Early administration of aspirin in patients treated with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke: a randomised controlled trial

Early antiplatelet therapy after intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Early neurological deterioration (END) and recurrence of vessel blockage frequently complicate intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Several studies have indicated the potential effectiveness of the early initiation (within < 24 h) of antiplatelet therapy (APT) after IVT. However, conflicting results have been reported by other studies. We aimed to offer a thorough overview of the current literature through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

Our systematic review and meta-analysis were prospectively registered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023488173) following the PRISMA guidelines. We systematically searched Web of Science, SCOPUS, PubMed, and Cochrane Library until May 5, 2024. Rayyan. ai facilitated the screening process. The R statistical programming language was used to calculate the odds ratios and conduct a meta-analysis. Our primary outcomes were excellent functional recovery (modified Rankin Scale score 0-1), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and mortality.

RESULTS

Eight studies involving 2,134 participants were included in the meta-analysis. Early APT showed statistically significant increased odds of excellent functional recovery (mRS 0-1) compared to the standard APT group (OR, 1.81; [95% CI: 1.10, 2.98], p = 0.02). However, we found no differences between the early and standard APT groups regarding sICH (OR, 1.74; [95% CI: 0.91, 3.33], p = 0.10) and mortality (OR, 0.88; [95% CI: 0.62, 1.24]; p = 0.47).

CONCLUSION

Early APT within 24 h of IVT in stroke patients is safe, with no increase in bleeding risk, and has a positive effect on excellent functional recovery. However, there was a statistically insignificant trend of increased sICH with early APT, and the current evidence is based on highly heterogeneous studies. Further large-scale RCTs are warranted.

Emerging Adjuvant Thrombolytic Therapies for Acute Ischemic Stroke Reperfusion

Thrombolytic therapies for acute ischemic stroke are widely available but only result in recanalization early enough, to be therapeutically useful, in 10% to 30% of cases. This large gap in treatment effectiveness could be filled by novel therapies that can increase the effectiveness of thrombus clearance without significantly increasing the risk of harm. This focused update will describe the current state of emerging adjuvant treatments for acute ischemic stroke reperfusion. We focus on new treatments that are designed to (1) target different components that make up a stroke thrombus, (2) enhance endogenous fibrinolytic systems, (3) reduce stagnant blood flow, and (4) improve recanalization of distal thrombi and postendovascular thrombectomy.

Low Dose Aspirin Initiation 18 Hours After Thrombolytic Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the safety of administering low-dose aspirin (81 mg) 18 hours after intravenous thrombolytic therapy.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort investigation. Individuals received either alteplase or tenecteplase for acute ischemic stroke followed by aspirin 81 mg (after follow-up imaging). An institutional change moved follow-up post-thrombolytic CT scans to 18 hours, and qualifying patients were grouped based on whether they received aspirin ≤24 hours or >24 hours. Chart reviews were conducted to assess the primary outcome of new or worsening intracranial hemorrhage, as well as secondary outcomes of change in stroke scale scores at discharge and 3 months, lengths of stay, favorable outcomes at 3 months, hospital readmission, and mortality.

RESULTS

Out of 350 patients screened, 130 qualified for inclusion-50 of whom received aspirin ≤24 hours (mean 21.1 hours, SD±6.2), and 80 who received aspirin >24 hours (mean 34 hours, SD±8.2). Only 1 new intracranial bleed occurred following aspirin administration in the >24-hour group. No statistically significant differences were observed in any of the secondary outcomes, although there was higher mortality (3/50 vs. 2/80, P =0.372) and shorter hospital length of stay (median difference -1.0 day, P =0.0336) in the <24 hours group.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose aspirin administration sooner than 24 hours following thrombolytic therapy did not increase bleeding events. Sooner aspirin administration after ischemic stroke can potentially enhance the prevention of secondary embolization and did not demonstrate worse clinical outcomes; however, further randomized controlled trials are needed.

Predictors of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage after endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke due to tandem lesion in anterior circulation

BACKGROUND

Endovascular treatment (EVT) of tandem lesion (TL) in the anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke (IS) usually requires periprocedural antithrombotic treatment and early initiation of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after carotid stenting. However, it may contribute to an occurrence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH) in some cases. We investigated factors influencing the SICH occurrence and assessed the possible predictors of SICH after EVT.

METHODS

IS patients with TL in the anterior circulation treated with EVT were enrolled in the multicenter retrospective ASCENT study. A good three-month clinical outcome was scored as 0-2 points in modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and recanalization using the TICI scale. SICH was assessed using the SITS-MOST criteria. Logistic regression analysis was used for the assessment of possible predictors of SICH with adjustment for potential confounders.

RESULTS

In total, 300 (68.7 % males, mean age 67.3 ± 10.2 years) patients with median of admission NIHSS 17 were analyzed. Recanalization (TICI 2b-3) was achieved in 290 (96.7 %) patients and 176 (58.7 %) had mRS 0-2. SICH occurred in 25 (8.3 %) patients. Patients with SICH did not differ from those without SICH in the rate of periprocedural antithrombotic treatment (64 vs. 57.5 %, p = 0.526) and in the rate of DAPT started within the first 12 h after EVT (20 vs. 42.2 %, p = 0.087). After adjustment, admission NIHSS and admission glycemia were found as the only predictors of SICH after EVT.

CONCLUSION

Admission NIHSS and glycemia were found as the only predictors of SICH after EVT for TL. No associations between periprocedural antithrombotic treatment, early start of DAPT after EVT and SICH occurrence were found.

Safety and efficacy of tirofiban combined with intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular treatment in acute large vessel occlusion stroke

OBJECTIVE

This study assesses the safety and efficacy of tirofiban for patients with large vessel occlusion stroke after intravenous thrombolysis.

METHODS

This study data was from SUSTAIN, DEVT, and RESCUE BT trials. According to whether the use of tirofiban who underwent endovascular treatment and preceding intravenous thrombolysis was divided into the tirofiban group and the no-tirofiban group. The safety outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, any intracranial hemorrhage within 48 h, and 3-month mortality. The efficacy outcome was defined as a score of 0-2 on the modified Rankin Scale scores at 3 months.

RESULTS

A total of 372 patients with intravenous thrombolysis were included in these SUSTAIN, DEVT, and RESCUE BT trials. Adjusted multivariate analysis showed that tirofiban with intravenous thrombolysis was not associated with symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (aOR, 0.87; 95 % CI, 0.49-1.57; P=0.65), any intracranial hemorrhage within 48 h (aOR, 1.00; 95 % CI, 0.60-1.66; P=1.00), 3-month mortality (aOR, 1.10; 95 % CI, 0.56-2.19; P=0.78) and 3-month modified Rankin Scale scores 0-2 (aOR, 0.72; 95 % CI, 0.42-1.25; P=0.25) in patients with acute large vessel occlusion. In the subgroup analysis, we found that tirofiban was not recommended for females (aOR, 0.34; 95 % CI, 0.12-0.93), baseline Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score≤9 (aOR, 0.37; 95 % CI, 0.18-0.76), and cardiogenic embolism (aOR, 0.36; 95 % CI, 0.14-0.97).

CONCLUSION

Tirofiban combined with intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute large vessel occlusion may be safe. Further studies need to confirm the effectiveness of tirofiban after intravenous thrombolysis in different stroke etiology.

Acute myocardial infarction and ischaemic stroke: differences and similarities in reperfusion therapies-a review

Acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) share a number of similarities. However, important differences in pathophysiology demand a disease-tailored approach. In both conditions, fast treatment plays a crucial role as ischaemia and eventually infarction develop rapidly. Furthermore, in both fields, the introduction of fibrinolytic treatments historically preceded the implementation of endovascular techniques. However, in contrast to STEMI, only a minority of AIS patients will eventually be considered eligible for reperfusion treatment. Non-invasive cerebral imaging always precedes cerebral angiography and thrombectomy, whereas coronary angiography is not routinely preceded by non-invasive cardiac imaging in patients with STEMI. In the late or unknown time window, the presence of specific patterns on brain imaging may help identify AIS patients who benefit most from reperfusion treatment. For STEMI, a uniform time window for reperfusion up to 12 h after symptom onset, based on old placebo-controlled trials, is still recommended in guidelines and generally applied. Bridging fibrinolysis preceding endovascular treatment still remains the mainstay of reperfusion treatment in AIS, while primary percutaneous coronary intervention is the strategy of choice in STEMI. Shortening ischaemic times by fine-tuning collaboration networks between ambulances, community hospitals, and tertiary care hospitals, optimizing bridging fibrinolysis, and reducing ischaemia-reperfusion injury are important topics for further research. The aim of this review is to provide insights into the common as well as diverging pathophysiology behind current reperfusion strategies and to explore new ways to enhance their clinical benefit.

Hyperacute ischemic stroke care-Current treatment and future directions

A decade on from the first positive thrombectomy trials, hyperacute therapies for ischemic stroke continue to rapidly advance. Effective treatments remain limited to reperfusion, although several cytoprotective approaches continue to be investigated. Intravenous fibrinolytics are now demonstrated to be beneficial up to 24 h in patients selected using perfusion imaging, but their role in patients with non-disabling symptoms appears very limited. Tenecteplase is superior to alteplase in meta-analysis of the latest trials, and adjuvant thrombolytics are an area of active investigation. Endovascular thrombectomy is beneficial in a wide range of anterior and posterior circulation large vessel occlusions up to 24 h after onset with the more distal occlusions, mild presentations, and >24 h window being the main frontiers to be tested in ongoing trials. Imaging parameters are prognostic but appear not to modify the relative treatment benefit of thrombectomy versus standard medical care. Therefore, deciding who not to treat with thrombectomy is a key clinical challenge that requires careful but rapid integration of clinical, imaging, and patient preference considerations. Systems of care to accelerate delivery of these highly effective therapies will maximize benefits for the greatest number of patients with stroke.

Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists in ischemic stroke patients without endovascular therapy: A meta-analysis

Platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonists have been employed in selective patients after endovascular therapy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS), yet application in patients without EVT is debated. This meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies on AIS patients without EVT assessed the effectiveness and safety of platelet GP IIb/IIIa antagonists compared with traditional antiplatelet or thrombolysis therapy. Articles were retrieved from databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane. The risk of bias and certainty level of evidence were assessed. Fifteen studies were included. GP IIb/IIIa antagonists increased the proportion of patients with modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-1 (odd ratio [OR] 1.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.81, p = 0.03), mRS 0-2 (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.12-1.46, p = 0.0004), and Barthel Index (BI) 95-100 (OR 1.25, p = 0.005); decreased the proportion of stroke progression within 5 days (OR 0.66, p = 0.006); and lowered the mean mRS score at 90 days (mean difference [MD] -0.43, p = 0.002) and the National Institute of Health stroke scale score at 7 days (MD -1.64, p < 0.00001) compared with conventional treatment. Proportions of stroke recurrence within 90 days (OR 1.20, p = 0.60), any intracranial hemorrhage (aICH) (OR 1.20, p = 0.12), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) (OR 0.91, p = 0.88), and death (OR 0.87, p = 0.25) had no statistical difference between both groups. This meta-analysis finds that compared with traditional antiplatelet or thrombolysis therapy, GP IIb/IIIa antagonists administered within 24-96 h of ischemic stroke onset significantly improve functional prognosis of patients with AIS not receiving EVT, as indicated by mRS and BI at 90 days, and do not increase the incidence of aICH, sICH, and death.

Intravenous thrombolysis plus mechanical thrombectomy versus mechanical thrombectomy alone for acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review and updated meta-analysis of clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is the gold standard treatment for large vessel occlusion (LVO). A vital factor that might influence MT outcomes is the use of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). A few clinical trials in this domain thus far have not yielded consistent outcomes. We conducted this meta-analysis to synthesize collective evidence in this regard.

METHODS

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement guidelines were followed, and we performed a comprehensive literature search of four databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL). For outcomes constituting continuous data, the mean difference (MD) and its standard deviation (SD) were pooled. For outcomes constituting dichotomous data, the frequency of events and the total number of patients were pooled as the risk ratio (RR).

RESULTS

Seven clinical trials with a total of 2317 patients are included in this meta-analysis. Six trials are randomized, and one trial was nonrandomized. No significant differences were found between MT plus IVT and MT alone in successful recanalization (RR 1.04, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) [0.92 to 1.17], P = 0.53), 90-day functional independence (RR 1.03, 95% CI [0.90 to 1.19], P = 0.65), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) (RR 1.22, 95% CI [0.84 to 1.75], P = 0.30), or mortality (RR 0.94, 95% CI [0.76 to 1.18], P = 0.61).

CONCLUSION

The current evidence does not favor either MT plus IVT or MT alone for LVO except for the procedural time. More trials are needed in this regard, and certain factors should be considered when comparing the two approaches.

Cardiocerebral Infarction Presenting in a Neurosurgical Emergency: A Case Report and Literature Review

Cardiocerebral infarction (CCI), the simultaneous occurrence of acute ischemic stroke and acute myocardial infarction (AMI), is a rare but critical condition. However, the optimal treatment strategy, particularly regarding the use of tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA), remains unclear. This case report describes a patient with CCI diagnosed during a neurosurgical emergency. A 67-year-old man with a history of hypertension presented with sudden right hemiparesis and sensory aphasia 30 minutes prior to hospital arrival. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging revealed acute cerebral infarction in the left middle cerebral artery territory but without large-vessel occlusion. Routine electrocardiography (ECG) showed ST-T elevation in leads V1, V2, II, III, and aVF (augmented vector foot). Subsequent blood tests confirmed positive troponin T and elevated creatine kinase levels. Despite the absence of reported AMI symptoms, the patient received a diagnosis of CCI. Due to the uncertain time of AMI onset and to expedite transfer to the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) unit, t-PA administration was withheld. Upon transfer, dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin (200 mg) and clopidogrel (300 mg) was initiated. Emergency coronary angioplasty successfully treated a 99% stenosis of the left anterior descending artery (#7). The patient's post-procedure course was uneventful. After 18 days, he was transferred to a rehabilitation hospital with a modified Rankin Scale score of 3. This case highlights the importance of routine 12-lead ECG in neurosurgical emergencies, regardless of presenting symptoms like chest pain. While guidelines support the use of t-PA in CCI, its administration requires careful consideration due to specific risks, including cardiac rupture and limitations on antithrombotic therapy within the first 24 hours.

Contemporary Prestroke Dual Antiplatelet Use and Symptomatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage Risk After Thrombolysis

Importance

Intravenous alteplase (IV-tPA) can be administered to patients with acute ischemic stroke but is associated with symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH). It is unclear if patients taking prestroke dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) are at higher risk of sICH.

Objective

To determine the associated risk of sICH in patients taking prestroke dual antiplatelet therapy receiving alteplase for acute ischemic stroke using propensity score matching analysis.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study used data from the American Heart Association and American Stroke Association Get With The Guidelines-Stroke (GWTG-Stroke) registry between 2013 and 2021. Data were obtained from hospitals in the GWTG-Stroke registry. This study included patients hospitalized with acute ischemic stroke and treated with IV-tPA. Data were analyzed from January 2013 to December 2021.

Exposures

Prestroke DAPT before treatment with IV-tPA for acute ischemic stroke.

Main Outcome Measures

sICH, In-hospital death, discharge modified Rankin scale score, and other life-threatening systemic hemorrhages.

Results

Of 409 673 participants, 321 819 patients (mean [SD] age, 68.6 [15.1] years; 164 587 female [51.1%]) who were hospitalized with acute ischemic stroke and treated with IV-tPA were included in the analysis. The rate of sICH was 2.9% (5200 of 182 344), 3.8% (4457 of 117 670), and 4.1% (893 of 21 805) among patients treated with no antiplatelet therapy, single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT), and DAPT, respectively (P < .001). In adjusted analyses after propensity score subclassification, both SAPT (odds ratio [OR], 1.13; 95% CI, 1.07-1.19) and DAPT (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.14-1.42) were associated with increased risks of sICH. Prestroke antiplatelet medications were associated with lower odds of discharge mRS score of 2 or less compared with no medication (SAPT OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.90-0.95; DAPT OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.88-0.98). Results of a subgroup analysis of patients taking DAPT exposed to aspirin-clopidogrel vs aspirin-ticagrelor combination therapy were not significant (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.84-1.86).

Conclusions and Relevance

Prestroke DAPT was associated with a significantly elevated risk of sICH among patients with ischemic stroke who were treated with thrombolysis; however, the absolute increase in risk was small. Patients exposed to antiplatelet medications did not have excess sICH compared with landmark trials, which demonstrated overall clinical benefit of thrombolysis therapy for acute ischemic stroke.

Is intraprocedural intravenous aspirin safe for patients who require emergent extracranial stenting during mechanical thrombectomy?

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative antiplatelet therapy is recommended for emergent stenting during mechanical thrombectomy (MT). Most patients undergoing MT are also given thrombolysis. Antiplatelet agents are contraindicated within 24 hours of thrombolysis. We evaluated outcomes and complications of patients stented with and without intravenous aspirin during MT.

METHODS

All patients who underwent emergent extracranial stenting during MT at the Royal Stoke University Hospital, UK between 2010 and 2020, were included. Patients were thrombolysed before MT, unless contraindicated. Aspirin 500 mg intravenously was given intraoperatively at the discretion of the operator. Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (sICH) and the National Institutes for Health Stroke Scale score (NIHSS) were recorded at 7 days, and mortality and functional recovery (modified Rankin Scale: mRS ≤2) at 90 days.

RESULTS

Out of 565 patients treated by MT 102 patients (median age 67 IQR 57-72 years, baseline median NIHSS 18 IQR 13-23, 76 (75%) thrombolysed) had a stent placed. Of these 49 (48%) were given aspirin and 53 (52%) were not. Patients treated with aspirin had greater NIHSS improvement (median 8 IQR 1-16 vs median 3 IQR -9-8 points, p=0.003), but there were no significant differences in sICH (2/49 (4%) vs 9/53 (17%)), mRS ≤2 (25/49 (51%) vs 19/53 (36%)) and mortality (10/49 (20%) vs 12/53 (23%)) with and without aspirin. NIHSS improvement (median 12 IQR 4-18 vs median 7 IQR -7-10, p=0.01) was greater, and mortality was lower (4/33 (12%) vs 6/15 (40%), p=0.05) when aspirin was combined with thrombolysis, than for aspirin alone, with no increase in bleeding.

CONCLUSION

Our findings based on registry data derived from routine clinical care suggest that intraprocedural intravenous aspirin in patients undergoing emergent stenting during MT does not increase sICH and is associated with good clinical outcomes, even when combined with intravenous thrombolysis.

Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke: The Last 30 Years of Trials and Tribulations

The landscape of acute ischemic stroke management has undergone a substantial transformation over the past 3 decades, mirroring our enhanced comprehension of the pathology and progress in diagnostic techniques, therapeutic interventions, and preventive measures. The 1990s marked a pivotal moment in stroke care with the integration of intravenous thrombolytics. However, the most significant paradigm shift in recent years has undoubtedly been the advent of endovascular thrombectomy. This article endeavors to deliver an exhaustive analysis of this revolutionary progression.

Prevalence and Outcomes of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke With Concomitant ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (Results From National Inpatient Sample 2016-2019)

BACKGROUND

Acute myocardial infarction may concomitantly occur with acute ischemic stroke. The prevalence, complications, and outcomes of acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in patients hospitalized with acute ischemic stroke are not well studied.

METHODS

We examined hospitalized patients with acute ischemic stroke who were included in the National Inpatient Sample from 2016 to 2019. Acute ischemic stroke and STEMI were defined by using the International Classification of Diseases-Tenth Revision diagnostic codes. Patients with Non-STEMI were excluded. The prevalence of complications and outcomes were expressed as percentages. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to examine the association of STEMI with a primary outcome of mortality and secondary outcomes. A subgroup analysis of patients with STEMI who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention was also performed.

RESULTS

Of the total (n=2 080 795) patients with acute ischemic stroke, 0.3% (n=6275; mean age, 70.5 years, 50.1% females, 69.5% White) also had STEMI diagnosed during the hospitalization. Of these, 1775 (28.3%) died in the STEMI group and 76 435 (3.7%) died in the group without STEMI. The most frequent complications in the STEMI group were acute kidney injury, intracranial hemorrhage, and ventricular arrhythmias. All secondary outcomes were associated with the diagnosis of STEMI (odds ratio [OR], 3.19 [95% CI, 2.82-3.6]; P≤0.001). STEMI was associated with mortality (OR, 8.37 [95% CI, 7.25-9.66]; P≤0.001) and intracranial hemorrhage (OR, 2.23 [95% CI, 1.84-2.70]; P≤0.001). Percutaneous coronary intervention was performed in 14.3% of STEMI subgroup patients. Percutaneous coronary intervention is not associated with mortality (OR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.6-1.43]; P=0.7), and intracranial hemorrhage (OR, 1.54 [95% CI, 0.0.93-2.56]; P=0.1).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with acute ischemic stroke with STEMI have a higher percentage of mortality. Percutaneous coronary intervention in the subgroup of patients with acute ischemic stroke with concomitant STEMI was not associated with increased odds of mortality and intracranial hemorrhage.

Dual-Frequency Ultrasound Assisted Thrombolysis in Interventional Therapy of Deep Vein Thrombosis

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is one of the main causes of disability and death worldwide. Currently, the treatment of DVT still needs a long time and faces a high risk of major bleeding. It is necessary to find a rapid and safe method for the therapy of DVT. Here, a dual-frequency ultrasound assisted thrombolysis (DF-UAT) is reported for the interventional treatment of DVT. A series of piezoelectric elements are placed in an interventional catheter to emit ultrasound waves with two independent frequencies in turn. The low-frequency ultrasound drives the drug-loaded droplets into the thrombus, while the high-frequency ultrasound causes the cavitation of the droplets in the thrombus. With the joint effect of the enhanced drug diffusion and the cavitation under the dual-frequency ultrasound, the thrombolytic efficacy can be improved. In a proof-of-concept experiment performed with living sheep, the recanalization of the iliac vein is realized in 15 min using the DF-UAT technology. Therefore, the DF-UAT can be one of the most promising methods in the interventional treatment of DVT.

Safety and efficacy of platelet glycoprotein VI inhibition in acute ischaemic stroke (ACTIMIS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1b/2a trial

BACKGROUND

Antagonists of glycoprotein VI-triggered platelet activation used in combination with recanalisation therapies are a promising therapeutic approach in acute ischaemic stroke. Glenzocimab is an antibody fragment that inhibits the action of platelet glycoprotein VI. We aimed to determine and assess the safety and efficacy of the optimal dose of glenzocimab in patients with acute ischaemic stroke eligible to receive alteplase with or without mechanical thrombectomy.

METHODS

This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with dose-escalation (1b) and dose-confirmation (2a) phases (ACTIMIS) was done in 26 stroke centres in six European countries. Participants were adults (≥18 years) with disabling acute ischaemic stroke with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 6 or higher before alteplase administration. Patients were randomly assigned treatment using a central electronic procedure. Total administered dose at the end of the intravenous administration was 125 mg, 250 mg, 500 mg, and 1000 mg of glenzocimab or placebo in phase 1b and 1000 mg of glenzocimab or placebo in phase 2a. Treatment was initiated 4·5 h or earlier from stroke symptom onset in patients treated with alteplase with or without mechanical thrombectomy. The sponsor, study investigator and study staff, patients, and central laboratories were all masked to study treatment until database lock. Primary endpoints across both phases were safety, mortality, and intracranial haemorrhage (symptomatic, total, and fatal), assessed in all patients who received at least a partial dose of study medication (safety set). The trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03803007, and is complete.

FINDINGS

Between March 6, 2019, and June 27, 2021, 60 recruited patients were randomly assigned to 125 mg, 250 mg, 500 mg, or 1000 mg glenzocimab, or to placebo in phase 1b (n=12 per group) and were included in the safety analysis. Glenzocimab 1000 mg was well tolerated and selected as the phase 2a recommended dose; from Oct 2, 2020, to June 27, 2021, 106 patients were randomly assigned to glenzocimab 1000 mg (n=53) or placebo (n=53). One patient in the placebo group received glenzocimab in error and therefore 54 and 52, respectively, were included in the safety set. In phase 2a, the most frequent treatment-emergent adverse event was non-symptomatic haemorrhagic transformation, which occurred in 17 (31%) of 54 patients treated with glenzocimab and 26 (50%) of 52 patients treated with placebo. Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage occurred in no patients treated with glenzocimab compared with five (10%) patients in the placebo group. All-cause deaths were lower with glenzocimab 1000 mg (four [7%] patients) than with placebo (11 [21%] patients).

INTERPRETATION

Glenzocimab 1000 mg in addition to alteplase, with or without mechanical thrombectomy, was well tolerated, and might reduce serious adverse events, intracranial haemorrhage, and mortality. These findings support the need for future research into the potential therapeutic inhibition of glycoprotein VI with glenzocimab plus alteplase in patients with acute ischaemic stroke.

FUNDING

Acticor Biotech.

No-reflow after stroke reperfusion therapy: An emerging phenomenon to be explored

In the field of stroke thrombectomy, ineffective clinical and angiographic reperfusion after successful recanalization has drawn attention. Partial or complete microcirculatory reperfusion failure after the achievement of full patency of a former obstructed large vessel, known as the "no-reflow phenomenon" or "microvascular obstruction," was first reported in the 1960s and was later detected in both experimental models and patients with stroke. The no-reflow phenomenon (NRP) was reported to result from intraluminal occlusions formed by blood components and extraluminal constriction exerted by the surrounding structures of the vessel wall. More recently, an emerging number of clinical studies have estimated the prevalence of the NRP in stroke patients following reperfusion therapy, ranging from 3.3% to 63% depending on its evaluation methods or study population. Studies also demonstrated its detrimental effects on infarction progress and neurological outcomes. In this review, we discuss the research advances, underlying pathogenesis, diagnostic techniques, and management approaches concerning the no-reflow phenomenon in the stroke population to provide a comprehensive understanding of this phenomenon and offer references for future investigations.

Safety of Antithrombotic Therapy within 24 Hours after Recombinant Tissue-Plasminogen Activator Treatment for Large-Artery Atherosclerosis Stroke: Insights from Emergent PTA/CAS Cases

BACKGROUND

Antithrombotic therapy (AT) should generally be avoided within 24 hours after recombinant tissue-plasminogen activator (rt-PA) treatment but should be considered in patients with large-artery atherosclerosis (LAA) who undergo concomitant emergent endovascular treatment (EVT). The aim of the present study was to assess the safety of AT within 24 hours after rt-PA treatment in patients with hyperacute ischemic stroke due to LAA who received concomitant EVT.

METHODS

From January 2013 through July 2019, consecutive patients with acute ischemic cerebrovascular disease due to LAA who were admitted within 6 hours from symptom onset were recruited. The patients were classified into six groups based on the reperfusion treatment and early (within 24 hours) AT from rt-PA treatment. Safety outcomes were compared among the groups.

RESULTS

A total of 155 patients (35 women [23%], median age 74 [IQR 66-79] years; NIHSS score 3 [1-10]) were included in the present study. Of these, 73 (47%) received no reperfusion therapy, 24 (15%) received rt-PA treatment and early AT, seven (6%) received rt-PA without early AT, 26 (17%) received EVT only, six (4%) received both rt-PA and EVT without early AT, and 19 (12%) received rt-PA and EVT with early AT. AT was administered a median of 3.9 (1.6-8.0) hours after rt-PA in patients with rt-PA+EVT with early AT. AT within 24 hours after rt-PA and EVT treatment did not increase hemorrhagic complications (p > 0.05 for all).

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective analyses, early AT administration for patients with hyperacute stroke due to LAA treated with rt-PA plus EVT did not increase hemorrhagic events.

Prevalence and Outcomes of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke and Concomitant Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (Results from the National Inpatient Sample 2016 to 2019)

Acute myocardial infarction (MI) may concomitantly occur with acute ischemic stroke. The incidence and outcomes of acute non-ST-elevation MI (NSTEMI) in acute ischemic stroke are not well studied. We examined hospitalized patients with acute ischemic stroke and a concomitant NSTEMI diagnosis who were included in the National Inpatient Sample 2016 to 2019. Acute ischemic stroke and NSTEMI were defined by using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes. Patients with ST-elevation MI were excluded. The outcomes were expressed as percentages. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to examine the association of concomitant acute ischemic stroke and NSTEMI with the primary outcome of mortality and the secondary outcomes. A subgroup analysis of patients with NSTEMI with acute ischemic stroke that underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (angiography and angioplasty) was also performed. Of the total hospitalized patients with acute ischemic stroke (n = 1,726,265), 1.60% (n = 27,630) patients (mean age 73.5 years, 52.2% women, 67% White race) had NSTEMI diagnosed during the hospitalization. Of these, 14.1% (n = 3,890) died in the NSTEMI group and 3.4% (n = 57,670) died in the non-NSTEMI group. The most common outcomes in the NSTEMI group were Acute kidney injury 31.8%, Intracranial hemorrhage 6.6%, and sepsis 6.13%. NSTEMI in acute ischemic stroke was associated with mortality (odds ratio [OR] 3.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.29 to 3.93, p ≤0.001), ICH (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.30 to 1.63, p <0.001), and having any of the secondary outcomes (OR 2.73, 95% CI 2.57 to 2.90, p <0.001). PCI was performed in 9.14% of patients with acute ischemic stroke with NSTEMI. PCI was associated with having any of the secondary outcomes (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.7 to 1.02, p = 0.8), mortality (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.54, p <0.001), and ICH (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.7, p = 0.01). In conclusion, NSTEMI in acute ischemic stroke is associated with increased mortality and other adverse events. PCI in the subgroup of patients with NSTEMI was not associated with increased mortality or intracranial bleeding.

Safety Outcomes of Mechanical Thrombectomy Versus Combined Thrombectomy and Intravenous Thrombolysis in Tandem Lesions

BACKGROUND

We aimed to describe the safety and efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) with or without intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) for patients with tandem lesions and whether using intraprocedural antiplatelet therapy influences MT's safety with IVT treatment.

METHODS

This is a subanalysis of a pooled, multicenter cohort of patients with acute anterior circulation tandem lesions treated with MT from 16 stroke centers between January 2015 and December 2020. Primary outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and parenchymal hematoma type 2. Additional outcomes included hemorrhagic transformation, successful reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score 2b-3), complete reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score 3), favorable functional outcome (90-day modified Rankin Scale score 0-2), excellent functional outcome (90-day modified Rankin Scale score 0-1), in-hospital mortality, and 90-day mortality.

RESULTS

Of 691 patients, 512 were included (218 underwent IVT+MT and 294 MT alone). There was no difference in the risk of sICH (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.22 [95% CI, 0.60-2.51]; P=0.583), parenchymal hematoma type 2 (aOR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.47-2.08]; P=0.985), and hemorrhagic transformation (aOR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.62-1.46]; P=0.817) between the IVT+MT and MT alone groups after adjusting for confounders. Administration of IVT was associated with an increased risk of sICH in patients who received intravenous antiplatelet therapy (aOR, 3.04 [95% CI, 0.99-9.37]; P=0.05). The IVT+MT group had higher odds of a 90-day modified Rankin Scale score 0 to 2 (aOR, 1.72 [95% CI, 1.01-2.91]; P=0.04). The odds of successful reperfusion, complete reperfusion, 90-day modified Rankin Scale score 0 to 1, in-hospital mortality, or 90-day mortality did not differ between the IVT+MT versus MT alone groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that the combination of IVT with MT for tandem lesions did not increase the overall risk of sICH, parenchymal hematoma type 2, or overall hemorrhagic transformation independently of the cervical revascularization technique used. However, intraprocedural intravenous antiplatelet therapy during acute stent implantation might be associated with an increased risk of sICH in patients who received IVT before MT. Importantly, IVT+MT treatment was associated with a higher rate of favorable functional outcomes at 90 days.

Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke due to Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease: Identification, Medical and Interventional Treatment, and Outcomes

Large vessel occlusion stroke due to underlying intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD-LVO) is prevalent in 10 to 30% of LVOs depending on patient factors such as vascular risk factors, race and ethnicity, and age. Patients with ICAD-LVO derive similar functional outcome benefit from endovascular thrombectomy as other mechanisms of LVO, but up to half of ICAD-LVO patients reocclude after revascularization. Therefore, early identification and treatment planning for ICAD-LVO are important given the unique considerations before, during, and after endovascular thrombectomy. In this review of ICAD-LVO, we propose a multistep approach to ICAD-LVO identification, pretreatment and endovascular thrombectomy considerations, adjunctive medications, and medical management. There have been no large-scale randomized controlled trials dedicated to studying ICAD-LVO, therefore this review focuses on observational studies.

Effects of intravenous thrombolysis with and without salvianolic acids for injection on the functional recovery of patients with acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis

In patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS), the effect of salvianolic acids for injection (SAFI) as the secondary treatment after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is unclear. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of SAFI for patients with AIS undergoing IVT. We searched seven electronic databases and two registries from inception to July 24, 2022, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of SAFI plus recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) on the functional recovery compared to rt-PA alone in patients with AIS. Two independent authors selected RCTs, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. A meta-analysis was conducted. Eight RCTs involving 682 patients with AIS were included. Compared to patients receiving intravenous rt-PA alone, those receiving intravenous rt-PA combined with SAFI had a higher likelihood of achieving favorable functional outcomes at 3 months. In addition, the use of SAFI for 2 weeks was associated with better neurological recovery. The evidence of benefit was confirmed by trial sequential analysis (TSA). The incidence of intracranial hemorrhage did not differ between the two groups. In patients with AIS, intravenous rt-PA combined with SAFI might achieve better functional outcomes. However, further high-quality studies are needed to firmly establish the clinical efficacy of SAFI.

The relationship between antiplatelet therapies and the outcome of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke

PURPOSE

We conducted this study to investigate the safety and efficacy of antiplatelet therapies (APT) for acute ischemic patients received endovascular treatment (EVT).

METHODS

The population of our study was derived from a nationwide multicentered registry conducted by 111 centers in China. Patients were divided to groups of no APT, single APT (SAPT) or dual APT (DAPT) according to the APT received at 24 h after EVT. The primary outcome was 90-day functional independence, and the safety outcomes included the symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), any type of intracranial hemorrhage, and all-caused death within 90 days. Patient characteristics, procedural data, and outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 1679 patients were included in this study, 71.42% of whom received oral APT at 24 h after EVT, and the initial time was 20.53(13.94-27.17) hours after recanalization or the end of procedure. 90-day functional independence was significantly more observed in patients with DAPT (54.02% vs. 33.64%; adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.940, 95% CI 1.444-2.606), but not in SAPT (40.75% vs. 33.64%; adjusted OR 1.280, 95% CI 0.907-1.804) compared with patients without APT. APT increased the risk of sICH (1.14% vs. 0, p = 0.036). Both the application of DAPT (adjusted OR 0.264, 95% CI 0.178-0.392, p < 0.001) and SAPT (adjusted OR 0.341, 95% CI 0.213-0.545, p < 0.001) could reduce the 90-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

In this uncontrolled series of patients APT at 24 h after EVT showed improvement of the patients' functional independence and reduction of mortality, even though the rate of sICH was increased, especially in the DAPT-group.

Safety and efficacy of tirofiban in acute ischemic stroke due to tandem lesions undergoing mechanical thrombectomy: A multicenter randomized clinical trial (ATILA) protocol

Background

In-stent thrombosis after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) worsen outcomes in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to tandem lesions (TL). Although an optimal antiplatelet therapy is needed, the best approach to avoid in-stent thrombosis is yet to be elucidated.

Hypothesis

Low-dose intravenous tirofiban is superior to intravenous aspirin in avoiding in-stent thrombosis in patients undergoing MT plus carotid stenting in the setting of AIS due to TL.

Methods

The ATILA-trial is a multicenter, prospective, phase IV, randomized, controlled (aspirin group as control), assessor-blinded clinical trial. Patients fulfilling inclusion criteria (AIS due to TL, ASPECTS ⩾ 6, pre-stroke modified Rankin Scale ⩽2 and onset <24 h) will be randomized (1:1) at MT onset to experimental (intravenous tirofiban) or control group (intravenous aspirin). Intravenous aspirin will be administered at a 500 mg single dose and tirofiban at a 500 µg bolus followed by a 200 µg/h infusion during first 22 h. All patients will be followed up to 3 months. Sample size estimated is 240 patients.

Outcomes

The primary efficacy outcome is the proportion of patients with carotid in-stent thrombosis within the first 24 h after MT. The primary safety outcome is the rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Secondary outcomes include functional independence defined as modified Rankin Scale 0-2, proportion of patients undergoing rescue therapy due to in-stent aggregation during MT and carotid reocclusion at 30 days.

Discussion

ATILA-trial will be the first clinical trial regarding the best antiplatelet therapy to avoid in-stent thrombosis after MT in patients with TL.

Trial registration

NCT0522596.

Outcome and risk of hemorrhage in patients with tandem lesions after endovascular treatment: A propensity score-matched case-control study

Objectives

Endovascular treatment of acute stroke patients with large vessel occlusions is well established. But tandem lesions of the internal carotid artery and the intracranial anterior circulation remain a challenge regarding the technical conditions and the putative higher risk of hemorrhage due to often required antiplatelet therapy.This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcome and the risk of hemorrhage after endovascular treatment of tandem lesions, with special regard to the periprocedural antiplatelet regimen.

Materials and Methods

In this retrospective study, we included 63 consecutive stroke patients with endovascular treated tandem lesions. One hundred eleven patients with a solitary intracranial occlusion were matched using a "propensity score-matched analysis" with the covariates sex, age, wake-up stroke, iv-thrombolysis and NIHSS.

Results

Rates of successful recanalization (mTICI 2b/3) and periprocedural complications were equal in both groups (P = 0.19; P = 0.35). The rate of good clinical outcome (mRS≤2) was similar, and the incidence of symptomatic hemorrhages was not significantly different (7.9% tandem lesions vs. 5.4% isolated intracranial occlusion, P = 0.51). Even intensified antiplatelet therapy in patients with tandem lesions did not increase the rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhages (P = 0.87).

Conclusions

Clinical outcome and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhages did not differ significantly between endovascular treated patients with tandem lesions and matched patients with solitary intracranial occlusions, regardless of the antiplatelet regimen. Therefore, the complex technical requirements for recanalization of a tandem lesion and the putative higher risk should not result in reluctant treatment that would decrease the chance of a good clinical outcome.

Safety outcomes of early initiation of antithrombotic agents within 24 h after intravenous alteplase at 0.6 mg/kg

BACKGROUND

We examined outcome of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with administration of antithrombotics within 24 h after intravenous low-dose alteplase.

METHODS

Consecutive AIS patients who were treated with intravenous alteplase at 0.6 mg/kg from 2005 to 2021 were retrospectively included in our single-center registry. Patients were classified into two groups: those who received antithrombotics within 24 h after intravenous alteplase (early initiation group) and those who did not (control group). Safety outcomes were any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), symptomatic ICH (sICH) within 36 h after onset, and death within 3 months. sICH was defined as any ICH with a ≥ 4-point increase in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score or death within 36 h.

RESULTS

Of 1111 patients (women, 426; median age, 76 [interquartile range, 69-83] years; median NIHSS score, 11 [6-19]; cardioembolism, 580 [52.2%]), early initiation group comprised 58 patients (22; 72 [65-80] years; 7 [4-12]; 11 [19.0%]) and control group comprised 1053 patients (404; 77 [69-84] years; 11 [6-19]; 569 [54.1%]). No significant between-group differences were observed in the incidence of any ICH (17.2% vs. 21.6%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57-2.44), sICH (0% vs. 0.9%, P = 1.00), or death within 3 months (5.2% vs. 6.7%; aOR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.36-4.23).

CONCLUSIONS

Early initiation of antithrombotics after intravenous alteplase at 0.6 mg/kg did not increase the rate of sICH or death within 3 months and may be used with caution in patients with advanced neurological deterioration.

Tirofiban for Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Receiving Intravenous Thrombolysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Tirofiban has been used as a rescue when thrombectomy is not successful in endovascular therapy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS), but the use of tirofiban after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is controversial. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of tirofiban combined with IVT in AIS compared with not receiving tirofiban.

METHODS

The PubMed and Embase databases were searched for all relevant studies published up to August 31, 2021. The safety endpoints included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and mortality. The efficacy endpoint was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at the 3-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Seven articles (1,036 patients) were included. Of these, 444 patients received tirofiban, and 592 patients did not. Meta-analysis showed that tirofiban did not increase the risk of sICH (OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.50-1.93; p = 0.96), any ICH (OR 0.94; 95% CI 0.63-1.39; p = 0.75) or mortality (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.39-1.15; p = 0.15) and tended to be associated with a favorable functional outcome (OR 1.33; 95% CI 0.99-1.78; p = 0.06) in patients with AIS. Subgroup analysis showed that bridging therapy combined with tirofiban could reduce mortality (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.23-0.98; p = 0.04). Tirofiban significantly improved the favorable functional outcome in patients with IVT only (non-EVT) (OR 1.98; 95% CI 1.30-3.02; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Intravenous tirofiban could be safe for patients with AIS undergoing IVT, regardless of receiving EVT. Intravenous tirofiban may reduce mortality rates for patients undergoing bridging therapy. It also could increase the likelihood of a favorable functional outcome, especially for patients receiving IVT only.

Effects of prior antiplatelet use on futile reperfusion in patients with acute ischemic stroke receiving endovascular treatment

Introduction:

We evaluated the effects of prior antiplatelet use (APU) on futile reperfusion (FR) after endovascular treatment (EVT) in acute ischemic stroke.

Material and methods:

We consecutively collected data of 9369 patients with acute ischemic stroke from four university-affiliated multicenter registry databases over 92 months. We enrolled 528 patients with acute stroke receiving EVT. Among them, we defined FR in subjects as a 3-month modified Rankin Scale score of >2 despite successful reperfusion after EVT. We classified patients into two groups: prior APU and no prior APU. We used propensity score matching (PSM) to overcome the imbalance in multiple covariates between the two groups. After PSM, we compared the baseline characteristics between the two groups and performed multivariate analysis to determine whether prior APU affected FR and other stroke outcomes.

Results:

The overall FR rate in the present study was 54.2%. In the PSM cohort, the FR was lower in the prior APU group than that in the no prior APU group (66.2% vs 41.5%, p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis using the PSM cohort, prior APU significantly reduced the risk of FR (odds ratio (OR), 0.32; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.18–0.55; p = 0.001) and stroke progression (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.15–0.93; p = 0.03). Prior APU was not associated with symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation in this study.

Conclusion:

Prior APU potentially reduced FR and stroke progression. Further, prior APU was not associated with symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation in patients receiving EVT. APU pretreatment can be a modifiable predictor of FR in clinical practice.

Acute ischaemic stroke: recent advances in reperfusion treatment

During the last 5–7 years, tremendous progress was achieved in the reperfusion treatment of acute ischaemic stroke during its first few hours from symptom onset. This review summarizes the latest evidence from randomized clinical trials and prospective registries with a focus on endovascular treatment using stent retrievers, aspiration catheters, thrombolytics, and (in selected patients) carotid stenting. Novel approaches in prehospital (mobile interventional stroke teams) and early hospital (direct transfer to angiography) management are described, and future perspectives (‘all-in-one’ laboratories with angiography and computed tomography integrated) are discussed. There is reasonable chance for patients with moderate-to-severe acute ischaemic stroke to survive without permanent sequelae when the large-vessel occlusion is removed by means of modern pharmaco-mechanic approach. Catheter thrombectomy is now the golden standard of acute stroke treatment. The role of cardiologists in stroke is expanding from diagnostic help (to reveal the cause of stroke) to acute therapy in those regions where such up-to-date Class I. A treatment is not yet available.

Navigating Antiplatelet Treatment Options for Stroke: Evidence-Based and Pragmatic Strategies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The benefit of using antiplatelet monotherapy in acute ischemic stroke and secondary stroke prevention is well established. In the last few years, several large randomized trials showed that the use of short-term dual antiplatelet therapy in particular stroke subtypes may reduce the risk of recurrent ischemic events. The aim of this article is to provide a critical analysis of the current evidence and recommendations for the use of antiplatelet agents for stroke prevention.

RECENT FINDINGS

Long-term therapy with aspirin, clopidogrel, or aspirin plus extended-release dipyridamole is recommended for secondary stroke prevention in patients with noncardioembolic ischemic stroke. Short-term dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel is superior to antiplatelet monotherapy in secondary stroke prevention when used in patients with mild noncardioembolic stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack. Dual therapy, however, is associated with an increased risk of major bleeding, particularly when the treatment is extended for greater than 30 days. Similarly, aspirin plus ticagrelor is superior to aspirin monotherapy for the prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke, although this combination is associated with a higher risk of hemorrhagic complications when compared to other dual antiplatelet regimens. Among patients who carry CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms associated with a slow bioactivation of clopidogrel, short-term treatment with aspirin plus ticagrelor is superior to aspirin plus clopidogrel for the reduction of recurrent stroke; however, the use of ticagrelor is associated with a higher risk of any bleeding. In patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis, aggressive medical management in addition to dual antiplatelet therapy up to 90 days is recommended. Antiplatelet therapy has an essential role in the management of ischemic stroke. The specific antiplatelet regimen should be individualized based on the stroke characteristics, time from symptom onset, and patient-specific predisposition to develop hemorrhagic complications.

Early tirofiban administration for patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis or bridging therapy: Systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

In the present systematic review and meta-analysis, we sought to compare the efficacy and safety of tirofiban administered in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) with or without mechanical thrombectomy (MT).

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and the Cochrane Library for randomized clinical trials and observational studies published between 2001 and 2021 that provided outcomes of AIS patients who underwent IVT alone or IVT bridging with or without tirofiban. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2 at 90 days. The secondary outcomes included the rates of (1) an excellent outcome defined as a mRS score of 0 or 1 at 90 days, (2) any type of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), (3) symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), (4) mortality, and (5) successful recanalization.

RESULTS

We included 722 patients with IVT bridging therapy in 3 trials; there were 171 patients in the tirofiban group and 551 patients in the nontirofiban group. We included 846 patients with IVT alone in 7 studies; there were 471 patients in the tirofiban group and 375 patients in the nontirofiban group. The patients treated with tirofiban had a reduced risk of mortality compared to the patients treated without tirofiban during IVT bridging (OR, 0.46; 95 % CI, 0.24-0.89; p = 0.02), but no significant differences were found in safety outcomes on sICH, ICH, recanalization or efficacy outcomes on modified Rankin scale 0-2 (p > 0.05). Pooled results showed that tirofiban combined with IVT alone did not increase the risks of sICH, ICH or mortality but was significantly associated with excellent (OR, 2.68; 95 % CI, 1.58-4.55; P = 0.0003) and favorable (OR, 2.36; 95 % CI, 1.58-3.52; p < 0.0001) functional outcomes at 90 days.

CONCLUSION

In AIS patients who underwent IVT or bridging therapy, early administration of tirofiban may be effective and safe, but further studies are needed to confirm the efficacy.

Early Antiplatelet for Minor Stroke following Thrombolysis (EAST): Rationale and Design

BACKGROUND

Early neurological deterioration (END) occurs in about 10% of patients after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), and is related to poor outcome. In theory, early antiplatelet following IVT could reduce END by preventing re-occlusion and stroke progression, but current guidelines recommend starting antiplatelet treatment at 24 hours after IVT due to concerns about hemorrhagic transformation. Given higher risk of hemorrhagic transformation in severe stroke, we hypothesized that minor stroke patients following IVT can safely benefit from early antiplatelet treatment.

AIMS

To explore the efficacy and safety of early antiplatelet in minor stroke patients after IVT.Sample size estimates: A maximum of 1022 patients are required to test the superiority hypothesis with 80% power according to a two-side 0.05 level of significance, stratified by age, gender, history of stroke or transient ischemic attack, history of hypertension, history of diabetes mellitus, systolic blood pressure at admission, time from IVT to treatment, thrombolysis drug, stroke territory, and stroke etiology.

DESIGN

Early antiplatelet for minor stroke following thrombolysis is a prospective, double blinded, multicenter, randomized and placebo-controlled trial. Minor stroke patients within 6h following IVT are randomly assigned into experimental group and control group with the ratio of 1:1. The experimental group is orally administered with 300 mg clopidogrel and 100 mg aspirin, and control group with placebo. Subsequently, both groups received guideline-based antithrombotic treatment from 24 hours after IVT to 90 days.

OUTCOME

The primary efficacy endpoint is excellent functional outcome, defined as the modified Rankin Scale 0-1 at 90 days after randomization, while primary safety endpoint is symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, defined as National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score increase ≥4 caused by intracranial hemorrhage within 36 hours after randomization.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of EAST will provide us powerful early antiplatelet evidence for minor stroke population following intravenous thrombolysis in clinical practice.

Safety and efficacy of low-dose rt-PA with tirofiban to treat acute non-cardiogenic stroke: a single-center randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The recanalization rate after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is not enough and there is still the possibility of re-occlusion. We aim to investigate the effectiveness and safety of infusing tirofiban after IVT.

METHODS

We performed a prospective controlled study of 60 patients with acute non-cardiogenic ischemic stroke who were hospitalized in Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital from January 2018 to December 2019. The patients were divided into 2 groups: those who received tirofiban for 24 h after IVT (rt-PA + T group) and those who did not receive postprocedural intravenous tirofiban (rt-PA group). The rt-PA + T group received low-dose rt-PA (0.6 mg/kg). The rt-PA group received standard dose rt-PA (0.9 mg/kg). The main outcome measure were safety, included the symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), any ICH, severe systemic bleeding, and mortality. The secondary outcome measure is curative efficacy which were evaluated by the 7d-NIHSS score and functional outcomes at 90 days. During hospitalization, the deterioration of neurological function was recorded.

RESULTS

All patients completed the follow-up with complete data, there were 30 patients in each of groups. The general characteristics between the two group patients had no statistically significant differences. Compared with the rt-PA + T group and the rt-PA group, in terms of safety, the rates of the sICH, severe systemic bleeding, and mortality in both groups were 0, and there was no statistically significant difference in the rates of any ICH between the two groups (10.0% vs. 3.3%, P = 0.306). In terms of efficacy, the rate of the early neurological deterioration events (END) was no statistical significance (0 vs. 6.6%, P = 0.246). There was no significant difference in the NIHSS score between the two groups before the IVT, and also at 24 h, however, the 7d-NIHSS score was lower in the rt-PA + T group compared with the rt-PA group (2.33 ± 1.85 vs. 4.80 ± 4.02, P = 0.004). At 90 days, 83.3% of patients in the rt-PA + T group had favorable functional outcomes compared with 60.0% of patients in the rt-PA group (P = 0.045).

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose rt-PA combined with tirofiban in acute non-cardiogenic ischemic stroke did not increase the risk of ICH, and mortality, and it was associated with neurological improvement.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial has been registered at the ChiCTR and identified as ChiCTR1800014666 (28/01/2018).

Emergency Cervical Carotid Artery Stenting After Intravenous Thrombolysis in Patients With Hyperacute Ischemic Stroke

BACKGROUND

Intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (IV rtPA) is the mainstay of treatment for acute ischemic stroke to recanalize thrombosed intracranial vessels within 4.5 hours. Emergency carotid artery stenting for the treatment of acute stroke due to steno-occlusion of the proximal internal carotid artery (ICA) can improve symptoms, prevent neurological deterioration, and reduce recurrent stroke risk. The feasibility and safety of the combination therapy of IV rtPA and urgent carotid artery stenting have not been established.

METHODS

From November 2005 to October 2020, we retrospectively assessed patients who had undergone emergent carotid artery stenting after IV rtPA for hyperacute ischemic stroke due to steno-occlusive proximal ICA lesion. Hemorrhagic transformation, successful recanalization, modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days, and stent patency at 3 and 12 months or longer were evaluated. Favorable outcome was defined as a 90-days mRS score of ≤ 2.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients with hyperacute stroke had undergone emergent carotid artery stenting after IV rtPA therapy. Their median age was 70 (67.5-73.5) years (94.7% men). Among 15 patients with an additional intracranial occlusion after flow restoration in the proximal ICA, a modified TICI grade ≥ 2b was achieved in 11 patients (73.3%). Hemorrhagic transformation occurred in five patients (26.3%); mortality rate was 5.7%. Eleven patients (57.9%) had favorable outcomes at 90 days. Stent patients (94.1%) maintained stent patency for ≥ 12 months.

CONCLUSION

We showed that emergent carotid artery stenting after IV rtPA therapy for hyperacute stroke caused by atherosclerotic proximal ICA steno-occlusion was feasible and safe.

Safety and Efficacy of Tirofiban During Intravenous Thrombolysis Bridging to Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients: A Meta-Analysis

Introduction

The safety and efficacy of tirofiban in intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) bridging to mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is unknown. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of tirofiban in IVT bridging to mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke.

Methods

We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wan Fang databases for randomized controlled trials and observational studies (case-control studies and cohort studies) comparing the tirofiban and non-tirofiban groups in AIS intravenous thrombolysis bridging to mechanical thrombectomy (Published by November 20, 2021). Our primary safety endpoints were symptomatic cerebral hemorrhage (sICH), intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), postoperative re-occlusion, and 3-month mortality; the efficacy endpoints were 3-month favorable functional outcome (MRS ≤ 2) and successful recanalization rate (modified thrombolytic therapy in cerebral infarction (mTICI) 2b or 3).

Results

A total of 7 studies with 1,176 patients were included in this meta-analysis. A comprehensive analysis of the included literature showed that the difference between the tirofiban and non-tirofiban groups in terms of successful recanalization (OR = 1.19, 95% Cl [0.69, 2.03], p = 0.53, I² = 22%) and favorable functional outcome at 3 months (OR = 1.13, 95% Cl [0.81, 1.60], p = 0.47, I² = 17%) in patients with IVT bridging mechanical thrombectomy of AIS was not statistically significant. Also, the differences in the incidence of sICH (OR = 0.97, 95% Cl [0.58, 1.62], p = 0.89) and ICH (OR = 0.83, 95% Cl [0.55, 1.24], p = 0.36) between the two groups were not statistically significant. However, the use of tirofiban during IVT bridging mechanical thrombectomy reduced the rate of postoperative re-occlusion (OR = 0.36, 95% Cl [0.14, 0.91], p = 0.03) and mortality within 3 months (OR = 0.54, 95% Cl [0.33, 0.87], p = 0.01) in patients.

Conclusion

The use of tirofiban during IVT bridging mechanical thrombectomy for AIS does not increase the risk of sICH and ICH in patients and reduces the risk of postoperative re-occlusion and mortality in patients within 3 months. However, this result needs to be further confirmed by additional large-sample, multicenter, prospective randomized controlled trials.

Systematic Review Registration

http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier: CRD42022297441.

Stroke outcome of early antiplatelet in post-thrombolysis haemorrhagic infarction

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Initiation of early antiplatelet (EA) therapy after acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) is essential. We aimed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of EA therapy in patients who had an AIS with haemorrhagic infarction (HI) after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT).

METHODS

Based on a multicentre stroke registry database, patients who had an AIS with post-thrombolysis HI at 24 hours were identified. EA users and non-EA users were defined as patients with HI who received or did not receive antiplatelet therapy between 24 and 48 hours after IVT. Primary outcome was favourable outcome defined as modified Rankin Scale scores 0-2 at 3 months. Secondary outcomes were early neurological deterioration (END) and haemorrhagic transformation expansion.

RESULTS

A total of 842 patients with HI were identified from 24 061 thrombolytic patients within 4.5 hours, and 341 (40.5%) received EA therapy. EA users were more likely to have a favourable outcome (55.7% vs 39.5%, OR 1.565; 95% CI 1.122 to 2.182; p=0.008) and lower rate of END (12.6% vs 21.4%, OR 0.585; 95% CI 0.391 to 0.875; p=0.009) compared with non-EA users. EA therapy was not associated with haemorrhagic transformation expansion (p=0.125). After propensity score matching, EA therapy was still independently associated with favourable outcome (54.3% vs 46.3%, OR 1.495; 95% CI 1.031 to 2.167; p=0.038) and lower risk of END (13.5% vs 21.2%, OR 0.544; 95% CI 0.350 to 0.845; p=0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Antiplatelet therapy can be safely used between 24 and 48 hours when HI occurs after IVT, and such therapy is associated with reduced risk of END and improved neurological outcome in patients who had an AIS.

Safety and efficacy of aspirin, unfractionated heparin, both, or neither during endovascular stroke treatment (MR CLEAN-MED): an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Aspirin and unfractionated heparin are often used during endovascular stroke treatment to improve reperfusion and outcomes. However, the effects and risks of anti-thrombotics for this indication are unknown. We therefore aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of intravenous aspirin, unfractionated heparin, both, or neither started during endovascular treatment in patients with ischaemic stroke.

METHODS

We did an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial with a 2 × 3 factorial design in 15 centres in the Netherlands. We enrolled adult patients (ie, ≥18 years) with ischaemic stroke due to an intracranial large-vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation in whom endovascular treatment could be initiated within 6 h of symptom onset. Eligible patients had a score of 2 or more on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, and a CT or MRI ruling out intracranial haemorrhage. Randomisation was done using a web-based procedure with permuted blocks and stratified by centre. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either periprocedural intravenous aspirin (300 mg bolus) or no aspirin, and randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive moderate-dose unfractionated heparin (5000 IU bolus followed by 1250 IU/h for 6 h), low-dose unfractionated heparin (5000 IU bolus followed by 500 IU/h for 6 h), or no unfractionated heparin. The primary outcome was the score on the modified Rankin Scale at 90 days. Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage was the main safety outcome. Analyses were based on intention to treat, and treatment effects were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) or common ORs, with adjustment for baseline prognostic factors. This trial is registered with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number, ISRCTN76741621.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 22, 2018, and Jan 27, 2021, we randomly assigned 663 patients; of whom, 628 (95%) provided deferred consent or died before consent could be asked and were included in the modified intention-to-treat population. On Feb 4, 2021, after unblinding and analysis of the data, the trial steering committee permanently stopped patient recruitment and the trial was stopped for safety concerns. The risk of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage was higher in patients allocated to receive aspirin than in those not receiving aspirin (43 [14%] of 310 vs 23 [7%] of 318; adjusted OR 1·95 [95% CI 1·13-3·35]) as well as in patients allocated to receive unfractionated heparin than in those not receiving unfractionated heparin (44 [13%] of 332 vs 22 [7%] of 296; 1·98 [1·14-3·46]). Both aspirin (adjusted common OR 0·91 [95% CI 0·69-1·21]) and unfractionated heparin (0·81 [0·61-1·08]) led to a non-significant shift towards worse modified Rankin Scale scores.

INTERPRETATION

Periprocedural intravenous aspirin and unfractionated heparin during endovascular stroke treatment are both associated with an increased risk of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage without evidence for a beneficial effect on functional outcome.

FUNDING

The Collaboration for New Treatments of Acute Stroke consortium, the Brain Foundation Netherlands, the Ministry of Economic Affairs, Stryker, Medtronic, Cerenovus, and the Dutch Heart Foundation.

Antiplatelet Use in Ischemic Stroke

Objective:

A literature review of antiplatelet agents for primary and secondary stroke prevention, including mechanism of action, cost, and reasons for lack of benefit.

Data sources:

Articles were gathered from MEDLINE, Cochrane Reviews, and PubMed databases (1980-2021). Abstracts from scientific meetings were considered. Search terms included ischemic stroke, aspirin, clopidogrel, dipyridamole, ticagrelor, cilostazol, prasugrel, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors.

Study selection and data extraction:

English-language original and review articles were evaluated. Guidelines from multiple countries were reviewed. Articles were evaluated independently by 2 authors.

Data synthesis:

An abundance of evidence supports aspirin and clopidogrel use for secondary stroke prevention. In the acute phase (first 21 days postinitial stroke), these medications have higher efficacy for preventing further stroke when combined, but long-term combination therapy is associated with higher hemorrhage rates. Antiplatelet treatment failure is influenced by poor adherence and genetic polymorphisms. Antiplatelet agents such as cilostazol may provide extra benefit over clopidogrel and aspirin, in certain racial groups, but further research in more diverse ethnic populations is needed.

Relevance to patient care and clinical practice:

This review presents the data available on the use of different antiplatelet agents poststroke. Dual therapy, recurrence after initiation of secondary preventative therapy, and areas for future research are discussed.

Conclusions:

Although good evidence exists for the use of certain antiplatelet agents postischemic stroke, there are considerable opportunities for future research to investigate personalized therapies. These include screening patients for platelet polymorphisms that confer antiplatelet resistance and for randomized trials including more racially diverse populations.

Reflection on the Past, Present, and Future of Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke

More than 25 years have passed since the US Food and Drug Administration approved IV recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (alteplase) for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. This landmark decision brought a previously untreatable disease into a new therapeutic landscape, providing inspiration for clinicians and hope to patients. Since that time, the use of alteplase in the clinical setting has become standard of care, continually improving with quality measures such as door-to-needle times and other metrics of specialized stroke unit care. The past decade has seen more widespread use of alteplase in the prehospital setting with mobile stroke units and telestroke and beyond initial time windows via the use of CT perfusion or MRI. Simultaneously, the position of alteplase is being challenged by new lytics and by the concept of its bypass altogether in the era of endovascular therapy. We provide an overview of alteplase, including its earliest trials and how they have shaped the current therapeutic landscape of ischemic stroke treatment, and touch on new frontiers for thrombolytic therapy. We highlight the critical role of thrombolytic therapy in the past, present, and future of ischemic stroke care.

Management of stroke in patients on antithrombotic therapy: Practical issues in the era of direct oral anticoagulants

Antithrombotic drugs (ADs) are the mainstay of secondary prevention of thrombotic vascular diseases. Management of patients under long-term treatment with ADs admitted for acute cerebrovascular disease, either ischemic stroke (IS) or intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), has become a frequent situation that might influence decision-making processes from diagnosis to therapeutic strategies. The aim of this review is to summarize current data from the literature to help clinicians in their decisions for stroke care in patients taking ADs. While a large body of data have made it possible to codify the management of patients presenting IS or ICH under antiplatelet drugs and vitamin K antagonists, the increasing use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAs) and future development of new antiplatelet drugs raise new problems. Development of rapid assessment tools measuring specific biological activity and reversion agents dedicated to each class of DOAs should make it possible to optimize individual therapeutic strategies. This review highlights the main steps of IS and ICH management from early identification of ADs, and use of dedicated biological assays, to the stepwise strategy to apply revascularization or reversal therapies and finally the resumption of ADs with a focus on individual clinical and radiological characteristics for more personalized care.

Fatal recurrent ischemic stroke caused by vertebral artery stump syndrome

Background:

Vertebral artery stump syndrome (VASS) develops into recurrent posterior circulation ischemic stroke after ipsilateral vertebral artery (VA) occlusion at its origin.

Case Description:

The patient was a 46-year-old man with the right posterior cerebral artery occlusion. We used a recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) and then performed mechanical thrombectomy using a stent retriever. Angiography revealed left VA occlusion and stagnant flow to the left VA from the right deep cervical artery; therefore, we diagnosed VASS. Within 24 h of the rt-PA injection, the symptoms had dramatically improved, and so we avoided additional antithrombotic agents. Only 13 h later, the patient developed a basilar artery occlusion and died in spite of a repeated mechanical thrombectomy.

Conclusion:

Vigilance against early (and sometimes fatal) recurrent stroke induced by VASS is required.

Tandem Lesions of the Vertebrobasilar System Treated by Thrombectomy and Vertebral Artery Stenting: A Case Report

Objective

There are few reports on endovascular treatment of tandem lesions in the posterior circulation and no consensus on treatment strategies has been reached. We report a case of tandem lesions of basilar artery occlusion and vertebral artery stenosis treated by thrombectomy and vertebral artery stenting.

Case Presentation

We present the case of a 73-year-old man who developed consciousness disorder and tetraplegia. Head and neck CTA revealed tandem left vertebral artery stenosis and basilar artery occlusion. The patient was treated using a reverse technique, which involves performing thrombectomy first and then vertebral artery stenting, along with Carotid Guardwire PS. Postoperative impairment of consciousness and improvement of tetraplegia were achieved.

Conclusion

The reverse technique combined with Carotid Guardwire PS may be a useful treatment strategy for tandem lesions in the posterior circulation.

Impact of Prior Antiplatelet Therapy on Outcomes After Endovascular Therapy for Acute Stroke: Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke Registry Results

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The influence of prior antiplatelet therapy (APT) uses on the outcomes of patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with endovascular therapy is unclear. We compared procedural and clinical outcomes of endovascular therapy in patients on APT or not before stroke onset.

METHODS

We analyzed 2 groups from the ongoing prospective multicenter Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke registry in France: patients on prior APT (APT+) and patients without prior APT (APT-) treated by endovascular therapy, with and without intravenous thrombolysis. Multilevel mixed-effects logistic models including center as random effect were used to compare angiographic (rates of reperfusion at the end of procedure, procedural complications) and clinical (favorable and excellent outcome, 90-day all-cause mortality, and hemorrhagic complications) outcomes according to APT subgroups. Comparisons were adjusted for prespecified confounders (age, admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score, intravenous thrombolysis, and time from onset to puncture), as well as for meaningful baseline between-group differences.

RESULTS

A total of 2939 patients were analyzed, of whom 877 (29.8%) were on prior APT. Patients with prior APT were older, had more frequent vascular risk factors, cardioembolic stroke mechanism, and prestroke disability. Rates of complete reperfusion (37.9% in the APT- group versus 42.7 % in the APT+ group; aOR, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.88-1.34]; P=0.41) and periprocedural complication (16.9% versus 13.3%; aOR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.7-1.2]; P=0.66) did not differ between the two groups. Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (aOR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.63-1.37]; P=0.73), 3 months favorable clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2; aOR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.77-1.25]; P=0.89), and mortality (aOR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.72-1.26]; P=0.76) at 90 days did not differ between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Prior APT does not influence angiographic and functional outcomes following endovascular therapy and should not be taken into account for acute revascularization strategies.

Acute ischemic stroke with cervical internal carotid artery steno-occlusive lesion: multicenter analysis of endovascular approaches

BACKGROUND

Occlusion of the internal carotid artery (ICA), whether isolated or in the setting of a tandem lesion (TL) have a poor response to treatment with intravenous thrombolysis. Previous studies ​​have demonstrated the superiority of mechanical thrombectomy in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) following large vessel occlusion, compared to standard intravenous fibrinolysis. The aim of our study was to describe endovascular treatment (EVT) in AIS due to isolated ICA occlusion or TL.

METHODS

We assessed the association between 90-day outcome and clinical, demographic, imaging, and procedure data in 51 consecutive patients with acute isolated ICA occlusion or TL who underwent EVT. We evaluated baseline NIHSS and mRS, ASPECTS, type of occlusion, stent placement, use of stent retrievers and/or thromboaspiration, duration of the procedure, mTICI, postprocedural therapy and complications.

RESULTS

A favorable 90-day outcome (mRS 0-2) was achieved in 34 patients (67 %) and was significantly associated with the use of dual antiplatelet therapy after the procedure (p = 0.008), shorter procedure duration (p = 0.031), TICI 2b-3 (p < 0.001) and lack of post-procedural hemorrhagic transformation (p = 0.001). Four patients did not survive, resulting in a mortality rate of 8 %.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study has shown that EVT in the treatment of AIS due to ICA occlusion is safe, and effective in determining a good functional outcome. ICA stenting led to good angiographic results and therapy with a glycoprotein IIb / IIIa inhibitor immediately after stent release did not result in a greater risk of hemorrhage. The use of post-procedural dual antiplatelet therapy was associated with favorable outcome, without a significant increase in hemorrhagic transformation.

The safety and effectiveness of early anti-platelet therapy after alteplase for acute ischemic stroke: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

For acute ischemic stroke patients, there is a risk of reocclusion after intravenous thrombolysis. In theory, early anti-platelet therapy can reduce the risk of vessel reocclusion. Although current guidelines do not recommend routine anti-platelet therapy within 24 h of intravenous thrombolytic therapy, many studies disagreed with it, especially after the emergence of new anti-platelet drugs. It is necessary to conduct a meta-analysis based on high-quality randomized controlled studies to re-evaluate this treatment strategy.

METHODS

Literature retrieval was systematically conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of sicence, clinical trials, CNKI and Wanfang Data, for searching randomized controlled trials (published between January 1, 2000 and April 30, 2020 with no language restrictions) comparing early (within 24 h) with routine (after 24 h) anti-platelet-aggregation therapy after rt-PA intravenous thrombolysis. The primary safety endpoint and primary efficacy indicator are the incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and a good prognosis at 90-day (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-1 or return to baseline mRS), respectively. We assessed pooled data by use of a random-effects model.

FINDINGS

Of the 378 identified studies, only 3 were eligible and included in our analysis (N = 1008 participants). Compared with routine treatment, early anti-platelet-aggregation therapy after rt-PA intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke patients did not affect the 90-day efficacy (95% CI 0.97 - 1.32). In terms of safety assessment, the early use of anti-platelet-aggregation drugs after thrombolysis has a neutral effect on the risk of intracranial hemorrhage, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and bleeding from other systemic sites.

CONCLUSION

Early anti-platelet therapy after alteplase did not benefit the acute ischemic stroke patients based on the current evidence. However, more clinical trials and statistical evidence are still needed.