Transmission of hepatitis C virus by organ transplantation in the United Kingdom

Cost-effectiveness of transplanting lungs and kidneys from donors with potential hepatitis C exposure or infection

Organ transplant guidelines in many settings recommend that people with potential hepatitis C virus (HCV) exposure or infection are deemed ineligible to donate. The recent availability of highly-effective treatments for HCV means that this may no longer be necessary. We used a mathematical model to estimate the expected difference in healthcare costs, difference in disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) and cost-effectiveness of removing HCV restrictions for lung and kidney donations in Australia. Our model suggests that allowing organ donations from people who inject drugs, people with a history of incarceration and people who are HCV antibody-positive could lead to an estimated 10% increase in organ supply, population-level improvements in health (reduction in DALYs), and on average save AU$2,399 (95%CI AU$1,155-3,352) and AU$2,611 (95%CI AU$1,835-3,869) per person requiring a lung and kidney transplant respectively. These findings are likely to hold for international settings, since this policy change remained cost saving with positive health gains regardless of HCV prevalence, HCV treatment cost and waiting list survival probabilities. This study suggests that guidelines on organ donation should be revisited in light of recent changes to clinical outcomes for people with HCV.

An overview about hepatitis C: a devastating virus

Hepatitis C (HCV) is the disease that has affected around 200 million people globally. HCV is a life threatening human pathogen, not only because of its high prevalence and worldwide burden but also because of the potentially serious complications of persistent HCV infection. Chronicity of the disease leads to cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma and end-stage liver disease. HCV positive hepatocytes vary between less than 5% and up to 100%, indicating the high rate of replication of viral RNA. HCV has a very high mutational rate that enables it to escape the immune system. Viral diversity has two levels; the genotypes and Quasiaspecies. Major HCV genotypes constitute genotype 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 while more than 50 subtypes are known. All HCV genotypes have their particular patterns of geographical distribution and a slight drift in viral population has been observed in some parts of the globe.

Current status of renal transplantation from HCV-positive donors

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains frequent among renal transplant (RT) recipients and has a detrimental effect on patient and graft survival. accelerated progression of liver disease due to HCV has been implicated in increased mortality after kidney transplantation but additional outcomes have been related to HCV after RT. all HCV-infected kidney transplant candidates should be considered for liver biopsy before RT. HCV infection should not be considered an absolute contraindication to renal transplantation, although the course of HCV-related liver disease is often progressive. Numerous organ procurement organizations have introduced the policy of accepting kidneys from HCV-positive donors for HCV-positive recipients, but this is still controversial. Single-center experiences have not reported adverse effects on the short-term patient and graft survival, however information from large databases has suggested that RT recipients of HCV-positive donors are independently at risk of mortality even in the modern era of immunosuppression. Renal transplantation should be considered using HCV-seropositive grafts for qualified patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 5 and HCV infection since good information indicates that the transplantation of kidneys from HCV-infected donors results in improved survival compared to wait-listed and dialysis-dependent candidates. a potential risk related to the use of donor HCV-positive kidneys cannot be excluded, and kidneys from HCV-infected donors should be restricted to recipients with evidence of active viremia at the time of kidney transplantation.

Estimating hepatitis C infection acquired in England, 1986–2000

Hepatitis C is a global health problem and in the UK seroprevalence studies have mainly concentrated on specific high-risk groups. The aim of this study was to determine changes in the prevalence of antibody to hepatitis C virus in England using residual specimens collected between 1986 and 2000 reflecting the general population. A cross-sectional study design using a convenience collection of serum specimens from adult patients submitted to laboratories in the years 1986, 1991, 1996 and 2000 from a total of 19 laboratories around England were investigated. The main outcome was to determine anti-HCV prevalence and the average incidence occurring between 1986 and 2000 and factors associated with infection. Multivariable analysis of results from all years showed there was a significant difference in prevalence between males and females (P<0·001), birth cohort (P<0·001) and by health region (P<0·001). An average of 0·72% (95% CI 0–1·65%) of those susceptible to HCV born between 1950 and 1970 were estimated to have acquired the infection between 1986 and 2000. Analysis of this convenience serum collection suggests that HCV prevalence is low in the general population, and is associated with period of birth, gender and health region. There was evidence to support a low incidence of HCV infection in those born between 1950 and 1970 over the period 1986–2000 which, at the population level, equated to a substantial burden of infection (~106 000 persons). Continued surveillance and prevention targeted at injecting drug users are essential for the control of hepatitis C in the UK.

Hepatitis C virus: laboratory surveillance in England and Wales, 1992-2004

Between 1992 and 2004, a total of 49,819 confirmed hepatitis C infections have been reported to the Health Protection Agency (HPA) by laboratories in England and Wales; the annual number of reports increased from 241 in 1991 to 8149 in 2004. Most reports with a known risk factor were in injecting drug users (87%, 12,438/14,221), but 71% (35,598/49,819) of the total had no reported identified risk. The age-sex distribution of the latter cases was similar to that in injecting drug users. Using names to assign ethnicity, individuals with South Asian names had an older age distribution and a different risk factor profile from non-South Asians. Using published age-specific prevalence data from 1996, it was estimated that around 28,1764 cases of hepatitis C infection exist in England and Wales, and that only 17% of these cases have been reported to the HPA. Surveillance reports continue to provide important information regarding trends in hepatitis C infection in specific risk groups.

Should antihepatitis B virus core positive or antihepatitis C virus core positive subjects be accepted as organ donors for liver transplantation?

Since the introduction of liver transplantation as a routine surgical procedure for the treatment of end-stage liver disease, there has been an increasing gap between the number of available grafts and the number of patients on the waiting list. This has led transplant centers to expand the donor pool by different means. One of them has been the introduction of living donor liver transplantation. Other strategies include using less than optimal allografts from deceased donors, the so-called marginal donors, which include the use of grafts from older subjects, livers with moderate amounts of steatosis, or from donors with markers of past or current infection with hepatitis viruses who have absent or minimal liver biochemical or histologic injury. In this review, we will focus on the current use of allografts from donors with antihepatitis B core antibody and/or antibodies against hepatitis C virus in cadaveric and living donor liver transplantation.

Treatment of hepatitis C in potential kidney and heart transplant patients

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is common in certain solid organ transplant recipients, most notably in those undergoing liver or kidney transplantation. Infection typically antedates transplantation but may have been acquired at the time of transplantation via infected blood products or organs. A more rapid and aggressive course of HCV-related infection and liver disease is the major concern in organ transplant recipients compared with immunocompetent patients. HCV-related liver disease is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease treated by dialysis or transplantation. The outcome of HCV infection in renal and liver transplant recipients has been extensively investigated, whereas literature on HCV-related liver disease among patients with orthotopic heart transplantation is scanty. This article reviews the literature concerning the treatment of HCV-related liver disease in renal and orthotopic heart transplantation.

The use of hepatitis C-infected grafts in liver transplantation

1. Liver grafts from hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected deceased donors can be used safely in HCV-infected recipients. 2. Histological assessment of the graft before orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is advised. 3. Recipients of these grafts should give consent accordingly. 4. The course of HCV disease after OLT parallels that in patients who received noninfected organs.

The use of virologically compromised organs in liver transplantation

The present organ donor crisis has led to accepted use of organs from donors infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV). Although capable of transmitting disease, these grafts offer opportunities to expand the donor pool for certain populations. Anti-HBc positive grafts can be used if care is taken to provide prophylaxis. Good quality grafts from HCV+ donors may be used in recipients who are themselves HCV+ with good outcomes.

Managing occupational risks for hepatitis C transmission in the health care setting

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a significant contemporary health problem in the United States and elsewhere. Because it is primarily transmitted via blood, hepatitis C infection presents risks for both nosocomial transmission to patients and occupational spread to health care workers. Recent insights into the pathogenesis, immunopathogenesis, natural history, and treatment of infection caused by this unique flavivirus provide a rationale for the use of new strategies for managing occupational hepatitis C infections when they occur. This article reviews this developing information. Recently published data demonstrate success rates in the treatment of "acute hepatitis C syndrome" that approach 100\%, and although these studies are not directly applicable to all occupational infections, they may provide important clues to optimal management strategies. In addition, the article delineates approaches to the prevention of occupational exposures and also addresses the difficult issue of managing HCV-infected health care providers. The article summarizes currently available data about the nosocomial epidemiology of HCV infection and the magnitude of risk and discusses several alternatives for managing exposure and infection. No evidence supports the use of immediate postexposure prophylaxis with immunoglobulin, immunomodulators, or antiviral agents. Based on the very limited data available, the watchful waiting and preemptive therapy strategies described in detail in this article represent reasonable interim approaches to the complex problem of managing occupational HCV infections, at least until more definitive data are obtained.

Transmission of viral hepatitis by kidney transplantation: donor evaluation and transplant policies (Part 2: hepatitis C virus)

This two-part article discusses serologic testing of prospective donors for viral hepatitis B and C as part of the comprehensive donor evaluation and reviews of the current policies and practices aimed at preventing donor-to-recipient transmission of hepatitis B and C viruses (HBV, HBC). This second part of the review discusses HCV. Organs procured from HCV-infected donors can transmit the virus to their recipients. Because a number of studies have associated infections with HCV with increased morbidity and mortality among renal transplant recipients, it is important to prevent HCV transmission with renal transplantation. The majority of organ procurement organizations (OPOs) perform routine screening of organ donors for antibodies to HCV (anti-HCV). The prevalence of HCV infection among cadaver organ donors, ascertained based on a positive anti-HCV test by ELISA2, varies worldwide between 1.08% and 11.8%. The use of kidneys from donors negative for anti-HCV by ELISA2 carries negligible or no risk of transmitting HCV infection. The use of organs from anti-HCV-positive donors has been restricted to life-saving transplants (heart, liver or lung) by the majority of OPOs worldwide. However, discarding kidneys from all anti-HCV positive donors would lead to unnecessary waste of organs because not all anti-HCV positive donors are infectious. Recently, the policy of unconditional restriction on the use of kidneys from anti-HCV positive donors has been challenged, and transplantation of organs from anti-HCV-positive donors into anti-HCV-positive recipients has been found to be safe. An even better alternative might be a policy of transplanting kidneys from anti-HCV-positive donors only in HCV RNA-positive recipients. However, until more data become available, these two strategies remain experimental treatments.

Cardiac Transplantation: Pre-transplant Infectious Diseases Evaluation and Post-transplant Prophylaxis

Screening of recipients and donors of cardiac allografts for infectious pathogens, and the use of appropriate immunization and antimicrobial prophylaxis strategies, remain important for the control of infection following heart transplantation. However, the risk of infectious complications in a particular patient must often be weighed against the risk of delaying or denying allograft transplantation. In addition, the ongoing degree of immunosuppression and its contribution to the risk for infectious complications should also be considered to guide the length of prophylactic antimicrobial therapy and provide optimal patient care.

Update on chronic viral hepatitis

Many recent and significant advances in the field of chronic viral hepatitis, including therapy, suggest that an update on chronic hepatitis is timely. Chronic hepatitis B virus infection remains a significant worldwide cause of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, despite the wide availability of a long established and effective vaccine. Transmission occurs via perinatal, sexual, and parenteral routes (particularly intravenous drug abuse and although blood products still carry a risk, this is now extremely low in Western countries). Only a minority of infected adult cases develop chronic hepatitis but in children under 1 year, 90% develop chronic hepatitis. The clinical spectrum of chronic liver injury ranges from mild inflammation to end stage liver cirrhosis. Interferon alfa has been the mainstay of treatment for patients with active disease but nucleoside analogues (lamivudine and adefovir) are now available with similar efficacy. Patients with end stage liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma can be offered transplantation but infection in the graft is commonplace. The combination of hepatitis B immunoglobulin and newer antiviral drugs reduce the incidence and severity of graft infection significantly. The hepatitis C virus epidemic of the latter half of the 20th century now affects more than 1% of populations worldwide. This RNA virus is spread parenterally and is becoming the leading indication for liver transplantation. The majority of patients develop chronic hepatitis, which may be progressive, evolving to significant liver disease (cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma) in about 20% cases after decades. Treatment with the combination of interferon alfa and ribavirin is successful in up to 40% cases. Liver transplantation is a therapeutic option for some but graft infection is universal and often complicated by progressive liver fibrosis. A vaccine remains a remote prospect so that prevention is crucial. Hepatitis D virus infection occurs on a background of hepatitis B virus infection and can also cause liver damage. The response to antiviral therapy is poor. The newer "hepatitis" viruses G and TT do not cause significant liver injury.

Pretransplant evaluation for infections in donors and recipients of solid organs

The risk of infectious disease reactivation in recipients of and transmission by solid-organ transplants remains, and thorough screening and testing of recipient and donor is especially important. In conceiving screening strategies, it is crucial to consider the sensitivity and specificity of individual diagnostic tests in the context of their use. Furthermore, recognition of special risks for infectious complications of transplantation will help to guide preventive, diagnostic, and therapeutic steps in the control of infectious complications in individual patients. The acceptability of risks for infectious complications after transplantation depends also on the urgency of transplantation of a vital organ as well as the availability of organs. Although these principals are well accepted, standards for the extent of screening and criteria for inappropriate donors and exclusion of unfit recipients remain controversial to some extent.

The epidemiology of hepatitis C in a UK health regional population of 5.12 million

BACKGROUND

The epidemiology and natural history of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in the UK are uncertain. Previous reports are from small or selected populations such as blood donors or tertiary referral centres.

AIMS

To study the epidemiology and natural history of HCV infection.

METHODS

Prospective study incorporating five centres within the Trent region. Patients were managed and followed up according to a commonly agreed protocol.

SUBJECTS

A total of 1128 HCV positive patients. Patients with haemophilia, human immunodeficiency virus, and chronic renal failure were excluded.

RESULTS

Between September 1991 and December 1998, 2546 anti-HCV positive patients were identified of whom 1128 (44%) were enrolled in the cohort. A risk factor(s) for infection was identified in 93.4% of patients who completed the questionnaire; 81% of patients were HCV RNA positive. A total of 397 initial liver biopsies were scored by a single pathologist. These showed a correlation between high alcohol intake and fibrosis score. Multivariate analysis showed fibrosis to be associated with age over 40, past evidence of hepatitis B virus infection, and higher necroinflammatory grade but not with sex, viral genotype, maximum known alcohol intake, estimated duration of infection, or mode of transmission. Twelve (7.8%) of 153 patients who received interferon therapy had sustained serum virus clearance. Sixty six patients have died during the follow up period, 31 with a liver related cause of death. This represents a considerable excess over the expected death rate for a cohort of this age and sex distribution.

CONCLUSIONS

HCV infection is an emerging health problem in the Trent region. Identifying risk factors for infection and disease severity will enhance understanding and facilitate improved intervention. An excess mortality in infected individuals is already evident in this unselected cohort.

Hepatitis C: a review and update

The hepatitis C virus is an RNA virus that is a major cause of acute and chronic hepatitis. It is contracted chiefly through parenteral exposure to infected material such as blood transfusions or injections with dirty needles. Those at highest risk for development of hepatitis C are injection-drug users, people who snort cocaine with shared straws, and health care workers who are at risk for needle-stick and other exposures. Although the incidence of acute hepatitis C infection has fallen dramatically in the United States during the past decade, the prevalence of infection remains high (approximately 2.7 million Americans) because chronic hepatitis C develops in about 75% of those infected. Both acute and chronic hepatitis C are asymptomatic in most patients. However, chronic hepatitis C is a slowly progressive disease and results in severe morbidity in 20% to 30% of infected persons. Chronic hepatitis C is associated with a host of extrahepatic manifestations, many of which may be seen by dermatologists. The most frequent of these are mixed cryoglobulinemia with leukocytoclastic vasculitis and porphyria cutanea tarda. (J Am Acad Dermatol 2001;44:159-79.)

LEARNING OBJECTIVE

At the conclusion of this learning activity, participants should be familiar with the essentials of the virology of the hepatitis C virus and the major features of the human diseases caused by hepatitis C viral infection; the extrahepatic manifestations of hepatitis C viral infection, with particular emphasis upon dermatologic manifestations, including leukocytoclastic vasculitis, porphyria cutanea tarda, and lichen planus; and the current methods of management of hepatitis C and its extrahepatic manifestations.

Detection of hepatitis C virus in the corneas of seropositive donors

PURPOSE

There have been no reported cases of hepatitis C virus (HCV) transmission by corneal transplantation. Previous studies have also shown no correlation between HCV seropositivity and the presence of HCV RNA in the corneal tissues. This study aims to investigate such correlation and to provide further evidence to the possible transmissibility of HCV via corneal grafts.

METHODS

Of the 1,619 potential corneal donors to the Eye Bank of Canada over a 1-year period, 15 tested HCV-positive by the second-generation Abbott HCV enzyme immunoassay (EIA) 2.0 assay. Their sera were further tested with second-generation radio-immunoblot assay (RIBA-II), and their corneas (29 altogether) were processed for identification of HCV RNA using polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

RESULTS

Of the 29 corneas from seropositive donors, HCV RNA was detected in 7 (24.1%).

CONCLUSION

This is the first study in the literature that demonstrates a significant correlation between HCV seropositivity and the presence of HCV in the corneas. Routine HCV serologic testing for all potential corneal donors and rejection of corneal tissues based on HCV seropositivity is certainly justifiable.

Hepatitis C transmission and infection by orthotopic heart transplantation

BACKGROUND

The transmission and clinical consequences of hepatitis C viral (HCV) infection acquired by orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) from an HCV-infected donor to an HCV-naive recipient have not been well described. We report our experience in 5 HCV-naive patients who were transplanted with hearts from HCV-positive donors. All transplants occurred within a 1-year period.

METHODS

After cardiac transplantation we retrospectively examined the recipients' clinical course, liver-associated enzymes, HCV-antibody serology, quantitative HCV RNA level, and HCV genotype.

RESULTS

Five subjects with rapidly deteriorating heart failure and negative serum antibodies to HCV received an emergent OHT from a donor known to be infected with HCV. Liver-associated enzymes peaked at 2 to 6 weeks post-transplant: mean peak alanine aminotransferase was 180 U/L (normal, 9 to 52) and aspartate aminotransferase was 111 U/L (normal, 14 to 36). Liver enzymes had returned to normal limits by 6 and 12 months post-OHT. At a mean 15 months after transplantation, only 1 of 5 patients has developed antibodies to HCV, but 4 of 5 have evidence of infection, as shown by serum HCV RNA. No patient has developed evidence of liver failure.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) Transmission of HCV from an HCV-positive donor to an HCV-naive recipient at the time of OHT is likely. (2) Antibodies to HCV post-OHT may remain negative for more than 1 year in these patients. (3) Hepatitis C viral RNA using polymerase chain reaction should be the test of choice for diagnosis of HCV infection post-OHT. (4) Hepatitis C viral donor hearts should be limited to critically ill patients in extremis until the long-term consequences of acquisition of HCV by an OHT recipient are known.

Hepatitis C virus infection in special groups

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is associated with a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations which may influence the choice of diagnostic assays, especially in haemodialysis patients, the clinical course of infection with possible multiple and sequential episodes of hepatitis in multiple transfused patients, and the severity of liver disease, especially in patients with HBV-HCV co-infection. The consequences of HCV infection in patients with organ graft are not completely understood due to the complexity of the clinical situations and the unavailability of long-term follow-up. Furthermore, current antiviral therapy is not very effective in these populations. Thus, it is especially important to protect patients at risk for HCV infection, using universal precautionary procedures.

A randomized trial of solvent/detergent-treated and standard fresh-frozen plasma in the coagulopathy of liver disease and liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Virus inactivation of pooled fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) by the solvent/detergent (SD) method results in a loss of approximately 20 percent of factor VIII. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of SD-treated plasma in correcting the coagulopathy associated with liver disease and liver transplantation.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Forty-nine patients with coagulation deficits due to liver disease, who required FFP for invasive procedures or liver transplantation, were randomly assigned to receive either FFP or SD-treated plasma. Patients were assessed for side effects, correction of coagulopathy over 24 hours, and seroconversion for viral markers 6 to 18 months after treatment.

RESULTS

In the liver disease group, equal correction of clotting factors and partial thromboplastin time was seen with FFP and SD-treated plasma, with a similar return to baseline values over 24 hours. There was greater correction of the International Normalised Ratio in patients receiving SD-treated plasma (p = 0.037), but this patient group had higher baseline values than recipients of FFP (p = 0.024). Liver transplant patients also showed equivalent correction of coagulopathy with the same dose of FFP and SD-treated plasma. The use of other blood components during transplantation was identical in the two treatment groups. No seroconversions were seen for HIV or hepatitis B or C virus. One patient who had received FFP seroconverted for human parvovirus B19. Apparent seroconversion for hepatitis A virus seen at 9 to 13 months in four other patients was probably due to detection of passively transferred antibodies, as later testing of these patients gave negative results. Minor side effects were rare in both groups.

CONCLUSION

SD-treated plasma is an efficacious source of coagulation factors for patients with liver disease who are undergoing biopsy or transplantation. Assessment of seroconversion for viral markers in recipients of plasma-derived products and plasma components should include consideration of the possibility that passively transferred antibodies were detected.

Outcome of de novo hepatitis C virus infection in heart transplant recipients

The outcome of de novo hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in heart transplant recipients of HCV-antibody positive organs is not known. The aim of the study was to determine the short-term outcome of de novo HCV infection in recipients of HCV-positive donor organs. HCV-antibody negative recipients of HCV-antibody positive hearts were identified from January 1, 1991 to February 28, 1998. Control patients matched for year of transplantation were also identified. Twenty-eight patients (22 males, mean age of 56 +/- 11 SD) received hearts from HCV-antibody-positive donors. The control group was similar to the patients in all clinical and demographic aspects. Twenty-three patients had detectable viremia by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Of these 23 patients with de novo HCV infection, 7 (30%) developed HCV-related liver disease. Three patients (13%) had chronic hepatitis and 4 patients (17%) developed severe acute cholestatic hepatitis (ACH). Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) use (P =.04) and high viral load at onset of acute liver disease (P =.02) were associated with ACH. Overall survival was similar between patients with de novo HCV infection and controls (P =.20). Development of ACH (P =.02) and MMF use (P =.0009) were associated with decreased survival in patients with de novo HCV infection. The present study showed that survival of patients with de novo HCV infection was similar to a matched control group. HCV-related severe ACH is associated with a poor short-term outcome in patients with de novo HCV infection. MMF use may be associated with a higher incidence of HCV-related severe ACH and a poor short-term outcome.

Further evidence for an association between non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and chronic hepatitis C virus infection

Non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) may be associated with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. This was studied further in two parts. First, 1,151 patients with HCV-related cirrhosis and 181 patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related cirrhosis, well matched for age, sex, and severity of cirrhosis, were reviewed retrospectively. The prevalence of diabetes mellitus was higher in HCV-related cirrhosis (23.6%) than in HBV-related cirrhosis (9.4%; odds ratio [OR], 2.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6-4.79; P =.0002). The prevalence of diabetes mellitus was associated closely with the Child-Pugh score (OR, 3.83; 95% CI, 2. 38-6.17; P <.0001) and increasing age (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00-1.03; P =.0117). Second, 235 patients with biopsy confirmed chronic HBV or HCV underwent an oral glucose tolerance test. Only 1 of 70 patients with chronic viral hepatitis without cirrhosis was diabetic. However, 31 of 127 patients with HCV-related cirrhosis (24.4%) were diabetic compared with 3 of 38 patients with HBV-related cirrhosis (7.9%, P =.0477). The major variables associated with NIDDM were cirrhosis (OR, 14.39; 95% CI, 1.91-108; P =.0096) and male sex (OR, 4.64; 95% CI, 1. 32-16.18; P =.0161). Fasting insulin levels in 30 patients with HCV-related cirrhosis and diabetes mellitus were elevated significantly, which was consistent with insulin resistance. However, acute insulin responsiveness was reduced in all patients with HCV infection and diabetes suggesting concomitant B-cell dysfunction. This study confirms an association between HCV and NIDDM.

Recurrent and new hepatitis C virus infection after liver transplantation

Chronic infection with the hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the most common reason for liver transplantation. We examined the results of laboratory tests for HCV on a cohort of patients who received a liver transplant between 1990 and 1994 at three large centers. Seven hundred twenty-two recipients and 604 donors were tested for antibody to HCV (anti-HCV) using a second-generation enzyme-linked immunoassay (EIA-2), followed by recombinant immunoblot (RIBA-2) and HCV RNA confirmation by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) (with genotyping and viral quantification). Diagnosis of posttransplantation infection required detection of serum HCV RNA that could be genotyped by sequencing or was repeatedly positive despite being unsequenceable. Twenty-five percent of transplantation candidates were seropositive for anti-HCV. Approximately 86% of anti-HCV-positive, 93% of RIBA-positive, and 97% of HCV RNA-positive candidates developed infection after transplantation. Pretransplantation HCV RNA was superior to RIBA-2 for predicting posttransplantation infection. Whereas HCV genotype was identified in nearly all candidates and changed little after transplantation, serum viral levels rose markedly after transplantation. Fifteen donors were either anti-HCV- or HCV RNA-positive. Recipients of grafts from donors with HCV RNA all developed infection, whereas infection was not detected in recipients of grafts from donors with anti-HCV but without detectable HCV RNA. The rate of new infection fell significantly (P =.02) after the introduction of EIA-2 screening of blood. Donor and candidate markers for HCV predict posttransplantation infection.

Chronic hepatitis in children after liver transplantation: role of hepatitis C virus and hepatitis G virus infections

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Chronic graft hepatitis occurs in 20-30% adults after liver transplantation but the prevalence and causes in children are not known. In adults, hepatitis C virus infection is prevalent prior to transplantation and recurrent infection is a frequent cause of graft dysfunction. The significance of the recently described hepatitis G virus infection remains unproven. The aim of this study was to examine the role of hepatitis C virus and hepatitis G virus infection in chronic graft hepatitis after paediatric liver transplantation.

METHODS

The prevalence of graft hepatitis and the role of hepatitis C virus and hepatitis G virus infections in 80 children after liver transplantation have been studied, with a median follow up of 4.4 years (range 0.4 to 10.7), and the persistence of hepatitis G infection in the presence of immunosuppression has been determined.

RESULTS

Chronic graft hepatitis was diagnosed in 19/80 (24%) children and was most frequently seen in children transplanted for cryptogenic cirrhosis (71%). There was no significant difference in the prevalence of chronic hepatitis in those transplanted before or after donor anti-HCV screening. Hepatitis C infection occurred in three children transplanted prior to donor screening but in only one was associated with chronic hepatitis. Hepatitis G infection was found in 22/79 (28%) transplant recipients but was not associated with graft hepatitis. In 17/21 children hepatitis G infection persisted for a median of 5.2 years after transplantation.

CONCLUSION

Chronic hepatitis occurred in 24% of children after liver transplantation, a similar prevalence to that in adults. Cryptogenic liver disease predisposed to graft hepatitis, but neither hepatitis C nor hepatitis G infection was associated. Hepatitis G virus caused a frequent and usually persistent infection after transplantation.

Viral replication in patients with concomitant hepatitis B and C virus infections

The aim of this study was to assess the implications of dual infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV). The HBV and HCV status in 100 patients with chronic hepatitis was analysed. HBV DNA was studied using liquid hybridization and the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). HCV viremia was measured using qualitative and quantitative PCR. The HCV genotype was determined by PCR. Patients were divided into three groups according to their HCV-RNA and HBsAg status: group I consisted of 40 patients with chronic hepatitis caused by HBV; group II, 40 patients with chronic hepatitis caused by HCV; and group III, 20 patients infected with both viruses. The HBV-DNA level was higher in group I than in group III (66.4 vs. 11.5 pg/ml; p < 0.05). Quantification of HCV viremia revealed mean values of 36.9 copies x 10(5)/ml in group II and 5.5 copies/ml x 10(5) in group III (p < 0.05). The mean aminotransferase level and histological activity were higher in group III. HCV genotype lb was the predominant type. The data suggest that there is reciprocal inhibition of viral replication in patients with dual HBV and HCV infection. Liver disease appears to be more severe in patients with chronic hepatitis B and C.

Risk of inappropriate exclusion of organ donors by introduction of hepatitis B core antibody testing

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B virus infection originating from hepatitis B surface antigen-negative, hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc)-positive organ donors has been documented, and anti-HBc-positive donors have been excluded as liver donors. We assessed the prevalence of anti-HBc in UK organ donors and followed up recipients of organs from anti-HBc-positive donors for serological evidence of posttransplantation hepatitis B virus infection.

METHODS

Serum samples from 400 hepatitis B surface antigen-negative organ donors were tested for anti-HBc.

RESULTS

Only five (1.25%) of 20 sera in which anti-HBc was initially detected were confirmed as anti-HBc positive on further testing. Posttransplantation serum samples from four recipients of confirmed anti-HBc-positive organs showed no evidence of de novo hepatitis B infection.

CONCLUSIONS

The poor specificity of some anti-HBc immunoassays was confirmed and suggests that donor exclusion on the basis of a single anti-HBc-positive result may result in the inappropriate loss of organs.

Mode of hepatitis C virus infection, epidemiology, and chronicity rate in the general population and risk groups

Since the discovery of the hepatitis C virus (HCV), it has become evident that this infectious agent is a primary cause of posttransfusion and sporadic non-A, non-B hepatitis. Identification and introduction of surrogate markers for posttransfusion hepatitis and later introduction of anti-HCV screening has decreased the incidence of posttransfusion hepatitis. Community-acquired HCV infection is less common than posttransfusion HCV hepatitis. HCV infection may lead to liver cirrhosis without prior evidence of laboratory or histologic infection. Populations at risk for HCV infection include patients receiving organ transplants, health care workers, infants born to HCV-infected mothers, and hemodialysis patients. Intravenous drug abusers and their sexual partners also demonstrate a high rate of HCV infection. Nosocomial HCV transmission may occur despite the observance of universal precautions. Dental or surgical intervention, salivary inoculation, family members infected with HCV, cocaine abuse, HIV infection, and lower socioeconomic status also each correlate with an increased risk of infection. HCV infection is associated with many immune-mediated diseases. There may also be some relationship between human leukocyte antigens and HCV infection. Since there currently is no HCV vaccine, prevention of exposure remains the only possibility for reducing HCV transmission and prevalence.

High prevalence of hepatitis C infection in Afro-Caribbean patients with type 2 diabetes and abnormal liver function tests

Moderate elevations of serum transaminases are frequently found in patients with diabetes mellitus and are often attributed to fatty infiltration of the liver without further investigation. Recent studies of patients with end-stage liver disease have suggested a possible association between Hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody positivity and the development of diabetes (mostly Type 2). As a first step in the examination of any potential association between HCV and Type 2 diabetes in subjects without overt liver disease, we examined 200 British patients with Type 2 diabetes (100 White Caucasians, 50 Asians, and 50 Afro-Caribbeans), recruited from the United Kingdom Prospective Study of Diabetes, half of whom had a significant elevation of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) on at least two occasions and half of whom had consistently normal ALT levels. In Afro-Caribbean Type 2 diabetic subjects 7/25 (28%) patients with abnormal ALT and 1/25 (4%) with normal ALT were HCV antibody positive. Among White Caucasian subjects 6/50 (12%) patients with abnormal LFTs and 0/50 with normal LFTs were HCV antibody positive and in Asians the prevalence was 2/25 (8%) and 0/25, respectively. This study suggests that persistent mild to moderate elevation of serum transaminases in a patient with Type 2 diabetes should not automatically be attributed to the metabolic disturbances of diabetes. Particularly in Afro-Caribbean subjects, HCV infection is a major diagnostic consideration. The question of whether HCV infection itself may have a diabetogenic action is worthy of further investigation.