Assessment of chronic back pain patient characteristics using factor analysis of the MMPI-2: which dimensions are actually assessed?

Lessons for Better Pain Management in the Future: Learning from the Past

The treatment of noncancer pain in the United States and globally is met with significant challenges, resulting in profound physical, emotional, and societal costs. Based on this need, numerous modalities have been proposed to manage chronic pain, including opioid and nonopioid interventions as well as surgical approaches. Thus, the future of pain management continues to be mired in evolving concepts and constant debates. Consequently, it is crucial to understand the past as we move towards the future. The evolution of lessons for better pain management at present and for the future starting from the 1990s to the present date are reviewed and emphasized with a focus on learning from the past for the future. This review summarizes the evolution of multiple modalities of treatments, including multidisciplinary programs, multimodal therapy, interventional techniques, opioid therapy, other conservative modalities, and surgical interventions. This review emphasizes the individual, patient-centered development of an effective pain treatment plan after proper evaluation to establish a diagnosis. It includes measurable outcomes that focus on improvements in the quality of life and activities of daily living, as well as improvement in pain and function and, most importantly, return to productive citizenship. It is crucial that the knowledge of best practices be advanced, along with emphasis on lessons learned in the past to provide best practices for better pain management.

Delayed recovery in patients with whiplash-associated disorders

BACKGROUND

Prognosis of whiplash injury has been found to be related to a number of sociodemographic, treatment and clinical factors. In the current study, we attempt to identify several novel prognostic factors for delayed recovery in whiplash-associated disorders (WADs), using a validated and reliable measure of recovery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective review of a large database of a national network of physiotherapy and rehabilitation service providers in Canada yielded 5581 individuals injured in motor vehicle collisions. Cases were grouped into 3 cohorts based on time lapsed between injury date and initial presentation. Acute (n=3075), early chronic (n=958) and chronic (n=1548) patient cohorts were compared regarding treatment outcome and relative distribution of 29 prognostic factors. Outcome was defined by a minimally important clinical change (10%) on a previously validated disability questionnaire between initial and discharge rehabilitation visits.

RESULTS

Analysis demonstrated positive outcomes to be proportionally fewer in the chronic cohort (52.1%) relative to the early chronic (61.4%), which was in turn lower than the acute cohort (72.3%). Furthermore, individuals presenting with chronic pain were more likely to: (1) be female; (2) present with lower limb pain or nonorganic signs; (3) have returned to work; (4) have retained a lawyer; or (5) have undergone previous spinal surgery, and were less likely to: (1) present with neck or midback pain; (2) live in Ontario or Nova Scotia; or (3) have modified duties upon return to work. Acute, early chronic and chronic cohorts were also found to differ in the distribution of several other prognostic factors at initial clinical visit.

CONCLUSIONS

Recovery in whiplash-associated disorder appears to be multifactorial with both medical and non-injury related factors influencing outcome. Further characterisation of these factors may prove invaluable in guiding future clinical treatment and referral practices.

The INTERMED questionnaire for predicting return to work after a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program for chronic low back pain

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the performance of the INTERMED questionnaire score, alone or combined with other criteria, in predicting return to work after a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain.

METHODS

The INTERMED questionnaire is a biopsychosocial assessment and clinical classification tool that separates heterogeneous populations into subgroups according to case complexity. We studied 88 patients with chronic low back pain who followed an intensive multidisciplinary rehabilitation program on an outpatient basis. Before the program, we recorded the INTERMED score, radiological abnormalities, subjective pain severity, and sick leave duration. Associations between these variables and return to full-time work within 3 months after the end of the program were evaluated using one-sided Fisher tests and univariate logistic regression followed by multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

The univariate analysis showed a significant association between the INTERMED score and return to work (P<0.001; odds ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.96). In the multivariate analysis, prediction was best when the INTERMED score and sick leave duration were used in combination (P=0.03; odds ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.93).

CONCLUSION

The INTERMED questionnaire is useful for evaluating patients with chronic low back pain. It could be used to improve the selection of patients for intensive multidisciplinary programs, thereby improving the quality of care, while reducing healthcare costs.

Chronic low back pain in individuals with chronic neck pain of traumatic and non-traumatic origin: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether the prevalence of chronic low back pain is higher in chronic whiplash patients than in the general population. In a population-based study, we evaluated the prevalence of chronic low back pain in individuals with chronic neck pain of traumatic and non-traumatic origin, with special emphasis on whiplash injury.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Additional questions concerning the patient's experience of neck and low back pain were added to the questionnaire of the MONICA health survey. 4,415 subjects aged 25-64 years were randomly selected from a geographically well-defined area in northern Sweden.

RESULTS

The prevalences of chronic low back pain and chronic neck pain were 16% and 17%, respectively. 51% of subjects had both back and neck pain. Of the patients with neck pain, one quarter had a history of neck injury, which was related to whiplash injury in almost one-half of the cases. The prevalence of chronic low back pain in individuals with chronic non-traumatic neck pain was 53%, and it was 48% in those with chronic neck pain and a history of neck trauma. There was no difference in the prevalence of chronic low back pain between whiplash injury and other types of neck trauma. Confounding factors such as sex, age, marital status, BMI, smoking status and level of education were not significantly different between traumatic and non-traumatic groups.

INTERPRETATION

Independently of traumatic or non-traumatic origin of the symptoms, the prevalence of chronic low back pain is 3 times higher in individuals with chronic neck pain than in the general population. Causes other than a history of neck trauma, such as chronic muskuloskeletal pain syndromes, may be important in evaluation of these cases.

Neuropsychological functioning and MMPI-2 profiles in chronic neck pain: a comparison of whiplash and non-traumatic groups

We measured the neuropsychological functioning in 42 patients with chronic neck pain, 21 with a whiplash trauma and 21 without previous trauma. Subjectively, the whiplash group was more forgetful and had more concentration difficulties compared with the non-traumatic group. The neuropsychological tests did not reveal any differences between the two groups and a reference group of healthy individuals. Thus, chronic neck pain did not seem to interfere with neuropsychological functioning. The personality traits assessed with MMPI-2 in our 42 patients with chronic neck pain differed significantly from the normals on several scales. We also found that the whiplash group had more divergent test results than the non-traumatic group on the MMPI-2 test. Thus, it seems that the health status in those with chronic neck pain is closely linked to separate personality traits. It is concluded that the subjective complaints and poor performance in patients with chronic neck pain may be associated to somatization and inadequate coping, especially in chronic whiplash patients.

Personality assessment without borders: adaptation of the MMPI-2 across cultures

In contemporary psychology, personality assessment knows few national or cultural boundaries. Psychological tests developed in one country are often translated and adapted into cultures that might appear to be greatly different from the country of origin. In this article, I address the factors that are important to international test adaptation and examine problems that can adversely affect cross-cultural test research programs. I address qualities important for verifying the accuracy and adequacy of cross-cultural assessment. I review the extensive adaptation of the MMPI (Hathaway & McKinley, 1940) and MMPI-2 (Butcher, Dahlstrom, Graham, Tellegen, & Kaemmer, 1989), the most frequently used personality measure. I highlight several contemporary research trends in international personality assessment.

The MMPI-2 in sexual harassment and discrimination litigants

In order to understand patterns of respondents on validity and clinical scales, this study analyzed archival Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory 2s (MMPI-2s) produced by 192 women and 14 men who initiated legal claims of ongoing emotional harm related to workplace sexual harassment and discrimination. The MMPI-2s were administered as a part of a comprehensive psychiatric forensic evaluation of the claimants' current psychological condition. All validity and clinical scale scores were manually entered into the computer, and codetype and cluster analyses were obtained. Among the women, 28% produced a "normal limits" profile, providing no MMPI-2 support for their claims of ongoing emotional distress. Cluster analysis of the validity scales of the remaining profiles produced four distinctive clusters of profiles representing different approaches to the test items.

Electrodermal activity in low back pain patients with and without co-morbid depression

Electrodermal activity was examined at rest and during a series of pure innocuous tones in two groups of chronic low back pain patients, one of which consisted of patients suffering also from depression. A group of healthy participants and a group of patients suffering from depression unrelated to pain served as control groups. The non-depressed patients presented an increased electrodermal activity, especially a higher frequency of non-specific fluctuations, as compared to the three other groups. Skin conductance level also appeared lower in the two groups of depressed participants than in the healthy control group. These data show that the EDA recorded in chronic pain patients with and without co-morbid depression must advantageously be analysed separately.

Prediction of prolonged work disability in occupational low-back pain based on nurse case management data

This study evaluated whether risk prediction data captured by nurse case managers (NCMs) could predict prolonged disability from occupational low back pain. Cases of uncomplicated occupational low back pain referred to NCMs, with dates of injury between January 1, 1997 and June 30, 1998, were selected (n = 986). Predictive information was obtained from the NCM screening checklist of potential risk factors and other administrative claims data. Data were collected on 23 variables thought to predict work status at 6 months postinjury. In a multivariate logistic regression model, being out of work was significantly associated with older age, language barriers, earlier referral to NCM, and neutral or negative attorney attitude toward return to work. The overall predictive power of the model was low (area under curve = 0.6). Although NCM risk factor data collection is feasible and practical in insurance settings, future studies should explore additional variables and refined data collection methods in order to achieve a more accurate prediction.

Objective personality assessment of people in diverse cultures: European adaptations of the MMPI-2

This article examines the cross-national application of psychological tests and examines the generalizability of objective psychological assessment instruments. The most widely used and internationally adapted personality instrument, the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI-2), is highlighted to illustrate the adaptation of psychological tests across the barriers of language and culture. The problems and limitations of using questionnaire methods were noted and effective strategies for translating, adapting, and standardizing questionnaires in languages and cultures different from their country of origin are reviewed. The history of several European adaptations of the original MMPI and MMPI-2 is surveyed to illustrate the extensive research base for the test in Europe. Applications of the MMPI-2 in clinical and non-clinical (e.g. industrial) settings were noted. Current research is described and recommendations for future research are provided.

A structured evidence-based review on the meaning of nonorganic physical signs: Waddell signs

STUDY DESIGN

This is a structured, evidence-based review of all available studies addressing the concept of nonorganic findings: Waddell signs (WSs).

OBJECTIVES

To determine what evidence, if any, exists for the various interpretations for the presence of WSs on physical examination.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

WSs are a group of eight physical findings divided into five categories, the presence of which has been alleged at times to have the following interpretations: Malingering/secondary gain, hysteria, psychological distress, magnified presentation, abnormal illness behavior, abnormal pain behavior, and somatic amplification. At the present time, there is, therefore, significant confusion as to what these findings mean.

METHODS

A computer and manual literature search produced 61 studies and case series reports relating to WSs. These references were reviewed in detail, sorted, and placed into tabular form according to the following subject areas: 1) Reliability (test-retest); 2) Reliability (inter-rater); 3) Reliability (factor analysis); 4) Validity, psychological distress; 5) Validity, correlation Minnesota Multiphasic Pain Inventory (MMPI); 6) Validity, correlation abnormal illness behavior; 7) Validity, other behaviors; 8) Validity, as a nonorganic phenomenon; 9) Validity, correlation pain drawing; 10) Validity, functional performance; 11) Validity, treatment outcome; 12) Validity, predicting surgical treatment outcome; 13) Validity, return to work outcome; 14) Validity, secondary gain correlation; and 15) Validity, pain correlation. Each study in each topic area was classified according to the type of study it represented according to the type of evidence guidelines developed by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR). In addition, a list of 14 study quality criteria was used to measure the quality of each study. Each study was categorized for each criterion as positive, (criterion filled), negative (criterion not filled), or not applicable independently by two of the authors. A percent quality score was obtained for each study by counting the total number of positives obtained, dividing by 14 minus the total number of not applicables, and multiplying by 100. Only studies having a quality score of 75% or greater were used to formulate the conclusions of this review. The strength and consistency of the evidence represented by the remaining studies in each topic area (above) was then categorized according to the strength and consistency AHCPR guidelines. Conclusions of this review for each topic area are based on these results.

RESULTS OF DATA SYNTHESIS

Of the 61 studies, four had quality scores below 75% and were not used to generate the results of this review. According to the AHCPR guidelines for strength and consistency of the reviewed data, the following results were obtained: 1) There was consistent evidence for WSs being associated with decreased functional performance, poor nonsurgical treatment outcome, and greater levels of pain; 2) There was generally consistent evidence for WSs not being associated with psychological distress, abnormal illness behavior, or secondary gain; 3) There was also generally consistent evidence that WSs are an organic phenomenon and that they cannot be used to discriminate organic from nonorganic problems; 4) There was inconsistent evidence that WSs do demonstrate inter-rater reliability, do not correlate with the neurotic triad of the MMPI, are associated with poorer surgical treatment outcome, and are associated with nonreturn to work; 5) There was little or no evidence that WSs demonstrate test-retest reliability, or reliable factors, and are associated with self-esteem problems, catastrophizing, or the nonorganic pain drawing.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the above results, the following conclusions were made: 1) WSs do not correlate with psychological distress; 2) WSs do not discriminate organic from nonorganic problems; 3) WSs may represent an organic phenomenon; 4) WSs are associated with poorer treatment outcome; 5) WSs are associated with greater pain levels; 6) WSs are not associated with secondary gain; and 7) As a group, WS studies demonstrate some methodological problems.

Chronic nonmalignant pain and violent behavior

Research suggests that violence has entered the medical setting to a remarkable degree, causing medical professionals to be at the highest risk for becoming the victims of assaults and violent acts. This article reviews general theories of aggression and research on these theories, and uses them to assess risk factors in patients with chronic pain. There are data to suggest that pain may increase the risk of aggressiveness in some patients. However, it may decrease the risk in others paradoxically. The research available underscores the need for evaluating patients with pain for the risk of violent or aggressive behavior; specific recommendations are made in this regard.

Cross-cultural replication of the five-factor model and comparison of the NEO-PI-R and MMPI-2 PSY-5 scales in a Dutch psychiatric sample

The authors investigated cross-cultural replicability of the five-factor model (FFM) of personality as represented by the revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R; P. T. Costa & R. R. McCrae, 1992) in a sample of 423 Dutch psychiatric patients. Also, NEO-PI-R domain scales were compared with the Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5; A. R. Harkness & J. L. McNulty, 1994) scales of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (J. N. Butcher, W. G. Dahlstrom, J. R. Graham, A. Tellegen, & B. Kaemmer, 2002). Principal-components analysis with procrustean rotation confirmed the hypothesized structural similarity of the present sample with the U.S. normative factor scores. All of the hypothesized relations between NEO-PI-R and PSY-5 scales were confirmed. The results provide evidence for cross-cultural replicability of the FFM and for validity of the NEO-PI-R and PSY-5 constructs in the psychological assessment of psychiatric patients.

The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory and chronic pain: a conceptual analysis of a long-standing but complicated relationship

The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Disorder (MMPI) and its successor, the MMPI-2, have a long-standing tradition in the assessment of patients with chronic pain. With the introduction of more narrowly defined and factor-analyzed pain inventories, however, the utility of the MMPI-2 for pain assessment has been brought into question. In this review, the relevant literature is carefully scrutinized from a conceptual and historical perspective. It is concluded that many of the (recent) criticisms are largely ungrounded. Rather than the test itself being at fault or of little utility in the field of pain assessment, it has simply been applied inappropriately (i.e., for determination of pain etiology or underlying personality structure "explaining" the chronic pain). In conclusion, it is suggested that the application of the MMPI-2 in the assessment of patients with chronic pain should correspond more closely to the original aims and psychometric properties of the tool--that is, for screening and the generation of hypotheses regarding comorbid psychopathology and personality features having the potential to complicate the treatment process. Guidelines for clinical interpretation of MMPI-2 profiles with regard to chronic pain are provided.

MMPI-2 Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5) and prediction of treatment outcome for patients with chronic back pain

This study investigated the utility of the MMPI-2-based Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5) scales (Harkness, McNulty, & Ben-Porath, 1995) in the outcome prediction of behaviorally oriented chronic-pain treatment. The PSY-5 is a dimensional descriptive system for personality and its disorders. The sample consisted of 120 consecutive chronic-back-pain patients who followed a 4-week multimodal treatment program aimed at achieving a normal pattern of functioning, including return to regular work. The psychometric properties of the PSY-5 scales (Aggressiveness, Psychoticism, Constraint, Negative Emotionality/Neuroticism, and Positive Emotionality/Extraversion) were highly similar to the data reported by Harkness et al. (1995) and also corresponded to the characteristics of chronic-pain patients. The results of the hierarchical regression analyses provided support for the utility of the PSY-5 Positive Emotionality/Extraversion scale for the prediction of emotionally oriented outcome. We conclude that the PSY-5 model of personality psychopathology provides a solid basis for the more systematic study of the complex relation between personality characteristics and multidimensional treatment.

Prognostic factors and treatment-related changes associated with return to work in the multimodal treatment of chronic back pain

The goals of the current study were to determine those preprogram (= prognostic) variables and treatment-related changes that predict return to work in the multimodal management of chronic back pain. The outcome measures for 143 patients at 6-month follow-up were analyzed. The program had a duration of 4 weeks, was based largely on the functional restoration approach (Mayer and Gatchel, 1998), and occurred within a workers' compensation framework. Some 87% of the patients successfully returned to work. Three sets of predictor variables were considered: demographic/socioeconomic data, physical measures, and psychological measures. Three prognostic variables proved to be significant negative predictors of return to work: time off work, previous spinal surgery, and a clinically elevated (preprogram) score on the MMPI-2 scale Lassitude-Malaise (Hy3). A repeated-measures MANOVA showed an incomplete return to work to be associated with only limited improvement in self-reported disability and pain report. However, patients who failed to return to work did not differ with regard to improvement in objective physical functioning or psychological distress. It is therefore hypothesized that a change in the perceived disability status is the key element necessary to return patients with chronic back pain to work, although ongoing reinforcement schemes operative in the home/work environment may lead to a relapse in the posttreatment phase.