Effect of intradialytic parenteral nutrition on mortality rates in end-stage renal disease care

Revisiting Intradialytic Parenteral Nutrition: How Can We Apply the Evidence in Clinical Practice?

Intradialytic parenteral nutrition (IDPN) remains a controversial nutrition support practice in hemodialysis. Multiple reviews and evidence-based clinical practice guidelines have been published in the past 20 years. Despite essentially looking at the same evidence, conclusions and recommendations vary significantly, leading to widespread uncertainty among clinicians on the value of and indications for IDPN. This paper aims to bring a clinical perspective to the current state of evidence and clinical practice, recognizing the strengths and weaknesses of current evidence and the clinical questions that remain unanswered, as well as providing guidance for using IDPN in clinical practice. IDPN should be considered a strategy to complement spontaneous oral intake in clinically stable patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis or who have or are at risk of malnutrition and who have substantial but not adequate protein and/or energy intake. There is a clear need for robust randomized controlled trials evaluating the impact of IDPN in appropriately selected patients. Additionally, future trials should include patient-centered outcome measures such as appetite, spontaneous oral intake, quality of life, and reliable measures of nutritional status.

Efficacy of intradialytic amino acids on nutritional status in children with stage 5 chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Protein energy wasting (PEW) is a common cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD 5). Intradialytic parenteral nutrition (IDPN) has been used as a therapy for preventing and treating PEW in children with CKD 5 when other conventional modalities fail. However, not enough data is available to define its effectiveness in treating malnutrition in children. This study aims to investigate potential benefits of IDPN in Egyptian children with CKD 5.

METHODS

In this prospective, placebo-controlled, parallel-group single blinded study, we enrolled 50 CKD 5 patients; 25 patients (intervention group) received intravenous amino acids (KIDIMN), while 25 patients (control group) received normal saline as placebo, each given during regular dialysis 3 times a week for 9 months. Patients were subjected to nutritional assessment at baseline and 3-, 6-, and 9-month follow-up using height Z-score, hand grip strength (HGS) for muscle power assessment, body composition monitor (BCM) for assessing lean tissue mass (LTM) and adipose tissue mass (ATM), and biochemical measures including serum albumin, serum triglyceride, and serum cholesterol.

RESULTS

When comparing baseline and 9-month follow-up values, significant improvement was recorded in height Z-score, LTM, and serum albumin in the intervention group unlike the control group where no significant changes were recorded.

CONCLUSION

IDPN is proposed to be an effective method for preventing and treating malnutrition in children with CKD 5. However, further multi-centric studies with larger sample size and longer duration of follow-up are still recommended.

Effectiveness of Intradialytic Parenteral Nutrition in Treating Protein-Energy Wasting in Hemodialysis: A Rapid Systematic Review

Intradialytic parenteral nutrition (IDPN) is commonly requested before recommended therapies in malnourished patients on hemodialysis. This review provides updated critical synthesis of the evidence on the use of IDPN in patients on hemodialysis. We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, and other sources to identify evidence. Two reviewers sequentially selected studies, abstracted data, rated study quality, and synthesized evidence using predefined criteria. IDPN did not improve clinically relevant outcomes compared with dietary counseling or oral supplementation and had varied results compared with usual care in 12 studies. Data are limited on adverse events or cost-effectiveness of IDPN. Important limitations of the evidence, including limited measurement of clinically important outcomes, methodological concerns, and heterogeneity between studies, weaken our confidence in these findings. IDPN may be a reasonable treatment option for patients who fail to respond or cannot receive recommended treatments, but the broad usage of IDPN before recommended treatment options does not appear warranted.

When Is Parenteral Nutrition Appropriate?

Parenteral nutrition (PN) represents one of the most notable achievements of modern medicine, serving as a therapeutic modality for all age groups across the healthcare continuum. PN offers a life-sustaining option when intestinal failure prevents adequate oral or enteral nutrition. However, providing nutrients by vein is an expensive form of nutrition support, and serious adverse events can occur. In an effort to provide clinical guidance regarding PN therapy, the Board of Directors of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) convened a task force to develop consensus recommendations regarding appropriate PN use. The recommendations contained in this document aim to delineate appropriate PN use and promote clinical benefits while minimizing the risks associated with the therapy. These consensus recommendations build on previous ASPEN clinical guidelines and consensus recommendations for PN safety. They are intended to guide evidence-based decisions regarding appropriate PN use for organizations and individual professionals, including physicians, nurses, dietitians, pharmacists, and other clinicians involved in providing PN. They not only support decisions related to initiating and managing PN but also serve as a guide for developing quality monitoring tools for PN and for identifying areas for further research. Finally, the recommendations contained within the document are also designed to inform decisions made by additional stakeholders, such as policy makers and third-party payers, by providing current perspectives regarding the use of PN in a variety of healthcare settings.

In Quality We Trust; but Quality of Life or Quality of Care?

The ESRD program provides medical care to a diverse and medically complex patient population. The care for the ESRD patient population has become increasingly benchmarked with process of care measures. These measures include dialysis adequacy, anemia, nutrition, and vascular access outcomes. These process-related dialysis measures may not improve the care of the individual patient as care relates to the individual's goals and values. There is also evidence that these process measures may not be causally related to quality of life, hospitalization, and survival. The adoption of patient-reported outcomes may shift the balance toward more patient-centered care. However, the extent to which mandated measures of health-related quality of life and patient satisfaction result in improved outcomes remains unclear.

The Effects of Parenteral Amino Acid Therapy on Protein Carbamylation in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients

OBJECTIVE

Protein carbamylation is a urea-driven post-translational protein modification associated with mortality in dialysis patients. Free amino acids (AAs) are competitive inhibitors of protein carbamylation and animal studies suggest increasing AA concentrations reduces carbamylation burden. We hypothesized that AA therapy in maintenance hemodialysis patients would reduce carbamylation, carrying the potential to improve clinical outcomes.

DESIGN

Prospective pilot clinical trial (NCT1612429).

SETTING

The study was conducted from March 2013 to March 2014 in outpatient dialysis facilities in the Boston metropolitan area.

SUBJECTS AND INTERVENTION

We enrolled 23 consecutively consenting hemodialysis subjects, infusing the first 12 individuals with 250 cc of AAs 3 times per week postdialysis over 8 weeks. The remaining 11 subjects served as controls.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Change in carbamylated albumin (C-Alb), a measure of total body carbamylation burden, between baseline and 8 weeks was the primary outcome.

RESULTS

The treated and control groups had similar clinical characteristics and similar baseline C-Alb levels (mean ± SE 9.5 ± 2.4 and 9.3 ± 1.3 mmol/mol, respectively; P = .61). The treated arm showed a significant reduction in C-Alb compared with controls at 4 weeks (8.4% reduction in the treated arm vs. 4.3% increase in controls; P = .03) and the effect was greater by 8 weeks (15% reduction in the treated vs. 1% decrease in controls; P = .01).

CONCLUSION

In this pilot study, AA therapy appeared safe and effective at reducing C-Alb levels in hemodialysis patients compared with no treatment. The impact of reduced protein carbamylation on clinical outcomes should be further investigated.

Hypoalbuminemia in hemodialyzed end stage renal disease patients: risk factors and relationships--a 2 year single center study

Background

Malnutrition affects 1/3 of hemodialysis patients and associates with a higher risk of morbidity and mortality. Serum albumin is a marker of nutrition and inflammation, and predicts mortality, particularly when <3.8 g/dL. This study was performed to identify risk factors for hypoalbuminemia (<3.8 g/dL) and the particular temporal relationship and strength of association between protein intake (nPCR) and serum albumin when confounding variables are taken into account.

Methods

Demographic, clinical, and dialysis-related data of 57 ESRD patients on hemodialysis over 24 months in 6 temporal segments were analyzed with serum albumin as a continuous, and categorical outcome (with 3.8 g/dl as cut-off) variable , against 13 potential independent variables [4 demographic factors, 3 nutrition-related, and 5 morbidity-related parameters, and % urea reduction ratio (URR)]. The temporal relationships between albumin and nPCR were analyzed for the concurrent & 3 subsequent months in each temporal segment.

Results

The impact of nPCR on serum albumin (p < 0.05) was significant but with no discernible temporal relationship. Advancing age, longer vintage, female gender, diabetes mellitus, nPCR, serum phosphate and ferritin had significant correlation with albumin <3.8 g/dl (p < 0.05). Serum phosphate levels correlated positively, and fever, bacteremia, hospital stay and weight loss negatively, with mean serum albumin but did not negate the effect of nPCR. Regression analysis showed that mean albumin associated with nPCR, fever, hospital stay, bacteremia, dialysis vintage, age, sex, and diabetes mellitus; and that an albumin level of <3.8 g/dl associated with age, female sex, diabetes, lower nPCR, and higher ferritin.

Conclusion

Suggested target albumin levels were not met in elderly, female, and diabetic patients. The association of nPCR with albumin was not nullified by confounding demographic or morbidity-related factors. nPCR had no demonstrable temporal relationship with albumin.

[Efficacy of oral supplementation during dialysis in patients with chronic renal failure]

Protein-calorie malnutrition is common in hemodialysis patients and is a powerful predictor of morbidity and mortality. Nutritional supplementation, administered orally or parenterally, especially during dialysis, may compensate for the relatively inadequate protein and energy intake and improves net protein anabolism in chronic hemodialysis patients. Intradialytic oral nutrition seems preferable to intradialytic parenteral nutrition (IDPN) due to its lower cost and persistence of its anabolic effects after infusion is stopped, and because IDPN induces a higher increase in serum glucose and insulin levels and a greater reduction in serum ghrelin concentrations. Further larger scale randomized, controlled trials of nutritional interventions should be performed in maintenance dialysis patients to assess their efficacy regarding quality of life, morbidity, and mortality.

Relationship between serum protein and mortality in adults on long-term hemodialysis: exhaustive review and meta-analysis

The aim of this exhaustive review and meta-analysis was to explore the relation among serum protein, inflammatory markers, and all-cause and cardiovascular mortalities in adult patients on maintenance hemodialysis. We searched the Medline, Science Citation Index, Academic Search Premier, Cochrane Library, and Embase electronic data bases. Data extraction and quality assessment were done independently by two reviewers and results were pooled using the random effects model. Cochran's Q was used to identify heterogeneity and a funnel plot was used for assessment of publication bias. A meta-analysis was performed on 38 studies (265 330 patients) reporting on serum proteins, inflammatory markers, and mortality. A significant inverse relation was found between serum albumin and all-cause (hazard ratio [HR] 0.7038, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.6367-0.7781) and cardiovascular (HR 0.8726, 95% CI 0.7909-0.9628) mortalities, with a significantly stronger relation with all-cause mortality (P=0.0014). Pooled results for C-reactive protein showed a weak but significant direct relation with all-cause mortality (HR 1.0322, 95% CI 1.0151-1.0496), but there was not a significant relation between C-reactive protein and cardiovascular mortality (HR 1.0172, 95% CI 0.9726-1.0639). A high degree of heterogeneity was identified among studies especially in the case of all-cause mortality. An asymmetrical funnel plot for serum albumin is suggestive of publication bias. From the meta-analysis it is concluded that serum albumin showed a significant inverse relation with all-cause and cardiovascular mortalities but the relation between prealbumin and all-cause mortality was not significant. C-reactive protein showed a significant direct relation with all-cause mortality but not with cardiovascular mortality. The potential adverse effects of malnutrition and infections in relation to mortality highlight the need for continued treatment of infections and correction of malnutrition in patients on dialysis.

Severity of hypoalbuminemia predicts response to intradialytic parenteral nutrition in hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Intradialytic parenteral nutrition (IDPN) is used infrequently to correct hypoalbuminemia in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients. We hypothesized that the severity of baseline hypoalbuminemia correlates with the success rate of IDPN therapy in MHD patients.

METHODS

In a prospective and contemporary cohort of 196 hypoalbuminemic MHD patients who received IDPN through Pentec Health (Boothwyn, PA), predictors of IDPN response were examined using multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of 196 hypoalbuminemic MHD patients, 134 had severe hypoalbuminemia, defined as a baseline serum albumin level of less than 3.0 g/dL. The average period of IDPN therapy was 5.8 +/- 2.4 months, S.D. The baseline level of serum albumin was lower in MHD patients who responded to IDPN (2.68 +/- 0.47 g/dL, S.D.). A multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted the associations for age, gender, diabetes, and IDPN time. The presence of severe hypoalbuminemia (serum albumin, <3.0 g/dL) at baseline was associated with a 2.5 times higher chance of responding to IDPN (95% confidence interval, 1.3 to 4.9; P = .006). The same severe hypoalbuminemia was associated with a 3.5 times increased likelihood of serum albumin correction by at least 0.5 g/dL (95% confidence interval, 1.8 to 6.8; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Improvement of hypoalbuminemia occurs in most hypoalbuminemic MHD patients who receive IDPN therapy. The likelihood and magnitude of the response to IDPN are associated with the severity of baseline hypoalbuminemia. These associations need to be verified in controlled trials.

Intradialytic nutritional support

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Intradialytic nutritional support has been used for more than 30 years both in critically ill patients with acute renal failure and during maintenance hemodialysis. Present knowledge allows better estimation of its metabolic and nutritional efficacy, as well its effect on patient outcome.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent data showed that intradialytic nutritional support is able to counteract these effects of dialysis on protein metabolism and to improve both nitrogen and energy balance. In maintenance hemodialysis patients, the improvement of nutritional status during nutritional support was shown to improve long-term survival. In critically ill patients with acute renal failure, protein sparing is one of the main therapeutic goals. The effect of nutritional support on patient outcome is not demonstrated. Recent data, however, showed that the improvement of nitrogen balance may be associated with a better outcome.

SUMMARY

Current information helps to better assess the effects of intradialytic nutritional support, to clarify the nutritional management of renal failure patients and to provide recommendations. Future research should focus on the possible means to improve the efficacy of nutritional support, either by modifying its components of by associating anabolic or anticatabolic agents.

Intradialytic parenteral nutrition does not improve survival in malnourished hemodialysis patients: a 2-year multicenter, prospective, randomized study

Although intradialytic parenteral nutrition (IDPN) is a method used widely to combat protein-calorie malnutrition in hemodialysis patients, its effect on survival has not been thoroughly studied. We conducted a prospective, randomized trial in which 186 malnourished hemodialysis patients received oral nutritional supplements with or without 1 year of IDPN. IDPN did not improve 2-year mortality (primary end point), hospitalization rate, Karnofsky score, body mass index, or laboratory markers of nutritional status. Instead, both groups demonstrated improvement in body mass index and the nutritional parameters serum albumin and prealbumin (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that an increase in prealbumin of >30 mg/L within 3 months, a marker of nutritional improvement, independently predicted a 54% decrease in 2-year mortality, as well as reduced hospitalizations and improved general well-being as measured by the Karnofsky score. Therefore, although we found no definite advantage of adding IDPN to oral nutritional supplementation, this is the first prospective study demonstrating that an improvement in prealbumin during nutritional therapy is associated with a decrease in morbidity and mortality in malnourished hemodialysis patients.

Effect of intradialytic parenteral nutrition in patients with malnutrition–inflammation complex syndrome on body weight, inflammation, serum lipids and adipocytokines: results from a pilot study

OBJECTIVE

Evaluation of the influence of intradialytic parenteral nutrition (IDPN) in patients suffering from Malnutrition-Inflammation Complex Syndrome (MICS) on nutritional status, inflammation, adipocytokines and serum lipids.

SUBJECTS

Six patients with MICS were assigned to IDPN, whereas six patients matched for age, sex, body mass index (BMI) and co-morbidity without malnutrition served as controls. Patients were recruited from Outpatient Dialysis Unit, Medical University Innsbruck and from Dialysis Unit, Hospital Feldkirch.

RESULTS

In all patients with IDPN, dry body weight increased during the interventional period whereas body weight remained stable in patients without IDPN. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha levels were higher in patients with MICS compared with controls at all time points. Total cholesterol, LDL- and HDL-levels significantly increased during dialysis at all time points in controls but not in patients with MICS. Albumin, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6 (IL-6), soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R) and adipocytokines did not differ between patients and controls during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

IDPN in patients with MICS increases body weight despite not influencing inflammatory status. Furthermore, IDPN does not induce a pro-atherogenic lipid composition enhancing the risk for atherosclerosis. Thus, IDPN is a safe and effective treatment of malnutrition in patients with MICS.

Intradialytic parenteral nutrition: comparison of olive oil versus soybean oilbasedlipid emulsions

Lipid, oxidative and inflammatory parameters are frequently altered in dialysis patients and may be worsened by intravenous lipid emulsions (ILE). We assessed the efficacy and tolerance of olive as compared with standard soybean oil-based ILE during intradialytic parenteral nutrition (IDPN). IDPN mixtures containing amino acids, glucose, and either olive oil (OO group,n17) or soybean oil-based ILE (SO group,n18) were administered in a 5-week randomized, double-blind study. On days 0 and 35, patients' nutritional status was assessed by BMI, normalized protein catabolic rate, predialytic creatinine, serum albumin and transthyretin; lipid metabolism by plasma LDL- and HDL-cholesterol, triacylglycerols, phospholipids, apo A-I, A-II, B, C-II, C-III, E and lipoprotein (a); oxidative status by α-tocopherol, retinol, selenium, glutathione peroxidase, malondialdehyde and advanced oxidized protein products; inflammatory status by serum C-reactive protein, orosomucoid, IL-2 and IL-6. No serious adverse event was observed. Significant changes were observed from day 0 to day 35 (P<0·05): nutritional criteria improved (albumin in OO; albumin, transthyretin and creatinine in SO); LDL-cholesterol, apo B, C-II, C-III and apo A-I/A-II ratio increased in both groups. HDL-cholesterol decreased in OO; apo E increased and lipoprotein (a) decreased in SO; α-tocopherol/cholesterol ratio increased in OO; malondialdehyde decreased in both groups; IL-2 increased in both groups. The between-group comparison only showed the following differences: α-tocopherol/cholesterol increased in OO; lipoprotein (a) decreased in SO. From these data, it was concluded that OO- and SO-based IDPNs similarly improved nutritional status and influenced plasma lipid, oxidative, inflammatory and immune parameters.

Hypoalbuminemia in renal failure: pathogenesis and therapeutic considerations

Hypoalbuminemia is common in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). It is caused by a combination of a reduced synthesis and an increased degradation of albumin. The altered albumin homeostasis in ESRD patients is caused by a systemic inflammatory state which correlates closely with mortality. Hypoalbuminemia is a strong predictor of an adverse prognosis, but it is not a pathogenic factor in itself. In critically ill patients in intensive care units, the intravenous administration of human serum albumin generally does not improve prognosis. In contrast, in hypoalbuminemic dialysis patients with volume overload and a reduced effective arterial volume the administration of albumin is based on the pathophysiological concept of increasing intravascular oncotic pressure to transfer extravascular fluid into the intravascular compartment for ultrafiltration in order to mobilize edema fluid.

Malnutrition in Hemodialysis Patients: What Therapy?

Malnutrition is common in hemodialysis patients and is a powerful predictor of morbidity and mortality. Although much progress has been made in recent years in identifying the causes and pathogenesis of malnutrition in hemodialysis patients, as well as recognizing the link between malnutrition and morbidity and mortality, no consensus has been reached concerning its management. Along with such conventional interventions as nutritional counseling, oral nutritional supplements, and intradialytic parenteral nutrition, novel preventive and therapeutic strategies have been tested, such as appetite stimulants, growth hormone, androgenic anabolic steroids, and anti-inflammatory drugs, with contradictory and nonconclusive results. Malnutrition still remains a great challenge for nephrologists in the third millennium.

Multinutrient Oral Supplements and Tube Feeding in Maintenance Dialysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

This systematic review aims to determine the potential benefits of enteral multinutrient support (oral or tube) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) receiving maintenance dialysis.

METHODS

Studies of multinutrient oral supplements and enteral tube feeding that involved comparisons of nutritional support versus routine care (ie, usual diet), disease-specific formulae (with adapted macronutrient and micronutrient composition for use in maintenance dialysis patients) versus standard formulae, and enteral tube feeding versus parenteral nutrition are included in this review. The outcome measures sought were clinical (quality of life, complications, and mortality), biochemical (albumin and electrolyte levels), and nutritional (dietary intake and anthropometry). Meta-analyses were performed when possible.

RESULTS

This review of 18 studies (5 randomized controlled trials [RCTs], 13 non-RCTs) suggests that enteral nutritional support increased total (energy and protein) intake and increased serum albumin concentration by 0.23 g/dL (2.3 g/L; 95% confidence interval, 0.037 to 0.418 g/dL [0.37 to 4.18 g/L]; 1 RCT, 2 non-RCTs), with little effect on electrolyte status (serum phosphate and potassium). Few studies reported clinical outcome, and there was insufficient information to compare disease-specific versus standard formulae or enteral versus parenteral nutrition.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review suggests that enteral multinutrient support significantly increases serum albumin concentrations and improves total dietary intake. This may improve clinical outcome, especially in malnourished patients, but insufficient published data exist to examine this. Additional research is required to investigate clinical, economic, and nutritional consequences of using oral supplements and tube feeding (using standard or disease-specific feeds) in patients with CKD receiving maintenance dialysis.

C-reactive protein and end-stage renal disease

The significance of CRP and inflammation has increased over time, especially in the end-stage renal disease (ESRD) population. From a simple marker it now appears that CRP is an active participant in pro-atherosclerotic phenomenon including local pro-inflammatory and thrombotic events. Studies in the general population indicate the usefulness of CRP in prognostication and in monitoring response to therapy. The clinical usefulness of CRP monitoring in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and especially in ESRD deserves closer study. In the meantime, the utility of CRP measurements for monitoring and treatment is on a case-by-case basis. Management of traditional cardiovascular risk factors should be considered. In the interest of optimizing therapy it is prudent to use biocompatible membranes and ultrapure water. A careful search for infectious processes in dialysis patients is recommended, with special attention to vascular access sites, periodontitis, gastritis, and other potentially chronic or covert infections. ACE-inhibitor use should be maximized in all eligible CKD patients. The data on the use of statins in ESRD have been generally positive but await further validation. Individualized use for selected patients is probably beneficial.

POOR NUTRITIONAL STATUS AND INFLAMMATION: Novel Approaches in an Integrated Therapy of Inflammatory-Associated Wasting in End-Stage Renal Disease

It is increasingly apparent that end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients carry an inflammatory burden, which may play a pivotal role in the evolution of not only wasting, but also the massive increase in the relative risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Thus wasting is strongly associated with a persistent systemic inflammatory response, CVD, and impaired patient survival in end-stage renal disease (ESRD), as well as in other chronic diseases. Evidence suggests that a facilitative interaction between inflammatory cytokines and other factors such as poor appetite, comorbidity, acidosis, anemia, and hormonal derangements may cause wasting in this patient group. Clearly, isolated interventions in the form of nutritional energy and protein supplementation have seldom proven to be very effective in improving nutritional status and outcome in ESRD patients, presumably because of the need to attack other causative factors. Therefore, new treatment strategies must be evaluated. Strategies such as multiple appetite stimulants, various "anti-inflammatory diets," and new potentially useful anti-inflammatory pharmacologic agents may be tested alone, or in combination, to evaluate if these new therapeutic modalities can improve the outcome of ESRD patients. As the etiology of wasting in ESRD is multifactorial, we propose that its treatment must include not one, but a number of concomitant measures to provide an integrated therapy against this devastating complication.

Malnutrition in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis: Is Intradialytic Parenteral Nutrition the Answer?

Patients with end-stage renal disease often experience malnutrition as a result of decreased dietary intake; inadequate dialysis; loss of nutrients into the dialysate; abnormal protein, carbohydrate, and lipid metabolism; and concomitant diseases, which may contribute to an increase in morbidity and mortality. Intradialytic parenteral nutrition (IDPN) is being used to improve nutritional status, in conjunction with other methods of nutritional supplementation. The biggest advantage of IDPN is probably its convenience since it is administered during dialysis treatment and thus does not require additional clinic visits or prolonged dialysis time. Although IDPN has several disadvantages, its ability to improve nutritional status and reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease is promising. Well-designed, large-scale, prospective studies are required to confirm its beneficial effects.

Inflammation and nutrition in renal insufficiency

Protein-energy malnutrition (PEM) and inflammation are common in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and worsen as the CKD progresses toward the end-stage renal disease (ESRD). These conditions are major predictors of poor clinical outcome in kidney failure, as reflected by a strong association between hypoalbuminemia and cardiovascular disease (CVD). It has been suggested that inflammation is the cause of both PEM and CVD and, hence, the main link among these conditions, but these hypotheses are not well established. Increased release or activation of inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-6 or tumor necrosis factor alpha, may suppress appetite, cause muscle proteolysis and hypoalbuminemia, and may be involved in atherogenesis. Increasing serum levels of proinflammatory cytokines caused by reduced renal function, volume overload, oxidative or carbonyl stress, decreased levels of antioxidants, increased susceptibility to infection in uremia, and the presence of comorbid conditions may lead to inflammation in CKD patients. In hemodialysis patients, the exposure to dialysis tubing and dialysis membranes, poor quality of dialysis water, back-filtration or back-diffusion of contaminants, and foreign bodies in dialysis access maybe additional causes of inflammation. Similarly, episodes of overt or latent peritonitis, peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter and its related infections, and constant exposure to PD solution may contribute to inflammation in these patients. The degree to which PEM in dialysis patients is caused by inflammation is not clear. Because both PEM and inflammation are strongly associated with each other and can change many nutritional measures and outcome concurrently in the same direction, the terms malnutrition-inflammation complex syndrome (MICS) and/or malnutrition-inflammation-atherosclerosis (MIA) have been suggested to denote the important contribution of both of these conditions to poor clinical outcome. Maintenance dialysis patients who are underweight or who have low serum levels of cholesterol, creatinine, or homocysteine may be suffering from the MICS/MIA and its subsequent poor outcome. Consequently, obesity and hypercholesterolemia may appear protective, which is known as reverse epidemiology. Although MICS/MIA may have a significant contribution in reversing the traditional CVD risk factors in dialysis patients, it is not clear whether PEM or inflammation and their complications can be effectively managed in CKD and ESRD or whether their management improves clinical outcome.

Malnutrition-inflammation complex syndrome in dialysis patients: causes and consequences

Protein-energy malnutrition (PEM) and inflammation are common and usually concurrent in maintenance dialysis patients. Many factors that appear to lead to these 2 conditions overlap, as do assessment tools and such criteria for detecting them as hypoalbuminemia. Both these conditions are related to poor dialysis outcome. Low appetite and a hypercatabolic state are among common features. PEM in dialysis patients has been suggested to be secondary to inflammation; however, the evidence is not conclusive, and an equicausal status or even opposite causal direction is possible. Hence, malnutrition-inflammation complex syndrome (MICS) is an appropriate term. Possible causes of MICS include comorbid illnesses, oxidative and carbonyl stress, nutrient loss through dialysis, anorexia and low nutrient intake, uremic toxins, decreased clearance of inflammatory cytokines, volume overload, and dialysis-related factors. MICS is believed to be the main cause of erythropoietin hyporesponsiveness, high rate of cardiovascular atherosclerotic disease, decreased quality of life, and increased mortality and hospitalization in dialysis patients. Because MICS leads to a low body mass index, hypocholesterolemia, hypocreatininemia, and hypohomocysteinemia, a "reverse epidemiology" of cardiovascular risks can occur in dialysis patients. Therefore, obesity, hypercholesterolemia, and increased blood levels of creatinine and homocysteine appear to be protective and paradoxically associated with a better outcome. There is no consensus about how to determine the degree of severity of MICS or how to manage it. Several diagnostic tools and treatment modalities are discussed. Successful management of MICS may ameliorate the cardiovascular epidemic and poor outcome in dialysis patients. Clinical trials focusing on MICS and its possible causes and consequences are urgently required to improve poor clinical outcome in dialysis patients.

Characteristics and effects of inflammation in end-stage renal disease

Malnutrition and cardiovascular disease are associated with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and both are closely associated with one another, both in cross-sectional analysis and when the courses of individual patients are followed over time. Inflammation, by suppressing synthesis of albumin, transferrin, and other negative acute-phase proteins and increasing their catabolic rates, either combines with modest malnutrition or mimics malnutrition, resulting in decreased levels of these proteins in dialysis patients. Inflammation also leads to reduced muscle mass by increasing muscle protein catabolism and blocking synthesis of muscle protein. More importantly, inflammation alters plasma protein composition and endothelial structure and function so as to promote vascular disease. Markers of inflammation, C-reactive protein (CRP), and interleukin (IL)-6 powerfully predict death from all causes and from cardiovascular disease in dialysis patients as well as progression of vascular injury. The causes of inflammation are likely multifactorial, including oxidative modification of plasma proteins, interaction of blood with nonbiocompatible membranes and lipopolysaccharides in dialysate, subclinical infection of vascular access materials, oxidative catabolism of endothelium-derived nitric oxide, and other infectious processes. Treatment should be focused on identifying potential causes of inflammation, if obvious, and reduction of other risk factor for cardiovascular disease.

Serum albumin concentration in dialysis patients: Why does it remain resistant to therapy?

Serum albumin, transferrin, and prealbumin levels decrease as glomerular filtration rate (GFR) declines, even prior to the start of dialysis. The levels of these serum proteins are also associated with creatinine levels and lean body mass. Lean body mass also decreases with advancing renal failure. While all of these measures are regarded as reflections of nutritional status, each are strongly associated with any of several indicators of inflammation: positive acute-phase proteins or the cytokines that regulate their synthesis rate, in both longitudinal and cross-sectional studies. Inflammation in turn is associated with comorbid conditions, cardiovascular disease, chronic infections, age, and vascular access type. Additionally, dialysis patients are subjected to oxidative stress and exposure of blood to foreign antigens in the dialysis process that also potentially contribute to inflammation. In otherwise healthy individuals reduced protein and calorie intake does not cause hypoalbuminemia since albumin fractional catabolic rate (FCR) and resting energy expenditure (REE) normally decrease in response. The simultaneous occurrence of decreased protein intake and inflammation prevent these homeostatic compensations to reduced nitrogen and energy intake from occurring, resulting in decreasing albumin, transferrin, and prealbumin levels and loss of muscle mass. Nutritional intake may also be challenged as a result of renal failure associated with anorexia, gastroparesis, and socioeconomic factors, which may all cause nutritional intake to be sufficiently marginal so that the combined effects of inflammation and decrease protein intake are expressed as decreased visceral and somatic protein stores.

Nutritional requirements in maintenance hemodialysis

There is a high prevalence of nutritional disorders in maintenance hemodialysis patients. This fact has been recently confirmed because larger routine assessments of MHD patients body composition are now performed. Food records and dietary interviews show spontaneous low intakes of protein and energy in many patients. An increasing dialysis dose above a Kt/V (single pool) of 1.5 may not improve patients nutritional intakes. Inflammation may further impair the balance between protein synthesis and catabolism and cause anorexia. In response to these abnormalities, the management of energy, protein, vitamins, and trace elements intake will be discussed with special emphasis on calcium, phosphorus, enteral support, and parenteral nutrition.

Therapeutic effects of oral nutritional supplementation during hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Protein-calorie malnutrition is common in chronic hemodialysis (CHD) patients and correlates with morbidity and mortality in these patients. There are limited trials evaluating the efficacy of oral nutritional supplementation in malnourished CHD patients.

METHODS

Eighty-five CHD patients with evidence of malnutrition were included in this prospective study. Patients were followed for a 3-month baseline period during which they received conventional nutrition counseling. This was followed by an intervention period, during which an oral nutritional supplement specifically formulated for CHD patients was given over a period of 6 months. An important element of this study was that the nutritional supplement was provided during dialysis to ensure compliance. Serial measurements of nutritional parameters including concentrations of serum albumin, prealbumin, transferrin as well as body mass index (BMI) and subjective global assessment (SGA) were obtained during the 9-month period.

RESULTS

The nutritional parameters did not change during the 3-month baseline period. Following administration of oral supplementation during hemodialysis, there were significant increases in concentrations of serum albumin (from 3.33 +/- 0.32 g/dL at baseline, to 3.65 +/- 0.26 g/dL at month 6, P < 0.0001) and serum prealbumin (from 26.1 +/- 8.6 mg/dL at baseline, to 30.7 +/- 7.4 mg/dL at month 6, P = 0.002). Mean SGA score increased 14% by the end of the study (P = 0.023). Although BMI and estimated dry weight increased also, these changes were not statistically significant. Serum transferrin did not change during the study period.

CONCLUSION

Oral nutritional supplementation given during hemodialysis improves nutritional markers in malnourished CHD patients.

Intradialytic parenteral nutrition in malnourished children treated with hemodialysis

OBJECTIVE

To examine the feasibility and effectiveness of intradialytic parenteral nutrition (IDPN) in children on hemodialysis.

DESIGN

Prospective experimental study with a single intervention group.

SETTING

A pediatric hemodialysis unit.

SUBJECTS

Four malnourished children on hemodialysis (3 girls and 1 boy) 4 to 18 years of age were studied during a period of 1 year.

INTERVENTION

IDPN, which is composed of amino acids (8.5% solution), glucose (as 10% to 15% dextrose), and 20% fat emulsion, was administered at every dialysis session (3 times a week, during 4 hours each time) for 7 to 12 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Oral caloric intake (evaluated by using a 3-day diet history), dry weight (weight after dialysis), body mass index, percent ideal body weight, total lymphocyte count, and serum levels of albumin before, immediately after cessation of IDPN, and 3 months after cessation of IDPN.

RESULTS

Oral caloric intake increased markedly after IDPN administration, from 5 to 63 kcal/kg/d (mean, 33 kcal/kg/d) before IDPN administration to 35 to 177 kcal/kg/d (mean, 86 kcal/kg/d) at the time of cessation. Weight did not change during the treatment period but it did increase from 9.5 to 36.4 kg (mean, 25 kg) to 11 to 39 kg (mean, 26.7 kg) 3 months later. Percent ideal body weight increased from 73% to 88% (mean, 78.5%) to 79% to 90% (mean, 85.1%), and body mass index increased from 12.2 to 15 kg/m(2) (mean, 13.5 kg/m(2)) to 13.4 to 15.5 kg/m(2) (mean, 14.6 kg/m(2)). Total lymphocyte count increased from 538 to 2,041 cells/mm(3) (mean, 1,403 cells/mm(3)) to 724 to 2,884 cells/mm(3) (mean, 2,066 cells/mm(3)). Plasma levels of albumin increased in 1 patient but remained unchanged in others.

CONCLUSION

Short-term IDPN treatment may serve as a safe and effective nutritional intervention in malnourished children on hemodialysis.

Relative contributions of nutrition and inflammation to clinical outcome in dialysis patients

Protein-energy malnutrition (PEM) is a common phenomenon in maintenance dialysis (MD) patients and a risk factor for poor quality of life and increased morbidity and mortality, including cardiovascular death, in these individuals. The association between undernutrition and adverse outcome in MD patients, which stands in contrast to that seen in the general population, has been referred to as reverse epidemiology. Measures of food intake, body composition tools, nutritional scoring systems, and laboratory values are used to assess the degree of severity of PEM, but no uniform approach is available for rating the overall severity of PEM. Epidemiologic studies suggest that inflammation is a missing link between PEM and poor clinical outcome in MD patients, and the existence of a malnutrition inflammation complex syndrome is suggested in these patients. Inflammation may be due to subclinical and clinically apparent illnesses. Some investigators suggest that PEM may predispose to illness and inflammation. There is a paucity of information concerning the effect of nutritional therapy on morbidity and mortality in MD patients. Interventional studies of the effect of nutritional support on outcome often are difficult to interpret because of small sample sizes, short duration of study, and other limitations. Large-scale, randomized, clinical trials of the effects of nutritional intake, nutritional status, and inflammation on clinical outcome are needed to define better the relationships between these factors in MD patients.

Association between prevalent care process measures and facility-specific mortality rates

BACKGROUND

Medical communities often develop practice guidelines recommending certain care processes intended to promote better clinical outcome among patients. Conformance with those guidelines by facilities is then monitored to evaluate care quality, presuming that the process is associated with and can be used reliably to predict clinical outcome. Outcome is often monitored as a facility-specific mortality rate (SMR) standardized to the mix of patients treated, also presuming that inferior outcome implies a suboptimal process. The U.S. Health Care Financing Administration monitors three practice guidelines, called Core Indicators, in dialysis facilities to assist management of its end-stage renal disease program: (1) patients' hematocrit values should exceed 30 vol%, (2) the urea reduction ratio (URR) during dialysis should equal or exceed 65%, and (3) patients' serum albumin concentrations should equal or exceed 3.5 g/dL.

METHODS

The associations of a facility-specific SMR were evaluated with the fractions of hemodialysis patients not conforming to (that is, at variance with) the Core Indicators during three successive years (1993 to 1995) in large numbers of facilities (394, 450, and 498) using one-variable and multivariable statistical models. Three related strategies were used. First, the association of the SMR with the fraction of patients not meeting the guideline was evaluated. Second, each facility was classified by whether its SMR exceeded the 80% confidence interval above 1.0 (worse than 1.0, Group 3), was less than the interval below 1.0 (better than 1.0, Group 1), or was within the interval (Group 2). The fraction of those patients who did not meet the Indicator guidelines was then evaluated in each group. Third, the ability of variance from Indicator guidelines to predict into which of the three SMR groups a facility would be categorized was evaluated.

RESULTS

SMR was directly correlated with variance from the Indicator guidelines, but the strengths of the associations were weak particularly for the hematocrit (R(2) = 2.2%, 5.6, and 2.2 for each of the 3 years) and URR Indicators (R(2) = 2.6, 0.6, 3.3). It was stronger for the albumin Indicator (R(2) = 11.6, 20.4, 21.8). The fractions of patients falling outside of the Indicator guidelines tended to be higher in the highest SMR group. The groups were not well separated, however, particularly for the hematocrit and URR Indicators, and there was substantial overlap between them. Finally, although the likelihood that a facility would be a member of the high or low SMR group was associated with fractional variance from Core Indicator guidelines, the strengths of association were weak, and the probability that a facility would be a member of the high or low group could not be easily distinguished from the probability that it would be a member of the middle group.

CONCLUSIONS

While there were statistical associations between SMR and the fraction of patients in facilities who were at variance with these guidelines, they were weak and variances from the guidelines could not be used reliably to predict high or low SMR. Such findings do not imply that measures reflecting anemia, dialysis dose, or medical processes that influence serum albumin concentration are irrelevant to the quality of care. They do suggest, however, that more attention needs be paid to these and other associates and causes of mortality among dialysis patients when developing care process indicator guidelines.

Differential effects of growth hormone therapy in malnourished hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Malnutrition is common in chronic hemodialysis patients and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Several factors such as metabolic acidosis, hyperparathyroidism, and insulin as well as growth hormone (GH) resistance may lead to enhanced protein catabolism. Recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) has been proposed as treatment of malnutrition because of its anabolic effects.

METHODS

In the present placebo-controlled, double blind study, the effects of three months of rhGH therapy on nutritional and anthropometric parameters, on bone metabolism and bone mineral density (BMD), as well as on polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMNL) function and quality of life (QoL) were evaluated in 19 malnourished hemodialysis patients (10 females and 9 males) with a mean age of 59.3 +/- 13.4 years. RhGH (0.125 IU/kg) was given three times a week during the first four weeks and 0.25 IU/kg thereafter three times a week after each dialysis session.

RESULTS

Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) concentration rose significantly from 169.2 +/- 95.6 ng/mL to 262.9 +/- 144.4 ng/mL (p< 0.01) in the group receiving rhGH. Albumin, prealbumin, transferrin, cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, cholinesterase, predialytic creatinine, and blood urea nitrogen showed no significant changes during the three months in both groups. Total body fat (%TBF) was slightly reduced after three months (P = NS) in the patients receiving GH, whereas lean body mass (LBM) remained stable during therapy. Procollagen I carboxy terminal peptide (PICP), a marker of bone formation, increased significantly after three months from 250.1 +/- 112.6 to 478.5 +/- 235.2 microg/L (P < 0.01) in the GH-treated patients, whereas parameters of bone resorption like telopeptide ICTP showed only a slight increase (50.3 +/- 18.5 vs. 70.0 +/- 39.5 microg/L, P = NS). BMD at the lumbar spine decreased significantly after three months in the treatment group (0.8 +/- 0.17 vs. 0.77 +/- 0.16 g/cm2, P < 0.01), whereas BMD at the femoral neck remained stable in both groups. Phagocytic activity of PMNLs increased significantly after three months of therapy with rhGH, whereas other parameters of PMNL function were not affected by GH. QoL was slightly improved in the GH treated group, but decreased markedly in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

Three months of treatment with rhGH in malnourished patients on chronic hemodialysis causes a significant increase in IGF-I levels without significant changes in nutritional and anthropometric parameters. In contrast, bone turnover was enhanced with an initial decrease in BMD at the lumbar spine, and phagocytic activity of PMNLs was increased.