Pharmacological characterization of recombinant rat corticotropin releasing factor binding protein using different sauvagine analogs

Molecular evolution of CRH and CRHR subfamily before the evolutionary origin of vertebrate

Corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) is well-cited for its important role in governing the stress responses via neuroendocrine system in vertebrates. After the identification of homologs of CRH receptor (CRHR) in both deuterostome and arthropod lineages, it was suggested that the ancestral homolog of CRH-CRHR molecular system is present in the bilaterian. However, homolog sequences from arthropods differ considerably from vertebrate CRH-like peptide sequences. Due to the significant difference between the biological system, as well as the gene regulatory network, of protostome and that of vertebrate, physiological studies on the protostomes may not provide important insight into the evolutionary history of vertebrate CRH system, while tunicate and amphioxus, two close relatives to vertebrate, which have diverged before two rounds of whole genome duplication (2WGDs) do. Given the identification of amphioxus CRH-like peptide by our group, this review aims to reexamine the current hypotheses on the evolution of CRH subfamily. It is generally accepted that paralogs of CRH and CRHR have been produced through 2WGDs, which occurred during the early vertebrate evolution. The identification of a single crh-like gene in amphioxi and tunicates by in silico search and the presence of two paralogons with a total of 5 crh-like genes in gnathostomes has shown that an additional duplication event might have happened to the ancestral crh-like gene before 2WGDs. On the other hand, the evolution of crhr gene subfamily appears to be mainly influenced by 2WGDs and only two receptor genes have been retained in the genomes of jawed vertebrates.

Chronic and acute effects of stress on energy balance: are there appropriate animal models?

Stress activates multiple neural and endocrine systems to allow an animal to respond to and survive in a threatening environment. The corticotropin-releasing factor system is a primary initiator of this integrated response, which includes activation of the sympathetic nervous system and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. The energetic response to acute stress is determined by the nature and severity of the stressor, but a typical response to an acute stressor is inhibition of food intake, increased heat production, and increased activity with sustained changes in body weight, behavior, and HPA reactivity. The effect of chronic psychological stress is more variable. In humans, chronic stress may cause weight gain in restrained eaters who show increased HPA reactivity to acute stress. This phenotype is difficult to replicate in rodent models where chronic psychological stress is more likely to cause weight loss than weight gain. An exception may be hamsters subjected to repeated bouts of social defeat or foot shock, but the data are limited. Recent reports on the food intake and body composition of subordinate members of group-housed female monkeys indicate that these animals have a similar phenotype to human stress-induced eaters, but there are a limited number of investigators with access to the model. Few stress experiments focus on energy balance, but more information on the phenotype of both humans and animal models during and after exposure to acute or chronic stress may provide novel insight into mechanisms that normally control body weight.

Hippocampal c-Jun-N-terminal kinases serve as negative regulators of associative learning

In the adult mouse, signaling through c-Jun N-terminal kinases (JNKs) links exposure to acute stress to various physiological responses. Inflammatory cytokines, brain injury and ischemic insult, or exposure to psychological acute stressors induce activation of hippocampal JNKs. Here we report that exposure to acute stress caused activation of JNKs in the hippocampal CA1 and CA3 subfields, and impaired contextual fear conditioning. Conversely, intrahippocampal injection of JNKs inhibitors sp600125 (30 μm) or D-JNKI1 (8 μm) reduced activity of hippocampal JNKs and rescued stress-induced deficits in contextual fear. In addition, intrahippocampal administration of anisomycin (100 μg/μl), a potent JNKs activator, mimicked memory-impairing effects of stress on contextual fear. This anisomycin-induced amnesia was abolished after cotreatment with JNKs selective inhibitor sp600125 without affecting anisomycin's ability to effectively inhibit protein synthesis as measured by c-Fos immunoreactivity. We also demonstrated milder and transient activation of the JNKs pathway in the CA1 subfield of the hippocampus during contextual fear conditioning and an enhancement of contextual fear after pharmacological inhibition of JNKs under baseline conditions. Finally, using combined biochemical and transgenic approaches with mutant mice lacking different members of the JNK family (Jnk1, Jnk2, and Jnk3), we provided evidence that JNK2 and JNK3 are critically involved in stress-induced deficit of contextual fear, while JNK1 mainly regulates baseline learning in this behavioral task. Together, these results support the possibility that hippocampal JNKs serve as a critical molecular regulator in the formation of contextual fear.

Residues of corticotropin releasing factor-binding protein (CRF-BP) that selectively abrogate binding to CRF but not to urocortin 1

Corticotropin releasing factor-binding protein (CRF-BP) binds CRF and urocortin 1 (Ucn 1) with high affinity, thus preventing CRF receptor (CRFR) activation. Despite recent progress on the molecular details that govern interactions between CRF family neuropeptides and their cognate receptors, little is known concerning the mechanisms that allow CRF-BP to bind CRF and Ucn 1 with picomolar affinity. We conducted a comprehensive alanine scan of 76 evolutionarily conserved residues of CRF-BP and identified several residues that differentially affected the affinity for CRF over Ucn 1. We determined that both neuropeptides derive their similarly high affinity from distinct binding surfaces on CRF-BP. Alanine substitutions of arginine 56 (R56A) and aspartic acid 62 (D62A) reduce the affinity for CRF by approximately 100-fold, while only marginally affecting the affinity for Ucn 1. The selective reduction in affinity for CRF depends on glutamic acid 25 in the CRF peptide, as substitution of Glu(25) reduces the affinity for CRF-BP by approximately 2 orders of magnitude, but only in the presence of both Arg(56) and Asp(62) in human CRF-BP. We show that CRF-BP(R56A) and CRF-BP(D62A) have lost the ability to inhibit CRFR1-mediated responses to CRF that activate luciferase induction in HEK293T cells and ACTH release from cultured rat anterior pituitary cells. In contrast, both CRF-BP mutants retain the ability to inhibit Ucn 1-induced CRFR1 activation. Collectively our findings demonstrate that CRF-BP has distinct and separable binding surfaces for CRF and Ucn 1, opening new avenues for the design of ligand-specific antagonists based on CRF-BP.

Differential activation of CRF receptor subtypes removes stress-induced memory deficit and anxiety

The objective of this study was to investigate the role of corticotropin-releasing factor receptors 1 (CRF(1)) and 2 (CRF(2)) in anxiety-like behavior and learning of C57BL/6J mice after exposure to a stressful stimulus. When C57BL/6J mice were exposed to immobilization (1 h) serving as stressful stimulus, context- and tone-dependent fear conditioning were impaired if the training followed immediately after immobilization. The stress-induced impairment of context-dependent fear conditioning was prevented by specific blockade of CRF(2) of the lateral septum (LS) with anti-sauvagine-30. Immobilization did not only affect conditioned fear, but also enhanced, through CRF(2) of the LS, anxiety-like behavior determined with the elevated plus maze. Recovery from stress-induced anxiety and impairment of context-dependent fear conditioning was observed after 1 h delay of training and required hippocampal CRF(1), as indicated by the finding that this recovery was prevented by blockade of intrahippocampal CRF(1). It was concluded that exposure to a stressor initially affected both anxiety-like behavior and contextual conditioned fear through septal CRF(2), while the later activation of hippocampal CRF(1) resulted in the return to baseline levels of both processes. Intraventricular injection of mouse urocortin 2, a CRF(2)-selective agonist, removed the stress-induced anxiety and learning impairment, but did not reduce the activation of the hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis indicative of the hormonal stress response. We propose that the enhanced anxiety is the component of the stress response responsible for the memory deficit.

Chronic low dose ovine corticotropin releasing factor or urocortin II into the rostral dorsal raphe alters exploratory behavior and serotonergic gene expression in specific subregions of the dorsal raphe

Corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) family peptides play key roles in integrating neural responses to stress. Both major CRF receptors have been pharmacologically identified in the dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN), a stress sensitive and internally heterogeneous nucleus supplying many forebrain regions with serotonergic input. Despite the involvement of chronic stress and serotonergic dysfunction in human mood and anxiety disorders, little is known about the effects of chronic CRF receptor activation on the DRN. We infused ovine CRF (1 ng/h), urocortin II (UCNII, 1 ng/h), or vehicle alone into rat DRN over 6 days. During infusion, animals were allowed to freely explore an open field for 15 min on each of 2 days, with the addition of a novel object on the second day. Following behavioral testing, 5-HT1A, 5-HT1B, 5-HT transporter (SERT), and tryptophan hydroxylase-2 (Tph2) expression was examined through the DRN by in situ hybridization. Ovine CRF infusion resulted in significantly decreased novel object touches, climbs, as well as increased latency to first novel object contact. UCNII had a similar but less dramatic effect, decreasing only climbing behavior. Both ovine CRF and UCNII blunted the decrease in corner time expected on re-exposure to the open field. Both peptides also produced regionally specific changes in gene expression: 5-HT1A expression was increased 30% in the mid-rostral ventromedial DRN, while SERT was decreased by 30% in the mid-caudal shell dorsomedial DRN. There also appeared to be a shift in the relative level of Tph2 expression between the ventromedial and core dorsomedial DRN at the mid-rostral level. Changes in 5-HT1A, SERT, and relative Tph2 mRNA abundance were correlated with novel object exploration. These findings suggest chronic intra-DRN administration of CRF agonists decreases exploratory behavior, while producing subregionally limited changes in serotonergic gene expression. These studies may be relevant to mechanisms underlying behavioral changes after chronic stress.

Physiology, pharmacology, and therapeutic relevance of urocortins in mammals: ancient CRF paralogs

Urocortins, three paralogs of the stress-related peptide corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) found in bony fish, amphibians, birds, and mammals, have unique phylogenies, pharmacologies, and tissue distributions. As a result and despite a structural family resemblance, the natural functions of urocortins and CRF in mammalian homeostatic responses differ substantially. Endogenous urocortins are neither simply counterpoints nor mimics of endogenous CRF action. In their own right, urocortins may be clinically relevant molecules in the pathogenesis or management of many conditions, including congestive heart failure, hypertension, gastrointestinal and inflammatory disorders (irritable bowel syndrome, active gastritis, gastroparesis, and rheumatoid arthritis), atopic/allergic disorders (dermatitis, urticaria, and asthma), pregnancy and parturition (preeclampsia, spontaneous abortion, onset, and maintenance of effective labor), major depression and obesity. Safety trials for intravenous urocortin treatment have already begun for the treatment of congestive heart failure. Further understanding the unique functions of urocortin 1, urocortin 2, and urocortin 3 action may uncover other therapeutic opportunities.

The molecular mechanisms underlying the regulation of the biological activity of corticotropin-releasing hormone receptors: implications for physiology and pathophysiology

The CRH receptor (CRH-R) is a member of the secretin family of G protein-coupled receptors. Wide expression of CRH-Rs in the central nervous system and periphery ensures that their cognate agonists, the family of CRH-like peptides, are capable of exerting a wide spectrum of actions that underpin their critical role in integrating the stress response and coordinating the activity of fundamental physiological functions, such as the regulation of the cardiovascular system, energy balance, and homeostasis. Two types of mammal CRH-R exist, CRH-R1 and CRH-R2, each with unique splicing patterns and remarkably distinct pharmacological properties, but similar signaling properties, probably reflecting their distinct and sometimes contrasting biological functions. The regulation of CRH-R expression and activity is not fully elucidated, and we only now begin to fully understand the impact on mammalian pathophysiology. The focus of this review is the current and evolving understanding of the molecular mechanisms controlling CRH-R biological activity and functional flexibility. This shows notable tissue-specific characteristics, highlighted by their ability to couple to distinct G proteins and activate tissue-specific signaling cascades. The type of activating agonist, receptor, and target cell appears to play a major role in determining the overall signaling and biological responses in health and disease.

Fractal rigidity by enhanced sympatho-vagal antagonism in heartbeat interval dynamics elicited by central application of corticotropin-releasing factor in mice

The dynamics of heartbeat interval fluctuations were studied in awake unrestrained mice following intracerebroventricular application of the neuropeptide corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF). The cardiac time series derived from telemetric ECG monitoring were analyzed by non-parametric techniques of nonlinear signal processing: delay-vector variance (DVV) analysis, higher-order variability (HOV) analysis, empirical mode decomposition (EMD), multiscale embedding-space decomposition (MESD), multiexponent multifractal (MEMF) analysis. The analyses support the conjecture that cardiac dynamics of normal control mice has both deterministic and stochastic elements, is nonstationary, nonlinear, and exerts multifractal properties. Central application of CRF results in bradycardia and increased variability of the beat-to-beat fluctuations. The altered dynamical properties elicited by CRF reflect a significant loss of intrinsic structural complexity of cardiac control which is due to central neuroautonomic hyperexcitation, i.e., enhanced sympatho-vagal antagonism. The change in dynamical complexity is characterized by an effect referred to as fractal rigidity, leading to a significant impairment of adaptability to extrinsic challenges in a fluctuating environment. The impact of dynamical neurocardiopathy as a major precipiting factor for the propensity of cardiac arrhythmias or sudden cardiac death by unchecked central CRF release in significant acute life events in man is critically discussed.

The therapeutic potential of CRF1 antagonists for anxiety

Preclinical studies suggest that the brain corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) systems mediate anxiety-like behavioural and somatic responses through actions at the CRF1 receptor. CRF1 antagonists block the anxiogenic-like effects of CRF and stress in animal models. Cerebrospinal fluid levels of CRF are elevated in some anxiety disorders and normalise with effective treatment, further implicating CRF systems as a therapeutic target. Prototypical CRF1 antagonists are highly lipophilic, non-competitive antagonists of peptide ligands. Modification of the chemotype and the identification of novel pharmacophores are yielding more drug-like structures with increased hydrophilicity at physiological pHs. Newer compounds exhibit improved solubility, pharmacokinetic properties, potency and efficacy. Several clinical candidates have entered Phase I/II trials. However, unmet challenges await resolution during further discovery, clinical development and therapeutic application of CRF1 antagonists.

Corticotropin-Releasing Factor Receptor 1 and Central Heart Rate Regulation in Mice during Expression of Conditioned Fear

The present study was performed to 1) determine heart rate (HR) effects mediated through central corticotropin-releasing factor receptor subtypes 1 (CRF(1)) investigate and 2 (CRF(2)) and 2) to the contribution of endogenous CRF to baseline HR and its fear-induced adjustment in freely moving mice. CRF ligands were injected into both lateral ventricles (i.c.v.) 15 min before the presentation of a conditioned auditory fear stimulus (CS). Initial behavioral results suggest an ovine CRF (oCRF)-mediated enhanced baseline fear and mildly enhanced conditioned auditory fear. In contrast, i.c.v. injection of oCRF (35-210 ng/mouse) dose-dependently decreased baseline HR, increased HR variability, and attenuated the CS-induced tachycardia. This effect is suggested to depend on a combined activation of sympathetic and parasympathetic activity referred to as enhanced sympathovagal antagonism. An extreme bradycardia was elicited by oCRF injection into the lower brainstem. All HR effects were probably mediated by CRF(1) because injection of the CRF(2)-selective agonist mouse urocortin II was ineffective, and the baseline bradycardia by i.c.v. CRF was preserved in CRF(2)-deficient mice. Injection of various CRF receptor antagonists including the CRF(2)-selective antisauvagine-30 did not affect the conditioned HR response. This finding suggests that endogenous CRF does not contribute to the fear-mediated tachycardia. Thus, the hypothesis of an involvement of CRF in HR responses of mice to acute aversive stimulation is rejected. Pharmacological evidence points at the involvement of CRF(1) in enhanced sympathovagal antagonism, a pathological state contributing to elevated cardiac risk, whereas the physiological role of the brain CRF system in cardiovascular regulation remains to be determined.

Three-amino acid motifs of urocortin II and III determine their CRF receptor subtype selectivity

Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) and the CRF-like peptide urocortin I (UcnI) exert their activity through two different CRF receptors, CRF1 and CRF2. Recently, UcnII and UcnIII have been discovered as potential endogenous agonists selective for CRF2 known to be involved in brain functions such as learning and anxiety, as well as in cardiovascular functions. A structure-affinity relationship study using chimeric peptides was designed to characterize mouse UcnII (mUcnII) and mUcnIII further and to investigate the structural basis of their receptor subtype selectivity. In the framework of this study, mUcnII (IC50 = 4.4 nM) but not mUcnIII was identified as high-affinity ligand for the rat CRF binding protein. Such affinity had previously not been observed for the human version of this protein. On the basis of secondary structure predictions, it was hypothesized that the amino acid motifs Pro-Ile-Gly of mUcnII and Pro-Thr-Asn of mUcnIII decrease alpha-helicity and thereby impair binding to CRF1. In support of this hypothesis, binding affinity to CRF1 of the chimeric peptides [Pro11Ile12Gly13]h/rCRF, [Pro11Thr12Asn13]h/rCRF, and the corresponding rUcnI analogs was found to be decreased by three orders of magnitude, whereas binding affinity to CRF2 was much less affected. The dramatic decrease in binding affinity to CRF1 correlated with a decrease in alpha-helicity as indicated by the data of circular dichroism spectroscopy.

Calmodulin and Munc13 Form a Ca2+ Sensor/Effector Complex that Controls Short-Term Synaptic Plasticity

The efficacy of synaptic transmission between neurons can be altered transiently during neuronal network activity. This phenomenon of short-term plasticity is a key determinant of network properties; is involved in many physiological processes such as motor control, sound localization, or sensory adaptation; and is critically dependent on cytosolic [Ca2+]. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms and the identity of the Ca2+ sensor/effector complexes involved are unclear. We now identify a conserved calmodulin binding site in UNC-13/Munc13s, which are essential regulators of synaptic vesicle priming and synaptic efficacy. Ca2+ sensor/effector complexes consisting of calmodulin and Munc13s regulate synaptic vesicle priming and synaptic efficacy in response to a residual [Ca2+] signal and thus shape short-term plasticity characteristics during periods of sustained synaptic activity.

Cortagine, a specific agonist of corticotropin-releasing factor receptor subtype 1, is anxiogenic and antidepressive in the mouse model

Two subtypes of the corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) receptor, CRF(1) and CRF(2), differentially modulate brain functions such as anxiety and memory. To facilitate the analysis of their differential involvement, we developed a CRF(1)-specific peptidic agonist by synthesis of chimeric peptides derived from human/rat CRF, ovine CRF (oCRF), and sauvagine (Svg). High affinity to the CRF-binding protein was prevented by introduction of glutamic acid in the binding site of the ligand. The resulting chimeric peptide, [Glu(21),Ala(40)][Svg(1-12)]x[human/rat CRF(14-30)]x[Svg(30-40)], named cortagine, was analyzed pharmacologically in cell culture by using human embryonic kidney-293 cells transfected with cDNA coding for CRF(1) or CRF(2), in autoradiographic experiments, and in behavior experiments using male C57BL/6J mice for its modulatory action on anxiety- and depression-like behaviors with the elevated plus-maze test and the forced swim test (FST), respectively. We observed that cortagine was more selective than oCRF, frequently used as CRF(1)-specific agonist, in stimulating the transfected cells to release cAMP. Cortagine's specificity was demonstrated in autoradiographic experiments by its selective binding to CRF(1) of brain sections of the mouse. After injection into the brain ventricles, it enhanced anxiety-like behavior on the elevated plus-maze at a lower dose than oCRF. Whereas at high doses, oCRF injected into the lateral intermediate septum containing predominantly CRF(2) increased anxiety-like behavior as CRF(2)-specific agonists do, cortagine did not. In contrast to its anxiogenic actions, cortagine reduced significantly the immobility time in the FST as described for antidepressive drugs. Thus, cortagine combines anxiogenic properties with antidepressive effects in the FST.

Determinants of Corticotropin Releasing Factor. Receptor Selectivity of Corticotropin Releasing Factor Related Peptides

The corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) peptide family is an important target in pharmaceutical research. The CRF system consists of two receptors, corticotropin releasing factor receptor 1 (CRF1R) and corticotropin releasing factor receptor 2 (CRF2R), a nonreceptor binding protein, and the peptide agonists of these receptors. The recent discovery of the CRF2R selective peptide agonists, UCN2, UCN3 and URP, prompted investigations into the structural source of CRF1R versus CRF2R selectivity of CRF peptide family members. Data from chimeric peptides demonstrated that amino acids in the N-terminus and C-terminus of CRF, UCN1, UCN2 and Sauvagine peptide families influence CRFR selectivity. Analysis of specific amino acid residues in the N-terminus and C-terminus demonstrated that the presence of a proline at position 11 and alanine at positions 35 and 39 (hCRF numbering) decreases CRF1R activity and increases CRF2R selectivity in CRF, UCN1 and sauvagine peptides. The availability of a large group of selective and nonselective CRF receptor peptide agonists will facilitate the development of CRF receptor selective drugs.

The binding protein of corticotropin-releasing factor: ligand-binding site and subunit structure

Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF), recognized as an important stress factor, binds to a CRF receptor and a CRF-binding protein (CRFBP) that represents a reservoir of endogenous CRF. Although CRFBP was observed to dimerize, at least in part, the ligand was found to be exclusively bound to the monomer-as indicated by photoaffinity labeling. We localized the CRF binding site by using photoaffinity labeling in combination with different mass spectrometric techniques. The amino acid residues Arg-23 and Arg-36 of CRFBP were identified as the sites of photoincorporation of monofunctional and bifunctional photoprobes designed on the basis of the amino acid sequence of human/rat CRF(6-33). It was, therefore, concluded that the sequence of amino acid residues 23-36 of CRFBP is involved in ligand binding. Our data are in support of an antiparallel alignment of the photoprobe with the amino acid residues 23-36 of the CRFBP monomer.

The corticotropin-releasing factor family of peptides and CRF receptors: their roles in the regulation of energy balance

The corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) system could play a significant role in the regulation of energy balance. This system, which includes CRF, CRF-related peptides and CRF receptors, is part of a huge network of cells connected to central and peripheral pathways modulating energy metabolism. CRF and CRF-related peptides, which elicit their effects through G-protein-coupled receptors known in mammals as CRF(1) receptor and CRF(2) receptor, are capable of strong anorectic and thermogenic effects. Also supporting a role for the CRF system in the regulation of energy balance are findings demonstrating alterations in this system in obese and food-deprived animals that concur to facilitate energy deposition. In recent years, great progress has been made in understanding the specific physiological roles of the CRF system. In that respect, the discovery of urocortins II and III, two endogenous ligands of the CRF(2) receptor, and the development of selective and long-acting antagonists for the CRF receptors, have led to a better comprehension of the role of the CRF system in the regulation of energy balance. Although there are still important unresolved issues in the field of CRF research, the progress made recently warrants investigations aimed at evaluating the CRF system as a potential target for anti-obesity drugs.

Functional and protein chemical characterization of the N-terminal domain of the rat corticotropin-releasing factor receptor 1

Rat corticotropin-releasing factor receptor 1 (rCRFR1) was produced either in transfected HEK 293 cells as a complex glycosylated protein or in the presence of the mannosidase I inhibitor kifunensine as a high mannose glycosylated protein. The altered glycosylation did not influence the biological function of rCRFR1 as demonstrated by competitive binding of rat urocortin (rUcn) or human/rat corticotropin-releasing factor (h/rCRF) and agonist-induced cAMP accumulation. The low production rate of the N-terminal domain of rCRFR1 (rCRFR1-NT) by transfected HEK 293 cells, was increased by a factor of 100 in the presence of kifunensine. The product, rCRFR1-NT-Kif, bound rUcn specifically (K(D) = 27 nM) and astressin (K(I) = 60 nM). This affinity was 10-fold lower than the affinity of full length rCRFR1. However, it was sufficiently high for rCRFR1-NT-Kif to serve as a model for the N-terminal domain of rCRFR1. With protein fragmentation, Edman degradation, and mass spectrometric analysis, evidence was found for the signal peptide cleavage site C-terminally to Thr(23) and three disulfide bridges between precursor residues 30 and 54, 44 and 87, and 68 and 102. Of all putative N-glycosylation sites in positions 32, 38, 45, 78, 90, and 98, all Asn residues except for Asn(32) were glycosylated to a significant extent. No O-glycosylation was observed.

A single amino acid serves as an affinity switch between the receptor and the binding protein of corticotropin-releasing factor: implications for the design of agonists and antagonists

In view of the observation that corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) affects several brain functions through at least two subtypes of G protein-dependent receptors and a binding protein (CRFBP), we have developed synthetic strategies to provide enhanced binding specificity. Human/rat CRF (h/rCRF) and the CRF-like peptide sauvagine (Svg), differing in their affinities to CRFBP by two orders of magnitude, were used to identify the residues determining binding to CRFBP. By amino acid exchanges, it was found that Ala(22) of h/rCRF was responsible for this peptide's high affinity to CRFBP, whereas Glu(21) located in the equivalent position of Svg prevented high affinity binding to CRFBP. Accordingly, [Glu(22)]h/rCRF was not bound with high affinity to CRFBP in contrast to [Ala(21)]Svg, which exhibited such high affinity. Furthermore, the affinity of both peptides to either CRF receptor (CRFR) subtype was not reduced by these replacements, and their subtype preference was not changed. Thus, exchange of Ala and Glu and vice versa in positions 22 and 21 of h/rCRF and Svg, respectively, serves as a switch discriminating between CRFBP and CRFR. On the basis of this switch function, development of new specific CRF agonists and antagonists is expected to be facilitated. One application was the modification of the CRF antagonist astressin (Ast), whose employment in animal experiments is limited by its low solubility in cerebrospinal fluid. Introduction of Glu residues into Ast generated with [Glu(11,16)]Ast an acidic astressin, which efficiently antagonized in vivo the CRFR1-dependent reduction of locomotion induced by ovine CRF without detectable binding to CRFBP.