The effect of dialysate calcium levels on blood pressure during hemodialysis

Hypercalcemic Crisis Due to Parathyroid Adenoma Improved by Continuous Hemodialysis with a Common Calcium Concentration Dialysate: Discussion of Therapeutic Management

A hypercalcemic crisis due to primary hyperparathyroidism is a life-threatening condition. We herein report a 71-years-old man with hypercalcemic crisis due to primary hyperparathyroidism with parathyroid adenoma. Generally, hemodialysis or continuous hemodiafiltration using calcium-free or low-calcium dialysate is performed early for hypercalcemic crisis. In this case, continuous hemodialysis with a common calcium concentration dialysate improved the hypercalcemic crisis, and parathyroidectomy was performed. The patient recovered sufficiently. Prediction of hypercalcemia crisis, appropriate introduction and methods of blood purification therapy, and timing decisions for parathyroidectomy are required for therapeutic management of hypercalcemic crisis with parathyroid adenoma.

Nitric Oxide Levels as a Marker of Intradialytic Hypertension in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients

Intradialytic hypertension (IDH) is an important emerging complication in hemodialysis patients. No study has examined the diagnostic markers of various risk factors for the occurrence of IDH in chronic hemodialysis patients. Therefore, our study aimed to assess the use of nitric oxide (NO) as a marker of IDH among end-stage renal disease patients. The patients were divided into two groups: Group I (40 patients) with IDH and Group II (40 patients) without IDH. For all participants, a full medical history was taken, followed by laboratory examinations to measure the level of NO and a clinical examination. The dose of erythropoietin per week, the level of intact parathyroid hormone, and platelet count were significantly higher in Group I than in Group II, whereas the mean level of NO (2.10 ± 1.23 pmol/L) was highly significantly lower in patients with IDH (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that hypertension (odds ratio: 1.824, 95% confidence interval: 1.273-2.982) and the level of NO (odds ratio: 1.68, 95% confidence interval: 1.13-2.97) were independent risk factors for IDH. The receiver operating characteristic curve showed that the cutoff point of NO was 2.52 μmol/L to differentiate between cases with and without IDH (area under the curve = 0.844). Our findings support previous research regarding the involvement of endothelial dysfunction and a higher sodium level in the pathogenesis of IDH. We also found that the NO level had a good diagnostic value for the occurrence of IDH at a cutoff of 2.52 μmol/L.

Calcium balance in hemodialysis: More uncertainty than certainty

There is controversy about the choice of dialysate calcium concentration (DCa), with strong arguments both in favor of and against the use of a low or high DCa, as they can both be potentially harmful. Evidence suggests that calcium mass balance is positive with a DCa 3.5 mEq/L, negative or neutral with the use of DCa 2.5 mEq/L, whereas both positive and negative balances have been observed with the use of DCa 3.0 mEq/L. Overall, the use of DCa >2.5 mEq/L is usually associated with an increase in serum calcium level and a decrease in serum PTH level and use of lower vitamin D analogue dose, with the opposite effects usually observed with the use of lower DCa. Most of the available evidence is from small-sized and crossover studies; hence, evidence should be regarded with caution and applied in a patient-specific manner. As there are a lot of significant unanswered questions regarding calcium balance and the optimal DCa in hemodialysis patients, further high-quality research is needed to clarify many still unclear aspects of calcium homeostasis and balance in these patients. In conclusion, with the existing evidence the choice of DCa needs to be individualized and contextualized in the setting of each patient's calcium balance needs and homeostatic response, taking also into account oral calcium intake (dietary and medicinal), any other relevant therapy administered, such as vitamin D analogues, the type of renal mineral bone disorder, and associated cardiovascular comorbidity.

Short- and Long-term Effects of Dialysate Calcium Concentrations on Mineral and Bone Metabolism in Hemodialysis Patients: The K4 Study

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

The short- and long-term impact of conversion of dialysate calcium concentration from either 2.5 or 3.0 mEq/L to 2.75 mEq/L on mineral and bone metabolism remains unknown in hemodialysis patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Nonrandomized intervention study.

SETTING & POPULATION

12 hemodialysis patients treated at baseline with a 2.5-mEq/L dialysate calcium concentration and another 12 hemodialysis patients treated with a 3.0-mEq/L dialysate calcium concentration.

INTERVENTION

Use of 2.75-mEq/L dialysate calcium concentration.

OUTCOMES

Changes in intradialytic calcium and phosphate clearance and changes in predialysis and intradialytic serum and ionized mineral and biochemical parameters over the 24 weeks following dialysate calcium conversion.

RESULTS

Conversion of dialysate calcium concentration from 2.5 to 2.75 mEq/L increased intradialytic calcium loading and serum total and ionized calcium levels, whereas conversion of dialysate calcium from 3.0 to 2.75 mEq/L decreased intradialytic calcium loading and serum total and ionized calcium levels. Dialysate calcium concentration conversion did not affect intradialytic serum parathyroid hormone level, intradialytic phosphate elimination, or predialysis serum calcium, phosphate, parathyroid hormone, and fibroblast growth factor 23 levels. Intradialytic calcium influx was determined by dialysate calcium concentration and predialysis serum calcium levels, whereas intradialytic phosphate elimination was determined by predialysis serum phosphate levels.

LIMITATIONS

Small sample size and no control groups treated with 2.5- and 3.0-mEq/L dialysate calcium concentrations during the 24 weeks of the observation period.

CONCLUSIONS

Conversion of dialysate calcium concentration from either 3.0 or 2.5 to 2.75 mEq/L results in expected changes in calcium loading based on predialysis calcium concentration. The dialysate calcium concentration should be personalized based on clinical factors.

FUNDING

None.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

University Hospital Medical Information Network, www.umin.ac.jp/english/, R000040105, UMIN000035184.

Hyperuricemia is associated with decreased changes in heart rate variability after hemodialysis in non-diabetic patients

Hyperuricemia has been associated with low heart rate variability (HRV), however whether there is an association between uric acid (UA) and HRV changes after hemodialysis (HD) is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of UA in HRV changes before and after HD in non-diabetic patients. Ninety-six non-diabetic patients under maintenance HD were enrolled. HRV was examined to assess changes before and after HD. A change in HRV (ΔHRV) was calculated as post-HD HRV minus pre-HD HRV. Compared to the patients with a UA level ≦ 7 mg/dL, those with a UA level > 7 mg/dL had lower ∆high frequency (HF)% (p = 0.027). UA was negatively associated with ∆HF% (r = -0.247, p = 0.015) and ∆low frequency (LF)/HF (r = -0.236, p = 0.021) in the non-diabetic patients undergoing HD. Furthermore, in multivariate analysis after adjustments for demographic, clinical, and biochemical characteristics and medications, UA was independently associated with ∆HF% (per 1 mg/dL, unstandardized coefficient β = -2.892; 95% CI, -5.066 to -0.717; p = 0.010) and ∆LF/HF (per 1 mg/dL, unstandardized coefficient β = -0.165; 95% CI, -0.291 to -0.038; p = 0.011). Hyperuricemia contributed to lesser HF% and LF/HF increase after HD in the non-diabetic patients, reflecting a state of impaired sympatho-vagal equilibrium in non-diabetic HD patients with hyperuricemia. Lowering UA levels may have the potential to improve increased HRV in non-diabetic HD patients.

Dialysate Calcium Concentration, Mineral Metabolism Disorders, and Cardiovascular Disease: Deciding the Hemodialysis Bath

Patients with end-stage kidney disease treated with dialysis are at increased risk to experience fractures and cardiovascular events than similar-aged people from the general population. The enhanced risk for these outcomes in dialysis patients is not completely explained by traditional risk factors for osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease. Mineral metabolism abnormalities are almost universal by the time patients require dialysis therapy, with most patients having some type of renal osteodystrophy and vascular calcification. These abnormalities have been linked to adverse skeletal and cardiovascular events. However, it has become clear that the treatment regimens used to modify the serum calcium, phosphate, and parathyroid hormone levels almost certainly contribute to the poor outcomes for dialysis patients. In this article, we focus on one aspect of mineral metabolism management; dialysate calcium concentration and the relationships among dialysate calcium concentrations, mineral and bone disorder, and cardiovascular disease in hemodialysis patients.

Should dialysate calcium be individualized?

The growing interest in a personalized choice of dialysate calcium concentration faces some important unsolved questions. First, the desired aims to be achieved should be clarified, as different d-Ca concentrations might differentially impact dialysis calcium balance and serum calcium concentration. A second point to be addressed is how to achieve the desired goals; the kinetics of calcium during dialysis treatment are complex. This is not an easy task and probably only an automatic device able to read serum calcium concentration in real-time and adjust d-Ca to it might supply an effective method for individualizing d-Ca. Finally, it is not even clear whether individualizing d-Ca is worth doing; cost-effectiveness studies might give some further insights into this intricate issue.

Attending rounds: A patient with intradialytic hypotension

Intradialytic hypotension is the most common adverse event that occurs during the hemodialysis procedure. Despite advances in machine technology, it remains a difficult management issue. The pathophysiology of intradialytic hypotension and measures to reduce its frequency are discussed. An accurate assessment of dry weight is crucial in all patients on dialysis and especially those patients prone to intradialytic hypotension. The presence of edema and hypertension has recently been shown to be a poor predictor of volume overload. Noninvasive methods to assess volume status, such as whole body and segmental bioimpedance, hold promise to more accurately assess fluid status. Reducing salt intake is key to limiting interdialytic weight gain. A common problem is that patients are often told to restrict fluid but not salt intake. Lowering the dialysate temperature, prohibiting food ingestion during hemodialysis, and midodrine administration are beneficial. Sodium modeling in the absence of ultrafiltration modeling should be abandoned. There is not enough data on the efficacy of l-carnitine to warrant its routine use.

Intradialytic hypertension is a marker of volume excess

BACKGROUND

Intradialytic blood pressure (BP) profiles have been associated with all-cause mortality, but its pathophysiology remains unknown. We tested the hypothesis that intradialytic changes in BP reflect excess volume.

METHODS

The dry weight reduction in hypertensive haemodialysis patients (DRIP) trial probed dry weight in 100 prevalent haemodialysis patients; 50 patients who did not have their dry weight probed served as time controls. In this post hoc analysis, intradialytic BP was recorded at each of the 30 dialysis treatments during the trial. The slope of intradialytic BP over dialysis was calculated by the log of BP regressed over time. Using a linear mixed model, we compared these slopes between control and ultrafiltration groups at baseline and over time, tested the effect of dry weight reduction on these slopes and finally tested the ability of change in intradialytic slopes to predict change in interdialytic systolic BP.

RESULTS

At baseline, intradialytic systolic and diastolic BP dropped at a rate of ~3%/h (P < 0.0001). Over the course of the trial, compared to the control group, the slopes steepened in the ultrafiltration group for systolic but not diastolic BP. Those who lost the most post-dialysis weight from baseline to 4 weeks and baseline to 8 weeks also experienced the greatest steepening of slopes. Each percent per hour steepening of the intradialytic systolic BP slope was associated with 0.71 mmHg [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01-1.42, P = 0. 048] reduction in interdialytic ambulatory systolic pressure.

CONCLUSIONS

Intradialytic BP changes appear to be associated with change in dry weight among haemodialysis patients. Among long-term haemodialysis patients, intradialytic hypertension may, thus, be a sign of volume overload.

Intradialytic hypertension: a less-recognized cardiovascular complication of hemodialysis

Intradialytic hypertension, defined as an increase in blood pressure during or immediately after hemodialysis that results in postdialysis hypertension, has long been recognized to complicate the hemodialysis procedure, yet often is largely ignored. In light of recent investigations suggesting that intradialytic hypertension is associated with adverse outcomes, this review broadly covers the epidemiologic characteristics, prognostic significance, potential pathogenic mechanisms, prevention, and possible treatment of intradialytic hypertension. Intradialytic hypertension affects up to 15% of hemodialysis patients and occurs more frequently in patients who are older, have lower dry weights, are prescribed more antihypertensive medications, and have lower serum creatinine levels. Recent studies associated intradialytic hypertension independently with higher hospitalization rates and decreased survival. Although the pathophysiologic mechanisms of intradialytic hypertension are uncertain, it likely is multifactorial and includes subclinical volume overload, sympathetic overactivity, activation of the renin-angiotensin system, endothelial cell dysfunction, and specific dialytic techniques. Prevention and treatment of intradialytic hypertension may include careful attention to dry weight, avoidance of dialyzable antihypertensive medications, limiting the use of high-calcium dialysate, achieving adequate sodium solute removal during hemodialysis, and using medications that inhibit the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system or decrease endothelin 1 levels. In summary, although intradialytic hypertension often is underappreciated, recent studies suggest that it should not be ignored. However, further work is necessary to elucidate the pathophysiologic mechanisms of intradialytic hypertension and its appropriate management and determine whether treatment of intradialytic hypertension can improve clinical outcomes.

Decreased pulse pressure during hemodialysis is associated with improved 6-month outcomes

Pulse pressure is a well established marker of vascular stiffness and is associated with increased mortality in hemodialysis patients. Here we sought to determine if a decrease in pulse pressure during hemodialysis was associated with improved outcomes using data from 438 hemodialysis patients enrolled in the 6-month Crit-Line Intradialytic Monitoring Benefit Study. The relationship between changes in pulse pressure during dialysis (2-week average) and the primary end point of non-access-related hospitalization and death were adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, medications, and laboratory variables. In the analyses that included both pre- and post-dialysis pulse pressure, higher pre-dialysis and lower post-dialysis pulse pressure were associated with a decreased hazard of the primary end point. Further, every 10 mm Hg decrease in pulse pressure during dialysis was associated with a 20% lower hazard of the primary end point. In separate models that included pulse pressure and the change in pulse pressure during dialysis, neither pre- nor post-dialysis pulse pressure were associated with the primary end point, but each 10 mm Hg decrease in pulse pressure during dialysis was associated with about a 20% lower hazard of the primary end point. Our study found that in prevalent dialysis subjects, a decrease in pulse pressure during dialysis was associated with improved outcomes. Further study is needed to identify how to control pulse pressure to improve outcomes.

Citrate- vs. acetate-based dialysate in bicarbonate haemodialysis: consequences on haemodynamics, coagulation, acid-base status, and electrolytes

Background

A concentrate for bicarbonate haemodialysis acidified with citrate instead of acetate has been marketed in recent years. The small amount of citrate used (one-fifth of the concentration adopted in regional anticoagulation) protects against intradialyser clotting while minimally affecting the calcium concentration. The aim of this study was to compare the impact of citrate- and acetate-based dialysates on systemic haemodynamics, coagulation, acid-base status, calcium balance and dialysis efficiency.

Methods

In 25 patients who underwent a total of 375 dialysis sessions, an acetate dialysate (A) was compared with a citrate dialysate with (C+) or without (C) calcium supplementation (0.25 mmol/L) in a randomised single-blind cross-over study. Systemic haemodynamics were evaluated using pulse-wave analysis. Coagulation, acid-base status, calcium balance and dialysis efficiency were assessed using standard biochemical markers.

Results

Patients receiving the citrate dialysate had significantly lower systolic blood pressure (BP) (-4.3 mmHg, p < 0.01) and peripheral resistances (PR) (-51 dyne.sec.cm^-5, p < 0.001) while stroke volume was not increased. In hypertensive patients there was a substantial reduction in BP (-7.8 mmHg, p < 0.01). With the C+ dialysate the BP gap was less pronounced but the reduction in PR was even greater (-226 dyne.sec.cm^-5, p < 0.001). Analyses of the fluctuations in PR and of subjective tolerance suggested improved haemodynamic stability with the citrate dialysate. Furthermore, an increase in pre-dialysis bicarbonate and a decrease in pre-dialysis BUN, post-dialysis phosphate and ionised calcium were noted. Systemic coagulation activation was not influenced by citrate.

Conclusion

The positive impact on dialysis efficiency, acid-base status and haemodynamics, as well as the subjective tolerance, together indicate that citrate dialysate can significantly contribute to improving haemodialysis in selected patients.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00718289

Haemodynamic consequences of changing bicarbonate and calcium concentrations in haemodialysis fluids

Background. In a previous study we demonstrated that mild metabolic alkalosis resulting from standard bicarbonate haemodialysis induces hypotension. In this study, we have further investigated the changes in systemic haemodynamics induced by bicarbonate and calcium, using non-invasive procedures.

Methods. In a randomized controlled trial with a single-blind, crossover design, we sequentially changed the dialysate bicarbonate and calcium concentrations (between 26 and 35 mmol/l for bicarbonate and either 1.25 or 1.50 mmol/l for calcium). Twenty-one patients were enrolled for a total of 756 dialysis sessions. Systemic haemodynamics was evaluated using pulse wave analysers. Bioimpedance and BNP were used to compare the fluid status pattern.

Results. The haemodynamic parameters and the pre-dialysis BNP using either a high calcium or bicarbonate concentration were as follows: systolic blood pressure (+5.6 and −4.7 mmHg; P < 0.05 for both), stroke volume (+12.3 and +5.2 ml; P < 0.05 and ns), peripheral resistances (−190 and −171 dyne s cm⁻⁵; P < 0.05 for both), central augmentation index (+1.1% and −2.9%; ns and P < 0.05) and BNP (−5 and −170 ng/l; ns and P < 0.05). The need of staff intervention was similar in all modalities.

Conclusions. Both high bicarbonate and calcium concentrations in the dialysate improve the haemodynamic pattern during dialysis. Bicarbonate reduces arterial stiffness and ameliorates the heart tolerance for volume overload in the interdialytic phase, whereas calcium directly increases stroke volume. The slight hypotensive effect of alkalaemia should motivate a probative reduction of bicarbonate concentration in dialysis fluid for haemodynamic reasons, only in the event of failure of classical tools to prevent intradialytic hypotension.

Review of dialysate calcium concentration in hemodialysis

The dialysate calcium (Ca) concentration for hemodialysis (HD) patients can be adjusted to manage more optimally the body's Ca and phosphate balance, and thus improve bone metabolism as well as reduce accelerated arteriosclerosis and cardiovascular mortality. The appropriate dialysate Ca concentration allowing this balance should be prescribed to each individual patient depending on a multitude of variable factors relating to Ca load. A lower dialysate Ca concentration of 1.25 to 1.3 mmol/L will permit the use of vitamin D supplements and Ca-based phosphate binders in clinical practice, with much less risk of Ca loading and resultant hypercalcemia and calcification. Low Ca baths are useful in the setting of adynamic bone disease where an increase in bone turnover is required. However, low Ca levels in the dialysate may also predispose to cardiac arrhythmias and hemodynamically unstable dialysis sessions with intradialytic hypotension. Higher Ca dialysate is useful to sustain normal serum Ca levels where patients are not taking Ca-based binders or if Ca supplements are not able to normalize serum levels. Suppression of hyperparathyroidism is also effective with dialysate Ca of 1.75 mmol/L, but hypercalcemia, metastatic calcification, and oversuppression of parathyroid hormone are risks. Dialysate Ca of 1.5 mmol/L may be a compromise between bone protection and reduction in cardiovascular risk for conventional HD and is a common concentration used throughout the world. The increase in longer, more frequent dialysis such as short-daily and nocturnal HD, however, provides another challenge with regard to optimal dialysate Ca levels and higher levels of 1.75 mmol/L are probably indicated in this setting. Difficulties in determining the ideal dialysate Ca occur because of the complex pathophysiology of bone and mineral metabolism in HD patients and there needs to be a balance between dialysis prescription and other treatment modalities. To optimize management of the abnormal Ca balance, other aspects of this disorder need to be more fully clarified and, with evolving medications for phosphate control and treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism, as well as the emergence of a multitude of different HD regimes, further studies are required to make definitive recommendations. At present, we need to maintain flexibility with HD treatments and so dialysate Ca needs to be individualized to meet the specific requirements of patients by optimizing management of renal bone disease and simultaneously reducing metastatic calcification and cardiovascular disease.

The hemodynamic effect of calcium ion concentration in the infusate during predilution hemofiltration in chronic renal failure

BACKGROUND

It is the prevailing view that convective dialysis techniques stabilize blood pressure. Calcium concentration in the substitution fluid may be important in this respect. The aim of this study is to investigate the influence of calcium ion concentration in the substitution fluid on hemodynamic stability during predilution hemofiltration (HF).

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, crossover, blinded, controlled trial with 12 stable long-term hemodialysis patients without diabetes. Each patient was randomly assigned to substitution fluid with a calcium ion (iCa) concentration of 2.5 mEq/L (1.25 mmol/L; low-calcium session [L-HF]) or 3.5 mEq/L (1.75 mmol/L; high-calcium session [H-HF]) during 4.5 hours of predilution HF with a volume of 1.24 +/- 0.09 L/kg dry body weight and a temperature of 37 degrees C. Ultrafiltration was kept constant in each patient. Blood pressure (mean, systolic [SBP], and diastolic blood pressure [DBP]), pulse rate, arterial and venous temperature, energy transfer, and relative blood volume were measured at 15-minute intervals. Cardiac output, total peripheral resistance, stroke volume, and iCa were measured hourly. The 2 treatments were matched with the exception of iCa concentration.

RESULTS

A significant intratreatment reduction in cardiac output and stroke volume was shown to the same extent for both groups. Intertreatment comparisons showed a significantly lower mean arterial pressure, SBP, DBP, and total peripheral resistance in the L-HF compared with the H-HF group.

CONCLUSION

iCa concentration of 3.5 versus 2.5. mEq/L (1.75 versus 1.25 mmol/L) in the infusate during predilution HF stabilized blood pressure, possibly because of greater peripheral resistance rather than through changes in cardiac performance.

Does bicarbonate transfer have relevant hemodynamic consequences in standard hemodialysis?

BACKGROUND

In a previous study we demonstrated that mild metabolic alkalosis resulting from standard bicarbonate hemodialysis induces hypotension. This study aimed to compare hemodynamic consequences of either a decrease in the dialysate bicarbonate from 32 to 26 mmol/l or an increase in the dialysate calcium of 0.25 mmol/l and to verify whether the calcium shift secondary to alkalemia explains the consequences on blood pressure.

METHODS

In this randomized controlled trial with a single-blind, cross-over design, we used dialysis liquids with two different bicarbonate (32 mmol/l in modalities A and C, and 26 mmol/l in modality B) and calcium (1.25 mmol/l in modalities A and B, and 1.50 mmol/l in modality C) concentrations, and in 27 patients, 243 dialysis sessions, compared blood pressure, heart rate and the incidence of hypotension.

RESULTS

No significant differences were seen between A and B while an increase in systolic and diastolic blood pressures and a decrease in the incidence of hypotension (10.5 vs. 1.2%, p < 0.05) were documented in C. The subgroup of patients who with A showed a lower mean systolic blood pressure received more angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II type-1 receptor blockers (36 vs. 0%, p<0.05) and in C showed a less important increase in systolic and diastolic pressures, but the incidence of hypotensive episodes between A and B was not significantly different (9.1 vs. 15.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study it was not possible to demonstrate hemo dynamic instability associated with mild metabolic alkalosis. Even in the subgroup showing a lower blood pressure with a higher dialysate bicarbonate, significant hemodynamic or clinical consequences were not noticed. The calcium shift (0.05 mmol/l) related to alkalemia would justify a mean decrease in systolic blood pressure of only about 1 mm Hg.

Modifying the dialysis prescription to reduce intradialytic hypotension

The dialysis prescription can have a substantial impact on the frequency of intradialytic hypotension (IDH). Plasma volume will decline to a greater extent when the ultrafiltration (UF) rate is rapid (high interdialytic weight gains and/or short treatment time), favoring IDH. The relationship of the target weight to the euvolemic weight determines the size of the interstitial fluid compartment, which is a major determinant of the rate of plasma refilling during UF. The higher the dialysate sodium, the smaller the decline in plasma volume for any given amount of UF. Use of a dialysate temperature that prevents a positive thermal balance during dialysis will allow peripheral vascular resistance to be maintained and minimize IDH. A higher ionized calcium during treatment facilitates an increase in cardiac output, a benefit that may be particularly notable in patients with depressed cardiac ejection fraction. Low dialysate magnesium, potassium, and bicarbonate may all favor IDH, although insufficient data are available for definitive conclusions. The choice of antihypertensive medication and the treatment schedule must be carefully considered in patients with IDH. The future integration of technology to monitor blood pressure, plasma volume, and thermal and sodium balance into a computer-based biofeedback system will very likely go a long way toward reducing the frequency of IDH.

Individualizing the dialysate in the hemodialysis patient

In most outpatient centers the dialysate is prepared centrally such that the composition of the dialysate is the same for all patients. When delivered in this manner most patients tolerate the procedure well. However, there are patients who tolerate the procedure poorly, which has prompted a great deal of research focused on individualizing the composition of the dialysate in order to improve patient tolerability. Prescribing a patient-specific dialysate will become increasingly important as the age of and number of comorbid conditions increase in the dialysis population. Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) depend on dialysis to maintain fluid and electrolyte balance. Hemodialysis allows for solutes to diffuse between blood and dialysate such that, over the course of the procedure, plasma composition is restored toward normal values. The makeup of the dialysate is of paramount importance in accomplishing this goal. In most out-patient settings patients receive hemodialysis using dialysate prepared in bulk and delivered via a central delivery system so that the composition of the dialysate is the same for all patients. While most patients tolerate the procedure when administered in this fashion, many patients suffer from hemodynamic instability or symptoms of dialysis disequilibrium. One strategy to improve the clinical tolerance to dialysis is to adjust the dialysate composition according to the individual characteristics of the patient. This article reviews recent developments on how the dialysate can be manipulated in order to improve patient tolerance. Individualizing the dialysate composition is likely to gain increasing importance given the advancing age and increasing number of comorbid conditions found in ESRD patients.

A protocol-based treatment for intradialytic hypotension in hospitalized hemodialysis patients

Human serum albumin is used in hemodialysis (HD) units as treatment for hypotension despite its high cost and undetermined efficacy. During a 4-month period in 1995, albumin was used in 22% of 1,296 consecutive HD treatments in the HD unit or intensive care units (ICUs) at our tertiary-care hospital. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of a protocol designed to minimize albumin use for treating HD-associated hypotension (HDAH). The protocol consisted of the stepwise use of saline, mannitol, and albumin for the purpose of achieving physician-determined ultrafiltration goals. Patients were exempted from receiving the protocol for age younger than 18 years, freshly declotted angioaccess, or cardiovascular instability. The protocol was evaluated prospectively in 2,559 consecutive dialysis sessions (15% in ICUs) in 442 patients. Hypotension occurred during 608 sessions (24%), and attending nephrologists elected to initiate the protocol in 71% of these cases. Of the 433 instances in which the protocol was begun, reversal of hypotension was achieved without the need for albumin in 91% and with the addition of albumin in an additional 2%. Protocol treatment was not completed because of nursing error in 1% or clotting of filter or angioaccess in 4%. Use of the protocol failed to reverse hypotension in only 2% of the cases in which it was completed. Albumin was administered in only 6% of the 2,559 HD treatments. In summary, our protocol-based approach to HDAH was effective, easy for nurses to use, albumin sparing, and cost reducing.

Calcium free hemodialysis: experience in the treatment of 33 patients with severe hypercalcemia

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy, adverse effects and relevance of calcium-free hemodialysis (CFHD) in the treatment of major hypercalcemia.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Medical ICU.

PATIENTS

All patients admitted over a 9-year period for hypercalcemia requiring urgent treatment and who underwent hemodialysis.

INTERVENTIONS

CFHD with an acetate dialysate.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirty-three patients with severe hypercalcemia from various etiologies received CFHD. Marked and rapid decrease of serum total calcium was obtained during all sessions (mean decrease: 1.71 +/- 0.54 mmol/l). Calcium rebound within 24 h after CFHD was observed in all evaluable cases (1 +/- 0.45 mmol/l; mean delay 13.7 +/- 5.8 h). Adverse cardiovascular effects occurred in 17 of 48 sessions (35%) and in 13 of 30 evaluable patients (43%).

CONCLUSIONS

Adverse effects are frequent during CFHD. After correction of hypovolemia, its use should be restricted to patients with severe clinical symptoms or advanced renal impairment.

Calcium kinetics and the long-term effects of lowering dialysate calcium concentration

The optimal dialysate calcium (Ca) content for hemodialysis has been classically fixed at 1.75 mM. However, this dialysate Ca concentration (dCa) with its positive intradialytic Ca balance combined with the use of CaCO3 as a phosphate binder may result in hypercalcemia. To prevent or treat hypercalcemia, a decrease in dCa has been proposed. In the present study both the acute and the long-term effects of lowering dCa were assessed. Additionally, given the results obtained after one year with low dCa the effectiveness of i.v. 1 alpha vitamin D3 in lowering PTH serum levels in two groups of patients dialyzed with different dCa was also studied. (a) Ca kinetics during hemodialysis (HD) and on line hemodiafiltration (HDF) were studied in a group of nine stable patients who were sequentially treated with 1.75, 1.5 and 1.25 mM dCa. Dialysate was the same but for the dCa which was lowered stepwise. Na, K, tCa, ionized Ca (iCa), proteins, phosphate and pH were measured from blood inlet and outlet and dialysate outlet at the start, one hour, two hours and after the treatments. At the same time weight, blood pressure and heart rate were recorded. The sieving of iCa was significantly different in HDF versus HD (F = 6.73; P < 0.01); intravenous infusion of 18 liters of filtered ultrapure dialysate compensated the Ca loss due to the convective component of HDF, as iCa was similar at the blood inlet in HD and HDF in the three dCa tested (F = 2.59; NS). Intradialytic iCa kinetics measured in the blood inlet were significantly different with different dCa (P < 0.001 for 1.75 mM vs. 1.5 mm and P < 0.001 for 1.5 mM vs. 1.25 mM). A significant increase in post-dialysis iCa was observed with dCa of 1.75 and 1.5 while no modification was observed with 1.25 mM dCa. (b) Regarding long-term effects of lowering dCa, seven of the nine patients acutely studied were followed for a one year period after changing from dCa = 1.5 to dCa = 1.25 mM. A control group of six patients was maintained with dCa = 1.5 for the same period of time and with the same treatment schedule but for dCa. Total Ca, phosphate and alkaline phosphatase were assessed monthly, and phosphate binders and oral vitamin D derivative doses were adapted accordingly. Intact PTH was determined quarterly. CaCO3 oral intake was more than doubled in the low dCa group. Total Ca, phosphate and ALP were similar in both groups over the assessed year.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Safety and efficacy of long-term treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism by low-dose intravenous calcitriol

To assess the safety and efficacy of low-dose intravenous (IV) calcitriol therapy for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism, 21 hemodialysis patients with amino-terminal parathyroid hormone (N-PTH) levels greater than 4 times normal were treated for 12 to 24 months in a prospective trial. The initial dose was 0.50 microgram, which was titrated every 3 months thereafter, as dictated by predialysis calcium, phosphorus, and N-PTH concentration. Dialysate calcium concentration was 1.5 mmol/L. Low-dose IV calcitriol decreased the N-PTH concentration to 48 +/- 6% and 29 +/- 5% of baseline following 12 and 24 months of therapy, respectively. The maximum dose of calcitriol was 0.92 +/- 0.11 microgram (0.50 to 2.25 micrograms). After 12 months of therapy, serum calcium increased from 2.22 +/- 0.04 to 2.41 +/- 0.03 mmol/L (8.9 +/- 0.2 to 9.7 +/- 0.1 mg/dL) without change thereafter. Baseline serum phosphorus was 1.44 +/- 0.09 mmol/L (4.5 +/- 0.3 mg/dL), and was unaltered by calcitriol therapy. Control of serum phosphorus was achieved with calcium-containing phosphate binders, except in three patients who were subsequently withdrawn from the study after 12 months because of persistent hyperphosphatemia due to noncompliance. We conclude that long-term, low-dose IV calcitriol is a safe and effective therapy for most hemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism. In contrast to conventional dosing regimens, low-dose IV therapy does not necessitate the use of aluminum-containing phosphate binders and/or a low-calcium dialysate bath.

Reduced risk of hypercalcemia for hemodialysis patients by administering calcitriol at night

Renal osteodystrophy therapy in dialysis patients with calcitriol and intestinal phosphate binders containing calcium entails the risk of hypercalcemia. A study was performed using 35 hemodialysis patients to see whether the time of day when calcitriol is administered influences the incidence of hypercalcemia. It was shown that simply by administering at night (11:00 PM), the occurrence of hypercalcemia was significantly reduced. While greater than 80% of patients developed hypercalcemia when calcitriol was administered in the morning, when administered at night, this figure was only 50% (P less than 0.013). At the same time, the extent of hypercalcemia when calcitriol was administered at night was significantly lower than when it was administered in the morning. The incidence of hypercalcemia occurred regardless of the type of phosphate binder containing calcium used, whether it was calcium acetate or calcium carbonate. In addition, hypercalcemic episodes were always associated with hyperphosphatemia. On the basis of the above information, it would be expedient to administer calcitriol at night to dialysis patients, in order to reduce the risk of hypercalcemia and to preserve the hypophosphatemic effect of the applied intestinal phosphate binders.

Biocompatibility issues in hemodialysis

Hemodialysis, as a life-saving treatment modality for uremic patients, implies a repeated and compulsory contact of blood with foreign materials. As a consequence, biocompatibility problems are unavoidable. The same applies for the material used for the creation of vascular access, and for the alternative dialysis method, CAPD (continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis), although each system might cause its own and specific problems. Although in early dialysis the focus has been on maintenance of life and elimination of toxins, later on the important morbid implications of this lack of biocompatibility have been recognized. Eight major problems will be discussed, especially in the perspective of recent new findings in this field: (1) coagulation and clotting; (2) complement and leukocyte activation; (3) susceptibility to infection; (4) leaching or spallation; (5) surface alterations of solid materials; (6) allergic reactions; (7) shear; (8) transfer of compounds from contaminated dialysate. After description of the major biochemical and clinical implications of these problems, ways to prevent morbid events and future perspectives will be described.

Long-term effects of calcium carbonate and 2.5 mEq/liter calcium dialysate on mineral metabolism

Many investigators have shown that calcium carbonate (CaCO3) is an effective phosphate binder which also prevents the potential disabling effects of aluminum (Al) accumulation. However, hypercalcemia may develop in a substantial numbers of patients. Thus, to control serum phosphate (PO4) and prevent hypercalcemia, we performed studies in 21 patients on maintenance hemodialysis in which, in addition to the oral administration of CaCO3, the concentration of calcium (Ca) in the dialysate was reduced from 3.25 to 2.5 mEq/liter. The studies were divided in three periods: I. control, on Al-binders (one month); II. no Al-binders (one month); III. CaCO3 (seven months). Blood was obtained three times/week before dialysis for the first five months of the study and once a week for the remaining four months. During the control period, the mean serum calcium was 8.86 +/- 0.08 mg/dl. The value decreased to 8.65 +/- 0.07 mg/dl when phosphate binders containing aluminum were discontinued, and increased to 9.19 +/- 0.07 mg/dl (P less than 0.001 compared to period II) during oral supplementation with calcium carbonate. The mean serum phosphorus was 5.03 +/- 0.07 mg/dl during the control period, and increased to 7.29 +/- 0.91 mg/dl (P less than 0.001) after phosphate binders were discontinued. It decreased to 4.95 +/- 0.06 mg/dl (P less than 0.001) with the administration of calcium carbonate. During CaCO3 administration, serum Al decreased from 64.2 +/- 8.5 to 37.1 +/- 3.6 and 25.1 +/- 3.0 micrograms/liter (P less than 0.001) at three and seven months, respectively. Serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) decreased by 20%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Parathyroid hormone suppression by intravenous 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D. A role for increased sensitivity to calcium

Numerous in vitro studies in experimental animals have demonstrated a direct suppressive effect of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)2D) on parathyroid hormone (PTH) synthesis. We therefore sought to determine whether such an effect could be demonstrated in uremic patients undergoing maneuvers designed to avoid changes in serum calcium concentrations. In addition, the response of the parathyroid gland in patients undergoing hypercalcemic suppression (protocol I) and hypocalcemic stimulation (protocol II) before and after 2 wk of intravenous 1,25(OH)2D was evaluated. In those enlisted in protocol I, PTH values fell from 375 +/- 66 to 294 +/- 50 pg (P less than 0.01) after 1,25(OH)2D administration. During hypercalcemic suppression, the "set point" (PTH max + PTH min/2) for PTH suppression by calcium fell from 5.24 +/- 0.14 to 5.06 +/- 0.15 mg/dl (P less than 0.05) with 1,25(OH)2D. A similar decline in PTH levels after giving intravenous 1,25(OH)2D was noted in protocol II patients. During hypocalcemic stimulation, the parathyroid response was attenuated by 1,25(OH)2D. We conclude that intravenous 1,25(OH)2D directly suppresses PTH secretion in uremic patients. This suppression, in part, appears to be due to increased sensitivity of the gland to ambient calcium levels.

Physiological mechanisms for calcium-induced changes in systemic arterial pressure in stable dialysis patients

The mechanisms by which variations in blood ionized calcium (Ca2+) influence systemic arterial pressures independent of changes in extracellular fluid volume, pH, and electrolytes are unknown. To study this issue, we dialyzed eight stable hemodialysis patients on three separate occasions during 1 week with dialysates differing only in calcium concentration. Ultrafiltration was adjusted to achieve the patient's estimated dry weight. Postdialysis Ca2+ was measured, as were arterial blood gases, electrolytes, magnesium, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, and hematocrit. Blood pressures and two-dimensional, targeted M-mode echocardiograms were recorded with the patient in the supine position after 15 minutes of rest. Postdialysis, three different levels of Ca2+ were achieved. Other measured biochemical variables and body weight did not differ among the three study periods. Changes in Ca2+ correlated directly with changes in systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressures, left ventricular stroke volume, and cardiac output. In contrast, heart rate, left ventricular end-diastolic dimension, and total systemic vascular resistance were not altered significantly by changes in Ca2+. Thus, alterations in Ca2+ within the physiological range affect systemic blood pressure primarily through changes in left ventricular output rather than in peripheral vascular tone in stable dialysis patients.