Biliary lavage with corticosteroids in primary sclerosing cholangitis. A clinical, cholangiographic and bacteriological study

Pharmacological interventions for primary sclerosing cholangitis: an attempted network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Primary sclerosing cholangitis is a chronic cholestatic liver disease that is associated with both hepatobiliary and colorectal malignancies, which can result in liver cirrhosis and its complications. The optimal pharmacological treatment for patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis remains controversial.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the comparative benefits and harms of different pharmacological interventions in people with primary sclerosing cholangitis by performing a network meta-analysis, and to generate rankings of available pharmacological interventions according to their safety and efficacy. Given that it was not possible to assess whether potential effect modifiers were similar across comparisons, we did not perform the network meta-analysis but instead used standard Cochrane methods.When trials begin to provide an adequate description of potential effect modifiers, we will attempt to conduct network meta-analysis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index - Expanded, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and randomised controlled trials registers until February 2017 to identify randomised clinical trials (RCT) on pharmacological interventions for primary sclerosing cholangitis.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included only RCTs, irrespective of language, blinding, or publication status, in which participants were given a diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis. We excluded trials that included previously liver-transplanted participants. We considered any of various pharmacological interventions compared with one other or with placebo. We excluded trials that compared different doses of various pharmacological interventions or that reported different treatment durations, except for ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). As UDCA is the drug most commonly investigated for primary sclerosing cholangitis, we performed a second analysis in which we stratified the dose of UDCA.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We calculated the odds ratio and the rate ratio with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using both fixed-effect and random-effects models based on available-participant analysis with Review Manager. We assessed risk of bias according to Cochrane, controlled risk of random errors with Trial Sequential Analysis, and assessed the quality of the evidence using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 22 RCTs in which 1211 participants were randomised to 13 different interventions. Most were placebo-controlled trials. Trials had few restrictions apart from an established diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis, evidence of cholestasis, absence of decompensated liver disease, and absence of malignancy. However, some trials included symptomatic participants only, and others included both symptomatic and asymptomatic participants. A total of 11 RCTs (706 participants) provided data for one or more outcomes. The period of follow-up ranged from three months to three years in most trials. Only three trials reported follow-up longer than three years. Investigators found no evidence of differences in important clinical benefits such as reduction in mortality at maximal follow-up and improvement in health-related quality of life. Primary outcomes Mortality: Effect estimates: colchicine versus placebo: odds ratio 0.44, 95% CI 0.04 to 5.07, participants = 84, one trial; penicillamine versus placebo: odds ratio 1.18, 95% CI 0.39 to 3.58, participants = 70, one trial; steroids versus placebo: odds ratio 3.00, 95% CI 0.10 to 90.96, participants = 11, one trial; ursodeoxycholic acid versus placebo: odds ratio 1.51, 95% CI 0.63 to 3.63, participants = 348, two trials, I² = 0%; vancomycin versus placebo: not estimable because no events in either group, participants = 29, one trial. Serious adverse events (proportion): Effect estimates: infliximab versus placebo: odds ratio not estimable (because of zero events in both arms), participants = 7, one trial; steroids versus placebo: odds ratio 20.00, 95% CI 0.93 to 429.90, participants = 11, one trial; vancomycin versus placebo: not estimable because no events in either group, participants = 29, one trial. Serious adverse events (number): Effect estimates: infliximab versus placebo: rate ratio 0.80, 95% CI 0.02 to 40.44, participants = 7, one trial; penicillamine versus placebo: rate ratio 13.60, 95% CI 0.78 to 237.83, participants = 70, one trial; steroids versus placebo: rate ratio 3.32, 95% CI 0.71 to 15.62, participants = 11, one trial. Adverse events (proportion): Effect estimates: steroids versus placebo: odds ratio 20.00, 95% CI 0.93 to 429.90, participants = 11, one trial; ursodeoxycholic acid versus placebo: odds ratio 1.22, 95% CI 0.68 to 2.17, participants = 198, one trial; vancomycin versus placebo: not estimable because no events in either group, participants = 29, one trial. Adverse events (number): Effect estimates: cyclosporin versus placebo: rate ratio 2.64, 95% CI 0.99 to 7.03, participants = 26, one trial; steroids versus placebo: rate ratio 3.32, 95% CI 0.71 to 15.62, participants = 11, one trial; ursodeoxycholic acid plus metronidazole versus ursodeoxycholic acid: rate ratio 2.36, 95% CI 0.98 to 5.71, participants = 71, one trial. Health-related quality of life: ursodeoxycholic acid versus placebo: mean difference 1.30, 95% CI -5.61 to 8.21, participants = 198, one trial (Short Form (SF)-36 General Health Scale). Secondary outcomes Studies provided no evidence of differences in clinical benefits such as a reduction in the requirement for liver transplantation or a reduction in the incidence proportion of cholangiocarcinoma. One small trial (29 participants) comparing vancomycin versus placebo reported no malignancies, no liver decompensation, and no liver transplantation in either group after a very short follow-up period of 12 weeks after treatment. None of the remaining trials clearly reported other clinical benefits such as decreased development of all malignancies, colorectal cancer, liver decompensation, time to liver decompensation, time to liver transplantation, or requirement for cholecystectomy to allow comparisons between different interventions.

SOURCE OF FUNDING

Fifteen trials reported the source of funding; three were funded by parties without vested interest in results of the trial, and 12 were funded in part or in full by drug companies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Evidence is currently insufficient to show differences in effectiveness measures such as mortality, health-related quality of life, cirrhosis, or liver transplantation between any active pharmacological intervention and no intervention. However, trials were at high risk of bias and included small numbers of participants, had short follow-up periods, and reported few clinical outcomes. An urgent need exists to identify an effective medical treatment for primary sclerosing cholangitis through well-designed RCTs with adequate follow-up that aim to identify differences in outcomes important to people with primary sclerosing cholangitis.

A review of the medical treatment of primary sclerosing cholangitis in the 21st century

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic cholestatic liver disease that progresses to end-stage liver disease and cirrhosis. Recurrent biliary inflammation is thought to lead to dysplasia, and as such PSC confers a high risk of cholangiocarcinoma. PSC accounts for 10% of all UK liver transplants, although transplantation does not guarantee a cure with 20% recurrence in the graft. At present there are no effective medical treatment options for PSC, and trials of novel therapeutic agents are limited by the time taken to reach clinically significant endpoints with no well defined early surrogate markers for disease outcome. Moreover, PSC appears to be a heterogeneous disease with regards to disease distribution, associated inflammatory bowel disease and subsequent disease outcome, further compounding the issue. Thus existing trials have taken place in heterogeneous groups, are likely to be underpowered to detect any individual subgroups effect. The current mainstay of medical treatment is still with ursodeoxycholic acid, although there is no evidence that it alters long-term outcome. Small pilot studies of immunosuppressive agents have taken place, but despite evidence that may support studies in larger groups, these have not been conducted. Recent advances in our understanding of the disease pathogenesis may therefore pave the way for trials of novel therapeutic agents in PSC, even given the limitations described. This review explores the controversial evidence underlying current treatment strategies and discounted treatments, and explores prospective agents that may bring new hope to the treatment of PSC in the 21st century.

Primary sclerosing cholangitis: a review and update on therapeutic developments

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic, cholestatic, idiopathic liver disease characterized by fibro-obliterative inflammation of the hepatic bile ducts. In a clinically significant proportion of patients, PSC progresses to cirrhosis, end-stage liver disease, and in some cases, cholangiocarcinoma. Despite clinical trials of nearly 20 different pharmacotherapies over several decades, safe and effective medical therapy, albeit critically needed, remains to be established. PSC is pathogenically complex, with genetic, immune, enteric microbial, environmental and other factors being potentially involved and, thus, not surprisingly, it manifests as a clinically heterogeneous disease with a relatively unpredictable course. It is likely that this complexity and clinical heterogeneity are responsible for the negative results of clinical trials, but novel insights about and approaches to PSC may shift this trend. The authors herein provide a review of previously tested pharmacologic agents, discuss emerging fundamental concepts and present viewpoints regarding how identifying therapies for PSC may evolve over the next several years.

Glucocorticosteroids for primary sclerosing cholangitis

BACKGROUND

Primary sclerosing cholangitis is a chronic cholestatic disease of intrahepatic and extrahepatic biliary ducts, characterised by chronic periductal inflammation and sclerosis of the ducts, which results in segmental stenoses of bile ducts, cholestasis, fibrosis, and ultimately, liver cirrhosis. Patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis are at higher risk of cholangiocarcinoma as well as of colonic neoplasia, since primary sclerosing cholangitis is associated with inflammatory bowel disease in more than 80% of the patients. Several therapeutic modalities have been proposed for primary sclerosing cholangitis, like ursodeoxycholic acid, glucocorticosteroids, and immunomodulatory agents, but none has been successful in reversing the process of the disease. To date, liver transplantation is the only definite therapeutic solution for patients with advanced primary sclerosing cholangitis with liver cirrhosis.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of glucocorticosteroids for patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and LILACS from their inception until September 2009, as well as reference lists.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials comparing any dose or duration of glucocorticosteroids versus placebo, no intervention, or other immunosuppressive agents. We included trials irrespective of language, blinding, or publication status.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Authors extracted data independently and assessed the methodological quality by the generation of the allocation sequence, allocation concealment, double blinding, follow-up, incomplete outcome data reporting, selective reporting, baseline imbalance, and early stopping. The results of the meta-analyses were presented as relative risks (RR) or mean difference (MD), both with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The primary outcome measures were mortality and liver-related morbidity.

MAIN RESULTS

Two randomised clinical trials were eligible for inclusion. One trial compared biliary lavage with hydrocortisone versus saline in 17 patients. Hydrocortisone tended to increase adverse events (pancreatitis, cholangitis with septicaemia, paranoid ideas, fluid retention) (RR 3.43, 95% CI 0.51 to 22.9) and had no cholangiographic improvement, which led to termination of the trial. The other trial compared budesonide versus prednisone in 18 patients. Patients had statistically significant higher serum bilirubin concentration after treatment with prednisone compared with budesonide (MD 10.4 micromol/litre, 95% CI 1.16 to 19.64 micromol/litre). No other statistically significant effects on clinical or biochemical outcomes were reported on any of the evaluated interventions.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence to support or refute peroral glucocorticosteroids for patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. The intrabiliary application of corticosteroids via nasobiliary tube seems to induce severe adverse effects.

Primary sclerosing cholangitis--what is the difference between east and west?

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic, progressive, cholestatic liver disease characterized by inflammation and fibrotic obliteration of the hepatic biliary tree. It is commonly associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). A number of complications can occur which require special consideration, the most important of which is the development of cholangiocellular carcinoma (CCC). Unfortunately, no medical therapy is currently available for the underlying liver disease. Liver transplantation is an effective, life-extending option for patients with advanced PSC. Geographical variations between East and West include a second peak for age with a lower association with IBD in a Japanese population and female predominance in a lone study from Turkey. The clinical and biochemical Mayo criteria may not be universally applicable, as different patients show variations regarding the initial presentation and natural course of the disease. Directing research towards explaining these geographical differences and understanding the pathogenesis of PSC is required in order to develop better therapies for this devastating disease.

Primary sclerosing cholangitis - What is the difference between east and west?

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic, progressive, cholestatic liver disease characterized by inflammation and fibrotic obliteration of the hepatic biliary tree. It is commonly associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). A number of complications can occur which require special consideration, the most important of which is the development of cholangiocellular carcinoma (CCC). Unfortunately, no medical therapy is currently available for the underlying liver disease. Liver transplantation is an effective, life-extending option for patients with advanced PSC. Geographical variations between East and West include a second peak for age with a lower association with IBD in a Japanese population and female predominance in a lone study from Turkey. The clinical and biochemical Mayo criteria may not be universally applicable, as different patients show variations regarding the initial presentation and natural course of the disease. Directing research towards explaining these geographical differences and understanding the pathogenesis of PSC is required in order to develop better therapies for this devastating disease.

The challenges in primary sclerosing cholangitis--aetiopathogenesis, autoimmunity, management and malignancy

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic cholestatic liver disease, characterized by progressive inflammation and fibrosis of the bile ducts, resulting in biliary cirrhosis and is associated with a high risk of cholangiocarcinoma. The majority of patients are young, male and have coexisting inflammatory bowel disease. PSC is found with a prevalence of 10/100,000 in Northern European populations. The pathophysiology of PSC is a complex multistep process including immunological mechanisms, immunogenetic susceptibility and disorders of the biliary epithelia. The diagnosis is primarily based on endoscopic cholangiography although magnetic resonance imaging is increasingly used; biochemistry and immunoserology as well as histology play only a minor role. Due to the high risk of developing cholangiocarcinoma and also other tumours of the GI tract, surveillance strategies are essential, however they have yet to be established and evaluated. Biochemical parameters, clinical risk factors, endoscopic procedures and imaging techniques contribute to the early identification of patients at risk. Since medical therapy of PSC with ursodeoxycholic acid does not improve survival, to date, liver transplantation is the only option with a cure potential; if transplantation is accurately timed, transplanted PSC patients have an excellent rate of survival. However if cholangiocarcinoma is detected, a curative treatment is not possible in the majority of cases. The present review critically summarizes the current knowledge on the aetiopathogenesis of PSC and gives an overview of the diagnostic approaches, surveillance strategies and therapeutic options. Primary sclerosing cholangitis is a disease of unknown aetiology and without any further curative treatment options apart from liver transplantation. Therefore it may be regarded as the greatest challenge in hepatology today.

A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study of infliximab in primary sclerosing cholangitis

GOALS

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of infliximab in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.

STUDY

In this double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 24 patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis were screened and randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive infliximab (5 mg/kg) or placebo at weeks 0, 2, 6, 12, 18, and 24; patients were followed through week 52. The primary efficacy end point was a decrease of at least 50% in the serum alkaline phosphatase level from baseline to week 18. A blinded histologic assessment of liver biopsy samples, obtained at weeks 0 and 26, was performed using a predefined scoring system, including scores for inflammation, fibrosis, and cholestasis.

RESULTS

Patient enrollment was prematurely stopped when results of an interim analysis showed no significant treatment benefit. Of the 24 patients screened, 10 were enrolled (6 patients received infliximab). Mean alkaline phosphatase levels at weeks 0, 18, and 52 were 349, 330, and 389 U/L, respectively, for the infliximab group and 481, 438, and 391 U/L, respectively, for the placebo group. Liver biopsy samples were analyzed in 7 patients (4 infliximab); no apparent differences could be detected in any of the histologic parameters. In 3 of 4 infliximab-treated patients and 2 of 3 placebo-treated patients, the disease stage did not change after 6 months of treatment. No meaningful changes were detected in the symptom score. No serious drug-related adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Study findings failed to demonstrate efficacy of infliximab in this small group of patients with established primary sclerosing cholangitis.

Evaluating the evidence from clinical trials in chronic hepatitis C

A number of studies are being published on investigational agents for the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C. Before incorporating new medications into therapy or electing to postpone therapy until an investigational agent receives regulatory approval, it is important to evaluate the following specific features of the published evidence: quality of the evidence, precision of the treatment effect, magnitude of the treatment effect, magnitude of the hazards, and other factors such as risk-benefit analysis and cost, including cost-effectiveness. Previous studies of treatment of patients with the disease allow us to establish some benchmarks and provide structure to evaluate the evidence of the efficacy and safety of these newer drugs.

Basic immunosuppressive drugs outside solid organ transplantation

Immunosuppressive drugs are the backbone of solid organ transplantation. The introduction of new immunosuppressive drugs led to improved patient and organ survival rates. Nowadays, acute rejection can be reduced to a minimum. Individualization and avoidance of drug-related adverse effects became a new goal to achieve. The potency of immunosuppressive drugs makes them attractive for use in various autoimmune diseases; therefore, the experience on immunosuppressive drugs outside the field of organ transplantation is analysed in this review.

Endoscopic treatment of biliary tract disease prior to orthotopic liver transplantation

Endoscopic therapy for biliary tract disease in patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) before liver transplantation is safe and effective. Reported results in patients with choledocholithiasis, primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), and symptomatic gallbladder diseases are encouraging. Prompt recognition and appropriate treatment of symptomatic gallbladder and bile duct disease are important in reducing morbidity and mortality in these high-risk patients while they await liver transplantation. Confirmation of tissue diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma in patients with sclerosing cholangitis is still difficult. Better screening tools and diagnostic methods are necessary for early detection. Because liver transplantation is the only definitive therapy for patients with advanced cirrhosis, maintenance of their candidacy with either endoscopic or radiologic therapeutic interventions is warranted until transplantation. Endoscopic therapy is the preferred method when feasible. If necessary, percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) is a viable alternative because both avoid the attendant risks of surgery in a high-risk population with advanced liver disease.

Review article: current management of primary sclerosing cholangitis

The management of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is hindered by incomplete understanding of the pathogenesis of the disease and the lack of good prognostic models. Few large randomized controlled trials of drug therapy have been published. Best practice in the management of PSC is currently based therefore on careful interpretation of the available evidence, close observation of individual patients and clinical experience of the disease. Drug therapy is useful for alleviating symptoms. Ursodeoxycholic acid may slow progression of the disease and reduce the frequency of complications. Consensus is emerging on the issues of screening for the malignant complications of PSC and the indications for liver transplantation are becoming broader and encompassing the earliest stages of cholangiocarcinoma. In view of the rarity of the disease in the general population, large international collaborations to study PSC are necessary to provide clearer answers in areas of uncertainty, and these are now beginning to emerge.

Metronidazole and ursodeoxycholic acid for primary sclerosing cholangitis: a randomized placebo-controlled trial

No effective medical therapy is currently available for primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) improves liver enzymes, but its effect on liver histology is controversial. Metronidazole (MTZ) prevents PSC-like liver damage in animal models and reduces intestinal permeability. We recruited 80 patients with PSC into a randomized placebo-controlled study to evaluate the effect of UDCA and MTZ (UDCA/MTZ) compared with UDCA/placebo on the progression of PSC. Patients (41 UDCA/placebo and 39 UDCA/MTZ) were followed every third month. Assessment of liver function test, histological stage and grade, and cholangiography (via ERCP) at baseline showed no differences between the groups. After 36 months, serum aminotransferases gamma-glutamyltransferase, and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) decreased markedly in both groups, serum ALP more significantly in the UDCA/MTZ group (-337 +/- 54 U/L, P < .05) compared with the UDCA/placebo group. The New Mayo Risk Score decreased markedly only in the UDCA/MTZ group (-0.50 +/- 0.13, P < .01). The number of patients with improvement of stage (P < .05) and grade (P < .05) was higher in the combination group. ERCP findings showed no progression or improvement in 77% and 68% of patients on UDCA/MTZ and UDCA/placebo, respectively. In conclusion, combining MTZ with UDCA in PSC improved serum ALP levels and New Mayo Risk Score, but no statistically significant effect on disease progression as assessed via liver histology or ERCP was seen. Long-term studies using a higher dose of UDCA combined with MTZ in larger patient populations are indicated.

Primary sclerosing cholangitis

Primary sclerosing cholangitis is a cholestatic liver disease strongly associated with IBD. Considerable advances in the understanding of its pathogenesis have been made. The idea of autoimmunity affecting genetically susceptible individuals is largely accepted; however, much remains to be explained about the origin of this disease. Despite active investigation of different therapeutic modalities with the goal of modifying disease progression, liver transplantation continues to be the only option to provide survival benefit in these patients.

Glucocorticosteroids for primary sclerosing cholangitis

BACKGROUND

Glucocorticosteroids have been suggested for primary sclerosing cholangitis, which is characterised by chronic inflammation and fibrosis in the intrahepatic and extrahepatic biliary tree.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of glucocorticosteroids for patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials on The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE from their inception until March 2003, and reference lists.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials comparing any dose or duration of glucocorticosteroids versus placebo, no intervention, or other immunosuppressive agents. We included trials irrespective of language, blinding, or publication status.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Both reviewers extracted data independently and assessed the methodological quality by the generation of the allocation sequence, allocation concealment, double blinding, and follow-up. The results of the meta-analyses were presented as relative risks or weighted mean difference (WMD), both with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The primary outcome measures were mortality and liver-related morbidity.

MAIN RESULTS

Two randomised clinical trials were eligible for inclusion. One trial compared biliary lavage with hydrocortisone versus saline in 17 patients. A significant number of adverse events (pancreatitis; cholangitis with septicaemia; paranoid ideas; fluid retention) and no cholangiographic improvement led to termination of the trial. The other trial compared budesonide versus prednisone in 18 patients. Patients had significantly higher serum bilirubin concentration after treatment with prednisone compared with budesonide (WMD 10.4 micro mol/litre, 95% CI 1.16 to 19.64 micro mol/litre). No other significant effects on clinical or biochemical outcomes were identified for any of the evaluated interventions.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence to support or refute peroral glucocorticosteroids for patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.

The management of primary sclerosing cholangitis

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic cholestatic hepatobiliary disease that usually progresses to biliary cirrhosis and liver failure; it also predisposes to cholangiocarcinoma. The cause of PSC is unknown, although evidence suggests that the tissue damage is mediated by the immune system. There is an unexplained close association between PSC and inflammatory bowel disease, particularly in ulcerative colitis, which coexists in the majority of patients with PSC. No medical therapy has been proven to halt or reverse disease progression; however, recent preliminary evidence suggests that ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) in a high dose of 20 to 25 mg/kg may slow the disease process. Evidence from a pilot study suggests that the combination of UDCA and immunosuppressive therapy, such as prednisolone or azathioprine, may also increase efficacy. For patients with end-stage PSC, liver transplantation remains the only effective therapy, although there is clear evidence that PSC may recur in the liver allograft.

Medical and endoscopic treatment in primary sclerosing cholangitis

Primary sclerosing cholangitis is an important cause of chronic cholestatic liver disease. The aetiology is still unknown and an immunological basis is discussed. The disease results in diffuse narrowing and irregularities of intra- and extra-hepatic bile ducts that may lead to biliary cirrhosis. Progression of the disease is highly variable and fluctuating. An important issue is the risk for developing cholangiocarcinoma. For end-stage disease liver transplantation is the only therapeutic option. If strictures of the extra-hepatic bile ducts are demonstrable, endoscopic interventions are effective palliative treatment options. The use of immunosuppressive or anti-inflammatory drugs has been shown to have no influence on the course of primary sclerosing cholangitis.

The management of primary sclerosing cholangitis

Primary sclerosing cholangitis is a chronic cholestatic liver disease characterized by a progressive, obliterating fibrosis of the intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts. The pathogenesis of PSC is unknown, but it is thought to be an immune-mediated disease. Although the role of cupruretics, immunosuppressants (corticosteroids, azathioprine, tacrolimus, methotrexate), antifibrogenic agents, and ursodeoxycholic acid in the treatment of primary sclerosing cholangitis is reviewed, none of these agents has been shown to retard or reverse the rate of disease progression. Of these therapies, ursodeoxycholic acid at high doses looks the most promising, but large trials are needed to establish whether treatment with high-dose ursodeoxycholic acid influences the morbidity and mortality associated with primary sclerosing cholangitis.

Primary sclerosing cholangitis: a clinical review

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a cholestatic liver disease characterized by fibro-obliterative inflammation of the entire biliary tree. It is a slowly progressive disease with an undulating course, resulting in terminal biliary cirrhosis after a median period of about 12 years after diagnosis. The etiology of the disease is unknown and there is no effective therapy that can halt disease progression. Around 8% of PSC patients develop cholangiocarcinoma, which, by the time it is diagnosed, cannot be treated curatively. The purpose of this article is to review the current knowledge about primary sclerosing cholangitis and to speculate on future strategies to address the issues of etiology and therapy.

Progress in the endoscopic management of benign biliary strictures

Benign biliary strictures can now be effectively treated with endoscopic therapy in a variety of clinical situations. Despite recent developments in imaging techniques (endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging), it is often difficult to differentiate benign from malignant biliary strictures. The sensitivity of tissue diagnosis (cytology and needle biopsy) at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) remains poor (40-50%), and further diagnostic methods are required. Endoscopic therapy offers a definitive treatment in 70-90% of patients following post-operative biliary stricture, including anastomotic strictures following liver transplant. Endoscopic therapy successfully achieves symptomatic, biochemical, and cholangiographic response, and may improve survival in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Strictures secondary to chronic pancreatitis are resistant to standard endoscopic therapy and metallic endoprotheses have been trialed with varying success. Endoscopic therapy is technically difficult and should be performed in specialized centres using a multidisciplinary approach.

Ursodiol for primary sclerosing cholangitis. Mayo Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis-Ursodeoxycholic Acid Study Group

BACKGROUND

There is no satisfactory medical therapy for patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Ursodiol (ursodeoxycholic acid) benefits patients with primary biliary cirrhosis, another cholestatic liver disease.

METHODS

From May 1989 to July 1995, we enrolled 105 patients with well-documented primary sclerosing cholangitis in a randomized, double-blind study comparing ursodiol (13 to 15 mg per kilogram of body weight per day in divided doses) with placebo. The primary outcome was the time to treatment failure, defined as death; liver transplantation; histologic progression by two stages (of four) or progression to cirrhosis; the development of varices, ascites, or encephalopathy; sustained quadrupling of the serum bilirubin concentration; marked worsening of fatigue or pruritus; inability to tolerate the drug; or voluntary withdrawal from the study.

RESULTS

We analyzed data on the 51 patients in each group with at least 3 months of follow-up; the median follow-up was 2.2 years. There was no significant difference between the groups in time to treatment failure (relative risk of treatment failure in the ursodiol group, 1.01; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.6 to 1.7). During the first two years of follow-up, treatment was unsuccessful in 17 of 32 patients (53 percent) in the placebo group and 16 of 31 (52 percent) in the ursodiol group. There were also no differences in time to treatment failure for patients with early-stage disease or in time to liver transplantation. Ursodiol, but not placebo, was associated with improvement in serum alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, bilirubin, and albumin levels at one and two years.

CONCLUSIONS

In a group of patients with well-defined primary sclerosing cholangitis, ursodiol provided no clinical benefit.

Investigation of the patient with abnormal liver function tests

About one-half of patients with ulcerative colitis develop abnormal liver function tests at some time during the course of the illness. This should prompt an investigation for primary sclerosing cholangitis and other common hepatobiliary diseases. Primary sclerosing cholangitis occurs in 2-10% of patients with ulcerative colitis. The diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis is most often made by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Liver histopathology is often inconclusive but magnetic resonance cholangiography shows promise as a useful non-invasive diagnostic tool. Cholangiocarcinoma complicates 20-40% of patients with end-stage primary sclerosing cholangitis and is now one of the most common causes of death in patients with ulcerative colitis. Distinction between benign and malignant strictures can be difficult and is best done with a combination of clinical suspicion, repeated imaging for mass lesions, cholangiography, and endoscopic brushings and/or biopsies. Dominant lesions of the common bile duct or common hepatic duct produce progressive jaundice and liver damage. Early treatment may improve prognosis. Single strictures can be dilated endoscopically. If the stricture is more complicated and extends into the intrahepatic ducts or there is suspicion of cholangiocarcinoma, surgical resection may be more appropriate. Liver transplantation should be considered in end-stage disease.

Review article: the management of primary sclerosing cholangitis

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic cholestatic liver disease characterized by a progressive obliterating fibrosis of the intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts. The pathogenesis of PSC is poorly understood but it is thought to be an immune-mediated disease. The optimal therapy which successfully improves symptoms, delays progression towards liver failure and transplantation and prevents the onset of cholangiocarcinoma remains elusive. Although current treatments are used to manage cholestasis and its consequences and some of the more general complications of the disease, none of the current therapeutic agents have been shown to retard and reverse the rate of disease progression. The role of cupruretics, corticosteroids, methotrexate, antifibrogenic agents and ursodeoxycholic acid in the treatment of PSC is reviewed. Orthotopic liver transplantation remains the only therapeutic option for advanced PSC but the timing of transplantation remains controversial and the possibility of recurrence of the disease in the graft is increasingly recognised. It is likely that greater insight into the pathogenetic mechanisms involved in PSC will allow therapy to be targetted more specifically at the biliary epithelium.

Endoscopic stent therapy for dominant extrahepatic bile duct strictures in primary sclerosing cholangitis

BACKGROUND

In 15% to 20% of patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis, a dominant stricture of the extrahepatic bile ducts may be responsible for declining results of serum biochemical liver tests and may contribute to symptoms such as jaundice, cholangitis, pruritus, and right upper quadrant pain.

METHODS

Retrospectively, over the period 1985 to 1994, we evaluated 25 patients who had been treated by endoscopic stent therapy after declining results of serum biochemical liver tests and symptoms attributable to dominant extrahepatic bile duct strictures. Serum biochemical liver test results and symptoms were compared before and after treatment.

RESULTS

Endoscopic therapy was technically successful in 21 patients (84%). In these 21 patients results of all serum biochemical liver tests improved significantly (p < 0.001) within 6 months of stent therapy. During median follow-up of 29 (2 to 120) months after stent removal, 12 patients (57%) remained asymptomatic with stable serum biochemical liver tests and 4 (19%) had clinical and biochemical relapse of disease that responded favourably to additional endoscopic therapy. Early procedure-related complications occurred in 14% of therapeutic endoscopic biliary procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic stent therapy is a safe and effective treatment modality for an acute exacerbation of disease caused by dominant extrahepatic bile duct strictures in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.

Current concepts in primary sclerosing cholangitis

OBJECTIVE

To describe primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and its associated complications, as well as medical and surgical treatment.

DESIGN

A review of PSC and its associated etiopathologic factors is presented; numerous studies of agents that are used to treat patients with PSC are discussed.

RESULTS

PSC, a slowly progressive disease that often involves autoimmune damage to the biliary tree, is frequently associated with inflammatory bowel disease, usually chronic ulcerative colitis. Long-term follow-up of patients with PSC has revealed a high incidence of colon cancer and bile duct cancer, both of which are most likely related to the chronic inflammation involving these two organs. Although PSC is an unusual disease, it is now diagnosed with approximately the same frequency as is primary biliary cirrhosis. The histopathologic evolution of PSC results in irreversible damage to bile ducts, which ultimately leads to cholestasis, cirrhosis, liver failure, and premature death from liver failure unless liver transplantation is performed. Therefore, the best chance of achieving success is to treat patients with early-stage disease rather than those with irreversible end-stage cirrhotic disease. Although several medical therapies for PSC have been evaluated, only D-penicillamine, cyclosporine, methotrexate, and, most recently, ursodeoxycholic acid have been studied in controlled clinical trials. Furthermore, several surgical therapies for PSC and its associated complications have been assessed.

CONCLUSION

Currently, no therapy achieves a complete clinical, biochemical, or histologic remission in this disease. Until the etiopathogenesis of PSC is further defined, effective therapy is unlikely to be found. Thus, liver transplantation will continue to be an important therapeutic intervention for the management of patients with end-stage PSC.

Primary sclerosing cholangitis

Primary sclerosing cholangitis is a condition of unknown cause. It is recognized by liver dysfunction and its characteristic radiologic appearance, which is related to portal tract inflammation, bile duct proliferation, and periductal fibroses involving small intrahepatic and large extrahepatic ducts. The disease lasts about 10 years from the time of diagnosis. Primary sclerosing cholangitis is recognized by abnormal results on routine liver function tests or by the development of clinical jaundice. An autoimmune cause has been suggested because of its strong association with inflammatory bowel disease, certain antigens, AIDS, and immunoregulatory abnormalities. Results of medical management of sclerosing cholangitis have been disappointing. Immunosuppressive drugs, copper chelating agents, and antibiotics have failed to alter progression of the disease. Colectomy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease also has no influence. The judicious use of dilations of strictures, bypass procedures, or resection can palliate jaundice in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis, but liver transplantation is the definitive treatment. Because palliative operations increase the hazards of liver transplantation, percutaneous dilations and stentings are preferred initially. Cirrhosis and portal hypertension are indications for transplantation. In the future, transplantation may be indicated earlier in the course of the disease.

Ursodeoxycholic acid for the treatment of primary sclerosing cholangitis: a 30-month pilot study

We investigated the effects of once-daily oral administration of 10 mg/kg ursodeoxycholic acid (generic name, ursodiol) on elevated serum enzyme activities, bilirubin, cholesterol, bile acids and symptoms in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. A 30-mo, open-label, pilot trial was designed to cover four periods: (a) 3 mo of pretreatment observation (period 1), (b) 6 mo on ursodiol (period 2), (c) 3 mo withdrawal of treatment (period 3) and (d) 18 mo of extended retreatment (period 4). Diagnosis was confirmed by cholangiography and liver biopsy specimens. We enrolled 12 patients with persistently elevated pretreatment alkaline phosphatase and gamma-glutamyltransferase levels (at least twice the upper limit of normal), and observed them for a median of 37 mo. Significant reductions in serum total cholesterol levels and in serum enzyme activities indicating cholestasis and hepatocellular injury occurred during ursodiol treatment in both treatment periods 2 and 4 and relapsed with treatment interruption in period 3. Elevated serum bilirubin and symptoms of disabling fatigue, pruritus and diarrhea were improved by ursodiol. Improvements have continued after 2 yr of treatment in 10 patients (1 patient had a transplantation after he relapsed on withdrawal of ursodiol therapy; another died of postoperative complications of colon resection for carcinoma). No other cases of clinical deterioration were observed in the retreatment period. The longer term reductions of alkaline phosphatase, transaminases, bilirubin and cholesterol after 2 yr of treatment were even greater than the initial reductions after 6 mo of treatment. These results justify initiation of larger, controlled clinical trials, with serial morphological evaluations of the liver and biliary tree.

Improving biliary-enteric drainage in primary sclerosing cholangitis: experience with endoscopic methods

Six jaundiced patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis and a dominant biliary stricture were managed by endoscopic placement of endoprostheses. Five showed considerable improvement within weeks of stenting: their serum bilirubin concentration fell from mean (range) 266 mumol/l (63-681) to 65 mumol/l (10-280) after one month. One patient required a liver transplant at five months because of continued deterioration in hepatic function. Follow up of 12-49 months in the remaining five patients shows sustained biochemical improvement, with repeat cholangiograms indicating doubling of the minimum calibre of the extrahepatic bile duct in four patients and considerable shortening of stricture length in three. Three patients developed sepsis at the time of the initial endoprosthesis insertion: surgical drainage was necessary in one. Endoscopic methods of improving biliary-enteric drainage in jaundiced patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis may be preferable to surgical and percutaneous methods, which may complicate subsequent liver transplantation.

Primary sclerosing cholangitis: surgical options, prognostic variables and outcome

The natural history of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is poorly defined and its management remains controversial. Forty-eight symptomatic patients (median age 39 years, range 8-67 years; 30 male) with PSC were reviewed retrospectively. Thirty patients had inflammatory bowel disease. Four patients (8 per cent) developed or had an associated malignancy. Twenty-one (44 per cent) died; overall 5 year actuarial survival was 30 per cent. Twenty-three patients had 27 non-transplant related biliary operations (16 patients specifically for PSC) of whom 12 died. Serum bilirubin was the only parameter to improve after biliary surgery. Seventeen patients (35 per cent) underwent orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) of whom nine are currently alive (1 year projected survival of 55 per cent). Previous biliary surgery correlated with a poor outcome (P less than 0.0001) after OLT. Being male, presence of cirrhosis, duration of symptomatic disease (greater than 3 years) and a serum bilirubin level greater than 100 mumol/l at presentation, were independently associated with a poor outcome (P less than 0.05). These data provide evidence that PSC is a progressive disease and conventional surgical options have little influence on the outcome. Previous biliary surgery adversely affects outcome following OLT. For progressive liver disease, liver transplantation should be considered the treatment of choice.

Advances in primary sclerosing cholangitis

Primary sclerosing cholangitis is an increasingly recognized chronic cholestatic liver disease. It frequently occurs in association with chronic ulcerative colitis and is characterized by inflammation and fibrosis of the intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts. The cause is unknown, although many mechanisms have been considered, including infectious, toxic, and immunologic. The prognosis varies. No adequate treatment exists, although a number of potential treatments have been evaluated in uncontrolled trials, and the results of controlled trials have only recently been reported. Liver transplantation has recently been shown to be an effective treatment for end-stage disease. These various advances in our understanding of primary sclerosing cholangitis are reviewed.

Primary sclerosing cholangitis: clinical and immunopathological review of 21 cases

Twenty-one patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis were seen during 1979-87. The mean age at onset of disease was 51.7 years (range: 13-78 years) with a male: female ratio of 2.5:1. Six (29%) were asymptomatic at the time of diagnosis. Eleven patients (52%) had ulcerative colitis. Cholangiography demonstrated abnormalities limited to the intrahepatic ducts in 10 cases, with both intrahepatic and extrahepatic involvement in 11. Histological features on liver biopsy included: portal tract inflammation and cholestasis in all; paucity of bile ducts in 56%; piecemeal necrosis in 19% and cirrhosis in 6%. Circulating autoantibodies and elevated serum immunoglobulins were found in half of the patients and HLA-B8 was detected in 53%. A deficiency of circulating CD3 and CD8 cells was not found in the 12 patients tested. The mean follow-up was 51 months (range: 3-180 months). Three patients died from non-hepatic causes and another has received liver transplantation. A Kaplan-Meier curve predicted 70% survival at 72 months.