CINAHL (EBSCO), PsychInfo, ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform's Search Portal will be undertaken. An IPD meta-analysis will be performed using methodologies recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration. The primary outcome is intracranial progression-free survival, as determined by response assessment in neuro-oncology-BM criteria. Secondary outcomes include overall survival, time to whole brain radiotherapy, quality of life, and adverse events of special interest. Effect differences will be explored among prespecified subgroups.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Approved by each trial's ethics committee. Results will be relevant to clinicians, researchers, policymakers and patients, and will be disseminated via publications, presentations and media releases.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION

CRD42022330532.

Brain Metastasis from EGFR-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Secretion of IL11 from Astrocytes Up-Regulates PDL1 and Promotes Immune Escape

Patients who have non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are more prone to brain metastasis (BM) and poor prognosis. Previous studies showed that the tumor microenvironment of BM in these patients is immunosuppressed, as indicated by reduced T-cell abundance and activity, although the mechanism of this immunosuppression requires further study. This study shows that reactive astrocytes play a critical role in promoting the immune escape of BM from EGFR-mutated NSCLC by increasing the apoptosis of CD8+ T lymphocytes. The increased secretion of interleukin 11(IL11) by astrocytes promotes the expression of PDL1 in BM, and this is responsible for the increased apoptosis of T lymphocytes. IL11 functions as a ligand of EGFR, and this binding activates EGFR and downstream signaling to increase the expression of PDL1, culminating in the immune escape of tumor cells. IL11 also promotes immune escape by binding to its intrinsic receptor (IL11Rα/glycoprotein 130 [gp130]). Additional in vivo studies show that the targeted inhibition of gp130 and EGFR suppresses the growth of BM and prolongs the survival time of mice. These results suggest a novel therapeutic strategy for treatment of NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations.

Mathematical modeling of brain metastases growth and response to therapies: A review

Brain metastases (BMs) are the most common intracranial tumor type and a significant health concern, affecting approximately 10% to 30% of all oncological patients. Although significant progress is being made, many aspects of the metastatic process to the brain and the growth of the resulting lesions are still not well understood. There is a need for an improved understanding of the growth dynamics and the response to treatment of these tumors. Mathematical models have been proven valuable for drawing inferences and making predictions in different fields of cancer research, but few mathematical works have considered BMs. This comprehensive review aims to establish a unified platform and contribute to fostering emerging efforts dedicated to enhancing our mathematical understanding of this intricate and challenging disease. We focus on the progress made in the initial stages of mathematical modeling research regarding BMs and the significant insights gained from such studies. We also explore the vital role of mathematical modeling in predicting treatment outcomes and enhancing the quality of clinical decision-making for patients facing BMs.

SRTRP-Net: A multi-task learning network for segmentation and prediction of stereotactic radiosurgery treatment response in brain metastases

Before the Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) treatment, it is of great clinical significance to avoid secondary genetic damage and guide the personalized treatment plans for patients with brain metastases (BM) by predicting the response to SRS treatment of brain metastatic lesions. Thus, we developed a multi-task learning model termed SRTRP-Net to provide prior knowledge of BM ROI and predict the SRS treatment response of the lesion. In dual-encoder tumor segmentation Network (DTS-Net), two parallel encoders encode the original and mirrored multi-modal MRI images. The differences in the dual-encoder features between foreground and background are enhanced by the symmetrical visual difference block (SVDB). In the bottom layer of the encoder, a transformer is used to extract local contextual features in the spatial and depth dimensions of low-resolution images. Then, the decoder of DTS-Net provides the prior knowledge for predicting the response to SRS treatment by performing BM segmentation. SRS response prediction network (SRP-Net) directly utilizes shared multi-modal MRI features weighted by the signed distance map (SDM) of the masks. The bidirectional multi-dimensional feature fusion module (BMDF) fuses the shared features and the clinical text information features to obtain comprehensive tumor information for characterizing tumors and predicting SRS treatment response. Experiments based on internal and external clinical datasets have shown that SRTRP-Net achieves comparable or better results. We believe that SRTRP-Net can help clinicians accurately develop personalized first-time treatment regimens for BM patients and improve their survival.

Surgery of enlarging lesions after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer with oncogenic driver mutations frequently reveals radiation necrosis: case series and review

In brain metastases, radiation necrosis (RN) is a complication that arises after single or multiple fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS/FSRS), which is challenging to distinguish from local recurrence (LR). Studies have shown increased RN incidence rates in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with oncogenic driver mutations (ODMs) or receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). This study investigated enlarging brain lesions following SRS/FSRS, for which additional surgeries were performed to distinguish between RN and LR. We investigated seven NSCLC patients with ODMs undergoing SRS/FSRS for BM and undergoing surgery for suspicion of LR on MRI imaging. Descriptive statistics were performed. Among the seven patients, six were EGFR+, while one was ALK+. The median irradiation dose was 30 Gy (range, 20-35 Gy). The median time to develop RN after SRS/FSRS was 11.1 months (range: 6.3-31.2 months). Moreover, gradually enlarging lesions were found in all patients after 6 months post-SRS/FSR. Brain radiation necrosis was pathologically confirmed in all the patients. RN should be suspected in NSCLC patients when lesions keep enlarging after 6 months post-SRS/FSRS, especially for patients with ODMs and receiving TKIs. Further, this case series indicates that further dose reduction might be necessary to avoid RN for such patients.

Integrating Overall Survival and Tumor Control Probability Models to Predict Local Progression After Brain Metastasis Radiosurgery

Purpose

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases is frequently prescribed to the maximum tolerated dose to minimize the probability of local progression. However, many patients die from extracranial disease prior to local progression and may not require maximally aggressive treatment. Recently, improvements in models of SRS tumor control probability (TCP) and overall survival (OS) have been made. We predicted that by combining models of OS and TCP, we could better predict the true risk of local progression after SRS than by using TCP modeling alone.

Methods and Materials

Records of patients undergoing SRS at a single institution were reviewed retrospectively. Using established TCP and OS models, for each patient, the probability of 1-year survival [p ( O S ) ] was calculated, as was the probability of 1-year local progression [p ( L P ) ]) for each treated lesion. Joint-probability was used to combine the models [p ( L P , O S ) = p ( L P ) * p ( O S ) ]. Analyses were conducted at the individual metastasis and whole-patient levels. Fine-Gray regression was used to model p ( L P ) or p ( L P , O S ) on the risk of local progression after SRS, with death as a competing risk.

Results

At the patient level, 1-year local progression was 0.08 (95% CI, 0.03-0.15), median p ( L P , O S ) was 0.13 (95% CI, 0.07-0.2), and median p ( L P ) was 0.29 (95% CI, 0.22-0.38). At the metastasis level, 1-year local progression was 0.02 (95% CI, 0.01-0.04), median p ( L P , O S ) was 0.05 (95% CI, 0.02-0.07), and median p ( L P ) was 0.10 (95% CI, 0.07-0.13). p ( L P , O S ) was found to be significantly associated with the risk of local progression at the patient level (P = .048) and metastasis level (P = .007); however, p ( L P ) was not (P = .16 and P = .28, respectively).

Conclusions

Simultaneous modeling of OS and TCP more accurately predicted local progression than TCP modeling alone. Better understanding which patients with brain metastases are at risk of local progression after SRS may help personalize treatment to minimize risk without sacrificing efficacy.