The evaluation of fine-needle procedures for the diagnosis of focal liver lesions in cirrhosis

Avoiding "Needless" nephrectomy: What is the role of small renal mass biopsy in 2024?

Current guidelines do not mandate routine preoperative renal mass biopsy (RMB) for small renal masses (SRMs), which results in a considerable rate (18%-26%) of needless nephrectomy/partial nephrectomy for benign renal tumors. In light of this ongoing practice, a narrative review was conducted to examine the role of routine RMB for SRM. First, arguments justifying the current non-biopsy approach to SRM are critically reviewed and contested. Second, as a standalone procedure, RMB is critically assessed; RMB was found to have higher sensitivity, specificity, and an equal or lower complication rate when compared with other commonly preoperatively biopsied solid organ tumors (e.g., breast, prostate, lung, pancreas, thyroid, and liver). Based on the foregoing information, we propose a paradigm shift in SRM management, advocating for an updated policy in which partial nephrectomy or nephrectomy for SRM invariably occurs only after a preoperative biopsy confirms that a SRM is indeed malignant.

Peripheral Mononuclear Cells Surface Markers Evaluation in Different Stages of Hepatocellular Carcinoma; in a Trial for Early and Accurate Diagnosis in Patients with Post-Hepatitis Liver Cirrhosis and Unremarkable Raised AFP

Introduction

HCC is frequently diagnosed late, when only palliative treatment is available. So, we try to use different immunological markers to identify early HCC in patients with unremarkable raised AFP.

Methods

This study was conducted on 112 participants divided into two equal groups: Group I, 56 patients with liver cirrhosis and different stages of HCC; Group II, 56 patients with liver cirrhosis. The diagnosis of HCC was based on AASLD guidelines. TNM and BCLC classification systems are used for staging of HCC.

Results

A significant reduction in the median percentage of lymphocyte subset (CD3⁺, CD4⁺, CD8⁺, CD19⁺) and NK cell percentage (CD56⁺) has been detected in HCC patients (all P < 0.001). In the HCC group the median monocyte subpopulations CD14⁺ CD16^- Classical, CD14⁺⁺ CD16⁺ Intermediate, and CD14^-+ CD16⁺⁺ Non-Classical were 11.7, 4.0, and 3.5, respectively, with marked reduction compared with liver cirrhosis group (all P < 0.001). Patients with advanced stages (BCLC C and D) were more likely to have significantly higher median CD33⁺ than patients with early stages (BCLC A and B) (P = 0.05); also, the median levels of HLA DR⁺ lymphocytes % in the HCC case group were 21.8 in patients with advanced disease (BCLC C and D) and 13.1 in patients with early stages of the disease (P = 0.04). Patients with late stage (TNM III) were more likely to have significantly higher median CD14⁺ CD16^- Classical monocyte subset, CD36⁺ HLA DR⁺, and CD36⁺ CD16^- than patients with early stages (TNM I and II).

Conclusion

Patients with HCC with unremarkable raised AFP showed marked reduction in lymphocytes, natural killer cells, and all monocyte subpopulations. In addition, patients with advanced HCC showed increased CD33⁺ and HLA DR⁺ lymphocytes %, CD14⁺ CD16^- Classical monocyte subset, CD36⁺ HLA DR⁺, and CD36⁺ CD16^- compared with patients with early stages of HCC.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma in a Patient With Hepatic Steatosis

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has historically developed in the setting of known risk factors-chronic liver disease from viral hepatitis and cirrhosis. In the absence of a risk factor, the development of HCC was rare. However, the increasing prevalence of nonalcoholic liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, the paradigm is shifting. Currently, no HCC screening guidelines exist for these patients. We report a 30-year-old man with a medical history of treated nonseminomatous germ cell testicular cancer who presented with asymptomatic transaminitis. Subsequent workup was notable for a 1.6-cm liver lesion. The patient underwent a left lobe wedge resection with pathology demonstrating a well-differentiated HCC in a background of hepatic steatosis.

Contemporary role of liver biopsy in hepatocellular carcinoma

A correct diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhotic patients with focal liver lesions is one of the most important issues nowadays. Probably one of the oldest debates in the hepatology community is whether to perform liver biopsy (LB) in all cirrhotic patients with focal liver lesions. We now face a time when oncology is moving towards personalized medicine. According to the current European Association for the study of Liver diseases HCC guidelines, LB has only a minor role in the management of HCC. However, the current recommendations were made more than five years ago. As time has passed, the development of high-throughput molecular technologies has helped reveal the main molecular mechanism involved in HCC development and progression. Several subtypes of HCC, with both molecular and histological characterization, have been described. Importantly, some of these subtypes have prognostic impact. In the context of personalized treatment, the role of LB will be carefully reconsidered. Until then, it is mandatory to know the various techniques of LB, their performances, complications and limitations. The balance of risk and benefit defines many of the decisions that we make as providers of medical care. In this review, we discuss not only the risks associated with LB, but also the benefits of biopsy in various clinical scenarios. Not long from now, the role of LB will be reconsidered. It is possible that we will go back in time and once again use biopsy for HCC diagnosis. Then again, we may move back to the future to try to improve the use of liquid biopsy in the follow-up of HCC patients after various treatment modalities.

The long-term benefits of nucleos(t)ide analogs in compensated HBV cirrhotic patients with no or small esophageal varices: A 12-year prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Esophageal varices (EV) are a marker of disease severity in compensated cirrhosis due to hepatitis B virus (HBV) which predicts also the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), clinical decompensation and anticipated liver related death. The dynamics and prognostic significance of EV in patients under long-term HBV suppression by nucleos(t)ide analogs (NUC), are poorly known.

METHODS

A standardized protocol (Baveno) including 414 upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopies was applied to 107 HBeAg-negative compensated cirrhotic patients (93% Child-Pugh A) during a median of 12 (range 2 to 17) years of NUC therapy. Patients who initially started on lamivudine (LMV) and then developed resistance (LMV-R), were rescued by early administration of adefovir, or were switched to tenofovir. Surveillance included serum HBV DNA every three months and abdominal ultrasound every six months.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients had baseline F1 EV which regressed in 18, remained unchanged in eight and progressed in one patient; the 12-year cumulative incidence of EV regression was 83% (95% CI: 52-92%). De novo F1/F2 EV developed in 6/80 patients with a 12-year cumulative incidence of 10% (95% CI: 5-20%). Six of seven patients with de novo varices or progression of pre-existing varices had either a clinical breakthrough due to LMV-R and/or developed a HCC. No bleedings from ruptured EV occurred, 12 patients died (9 HCC) and 15 were transplanted (13 HCC): the 12-year cumulative incidence of HCC and overall survival was 33% (95% CI: 24-42%) and 76% (95% CI: 67-83%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term pharmacological suppression of HBV in HBeAg-seronegative patients with compensated cirrhosis leads to a significant regression of pre-existing EV accompanied by a negligible risk of developing de novo EV.

Saudi guidelines for the diagnosis and management of hepatocellular carcinoma: technical review and practice guidelines

Recognizing the significant prevalence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Saudi Arabia, and the difficulties often faced in early and accurate diagnoses, evidence-based management, and the need for appropriate referral of HCC patients, the Saudi Association for the Study of Liver diseases and Transplantation (SASLT) formed a multi-disciplinary task force to evaluate and update the previously published guidelines by the Saudi Gastroenterology Association. These guidelines were later reviewed, adopted and endorsed by the Saudi Oncology Society (SOS) as its official HCC guidelines as well. The committee assigned to revise the Saudi HCC guidelines was composed of hepatologists, oncologists, liver surgeons, transplant surgeons, and interventional radiologists. Two members of the task force served as guidelines editors. A wide based search on all published reports on all aspects of the epidemiology, natural history, risk factors, diagnosis, and management of HCC was performed. All available literature was critically examined and available evidence was then classified according to its strength. The whole document and the recommendations were then discussed in detail by members and consensus was obtained. All recommendations in these guidelines were based on the best available evidence, but were tailored to the patients treated in Saudi Arabia. We hope that these guidelines will improve HCC patient care and enhance the multidisciplinary care needed for these patients.

Diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis by dynamic contrast imaging: the importance of tumor cell differentiation

Dynamic contrast imaging techniques are considered the standard of care for the radiological diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhosis. However, the accuracy of radiological diagnosis depends largely on the degree of arterial hypervascularization, which increases with tumor size. Owing to the interplay and prognostic relevance of tumor vascularization and cell differentation, we asked ourselves whether tumor grade also affects the outcome of radiological diagnosis. Sixty-two HCCs (47 of which measured 1-2 cm) were consecutively detected in 59 patients with compensated cirrhosis under surveillance with ultrasound and confirmed by way of echo-guided biopsy and concurrent investigations with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CE-US), computed tomography (CT), and gadolinium magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Tumor cell differentiation was evaluated using Edmondson-Steiner criteria in liver cores of 0.9-5.0 cm (median 1.6 cm). Eighteen (29%) HCCs were grade I (1.5 cm), 28 (45%) were grade II (1.5 cm), 16 (26%) were grade III (1.8 cm), and none were grade IV. Contrast wash-in and wash-out were concurrently demonstrated in 21 (34%) tumors by way of CE-US, including three (16%) grade I and 18 (41%) grade II-III (P = 0.08); in 32 (52%) tumors by way of CT, including three (16%) grade I and 29 (66%) grade II-III (P = 0.0006); and 28 (47%) tumors by way of MRI, including three grade I (16%) and 25 (57%) grade II-III (P = 0.01). Among 1- to 2-cm tumors, the radiological diagnosis was achieved in two of 16 grade I and 17 of 31 grade II-III tumors (P = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

Tumor grade, a relevant predictor of disease severity, influences the accuracy of dynamic contrast techniques in the diagnosis of HCC.

Sustained virologic response prevents the development of esophageal varices in compensated, Child-Pugh class A hepatitis C virus-induced cirrhosis. A 12-year prospective follow-up study

The incidence of de novo development of esophageal varices (EV) in patients with compensated liver cirrhosis has been determined by few studies in the short term and never in the long term. The aims of the present study were to determine the incidence and the risk factors associated with the development of EV and to assess whether antiviral treatment and achievement of sustained virologic response (SVR) may prevent de novo EV development in patients with HCV-induced cirrhosis. We studied 218 patients with compensated EV-free, HCV-induced cirrhosis consecutively enrolled between 1989 and 1992 at three referral centers in Milan, Italy. Endoscopic surveillance was performed at 3-year intervals according to international guidelines. SVR was defined as undetectable serum HCV-RNA 24 weeks after treatment discontinuation. During a median follow-up of 11.4 years, 149/218 (68%) patients received antiviral treatment and 34 (22.8%) achieved SVR. None of the SVR patients developed EV compared with 22 (31.8%) of the 69 untreated subjects (P < 0.0001) and 45 (39.1%) of the 115 non-SVR patients (P < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, HCV genotype 1b (hazard ratio [HR] 2.40; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17-4.90) and baseline model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score (HR 1.20; 95% CI 1.07-1.35 for 1 point increase) were independent predictors of EV.

CONCLUSION

In the long term, the achievement of SVR prevents the development of EV in patients with compensated HCV-induced cirrhosis. Therefore, in these patients, endoscopic surveillance can be safely delayed or avoided. Genotype 1b infection and MELD score identify the subset of patients at higher risk of EV development who need tailored endoscopic surveillance.

Approach to Solid Liver Masses in the Cirrhotic Patient

Liver masses in cirrhosis are increasingly being recognized with the use of new imaging modalities. The majority of these lesions are detected by ultrasound, enhanced CT and MRI. The most likely diagnosis of a solid liver lesion in a cirrhotic liver is hepatocellular carcinoma, followed by high grade or low grade dysplastic nodule, and cholangiocarcinoma. Lymphoma and liver metastasis are extremely rare. Diagnosis is made by contrast enhanced ultrasound, multi detector (MDCT) and MRI. Fine needle core biopsy (FNCB) or aspiration (FNAB) or both may be required in doubtful cases. If uncertainty persists on the nature of the lesion, surgical liver resection is recommended. This review discusses the main characteristics of the most common solid liver masses in cirrhotic patient.

Characteristics of common solid liver lesions and recommendations for diagnostic workup

Due to the widespread clinical use of imaging modalities such as ultrasonography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), previously unsuspected liver masses are increasingly being found in asymptomatic patients. This review discusses the various characteristics of the most common solid liver lesions and recommends a practical approach for diagnostic workup. Likely diagnoses include hepatocellular carcinoma (the most likely; a solid liver lesion in a cirrhotic liver) and hemangioma (generally presenting as a mass in a non-cirrhotic liver). Focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatic adenoma should be ruled out in young women. In 70% of cases, MRI with gadolinium differentiates between these lesions. Fine needle core biopsy or aspiration, or both, might be required in doubtful cases. If uncertainty persists as to the nature of the lesion, surgical resection is recommended. If the patient is known to have a primary malignancy and the lesion was found at tumor staging or follow up, histology is required only when the nature of the liver lesion is doubtful.

Predicting mortality risk in patients with compensated HCV-induced cirrhosis: a long-term prospective study

OBJECTIVES

The identification of prognostic factors associated with mortality is crucial in any clinical setting.

METHODS

We enrolled in a prospective study 352 patients with compensated hepatitis C virus (HCV)-induced cirrhosis, consecutively observed between 1989 and 1992. At entry, patients underwent upper endoscopy to detect esophageal varices, and were then surveilled by serial clinical and ultrasonographic examination. The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score was calculated with information collected at enrollment. Baseline predictors and intercurrent events associated with mortality were assessed using the Cox regression model.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 14.4 years, 194 subjects received a single course of interferon monotherapy, 131 patients developed decompensation (ascites, bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy), 109 patients had hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), 9 had liver transplant, and 158 died. Esophageal varices were associated with development of decompensation (hazard ratio (HR), 2.09; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.33-3.30) and liver-related death (HR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.41-3.66). A MELD score of > 10 predicted overall mortality (HR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.50-3.09). Overall survival of patients with MELD < or = 10 was 80% at 10 years. HCC occurrence increased the risk of decompensation fivefold (HR, 5.52; 95% CI, 3.77-8.09). Hepatic and overall mortality hazard ratios were 8.62 (95% CI, 5.57-13.3) and 3.80 (95% CI, 2.67-5.42), respectively, for patients who developed HCC, and 16.9 (95% CI, 9.97-28.6) and 7.08 (95% CI, 4.88-10.2) for those who experienced decompensation.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with compensated HCV-induced cirrhosis, the presence of esophageal varices at baseline predicted decompensation and mortality. The development of HCC during follow-up strongly hastens the occurrence of decompensation, which is the main determinant of death. Patients with a MELD score < or = 10 at study entry had a prolonged life expectancy.

Lack of correlation between serum anti-HBcore detectability and hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with HCV-related cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

While the likelihood of developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients coinfected with both HBV and HCV is increased, the role of previous exposure to HBV as a risk factor associated with tumor occurrence in subjects with HCV-related cirrhosis has not been fully investigated.

AIM

To assess whether serum anti-HBc positivity, as a marker of previous HBV exposure, is associated with HCC development in HCV-related positive, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) negative patients with cirrhosis treated with alfa-interferon (IFN) monotherapy. PATIENTS AND: A database including 883 consecutive patients (557 men, mean age 54.7 yr) with histologically

METHODS

proven cirrhosis treated with IFN between 1992 and 1997 was analyzed. All subjects have been surveilled every 6 months by ultrasound. Independent predictors of HCC were assessed by Cox multiple regression analysis.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 96.1 months. Anti-HBc testing was available in 693 cases and, among them, 303 patients (43.7%) were anti-HBc seropositive. Anti-HBc positive patients were more often men (67.0%vs 58.7%, P= 0.03), had lower transaminase levels (3.3 +/- 2.0 vs 3.8 +/- 2.5 u.l.n., P= 0.004), and had higher rate of alcohol intake (38.3%vs 22.5%, P < 0.001) than anti-HBc negative patients. Overall, the incidence rates of HCC per 100 person-years were 1.84 (95% CI 1.34-2.47) in the anti-HBc positive patients and 1.86 (95% CI 1.41-2.42) in anti-HBc negative ones. By Cox multiple regression, there was no association of serum anti-HBc with HCC development (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.69-1.52) or liver-related deaths incidence (HR 1.21; 95% CI 0.76-1.95).

CONCLUSIONS

In comparison with anti-HBc negative subjects, serum anti-HBc positive patients with HCV-related/HBsAg negative cirrhosis treated with IFN monotherapy did not show a greater risk of HCC.

Algorithm for immediate cytologic diagnosis of hepatic tumors

OBJECTIVE

Immediate cytologic assessment of hepatic lesions can help determine the adequacy of specimens and may yield a preliminary diagnosis. The purpose of this study was to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of on-site cytologic assessment compared with definitive cytologic examination in the detection and correct subtyping of malignant hepatic lesions.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The study population included 472 consecutively registered patients with hepatic nodules who underwent sonographically guided fine-needle aspiration and core biopsies. During on-site cytologic analysis, the pathologist made a preliminary diagnosis of malignancy or negative for malignancy for each nodule. When a malignant lesion was diagnosed, immediate subtyping was attempted.

RESULTS

With immediate cytologic analysis, 280 (80.9%) of 346 malignant nodules were correctly identified without false-positive cases. With immediate subtyping, 113 (68.1%) of 166 cases of hepatocellular carcinoma, 28 (77.8%) of 36 cases of cholangiocarcinoma, and 113 (85.0%) of 133 cases of metastasis were detected.

CONCLUSION

High diagnostic accuracy for malignancy can be achieved with on-site cytologic evaluation of hepatic tumors. Specific diagnoses of hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and metastasis also can be made on-site in most cases. The absence of false-positive diagnosis of malignancy at on-site cytologic examination may make additional biopsy unnecessary. We propose an algorithm for the cytohistopathologic management of hepatic tumors.

Management of solitary 1 cm to 2 cm liver nodules in patients with compensated cirrhosis: a decision analysis

OBJECTIVES

Current guidelines, based on expert opinion, recommend that suspected 1 cm to 2 cm hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) detected on screening be biopsied and, if positive, treated (eg, resection or transplantation). Alternative strategies are immediate treatment or observation until disease progression occurs.

METHODS

A Markov decision model was developed that compared three management strategies - immediate resection, biopsy and resection if positive, and ultrasound surveillance every three months until disease progression - for a single 1 cm to 2 cm liver nodule suspicious for HCC following ultrasound screening and computed tomography confirmation. The cohort included 55-year-old patients with compensated cirrhosis and no significant comorbidities. The model used in the present study incorporated the probabilities of false-positive and false-negative results, needle-track seeding, HCC recurrence, cirrhosis progression and death. The quality-adjusted life expectancy (LE) and the unadjusted LE were evaluated and the model's strength was assessed with sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

In the base case analysis, biopsy, resection and surveillance yielded an unadjusted LE of 60.5, 59.7 and 56.6 months, respectively, and a quality-adjusted LE of 46.6, 45.6 and 43.8 months, respectively. In probabilistic sensitivity analyses, biopsy was the preferred strategy 69.5% of the time, resection 30.5% of the time and surveillance never. Resection was the optimal decision if the sensitivity of biopsy was very low (less than 0.45) or if the accuracy of the imaging tests resulted in a high percentage of HCC-positive patients (greater than 76%) in the screened cohort, as with expert interpretation of triphasic computed tomography.

CONCLUSIONS

The present model suggests that biopsy is the preferred management strategy for these patients. When postimaging probability of HCC is high or pathology expertise is lacking, resection is the best alternative. Surveillance is never the optimal strategy.

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: role of biopsy

Patients with compensated cirrhosis (and low Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score) should not undergo transplantation unless they have small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Therefore, presence of HCC should be definitely ascertained before deciding on transplantation in this group of patients. Current imaging techniques allow detection of small liver nodules (<1 cm). Not all liver nodules between 1 and 2 cm are HCC. In addition, benign regenerative nodules have a relatively low potential for degeneration. It is generally agreed that in patients with evidence of cirrhosis, a definitive diagnosis of HCC can be made without tissue analysis in case of nodules >2 cm with a characteristic pattern on either computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (hypervascularity in the arterial phase and washout in the early or delayed venous phase). Two concordant imaging techniques (triphasic CT and MRI) are needed to ascertain HCC in case of nodules between 1 and 2 cm. Biopsy is needed for making a diagnosis of HCC in patients with cirrhosis with nodules that do not fulfill the above criteria. Whatever the characteristics of the nodules, biopsy should also be performed in patients without documented cirrhosis. In case of HCC, percutaneous biopsy carries a risk of needle tract seeding of 1-2%. Percutaneous biopsy carries a potential risk of hematogenous dissemination that has not been clearly assessed. There is no clear evidence that the risk of posttransplantation recurrence is higher in patients who undergo biopsy before transplantation. Therefore, in case of HCC, previous biopsy should not be considered a contraindication for transplantation. Even though the specificity of biopsy is close to 100%, its negative predictive value is low. Negative biopsy findings do not exclude the presence of HCC. Patients with negative biopsy findings should either undergo a second biopsy or an enhanced surveillance protocol.

Malignant progression of a small HCC nodule: hypovascular 'early HCC' converted to hypervascular 'small HCC' within six months

We report a case of hepatocellular carcinoma superimposed on chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) hepatitis in which final diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma was delayed because there was no consensus on hypervascularity with two diagnostic methods at the time of presentation. A 3 cm lesion was initially observed as hypovascular at multidetector-row computed tomography. Conversely, two months later the lesion appeared hypervascular at contrast-ultrasonography and gadolinium-enhanced dynamic magnetic resonance, and hyperintense after superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced T2W studies. Only in the late follow-up it was definitively confirmed as hypervascular in the arterial phase of multidetector-row computed tomography. This case clearly highlights some pitfalls in the European Association for the study of the liver guidelines for hepatocellular carcinoma management, which were readdressed in the last American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) and in the forthcoming international proposals, leading to more pragmatic suggestions for clinical practice.

Screening

Screening is the only practical approach for improving the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, as early detection increases the application of curative treatments. A conference of experts from Japan, USA, and Europe (Barcelona 2005) advised surveillance every six months for patients with chronic liver disease at increased risk of HCC with abdominal US. Whether this approach benefits HCC patients in terms of survival is still uncertain, since available data are retrospective and biased by lead-time factors in the calculation of patient survival. Only one randomized controlled study in China showed the benefit of surveillance for HCC; however, in a population-based setting. Today, clinic-based, randomized studies are unfeasible for ethical reasons. In a cohort of 447 Italian patients with compensated cirrhosis, we compared the survival of HCC patients identified along three consecutive quinquennia of surveillance. HCC developed in 112 patients (3.4% per year) and was the prime cause of death. Forty-six patients (41%) had a single tumor with mean sizes of 3.7, 3.0, and 2.2 cm in the three quinquennia (first vs third, P = 0.0147; second vs third, P = 0.02) and 38(44%) underwent radical therapies. Mortality rates in HCC patients fell from 45% in the first quinquennium to 10% in the third (P = 0.0009), in parallel with a reduction in mortality of treated patients (34, 28, and 5%) (first vs third, P = 0.0024). Cirrhotic patients developing HCC during the last five years of surveillance survived longer than previously, as a consequence of improved management of the tumor and complications of cirrhosis. It remains controversial whether HCC screening is cost-effective, i.e. whether the cost of detection, confirmatory studies, and treatment are outbalanced by the number of life-years gained. In a retrospective study of Italian patients with cirrhosis, there was an incremental cost-efficacy ratio of surveillance vs no surveillance to be $USD 112 993 per liver-year saved. The cost of surveillance was increased by surgery applied to 15 patients with HCC detected during surveillance.

Sustained virological response to interferon-alpha is associated with improved outcome in HCV-related cirrhosis: a retrospective study

The effect of achieving a sustained virological response (SVR) following interferon-alpha (IFNalpha) treatment on the clinical outcomes of patients with HCV-related cirrhosis is unknown. In an attempt to assess the risk of liver-related complications, HCC and liver-related mortality in patients with cirrhosis according to the response to IFNalpha treatment, a retrospective database was developed including all consecutive patients with HCV-related, histologically proven cirrhosis treated with IFNalpha monotherapy between January 1992 and December 1997. SVR was an undetectable serum HCV-RNA by PCR 24 weeks after IFNalpha discontinuation. HCC was assessed by ultrasound every 6 months. Independent predictors of all outcomes were assessed by Cox regression analysis. Of 920 patients, 124 (13.5%) were classified as achieving a SVR. During a mean follow-up of 96.1 months (range: 6-167) the incidence rates per 100 person-years of liver-related complications, HCC and liver-related death were 0, 0.66, and 0.19 among SVR and 1.88, 2.10, and 1.44 among non-SVR (P<0.001 by log-rank test). Multivariate analyses found that non-SVR was associated with a higher risk of liver-related complications (hazard ratio, HR, not applicable), HCC (HR 2.59; 95% CI 1.13-5.97) and liver-related mortality (HR 6.97; 95% CI 1.71-28.42) as compared to SVR.

CONCLUSION

Thus, in patients with HCV-related, histologically proven cirrhosis, achievement of a SVR after IFNalpha therapy was associated with a reduction of liver-related mortality lowering both the risk of complications and HCC development. Irrespective of SVR achievement, all patients should continue surveillance because the risk of occurrence of HCC was not entirely avoided.

Comparison of liver biopsy and noninvasive methods for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Current management guidelines for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) do not require biopsy to prove the diagnosis. We evaluated our experience of patients with liver disease and hepatic lesions suspicious for HCC who underwent both fine-needle aspiration and core biopsy and correlated the results with those from commonly used noninvasive approaches.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of a series of patients undergoing biopsy because of a suspicion of HCC and compared sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of biopsy with existing noninvasive methods for diagnosing HCC.

RESULTS

HCC was diagnosed by biopsy in 74 (63%) of 118 cases, and an additional 10 were found to have HCC on follow-up. Patients with positive biopsy results had significantly higher serum alpha-fetoprotein levels (median, 57 vs 12; P = .014) than those with negative biopsies, although these 2 groups were otherwise similar with regard to tests of liver function, lesion size on imaging, and Child-Pugh class. No patient developed evidence of tumor spread along the needle track after biopsy. We compared the diagnosis of HCC by biopsy with noninvasive diagnostic criteria advocated by the European Association for the Study of the Liver and those used by the United Network for Organ Sharing. Compared with criteria of the European Association for the Study of the Liver and the United Network for Organ Sharing, biopsy had greater sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend a greater role for image-guided biopsy of lesions greater than 1 cm clinically suspicious for HCC to allow adequate treatment planning because the risks of biopsy appear small and the potential benefits significant. Obtaining material for both cytologic and histologic examination at biopsy maximizes the diagnostic yield.

General management

Hepatocellular carcinoma is one of the most common malignancies worldwide. The general management of hepatocellular carcinoma begins with an accurate diagnosis. With advances in imaging studies, noninvasive diagnosis has become an accepted standard of care for hepatocellular carcinoma, though pathologic examination is still required in selected cases. Following diagnosis, accurate staging is the next most important step in selecting the most appropriate treatment modality. Patients with localised tumor and compensated liver disease should be considered for partial hepatectomy, and patients with poor hepatic function but early tumor stage are candidates for liver transplantation. Patients who do not qualify for either of these curative treatments may be evaluated for palliative therapy, of which transarterial chemoembolisation is most widely used. This review will discuss the role of biopsy, the pros and cons of noninvasive and pathologic tissue diagnosis as well as the general approach to choose the most appropriate treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Staging systems in hepatocellular carcinoma

Staging systems are key to predict the prognosis of patients with cancer, to stratify the patients according to prognostic variables in the setting of clinical trials, to allow the exchange of information among researchers, and finally to guide the therapeutic approach. The current knowledge of the disease, however, prevents recommendation of a staging system that can be used world-wide. The conventional staging systems for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), such as the Okuda stage or the TNM stage have shown important limitations in classifying patients. Several new systems have been proposed recently, and only three of them have been validated at this point. The BCLC staging classification links the stage of the disease to a specific treatment strategy. The JIS score has been proposed and used in Japan, although it needs Western validation. The CLIP score is used in patients with advanced tumors. Several reasons explain the difficulty in identifying a world-wide system. First, HCC is a complex neoplasm inserted on a pre-neoplastic cirrhotic liver, and thus variables of both diseases leading to death should be taken into account. Second, the disease is very heterogeneous around the world, and this reflects different underlying epidemiological backgrounds and risk factors. Third, HCC is the sole cancer treated by transplantation in a small proportion of patients. Fourth, only around 20% of the cases are currently treated by surgery, thus precluding the wide use of pathology-based systems, such as TNM. Finally, the potential relevance of a molecular signature identified in terms of outcome prediction is unknown, and further research is needed to obtain this valuable biological information that may aid in classifying the patients.

Diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is responsible for a large proportion of cancer deaths worldwide. HCC is frequently diagnosed after the development of clinical deterioration at which time survival is measured in months. Long-term survival requires detection of small tumors, often present in asymptomatic individuals, which may be more amenable to invasive therapeutic options. Surveillance of high-risk individuals for HCC is commonly performed using the serum marker alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) often in combination with ultrasonography. Various other serologic markers are currently being tested to help improve surveillance accuracy. Diagnosis of HCC often requires more sophisticated imaging modalities such as CT scan and MRI, which have multiphasic contrast enhancement capabilities. Serum AFP used alone can be helpful if levels are markedly elevated, which occurs in fewer than half of cases at time of diagnosis. Confirmation by liver biopsy can be performed under circumstances when the diagnosis of HCC remains unclear.

Screening and treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma

Surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has become routine despite a lack of evidence of efficacy. Suitable candidates for surveillance include patients with cirrhosis and some subsets of noncirrhotic chronic hepatitis B carriers. The best surveillance testis ultrasonography at 6- to 12-month intervals. Serological tests are less effective. Defining an abnormal result is difficult in the cirrhotic liver. Diagnosis requires radiological investigations and may require a biopsy if the lesion is between 1 and 2 cm in diameter. In the face of an abnormal surveillance test and failure to confirm the diagnosis initially, enhanced follow-up is required. HCC can be treated for cure by liver transplantation, resection, or local ablation. For patients with suitable lesions, liver transplantation offers the best form of therapy. Chemoembolization offers increased survival over no therapy. Several experimental therapies are being investigated.

Pathogenesis and screening for hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma is an increasingly common clinical problem. Investigators have begun to understand aspects of the pathogenesis of the tumor, mainly from a morphologic point of view. Preneoplastic lesions and early cancer may be difficult to distinguish radiologically. Nonetheless, programs for surveillance of liver cancer have been developed. Little uniformity exists in methods of surveillance, and even less in methods of investigation and follow-up after an abnormal result is obtained. This article attempts to bring some rigor to the understanding of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Overexpression of squamous cell carcinoma antigen variants in hepatocellular carcinoma

Pathogenetic mechanisms of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are still unclear and new tools for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes are ongoing. We have assessed whether squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCCA), a serpin overexpressed in neoplastic cells of epithelial origin, is also expressed in liver cancer. Squamous cell carcinoma antigen was evaluated by immunohistochemistry in 65 HCCs of different aetiology and in 20 normal livers. Proliferative activity was assessed using MIB-1 antibody. In 18 surgical samples, tumour and nontumour liver tissue was available for SCCA cDNA amplification and sequencing. Squamous cell carcinoma antigen was detected in 55 out of 65 (85%) tumour specimens, but in none of the 20 controls. In the majority of the cases, the positive signal was found in the cytoplasm of more than 50% of the hepatocytes. Low or undetectable SCCA (score⩽1) was associated to lower MIB-1 labelling index, compared to cases with SCCA score ⩾2 (mean±s.d.: 2%±2.4 vs 7.5%±10.3, P<0.05). Squamous cell carcinoma antigen mRNA could be directly sequenced in 14 out of 18 liver tumours but in none of the corresponding nontumour samples. From sequence alignment, a novel SCCA1 variant (G₃₅₁ to A) was identified in five cases, while SCCA1 was revealed in six cases and SCCA2 in three cases. In conclusion, SCCA variants are overexpressed in HCC, independently of tumour aetiology. A novel SCCA1 variant has been identified in one third of liver tumours.

Indication and contraindication for hepatic resection for liver tumors without fine-needle biopsy: validation and extension of an Eastern approach in a Western community hospital

Fine-needle biopsy (FNB) is associated with problems, such as tumor seeding, which are not negligible. The aim of this study was to validate prospectively the accuracy of our diagnostic work-up without FNB, not just to address but also to rule out from a surgical program patients with focal liver lesions (FLLs). From September 2001 to July 2003, 89 patients were seen at an outpatient clinic for FLLs. Nine patients were excluded because of previous FNB and 18 were excluded because carrier of advanced disease. Sixty-two patients with 101 FLLs were included. Preoperative diagnoses were established by means of clinical histories, serum tumor marker levels, ultrasonography (US), and spiral computed tomography (CT). Other imaging modalities were carried out when it was considered necessary. Forty-eight patients underwent surgery, with histological confirmation of the preoperative diagnosis. The remaining 14 patients underwent a close follow-up. The preoperative diagnoses of 47 of the 48 patients who underwent surgery were confirmed (97.9%). All of the 14 patients ruled out for surgical treatment did not show FLL progression at 6-24 months of follow-up. Of the 9 patients who had FNB previously in other centers, 2 had a wrong histological diagnosis. In view of these results, a diagnostic work-up without FNB seems adequate either to include or to exclude patients with potentially resectable FLL from the surgical program and once more highlight the fact that the use of FNB should be drastically limited.

Fine needle biopsy of focal liver lesions: the hepatologist's point of view

Guided biopsy of hepatocellular carcinoma has been recently discussed again due to the progress of imaging techniques and the risk of malignant seeding after the procedure. Ultrasound is probably still the most accurate imaging modality for early detection of nodules arising on cirrhosis, even when compared with more advanced imaging techniques. It can be easily employed in the surveillance of high-risk cirrhotic patients. Ultrasound-guided biopsy has very high sensitivity and almost absolute specificity, which allows the appropriate treatment to start after a positive diagnosis. It also allows correct diagnosis of lymphomatous nodules, the incidence of which is increased in hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis. The risk of seeding appears limited according to the currently available epidemiological data; this should be considered against the risk of false-positive diagnosis of malignancy based on imaging studies alone. Ultrasound-guided biopsy is a valuable tool also for the diagnosis of small nodules (less than 10 mm in diameter). The best accuracy in the sampling of hepatocellular carcinoma nodules is obtained by combining smear cytology and microhistology. This can be achieved by a single biopsy with a fine cutting needle that furnishes pathologic material suitable for both examinations, reducing risks and costs.

Improved diagnosing of small hepatocellular carcinomas by echo-enhanced power Doppler sonography in patients with cirrhosis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Echo-enhanced power Doppler sonography is an increasingly used procedure for the differentiation of liver tumours. The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the accuracy of echo-enhanced power Doppler sonography in comparison with conventional ultrasound and fundamental power Doppler sonography in diagnosing hepatocellular carcinomas and regenerative nodules in patients with cirrhosis.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Eighty-seven patients with cirrhosis and 90 liver tumours at conventional ultrasound were included in the study, selected from 103 consecutive patients with a mean age of 60 years (range 23-87 years) who presented to our department from January 1998 through January 2002. Sonography was performed by an experienced examiner, who was unaware of the clinical diagnosis. The exact diagnosis was based upon histological evidence from biopsy examination, laboratory results, and/or a follow-up of at least 18 months.

RESULTS

There were 65 hepatocellular carcinomas, 21 regenerative nodules, and four metastases in the study group. Only 43% of the carcinomas (mainly nodules > 3 cm in diameter) could be classified correctly by conventional ultrasound or fundamental power Doppler sonography. However, 46% of the malign lesions (mainly nodules < 3 cm in diameter) were not differentiable. All non-differentiable tumours were classified correctly by echo-enhanced power Doppler sonography. The overall sensitivity of echo-enhanced power Doppler sonography with respect to diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma was 89%; its specificity was 60%. The corresponding values for regenerative nodules were 71% and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Only hepatocellular carcinomas greater than 3 cm in size can be diagnosed with a high accuracy by conventional ultrasound or fundamental power Doppler sonography. However, small malignant lesions in cirrhotic livers are often not differentiable with these techniques. With echo-enhanced power Doppler sonography, the differentiation of small hepatocellular carcinomas can be improved. However, histology is the standard of reference.

Percutaneous fine-needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis and management of liver tumours

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to investigate the value of percutaneous fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in the diagnosis and management of liver tumours.

METHODS

FNAC followed by histopathological examination was carried out in 216 patients with suspected liver tumours. The final diagnosis was primary liver cancer in 106, colorectal metastases in 51, non-colorectal metastases in 46, benign tumour in nine and no tumour in four patients.

RESULTS

Cytology resulted in correct classification of the lesion as benign or malignant in 87 per cent of patients, correct discrimination between primary and secondary malignancy in half of the patients, and a correct diagnosis of tumour type in one-third of patients. The tumour was erroneously classified as benign or malignant in 22 patients (11 per cent) and four patients (2 per cent) respectively. When FNAC showed malignancy, the predictive value was 98 per cent, whereas the predictive value was 27 per cent when it did not. FNAC guided investigations and treatment in one-quarter of patients. Implantation metastases were recorded in seven patients (3 per cent), including five (10 per cent) of 51 patients with colorectal liver metastases, and caused major local problems and death in four patients.

CONCLUSION

FNAC was valuable in about a quarter of patients with liver tumour. The risks of implantation metastases and a false-negative finding do not justify its use in candidates for curative therapy of liver tumours.

Quantitative Analysis of Aldolase A mRNA in Liver Discriminates between Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Cirrhosis

Background: Chronic liver diseases can progress to cirrhosis and to hepatocellular carcinoma. Timely and unequivocal recognition of the neoplastic evolution of cirrhosis is critical. To this aim, we used a noncompetitive reverse transcription-PCR procedure to analyze aldolase A mRNA in liver tissue from patients with chronic liver diseases at different stages.

Methods: We studied 12 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, 19 patients affected by chronic hepatitis C or cirrhosis, and 7 healthy controls. Aldolase A mRNA was reverse-transcribed to cDNA, which was then amplified by PCR. The amplified segments were “read” with a novel dot-blot procedure. A calibrator with the same sequence, synthesized in vitro using a T7 phage promoter, was processed at scalar dilutions in parallel to the target samples to generate a calibration curve and so quantify the target mRNA (detection limit, 0.03 amol; linearity spanning five orders of magnitude).

Results: Aldolase A mRNA was ∼10-fold higher in liver biopsies from patients with hepatocellular carcinoma vs patients with chronic hepatitis C or cirrhosis, and healthy individuals. Furthermore, aldolase A mRNA concentrations were 1.2- to 21.3-fold higher in 12 liver biopsies compared with the paired surrounding cirrhotic tissue.

Conclusions: The quantitative analysis of liver tissue aldolase A mRNA differentiates between nonneoplastic chronic liver diseases and hepatocellular carcinoma, which suggests that it has diagnostic potential.

Accurate preoperative evaluation of liver mass lesions without fine-needle biopsy

Fine-needle biopsy (FNB) is associated with problems, such as tumor seeding, which are probably underestimated. The aim of this study was to validate prospectively the accuracy of our diagnostic work-up without FNB, for defining indications for surgery in a cohort of patients with focal liver lesions (FLLs). Between January 1997 and December 1998, 160 consecutive patients carrying 225 FLLs admitted to our department were evaluated prospectively. Preoperative diagnoses were established by means of clinical histories, serum tumor marker levels, ultrasonography, and spiral computed tomography (CT). Angiography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and Lipiodol-CT were performed when it was considered necessary to plan the surgical strategy. All the patients underwent surgery and results of pathological examinations were obtained for all of them. The preoperative diagnoses of 221 of the 225 lesions (98.2%) were confirmed, and the indications for liver resection in 156 of the 160 patients (97.5%) were correct. The respective accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 99.6%, 100%, 98.9%, 99.3%, and 100% for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); 99.1%, 100%, 98.8%, 96.9%, and 100% for metastases; 99.6%, 100%, 99.5%, 91%, and 100% for cholangiocellular carcinomas (CCCs); all 100% for mixed HCC-CCCs; and 98.7%, 57.1%, 100%, 100%, and 98.6% for benign tumors. In view of these results, the fact that the real risks of FNB have yet to be established and the possibility that tumor seeding has a major impact on patient prognosis, the use of FNB should be drastically limited.

High alpha-fetoprotein level in HCV-related nodular liver cell dysplasia

The diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma is generally made in patients with a mass lesion in the cirrhotic liver if the alpha-fetoprotein level is >1,000 ng/L. Other causes of elevation of alpha-fetoprotein to this extreme degree include nonseminomatous germ cell tumor and hepatic metastasis. However, it is extremely rare for benign hepatic lesions to cause alpha-fetoprotein of > 1,000 ng/ml. We report a Chinese patient with spontaneous normalization of alpha-fetoprotein with an initial value > 10,000 ng/ml due to nodular dysplasia complicating hepatitis C-related liver cirrhosis. The alpha-fetoprotein was secreted from the dysplastic liver cells.

Multivariate discriminant analysis of biochemical parameters for the differentiation of clinically confounding liver diseases

We describe a series of studies on the contribution of laboratory medicine to the differential diagnosis of clinically confounding diseases in the field of chronic hepatobiliary diseases. Ascitic cholesterol and lactate dehydrogenase (LD), selected by multivariate discriminant analysis (MDA) from a multitude of serum and ascitic analytes, correctly classified 100% of patients with malignant ascites or non-malignant ascites. In addition, ascitic pseudouridine differentiated hepatocarcinoma (HC) from cirrhotic ascites with a diagnostic effectiveness (overall discrimination power) of 90%. A panel of analytes constituted by serum gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT), the GGT isoenzyme complexed with low- and very low-density lipoprotein, aspartate aminotransferase, copper, hepatic alkaline phosphatase (AP), the LD-5 isoenzyme and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), selected by the MDA, correctly classified 93% of about 200 cases of cirrhosis or HC. Finally, MDA also identified an equation, based on serum values of the LD-4/LD-5 and carcinoembryonic antigen/AFP ratios, AP and iron that correctly classified 96% of HC or secondary liver neoplasia cases in 100 patients. This approach based on panels of analytes selected by a sophisticated statistical analysis is a rapid and non-invasive contribution to the differential diagnosis of chronic liver disease including neoplasia.

Cytological vs microhistological diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparative accuracies in the same fine-needle biopsy specimen

There is still debate over the relative merits of cytology and histology in diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic livers. Previous comparisons of the diagnostic accuracies of these two methods may have been biased by sampling errors due to multiple punctures. We compared the diagnostic accuracies of cytology and microhistology using tissue and cells from the same point in liver nodules subsequently proved to be hepatocellular carcinoma. A single ultrasound-guided liver-nodule biopsy was obtained with a 20- to 21-G cutting needle from 131 cirrhotic patients. The solid portion of samples was used for microhistology; the remainder was subjected to smear cytology. The results of each type of examination were expressed as true positive, nonspecific malignancy, false negative, or inadequate for diagnosis. No false-positive diagnoses were made in 13 benign lesions. In 118 HCC nodules (particularly those <30 mm in diameter), cytology provided a significantly higher percentage of correct diagnoses (85.6%) that was only slightly inferior to that based on results of both studies (89.8%). The single-biopsy technique generally provides adequate tissue for histology and cytology specimens with a high cellularity. It reduces both the cost and the risks of fine-needle biopsy diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.