Randomised trialomania? The multicentre liver transplant trials of tacrolimus

Thirty Years of Tacrolimus in Clinical Practice

Tacrolimus was discovered in 1984 and entered clinical use shortly thereafter, contributing to successful solid organ transplantation across the globe. In this review, we cover development of tacrolimus, its evolving clinical utility, and issues affecting its current usage. Since earliest use of this class of immunosuppressant, concerns for calcineurin-inhibitor toxicity have led to efforts to minimize or eliminate these agents in clinical regimens but with limited success. Current understanding of the role of tacrolimus focuses more on its efficacy in preventing graft rejection and graft loss. As we enter the fourth decade of tacrolimus use, newer studies utilizing novel combinations (as with the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor, everolimus, and T-cell costimulation blockade with belatacept) offer potential for enhanced benefits.

One thousand consecutive primary liver transplants under tacrolimus immunosuppression: a 17- to 20-year longitudinal follow-up

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus has proven to be a potent immunosuppressive agent in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). The aim of this study is to examine its long-term efficacy and safety.

METHODS AND RESULTS

One thousand consecutive primary OLTs performed between August 1989 and December 1992 and maintained under tacrolimus-based immunosuppression were followed up until January 2009. Patient and graft survivals with corresponding causes of death and retransplantation, maintenance immunosuppression, and adverse effects were examined. The study population includes 600 males and 400 females comprising 166 children, 630 adults, and 204 seniors. The mean follow-up was 17.83 (range, 16.1-19.50) years. The overall 20-year actuarial patient and graft survivals were 35.8% and 32.6%, respectively. At the last follow-up, 442 patients were alive; 133 (77.1%) children, 265 (34.5%) adults, and 44 (16.1%) seniors (P=0.0001). After the first post-OLT year, cardiopulmonary events, recurrence of primary disease, and malignancy were the main causes of death. Overall, 183 recipients underwent retransplants; mainly for primary nonfunction, hepatic artery thrombosis, and recurrent primary disease, 180 required dialysis, and 45 underwent kidney transplant. A total of 97.7% of the survivors were on tacrolimus and 26.2% were also receiving adjunctive immunosuppressants at the last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall 20-year actuarial patient and graft survivals were 35.8% and 32.6%, respectively, with significantly better survival among children. Age-related complications, recurrence of primary disease, and malignancy were the major causes of late graft loss. Graft loss related to immunologic reasons was rare. The prevention of recurrent disease and newer immunosuppressive regimen will further improve these results.

Cyclosporin versus tacrolimus for liver transplanted patients

BACKGROUND

Most liver transplant recipients receive either cyclosporin or tacrolimus to prevent rejection. Both drugs inhibit calcineurin phosphatase which is thought to be the mechanism of their anti-rejection effect and principle toxicities. The drugs have different pharmacokinetic profiles and potencies. Several randomised clinical trials have compared cyclosporin and tacrolimus in liver transplant recipients, but it remains unclear which is superior.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the beneficial and harmful effects of immunosuppression with cyclosporin versus tacrolimus for liver transplanted patients.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index Expanded, and conference proceedings were searched (August 2005) to identify relevant randomised clinical trials. Our search included scanning of reference lists in relevant articles and correspondence with investigators and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised clinical trials where tacrolimus was compared with cyclosporin for the initial treatment of first-time liver transplant recipients. We included randomised trials irrespective of blinding, language, and publication status.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality. Data were synthesised (fixed-effect model) and results expressed as relative risk (RR), values less than 1.0 favouring tacrolimus, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Two authors assessed trials for eligibility, quality, and extracted data independently.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 16 randomised trials. The number of deaths was 254 in the tacrolimus group (1899 patients) and 302 in the cyclosporin group (1914 patients). At one year, mortality (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.99) and graft loss (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.86) were significantly reduced in tacrolimus-treated recipients. Tacrolimus reduced the number of recipients with acute rejection (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.88), and steroid-resistant rejection (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.74) in the first year. Differences were not seen with respect to lymphoproliferative disorder or de-novo dialysis rates, but more de-novo insulin-requiring diabetes mellitus (RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.86) occurred in the tacrolimus group. More patients were withdrawn from cyclosporin therapy than from tacrolimus (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.66).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Tacrolimus is superior to cyclosporin in improving survival (patient and graft) and preventing acute rejection after liver transplantation, but it increases the risk of post-transplant diabetes. Treating 100 recipients with tacrolimus instead of cyclosporin would avoid acute rejection and steroid-resistant rejection in nine and seven patients, respectively, and graft loss and death in five and two patients, respectively, but four additional patients would develop diabetes after liver transplantation.

Cyclosporin versus tacrolimus as primary immunosuppressant after liver transplantation: a meta-analysis

A systematic review of randomized clinical trials (RCT) was undertaken to evaluate the beneficial and harmful effects of immunosuppression with cyclosporin versus tacrolimus for liver transplanted patients. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central and Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Registers were searched. Using fixed and random effects model, relative risk (RR), values <1 favoring tacrolimus, with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Of 717 potentially relevant references, 16 RCTs were eligible for inclusion. Mortality and graft loss at 1 year were significantly reduced in tacrolimus-treated recipients (Death: RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.73-0.99; graft loss: RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.61-0.86). Tacrolimus reduced the number of recipients with acute rejection (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.75-0.88) and steroid-resistant rejection (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.47-0.74) in the first year. Lymphoproliferative disorder or dialysis rates were not different but more de novo diabetes (RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.01-1.86) occurred with tacrolimus. More patients stopped cyclosporin than tacrolimus (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.49-0.66). Treating 100 recipients with tacrolimus instead of cyclosporin would avoid rejection and steroid-resistant rejection in nine and seven patients respectively, graft loss and death in five and two patients respectively, but four additional patients would develop diabetes after liver transplantation.

Tacrolimus for Primary Liver Transplantation: 12 to 15 Years Actual Follow-Up With Safety Profile

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus has been increasingly used for liver transplantation during the last decade. The drug has immunological advantages in short- to medium-term follow-up. However, data on longitudinal follow-up are lacking.

AIM

The aim of the present report was to examine the impact of tacrolimus in primary adult and pediatric liver transplantation (LTx) patients.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

One thousand consecutive primary LTx patients were performed under tacrolimus between August 1989 and December 1992 were followed up until August 2004. Mean follow-up was 13.4 +/- 0.92 (range, 11.7-15) years. There were 600 males and 400 females with a mean age of 42.6 +/- 20.2 years. There were 166 children (age 18 years or younger) and 834 adults, of whom 204 were older than 60 years (seniors).

RESULTS

Four hundred ninety-seven (49.7%) patients died in the follow-up period. The overall 15-year actuarial patient survival rate was 51.4%. The survival rate for children was significantly better (81.3%) compared with adults (47.5%) and seniors (36.4%) (P = .0001). One hundred fifty-one patients received a second LTx, 22 patients received a third LTx, and 4 patients received a fourth LTx. Over all 15 years the actuarial graft survival rate was 46.1%. At last follow-up, 69.1% of patients were off steroids. The majority of late deaths were due to age-related complications, recurrence of disease, and De novo cancers.

CONCLUSION

The data on longitudinal follow-up have shown actuarial survival for children to be significantly better than in adults and seniors. Graft loss from immunological causes are rare even with long-term follow-up.

Tacrolimus in liver transplantation

Tacrolimus has been in clinical use for ten years. It was launched in a hail of publicity following the successful treatment of cases with apparently irreversible rejection using conventional immunosuppressive therapies. Since that time, the overall experience with the drug has increased considerably. The purpose of this article is to review tacrolimus comprehensively, including evidence derived from major clinical trials, to enable the reader to become familiar with its clinical role, including a comparison with its main competitor, cyclosporin. Tacrolimus was discovered in 1984, it predominantly acts via inhibition of T-cell mediated immunity, and to a lesser extent B-cell humoral immunity. The agent was introduced into clinical medicine in 1989 and was soon shown to be a highly effective immunosuppressive agent, receiving approval in 1994 by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for primary immunosuppression in adult and paediatric liver transplantation. Tacrolimus has proved to be a major development in transplantation. Whilst the available data have been hindered to some extent by deficiencies of trial design in the major studies, there is still more comparative clinical data available for tacrolimus than for any of its predecessors. The overall balance of risk benefit is considered by many to be tipped in favour of tacrolimus; it is likely that with more long-term follow-up results becoming available in liver and other solid organ transplants, the benefits will appear clearer.

Pregnancy after liver transplantation with tacrolimus immunosuppression: a single center's experience update at 13 years

BACKGROUND

Chronic liver disease often leads to amenorrhea in women of childbearing age. There are several reports of successful pregnancy after liver transplantation (LTx) with cyclosporine A immunosuppression. Tacrolimus has been increasingly used in solid-organ transplantation, and the effect of the drug on pregnancy is still of interest to clinicians. This study updates our single-center experience.

METHODS

All pregnancies after LTx with tacrolimus immunosuppression were followed prospectively. Patients' clinical courses during pregnancy and labor along with gestational period and birth weight were catalogued. Changes in liver function, renal function, and immunosuppression also were recorded. The birth weight percentile was calculated on the basis of the gestational period using a standard chart.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven mothers delivered 49 babies. Three mothers delivered three times, and six mothers delivered two times. Thirty-six mothers (97%) survived the pregnancy, and 36 allografts (97%) survived. The one death and graft loss was in a patient who demonstrated infra-aortic arterial graft, which clotted by the gravid uterus during labor. The patient developed a gangrenous liver and died before she could undergo retransplantation. The mean gestational period was 36.4+/-3.2 weeks, excluding two premature deliveries at 23 and 24 weeks gestation. Twenty-two babies (46.9%) were delivered by cesarean section, and the other babies were delivered vaginally. In addition to the two premature babies, one baby, who was born to a mother with Alagille syndrome, died from congenital birth defects. The rest of the newborns survived. The mean birth weight was 2,797+/-775 g, with 38 babies (78%) weighing more than 2,000 g. The mean birth weight percentile to gestational period was 54+/-23. Four babies (8.5%) had a birth weight percentile of less than 25, and 28 babies (59.6%) had a birth weight percentile greater than 50. Twelve patients demonstrated an increase in hepatic enzymes without jaundice during the pregnancy. All of them responded to augmentation of immunosuppression.

CONCLUSION

The present report reconfirms the safety of tacrolimus during pregnancy after LTx. Preterm delivery and low birth weight seem to be a persistent problem in all solid-organ transplantation under any form of immunosuppression. However, toxemia of pregnancy and new onset of hypertension seem to be have a low occurrence with the use of tacrolimus.

Liver failure, transplantation, and critical care

The management of patients for end-stage liver disease in the ICU mandates a multidisciplinary approach and intense monitoring. Orthotopic liver transplantation still remains the only definitive therapy. Given the increasing disparity between the number of potential recipients and available cadaver organs, the current challenge is to optimize outcome with the limited resource. In recent years, considerable progress has been made in developing specific and supportive medical measures. Future research should target a better understanding of mechanisms responsible for liver cell death and liver regeneration, as well as developments in xenotransplantation, hepatocyte transplantation, and liver-directed gene therapy.

Tacrolimus versus microemulsified ciclosporin in liver transplantation: the TMC randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Calcineurin inhibitors are the most commonly used immunosuppressive drugs in liver transplantation, but the optimum initial immunosuppression regimen is not known. The aim of our study was to compare tacrolimus with microemulsified ciclosporin, in a regimen with standardised concomitant immunosuppressive therapy.

METHODS

In all liver transplant centres in the UK and Republic of Ireland, 606 patients undergoing a first orthotopic liver transplantation were randomly assigned open-label tacrolimus or microemulsified ciclosporin. Primary outcome was the combined frequency (whichever occurred first) of death, retransplantation, or treatment failure for immunological reasons, analysed by intention to treat.

FINDINGS

96% of patients received the treatment allocated to them. The primary outcome was reached in 62 (21%) of 301 patients in the tacrolimus group versus 99 (32%) of 305 allocated microemulsified ciclosporin (relative risk 0.63 [95% CI 0.48-0.84], p=0.001; time-to-event analysis log-rank test p=0.002): deaths (50 [17%] vs 72 [24%]); retransplantations (11 [4%] vs 31 [10%]) treatment failure for immunological reasons (6 [2%] vs 12 [4%]). The relative risk for the composite outcome was in favour of tacrolimus. The main causes of death in both trial groups were sepsis and multiple organ failure (31 [10%] vs 30 [10%]), and the main cause for retransplantation was hepatic artery thrombosis (6 [2%] vs 17 [6%]). Renal dysfunction and the need for antihypertensive therapy were much the same in both groups. Tacrolimus was more diabetogenic.

INTERPRETATION

Clinical outcome at 1 year was better with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression than with microemulsified ciclosporin during the first year after liver transplantation. Tacrolimus should be the first choice of calcineurin inhibitor for patients receiving their first liver graft.

Does tacrolimus offer virtual freedom from chronic rejection after primary liver transplantation? Risk and prognostic factors in 1,048 liver transplantations with a mean follow-up of 6 years

Tacrolimus has proven to be a potent immunosuppressive agent in liver transplantation (LT). Its introduction has led to significantly less frequent and severe acute rejection. Little is known about the rate of chronic rejection (CR) in primary LT using tacrolimus therapy. The aim of the present study is to examine the long-term incidence of CR, risk factors, prognostic factors, and outcome after CR. The present study evaluated the development of CR in 1,048 consecutive adult primary liver allograft recipients initiated and mostly maintained on tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive therapy. They were evaluated with a mean follow-up of 77.3 +/- 14.7 months (range, 50.7 to 100.1 months). To assess the impact of primary diagnosis on the rate and outcome of CR, the population was divided into 3 groups. Group I included patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV)- or hepatitis B virus (HBV)-induced cirrhosis (n = 312); group II included patients diagnosed with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), or autoimmune hepatitis (AIH; n = 217); and group III included patients with all other diagnoses (n = 519). Overall, 32 of 1,048 patients (3.1%) developed CR. This represented 13 (4.1%), 12 (5.5%), and 7 patients (1.3%) in groups I, II, and III, respectively. The relative risk for developing CR was 3.2 times greater for group I and 4.3 times greater for group II compared with group III. This difference was statistically significant (P =.004). The incidence of acute rejection and total number of acute rejection episodes were significantly greater in patients who developed CR compared with those who did not (P <.0001). Similarly, the mean donor age for CR was significantly older than for patients without CR (43.0 v 36.2 years; P =.02). Thirteen of the 32 patients (40.6%) who developed CR retained their original grafts for a mean period of 54 +/- 25 months after diagnosis. Seven patients (21.9%) underwent re-LT, and 12 patients (38.3%) died. Serum bilirubin levels and the presence of arteriopathy, arterial loss, and duct loss on liver biopsy at the time of diagnosis of CR were significantly greater among the 3 groups of patients. In addition, patient and graft survival for group I were significantly worse compared with groups II and III. We conclude that CR occurred rarely among patients maintained long term on tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive therapy. When steroid use is controlled, the incidence of acute rejection, mean donor age, HBV- and/or HCV-induced cirrhosis, or a diagnosis of PBC, PSC, or AIH were found to be predictors of CR. Greater values for serum bilirubin level, duct loss, arteriopathy, arteriolar loss, and presence of HCV or HBV were found to be poor prognostic factors for the 3 groups; greater total serum bilirubin value (P =.05) was the only factor found to be significant between patients who had graft loss versus those who recovered.

Reasons why some children receiving tacrolimus therapy require steroids more than 5 years post liver transplantation

Tacrolimus is a potent immunosuppressive agent and has been used in liver transplantation (LTx) for nearly a decade. More than 70% of children can be maintained on tacrolimus monotherapy, without steroids, by the end of 1 yr post-Tx. This freedom from steroids does not appear to change significantly in subsequent years. The use of steroids has obvious metabolic and cosmetic disadvantages, besides affecting linear growth in children. The present study identifies why some children still require steroid therapy after successful LTx. One hundred and sixty-six consecutive pediatric patients who had undergone primary LTx between October 1989 and December 1992, were included in this study. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 9 yr (mean 7.5 +/- 0.8 yr). One hundred and forty-one children were alive in November 1998 and these patients constituted the study group. Their current rate of prednisone use, reason for prednisone use, and prednisone dose were examined retrospectively. Of the 141 patients, 139 (98.5%) had stopped taking steroids at some time-point after LTx. Thirteen patients (9%) were off immunosuppression altogether (group I), 97 were undergoing tacrolimus monotherapy (group II), and the remaining 31 were receiving therapy with steroids and tacrolimus (group III). The mean prednisone dose at the last follow-up was 6.5 +/- 4.9 mg/day (median 5.0 mg/day). In group III, two children were never weaned off steroids because of inadequate follow-up (both lived outside the country), and the remaining 29 children completely stopped steroid therapy at some time-point after LTx; however, prednisone was re-introduced for clinically suspected or biopsy-proven rejection in 24. Seven children in group III had completely stopped immunosuppressive therapy either as part of an immunosuppression reduction protocol (n = 3) or for suspected or proven post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) (n = 4). In eleven of the 18 children in group III, requirement of steroid for rejection was thought to be related, in part, to non-compliance. In three children in group III, steroids were re-introduced for renal dysfunction, and two of these patients subsequently received a kidney Tx. In one child with cerebral ischemia, steroids were used to reduce brain edema, and another child had features of auto-immune hepatitis. Hence, almost all children can be weaned off steroids when tacrolimus is used as primary immunosuppression after primary LTx. However, approximately 22% of children may need re-institution of steroids because of late acute rejection or renal dysfunction. The concomitant use of other non-steroidal immunosuppressive agents with tacrolimus may further reduce the dose and rate of steroid use.

Pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid after mycophenolate mofetil administration in liver transplant patients treated with tacrolimus

The pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid (MPA) was studied after oral administration of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in 8 liver transplant patients. The mean (+/- SD) maximum MPA plasma concentration of 10.6 (+/- 7.5) mg/ml was achieved within 0.5 to 5 hours. The mean (+/- SD) steady-state area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC(0-12)) was 40 (+/- 30.9) mg/ml/h. The mean (+/- SD) half-life was 5.8 (+/- 3.8) hours. There was poor correlation between trough blood concentrations of tacrolimus (r = -0.004) or serum creatinine (r = 0.689) with MPA AUC, while the serum bilirubin concentrations correlated (r = 0.743) well with MPA AUC, suggesting impairment in MPA conjugation in patients with liver dysfunction. The mean (+/- SD) ratio of the AUC of mycophenolic acid glucuronide (MPAG) to MPA was 64 (+/- 84), which correlated significantly with serum creatinine (r = 0.72) but not with serum bilirubin concentrations (r = 0.309), indicating accumulation of MPAG in patients with renal dysfunction. In 7 primary liver transplant patients on the same dose of MMF, the trough plasma concentrations of MPA during the first week of therapy ranged from < 0.3 to 1.5 microg/ml. The MPA concentrations increased by several folds during the next few weeks, which correlates well with increases in serum albumin concentrations. Changes in albumin appear to partially contribute to the variations in the pharmacokinetics of MPA in liver transplant patients.

Long-term follow-up after liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease under tacrolimus

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation (LTx) for alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) is an accepted modality of treatment and is one of the most common indications for LTx in the United States. The present report examines the long-term patient survival, graft survival, rates of recidivism, and development of de novo cancers in this group, and compares these results with a contemporaneous group of patients who were transplanted for non-ALD indications.

METHODS

Between August 1989 and December 1992, 185 adults received LTx for ALD (group I). During the same time interval, 649 adults received LTx for non-ALD (group II). The mean follow-up time was 94+/-10.7 months for group I vs. 92+/-11 months for group II. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and the incidence of cancers using Surveillance Epidemiologic End Result data were compared in both groups.

RESULTS

At 5 years after orthotopic LTx, the overall patient survival and graft survival for group I were 72.0% and 66.5% vs. 66.5% and 60.3% for group II, respectively. After 5 years, the patient survival and graft survival for the alcoholic group were significantly lower (P=0.001) compared to the non-alcoholic group. The rate of de novo oropharyngeal cancer and lung cancer was 25.5 times and 3.7 times higher, respectively, in ALD group compared with the general population matched for age, sex, and length of follow-up (P=0.001), whereas this was not higher in the non-ALD group. Prior pretransplant length of sobriety and alcohol rehabilitation was not associated with the rate of post-LTx rate of recidivism, which was 20%. Out of 79 deaths in group I, only 1 was attributed to recidivism and 3 to noncompliance with recidivism. The other deaths occurred from de novo cancer (n=13), posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (n=5), age-related complications (n=23), and other infection or miscellaneous causes (n=34).

CONCLUSIONS

Patient and graft survival past 5 years after orthotopic LTx is significantly lower for ALD for a variety of reasons (P=0.001). The rate of upper airway malignances was significantly higher in ALD patients than for non-ALD post-LTx patients and the general public. Graft loss/death related to recidivism or chronic rejection was extremely low. More attention is needed for early diagnosis of de novo cancer and prevention of cardiorespiratory and cerebrovascular complications.

History of clinical transplantation

The emergence of transplantation has seen the development of increasingly potent immunosuppressive agents, progressively better methods of tissue and organ preservation, refinements in histocompatibility matching, and numerous innovations in surgical techniques. Such efforts in combination ultimately made it possible to successfully engraft all of the organs and bone marrow cells in humans. At a more fundamental level, however, the transplantation enterprise hinged on two seminal turning points. The first was the recognition by Billingham, Brent, and Medawar in 1953 that it was possible to induce chimerism-associated neonatal tolerance deliberately. This discovery escalated over the next 15 years to the first successful bone marrow transplantations in humans in 1968. The second turning point was the demonstration during the early 1960s that canine and human organ allografts could self-induce tolerance with the aid of immunosuppression. By the end of 1962, however, it had been incorrectly concluded that turning points one and two involved different immune mechanisms. The error was not corrected until well into the 1990s. In this historical account, the vast literature that sprang up during the intervening 30 years has been summarized. Although admirably documenting empiric progress in clinical transplantation, its failure to explain organ allograft acceptance predestined organ recipients to lifetime immunosuppression and precluded fundamental changes in the treatment policies. After it was discovered in 1992 that long-surviving organ transplant recipients had persistent microchimerism, it was possible to see the mechanistic commonality of organ and bone marrow transplantation. A clarifying central principle of immunology could then be synthesized with which to guide efforts to induce tolerance systematically to human tissues and perhaps ultimately to xenografts.

Chronic liver allograft rejection in a population treated primarily with tacrolimus as baseline immunosuppression: long-term follow-up and evaluation of features for histopathological staging

BACKGROUND

Predisposing factors, long-term occurrence, and histopathological changes associated with recovery or progression to allograft failure from chronic rejection (CR) were studied in adult patients treated primarily with tacrolimus.

METHODS

CR cases were identified using stringent criteria applied to a retrospective review of computerized clinicopathological data and slides.

RESULTS

After 1973 days median follow-up, 35 (3.3%) of 1049 primary liver allograft recipients first developed CR between 16 and 2532 (median 242) days. The most significant risk factors for CR were the number (P<0.001) and histological severity (P<0.005) of acute rejection episodes and donor age >40 years (P<0.03). Other demographic and matching parameters were not associated with CR in this cohort. Ten patients died with, but not of, CR. Eight required retransplantation because of CR at a median of 268 days. Ten resolved either histologically or by normalization of liver injury tests over a median of 548 days. CR persisted for 340 to 2116 days in the remaining seven patients. More extensive bile duct loss (P<0.01), smallarterial loss (P<0.03), foam cell clusters (P<0.01) and higher total bilirubin (P<0.02) and aspartate aminotransferase (P<0.03) were associated with allograft failure from CR.

CONCLUSIONS

Early chronic liver allograft rejection is potentially reversible and a combination of histological, clinical, and laboratory data can be used to stage CR. Unique immunological and regenerative properties of liver allografts, which lead to a low incidence and reversibility of early CR, can provide insights into transplantation biology.

An analysis of pretransplantation variables associated with long-term allograft outcome in pediatric liver transplant recipients receiving primary tacrolimus (FK506) therapy

BACKGROUND

The present study analyzes pretransplantation variables associated with long-term liver allograft survival in 278 children who underwent transplantation under primary tacrolimus (FK506) therapy at a single center between October 1989 and October 1996.

METHODS

The influence of 17 pretransplantation variables on long-term liver allograft outcome was analyzed. Donor variables included age, weight, gender, and cold ischemia time. Recipient variables included age, weight, gender, original liver disease, pretransplantation waiting time, previous abdominal surgery, United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) status, ABO blood group, bilirubin level, prothrombin time, ammonia level, creatinine level, and reduced-size/split liver grafts.

RESULTS

Overall actuarial graft survival was 79.9% at 1 year, 79.1% at 2 years, and 78.3% at 3, 4, and 5 years. Retransplantation rate was 10.8%. Pretransplantation variables with a significant adverse effect on graft survival by univariate analysis were donor age < or = 1 year (P<0.004), donor weight < or = 10 kg (P<0.003), UNOS status I and II (P<0.007), ABO type O, B, and AB (P<0.03), and reduced-size/split liver grafts (P<0.02). Pretransplantation variables significant by multivariate analysis and therefore independent predictors of inferior graft outcome were donor weight '10 kg (relative risk [RR] 2.91, confidence interval [CI] 1.53-5.51); reduced-size/split liver grafts (RR 2.53, CI 1.30-5.64); and UNOS status I (RR 2.22, CI 1.11-4.43).

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric liver transplant recipients receiving primary tacrolimus therapy have long-term graft survival rates approaching 80%. UNOS status, donor weight, and the use of reduced-size/split liver grafts are the most important factors affecting survival.

What have we learned about primary liver transplantation under tacrolimus immunosuppression? Long-term follow-up of the first 1000 patients

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the long-term efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) recipients, as well as to examine the factors that influence long-term morbidity and mortality rates.

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus (FK506, Prograf) was introduced as primary immunosuppression for primary liver transplantation in 1989; many subsequent trials have verified the association of tacrolimus with decreased rates of acute rejection and steroid-resistant rejection after OLT. Cumulative experience with tacrolimus has also defined its short- and intermediate-term toxicity.

METHODS

One thousand consecutive patients undergoing primary OLT at a single center from August 1989 to December 1992, under tacrolimus immunosuppression, were followed until January 1999. Patients were categorized by age. Mean follow-up was 93.4+/-11 months after OLT. Patient survival, graft survival (with corresponding causes of death and retransplantation), and rejection rates (and corresponding doses of immunosuppression) were examined as efficacy parameters. Hypertension, renal function, incidence of malignancies, incidence of diabetes, and other toxicities were examined as safety parameters.

RESULTS

Actual 6-year overall patient survival rate was 68.1% and graft survival rate was 62.5%, with significant differences in the patterns of survival among the different age groups. After the first post-OLT year, infection, recurrence of disease, de novo malignancies, and cardiovascular events were the main causes of graft loss and death during the long-term follow-up. Graft loss related to either acute or chronic rejection was rare. The rate of acute rejection beyond 2 years was approximately 3% per year, and most were steroid-responsive. Approximately 70% of the patients were receiving tacrolimus monotherapy beyond year 1; at the latest follow-up, 74.2% were maintained on tacrolimus alone. In 6.1% of the survivors, end-stage renal disease developed during the follow-up period, requiring either dialysis or kidney transplantation. Hyperkalemia and hypertension was observed in approximately one third of the patients. Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (including patients who had diabetes before the transplant) was observed in 14% in year 1, dropping to 11% in year 7. In 82 patients, de novo malignancies developed; in 41 patients, lymphoproliferative disorders developed during the entire follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term patient and graft survival rates are excellent under tacrolimus immunosuppression. Pediatric patients have a better long-term outcome than adults, in part because of the limited recurrence of the original disease, which was the most common cause of late graft loss (other than patient death, most commonly the result of late de novo malignancies and cardiovascular events). Graft loss from late rejection was rare.

Cyclosporine and tacrolimus (FK506): a comparison of efficacy and safety profiles

Multicenter clinical trials conducted in the United States and Europe to compare the efficacy and safety of cyclosporine with tacrolimus (FK506) have demonstrated comparable long-term patient survival and graft survival in liver and renal transplant recipients. Importantly, treatment with tacrolimus was associated with reductions in the incidence and severity of acute rejection episodes. However, tacrolimus-based therapy was also associated with increased toxicities in comparison to conventional cyclosporine-based therapy. It is becoming increasingly accepted that earlier trials may have employed high or supratherapeutic doses of tacrolimus and may have been unbalanced with respect to study design. In addition, these pivotal comparative trials were performed with the original formulation of cyclosporine, and not the cyclosporine microemulsion preparation. This critical review of the literature focuses on the United States and European tacrolimus multicenter clinical trials and examines the efficacy and safety of the two primary immunosuppressants, cyclosporine and tacrolimus, obtained in these and other studies. The preliminary findings of ongoing studies comparing the efficacy and safety of the improved formulation, cyclosporine microemulsion, with tacrolimus are also discussed. The overall efficacy of the two agents appears to be similar. The safety profile shows differing toxicities of the two medications. The availability of these two immunosuppressants allows the clinician improved options when choosing an immunosuppressive regimen in solid organ transplantation.

Three amino acid residues determine selective binding of FK506-binding protein 12.6 to the cardiac ryanodine receptor

FK506-binding protein (FKBP12) has been found to be associated with the skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor (RyR1) (calcium release channel), whereas FKBP12.6, a novel isoform of FKBP, is selectively associated with the cardiac ryanodine receptor (RyR2). For both RyRs, the stoichiometry is 4 FKBP/RyR. Although FKBP12.6 differs from FKBP12 by only 18 of 108 amino acids, FKBP12.6 selectively binds to RyR2 and exchanges with bound FKBP12.6 of RyR2, whereas both FKBP isoforms bind to RyR1 and exchange with bound FKBP12 of RyR1. To assess the amino acid residues of FKBP12.6 that are critical for selective binding to RyR2, the residues of FKBP12.6 that differ with FKBP12 were mutated to the respective residues of FKBP12. RyR2 of cardiac sarcoplasmic reticulum, prelabeled by exchange with [35S]FKBP12.6, was used as assay system for binding/exchange with the mutants. The triple mutant (Q31E/N32D/F59W) of FKBP12.6 was found to lack selective binding to the cardiac RyR2, comparable with that of FKBP12.0. In complementary studies, mutations of FKBP12 to the three critical amino acids of FKBP12.6, conferred selective binding to RyR2. Each of the FKBP12.6 and FKBP12 mutants retained binding to the skeletal muscle RyR1. We conclude that three amino acid residues (Gln31, Asn32, and Phe59) of human FKBP12.6 account for the selective binding to cardiac RyR2.

Primary adult liver transplantation under tacrolimus: more than 90 months actual follow-up survival and adverse events

The introduction of tacrolimus has shown decreased rates of acute and steroid-resistant rejection after liver transplantation (LTx). The aim of the present study is to examine the long-term efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in primary liver transplant recipients. The first 121 consecutive adults (aged >16 years) who underwent primary LTx at a single center from August 1989 to February 1990 were followed up until August 1997. The mean follow-up was 93.2 +/- 1.2 months (range, 90.5 to 96.5 months). Patient survival, graft survival, rate of rejection, and adverse events were examined. The actual 7-year patient survival rate was 67.8%, and the graft survival rate was 63.6%. Infections, recurrence of disease, de novo malignancies, and cardiovascular events constituted the main causes of graft loss and death in the long term. Graft loss related to acute or chronic rejection was rare. The rate of acute rejection beyond 2 years was approximately 3% per year, and most rejections were steroid responsive. Approximately 70% of the patients received only tacrolimus after 1 year. Four patients developed end-stage renal disease, and 2 patients underwent kidney transplantation. Hyperkalemia and hypertension were observed in one third of the patients. New-onset insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus was observed in 9% and 13% of the patients at the 1-year and 7-year follow-up, respectively. Seven patients developed de novo malignancies, including two skin malignancies. Six patients developed posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder during the entire follow-up period. Actual patient and graft survival at 7 years was excellent, and few adverse events developed after the first year. Graft loss from acute or chronic rejection was rare under tacrolimus, and approximately 70% of the patients were steroid free on tacrolimus monotherapy after the first year after LTx.

Chimerism and xenotransplantation. New concepts

In both transplant and infectious circumstances, the immune response is governed by migration and localization of the antigen. If the antigenic epitopes of transgenic xenografts are sufficiently altered to avoid evoking the destructive force of innate immunity, the mechanisms of engraftment should be the same as those that permit the chimerism-dependent immunologic confrontation and resolution that is the basis of allograft acceptance. In addition to "humanizing" the epitopes, one of the unanswered questions is whether the species restriction of complement described in 1994 by Valdivia and colleagues also necessitates the introduction of human complement regulatory genes in animal donors. Because the liver is the principal or sole source of most complement components, the complement quickly is transformed to that of the donor after hepatic transplantation. Thus, the need for complementary regulatory transgenes may vary according to the kind of xenograft used. Much evidence shows that physiologically important peptides produced by xenografts (e.g., insulin, clotting factors, and enzymes) are incorporated into the metabolic machinery of the recipient body. To the extent that this is not true, xenotransplantation could result in the production of diseases that are analogous to inborn errors of metabolism. In the climate of pessimism that followed the failures of baboon to human liver xenotransplantation in 1992-1993, it seemed inconceivable that the use of even more discordant donors, such as the pig, could ever be seriously entertained; however, this preceded insight into the xenogeneic and allogeneic barriers that has brought transplantation infectious immunity to common ground. With this new insight and the increasing ease of producing transgenic donors, the goal of clinical xenotransplantation may not be so distant.

Pediatric transplantation

Advances in organ preservation, surgical technique, and postoperative care have permitted the rapid development of liver transplantation in children. Consequently, the applicability of this procedure has gone beyond the treatment of life-threatening complications of chronic liver disease and now includes disabling morbidities and quality-of-life issues. The use of hepatic segments for transplantation with reduced or split cadaveric grafts and living-related donors has decreased the mortality of children awaiting liver transplantation. We are presently armed with a new potent immunosuppressive drug, tacrolimus, and an understanding that the migration and grafting of passenger leukocytes of bone marrow origin is the seminal explanation for allograft acceptance. The next forefront will involve manipulation of the process not only for the transplantation of already successful whole organs--such as the liver, kidney, pancreas, and heart--but also in the development of the intestinal transplantation program. Thus, augmentation of leukocyte traffic in unconditioned recipients of cadaver allografts with concomitant intravenous infusion of donor bone marrow cells under the same immunosuppressive management of tacrolimus-prednisone treatment will be the path into the future.

Immunosuppressive therapy

Although several new immunosuppressive medications have been developed in the past decade, many possible avenues are yet to be explored. Although the newer agents have not reflected any clear benefit in patient or graft survival over CsA or tacrolimus, they have been useful in reducing the incidence and severity of rejection, reducing the concomitant use of steroids, and decreasing the doses of CsA or tacrolimus to minimize their toxicity profile. The appearance of these new agents has given more options to clinicians, who can select the one with the least toxicity and most efficacy for individual patients. In the future, combinations of these agents, in conjunction with a strategy to induce tolerance of the donor organ without drug toxicity, will be the goal.

Tacrolimus (FK506) and the pharmaceutical/academic/regulatory gauntlet

The pivotal issue of transplant rejection diagnosis and management is design, conduct, and analysis of clinical trials. The historical experience with clinical trials of major immunosuppressive drugs (cyclosporine and especially tacrolimus) is examined in this article. Cyclosporine was a turning point in transplantation, providing an extraordinary improvement over previous therapies. Additionally, early investigational experience with tacrolimus was shown to be important in rescue from cyclosporine failure. Experience with tacrolimus in liver recipients for primary therapy led to understanding that the side effect profile was similar to cyclosporine and that the important side effects of tacrolimus (toxicity and diabetes) could be lessened by altering the drug dose. Early dosing regimens were determined by attempts to balance the toxicities (representing a dose ceiling) against rejection (for minimum dosing). Drug levels became understandable and trough levels could be used to guide therapy. However, when the multicenter liver trial was implemented, high starting doses were included in the protocol design, ignoring information obtained with drug level monitoring. Disregard for this information led to a distortion of the potential value of tacrolimus. Historical controls from the Pittsburgh experience suggested that tacrolimus was a critical immunosuppressant, and the randomized trial against cyclosporine confirmed the drug's ability to compete. The multicenter liver trial, however, was not balanced across treatment arms for other immunosuppressive agents (ie, higher doses of prednisone from center to center, additional induction protocols at various centers). Additionally, analysis of study results differed across continents, and the role of tacrolimus in cyclosporine rescue was not examined thoroughly. When tacrolimus was proposed for use in extrahepatic organ transplantation, again the Pittsburgh experience, as well as experience from other single centers, was determined inadequate evidence of efficacy, and randomized trials were required by the FDA. The fact that multicenter trials in transplantation have historically been poorly designed or analyzed weighed against the dramatic improvements shown from historically controlled studies or single-center trials should lead to question of the regulatory requirement for multicenter randomized trials for all organ types.

High-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry as a reference for analysis of tacrolimus to assess two immunoassays in patients with liver and renal transplants

The accuracy and imprecision of three assays used for therapeutic monitoring of tacrolimus were tested using blood-containing weighed-in amounts of the drug, an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), a microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA I), and a high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS2) assay. Accuracy was acceptable for the HPLC-MS2 assay at all concentrations tested (< 10% deviation) and for the ELISA at 1.0 and 4.0 microg/l. Accuracy was not acceptable for the ELISA at 15.0 and 50.0 microg/l or for the MEIA I at all concentrations tested. Imprecision was acceptable for the HPLC-MS2 assay at all concentrations tested (coefficient of variation < 10%), for the ELISA at 15.0 and 50.0 microg/l, and for the MEIA I at 15.0 and 50.0 microg/l. Imprecision was not acceptable for the ELISA at 1.0 and 4.0 microg/l or for the MEIA I at 1.0 and 4.0 microg/l. This assessment with weighed-in amounts of tacrolimus verified the HPLC-MS2 assay as a reference method. The performance of the two immunoassays with HPLC-MS2 was then compared in the clinical setting using blood from patients with liver (n = 30) and renal (n = 37) transplants. In the liver transplant group (127 samples), the range of tacrolimus concentrations measured by HPLC-MS2, ELISA, and MEIA I was 1.9 to 31.8, 2.1 to 35.0, and less than 0.1 to 36.5 mg/l, respectively. In the renal transplant group (129 samples), the ranges were 1.7 to 26.1, 1.9 to 24.4, and 0.9 to 28.5 microg/l, respectively. Compared with the HPLC-MS2, the ELISA had minimal bias (0.1 to 0.2 microg/l) but unacceptable variability in values (SD > 13%). The MEIA I had unacceptable bias (1.7-1.8 microg/l) and variability (SD > 23%). These data indicated that neither the ELISA nor MEIA I is interchangeable with HPLC-MS2. Moreover, in view of the current trend to reduce the therapeutic dose of tacrolimus, quantitative results using the MEIA I would not be obtainable during therapeutic drug monitoring in some patients in whom effective therapeutic concentrations can be less than 5.0 microg/l.

Tacrolimus. An update of its pharmacology and clinical efficacy in the management of organ transplantation

Tacrolimus (FK 506) has been evaluated as immunosuppressive therapy in patients with a variety of solid organ and other transplants. Extensive data have now confirmed its efficacy as primary or rescue therapy in renal and hepatic transplantation. In prospective and historically controlled studies of primary therapy, tacrolimus generally demonstrated greater efficacy than the conventional formulation of cyclosporin for preventing episodes of acute rejection and allowed reduction of corticosteroid use. Chronic rejection rates were also significantly lower with tacrolimus in a large randomised liver transplantation trial. However, patient and graft survival rates were similar in both treatment groups (although numerically larger in adults with liver transplants). In children, rejection rates and corticosteroid requirements were usually lower with tacrolimus and patient and graft survival were generally similar with the 2 immunosuppressants. The finding of reduced corticosteroid requirements with tacrolimus may be of particular benefit in prepubertal children, who are still growing. A small amount of evidence has also accumulated regarding the use of tacrolimus as primary therapy in patients who have undergone bone marrow or heart and/or lung transplantation. Data are not conclusive, particularly in children, but tacrolimus appears to be useful for treating patients who have undergone these organ transplantations and may be associated with a lower incidence of obliterative bronchiolitis than cyclosporin in the latter group. Potential efficacy has also been shown in a limited number of patients with pancreas or pancreas-kidney, pancreatic islet and intestinal or multivisceral transplants, and in children who have undergone heart or heart-lung transplantation. Tacrolimus also has a use as rescue therapy in bone marrow, heart, lung and pancreatic transplantation, but data are currently insufficient for conclusions to be made. However, these results support the need for further study in these populations. Adverse effects occurring during tacrolimus therapy are generally of the type common to all immunosuppressive regimens. However, diabetes mellitus, neurotoxicity and nephrotoxicity are more common in tacrolimus than cyclosporin recipients. Hyperlipidaemia, hypertension, hirsutism and gingival hyperplasia are more common with cyclosporin. In 2 large multicentre clinical trials (US liver and European renal), tacrolimus was discontinued more frequently during the first year because of adverse events. However, the tolerability of tacrolimus appears related to dosage, improving as the dose is reduced. Tacrolimus should be considered an effective primary immunosuppressant in renal and hepatic transplantation. The drug is also a useful agent for rescue therapy in patients experiencing rejection or poor tolerability to cyclosporin. Thus, tacrolimus provides the clinician with an effective option for patients requiring immunosuppression and, with a different tolerability and efficacy profile to cyclosporin, it will better allow the tailoring of therapy to meet the needs of individual patients.

HLA and cross-reactive antigen group matching for cadaver kidney allocation

BACKGROUND

Allocation of cadaver kidneys by graded human leukocyte antigen (HLA) compatibility scoring arguably has had little effect on overall survival while prejudicing the transplant candidacy of African-American and other hard to match populations. Consequently, matching has been proposed of deduced amino acid residues of the individual HLA molecules shared by cross-reactive antigen groups (CREGs). We have examined the circumstances under which compatibility with either method impacted graft survival.

METHODS

Using Cox proportional hazards regression modeling, we studied the relationship between levels of conventional HLA mismatch and other donor and recipient factors on primary cadaver kidney survival between 1981 and 1995 at the University of Pittsburgh (n=1,780) and in the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Scientific Registry during 1991-1995 (n=31,291). The results were compared with those obtained by the matching of amino acid residues that identified CREG-compatible cases with as many as four (but not five and six) HLA mismatches.

RESULTS

With more than one HLA mismatch (> 85% of patients in both series), most of the survival advantage of a zero mismatch was lost. None of the HLA loci were "weak." In the UNOS (but not Pittsburgh) category of one-HLA mismatch (n=1334), a subgroup of CREG-matched recipients (35.3%) had better graft survival than the remaining 64.7%, who were CREG-mismatched. There was no advantage of a CREG match in the two- to four-HLA incompatibility tiers. Better graft survival with tacrolimus was observed in both the Pittsburgh and UNOS series.

CONCLUSIONS

Obligatory national sharing of cadaver kidneys is justifiable only for zero-HLA-mismatched kidneys. The potential value of CREG matching observed in the one-HLA-mismatched recipients of the UNOS (but not the Pittsburgh) experience deserves further study.

Prevention of transplant rejection: current treatment guidelines and future developments

In the past 2 decades, progressive improvements in the results of organ transplantation as a therapeutic strategy for patients with end-stage organ disease have been achieved due to greater insight into the immunobiology of graft rejection and better measures for surgical and medical management. It is now known that T cells play a central role in the specific immune response of acute allograft rejection. Strategies to prevent T cell activation or effector function are thus all potentially useful for immunosuppression. Standard immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplantation consists of baseline therapy to prevent rejection and short courses of high-dose corticosteroids or monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies as treatment of ongoing rejection episodes. Triple-drug therapy with the combination of cyclosporin, corticosteroids and azathioprine is now the most frequently used immunosuppressive drug regimen in cadaveric kidney recipients. The continuing search for more selective and specific agents has become, in the past decade, one of the priorities for transplant medicine. Some of these compounds are now entering routine clinical practice: among them are tacrolimus (which has a mechanism of action similar to that of cyclosporin), mycophenolate mofetil and mizoribine (which selectively inhibit the enzyme inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase, the rate-limiting enzyme for de novo purine synthesis during cell division), and sirolimus (rapamycin) [which acts on and inhibits kinase homologues required for cell-cycle progression in response to growth factors, like interleukin-2 (IL-2)]. Other new pharmacological strategies and innovative approaches to organ transplantation are also under development. Application of this technology will offer enormous potential not only for the investigation of mechanisms and mediators of graft rejection but also for therapeutic intervention.

Pregnancy after liver transplantation under tacrolimus

BACKGROUND

The maternal and fetal risk of pregnancy after organ transplantation under tacrolimus has not been reported. This was prospectively studied in 27 pregnancies by 21 female liver recipients who were treated with tacrolimus before and throughout gestation.

METHOD

Twenty-seven babies were born between October 1990 and April 1996. In 15 cases, samples were obtained at or after delivery and stored (-40 degrees C) for comparison of tacrolimus concentration in the maternal blood with different combinations of cord and infant venous blood, breast milk, or a section of the placenta.

RESULTS

The 21 mothers had surprisingly few serious complications of pregnancy and no mortality. Two infants with 23 and 24 weeks gestation died shortly after birth. The mean birth weight of the other 25 was 2638+/-781 g after a gestational period of 36.6+/-3.3 weeks. Mean birth weight percentile for gestational age was 50.2+/-26.2 (median 40). On the day of delivery, the mean tacrolimus concentrations (ng/ml) were 4.3 in placenta versus 1.5, 0.7, and 0.5 in maternal, cord, and child plasma, and 0.6 in the first breast milk specimens. The infants had a 36% incidence of transient perinatal hyperkalemia (K+>7.0 meq/L) and a mild reversible renal impairment, which were thought to reflect in part maternal homeostasis. One newborn had unilateral polycystic renal disease (the only anomaly). All 25 babies have had satisfactory postnatal growth and development with a current mean weight percentile of 62+/-37 (median 80).

CONCLUSIONS

Pregnancy by postliver transplant mothers under tacrolimus was possible with a surprisingly low incidence of the hypertension, preeclampsia, and other maternal complications historically associated with such gestations. As in previous experience with other immunosuppressive regimens, preterm deliveries were common. However, prenatal growth for gestational age and postnatal infant growth for postpartum age were normal.

Review of immunosuppression for lung transplantation. Novel drugs, new uses for conventional immunosuppressants, and alternative strategies

The history, pharmacokinetics, mechanisms of action, and experimental as well as clinical data on the immunosuppressive potential of the novel drugs tacrolimus (FK506), sirolimus (rapamycin), mycophenolic acid (mycophenolate mofetil), and leflunomide (and its malononitriloamide analogues) are provided. Novel approaches with the following conventional immunosuppressants are outlined: methotrexate, aerosolized immunosuppression and the implementation of steroid taper. Total lymphoid irradiation and photopheresis for treatment of recurrent rejection are also discussed.

Immunosuppressive agents in clinical trials in transplantation

Many new agents are in or near clinical trials in organ transplantation. The small molecule antibioticlike drugs are inhibitors of key enzymes in T-cell signal transduction (calcineurin target of rapamycin [TOR], and inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase). Calcineurin inhibitors include cyclosporine microemulsion formulation generic cyclosporine preparations, and tacrolimus. Rapamycin (also known as sirolimus) acts on target of rapamycin to abrogate signals necessary for clonal expansion and is now in phase III. Recent trials of mycophenolate mofetil, an inhibitor of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase, have shown that it reduces acute renal graft rejection when used with steroids and cyclosporine. New protein reagents in trials include polyclonal antilymphocyte antibodies, mouse monoclonal antibodies, "humanized" mouse monoclonals, and engineered proteins based on naturally occurring signalling molecules. Humanized antibodies against the interleukin-2 receptor are promising because humanized antibodies should combine low toxicity with the potential for long-term use. Engineered human proteins designed to block costimulatory molecules on antigen-presenting cells could have similar potential for low toxicity and extended use. These agents are designed to reduce acute rejection and the toxicity of the existing drugs and eventually improve long-term patient and graft survival. Organ transplant practice will probably change considerably as these agents become available.

Two-year data from the European multicentre tacrolimus (FK506) liver study

To provide a more definitive assessment of the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus therapy in comparison with cyclosporin, the extended follow-up of the European multicentre study is reported. Two-year Kaplan-Meier estimates indicated significant reductions in acute (tacrolimus 45.4%, cyclosporin 55.8%; P = 0.006), refractory (1.2% versus 6.4%; P = 0.003) and chronic rejection (2.0% versus 6.9%; P = 0.015) despite significantly lower steroid usage in patients receiving tacrolimus therapy. Patient and graft survival rates (80.6% versus 74.8% and 74.5% versus 70.0%, respectively) were also superior, although these failed to reach statistical significance. Safety profiles were comparable for most major categories (including renal, neurological and glucose metabolic disorders) and in certain aspects were more favourable for tacrolimus. Hypertension (28.0% versus 39.6%, P < 0.01) and cytomegalovirus infection (14.8% versus 22.3%, P < 0.01), two events with important long-term clinical consequences, were reported significantly less frequently. Hirsutism (0.0% versus 8.7%, P < 0.01) and gum hyperplasia (0.0% versus 2.3%, P < 0.05) were absent in patients receiving tacrolimus. Tacrolimus appears to provide effective and safe long-term immunosuppression.

Combined immunosuppressive therapy with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil for small bowel transplantation in pigs

In a swine model of orthotopic small bowel transplantation, we assessed the efficacy of combined therapy with a low dose of tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil, compared with high-dose tacrolimus monotherapy. The bowel was replaced in 25 piglets: group 1 (n = 5), no immunosuppression; group 2 (n = 10), tacrolimus, 0.3 mg/kg daily i.m. for 7 days, followed by b.i.d. oral doses to maintain blood levels of 15-25 ng/ml; and group 3 (n = 10), tacrolimus, 0.1 mg/kg i.m., in a single dose on day 0 and thereafter oral doses to maintain blood levels of 5-15 ng/ml, plus oral mycophenolate mofetil (10 mg/kg twice daily). Follow-up time was limited to 60 days. Median survival time as 11, 27, and > 60 days in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P = 0.001). Survival rates were 0%, 40%, and 80% at 30 days and 0%, 0%, and 70% at 60 days in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P = 0.03), group 1 vs. group 2; P = 0.003, group 1 vs. group 3; P = 0.02, group 2 vs. group 3). One animal in group 1 (20%) and two animals each in groups 2 and 3 (20%) died of technical complications. Rejection was the cause of death of 80% of animals of group 1 and of no animals in either group 2 or 3. None of the immunosuppressed animals developed clinical or histopathological evidence of graft-versus-host disease. Sixty percent of animals in group 2 (n = 6) and 10% in group 3 (n = 1) died from infections; two other animals in group 2 died of emaciation. The seven animals of group 3 that were alive at 60 days had immunosuppression stopped at that time. All died of rejection within 1 month. In conclusion, double-drug therapy with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil consistently allowed extended survival after small bowel transplantation in swine, preventing or controlling acute cellular rejection without a high incidence of lethal complications related to overimmunosuppression.

The Pittsburgh randomized trial of tacrolimus compared to cyclosporine for hepatic transplantation

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus (formerly FK506) was first used clinically in 1989 to successfully replace cyclosporine in hepatic transplant recipients who were experiencing intractable rejection or as the baseline drug from the time of operation. After extensive pilot experience, an institutional review board-mandated clinical trial comparing cyclosporine with tacrolimus was performed.

STUDY DESIGN

From February 16, 1990 to December 26, 1991, 154 patients were recruited. The competing drugs were combined with equal induction doses of prednisone in both arms of the study for the first 81 patients and with subsequently higher doses of prednisone in the remaining 35 patients who received cyclosporine and were entered into the trial. Drug crossover was permitted for lack of efficacy or adverse events. End points were rejection confirmed by biopsy and treatment failure leading to retransplantation or death.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine patients were randomized to the tacrolimus arm and 75 to the cyclosporine arm during 1990 and 1991. All patients were available for follow-up throughout the trial, which terminated on May 30, 1995. The mean duration of follow-up was four years. Patients randomized to the tacrolimus arm were less likely to experience acute rejection than were those receiving cyclosporine, with 36.2 percent of the patients receiving tacrolimus and 16.8 percent of the patients receiving cyclosporine showing freedom from rejection at one year (p = 0.003, likelihood ratio test). Survival of patients over the course of the study was virtually the same in the two groups.