Immune response to a recombinant human TNFR55-IgG1 fusion protein: auto-antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and multiple sclerosis (MS) patients have neither neutralizing nor agonist activities

Impact of immunogenicity on clinical efficacy and toxicity profile of biologic agents used for treatment of inflammatory arthritis in children compared to adults

The treatment of inflammatory arthritis has been revolutionised by the introduction of biologic treatments. Many biologic agents are currently licensed for use in both paediatric and adult patients with inflammatory arthritis and contribute to improved disease outcomes compared with the pre-biologic era. However, immunogenicity to biologic agents, characterised by an immune reaction leading to the production of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), can negatively impact the therapeutic efficacy of biologic drugs and induce side effects to treatment. This review explores for the first time the impact of immunogenicity against all licensed biologic treatments currently used in inflammatory arthritis across age, and will examine any significant differences between ADA prevalence, titres and timing of development, as well as ADA impact on therapeutic drug levels, clinical efficacy and side effects between paediatric and adult patients. In addition, we will investigate factors associated with differences in immunogenicity across biologic agents used in inflammatory arthritis, and their potential therapeutic implications.

Immunogenicity of biologic agents in rheumatology

Biologic agents have become a core component of therapeutic strategies for many inflammatory rheumatic diseases. However, perhaps reflecting the specificity and generally high affinity of biologic agents, these therapeutics have been used by rheumatologists with less consideration of their pharmacokinetics than that of conventional synthetic DMARDs. Immunogenicity was recognized as a potential limitation to the use of biologic agents at an early stage in their development, although regulatory guidance was relatively limited and assays to measure immunogenicity were less sophisticated than today. The advent of biosimilars has sparked a renewed interest in immunogenicity that has resulted in the development of increasingly sensitive assays, an enhanced appreciation of the pharmacokinetic consequences of immunogenicity and the development of comprehensive and specific guidance from regulatory authorities. As a result, rheumatologists have a greatly improved understanding of the field in general, including the factors responsible for immunogenicity, its potential clinical consequences and the implications for everyday treatment. In some specialties, immunogenicity testing is becoming a part of routine clinical management, but definitive evidence of its cost-effectiveness in rheumatology is awaited.

Immunogenicity of Biologics in Chronic Inflammatory Diseases: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

A systematic review was conducted to explore the immunogenicity of biologic agents across inflammatory diseases and its potential impact on efficacy/safety.

METHODS

Literature searches were conducted through November 2016 to identify controlled and observational studies of biologics/biosimilars administered for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA), psoriasis (Ps), Crohn's disease, and ulcerative colitis.

RESULTS

Of >21,000 screened publications, 443 were included. Anti-drug antibody (ADAb) rates varied widely among biologics across diseases (and are not directly comparable because of immunoassay heterogeneity); the highest overall rates were reported with infliximab (0-83%), adalimumab (0-54%), and infliximab biosimilar CT-P13 (21-52%), and the lowest with secukinumab (0-1%), ustekinumab (1-11%), etanercept (0-13%), and golimumab (0-19%). Most ADAbs were neutralizing, except those to abatacept and etanercept. ADAb+ versus ADAb- patients had lower rates of clinical response to adalimumab (RA, PsA, JIA, AS, Ps), golimumab (RA), infliximab (RA, PsA, AS, Ps), rituximab (RA), ustekinumab (Ps), and CT-P13 (RA, AS). Higher rates of infusion-related reactions were reported in infliximab- and CT-P13-treated ADAb+ patients. Background immunosuppressives/anti-proliferatives reduced biologic immunogenicity across diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on reviewed reports, biologic/biosimilar immunogenicity differs among agents, with the highest rates observed with infliximab and adalimumab. As ADAb formation in biologic-/biosimilar-treated patients may increase the risk of lost response, the immunogenicity of these agents is an important (albeit not the only) consideration in the treatment decision-making process.

Immunogenicity Assessment of Tumor Necrosis Factor Antagonists in the Clinical Laboratory

BACKGROUND

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists are increasingly used for the treatment of inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. Immunogenicity of these drugs poses therapeutic challenges such as therapeutic failure and adverse effects in a number of patients. Evaluation of clinical nonresponsiveness includes laboratory testing for drug concentrations and detecting the presence of antidrug antibodies.

CONTENT

This review provides an overview of the immunogenicity of TNF antagonists and testing methodologies currently available for measuring antidrug antibody response, which decreases treatment efficacy and may result in therapeutic failure. This review summarizes methodologies such as binding assays, including ELISA and HPLC-based homogenous mobility shift assay, as well as functional cell-based assays such as reporter gene assay. Furthermore, based on the laboratory findings of testing for antidrug antibody response, as well as serum drug concentrations, an algorithm is provided for interpretation, based on the current available literature and guidelines, which may aid in determining optimal therapy after treatment failure.

SUMMARY

Laboratory testing methodologies for measuring serum concentrations of TNF inhibitors and antidrug antibodies are clinically available. These methods provide an evidence-based, personalized approach for the workup of patients showing treatment failure, which saves time and resources, and contributes to improved patient care.

Immunogenicity of anti-TNFα therapy in psoriasis: a clinical issue?

INTRODUCTION

Immunogenicity of antitumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα) agents has been proven to play a significant role in the variability of clinical responses among patients with chronic inflammatory diseases. However, its clinical impact on the outcome of patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis receiving anti-TNFα treatment is not yet fully clear. Despite the high rates of efficacy of anti-TNFα agents in psoriasis, a substantial proportion of patients remain who experience a primary or secondary failure or significant side effects, which are potentially ascribable to immunogenicity.

AREAS COVERED

Topics include immunologic response elicited by anti-TNFα agents, the impact of immunogenicity on treatment response to anti-TNFα and the role played by immunogenicity in the lack of efficacy of anti-TNFα agents (infliximab, adalimumab and etanercept) in psoriasis.

EXPERT OPINION

Based on data available in the literature and the clinical experience of the authors, this article suggests the optimal approach to drug monitoring and antidrug antibody assay and the most effective use of biologic immunotherapies in this setting. Immunogenicity should be taken into account in the adoption of therapeutic choices in psoriatic patients, such as anti-TNFα agent intensification, or switching to another anti-TNFα agent or a drug with a different mechanism of action.

Immunogenicity of anti-TNF biologic therapies for rheumatoid arthritis

Currently, five anti-TNF biologic agents are approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA): adalimumab, infliximab, etanercept, golimumab and certolizumab pegol. Formation of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) has been associated with all five agents. In the case of adalimumab and infliximab, immunogenicity is strongly linked to subtherapeutic serum drug levels and a lack of clinical response, but for the other three agents, data on immunogenicity are scarce, suggesting that further research would be valuable. Low ADA levels might not influence the efficacy of anti-TNF therapy, whereas high ADA levels impair treatment efficacy by considerably reducing unbound drug levels. Immunogenicity is not only an issue in patients treated with anti-TNF biologic agents; the immunogenicity of other therapeutic proteins, such as factor VIII and interferons, is well known and has been investigated for many years. The results of such studies suggest that investigations to determine the optimal treatment regimen (drug dosing, treatment schedule and co-medication) required to minimize the likelihood of ADA formation might be an effective and practical way to deal with the immunogenicity of anti-TNF biologic agents for RA.

Immunogenicity of biotherapeutics-an overview

With the recent increase in the approval and use of biotherapeutics in clinical practice, management of the development of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) has become a key issue for effective long-term use of these drugs. In most instances, the clinical benefit derived from the use of the therapeutics outweighs the risk of developing ADA. In rare instances, however, safety issues accompany development of ADA. Although it is unclear why certain individuals generate an immune response while others tolerate the drug, growing experience from the clinic has facilitated a better appreciation of many patient-, disease- and product-related factors that contribute to immunogenicity. Furthermore, improvements in protein production, purification and delivery methods along with use of humanized or fully human recombinant proteins have helped to reduce the rates of immunogenicity considerably. This document provides an overview of the scientific reasons for developing an immunogenic response, factors that contribute to the immunogenicity of biotherapeutics, clinical impact of immunogenicity and general strategies used to manage this risk.

Epitope spreading of the anti-CYP2D6 antibody response in patients with autoimmune hepatitis and in the CYP2D6 mouse model

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a serious chronic inflammatory disease of the liver with yet unknown etiology and largely uncertain immunopathology. The hallmark of type 2 AIH is the generation of liver kidney microsomal-1 (LKM-1) autoantibodies, which predominantly react to cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6). The identification of disease initiating factors has been hampered in the past, since antibody epitope mapping was mostly performed using serum samples collected late during disease resulting in the identification of immunodominant epitopes not necessarily representing those involved in disease initiation. In order to identify possible environmental triggers for AIH, we analyzed for the first time the spreading of the anti-CYP2D6 antibody response over a prolonged period of time in AIH patients and in the CYP2D6 mouse model, in which mice infected with Adenovirus-human CYP2D6 (Ad-h2D6) develop antibodies with a similar specificity than AIH patients. Epitope spreading was analyzed in six AIH-2-patients and in the CYP2D6 mouse model using SPOTs membranes containing peptides covering the entire CYP2D6 protein. Despite of a considerable variation, both mice and AIH patients largely focus their humoral immune response on an immunodominant epitope early after infection (mice) or diagnosis (patients). The CYP2D6 mouse model revealed that epitope spreading is initiated at the immunodominant epitope and later expands to neighboring and remote regions. Sequence homologies to human pathogens have been detected for all identified epitopes. Our study demonstrates that epitope spreading does indeed occur during the pathogenesis of AIH and supports the concept of molecular mimicry as a possible initiating mechanism for AIH.

Therapeutic effect of PEGylated TNFR1-selective antagonistic mutant TNF in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis mice

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory demyelinating disease, the pathogenesis of which is related to elevated serum levels of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF). Although anti-TNF therapy has been tested as a potential treatment for MS, no remission of symptoms was observed. Recent reports indicated that the TNFR1 signal was responsible for the pathogenesis of murine experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), while the TNFR2 signal was responsible for recovery of the pathogenesis of EAE. Therefore, selective blocking of TNFR1 appears to be a promising strategy for the treatment of MS. In this regard, we previously succeeded in developing a novel TNFR1-selective antagonistic TNF mutant (R1antTNF) by using phage display technology. Here, we have examined the therapeutic potential of R1antTNF using EAE mice. Treatment with PEGylated R1antTNF (PEG-R1antTNF) significantly improved the clinical score and cerebral demyelination at the onset of EAE. Considerable suppression of Th1 and Th17-type response was also observed in spleen and lymph node cells of mice given PEG-R1antTNF. Moreover, the administration of PEG-R1antTNF suppressed the infiltration of inflammatory cells containing Th1 and Th17 cells into the spinal cord. These results suggest that selective blocking of TNFR1 by PEG-R1antTNF could be an effective therapeutic strategy against MS.

Dealing with immunogenicity of biologicals: assessment and clinical relevance

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In the last decade, biologicals revolutionized rheumatology. An increasing number of patients benefit from biotherapeuticals. However, some patients do not respond to treatment and others lose their response after a certain time. Immunogenicity is one of the factors linked to secondary nonresponse but its clinical significance has remained controversial.

RECENT FINDINGS

In recent years, knowledge of how to assess immunogenicity of biologicals has improved. Various reports show an inverse relationship between drug levels and antibody formation against the drug. Studies associated immunogenicity of therapeutic antibodies with clinically significant nonresponse in a subgroup of patients. Clinically relevant immunogenicity is influenced by several factors including dosing and concomitant medication. It has been shown that immunogenicity against biologicals can be persistent or transient.

SUMMARY

Immunogenicity affects a significant number of patients treated with biologicals. Monitoring of drug levels as well as of antibodies against therapeutic antibodies may lead to more rational treatment strategies.

Biologic therapies in rheumatology: lessons learned, future directions

During the past decade biologic therapies such as monoclonal antibodies and fusion proteins have revolutionized the management of rheumatic disease. By targeting key cytokines and immune cells biologics have provided more specific therapeutic interventions with less immunosuppression. Clinical use, however, has revealed that their theoretical simplicity hides a more complex reality. Efficacy, toxicity and even pharmacodynamic effects can deviate from those predicted, as poignantly illustrated by the catastrophic effects witnessed during the first-into-human administration of TGN1412. This review summarizes lessons gleaned from practical experience and discusses how these can inform future discovery and development of new biologic therapies for rheumatology.

Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors: Clinical implications of their different immunogenicity profiles

The beneficial effects of the anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) monoclonal antibodies infliximab and adalimumab and the soluble receptor fusion protein etanercept in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and a variety of other inflammatory disorders have been well described. However, less is known about the propensity of these agents to stimulate the production of antibodies against themselves and the clinical implications of such immunogenicity. A better understanding of the differential immunogenicity of these agents may help explain certain phenomena that have been reported with clinical use of anti-TNF agents (eg, infusion reactions [all agents], the need for increasing doses with prolonged use [infliximab]). This review will discuss our current understanding of the diverse immunogenic profiles of currently marketed anti-TNF agents.

Biology of tumor necrosis factor-alpha- implications for psoriasis

Numerous recent investigations have pointed to a key role of the proinflammatory, pleiotropic cytokine tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) in host defense and inflammatory processes. TNF overexpression has been found in lesional skin and in the circulation of psoriatic patients, and it was suggested that TNF-alpha is crucial in this and other immune diseases. Several approaches to inhibit TNF-alpha activity have been developed. These include three different neutralizing antibodies to TNF-alpha as well as three different soluble TNF-alpha receptors with characteristic properties designed to bind the 17-KDa soluble trimeric TNF-alpha and the 26-KDa membrane-bound form of TNF-alpha. Clinical trials have demonstrated significant antipsoriatic effects, and it is likely that blocking TNF-alpha will become an important therapeutic option. The data available from these trials contribute to further understanding of the disease by demonstrating the major role of TNF-alpha. An in-depth understanding of the regulation of TNF gene expression, protein production, receptor expression, and signaling pathways may lead to further, potentially important novel therapeutic strategies and antipsoriatic active small molecules, suitable for oral application in the future. Here we review the current knowledge of TNF biology, the approaches to inhibit TNF activity, and their clinical and immunological effects in psoriasis. In addition, the host-defense effects and chronic TNF-blocking activity are discussed.

Gene Therapy of Collagen-Induced Arthritis by Electrotransfer of Human Tumor Necrosis Factor-αSoluble Receptor I Variants

Electrotransfer is a simple and efficient strategy of nonviral gene delivery. We have used this method to deliver plasmids encoding three human tumor necrosis factor-alpha soluble receptor I variants (hTNFR-Is) a monomeric hTNFR-Is, a chimeric hTNFR-Is/mIgG1, and a dimeric (hTNFR-Is)(2) form. Electrotransfer parameters were studied and because anti-TNF strategies have proven efficient for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in clinics, we used a collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) mouse model to assess the efficacy of our constructs in the treatment of the disease. All proteins were proven bioactive, both in vitro and ex vivo. Plasmid intramuscular electrotransfer in mice resulted in a local expression of the three variants for at least 6 months; systemic expression lasted also more than 6 months for the hTNFR-Is/mIgG1 form, while it was shorter for the two other forms. This expression was plasmid dose-dependent. Electrotransfer of 50 microg of hTNFR-Is/mIgG1 at the onset of a CIA induced a clear-cut decrease in both clinical and histologic signs of the disease; the dimeric form also showed some efficacy. Moreover, the long-lasting protective effect was observed for more than 5 weeks. Comparison of this electrotransfer approach with repeated recombinant protein (etanercept) injections highlighted the potential practical interest of gene therapy approach for CIA, which leads to sustained therapeutic effect after single treatment. These results show that electrotransfer may be a useful method to deliver cytokine or anticytokine therapy in rheumatoid arthritis and also illustrate the potentiality of plasmid intramuscular electrotransfer for the rapid screening and assessment of different variant forms of secreted proteins.

Anti-TNF-alpha therapies: the next generation

The functioning of the immune system is finely balanced by the activities of pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory mediators or cytokines. Unregulated activities of these mediators can lead to the development of serious inflammatory diseases. In particular, enhanced tumour-necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) synthesis is associated with the development of rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease. Inhibiting TNF-alpha activities in these diseases has been remarkably successful. However, the current injectable protein therapies have associated risks and limitations. An oral, small molecule that regulates TNF-alpha biology could either replace the injectables or provide better disease control when used alone or in conjunction with existing therapies. In this review, we discuss briefly the present understanding of TNF-alpha-mediated biology and the current injectable therapies in clinical use, and focus on some of the new therapeutic approaches with oral, small-molecule inhibitors.

Soluble cytokine receptors in biological therapy

Due to their fundamental involvement in the pathogenesis of many diseases, cytokines constitute key targets for biotherapeutic approaches. The discovery that soluble forms of cytokine receptors are involved in the endogenous regulation of cytokine activity has prompted substantial interest in their potential application as immunotherapeutic agents. As such, soluble cytokine receptors have many advantages, including specificity, low immunogenicity and high affinity. Potential disadvantages, such as low avidity and short in vivo half-lifes, have been addressed by the use of genetically-designed receptors, hybrid proteins or chemical modifications. The ability of many soluble cytokine receptors to inhibit the binding and biological activity of their ligands makes them very specific cytokine antagonists. Several pharmaceutical companies have generated a number of therapeutic agents based on soluble cytokine receptors and many of them are undergoing clinical trials. The most advanced in terms of clinical development is etanercept (Enbrel, Immunex), a fusion protein between soluble TNF receptor Type II and the Fc region of human IgG1. This TNF-alpha; antagonist was the first soluble cytokine receptor to receive approval for use in humans. In general, most agents based on soluble cytokine receptors have been safe, well-tolerated and have shown only minor side effects in the majority of patients. Soluble cytokine receptors constitute a new generation of therapeutic agents with tremendous potential for applications in a wide variety of human diseases. Two current areas of research are the identification of their most promising applications and characterisation of their long-term effects.

Development of a novel, nonimmunogenic, soluble human TNF receptor type I (sTNFR-I) construct in the baboon

Pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of six different recombinant human soluble p55 tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor I (sTNFR-I) constructs were evaluated in juvenile baboons. The constructs included either an sTNFR-I IgG1 immunoadhesin (p55 sTNFR-I Fc) or five different sTNFR-I constructs covalently linked to polyethylene glycol. The constructs were administered intravenously three times, and pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity were examined over 63 days. All of the constructs were immunogenic, with the exception of a 2.6-domain monomeric sTNFR-I. To evaluate whether the nonimmunogenic 2.6-domain monomeric construct could protect baboons against TNF-alpha-induced mortality, baboons were pretreated with 1, 5, or 10 mg/kg body wt and were compared with baboons receiving either placebo or 1 mg/kg body wt of the dimeric 4.0-domain sTNFR-I construct (n = 3 each) before lethal Escherichia coli bacteremia. The monomeric construct protected baboons and neutralized TNF bioactivity, although greater quantities were required compared with the dimeric 4.0-domain sTNFR-I construct. We conclude that E. coli-recombinant-derived human sTNFR-I constructs can be generated with minimal immunogenicity on repeated administration and still protect against the consequences of exaggerated TNF-alpha production.

Soluble cytokine receptors: novel immunotherapeutic agents

Being mediators of immune and inflammatory reactions, abnormal or excessive production of cytokines is often the main cause of the pathology in many types of disease. Targeting cytokines by means of inhibitory drugs may thus offer a valid therapeutic approach in particular diseases. Soluble forms of cytokine receptors (sCR) normally participate in the control of cytokine activity in vivo by inhibiting the ability of cytokines to bind their membrane receptors and from generating a biological response. The ability of sCR to act as cytokine inhibitors, coupled to their specificity, high affinities and low immunogenicities have prompted considerable interest in their use as immunotherapeutic agents. In fact, many types of sCR have been shown to inhibit the biological activity of their cytokines in vitro and in different experimental models. Several sCR, particularly the soluble TNF receptors sTNFR-I (p55) and sTNFR-II (p75), have been modified by linking them to the Fc portion of human immunoglobulin (e.g., 'immunoadhesins') or by the addition of polyethylene-glycol (PEG) (e.g., 'PEGylation'), in order to enhance their affinity and/or biological half-life. These agents have shown significant therapeutic value in clinical trials of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Indeed, a sTNFR-II:Fc hybrid molecule (etanercept), the first sCR-derived therapeutic agent to receive approval for human use, is already utilised for the treatment of some forms of RA. Additional applications of this drug in other inflammatory conditions are currently being evaluated, while another sCR-derived agent, a human sIL-4R, is undergoing trials for the treatment of asthma. Many other sCR, such as sIL-1R, sIL-5R, sIFNgammaR, may also have significant potential for the treatment of a wide variety of human diseases.