Converting enzyme inhibition in chronic renal failure

Mineralocorticoid receptor blockade-a novel approach to fight hyperkalaemia in chronic kidney disease

Hyperkalaemia continues to be a major hazard of mineralocorticoid receptor blockade in an effort to retard the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). In cardiac patients on mineralocorticoid receptor blockade, RLY-5016 which captures K⁺ in the colon has been effective in reducing the risk of hyperkalaemia. This compound might be useful in CKD as well.

Peptide-drug conjugate linked via a disulfide bond for kidney targeted drug delivery

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a worldwide public health problem, and unfortunately, the therapeutic index of clinically available drugs is limited. Thus, there is a great need to exploit effective treatment strategies, and the carrier-drug approach is an attractive method to improve the kidney specificity of the therapeutic agents. The aim of this present study is to develop a peptide-drug conjugate for the kidney targeted delivery of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor captopril (CAP), since G3-C12 peptide (ANTPCGPYTHDCPVKR) could specifically accumulate in the kidney after intravenous injection. Therefore, FITC labeled G3-C12 peptide (G3-C12-FITC) and peptide-drug conjugate (G3-C12-CAP) with a disulfide bond which can be cleaved by reduced glutathione in the kidney were prepared by solid-phase peptide synthesis. The fluorescence imaging of G3-C12-FITC revealed that the labeled peptide specifically accumulated in the kidney soon after i.v. injection to mice, and the accumulation is due largely to the reabsorption of the peptide by the proximal renal tubule cells. Furthermore, in comparison with the corresponding nonconjugated form, a 2.7-fold increase in renal area under concentration-time curve produced by the conjugate was observed in mice. Interestingly, the CAP entirely released in the kidney even at 0.05 h postinjection through disulfide reduction. As a consequence, the in vivo renal ACE inhibition was significantly increased. In conclusion, these findings suggest the potential of G3-C12 peptide serving as a suitable candidate carrier for kidney-targeted drug delivery.

Regression of existing glomerulosclerosis by inhibition of aldosterone

In this study, the effects of inhibition of aldosterone on regression of existing hypertension-related glomerulosclerosis were investigated. Adult male Sprague Dawley rats (220 to 250 g) underwent 5/6 nephrectomy (Nx). Severity of glomerulosclerosis was assessed by renal biopsy 8 wk later, and rats were divided into four groups with equal biopsy sclerosis and then randomized by group to 4-wk treatments as follows: Control with no further treatment (CONT; n = 6); spironolactone (SP) alone (200 mg/kg per d, by gavage, n = 6); or SP combined with nonspecific triple antihypertensive drugs (TRX; reserpine, hydralazine, and hydrochlorothiazide in drinking water; SP+TRX, n = 7) or with angiotensin type 1 receptor antagonist (AT1RA; losartan in drinking water; SP+AT1RA, n = 8). When the rats were killed 12 wk after Nx, autopsy glomerulosclerosis index (SI; 0 to 4+ scale) was compared with biopsy SI in the same rats. Systolic BP was increased at 8 wk after Nx and continued to increase at 12 wk after Nx in the CONT and SP groups but not in SP+TRX- or SP+AT1RA-treated rats. Serum creatinine at 12 wk was significantly decreased in all SP-treated groups versus CONT. CONT rats had on average a 157% increase in SI from biopsy to killing at 12 wk, compared with only 84% increase in SP rats, with regression of SI in some rats. The effects on glomerulosclerosis by SP were further enhanced (when systolic BP was controlled by TRX or by AT1RA). It is concluded that inhibition of aldosterone by SP not only slows development of glomerulosclerosis but also induces regression in some rats of existing glomerulosclerosis.

The role of bradykinin in the antifibrotic actions of perindoprilat on human mesangial cells

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) protect against the development of glomerulosclerosis using mechanisms partly dissociated from their systemic antihypertensive action. The aim of the current study was to delineate the mechanism of action underlying the antifibrotic effects of the ACE-I perindoprilat in the context of macrophage-mediated scarring in human mesangial cells.

METHODS

Mesangial cells were treated with macrophage-conditioned medium (MPCM) in the presence or absence of the ACE-I perindoprilat.

RESULTS

Forty micromol/L perindoprilat reduced MPCM-induced mesangial cell fibronectin levels by 19.4 +/- 0.6% (P < 0.001). Immunoprecipitation of 35S-methionine biosynthetically labeled fibronectin and Northern analysis suggested that the decrease in fibronectin levels was not caused by reduced synthesis. MPCM stimulated the production of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) 2, 3, and 9 in mesangial cells; however, these were not significantly altered by ACE-I treatment, and neither was production of their tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMP-1). Addition of exogenous bradykinin to MPCM-treated mesangial cells resulted in a 22.5 +/- 1.4% (P < 0.02) reduction in secreted fibronectin levels, while semiquantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and Southern blotting demonstrated that bradykinin B2 receptor expression was up regulated by 71 +/- 30% in MPCM-stimulated mesangial cells in response to ACE-I treatment (P= 0.032). Moreover, the bradykinin B2 receptor antagonist HOE 140 attenuated the beneficial effects of perindoprilat. MPCM-stimulated mesangial cell protein expression levels of plasminogen activator system components tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) were altered after treatment with ACE-I.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that ACE-I-induced renoprotection, in the context of macrophage-stimulated mesangial cell scarring, is mediated, at least in part, via the actions of bradykinin.

Aldosterone in renal disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Interruption of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, chiefly with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers, has yielded beneficial results in retarding injury and progression in numerous intrinsic renal diseases. The renoprotection offered by these agents is incomplete and far from optimal. Studying mediators of progression other than angiotensin II is therefore extremely important. The emerging role of aldosterone in progression of renal disease and the utility of its antagonism is discussed here.

RECENT FINDINGS

The experimental evidence linking aldosterone to renal disease is discussed. The exciting results from clinical studies employing mineralocorticoid receptor blockers are also described.

SUMMARY

Aldosterone antagonism offers additional antiproteinuric benefits to those achieved with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition. Long-term trials addressing effectiveness and safety, especially in regards to hyperkalemia, are greatly needed.

Hyperkalemia, renal failure, and converting-enzyme inhibition: an overrated connection

Hyperkalemia is widely viewed as a common complication of ACE inhibition in azotemic patients. These renal failure patients are the patients who benefit most from ACE inhibition. Because we could not confirm this notion after a retrospective evaluation of 236 azotemic patients, we studied 2 models of renal mass reduction. In the first, we did a 5/6 nephrectomy (Nx) on rats and studied them 2 weeks after surgery (before chronic renal changes had developed). A second group was studied 16 weeks after Nx, once chronic renal failure was established. Rats in both models were treated with quinapril in drinking water. After baseline evaluation, we challenged them either by a high-K(+) diet or by blocking aldosterone receptors. We found that although quinapril blocked the K(+)-induced increase in aldosterone, serum K(+) levels and K(+) balance were maintained before and during high K(+) intake or during simultaneous spironolactone administration. We conclude that in hemodynamically stable rats with reduced renal mass and renal dysfunction, the administration of an ACE inhibitor does not cause severe hyperkalemia.

Aldosterone in renal disease

Blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system has proved effective in retarding the progression of renal disease in the remnant kidney model, as well as other experimental diseases, and most importantly, in a range of progressive human renal diseases. Attention has focused on the role of angiotensin II in propagating progression both by its hemodynamic and non-hemodynamic actions. Recent evidence, predominantly in the remnant kidney model, indicates that the drugs used to block this hormone system, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers, also lower aldosterone levels. Aldosterone as well as angiotensin II thus appears to be instrumental in sustaining the hypertension and fibroproliferative destruction of the residual kidney.

Nephroprotective effect of antihypertensive drugs in essential hypertension

BACKGROUND

Effective antihypertensive treatment has prevented target-organ involvement in hypertension, markedly reducing morbidity and mortality from strokes, coronary heart disease, cardiac failure, and hypertensive emergencies. However, the incidence of hypertension-related end-stage renal disease continues to increase, suggesting that therapeutic reduction in arterial pressure by itself is not sufficient to prevent the development of hypertensive renal failure.

OBJECTIVE

To examine experimental and clinical data concerning the protective effect of reduction of arterial pressure on the progression of hypertension-related renal disease, and the evidence indicating that some antihypertensive agents may afford more nephroprotection, over and above that attributable to reduction of arterial pressure.

RESULTS

Results of numerous studies clearly indicate that adequate control of arterial pressure, irrespective of the antihypertensive agent used, slowed the progression of renal disease. Results of some studies suggest that lowering arterial pressure below the level that is usually considered adequate has an additional beneficial effect by slowing the progression of renal injury.

CONCLUSION

Results of a number of studies evaluating nephroprotective effects of various drugs and regimens have indicated that certain agents, most notably angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and their combination with calcium antagonists, afford more protection than do others at similar levels of reduction of arterial pressure. Results of still other studies suggest that certain agents that exert greater nephroprotection are more efficient at controlling arterial pressure. Therefore, further data are needed before any final conclusion can be drawn. However, it is clear that, in order to establish nephroprotection in patients with essential hypertension, the problem should not be further complicated by additional comorbid diseases such as diabetes mellitus.

Racial differences in the renal response to blood pressure lowering during chronic angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition: a prospective double-blind randomized comparison of fosinopril and lisinopril in older hypertensive patients with chronic renal insufficiency

This study was undertaken to compare the effects of chronic angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition on blood pressure (BP) and renal hemodynamics in older black and nonblack hypertensive patients with chronic renal insufficiency. A multicenter, placebo lead-in double-blind, parallel group study was performed to compare the antihypertensive efficacy and renal hemodynamic response to the once-daily ACE inhibitor fosinopril (n = 14) and lisinopril (n = 13) over a 22-week period. The study goal was to lower diastolic blood pressure (DBP) to 90 mm Hg or less. Furosemide was added after 6 weeks if blood pressure goal was not achieved. At outpatient clinics at university medical centers, 27 older hypertensive patients (> or = 45 years; 12 blacks, 15 nonblacks; 19 male, eight female) with DBP of 95 mm Hg or higher and 4-hour creatinine clearance 20 to 70 mL/min/1.73 m2 were studied. Changes (delta) from baseline in BP, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and renal plasma flow (RPF) were measured. Mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) and DBP decreased significantly and to a similar extent in randomized groups: fosinopril (mean +/- SEM) delta DBP at 6 weeks was -13 +/- 2 (P < 0.0001; 95% CI, -16 to -9) and at 22 weeks was -12 +/- 2 (P < 0.0001; 95% CI, -16 to -9); lisinopril delta DBP at 6 weeks was -14 +/- 6 (P < 0.0001; 95% CI, -10 to -18) and at 22 weeks was -16 +/- 2 (P < 0.0001; 95% CI, -12 to -21). GFR and RPF did not change significantly in either group. BP was significantly reduced and to a similar extent in blacks and nonblacks: for blacks, delta DBP at 6 weeks was -11 +/- 3 (P < 0.05; 95% CI, -0.01 to -9) and at 22 weeks was -16 +/- 2 (P < 0.0001; 95% CI, -11 to -20); for nonblacks, delta DBP at 6 weeks was -14 +/- 1 (P < 0.0001; 95% CI, -12 to -17) and at 22 weeks was -12 +/- 2 (P < 0.0001; 95% CI, -16 to -8). Eight patients (five blacks and three nonblacks) required an addition of furosemide after 6 weeks to reach the DBP goal of < or = 90 mm Hg at 22 weeks. GFR was not significantly altered for either racial group at 6 weeks; however, at 22 weeks; however, at 22 weeks, GFR decreased significantly in blacks (delta GFR, -16 +/- 5; P < 0.006; 95% CI, -26 to -5) and tended to increase in nonblacks (delta GFR, 7 +/- 6; P > 0.25). delta GFR correlated directly with the delta RPF (delta GFR = 0.0611* delta RPF -2.35 +; r = 0.68; P < 0.003). There was no correlation between delta MAP and delta GFR or delta RPF in blacks or nonblacks. We conclude that chronic ACE inhibition with fosinopril and lisinopril alone or in combination with furosemide lowers BP in older blacks and nonblacks with hypertension and chronic renal insufficiency. Racial differences in the renal hemodynamic response to chronic ACE inhibition were noted and appear to be independent of diuretic use and the magnitude of BP lowering.

Achievement and safety of a low blood pressure goal in chronic renal disease. The Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group

The Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study showed a beneficial effect of a lower-than-usual blood pressure (BP) goal on the progression of renal disease in patients with proteinuria. The purpose of the present analyses was to examine the achieved BP, baseline characteristics that helped or hindered achievement of the BP goals, and safety of the BP interventions. Five hundred eighty-five patients with baseline glomerular filtration rate between 13 and 55 mL/min per 1.73 m2 (0.22 to 0.92 mL/s per 1.73 m2) were randomly assigned to either a usual or low BP goal (mean arterial pressure < or = 107 or < or = 92 mm Hg, respectively). Few patients had a history of cardiovascular disease. All antihypertensive agents were permitted, but angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (with or without diuretics) followed by calcium channel blockers were preferred. The mean (+/- SD) of the mean arterial pressures during follow-up in the low and usual BP groups was 93.0 +/- 7.3 and 97.7 +/- 7.7 mm Hg, respectively. Follow-up BP was significantly higher in subgroups of patients with preexisting hypertension, baseline mean arterial pressure > 92 mm Hg, a diagnosis of polycystic kidney disease or glomerular diseases, baseline urinary protein excretion > 1 g/d, age > or = 61 years, and black race. The frequency of medication changes and incidence of symptoms of low BP were greater in the low BP group, but there were no significant differences between BP groups in stop points, hospitalizations, or death. When data from both groups were combined, each 1-mm Hg increase in follow-up systolic BP was associated with a 1.35-times greater risk of hospitalization for cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease. Lower BP than usually recommended for the prevention of cardiovascular disease is achievable by several medication regimens without serious adverse effects in patients with chronic renal disease without cardiovascular disease. For patients with urinary protein excretion > 1 g/d, target BP should be a mean arterial pressure of < or = 92 mm Hg, equivalent to 125/75 mm Hg.

The benefits of ACE inhibitors and calcium antagonists in slowing progressive renal failure: focus on fixed-dose combination antihypertensive therapy

During the past two decades, major investigative interest has been focused on the determinants of chronic renal disease and interventions to retard the inexorable progression to end-stage renal disease. Recent studies have provided a theoretic framework for anticipating that angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and possibly calcium antagonists, may preferentially retard the progression of renal disease. Whereas the majority of available clinical trials have assessed the effects of ACE inhibitors in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), there are relatively few long-term studies that have evaluated the renal protective effects of ACE inhibitors and calcium antagonists in patients with nondiabetic renal disease. Although clinical trials have been initiated using both of these drug classes as monotherapy, theoretical considerations suggest that fixed-dose combinations of an ACE inhibitor and a calcium antagonist might be appealing as renal protective agents. Several lines of evidence suggest that the renal microcirculatory effects of coadministration of both agents should be complementary. Similarly, recent observations suggest that the two classes may act in a complementary manner to countervail pathogenetic mechanisms at the level of the mesangium. A recent study in type II diabetic patients demonstrated that combination therapy with an ACE inhibitor and a calcium antagonist induced the greatest reduction in proteinuria, and reduced the rate of decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) more than did either agent alone at the same level of blood pressure reduction. Based on such considerations, recent randomized prospective studies have been initiated to compare the renal protective effects of combination calcium antagonist-ACE inhibitor therapy versus monotherapy with agents of either of these two antihypertensive classes.

Role of aldosterone in the remnant kidney model in the rat

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) participates in the injury sustained by the remnant kidney. Our studies assessed the importance of aldosterone in that model and the response of aldosterone to drugs interfering with the RAAS. Initially, four groups of rats were studied: SHAM-operated rats, untreated remnant rats (REM), REM rats treated with losartan and enalapril (REM AIIA), and REM AIIA rats infused with exogenous aldosterone (REM AIIA + ALDO). The last group was maintained with aldosterone levels comparable to those in untreated REM rats by constant infusion of exogenous aldosterone. REM rats had larger adrenal glands and a > 10-fold elevation in plasma aldosterone compared to SHAM. REM AIIA rats demonstrated significant suppression of the hyperaldosteronism as well as marked attenuation of proteinuria, hypertension, and glomerulosclerosis compared to REM. REM AIIA + ALDO rats manifested greater proteinuria, hypertension, and glomerulosclerosis than REM AIIA rats. Indeed, by 4 wk of observation all of these features of the experimental disease were similar in magnitude in REM AIIA + ALDO and untreated REM. In separate REM rats spironolactone administration did not reduce glomerular sclerosis but did transiently reduce proteinuria, lowered arterial pressure, and lessened cardiac hypertrophy. In summary, aldosterone contributes to hypertension and renal injury in the remnant kidney model.

Racial differences in the incidence of end-stage renal disease

OBJECTIVE

To examine trends in the incidence of treated end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and variations between blacks and whites.

DESIGN

Retrospective record reviews of all new patients > or = 15 years starting chronic dialysis during 1980-1988 at the Piedmont Dialysis Center, Forsyth County, North Carolina.

RESULTS

The cumulative nine-year incidence rate for hypertensive ESRD was 570 per million, and for diabetic ESRD 497 per million. Among men, hypertensive ESRD accounted for the largest proportion of cases (39.2% and 28.4%, blacks and whites respectively), while diabetic ESRD contributed 33.9% of black female cases and 24.4% of white female cases. Compared to whites, blacks were at significantly increased risk, with an adjusted risk odds ratio (OR) of 4.4 (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.5-6.0) for all causes combined, 6.0 (CI 3.9-9.0) for hypertensive renal disease, 6.0 (CI 3.8-9.3) for renal disease due to insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, and 12.2 (CI 6.9-21.7) due to non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). The greatest risk among blacks was seen in the 55-64 year age group, with ORs of 9.1 for all causes combined and 30.6 for hypertensive renal disease. The OR for renal disease due to NIDDM for black versus white women was 20.0 (CI 9.5-41.7). Compared to 1980, 1981, 1982 and 1983, increased incidence rates were seen in each year after 1984.

CONCLUSION

These findings show even greater excess risk of ESRD among blacks than previously reported. The majority of the excess risk is seen for ESRD due to hypertension and diabetes, especially NIDDM. The reasons for the increased risk among blacks, and for the increasing incidence rates of ESRD are not known.

ACE inhibition preserves renal function better than beta-blockade in the treatment of essential hypertension

Antihypertensive treatment can slow down the decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) with time. In patients with diabetic nephropathy, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition has been shown to be more effective in this regard than conventional antihypertensive therapy. Whether this applies to the much larger population of patients with essential hypertension is not yet known. In the present study, the effects of two different antihypertensive therapies on the loss of GFR with time, determined with Cr51-EDTA clearance after 6, 12 and 24 months of treatment, were assessed in a prospective, randomised, double-blind trial in 257 patients with essential hypertension. All had normal renal function and none had diabetes mellitus or glucosuria. Proteinuria (dipstick positive or trace) was detected in 7 patients initially. The two therapeutic modalities were the ACE inhibitor cilazapril and the beta-adrenoceptor blocking agent atenolol. Both therapies were equally effective in lowering systolic blood pressure (e.g. from 168 mmHg to 152 mmHg with cilazapril and from 170 mmHg to 155 mmHg with atenolol after 6 months, p < 0.001 for both). However, atenolol was slightly but significantly more effective in lowering the diastolic blood pressure at 6, 12 and 24 months. The decline in GFR with time was significantly smaller with cilazapril than with atenolol. After 6 months the reduction in GFR was 1.0 vs. 4.0 ml/min x 1.73 m2, p = 0.008 (cilazapril vs. atenolol) and after 12 months the corresponding changes were 2.0 vs. 4.5 ml/min x 1.73 m2, p = 0.04 and after 24 months 3.0 vs. 4.0 ml/min x 1.73 m2, respectively (n.s.).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Randomised controlled trial of enalapril and beta blockers in non-diabetic chronic renal failure

OBJECTIVE

To compare the ability of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and beta blockers to slow the development of end stage renal failure in non-diabetic patients with chronic renal failure.

DESIGN

Open randomised multicentre trial with three year follow up.

SETTING

Outpatient departments of six French hospitals.

PATIENTS

100 hypertensive patients with chronic renal failure (initial serum creatinine 200-400 mumol/l. 52 randomised to enalapril and 48 to beta blockers (conventional treatment).

INTERVENTIONS

Enalapril or beta blocker was combined with frusemide and, if necessary, a calcium blocker or centrally acting drug in patients whose diastolic pressure remained above 90 mm Hg.

RESULTS

17 patients receiving conventional treatment and 10 receiving enalapril developed end stage renal failure. The cumulative renal survival rate was significantly better in the enalapril group than in the conventional group (P < 0.05). The slope of the reciprocal serum creatinine concentration was steeper in the conventionally treated patients (-6.89 x 10(-5)l/mumol/month) than in the enalapril group (-4.17 x 10(-5)l/mumol/month; P < 0.05). No difference in blood pressure was found between groups.

CONCLUSION

In hypertensive patients with chronic renal failure enalapril slows progression towards end stage renal failure compared with beta blockers. This effect was probably not mediated through controlling blood pressure.

Captopril inhibits the agonist-induced increase of cytosolic free Ca2+ in glomerular mesangial cells

To evaluate the underlying mechanism of the putative renal protective effects of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, the modulatory action of captopril on the angiotensin II (Ang II) and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-induced increase of cytosolic free calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i) was investigated in cultured glomerular mesangial cells (MC) from spontaneously hypertensive rats from the Münster strain (SHR) and normotensive Wistar-Kyoto rats (WKY). Resting [Ca2+]i was not affected by captopril in MC from either SHR or WKY. Captopril inhibited the Ang II-induced [Ca2+]i increase in MC from both SHR and WKY in a dose-dependent and time-dependent fashion. The preincubation of MC with 1 mumol/liter captopril for 40 minutes significantly reduced the Ang II-induced [Ca2+]i increase in SHR from 167 +/- 30 nmol/liter (N = 17) to 74 +/- 20 nmol/liter (N = 8, P < 0.05) and in WKY from 102 +/- 42 nmol/liter (N = 14) to 43 +/- 12 nmol/liter (N = 7, P < 0.05). After removal of external calcium there was no significant effect of captopril on the Ang II-induced [Ca2+]i increase. With the Mn2+ quenching technique, it was confirmed that captopril affects Ca2+ influx. Phospholipase C activity as estimated by diacylglycerol formation was not changed by captopril. The preincubation of MC with 1 mumol/liter captopril for 40 minutes significantly reduced the PDGF-induced [Ca2+]i increase in SHR from 166 +/-54 nmol/liter (N = 9) to 31 +/- 19 nmol/liter (N = 6, P < 0.01) and in WKY from 127 +/- 31 nmol/liter (N = 11) to 61 +/- 32 nmol/liter (N = 5, P < 0.05). Similarly captopril reduced the [Ca2+]i increase induced by endothelin and vasopressin. The results indicate that the actions of Ang II and PDGF on MC are modulated by captopril, probably resulting in the impairment of the calcium dependent contractile response of mesangial cells.

ACE inhibitors in non-diabetic renal disease

In non-diabetic renal disease ACE inhibitors have brought both benefit and problems. On the one hand, they are undoubtedly effective antihypertensive agents and data suggest that they may have a beneficial role in the prevention of progression of renal disease, although further placebo controlled double blind trials of adequate duration are required. On the other hand, their widespread use in elderly patients and those with generalised atherosclerosis has increased the risk of acute renal failure when occult renovascular disease is present. Awareness among physicians of the high rate of renovascular disease in populations at risk is to be encouraged.

The paradox of the renin-angiotensin system in chronic renal disease

Despite normal to suppressed levels of renin activity in chronic renal disease, multiple lines of evidence suggest a role for the RAS, especially its intrarenal expression, in several critical aspects of this condition. Alterations in the distribution and control of components of the renal RAS could account for localized areas of activation of this system. Renal scarring may be particularly important as a major stimulus to renin synthesis in the diseased kidney. While both intrarenal and systemic hypertension may depend in part upon actions of the RAS, other non-hemodynamic actions of the RAS may also contribute to the adaptation of residual nephrons as well as their progressive injury.

What effect does blood pressure control have on the progression toward renal failure?

Since hypertension is associated with nephrosclerosis and an increased progression toward end-stage renal failure, the therapeutic approach to the treatment of hypertension should aim to protect the kidney against damage or to halt the progression toward end-stage renal failure. It appears that compared with systolic and mean blood pressure, the level of diastolic blood pressure is particularly associated with renal damage. In the presence of kidney failure the choice of antihypertensive drug should be made according to pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. From the pharmacokinetic point of view, drugs that are eliminated via the biliary route are preferable since no dosage adjustment is required, and those with a favorable trough to peak effect can achieve better blood pressure control by reducing blood pressure variability. Pharmacodynamic properties should include efficacy in lowering blood pressure, beneficial renal effects, and good tolerability. Hence, the dihydropyridine calcium antagonists, which are effective during volume repletion and which counteract vasoconstrictor mechanisms, seem to be particularly effective. There is some suggestion, but no definitive proof, that blood pressure should be lowered well below 140/90 mm Hg; to achieve this, combination therapy frequently must be used. The rationale for combining two or more antihypertensive drugs is based on the knowledge that this combination can exert an additive antihypertensive action while reducing side effects. The combination of an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor with a dihydropyridine calcium antagonist may well fulfill these criteria since this combination could enhance both antihypertensive and renal hemodynamic effects in comparison to single-drug treatment and could reduce the side effects of both drugs.

Microalbuminuria in patients with essential hypertension: effects of several antihypertensive drugs

PURPOSE

Microalbuminuria can be present in 10% to 40% of patients with essential hypertension and is associated with an increased incidence of cardiovascular events. The effect of commonly used antihypertensive agents on urinary albumin excretion (UAE) has not been well established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a converting enzyme inhibitor, a calcium channel blocker, a beta blocker, and a diuretic on UAE and on creatinine clearance in patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We prospectively measured UAE prior to and 4 and 8 weeks after treatment with enalapril, nitrendipine, atenolol, or a diuretic in 48 patients with essential hypertension and microalbuminuria.

RESULTS

All these agents were equally effective in reducing arterial pressure. However, enalapril but not the other agents significantly decreased UAE.

CONCLUSION

Eight weeks of therapy with enalapril may reduce UAE in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension, whereas other agents, such as nitrendipine, atenolol, or diuretics, had no measurable effect on UAE. The clinical and prognostic significance of these observations remains to be established.

Long-term beneficial effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in patients with nephrotic proteinuria

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) can reduce proteinuria in diabetic and nondiabetic nephropathy. However, no studies have determined whether this antiproteinuric effect modifies the progression of renal insufficiency. We studied the evolution of 46 nondiabetic patients with nephrotic proteinuria treated with captopril for a minimum of 12 months. The follow-up period before captopril treatment was 12 to 18 months. At the end of follow-up, after captopril introduction (24.4 +/- 7.6 months), proteinuria had decreased from 6.3 +/- 2.5 to 3.9 +/- 3.1 g/24 h (P less than 0.001), with a mean decrease of 45% +/- 28%. The proteinuria decrease was higher in patients with reflux nephropathy, proteinuria associated with reduction of renal mass, inactive crescentic glomerulonephritis, nephroangiosclerosis, and IgA nephropathy, whereas patients with membranous glomerulonephritis and idiopathic focal glomerulosclerosis showed a poorer response. Patients were separated according to a proteinuria reduction greater (group A, 23 patients) or lower (group B, 23 patients) than 45% of the initial value. At the end of follow-up, renal function had not significantly changed in group A with respect to values at the start of treatment: serum creatinine (SCr) was 229 +/- 167 mumol/L (2.6 +/- 1.9 mg/dL) versus 203 +/- 97 mumol/L (2.3 +/- 1.1 mg/dL), and creatinine clearance (CrCl) was 0.80 +/- 0.52 mL/s (48 +/- 31 mL/min) versus 0.87 +/- 0.47 mL/s (52 +/- 28 mL/min). The slope of the reciprocal of Scr (1/SCr) showed a significantly beneficial change after captopril introduction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effects of enalapril on adriamycin-induced nephrosis

Adriamycin induces proteinuria and glomerular changes in rats similar to those found in human focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). Progression of this lesion may be slowed by use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition. To evaluate this we injected two groups of Sprague-Dawley rats with Adriamycin (2 intravenous doses of 2 mg/kg given at an interval of 3 weeks). One group of rats received enalapril (50 mg/l) in their drinking water. Control rats were injected with saline. After 28 weeks, the mean whole kidney glomerular filtration rate was significantly less and proteinuria and sclerotic index were significantly greater in rats receiving adriamycin compared with controls (P < 0.05). Administration of enalapril did not decrease proteinuria (545 +/- 398 mg/day vs 494 +/- 325 mg/day, P >0.05) or improve the glomerular filtration rate (0.31 +/- 0.18 ml/min per g kidney weight vs 0.41 +/- 0.21 ml/min per g, P = 0.27). However, treatment with enalapril significantly reduced the mean glomerular sclerotic index compared with untreated rats (1.62 +/- 0.88 vs 0.82 +/- 0.49, P = 0.05). Enalapril may be beneficial in preserving glomerular structure in this experimental model of FSGS.

Hypertensive nephropathy: is a more physiologic approach to blood pressure control an important concern for the preservation of renal function?

During the past 2 decades, there have been important reductions in stroke-related morbidity and mortality due to better control of hypertension. However, there has been a lesser effect on the reduction of coronary mortality and far less of an impact on all other forms of noncardiovascular disorders such as renal disease. This suggests that our ability to prevent hypertensive nephrosclerosis through traditional methods of lowering blood pressure may not be as effective as was once thought, particularly in high-risk patients such as blacks, diabetics, the elderly, and patients with preexisting renal disease. One reason that may partially explain the difficulty in protecting the renal circulation from hypertensive damage is the interaction between antihypertensive medications and the aged-related decline in renal perfusion. Depending on their mechanism of action, antihypertensive agents may impair renal blood flow (through plasma volume contraction or reduction) and further aggravate the age-related decline in renal perfusion. A worsening of renal perfusion may activate counterregulatory neurohormonal mechanisms, such as the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, which in turn may place the patient at increased risk for the development of glomerulosclerosis through promotion of vascular or mesangial hypertrophic changes or increased intraglomerular pressure, despite an associated reduction in systemic blood pressure. Since antihypertensive agents have such varied effects on systemic and renal hemodynamics, an understanding of the antihypertensive actions in a given patient may have significant influence on renal function. Thus, an improved understanding about the effects of aging and hypertension on the renal microcirculation will hopefully facilitate a more physiologically appropriate antihypertensive medication selection with the expectation that renal function will be benefitted over the long term.

Long-term comparison between captopril and nifedipine in the progression of renal insufficiency

To verify the hypothesis that angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors possess a unique renoprotective effect in progressive chronic renal disease, we decided to compare the effects of an ACE inhibitor and a calcium antagonist on both hypertension and the progression of non-diabetic renal insufficiency in a long-term study. A four-year, multicenter, prospective, randomized trial was conducted on 142 hypertensive patients (pts) with established chronic renal failure from six Italian nephrology departments. They were on standard antihypertensive therapy with a low-protein diet and underwent twice-monthly surveillance for a one year pre-randomization period. After that year, 121 pts were randomly allocated to captopril or slow-release nifedipine therapies for a three-year study period. The progression of renal insufficiency was monitored every two months. Blood pressure control was significantly better after randomization than during the year of standard antihypertensive therapy. The progression rate before randomization (BR) was definitely higher before than after randomization (AR): Creatinine clearance (CCr) change BR = -0.46 +/- 0.45 ml/min/month, creatinine clearance change AR = -0.23 +/- 0.43 ml/min/month (P less than 0.01). After randomization, the mean blood pressure values were virtually the same throughout the three year period of the study in the two groups treated by captopril (group I), or nifedipine (group II).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Renal hemodynamics and reduction of proteinuria by a vasodilating beta blocker versus an ACE inhibitor

The effects of a nonselective beta-adrenergic blocking drug with beta-2 agonist activity (dilevalol 200 mg) on proteinuria and renal hemodynamics were evaluated in a double-blind crossover study versus an ACE inhibitor (enalapril 5 mg) in eight patients with glomerulonephritis, moderate renal function impairment and proteinuria greater than 1 g/24 hr. Patients were studied after a one week placebo phase while off all other medications, except steroids in a few cases, and after three weeks of treatment. A 10-day placebo washout perod was included between the various drug treatments. During each period renal hemodynamics were measured by clearance techniques, and urinary protein excretion as well as fractional clearance of albumin and IgG were determined. Both drugs reduced mean arterial pressure and proteinuria to a similar extent [mean arterial pressure: placebo 108 +/- 13 mm Hg; dilevalol 103 +/- 11 mm Hg (P less than 0.05); enalapril 103 +/- 12 mm Hg (P less than 0.05); protein excretion: placebo 5.1 +/- 4.2 g/day; dilevalol 3.3 +/- 3.0 g/day (P less than 0.05); enalapril 2.8 +/- 2.8 g/day (P less than 0.05)]. The antiproteinuric effect was greater with enalapril than dilevalol. Dilevalol reduced GFR [baseline inulin clearance: 73.3 +/- 38 ml/min/1.73 m2; after dilevalol: 63.3 +/- 28 ml/min/1.73 m2 (P less than 0.05)] and the decrease of proteinuria correlated positively with the reduction of GFR. Enalapril did not significantly lower the GFR (inulin clearance during enalapril 66.8 +/- 23 ml/min/1.73 m2) and the reduction of proteinuria did not correlate with the lowering of the GFR.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Blood pressure, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and the kidney

Angiotensin II plays an important role in the kidney by regulating renal flow, glomerular filtration rate, mesangial cell function, and sodium reabsorption. Blockade of the renin-angiotensin system has powerful effects on kidney function. Studies in animal models of renal failure suggest that converting enzyme inhibitors slow down the inevitable progression of the renal failure. This could be in part due to their effect on reducing glomerular pressure or by reducing glomerular hypertrophy. In patients with malignant hypertension, diabetic nephropathy, and other causes of renal failure, preliminary evidence suggests that lowering the blood pressure with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors may possibly carry some other benefits compared with other blood pressure lowering regimens. However, single drug therapy is rarely sufficient to control blood pressure in these patients. Further properly controlled randomized trials should give a clear indication of whether any particular class of drug has any advantage in slowing down the progressive renal impairment for a given lowering of blood pressure. In patients with renovascular hypertension ACE inhibitors are effective drugs in lowering blood pressure. However, in certain settings they may cause a reversible decline in renal function.

Adverse effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in antihypertensive therapy with focus on quinapril

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are useful first-line drugs in the therapy of mild and moderate hypertension. Adverse reactions to this drug class are rarely serious. Hypotension, cough, rash, and taste disturbance are uncommon; reduced glomerular filtration and hyperkalemia occur infrequently; angioedema is rare and neutropenia is extremely rare. Quinapril is a new ACE inhibitor that is converted to biologically active quinaprilat in the liver. This ACE inhibitor has a rapid onset of action and inhibits local tissue converting enzyme systems in kidney, heart, and brain, as well as in the circulating renin-angiotensin system. Clinically significant adverse effects of quinapril occur at low rates. In 1,771 patients receiving quinapril, the reported incidence of the first occurrence of orthostatic hypotension was comparable to that seen in patients receiving placebo. In other studies, headache was reported by up to 4.7% of patients receiving quinapril, which is comparable to reported incidences of headache in patients receiving other ACE inhibitors. Other adverse events reported at rates greater than 1% include cough with associated rhinitis and bronchitis, dizziness, and somnolence. Such adverse events have only rarely led to the withdrawal of patients from clinical studies of quinapril.

Risk for renal injury in diabetic hypertensive patients. Pharmacologic approaches

In the first article of this pair (page 77), Drs Weir and Bakris discussed a physiologic approach to management of diabetic hypertensive patients. In this article, they discuss the latest findings regarding use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium channel blockers along with glycemic control and reduced protein intake.

Comparative effects of antihypertensives on proteinuria: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor versus alpha 1-antagonist

Control of hypertension improves the course of renal disease. We compared the renal hemodynamic and permselective responses to an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (CEI) (enalapril) and an alpha 1-antagonist (prazosin) in 14 patients with established glomerular disease. A single-blinded, randomized, cross-over design was used consisting of a 3-week baseline period followed by two 4-week treatment periods, which were separated by a 4-week washout period. During the treatment periods, the CEI or alpha 1-antagonist was added to the patients' baseline antihypertensive medications. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was reduced to similar levels by both drugs, although the time-averaged blood pressure throughout the study was higher with the alpha 1-antagonist. Twenty-four-hour urinary protein, albumin, and IgG excretion were not significantly different at the end of the CEI and alpha 1-antagonist periods. However, compared with baseline values, significant decreases in total protein and IgG excretion occurred only during the CEI period, while albumin excretion decreased with both drugs. A 22% decrease in the fractional clearance of albumin (4.95 +/- 1.44 to 3.88 +/- 1.57 x 10(-3); P less than 0.01) and a 49% decrease in the fractional clearance of IgG (1.58 +/- 0.42 to 0.81 +/- 0.28 x 10(-3); P less than 0.001) occurred during CEI therapy with no significant changes in these parameters being seen with alpha 1-antagonist therapy (albumin: 4.95 +/- 1.44 to 4.48 +/- 1.51 x 10(-3), P = NS; IgG: 1.58 +/- 0.42 to 1.71 +/- 0.70 x 10(-3), P = NS). At the time of the fractional clearance measurements, MAP proved to be lower on the CEI. Reanalysis of the data for the subgroup of 11 patients without differences in MAP during the clearance period demonstrated a beneficial effect favoring CEI. Except for the greatest decreases in blood pressure (21 to 30 mm Hg), a greater antiproteinuric effect for a given decrease in blood pressure was seen with the CEI. Additionally, reduction in proteinuria occurred in a subset of seven patients whose baseline MAP was in the normotensive range. In conclusion, lowering MAP improves proteinuria. CEI appears to exert a more favourable effect even at similar MAP. Reductions in blood pressure, even within the accepted normal range, lessen permselective defects.

ACE inhibitors in renal disease

Recent experimental studies suggest that the resistance state of the preglomerular and postglomerular capillary arterioles may determine if a particular class of antihypertensive agents will protect the kidney from hemodynamically mediated glomerular injury. This review discusses (1) the effects of angiotensin II on the renal microcirculation, (2) the pathophysiology of essential hypertensive renal disease, (3) the renal pharmacology of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and (4) the hypothesis that renal protection is dependent on control of systemic and glomerular hypertension.

Nephrotic proteinuria without hypoalbuminemia: clinical characteristics and response to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition

Although hypoalbuminemia is a fundamental characteristic of nephrotic syndrome (NS), there are many patients with massive proteinuria that do not develop hypoalbuminemia. We have studied the clinical and biochemical characteristics of 19 patients with persistent massive proteinuria (greater than 5 g/d) and normal serum albumin (group I) in comparison with 16 patients with similar proteinuria excretion, but persistent hypoalbuminemia (group II). Most of group I patients had diagnoses suggesting glomerular hyperfiltration (focal glomerulosclerosis [FGS] associated with vesicoureteral reflux [VUR], reduction of renal mass, proteinuria associated with obesity, sclerotic phase of idiopathic crescentic glomerulonephritis [GN] in contrast with those of group II, in which membranous GN was the most frequent diagnosis. We prospectively investigated differences in the antiproteinuric effect of captopril, an antiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI); after 6 months of treatment, proteinuria decreased clearly in group I (7.1 +/- 1.7 to 3.7 +/- 1.7 g/d; P less than 0.001), whereas no significant changes were observed in group II (8.1 +/- 2.4 to 8.8 +/- 4 g/d). Serum creatinine (Scr) remained stable during captopril treatment in group I, whereas three patients in group II showed a worsening of renal function.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Can the rate of progression of chronic renal failure be altered?

The cost of renal replacement therapy for end-stage renal disease in the United States exceeds three billion dollars per year. Nonimmunologic mechanisms may contribute to progressive renal injury in renal failure of diverse etiologies. Based on the potential adverse renal effects of these processes, a number of dietary and pharmacologic interventions have been proposed as being potentially beneficial in slowing the rate of progression of chronic renal failure to end-stage renal disease. This article reviews current evidence in animal models and humans supporting the efficacy of each of the proposed interventions.

Comparison of converting enzyme inhibitor and calcium channel blocker in hypertensive glomerular injury

The protective effect of converting enzyme inhibitors in experimental hypertensive glomerular injury is associated with decreased systemic arterial and glomerular capillary pressure. Although calcium channel blockers effectively lower systemic blood pressure, their effect on glomerular capillary pressure and on hypertensive glomerular injury is uncertain. We compared equihypotensive treatment with the calcium antagonist TA 3090 or the converting enzyme inhibitor captopril in post-salt hypertensive Dahl salt-sensitive (DS) rats for up to 5 weeks after five sixths nephrectomy. Before the nephrectomy, all rats demonstrated hypertension (mean 177 mm Hg), proteinuria (mean 175 mg/day), and mild glomerulosclerosis (mean injury score 35). Rats treated with captopril or TA 3090 demonstrated a significant and equivalent decrease in systolic blood pressure compared with untreated rats at 2, 3, and 5 weeks after five sixths nephrectomy; however, only captopril reduced proteinuria. Final proteinuria was actually increased in rats treated with TA 3090 compared with untreated rats. Glomerular injury score was significantly decreased in captopril-treated compared with untreated rats at 2 weeks (33 +/- 9 versus 117 +/- 10, p less than 0.05) and 5 weeks (46 +/- 9 versus 94 +/- 24, p less than 0.05), whereas treatment with TA 3090 delayed but did not prevent progressive glomerular injury (2-week score 35 +/- 7, p less than 0.05 versus untreated; 5-week score 109 +/- 19, p = NS versus untreated). Thus, in hypertensive DS rats after subtotal nephrectomy, treatment with a converting enzyme inhibitor reduced systemic blood pressure, proteinuria, and glomerulosclerosis. However, equihypotensive treatment with a calcium channel blocker did not reduce proteinuria and delayed but did not prevent glomerulosclerosis. Thus, in the rat similar reductions in systemic blood pressure with these two classes of agents have disparate effects on the progression of chronic renal failure.

Renal protective effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition

Nephron loss is a common progression of a diverse range of kidney diseases. Recent experimental models of chronic renal disease have suggested that hemodynamic and nonhemodynamic mechanisms play key roles in progressive renal injury. Extensive renal ablation in the rat was followed by development of altered glomerular hemodynamics. Albuminuria and histologic damage leading to focal glomerulosclerosis were preceded by the development of increased glomerular pressures and were prevented by interventions such as severe dietary protein restriction and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor therapy. Both experimental interventions ameliorated glomerular hypertension. It was therefore concluded that these interventions ameliorated injury by glomerular hemodynamic effect. Similar findings were obtained in a rat model of type I diabetes mellitus induced by streptozotocin in which glomerular hemodynamic factors appeared important to the development of progressive renal disease. Recent studies have suggested that nonhemodynamic factors have important roles in the progression of glomerular injury. For example, although the predominant effects of ACE inhibitor therapy appear to be hemodynamically mediated, data are emerging which suggest that these agents may also influence growth/proliferation of glomerular cells. Because hyperplasia/hypertrophy may influence glomerular susceptibility to injury, this may also be a potential mechanism whereby ACE inhibitor therapy influences glomerular damage. In addition, a variety of studies have suggested that hyperlipidemia, which is frequent accompaniment of glomerular disease, is an important modulator of glomerular injury independent of glomerular hemodynamic effects. Coagulation factors, calcium phosphorus balance, as well as the genetic susceptibility of the glomerulus to injury, all appear to contribute to progressive nephron destruction.