Clinical characteristics associated with antihistone antibodies in patients with localized scleroderma

The Serological Evidence of Positive Rheumatoid Factor in Morphea Patients and Its Relation to Disease Severity

Background and objective Morphea, or localized scleroderma (LS), is an autoimmune skin disorder characterized by inflammation and sclerosis. Its potential causes include infections, genetic predisposition, and trauma. The disease involves cycles of inflammation and fibrosis, leading to skin hardening and scarring, which can cause deformities if untreated. Research exploring the link between morphea and rheumatoid factor (RF), a marker associated with other autoimmune conditions, is ongoing. This study aimed to examine the less-explored role of RF, a marker typically linked to rheumatoid arthritis (RA), in the severity of morphea. It focused on assessing the levels of RF among morphea patients and its correlation with disease severity, intending to provide deeper insights into the condition and its management. Methods This study involved a simple randomized cross-sectional analysis to evaluate the role of the RF in measuring morphea severity among patients at the Dermatology and Venereology Department of Al-Sader Teaching Hospital from October 2022 to December 2023. We included participants with clinically and laboratory-confirmed morphea while excluding those with other autoimmune dermatological diseases, recent systemic steroid or immunosuppressive therapy, and pregnant women. The assessment of disease severity was done by utilizing the Localized Scleroderma Cutaneous Assessment Tool (LoSCAT). Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics version 27 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY), with a significance threshold of p<0.05. Results Elevated RF levels were significantly associated with increased morphea severity, with severe cases showing higher RF levels (mean: 30.34 U/mL) compared to moderate (25.83 U/mL) and mild cases (21.56 U/mL) (p = 0.028). However, no significant correlation was found between RF levels and demographic factors such as age, gender, or occupation. Patients with high RF levels had a longer disease duration (mean: 57.15 years) compared to those with normal levels (25.83 years, p = 0.020). Significant differences were observed in lesion distribution on the back (p = 0.002). Logistic regression indicated that severe morphea patients were more likely to have elevated RF levels [odds ratio (OR): 1.158, p = 0.014]. Conclusions This study enriches our understanding of RF's role in morphea, revealing no significant correlation with demographic factors but suggesting its potential role in disease chronicity and severity.

A Comparison of Clinical, Demographic and Treatment Characteristics of Pediatric-Onset and Adult-Onset Patients Diagnosed With Localized Scleroderma

INTRODUCTION

Morphea localized scleroderma (LS) is a rare skin disease with unknown pathogenesis, which causes sclerosis of the dermis and subcutaneous tissue.

OBJECTIVES

It was aimed to compare the characteristics of patients with pediatric and adult-onset morphea.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on the records of 183 adult morphea patients. The demographics, clinical and laboratory characteristics, and treatment options of the patients were recorded. Adult patients with morphea over the age of 18 were divided into two groups according to the age of onset and compared.

RESULTS

Twenty-two percent (N = 41) of the patients had pediatric-onset morphea (POLS) and 77.6% (n=142) had adult-onset morphea (AOLS). While POLS had a higher head-neck involvement, AOLS had a higher breast involvement (P < 0.001 and P = 0.043). Patients with linear morphea were younger, and more frequently had at least one laboratory anomaly (P = 0.016 versus 0.024). Anti-dsDNA positivity and low hemoglobin (Hb) were observed more frequently in patients with breast involvement. Patients with inguinal involvement, on the other hand, had lower Hb and a higher rate of diabetes, and those patients were older (P = 0.042, 0.040, and 0.012, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical characteristics and accompanying laboratory anomalies of the patients with morphea depend on the age of onset, involvement areas and the types of morphea, having such data readily available should guide the holistic approach for, and the monitoring process of, the disease.

Development of minimum standards of care for juvenile localized scleroderma

Juvenile localized scleroderma (jLS), also known as morphea, is an orphan disease. Pediatric guidelines regarding diagnosis, assessment, and management are lacking.Our objective was to develop minimum standards of care for diagnosis, assessment, and management of jLS. A systematic review was undertaken to establish the pediatric evidence for assessment and monitoring of jLS. An expert panel, including members of the Pediatric Rheumatology European Society (PRES) Scleroderma Working Group, were invited to a consensus meeting where recommendations were developed based on evidence graded by the systematic review and, where evidence was lacking, consensus opinion. A nominal technique was used where 75% consensus was taken as agreement. Recommendations for diagnosis, assessment, and management were developed. Due to a lack of pediatric evidence, these were primarily consensus driven. Careful assessment for extra-cutaneous manifestations including synovitis, brain involvement, and uveitis were key features together with joint assessments between Dermatology and Rheumatology to improve and standardize care.

CONCLUSION

Management of jLS is varied. These recommendations should help provide standardization of assessment and care for those with this rare and potentially debilitating condition. What is Known: • Children with juvenile localized scleroderma (jLS) are managed by a number of specialties including pediatric rheumatologists and dermatologists, sometimes in shared clinics. Studies have shown that management varies considerably and that there are notable differences between specialties [1]. • There is very little published guidance on management of jLS. What is new: • These recommendations aim to standardize diagnosis, assessment, and management through review of pediatric evidence and consensus agreement. • Joint review of patients by both pediatric rheumatologists and dermatologists is recommended.

Diagnostic criteria, severity classification and guidelines of localized scleroderma

We established diagnostic criteria and severity classification of localized scleroderma because there is no established diagnostic criteria or widely accepted severity classification of the disease. Also, there has been no clinical guideline for localized scleroderma, so we established its clinical guideline ahead of all over the world. In particular, the clinical guideline was established by clinical questions based on evidence-based medicine according to the New Minds Clinical Practice Guideline Creation Manual (version 1.0). We aimed to make the guideline easy to use and reliable based on the newest evidence, and to present guidance as specific as possible for various clinical problems in treatment of localized scleroderma.

Detection of autoimmune antibodies in localized scleroderma by synthetic oligonucleotide antigens

In this study, we developed a series of synthetic oligonucleotides that allowed us to investigate the details on the antigen recognition by autoimmune antibodies in localized scleroderma subjects. Besides dramatically improved analytical specificity of the assay, our data suggests a potential linking for antibodies to DNA to the biological status of disease state in localized scleroderma. Moreover, introducing chemical modifications into short synthetic deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and ribonucleic acid (RNA) molecules completely changed the binding titers of corresponding antibodies and their clinical relevance. The strongest observed effect was registered for the localized scleroderma skin damage index (LoSDI) on the IgG antibodies to TC dinucleotide-rich double-stranded antigen (p < 0.001). In addition to providing valuable tools for diagnosis of clinically relevant biomarkers, we believe that this work opens up new opportunities for research on antibodies to nucleic acids in localized scleroderma and other autoimmune diseases.

Morphea and Eosinophilic Fasciitis: An Update

Morphea, also known as localized scleroderma, encompasses a group of idiopathic sclerotic skin diseases. The spectrum ranges from relatively mild phenotypes, which generally cause few problems besides local discomfort and visible disfigurement, to subtypes with severe complications such as joint contractures and limb length discrepancies. Eosinophilic fasciitis (EF, Shulman syndrome) is often regarded as belonging to the severe end of the morphea spectrum. The exact driving mechanisms behind morphea and EF pathogenesis remain to be elucidated. However, extensive extracellular matrix formation and autoimmune dysfunction are thought to be key pathogenic processes. Likewise, these processes are considered essential in systemic sclerosis (SSc) pathogenesis. In addition, similarities in clinical presentation between morphea and SSc have led to many theories about their relatedness. Importantly, morphea may be differentiated from SSc based on absence of sclerodactyly, Raynaud’s phenomenon, and nailfold capillary changes. The diagnosis of morphea is often based on characteristic clinical findings. Histopathological evaluation of skin biopsies and laboratory tests are not necessary in the majority of morphea cases. However, full-thickness skin biopsies, containing fascia and muscle tissue, are required for the diagnosis of EF. Monitoring of disease activity and damage, especially of subcutaneous involvement, is one of the most challenging aspects of morphea care. Therefore, data harmonization is crucial for optimizing standard care and for comparability of study results. Recently, the localized scleroderma cutaneous assessment tool (LoSCAT) has been developed and validated for morphea. The LoSCAT is currently the most widely reported outcome measure for morphea. Care providers should take disease subtype, degree of activity, depth of involvement, and quality-of-life impairments into account when initiating treatment. In most patients with circumscribed superficial subtypes, treatment with topical therapies suffices. In more widespread disease, UVA1 phototherapy or systemic treatment with methotrexate (MTX), with or without a systemic corticosteroid combination, should be initiated. Disappointingly, few alternatives for MTX have been described and additional research is still needed to optimize treatment for these debilitating conditions. In this review, we present a state-of-the-art flow chart that guides care providers in the treatment of morphea and EF.

Linear scleroderma with prominent multiple lymphadenopathy followed by the development of polymyositis: A case report and review of published work

Localized scleroderma is an inflammatory disorder affecting the skin and underlying tissues, a certain subset of which develops other autoimmune diseases on the basis of a prominent autoimmune background. We here report a unique case of linear scleroderma presenting with a sclerotic plaque on the left thigh, multiple lymphadenopathy in bilateral inguinal and para-aortic lymph nodes, and hepatosplenomegaly, who later developed polymyositis. We describe the detailed disease course of our case and discuss the clinical significance of multiple lymphadenopathy in localized scleroderma based on a review of published work.

Localized scleroderma: a review

Localized scleroderma (LoS) comprises a heterogeneous spectrum of fibrotic diseases that primarily affect the skin with inflammation and skin thickening. The extent of skin involvement and manifestation at extra-cutaneous structures characterizes the specific subset. Fat tissue, fascia, and sometimes muscle, and bones might be involved, and in rare cases the central nervous or ocular system.

A worldwide accepted classification system for LoS is still lacking. The latest guidelines have proposed a distinction of limited, generalized, linear, deep, and mixed types. The exact pathophysiology of LoS is not fully understood yet, but it is thought that an externally triggered release of pro-inflammatory cytokines leads to a dysregulation of the connective tissue metabolism.

LoS is diagnosed according to typical clinical features. Further diagnostic procedures are helpful to characterize the subtype and to define the extent of inflammation and fibrosis.

Due to the heterogeneity of LoS, therapeutic strategies should always be selected depending on the respective subtype. The stage of tissue inflammation and sclerosis has to be considered. Treatment options such as topical corticosteroids, calcipotriol, and calcineurin inhibitors as well as phototherapy are well established. In subsets with severe wide-spread skin manifestation and/or extra-cutaneous involvement, methotrexate monotherapy or a combination of methotrexate and systemic corticosteroids need to be considered. Physical treatment should always be added to the topical and systemic treatment to prevent significant disabilities due to LoS. This article provides an updated review on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical classification and treatment options for patients suffering from LoS.

Localized scleroderma: clinical spectrum and therapeutic update

Scleroderma is a rare connective tissue disease that is manifested by cutaneous sclerosis and variable systemic involvement. Two categories of scleroderma are known: systemic sclerosis, characterized by cutaneous sclerosis and visceral involvement, and localized scleroderma or morphea which classically presents benign and self-limited evolution and is confined to the skin and/or underlying tissues. Localized scleroderma is a rare disease of unknown etiology. Recent studies show that the localized form may affect internal organs and have variable morbidity. Treatment should be started very early, before complications occur due to the high morbidity of localized scleroderma. In this review, we report the most important aspects and particularities in the treatment of patients diagnosed with localized scleroderma.

Clinical and laboratory features of systemic sclerosis complicated with localized scleroderma

Localized scleroderma (LSc) primarily affects skin, whereas systemic sclerosis (SSc) affects skin and various internal organs. LSc and SSc are considered to be basically different diseases, and there is no transition between them. However, LSc and SSc have several common characteristics, including endothelial cell dysfunction, immune activation, and excess fibrosis of the skin, and there exist several SSc cases complicated with LSc during the course of SSc. Clinical and laboratory characteristics of SSc patients with LSc remain unclear. We investigated the clinical and laboratory features of 8 SSc patients with LSc among 220 SSc patients (3.6%). The types of LSc included plaque (5/8), guttate (2/8), and linear type (1/8). All cases were diagnosed as having SSc within 5 years before or after the appearance of LSc. In three cases of SSc with LSc (37.5%), LSc skin lesions preceded clinical symptoms of SSc. Young age, negative antinuclear antibody, and positive anti-RNA polymerase III antibody were significantly prevalent in SSc patients with LSc. The positivity of anticentromere antibody tended to be prevalent in SSc patients without LSc. No significant difference in the frequency of complications, such as interstitial lung disease, reflux esophagitis, and pulmonary artery hypertension, was observed. The awareness of these characteristic of SSc with LSc are essential to establish an early diagnosis and treatment.

Morphea in adults and children cohort III: nested case-control study--the clinical significance of autoantibodies in morphea

IMPORTANCE

Small studies have implicated the association of specific autoantibodies with morphea subtype or severity, but no large-scale studies have been conducted. This prospective case-control study confirmed the presence of antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) and other autoantibodies in morphea but found they are of limited significance.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of ANAs, extractable nuclear antigens such as antihistone antibodies (AHAs), and anti-single-stranded DNA antibodies (ssDNA abs) in patients with morphea vs a healthy control population and their association with clinical measures of morphea severity.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Nested case-control study, conducted at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, and University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston. Study participants included individuals enrolled in the Morphea in Adults and Children (MAC) cohort and Scleroderma Family Registry and DNA Repository.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Prevalence of ANAs, AHAs, ssDNA abs in patients with morphea vs matched controls and association of the presence of autoantibodies with clinical indicators of morphea severity.

RESULTS

The prevalence of ANAs, AHAs, and ssDNA abs in patients with morphea was 34%, 12%, and 8%, respectively. Antinuclear antibodies and AHAs, but not ssDNA abs, were present more frequently in cases than in controls. There was no difference in ANA prevalence among morphea subtypes. Among patients with linear morphea, the presence of autoantibodies was associated with clinical indicators of severe morphea including functional limitation (ssDNA ab, P = .005; and AHA, P = .006), extensive body surface area involvement (ssDNA ab, P = .01; and ANA, P = .005), and higher skin scores (ANA, P = .004). The presence of autoantibodies was not associated with clinical measures of morphea activity.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Our results demonstrate that ANAs and AHAs are more prevalent among patients with morphea but are of limited clinical utility except in linear morphea, where their presence, although infrequent, is associated with greater lesion burden and functional impairment.

Update on the classification and treatment of localized scleroderma

Morphea or localized scleroderma is a distinctive inflammatory disease that leads to sclerosis of the skin and subcutaneous tissues. It comprises a number of subtypes differentiated according to their clinical presentation and the structure of the skin and underlying tissues involved in the fibrotic process. However, classification is difficult because the boundaries between the different types of morphea are blurred and different entities frequently overlap. The main subtypes are plaque morphea, linear scleroderma, generalized morphea, and pansclerotic morphea. With certain exceptions, the disorder does not have serious systemic repercussions, but it can cause considerable morbidity. In the case of lesions affecting the head, neurological and ocular complications may occur. There is no really effective and universal treatment so it is important to make a correct assessment of the extent and severity of the disease before deciding on a treatment approach.

Pediatric scleroderma: systemic or localized forms

Pediatric scleroderma includes 2 major groups of clinical entities, systemic sclerosis (SSc) and localized scleroderma (LS). Although both share a common pathophysiology, their clinical manifestations differ. LS is typically confined to the skin and underlying subcutis, with up to a quarter of patients showing extracutaneous disease manifestations such as arthritis and uveitis. Vascular, cutaneous, gastrointestinal, pulmonary, and musculoskeletal involvement are most commonly seen in children with SSc. Treatment of both forms targets the active inflammatory stage and halts disease progression; however, progress needs to be made toward the development of more effective antifibrotic therapy to help reverse disease damage.

Cytokine profiles in localized scleroderma and relationship to clinical features

Localized scleroderma (LS) is a disfiguring autoimmune disease of the skin and underlying tissue that mainly affects the pediatric population. Inflammation of the tissue leads to fibrosis and atrophy, causing physical and psychological disability that can continue throughout childhood into adulthood. Available therapies for LS have had variable effects and are associated with morbidity themselves. A better understanding of the pathophysiology of LS, especially during the active inflammatory phase, would lead to more directed and efficacious therapies. As in systemic sclerosis (SSc), the other form of scleroderma, T-helper (Th) cells and their associated cytokines have been suggested to contribute significantly to the pathophysiology of LS supported by the presence of cytokines from these lineages in the sera and tissue of LS patients. It is postulated that the imbalance between Th1/Th2/Th17 cell subsets drives inflammation in the early stages of disease (Th1 and Th17 predominant) and fibrosis in the later stages of scleroderma (Th2 predominant). We review the available experimental data regarding cytokines in LS and compare them to available clinical disease severity and activity features. This provides the platform to launch further investigations into the role of select cytokines in the pathogenesis of LS and to provide directed therapeutic options in the future.

Case of localized scleroderma successfully treated with bath psoralen and ultraviolet A therapy

The patient was a 12-year-old girl with linear scleroderma distributed on the right abdomen, dorsal aspect of the right thigh, lower leg and foot. The initial regimen of oral prednisolone and methotrexate, or i.v. methylprednisolone failed in the treatment of the scleroderma. Then bath psoralen and ultraviolet A therapy (bath-PUVA) therapy of 0.2 J-4.0 J/cm(2) daily to total doses 62.8 J/cm(2) combined with oral prednisolone was started. After bath-PUVA therapy, regression of the skin sclerosis was observed, the possible mobile range of the right ankle was increased and histological examination confirmed improvement of the sclerosis. The successful results of bath-PUVA therapy in this case suggest its utility for localized scleroderma.

Localized scleroderma and systemic sclerosis: is there a connection?

Excess fibrosis of the skin is a clinical hallmark of both localized scleroderma and systemic sclerosis. Localized scleroderma is generally thought to be a skin-limited disease whereas systemic sclerosis can have a wide range of internal organ involvement. Recent data suggest that a subset of patients with juvenile localized scleroderma can go on to develop systemic involvement of their disease. This raises the question of what the connection is, if any, between localized scleroderma and systemic sclerosis.

Antigen specificity of antihistone antibodies in connective tissue disease patients with anti-U1RNP antibodies

To determine the prevalence of antibodies to individual histone components in collagen disease patients with anti-U1RNP antibodies. Serum samples were examined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Patients with mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD) and systemic sclerosis (SSc) showed similar levels and patterns of antihistone antibody (AHA) reactivities to individual histones: IgG responses to H2B or H3 and IgM responses to H2B were highest. However, both IgG and IgM AHAs against outer portion of chromatin (H1, H2A, or H2B) were generally higher in SLE compared with other diseases. SLE or SSc patients with anti-U1RNP antibodies showed generally higher AHA levels than in those without them. Thus, the pattern of reactivities to each histone component was dependent on the disease, while the intensity was dependent on both the disease and anti-U1RNP antibodies. The antigenic stimulus in SLE may be different from other connective tissue diseases and is more likely to be native chromatin.

Deep Morphea

Deep morphea encompasses a variety of clinical entities in which inflammation and sclerosis are found in the deep dermis, panniculus, fascia, or superficial muscle. Morphea profunda, eosinophilic fasciitis, and disabling pansclerotic morphea of children are included in this group, but overlapping of the extent and depth of cutaneous involvement in these various conditions precludes their distinction on the sole basis of clinical or even histologic examination. Furthermore, the limits between morphea profunda and generalized morphea, which usually are classified outside this group, are not clear. Histologically, all these disorders show similar inflammatory and sclerotic findings, the primary difference being the depth of these changes. Associated clinical findings, including arthralgias, arthritis, contractures, or carpal tunnel syndrome, are frequent. Although visceral complications are uncommon, pulmonary, esophageal, and even cardiac abnormalities have been reported. Eosinophilia, hypergammaglobulinemia, and increased erythrocyte sedimentation rate may be present with disease activity. Laboratory studies may demonstrate autoantibody production. Treatment is nonstandardized but UVA irradiation and antiinflammatory or immunosuppressive drugs (mainly antimalarial agents and corticosteroids) may be beneficial.

Elevated serum BAFF levels in patients with localized scleroderma in contrast to other organ-specific autoimmune diseases

Serum levels of B-cell activating factor belonging to the tumor necrosis factor family (BAFF), a potent B-cell survival factor, are elevated in patients with systemic autoimmune diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis and systemic sclerosis (SSc). The objective of this study was to determine serum BAFF levels and relate the results to the clinical features in patients with organ-specific autoimmune diseases of the skin, such as localized scleroderma and autoimmune bullous diseases. Serum BAFF levels were examined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 44 patients with localized scleroderma, 20 with pemphigus vulgaris/pemphigus foliaceus, 20 with bullous pemphigoid and 30 healthy controls. Twenty patients with SSc and 20 with SLE were also examined as disease controls. Serum BAFF levels were elevated in localized scleroderma patients compared with healthy controls. Concerning localized scleroderma subgroups, patients with generalized morphea, the severest form of localized scleroderma, had higher serum BAFF levels than linear scleroderma or morphea patients. The BAFF levels of generalized morphea were comparable with those of SSc or SLE. Furthermore, serum BAFF levels correlated positively with antihistone antibody levels and the severity of skin lesion as well as the number of skin lesions. By contrast, serum BAFF levels were not significantly elevated in patients with pemphigus or pemphigoid. These results suggest that BAFF may be contributing to autoimmunity and disease development in localized scleroderma.

Antihistone antibodies in linear scleroderma variants

BACKGROUND

Linear scleroderma occurs as two clinically distinct variants: the frontoparietal en coup de sabre type, and the torso-extremity type. Antihistone antibodies (AHAs), which traditionally are markers for drug-induced lupus, may also be linked to linear scleroderma.

METHODS

Retrospective review of all patients presenting with linear scleroderma who had AHA titers measured.

RESULTS

A total of 35 patients were identified. Twenty patients with linear scleroderma of the torso and/or extremities comprised 14 pediatric patients (<or=18 years old; positive AHA, 10/14=71%; positive ANA, 3/13=23%) and six adults (four positive AHA; five positive ANA). Among the 15 patients with frontoparietal linear scleroderma, en coup de sabre type, 11 were pediatric patients (positive AHA, 5/11=45%; positive ANA, 4/11=36%) and four were adults (1 positive AHA/ANA).

CONCLUSION

The two clinical variants of linear scleroderma are not only clinically distinct, but also may be serologically different. The AHA titers may be related to the extent of involvement as well as disease activity in linear scleroderma.

Involvement of alphavbeta5 integrin in the establishment of autocrine TGF-beta signaling in dermal fibroblasts derived from localized scleroderma

Localized scleroderma (LSc) is a connective tissue disorder limited to skin and subcutaneous tissue, which may share pathogenic processes with systemic sclerosis (SSc). We previously demonstrated that upregulated expression of integrin alphavbeta5 might contribute to autocrine TGF-beta signaling in SSc fibroblasts. Based on these data, we presently focused on alphavbeta5 and assessed its involvement in pathogenesis of LSc. We initially demonstrated that LSc fibroblasts might be activated by the stimulation of autocrine TGF-beta. Consistent with SSc fibroblasts, expression levels of alphavbeta5 were elevated in LSc fibroblasts in vitro and in vivo. Anti-alphavbeta5 antibody partially reversed expression levels of type I procollagen and MMP-1 and constitutive DNA-Smad3 binding in LSc fibroblasts. In LSc fibroblasts pretreated with antisense TGF-beta1, exogenous latent TGF-beta1 stimulation increased expression of type I procollagen in an alphavbeta5-dependent manner. The luciferase activities of TMLC cells, Mv1Lu cells stably expressing a portion of the plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 promoter, co-cultured with LSc fibroblasts were significantly elevated compared with those co-cultured with normal fibroblasts and were significantly reduced in the presence of anti-alphavbeta5 antibody. Anti-alphavbeta5 antibody reversed the myofibroblastic features of LSc fibroblasts. These results indicate that upregulated expression of alphavbeta5 contributes to autocrine TGF-beta signaling in LSc fibroblasts.

Antinucleosome antibody is a major autoantibody in localized scleroderma

BACKGROUND

Localized scleroderma (LSc) exhibits autoimmunity, and antihistone antibody is frequently detected. The major antigens recognized by antihistone antibody are histones H1, H2A and H2B, which are located on the outer side of the nucleosome and are relatively more accessible for antibody binding. Therefore, it has been hypothesized that antihistone antibody is induced by nucleosome or native chromatin as immunogens in LSc.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether antinucleosome antibody is present in patients with LSc.

METHODS

Antinucleosome antibody, antihistone antibody and antidouble-stranded DNA (dsDNA) antibody were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results IgG or IgM antinucleosome antibody was detected more frequently in patients with LSc than was antihistone antibody: in 40 of 49 (82%) vs. 26 of 49 (53%), respectively. No patients had anti-dsDNA antibody. The prevalence of antinucleosome antibody positivity was comparable in the three subgroups of LSc (generalized morphoea, 89%; linear scleroderma, 71%; morphoea, 90%). Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) exhibited a similar frequency of antinucleosome antibody positivity (13 of 15, 87%), but their IgG levels of this autoantibody were much higher than those found in patients with LSc. By contrast, IgM antinucleosome antibody levels were normal in patients with SLE, while they were significantly increased in patients with LSc compared with normal controls. Antinucleosome antibody was also detected at lower frequency in patients with systemic sclerosis (five of 20, 25%) or dermatomyositis (five of 15, 33%). Nucleosome-restricted antibodies, i.e. antibodies that react with the whole nucleosome particle but not with its individual components (histones and dsDNA) were also present in 35% of patients with LSc.

CONCLUSIONS

Although antinucleosome antibody was not specific to LSc, its high prevalence in LSc indicates that antinucleosome antibody is a major autoantibody in this disease.

Novel Autoantibody to Cu/Zn Superoxide Dismutase in Patients with Localized Scleroderma

Abnormal production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) induces tissue damage and superoxide dismutase (SOD) that converts superoxide radicals to hydrogen peroxide functions as defense against ROS. Cu/Zn SOD administration has been shown to be effective for various fibrotic conditions by inhibiting the fibrogenic effects of ROS. We hypothesized that autoimmune background in localized scleroderma induced anti-Cu/Zn SOD autoantibodies that inhibited SOD activity and thereby contributed to fibrosis by increasing ROS. ELISA using human purified Cu/Zn SOD revealed that IgG or IgM anti-Cu/Zn SOD Ab was detected in the serum of 89% of localized scleroderma patients, especially 100% of patients with generalized morphea, the severest form of localized scleroderma, but was positive only in the serum of less than 15% of patients with other autoimmune disorders, including systemic sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, dermatomyositis, and autoimmune bullous disorders. The immunoblotting analysis confirmed the presence of IgG anti-Cu/Zn SOD Ab in sera from localized scleroderma patients. Remarkably, anti-Cu/Zn SOD autoantibody could inhibit Cu/Zn SOD enzymatic activity. Collectively, these results indicate that anti-Cu/Zn SOD Ab is a novel, major autoantibody in localized scleroderma, and also suggest that the autoantibody may play a role in the development of fibrosis by directly inhibiting SOD activity.

Scleroderma in children and adolescents

The scleroderma disorders remain challenging conditions in pediatric rheumatology to understand pathologically and indeed for which to provide care. It is clear that much progress is being made in the clinical approach to understanding this group of group of disorders. It seems likely that the different lesions of LS may represent unique immunopathogenic mechanisms or perhaps reflect unique genetic or other characteristics of the patients themselves. To take advantage of the revolution in therapies now occurring in rheumatology it is critical that controlled clinical trials are developed with appropriate agreed upon outcome measures for both localized and systemic disease.

Unilateral generalized morphea in childhood

We report a 6-year-old boy with unilateral generalized morphea distributing on the right side of his lower leg, trunk, and upper arm. A skin biopsy from the right thigh showed accumulation of thick collagen bundles extending from the middle dermis to the subcutaneous fat tissue. The levels of antinuclear antibodies, rheumatoid factor, and anti single-stranded DNA antibody were elevated. No severe deformity or functional disabilities were noted. With topical corticosteroid therapy, the sclerotic skin became gradually softer, and no progression of sclerosis has been noted for one year.

Localization of autoepitopes on the PCM-1 autoantigen using scleroderma sera with autoantibodies against the centrosome

Characterization of epitope domains of autoantigens is important for deducing the cellular functions of autoantigens and may be important for understanding the autoimmune response. In the reported studies, epitope analysis of the centrosome autoantigen PCM-1 was performed. For these investigations, portion of the PCM-1 cDNA were subcloned into the pMAL expression plasmid, fusion proteins were induced, and aliquots of the extracts were probed by immunoblot analysis using two human autoimmune anticentrosome autoantisera. Immunoblotting identified three individual autoepitopes of 26-40 amino acid residues, amino acids 506-545, 1434-1465, and 1661-1686, within the PCM-1 protein. ELISA assays using non-denatured proteins did not identity any additional autoepitopes in the remainder of the PCM-1 molecule. To analyze the identified autoepitopes further, synthetic peptides were generated that covered each of the three autoepitopes and the synthetic peptides then were probed using the scleroderma sera. Peptides that covered the antigenic regions from amino acids 506-545 and 1434-1465 failed to react with the anticentrosome autoantisera suggesting that overall protein conformation may be important for the formation of those two autoepitopes. Peptides derived from the sequence of the third autoepitope were recognized by autoantibodies present in the anticentrosome autoantisera allowing the identification of the tripeptide KDC as the autoepitope in this region of the PCM-1 molecule. These studies lay the foundation for future investigations of the autoimmune response in scleroderma patients that are producing anticentrosome autoantibodies and should allow an investigation of the cellular role of the PCM-1 protein.

Soluble CD4 and CD8 in serum from patients with localized scleroderma

Localized scleroderma has been shown to be accompanied by various immunologic abnormalities. To obtain functional information on activated CD4+ or CD8+ T cells, we studied the levels of soluble CD4 (sCD4) and soluble CD8 (sCD8) in serum from patients with localized scleroderma. Serum samples were examined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The samples were obtained from 49 patients in the following three subgroups: 15 patients with generalized morphea, 22 with linear scleroderma, and 12 with morphea. The levels of sCD4 and sCD8 were significantly elevated in patients with generalized morphea. Furthermore, these patients showed significantly higher levels of sCD4 than those with systemic sclerosis (SSc). The frequency of positivity for IgG anti-single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) antibody was significantly higher in localized scleroderma patients with elevated sCD4 levels than in patients with normal sCD4 levels. The frequency of positivity for antinuclear antibodies, IgM antihistone antibodies, IgG anti-ssDNA antibody and rheumatoid factor, and elevated sCD23 levels were significantly higher in localized scleroderma patients with elevated sCD8 levels than in patients with normal sCD8 levels. Our findings suggest that both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells are activated in vivo in generalized morphea and that the immunologic events in generalized morphea are different from those in SSc.

Elevated soluble CD23 levels in the sera from patients with localized scleroderma

Soluble CD23 (sCD23) is closely related to B-cell activation and elevated serum levels of sCD23 have been reported in several autoimmune disorders. This study investigated the serum levels of sCD23 and determined the correlation of sCD23 with other immunologic abnormalities and clinical features in localized scleroderma. We examined 49 serum samples by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in the following three subgroups: 15 patients with generalized morphoea, 22 with linear scleroderma, and 12 with morphoea. The serum levels of sCD23 were significantly elevated in patients with localized scleroderma, compared with those in healthy individuals. Of the three subgroups of localized scleroderma, patients with generalized morphoea had the highest levels of serum sCD23. The frequency of IgM antihistone antibody (AHA) and IgM rheumatoid factor (RF), the number of linear lesions, and the frequency of muscle involvement were significantly higher in patients with elevated sCD23 levels than in those with normal levels of sCD23. A significant correlation between the serum sCD23 level and the number of involved areas of the body was observed. Our data suggest that the activation of virgin B cells, which is reflected by elevated sCD23 levels, is closely associated with the production of IgM autoantibodies in localized scleroderma and furthermore that the serum levels of sCD23 are a new serological indicator of the severity of localized scleroderma.

Autoepitope mapping of the centrosome autoantigen PCM-1 using scleroderma sera with anticentrosome autoantibodies

We previously characterized a scleroderma serum (serum 1) containing autoantibodies against centrosome autoantigens that have been named PCM-1, PCM-2 and PCM-3. In this study, we analyzed another scleroderma serum (serum 2) reactive with centrosome autoantigens of identical molecular weights to those recognized by serum 1. To further analyze the autoepitope domains in PCM-1 recognized by the autoantibodies present in scleroderma sera, cDNAs encoding different portions of the PCM-1 autoantigen were expressed in bacteria as fusion proteins. The immunoreactivity of the fusion proteins to the scleroderma sera was assayed by immunoblot analysis. Two regions containing autoepitope domains reactive with both sera were identified in the PCM-1 molecule. One is between amino acids 312-706 of the PCM-1 autoantigen, and the other is localized between amino acids 1,433-1,787, indicating that the immune response is oligoclonal. The results are important to clarify the mechanism of induction of anticentrosome autoantibodies. The potential diagnostic and prognostic significance of the autoantibodies for subgroups of scleroderma is discussed.