Hormone replacement therapy and high incidence of breast cancer between mammographic screens

Burden of Kaposi sarcoma according to HIV status: A systematic review and global analysis

In 2020, over 34 000 cases of Kaposi sarcoma (KS) were estimated globally, all attributable to KS herpesvirus (KSHV). Prior to the HIV epidemic, KS already existed in KSHV endemic regions, notably in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). The HIV epidemic has vastly increased the KS burden. We developed a methodology to provide global estimates of KS burden according to HIV status. A systematic review identified studies reporting HIV prevalence in consecutive KS series. Pooled estimates of HIV prevalence, by country or UN subregion, were used to calculate population-attributable fraction (PAF) and these were applied to IARC's GLOBOCAN 2020 to estimate burden and incidence of HIV-attributable and non-HIV-attributable KS. We identified 55 eligible studies, reporting HIV prevalence ranging from ≤5% to ≥95%. Approximately 80% of KS in SSA was estimated attributable to HIV, vs ~50% in the rest of the world. By applying PAFs to national GLOBOCAN estimates, an estimated 19 560 KS cases attributable to HIV were diagnosed in SSA in 2020 (~80% of the worldwide burden), vs 5064 cases of non-HIV-attributable KS (~60% of the worldwide burden). Incidence of HIV-attributable KS was highest in Southern Africa (6.0 cases per 100 000) and Eastern Africa (3.4), which were also the world regions with highest incidence of non-HIV-attributable KS (0.4 and 1.0 cases per 100 000, respectively). This first systematic effort to produce a global picture of KS burden stratified by HIV status highlights the continuing important burden of HIV-attributable KS in SSA, even in the era of combined antiretroviral therapy.

Progesterone Receptor Signaling in the Breast Tumor Microenvironment

The tumor microenvironment (TME) is a complex infrastructure composed of stromal, epithelial, and immune cells embedded in a vasculature ECM. The microenvironment surrounding mammary epithelium plays a critical role during the development and differentiation of the mammary gland, enabling the coordination of the complex multihormones and growth factor signaling processes. Progesterone/progesterone receptor paracrine signaling interactions in the microenvironment play vital roles in stem/progenitor cell function during normal breast development. In breast cancer, the female sex hormones, estrogen and progesterone, and growth factor signals are altered in the TME. Progesterone signaling modulates not only breast tumors but also the breast TME, leading to the activation of a series of cross-communications that are implicated in the genesis of breast cancers. This chapter reviews the evidence that progesterone and PR signaling modulates not only breast epitheliums but also the breast TME. Furthermore, crosstalk between estrogen and progesterone signaling affecting different cell types within the TME is discussed. A better understanding of how PR and progesterone affect the TME of breast cancer may lead to novel drugs or a therapeutic approach for the treatment of breast cancer shortly.

Ospemifene and 4-hydroxyospemifene effectively prevent and treat breast cancer in the MTag.Tg transgenic mouse model

OBJECTIVE

Ospemifene, a new drug indicated for the treatment of vulvovaginal atrophy, has completed phase III clinical trials. A condition affecting millions of women worldwide, vulvovaginal atrophy has long been treated with estrogen therapy. Estrogen treatment carries with it risks of thromboembolism, endometrial proliferative effects, and breast cancer promotion. In this study, we test the effects of three dosing levels of ospemifene in both the prevention and treatment of breast cancer in the MTag.Tg mouse model.

METHODS

The polyomavirus middle-T transgenic mouse model (MTag.Tg), which produces synchronized, multifocal mammary tumors in the immunologically intact C57BL/6 background, was used to examine the impact of ospemifene treatment. First, a cell line derived from an MTag.Tg mouse tumor (MTag 34) was treated in vitro with ospemifene and its major metabolite, 4-hydroxyospemifene (4-OH ospemifene). MTag.Tg mice were treated daily by gavage with three different doses of ospemifene (5, 25, and 50 mg/kg) before or after the development of mammary tumors. Survival and tumor development results were used to determine the effect of ospemifene treatment on mammary tumors in both the preventive and treatment settings.

RESULTS

Tumors and the MTag 34 cell line were positive for estrogen receptor expression. The MTag 34 line was not stimulated by ospemifene or its major, active metabolite 4-OH ospemifene in vitro. Ospemifene increased survival time and exerted an antitumor effect on the development and growth of estrogen receptor-positive mammary tumors in the MTag.Tg mouse model at the 50-mg/kg dose. The levels of ospemifene and 4-OH ospemifene in both the tumors and plasma of mice confirmed the dosing. Ospemifene did not exert an estrogenic effect in the breast tissue at doses equivalent to human dosing.

CONCLUSIONS

Ospemifene prevents and treats estrogen receptor-positive MTag.Tg mammary tumors in this immune-intact mouse model in a dose-dependent fashion. Ospemifene drug levels in the plasma of treated mice were comparable with those found in humans. Combined with our previous data, ospemifene does not seem to pose a breast cancer risk in animals and slows down cancer development and progression in the MTag.Tg model.

Breast cancer incidence and overdiagnosis in Catalonia (Spain)

Introduction

Early detection of breast cancer (BC) with mammography may cause overdiagnosis and overtreatment, detecting tumors which would remain undiagnosed during a lifetime. The aims of this study were: first, to model invasive BC incidence trends in Catalonia (Spain) taking into account reproductive and screening data; and second, to quantify the extent of BC overdiagnosis.

Methods

We modeled the incidence of invasive BC using a Poisson regression model. Explanatory variables were: age at diagnosis and cohort characteristics (completed fertility rate, percentage of women that use mammography at age 50, and year of birth). This model also was used to estimate the background incidence in the absence of screening. We used a probabilistic model to estimate the expected BC incidence if women in the population used mammography as reported in health surveys. The difference between the observed and expected cumulative incidences provided an estimate of overdiagnosis.

Results

Incidence of invasive BC increased, especially in cohorts born from 1940 to 1955. The biggest increase was observed in these cohorts between the ages of 50 to 65 years, where the final BC incidence rates more than doubled the initial ones. Dissemination of mammography was significantly associated with BC incidence and overdiagnosis. Our estimates of overdiagnosis ranged from 0.4% to 46.6%, for women born around 1935 and 1950, respectively.

Conclusions

Our results support the existence of overdiagnosis in Catalonia attributed to mammography usage, and the limited malignant potential of some tumors may play an important role. Women should be better informed about this risk. Research should be oriented towards personalized screening and risk assessment tools.

Use of hormone therapy and risk of breast cancer detected at screening and between mammographic screens

Postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) is associated with increased risk of breast cancer, but in women undergoing breast cancer screening it is not clear whether use of HT is associated with increased risk of breast cancer detected at screening or between screens (interval cancer). Further, it is unclear whether the use of the HTs that have been common in Scandinavia is associated with higher risk of breast cancer than the HTs used in other countries. Our study was based on data from 296,651 women aged 50-69 years, who participated in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program during 1995-2004. After a mean enrollment time of 3.8 years, 1,512 women were diagnosed with invasive screen detected breast cancer, and 814 with invasive interval breast cancer. Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) of breast cancer associated with HT use, after adjusting for confounders. Ever users of HT had a 58% increased risk of breast cancer, compared to never users. The HRs associated with HT use were 1.45 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.29-1.63) for screen detected and 1.89 (95% CI = 1.61-2.23) for interval cancer. The difference between screen detected and interval cancer was statistically significant (p = 0.011). The HR of breast cancer increased with duration of HT use, but significantly more so for interval than for screen detected cancer (use of HT for 5 or more years compared to never use; HR = 2.91, 95% CI = 2.10-4.04 and HR = 1.94, 95% CI = 1.51-2.50, respectively; p = 0.002). The population attributable fraction of breast cancer due to HT use was 19.8% overall. Ever users of HT tended to develop a cancer of lower grade. No other differences in histological tumor characteristics were observed between ever and never users of HT among screen detected or interval cancers. The estimated risks of either breast cancer overall with HT use are higher in Norway than reported in similar studies from the U.S. HT-use is a stronger risk factor for interval cancer than for screen detected cancer. The increased risk of interval cancer, which may partly be due to decreased sensitivity of mammograms in HT users, remains a challenge in breast cancer screening programs.

Hormone replacement therapy: pathobiological aspects of hormone-sensitive cancers in women relevant to epidemiological studies on HRT: a mini-review

Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) has gained widespread and in some areas indiscriminate use. In reference to recent epidemiological studies which showed unexpected and controversial associations of HRT use with malignant tumours, here we review the current understanding of the dynamics of tumour growth. The pathomorphological characteristics and sex hormone sensitivity of cancers of the breast, endometrium, ovary and colon are discussed. The development of cancer from the first malignant tumour cell to clinical diagnosis takes many years. Hormones can influence tumour growth, but it is questionable whether hormones induce malignant tumours de novo. It is much more likely that hormones 'merely' promote the growth of already existing tumour cells. The long developmental process of tumours is in apparent contradiction to results of some epidemiological studies that describe an increased cancer risk, implying primary initiation, in HRT users within observation periods of 1-6 years. The mechanisms of initiation versus promotion of hormone-sensitive cancers, particularly breast cancer, are only partly understood. The conventional methods of epidemiological studies cannot detect potential risk factors without bias if they do not include a pathomorphological component on growth characteristics. The results of previous studies should be interpreted with great caution with regard to tumour biology.

Hormones and mammographic breast density

Mammographic density reveals information about the hormonal environment along with the heritability in which breast cancer develops. This is made possible by the widespread use of population screening by mammography. Increasingly this is an important observation not just for population studies, which reveal disease determinants, but also for the individual. Density reveals the effect of the intrinsic hormonal environment and its background genetics, and also the effect of pharmaceuticals--agents used for disease control and prevention and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) used for well-being around the menopause. Increasingly this focus on the individual will need methods of measurement of density that can be monitored with greater accuracy than the widely used BI-RADS 4 categories. For this purpose studies are under way to measure volume of dense tissue as a continuous variable. In due course, measurement of density will be used as a biomarker of risk, employed in risk models and to monitor interventions. Before this can happen more knowledge will be needed of the change occurring naturally through the menopause and the differences between individuals. This will need specific study backed up with detailed information about the patient on large numbers of women and their mammograms. Currently the widespread use of HRT has increased the prevalence of the dense patterns and potentially may adversely affect the effectiveness of mammographic screening programmes. There is a large literature recording this from which we see that combined continuous preparations of oestrogen progestin are more likely to cause increased density than oestrogen alone or tibolone. Breast density, measured more accurately, has the potential to be an important adjunct to risk estimation and to monitor interventions for breast cancer prevention with pharmaceuticals (such as SERMS) and by change in lifestyle behaviours.

Long-term effects of continuous oral and transdermal estrogen replacement therapy on sex hormone binding globulin and free testosterone levels

OBJECTIVE

To determine the long-term effects of estrogen replacement therapy on sex hormone binding globuline (SHBG) and free testosterone (fT) levels in surgical postmenopausal women.

STUDY DESIGN

Forty patients with surgical menopause were enrolled in this prospective study. The women were randomly divided into two groups. The first group received oral therapy (continuous conjugated equine estrogens (CEE) - 0.625mg per day) and the second group received transdermal therapy (patches delivering continuous 17beta-estradiol (E2)--0.05mg per day). Serum SHBG and fT levels were determined at baseline and after first and second years of treatment. Two-way repeated measures analysis of variance with Bonferroni adjusted post-hoc test and unpaired-t-test were performed for statistical analysis with SPSS program.

RESULTS

Serum SHBG levels increased significantly with oral CEE after first year of treatment (P<0.05) and remained at this level for the next year. Transdermal therapy did not affect SHBG levels after first and second years (P<0.05). Serum fT levels did not change significantly in either group at the end of the first or second years (P<0.05) although there was a significant difference between the groups after 2 years (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Oral conjugated estrogens increased SHBG levels during therapy. This effect may balance the increased estrogen and androgen stimulation on breast tissue and may be more beneficial to the cardiovascular system in postmenopausal women.

Comparative safety of bone remodeling agents with a focus on osteoporosis therapies

This article reviews the different treatments currently available for osteoporosis and examines the benefits and adverse events that are associated with each. While emphasizing safety considerations, this review summarizes the following treatments for osteoporosis: calcium supplements, fluoride, hormone replacement therapy, raloxifene, bisphosphonates, salmon calcitonin, and calcitriol. Before prescribing any of these agents, the clinician should review the risk/benefit profile of each drug in the context of the individual patient's history, concomitant diseases, concurrent medications, and general physical condition.

Are women being counseled about estrogen replacement therapy?

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and several medical professional associations have published guidelines recommending that all women be counseled around the time of menopause about the benefits and risks of estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) so that they may make an informed decision about its use. Despite the proliferation of ERT counseling guidelines, little is known about whether these guidelines are being followed. There were 1,500 female members (aged 40 to 69) of a Northeastern U.S. Independent Practice Association--model Health Maintenance Organization who were surveyed, and 51 percent reported that a health care provider had talked with them about the benefits and risks of ERT. In multivariate analyses, a woman's demographic characteristics (age, race, income), stage of menopause, severity of menopausal symptoms, and body weight were the major correlates of receipt of ERT counseling. Women at greater risk for osteoporosis or heart disease were no more likely to be counseled, although those with diagnosed osteoporosis were. What appear to be selective ERT counseling practices will need to be modified if the goal of providing universal ERT counseling to midlife women is to be attained.

Hormone replacement therapy and breast cancer

There is considerable evidence that the risk of breast cancer is related to ovarian function. However, the effect of postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on breast cancer risk continues to be debated in the absence of data from randomised controlled trials. Observational studies suggest that HRT probably promotes the growth of pre-existing breast cancers rather than initiating malignant transformation of breast epithelial cells but without exerting an obviously detrimental effect on disease-specific mortality. The controversy surrounding HRT and breast cancer has become additionally more complex as a result of the dilemma faced by clinicians advising women rendered oestrogen-deficient by breast cancer therapy. Whilst HRT is currently contra-indicated due to theoretical concerns that it will promote disease recurrence, its increasing, ad hoc prescription to symptomatic breast cancer patients has not been associated with an increase in disease recurrence. Large-scale randomised trials of HRT in healthy women and breast cancer survivors are now ongoing but it will be some years before useful clinical information becomes available. Until then, the limitations and biases implicit as a result of the design of observational studies must be borne in mind when interpreting such studies.

Hormone replacement therapy and accuracy of mammographic screening

BACKGROUND

Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is commonly used and may affect the accuracy of mammographic screening.

METHODS

We examined the sensitivity, specificity, and small-cancer detection rate according to HRT use in 103,770 women in Victoria, Australia, who attended first-round screening in 1994 and who did not have a personal history of breast cancer or a breast lump or a bloodstained or watery nipple discharge at the time of screening. BreastScreen Victoria provides mammography to women aged 40 years and older every 2 years. Unconditional logistic modelling was used to adjust for age, family history, and symptom status.

FINDINGS

The sensitivity of screening mammography for a 2-year screening interval was lower in HRT users (64.8% [95% CI 58-72]) than non-users (77.3% [74-81]). In the target group (50-69 years), the sensitivity was 64.3% (57-72) in HRT users and 79.8% (76-84) in non-users. Among women who were diagnosed with cancer during the 2-year screening interval, HRT users were more likely to have a false negative result than non-users (odds ratio 1.60 [1.04-2.21]) after adjusting for potential confounding factors. Specificity was 0.6% lower in HRT users compared with non-users. Among women who did not have cancer diagnosed in the interval, HRT users were more likely to have a false positive result (adjusted odds ratio 1.12 [1.05-1.19]).

INTERPRETATION

We show that HRT use reduces the sensitivity of mammographic screening. In countries where HRT use is widespread, the reduction in sensitivity with HRT use may undermine the capacity of population-based mammographic-screening programmes to realise their potential mortality benefit.

Mammographic density changes in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women: is effect of hormone replacement therapy predictable?

BACKGROUND

Mammographic density adversely affects diagnostic accuracy and may be a risk factor for breast cancer. Mammographic density is affected by hormone replacement therapy (HRT).

OBJECTIVE

To assess mammographic density in postmenopausal women with and without HRT.

METHOD

Part I. Mammographic density was determined in 1232 postmenopausal women attending a breast screening clinic. Density was compared between HRT users and nonusers in three age groups. When available, previous mammograms were assessed for interval density change. Part II. Density change in 162 women during transition from premenopause to postmenopause was recorded. HRT effect was assessed.

RESULTS

Part I. There was no density difference between postmenopausal HRT-users and nonusers younger than age 55. Thereafter, the density was significantly less in nonusers. In the majority of HRT-users the density remained at pretreatment levels but density increased in 8% of women after HRT was started. Part II. Of 117 HRT nonusers followed over menopause 38% had a density decrease before age 55. Of those started on HRT, 80% had no density change, 18% decreased density and 2% increased density.

CONCLUSIONS

The density decreases significantly after age 55 with the greatest change occurring between age 55 and 64. This decrease does not occur in the majority of HRT-users. Usually HRT maintains the density present at the time HRT is started. Density decreases after HRT is started in some women suggesting refractoriness to hormones. In fewer than 8% of women density increases commensurate with HRT. Any adverse effect of HRT may depend on the receptivity of the epithelial elements which, in turn, may be reflected by the mammographic density at the time HRT is started.

Theoretical basis for the benefit of postmenopausal estrogen substitution

Women are being presented with an increasing number of choices for health care management as they move through the aging process. Estrogen has positive effects on mood, sexual function, target end organs and cognitive function, and may play an important role in the etiology of Alzheimer's Disease by acting to prevent amyloid plaque formation, oxidative stress, or deterioration of the cholinergic neurotransmitter system. The benefits of estrogen therapy for osteoporosis, the cardiovascular system, and lipid metabolism are far reaching, but the possibility of developing breast cancer later in life is also relevant. Understanding the mechanisms for the action of the estrogens, anti-estrogens, and the selective estrogen receptor modulators, and possible alternative routes of symptom management for some menopausal events is important to make appropriate decisions on choice of therapy. This review discusses the theoretical basis for estrogen's actions in the management of the postmenopausal stage of the life cycle.