Characterisation of the neuropeptide Y receptor that mediates feeding in the rat: a role for the Y5 receptor?

G protein-coupled receptors in energy homeostasis

G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) compromise the largest membrane protein superfamily which play vital roles in physiological and pathophysiological processes including energy homeostasis. Moreover, they also represent the up-to-date most successful drug target. The gut hormone GPCRs, such as glucagon receptor and GLP-1 receptor, have been intensively studied for their roles in metabolism and respective drugs have developed for the treatment of metabolic diseases such as type 2 diabetes (T2D). Along with the advances of biomedical research, more GPCRs have been found to play important roles in the regulation of energy homeostasis from nutrient sensing, appetite control to glucose and fatty acid metabolism with various mechanisms. The investigation of their biological functions will not only improve our understanding of how our body keeps the balance of energy intake and expenditure, but also highlight the possible drug targets for the treatment of metabolic diseases. The present review summarizes GPCRs involved in the energy control with special emphasis on their pathophysiological roles in metabolic diseases and hopefully triggers more intensive and systematic investigations in the field so that a comprehensive network control of energy homeostasis will be revealed, and better drugs will be developed in the foreseeable future.

An emerging role of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) beyond glucose control: potential implications in cardiovascular disease

The introduction of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors for the treatment of Type 2 diabetes acknowledges the fundamental importance of incretin hormones in the regulation of glycemia. Small molecule inhibitors of DPP4 exert their effects via inhibition of enzymatic degradation of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP). The widespread expression of DPP4 in tissues such as the vasculature and immune cells suggests that this protein may play a role in cardiovascular function. DPP4 is known to exert its effects via both enzymatic and non-enzymatic mechanisms. A soluble form of DPP4 lacking the cytoplasmic and transmembrane domain has also been recently recognized. Besides enzymatic inactivation of incretins, DPP4 also mediates degradation of many chemokines and neuropeptides. The non-enzymatic function of DPP4 plays a critical role in providing co-stimulatory signals to T cells via adenosine deaminase (ADA). DPP4 may also regulate inflammatory responses in innate immune cells such as monocytes and dendritic cells. The multiplicity of functions and targets suggests that DPP4 may play a distinct role aside from its effects on the incretin axis. Indeed recent studies in experimental models of atherosclerosis provide evidence for a robust effect for these drugs in attenuating inflammation and plaque development. Several prospective randomized controlled clinical trials in humans with established atherosclerosis are testing the effects of DPP4 inhibition on hard cardiovascular events.

Gastric acid secretion induced by paraventricular nucleus microinjection of orexin A is mediated through activation of neuropeptide Yergic system

Very recently, we have reported that the modulatory effect of PVN on gastric acid secretion may be mediated through the orexin fibers and/or orexin-responsive neurons. In this study, we address the hypothesis which demonstrates the existence of a putative orexin A - neuropeptide Y Y1/Y5 receptors interaction to increase gastric acid secretion in pyloric-ligated conscious rats. Male Wistar rats were implanted with guide canula directed to the PVN and lateral ventricle. Intracerebroventricular (ICV) microinjections of GR-231118 (Y1 receptor antagonist) and CGP-71683 (Y5 receptor antagonist) on gastric acid secretion were considered. The effect of pretreatment with Y1 receptor antagonist, GR-231118, and Y5 receptor antagonist, CGP-71683, on PVN orexin A-induced acid secretion was assessed. Gastric acid secretion was measured using the pylorus-ligation method, and the amount of gastric acid was determined by titration with 0.01N NaOH to a pH of 7.0.

KEY RESULTS

ICV microinjections of GR-231118 and CGP-71683 decreased acid secretion by 25±0.05% and 67±0.02%, respectively. ICV microinjections of GR-231118 and CGP-71683 inhibited effects of PVN-injected orexin-A on acid secretion. We suggest that Y1 and Y5 receptors stimulate gastric acid secretion and the stimulatory effect of PVN orexin receptors on gastric acid secretion may be mediated via interactions, at least in part, through activation of Y1 and Y5 receptors. These neural pathways may play key roles in the orexinergic action of orexins in the cephalic phase of gastric acid secretion.

The role of neuropeptide Y in energy homeostasis

When administered into the brain, NPY acts at Y1 and Y5 receptors to increase food intake. The response occurs with a short latency and is quite robust, such that exogenous NPY is generally considered to be the most potent of a growing list of orexigenic compounds that act in the brain. The role of endogenous NPY is not so straightforward, however. Evidence from diverse types of experiments suggests that rather than initiating behavioral eating per se, endogenous NPY elicits autonomic responses that prepare the individual to better cope with consuming a calorically large meal.

Peripheral neuropeptide Y Y1 receptors regulate lipid oxidation and fat accretion

OBJECTIVE

Neuropeptide Y and its Y receptors are important players in the regulation of energy homeostasis. However, while their functions in feeding regulation are well recognized, functions in other critical aspects of energy homeostasis are largely unknown. To investigate the function of Y1 receptors in the regulation of energy homeostasis, we examined energy expenditure, physical activity, body composition, oxidative fuel selection and mitochondrial oxidative capacity in germline Y1(-/-) mice as well as in a conditional Y1-receptor-knockdown model in which Y1 receptors were knocked down in peripheral tissues of adult mice.

RESULTS

Germline Y1(-/-) mice of both genders not only exhibit a decreased respiratory exchange ratio, indicative of increased lipid oxidation, but interestingly also develop late-onset obesity. However, the increased lipid oxidation is a primary effect of Y1 deletion rather than secondary to increased adiposity, as young Y1(-/-) mice are lean and show the same effect. The mechanism behind this is likely because of increased liver and muscle protein levels of carnitine palmitoyltransferase-1 (CPT-1) and maximal activity of key enzymes involved in beta-oxidation; beta-hydroxyacyl CoA dehydrogenase (betaHAD) and medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (MCAD), leading to increased mitochondrial capacity for fatty acid transport and oxidation. These effects are controlled by peripheral Y1-receptor signalling, as adult-onset conditional Y1 knockdown in peripheral tissues also leads to increased lipid oxidation, liver CPT-1 levels and betaHAD activity. Importantly, these mice are resistant to diet-induced obesity.

CONCLUSIONS

This work shows the primary function of peripheral Y1 receptors in the regulation of oxidative fuel selection and adiposity, opening up new avenues for anti-obesity treatments by targeting energy utilization in peripheral tissues rather than suppressing appetite by central effects.

Tolerance to ethanol sedation and withdrawal hyper-excitability is mediated via neuropeptide Y Y1 and Y5 receptors

AIMS

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is widely distributed throughout the brain and has been implicated in some of the actions of ethanol. The aim of the present study was to characterize the subtypes of NPY receptors in ethanol induced sedation, tolerance and withdrawal hyper-excitability.

MAIN METHODS

The loss of righting reflex paradigm was used to record the sleep duration in mice.

KEY FINDINGS

The acute administration of ethanol (3-4g per kg, i.p., 20%v/v) resulted in marked sedation. While prolonged ethanol consumption led to the development of tolerance, the mice showed hyper-excitability following ethanol withdrawal. Prior acute intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection of NPY (5-20 ng per mouse) or NPY Y1 and Y5 receptors agonist [Leu(31), Pro(34)]-NPY (0.02-0.2 ng per mouse) potentiated ethanol induced sedation. On the other hand, administration of selective NPY Y1 receptor antagonist BIBP3226 (5 ng per mouse, i.c.v.) inhibited ethanol induced sedation. Chronic concomitant treatment of NPY (20 ng per mouse, i.c.v.) or [Leu(31), Pro(34)]-NPY (0.2 ng per mouse, i.c.v.) to ethanol-fed groups prevented the development of tolerance and attenuated withdrawal hyper-excitability. Moreover, acute treatment of NPY (5 ng per mouse, i.c.v.) or [Leu(31), Pro(34)]-NPY (0.02 ng per mouse, i.c.v.) reversed the peak ethanol withdrawal hyper-excitability.

SIGNIFICANCE

The results underscore a role for NPY Y1 and Y5 receptors in the ethanol induced sedation, tolerance and withdrawal hyper-excitability. We suggest that modulation of NPY Y1 and Y5 receptors may be a strategy to address the ethanol withdrawal conditions.

Neuropeptide Y modulates the antidepressant activity of imipramine in olfactory bulbectomized rats: involvement of NPY Y1 receptors

Since long-term treatment with imipramine increases the neuropeptide Y (NPY) levels in the frontal cortex and hypothalamus, the possibility exists that the antidepressant action of imipramine may be mediated via the NPY Y1 receptors. Bilateral olfactory bulbectomy (OBX) resulted in hyperactivity (increased number of ambulation, rearing and grooming episodes) in open field test (OFT) suggesting a depression-like condition. Chronic (14 days) administration of NPY, NPY Y1/Y5 receptor agonist [Leu(31), Pro(34)]-NPY (intracerebroventricular, i.c.v.) or tricyclic antidepressant imipramine (intraperitoneal) to OBX rats dose-dependently resulted in decreased hyperactivity in OFT, while selective NPY Y1 receptor antagonist BIBP3226 (i.c.v.) produced opposite effects. The antidepressant actions of imipramine were enhanced by co-administration of NPY or [Leu(31), Pro(34)]-NPY, and antagonized by BIBP3226 given at sub-effective doses. The data suggest that NPY, acting via NPY Y1 receptors, may be involved in antidepressant action of imipramine in OBX rats.

Neuropeptide y receptor selective ligands in the treatment of obesity

Obesity is a serious public health problem throughout the world, affecting both developed societies and developing countries. The central nervous system has developed a meticulously interconnected circuitry in order to keep us fed and in an adequate nutritional state. One of these consequences is that an energy-dense environment favors the development of obesity. Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is one of the most abundant and widely distributed peptides in the central nervous system of both rodents and humans and has been implicated in a variety of physiological actions. Within the hypothalamus, NPY plays an essential role in the control of food intake and body weight. Centrally administered NPY causes robust increases in food intake and body weight and, with chronic administration, can eventually produce obesity. NPY activates a population of at least six G protein-coupled Y receptors. NPY analogs exhibit varying degrees of affinity and specificity for these Y receptors. There has been renewed speculation that ligands for Y receptors may be of benefit for the treatment of obesity. This review highlights the therapeutic potential of Y(1), Y(2), Y(4), and Y(5) receptor agonists and antagonists as additional intervention to treat human obesity.

Neuropeptide Y in normal eating and in genetic and dietary-induced obesity

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is one the most potent orexigenic peptides found in the brain. It stimulates food intake with a preferential effect on carbohydrate intake. It decreases latency to eat, increases motivation to eat and delays satiety by augmenting meal size. The effects on feeding are mediated through at least two receptors, the Y1 and Y5 receptors. The NPY system for feeding regulation is mostly located in the hypothalamus. It is formed of the arcuate nucleus (ARC), where the peptide is synthesized, and the paraventricular (PVN), dorsomedial (DMN) and ventromedial (VMN) nuclei and perifornical area where it is active. This activity is modulated by the hindbrain and limbic structures. It is dependent on energy availability, e.g. upregulation with food deprivation or restriction, and return to baseline with refeeding. It is also sensitive to diet composition with variable effects of carbohydrates and fats. Leptin signalling and glucose sensing which are directly linked to diet type are the most important factors involved in its regulation. Absence of leptin signalling in obesity models due to gene mutation either at the receptor level, as in the Zucker rat, the Koletsky rat or the db/db mouse, or at the peptide level, as in ob/ob mouse, is associated with increased mRNA abundance, peptide content and/or release in the ARC or PVN. Other genetic obesity models, such as the Otsuka-Long-Evans-Tokushima Fatty rat, the agouti mouse or the tubby mouse, are characterized by a diminution in NPY expression in the ARC nucleus and by a significant increase in the DMN. Further studies are necessary to determine the exact role of NPY in these latter models. Long-term exposure to high-fat or high-energy palatable diets leads to the development of adiposity and is associated with a decrease in hypothalamic NPY content or expression, consistent with the existence of a counter-regulatory mechanism to diminish energy intake and limit obesity development. On the other hand, an overactive NPY system (increased mRNA expression in the ARC associated with an upregulation of the receptors) is characteristic of rats or rodent strains sensitive to dietary-induced obesity. Finally, NPY appears to play an important role in body weight and feeding regulation, and while it does not constitute the only target for drug treatment of obesity, it may nevertheless provide a useful target in conjunction with others.

Gastrointestinal satiety signals in humans — Physiologic roles for GLP-1 and PYY ?

The present review summarizes the appetite suppressing effects of PYY and GLP-1 in the regulation of food intake in humans. Current evidence supports a role for gastrointestinal peptides as regulators of satiety. The regulation of satiety is, however, complex and it is not surprising that multiple control systems exist. It is interesting to note that nutrients in the small intestine such as hydrolysis products of fat stimulate the release of satiety peptides such as GLP-1 or PYY that serve as satiety signals. Both peptides, released from L-cells from the gastrointestinal tract by the local action of digested food, exert various regulatory functions: stimulation of insulin secretion and inhibition of glucagon secretion as typical actions of GLP-1, inhibition of gastric emptying, and inhibition of appetite for both GLP-1 and PYY. The review focuses on the question, whether the two peptides are true endocrine factors that act as physiologic, hormonal regulators of appetite.

PYY3-36 as an anti-obesity drug target

The neuropeptide Y (NPY)/peptide YY (PYY) system has been implicated in the physiology of obesity for several decades. More recently ignited enormous interest in PYY3-36, an endogenous Y2-receptor agonist, as a promising anti-obesity compound. Despite this interest, there have been remarkably few subsequent reports reproducing or extending the initial findings, while at the same time studies finding no anti-obesity effects have surfaced. Out of 41 different rodent studies conducted (in 16 independent labs worldwide), 33 (83%) were unable to reproduce the reported effects and obtained no change or sometimes increased food intake, despite use of the same experimental conditions (i.e. adaptation protocols, routes of drug administration and doses, rodent strains, diets, drug vendors, light cycles, room temperatures). Among studies by authors in the original study, procedural caveats are reported under which positive effects may be obtained. Currently, data speak against a sustained decrease in food intake, body fat, or body weight gain following PYY3-36 administration and make the previously suggested role of the hypothalamic melanocortin system unlikely as is the existence of PYY deficiency in human obesity. We review the studies that are in the public domain which support or challenge PYY3-36 as a potential anti-obesity target.

The neuropeptide-Y Y5 receptor antagonist L-152,804 decreases alcohol self-administration in inbred alcohol-preferring (iP) rats

Neuropeptide-Y (NPY) is the most abundant and widely distributed peptide in the mammalian central nervous system and increases feeding behavior through actions at the Y5 receptor subtype. Recent pharmacological evidence indicates that NPY activity at this receptor subtype can modulate ethanol reinforcement. The purpose of this study was to determine if NPY Y5 receptor antagonism reduces ethanol self-administration and reinforcement in a rodent genetic animal model of alcoholism. Selectively inbred alcohol-preferring (iP) rats were trained to voluntarily consume ethanol (10% vol/vol) versus H2O in a 24-h two-bottle choice test. An additional group of iP rats was trained in operant ethanol self-administration to lever press on a fixed-ratio 1 schedule for ethanol (10% vol/vol) reinforcement. Following establishment of baseline intake or ethanol-reinforced responding, iP rats were injected with L-152,804 (0-20 mg/kg) prior to two-bottle or operant ethanol self-administration sessions. In the two-bottle choice test, L-152,804 (3 and 10 mg/kg, ip) significantly reduced ethanol intake (g/kg) at 4- and 6-h postinjection and had no effect on food intake. In the operant procedure, L-152,804 (10 and 20 mg/kg, ip) significantly reduced both the dosage of self-administered ethanol (g/kg/1-h) and the total number of ethanol-reinforced responses. No effect was observed on latency to the first response or the number of inactive lever presses. These results indicate that blockade of NPY Y5 receptor activity decreases both voluntary ethanol drinking and ethanol reinforcement in a rodent genetic animal model of alcoholism. For this reason, NPY Y5 receptor antagonists may be useful in medical management of alcohol abuse and alcoholism in the human population.

Functional characterization of human neuropeptide Y receptor subtype five specific antagonists using a luciferase reporter gene assay

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) has several receptors; one of them, the neuropeptide Y5 receptor (NPY5) seems involved in feeding behavior in mammals. Although this particular receptor has been extensively studied in the literature, the difficulties encountered to obtain a stable cell line expressing this recombinant receptor have impaired the development of tools necessary to establish its molecular pharmacology. We thus established a method for the functional study of new ligands. It is based upon the cotransfection in human melatonin receptor 1 (MT1)-overexpressing HEK293 cells of three plasmids encoding melanocortin receptor (MC5), neuropeptide Y5 receptor (NPY5) and a cyclic AMP response element-controlled luciferase. Once challenged with alphaMSH, the MC5 receptor activates the cyclic AMP response, through the coupling protein subunit G(s). In contrast, NPY5 agonists, through the NPY5 receptor which is negatively coupled to the same pathway, counteract the alphaMSH-mediated effect on cyclic AMP level. Using appropriate controls, this method can pinpoint compounds with antagonistic activity. Simple and straightforward, this system permits reproducible measurements of agonist or antagonist effects in the presence of neuropeptide Y, the natural agonist. This method has the advantage over already existing methods and beyond its apparent complexity, to enhance the cyclic AMP concentration at a 'physiological' level, by opposition to a forskolin-induced adenylate cyclase activation. Finally, to further validate this assay, we showed results from (1) a series of natural peptidic agonists that permitted the standardization and (2) a series of potent nonpeptidic antagonists (affinity >10(-9) M) that form a new class of active NPY5 receptor antagonists.

Synthesis and evaluation of new hydrazide derivatives as neuropeptide Y Y5 receptor antagonists for the treatment of obesity

NPY is the most potent orexigenic agent known to man, with NPY Y1 and NPY Y5 being the receptor subtypes that are most likely responsible for centrally-mediated NPY-induced feeding responses. Based on the aforementioned, novel hydrazide derivatives were prepared for the purpose of searching new NPY Y5 receptor antagonists. Many of the compounds exhibited nanomolar binding affinity for this receptor, affording trans-N-(4-[N'-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)hydrazinocarbonyl]cyclohexylmethyl)-4-fluorobenzenesulfonamide, which showed the best activity (IC(50)=0.43nM).

Localization of neuropeptide Y receptor Y5 mRNA in the guinea pig brain by in situ hybridization

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) has prominent stimulatory effects on food intake in virtually all animals that have been studied. In mammals, the effect is primarily mediated by receptors Y1 and Y5, which seem to contribute to different aspects of feeding behavior in guinea pigs and rats/mice. Interestingly, differences in receptor distribution among mammalian species have been reported. To get a broader perspective on the role of Y5, we describe here studies of guinea pig (Cavia porcellus), a species which due to its phylogenetic position in the mammalian radiation is an interesting complement to previous studies in rat and mouse. Guinea pig brain sections were hybridized with two 35S-labeled oligonucleotides complementary to Y5 mRNA. The highest expression levels of Y5 mRNA were observed in the hippocampus and several hypothalamic and brain stem nuclei implicated in the regulation of feeding, such as the paraventricular, arcuate and ventromedial hypothalamic nuclei. This contrasts with autoradiography studies that detected low Y5-like binding in these areas, a discrepancy observed also in rat and human. Y5 mRNA expression was also seen in the striatum, in great contrast to mouse and rat. Taken together, these data show that Y5 mRNA distribution displays some interesting species differences, but that its expression in feeding centers seems to be essentially conserved among mammals, adding further support for an important role in food intake.

Enhancement of feeding suppression by PYY(3-36) in rats with area postrema ablations

We investigated suppression of food intake by intraperitoneal (IP) injections of peptide YY(3-36) (PYY(3-36)) (24, 60, or 150 microg/kg) in rats with ablations of the area postrema (APX) and in controls with sham ablations. In controls, PYY(3-36)-induced suppression was modest and short-lived, averaging 20% at most and persisting less than 6h. The highest dose tested (150 microg/kg) was even less effective than were the two lesser doses after 3h. APX did not diminish the potency of these effects of PYY(3-36). In fact, the magnitude of suppression produced by the greatest dose of PYY(3-36) in APX rats was significantly greater than in controls and PYY(3-36)-induced suppression was still present at 24h.

Neuropeptide-Y Y5 Receptors Modulate the Onset and Maintenance of Operant Ethanol Self-Administration

BACKGROUND

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is the most abundant and widely distributed peptide in the mammalian central nervous system and increases feeding behavior at NPY Y1 or Y5 receptor subtypes. Recent pharmacological and mutant mouse data indicate that NPY activity at its receptors can influence ethanol self-administration, although the direction and strength of this influence are not clear.

METHODS

Effects of the novel NPY Y5 receptor antagonist L-152,804 on the onset and maintenance of operant self-administration were examined in male C57BL/6J mice, which were trained to self-administer ethanol (10% v/v) versus water via the sucrose substitution method during 16 hr overnight sessions. After 4 months of baseline responding, mice were injected with L-152,804 (0, 10, 30, or 60 mg/kg, intraperitoneally) before operant sessions. Potential locomotor effects of L-152,804 and possible interaction with the sedative properties of ethanol also were examined.

RESULTS

All three doses of L-152,804 significantly delayed the onset of ethanol-reinforced responding relative to vehicle injection. L-152,804 produced no effect on the total number of ethanol- or water-reinforced responses per 16 hr session. However, L-152,804 selectively modulated the temporal distribution of ethanol-reinforced responding depending on the dose (10 and 60 mg/kg) and time point measured in a manner consistent with blockade of ethanol reinforcement. Additional experiments determined that L-152,804 (10 or 60 mg/kg) did not alter spontaneous locomotor activity or influence the sedative effects of ethanol (4 g/kg).

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that blockade NPY Y5 receptor activity modulates the onset and maintenance of ethanol self-administration. For this reason, NPY-Y5 receptor antagonists may be useful in medical management of alcohol abuse and alcoholism.

Agonists for neuropeptide Y receptors Y1 and Y5 stimulate different phases of feeding in guinea pigs

1. The stimulatory effect of neuropeptide Y (NPY) on food intake is well established but the roles of the receptor subtypes Y(1) and Y(5) have been difficult to define. We have studied the effects of two novel Y(1)-preferring and two Y(5)-preferring agonists on feeding in guinea pigs. 2. The Y(1)-preferring receptor agonists [Arg(6),Pro(34)]pNPY and [Phe(7),Pro(34)]pNPY had high affinity for the Y(1) receptor (K(i) values 0.07 and 0.04 nM, respectively) and nanomolar affinity for the Y(5) receptor. Administration of either compound into the third brain ventricle increased food intake equally to NPY. 3. The Y(5) agonist [Ala(31),Aib(32)]pNPY displayed a moderate affinity for the Y(5) receptor (K(i) 7.42 nM) and a low affinity for Y(1) (K(i) 1.7 micro M). This compound had only a modest effect on feeding. 4. The other Y(5)-preferring peptide [cPP(1-7),NPY(19-23),Ala(31),Aib(32),Gln(34)]hPP had a higher affinity at the Y(5) receptor (K(i) 1.32 nM) and also at the Y(1) receptor (K(i) 85 nM). It potently stimulated feeding: the food consumption after administration of this peptide was two-fold compared to NPY. 5. Our results support the view that both the receptor subtypes Y(1) and Y(5) are involved in the stimulation of feeding. As the action profiles of the Y(1) and Y(5) agonists on feeding parameters were different, it seems that they influence different phases of eating.

Neuropeptide Y and its receptors as potential therapeutic drug targets

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is a 36-amino-acid peptide that exhibits a large number of physiological activities in the central and peripheral nervous systems. NPY mediates its effects through the activation of six G-protein-coupled receptor subtypes named Y(1), Y(2), Y(3), Y(4), Y(5), and y(6). Evidence suggests that NPY is involved in the pathophysiology of several disorders, such as the control of food intake, metabolic disorders, anxiety, seizures, memory, circadian rhythm, drug addiction, pain, cardiovascular diseases, rhinitis, and endothelial cell dysfunctions. The synthesis of agonists and antagonists for these receptors could be useful to treat several of these diseases.

Selective antagonism of the NPY Y5 receptor does not have a major effect on feeding in rats

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is thought to play a key role in stimulating feeding, thus making NPY receptors attractive appetite suppressant drug targets for treating obesity. Because the orexigenic effects of NPY have been ascribed to actions at the NPY Y5 receptor, we have determined the role of this receptor in feeding in rats, using a small molecule antagonist of this receptor. NPY5RA-972 is a selective and potent (<10 nmol/l) NPY Y5 receptor antagonist. This compound is central nervous system (CNS) penetrant, and an oral dose of 10 mg/kg NPY5RA-972 to rats produced concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid that greatly exceeded the in vitro IC(50) (inhibitory concentration 50%). Indeed, at doses to rats as low as 1 mg/kg, NPY5RA-972 inhibited feeding induced by intracerebroventricular (ICV) administration of a selective NPY Y5 agonist ([cPP(1-7),NPY(19-23),Ala(31),Aib(32),Gln(34)]-hPP). However, in the dose range 1-10 mg/kg, NPY5RA-972 had no significant effect on food intake in Wistar rats induced to feed by either ICV NPY or 24 h fasting or in free-feeding Wistar or obese Zucker rats. Chronic administration of NPY5RA-972 (10 mg/kg twice daily) had no effect on food intake or body weight in either free-feeding Wistar rats or dietary obese rats. These data indicate that NPY5RA-972 is a potent, selective, orally active, and CNS-penetrant antagonist of the NPY Y5 receptor that prevents feeding driven by activation of this receptor. The data obtained with this antagonist indicate that the NPY Y5 receptor is not a major regulator of feeding in the rat.

A convenient 3-step synthesis of 3-acetamido-6-arylpyridazines directed to novel Y5 receptor antagonist

A 3-step synthesis of 3-acetamido-6-arylpyridazines as potential NPY5 antagonists.

Neuropeptide Y-Y1 receptor modulates nitric oxide level during stroke in the rat

In a rat endovascular middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) stroke model, we previously showed that intracerebroventricular (ICV) injection of neuropeptide Y (NPY) or an Y1 receptor agonist, [Leu(31),Pro(34)]-NPY, increased the infarct volume, that an Y1 receptor antagonist, BIBP3226, reduced the infarct volume, and that an Y2 receptor agonist, NPY3-36, had no effect. In this study, we used electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy to measure nitric oxide (NO) and examined how ICV administration of NPY or its receptor analogs would modulate the brain NO level between the bregma levels +2 and -4 mm during MCAO, since excessive NO mediates ischemic damage. The relative brain NO concentration was increased to 131.94 +/- 7.99% (mean +/- SEM; n = 8) at 15 min of MCAO. NPY treatment further increased the relative brain NO concentration to 250.94 +/- 50.48% (n = 8), whereas BIBP3226 significantly reduced the brain NO concentration to 69.63 +/- 8.84% (n = 8). [Leu(31),Pro(34)]-NPY (137.61 +/- 14.54%; n = 7) or NPY3-36 (129.23 +/- 21.77%; n = 8) did not affect the brain NO concentration at 15 min of MCAO. Our results suggest that the NPY-Y1 receptor activation mediates ischemic injury via NO overproduction and that inhibition of the Y1 receptor may confer protection via suppression of excessive NO production during ischemia.

Receptor subtypes Y1 and Y5 mediate neuropeptide Y induced feeding in the guinea-pig

1. Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is one of the most potent stimulants of food intake. It has been debated which receptor subtype mediates this response. Initially Y(1) was proposed, but later Y(5) was announced as a 'feeding' receptor in rats and mice. Very little is known regarding other mammals. The present study attempts to characterize the role of NPY in feeding behaviour in the distantly related guinea-pig. When infused intracerebroventricularly, NPY dose-dependently increased food intake. 2. PYY, (Leu(31),Pro(34))NPY and NPY(2 - 36) stimulated feeding, whereas NPY(13 - 36) had no effect. These data suggest that either Y(1) or Y(5) receptors or both may mediate NPY induced food intake in guinea-pigs. 3. The Y(1) receptor antagonists, BIBO 3304 and H 409/22 displayed nanomolar affinity for the Y(1) receptor (K(i) values 1.1+/-0.2 nM and 5.6+/-0.9 nM, respectively), but low affinity for the Y(2) or Y(5) receptors. When guinea-pigs were pretreated with BIBO 3304 and H 409/22, the response to NPY was inhibited. 4. The Y(5) antagonist, CGP 71683A had high affinity for the Y(5) receptor (K(i) 1.3+/-0.05 nM) without having any significant activities at the Y(1) and Y(2) receptors. When CGP 71683A was infused into brain ventricles, the feeding response to NPY was attenuated. 5. The present study shows that NPY stimulates feeding in guinea-pigs through Y(1) and Y(5) receptors. As the guinea-pig is very distantly related to the rat and mouse, this suggests that both Y(1) and Y(5) receptors may mediate NPY-induced hyperphagia also in other orders of mammals.

Appetite suppression based on selective inhibition of NPY receptors

AIM

The aim of this review is to critically assess available evidence that blockade of the actions of NPY at one of the five NPY receptor subtypes represents an attractive new drug discovery target for the development of an appetite suppressant drug.

RESULTS

Blockade of the central actions of NPY using anti-NPY antibodies, antisense oligodeoxynucleotides against NPY and NPY receptor antagonists results in a decrease in food intake in energy-deprived animals. These results appear to show that endogenous NPY plays a role in the control of appetite. The fact that NPY receptors exist as at least five different subtypes raises the possibility that the actions of endogenous NPY on food intake can be adequately dissociated from other effects of the peptide. Current drug discovery has produced a number of highly selective NPY receptor antagonists which have been used to establish the NPY Y(1) receptor subtype as the most critical in regulating short-term food intake. However, additional studies are now needed to more clearly define the relative contribution of NPY acting through the NPY Y2 and NPY Y5 receptors in the complex sequence of physiological and behavioral events that underlie the long-term control of appetite.

CONCLUSIONS

Blockade of the NPY receptor may produce appetite-suppressing drugs. However, it is too early to state with certainty whether a single subtype selective drug used alone or a combination of NPY receptor selective antagonists used in combination will be necessary to adequately influence appetite regulation.

Roles of pancreatic polypeptide in regulation of food intake

Pancreatic polypeptide (PP) is produced in pancreatic islets of Langerhans and released into the circulation after ingestion of a meal. Peripherally administered PP suppresses food intake and gastric emptying. On the other hand, central administration of PP elicits food intake and gastric emptying. Therefore, PP actions on food intake may be, in part, attributable to gastric emptying. PP transgenic mice exhibit decreases in both food intake and gastric emptying rate that were clearly reversed by anti-PP antiserum. PP is an anorexigenic signal in the periphery and an orexigenic signal in the central nervous system.

Multiple NPY receptors Inhibit GABA(A) synaptic responses of rat medial parvocellular effector neurons in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus

We have recently shown that NPY and alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone, which potently induce or inhibit feeding, respectively, have opposing modulatory actions on GABAergic synapses in the medial parvocellular region of the paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus (mpPVN). Because this action might underlie the effects of NPY on feeding, we have examined the pharmacology of NPY responses using electrophysiological recordings. Focal electrical stimulation within the PVN elicited a GABA(A) synaptic response in some mpPVN neurons, which was reversibly inhibited by NPY in a concentration-dependent manner (EC(50) = 28 nM). NPY did not alter the response to the GABA(A) agonist, muscimol. Agonist responses to NPY analogs were not consistent with a single NPY receptor subtype; the most subtype selective agonists were less effective than the more broadly selective ones. Antagonist blockade of individual receptor subtypes partly inhibited NPY action, while fully blocking effects of selective agonists. Combining Y1 and Y5 antagonists blocked actions of NPY entirely, but the Y2 antagonist also completely blocked actions of NPY in some neurons. NPY inhibits GABA(A) synaptic transmission onto mpPVN neurons, but this can be mediated by three different NPY receptors. Controversy regarding the receptor or receptor subtypes involved in NPY-mediated feeding may arise from the multiple NPY receptors present.

Feeding after fourth ventricular administration of neuropeptide Y receptor agonists in rats

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) and peptide YY (PYY) stimulate food intake after injection into the fourth cerebral ventricle, suggesting that NPY receptors in the hindbrain are targets for the stimulatory effect of these peptides on food intake. However, the NPY/PYY receptor subtype mediating the feeding response in the hindbrain is not known. To approach to this question we compared dose-effect of several NPY receptor agonists to stimulate food intake in freely-feeding rats 60- and 120-min after injection into the fourth cerebral ventricle. At the 120-min time point, PYY was 2- to 10-times as potent as NPY over the dose-response range and stimulated twice the total intake at the maximally effective dose (2-fold greater efficacy). NPY was 2-times as potent as the Y1, Y5 receptor agonist, [Leu(31)Pro(34)]NPY but acted with comparable efficacy. The Y5-, Y2-differentiating receptor agonist, NPY 2-36, was comparable in potency to PYY at low doses but equal in efficacy NPY and [Leu(31)Pro(34)]NPY. The Y2 receptor agonist, NPY 13-36, produced only a marginal effect on total food intake. The profile of agonist potency after fourth cerebral ventricle administration is similar to the profile obtained when these or related agonists are injected in the region of the hypothalamus. Agonists at both Y1 and Y5 receptors stimulated food intake with a rank order of potency that does not conclusively favor the exclusive involvement of a single known NPY receptor subtype. Thus it is possible that the ingestive effects of NPY and PYY are mediated by multiple or novel receptor subtypes in the hindbrain. And the relatively greater potency and efficacy of PYY raises the possibility that a novel PYY-preferring receptor in the hindbrain is involved in the stimulation of food intake.

cNeuropeptide Y family of peptides: Structure, anatomical expression, function, and molecular evolution

Evolutionary relationships between neuroendocrine peptides are often difficult to resolve across divergent phyla due to independent duplication events in different lineages. Thanks to peptide purification and molecular cloning in many different species, the situation is beginning to clear for the neuropeptide Y (NPY) family, which also includes peptide YY (PYY), the tetrapod pancreatic polypeptide (PP) and the fish pancreatic peptide Y (PY). It has long been assumed that the first duplication to occur in vertebrate evolution generated NPY and PYY, as both of these are found in all gnathostomes as well as lamprey. Evidence from other gene families show that this duplication was probably a chromosome duplication event. The origin of a second PYY peptide found in lamprey remains to be explained. Our recent cloning of NPY, PYY and PY in the sea bass proves that fish PY is a separate gene product. We favour the hypothesis that PY is a duplicate of the PYY gene and that it may have occurred late in fish evolution, as PY has so far only been found in acanthomorph fishes. Thus, this duplication seems to be independent of the one that generate PP from PYY in tetrapods, although both tetrapod PP and fish PY are expressed in the pancreas. Studies in the sea bass and other fish show that PY, in contrast to PP, is expressed in the nervous system. We review the literature on the distribution and functional aspects of the various NPY-family peptides in vertebrates.

Key words: neuropeptide Y, pancreatic polypeptide, fish pancreatic peptide, gene duplication.

Orexin-induced food intake involves neuropeptide Y pathway

Orexins (orexin-A and -B) are recently identified neuropeptides, which are thought to be implicated in the regulation of feeding behavior. We used a NPY-Y1 receptor specific antagonist, BIBO3304, to examine whether NPY is involved in orexin-induced feeding behavior. Intracerebroventricular administration of orexin-A (10 nmol) induced food intake in rats (food intake for 3 h; vehicle 0.3+/-0.2 g vs. orexin-A 10 nmol, 4.0+/-0.5 g, n=4). Orexin-induced feeding behavior was partially inhibited by prior administration of BIBO3304 (3 h food intake: orexin-A 10 nmol, 4.0+/-0.5 g vs. BIBO3304 (60 microgram) + orexin-A 10 nmol, 2.2+/-0.2 g, n=4). A low dose of BIBO3304 (30 microgram) did not show a significant inhibitory effect. BIBO3457, an inactive enantiomer, used as a negative control, did not show any inhibitory effect on orexin-A-induced feeding behavior. Fos expression was observed in NPY-containing neurons in the arcuate nucleus 1 h after orexin-A (10 nmol) was administered intracerebroventricularly (control 0.3+/-0.08%, orexin-A 10.2+/-0.8%, n=5 rats/group). These observations suggest that NPY is involved in orexin-induced feeding behavior. However, BIBO3304 did not completely abolish the effect of orexin-A. These results suggest that orexin-A elicits feeding behavior partially via the NPY pathway. The NPY system could be the one of downstream pathways by which orexin-A induces feeding behavior. Another pathway may also be involved in orexin-A-induced feeding behavior, because BIBO3304 did not completely abolish orexin-A-induced feeding behavior.

Molecular characterization of the ligand-receptor interaction of the neuropeptide Y family

Neuropeptide Y (NPY), peptide YY (PYY) and pancreatic polypeptide (PP) belong to the NPY hormone family and activate a class of receptors called the Y-receptors, and also belong to the large superfamily of the G-protein coupled receptors. Structure-affinity and structure-activity relationship studies of peptide analogs, combined with studies based on site-directed mutagenesis and anti-receptor antibodies, have given insight into the individual characterization of each receptor subtype relative to its interaction with the ligand, as well as to its biological function. A number of selective antagonists at the Y1-receptor are available whose structures resemble that of the C-terminus of NPY. Some of these compounds, like BIBP3226, BIBO3304 and GW1229, have recently been used for in vivo investigations of the NPY-induced increase in food intake. Y2-receptor selective agonists are the analog cyclo-(28/32)-Ac-[Lys28-Glu32]-(25-36)-pNPY and the TASP molecule containing two units of the NPY segment 21-36. Now the first antagonist with nanomolar affinity for the Y2-receptor is also known, BIIE0246. So far, the native peptide PP has been shown to be the most potent ligand at the Y4-receptor. However, by the design of PP/NPY chimera, some analogs have been found that bind not only to the Y4-, but also to the Y5-receptor with subnanomolar affinities, and are as potent as NPY at the Y1-receptor. For the characterization of the Y5-receptor in vitro and in vivo, a new class of highly selective agonists is now available. This consists of analogs of NPY and of PP/NPY chimera which all contain the motif Ala31-Aib32. This motif has been shown to induce a 3(10)-helical turn in the region 28-31 of NPY and is suggested to be the key motif for high Y5-receptor selectivity. The results of feeding experiments in rats treated with the first highly specific Y5-receptor agonists support the hypothesis that this receptor plays a role in the NPY-induced stimulation of food intake. In conclusion, the selective compounds for the different Y receptor subtypes known so far are promising tools for a better understanding of the physiological properties of the hormones of the NPY family and related receptors.

Neuropeptide Y receptor(s) mediating feeding in the rat: characterization with antagonists

The present study evaluated the effect of the neuropeptide Y (NPY) Y1 receptor antagonists BIBO 3304 and SR 120562A and of the Y5 receptor antagonists JCF 104, JCF 109, and CGP 71683A on feeding induced either by NPY or food deprivation. In a preliminary experiment, NPY was injected into the third cerebroventricle (3V) at doses of 0.07, 0.15, 0.3, or 0.6 nmol/rat. The dose of 0.3 nmol/rat, which produced a cumulative 2-h food intake of 11.2 +/- 1.9 g/kg body weight, was chosen for the following experiments. The antagonists were injected in the 3V 1 min before NPY. The Y1 receptor antagonist BIBO 3304 significantly inhibited NPY-induced feeding at doses of 1 or 10 nmol/rat. The Y1 receptor antagonist SR 120562A, at the dose of 10 but not of 1 nmol/rat, significantly reduced the hyperphagic effect of NPY, 0.3 nmol/rat. The Y5 receptor antagonists JCF 104 and JCF 109 (1 or 10 nmol/rat) and CGP 71683A (10 or 100 nmol/rat) did not significantly modify the effect of NPY, 0.3 nmol/rat. However, JCF 104 (10 nmol/rat) and CGP 71683A (100 nmol/rat), but not JCF 109 (10 nmol/rat), significantly reduced food intake during the interval from 2 to 4 h after injection of a higher dose, 0.6 nmol/rat, of NPY. Feeding induced by 16 h of food deprivation was significantly reduced by the Y1 receptor antagonist BIBO 3304 (10 nmol/rat), but it was not significantly modified by the same dose of SR 120562A or JCF 104. These findings support the idea that the hyperphagic effect of NPY is mainly mediated by Y1 receptors. The results obtained with JCF 104 and CGP 71683A suggest that Y5 receptors may have a modulatory role in the maintenance of feeding induced by rather high doses of NPY after the main initial feeding response.

Effects of single and chronic intracerebroventricular administration of the orexins on feeding in the rat

Two novel hypothalamic neuropeptides, orexin-A and -B, are suggested to regulate feeding. A single intracerebroventricular injection of orexin-A (23.4 nmol), administered 3 h into the light phase, increased feeding in satiated rats and prolonged feeding in fasted rats; it also increased feeding when given 6 h into, but not at the start of, the dark phase. An 8-day intracerebroventricular infusion with orexin-A (18 nmol/day) increased daytime feeding on days 2 and 8, but nocturnal feeding was reduced and there was no change in 24 h intake. Orexin-B had no effects. These results demonstrate a circadian variation in feeding responses to orexin-A.