The adjuvant MF59 increases the immunogenicity and protective efficacy of subunit influenza vaccine in mice

Evolutionary conservation and positive selection of Influenza A Nucleoprotein CTL epitopes for universal vaccination: a proof-of-concept

Influenza (flu) infection is a leading cause of respiratory disease and death worldwide. While seasonal flu vaccines are effective at reducing morbidity and mortality, such effects rely on the odds of successful prediction of the upcoming viral strains. Additional threats from emerging flu viruses that we cannot predict and avian flu viruses that can be directly transmitted to humans, urge the strategic development of universal vaccinations that can protect against flu viruses of different subtypes and across species. Annual flu vaccines elicit mainly humoral responses. Under circumstances when antibodies induced by vaccination fail to recognize and neutralize the emerging virus adequately, virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) are the major contributors to the control of viral replication and elimination of infected cells. Our studies exploited the evolutionary conservation of influenza A nucleoprotein (NP) and the fact that NP-specific CTL responses pose a constant selecting pressure on functional CTL epitopes, to screen for NP epitopes that are highly conserved among heterosubtypes but are subjected to positive selection historically. We identified a region on NP that is evolutionarily conserved and historically positively selected (NP_137-182 ) and validated that it contains an epitope that is functional in eliciting NP-specific CTL responses and immunity that can partially protect immunized mice against lethal dose infection of a heterosubtypic influenza A virus. Our proof-of-concept study supports the hypothesis that evolutionary conservation and positive selection of influenza nucleoprotein can be exploited to identify functional CTL epitope to elicit cross protection against different heterosubtypes, therefore, to help develop strategies to modify flu vaccine formula for a broader and more durable protective immunity. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Matrix-M™ adjuvation broadens protection induced by seasonal trivalent virosomal influenza vaccine

Background

Influenza virus infections are responsible for significant morbidity worldwide and therefore it remains a high priority to develop more broadly protective vaccines. Adjuvation of current seasonal influenza vaccines has the potential to achieve this goal.

Methods

To assess the immune potentiating properties of Matrix-M™, mice were immunized with virosomal trivalent seasonal vaccine adjuvated with Matrix-M™. Serum samples were isolated to determine the hemagglutination inhibiting (HAI) antibody titers against vaccine homologous and heterologous strains. Furthermore, we assess whether adjuvation with Matrix-M™ broadens the protective efficacy of the virosomal trivalent seasonal vaccine against vaccine homologous and heterologous influenza viruses.

Results

Matrix-M™ adjuvation enhanced HAI antibody titers and protection against vaccine homologous strains. Interestingly, Matrix-M™ adjuvation also resulted in HAI antibody titers against heterologous influenza B strains, but not against the tested influenza A strains. Even though the protection against heterologous influenza A was induced by the adjuvated vaccine, in the absence of HAI titers the protection was accompanied by severe clinical scores and body weight loss. In contrast, in the presence of heterologous HAI titers full protection against the heterologous influenza B strain without any disease symptoms was obtained.

Conclusion

The results of this study emphasize the promising potential of a Matrix-M™-adjuvated seasonal trivalent virosomal influenza vaccine. Adjuvation of trivalent virosomal vaccine does not only enhance homologous protection, but in addition induces protection against heterologous strains and thus provides overall more potent and broad protective immunity.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12985-015-0435-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

An adjuvanted inactivated murine cytomegalovirus (MCMV) vaccine induces potent and long-term protective immunity against a lethal challenge with virulent MCMV

Background

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is a ubiquitous pathogen that causes serious problems in immunocompromised or immunologically immature hosts. Vaccination is the preferred approach for prevention of HCMV infection, but so far no approved HCMV vaccine is available. In this study, we assessed the immunogenicity and protective immunity of a formalin-inactivated murine cytomegalovirus vaccine (FI-MCMV) in a mouse model in combination with adjuvants MF59, alum, or chitosan.

Methods

Specific-pathogen-free BALB/c mice aged 6–8 weeks were immunized twice, 3 weeks apart, with various doses of FI-MCMV (0.25 μg, 1 μg, 4 μg) with or without adjuvant. Mice were challenged with a lethal dose (5 × LD₅₀) of a more virulent mouse salivary gland-passaged MCMV 3 weeks after the second immunization. The protective immunity of the vaccine was evaluated by determining the survival rates, residual spleen and salivary gland viral loads, body weight changes, and serum anti-MCMV IgG titers.

Results

Immunization with FI-MCMV vaccine induced a high level of specific antibody response. Antigen sparing was achieved by the addition of an adjuvant, which significantly enhanced the humoral response to vaccine antigens with a wide range of doses. The level of live virus detected in the spleen on day 5 and in the salivary glands on day 21 after the lethal challenge was significantly lower in adjuvant-treated groups than in controls. Survival rates in adjuvant-treated groups also increased significantly. Furthermore, these protective immune responses were sustained for at least 6 months following immunization.

Conclusions

These results show that inactivated MCMV vaccine is effective, and that the adjuvanted FI-MCMV vaccine provides more effective and longer-term protection than the adjuvant-free vaccine.

The history of MF59(®) adjuvant: a phoenix that arose from the ashes

The first clinical trial of an MF59(®)-adjuvanted influenza vaccine (Novartis) was conducted 20 years ago in 1992. The product that emerged (Fluad(®), Novartis) was licensed first in Italy in 1997 and is now licensed worldwide in 30 countries. US licensure is expected in the coming years. By contrast, many alternative adjuvanted vaccines have failed to progress. The key decisions that allowed MF59 to succeed in such a challenging environment are highlighted here and the lessons that were learned along the way are discussed. MF59 was connected to vaccines that did not succeed and was perceived as a 'failure' before it was a success. Importantly, it never failed for safety reasons and was always well tolerated. Even when safety issues have emerged for alternative adjuvants, careful analysis of the substantial safety database for MF59 have shown that there are no significant concerns with widespread use, even in more 'sensitive' populations.

MF59 adjuvant: the best insurance against influenza strain diversity

MF59 is a well-established, safe and potent vaccine adjuvant that has been licensed for more than 13 years for use in an influenza vaccine focused on elderly subjects (Fluad®), Novartis, Cambridge, MA, USA). Recently, MF59 was shown to be safe in a seasonal influenza vaccine for young children and was able to increase vaccine efficacy from 43 to 89%. A key and consistent feature of MF59 is the ability of the emulsion to induce fast priming of influenza antigen-specific CD4(+) T-cell responses, to induce strong and long-lasting memory T- and B-cell responses and to broaden the immune response beyond the influenza strains actually included in the vaccine. The enhanced breadth of response is valuable in the seasonal setting, but is particularly valuable in a (pre-) pandemic setting, when it is difficult to predict which strain will emerge to cause the pandemic. We have shown that the ability of MF59 to increase the breadth of immune response against influenza vaccines is mainly due to the spreading of the repertoire of the B-cell epitopes recognized on the hemagglutinin and neuraminidase of the influenza virus.

Particulate vaccines: on the quest for optimal delivery and immune response

Subunit vaccines offer a safer alternative to traditional organism-based vaccines, but their immunogenicity is impaired. This hurdle might be overcome by the use of micro- and nanodelivery systems carrying the antigen(s). This review discusses the rationale for the use of particulate vaccines and provides an overview of antigen-delivery vehicles currently under investigation. It further highlights the cellular uptake, antigen processing and the presentation by antigen-presenting cells because these processes are partially governed by particle characteristics and eventually determine the immunological outcome. Finally, we address the attractive concept of concomitant delivery of antigens and immunopotentiators. The condensed knowledge could be an asset for rationally designing antigen-delivery vehicles to obtain safe and efficacious vaccines.

MF59-adjuvanted vaccines for seasonal and pandemic influenza prophylaxis

Abstract  Influenza is a major cause of worldwide morbidity and mortality through frequent seasonal epidemics and infrequent pandemics. Morbidity and mortality rates from seasonal influenza are highest in the most frail, such as the elderly, those with underlying chronic conditions and very young children. Antigenic mismatch between strains recommended for vaccine formulation and circulating viruses can further reduce vaccine efficacy in these populations. Seasonal influenza vaccines with enhanced, cross‐reactive immunogenicity are needed to address these problems and can confer a better immune protection, particularly in seasons were antigenic mismatch occurs. A related issue for vaccine development is the growing threat of pandemic influenza caused by H5N1 avian strains. Vaccines against strains with pandemic potential offer the best approach for reducing the potential impact of a pandemic. However, current non‐adjuvanted pre‐pandemic vaccines offer suboptimal immunogenicity against H5N1. For both seasonal and pre‐pandemic vaccines, the addition of adjuvants may be the best approach for providing enhanced cross‐reactive immunogenicity. MF59^®, the first oil‐in‐water emulsion licensed as an adjuvant for human use, can enhance vaccine immune responses through multiple mechanisms. A trivalent MF59‐adjuvanted seasonal influenza vaccine (Fluad^®) has shown to induce significantly higher immune responses to influenza vaccination in the elderly, compared with non‐adjuvanted vaccines, and to provide cross‐reactive immunity against divergent influenza strains. Similar results have been generated with a MF59‐adjuvanted H5N1 pre‐pandemic vaccine, which showed higher and broader immunogenicity compared with non‐adjuvanted pre‐pandemic vaccines.

Heterosubtypic protection conferred by combined vaccination with M2e peptide and split influenza vaccine

There is urgent need to develop influenza vaccines with broad-spectrum protection against the potential influenza pandemic. The extracellular domain of influenza M2 protein (M2e) is considered as an appropriate target to induce heterosubtypic protection. We investigated the immunity and protection induced by combined vaccination with synthetic M2e peptide and traditional split influenza vaccine. The combined vaccination was able to induce similar strain-specific hemagglutinin inhibition (HI) antibodies as vaccination of split virus alone. However, aluminum-adjuvant but not oil-in-water-emulsion adjuvant combined vaccination was able to induce high titers of anti-M2e antibodies and provoke M2e-specific T lymphocyte response. Furthermore, we found that the addition of M2e peptide greatly enhanced the cross-protective efficacy of split virus in aluminum adjuvant but slightly weakened the efficacy of vaccination in oil-in-water-emulsion adjuvant. Moreover, aluminum-adjuvant combined vaccination conferred complete cross-protection against heterosubtypic influenza virus. According to the results, we suggest that the M2e peptide should be added into split influenza vaccine in the preparation for the potential influenza pandemic.

MF59 is a safe and potent vaccine adjuvant that enhances protection against influenza virus infection

In preclinical studies, MF59 adjuvant offered improved protection against influenza virus challenge and significantly reduced the viral load in the lungs of challenged mice. In humans, MF59 is a safe and potent vaccine adjuvant that has been licensed in more than 20 countries (Fluad [Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Inc., MA, USA]). The safety profile of an MF59-adjuvanted vaccine is well established through a large safety database. MF59 adjuvant has had a significant impact on the immunogenicity of influenza vaccines in the elderly and in adults who are chronically ill. MF59 has also been shown to have a significant impact on the immunogenicity of pandemic influenza vaccines. MF59 allows for broader cross-reactivity against viral strains not included in the vaccine. MF59 has been shown to be more potent for both antibody and T-cell responses than aluminum-based adjuvants. MF59 has broad potential to be used as a safe and effective vaccine adjuvant for a wide range of vaccine types.

MF59 is a safe and potent vaccine adjuvant for flu vaccines in humans: what did we learn during its development?

The MF59 adjuvant has been included in a licensed influenza vaccine for a decade. Hence, we have a significant amount of clinical data to establish its potency and safety. We can now reassess our early preclinical studies and determine whether or not they were useful to predict human responses. The main lesson learned is that mouse models can be valuable, but one must ask the right questions and the models must be used appropriately.

Bacterial ghosts as adjuvant particles

The development of more advanced and effective vaccines is of great interest in modern medicine. These new-generation vaccines, based on recombinant proteins or DNA, are often less reactogenic and immunogenic than traditional vaccines. Thus, there is an urgent need for the development of new and improved adjuvants. Besides many other immunostimulatory components, the bacterial ghost (BG) system is currently under investigation as a potent vaccine delivery system with intrinsic adjuvant properties. BGs are nonliving cell envelope preparations from Gram-negative cells, devoid of cytoplasmic contents, while their cellular morphology and native surface antigenic structures remain preserved. Owing to the particulate nature of BGs and the fact that they contain many well known immune-stimulating compounds, BGs have the potential to enhance immune responses against ghost-delivered target antigens.

Hepatitis C virus polyprotein vaccine formulations capable of inducing broad antibody and cellular immune responses

Although approximately 3 % of the world's population is infected with Hepatitis C virus (HCV), there is no prophylactic vaccine available. This study reports the design, cloning and purification of a single polyprotein comprising the HCV core protein and non-structural proteins NS3, NS4a, NS4b, NS5a and NS5b. The immunogenicity of this polyprotein, which was formulated in alum, oil-in-water emulsion MF59 or poly(dl-lactide co-glycolide) in the presence or absence of CpG adjuvant, was then determined in a murine model for induction of B- and T-cell responses. The addition of adjuvants or a delivery system to the HCV polyprotein enhanced serum antibody and T-cell proliferative responses, as well as IFN-gamma responses, by CD4+ T cells. The antibody responses were mainly against the NS3 and NS5 components of the polyprotein and relatively poor responses were elicited against NS4 and the core components. IFN-gamma responses, however, were induced against all of the individual components of the polyprotein. These data suggest that the HCV polyprotein delivered with adjuvants induces broad B- and T-cell responses and could be a vaccine candidate against HCV.

Safety and efficacy of two types of influenza vaccination in heart transplant recipients: a prospective randomised controlled study

BACKGROUND

Influenza may cause severe disease in immunosuppressed patients. Different vaccines have been proved to be efficacious to prevent influenza in tranplant recipients. Since the last five years the addition of adjuvants to improve the immune response to vaccine preparations has been proposed and evaluated. In this study, two antigenically identical vaccines, but different for the presence of adjuvants were randomised among a cohort of heart transplant recipients to evaluate their safety and immunogenicity.

METHODS

58 patients, receiving an heart transplant more than 6 months before, were randomised to receive one shoot vaccination with Fluad (containing the MF59 adjuvant) or Agrippal (no adjuvant added) or to enter the control, not-vaccinated, group. The immune response to influenza was evaluated separately for type A and type B viruses and for the IgG and the IgM antibodies. Patients were clinically evaluated at least monthly up to 6 months.

RESULTS

Influenza symptoms were reported by 33% of patients receiving Fluad, 29% of the Agrippal and 63% of the control group. 4 episodes of acute myocardial rejection >/=3A were identified without difference between the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The superior efficacy of vaccines containing adjuvants was not found and the data clearly confirmed that vaccination against influenza is safe and effective in heart transplant recipients. The use of vaccine containing adjuvant substances do not ameliorate the clinical performance of the immunisation suggesting that less expensive influenza vaccine preparation without adjuvant substances could be equally useful to protect heart transplant recipients.

Mucosal adjuvants and delivery systems for protein-, DNA- and RNA-based vaccines

Almost all vaccinations today are delivered through parenteral routes. Mucosal vaccination offers several benefits over parenteral routes of vaccination, including ease of administration, the possibility of self-administration, elimination of the chance of injection with infected needles, and induction of mucosal as well as systemic immunity. However, mucosal vaccines have to overcome several formidable barriers in the form of significant dilution and dispersion; competition with a myriad of various live replicating bacteria, viruses, inert food and dust particles; enzymatic degradation; and low pH before reaching the target immune cells. It has long been known that vaccination through mucosal membranes requires potent adjuvants to enhance immunogenicity, as well as delivery systems to decrease the rate of dilution and degradation and to target the vaccine to the site of immune function. This review is a summary of current approaches to mucosal vaccination, and it primarily focuses on adjuvants as immunopotentiators and vaccine delivery systems for mucosal vaccines based on protein, DNA or RNA. In this context, we define adjuvants as protein or oligonucleotides with immunopotentiating properties co-administered with pathogen-derived antigens, and vaccine delivery systems as chemical formulations that are more inert and have less immunomodulatory effects than adjuvants, and that protect and deliver the vaccine through the site of administration. Although vaccines can be quite diverse in their composition, including inactivated virus, virus-like particles and inactivated bacteria (which are inert), protein-like vaccines, and non-replicating viral vectors such as poxvirus and adenovirus (which can serve as DNA delivery systems), this review will focus primarily on recombinant protein antigens, plasmid DNA, and alphavirus-based replicon RNA vaccines and delivery systems. This review is not an exhaustive list of all available protein, DNA and RNA vaccines, with related adjuvants and delivery systems, but rather is an attempt to highlight many of the currently available approaches in immunopotentiation of mucosal vaccines.

Cell death induced by vaccine adjuvants containing surfactants

Many vaccine adjuvants contain surface-active agents, but the immunological roles played by these components have been essentially ignored. The objective of this study was to examine possible apoptotic and necrotic effects of the surface-active agents, Pluronic L121 and Tween 80, which are components of L121-adjuvant (a formulation we synthesized with the aim of representing several commercially produced adjuvants), on EL4 lymphoma cells. Cell viability and cytolytic effects were analyzed using the MTT and LDH release assays, and the distribution of cells in different stages of the cell cycle after treatment with these agents was analyzed by propidium iodide (PI) staining and flow cytometry. L121-adjuvant was shown to induce cell cycle arrest and inhibit cell proliferation. Treatment of EL4 cells with surface-active agents resulted in a concentration-dependent increase in the apoptotic/necrotic cell populations. Fluorescence microscopy using Hoechst 33342 staining demonstrated chromosome condensation and DNA fragmentation in cells treated with surfactants or adjuvant. The apoptotic and necrotic effects of vaccine adjuvant containing surface-active agents were confirmed by Annexin V/propidium iodide staining and flow cytometric analysis. Pretreatment of EL4 cells with zVAD-fmk, a broad range caspase inhibitor, partially prevented apoptosis induced by Pluronic L121, but did not prevent the cell death induced by Tween 80 or L121-adjuvant. These findings suggested that Tween 80 and L121-adjuvant induced apoptosis in EL4 cells via a "non-classical" caspase-independent pathway. Results presented in this study suggest mechanisms of elicitation of CD8(+), class I-restricted CTL response by soluble antigens mediated by the vaccine adjuvant containing surface-active agents.

Flow cytometric quantitation of the protective efficacy of dendritic cell based vaccines in a human papillomavirus type 16 murine challenge model

A murine model for the assessment of protective immunity to human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16, a virus that does not naturally infect mice, is described. In this system, protection was tested following intranasal challenge of mice with a recombinant vaccinia virus expressing both the selected HPV antigen and a beta-galactosidase (beta-gal) reporter. The extent of viral infectivity was determined by measuring beta-gal positive lung cells using flow cytometry. The efficacy of this model to measure protective immunity was evaluated by priming mice with the beta-gal vaccinia virus then challenging the mice with the same virus. Vaccinia primed mice had negligible numbers of beta-gal positive cells in the lung 5 days following viral challenge indicating protection, whereas around 50% of cells were infected in immunologically naive, challenged mice. The protective efficacy of two dendritic cell vaccines for HPV16 was measured in this model. Both vaccines provided some protection to subsequent viral challenge, compared with their controls. Although this protection model was applied to HPV in this study, it may also have broad application to other viruses that do not infect mice naturally.

MF59-adjuvanted vaccines: increased immunogenicity with an optimal safety profile

The need to enhance the immunogenicity of purified subunit antigens has prompted the development of several new adjuvants. However, many of these new molecules have demonstrated a reactogenicity profile that is not suitable for their inclusion in vaccines for human use. In this context, the adjuvant emulsion MF59 has been developed, tested in combination with different antigens in several animal models and subsequently evaluated in humans. Clinical trials with several MF59-adjuvanted vaccines have been performed in different age groups (from newborns to the elderly) and have shown an increased immunogenicity of coadministered antigens, associated with a high level of safety and tolerability. MF59 has been the first adjuvant to be licensed for human use after alum and, as part of an enhanced influenza vaccine for the elderly, is now available in the marketplace of several countries worldwide.

Type I IFN as a natural adjuvant for a protective immune response: lessons from the influenza vaccine model

The identification of natural adjuvants capable of selectively promoting an efficient immune response against infectious agents would represent an important advance in immunology, with direct implications for vaccine development, whose progress is generally hampered by the difficulties in defining powerful synthetic adjuvants suitable for clinical use. Here, we demonstrate that endogenous type I IFN is necessary for the Th1 type of immune response induced by typical adjuvants in mice and that IFN itself is an unexpectedly powerful adjuvant when administered with the human influenza vaccine, for inducing IgG2a and IgA production and conferring protection from virus challenge. The finding that these cytokines, currently used in patients, are necessary for full expression of adjuvant activity and are sufficient for the generation of a protective immune response opens new perspectives in understanding the basis of immunity and in vaccine development.

Development and application of an analytical method for the determination of squalene in formulations of anthrax vaccine adsorbed

Specific lots of Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed, administered to members of the US Armed Forces, have been described on various Internet sites and in news articles as a source of squalene, a chemical purported by these media to be associated with the Gulf War Syndrome. We have developed and validated a method using high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection for the determination of squalene in anthrax vaccine preparations. The method has a limit of detection of 140 parts per billion and has been successfully applied to a commercial vaccine known to contain squalene. We have applied this method to 17 lots of Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed administered to members of the US Armed Forces. No squalene has been detected in any lot. The results of these analyses provide direct evidence for the absence of squalene as an ingredient or a manufacturing contaminant in Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed.

Recent advances in vaccine adjuvants

New generation vaccines, particularly those based on recombinant proteins and DNA, are likely to be less reactogenic than traditional vaccines but are also less immunogenic. Therefore, there is an urgent need for the development of new and improved vaccine adjuvants. Adjuvants can be broadly separated into two classes based on their principal mechanisms of action: vaccine delivery systems and immunostimulatory adjuvants. Vaccine-delivery systems generally are particulate (e.g., emulsions, microparticles, iscoms, and liposomes) and function mainly to target associated antigens into antigen-resenting cells. In contrast, immunostimulatory adjuvants are derived predominantly from pathogens and often represent pathogen-ssociated molecular patterns (e.g., lipopolysaccaride, monophosphoryl lipid A, CpG DNA). which activate cells of the innate immune system. Recent progress in innate immunity is beginning to yield insight into the initiation of immune responses and the ways in which immunostimulatory adjuvants may enhance this process. The discovery of more potent adjuvants may allow the development of prophylactic and therapeutic vaccines against cancers and chronic infectious diseases. In addition, new adjuvants may also allow vaccines to be delivered mucosally.

Recent developments in adjuvants for vaccines against infectious diseases

New generation vaccines, particularly those based on recombinant proteins and DNA, are likely to be less reactogenic than traditional vaccines, but are also less immunogenic. Therefore, there is an urgent need for the development of new and improved vaccine adjuvants. Adjuvants can be broadly separated into two classes, based on their principal mechanisms of action; vaccine delivery systems and 'immunostimulatory adjuvants'. Vaccine delivery systems are generally particulate e.g. emulsions, microparticles, iscoms and liposomes, and mainly function to target associated antigens into antigen presenting cells (APC). In contrast, immunostimulatory adjuvants are predominantly derived from pathogens and often represent pathogen associated molecular patterns (PAMP) e.g. LPS, MPL, CpG DNA, which activate cells of the innate immune system. Once activated, cells of innate immunity drive and focus the acquired immune response. In some studies, delivery systems and immunostimulatory agents have been combined to prepare adjuvant delivery systems, which are designed for more effective delivery of the immunostimulatory adjuvant into APC. Recent progress in innate immunity is beginning to yield insight into the initiation of immune responses and the ways in which immunostimulatory adjuvants may enhance this process. However, a rational approach to the development of new and more effective vaccine adjuvants will require much further work to better define the mechanisms of action of existing adjuvants. The discovery of more potent adjuvants may allow the development of vaccines against infectious agents such as HIV which do not naturally elicit protective immunity. New adjuvants may also allow vaccines to be delivered mucosally.

Safety and immunogenicity of adjuvanted and unadjuvanted subunit influenza vaccines administered intranasally to healthy adults

Antigen-specific mucosal immunity is thought to be important for protection against influenza virus infection. Currently licensed parenteral influenza vaccines stimulate the production of serum antibodies, but are poor inducers of mucosal immunity. The adjuvant MF59 has been shown to enhance the humoral immune response to parenteral influenza vaccine in humans and the mucosal immune response to intranasally-administered influenza vaccine in mice. We conducted an open-label safety study followed by an observer-blind, randomized trial comparing the immune response to intranasally-administered subunit influenza vaccine adjuvanted with MF59, unadjuvanted subunit influenza vaccine, and placebo. Adverse reactions did not occur significantly more frequently in vaccinees than placebo recipients. Of 31 subjects receiving 2 doses of MF59-adjuvanted influenza vaccine, 19 (61%), 8 (26%), and 11 (35%) developed a mucosal IgA response to influenza A/H1N1, A/H3N2, and B, respectively. The percentage of subjects with a serum antibody response was slightly lower. The immune responses to adjuvanted vaccine were not significantly different from those to unadjuvanted vaccine. Both vaccines gave more frequent responses than seen in placebo recipients, indicating the potential of intranasal inactivated vaccines to stimulate local IgA responses.

GAD65 and insulin B chain peptide (9-23) are not primary autoantigens in the type 1 diabetes syndrome of the BB rat

To investigate whether GAD65 whole molecule, GAD65 p35 or insulin B chain peptide (amino acids 9-23) play an essential role in the pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes in the BioBreeding (BB) rat, we gave serial injections of GAD65, p35 or insulin B chain (9-23) to six groups of BB/Worcester rats. The individual antigens were administered either intrathymically on day 2 and intraperitoneally in MF 59-0 adjuvant 5 times during the first 5 weeks, or by intranasal instillation once neonatally and 5 days/week for the following 6 weeks. Control groups were injected with vehicle only. Age of onset of diabetes and degree of insulitis were not different between controls and antigen-treated rats. Rats that received GAD65 intrathymically and intraperitoneally developed high GAD65-antibody titers without altering diabetes development. In GAD65-treated animals, serum antibodies recognized epitopes at 3 sites on GAD65 in diabetic animals but only at 1 site in non-diabetic animals. GAD65-injected animals also showed a significant reduction of IFN-gamma mRNA expression in the thymus. This study provides evidence against the hypothesis that GAD65 and insulin B chain peptide (9-23) are primary diabetogenic autoantigens in BB rats because immunizations with these antigens and GAD65-induced immune deviation did not alter the development of diabetes.

Advances in vaccine adjuvants

Currently, aluminum salts and MF59 are the only vaccine adjuvants approved for human use. With the development of new-generation vaccines (including recombinant subunit and mucosal vaccines) that are less immunogenic, the search for more potent vaccine adjuvants has intensified. Of the novel compounds recently evaluated in human trials, immunostimulatory molecules such as the lipopolysaccharide derived MPL and the saponin derivative QS21 appear most promising, although doubts have been raised as to their safety in humans. Preclinical work with particulate adjuvants, such as the MF59 microemulsion and lipid-particle immune-stimulating complexes (Iscoms), suggest that these molecules are also potent elicitors of humoral and cellular immune responses. In addition, preclinical data on CpG oligonucleotides appear to be encouraging, particularly with respect to their ability to selectively manipulate immune responses. While all these adjuvants show promise, further work is needed to better define the mechanisms of adjuvant action. Ultimately, the development of more potent adjuvants may allow vaccines to be used as therapeutic, rather than prophylactic, agents.

Advances in cancer vaccine development

Traditionally, cancer vaccines have used whole tumour cells administered in adjuvant or infected with viruses to increase the immunogenicity of the cells. With the identification of tumour-associated and tumour-specific antigens (TAA, TSA), antigen and epitope-specific vaccines have been designed. Compared to tumour cell vaccines, antigen and epitope vaccines are more specific and easier to produce in large quantities but may display lower immunogenicity and lead to the in vivo selection of antigen or epitope-negative escape tumour variant cells. The optimal vaccine will elicit both humoral and cellular immunity in the patients as both parameters have been positively correlated with the induction of beneficial clinical responses. The choice of adjuvant, costimulation and delivery mode greatly determines the outcome of vaccinations and may favour the induction of T-cell responses of T helper (Th)1, Th2, or both Th1 and Th2 types. Animal models of TAA vaccines must take into account the normal tissue expression of TAA, which may induce immunological tolerance to TAA. With the identification of homologues of human TAA in animals, novel experimental models of cancer vaccines which mimic the condition in patients are now available. Several vaccines comprising tumour cells, TAA or anti-idiotypic antibodies mimicking TAA have recently entered phase III of clinical evaluation.