Atenolol in hypertension: is it a wise choice?

Clinical outcome in hypertensive patients treated with amlodipine plus bisoprolol or plus valsartan

OBJECTIVE

Several guidelines do not recommend beta-blocker as the first-line treatment for hypertension because of its inferior efficacy in stroke prevention. Combination therapy with beta-blocker is commonly used for blood pressure control. We compared the clinical outcomes in patients treated with amlodipine plus bisoprolol (A + B), a ß1-selective beta-blocker and amlodipine plus valsartan (A + V).

METHODS

A population-based cohort study was performed using data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. From 2012 to 2019, newly diagnosed adult hypertensive patients who received initial amlodipine monotherapy and then switched to A + V or A + B were included. The efficacy outcomes included all-cause death, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) event (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and coronary revascularization), hemorrhagic stroke, and heart failure. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the relationship between outcomes and different treatments.

RESULTS

Overall, 4311 patients in A + B group and 10980 patients in A + V group were included. After a mean follow-up of 4.34 ± 1.79 years, the efficacy outcomes were similar between the A + V and A + B groups regarding all-cause death (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83-1.18), ASCVD event (aHR 0.97, 95% CI 0.84-1.12), and heart failure (aHR 1.06, 95% CI 0.87-1.30). The risk of hemorrhagic stroke was lower in A + B group (aHR 0.70, 95% CI 0.52-0.94). The result was similar when taking death into consideration in competing risk analysis. The safety outcomes were similar between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no difference of all-cause death, ASCVD event, and heart failure in A + B vs. A + V users. But A + B users had a lower risk of hemorrhagic stroke.

Bioequivalence Study of Atenolol Tablets in Healthy Chinese Subjects Under Fasting and Fed Conditions

Atenolol, a cardioselective β1-blocker, exhibits efficacy in treating cardiovascular diseases. We conducted a single-center, randomized, open, single-dose, 2-preparation, 2-cycle, 2-sequence, double-crossover trial with a 7-day washout period to investigate the pharmacokinetics, bioequivalence (BE), and safety of test and reference atenolol tablets (25 mg) in healthy Chinese volunteers. Forty-eight healthy participants were randomized into the fasting and fed arms. After administering a single oral dose of the test or reference formulation (25 mg), plasma atenolol concentrations were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetic parameters were obtained from concentration-time profiles. In total, 23 and 24 individuals were included in the fasting and fed arms, respectively. The mean concentration-time profiles for both formulations were similar, and Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ were within the BE range of 80%-125%. Thirteen adverse events (AEs) were observed in 7 participants in the fasting arm; 1 withdrew from the trial early owing to an AE. In the fed arm, 20 AEs were observed in 8 participants, and none withdrew from the trial. All adverse reactions were grade I, with no serious AEs or deaths. Therefore, the 2 tablets are bioequivalent in healthy Chinese individuals under fasting and fed conditions, supporting their further clinical development.

Sustainable Synthesis of the Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient Atenolol in Deep Eutectic Solvents

Atenolol, one of the top five best-selling drugs in the world today used to treat angina and hypertension, and to reduce the risk of death after a heart attack, faces challenges in current synthetic methods to address inefficiencies and environmental concerns. The traditional synthesis of this drug involves a process that generates a large amount of waste and other by-products that need disposal. This study presents a one-pot DES-based sustainable protocol for synthesizing atenolol. The use of the DES allowed the entire process to be conducted with no need for additional bases or catalysts, in short reaction times, under mild conditions, and avoiding chromatographic purification. The overall yield of atenolol was 95%. The scalability of the process to gram-scale production was successfully demonstrated, emphasizing its potential in industrial applications. Finally, the 'greenness' evaluation, performed using the First Pass CHEM21 Metrics Toolkit, highlighted the superiority in terms of the atom economy, the reaction mass efficiency, and the overall process mass intensity of the DES-based synthesis compared with the already existing methods.

10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, an interprofessional expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

From guidelines to current practices: Suboptimal hypertension management in France

In France, the prevalence of hypertension is higher than 30%. Although treatment guidelines have been well established over the last twenty years, the national blood pressure control rate is below the average of high-income countries. This observational study aimed to describe the antihypertensive prescription behaviours of primary care physicians (PCPs) in France and to assess their compliance with current French guidelines, focusing on three specific prescription issues and their potential repercussions on blood pressure control: treatment initiation, treatment renewal or change and type of triple therapy. Prescription data were retrieved using the IQVIA longitudinal patient database (LPD), which delivers real-world data insights from French primary care electronic medical records (EMR). The average number of prescribed therapeutic agents was 1.9 per patient, with 39.3% monotherapy prescriptions. Treatment initiation represented 7.2% of all antihypertensive prescriptions. At treatment initiation, 22.5% of patients were prescribed dual therapy. The proportion of treatment renewal in the same therapeutic class was 74.3% while the proportion of treatment change was 18.5%. Of these, only 6.3% of patients received an additional therapy. Lastly, 35.7% of triple therapies were consistent with the recommended combinations. In conclusion, this study provides evidence of therapeutic gaps in hypertension management in France. The low blood control rate may be attributed to PCPs' therapeutic inertia and lack of knowledge of treatment guidelines. All stakeholders should commit to rapid corrective action in order to provide patients with the best care.

2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease" provides an update to and consolidates new evidence since the "2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease" and the corresponding "2014 ACC/AHA/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Focused Update of the Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease."

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from September 2021 to May 2022. Clinical studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and other evidence conducted on human participants were identified that were published in English from MEDLINE (through PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline.

STRUCTURE

This guideline provides an evidenced-based and patient-centered approach to management of patients with chronic coronary disease, considering social determinants of health and incorporating the principles of shared decision-making and team-based care. Relevant topics include general approaches to treatment decisions, guideline-directed management and therapy to reduce symptoms and future cardiovascular events, decision-making pertaining to revascularization in patients with chronic coronary disease, recommendations for management in special populations, patient follow-up and monitoring, evidence gaps, and areas in need of future research. Where applicable, and based on availability of cost-effectiveness data, cost-value recommendations are also provided for clinicians. Many recommendations from previously published guidelines have been updated with new evidence, and new recommendations have been created when supported by published data.

2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease" provides an update to and consolidates new evidence since the "2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease" and the corresponding "2014 ACC/AHA/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Focused Update of the Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease."

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from September 2021 to May 2022. Clinical studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and other evidence conducted on human participants were identified that were published in English from MEDLINE (through PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline.

STRUCTURE

This guideline provides an evidenced-based and patient-centered approach to management of patients with chronic coronary disease, considering social determinants of health and incorporating the principles of shared decision-making and team-based care. Relevant topics include general approaches to treatment decisions, guideline-directed management and therapy to reduce symptoms and future cardiovascular events, decision-making pertaining to revascularization in patients with chronic coronary disease, recommendations for management in special populations, patient follow-up and monitoring, evidence gaps, and areas in need of future research. Where applicable, and based on availability of cost-effectiveness data, cost-value recommendations are also provided for clinicians. Many recommendations from previously published guidelines have been updated with new evidence, and new recommendations have been created when supported by published data.

Sustainable chromatographic quantitation of multi-antihypertensive medications: application on diverse combinations containing hydrochlorothiazide along with LC-MS/MS profiling of potential impurities: greenness and whiteness evaluation

Cardiovascular disorders are among the leading causes of death worldwide, especially hypertension, a silent killer syndrome requiring multiple drug therapy for appropriate management. Hydrochlorothiazide is an extensively utilized thiazide diuretic that combines with several antihypertensive drugs for effective treatment of hypertension. In this study, sustainable, innovative and accurate high performance liquid chromatographic methods with diode array and tandem mass detectors (HPLC-DAD and LC-MS/MS) were developed, optimized and validated for the concurrent determination of Hydrochlorothiazide (HCT) along with five antihypertensive drugs, namely; Valsartan (VAL), Amlodipine besylate (AML), Atenolol (ATN), Amiloride hydrochloride (AMI), and Candesartan cilextil (CAN) in their diverse pharmaceutical dosage forms and in the presence of Chlorothiazide (CT) and Salamide (DSA) as HCT officially identified impurities. The HPLC-DAD separation was achieved utilizing Inertsil ODS-3 C18 column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) attached with photodiode array detection at 225.0 nm. Gradient elution was performed utilizing a mixture of solvent A (20.0 mM potassium dihydrogen phosphate, pH 3.0 ± 0.2, adjusted with phosphoric acid) and solvent B (acetonitrile) at ambient temperature. Linearity ranges were 0.1-100.0 µg/mL for HCT, VAL, AML and CAN, 0.05 -100.0 µg/mL for both ATN and AMI and 0.05-8.0 µg/mL for both CT and DSA. Additionally, this work describes the use of liquid chromatography-electrospray-tandem mass spectrometry for the accurate detection and quantification of the impurities; CT and DSA in the negative mode utilizing triple quadrupole mass spectrometry. The linearity ranges for those impurities were 1.0-200.0 ng/mL and 5.0-200.0 ng/mL for CT and DSA, respectively. Developed methods' validation was achieved in accordance with International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) guidelines. Upon applying liquid chromatographic techniques for the drug analysis, a green and sustainable assessment have to be handled due to the consumption of energy and many solvents. Through the use of the HEXAGON, Analytical Greenness (AGREE) and White Analytical Chemistry (WAC) tools, greenness and sustainability have been statistically assessed. The optimized HPLC-DAD and LC-MS/MS methods were fast, accurate, precise, and sensitive, and consequently could be applied for conventional analysis and quality control of the proposed drugs in their miscellaneous dosage forms for the purpose of reducing laboratory wastes, time of the analysis time, effort, and cost.

The controversial role of beta-blockers in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Beta-blocker (BB) therapy is a main pillar in treating patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction and has shown a prognostic benefit. However, evidence for application of BB in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), especially in the absence of coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation or arterial hypertension, is scarce. HFpEF is characterized by elevations in left atrial pressure and reduced compliance of the left ventricle leading to a hampered increase of cardiac output (CO) during exercise, which results in exertional dyspnea. This may be due to either a limited increase in stroke volume or reduced chronotropy during physical activity. We critically discuss the pathophysiological background of HFpEF, current data on BB in heart failure therapy, as well as the potential benefits and harms of BB therapy in HFpEF. Furthermore, we argue that non-cardio selective BB with peripheral activity to reduce afterload may be more suitable in this population than cardio-selective BB. Although preliminary data on BB in HFpEF are available, multicenter prospective trials to assess a reduction of cardiovascular morbidity are warranted. Future trials need to focus on phenotyping HFpEF patients and assess who may benefit most from tailored BB therapy.

10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, a multidisciplinary expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

Clinical impact of beta-blockers at discharge on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with non-reduced ejection fraction after acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Beta-blockers are associated with several clinical benefits in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (REF) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), such as lower rates of mortality, recurrence of myocardial infarction, and heart failure. However, the long-term prognosis of beta-blockers has rarely been investigated in patients with non-REF after AMI. This study aimed to investigate the clinical benefits of beta-blockers in these patients.

METHODS

A total of 3281 consecutive patients who were hospitalized within 48 h after AMI were registered in the J-MINUET study. Patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and had a left ventricular ejection fraction ≥40 % were enrolled, and patients who died during admission were excluded. Included patients were divided into two groups according to the prescription of beta-blockers at discharge. Their characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

The number of AMI patients treated with beta-blockers was 1353 (70.4 %). Patients who received beta-blockers were younger and had a higher incidence of hypertension, dyslipidemia, and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction than those who did not receive beta-blockers. The peak creatine kinase level after primary PCI was significantly higher in patients who received beta-blockers. These patients also had a lower incidence of a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and stroke compared to those that did not receive beta-blockers (7.3 % vs. 11.9 %, p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that beta-blocker use was an independent factor for better clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The J-MINUET study revealed the clinical benefit of beta-blockers in AMI patients with non-REF after primary PCI.

Hypertension management in patients with cardiovascular comorbidities

Arterial hypertension is a leading cause of death globally. Due to ageing, the rising incidence of obesity, and socioeconomic and environmental changes, its incidence increases worldwide. Hypertension commonly coexists with Type 2 diabetes, obesity, dyslipidaemia, sedentary lifestyle, and smoking leading to risk amplification. Blood pressure lowering by lifestyle modifications and antihypertensive drugs reduce cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality. Guidelines recommend dual- and triple-combination therapies using renin–angiotensin system blockers, calcium channel blockers, and/or a diuretic. Comorbidities often complicate management. New drugs such as angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors, sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, and non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists improve CV and renal outcomes. Catheter-based renal denervation could offer an alternative treatment option in comorbid hypertension associated with increased sympathetic nerve activity. This review summarises the latest clinical evidence for managing hypertension with CV comorbidities.

Impact of Antihypertensive Drug Class on Outcomes in the SPRINT

BACKGROUND

The primary objective of this analysis is to assess if greater exposure to any major antihypertensive drug class was associated with reduced primary composite outcome events in SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial).

METHODS

This is a secondary analysis of the SPRINT trial evaluating whether longitudinal, time varying exposure to any major antihypertensive drug class had any impact on primary outcome events, after adjusting for effects of randomization arm, time varying achieved systolic blood pressure, other drug class exposure, and baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

Nine thousand two hundred fifty-two participants were included. After adjustments, exposure of one year or greater to thiazide-type diuretics or renin-angiotensin system blockers was associated with significantly fewer primary events than exposure of less than one year (hazard ratio, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.64-0.94]). There was no significant difference with longer versus shorter exposure to calcium channel blockers. Greater exposure to beta-blockers was associated with an increase in primary events compared with exposure of <1 year (hazard ratio, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.13-1.62]). Furthermore, thiazide-type diuretics were associated with a reduction in heart failure events and renin-angiotensin system blockers with reduced myocardial infarction. Both were associated with less cardiovascular deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

The SPRINT trial demonstrated a lower target blood pressure led to reductions in adverse cardiovascular events. This analysis suggests greater exposure to thiazide-type diuretics and renin-angiotensin system blockers also contributed to reduced adverse cardiovascular events. Greater exposure to beta-blockers was associated with increased cardiovascular events.

Antihypertensive and cardioprotective effects of three generations of beta-adrenergic blockers: an historical perspective

There are currently, 3 generations of beta-adrenergic blockers for the treatment of hypertension and cardiovascular diseases. The 1^st generation caused vasoconstriction and bronchoconstriction due to β₁ + β₂ receptor blockade and unopposed α₁ receptors. The 2^nd generation of beta-blockers has lesser adverse effects than the 1^st generation with the 3^rd generation beta-blockers having much lesser effects than the other two generations. Current US and International guideline do not recommend beta-blockers as first line therapy of hypertension, but only in the presence of coronary artery disease or heart failure due to their lesser antihypertensive effect. These recommendations are disputed by several older and recent studies which have shown that the beta-blockers are effective and safe for the treatment of hypertension and could be used as first line therapy. To clarify this issue a Medline search of the English language literature was conducted between 2012 and 2021 and 30 pertinent papers were selected. The data from these studies show that the beta-blockers have inferior antihypertensive and stroke protective effect compared with the other classes of antihypertensive drugs and should be used as first line therapy only in patients with hypertension associated with coronary artery disease or heart failure. The information from these papers and collateral literature will be discussed in this perspective.

10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2022

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, a multidisciplinary expert committee (https://doi.org/10.2337/dc22-SPPC), are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations, please refer to the Standards of Care Introduction (https://doi.org/10.2337/dc22-SINT). Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

Antihypertensive Treatment and Central Arterial Hemodynamics: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Antihypertensive treatment may have different effects on central arterial hemodynamics. The extent of the difference in effects between various antihypertensive drugs remains undefined.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that explored the effects of antihypertensive agents on both central and peripheral systolic blood pressure (SBP) and pulse pressure (PP) or central augmentation index, with a special focus on the comparison between newer [renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAS) inhibitors and calcium-channel blockers (CCBs)] and older antihypertensive agents (diuretics and β- and α-blockers).

Results: In total, 20 studies (n = 2,498) were included. Compared with diuretics (10 studies), β-blockers (16 studies), or an α-blocker (1 study), RAS inhibitors (21 studies), and CCBs (6 studies) more efficaciously (P < 0.001) reduced both central and peripheral SBP by a weighted mean difference of −5.63 (−6.50 to −4.76 mmHg) and −1.97 mmHg (−2.99 to −0.95 mmHg), respectively. Compared with older agents, the newer agents also more efficaciously (P < 0.001) reduced central PP (−3.27 mmHg; −4.95 to −1.59 mmHg), augmentation index (−6.11%; −7.94 to −4.29) and augmentation (−3.35 mmHg; −5.28 to –1.42 mmHg) but not peripheral PP (p ≥ 0.09). Accordingly, the newer agents reduced central-to-peripheral PP amplification significantly less than the older agents (0.11 mmHg; 0.05 to 0.17 mmHg; P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Newer agents, such as RAS inhibitors and CCBs, were significantly more efficacious than older agents in their effects on central hemodynamics.

Screening of β1- and β2-Adrenergic Receptor Modulators through Advanced Pharmacoinformatics and Machine Learning Approaches

Cardiovascular diseases (CDs) are a major concern in the human race and one of the leading causes of death worldwide. β-Adrenergic receptors (β1-AR and β2-AR) play a crucial role in the overall regulation of cardiac function. In the present study, structure-based virtual screening, machine learning (ML), and a ligand-based similarity search were conducted for the PubChem database against both β1- and β2-AR. Initially, all docked molecules were screened using the threshold binding energy value. Molecules with a better binding affinity were further used for segregation as active and inactive through ML. The pharmacokinetic assessment was carried out on molecules retained in the above step. Further, similarity searching of the ChEMBL and DrugBank databases was performed. From detailed analysis of the above data, four compounds for each of β1- and β2-AR were found to be promising in nature. A number of critical ligand-binding amino acids formed potential hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions. Finally, a molecular dynamics (MD) simulation study of each molecule bound with the respective target was performed. A number of parameters obtained from the MD simulation trajectories were calculated and substantiated the stability between the protein-ligand complex. Hence, it can be postulated that the final molecules might be crucial for CDs subjected to experimental validation.

Antiarrhythmic Drugs for Atrial Fibrillation in the Outpatient Setting: Common Clinical Scenarios and Pearls for the Primary Care Clinician

The management of atrial fibrillation (AF) in the outpatient setting has become more complex with the utilization of antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) and increasing complexity of comorbid conditions. The primary care clinician is critically involved in the pharmacologic management of AF, whether it be direct prescription of AADs or managing potential drug-drug interactions with other medications. In this review, we provide instructive, high-yield clinical scenarios and quick clinical references to increase familiarity and comfort with the use of AADs.

Beta-blockers in hypertension: overview and meta-analysis of randomized outcome trials

BACKGROUND

Meta-analyses from randomized outcome-based trials have challenged the role of beta-blockers for the treatment of hypertension. However, because they often include trials on diseases other than hypertension, the role of these drugs in the choice of the blood pressure (BP)-lowering treatment strategies remains unclear.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched for randomized trials that compared beta-blockers vs. placebo/no-treatment/less-intense treatment (BP-lowering trials) or beta-blockers vs. other antihypertensive agents in patients with or without hypertension (comparison trials). Among BP-lowering trials and according to baseline comorbidity, we separately considered trials in hypertension, trials without chronic heart failure or acute myocardial infarction, and trials with either chronic heart failure or acute myocardial infarction. Seven fatal and nonfatal outcomes were calculated (random-effects model) for BP-lowering or comparison trials.

RESULTS

A total of 84 BP-lowering or comparison trials (165 850 patients) were eligible. In 67 BP-lowering trials (68 478 patients; mean follow-up 2.5 years; baseline SBP/DBP, 136/82 mmHg), beta blockers were associated with a lower incidence of major cardiovascular events [risk ratio 0.85 and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.78-0.92] and all-cause death (risk ratio 0.81 and 95% CI 0.75-0.86). Restriction of the analysis to five trials recruiting exclusively hypertensive patients (18 724 patients; mean follow-up 5.1 years; baseline SBP/DBP 163/94 mmHg), a -10.5/-7.0 mmHg BP decrease was accompanied by reduction of major cardiovascular events by 22% (95% CI, 6-34). In 24 comparison trials (103 764 patients, 3.92 years of mean follow-up), beta-blockers compared with other agents were less protective for stroke and all-cause death in all trials and in trials conducted exclusively in hypertensive patients (averaged risk ratio increase 20 and 6%, respectively, for both cases).

CONCLUSION

Compared with other antihypertensive agents, beta-blockers appear to be substantially less protective against stroke and overall mortality. However, they exhibit a substantial risk-reducing ability for all events when prescribed to lower BP in patients with modest or more clear BP elevations, and therefore can be used as additional agents in hypertensive patients.

A Preliminary Investigation on the Effects of Atenolol for Treating Symptoms of Anxiety

INTRODUCTION

Anxiety disorders are among the most commonly diagnosed of psychiatric disorders. Many symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder are also anxiety-related. Traditional medications used to treat these disorders, such as antidepressants and benzodiazepines, are often ineffective, not well-tolerated, and can be habit forming. An alternative agent is, therefore, needed. Beta-blockers are one class of medication with potential to treat anxiety-related disorders; however, current evidence remains limited and requires further characterization. To this end, this retrospective study aims to present a novel preliminary report on the use of the beta-blocker, atenolol, to potentially treat anxiety-related disorders.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ninety-two patients were identified from outpatient military mental health clinics in Okinawa, Japan, who had received atenolol for mental health-related symptoms. Primary measures collected were the rates of patient-reported (1) general beneficial/positive effect of atenolol, (2) adverse effects from atenolol, and (3) preference of atenolol to propranolol. Data were collected from patients who were given binary response options to report their perceived experiences for each primary measure. This study was approved by the Naval Medical Center San Diego Institutional Review Board.

RESULTS

The results showed 86% of patients reporting a positive effect and continuing to take atenolol, including 87% with a diagnosis of posttraumatic stress disorder, 100% with diagnosis of other specified trauma- and stressor-related disorder, and 81% diagnosed with anxiety disorders. In total, 90% of patients denied adverse effects or found the adverse effects tolerable. Additionally, 100% of patients who had previously taken propranolol for anxiety reported that they preferred atenolol.

CONCLUSIONS

The present preliminary observational data suggests that atenolol may be well-tolerated and effective among persons with anxiety disorders. These data also suggest that atenolol may be more effective and better tolerated than propranolol, which is the most commonly prescribed beta-blocker for these conditions; however, more rigorously controlled empirical studies are needed to further substantiate this claim. Despite an overwhelmingly high rate of positive reports from patients' self-evaluations of atenolol treatment for anxiety-related disorders, this early investigation was not placebo-controlled nor double-blinded, and formal outcome measures were not assessed due to a lack of availability. More detailed examinations are needed to further determine whether atenolol is a viable alternative or augmenting agent to propranolol, benzodiazepines, and antidepressants for anxiety disorders and trauma-related disorders.

Comprehensive Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of First-Line β-Blocker Monotherapy in Hypertensive Patients: A Large-Scale Multicenter Observational Study

[Figure: see text].

The Ecology of Antihypertensives in the United States, 1997-2017

OBJECTIVE

Antihypertensives are the most used medication type in the USA, yet there remains uncertainty about the use of different antihypertensives. We sought to characterize use of antihypertensives by and within medication class(es) between 1997 and 2017.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A repeated cross-sectional study of 493,596 adult individuals using the 1997-2017 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). The Orange Book was used for adjunctive information. The primary outcome was the estimated use by and within antihypertensive medication class(es).

RESULTS

The proportion of individuals taking any antihypertensive during a year increased from 1997 to the early 2010s and then remained stable. The proportion of adults using angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) and dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (CCBs) increased during the study period, while angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is) increased until 2010 after which rates remained stable. Beta-blocker use was similar to that of ACE-Is with an earlier decline starting in 2012. Thiazide diuretic use increased from 1997 to 2007, leveled off until 2014, and declined from 2015 to 2017. Non-dihydropyridine CCB use declined throughout the study. ACE-Is, ARBs, CCBs, thiazide diuretics, and loop diuretics all had one dominant in-class medication. There was a clear increase in the use of losartan within ARBs, lisinopril within ACE-Is, and amlodipine within CCBs following generic conversion. Furosemide and hydrochlorothiazide started with and maintained a dominant position in their classes. Metoprolol use increased throughout the study and became the dominant beta-blocker.

CONCLUSIONS

Antihypertensive classes appear to have a propensity to equilibrate to an individual medication, despite a lack of outcomes-based research to compare medications within a class.

Cobalt-Catalyzed 1,4-Aryl Migration/Desulfonylation Cascade: Synthesis of α-Aryl Amides

A cobalt-catalyzed 1,4-aryl migration/disulfonylation cascade applied to α-bromo N-sulfonyl amides was developed. The reaction was highly chemoselective, allowing the preparation of α-aryl amides possessing a variety of functional groups. The method was used as the key step to synthesize an alkaloid, (±)-deoxyeseroline. Mechanistic investigations suggest a radical process.

10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2021

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, a multidisciplinary expert committee (https://doi.org/10.2337/dc21-SPPC), are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations, please refer to the Standards of Care Introduction (https://doi.org/10.2337/dc21-SINT). Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

Determination of atenolol based on the reversion of the fluorescence resonance energy transfer between AgInS2 quantum dots and Au nanoparticles

The present work focused on the development of a fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based sensing platform for the monitoring of atenolol in pharmaceutical formulations. The implemented approach involved the assembly of d-penicillamine-capped AgInS₂/ZnS quantum dots (QDs), as energy donors, and gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) as acceptors and the establishment of electrostatic interaction between both capping ligands at the nanoparticle surface, which induced the inhibition of the ternary QD photoluminescence (PL). The presence of a ZnS shell around the ternary QD core and the use of cysteamine (CA) as the AuNP capping ligand, instead of the typical citrate, allowed a more efficient FRET process to occur. The ability of Cd-free ternary QDs to be used as a sensing element in FRET-based assays was demonstrated, emphasizing the advantages relative to the common Cd-based QDs, when seeking the implementation of more environmentally friendly and less toxic analytical methodologies. The influence of several β-blocker drugs on the FRET donor-acceptor assemblies was thoroughly assessed. Atenolol and nadolol caused the aggregation of CA-AuNPs via hydrogen bonding interactions which reduced the spectral overlap between the donor and acceptor, impairing the FRET process and consequently the emission of the QDs was restored. Under the optimized conditions, the obtained results exhibited a linear relationship between the QD PL recovery signal and atenolol concentration of up to 11.22 mg L^-1 with a detection limit of 1.05 mg L^-1. This FRET sensing platform was successfully applied in the determination of atenolol in pharmaceutical formulations with recovery values ranging from 97.4 to 104.3%.

Twice-daily versus once-daily lisinopril and losartan for hypertension: Real-world effectiveness and safety

BACKGROUND

Lisinopril and losartan manufacturer labels recommend twice-daily dosing (BID) if once-daily (QDay) is insufficient to lower blood pressure (BP).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Retrospective cohort study of patients taking QDay lisinopril and losartan who experienced a dose-doubling (index date). A text-processing tool categorized BID and QDay groups at the index date based on administration instructions. We excluded: pregnant/hospice, regimens other than BID/QDay, and without BP measurements -6 months/+12 months of the index date. The most proximal BP measurements -6 months and +2 weeks to 12 months of the index date were used to evaluate BP differences. Propensity scores were generated, and differences in BP and adverse events (angioedema, acute kidney injury, hyperkalemia) between BID/QDay groups were analyzed within dosing cohorts using inverse propensity of treatment-weighted regression models. Of 11,210 and 6,051 patients who met all criteria for lisinopril and losartan, 784 (7.0%) and 453 (7.5%) were taking BID, respectively. BID patients were older and had higher comorbidity and medication burdens. There were no differences in systolic/diastolic BP between BID and QDay, with absolute differences in mean systolic BP ranging from -1.8 to 0.7 mmHg and diastolic BP ranging from -1.1 to 0.1 mmHg (all 95% confidence intervals [CI] cross 0). Lisinopril 10mg BID was associated with an increased odds of angioedema compared to lisinopril 20mg QDay (odds ratio 2.27, 95%CI 1.13-4.58).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjusted models do not support improved effectiveness or safety of BID lisinopril and losartan.

Effects of Blood Pressure Lowering Agents on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Weight Excess Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Obesity hypertension is an ongoing pandemic. The first-line medications to treat this condition are still subject to debate. We compared diuretics, calcium-channel blockers (CCB), beta-blockers (BB), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) as an initial antihypertensive therapy for prevention of cardiovascular morbimortality of hypertensive individuals who are overweight or obese.

METHODS

We conducted a search of the literature for randomized clinical trials in which at least 50% of the participants were overweight or obese. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, acute myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure (HF), stroke, or end-stage renal disease.

RESULTS

Our search yielded 16 randomized studies. Comparisons of two classes of drugs with at least two studies indicated that (1) CCB and ACEI increased the risk of HF [relative risk (RR) = 2.26; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.16-4.40] and stroke [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.13; 1.00-1.26]), respectively, compared to diuretics; and (2) CCB showed a reduction in stroke (HR = 0.77; 0.66-0.89) and total mortality (HR = 0.94; 0.87-1.01) compared to the BB atenolol. Comparisons of two classes of antihypertensive medications with only one study showed that the risk of MI was higher with ARB valsartan versus CCB (HR = 1.19; 95% CI 1.02-1.38, p = 0.02). In contrast, losartan lowered the risk of a composite cardiovascular outcome compared to atenolol (HR = 0.87; 95% CI 0.77-0.98, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

In hypertensive subjects with excess weight, diuretics are more effective for preventing HF and stroke than CCB and ACEI, respectively. CCB are a good first-line choice for prevention of cardiovascular disease, except HF.

Cobalt-Catalyzed Cross-Couplings between Alkyl Halides and Grignard Reagents

Metal-catalyzed cross-couplings have emerged as essential tools for the construction of C-C bonds. The identification of efficient catalytic systems as well as large substrate scope made these cross-couplings key reactions to access valuable molecules ranging from materials, agrochemicals to active pharmaceutical ingredients. They have been increasingly integrated in retrosynthetic plans, allowing shorter and original route development. Palladium-catalyzed cross-couplings still largely rule the field, with the most popular reactions in industrial processes being the Suzuki and Sonogashira couplings. However, the extensive use of palladium complexes raises several problems such as limited resources, high cost, environmental impact, and frequent need for sophisticated ligands. As a consequence, the use of nonprecious and cheap metal catalysts has appeared as a new horizon in cross-coupling development. Over the last three decades, a growing interest has thus been devoted to Fe-, Co-, Cu-, or Ni-catalyzed cross-couplings. Their natural abundance makes them cost-effective, allowing the conception of more sustainable and less expensive chemical processes, especially for large-scale production of active molecules. In addition to these economical and environmental considerations, the 3d metal catalysts also exhibit complementary reactivity with palladium complexes, facilitating the use of alkyl halide partners due to the decrease of β-elimination side reactions. In particular, by using cobalt catalysts, numerous cross-couplings between alkyl halides and organometallics have been described. However, cobalt catalysis still stays far behind palladium catalysis in terms of popularity and applications, and the expansion of the substrate scope as well as the development of simple and robust catalytic systems remains an important challenge.In 2012, our group entered the cobalt catalysis field by developing a cobalt-catalyzed cross-coupling between C-bromo glycosides and Grignard reagents. The generality of the coupling allowed the preparation of a range of valuable C-aryl and C-vinyl glycoside building blocks. We then focused on the functionalization of saturated N-heterocycles, and a variety of halo-azetidines, -pyrrolidines, and -piperidines were successfully reacted with aryl and alkenyl Grignard reagents under cobalt catalysis. With the objective of preparing valuable α-aryl amides, a cobalt-catalyzed cross-coupling applied to α-bromo amides was studied and then extended to α-bromo lactams. Recently, we also reported an efficient and general cross-coupling involving cyclopropyl- and cyclobutyl-magnesium bromides. This method allows the alkylation of functionalized small strained rings by a range of primary and secondary alkyl halides.

The Use of Ion Liquids as a Trojan Horse Strategy in Enzyme-Catalyzed Biotransformation of (R,S)-Atenolol

The enzymatic method was used for the direct biotransformation of racemic atenolol. The catalytic activities of commercially available lipases from Candida rugosa were tested for the kinetic resolution of (R,S)-atenolol by enantioselective acetylation in various two-phase reaction media containing ionic liquids. The composed catalytic system gave the possibility to easy separate substrates and products of the conducted enantioselective reaction and after specific procedure to reuse utilized enzymes in another catalytic cycle.

Flecainide is well-tolerated and effective in patient with atrial fibrillation at 12 months: a retrospective study

Introduction:

Current atrial fibrillation (AF) guidelines recommend flecainide as a first-line rhythm control option in patients without structural heart disease. While there is proven efficacy in clinical trials and guideline support, it is hypothesized that flecainide may be underutilized due to negative outcomes in the CAST trial and that adverse effects are less common than previously perceived.

Methods:

This retrospective chart review evaluated patients ⩾18 years initiated on flecainide for AF from August 2011 to October 2016 by a cardiology provider at the study site. Exclusion criteria included: <5 days of flecainide therapy, AF due to a reversible cause, and inadequate documentation. The primary outcome was efficacy of flecainide at maintaining symptomatic control at 6 and 12 months. Secondary outcomes included characterization of alterations in rhythm control strategies and documented normal sinus rhythm per electrocardiogram at 6 and 12 months.

Results:

Of the 326 patients identified, 144 patients were included. After 6 and 12 months, 102 patients (70.8%) and 89 patients (61.8%) of the 144 were symptomatically controlled. Atenolol use (p = 0.024), female sex (p = 0.006), hypertension (p = 0.040), and dronedarone failure (p = 0.012) were associated with flecainide discontinuation at 6 months. At 12 months, only previous propafenone failure (p = 0.032) was significant. Of the 144 patients, 16 (11.1%) reported adverse effects with dizziness, hot flashes, bradycardia, and headache (1.4% each) being the most common.

Conclusion:

Flecainide is a well-tolerated medication, even at 12 months, with very minor adverse effects. These results support the utility of flecainide in guideline recommended patient populations.

Semi-mechanistic modelling platform to assess cardiac contractility and haemodynamics in preclinical cardiovascular safety profiling of new molecular entities

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Cardiovascular safety is one of the most frequent causes of safety-related attrition both preclinically and clinically. Preclinical cardiovascular safety is routinely assessed using dog telemetry monitoring key cardiovascular functions. The present research was to develop a semi-mechanistic modelling platform to simultaneously assess changes in contractility (dPdt_max ), heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) in preclinical studies.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Data from dPdt_max , HR, preload (left ventricular end-diastolic pressure [LVEDP]) and MAP were available from dog telemetry studies after dosing with atenolol (n = 27), salbutamol (n = 5), L-N^G -nitroarginine methyl ester (L-NAME; n = 4), milrinone (n = 4), verapamil (n = 12), dofetilide (n = 8), flecainide (n = 4) and AZ001 (n = 14). Literature model for rat CV function was used for the structural population pharmacodynamic model development. LVEDP was evaluated as covariate to account for the effect of preload on dPdt_max .

KEY RESULTS

The model was able to describe drug-induced changes in dPdt_max , HR and MAP for all drugs included in the developed framework adequately, by incorporating appropriate drug effects on dPdt_max , HR and/or total peripheral resistance. Consistent with the Starling's law, incorporation of LVEDP as a covariate on dPdt_max to correct for the preload effect was found to be statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

The contractility and haemodynamics semi-mechanistic modelling platform accounts for diurnal variation, drug-induced changes and inter-animal variation. It can be used to hypothesize and evaluate pharmacological effects and provide a holistic cardiovascular safety profile for new drugs.

Clinical Management of Stable Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Although cardiologists have long treated patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and concomitant type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), T2DM has traditionally been considered just a comorbidity that affected the development and progression of the disease. Over the past decade, a number of factors have shifted that have forced the cardiology community to reconsider the role of T2DM in CAD. First, in addition to being associated with increased cardiovascular risk, T2DM has the potential to affect a number of treatment choices for CAD. In this document, we discuss the role that T2DM has in the selection of testing for CAD, in medical management (both secondary prevention strategies and treatment of stable angina), and in the selection of revascularization strategy. Second, although glycemic control has been recommended as a part of comprehensive risk factor management in patients with CAD, there is mounting evidence that the mechanism by which glucose is managed can have a substantial impact on cardiovascular outcomes. In this document, we discuss the role of glycemic management (both in intensity of control and choice of medications) in cardiovascular outcomes. It is becoming clear that the cardiologist needs both to consider T2DM in cardiovascular treatment decisions and potentially to help guide the selection of glucose-lowering medications. Our statement provides a comprehensive summary of effective, patient-centered management of CAD in patients with T2DM, with emphasis on the emerging evidence. Given the increasing prevalence of T2DM and the accumulating evidence of the need to consider T2DM in treatment decisions, this knowledge will become ever more important to optimize our patients' cardiovascular outcomes.

Managing Hypertension in the elderly: What's new?

Hypertension is the leading modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular events and mortality in the world. Hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular events and mortality in the elderly. The 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association hypertension guidelines recommend treatment of noninstitutionalized ambulatory community-dwelling persons aged 65 years and older with an average systolic blood pressure of 130 ​mm Hg or higher or a diastolic blood pressure of 80 ​mm Hg or higher with lifestyle measures plus antihypertensive drug to lower the blood pressure to less than 130/80 ​mm Hg For elderly adults with hypertension and a high burden of comorbidities and limited life expectancy, clinical judgment, patient preference, and a team-based approach to assess risk/benefit is reasonable for decisions about the intensity of SBP lowering and the choice of antihypertensive drugs to use for treatment. Randomized clinical trials need to be performed in frail elderly patients with hypertension living in nursing homes. Elderly frail persons with prevalent and frequent falls, marked cognitive impairment, and multiple comorbidities requiring multiple antihypertensive drugs also need to be included in randomized clinical trials. Data on patients older than 85 years treated for hypertension are also sparse. These patients need clinical trial data. Finally, the effect of different antihypertensive drugs on clinical outcomes including serious adverse events needs to be investigated in elderly frail patients with hypertension and different comorbidities.

Managing the elderly patient with hypertension: current strategies, challenges, and considerations

Introduction: Hypertension is the leading modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular events and mortality in the world.Areas covered: An extensive literature review of articles and clinical trials on PUBMED on the topic of hypertension in the elderly from 1976 through January 2020 was conducted. This review article discusses clinical trials on treatment of hypertension in the elderly, the 2017 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) hypertension guidelines, the 2018 European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Hypertension guidelines, and the treatment of hypertension and of resistant hypertension in the elderly.Expert opinion: The 2017 ACC/AHA hypertension guidelines recommend treatment of noninstitutionalized ambulatory community-dwelling adults aged 65 years and older with an average systolic blood pressure of 130 mm Hg or higher with lifestyle measures plus antihypertensive drug to lower the blood pressure to less than 130/80 mm Hg. For elderly adults with hypertension and a high burden of comorbidities and limited life expectancy, clinical judgment, patient preference, and a team-based approach to assess risk/benefit is reasonable for decisions about the intensity of SBP lowering and the choice of antihypertensive drugs to use for treatment.

Racial and Sex Differences in the Response to First-Line Antihypertensive Therapy

Objective: As compared to whites, the black population develops hypertension (HTN) at an earlier age, has a greater frequency and severity of HTN, and has poorer control of blood pressure (BP). Traditional practices and treatment efforts have had minor impact on these disparities, with over a 2-fold higher death rate currently for blacks as compared to whites. The University of Mississippi Medical Center (UMC) is located in the southeastern US and the Stroke Belt, which has higher rates of HTN and related diseases as compared to the rest of the country. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the UMC's Research Data Warehouse, containing >30 million electronic health records from >900,000 patients to determine the initial BP response following the first prescribed antihypertensive drug. Results: There were 5,973 white (45% overall HTN prevalence) and 10,731 black (57% overall HTN prevalence) patients who met criteria for the study. After controlling for age, BMI, and drug dosage, black males were overall less likely to have controlled BP (defined as < 140/90 mmHg) and were associated with smaller falls in BP as compared to whites and black females. Blockers of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) failed to significantly improve odds of HTN control vs. the untreated group in black patients. However, our data suggests that these drugs do provide significant benefit in blacks when combined with THZ, as compared to untreated and as compared to THZ alone. Conclusion: These data support the use of a single-pill formulation with ARB or ACE inhibitor with a thiazide in blacks for initial first-line HTN therapy and suggests that HTN treatment strategies should consider both race and gender. Our study gives a unique insight into initial antihypertensive responses in actual clinical practice and could have an impact in BP control efficiency in a state with prevalent socioeconomic and racial disparities.

10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2020

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, a multidisciplinary expert committee (https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-SPPC), are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations, please refer to the Standards of Care Introduction (https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-SINT). Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

Associations between β-blocker therapy and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with diabetes and established cardiovascular disease

BACKGROUND

The effects of β-blocker therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) are unclear. We sought to evaluate associations between β-blocker use in T2D with ASCVD and cardiovascular (CV) outcomes.

METHODS

In patients with T2D and ASCVD enrolled in the Trial Evaluating Cardiovascular Outcomes with Sitagliptin (TECOS), an inverse probability of treatment-weighted Cox proportional hazards model was used to examine the association between baseline β-blocker therapy (at randomization) and the primary CV composite (defined as CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction [MI], non-fatal stroke, or hospitalization for unstable angina), including in subgroups with prior MI and heart failure (HF); other outcomes evaluated included individual components of the primary composite, hospitalization for HF, and severe hypoglycemic events.

RESULTS

Of the 14,671 patients randomized, 9322 (64%) were on a β-blocker at baseline; these patients were more likely to have prior MI or HF. Over a median 3.0 (25th, 75th percentile: 2.2, 3.6) years, the risk of the primary CV composite was significantly higher with baseline β-blocker use versus no β-blocker use (4.5 vs. 3.4 events/100-patient years, adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.29); no significant interaction was noted for patients with versus without prior MI or HF. Baseline β-blocker use was not associated with risks for severe hypoglycemic events (HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.88-1.48).

CONCLUSIONS

In this observational analysis of T2D and ASCVD, baseline β-blocker use was not associated with risks for severe hypoglycemia yet also was not associated with CV risk reduction over 3 years of follow-up, supporting a randomized examination of chronic β-blocker therapy in this patient population. (TECOS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00790205).

Standardizing hypertension management in a primary care setting in India through a protocol based model

Hypertension is a leading cause of death in India. Control rates of hypertension are abysmal, even for people on treatment. There are a number of barriers to adequate control of hypertension in India, including therapeutic inertia and the lack of a systematic, simplified approach. Standardizing hypertension management through an evidence based model that sets thresholds for diagnosis, treatment goals, follow up intervals and choice of drugs can lead to improved management of hypertension in an individual hospital or health system. In this paper, we summarize the evidence for such a model, and adapt it to the Indian context, focusing on maximizing effectiveness, safety and ease of use by a non-expert. This model can be utilized by individual practitioners, hospitals, primary health centers (PHCs) and the Health and Wellness Centers (HWCs) under the Ayushman Bharat initiative.

Lipid management in patients with chronic kidney disease

An increased risk of cardiovascular disease, independent of conventional risk factors, is present even at minor levels of renal impairment and is highest in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring dialysis. Renal dysfunction changes the level, composition and quality of blood lipids in favour of a more atherogenic profile. Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) or ESRD have a characteristic lipid pattern of hypertriglyceridaemia and low HDL cholesterol levels but normal LDL cholesterol levels. In the general population, a clear relationship exists between LDL cholesterol and major atherosclerotic events. However, in patients with ESRD, LDL cholesterol shows a negative association with these outcomes at below average LDL cholesterol levels and a flat or weakly positive association with mortality at higher LDL cholesterol levels. Overall, the available data suggest that lowering of LDL cholesterol is beneficial for prevention of major atherosclerotic events in patients with CKD and in kidney transplant recipients but is not beneficial in patients requiring dialysis. The 2013 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline for Lipid Management in CKD provides simple recommendations for the management of dyslipidaemia in patients with CKD and ESRD. However, emerging data and novel lipid-lowering therapies warrant some reappraisal of these recommendations.

Efficacy and toxicity of antihypertensive pharmacotherapy relative to effective dose 50

Antihypertensive drugs have usually been approved at doses near the top of their respective dose-response curves. Efficacy plateaus but adverse drug reactions (ADRs), such as falls, cerebral or renal ischaemia, increase as dose is increased, especially in older patients with comorbidities. ADRs reduce adherence and may be difficult to ascertain reliably. Higher doses have generally not been shown to reduce total mortality, which provides a summary of efficacy and safety. Weight loss and other lifestyle measures are essential and may be sufficient treatment in many young and low risk patients. Most antihypertensive drug lower systolic blood pressure by around 10 mmHg, which reduces stroke and heart failure by about a quarter. Clinical trials have not been designed to demonstrate specific blood pressure treatment thresholds and targets, which are mostly extrapolated from epidemiology. Mean population oral effective dose 50 may be the most appropriate dose at which to commence antihypertensive drugs. The dose can then be titrated up if greater efficacy is demonstrated, or lowered if ADRs develop. Lower dose combination therapy may best balance benefit and harms with fewer ADRs and additive, potentially synergistic, efficacy.

Role of Beta-blockers in Cardiovascular Disease in 2019

Beta-blockers are the cornerstone of treatment for various cardiovascular conditions. Although their effects have classically been considered to be driven by their antagonistic and competitive action on beta-adrenergic receptors, nowadays it is known that their effect goes beyond that of mere competition with catecholamines on these receptors. Beta-blockers were discovered as antianginal drugs in the 1960s and are currently widely used in heart failure, arrhythmias, and ischemic heart disease. In this article, we review the evidence for the beneficial effects of beta-blockers in these conditions, as well as the current recommendations in clinical practice guidelines for their use. Surprisingly, despite having been prescribed for more than 4 decades, new, previously unnoticed mechanisms of action on cellular compartments are still being discovered, which continues to open up new horizons for their use. All in all, beta-blockers are one of the most fascinating drug groups in our therapeutic armamentarium.

Implications of the New 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines for Hypertension

Automated validated devices should be used for measuring blood pressure (BP). The 2017 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) hypertension guidelines recommend that a systolic BP between 120-129 mmHg with a diastolic BP less than 80 mmHg should be treated with lifestyle measures. These guidelines recommend treatment with lifestyle measures plus BP lowering drugs for secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in persons with clinical cardiovascular disease and an average systolic BP of ≥130 mmHg or an average diastolic BP≥80 mmHg. These guidelines recommend treatment with lifestyle measures plus BP lowering drugs for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in persons with an estimated 10-year risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease ≥ 10% and an average systolic BP ≥130 mmHg or an average diastolic BP ≥80 mmHg. These guidelines recommend treatment with lifestyle measures plus BP lowering drugs for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in persons with an estimated 10-year risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease of < 10% and an average systolic BP ≥140 mmHg or an average diastolic BP ≥ 90 mmHg. These guidelines recommend initiating antihypertensive drug therapy with 2 first-line drugs from different classes either as separate agents or in a fixed-dose combination in persons with a BP ≥140/90 mmHg or with a BP > 20/10 mmHg above their BP target. White coat hypertension must be excluded before starting treatment with antihypertensive drugs in persons with hypertension at low risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Antihypertensive drug treatment for different disorders is discussed.

Tachycardia: The hidden cardiovascular risk factor in uncomplicated arterial hypertension

Early detection and management of elevated blood pressure is crucial in reducing the burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The importance of an absolute risk assessment and patient risk stratification has been highlighted in the European hypertension guidelines since 2003. Amongst numerous risk factors influencing patient prognosis, elevated heart rate (HR) has been indicated as important predictor of future risk of hypertension, coronary heart disease, sudden cardiac death, heart failure, CVD, stroke, total cancer and mortality. Given that resting HR can be easily determined in clinical practice and modified by lifestyle changes as well as beta-blocker therapy, it seems reasonable that lowering resting HR should be a potential target to reduce disease burden and premature mortality. However, there is a lack of outcome studies of HR lowering in tachycardia-related hypertension. This review outlines the underlying mechanisms of early course hypertension pathophysiology with the critical role of the sympathetic nervous system activation, the prognostic significance of fast HR and the mechanistic rationale for the use of non-pharmacological approaches and/or highly long-acting cardioselective beta-blockers with some consideration given to betaxolol properties.

10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2019

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes" includes ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, a multidisciplinary expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations, please refer to the Standards of Care Introduction Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.