Hypoglycaemia associated with use of inhibitors of angiotensin converting enzyme

Injectable, reversibly thermoresponsive captopril-laden hydrogel for the local treatment of sensory loss in diabetic neuropathy

A major and irreversible complication of diabetes is diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN), which can lead to significant disability and decreased quality of life. Prior work demonstrates the peptide hormone Angiotensin II (Ang II) is released locally in neuropathy and drives inflammation and impaired endoneurial blood flow. Therefore, we proposed that by utilizing a local thermoresponsive hydrogel injection, we could deliver inhibitors of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) to suppress Ang II production and reduce nerve dysfunction in DPN through local drug release. The ACE inhibitor captopril was encapsulated into a micelle, which was then embedded into a reversibly thermoresponsive pluronics-based hydrogel matrix. Drug-free and captopril-loaded hydrogels demonstrated excellent product stability and sterility. Rheology testing confirmed sol properties with low viscosity at ambient temperature and increased viscosity and gelation at 37 °C. Captopril-loaded hydrogels significantly inhibited Ang II production in comparison to drug-free hydrogels. DPN mice treated with captopril-loaded hydrogels displayed normalized mechanical sensitivity and reduced inflammation, without side-effects associated with systemic exposure. Our data demonstrate the feasibility of repurposing ACE inhibitors as locally delivered anti-inflammatories for the treatment of sensory deficits in DPN. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first example of a locally delivered ACE inhibitor for the treatment of DPN.

Lower Incidence of Hypoglycemia With Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Versus ACE Inhibitor Therapy in People With or Without Diabetes

This article describes a study examining the association between treatment with ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and incident hypoglycemia in patients with or without diabetes who were admitted to the internal medicine departments of a tertiary hospital in the Tel Aviv district of Israel. The authors found that treatment with ARBs, but not ACE inhibitors, compared with treatment with neither, was associated with a reduced risk of hypoglycemia regardless of diabetes status.

An Overview of Clinically Imperative and Pharmacodynamically Significant Drug Interactions of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System (RAAS) Blockers

INTRODUCTION

Hypertension is a leading cause of cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease, resulting in premature death and disability. The Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System (RAAS) blockers, including Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARBs), are used as first-line antihypertensive therapy to treat hypertensive patients with comorbidities, including diabetes, ischemic heart disease, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease. The use of RAS blockers is associated with the risks, such as hyperkalemia, angioedema, etc. The drugs potentiating them interact pharmacodynamically, resulting in adverse consequences. This review article focuses on the clinically important drug interactions of RAAS blockers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The electronic databases, such as Medline/PubMed Central/PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), Embase, and reference lists were searched to identify relevant articles.

RESULTS

The risk of hyperkalemia may be enhanced potentially in patients receiving a RAS blocker and potassium-sparing diuretics, potassium supplements, trimethoprim, adrenergic betablockers, antifungal agents, calcineurin inhibitors, pentamidine, heparins or an NSAID, concomitantly. The patients taking ACE inhibitors and mTOR inhibitors, DPP4 inhibitors, alteplase, or sacubitril/valsartan concurrently may be at increased risk of developing angioedema.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians, pharmacists, and other healthcare practitioners should be accountable for medication safety. To avoid adverse implications, prescribers and pharmacists must be aware of the drugs that interact with RAAS blockers.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors Used Concomitantly with Insulin Secretagogues and the Risk of Serious Hypoglycemia

Serious hypoglycemia is a major adverse event associated with insulin secretagogues. Previous studies have suggested a potential relationship between angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) used with sulfonylureas and serious hypoglycemia, and widely used drug compendia warn of this potential drug-drug interaction. We investigated the association between serious hypoglycemia and concomitant use of ACEIs in patients receiving insulin secretagogues, using the self-controlled case series design and Medicaid claims data from 5 US states linked to Medicare claims from 1999-2011. The exposure of interest was active prescription for ACEIs during insulin secretagogue or metformin (negative control object drug) episodes. The outcome was hospital presentation for serious hypoglycemia, identified by discharge diagnosis codes in inpatient and emergency department claims (positive predictive value ~ 78-89%). We calculated confounder-adjusted rate ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence internals (CIs) of outcome occurrence during ACEI-exposed vs. ACEI-unexposed time using conditional Poisson regression. The RRs for ACEIs were not statistically elevated during observation time of glipizide (RR, 1.06; CI, 0.98-1.15), glyburide (RR, 1.05; CI, 0.96-1.15), repaglinide (RR, 1.15; CI, 0.94-1.41), or metformin (RR, 1.02; CI, 0.97-1.06); but was modestly elevated with glimepiride (RR, 1.23; CI, 1.11-1.37) and modestly reduced with nateglinide (RR, 0.73; CI, 0.56-0.96). The overall pattern of results do not suggest that ACEIs used with insulin secretagogues were associated with increased rates of serious hypoglycemia, with the possible exception of glimepiride.

Outcome trends in people with heart failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease in the UK over twenty years

BACKGROUND

Heart failure (HF) together with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are major pandemics of the twenty first century. It is not known in people with new onset HF, what the distinct and combined associations are between T2D and CKD comorbidities and cause-specific hospital admissions and death, over the past 20 years.

METHODS

An observational study using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked to the Hospital Episode Statistics in England (1998-2017). Participants were people aged ≥30 years with new onset HF. Exposure groups were HF with: (i) no T2D and no CKD (reference group); (ii) CKD-only (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 ml/min per 1.73 m²); (iii) T2D-only; (iv) T2D and CKD. CKD severity groups were: CKD-3a (eGFR 45-59); CKD-3b (30-44); CKD-4 (15-29); CKD-5 (<15). Outcomes were cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular hospitalisations and all-cause death.

FINDINGS

In 87,709 HF patients (mean age, 78 years; 49% female), 40% had CKD-only, 12% T2D-only, and 16% both. Age-standardised first-year CVD hospitalisation rates were significantly higher in HF patients with CKD-only (46.4; 95% CI 44.9,47.9 per 100 person years) and T2D-only (49.2; 46.7,58.8) than in the reference group (35.1; 34.0,36.1); the highest rate was in patients with T2D-CKD-5: 89.1 (65.8,112.4). Similar patterns were observed for non-CVD hospitalisations and deaths. Group differences remained significant after adjustment for potential confounders. Median survival was highest in the reference (4.4 years) and HF-T2D-only (4.1 years) groups, compared to HF-CKD-only (2.2 years). HF-T2D-CKD group survival ranged from 2.8 (CKD-3a) to 0.7 years (CKD-5). Over time, CVD hospitalisation rates significantly increased for HF-CKD-only (+26%) and reduced (-24%) for HF-T2D-only groups; no reductions were observed in any of the HF-T2D-CKD groups. Trends were similar for non-CVD hospitalisations and death: whilst death rates significantly reduced for HF-T2D-only (-37%), improvement was not observed in any of the T2D-CKD groups.

INTERPRETATION

In a cohort of people with new onset HF, hospitalisations and deaths are high in patients with T2D or CKD, and worst in those with both comorbidities. Whilst outcomes have improved over time for patients with HF and comorbid T2D, similar trends were not seen in those with comorbid CKD. Strategies to prevent and manage CKD in people with HF are urgently needed.

FUNDING

NIHR fellowship [reference: NIHR 30011].

Co-administration of prazosin and propranolol with glibenclamide improves anti-oxidant defense system in endothelial tissue of streptozotocin-induced diabetic Wistar rats

Background Due to increasing prevalence of diabetes and associated endothelial dysfunction, this study was carried out to investigate the effects of co-administration of adrenoceptor blockers (prazosin and propranolol) and glibenclamide on plasma biomarkers of endothelial functions in diabetic rats. Methods Experiments were carried out on 35 male Wistar rats (170-200 g). They were divided into seven groups (n=5) as follows: normal control, diabetic control, diabetic + glibenclamide (GLB-5mg/kg/day), diabetic+ prazosin (PRZ-0.5 mg/kg/day), diabetic + PRZ + GLB, diabetic + propranolol (PRP-10 mg/kg/day), diabetes + PRP + GLB. Experimental diabetes was induced with streptozotocin (60 mg/kg) and drugs were administered orally for 3 weeks. Blood pressure was measured and animals were sacrificed afterwards. Blood samples were collected by cardiac puncture, and major marker of endothelial functions, nitric oxide derivatives (NOx), as well as superoxide dismutase (SOD) and malondialdehyde (MDA) were measured on the plasma. The aorta was harvested for histological examination. Data were subjected to descriptive statistics and analysed using ANOVA at α 0.05. Results There was a significant increase in levels of NOx and SOD, and a decrease in MDA level in diabetic treated groups compared to diabetic control. Mean blood pressure increased in diabetic control and diabetic + GLB group when compared with normal control, while it was mildly reduced in diabetic group treated with PRZ and PRP, and co-administered GLB. More so, Aorta histology was altered in diabetic control groups when compared with normal control and all diabetic treated groups. Conclusions Results from this study suggest that PRZ, PRP, and GLB (singly and in combined therapy) could have a restorative effect on endothelial functions in diabetes.

Clinical approach to the inflammatory etiology of cardiovascular diseases

Inflammation is an obligatory marker of arterial disease, both stemming from the inflammatory activity of cholesterol itself and from well-established molecular mechanisms. Raised progenitor cell recruitment after major events and clonal hematopoiesis related mechanisms have provided an improved understanding of factors regulating inflammatory phenomena. Trials with inflammation antagonists have led to an extensive evaluation of biomarkers such as the high sensitivity C reactive protein (hsCRP), not exerting a causative role, but frequently indicative of the individual cardiovascular (CV) risk. Aim of this review is to provide indication on the anti-inflammatory profile of agents of general use in CV prevention, i.e. affecting lipids, blood pressure, diabetes as well nutraceuticals such as n-3 fatty acids. A crucial issue in the evaluation of the benefit of the anti-inflammatory activity is the frequent discordance between a beneficial activity on a major risk factor and associated changes of hsCRP, as in the case of statins vs PCSK9 antagonists. In hypertension, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors exert an optimal anti-inflammatory activity, vs the case of sartans. The remarkable preventive activity of SLGT-2 inhibitors in heart failure is not associated with a clear anti-inflammatory mechanism. Finally, icosapent ethyl has been shown to reduce the CV risk in hypertriglyceridemia, with a 27 % reduction of hsCRP. The inflammation-based approach to arterial disease has considerably gained from an improved understanding of the clinical diagnostic strategy and from a better knowledge on the mode of action of numerous agents, including nutraceuticals.

Hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with oral antihyperglycemic agents detected by continuous glucose monitoring: a multi-center prospective observational study in Croatia

BACKGROUND

Hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is still unsolved issue. The aim of this study was to investigate hypoglycemia in T2DM in participants treated with oral antihyperglycemic agents using different glucose cut-off values and to explore influence of different therapies.

METHODS

This multi-center prospective observational study included participant with T2DM from primary care offices across Croatia treated with antihyperglycemic agents who were monitored using professional continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) device (iPro™2). Hypoglycemia was defined as at least 1% of the monitored period spent in the hypoglycemic range and/or area under the curve of glycemia registered ever under the defined cut-off value. The higher upper limit of blood glucose cut-off value was 3.9 mmol/L (70 mg/dL) and the lower one 3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL).

RESULTS

Study included 94 participants. Median hemoglobin A1C levels, age, T2DM duration, body mass index, and CGM use duration were 7 (5.8-11.5) %, 65 (40-86) years, 7 (1-36) years, 30.4 (21.3-41.5) kg/m² and 6 (1-7) days, respectively. Fifty participants were treated with sulfonylurea, primarily gliclazide (84%). The percentage of participant with hypoglycemia based on the higher cut-off value was 42.6% vs. 16% based on the higher cut-off value. The percentage of participant with nocturnal hypoglycemia (23 PM to 06 AM) was significantly lower among participant with hypoglycemia based on the higher cut-off value compared to lower one (7.8% vs. 22.9%). Sulfonylurea treatment did not influence the occurrence of hypoglycemia. Analysis of the data from participants having hypoglycemia based on the lower cut-off value pointed to other possible risk factors for hypoglycemia like prolonged overnight fasting, physical activity, alcohol consumption, and concomitant therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

In participant with T2DM treated with oral antihyperglycemic agents hypoglycemia based on the blood glucose cut-off value of 3.9 mmol/L was more prevalent, but with less nocturnal hypoglycemia. Sulfonylurea therapy was not risk factor for hypoglycemia regardless of cut-off value. In participants having hypoglycemia based on the blood glucose cut-off value of 3.0 mmol/L some other possible factors were identified related to concomitant therapy, nutrition and daily habits.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03253237.

Pharmacogenomics at the center of precision medicine: challenges and perspective in an era of Big Data

Pharmacogenomics (PGx) is one of the core elements of personalized medicine. PGx information reduces the likelihood of adverse drug reactions and optimizes therapeutic efficacy. St Catherine Specialty Hospital in Zagreb/Zabok, Croatia has implemented a personalized patient approach using the RightMed^® Comprehensive PGx panel of 25 pharmacogenes plus Facor V Leiden, Factor II and MTHFR genes, which is interpreted by a special counseling team to offer the best quality of care. With the advent of significant technological advances comes another challenge: how can we harness the data to inform clinically actionable measures and how can we use it to develop better predictive risk models? We propose to apply the principles artificial intelligence to develop a medication optimization platform to prevent, manage and treat different diseases.

Simple Reason for Hypoglycemia: ACE Inhibitor-induced Severe Recurrent Hypoglycemia in a Nondiabetic Patient

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are among the most common medications used to treat patients with concomitant diabetes and hypertension. They are considered the first line of treatment for hypertension in this population. Several case studies have reported that ACE inhibitors can induce hypoglycemia in patients with diabetes. To our knowledge, however, ACE inhibitors have not been found to induce hypoglycemia in patients without diabetes. This report describes a patient without diabetes experiencing recurrent severe hypoglycemia induced by the ACE inhibitor lisinopril.

Impact of drugs on hypoglycaemia in hospitalised patients

Objectives

Hospital admission rates for hypoglycaemia now exceed those for hyperglycaemias among older adults. A growing number of reports associating hypoglycaemia with non-antidiabetic drugs have been published. Clinical pharmacists are often faced with hypoglycaemia in patients taking multiple medications. This study assessed the potential relationship between prescribed drugs and episodes of hypoglycaemia during hospitalisation.

Methods

Point-of-care blood glucose values and prescribed drugs were analysed in patients admitted to a regional hospital. Hypoglycaemia cases were defined as patients with at least one hypoglycaemic event (random glucose value ≤3.9 mmol/L), and normoglycaemic cases as those with random glucose concentrations within the range of 4.5-5.8 mmol/L. Analyses were carried out using multivariate logistic regressions and Cox proportional hazard models.

Results

373 patients (53% males; median age=74 years) were included in the analysis and of these, 64 (17%) had at least one hypoglycaemic event. Patients who experienced a hypoglycaemic event had a longer length of stay (median=10 vs 7 days, p<0.01) and a higher rate of antidiabetic drugs prescription (83% vs 37%, p<0.01). The number of non-antidiabetic drugs was associated with an increased risk of hypoglycaemia during hospitalisation (HR 2.3, 95% CI 1.4 to 4, p<0.01). After adjusting by confounders, heparin and pantoprazole were found to be associated with hypoglycaemia.

Conclusions

The relationship between hypoglycaemia and polypharmacy reinforces the advice to limit polymedication as much as possible, especially in elderly patients. This result underlines the potential involvement of clinical pharmacists with the aim to reduce the risk of hypoglycaemia during hospitalisation.

Interdisciplinary approach to compensation of hypoglycemia in diabetic patients with chronic heart failure

Diabetes mellitus is a chronic disease requiring lifelong control with hypoglycemic agents that must demonstrate excellent efficacy and safety profiles. In patients taking glucose-lowering drugs, hypoglycemia is a common cause of death associated with arrhythmias, increased thrombus formation, and specific effects of catecholamines due to sympathoadrenal activation. Focus is now shifting from merely glycemic control to multifactorial approach. In the context of individual drugs and classes, this article reviews interdisciplinary strategies evaluating metabolic effects of drugs for treatment of chronic heart failure (CHF) which can mask characteristic hypoglycemia symptoms. Hypoglycemia unawareness and cardiac autonomic neuropathy are discussed. Data suggesting that hypoglycemia modulates immune response are reviewed. The potential role of gut microbiota in improving health of patients with diabetes and CHF is emphasized. Reports stating that nondiabetic CHF patients can have life-threatening hypoglycemia associated with imbalance of thyroid hormones are discussed. Regular glycemic control based on HbA1c measurements and adequate pharmacotherapy remain the priorities in diabetes management. New antihyperglycemic drugs with safer profiles should be preferred in vulnerable CHF patients. Multidrug interactions must be considered. Emerging therapies with reduced hypoglycemia risk, telemedicine, sensor technologies, and genetic testing predicting hypoglycemia risk may help solving the challenges of hypoglycemia in CHF patients with diabetes. Interdisciplinary work may involve cardiologists, diabetologists/endocrinologists, immunologists, gastroenterologists, microbiologists, nutritionists, imaging specialists, geneticists, telemedicine experts, and other relevant specialists. This review emphasizes that systematic knowledge on pathophysiology of hypoglycemia in diabetic patients with CHF is largely lacking and the gaps in our understanding require further discoveries.

Exercise, metformin and hypoglycaemia: a neglected entity

We describe a case of hypoglycaemia induced by exercise in a patient with type 2 diabetes taking metformin, who was not taking insulin or sulphonylurea medication. The hypoglycaemia resolved after the dosage of metformin was reduced, despite increased physical activity. A brief review of the literature identifying the frequency of and risk factors for hypoglycaemia during treatment with metformin is discussed.

Targeting inflammation in metabolic syndrome

The metabolic syndrome (MetS) is comprised of a cluster of closely related risk factors, including visceral adiposity, insulin resistance, hypertension, high triglyceride, and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; all of which increase the risk for the development of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. A chronic state of inflammation appears to be a central mechanism underlying the pathophysiology of insulin resistance and MetS. In this review, we summarize recent research which has provided insight into the mechanisms by which inflammation underlies the pathophysiology of the individual components of MetS including visceral adiposity, hyperglycemia and insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and hypertension. On the basis of these mechanisms, we summarize therapeutic modalities to target inflammation in the MetS and its individual components. Current therapeutic modalities can modulate the individual components of MetS and have a direct anti-inflammatory effect. Lifestyle modifications including exercise, weight loss, and diets high in fruits, vegetables, fiber, whole grains, and low-fat dairy and low in saturated fat and glucose are recommended as a first line therapy. The Mediterranean and dietary approaches to stop hypertension diets are especially beneficial and have been shown to prevent development of MetS. Moreover, the Mediterranean diet has been associated with reductions in total and cardiovascular mortality. Omega-3 fatty acids and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α agonists lower high levels of triglyceride; their role in targeting inflammation is reviewed. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, and aldosterone blockers comprise pharmacologic therapies for hypertension but also target other aspects of MetS including inflammation. Statin drugs target many of the underlying inflammatory pathways involved in MetS.

Case-control study of oral glucose-lowering drugs in combination with long-acting insulin and the risks of incident myocardial infarction and incident stroke

BACKGROUND

The use of oral glucose-lowering therapies with insulin is common, but the cardiovascular effects are largely unknown. Among users of long-acting insulin, we conducted a population-based case-control study to evaluate the incident myocardial infarction (MI) and incident stroke risks associated with the use of sulfonylureas and the use of metformin.

METHODS

Cases were Group Health Cooperative enrollees with type 2 diabetes who used long-acting insulin at the time of diagnosis with a first MI (n = 413) or first stroke (n = 247) from 1995 to 2010. Controls (n = 443) with type 2 diabetes who used long-acting insulin were matched to cases on age, sex, and calendar year. Sulfonylurea and metformin use was classified as current, past, or never using electronic pharmacy records. MI and stroke diagnoses were validated by medical record review. Analyses were adjusted for potential confounders.

RESULTS

Current use of sulfonylureas compared with never use was associated with a higher risk of MI (odds ratio [OR] 1.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-2.55) but not stroke (OR 1.22; 95%CI, 0.74-2.00). Current use of metformin compared with never use was associated with a lower risk of stroke (OR 0.54; 95%CI, 0.31-0.95) but not MI (OR 0.77; 95%CI, 0.44-1.33). Past use of sulfonylureas and past use of metformin were not associated with either outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Sulfonylureas in combination with long-acting insulin may increase the risk of MI compared with the use of insulin alone. Metformin may be an important cardiovascular disease prevention therapy for patients on insulin therapy. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Risk of Hospitalization for Hypoglycemia in Older Patients with Diabetes Using Antipsychotic Drugs

OBJECTIVE

Antipsychotics may disrupt metabolic regulation in patients with diabetes mellitus. The risk of hypoglycemia in older users of antipsychotics with diabetes is largely unknown. Therefore, we investigated the association between the use of antipsychotic drugs and hypoglycemia requiring hospital admission in older patients with diabetes.

METHODS

In a nested case-control study using community pharmacy records linked to hospital admission data in the Netherlands (1998-2008), a cohort of 68,314 patients at least 65 years with diabetes was studied. Cases were patients from the study cohort with a first hospital admission for hypoglycemia; up to five comparison subjects were selected for each case. Exposure to antipsychotic drugs was the primary determinant of interest. Logistic regression analysis was performed to estimate the strength of the association between antipsychotic drug use and hypoglycemia, taking into account potential confounders.

RESULTS

Eight hundred fifteen patients were admitted to hospital for hypoglycemia. Current use of antipsychotic drugs was associated with an increased risk of hypoglycemia compared with non-use (adjusted OR: 2.26; 95% CI: 1.45-3.52; Wald χ(2) = 13.08, df = 1, p ≤0.001), especially in the first 30 days of treatment (adjusted OR: 7.65; 95% CI: 2.50-23.41; Wald χ(2) = 12.72, df = 1, p ≤0.001) and with higher doses (adjusted OR: 8.20; 95% CI: 3.09-21.75; Wald χ(2) = 17.90, df = 1, p ≤0.001).

CONCLUSION

Use of antipsychotic drugs by older patients with diabetes mellitus was associated with an increased risk of hospitalization for hypoglycemia. Our findings suggest that glucose levels should be monitored closely after initiation of antipsychotic drugs.

Effects of ACE inhibitors on insulin resistance and lipid profile in children with metabolic syndrome

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of using ACE inhibitors on insulin resistance, glucose metabolism, body fat composition, and lipid profile in children over 10 years of age with obesity-associated metabolic syndrome (MS).

METHODS

A total of 53 children with MS, who had been followed for at least one year were included in the study. The sample was divided into two groups: Group 1-30 obese children (13 female, 17 male) who were not using an ACE inhibitor and Group 2-23 obese children (13 female, 10 male) who were using an ACE inhibitor. Anthropometric and laboratory data obtained at baseline and at the 3rd, 6th, and 12th months of follow-up were compared in the two groups.

RESULTS

Comparison of the data in the two groups at 3rd, 6th, and 12th months revealed no statistically significant differences in terms of weight standard deviation score (SDS), body mass index SDS, weight for height percentile, body fat percentage, and very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL)values. However, there were statistically significant differences in mean glucose and insulin levels, homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance, LDL and high-density lipoprotein values, and highly significant differences in mean triglyceride values.

CONCLUSIONS

The positive effects of ACE inhibitor drugs, particularly on hypertriglyceridemia and insulin resistance, might bring them forth as first-line drugs in the treatment of obese and hypertensive children. Randomized, controlled, double-blind, and long-term studies are needed for a definitive conclusion.

Effects of antihypertensive therapy on glucose, insulin metabolism, left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and renin system in overweight and obese hypertensives

BACKGROUND

We attempted to test the hypothesis that the direct renin inhibitor aliskiren can improve diastolic dysfunction, glucose, and insulin metabolism (GIM) in overweight and obese hypertensive patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Seventy-eight hypertensive patients were divided into two groups: 38 treated with aliskiren for six months, and 40 treated without aliskiren but with only traditional anti-hypertensive therapy, as controls. Doppler mitral flow velocity patterns were assessed before and after aliskiren during a six-month period. GIM (three-hour intravenous glucose tolerance test) was measured after four to six weeks of washout and six months of treatment. The mitral E/A ratio increased from 0.65 ± 0.11 to 0.75 ± 0.19. None of the indexes changed in the control group. In the control group, GIM parameters, fasting glucose levels (5.3 ± 0.9 to 6.0 ± 1.5 mmol/l; p = 0.003), fasting insulin levels (121 ± 121 to 189 ± 228 pmol/l; p = 0.03), and most other relevant metabolic measures (p < 0.05 for all) significantly worsened. Aliskiren did not affect GIM. In the control group LVM/height was not affected (119 ± 12 to 120 ± 17 g/m; p = 0.8), whereas aliskiren significantly reduced LVM/height (120 ± 13 to 111 ± 19 g/m; p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Optimal target BP was achieved in the group as a whole and in both obese patient groups, while benefits to cardiac structure were of a smaller magnitude. In high-risk, overweight/obese patients with hypertension, traditional therapy provides significantly greater BP- versus aliskiren-lowering throughout the 24-hour dosing interval. Therefore in obese, hypertensive individuals, adequate and similar blood pressure control was achieved with aliskiren; however, the aliskiren group and not the control group was associated with a more favorable GIM profile and led to a significant regression of LVM; overall aliskiren-based treatment offers sustained control of PRA.

Drug-induced hypoglycaemia in type 2 diabetes

INTRODUCTION

Hypoglycaemia is a side effect caused by some therapies for type 2 diabetes, which can cause physical, social and psychological harm. Hypoglycaemia also prevents attainment of treatment goals and satisfactory glycaemic control.

AREAS COVERED

The risk of hypoglycaemia associated with commonly prescribed therapies, including metformin, sulphonylureas, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 enzyme (DPP-4) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists and thiazolidinediones, is reviewed in this paper (insulin-induced hypoglycaemia is not included). Other medications that are frequently co-prescribed in type 2 diabetes are also discussed, including anti-hypertensive drugs, antibiotics and fibrates, along with various important patient-related risk factors.

EXPERT OPINION

Hypoglycaemia is a common and potentially dangerous side effect of some medications used for type 2 diabetes. The risk of hypoglycaemia should always be considered when selecting and implementing a therapy, with a focus on the individual. Future research into new therapies should measure the frequency of hypoglycaemia prospectively and accurately. Hypoglycaemia has been shown to be a potentially life-threatening metabolic stress; therefore therapies that effectively manage diabetes without the risk of hypoglycaemia are likely to be favoured in the future.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme insertion/deletion polymorphism and severe hypoglycemia complicating type 2 diabetes: the Fremantle Diabetes Study

AIMS/HYPOTHESES

The aim of this study was to determine whether the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene I/D polymorphisms independently predict severe hypoglycemia in community-dwelling type 2 patients.

METHODS

Six hundred and two patients who were ACE genotyped at baseline and assessed in 1998 were followed up to the end of June 2006. Severe hypoglycemia was defined as that requiring documented health service use as the primary diagnosis. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to determine the predictors of first episode and zero-inflated negative binomial regression modeling identified predictors of frequency.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients (8.1%) experienced 63 episodes of severe hypoglycemia. After adjusting for previously identified significant independent predictors of time to first episode, both ACE DD genotype and ACE inhibitor therapy, but not their interaction, added to the model [hazard ratio (95% confidence interval): 2.34 (1.29-4.26), P = 0.006, and 1.77 (0.99-3.13), P = 0.052, respectively]. Similarly, after adjusting for previously identified risk factors for multiple episodes of severe hypoglycemia, ACE DD genotype was independently associated with increased risk [incidence relative risk (95% confidence interval): 1.80 (1.00-3.24), P = 0.050].

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

ACE DD genotype was associated with an approximately 2-fold increased risk of the first episode of severe hypoglycemia and its subsequent frequency in well-characterized patients with type 2 diabetes. Consistent with previous case-control studies, ACE inhibitor therapy was a weak predictor of severe hypoglycemia. ACE I/D genotyping might provide useful adjunctive prognostic information when intensive glycemic control measures are contemplated.

Drug-induced hypoglycaemia: an update

Drugs are the most frequent cause of hypoglycaemia in adults. Although hypoglycaemia is a well known adverse effect of antidiabetic agents, it may occasionally develop in the course of treatment with drugs used in everyday clinical practice, including NSAIDs, analgesics, antibacterials, antimalarials, antiarrhythmics, antidepressants and other miscellaneous agents. They induce hypoglycaemia by stimulating insulin release, reducing insulin clearance or interfering with glucose metabolism. Several drugs may also potentiate the hypoglycaemic effect of antidiabetic agents. Administration of these agents to individuals with diabetes mellitus is of most concern. Many of these drugs, and depending on clinical setting, may also induce hyperglycaemia. Drug-induced hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity may lead in certain circumstances to hypoglycaemia. Some drugs may also induce hypoglycaemia by causing pancreatitis. Drug-induced hypoglycaemia is usually mild but may be severe. Effective clinical management can be handled through awareness of this drug-induced adverse effect on blood glucose levels. Herein, we review pertinent clinical information on the incidence of drug-induced hypoglycaemia and discuss the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, and prevention and management.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme and angiotensin II receptor subtype 2 genotypes in type 1 diabetes and severe hypoglycaemia requiring emergency treatment: a case cohort study

AIMS

In type 1 diabetes, individual susceptibility to severe hypoglycaemia is likely to be influenced by genetic factors. We have previously reported an association of the deletion (D-) allele of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism and the A-allele of the angiotensin II receptor subtype 2 (AT2R) 1675 G>A polymorphism with risk of severe hypoglycaemia in such patients. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that these alleles are more frequent in patients suffering from the most severe episodes of hypoglycaemia requiring medical emergency treatment.

METHODS

The case cohort study consisted of 108 cases of type 1 diabetic patients with severe hypoglycaemia requiring medical emergency treatment during a 1-year period and 262 consecutive controls without such events. ACE I/D and AT2R 1675G>A genotype distributions were compared between cases and controls.

RESULTS

The proportion of D-allele carriers was higher amongst cases than controls (83 vs. 73%; P=0.032). In contrast, AT2R genotype distribution was similar in cases and controls. In a multiple regression analysis, D-allele carriage remained a significant risk factor for being a case [odds ratio: 1.9 (1.0-3.6)] together with male sex, impaired symptomatic awareness of hypoglycaemia and presence of nephropathy.

CONCLUSION

The D-allele of the ACE gene is associated with severe hypoglycaemia requiring emergency treatment in type 1 diabetic patients with preserved spontaneous ACE activity. This supports the association between high ACE activity and occurrence of severe hypoglycaemia.

Drug-induced endocrine disorders in the intensive care unit

The neuroendocrine response to critical illness is key to the maintenance of homeostasis. Many of the drugs administered routinely in the intensive care unit significantly impact the neuroendocrine system. These agents can disrupt the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, cause thyroid abnormalities, and result in dysglycemia. Herein, we review major drug-induced endocrine disorders and highlight some of the controversies that remain in this area. We also discuss some of the more rare drug-induced syndromes that have been described in the intensive care unit. Drugs that may result in an intensive care unit admission secondary to an endocrine-related adverse event are also included. Unfortunately, very few studies have systematically addressed drug-induced endocrine disorders in the critically ill. Timely identification and appropriate management of drug-induced endocrine adverse events may potentially improve outcomes in the critically ill. However, more research is needed to fully understand the impact of medications on endocrine function in the intensive care unit.

Approach to managing hypoglycemia in elderly patients with diabetes

Hypoglycemia is a common clinical problem in elderly patients with diabetes. Aging modifies the counterregulatory and symptomatic responses to hypoglycemia. Hypoglycemia in the elderly is not only due to tight blood sugar control, but also due to a multitude of other factors. Hypoglycemia often occurs with insulin, sulfonylureas, or meglitinide therapy. However, other causes may also contribute to hypoglycemia, such as decreased cognition, renal impairment, or polypharmacy. The presenting features of hypoglycemia may be atypical and misinterpreted, resulting in delayed treatment. Morbidity is greater in elderly patients, and the risk of progression to severe hypoglycemia is high because of their altered symptom profile, diminished symptom intensity, and altered glycemic thresholds. Hypoglycemia seems to be the main limiting factor in their glycemic control. In this article we discuss strategies to prevent hypoglycemic episodes.

Development of an evidence-based checklist for the detection of drug related problems in type 2 diabetes

Objective To develop an evidence-based checklist to identify potential drug related problems (PDRP) in patients with type 2 diabetes. Setting The evidence based checklist was applied to records of ambulatory type 2 diabetes patients in New South Wales, Australia. Method After comprehensive review of the literature, relevant medication groups and potential drug related problems in type 2 diabetes were identified. All the relevant information was then structured in the form of a checklist. To test the utility of the evidence-based checklist a cross-sectional retrospective study was conducted. The PDRP checklist was applied to the data of 148 patients with established type 2 diabetes and poor glycaemic control. The range and extent of DRPs in this population were identified, which were categorized using the PCNE classification. In addition, the relationship between the total as well as each category of DRPs and several of the patients’ clinical parameters was investigated. Main outcome measure: Number and category of DRPs per patient. Results The PDRP checklist was successfully developed and consisted of six main sections. 682 potential DRPs were identified using the checklist, an average of 4.6 (SD = 1.7) per patient. Metabolic and blood pressure control in the study subjects was generally poor: with a mean HbA1c of 8.7% (SD = 1.5) and mean blood pressure of 139.8 mmHg (SD = 18.1)/81.7 mmHg (SD = 11.1). The majority of DRPs was recorded in the categories ‘therapy failure’ (n = 264) and ‘drug choice problem’ (n = 206). Potentially non-adherent patients had a significantly higher HbA1c than patients who adhered to therapy (HbA1c of 9.4% vs. 8.5%; P = 0.01). Conclusion This is the first tool developed specifically to detect potential DRPs in patients with type 2 diabetes. It was used to identify DRPs in a sample of type 2 diabetes patients and demonstrated the high prevalence of DRPs per patient. The checklist may assist pharmacists and other health care professionals to systematically identify issues in therapy and management of their type 2 diabetes patients and enable earlier intervention to improve metabolic control.

A signal of increased risk of hypoglycaemia with angiotensin receptor blockers caused by confounding

AIMS

To study reporting of hypoglycaemia in angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) users, and to investigate the possibility of confounding.

METHODS

The French pharmacovigilance database was examined for an association between hypoglycaemia and ARBs or other drugs using reports notified between 1996 and 2005. This association was also tested in patients taking or not taking antidiabetic agents (ADAs) using reporting odds ratios (ROR).

RESULTS

Hypoglycaemia was mentioned in 807 of the 174 595 reports entered during the study period. Overall hypoglycaemia was associated with the use of ARBs [ROR 2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1, 3] and with the use of ADAs (ROR 32, 95% CI 27, 37). Moreover, the use of ARBs was associated with the use of ADAs (OR 7, 95% CI 6, 8). Considering separately reports with and without ADA, the association of ARB use with a higher risk of hypoglycaemia disappeared (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2, 0.8 and OR 2, 95% CI 1, 3, respectively).

CONCLUSION

A signal indicating an association between ARB use and hypoglycaemia was found in the French pharmacovigilance database. This signal disappeared after stratification on ADA use, thus suggesting confounding by indication. Moreover, the association between ARB use and hypoglycaemia was negative in ADA users.

The association between antidepressant use and disturbances in glucose homeostasis: evidence from spontaneous reports

OBJECTIVES

Depression is common in patients with diabetes, and the use of antidepressants may impair glycaemic control. We assessed the association between antidepressant use and hyper- and hypoglycaemia.

METHODS

Based on spontaneous reports listed in the World Health Organization (WHO) Adverse Drug Reaction Database, a case-control study was conducted. The study base consisted of all adverse drug reactions (ADRs) ascribed to antidepressants, antipsychotics and benzodiazepines between 1969 and 2005. Cases were defined as reported ADRs classified as hyper- or hypoglycaemia and separated in different study populations. All other reports were considered as controls. Exposure to antidepressants was the primary determinant investigated. Benzodiazepines and antipsychotics were chosen as reference groups. Potential confounding factors, namely, age, gender, use of antidiabetic medication, use of hyper- or hypoglycaemia-inducing comedication and reporting year, were determined on the index date. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the strength of the association, which was expressed as reporting odds ratios (RORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

RESULTS

Overall, the use of antidepressants was associated with hyperglycaemia [ROR 1.52 (95% CI: 1.20-1.93)] and of hypoglycaemia [ROR 1.84 (95% CI: 1.40-2.42)]. The association with hyperglycaemia was most pronounced for antidepressants with affinity for the 5-HT(2c) receptor, histamine-(1) receptor and norepinephrinic (NE) reuptake transporter. The association with hypoglycaemia was most pronounced for antidepressants with affinity for the serotonin reuptake transporter.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study strengthen the findings in individual case reports that the use of antidepressants is associated with disturbances in glucose homeostasis.

Diabetes, left ventricular systolic dysfunction, and chronic heart failure

Chronic heart failure (HF) and diabetes mellitus (DM) commonly coexist. Each condition increases the likelihood of developing the other, and when they occur together in the same patient the risk of morbidity and mortality increases markedly. We discuss the epidemiological overlap and consider the complex patho-physiological pathways linking the two diseases. The treatment of each condition is made more problematic by the presence of the other. We review the evidence-based treatment strategies and discuss the common problems faced by physicians when treating patients with both conditions. This article forms a comprehensive overview of a fascinating intersection between two common diseases.

The association between antidepressant use and hypoglycaemia in diabetic patients: a nested case-control study

PURPOSE

Hypoglycaemia is a limiting factor for glycaemic management of diabetes with intensive insulin and/or oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) regimen. Case reports suggest that antidepressants may interfere with blood glucose metabolism in patients with diabetes mellitus potentially increasing the risk of clinically relevant hypoglycaemia. Comorbid depression treated with antidepressants could therefore further complicate glycaemic control. We have carried out a nested case-control study among diabetic patients to assess the risk of hypoglycaemia requiring hospitalisation associated with the use of antidepressants.

METHODS

Diabetic patients treated with insulin and/or OADs were selected from the Dutch Pharmo system. Exposure to antidepressants was the primary determinant investigated. Use of antidepressants was further subclassified based on the receptor binding profile to investigate whether specific pharmacological properties could explain a potential influence on glucose homeostasis. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios and to adjust for confounding factors.

RESULTS

From the base cohort (40 600 patients), 549 (1.35%) cases were identified and 1897 controls were selected. Current use of any antidepressant was not associated with a significantly higher risk of hypoglycaemia requiring hospitalisation (OR: 1.36 (95%CI: 0.84-2.20)). A trend for a higher risk on hypoglycaemia was identified for antidepressants with high affinity for the serotonin reuptake transporter. The risk on severe hypoglycaemia was increased after 3 years of use (OR: 2.75 (95%CI: 1.31-5.77)).

CONCLUSIONS

It is important for diabetic patients using antidepressants for more than 3 years to pay attention for symptoms of hypoglycaemia and strict blood glucose self-monitoring.

Validation of ICD-9-CM coding algorithm for improved identification of hypoglycemia visits

BACKGROUND

Accurate identification of hypoglycemia cases by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes will help to describe epidemiology, monitor trends, and propose interventions for this important complication in patients with diabetes. Prior hypoglycemia studies utilized incomplete search strategies and may be methodologically flawed. We sought to validate a new ICD-9-CM coding algorithm for accurate identification of hypoglycemia visits.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study using a structured medical record review at three academic emergency departments from July 1, 2005 to June 30, 2006. We prospectively derived a coding algorithm to identify hypoglycemia visits using ICD-9-CM codes (250.3, 250.8, 251.0, 251.1, 251.2, 270.3, 775.0, 775.6, and 962.3). We confirmed hypoglycemia cases by chart review identified by candidate ICD-9-CM codes during the study period. The case definition for hypoglycemia was documented blood glucose 3.9 mmol/l or emergency physician charted diagnosis of hypoglycemia. We evaluated individual components and calculated the positive predictive value.

RESULTS

We reviewed 636 charts identified by the candidate ICD-9-CM codes and confirmed 436 (64%) cases of hypoglycemia by chart review. Diabetes with other specified manifestations (250.8), often excluded in prior hypoglycemia analyses, identified 83% of hypoglycemia visits, and unspecified hypoglycemia (251.2) identified 13% of hypoglycemia visits. The absence of any predetermined co-diagnosis codes improved the positive predictive value of code 250.8 from 62% to 92%, while excluding only 10 (2%) true hypoglycemia visits. Although prior analyses included only the first-listed ICD-9 code, more than one-quarter of identified hypoglycemia visits were outside this primary diagnosis field. Overall, the proposed algorithm had 89% positive predictive value (95% confidence interval, 86-92) for detecting hypoglycemia visits.

CONCLUSION

The proposed algorithm improves on prior strategies to identify hypoglycemia visits in administrative data sets and will enhance the ability to study the epidemiology and design interventions for this important complication of diabetes care.

Blocking the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system to prevent diabetes mellitus

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) is increasing around the world, and the public health impact of DM, driven largely by cardiovascular disease complications, underpins the importance of continued efforts toward primary prevention of DM. Only a few interventions have been shown to prevent DM, with none of them yet proven to improve cardiovascular risk commensurately. Accumulating evidence suggest that drugs that block the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), many of which have proven cardiovascular disease (CVD) benefit, also have favourable effects on parameters of glucose metabolism and incident diabetes. Here we review the evidence accumulated to date from animal studies, clinical mechanistic studies and clinical trials regarding the effect of RAAS inhibition and incident DM.

The relationship between ACE genotype and risk of severe hypoglycaemia in a large population-based cohort of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

Genetic factors may account for familial clustering related to diabetes complications. Studies have shown a significant relationship between the presence of the deletion (D) allele of the gene encoding ACE and risk of severe hypoglycaemia. This large prospective cohort study assesses this relationship in a large sample of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

We studied 585 children and adolescents (mean age 11.9 +/- 4 years, 48.4% males). The frequency of severe hypoglycaemia (an event leading to loss of consciousness or seizure) was prospectively assessed over the 13-year period 1992-2004. Patients were seen with their parents every 3 months and data recorded at each visit. The ACE gene was detected using PCR.

RESULTS

In our cohort of 585 children, 186 (31.8%) had at least one episode of severe hypoglycaemia, and of these 28.0% had the II genotype, 48.9% had the ID genotype and 23.1% had the DD genotype. This was in agreement with the Hardy-Weinberg proportion. A total of 477 severe hypoglycaemic episodes was recorded with a total of 3,404 person-years of follow-up, giving a total incidence of 14 per 100 patient-years. No significant increase in risk for DD genotype (incidence rate ratio = 0.97, 95% CI 0.61-1.55) relative to II genotype was observed.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

This large prospective study concludes that the presence of the D allele of the ACE gene does not predict a significantly higher risk of severe hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetic children and adolescents.

Clinical characteristics influencing the effectiveness of metformin on Japanese type 2 diabetes receiving sulfonylureas

In this study, we described the effectiveness of metformin on Japanese type 2 diabetes patients receiving sulfonylureas and the clinical characteristics of the patients whose glycemic control were significantly improved with metformin administration. Our results showed that the reduction of glycohemoglobin (HbA1C), serum concentration of total cholesterol, and diastolic blood pressure was statistically significant through the administration of metformin. The clinical characteristics of the patients who responded to metformin therapy exhibited lower systolic blood pressure in addition to higher HbA1C value just before administration of metformin when compared with DeltaHbA1C (HbA1C 6 months after administration of metformin--HbA1C before administration of metformin). Moreover, effectiveness of metformin was weakened, in comparison with non-hypertensive patients, even though the blood pressure of hypertensive patients was reduced to normal range by medication with antihypertensive drugs. But average reduction of HbA1C level of hypertensive patients without antihypertensive medications was smaller than those of patients with high blood pressure with such medication. These results suggested that high blood pressure and hypertension phenotype itself were suppressive factors of metformin but antihypertensive therapy itself enhanced the effectiveness of metformin regardless of the improvement of blood pressure.

Infection-related hypoglycemia in institutionalized demented patients: a comparative study of diabetic and nondiabetic patients

Hypoglycemia is common in elderly community dwelling patients and may accompany episodes of acute infection. We analyzed the interrelations of clinical variables with infection-related hypoglycemia (IRH) and its outcome in institutionalized demented elderly patients, with and without diabetes mellitus (DM). This is a retrospective cohort study involving residents of a large long term-care facility. We measured demographic, clinical, functional, nutritional and cognitive data as well as blood counts and chemistry analysis. We identified 65 elderly patients with IRH and compared data of 33 diabetic patients with 32 nondiabetic patients. Mean age of patients was 77.7 years and mean Mini-Mental score of 1.8. Diabetic patients were younger, more cognitively impaired, had a lower functional score (nonsignificant differences), but presented with more comorbidities, compared with nondiabetics (p=0.004). Mean blood glucose levels in diabetics and nondiabetics were 53.2 and 54.3 mg/dl, respectively. Only 22% of the patients showed clinical signs indicating hypoglycemia. Multivariate analysis showed that, in groups, comorbidity and functional status, creatinine, albumin, C-reactive protein (CRP) and total cholesterol were all associated with IRH. During a 6 months period, 58% (38/65) of the patients died, out of whom 47% (18/38) died within one month following the documentation of IRH. There were no statistically significant differences in short and late mortality rates between patients with and without DM. we conclude that asymptomatic IRH in institutionalized demented elderly is frequently associated with common respiratory and urinary infections, in both diabetic and nondiabetic patients. IRH seems to indicate a poor general health status rather than being the cause of death. Blood glucose needs to be screened in this population during common infections, also in nondiabetics, to identify patients at high risk.

Hypoglycemia in Type 2 diabetic patients randomized to and maintained on monotherapy with diet, sulfonylurea, metformin, or insulin for 6 years from diagnosis: UKPDS73

The UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) showed that a more intensive glucose control policy reduced risk of diabetic complications. As hypoglycemia is a barrier to achieving glycemic targets, we examined its occurrence and contributing factors in UKPDS patients randomized to and remaining for 6 years on diet, sulfonylurea, metformin (overweight subjects only), or insulin monotherapy from diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes. Self-reported hypoglycemic episodes were categorized as (1) transient, (2) temporarily incapacitated, (3) requiring third-party assistance, and (4) requiring medical attention, recording the most severe episode each quarter. Proportions of patients reporting at least one episode per year were calculated in relation to therapy, HbA(1c), and clinical characteristics. In 5063 patients aged 25-65 years, only 2.5% per year reported substantive hypoglycemia (Grades 2-4) and 0.55% major hypoglycemia (Grade 3 or 4). Hypoglycemia was more frequent in younger (4.0% <45 years vs. 2.2% >or=45 years), female (3.0% vs. 2.2% male), normal weight (3.6% body mass index <25 kg/m(2) vs. 1.9% >or=25 kg/m(2)), less hyperglycemic (5.2% HbA(1c) <7% vs. 2.3% >or=7%), or islet autoantibody-positive patients (4.3% vs. 2.1% negative) (all P<.0001). More on basal insulin reported hypoglycemia (3.8% per year) than diet (0.1%), sulfonylurea (1.2%), or metformin (0.3%) therapy, but less than on basal and prandial insulin (5.3%) (all P<.0001). Low hypoglycemia rates seen during the first 6 years of intensive glucose lowering therapy in Type 2 diabetes are unlikely to have a major impact on attempts to achieve guideline glycemic targets when sulfonylurea, metformin, or insulin are used as monotherapy.

Drug interactions of clinical importance with antihyperglycaemic agents: an update

Because management of type 2 diabetes mellitus usually involves combined pharmacological therapy to obtain adequate glucose control and treatment of concurrent pathologies (especially dyslipidaemia and arterial hypertension), drug-drug interactions must be carefully considered with antihyperglycaemic drugs. Additive glucose-lowering effects have been extensively reported when combining sulphonylureas (or the new insulin secretagogues, meglitinide derivatives, i.e. nateglinide and repaglinide) with metformin, sulphonylureas (or meglitinide derivatives) with thiazolidinediones (also called glitazones) and the biguanide compound metformin with thiazolidinediones. Interest in combining alpha-glucosidase inhibitors with either sulphonylureas (or meglitinide derivatives), metformin or thiazolidinediones has also been demonstrated. These combinations result in lower glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)), fasting glucose and postprandial glucose levels than with either monotherapy. Even if modest pharmacokinetic interferences have been reported with some combinations, they do not appear to have important clinical consequences. No significant adverse effects, except a higher risk of hypoglycaemic episodes that may be attributed to better glycaemic control, occur with any combination. Challenging the classical dual therapy with sulphonylurea plus metformin, there is a recent trend to use alternative dual combinations (sulphonylurea plus thiazolidinedione or metformin plus thiazolidinedione). In addition, triple therapy with the addition of a thiazolidinedione to the metformin-sulphonylurea combination has been recently evaluated and allows glucose targets to be reached before insulin therapy is considered. This triple therapy appears to be safe, with no deleterious drug-drug interactions being reported so far.Potential interferences may also occur between glucose-lowering agents and other drugs, and such drug-drug interactions may have important clinical implications. Relevant pharmacological agents are those that are widely coadministered in diabetic patients (e.g. lipid-lowering agents, antihypertensive agents); those that have a narrow efficacy/toxicity ratio (e.g. digoxin, warfarin); or those that are known to induce (rifampicin [rifampin]) or inhibit (fluconazole) the cytochrome P450 (CYP) system. Metformin is currently a key compound in the pharmacological management of type 2 diabetes, used either alone or in combination with other antihyperglycaemics. There are no clinically relevant metabolic interactions with metformin, because this compound is not metabolised and does not inhibit the metabolism of other drugs. In contrast, sulphonylureas, meglitinide derivatives and thiazolidinediones are extensively metabolised in the liver via the CYP system and thus, may be subject to drug-drug metabolic interactions. Many HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) are also metabolised via the CYP system. Even if modest pharmacokinetic interactions may occur, it is not clear whether drug-drug interactions between oral antihyperglycaemic agents and statins may have clinical consequences regarding both efficacy and safety. In contrast, a marked pharmacokinetic interference has been reported between gemfibrozil and repaglinide and, to a lesser extent, between gemfibrozil and rosiglitazone. This leads to a drastic increase in plasma concentrations of each antihyperglycaemic agent when they are coadministered with the fibric acid derivative, and an increased risk of adverse effects. Some antihypertensive agents may favour hypoglycaemic episodes when co-prescribed with sulphonylureas or meglitinide derivatives, especially ACE inhibitors, but this effect seems to result from a pharmacodynamic drug-drug interaction rather than from a pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction. No, or only modest, interferences have been described with glucose-lowering agents and other pharmacological compounds such as digoxin or warfarin. The effects of inducers or inhibitors of CYP isoenzymes on the metabolism and pharmacokinetics of the glucose-lowering agents of each pharmacological class has been tested. Significantly increased (with CYP inhibitors) or decreased (with CYP inducers) plasma levels of sulphonylureas, meglitinide derivatives and thiazolidinediones have been reported in healthy volunteers, and these pharmacokinetic changes may lead to enhanced or reduced glucose-lowering action, and thus hypoglycaemia or worsening of metabolic control, respectively. In addition, some case reports have evidenced potential drug-drug interactions with various antihyperglycaemic agents that are usually associated with a higher risk of hypoglycaemia.

Regional influences on the dispensing of glucose test strips in Dutch community pharmacies

BACKGROUND

Pharmacy practice guidelines promote the role of community pharmacies in self-monitoring of blood glucose. However, variations between Dutch pharmacies exist in the proportion of patients to whom test strips are dispensed.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether variations between community pharmacies in dispensing of blood glucose test strips can be explained by differences in patient characteristics and the region in which the pharmacy is located.

SETTING

PHARMO-Record Linkage System containing drug dispensing histories from 40 community pharmacies of about 450,000 patients in the Netherlands.

METHOD

We performed a retrospective cohort study. Data on prescription of all drugs and medical aids between 1991 and 2001 were extracted for all new users of antidiabetic drugs. Patients were excluded if the dispensing history did not allow classification of the type of diabetes or if the dispensing pharmacy could not be determined. The data were analysed using a Cox proportional hazard model.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Time to first test strips dispensed.

RESULTS

We identified 8,233 starters of antidiabetic drugs. During a median follow-up of 2.1 years, 20% of the patients were dispensed test strips at least once. Community pharmacy was significantly associated with the dispensing of test strips after adjustment for patient characteristics. This association was less apparent when stratified for the geographical location of the pharmacy.

CONCLUSION

Community pharmacy is an independent determinant of the start of use of test strips. Differences in dispensing of test strips between pharmacies are dependent on geographical region. This suggests that implementing practice guidelines for diabetes care in community pharmacy requires different approaches in different regions.

Etiologies of acute hypoglycemia in a Taiwanese Hospital Emergency Department

The etiologies of acute hypoglycemia (< 2.8 mmol/L) in adult emergency patients were assessed to provide more proper and prompt management. There were 228 hypoglycemic patients (112 women and 116 men, ranging in age from 22 to 93 years, mean = 69.6 years) identified for the study. These patients had hypoglycemia mainly due to excessive use of sulfonylureas or insulin. There was a diabetic history in 182 patients (79.83%). Other primary etiologies of acute hypoglycemia were sepsis in 13 (5.70%), and extensive liver disease in 13 (5.70%). This study indicates that good diabetic control can dramatically decrease the number of episodes of acute hypoglycemia in Taiwan. For acute hypoglycemic patients without a diabetic history, the possibility of sepsis or extensive liver disease is a problem in Taiwan.

Role of the renin-angiotensin system in the endocrine pancreas: implications for the development of diabetes

Activation of the renin-angiotensin system has a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of diabetic complications. However, recent evidence suggests that it may also contribute to the development of diabetes itself. In the endocrine pancreas, all the components of an active renin-angiotensin system are present, which modulate a range of activities including local blood flow, hormone release and prostaglandin synthesis. In both types 1 and 2 diabetes, there is an up-regulation of its expression and activity in the endocrine pancreas. Whether these changes have a direct pathogenetic role or reflect a response to local stress or tissue injury remains to be established. Angiotensin-mediated increases in oxidative stress, inflammation and free fatty acids levels potentially contribute to beta-cell dysfunction in diabetes. In addition, activation of the renin-angiotensin system appears to potentiate the action of other pathogenic pathways including glucotoxicity, lipotoxicity and advanced glycation. In experimental models of type 2 diabetes, blockade of the renin-angiotensin system with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor antagonists results in the improvement of islet structure and function. Moreover, the incidence of de novo diabetes appears to be significantly reduced by blockade of the renin-angiotensin system in clinical studies. At least two large controlled trials are currently underway to study the role of renin-angiotensin system in the development of diabetes. It is hoped that these studies will demonstrate the true potential of the blockade of the renin-angiotensin system for the prevention of diabetes.

Enhancement of blood glucose lowering effect of a sulfonylurea when coadministered with an ACE inhibitor: results of a glucose-clamp study

BACKGROUND

To investigate if coadministration of enalapril alters the metabolic effect of glibenclamide by employing an euglycemic glucose-clamp technique in healthy volunteers.

METHODS

A double-blind crossover study with nine healthy normotensive volunteers (age 27 +/- 3 y, BMI 23.3 +/- 2.0 kg m(-2); mean +/- SD)-randomly assigned to a 3-day treatment of either 5 mg enalapril or placebo. In the morning of the fourth day, volunteers orally received 3.5 mg glibenclamide together with either 10 mg enalapril or placebo. Blood glucose levels of volunteers were allowed to fall by 10% from fasting levels and were kept constant thereafter by employing a Biostator-based euglycemic glucose clamp.

RESULTS

Coadministration of enalapril-compared with placebo-resulted in a temporarily higher metabolic effect of glibenclamide (AUC GIR(0-120)229 +/- 173 vs 137 +/- 44 mg kg(-1), p < 0.01; mean +/- SD), which lasted from 120 min to 240 min after enalapril administration. In parallel, the maximal metabolic effect of glibenclamide tended to be higher with enalapril (GIR(max)5.2 +/- 1.9 vs 4.1 +/- 1.3 mg kg(-1) min(-1); p = 0.19). However, the total metabolic effect of glibenclamide was almost identical between volunteers taking enalapril or placebo (AUC GIR(0-600)1267 +/- 334 vs 1286 +/- 249 mg kg(-1), ns). In contrast, serum insulin levels, C-peptide levels, and serum glibenclamide profiles were not significantly different between enalapril and placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study may explain the higher incidence of hypoglycemic episodes observed in patients with type 2 diabetes when taking ACE inhibitors together with sulfonylureas or insulin. ACE inhibitors may cause a temporary increase of the insulin sensitivity, which leads to an increased risk of hypoglycemia under these conditions.

Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus through inhibition of the Renin-Angiotensin system

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is becoming a major health problem associated with excess morbidity and mortality. As the prevalence of type 2 diabetes is rapidly increasing, prevention of the disease should be considered as a key objective in the near future. Besides lifestyle changes, various pharmacological treatments have proven their efficacy in placebo-controlled clinical trials, including antidiabetic drugs such as metformin, acarbose and troglitazone, or antiobesity agents such as orlistat. Arterial hypertension, a clinical entity in which insulin resistance is common, is strongly associated with type 2 diabetes and may precede the disease by several years. While antihypertensive agents such as diuretics or beta-adrenoceptor antagonists may worsen insulin resistance and impair glucose tolerance, newer antihypertensive agents exert neutral or even slightly positive metabolic effects. Numerous clinical trials have investigated the effects of ACE inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor antagonists (ARAs) on insulin sensitivity in hypertensive patients, with or without diabetes, with no consistent results. Almost half of the studies with ACE inhibitors in hypertensive nondiabetic individuals demonstrated a slight but significant increase in insulin sensitivity as assessed by insulin-stimulated glucose disposal during a euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic clamp, while the other half failed to reveal any significant change. The effects of ARAs on insulin sensitivity are neutral in most studies. Mechanisms of improvement of glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity through the inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) are complex. They may include improvement of blood flow and microcirculation in skeletal muscles and, thereby, enhancement of insulin and glucose delivery to the insulin-sensitive tissues, facilitating insulin signalling at the cellular level and improvement of insulin secretion by the beta cells. Six recent large-scale clinical studies reported a remarkably consistent reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes in hypertensive patients treated with either ACE inhibitors or ARAs for 3-6 years, compared with a thiazide diuretic, beta-adrenoceptor antagonist, the calcium channel antagonist amlodipine or even placebo. The relative risk reduction averaged 14% (p = 0.034) in the CAPPP (Captopril Prevention Project) with captopril compared with a thiazide or beta1-adrenoceptor antagonist, 34% (p < 0.001) in the HOPE (Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation) study with ramipril compared with placebo, 30% (p < 0.001) in the ALLHAT (Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial) with lisinopril compared with chlortalidone, 25% (p < 0.001) in the LIFE (Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study) with losartan compared with atenolol, and 25% (p = 0.09) in the SCOPE (Study on Cognition and Prognosis in the Elderly) with candesartan cilexetil compared with placebo, and 23% (p < 0.0001) in the VALUE (Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-term Use Evaluation) trial with valsartan compared with amlodipine. All these studies considered the development of diabetes as a secondary endpoint, except the HOPE trial where it was a post hoc analysis. These encouraging observations led to the initiation of two large, prospective, placebo-controlled randomised clinical trials whose primary outcome is the prevention of type 2 diabetes: the DREAM (Diabetes REduction Approaches with ramipril and rosiglitazone Medications) trial with the ACE inhibitor ramipril and the NAVIGATOR (Nateglinide And Valsartan in Impaired Glucose Tolerance Outcomes Research) trial with the ARA valsartan. Finally, ONTARGET (ONgoing Telmisartan Alone and in combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial) will also investigate as a secondary endpoint whether it is possible to prevent the development of type 2 diabetes by blocking the RAS with either an ACE inhibitor or an ARA or a combination of both. Thus, the recent consistent observations of a 14-34% reduction of the development of diabetes in hypertensive patients receiving ACE inhibitors or ARAs are exciting. From a theoretical point of view, they emphasise that there are many aspects of the pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes that still need to be uncovered. From a practical point of view, they may offer a new strategy to reduce the ongoing epidemic and burden of type 2 diabetes.