Letter: Amiodarone and neurological side-effects

Neurological complications of cardiovascular drugs

Cardiovascular drugs are used to treat arterial hypertension, hyperlipidemia, arrhythmias, heart failure, and coronary artery disease. They also include antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs that are essential for prevention of cardiogenic embolism. Most neurologic complications of the cardiovascular drugs are minor or transient and are far outweighed by the anticipated benefits of treatment. Other neurologic complications are more serious and require early recognition and management. Overtreatment of arterial hypertension may cause lightheadedness or fatigue but often responds readily to dose adjustment or an alternative drug. Other drug complications may be more troublesome as in myalgia associated with statins or headache associated with vasodilators. The recognized bleeding risk of the antithrombotics requires careful calculation of risk/benefit ratios for individual patients. Many neurologic complications of cardiovascular drugs are well documented in clinical trials with known frequency and severity, but others are rare and recognized only in isolated case reports or small case series. This chapter draws on both sources to report the adverse effects on muscle, nerve, and brain associated with commonly used cardiovascular drugs.

Severe ataxia caused by amiodarone

Neurologic toxicity is an infrequently reported and under-recognized consequence of amiodarone, symptoms of which may include tremor, peripheral sensorimotor neuropathy, proximal weakness, and ataxia. The investigators report the rapid and complete remission of 4 months of progressively debilitating ataxia with the discontinuation of small-dose amiodarone in an elderly woman with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Despite the long half-life of amiodarone, her symptoms began to reduce after several days, and she was walking without assistance within 1 week. Wider recognition of this syndrome may avoid unnecessary and lengthy diagnostic evaluation and promote earlier neurologic recovery.

Parkinsonism and amiodarone therapy

We report a case of reversible, dose-related parkinsonian tremor in a patient taking amiodarone. In previous writings by others, basal ganglia dysfunction associated with amiodarone was dose related and reversibility was inversely related to duration of therapy. Patients receiving amiodarone are at risk for the development of basal ganglia dysfunction which may persist if the drug is not discontinued or the dosage reduced.

A general overview of amiodarone toxicity: its prevention, detection, and management

Although amiodarone is a highly effective antiarrhythmic agent, it has a high incidence of side effects, some of which can be serious or even lethal. With close monitoring, side effects can be found in essentially all patients, but fortunately most of these are mild and well tolerated. Furthermore, many will respond to dosage reduction in a relatively short period of time, ie, days to weeks, which is remarkable considering the long period of time amiodarone has been shown to persist in tissues. There is reasonable evidence that toxicity, particularly the early toxic manifestations with large loading dosages, can be favorably modified by reducing the dosage. Similarly, reducing the maintenance dosage will, in most instances, reduce or eliminate most toxic manifestations. The mechanisms of toxic effects are uncertain, but suggestive evidence exists for and against both an immunologic reaction and an intracellular lysosomal lipoidosis. Principles of use of amiodarone should include individualizing administration of dosages for each patient due to the unusual pharmacokinetic properties of this drug and continuous long-term attempts at using the lowest effective dosage. There are no definite tests that predict amiodarone efficacy or toxicity, but the serum level can be used as a rough guide of absorption and distribution in the attempt to minimize the maintenance dosage. No guidelines regarding screening tests for toxicity can be made at this time since great variability in these tests has been reported, and no evidence exists for their benefit in preventing adverse effects to amiodarone. However, follow-up testing at the intervals noted in the package insert are reasonable and important. The possibility of interactions with drugs already reported and with others not yet reported should always be kept in mind, and appropriate monitoring for clinical evidence of toxicity due to the concomitantly used drugs should be undertaken. Amiodarone can have a tremendous beneficial effect in the proper circumstances, but it is a drug that should command utmost respect because of its side effects and requires constant vigilance from any physician wishing to use it.

Cutaneous ultrastructural changes and photosensitivity associated with amiodarone therapy

Amiodarone, an antiarrhythmic agent, is known to cause photosensitivity and cutaneous hyperpigmentation. Five patients taking this drug for periods of 1 to 48 months were studied. Skin biopsy specimens taken from a sun-exposed site were assessed by light microscopy, electron microscopy, and direct immunofluorescence. Three patients allowed comparative studies to be done on a biopsy specimen from non-sun-exposed skin. Light microscopy findings, including special stains, were not diagnostic of amiodarone-associated cutaneous changes. Electron microscopy, however, displayed distinctive intracytoplasmic inclusions in many cell types, some of which have not been reported previously. These inclusions represent phospholipid membranes associated with amiodarone or its metabolites as the result of a drug-induced lipidosis. Previous reports had postulated the inclusions were lipofuscin. Sun exposure may accelerate the formation of these intracellular deposits because they are more prominent in sun-exposed skin. Four of the above five cases, plus two additional patients, had symptoms compatible with a photosensitivity. Porphyrin assays were normal. Of the six patients phototested, three showed acute reactions to ultraviolet A (UVA) and ultraviolet B (UVB) and significant delayed reactions to UVA and/or UVB. The patients who had normal phototesting were on the drug for shorter periods than those with positive tests.

Disabling neurological complications of amiodarone

Five patients developed neurological symptoms during treatment with amiodarone for intervals ranging between five and 40 months. In each case the daily maintenance dose did not exceed 600 mg. The neurological manifestations included gait ataxia, tremor, polyneuropathy, and myopathy. In all five patients, the neurological symptoms were severe and disabling. In one patient with a myopathy, there was no improvement after amiodarone was withdrawn. The neurological side effects of amiodarone may be disabling and are not always reversible with drug withdrawal. Neurological complications may arise during treatment with usual maintenance doses.

Peripheral neuropathy during longterm high-dose amiodarone therapy

Three patients developed peripheral neuropathy after taking amiodarone for more than 18 months. All had high serum concentrations of amiodarone and its desethyl metabolite; in one patient concentrations in a sural nerve biopsy were 80 times higher than in serum. Peripheral neuropathy is a complication of large doses of amiodarone taken over long periods.

Side effects and complications of amiodarone therapy

To assess the incidence of adverse effects associated with long-term amiodarone therapy, we reviewed the records of 217 consecutive patients who were treated for refractory arrhythmia. After an average of 11.8 months of therapy, one or more side effects occurred in 113 patients (52%). These were considered clinically significant in 42 patients (19.3%), mandating discontinuation of amiodarone in 18 (8.3%). The untoward reactions requiring discontinuation of amiodarone included thyroid dysfunction, visual disturbances, pulmonary infiltrates, ataxia, cardiac conduction abnormalities, and drug interactions. The mild side effects included corneal microdeposits, skin rashes, and gastrointestinal symptoms. There was a weak correlation between blood levels of amiodarone, the daily dose, and the cumulative dose (r = 0.23, p = 0.015). Drug levels were higher in symptomatic patients (p less than 0.03), although they received lower doses of amiodarone. While amiodarone is associated with frequent side effects, they are generally mild and do not necessitate drug discontinuation. Careful monitoring of therapy is essential to detect the potentially serious adverse reactions which are encountered in nearly 20% of patients.

Clinical use and pharmacology of amiodarone

Amiodarone, an investigational drug in the United States, has had considerable use in this country and worldwide in the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. This article reviews the clinical pharmacology of this potentially useful antiarrhythmic agent.

Peripheral neuropathy induced by amiodarone chlorhydrate. A clinicopathological study

Four cases of amiodarone neuropathy are reported. Patients presented a sensorimotor neuropathy with distal predominance. Improvement occurred after drug discontinuation. Nerve conduction velocities were significantly decreased. Other secondary effects of amiodarone were noted in two cases. In one case serum levels of amiodarone and N-monodesethylamiodarone were evaluated during and after treatment. Pathological study of nerve with morphometric evaluation was performed. Axonal degeneration changes were predominant in 3 cases. Aspects of segmental demyelination and remyelination were noted in one case and related to secondary demyelination. Numerous lysosomal inclusions were present in Schwann cells, fibroblasts, capillary endothelial and perithelial cells and in perineural cells. Similar inclusions have been observed in other drug-induced lipidosis. The factors responsible for this neuropathy are unknown. In one case, amiodarone-induced hepatic failure might explain the persisting high serum levels of the drug.

Amiodarone-induced pulmonary fibrosis in hamsters

Amiodarone, a cardiac antiarrhythmic agent, has been associated with the development of interstitial pulmonary fibrosis in patients receiving prolonged therapy with the drug. To further assess the toxic effects of amiodarone on lung tissue, Syrian hamsters were given a single intratracheal insufflation of the agent and evaluated for histologic evidence of lung injury. Control animals received intratracheal insufflations of the vehicle in which amiodarone was dissolved. After an initial, transient alveolitis in both experimental and control animals, the amiodarone-treated lungs developed increased interstitial thickening due to fibrinous exudates, alveolar epithelial hyperplasia, inflammatory cell infiltrates, and marked deposition of collagen manifested on trichrome staining. Controls, in contrast, showed nearly complete resolution of the initial alveolitis. An unusual feature of the amiodarone-induced lung injury was reemergence of the alveolitis between 5 and 14 days, which included a marked influx of eosinophils into the lung. Although the precise mechanism of the lung injury is not known, the persistence of the acute inflammatory cells as well as the presence of eosinophils suggests a hypersensitivity-type reaction. Furthermore, the progression of lung injury to fibrosis after a single insult with the drug suggests that mere discontinuation of amiodarone therapy in humans may not reverse the disease process, but that corticosteroid therapy may also be required. Amiodarone appears to be a useful agent to induce diffuse fibrotic reactions in the lung that morphologically resemble idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in humans.

Toxic and therapeutic effects of amiodarone in the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias

Amiodarone was used to treat cardiac arrhythmias that had been refractory to conventional medical therapy. The first 70 consecutive patients treated with amiodarone in this study had at least 6 months of follow-up (range 6 to 24, mean 11) and form the basis for this report. Sixty-six patients were treated for ventricular arrhythmias and four for supraventricular tachycardias. Amiodarone therapy consisted of a loading dose of 600 mg orally twice a day for 7 days, and 600 mg daily thereafter. Doses were reduced only if side effects occurred. Because of frequent side effects, the dose was reduced from 572 +/- 283 mg per day (mean +/- standard deviation) at 45 days to 372 +/- 174 mg per day at 6 months. With a mean follow-up of 11 months in the 54 patients who continued to take amiodarone, only 4 patients had ventricular fibrillation. Three additional patients experienced recurrent sustained ventricular tachycardia in long-term follow-up. All 70 patients had extensive clinical and laboratory evaluation in follow-up. Side effects were common, occurring in 93% of patients. Thirteen patients (19%) had to discontinue the medication because of severe side effects. Fifty-six patients had gastrointestinal side effects, most commonly constipation. All patients but 1 eventually developed corneal microdeposits, and 43 patients were symptomatic. Cardiovascular side effects were uncommon. Symptomatic pulmonary side effects occurred in seven patients, with unequivocal pulmonary toxicity occurring in five. Neurologic side effects, most commonly tremor and ataxia, occurred in 52 patients. Thyroid dysfunction occurred in 3 patients, and 32 patients had cutaneous abnormalities. Miscellaneous other side effects occurred in 32 patients. Amiodarone appears to be useful in the management of refractory arrhythmias. Because virtually all patients develop side effects when given a maintenance daily dose of 600 mg, lower maintenance doses should be used. It is unknown if the more severe side effects are dose-related. Amiodarone is difficult to administer because of its narrow toxic-therapeutic range and prolonged loading phase. More importantly, the first sign of antiarrhythmic failure may be manifest as sudden cardiac death.

Amiodarone for control of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia: clinical and electrophysiologic effects in 51 patients

We evaluated the electrophysiologic effects of amiodarone and its ability to control ventricular arrhythmia in a selected group of 51 patients with refractory sustained ventricular arrhythmia. Amiodarone in doses of 400 to 800 mg/day prolonged refractoriness in the atria, atrioventricular (AV) node, and ventricle as well as conduction through the AV node and His-Purkinje system. Although it had no effect on measurements of sinus nodal function (sinus nodal recovery time and sinoatrial conduction time), it prolonged the sinus cycle length and 2 patients required a permanent pacemaker for symptomatic sinus bradycardia. Amiodarone did not alter the ease of inducibility in any consistent manner, and only 5 of 43 patients (12%) who had inducible ventricular tachycardia before amiodarone therapy had none induced during amiodarone treatment. The clinical effectiveness of amiodarone could be evaluated in 46 patients followed up for 8.6 +/- 6 months (range 0.5 to 22). It provided effective therapy in 23 patients (50%), partly effective therapy in 13 (28%), and was ineffective in 10 (22%). Adverse effects were noted in 28 of 51 patients (55%), and in 11 of these (22%) the drug had to be discontinued because of adverse effects. We conclude that amiodarone is a useful agent for the treatment of refractory sustained ventricular arrhythmia. Its use should be reserved for patients with life-threatening sustained arrhythmia because of the significant incidence of adverse effects. Furthermore, good clinical response can be observed in patients receiving amiodarone in spite of continued inducibility.

Clinical efficacy and electrophysiology during long-term therapy for recurrent ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation

We evaluated the effects of amiodarone in 45 patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation. At a mean follow-up time of 12.7 +/- 8.8 months (range, three to 36), amiodarone was successful in nine of 16 patients with recurrent ventricular fibrillation and 21 of 29 with recurrent ventricular tachycardia. During amiodarone therapy, ventricular tachycardia could be induced in 18 of 19 patients in whom it had been induced before therapy, but only six of these 19 had spontaneous recurrence during follow-up. Side effects included corneal microdeposits, hyperthyroidism, blue skin, nausea, and symptomatic bradycardia. Pulmonary fibrosis occurred in three patients. Doses of up to 2000 mg a day did not produce cardiac toxicity, but neurologic side effects precluded long-term therapy at this dose. We conclude that amiodarone is effective for long-term therapy of recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias, that induction of arrhythmia during therapy does not always predict efficacy, and that side effects are frequent but do not usually limit therapy.

Neuromyopathy during chronic amiodarone treatment. A case report

Clinical, electrophysiological, and the nerve and muscle biopsy findings from a case treated with amiodarone are reported. Marked distal motor and sensory impairment and distal muscular atrophy were observed clinically. The electrophysiological examination revealed normal motor and sensory conduction velocities in the median nerve; the sensory action potentials were polyphasic and reduced in amplitude. Electromyography revealed denervation potentials and severe loss of motor units in the M. extensor digitorum brevis and in the M. tibialis anterior. The light and electronmicroscopical study of a N. suralis biopsy displayed total loss of large myelinated fibers and an almost total reduction of small myelinated fibers. The number of unmyelinated axons was markedly reduced. Fibrocytes and degenerative axons polymorphous inclusion bodies were present in Schwann cells. The muscle biopsy revealed both neurogenic and myopathic changes. Lipid storage was also present in the muscle fibers. Physical and chemical analysis of the nerve and muscle biopsy revealed the content of iodine to be more than 40 times increased. The findings indicate damage of axons, schwann cells and muscle fibers. It is suggested that the lipid storage in nerve and muscle tissue might be related to the accumulation of the drug or its metabolites.

Use of amiodarone in bradycardia-tachycardia syndrome

Five patients with the bradycardia-tachycardia syndrome have been treated successfully with the antiarrhythmic agent amiodarone. Three patients were treated for over nine months and one of these patients had corneal micro deposits. One patient had to be taken off the drug because of side effects. Amiodarone should be tried in patients suffering from the bradycardia-tachycardia syndrome before resorting to cardiac pacing.

New antiarrhythmic agents: amiodarone, aprindine, disopyramide, ethmozin, mexiletine, tocainide, verapamil

The present status, clinical experience, side effects, clinical pharmacology and electrophysiologic actions of seven new antiarrhythmic agents are reviewed. The drugs selected for comment are amiodarone, aprindine, disopyramide, ethmozin, mexiletine, tocainide and verapamil. Each drug has been shown to have clinical efficacy in suppressing cardiac arrhythmias.