Distinct modes of interaction of the retinoic acid receptor alpha with natural and synthetic retinoids

The core component of the mammalian SWI/SNF complex SMARCD3/BAF60c is a coactivator for the nuclear retinoic acid receptor

Retinoic acid receptors (RARs) activate transcription by recruiting coactivator complexes such as histone acetyltransferases (HAT) and the mediator complex, to increase chromatin accessibility by general transcription factors and to promote transcription initiation. Indirect evidences have suggested a role for the ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complex SWI/SNF in RAR-mediated transcription. Here we demonstrate that two highly related subunits of the core SWI/SNF complex, BAF60c1 and BAF60c2, interact physically with retinoid receptors and are coactivators for RARs. This coactivating property is dependent on SRC1 expression, showing that HATs and SWI/SNF cooperate in this retinoid-controlled transcriptional process.

Down-Regulation of the Tumor Suppressor Gene Retinoic Acid Receptor β2 through the Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase/Akt Signaling Pathway

The retinoic acid receptor β2 (RARβ2) is a potent, retinoid-inducible tumor suppressor gene, which is a critical molecular relay for retinoid actions in cells. Its down-regulation, or loss of expression, leads to resistance of cancer cells to retinoid treatment. Up to now, no primary mechanism underlying the repression of the RARβ2 gene expression, hence affecting cellular retinoid sensitivity, has been identified. Here, we demonstrate that the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt signaling pathway affects cellular retinoid sensitivity, by regulating corepressor recruitment to the RARβ2 promoter. Through direct phosphorylation of the corepressor silencing mediator for retinoic and thyroid hormone receptors (SMRT), Akt stabilized RAR/SMRT interaction, leading to an increased tethering of SMRT to the RARβ2 promoter, decreased histone acetylation, down-regulation of the RARβ2 expression, and impaired cellular differentiation in response to retinoid. The phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt signaling pathway, an important modulator of cellular survival, has thus a direct impact on cellular retinoid sensitivity, and its deregulation may be the triggering event in retinoid resistance of cancer cells.

Intestinal antiinflammatory effect of 5-aminosalicylic acid is dependent on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma

5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) is an antiinflammatory drug widely used in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases. It is known to inhibit the production of cytokines and inflammatory mediators, but the mechanism underlying the intestinal effects of 5-ASA remains unknown. Based on the common activities of peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor-γ (PPAR-γ) ligands and 5-ASA, we hypothesized that this nuclear receptor mediates 5-ASA therapeutic action. To test this possibility, colitis was induced in heterozygous PPAR-γ^+/− mice and their wild-type littermates, which were then treated with 5-ASA. 5-ASA treatment had a beneficial effect on colitis only in wild-type and not in heterozygous mice. In epithelial cells, 5-ASA increased PPAR-γ expression, promoted its translocation from the cytoplasm to the nucleus, and induced a modification of its conformation permitting the recruitment of coactivators and the activation of a peroxisome-proliferator response element–driven gene. Validation of these results was obtained with organ cultures of human colonic biopsies. These data identify PPAR-γ as a target of 5-ASA underlying antiinflammatory effects in the colon.

Regulation of human apoA-I by gemfibrozil and fenofibrate through selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha modulation

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this trial was to study the effects of fenofibrate (FF) and gemfibrozil (GF), the most commonly used fibrates, on high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and apolipoprotein (apo) A-I.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In a head-to-head double-blind clinical trial, both FF and GF decreased triglycerides and increased HDL cholesterol levels to a similar extent, whereas plasma apoA-I only increased after FF but not GF. Results in human (h) apoA-Itransgenic (hA-ITg) peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) alpha-/- mice demonstrated that PPARalpha mediates the effects of FF and GF on HDL in vivo. Although plasma and hepatic mRNA levels of hapoA-I increased more pronouncedly after FF than GF in hA-ITgPPARalpha+/+ mice, both fibrates induced acylCoAoxidase mRNA similarly. FF and GF transactivated PPARalpha with similar activity and affinity on a DR-1 PPAR response element, but maximal activation on the hapoA-I DR-2 PPAR response element was significantly lower for GF than for FF. Moreover, GF induced recruitment of the coactivator DRIP205 on the DR-2 site less efficiently than did FF.

CONCLUSIONS

Both GF and FF exert their effects on HDL through PPARalpha. Whereas FF behaves as a full agonist, GF appears to act as a partial agonist due to a differential recruitment of coactivators to the promoter. These observations provide an explanation for the differences in the activity of these fibrates on apoA-I.

Retinoids: fascinating up-and-coming scenario

Retinoids have been in sharp focus ever since their introduction 30 years ago. They include any drug (s) that bind to retinoid receptors and elicit a biological response. Enormous information on the subject seems to embroil the recent literature. Practically it is impossible to clearly comprehend the undercurrents. The meticulously dispensing text envisages surmounting the perspective reader's predicaments. Accordingly, retinoids and their related facets namely retinoid receptors, classification, mode of action, and the pharmacological diversity have been precisely defined. Commonly used systemic retinoids too have been given a substantial fresh look along with their monitoring. Overall, adverse effects and relative and absolute contraindications have been scrupulously incorporated. Human immuno deficiency virus (HIV) and isoretinoid for acne, in particular, have been highlighted. Micronized isotretinoin formulations have also been taken care so also commonly used topical retinoids. Tretinoin and their newer formulation have also been accounted for along with tretinoin polymer cream. Adapalene, a new chemical entity possessing a unique physico-chemical activity similar to that of tretinoin has also been dealt with. Newer retinoids are likely to be a subject of intrigue. A focus on future potentials of retinoids is its special ingredient. The inclusion of details of rexinoid the most recent introduction in their purview is likely to invoke interest to further consolidate its reckoning in future. All in all the text of the paper should provide an insight into the current rumbling around retinoids.

Control of retinoic acid receptor heterodimerization by ligand-induced structural transitions. A novel mechanism of action for retinoid antagonists

Heterodimerization of retinoic acid receptors (RARs) with 9-cis-retinoic receptors (RXRs) is a prerequisite for binding of RXR.RAR dimers to DNA and for retinoic acid-induced gene regulation. Whether retinoids control RXR/RAR solution interaction remains a debated question, and we have used in vitro and in vivo protein interaction assays to investigate the role of ligand in modulating RXR/RAR interaction in the absence of DNA. Two-hybrid assay in mammalian cells demonstrated that only RAR agonists were able to increase significantly RAR interaction with RXR, whereas RAR antagonists inhibited RXR binding to RAR. Quantitative glutathione S-transferase pull-down assays established that there was a strict correlation between agonist binding affinity for the RAR monomer and the affinity of RXR for liganded RAR, but RAR antagonists were inactive in inducing RXR recruitment to RAR in vitro. Alteration of coactivator- or corepressor-binding interfaces of RXR or RAR did not alter ligand-enhanced dimerization. In contrast, preventing the formation of a stable holoreceptor structure upon agonist binding strongly altered RXR.RAR dimerization. Finally, we observed that RAR interaction with RXR silenced RXR ligand-dependent activation function. We propose that ligand-controlled dimerization of RAR with RXR is an important step in the RXR.RAR activation process. This interaction is dependent upon adequate remodeling of the AF-2 structure and amenable to pharmacological inhibition by structurally modified retinoids.

Role of Ser(289) in RARgamma and its homologous amino acid residue of RARalpha and RARbeta in the binding of retinoic acid

The biological actions of retinoic acid (RA) are mediated by retinoic acid receptors (RARalpha, -beta, and -gamma) and retinoid X receptors (RXRalpha, -beta, and -gamma). Although the ligand-binding domains of RARs and RXRs have been suggested to share the same novel folding pattern, the ligand-binding pockets of each of the retinoid receptors must have unique structural features since it has been possible to develop RAR subtype-selective and RXR-selective retinoids. We have previously demonstrated the importance for RA binding and RA-dependent transactivation of Arg(276) in RARalpha and Arg(278) in RARgamma; however, in RARbeta Arg(269) functions in conjunction with Lys(220). Here we have examined the role of the hydroxyl group of RARgamma Ser(289) and its homologous amino acid residues in RARalpha (Ser(287)) and RARbeta (Ser(280)) alone and in conjunction with their respective RARgamma Arg(278) homologs for RA binding and RA-dependent transactivation activity. The hydroxyl group of this Ser in all three RARs was found by itself not to be important for RA binding and RA-dependent transactivation activity. However, in RARalpha and RARgamma this Ser appears to play a small role in conjunction with Arg(276) and Arg(278), respectively, for these activities. Alternatively, strong synergism was observed in RARbeta between Ser(280) and Arg(269) for RA-binding and RA-dependent transactivation activity. This provides further evidence that the mechanism of interaction between the carboxylate group of retinoids and the amino acid residues in the ligand binding pocket of RARbeta is different from that of RARalpha and RARgamma.

Allosteric regulation of the discriminative responsiveness of retinoic acid receptor to natural and synthetic ligands by retinoid X receptor and DNA

Transcriptional activation by retinoids is mediated through two families of nuclear receptors, all-trans-retinoic acid (RARs) and 9-cis retinoic acid receptors (RXRs). Conformationally restricted retinoids are used to achieve selective activation of RAR isotype alpha, beta or gamma, which reduces side effects in therapeutical applications. Synthetic retinoids mimic some of all-trans retinoic acid biological effects in vivo but interact differently with the ligand binding domain of RARalpha and induce distinct structural transitions of the receptor. In this report, we demonstrate that RAR-selective ligands have distinct quantitative activation properties which are reflected by their abilities to promote interaction of DNA-bound human RXRalpha (hRXRalpha)-hRARalpha heterodimers with the nuclear receptor coactivator (NCoA) SRC-1 in vitro. The hormone response element core motifs spacing defined the relative affinity of liganded heterodimers for two NCoAs, SRC-1 and RIP140. hRXRalpha activating function 2 was critical to confer hRARalpha full responsiveness but not differential sensitivity of hRARalpha to natural or synthetic retinoids. We also provide evidence showing that lysines located in helices 3 and 4, which define part of hRARalpha NCoA binding surface, contribute differently to (i) the transcriptional activity and (ii) the interaction of RXR-RAR heterodimers with SRC-1, when challenged by either natural or RAR-selective retinoids. Thus, ligand structure, DNA, and RXR exert allosteric regulations on hRARalpha conformation organized as a DNA-bound heterodimer. We suggest that the use of physically distinct NCoA binding interfaces may be important in controlling specific genes by conformationally restricted ligands.