Therapeutic plasma exchange: complications and management

Adverse Events and Outcomes of High-volume Plasma Exchange in 50 Acute Liver Failure Patients: A Monocentric Retrospective Real-world Study

Background and aims

Acute liver failure (ALF) is a condition that mostly requires Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission and sometimes necessitates emergency liver transplantation. High-volume plasma exchange (HVPE) may improve transplant-free survival (TFS) in ALF. Our study assessed complications of HVPE therapy and outcome in ALF patients.

Methods

We conducted a single-center retrospective study of all patients admitted to the ICU for ALF and who underwent HVPE between June 2016 and June 2021. The plasmapheresis technique used was centrifugation, and the volume exchanged was calculated as 15% of the ideal body weight. Dedicated staff prospectively collected clinical adverse effects, while biological data were retrospectively collected. The primary outcome was the rate of severe adverse effects (SAE, defined as severe manifestations of hypotension, allergy, metabolic disturbances or other life-threatening event) that occurred during HVPE sessions. Factors influencing day-21 TFS were also studied.

Results

One hundred twenty sessions were performed in 50 patients. The main etiology for ALF was paracetamol (52% of the patients). During the session, hemoglobin, platelet, transaminases, ammonia and bilirubin decreased, coagulation factors increased, and creatinine and lactate remained unchanged. At least one SAE was reported for 32 out of 120 sessions (26.7% [19%-35.5%], mostly severe alkalosis [24/117], hypotension [4/120] and hypocalcemia [4/119]). Arterial pH ≤ 7.43 following HVPE and paracetamol etiology were negatively and positively associated with day-21 TFS, respectively.

Conclusion

Severe adverse effects were frequent during HVPE performed for ALF, mainly severe alkalosis, hypotension and hypocalcemia. Post-HVPE, pH and paracetamol etiology were prognosis markers.

Chemotherapy plus therapeutic plasmapheresis with 4% human albumin solution in multiple myeloma patients with acute kidney injury: a prospective, open-label, proof-of-concept study

As no unified treatment protocol or evidence yet exists for plasmapheresis without plasma, this study explored the outcomes of using 4% human albumin (ALB) solution as a replacement solution in patients undergoing plasma exchange for multiple myeloma (MM) patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). This study was prospectively registered (ChiCTR2000030640 and NCT05251896). Bortezomib-based chemotherapy plus therapeutic plasmapheresis (TPP) with 4% human ALB solution was assessed for three years in patients with MM aged >18 years, with AKI according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes criteria, and without previous renal impairment from other causes. The primary endpoints were changes in renal function over 18 weeks and survival outcomes at 36 months. The secondary endpoints were the incidence of adverse reactions and symptom improvement. Among the 119 patients included in the analysis, 108 experienced renal reactions. The M protein (absolute changes: median -12.12%, interquartile ranges (IQRs) -18.62 to -5.626) and creatine (median -46.91 μmol/L, IQR -64.70 to -29.12) levels decreased, whereas the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) increased (median 20.66 mL/(min·1.73 m2), IQR 16.03-25.29). Regarding patient survival, 68.1% and 35.3% of patients survived for >12 and >36 months, respectively. The three symptoms with the greatest relief were urine foam, poor appetite, and blurred vision. All 11 patients (7.6%) who experienced mild adverse reactions achieved remission. In conclusion, in MM patients with AKI, plasma-free plasmapheresis with 4% human ALB solution and bortezomib-based chemotherapy effectively alleviated light chain damage to kidney function while improving patient quality of life.

US Clinical Practice Experience with Eculizumab in Myasthenia Gravis: Acute Clinical Events and Healthcare Resource Utilization

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The terminal complement inhibitor eculizumab is approved in the USA for the treatment of patients with acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis (MG). The ELEVATE study aimed to examine clinical-practice outcome data on eculizumab effectiveness in US adults with MG (generalized or ocular). This paper reports the findings on MG exacerbations and crises and associated healthcare resource utilization, and the use of rescue therapy.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted of US adults with MG who initiated eculizumab. Outcomes assessed for up to 2 years before and after eculizumab initiation included percentages and rates per patient per year (PPPY) of exacerbations and crises (the latter defined as intubation/impending intubation), healthcare resource utilization, and rescue therapy administration.

RESULTS

A total of 119 patients diagnosed with MG were enrolled in the study; 92 patients had ≥ 3 months of data both before and during eculizumab therapy and were included in the analyses. The mean rate of MG exacerbations decreased from 0.385 PPPY before eculizumab initiation to 0.152 PPPY during eculizumab treatment (p = 0.0034); the mean rate of MG crises decreased from 0.411 to 0.056 PPPY (p = 0.0018). Rates of healthcare resource utilization and rescue therapy use also decreased significantly during eculizumab treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective chart review analysis provides evidence for a beneficial impact of eculizumab treatment on the incidence of MG exacerbations and crises and associated healthcare resource utilization in clinical practice, and on rescue therapy use. These data further support the therapeutic benefits of eculizumab in patients with MG.

Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in Neurological Conditions: An Observation from the Eastern Part of India

INTRODUCTION

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is an extracorporeal process of separation of plasma from the cellular components of blood and its replacement with analogous fluids. This process is effective in treatment of disease conditions from dysregulation of the humoral immune system by removal of various humoral pathogenic substances like antibodies, immune complexes, monoclonal proteins, toxins or cytokine(s) and/or the replenishment of a specific plasma factor.

AIM AND OBJECTIVE

To evaluate major indications of therapeutic plasma exchange in neurological disorders. To identify major complications associated and factors associated with premature cessation of the therapeutic plasma exchange cycle. Materials and Methods: This is a hospital based retrospective study conducted by analyzing medical records of patients, who had undergone therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) for various neurological disorders at IMS & SUM hospital. Medical records total 118 patients who underwent TPE from January 2016 to December 2021 were analyzed. The demographic data, blood group pattern and indications for TPE were enumerated from the records. Various complications of TPE and reasons for incomplete TPE cycle were documented and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 508 TPE procedures were performed on 118 patients. In this study 61 patients were male and 57 patients were female. O-blood group was commonest blood group among the patients. GBS is the commonest indication of TPE. 57.6 % of patients could complete all sessions TPE cycle. Blockage of vascular access is the commonest cause of incomplete TPE session. Cramps (33%) and mild transient hypotension (27.1%0 were the commonest complications observed.

CONCLUSION

TPE is a safe and effective treatment option for various immune-mediated neurological disorders and should be considered in managing these disorders.

Early clinical response and complications of therapeutic plasma exchange in central nervous system demyelinating diseases

Background

Appropriate treatment reduces the severity and duration of relapses in demyelinating diseases of Central Nervous System (CNS). If high-dose corticosteroids treatment fails, therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is considered as a rescue treatment.

Objectives

This study aimed to investigate early clinical response and complications of TPE and prognostic factors in CNS demyelinating relapses.

Design

This prospective observational study was designed in a tertiary center during one year.

Methods

All adult patients diagnosed corticosteroid-resistant Multiple Sclerosis (MS), NeuroMyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD), idiotypic Transverse Myelitis or Clinical Isolated Syndrome relapses, were eligible. Clinical response is defined based on Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) at discharge. Clinical and laboratory complications recorded.

Results

Seventy-two patients were analyzed which 58.3% patients were female. MS was diagnosed for 61.1% of cases. Thirty-five patients (48.6%) responded and the mean differences of EDSS significantly decreased 0.60 score (CI95%:0.44-.77). Electrolyte imbalances and thrombocytopenia occurred in 80.6% and 55.6% of cases respectively and 40.3% of patients had systemic reactions. However, 26.4% patients experienced moderate to severe complications. In patients with moderate to severe disability, responders were younger (MD: 8.42 years, CI95%: 1.67-15.17) and had lower EDSS score at admission (median:6, IQR: 5.5-6 against 7.5 IQR: 6.5-8). The risk of failure was higher in active progressive MS patients compared with RRMS patients (OR: 6.06, CI 95%:1.37-26.76). Patients with thrombocytopenia were hospitalized more than others (MD: 1.5 days, CI 95%: 0-3). Females were more prone to hypokalemia and systemic reactions (OR: 3.11, CI 95%:1.17-8.24 and OR: 6.67, CI 95%:2.14-20.81 respectively).

Conclusion

The most common indication of TPE was corticosteroid-resistant severe MS relapses. About half of the patients presented an early clinical response. Lower disability, younger age and RRMS diagnosis are prognostic factors of better response. One out of four patients experienced moderate to severe complications, mainly electrolyte imbalances and systemic reactions. Appropriate interventions against these complications should be considered during TPE, especially in females.

Therapeutic apheresis in kidney transplantation: Emerging trends

INTRODUCTION

The use of therapeutic apheresis (TA) either as stand-alone or adjunctive treatment in kidney transplantation has increased over the years to become a leading indication. This study shows recent trends in indications for TA related to kidney transplantation, adverse events, and patient outcome in this cohort.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort review of adults who received TA for kidney transplant-related indications from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2022, at the University of Virginia Medical Centre, Charlottesville, VA, USA. Data extracted include basic demographics, indication for apheresis, number of procedures, procedure characteristics, procedure-related adverse events (complications), and serum ionized calcium and serum creatinine. Data were analyzed using statistical package for social sciences (SPSS 2022 IBM Inc).

RESULTS

Data from a total of 131 patients who received 860 TA procedures were analyzed. Indications for TA were antibody-mediated rejection (65.5%), recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (15%), thrombotic microangiopathy (5%), desensitization for ABO incompatibility (4.5%) and for HLA-incompatibility (4.5%), and recurrent IgA nephropathy (1%). Some adverse events were encountered in 16.7% of the procedures and include hypocalcemia (7%), vascular access malfunction (0.7%), hypotension (1.2%), arrhythmia (0.6%), and depletion coagulopathy (0.6%). The overall case mortality rate was 8.4% over the 6-year period. There was one death recorded on machine during TA resulting in a procedure-mortality rate of 0.12%.

CONCLUSION

Antibody-mediated rejection was the most common indication for TA related to kidney transplantation. Adverse events were minor and patient survival over the time was within usual limits.

In Search for Low-Molecular-Weight Ligands of Human Serum Albumin That Affect Its Affinity for Monomeric Amyloid β Peptide

An imbalance between production and excretion of amyloid β peptide (Aβ) in the brain tissues of Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients leads to Aβ accumulation and the formation of noxious Aβ oligomers/plaques. A promising approach to AD prevention is the reduction of free Aβ levels by directed enhancement of Aβ binding to its natural depot, human serum albumin (HSA). We previously demonstrated the ability of specific low-molecular-weight ligands (LMWLs) in HSA to improve its affinity for Aβ. Here we develop this approach through a bioinformatic search for the clinically approved AD-related LMWLs in HSA, followed by classification of the candidates according to the predicted location of their binding sites on the HSA surface, ranking of the candidates, and selective experimental validation of their impact on HSA affinity for Aβ. The top 100 candidate LMWLs were classified into five clusters. The specific representatives of the different clusters exhibit dramatically different behavior, with 3- to 13-fold changes in equilibrium dissociation constants for the HSA-Aβ40 interaction: prednisone favors HSA-Aβ interaction, mefenamic acid shows the opposite effect, and levothyroxine exhibits bidirectional effects. Overall, the LMWLs in HSA chosen here provide a basis for drug repurposing for AD prevention, and for the search of medications promoting AD progression.

Other Immunomodulatory Treatment for Cytokine Storm Syndromes

Cytokine storm syndromes (CSS) include different entities such as macrophage activation syndrome, primary and secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH), and multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) associated with COVID-19. An effective management strategy is critical in CSS. While biologics have become an essential part of CSS treatment, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has changed the fate of primary HLH patients. This chapter will focus on the available alternative immunomodulatory therapies in CSS, which include corticosteroids, cyclosporine A, intravenous immunoglobulin, interleukin 18 binding protein, therapeutic plasmapheresis, HSCT, and mesenchymal stromal cell-based therapies.

Plasmapheresis in the ICU

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is a treatment paradigm used to remove harmful molecules from the body. In short, it is a technique that employs a process that functions partially outside the body and involves the replacement of the patient's plasma. It has been used in the ICU for a number of different disease states, for some as a first-line treatment modality and for others as a type of salvage therapy. This paper provides a brief review of the principles, current applications, and potential future directions of TPE in critical care settings.

Adverse Events and Infectious Complications in the Critically Ill Treated by Plasma Exchange: A Five-Year Multicenter Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine, in critically ill patients treated with therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE), the incidence of adverse events as well as the incidence of secondary infections and its predictive factors.

DESIGN

A multicenter retrospective cohort study of an intensive care population treated with TPE to collect adverse events and infectious complications. The characteristics of patients who developed an infection after plasma exchange were compared with those of patients who did not.

SETTING

Four ICUs of French university hospitals.

PATIENTS

All adults admitted between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019, who received at least one plasma exchange session were included.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 711 TPE sessions were performed on 124 patients. The most frequent TPE indications were thrombotic microangiopathies (n = 32, 26%), myasthenia gravis (n = 25, 20%), and acute polyradiculoneuropathy (n = 12, 10%). Among the 124 patients, 22 (21%) developed arterial hypotension, 12 (12%) fever, and 9 (9%) electrolyte disturbance during TPE. Moreover, 60 (48%) presented at least one infectious complication: ventilator-associated pneumonia 42, pneumonia 13, bacteremia 18 (of which 6 catheter-related infections) viral reactivation 14. Independent risk factors for ICU-acquired infection were the ICU length of stay (24 vs. 7 d; hazard ratio [HR]: 1.09 [1.04-1.15], p < 0.001) and invasive mechanical ventilation (92% vs. 35%; HR: 16.2 [5.0-53.0], p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In critically ill patients treated with TPE, adverse events occurring during the procedure remain moderately frequent and are mostly not life-threatening. Infectious complications, mainly ventilation-associated pneumonia, are frequent in this population. The need of mechanical ventilation and longer ICU stay is associated with an increased risk of infection.

Impact of therapeutic and low volume plasma exchange on clinical laboratory parameters in patients treated for Alzheimer's disease from the AMBAR study

INTRODUCTION

Little is known about the impact of plasma exchange (PE) on clinical laboratory parameters in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients.

METHODS

AD patients in the AMBAR trial (N = 322) received weekly therapeutic PE (TPE) for 6 weeks followed by monthly low-volume PE (LVPE) for12 months. Treatment were placebo (sham PE), low-albumin, low-albumin + IVIG (i.e., albumin alternated with intravenous immunoglobulin) and high-albumin + IVIG.

RESULTS

Coagulation parameters transiently increased post-TPE. Blood calcium, platelets, and albumin levels decreased but remained within the reference range. Leukocyte counts increased. Fibrinogen, hemoglobin, total protein, gamma globulin, and IgG, transiently dipped below the reference range. Hypogammaglobulinemia (7.2 g/L) persisted in pre-TPE measurements. No changes were observed during the LVPE period. Cerebrospinal fluid parameters and vital signs were unchanged throughout.

CONCLUSION

Laboratory parameters of AD patients were affected by TPE similarly to effects of PE-treatment for other pathologies. These effects were less pronounced or non-existent for LVPE.

Therapeutic Plasma exchange therapy in Burns

Severe burn injury affects the body in many devastating ways, the most severe being systemic inflammatory response syndrome. This results in a myriad of effects like increasing capillary permeability, thereby fluid loss. It also causes a surge in inflammatory mediators like interleukin (IL)-6, which further increases the capillary leak and fluid loss. This results in refractory hypotension in patients despite adequate fluid resuscitation. Plasma exchange has been used in the management of a number of illnesses with a significant inflammatory component, and, therefore can be considered to have a role in burn injury. In our article, we would like to share our experience of using therapeutic plasma exchange therapy in burn patient.

Therapeutic plasma exchange for Graves' disease in pregnancy

Graves' disease in pregnancy may be associated with maternal, fetal and neonatal complications, which are proportionate to the severity of hyperthyroidism. Optimal management is detailed preconception counselling, achievement of an euthyroid state prior to conception, and close monitoring of thyroid function and thyroid-stimulating antibodies together with judicious use of anti-thyroid medications during pregnancy. A case of Graves' disease in pregnancy, complicated by pancytopenia, with a deterioration in thyroid function following cessation of thionamide therapy is described here. Therapeutic plasma exchange was subsequently used to achieve rapid control prior to thyroidectomy. Therapeutic plasma exchange is an effective treatment for hyperthyroidism where thionamides are ineffective or contraindicated, as a bridge to definitive management.

EXCHANGE-2: investigating the efficacy of add-on plasma exchange as an adjunctive strategy against septic shock-a study protocol for a randomized, prospective, multicenter, open-label, controlled, parallel-group trial

BACKGROUND

Sepsis is as a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to an infection. The mortality of sepsis and particular of septic shock is very high. Treatment mostly focuses on infection control but a specific intervention that targets the underlying pathological host response is lacking to the present time. The investigators hypothesize that early therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) will dampen the maladaptive host response by removing injurious mediators thereby limiting organ dysfunction and improving survival in patients with septic shock. Although small prospective studies demonstrated rapid hemodynamic stabilization under TPE, no adequately powered randomized clinical trial has investigated hard outcomes.

METHODS

This is a randomized, prospective, multicenter, open-label, controlled, parallel-group interventional trial to test the adjunctive effect of TPE in patients with early septic shock. Patients with a refractory (defined as norepinephrine (NE) ≥ 0.4 μg/kg/min ≥ 30 min OR NE 0.3 μg/kg/min + vasopressin) and early (shock onset < 24 h) septic shock will be included. The intervention is a standard TPE with donor fresh frozen plasma (1.2 × individual plasma volume) performed within 6 h after randomization and will be compared to a standard of care (SOC) control arm. The primary endpoint is 28 days mortality for which the power analysis revealed a group size of 137 / arm (n = 274) to demonstrate a benefit of 15%. The key secondary objective will be to compare the extent of organ failure indicated by mean SOFA over the first 7 days as well as organ support-free days until day 28 following randomization. Besides numerous biological secondary, safety endpoints such as incidence of bleeding, allergic reactions, transfusion associated lung injury, severe thrombocytopenia, and other severe adverse events will be assessed during the first 7 days. For exploratory scientific analyses, biomaterial will be acquired longitudinally and multiple predefined scientific subprojects are planned. This study is an investigator-initiated trial supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG, DA 1209/7-1), in which 26 different centers in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria will participate over a duration of 33 months.

DISCUSSION

This trial has substantial clinical relevance as it evaluates a promising adjunctive treatment option in refractory septic shock patients suffering from an extraordinary high mortality. A positive trial result could change the current standard of care for this septic subgroup. The results of this study will be disseminated through presentations at international congresses, workshops, and peer-reviewed publications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05726825 , Registered on 14 February 2023.

Regional citrate anticoagulation vs systemic heparin anticoagulation for double-filtration plasmapheresis

INTRODUCTION

Double-filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) has been utilized for immunomodulation in kidney transplantation. Anticoagulation is important to maintain circuit patency during DFPP. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) with systemic heparin anticoagulation during DFPP in kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of RCA (RCA-DFPP) to systemic heparin anticoagulation (Hep-DFPP) for DFPP among kidney transplant recipients in a single tertiary center.

RESULTS

A total of 112 sessions of DFPP were performed for 23 subjects, of which 62 sessions were RCA-DFPP and 50 sessions were Hep-DFPP. There were 13 sessions (11.6%) of premature circuit clotting, 10 sessions (16.1%) for RCA-DFPP and 3 sessions (6.0%) for Hep-DFPP (P = .10). All premature circuit clotting episodes occurred in subjects who underwent DFPP through a vascular catheter. Premature circuit clotting was associated with the use of a vascular catheter (odds ratio [OR] 14.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.7-73.7; P < .01) and high postfilter ionized calcium (OR 12.7, 95% CI 1.4-112.5; P < .01). There was no major bleeding event. Hep-DFPP was associated with higher occurrence of hypocalcemia (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.0-1.2; P < .01) and metabolic acidosis (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2-2.0; P = .04), while hypomagnesemia was more common for RCA-DFPP (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.1-7.4; P = .03).

CONCLUSION

Amongst kidney transplant patients who receive DFPP therapy, RCA-DFPP may be comparable to Hep-DFPP for the maintenance of circuit patency. Functioning vascular access is vital in avoiding premature clotting of the circuit. Close monitoring of electrolyte imbalances and coagulopathy related to DFPP is recommended.

Therapeutic plasma exchange in the intensive care unit: Rationale, special considerations, and techniques for combined circuits

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is an extracorporeal blood purification technique with proven efficacy in a variety of conditions, including in the intensive care setting. It is not uncommon for a critically ill patient to require more than one extracorporeal procedure in addition to TPE. This review focuses on the combination of TPE with other extracorporeal circuits in a critical care setting via a single vascular access (either in-series, parallel, or a hybrid mode) which is often referred to as performing procedures "in tandem." Authors performed literature review via pubmed.gov using search terms: plasma exchange, plasmapheresis, apheresis, tandem circuits, combined circuits, critical care, ICU, CRRT, hemodialysis, and ECMO. Thirty-eight English-language, peer-reviewed papers were appraised that satisfied the content of this review on techniques for combining circuits with plasma exchange, as well as describing the advantages of tandem procedures and potential complications that can arise. Performing these procedures simultaneously can be advantageous in reducing total procedure and staffing time, avoiding placement of additional central lines, reducing overall need for anticoagulation, and limiting multiple blood primes in certain populations. However, the described combined circuits are complex, associated with higher complications, and require a skilled team to understand and mitigate the potential complications associated with these combined procedures.

Prevention of Adverse Outcomes and Treatment Side Effects in Patients with Neuromuscular Disorders

In this article, we review prevention of serious adverse clinical outcomes and treatment side effects in patients with neuromuscular disorders including myopathies and myasthenia gravis. While neither of these entities is preventable, their course can often be modified, and severe sequelae may be prevented, with the identification of risk factors and proactive attention toward treatment planning.

Clinical and biochemical endpoints and predictors of response to plasma exchange in septic shock: results from a randomized controlled trial

Background

Recently, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) demonstrated rapid but individually variable hemodynamic improvement with therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) in patients with septic shock. Prediction of clinical efficacy in specific sepsis treatments is fundamental for individualized sepsis therapy.

Methods

In the original RCT, patients with septic shock of < 24 h duration and norepinephrine (NE) requirement ≥ 0.4 μg/kg/min received standard of care (SOC) or SOC + one single TPE. Here, we report all clinical and biological endpoints of this study. Multivariate mixed-effects modeling of NE reduction was performed to investigate characteristics that could be associated with clinical response to TPE.

Results

A continuous effect of TPE on the reduction in NE doses over the initial 24 h was observed (SOC group: estimated NE dose reduction of 0.005 µg/kg/min per hour; TPE group: 0.018 µg/kg/min per hour, p = 0.004). Similarly, under TPE, serum lactate levels, continuously decreased over the initial 24 h in the TPE group, whereas lactate levels increased under SOC (p = 0.001). A reduction in biomarkers and disease mediators (such as PCT (p = 0.037), vWF:Ag (p < 0.001), Angpt-2 (p = 0.009), sTie-2 (p = 0.005)) along with a repletion of exhausted protective factors (such as AT-III (p = 0.026), Protein C (p = 0.012), ADAMTS-13 (p = 0.008)) could be observed in the TPE but not in the SOC group. In a multivariate mixed effects model, increasing baseline lactate levels led to greater NE dose reduction effects with TPE as opposed to SOC (p = 0.004).

Conclusions

Adjunctive TPE is associated with the removal of injurious mediators and repletion of consumed protective factors altogether leading to preserved hemodynamic stabilization in refractory septic shock. We identified that baseline lactate concentration as a potential response predictor might guide future designing of large RCTs that will further evaluate TPE with regard to hard endpoints.

Trial registration Retrospectively registered 18th January 2020 at clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier: NCT04231994).

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-022-04003-2.

Is There Still a Role of Plasma Exchange in the Current Management of ANCA-Associated Vasculitides?

Purpose of Review

Plasma exchange (PLEX) is often recommended as an adjunctive therapy for patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) in the setting of rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis or diffuse alveolar haemorrhage. Since ANCAs are pathogenic, it seems a reasonable and justified approach to remove them through therapeutic PLEX, as despite advances in immunosuppressive therapy regimens, AAV is associated with significant morbidity and death. However, the association between ANCA levels and mortality or disease activity is uncertain. In addition, any treatment must be judged on the potential risks and benefits of its use. Here, we summarise the current data on PLEX usage in patients with AAV.

Recent Findings

The largest randomised trial to date the Plasma Exchange and Glucocorticoids in Severe ANCA-Associated Vasculitis (PEXIVAS) study failed to show added benefit for PLEX on the prevention of death or end-stage renal failure (ESRF) for the management of patients with severe AAV. However, there is a possibility that PLEX delays dialysis dependence and ESRF in the early stages of the disease. Regardless of whether this is only for 3 to 12 months, this could be of clinical significance and a substantial improvement in patient’s quality of life.

Summary

Cost utility analysis and trials including patient-centred outcomes are required to evaluate the use of PLEX. Furthermore, ascertaining those at high risk of developing ESRF could help identify those who may benefit from PLEX the most, and further insights are required in setting of diffuse alveolar haemorrhage.

Central venous catheters are associated with thrombosis among adult inpatients undergoing therapeutic plasma exchange

BACKGROUND

For inpatients undergoing therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) in the United States, the primary mode of venous access is the central venous catheter (CVC). To evaluate the impact of CVC on thrombosis outcomes of patients undergoing TPE, we analyzed the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

In a cross-sectional analysis of the NIS, we identified hospital discharges of adult patients treated with TPE. Cases were classified into two groups based on CVC status. The primary outcome was thrombosis. Secondary outcomes were major bleeding, packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion, in-hospital mortality, hospital length of stay (LOS), and charges.

RESULTS

Among 9863 TPE-treated discharges, CVC was used in 5988 (60%). These numbers correspond to weighted national estimates of 49 315 and 29 940, respectively. There was a positive and significant association between CVC and thrombosis (OR = 1.23, 95% 1.04-1.46, P = 0.0174), PRBC transfusion (OR = 1.15, 95% 1.03-1.29, P = 0.0121), in-hospital mortality (OR = 1.36, 95% 1.10-1.68, P = 0.0043), hospital LOS (15.63 vs 12.45 days, P < 0.0001) and hospital charges ($166 387 vs. $132 655, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

In hospitalized patients undergoing TPE, CVC use is associated with increased rates of thrombosis. Future studies are needed to investigate strategies to decrease CVC use and/or prevent CVC-associated complications in TPE-treated inpatients.

Serious acid-base disorder or life-threatening arrhythmia in patients with ABO-incompatible liver transplantation who received therapeutic plasma exchange - A report of two cases

Background

Excessive citrate load during therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) can cause metabolic alkalosis with compensatory hypercarbia and electrolyte disturbances. If TPE is required immediately before ABO-incompatible (ABOi) liver transplant (LT) surgery, metabolic derangement and severe electrolyte disturbance could worsen during LT anesthesia.

Case

We report two ABOi LT cases who received TPE on the day of surgery because isoagglutinin titers did not be dropped below 1:8. One case had a surprisingly high metabolic alkalosis with a pH of 7.73 immediately after tracheal intubation because of hyperventilation during mask bagging. The other experienced sudden ventricular tachycardia and blood pressure drop after surgical incision accompanied with severe hypokalemia of 1.8 mmol/L despite supplementation with potassium.

Conclusions

Special attention should be paid to patients who just completed TPE the operative day morning as they are vulnerable to severe acid-base disturbances and life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias in ABOi LT.

Novel double-filtration plasmapheresis preserves fibrinogen while removing immunoglobulin-G antibodies before ABO blood type-incompatible kidney transplantation

Background

Removal of anti-blood group antibodies is important for successful ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation (ABOi-KTx). Double-filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) using albumin solution removes antibodies effectively. However, fibrinogen is largely removed resulting in hemostatic failure. Herein, we designed an altered combination of plasma membranes in DFPP (novel DFPP, nDFPP) to retain more fibrinogen while removing IgG, and assessed its efficacy and safety compared with conventional DFPP (cDFPP).

Methods

Consecutive ABOi-KTx recipients (from 2015 to 2018) were enrolled. For the first membrane, we used Cascadeflo EC-50W in nDFPP and Plasmaflo OP-08W in cDFPP, and Cascadeflo EC-20W as the second membrane in both modalities. Removal rates (RR) of IgG, IgM and fibrinogen per DFPP session, and adverse events were compared with historical control patients who underwent cDFPP before ABOi-KTx, between 2006 and 2015.

Results

nDFPP and cDFPP groups included 12 and 23 cases, respectively. nDFPP was inferior to cDFPP in RR of IgG and IgM. nDFPP was also inferior to cDFPP in the decline in anti-blood group IgG and IgM antibody titers. However, fibrinogen was more preserved in nDFPP compared with cDFPP, indicating that nDFPP has more selective removal properties (median RR of IgG, IgM, and fibrinogen: 62.1%, 15.7% and 37.6%, respectively, in nDFPP; and 74.5%, 85.0% and 76.6%, respectively, in cDFPP). In the comparison of hemostatic function among the patients who had arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis, prolonged hemostasis (> 20 min) at the cannulation site was significantly less frequently observed in nDFPP group (1 in 9 cases, 9.1%) than in cDFPP group (all 18 cases, 10%, p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

nDFPP preserves fibrinogen while removing anti-blood type IgG antibodies before ABOi-KTx.

2020 guide for the diagnosis and treatment of interstitial lung disease associated with connective tissue disease

The prognosis of patients with connective tissue disease (CTD) has improved significantly in recent years, but interstitial lung disease (ILD) associated with connective tissue disease (CTD-ILD) remains a refractory condition, which is a leading cause of mortality. Because it is an important prognostic factor, many observational and interventional studies have been conducted to date. However, CTD is a heterogeneous group of conditions, which makes the clinical course, treatment responses, and prognosis of CTD-ILD extremely diverse. To summarize the current understanding and unsolved questions, the Japanese Respiratory Society and the Japan College of Rheumatology collaborated to publish the world's first guide focusing on CTD-ILD, based on the evidence and expert consensus of pulmonologists and rheumatologists, along with radiologists, pathologists, and dermatologists. The task force members proposed a total of 27 items, including 7 for general topics, 9 for disease-specific topics, 3 for complications, 4 for pharmacologic treatments, and 4 for non-pharmacologic therapies, with teams of 2-4 authors and reviewers for each item to prepare a consensus statement based on a systematic literature review. Subsequently, public opinions were collected from members of both societies, and a critical review was conducted by external reviewers. Finally, the task force finalized the guide upon discussion and consensus generation. This guide is expected to contribute to the standardization of CTD-ILD medical care and is also useful as a tool for promoting future research by clarifying unresolved issues.

Therapeutic plasma exchange in clinical pediatric neurology practice: Experience from a tertiary referral hospital

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to retrospectively evaluate the long-term efficacy, tolerability, and safety of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) in children with various neuroimmunological disorders.

METHODS

This analysis was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients with neuroimmunological events undergoing TPE procedures in a tertiary referral center.

RESULTS

There were 23 patients, 14 boys (60.9%), aged at diagnosis onset 8 months to 16.8 years. The main indications of TPE were Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS, n = 8), autoimmune encephalitis (n = 5), febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES, n = 4), and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM, n = 3). There was no life-threatening complication due to the TPE procedures. Eight (34.8%) of 23 patients experienced 13 (7%) complications in 186 TPE procedures, mostly electrolyte disturbances (n = 5). None of patients discontinued TPE due to complications. Two (8.7%) of 23 patients had marked improvement, 6 (26.1%) had moderate and 11 (47.8%) had mild improvement after TPE. The last follow-up visit revealed neurological sequelae in 12 (52.2%) patients. Therapeutic plasma exchange was found to be more effective on GBS, autoimmune encephalitis and myasthenia gravis, less effective on ADEM and FIRES. There was no correlation between improvement with TPE and clinical parameters, including age, sex, diagnosis, disease duration before TPE, presence of intubation, and length of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital.

CONCLUSION

Therapeutic plasma exchange was found to be effective and well-tolerated in children with various types of neuroimmunological disorder, with at least mild improvement in approximately 80% of the patients and no life-threatening complications.

Therapeutic plasma exchange in neurological diseases: Eleven years experience at a tertiary care center in Turkey

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is an apheresis procedure in which plasma is separated from the blood cellular components ex vivo, allocated, and replaced with another plasma or a plasma-replacing fluid. This study aimed to define the rate of complications and determine TPE distribution in various neurological diseases. Our study is a retrospective analysis of neurologic diseases requiring TPE between 2008 and 2019 that were selected using the medical records of neurology departments and apheresis units database. We performed 1459 TPE procedures on 207 patients between 2008 and 2019. TPE Procedure is most frequently applied in patients with Myasthenia-Gravis syndrome (34.7%). The complication ratio was 1.6% from a total of 1459 TPE procedures. The most commonly specified adverse event was allergic reactions 11 (5.3%), followed by hypotension 6 (2.9%). TPE was safe and tolerable, with manageable complications in experienced hands.

Extracorporeal treatment for poisoning to beta-adrenergic antagonists: systematic review and recommendations from the EXTRIP workgroup

BACKGROUND

β-adrenergic antagonists (BAAs) are used to treat cardiovascular disease such as ischemic heart disease, congestive heart failure, dysrhythmias, and hypertension. Poisoning from BAAs can lead to severe morbidity and mortality. We aimed to determine the utility of extracorporeal treatments (ECTRs) in BAAs poisoning.

METHODS

We conducted systematic reviews of the literature, screened studies, extracted data, and summarized findings following published EXTRIP methods.

RESULTS

A total of 76 studies (4 in vitro and 2 animal experiments, 1 pharmacokinetic simulation study, 37 pharmacokinetic studies on patients with end-stage kidney disease, and 32 case reports or case series) met inclusion criteria. Toxicokinetic or pharmacokinetic data were available on 334 patients (including 73 for atenolol, 54 for propranolol, and 17 for sotalol). For intermittent hemodialysis, atenolol, nadolol, practolol, and sotalol were assessed as dialyzable; acebutolol, bisoprolol, and metipranolol were assessed as moderately dialyzable; metoprolol and talinolol were considered slightly dialyzable; and betaxolol, carvedilol, labetalol, mepindolol, propranolol, and timolol were considered not dialyzable. Data were available for clinical analysis on 37 BAA poisoned patients (including 9 patients for atenolol, 9 for propranolol, and 9 for sotalol), and no reliable comparison between the ECTR cohort and historical controls treated with standard care alone could be performed. The EXTRIP workgroup recommends against using ECTR for patients severely poisoned with propranolol (strong recommendation, very low quality evidence). The workgroup offered no recommendation for ECTR in patients severely poisoned with atenolol or sotalol because of apparent balance of risks and benefits, except for impaired kidney function in which ECTR is suggested (weak recommendation, very low quality of evidence). Indications for ECTR in patients with impaired kidney function include refractory bradycardia and hypotension for atenolol or sotalol poisoning, and recurrent torsade de pointes for sotalol. Although other BAAs were considered dialyzable, clinical data were too limited to develop recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

BAAs have different properties affecting their removal by ECTR. The EXTRIP workgroup assessed propranolol as non-dialyzable. Atenolol and sotalol were assessed as dialyzable in patients with kidney impairment, and the workgroup suggests ECTR in patients severely poisoned with these drugs when aforementioned indications are present.

Immunotherapy for Peripheral Nerve Disorders

Inflammatory peripheral neuropathies can be disabling for any patient. Selecting the most appropriate agent for treatment, especially in the elderly, is no simple task. Several factors should be considered. Herein, we discuss immunotherapeutic options for peripheral nerve diseases and the important considerations required for choosing one in the geriatric population.

Outcome of therapeutic plasma exchange in Myasthenia gravis patients

Aims:

The aim of this study was to evaluate the indications, adverse reactions, and outcome of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) in myasthenia gravis (MG) patients.

Settings and Design:

Retrospective Observational study.

Methods and Material:

A total of 18 patients of MG had undergone 18 cycles and 87 session of TPE at our Institution, a tertiary care center in Western India. It was performed using a single volume plasma exchange with intermittent cell separator (Freseniouscomtec), subclavian central line access, and with alternate day interval. Outcome was assessed shortly after each session and overall outcome at the time of discharge.

Results:

Total of 68 patients of MG were admitted to Neurology Intensive care unit (ICU) during the study period [January 2016–December 2019]. Out of them, TPE was done in 18 patients. Among the 18 patients, 11 patients had myasthenic crisis and 7 patients had worsening of MG. The mean number of TPE session was 4.2(SD ± 1.2), volume exchange was 2215 ml (SD ± 435); overall incidence of adverse reaction was 33.3%. All patients had immediate benefits of each TPE cycle. Good acceptance of procedure was observed in 72.2% of patients.

Conclusions:

TPE is cost-effective rapid therapy for myasthenic crisis and progressive myasthenia gravis. It reduces ICU stays and improves outcome.

Extracorporeal treatment for calcium channel blocker poisoning: systematic review and recommendations from the EXTRIP workgroup

BACKGROUND

Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are commonly used to treat conditions such as arterial hypertension and supraventricular dysrhythmias. Poisoning from these drugs can lead to severe morbidity and mortality. We aimed to determine the utility of extracorporeal treatments (ECTRs) in the management of CCB poisoning.

METHODS

We conducted systematic reviews of the literature, screened studies, extracted data, summarized findings, and formulated recommendations following published EXTRIP methods.

RESULTS

A total of 83 publications (6 in vitro and 1 animal experiments, 55 case reports or case series, 19 pharmacokinetic studies, 1 cohort study and 1 systematic review) met inclusion criteria regarding the effect of ECTR. Toxicokinetic or pharmacokinetic data were available on 210 patients (including 32 for amlodipine, 20 for diltiazem, and 52 for verapamil). Regardless of the ECTR used, amlodipine, bepridil, diltiazem, felodipine, isradipine, mibefradil, nifedipine, nisoldipine, and verapamil were considered not dialyzable, with variable levels of evidence, while no dialyzability grading was possible for nicardipine and nitrendipine. Data were available for clinical analysis on 78 CCB poisoned patients (including 32 patients for amlodipine, 16 for diltiazem, and 23 for verapamil). Standard care (including high dose insulin euglycemic therapy) was not systematically administered. Clinical data did not suggest an improvement in outcomes with ECTR. Consequently, the EXTRIP workgroup recommends against using ECTR in addition to standard care for patients severely poisoned with either amlodipine, diltiazem or verapamil (strong recommendations, very low quality of the evidence (1D)). There were insufficient clinical data to draft recommendation for other CCBs, although the workgroup acknowledged the low dialyzability from, and lack of biological plausibility for, ECTR.

CONCLUSIONS

Both dialyzability and clinical data do not support a clinical benefit from ECTRs for CCB poisoning. The EXTRIP workgroup recommends against using extracorporeal methods to enhance the elimination of amlodipine, diltiazem, and verapamil in patients with severe poisoning.

Efficacy of plasma exchange for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated systemic vasculitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

To assess through systematic review and meta-analysis whether plasma exchange (PE) is associated with prognosis in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) patients.

Methods

A systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL databases from inception to 17 June 2020 was conducted. Ongoing or unpublished trials were also searched in ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization trials portal. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PE vs. non-PE in AAV patients (microscopic polyangiitis [MPA], granulomatosis with polyangiitis [GPA], or eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis [EGPA]) were included. The combined risk ratio (RR) was calculated by the random-effects model using the Mantel-Haenszel method. Heterogeneity was measured using the I² statistic. Primary outcomes were mortality, clinical remission (CR), and adverse events (AEs).

Results

Four RCTs comparing PE vs. no PE (N = 827) and 1 RCT comparing PE vs. pulse steroid treatment (N = 137) were included. All participants were MPA or GPA patients (no EGPA patients). PE was not associated with main primary outcomes compared with no PE (mortality RR 0.93 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.70–1.24], I² = 0%; CR RR 1.02 [95% CI 0.91–1.15], I² = 0%; and AE RR 1.10 [95% CI 0.73–1.68], I² = 37%) or pulse steroid (mortality RR 0.99 [95% CI 0.71–1.37]; CR [the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity score] mean difference − 0.53 [95% CI − 1.40–0.34]; and AE RR 1.05 [95% CI 0.74–1.48]). Focusing on the early treatment phases, PE was associated with a reduction in end-stage renal disease incidence compared with both no PE (PE 1/43 vs. no PE 10/41; RR 0.14 [0.03–0.77] at 3 months) and pulse steroid (PE 11/70 vs. pulse steroid 23/67; RR 0.46 [0.24–0.86] at 3 months).

Conclusion

We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis targeting all AAV patients, including MPA, GPA, and EGPA. In AAV patients, performing PE was not associated with the risk of mortality, CR, and AE. No RCT exists evaluating the efficacy of PE for EGPA; hence, this is required in the future. The results may affect the development of guidelines for AAV and may indicate the direction of future clinical research on AAV.

Trial registration

UMIN R000045239, PROSPERO CRD42020182566.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13075-021-02415-z.

Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in the Critically Ill Patient: Technology and Indications

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is frequently the most common Apheresis Medicine technique used for extracorporeal therapy of a wide variety of renal, neurological, hematological, and other clinical indications. Many of these clinical indications require intensive care during critical illness. Conventional TPE uses one of two main technical methods to achieve the goal of removing known disease mediators from the plasma: using centrifugal forces to separate and remove components of blood, or a membrane filtration method that separates plasma from the cellular components of blood. The following review discusses the basic principles of TPE, the technological aspects, and relevant clinical scenarios encountered in the intensive care unit, including relevant guidelines and recommendations from the American Society for Apheresis.

The use of therapeutic plasma exchange for pediatric patients supported on extracorporeal membranous oxygenator therapy: A narrative review

Therapeutic plasma exchange in children is increasingly recognized as a life-saving treatment and is challenged by some technical considerations. As extracorporeal membrane oxygenation has been used for nearly half a century for refractory reversible respiratory and/or cardiac failure in both pediatric and adult populations, it may serve as an extracorporeal platform for therapeutic plasma exchange. It is most commonly described in patients with sepsis with multiple organ failure or thrombocytopenia associated multi organ failure. Additional pathophysiological processes of inflammatory and immunological storms might benefit from the combination of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and plasma exchange. This is a nonmethodological review of English-language reports of therapeutic plasma exchange performed in patients supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, both pediatric and adult, searching six databases, MEDLINE, Clinical Key, GOOGLE SCHOLAR, CINAHL, Cochrane library, and EMBASE.

Deaf and Mute Patient Developing Recurrent Idiopathic Bilateral Optic Neuritis: A Case for Early Treatment With Plasmapheresis?

Bilateral idiopathic optic neuritis is an uncommon presentation of optic neuritis, and the initial treatment options are limited to corticosteroids with consideration for plasma exchange therapy as second-line therapy. We present the case of a 43-year-old deaf and mute patient whose ability to communicate via American Sign Language was severely impaired by her recurrent idiopathic bilateral optic neuritis. She was treated early and aggressively with both plasma exchange and corticosteroids within days of presentation and experienced rapid improvement in her vision. Early treatment with plasma exchange should be considered in patients whose impairment presents a significant communication barrier.

THERAPEUTIC PLASMA EXCHANGE AS A BRIDGE TO TOTAL THYROIDECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH SEVERE THYROTOXICOSIS

Objective

Graves disease is the most common cause of thyrotoxicosis. Medical management is the first-line treatment but may be contraindicated or ineffective. In patients with severe, refractory thyrotoxicosis therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) may be indicated as a bridge to thyroidectomy.

Methods

We present 3 cases of thyrotoxicosis refractory to medical management that were successfully treated with TPE and subsequent total thyroidectomy, and provide an analysis of the response to therapy via a change in free thyroxine (fT4) levels throughout their treatment course.

Results

The average change in fT4 per liter of fluid exchanged was 0.37 ng/dL (SD = 0.08) and the average percentage change of fT4 after each treatment was 20.7% (SD = 8.28). The mean decrease in fT4 after 4 TPE treatments was 57.4%. All patients successfully underwent total thyroidectomy without complication and were discharged from the hospital.

Conclusion

TPE should be considered for thyrotoxic patients with severe hyperthyroidism or thyroid storm refractory to medical management or contraindications to antithyroid drugs who need a bridge to total thyroidectomy. In these cases, TPE was a safe and effective treatment that enabled definitive management with thyroidectomy and may be considered in other patients with severe refractory hyperthyroidism or thyrotoxicosis.

Extracorporeal Treatment for Chloroquine, Hydroxychloroquine, and Quinine Poisoning: Systematic Review and Recommendations from the EXTRIP Workgroup

BACKGROUND

Although chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, and quinine are used for a range of medical conditions, recent research suggested a potential role in treating COVID-19. The resultant increase in prescribing was accompanied by an increase in adverse events, including severe toxicity and death. The Extracorporeal Treatments in Poisoning (EXTRIP) workgroup sought to determine the effect of and indications for extracorporeal treatments in cases of poisoning with these drugs.

METHODS

We conducted systematic reviews of the literature, screened studies, extracted data, and summarized findings following published EXTRIP methods.

RESULTS

A total of 44 studies (three in vitro studies, two animal studies, 28 patient reports or patient series, and 11 pharmacokinetic studies) met inclusion criteria regarding the effect of extracorporeal treatments. Toxicokinetic or pharmacokinetic analysis was available for 61 patients (13 chloroquine, three hydroxychloroquine, and 45 quinine). Clinical data were available for analysis from 38 patients, including 12 with chloroquine toxicity, one with hydroxychloroquine toxicity, and 25 with quinine toxicity. All three drugs were classified as non-dialyzable (not amenable to clinically significant removal by extracorporeal treatments). The available data do not support using extracorporeal treatments in addition to standard care for patients severely poisoned with either chloroquine or quinine (strong recommendation, very low quality of evidence). Although hydroxychloroquine was assessed as being non-dialyzable, the clinical evidence was not sufficient to support a formal recommendation regarding the use of extracorporeal treatments for this drug.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of our systematic review and analysis, the EXTRIP workgroup recommends against using extracorporeal methods to enhance elimination of these drugs in patients with severe chloroquine or quinine poisoning.

Is There a Role for Plasma Exchange in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis?

Purpose of review

This review summarises the evidence for the use of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) in anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibody (ANCA)–associated vasculitis. TPE is an extra-corporeal treatment which efficiently removes IgG and other pathogenic small molecules from the blood. There are several mechanistic reasons why this should be of benefit in AAV including the well-described pathogenicity of ANCA.

Recent findings

The recently published PEXIVAS trial is the largest study of TPE in AAV to date. It did not show a benefit for adjunctive TPE on a primary end point of ESRD or death. There was no difference in serious adverse events between those treated with TPE and those treated with immunosuppressive drugs alone.

Conclusions

Based on the results of PEXIVAS, most patients with AAV should not be treated with adjunctive TPE. However, there are subgroups of patients with AAV for whom TPE may still be of benefit, including those with double positivity for anti-GBM antibodies and ANCA.

Therapeutic Plasma Exchange Using Membrane Plasma Separation

Therapeutic plasma exchange is a blood purification technique designed for the removal of large molecular weight toxins such as pathogenic antibodies and lipoproteins. Plasma exchange can be performed either by membrane separation or centrifugation. Centrifugal plasma exchange is more common in the United States, while membrane separation is more popular in Germany and Japan. The membrane separation technique is similar to the ultrafiltration procedures performed with a standard dialysis machine but in which the membrane's pores are large enough to allow removal of all circulating molecules while retaining the cellular components. The current availability of plasma separation membranes compatible with CRRT systems has dramatically increased the potential for almost all nephrologists to perform these treatments. This review describes the membrane separation techniques available in the United States, the practical aspects of ordering and operating a membrane separation plasma exchange procedure, and its possible complications.

Safety and Tolerability of Plasma Exchange and Immunoadsorption in Neuroinflammatory Diseases

Plasma exchange (PE) and immunoadsorption (IA) are frequently used for treatment of various autoimmune-mediated neurological diseases, including multiple sclerosis (MS), chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), and Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). Although both methods are generally regarded as well-tolerated treatment options, evidence for safety and tolerability is low for most indications and largely relies on small case series. In this study, we retrospectively analysed adverse events (AEs) and laboratory changes in 284 patients with various neurological indications who received either PE (n = 65, 113 cycles) or IA (n = 219, 435 cycles) between 2013 and 2020 in our Neurology department. One standard treatment cycle for PE as well as IA consisted of five treatments on five consecutive days. During every treatment, the 2.0-2.5-fold individual plasma volume (PV) was treated in IA, while in PE, the 0.7-fold individual PV was replaced by human albumin solution. Overall, both methods showed an excellent safety profile; no deaths of life-threatening adverse events were recorded. Severe AEs (corresponding to grade 3 on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grading scale v5.0) including three patients with sepsis, one pneumonia, and one pneumothorax were present in 5/435 IA cycles (1.1%); in the PE group, no severe AEs were recorded. Furthermore, although advantageous tolerability is generally considered the main advantage of IA over PE, we found that overall frequency of AEs (including grades 1 and 2) was higher in IA (67.1% of all cycles) compared to PE (35.4%; p < 0.001). The low incidence of AEs in PE might be caused by the lower PV exchanged during each treatment (0.7-fold) compared to previous studies which predominantly exchanged the 1.0-1.5-fold PV. In order to verify this hypothesis as well as confirming the efficacy of this lower-dosed scheme, prospective studies comparing different treatment regimens are needed.

Therapeutic plasma exchange for control of thyroid storm

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) for thyroid storm has recently been upgraded to a category II indication after decades though its recommendation level still remains at Grade 2C according to the American Society for Apheresis (ASFA). In the absence of prospective randomized controlled trials due to the rarity of thyroid storm, retrospective data from case series continue to elevate the clinical evidence supporting TPE as a life-saving modality for complicated thyroid storm patients. We report three cases of life-threatening thyroid storm from Graves' disease rescued by TPE via rapid reduction in circulating thyroid hormones. Each patient underwent TPE when it was judged that other thyroid storm treatment options were futile or unsafe. The first patient received 4 cycles of TPE while the second patient received 9 cycles of TPE, and the third patient received 2 cycles of TPE with satisfactory clinical improvement. Plasma FT4 and TSH receptor antibody levels of the first case declined by 41.3% and >50% respectively right after the first round of TPE; plasma FT4 of the second patient dropped by up to 31.6% during the course of TPE; plasma FT4 and TSH receptor antibody of the third patient declined by 66% and 56.2% respectively after the first cycle of TPE. This demonstrates the safety, efficacy, and feasibility of TPE in thyroid storm especially when other therapeutic interventions are contraindicated. TPE operates via the elimination of serum proteins-bound thyroid hormones, thyroid autoantibodies, cytokines, and catecholamines in addition to increasing unsaturated binding sites for thyroid hormones.

Plasma Exchange or Immunoadsorption in Demyelinating Diseases: A Meta-Analysis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory disease mainly affecting the central nervous system. In MS, abnormal immune mechanisms induce acute inflammation, demyelination, axonal loss, and the formation of central nervous system plaques. The long-term treatment involves options to modify the disease progression, whereas the treatment for the acute relapse has its focus in the administration of high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone (up to 1000 mg daily) over a period of three to five days as a first step. If symptoms of the acute relapse persist, it is defined as glucocorticosteroid-unresponsive, and immunomodulation by apheresis is recommended. However, several national and international guidelines have no uniform recommendations on using plasma exchange (PE) nor immunoadsorption (IA) in this case. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted, including observational studies or randomized controlled trials that investigated the effect of PE or IA on different courses of MS and neuromyelitis optica (NMO). One thousand, three hundred and eighty-three patients were included in the evaluation. Therapy response in relapsing-remitting MS and clinically isolated syndrome was 76.6% (95%CI 63.7–89.8%) in PE- and 80.6% (95%CI 69.3–91.8%) in IA-treated patients. Based on the recent literature, PE and IA may be considered as equal treatment possibilities in patients suffering from acute, glucocorticosteroid-unresponsive MS relapses.

A Man in His 50s With Hemoptysis, Dyspnea, and Bilateral Patchy Ground-Glass Opacities

CASE PRESENTATION

A man in his 50s presented to the ED with a 3-day history of small-volume hemoptysis and new-onset dyspnea. The patient did not have fevers, chills, chest pain, abdominal pain, or changes in urination. His medical history included hypertension, a 35-pack-year active smoking history, and occupational hydrocarbon exposure as a mechanic in the foresting industry. He reported no recent travels, and he denied sick contacts. His medications included amlodipine, hydrochlorothiazide, lisinopril, omeprazole, and nicotine replacement therapy.

EarLy Elimination of Fatty Acids iN hypertriglyceridemia-induced acuTe pancreatitis (ELEFANT trial): Protocol of an open-label, multicenter, adaptive randomized clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a life-threatening inflammatory disease, with no specific pharmacological treatment. However, concerning some etiologies, early specific intervention (such as ERCP in biliary AP) has proven to be remarkably beneficial. Hypertriglyceridemia (HTG) induces severe pancreatic damage by several direct (cellular damage) and indirect (deterioration of microcirculation) mechanisms. Published data suggest that early removal of triglycerides (TGs) and toxic free fatty acids (FFAs) may be advantageous; however, high-quality evidence is still missing in the literature.

METHODS

Design: ELEFANT is a randomized controlled, multicenter, international trial testing the concept that early elimination of TGs and FFAs from the blood is beneficial in HTG-AP. The study will be performed with the adaptive "drop-the-loser" design, which supports the possibility of dropping the inferior treatment arm, based on the results of the interim analysis. Patients with HTG-AP defined by TG level over 11.3 mmol/l (1000 mg/dL) are randomized into three groups: (A) patients who undergo plasmapheresis and receive aggressive fluid resuscitation; (B) patients who receive insulin and heparin treatment with aggressive fluid resuscitation; and (C) patients with aggressive fluid resuscitation. Please note that all intervention must be started within 48 h from the onset of abdominal pain. Exclusion criteria are designed logically to decrease the possibility of any distorting effects of other diseases. The composite primary endpoint will include both severity and mortality.

RESULTS

Our null hypothesis is that early elimination of HTG and FFAs reduces the risk of mortality and severity of AP. Sample size calculation suggests that 495 patients will need to be enrolled in order to confirm or reject the hypothesis with a 10% dropout, 80% power and 95% significance level. The general safety and quality checks required for high-quality evidence will be adhered to. The study will be organized between February 2020 and December 2025.

CONCLUSION

Our study would provide the first direct evidence for or against early intervention in HTG-induced AP.

Hemodynamic Collapse Following Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in a Patient Receiving an Angiotensin Receptor Blocker

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is a procedure for removal of plasma and its components while leaving behind cellular elements via an apheresis device. It is used in multiple conditions one among which is systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Adverse reactions from TPE range from mild hypotension and fever to life-threatening cardiovascular compromise. We report the case of sudden hemodynamic collapse following TPE for a neuropsychiatric lupus flare in a patient on losartan. A 62-year-old Caucasian female with a history of drug-induced lupus presented to the hospital with symptoms of a neuropsychiatric lupus flare. She was initiated on TPE with 5% albumin based on recommendations by her rheumatologist. Shortly after TPE, she became hypotensive with poor response to fluid boluses, requiring pressor support and intubation. These symptoms resolved within 24 hours on supportive measures. This was believed to be due to losartan use on the day of TPE. The medication was discontinued and she had further sessions of TPE with no complications. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have previously been associated with flushing and hypotension in patients undergoing TPE. Patients undergoing TPE have an activation of the prekallikrein and bradykinin system on contact with the extracorporeal membranes. ACE inhibitors potentiate this reaction by inhibiting bradykinin catabolism. Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) have also been postulated to cause elevated bradykinin levels although data pertaining to the use of ARBs in TPE is limited. We hope to highlight this rare interaction in our case and emphasize the need for further data with regard to the same.

Pharmacotherapy for Pediatric Convulsive Status Epilepticus

Convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) is one of the most common pediatric neurological emergencies. Ongoing seizure activity is a dynamic process and may be associated with progressive impairment of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-mediated inhibition due to rapid internalization of GABA_A receptors. Further hyperexcitability may be caused by AMPA (alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid) and NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartic acid) receptors moving from subsynaptic sites to the synaptic membrane. Receptor trafficking during prolonged seizures may contribute to difficulties treating seizures of longer duration and may provide some of the pathophysiological underpinnings of established and refractory SE (RSE). Simultaneously, a practice change toward more rapid initiation of first-line benzodiazepine (BZD) treatment and faster escalation to second-line non-BZD treatment for established SE is in progress. Early administration of the recommended BZD dose is suggested. For second-line treatment, non-BZD anti-seizure medications (ASMs) include valproate, fosphenytoin, or levetiracetam, among others, and at this point there is no clear evidence that any one of these options is better than the others. If seizures continue after second-line ASMs, RSE is manifested. RSE treatment consists of bolus doses and titration of continuous infusions under continuous electro-encephalography (EEG) guidance until electrographic seizure cessation or burst-suppression. Ultimately, etiological workup and related treatment of CSE, including broad spectrum immunotherapies as clinically indicated, is crucial. A potential therapeutic approach for future studies may entail consideration of interventions that may accelerate diagnosis and treatment of SE, as well as rational and early polytherapy based on synergism between ASMs by utilizing medications targeting different mechanisms of epileptogenesis and epileptogenicity.

Complications of therapeutic plasma exchange: A retrospective study of 1201 procedures in 435 children

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is now widely used in therapy of multiple diseases in children, by removing the plasma with pathogenic agents from patients. However, adverse reactions may limit its application.A retrospective cohort study of 435 hospitalized children treated with 1201 plasma exchange procedures between January 2013 and July 2018 were enrolled.Complications occurred in 152 procedures (12.7%); 90 procedures (7.5%) had ≥2 complications. No death occurred. The most common complications were pruritus and urticaria (7%), followed by hypertension (1.92%) and hypotension (1.17%). One child had an outbreak of disseminated cryptococcosis neoformans infection, another child developed anaphylactic shock, and 3 children presented toxic epidermal necrolysis after TPE. The incidence of pruritus and urticaria was higher in children of the 6∼15 year group (P < .05) compared with other age groups. There was no significant difference in the incidence of hypertension and hypotension in children at different ages and weights (P > .05). Compared with other diseases, anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate (anti-NMDA) receptor encephalitis led to a higher incidence of complications in children (P < .05).The results suggest that TPE is a relatively safe procedure for children, and most of the complications are mild. The most common complication is pruritus and urticaria. However, serious complications such as toxic epidermal necrolysis and infection should still be taken seriously.

Therapeutic approaches in hypertriglyceridemia-induced acute pancreatitis: A literature review of available therapies and case series

Hypertriglyceridemia-induced acute pancreatitis (HGAP) is the third most common etiology of acute pancreatitis. HGAP can be attributed to genetic disturbances in triglyceride metabolism or multiple secondary causes. Here, we presented three cases for HGAP and explored different therapeutic approaches for treating HGAP. A case series of three patients who presented with HGAP and underwent different therapeutic approaches was conducted. The first patient was a 37-year-old male who presented with nonsevere HGAP; he was treated with conservative therapy with insulin and heparin infusion, which resulted in clinical and laboratory improvement. The second patient was a 64-year-old male with human immunodeficiency virus on multiple highly active antiretroviral therapy. He presented with severe HGAP and multiorgan failure. After initiation of therapeutic plasma exchange, his HGAP resolved. The third patient was a 28-year-old male who presented with recurrent episodes of HGAP; his conservative therapy failed and was eventually escalated to therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE). HGAP can be attributed to genetic disturbances of lipid or secondary etiologies. A nonsevere form of HGAP can be managed with conventional therapy including insulin and heparin; however, severe HGAP may require TPE.

A pilot study comparing treatments for severe attacks of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: Intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) with add-on plasma exchange (PLEX) versus simultaneous ivmp and PLEX

BACKGROUND

Our previous retrospective study demonstrated that NMOSD patients with an acute attack who did not respond to IVMP alone, however, showed further significant improvement after treatment with PLEX at 6 month-follow-up.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy between treatments with intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) with subsequent add-on plasma exchange (PLEX) and a combination of simultaneous IVMP and PLEX in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) patients with a severe acute attack.

METHOD

We conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled, pilot study of the treatments for a severe acute attack in NMOSD patients.

RESULTS

There were eleven AQP4-positive NMOSD patients in the study. One received only IVMP, five received IVMP with subsequent add-on PLEX treatment, and the other five received simultaneous IVMP and PLEX treatment. The attacks comprised myelitis (57.1%) and optic neuritis (42.9%). Both treatments with IVMP followed by subsequent add-on PLEX when needed (not-respond to IVMP treatment) and a combination treatment of simultaneous IVMP+PLEX from the outset showed clinical improvement measured by EDSS at 6 months follow-up, compared to those at the attacks (p-value = 0.07 in IVMP add-on PLEX group and p-value = 0.05 in IVMP+PLEX group), respectively. Although, a trend of a better outcome stratified by EDSS toward early PLEX initiation with IVMP+PLEX treatment was observed at 6 months follow-up, however not significantly.

CONCLUSION

Early treatment with PLEX should be encouraged especially in NMOSD with a severe acute attack.