MR-imaging of the brain of neurologic asymptomatic patients with large cell or adenocarcinoma of the lung. Does it influence prognosis and treatment?

Development of brain metastases in non-small-cell lung cancer: high-risk features

Aim: Brain metastases (BM) are a common site of disease progression and treatment failure in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and can be identified in up to 30-50% of patients. Although they are common, there is no standardized screening protocol for development of BM in NSCLC. Multiple clinical variables predict increased BM occurrence, and, when present, should be used to initiate screening MRI.Materials & methods: We performed a single center retrospective review of NSCLC patients, examining BM development and overall survival. Available clinical, radiographic and molecular data were reviewed for association with BM and overall survival. A predictive model for BM development was created for multivariate analysis.Results: Risk factors for new BM development in NSCLC included younger age, larger primary lung tumor, Karnofsky performance score (KPS) <70, pre-existing liver or bone metastases, large cell histology and family history of cancer. Factors associated with decreased OS were larger primary lung tumor, extracranial metastases at time of diagnosis, large cell histology and poorly-differentiated carcinoma histology.Conclusion: There are multiple high risk features for developing BM in NSCLC. Each of these factors should routinely be investigated, and presence should prompt brain MRI to allow earlier diagnosis and treatment of BM.

Imaging in Lung Cancer Staging

Lung cancer remains one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide, as well as in the United States. Clinical staging, primarily with imaging, is integral to stratify patients into groups that determine treatment options and predict survival. The eighth edition of the tumor, node, metastasis (TNM-8) staging system proposed in 2016 by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer remains the current standard for lung cancer staging. The system is used for all subtypes of lung cancer, including non-small cell lung cancer, small cell lung cancer, and bronchopulmonary carcinoid tumors.

A Review of the Current Approach and Treatment Landscape for Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The therapeutic landscape of the management of stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has drastically evolved with the incorporation of immunotherapy and targeted therapy. Stage III NSCLC accounts for one-third of the cases and the treatment strategy of these locally advanced presentations are diverse, ranging from surgical to non-surgical options; with the incorporation of chemo-immunotherapy, radiation, and targeted therapies wherever applicable. The staging of this disease has also changed, and it is essential to have a strong multidisciplinary approach to do justice to patient care. In this article, we aim to navigate the nuanced approaches in the diagnosis and treatment of stage III NSCLC and expand on the evolution of the management of this disease.

What is the current role of prophylactic cranial irradiation in the treatment algorithm for small cell lung cancer?

Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) is considered an important technological advance made in oncology in an effort to reduce the incidence of brain metastases (BM) and improve overall survival (OS) of patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Although it is often reported that PCI improves the therapeutic potential in limited-stage (LS) SCLC, no randomised trial has ever conclusively confirmed this. Nevertheless, PCI has been considered the standard of care for LS-SCLC since the late 1990s. The data supporting the use of PCI in LS-SCLC are based on an analysis of work performed prior to the current approach to staging [brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT)]. The evidence for the rationale and feasibility of this approach in the modern diagnostic era should be demonstrated. The situation with extensive stage (ES) SCLC is seemingly easier because, unlike LS-SCLC, we have data from two randomised trials. Unfortunately, their results are in direct conflict with each other. Although it is generally assumed that good control of brain disease leads to better quality of life, this has never been prospectively demonstrated. In fact, PCI is associated not only with increased treatment costs and some patient discomfort, but also with non-negligible potential toxicity. For this reason, efforts have been made to preserve cognitive function by sparing the hippocampus. This concept is called hippocampal avoidance. The optimal fractionation regimen is currently less controversial than the optimal integration of PCI into the treatment algorithm. A dose of 25 Gy administered in 10 fractions should remain the standard for the eventual use of PCI in patients with SCLC. In summary, PCI is not a conditio sine qua non in any indication. Neither in patients with LS-SCLC nor in patients with ES-SCLC has a clear improvement in OS been demonstrated at follow-up using current imaging modalities.

Lung Cancer Staging: Imaging and Potential Pitfalls

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths in men and women in the United States. Accurate staging is needed to determine prognosis and devise effective treatment plans. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) has made multiple revisions to the tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) staging system used by the Union for International Cancer Control and the American Joint Committee on Cancer to stage lung cancer. The eighth edition of this staging system includes modifications to the T classification with cut points of 1 cm increments in tumor size, grouping of lung cancers associated with partial or complete lung atelectasis or pneumonitis, grouping of tumors with involvement of a main bronchus regardless of distance from the carina, and upstaging of diaphragmatic invasion to T4. The N classification describes the spread to regional lymph nodes and no changes were proposed for TNM-8. In the M classification, metastatic disease is divided into intra- versus extrathoracic metastasis, and single versus multiple metastases. In order to optimize patient outcomes, it is important to understand the nuances of the TNM staging system, the strengths and weaknesses of various imaging modalities used in lung cancer staging, and potential pitfalls in image interpretation.

Imaging of brain metastasis in non-small-cell lung cancer: indications, protocols, diagnosis, post-therapy imaging, and implications regarding management

Increased survival (due to the use of targeted therapies based on genomic profiling) has resulted in the increased incidence of brain metastasis during the course of disease, and thus, made it essential to have proper imaging guidelines in place for brain metastasis from non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Brain parenchymal metastases can have varied imaging appearances, and it is pertinent to be aware of the various molecular risk factors for brain metastasis from NSCLC along with their suggestive imaging appearances, so as to identify them early. Leptomeningeal metastasis requires additional imaging of the spine and an early cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis. Differentiation of post-therapy change from recurrence on imaging has a bearing on the management, hence the need for its awareness. This article will provide in-depth literature review of the epidemiology, aetiopathogenesis, screening, detection, diagnosis, post-therapy imaging, and implications regarding the management of brain metastasis from NSCLC. In addition, we will also briefly highlight the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in brain metastasis screening.

Associated Factors of Spontaneous Hemorrhage in Brain Metastases in Patients with Lung Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Hemorrhage in brain metastases (BMs) from lung cancer is common and associated with a poor prognosis. Research on associated factors of spontaneous hemorrhage in patients with BMs is limited. This study aimed to investigate the predictive risk factors for BM hemorrhage and assess whether hemorrhage affects patient survival.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 159 BMs from 80 patients with lung adenocarcinoma from January 2017 to May 2022. Patients were classified into hemorrhagic and non-hemorrhagic groups. Patient demographics, lung cancer molecular subtype, treatment type, and tumor-node-metastasis stage were compared between the groups. Multivariate generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis and gradient boosting were performed. To determine whether BM hemorrhage can stratify overall survival after BM (OSBM), univariate survival analysis was performed.

RESULTS

In the univariate analysis, hemorrhagic BMs were significantly larger and had a history of receiving combination therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and intracranial radiation (p < 0.05). Multivariate GEE showed that tumor size and combination therapy were independent risk factors for BM hemorrhage (p < 0.05). Gradient boosting demonstrated that the strongest predictor of BM hemorrhage was tumor size (variable importance: 49.83), followed by age (16.65) and TKI combined with intracranial radiation (13.81). There was no significant difference in OSBM between the two groups (p = 0.33).

CONCLUSIONS

Hemorrhage in BMs from lung adenocarcinomas may be associated with BM tumor size and a combination of TKI and intracranial radiotherapy. BM hemorrhage did not affect OSBM.

Imaging of Lung Cancer Staging

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Imaging is integral in accurate clinical staging to stratify patients into groups to predict survival and determine treatment. The eighth edition of the tumor, node, and metastasis (TNM-8) staging system proposed by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer in 2016, accepted by both the Union for International Cancer Control and the American Joint Committee on Cancer, is the current standard method of staging lung cancer. This single TNM staging is used for all histologic subtypes of lung cancer, including nonsmall cell lung cancer, small cell lung cancer, and bronchopulmonary carcinoid tumor, and it addresses both clinical and pathologic staging. Familiarity with the strengths and limitations of imaging modalities used in staging, the nuances of TNM-8, its correct nomenclature, and potential pitfalls are important to optimize patient care. In this article, we discuss the role of computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography/CT in lung cancer staging, as well as current imaging recommendations pertaining to TNM-8.

Local control of brain metastases with osimertinib alone in patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Although osimertinib has excellent intracranial activity in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with exon 19 deletion or L858R EGFR alterations, measures of local control of brain metastases are less well-reported. We describe lesion-level outcomes of brain metastases treated with osimertinib alone.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC with untreated brain metastasis measuring ≥ 5 mm at the time of initiating osimertinib. Cumulative incidence of local recurrence in brain (LRiB) was calculated with death as a competing risk, and univariable and multivariable analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with LRiB.

RESULTS

We included 284 brain metastases from 37 patients. Median follow-up was 20.1 months. On initial MRI after starting osimertinib, patient-level response was complete response (CR) in 11 (15%), partial response (PR) in 33 (45%), stable disease (SD) in 18 (25%) and progressive disease (PD) in 11 (15%). The 1-year cumulative incidence of LRiB was 14% (95% CI 9.9-17.9) and was significantly different in patients with a CR (0%), PR (4%), and SD (11%; p = 0.02). Uncontrolled primary tumor (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 3.78, 95% CI 1.87-7.66; p < 0.001), increasing number of prior systemic therapies (aHR 2.12, 95% CI 1.49-3.04; p < 0.001), and higher ECOG score (aHR 7.8, 95% CI 1.99-31.81; p = 0.003) were associated with LRiB.

CONCLUSIONS

Although 1-year cumulative incidence of LRiB is < 4% with a CR or PR, 1-year cumulative incidence of LRiB is over 10% for patients with less than a PR to osimertinib on initial MRI. These patients should be followed closely for need for additional treatment such as stereotactic radiosurgery.

Investigation of the added value of CT-based radiomics in predicting the development of brain metastases in patients with radically treated stage III NSCLC

Introduction:

Despite radical intent therapy for patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), cumulative incidence of brain metastases (BM) reaches 30%. Current risk stratification methods fail to accurately identify these patients. As radiomics features have been shown to have predictive value, this study aims to develop a model combining clinical risk factors with radiomics features for BM development in patients with radically treated stage III NSCLC.

Methods:

Retrospective analysis of two prospective multicentre studies. Inclusion criteria: adequately staged [¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (18-FDG-PET-CT), contrast-enhanced chest CT, contrast-enhanced brain magnetic resonance imaging/CT] and radically treated stage III NSCLC, exclusion criteria: second primary within 2 years of NSCLC diagnosis and prior prophylactic cranial irradiation. Primary endpoint was BM development any time during follow-up (FU). CT-based radiomics features (N = 530) were extracted from the primary lung tumour on 18-FDG-PET-CT images, and a list of clinical features (N = 8) was collected. Univariate feature selection based on the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic was performed to identify relevant features. Generalized linear models were trained using the selected features, and multivariate predictive performance was assessed through the AUC.

Results:

In total, 219 patients were eligible for analysis. Median FU was 59.4 months for the training cohort and 67.3 months for the validation cohort; 21 (15%) and 17 (22%) patients developed BM in the training and validation cohort, respectively. Two relevant clinical features (age and adenocarcinoma histology) and four relevant radiomics features were identified as predictive. The clinical model yielded the highest AUC value of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.58–0.84), better than radiomics or a combination of clinical parameters and radiomics (both an AUC of 0.62, 95% CIs of 0.47–076 and 0.48–0.76, respectively).

Conclusion:

CT-based radiomics features of primary NSCLC in the current setup could not improve on a model based on clinical predictors (age and adenocarcinoma histology) of BM development in radically treated stage III NSCLC patients.

Clinical outcomes of patients with multiple courses of radiosurgery for brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer

We investigated the long-term clinical outcomes of patients who underwent multiple courses (≥ 5) of gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) due to recurrent brain metastases (BM) from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Between December 2001 and July 2019, consecutive 2571 patients underwent GKRS for BM from NSCLC. Clinical and radiological outcomes were investigated in 76 patients who underwent GKRS ≥ 5 times. The median follow-up period after the diagnosis of NSCLC was 54.6 months (range 14.5–159.1 months). The median number of GKRS procedures per patient was six (range 5–15). Actuarial post-GKRS survival rates at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years following initial GKRS were 88.1%, 79.5%, 65.3%, 51.4%, and 37.3%, respectively. No significant difference in overall survival was observed between patients (n = 22) with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and patients (n = 54) without WBRT (p = 0.076). The incidence of radiation-induced leukoencephalopathy was 64% and 18% in patients with and without WBRT, respectively (p < 0.0001). Multiple courses of SRS are a tolerable and effective treatment option for recurrent BM from NSCLC. Repeat SRS may be an alternative treatment option to avoid or delay WBRT.

Role of Pre-Operative Brain Imaging in Patients with NSCLC Stage I: A Retrospective, Multicenter Analysis

Simple Summary

Lung cancer is the worldwide leading cause of cancer-related death among both genders, with about 230,000 patients/year being diagnosed in the US alone. It accounts for about 40% of all brain metastases, which already occur in around 3% of early-stage patients. Nonetheless, current international guidelines do not unanimously recommend brain imaging for use in the early stages of cancer. Some studies have suggested that surgical or radiosurgical treatment of brain metastases may provide better survival, especially in asymptomatic patients. Additionally, advances in genome analysis have identified molecular targets for pharmaceutical agents. These recent advancements in treatment stress the importance of studying incidence as well as patient and tumor characteristics in order to potentially adapt future guidelines and provide the best possible treatment for early-stage lung cancer. This multicentric study analyzed the data of 577 patients diagnosed with early-stage lung cancer who had been submitted for brain imaging at initial tumor staging.

Abstract

Background: Lung cancer is the worldwide leading oncological cause of death in both genders combined and accounts for around 40–50% of brain metastases in general. In early-stage lung cancer, the incidence of brain metastases is around 3%. Since the early detection of asymptomatic cerebral metastases is of prognostic value, the aim of this study was to analyze the incidence of brain metastases in early-stage lung cancer and identify possible risk factors. Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicentric analysis of patients with Stage I (based on T and N stage only) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) who had received preoperative cerebral imaging in the form of contrast-enhanced CT or MRI. Patients with a history of NSCLC, synchronous malignancy, or neurological symptoms were excluded from the study. Analyzed variables were gender, age, tumor histology, cerebral imaging findings, smoking history, and tumor size. Results were expressed as mean with standard deviation or median with range. Results: In total, 577 patients were included in our study. Eight (1.4%) patients were found to have brain metastases in preoperative brain imaging. Tumor histology was adenocarcinoma in all eight cases. Patients were treated with radiotherapy (five), surgical resection (two), or both (one) prior to thoracic surgical treatment. Other than tumor histology, no statistically significant characteristics were found to be predictive of brain metastases. Conclusion: Given the low incidence of brain metastases in patients with clinical Stage I NSCLC, brain imaging in this cohort could be avoided.

Management of Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: ASCO Guideline

PURPOSE

To provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing clinicians on management of patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

An Expert Panel of medical oncology, thoracic surgery, radiation oncology, pulmonary oncology, community oncology, research methodology, and advocacy experts was convened to conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials published from 1990 through 2021. Outcomes of interest included survival, disease-free or recurrence-free survival, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 127 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Evidence-based recommendations were developed to address evaluation and staging workup of patients with suspected stage III NSCLC, surgical management, neoadjuvant and adjuvant approaches, and management of patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/thoracic-cancer-guidelines.

Assessment of Brain Metastasis at Diagnosis in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Prospective Observational Study From North India

PURPOSE

The incidence of symptomatic brain metastasis at diagnosis in non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is 5%-10%, and up to 40% develop during the disease course. There is a paucity of data supporting the role of brain imaging at diagnosis in asymptomatic cases particularly from resource-constraint settings. Here, we present our experience of mandatory baseline brain imaging with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) scans of all patients with NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a prospective observation study of patients with NSCLC with mandatory baseline brain CECT and a CNS examination. All histology proven patients with NSCLC diagnosed between January 2018 and October 2019 were included irrespective of stage.

RESULTS

A total of 496 patients were enrolled. The median age was 57 years (range, 23-84) with majority being males (75%) and smokers (66%). The prevalence of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and anaplastic lymphoma kinase fusions was 33.4% and 12%, respectively. Brain imaging leads to upstaging in 7% cases. The prevalence of brain metastases was 21% (n = 104), with half being asymptomatic (51%). Factors associated with higher proportion of brain metastasis were young age (≤ 40 years), adenocarcinoma histology, poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (3 and 4), and high neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (> 2.5). After a median follow-up of 10.8 months (95% CI, 7.33 to 12.73), the median overall survival was 7.46 versus 12.76 months (hazard ratio 0.67; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.96; P = .03) in patients with and without brain metastases, respectively. On multivariate analyses, high NLR and molecular graded prognostic assessment affected the overall survival significantly.

CONCLUSION

In our study, 21% of patients had brain metastasis at diagnosis detected with a mandatory baseline brain imaging with CECT. NLR and molecular graded prognostic assessment are significant predictors of survival in patients with brain metastasis.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Noninvasive Clinical Staging of Primary Lung Cancer

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in both men and women. The major risk factor for lung cancer is personal tobacco smoking, particularly for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and squamous cell lung cancers, but other significant risk factors include exposure to secondhand smoke, environmental radon, occupational exposures, and air pollution. Education and socioeconomic status affect both incidence and outcomes. Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), including adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and large cell carcinoma, comprises about 85% of lung cancers. SCLC accounts for approximately 13% to 15% of cases. Prognosis is directly related to stage at presentation. NSCLC is staged using the eighth edition of the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) criteria of the American Joint Committee on Cancer. For SCLC the eighth edition of TNM staging is recommended to be used in conjunction with the modified Veterans Administration Lung Study Group classification system distinguishing limited stage from extensive stage SCLC. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Impact of neuroimaging in the pretreatment evaluation of early stage non-small cell lung cancer

Background

There are limited data and conflicting guideline recommendations regarding the role of neuroimaging in the pretreatment evaluation of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

We performed a retrospective, pragmatic cohort study of patients with NSCLC diagnosed between January 1 and December 31, 2015. Eligible patients were identified from an institutional tumor registry. We collected all records of pretreatment neuroimaging within 12 weeks of diagnosis, including CT head (CT) and MRI brain (MRI). We abstracted the indication for neuroimaging, presence of central neurologic symptoms and cancer stage (with and without neuroimaging findings) from the tumor registry and the electronic health record.

Results

We identified 216 evaluable patients with newly diagnosed NSCLC. 157 of 216 patients (72.7%) underwent neuroimaging as part of initial staging, and 41 (26%) were found to have brain metastases. Of 43 patients with central neurologic symptoms at the time of neuroimaging, 28 (67%) had brain metastasis. In patients without central neurologic symptoms, brain metastases were discovered in 0 of 33 patients with clinical stage I or II, 4 of 36 (11%) with clinical stage III and 9 of 45 (20%) with clinical stage IV disease.

Conclusions

In patients with early stage NSCLC (i.e. clinical stage I and II) without central neurologic symptoms, brain metastases are unlikely. The continued use of neuroimaging in the pretreatment evaluation of clinical stage I patients without central neurologic symptoms is not needed.

Screening for brain metastases in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer, magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography? A prospective study

INTRODUCTION

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) guidelines advise to screen stage III NSCLC patients for brain metastases (BMs), preferably by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or when contraindicated or not accessible a dedicated contrast enhanced-computed tomography (dCE-CT), which can be incorporated in the staging ¹⁸Fluodeoxoglucose-positron emission tomography (¹⁸FDG-PET-CE-CT). In daily practice, often a dCE-CT is performed instead of a MRI. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the additive value of MRI after dCE-CT, incorporated in the ¹⁸FDG-PET-CE-CT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

It is an observational prospective multicentre study (NTR3628). Inclusion criteria included stage III NSCLC patients with a dCE-CT of the brain incorporated in the ¹⁸FDG-PET and an additional MRI of the brain. Primary end-point is percentage of patients with BM on MRI without suspect lesions on dCE-CT. Secondary end-points are percentage of patients with BM on dCE-CT and percentage of patients with BM ≤ 1 year of a negative staging MRI.

RESULTS

Sixteen (7%) patients with extracranial stage III had BM on dCE-CT and were excluded. One hundred forty-nine patients were enrolled. 7/149 (4.7%) had BM on MRI without suspect lesions on dCE-CT. One hundred eighteen patients had a follow-up of at least 1 year (four with BM on baseline MRI); eight of the remaining 114 (7%) patients developed BM ≤ 1 year after a negative staging brain MRI.

CONCLUSION

Although in 7% of otherwise stage III NSCLC patients, BMs were detected on staging dCE-CT, MRI brain detected BMs in an additional 4.7%, which we consider clinically relevant. Within 1 year after a negative staging MRI, 7% developed BM.

Assessing the pattern of recurrence in Danish stage I lung cancer patients in relation to the follow-up program: are we failing to identify patients with cerebral recurrence?

BACKGROUND

There is paucity of evidence regarding the optimal follow-up (FU) regimen for lung cancer. Consequently, FU is organized differently across countries. The Danish FU regimen has short FU intervals with a computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest and upper abdomen every three months in the early phase (first 2 years), then every six months in the late phase of FU (3rd, 5th year). Characterizing recurrences missed by the FU program in terms of site, tumor histology, department, and phase of FU, could improve the FU program.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A case-control study of curatively treated stage I lung cancer patients who attended the Danish FU-program and had recurrence identified through the follow-up program (controls, FU group) or outside FU program (cases, symptomatic group).

RESULTS

Of 233 included patients with recurrence, the FU group constituted 85% (n = 197). Among the 15% (n = 36) in the symptomatic group, 53% had involvement of the central nervous system compared with 3% in the FU group. The unadjusted odds ratio (OR) for having an isolated brain recurrence (IBR) in the symptomatic group was 52.3 (95%CI: 15.1-181.4) as compared with the FU group. The OR for having a symptomatic recurrence in the early phase of FU was 2.5 (95%CI: 0.7-8.7) compared with the late phase.

CONCLUSIONS

The FU program did not identify the majority of patients with IBR. Including cerebral imaging in the FU program may result in an earlier detection of brain metastases. These matters should be studied in a prospective setting.

Lymph Node Size Predicts for Asymptomatic Brain Metastases in Patients With Non-small-cell Lung Cancer at Diagnosis

BACKGROUND

We questioned whether the National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommendations for brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for patients with stage ≥ IB non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was high-yield compared with American College of Clinical Pharmacy and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines recommending stage III and above NSCLC. We present the prevalence and factors predictive of asymptomatic brain metastases at diagnosis in patients with NSCLC without extracranial metastases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 193 consecutive, treatment-naïve patients with NSCLC diagnosed between January 2010 and August 2015 was performed. Exclusion criteria included no brain MRI staging, symptomatic brain metastases, or stage IV based on extracranial disease. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed.

RESULTS

The patient characteristics include median age of 65 years (range, 36-90 years), 51% adenocarcinoma/36% squamous carcinoma, and pre-MRI stage grouping of 31% I, 22% II, 34% IIIA, and 13% IIIB. The overall prevalence of brain metastases was 5.7% (n = 11). One (2.4%) stage IA and 1 (5.6%) stage IB patient had asymptomatic brain metastases at diagnosis, both were adenocarcinomas. On univariate analysis, increasing lymph nodal stage (P = .02), lymph nodal size > 2 cm (P = .009), multi-lymph nodal N1/N2 station involvement (P = .027), and overall stage (P = .005) were associated with asymptomatic brain metastases. On multivariate analysis, increasing lymph nodal size remained significant (odds ratio, 1.545; P = .009).

CONCLUSION

Our series shows a 5.7% rate of asymptomatic brain metastasis for patients with stage I to III NSCLC. Increasing lymph nodal size was the only predictor of asymptomatic brain metastases, suggesting over-utilization of MRI in early-stage disease, especially in lymph node-negative patients with NSCLC. Future efforts will explore the utility of baseline MRI in lymph node-positive stage II and all stage IIIA patients.

What you see is (not) what you get: tools for a non-radiologist to evaluate image quality in lung cancer

Medical images are an integral part of oncological patient records and they are reviewed by many different specialists. Therefore, it is important that besides imaging experts, other clinicians are also aware that the diagnostic value of a scan is influenced by the applied imaging protocol. Based on two clinical lung cancer trials, we experienced that, even within a study protocol, there is a large variability in imaging parameters, which has direct impact on the interpretation of the image. These two trials were: 1) the NTR3628 in which the added value of gadolinium magnetic resonance imaging (Gd-MRI) to dedicated contrast enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) for detecting asymptomatic brain metastases in stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was investigated and 2) a sub-study of the NVALT 12 trial (NCT01171170) in which repeated 18 F-fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (¹⁸F-FDG-PET) imaging for early response assessment was investigated. Based on the problems encountered in the two trials, we provide recommendations for non-radiology clinicians, which can be used in daily interpretation of imaging. Variations in image parameters cannot only influence trial results, but sub-optimal imaging can also influence treatment decisions in daily lung cancer care, when a physician is not aware of the scanning details.

[Impact of routine brain imaging in the initial management of lung cancer]

INTRODUCTION

Brain metastases are a common complication of bronchial carcinoma (BC). There is no consensus as to the need to undertake a systematic search for these lesions during the initial assessment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the contribution of brain imaging in the initial evaluation of patients with CB.

METHODS

We undertook a retrospective analysis of patients treated in the Thoracic Oncology Clinic at the Institute Jules-Bordet between 01/09/2008 and 31/08/2013, who were treatment-naïve and were having a full diagnostic work-up including brain imaging.

RESULTS

Four hundred and sixty-three patients consecutively diagnosed with BC were included. Brain magnetic resonance imaging and/or CT-scan showed brain metastases in 101 patients (21.8%), of whom 67 had no symptoms suggestive of brain metastatic disease. The addition of a brain imaging into the work-up procedure resulted in a stage migration for 30 patients (6.5%), mainly otherwise staged IIIA (n=10) or IIIB (n=14) without brain imaging.

CONCLUSION

The addition of brain imaging in the initial assessment of bronchial carcinoma allows the identification of brain metastases in one case among 5, of which 2/3 are asymptomatic. This leads to a change in staging, primarily for disease otherwise considered to be stage III.

Brain metastasis in lung cancer

FDG-PET/CT is increasingly used in staging of lung cancer as single „one stop shop” method. Aim, patients, methods: We prospectively included 104 neurological asymptomatic patients (65 years, 26% women) with primary diagnosis of lung cancer. In all patients PET/CT including cerebral imaging and cerebral MRI were performed. Results: Diagnosis of brain metastases (BM) was made by PET/CT in 8 patients only (7.7%), by MRI in 22 (21.2%). In 80 patients both PET/CT and MRI showed no BM. In 6 patients (5.8%) BM were detectable on PET/CT as well as on MRI. Exclusive diagnosis of BM by MRI with negative finding on PET/CT was present in 16 patients (15.4%). 2 patients (1.9%) had findings typical for BM on PET/CT but were negative on MRI. With MRI overall 100 BM were detected, with PET/CT only 17 BM (p < 0.01). For the diagnosis of BM PET/CT showed a sensitivity of 27.3%, specificity of 97.6%, positive predictive value of 75% and negative predictive value of 83.3%. BM diameter on PET/CT and MRI were consistent in 43%, in 57% BM were measured larger on MRI. Discussion: Compared to the gold standard of MRI for cerebral staging a considerable number of patients are falsely diagnosed as free from BM by PET/CT. MRI is more accurate than PET/CT for detecting multiple and smaller BM. Conclusion: In patients with a curative option MRI should be performed additionally to PET/CT for definitive exclusion of brain metastases.

Prolonged survival of patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer with solitary brain metastases treated with surgical resection of brain and lung lesions followed by EGFR TKIs

BACKGROUND

The standard combination of initial and subsequent treatments of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with solitary brain metastases (BM) remain unclear. Thus, the management options and the progression-free survival (PFS) and the overall survival (OS) of EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients with solitary BM were investigated in the study.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data from NSCLC patients who harbored EGFR mutations and who presented solitary BM at diagnosis in our institute between 2012 and 2014. PFS and OS were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier methods and compared using log-rank tests.

RESULTS

In total, 36 NSCLC patients with solitary BM who harbored EGFR mutations were enrolled in this study. The PFS and OS of these patients was 12.4 and 19.3 months, respectively. Sixteen patients underwent surgical resection of brain and lung lesions followed by EGFR-TKIs treatment, and the median OS was 28.0 months, which was significantly longer than 16.4 months of 14 patients received radiotherapy combined with or followed by EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and 15.8 months of 6 patients received radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy. The median PFS also showed the same trend in each group (16.1, 10.4, and 9.8 months, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The survival was extended in the patients receiving surgical resection of brain and lung lesions followed by EGFR-TKIs treatment, and surgery combined with EGFR-TKIs could be a recommended treatment for EGFR mutated NSCLC patients with solitary BM.

Treatment of Stage IIIA Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Concise Review for the Practicing Oncologist

Stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer occurs in a heterogenous group of patients for whom the best treatment is multimodality therapy with chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery in a select group of individuals. This clinical review intends to answer the most common questions that clinicians face in the decision about the best management in this group.

Follow-up results of brain metastasis patients undergoing repeat Gamma Knife radiosurgery

OBJECTIVE

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) without upfront whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) has influenced recent treatment recommendations for brain metastasis patients. However, in brain metastasis patients who undergo SRS alone, new brain metastases inevitably appear with relatively high incidences during post-SRS follow-up. However, little is known about the second SRS results. The treatment results of second SRS were retrospectively reviewed, mainly for newly developed or, uncommonly, for recurrent brain metastases in order to reappraise the efficacy of this treatment strategy with a special focus on the maintenance of neurological status and safety.

METHODS

This was an institutional review board–approved, retrospective cohort study that used a prospectively accumulated database, including 3102 consecutive patients with brain metastases who underwent SRS between July 1998 and June 2015. Among these 3102 patients, 859 (376 female patients; median age 64 years; range 21–88 years) who underwent a second SRS without WBRT were studied with a focus on overall survival, neurological death, neurological deterioration, local recurrence, salvage SRS, and SRS-induced complications after the second SRS. Before the second SRS, the authors also investigated the clinical factors and radiosurgical parameters likely to influence these clinical outcomes. For the statistical analysis, the standard Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine post–second SRS survival and neurological death. A competing risk analysis was applied to estimate post–second SRS cumulative incidences of local recurrence, neurological deterioration, salvage SRS, and SRS-induced complications.

RESULTS

The post–second SRS median survival time was 7.4 months (95% CI 7.0–8.2 months). The actuarial survival rates were 58.2% and 34.7% at 6 and 12 months after the second SRS, respectively. Among 789 deceased patients, the causes of death could not be determined in 24 patients, but were confirmed in the remaining 765 patients to be nonbrain diseases in 654 (85.5%) patients and brain diseases in 111 (14.5%) patients. The actuarial neurological death–free survival rates were 94.4% and 86.6% at 6 and 12 months following the second SRS. Multivariable analysis revealed female sex, Karnofsky Performance Scale score of 80% or greater, better modified recursive partitioning analysis class, smaller tumor numbers, and higher peripheral dose to be significant predictive factors for longer survival. The cumulative incidences of local recurrence were 11.2% and 14.9% at 12 and 24 months after the second SRS. The crude incidence of neurological deterioration was 7.1%, and the respective cumulative incidences were 4.5%, 5.8%, 6.7%, 7.2%, and 7.5% at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months after the second SRS. SRS-induced complications occurred in 25 patients (2.9%) after a median post–second SRS period of 16.8 months (range 0.6–95.0 months; interquartile range 5.6–29.3 months). The cumulative incidences of complications were 1.4%, 2.0%, 2.4%, 3.0%, and 3.0% at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months after the second SRS, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Carefully selected patients with recurrent tumors—either new or locally recurrent—are favorable candidates for a second SRS, particularly in terms of neurological status maintenance and the safety of this treatment strategy.

A case-matched study of stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with brain metastases: comparing treatment results for those with versus without neurological symptoms

We aimed to reappraise whether post-stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) results for brain metastases differ between patients with and without neurological symptoms. This was an institutional review board-approved, retrospective cohort study using our prospectively accumulated database including 2825 consecutive BM patients undergoing gamma knife SRS alone during the 15-year period since July 1998. The 2825 patients were divided into two groups; neurologically asymptomatic [group A, 1374 patients (48.6 %)] and neurologically symptomatic [group B, 1451 (51.4 %)]. Because there was considerable bias in pre-SRS clinical factors between groups A and B, a case-matched study was conducted. Ultimately, 1644 patients (822 in each group) were selected. The standard Kaplan–Meier method was used to determine post-SRS survival. Competing risk analysis was applied to estimate cumulative incidences of neurological death, neurological deterioration, local recurrence, re-SRS for new lesions and SRS-induced complications. Post-SRS median survival times (MSTs) did not differ between the two groups; 7.8 months in group A versus 7.4 months in group B patients (HR 1.064, 95 % CI 0.963–1.177, p = 0.22). However, cumulative incidences of neurological death (HR 1.637, 95 % CI 1.174–2.281, p = 0.0036) and neurological deterioration (HR 1.425, 95 % CI 1.073–1.894, p = 0.014) were significantly lower in the group A than in the group B patients. Neurologically asymptomatic patients undergoing SRS for BM had better results than symptomatic patients in terms of both maintenance of good neurological state and prolonged neurological survival. Thus, we conclude that screening computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging is highly beneficial for managing cancer patients.

Cerebral staging of lung cancer: is one single contrast-enhanced T1-weighted three-dimensional gradient-echo sequence sufficient?

INTRODUCTION

Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold standard for cerebral staging in thoracic oncology. We hypothesize that a minimalist examination, consisting of a single contrast-enhanced T1-weighted three-dimensional gradient-echo sequence (CE 3D-GRE), would be sufficient for the cerebral staging of nonsymptomatic lung cancer patients.

METHODS

Seventy nonsymptomatic patients (50 % men; 62 years ± 10.2) referred for cerebral staging of a lung cancer were retrospectively included. All underwent a standard 3 T MRI examination with T1, FLAIR, T2* GRE, diffusion, and CE 3D-GRE sequences, for a total examination time of 20 min. The sole CE 3D-GRE (acquisition time: 6 min) was extracted and blindly interpreted by two radiologists in search of brain metastases. Hemorrhagic features of potential lesions and relevant incidental findings were also noted. Discrepant cases were reviewed by a third reader. The full MRI examination and follow-up studies were used as a reference to calculate sensitivity and specificity of the sole CE 3D-GRE.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight point six percent (27 out of 70) of the patients had brain metastases. Performances and reader's agreement with the sole CE 3D-GRE sequence were excellent for the diagnosis of brain metastases (sensitivity=96.3 %, specificity=100 %, κ=0.91) and incidental findings (sensitivity=85.7 %, specificity=100 %, κ=0.62) but insufficient for the identification of hemorrhages within the metastases (sensitivity=33.3 %, specificity=85.7 %, κ=0.47).

CONCLUSIONS

In the specific case of lung cancer, cerebral staging in nonsymptomatic patients can be efficiently achieved with a minimalistic protocol consisting of a single CE 3D-GRE sequence, completed if positive with a T2* sequence for hemorrhagic assessment, thus halving appointment delays.

Methods for staging non-small cell lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines

BACKGROUND

Correctly staging lung cancer is important because the treatment options and prognosis differ significantly by stage. Several noninvasive imaging studies and invasive tests are available. Understanding the accuracy, advantages, and disadvantages of the available methods for staging non-small cell lung cancer is critical to decision-making.

METHODS

Test accuracies for the available staging studies were updated from the second iteration of the American College of Chest Physicians Lung Cancer Guidelines. Systematic searches of the MEDLINE database were performed up to June 2012 with the inclusion of selected meta-analyses, practice guidelines, and reviews. Study designs and results are summarized in evidence tables.

RESULTS

The sensitivity and specificity of CT scanning for identifying mediastinal lymph node metastasis were approximately 55% and 81%, respectively, confirming that CT scanning has limited ability either to rule in or exclude mediastinal metastasis. For PET scanning, estimates of sensitivity and specificity for identifying mediastinal metastasis were approximately 77% and 86%, respectively. These findings demonstrate that PET scanning is more accurate than CT scanning, but tissue biopsy is still required to confirm PET scan findings. The needle techniques endobronchial ultrasound-needle aspiration, endoscopic ultrasound-needle aspiration, and combined endobronchial ultrasound/endoscopic ultrasound-needle aspiration have sensitivities of approximately 89%, 89%, and 91%, respectively. In direct comparison with surgical staging, needle techniques have emerged as the best first diagnostic tools to obtain tissue. Based on randomized controlled trials, PET or PET-CT scanning is recommended for staging and to detect unsuspected metastatic disease and avoid noncurative resections.

CONCLUSIONS

Since the last iteration of the staging guidelines, PET scanning has assumed a more prominent role both in its use prior to surgery and when evaluating for metastatic disease. Minimally invasive needle techniques to stage the mediastinum have become increasingly accepted and are the tests of first choice to confirm mediastinal disease in accessible lymph node stations. If negative, these needle techniques should be followed by surgical biopsy. All abnormal scans should be confirmed by tissue biopsy (by whatever method is available) to ensure accurate staging. Evidence suggests that more complete staging improves patient outcomes.

Prediction of acute toxicity grade ≥ 3 in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving intensity modulated radiotherapy and concurrent low-dose Cisplatin

BACKGROUND

Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is increasingly used with concurrent chemotherapy but toxicity data are not well investigated. We correlated clinical and dosimetric parameters with acute toxicity grade ≥ 3 in patients with locally advanced NSCLC treated with IMRT and concurrent low-dose cisplatin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed age, PS, comorbidities, gross tumor volume, and the volume of the esophagus irradiated with 50 Gy (V50oes) in relation with acute toxicity. The mean lung dose (MLD) and pulmonary toxicity was described. Treatment consisted of 24 × 2, 75 Gy, and daily cisplatin 6 mg/m². Patients with an MLD ≥ 20 Gy or a PS > 2 were excluded from CCRT. Toxicity was prospectively scored using the Common Toxicity Criteria for adverse events version 3.0. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was applied for scoring comorbidities. Multivariable logistic regressions for toxicity and survival estimates (Kaplan-Meier) were used for evaluation.

RESULTS

From 2008 to 2011, 188 patients received standard CCRT. In 35% of the patients, acute toxicity grade ≥ 3 was reported. Grade 5 toxicity was scored in 1% of the patients. V50oes (odds ratio [OR], 1.33 per 10% increase; P = .01) and PS ≥ 2 (OR, 3.45; P = .07) were significantly correlated with acute toxicity ≥ grade 3. No differences in toxicity were observed between age groups (< 70 and ≥ 70; P = .26), and those with a CCI score < 5 and ≥ 5, and acute severe toxicity (P = .36). Grade ≥ 3 pulmonary toxicity was seen in 7%. The 1- and 2-year overall survival in stage III disease were 78% and 52%, respectively. Patients with a poor PS or a high CCI score had similar survival outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent low-dose cisplatin using IMRT is effective in a large cohort of consecutive patients with NSCLC and life threatening toxicity is rare (1%). PS ≥ 2 and V50oes are correlated with acute toxicity grade ≥ 3.

Incidence of symptomatic brain metastasis following radical radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: is there a role for prophylactic cranial irradiation?

OBJECTIVE

Brain metastases following radical radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are a recognised phenomenon; however, the incidence of symptomatic brain metastasis is currently unknown. The aim of the study was to identify the number of patients, staged in accordance with National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidance, who developed symptomatic brain metastasis following radical radiotherapy. There are two aims: to evaluate NICE guidance; and to provide vital information on the likely benefit of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in reducing neurological symptoms from brain metastasis.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 455 patients with NSCLC who had undergone radical radiotherapy in 2009 and 2010 was performed. Computer-based systems were used to identify patient and tumour demographics, the staging procedures performed and whether brain imaging had identified brain metastasis in the follow-up period.

RESULTS

The total number of patients with brain metastasis within 6 months was 3.7%. The proportion of brain metastasis within 6 months in Stage I, II and III NSCLC throughout both years was 2.8%, 1.0% and 5.7%, respectively. Within the follow-up period (median 16 months, range 6-30 months), the total number of patients who developed symptomatic brain metastasis was 7.9%.

CONCLUSION

Patients staged in accordance with NICE guidance, of whom only 7.7% underwent brain staging, have a minimal incidence of brain metastasis following radical radiotherapy. The number of patients developing symptoms from brain metastasis following radical radiotherapy may be less than the morbidity caused by PCI.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This finding supports the NICE guidance and brings into question the potential benefit of PCI.

[Clinical symptoms and symptomatic management of brain metastases]

Cancer patients frequently develop brain metastases. Symptomatic treatments are important to stabilize these patients before an oncological procedure (usually radiotherapy, sometimes surgery or chemotherapy) can be started. These symptomatic treatments mainly rely on steroids to reduce the peritumoral edema; anti-epileptic drugs for patients who previously had seizures, and low-molecular-weight heparin for patients at risk of thrombo-embolic events.

[Management of brain metastases from non-small cell lung carcinoma]

INTRODUCTION

In France, approximately 30,000 new patients per year develop brain metastases (BM), most of them resulting from a lung cancer.

STATE OF THE ART

Surgery and radiosurgery of all the BM must be considered when possible. In other cases, whole brain radiotherapy remains the standard of care.

PERSPECTIVES

The role of chemotherapy, poorly investigated so far, should be revisited.

CONCLUSION

This review focused on BM secondary to a non-small cell lung carcinoma.

Outcomes associated with brain metastases in a three-arm phase III trial of gemcitabine-containing regimens versus paclitaxel plus carboplatin for advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases (BMs) are a common complication of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Because of historical data indicating a poor prognosis for patients with BM, few randomized phase III studies of advanced NSCLC have included patients with BM at presentation. Because the potential benefits of systemic therapy in patients with BM are uncertain, we analyzed data from a recent phase III study.

METHODS

One thousand one hundred thirty-five chemonaïve patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC were randomized to receive gemcitabine/carboplatin, gemcitabine/paclitaxel, or paclitaxel/carboplatin. Stratification was based on presence or absence of BM, stage, and baseline weight loss. Patients with BM were required to be clinically stable after treatment with radiotherapy or surgery before entry. Results were retrospectively analyzed by presence or absence of BM at study entry.

RESULTS

Rate of BM was 17.1% overall. The response rate was 28.9% for patients with BM (n = 194) versus 29.1% without BM (n = 941). Time to progression was 4.3 months with BM and 4.6 months without BM (p = 0.03). Median survival was 7.7 months (95% confidence interval: 6.7-9.3) among patients with BM (n = 194) and 8.6 months (95% confidence interval: 7.9-9.5) for patients without BM (n = 941), p = 0.09. Rates of hematologic adverse events were not different among patients with and without BM.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no significant differences in response, survival, or hematologic toxicity for patients with or without BM; however, patients with BM had a small but significantly shorter time to progression. Nonprogressing patients with treated BM are appropriate candidates for systemic therapy and entry into clinical trials.

A diagnostic model to detect silent brain metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

We aimed to discriminate subgroups according to the risk of brain metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) lacking neurological symptoms. We performed a retrospective review of 433 patients with NSCLC who underwent chest computed tomography (CT), brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and bone scans at an initial staging work-up between April 2003 and April 2007. Brain metastases were determined by MRI. Patients were stratified into groups according to the number of risk factors (0-3) identified by multivariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, histopathology with non-squamous cell carcinoma, nodal stage 2 on CT and presence of bone metastases were three risk factors for brain metastases. Patients were divided into four groups according to the number (0-3) of these predictive factors. The proportions of patients with brain metastases in the four groups were 2%, 3%, 17% and 35%, respectively, and these differences were significant (P<0.001). When analysis was performed in patients with localised disease, the number of risk factors was correlated with the prevalence of brain metastases (P=0.013) but stage was not (P=0.153). Although this diagnostic model should be validated through further studies, our data suggest that the number of risk factors might be a useful tool to identify silent brain metastases in patients with NSCLC.

Non-small cell lung cancer and silent brain metastasis. Survival and prognostic factors

The detection of silent brain metastasis is becoming increasingly common in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical course, prognostic significance, and treatment efficacy in patients with asymptomatic brain metastasis. A retrospective study of patients with cytologically and histologically diagnosed NSCLC and brain metastasis detected by cranial computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging was performed. We compared 12 neurologically asymptomatic patients to 69 symptomatic patients and analyzed overall survival, clinical course, and prognostic factors (age, sex, performance status, histologic type, TNM stage, number and size of brain metastases, clinical neurologic status, and treatment of primary tumor and brain metastasis). The strongest favorable prognostic factor was active treatment of both the primary tumor (surgery, chemotherapy and/or thoracic radiotherapy) and brain metastasis (neurosurgery and/or whole brain radiotherapy). Neurologically asymptomatic patients had significantly longer survival times than did symptomatic patients (median survival of 7.5 and 4 months, respectively). Control of clinical neurologic status during follow-up was achieved in a greater proportion of asymptomatic patients (80%) than symptomatic patients (40%). We conclude that it is important to detect brain metastasis in patients with NSCLC before neurologic signs or symptoms develop, as early detection improves prognosis and provides patients with the opportunity of receiving timely and more effective treatment.

Noninvasive staging of non-small cell lung cancer: ACCP evidenced-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition)

BACKGROUND

Correctly staging lung cancer is important because the treatment options and the prognosis differ significantly by stage. Several noninvasive imaging studies including chest CT scanning and positron emission tomography (PET) scanning are available. Understanding the test characteristics of these noninvasive staging studies is critical to decision making.

METHODS

Test characteristics for the noninvasive staging studies were updated from the first iteration of the lung cancer guidelines using systematic searches of the MEDLINE, HealthStar, and Cochrane Library databases up to May 2006, including selected metaanalyses, practice guidelines, and reviews. Study designs and results are summarized in evidence tables.

RESULTS

The pooled sensitivity and specificity of CT scanning for identifying mediastinal lymph node metastasis were 51% (95% confidence interval [CI], 47 to 54%) and 85% (95% CI, 84 to 88%), respectively, confirming that CT scanning has limited ability either to rule in or exclude mediastinal metastasis. For PET scanning, the pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity for identifying mediastinal metastasis were 74% (95% CI, 69 to 79%) and 85% (95% CI, 82 to 88%), respectively. These findings demonstrate that PET scanning is more accurate than CT scanning. If the clinical evaluation in search of metastatic disease is negative, the likelihood of finding metastasis is low.

CONCLUSIONS

CT scanning of the chest is useful in providing anatomic detail, but the accuracy of chest CT scanning in differentiating benign from malignant lymph nodes in the mediastinum is poor. PET scanning has much better sensitivity and specificity than chest CT scanning for staging lung cancer in the mediastinum, and distant metastatic disease can be detected by PET scanning. With either test, abnormal findings must be confirmed by tissue biopsy to ensure accurate staging.