Clinical, toxicological and pharmacological aspects of gemcitabine

Targeting Intracranial Tumours with a Combination of RNA and Chemotherapy

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a fast-growing and aggressive brain tumour, which remains largely resistant to treatment; the prognosis for patients is poor, with a median survival time of about 12-18 months, post diagnosis. In an effort to bring more efficacious treatments to patients, we targeted the down regulation of ITCH, an E3 ligase that is overexpressed in a variety of cancers, and which inhibits P73, a tumour suppressor gene. 6-O-glycolchitosan (GC) was used to deliver siRNA ITCH (GC60-siRNA-ITCH) and gemcitabine via the nose to brain route in CD-1 nude mice which had previously been implanted intracranially with U87-MG-luc2 cells. Prior to this in vivo study, an in vitro study established the synergistic effect of siRNA-ITCH in combination with a chemotherapy drug-gemcitabine. A downregulation of ITCH, an upregulation of p73 and enhanced apoptosis were observed in vitro in U87-MG cells, using qPCR, Western blot analysis, confocal laser scanning microscopy, flow cytometry and cytotoxicity assays. When GC60-siRNA-ITCH was combined with gemcitabine, there was a resultant decrease in cell proliferation in vitro. In CD1 mice, the administration of siRNA-ITCH (7 doses of 0.081 mg/kg) alone did not significantly affect animal survival (increasing mean survival from 29 to 33 days when compared to untreated animals), whereas intranasal gemcitabine had a significant effect on survival (increasing survival from 29 to 45 days when compared to untreated animals, p < 0.01). The most significant effect was seen with combination therapy (GC60-siRNA-ITCH plus gemcitabine), where survival increased by 89%, increasing from 29 to 54 days (p < 0.01). Our data demonstrate that siRNA chemosensitises brain tumours to gemcitabine and that the nose-to-brain delivery route may be a viable route for the treatment of intracranial tumours.

Clinical Targeting of Altered Metabolism in High-Grade Glioma

ABSTRACT

High-grade gliomas are among the deadliest of all cancers despite standard treatments, and new therapeutic strategies are needed to improve patient outcome. Targeting the altered metabolic state of tumors with traditional chemotherapeutic agents has a history of success, and our increased understanding of cellular metabolism in the past 2 decades has reinvigorated the concept of novel metabolic therapies in brain tumors. Here we highlight metabolic alterations in advanced gliomas and their translation into clinical trials using both novel agents and already established drugs repurposed for cancer treatment in an effort to improve outcome for these deadly diseases.

Gemcitabine-induced haemolytic uremic syndrome, although infrequent, can it be prevented: A case report and review of literature

Gemcitabine is an antineoplastic used to treat several malignancies including pancreatic cancer. Its toxicity profile is well known with myelotoxicity, increased vascular permeability and peripheral oedema as most frequent adverse events. However, several cases of acute renal failure have been reported and haemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) seems to be the underlying process. The cause of HUS remains unknown but its consequences can be lethal. Therefore, a high grade of suspicion is crucial to diagnose it and promptly treat it. This hopefully will reduce its morbidity. HUS is characterized by progressive renal failure associated with microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia and thrombocytopenia. The primary event is damage to endothelial cells and thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) is the histopathological lesion. TMA affects mainly renal microvasculature. However, some cases evolve with central nervous or cardiovascular systems involvement. We present here a case of gemcitabine-induced HUS, with renal and cardiovascular system affected at the time of diagnosis which to our knowledge this is the first time of such case to be reported.

Gemcitabine and glioblastoma: challenges and current perspectives

Gemcitabine is a nucleoside analog currently used for the treatment of various solid tumors as a single agent or in combination with other chemotherapeutic drugs. Its use against highly aggressive brain tumors (glioblastoma) has been evaluated in preclinical and clinical trials leading to controversial results. Gemcitabine can inhibit DNA chain elongation, is a potent radiosensitizer and it can enhance antitumor immune activity, but it also presents some drawbacks (e.g., short half-life, side effects, chemoresistance). The aim of this review is to discuss the challenges related to the use of gemcitabine for glioblastoma and to report recent studies that suggest overcoming these obstacles opening new perspectives for its use in the field (e.g., gemcitabine derivatives and/or nanomedicines).

Preparation and Evaluation of 177Lu-Labeled Gemcitabine: An Effort Toward Developing Radiolabeled Chemotherapeutics for Targeted Therapy Applications

OBJECTIVE

Gemcitabine, a nucleoside analogue, is used as a chemotherapeutic drug for the treatment of a wide variety of cancers. Therefore, radiolabeled gemcitabine may have potential as a radiotherapeutic agent for the treatment of various types of cancers. In the present work, an attempt has been made to radiolabel gemcitabine with ¹⁷⁷Lu and study the preliminary biological behavior of ¹⁷⁷Lu-labeled gemcitabine in tumor-bearing animal model.

EXPERIMENTAL

Gemcitabine was coupled with p-NCS-benzyl-DOTA, a bifunctional chelating agent, to facilitate radiolabeling with ¹⁷⁷Lu. The p-NCS-benzyl-DOTA-gemcitabine conjugate was radiolabeled with ¹⁷⁷Lu, produced in-house and characterized by high-performance liquid chromatography. Tumor targeting potential of the radiolabeled agent was determined by biodistribution studies in Swiss mice bearing fibrosarcoma tumors.

RESULTS

¹⁷⁷Lu-gemcitabine was prepared with a radiochemical purity of 95.7% ± 0.3% under the optimized reaction conditions. The radiolabeled agent showed adequate in vitro stability in normal saline as well as in human blood serum. Preliminary biological studies revealed rapid and significant accumulation of the radiotracer in the tumorous lesions along with fast clearance of activity from blood and other vital organs/tissue. Although tumor uptake gradually reduced with time, tumor to blood and tumor to muscle ratios were improved due to the comparatively faster clearance of activity from the nontarget organs/tissue.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrates the preliminary potential of ¹⁷⁷Lu-gemcitabine for targeted radiotherapy. However, further studies are warranted to assess its potential for radiotherapeutic applications.

Histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A resensitizes gemcitabine resistant urothelial carcinoma cells via suppression of TG-interacting factor

Gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) has been widely used for advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). However, resistance to this remedy has been noticed. We have demonstrated that increase of TG-interacting factor (TGIF) in specimens is associated with worse prognosis of upper tract UC (UTUC) patients. The roles of TGIF in the gemcitabine resistance of UC were explored. Specimens of 23 locally advanced/advanced stage UTUC patients who received GC systemic chemotherapy after radical nephroureterectomy were collected to evaluate the alterations of TGIF in the resistance to the remedy by using immunohistochemistry. In vitro characterizations of mechanisms mediating TGIF in gemcitabine resistance were conducted by analyzing NTUB1 cells and their gemcitabine-resistant subline, NGR cells. Our results show that increased TGIF is significantly associated with chemo-resistance, poor progression-free survival, and higher cancer-related deaths of UTUC patients. Higher increases of TGIF, p-AKT(Ser473) and invasive ability were demonstrated in NGR cells. Overexpression of TGIF in NTUB1 cells upregulated p-AKT(Ser473) activation, enhanced migration ability, and attenuated cellular sensitivity to gemcitabine. Knockdown of TGIF in NGR cells downregulated p-AKT(Ser473) activation, declined migration ability, and enhanced cellular sensitivity to gemcitabine. In addition, histone deacetylases inhibitor trichostatin A (TSA) inhibited TGIF, p-AKT(Ser473) expression and migration ability. Synergistic effects of gemcitabine and TSA on NGR cells were also demonstrated. Collectively, TGIF contributes to the gemcitabine resistance of UC via AKT activation. Combined treatment with gemcitabine and TSA might be a promising therapeutic remedy to improve the gemcitabine resistance of UC.

Antitumoral activity of a trichloromethyl pyrimidine analogue: molecular cross-talk between intrinsic and extrinsic apoptosis

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a malignant disorder caused by the proliferation of lymphoid progenitor cells and is the most common cancer in children. Cytotoxic nucleoside analogues are important chemotherapeutic agents, which are used in many cancers, including leukemias. In this study, we investigated the effects of the synthetic nucleoside analogue 1-(5,5,5-trichloro-2-methoxy-4-oxopenten-2-yl)-4-trichloromethyl-pyrimidin-2(1H)-one, named compound 3 or C3, on leukemia cell lines. The compound stimulated cell death by apoptosis, evidenced by DNA fragmentation, phosphatidylserine externalization, and caspase-3 activation. Compound 3 seemed to trigger several cell death pathways. The mitochondrial pathway was evidenced through a disturbance of mitochondrial membrane potential, strong cytochrome c liberation, decrease of antiapoptotic Bcl-2 protein expression, and caspase-9 activation. The C3 also induced caspase-8 and -12 activation, an increase in the intracellular calcium level, and an overproduction of reactive oxygen species. Increased caspase 8 activity suggests that the extrinsic pathway was activated and that the ROS production and enzyme activity alteration (glutathione S-transferase, glutathione peroxidase, catalase, and glutathione reductase) might be related to oxidative stress. Finally, the increase in calcium release, CHOP expression, and caspase-12 activity might characterize endoplasmic reticulum stress. Compound 3 was likewise cytotoxic to leukemic and melanoma human cell lines. Taken together, the results contribute to further understanding the new pyrimidine analogue as a potential chemotherapeutic drug or lead molecule.

Phase I trial of M2ES, a novel polyethylene glycosylated recombinant human endostatin, plus gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most lethal and resistant to treatment of solid tumors. Combination therapies with various types of drugs against pancreatic cancer have been extensively investigated. Endostatin is a potent endogenous inhibitor of angiogenesis, which may be administered in combination with various chemotherapeutic agents in the treatment of several types of cancer. To the best of our knowledge, this phase I trial was the first clinical study to determine the tolerance, safety and efficacy of M₂ES, a novel polyethylene glycosylated recombinant human endostatin, administered concurrently with full-dose gemcitabine in patients with inoperable, locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. A total of 16 patients were treated with gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m² on days 1, 8 and 15) and M₂ES (5-45 mg/m² on days 1, 8, 15 and 21) of each 28-day cycle. In 15 evaluable patients, the stable disease rate (SDR) was 40% (95% CI: 11.9-68.1%). In particular, a 75% SDR was observed in 3 out of 4 patients with a M₂ES dose level of 7.5 mg/m². The most noticeable M₂ES-related adverse events observed during the trial were grade 2 liver function abnormalities (6.3%) and grade 1 skin rash (6.3%). No dose-limiting toxicity was observed in any patients from all the dose levels. Therefore, there was no increased toxicity associated with the addition of M₂ES to gemcitabine and this combination was well tolerated.

SL-01, an oral derivative of gemcitabine, inhibited human breast cancer growth through induction of apoptosis

SL-01 is an oral derivative of gemcitabine that was synthesized by introducing the moiety of 3-(dodecyloxycarbonyl) pyrazine-2-carbonyl at N4-position on cytidine ring of gemcitabine. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of SL-01 on human breast cancer growth. SL-01 significantly inhibited MCF-7 proliferation as estimated by colorimetric assay. Flow cytometry assay indicated the apoptotic induction and cell cycle arrest in G1 phase. SL-01 modulated the expressions of p-ATM, p53 and p21 and decrease of cyclin D1 in MCF-7 cells. Further experiments were performed in a MCF-7 xenografts mouse model. SL-01 by oral administration strongly inhibited MCF-7 xenografts growth. This effect of SL-01 might arise from its roles in the induction of apoptosis. Immunohistochemistry assay showed the increase of TUNEL staining cells. Western blotting indicated the modulation of apoptotic proteins in SL-01-treated xenografts. During the course of study, there was no evidence of toxicity to mice. In contrast, the decrease of neutrophil cells in peripheral and increase of AST and ALT levels in serum were observed in the gemcitabine-treated mice.

CONCLUSION

SL-01 possessed similar activity against human breast cancer growth with gemcitabine, whereas, with lower toxicity to gemcitabine. SL-01 is a potent oral agent that may supplant the use of gemcitabine.

Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of SL-01, a prodrug of gemcitabine, in rats

PURPOSE

SL-01, dodecyl-3-((1-((2R,4R,5R)-3,3-difluoro-4-hydroxy-5-(hydroxymethyl)-tetrahydrofuran-2-yl)-2-oxo-1,2-dihydropyrimidin-4-yl) carbamoyl) pyrazine-2-carboxylate, is a prodrug of gemcitabine. Our previous reports suggested that SL-01 possesses superior bioavailability and anticancer activity to gemcitabine in mice. In this study, its pharmacokinetics and metabolisms were investigated in rats.

METHODS

The pharmacokinetics of SL-01 was studied following intravenous or oral administration of SL-01 to Sprague-Dawley rats. The metabolites profile of SL-01 was further determined in rats receiving intravenous administration of SL-01. Blood samples were analyzed by using LC-MS or LC-MS/MS assay.

RESULTS

Following administration with SL-01 intravenously or orally, SL-01, plasma gemcitabine released from SL-01 as well as the sum of gemcitabine (gemcitabine converted from SL-01 and plasma gemcitabine) exhibited higher values of V z /F and CL z /F, and longer MRT and t 1/2 than those of gemcitabine administered intravenously. The C max of gemcitabine produced by intravenous SL-01 was higher than that of gemcitabine dosed intravenously. The absolute bioavailability for the sum of gemcitabine was 32.2 % for intravenous and 22.2 % for oral administration with SL-01, respectively. After a single intravenous administration, a total of 5 components (M1, M2, M3, M4, and M5) were detected and identified as the metabolites of SL-01 in the plasma of rats. M1 and M2 were formed from the methylation and reduction of SL-01, respectively. Hydrolysis of the amide bond of SL-01 gave M3 and M4. M5 was produced from further dealkylation of M3.

CONCLUSIONS

SL-01 displayed improved absorption, good distribution, high clearance, long mean residence time, and moderate bioavailability after administered intravenously or orally to rats. The major metabolic pathways of SL-01 involved methylation, reduction, hydrolysis, and dealkylation. These results suggested that SL-01 acts as a prodrug of gemcitabine in rats.

Gemcitabine and docetaxel for hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase II North Central Cancer Treatment Group clinical trial

OBJECTIVES

Few effective options are available for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Several phase I trials suggest promising activity of a combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel.

METHODS

Patients with unresectable or metastatic HCC were treated with docetaxel 40 mg/m (later reduced to 30 mg/m) and gemcitabine 800 mg/m on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. Twenty-five patients were enrolled in 26 months. Median age was 64 (range, 27-078), 17 were male, 14 had liver-only disease, and 11 had extrahepatic disease.

RESULTS

Of 25 patients evaluable for the primary end point (response), 2 (8%) have a confirmed partial response. The median time to progression is 2.76 months (95% confidence interval, 1.84-6.64 mo). Median survival was 12.8 months (95% confidence interval, 5.26-28.00). Two patients died on study owing to adverse events (1 hepatic and 1 renal failure), neither of which were attributed to the study medications. Twenty patients (81%) have experienced grade 3+ adverse events, including 11 with grade 4+ adverse events, primarily neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, and fatigue.

CONCLUSIONS

Although this combination seems to have potential benefit, as measured by overall survival, its toxicity and the recent introduction of sorafenib has further limited the use of chemotherapy. Approaches other than chemotherapy are likely to be of the greatest potential benefit.

Combined chemotherapy with gemcitabine and carboplatin for metastatic urothelial carcinomas in patients with high renal insufficiency

BACKGROUND

This was a retrospective study to evaluate the activity and toxicity of a combined chemotherapeutic regimen of gemcitabine and carboplatin (GCa) in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinomas (UCs) with special regard to patients with highly impaired renal function.

METHODS

Eleven patients whose creatinine clearance was 30 ml/min or under and who had been diagnosed with metastatic UC were treated with GCa. The patient cohort comprised 4 males and 7 females, with a median age of 74 (range 67-84) years. The median follow-up was 19 (range 1-58) months.

RESULTS

Five of the 11 patients (45%) showed an objective response, with 2 achieving a clinically complete response and 3 a partial response with GCa. The grade 3/4 toxicity of the regimen was primarily hematological, including anemia (55%), neutropenia (45%), and thrombocytopenia (45%). Four patients (36%) could not complete the treatment in total. Grade 3 pneumonitis was found in one patient, and the treatment was terminated. Grade 4 febrile neutropenia occurred in the patient on hemodialysis, and the patient was forced to discontinue the chemotherapy. Another 2 patients also called off the treatment due to a pulmonary adverse event and an elevation of serum creatinine, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

GCa appears to be effective for the treatment of metastatic UCs in patients with impaired renal function, but it is necessary to pay attention to the occurrence of severe adverse events.

Synthesis and biological evaluation of oral prodrugs based on the structure of gemcitabine

A series of oral prodrugs based on the structure of gemcitabine (2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine) were synthesised by introducing an amide group at the N4-position of the cytidine ring. A total of 16 compounds were obtained, and their chemical and biological characteristics were evaluated. The half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC(50)s) for most of these compounds were higher than that of gemcitabine in vitro. Compounds 5d and 5m, the representative compounds, were examined in terms of their physiological stabilities and pharmacokinetics. Compound 5d showed good stability in PBS and simulated intestinal fluid, and an analysis of its pharmacokinetics in mice suggested that the introduction of an amide group to gemcitabine could greatly improve its bioavailability. Further evaluation of compound 5d in vivo showed that this compound possesses higher activity than gemcitabine against the growth of HepG2 human hepatocellular carcinoma cells and HCT-116 colon adenocarcinoma cells with less toxicity to animals. These results suggest that compound 5d could be further developed as a potential oral anticancer agent for clinical applications in which gemcitabine is currently used.

Gemcitabine-based induction chemotherapy and concurrent with radiation in advanced head and neck cancer

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine-based induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent gemcitabine and radiotherapy in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck. A total of 28 patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were enrolled. All patients were treated with 2 cycles of induction gemcitabine 1 gm/m(2) on days 1 and 8 plus cisplatin 75 mg/m(2)no day 1 of a 3-week cycles followed by conventionally fractionated radiotherapy to 70 Gy in 35 fractions concurrent with weekly gemcitabine 100 mg/m(2) within 2 h before radiotherapy. Median age was 56.5 years (range, 30-68). Four patients (14.3 %) achieved complete response (CR) and 19 patients (67.9 %) had partial response (PR) after induction chemotherapy. After concurrent chemo-radiotherapy, we reported 17 (60.7 %) CR and 8 (28.6 %) PR. Median loco-regional recurrence-free survival, progression-free survival, and overall survival were 17, 12.5, and 21 months, respectively. Performance status, T stage, AJCC stage, and response to chemo-radiation were found to have significant impact on survival. Acute grade 3 toxicity of concurrent chemo-radiation included 35.7 % dysphagia, 25 % stomatitis, and 10.7 % neutropenia, whereas late grade 3 toxicity included xerostomia in 7.1 % and stomatitis in 3.6 % of patients. Gemcitabine-based induction and concurrent chemo-radiotherapy is effective treatment for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck with acceptable and manageable toxicity. Optimizing dose and schedule of gemcitabine-based chemo-radiation is still needed.

Impact of preoperative chemotherapy on pulmonary function tests in resectable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Several chemotherapy agents, including gemcitabine and paclitaxel, have been reported to cause interstitial pneumonitis. The incidence of pulmonary toxicity from the combination of gemcitabine and paclitaxel is reported to be approximately 5%. In this report, pulmonary function test (PFT) results were analyzed from two similar randomized phase 2 trials that tested platinum and nonplatinum regimens preoperatively in patients with stage I or II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

The regimens included gemcitabine plus carboplatin, paclitaxel, or cisplatin. PFT and dyspnea scores were obtained at baseline and postchemotherapy, and were compared to one of several secondary end points, including ability to undergo surgical resection.

RESULTS

Baseline PFT scores varied with smoking status. Mean levels of diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (Dlco) adjusted for hemoglobin declined 8% from pre- to postinduction (Wilcoxon signed rank test, p < 0.0001). Changes in FVC, FEV(1), and total lung capacity were not statistically significant after chemotherapy. Although 27% of patients in the study had some reduction in PFT results, only 2 of the 85 eligible patients did not undergo surgery due to PFT reduction following chemotherapy. One patient in the study experienced a clinically significant respiratory toxicity (grade 3 dyspnea). Pulmonary toxicity was only statistically associated with male gender.

CONCLUSION

In the preoperative setting, gemcitabine-based chemotherapy was well tolerated. The most commonly affected PFT parameter postchemotherapy was the Dlco. Although 15% of patients had a significant reduction in the Dlco postchemotherapy, it did not correlate with clinical symptoms or affect the ability to undergo surgical resection.

Phase II feasibility study of concurrent radiotherapy and gemcitabine in chemonaive patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: long-term follow up data

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy (RT) with concurrent chemotherapy is the current standard of care for patients with unresectable locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Gemcitabine (GEM) is a potent radiosensitizer and in addition has activity as an anticancer agent in SCCHN.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-six patients with locally far advanced SCCHN were enrolled in a chemoradiation feasibility study between November 1998 and September 2003. Use was made of conventionally fractionated RT and GEM 100 mg/m(2), which was given within 2 h prior to radiotherapy on a weekly basis starting on day 1 of RT. Response was assessed according to WHO criteria, toxicity according to NCI-CTC version 2.

RESULTS

The patients received a median of 7 (2-8) weekly cycles of gemcitabine and a median cumulative RT dose of 70 Gy (66-84.75). Hematologic toxicity was mild, but non-hematologic toxicity was severe: grade 3-4 stomatitis occurred in 85% of patients, dermatitis in 69%, pharyngitis/esophagitis in 81% and 80% of the patients needed a feeding tube during treatment. All 22 evaluable patients responded (50% complete, 50% partial). Median follow up of the surviving patients is 46 months. Median disease-free and overall survival is 13 months and 19 months, respectively; 27% of the patients are alive without evidence of recurrence beyond 3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Conventionally fractionated RT in combination with GEM 100 mg/m(2) weekly is feasible and highly active in the treatment of locally advanced SCCHN. In particular, long-term local control rate is promising. Acute mucosal toxicities are significant but manageable. Long-term toxicity interferes with normal food intake.

Comparison of pharmacokinetics, efficacy and toxicity profile of gemcitabine using two different administration regimens in Chinese patients with non-small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a randomized comparative trial of pharmacokinetics, efficacy and toxicity profile treatment with 1200 mg/m(2) gemcitabine using standard 30-min infusion or fixed dose rate (FDR) infusion [10 mg/(m(2) x min)] on days 1 and 8 plus carboplatin AUC (area under curve) 5 on day 1 in Chinese non-small-cell cancer patients. Twelve patients were enrolled in this study.

METHODS

Plasma gemcitabine concentrations were measured by ion-pair reversed phase high performance liquid chromatography. Antitumoral activity and toxicity of gemcitabine was assessed according to World Health Organization criteria.

RESULTS

The obtained mean parameters, such as T(1/2) (elimination half time), AUC, and CL (clearance), were consistent with those reported in literature. Qualified response rate in our study was 33.3% for standard arm and 50% for FDR arm. Additional 50% and 33.3% patients contracted stable disease (SD) in standard arm and FDR arm, respectively. The predominant toxicity was hematologic, and patients in the standard infusion arm experienced consistently more hematologic toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Pharmacokinetic and clinical data in this trial support the continued evaluation of the FDR infusion strategy with gemcitabine.

Systemic anticancer therapy in gynecological cancer patients with renal dysfunction

Chronic kidney disease is a common occurrence in patients with gynecological cancer. Systemic anticancer treatment in such patients is a challenge for clinicians because of altered drug pharmacokinetics. For those drugs that are excreted mainly by the kidneys, decreased renal function may lead to increased systemic exposure and increased toxicity. Dose adjustment based on pharmacokinetic changes is required in this situation to avoid life-threatening toxicity. In this review, we summarize the nephrotoxicity and pharmacokinetic data of agents commonly used in systemic anticancer treatment of gynecological cancers and dose adjustment guidelines in the presence of impaired renal function. We review 17 medications that need dose adjustment (cisplatin, carboplatin, doxorubicin, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, topotecan, irinotecan, etoposide, capecitabine, bleomycin, methotrexate, actinomycin D, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, metoclopramide, cimetidine, and diphenhydramine) as well as 27 drugs that do not (paclitaxel, docetaxel, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, vincristine, letrozole, anastrozole, tamoxifen, leuprorelin, megestrol, gefitinib, erlotinib, trastuzumab, leucovorin, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, erythropoietin, ondansetron, granisetron, palonosetron, tropisetron, dolasetron, aprepitant, dexamethasone, lorazepam, and diazepam). We also review the formulae commonly used to estimate creatinine clearance, including Cockcroft-Gault, Chatelut, Jelliffe, Wright, and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease study formulae.

Phase II Study of Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Patients with Previously Untreated Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: Southwest Oncology Group Study 9718

BACKGROUND

This phase II study (S9718) evaluated the antineoplastic activity and tolerability of the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin in previously untreated patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC).

METHODS

Chemonaive patients with ES-SCLC, received gemcitabine 1250 mg/m intravenously (IV) over 30 minutes on days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 75 mg/m IV over 30 to 60 minutes on day 1. Treatments were repeated every 21 days for a maximum of six cycles.

RESULTS

A total of 88 patients were enrolled in the study; seven patients were not eligible and one did not receive treatment; 80 patients were fully assessable for survival, response, and toxicity. Objective response was observed in 42 patients (53%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 41%-64%) with two patients (3%; 95% CI: 0%-8%) achieving a complete response. Median PFS was 5 months (CI, 4.2-5.9 months), and median overall survival was 8.8 months (95% CI: 7.8-9.5 months). The 1- and 2-year survival rates were 27.5% (95% CI: 17.7%-37.3%) and 4% (95% CI: 0%-8%), respectively. The most common toxicity was neutropenia. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia was noted in 17 (21%) and 17 (21%) patients, respectively. Two patients developed febrile neutropenia, with subsequent full recovery. Twenty-one patients (23%) developed grade 3 thrombocytopenia. Grade 4 thrombocytopenia was seen in only one patient. The most common nonhematologic toxicities included grade 3 and 4 vomiting in 12 (21%) patients and fatigue in nine (10%) patients. Two patients (3%) died of respiratory infections while on treatment.

CONCLUSION

The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin is an active and reasonably well tolerated regimen for the treatment of ES-SCLC. It does not appear to offer any compelling advantages over other commonly used two drug regimens in this disease.

A phase II trial of a combination of pemetrexed and gemcitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer: an NCCTG study

PURPOSE

This phase II study was undertaken to define the efficacy and toxicity of pemetrexed in combination with gemcitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with measurable metastatic breast cancer who had previously received an anthracycline and a taxane in either the adjuvant or metastatic setting were treated with gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 (intravenous; days 1 and 8) and pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 (intravenous; day 8) every 21 days.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients received a median of five cycles (range one to 22) of treatment and were followed until death or for a median of 28 months (range 19.4-36.6) among living patients. Fourteen partial responses for an overall response rate of 24% [95% confidence interval (CI) 16% to 39%] were documented. Nine (15%; CI 5% to 32%) patients had stable disease for >6 months. The median survival time was 10.3 months (95% CI 8.3-18.9) and the 1 year survival rate was 49% (95% CI 38% to 64%). The median time to progression was estimated to be 3.7 months (95% CI 2.3-5.3). The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicities were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in 83% and 27% of patients, respectively. Fourteen percent of patients experienced febrile neutropenia. Other common grade 3 or 4 non-hematological toxicities included fatigue (17%), dyspnea (15%), rash (7%) and anorexia (5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of pemetrexed and gemcitabine is clinically active, with an overall response rate of 24% in patients with metastatic breast cancer who have previously been treated with an anthracycline and a taxane. Myelosuppression (66% grade 4 neutropenia and 14% febrile neutropenia) was the major treatment-related toxicity observed for this combination.

Monitoring of cell growth and assessment of cytotoxicity using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy

Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was used to monitor the growth of mammalian cancer cells and evaluate the cytotoxicity of chemicals using Fe(CN)6(3-/4-) as a redox probe. Cancer cells, the human hepatocarcinoma cell line (BEL7404), were grown on optically transparent indium tin oxide (ITO) semiconductor slides, which were used as the working electrodes in electrochemical experiments. Attachment and proliferation of cancer cells on ITO surfaces resulted in increase of electron-transfer resistance (R(et)) between the redox probe of Fe(CN)6(3-/4-) in electrolyte solution and ITO electrode surface. For cytotoxicity assessment, cells grown on ITO substrates were further cultured in the presence of different cytotoxicants and electrochemical impedance measurements were carried out at different time intervals. Gemcitabine, a promising antineoplastic drug showing activity against a wide spectrum of human solid tumors, was selected as a model for long-term cytotoxicity effect study, whereas mercury chloride represented a model for acute toxicants. The inhibitions of gemcitabine and mercury chloride on the viability and proliferation of BEL7404 cells were observed from the electrochemical impedance experiments, and the different action modes were discriminated. Additionally, microscope images were also used to observe the effects of these two chemicals on the morphology of the cells. General consistency has been found between the electrochemical impedance response and the morphological observation. Such an impedance method provides a simple and inexpensive way for in vitro assessment of chemical cytotoxicity.

Pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine in Chinese patients with non-small-cell lung cancer

To determine the pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine (2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine) in Chinese non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Six study subjects were administered gemcitabine at a fixed dose rate of 10 mg/m(2) per min (1200 mg/m(2), two hours infusion), and carboplatin and plasma gemcitabine concentrations were measured by ion-pair reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). 3P97 Pharmaceutical Kinetics Software was used for the calculation of pharmacokinetic parameters. The obtained mean parameters, elimination half life (t(1/2)) (10.67+/-3.38 min), area under the curve (AUC) (7.55+/-1.53 (microg x h)/ml), and clearance (CL) (3940.05+/-672.08 ml/min), were consistent with those reported in literature. The hematologic toxicology result showed that the regimen was effective on and tolerated by the patients.

Randomized phase II trial of three schedules of pemetrexed and gemcitabine as front-line therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

A randomized three-arm phase II study was undertaken to evaluate the optimum administration schedule of pemetrexed and gemcitabine in chemotherapy-naïve patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to three schedules of pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 plus gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2, separated by a 90-minute interval, on a 21-day cycle as follows: schedule A, pemetrexed followed by gemcitabine on day 1 and gemcitabine on day 8; schedule B, gemcitabine followed by pemetrexed on day 1 and gemcitabine on day 8; and schedule C, gemcitabine on day 1 and pemetrexed followed by gemcitabine on day 8.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-two eligible patients (schedule A, n = 59; schedule B, n = 31, and schedule C, n = 62) received a median of five (schedule A), two (schedule B), and four (schedule C) treatment cycles. Overall, 66% of patients experienced grade 3 or 4 neutropenia. Common grade 3 and 4 nonhematologic toxicities were dyspnea (11%), fatigue (16%), and transaminase elevation (9%). Schedule A seemed less toxic compared with schedule C (grade 3 or 4 events: 86% v 94%, respectively; P = .19; grade 4 events: 39% v 48%, respectively; P = .30). Schedule B was closed at interim analysis for inferior efficacy. Schedule A, with a confirmed response rate of 31% (95% CI, 20% to 45%), met the protocol-defined efficacy criteria, whereas schedule C, with a confirmed response rate of 16.1% (95% CI, 11% to 34%), did not. Median survival time and time to progression were 11.4 and 4.4 months, respectively, with no observable difference between the arms.

CONCLUSION

Pemetrexed and gemcitabine administered as outlined for schedule A met the protocol-defined efficacy criteria, was less toxic compared with the other treatment schedules, and should be further evaluated.

Three cases of hemolytic uremic syndrome in ovarian cancer patients treated with combination gemcitabine and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin

BACKGROUND

Hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) is a rare coagulation disorder characterized by microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia and acute uremia. Reports have described this fatal syndrome in association with cytotoxic agents. To our knowledge, no case reports of HUS in ovarian cancer patients receiving treatment with combination gemcitabine and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) have been reported.

CASE REPORTS

Three patients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma each developed profound hypertension and peripheral edema while receiving combination gemcitabine and PLD. The first patient had rapid hemolysis, thrombocytopenia, renal failure and respiratory distress. The other patients experienced slowly progressive renal failure and mild hematologic abnormalities. Two of the three patients had favorable outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The reported incidence of gemcitabine-induced HUS is rare. Clinicians should suspect HUS if blood pressure elevation or peripheral edema develop.

Amino Acid Ester Prodrugs of the Anticancer Agent Gemcitabine: Synthesis, Bioconversion, Metabolic Bioevasion, and hPEPT1-Mediated Transport

Gemcitabine, a clinically effective nucleoside anticancer agent, is a polar drug with low membrane permeability and is administered intravenously. Further, extensive degradation of gemcitabine by cytidine deaminase to an inactive metabolite in the liver affects its activity adversely. Thus, strategies that provide both enhanced transport and high metabolic bioevasion would potentially lead to oral alternatives that may be clinically useful. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether amino acid ester prodrugs of gemcitabine would (a) facilitate transport across intestinal membranes or across cells that express hPEPT1 and (b) provide resistance to deamination by cytidine deaminase. 3'-Monoester, 5'-monoester, and 3',5'-diester prodrugs of gemcitabine utilizing aliphatic (L-valine, D-valine, and L-isoleucine) and aromatic (L-phenylalanine and D-phenylalanine) amino acids as promoieties were synthesized and evaluated for their affinity and direct hPEPT1-mediated transport in HeLa/hPEPT1 cells. All prodrugs exhibited enhanced affinity (IC(50): 0.14-0.16 mM) for the transporter. However, only the 5'-L-valyl and 5'-L-isoleucyl monoester prodrugs exhibited (a) increased uptake (11.25- and 5.64-fold, respectively) in HeLa/hPEPT1 cells compared to HeLa cells and (b) chemical stability in buffers, that were comparable to valacyclovir, a commercially marketed oral amino acid ester prodrug. The widely disparate enzymatic bioconversion profiles of the 5'-L-valyl and 5'-L-isoleucyl prodrugs in Caco-2 cell homogenates along with their significant resistance to deamination by cytidine deaminase suggest that the disposition of gemcitabine following oral administration would be controlled by the rate of bioconversion following transport across the intestinal epithelial membrane. The combined results also suggest that it may be possible to modulate these characteristics by the choice of the amino acid promoiety.

Unexpected toxicity following use of gemcitabine as a radiosensitizer in head and neck carcinomas: a veterinary radiation therapy oncology group pilot study

Gemcitabine (2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine) was given intravenously twice weekly to 10 cats with oral squamous cell carcinoma and 15 dogs with nasal carcinoma undergoing radiotherapy as a radiosensitizing agent. The average total radiation dose was 50 Gy for dogs and 54 Gy for cats given Monday-Friday (planned dose of 54 and 57 Gy, respectively). Dogs received an average of five doses of gemcitabine beginning at 50 mg/m2, and cats received an average of five doses of gemcitabine beginning at 25 mg/m2. Twelve of 15 dogs and five of 10 cats required chemotherapy dose reduction or postponement because of hematologic or normal tissue toxicity. The results herein do not support the use of gemcitabine at the studied dose and schedule, as significant hematologic and local tissue toxicity was observed in the studied patients. Pharmacokinetic data are necessary to best define the efficacy and optimal dose and schedule of gemcitabine in combination with traditional radiotherapy.

Hemolytic uremic syndrome following prolonged gemcitabine therapy: report of four cases from a single institution

Hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) has been described following the administration of multiple antineoplastic agents, most notably mitomycin C. More recently, several cases of gemcitabine-induced HUS have been observed with the overall incidence of gemcitabine-induced HUS estimated at 0.015-0.25%. We here report on four patients who developed HUS following gemcitabine therapy at our institution within the last year (incidence 1.4%). All these patients had advanced-stage disease, were heavily pretreated, and received prolonged gemcitabine application, suggesting that in this subgroup of patients HUS may be more frequently encountered than documented so far.

Phase II Study of Pemetrexed-Gemcitabine Combination in Patients with Advanced-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

Cisplatin is one of the most active agents for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It is also known for significant toxicity, which makes it unsuitable for certain patients. Our purpose was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a promising cisplatin-free combination, gemcitabine plus pemetrexed, in NSCLC.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Chemo-naive patients with inoperable NSCLC were eligible for this study. Gemcitabine (1250 mg/m2) was given intravenously on days 1 and 8, followed by intravenous pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) on day 8. After inclusion of 13 patients, folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation was added to lower pemetrexed-induced toxicity. Quality of life was assessed with the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale.

RESULTS

Sixty patients enrolled; 58 were evaluable for response. All patients had a World Health Organization performance status of 0 or 1. Eighty-seven percent had stage IV disease. Nine patients had a confirmed partial response [overall response rate, 15.5%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 7.3-27.4%]. Twenty-nine (50.0%) patients had stable disease. Median overall survival was 10.1 months (95% CI, 7.9-13.0 months), with a 1- and 2-year overall survival of 42.6% (95% CI, 30.0-55.3%) and 18.5% (95% CI, 7.9-29.1%). Median progression-free survival was 5.0 months. Median response duration was 3.3 months. There were no deaths attributed to treatment. Common Toxicity Criteria grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (61.7%), febrile neutropenia (16.7%), fatigue (23.3%), and elevations of aspartate aminotransferase (15.0%) and alanine aminotransferase (20.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

This combination had good tolerance and achieved promising overall survival with extended 1- and 2-year survival rates. This cisplatin-free regimen warrants further evaluation in randomized trials.

Gemcitabine plus paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced breast cancer

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and tolerability of gemcitabine and paclitaxel as first-line treatment in advanced breast cancer.

METHODS

Patients with histologically confirmed metastatic or metastatic plus locally advanced breast cancer received gemcitabine 1,200 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) on day 1 every 21 days for 8 cycles.

RESULTS

From December 1999 to August 2001, 45 patients, with a median age of 53.5 years (range, 22-77), received a total of 260 cycles. All were assessable for response and toxicity. Twenty-seven patients had prior adjuvant therapy. Hormonal receptor status was positive in 31.1% and negative in 40.0% of patients. Main metastatic sites included soft tissue (62.2%) and lung (53.3%). The objective response rate was 66.7%; complete response, 22.2%; partial response, 44.4%; stable disease, 15.6%; progressive disease, 17.8%. Median duration of response was 18 months and median time to tumor progression was 11 months. Grade 3/4 leukopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia developed in 13.3% of patients, and 15.5% developed grade 3/4 mucositis. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Median overall survival was 19 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Gemcitabine plus paclitaxel is an active combination with a favorable toxicity profile as first-line treatment for patients with advanced breast cancer.

Phase II trial of gemcitabine concurrent with radiation for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

BACKGROUND

Concurrent chemoradiation is the current standard of treatment for patients with advanced unresectable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Due to the potent radiosensitizing properties of gemcitabine, we decided to assess its efficacy and toxicity with concurrent radiation in patients with advanced HNSCC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 1997 to December 2001, 27 patients with locally advanced HNSCC (stage III, 37%; stage IV, 63%) were enrolled. All received a course of radiotherapy (70 Gy over 7 weeks) concurrent with weekly infusions of gemcitabine at 100 mg/m2 or 50 mg/m2.

RESULTS

All patients were assessable for toxicity and 26 for response. Severe mucositis (grade 3-4) was observed in 74% of patients (grade 4, 41%). Severe hematological toxicity was uncommon. Mild and moderate xerostomy was the most common late toxicity in 23 patients (85%). The median radiation dose delivered was 70 Gy (40-80 Gy), 25 patients (93%) received > or = 80% of the intended dose. Gemcitabine dose intensity was > or = 80% in only 13 (48%) patients. The rate of complete and partial responses were 61% and 27%, respectively, for an overall response rate of 88%. At a median follow-up of 13 months (range 6-62), the actuarial 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 37% and 33%, respectively. The only variable associated with prolonged survival (P = 0.0001) was the degree of response. No difference was observed in response or toxicity with either gemcitabine 50 or 100 mg/m2.

CONCLUSIONS

The concurrent use of radiotherapy and gemcitabine is effective but produces manageable severe mucositis in a high percentage of patients.

A phase I, dose escalation trial of ZD0473, a novel platinum analogue, in combination with gemcitabine

PURPOSE

To develop a combination regimen for clinical testing, we performed a dose escalation study of ZD0473 in combination with gemcitabine. ZD0473 is a novel platinum analogue with an aliphatic cyclic carrier ligand. In vitro and in vivo studies suggest that it possesses a different spectrum of antitumor activity from cisplatin and carboplatin. In single-agent studies of ZD0473, myelosuppression was the predominant toxicity and responses wer observed.

METHODS

In this combination phase I trial, 36 patients with advanced cancer were accrued to four dose levels, with doses of ZD0473 and gemcitabine ranging from 60 to 120 mg/m2 and 600 to 750 mg/m2, respectively ZD0473 was administered on day 1 and gemcitabine was given on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle.

RESULTS

Hematologic toxicity was dose-limiting. Grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia occurred during 60% and 41% of all cycles. Nonhematologic toxicities were mild and reversible. Two partial responses and 19 patients with stable disease were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The recommended phase II doses are 90 mg/m2 of ZD0473 and 750 mg/m2 of gemcitabine for lightly pretreated patients and 600 mg/m2 for heavily pretreated patients. The combination of ZD0473 and gemcitabine is associated with dose-dependent thrombocytopenia and neutropenia as well as having promising clinical activity.

The radioenhancement of two human head and neck squamous cell carcinomas by 2'-2' difluorodeoxycytidine (gemcitabine; dFdC) is mediated by an increase in radiation-induced residual chromosome aberrations but not residual DNA DSBs

PURPOSE

The present study aimed at investigating if 2'-2' difluorodeoxycytidine (dFdC) radioenhancement was mediated by an effect on induction and/or repair of radiation-induced DNA DSBs and chromosome aberrations in cells with different intrinsic radiosensitivity.

METHODS

Confluent human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell lines designated SCC61 and SQD9 were treated with 5 microM dFdC for 3 or 24 h prior to irradiation. DNA DSBs induction and repair were analyzed by PFGE. Radiation-induced chromosome aberrations were examined with a FISH technique.

RESULTS

In both cell lines, dFdC did not modify radiation-induced DNA DSBs in a dose range between 0 and 40 Gy. After a single dose of 40 Gy, dFdC affected neither the kinetic of repair nor the residual amount of DNA DSBs up to 4 h after irradiation. Whereas dFdC did not increase the induction of chromosome aberrations, after a single dose of 5 Gy, the percentage of aberrant cells and the number of aberrations per aberrant cells were significantly higher in combination with dFdC.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that under experimental conditions yielding substantial radioenhancement, dFdC decreases the repair of genomic lesions inducing secondary chromosome breaks but has no effect on DNA DSBs repair as measured by PFGE.

A phase I study of gemcitabine and docetaxel for advanced stage solid tumors

BACKGROUND

We conducted a phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated dose of docetaxel in combination with gemcitabine for patients with refractory solid tumors.

METHODS

From January 1998 to November 1999, we treated 28 patients on a phase I protocol with gemcitabine given at a constant dose of 800 mg/m2 i.v. over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15. Docetaxel was administered by a phase I schedule over 1 hour on day 1 of a 28-day cycle with a starting dose of 50 mg/m2 and increased by increments of 10 mg/m2 based on dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) that occurred in the first cycle.

RESULTS

Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were the dose-limiting toxicities. The maximum tolerated dose was 60 mg/m2. The most significant nonhematologic toxicities included fatigue, nausea, vomiting, mucositis, and hypersensitivity reactions. There was one partial response at 15 months in a patient with gastric cancer and six patients with stable disease for 4.0 to 15.0 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The maximum tolerated dose of docetaxel with gemcitabine is 60 mg/m2. A Phase II study in selected primary sites is planned.

In vitro effects of combinations of cis-amminedichloro (2-methylpyridine) platinum (II) (ZD0473) with other novel anticancer drugs on the growth of SBC-3, a human small cell lung cancer cell line

Among numerous clinical regimens of combination chemotherapy, synergy has been observed to be particularly marked with combinations containing cisplatin (CDDP). However, the clinical use of CDDP has sometimes been limited by acquired resistance. The new-generation platinum drug, ZD0473, was synthesized with the aim of hindering the reaction of the drug with thiols, by the introduction of a 2-methylpyridine ligand. This enables the drug to exert antitumor activity against cisplatin-resistant cancer cells with elevated glutathione and/or metallothionein levels. The drug was also shown experimentally to overcome cisplatin resistance due to impaired drug accumulation, and enhanced DNA repair/tolerance to platinum-DNA adducts. We investigated the effects of combinations of ZD0473 with other anticancer drugs on the growth of a human small-cell lung cancer cell line (SBC-3). Six novel anticancer drugs were tested: docetaxel (TXT), paclitaxel (TXL), vinorelbine (VNB), irinotecan (CPT-11), gemcitabine (GEM) and pemetrexed (MTA). The growth inhibitory effect of the drugs was measured by MTT assay and the effects of the combination regimens were evaluated by the combination index analysis method developed by Chou and Talalay. Synergy was demonstrated for the combination regimens of ZD0473-GEM and ZD0473-TXL, while an additive effect was observed with combinations containing TXT, VNB, CPT-11 or MTA. In the case of the ZD0473-GEM combination, synergy was observed over a wide range of inhibition levels at dose ratios of 50:1, 100:1 and 250:1. The level of synergy was equivalent to that observed for combinations of CDDP-etoposide, CDDP-GEM and nedaplatin-CPT-11. The results suggest that the combination of ZD0473 with GEM merits further investigation in small cell lung cancer.

Pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine in a patient with end-stage renal disease: effective clearance of its main metabolite by standard hemodialysis treatment

PURPOSE

Gemcitabine (2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine) is a cytotoxic agent with a low toxicity profile and proven activity against a number of solid tumors. It is not known whether gemcitabine is safe to administer to patients with kidney failure, and if dose adjustment is necessary. We determined the tolerability and pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine and its noncytotoxic metabolite 2',2'-difluorodeoxyuridine (dFdU) in a patient with end-stage renal disease on maintenance hemodialysis therapy.

PATIENT AND METHODS

A 64-year-old patient with pancreatic cancer and end-stage renal disease received two cycles of gemcitabine at a standard dose of 1000 mg/m(2) given as a 30-min infusion on days 1 and 10. A regular 3.5-h hemodialysis treatment was performed 24 h after each infusion. Plasma and dialysate concentrations of gemcitabine and dFdU were determined by HPLC. The tolerability of gemcitabine treatment was assessed by clinical and laboratory parameters.

RESULTS

For gemcitabine, the maximal plasma concentration, terminal half-life (t(1/2)) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) were similar to those reported for patients with normal renal function. In contrast, end-stage renal disease resulted in a five- to tenfold prolongation of terminal half-life and a distinct increase in the AUC of plasma dFdU in this patient. Plasma dFdU was effectively eliminated by hemodialysis treatment. Both cycles of gemcitabine were tolerated well with no unexpected side effects observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Gemcitabine treatment in end-stage renal disease with intermittent standard hemodialysis treatment is safe and well tolerated. The pharmacokinetic data suggest that dose adjustment of gemcitabine should be avoided to ensure its full cytotoxic activity, and that hemodialysis treatment should be initiated 6-12 h after its administration to minimize the potential side effects of the metabolite dFdU.

Phase II trial of gemcitabine plus cisplatin repeating doublet therapy in previously treated, relapsed ovarian cancer patients

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to determine the safety and efficacy of gemcitabine plus cisplatin for patients with relapsed ovarian carcinoma and to compare ex vivo drug sensitivity profiles with clinical outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Previously treated patients with ovarian carcinoma received cisplatin (30 mg/m(2)) plus gemcitabine (600-750 mg/m(2)) on Days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle. Seventeen of the 27 patients underwent ex vivo analyses for correlation with clinical response.

RESULTS

Of 27 patients, there were 7 (26%) complete and 12 (44%) partial responses, for an overall response rate of 70% (95% CI: 53-87%). Toxicities included neutropenia Grade III in 51.9%, Grade IV in 29.6%; anemia Grade III in 18.5 %; thrombocytopenia Grade III in 66.7 %, Grade IV in 29.6%; nausea and vomiting Grade III in 14.8 %; peripheral neuropathy Grade III in 3.7%; and alopecia Grade IV in 11.1% of patients. The median time to progression for objective responders was 7.9 months with a range of 2.1 to 13.2 months. There were no treatment-related deaths. Ex vivo results correlated with response, time to progression, and survival, remaining significant when adjusted for platin-resistance and number of prior therapies. Adjustment for platin-free interval decreased the significance but did not, in and of itself, predict significantly for progression-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Cisplatin plus gemcitabine is active for patients with relapsed ovarian cancer. Toxicities, primarily hematologic, are manageable with dose modifications. Responses observed in heavily pretreated and platin-resistant patients indicate activity in drug-refractory patients. The results of the ex vivo analyses correlate with clinical outcomes.

Gemcitabine and doxorubicin for the treatment of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase I-II trial

BACKGROUND

We determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and then further evaluated the response rate and safety profile of gemcitabine (Gem) plus doxorubicin (Dox) in chemonaïve patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Dose escalation was tested over four dose levels in each 21-day cycle: level 1 (Gem 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8, Dox 30 mg/m(2) on day 1), level 2 (Gem/Dox 1250/30), level 3 (Gem/Dox 1250/45) and level 4 (Gem/Dox 1250/60). The MTD was further evaluated in phase II.

RESULTS

Patients' characteristics were: 47 men, three women; median age 53 years (range 28-70); Zubrod performance status (PS) scores 0-1 (74%), PS 2 (26%); Okuda stage I (24%) and stage II (76%). Fifteen patients were enrolled in phase I: level 1 (n = 3), level 2 (n = 6), level 3 (n = 6), level 4 (n = 0). Level 2 was identified as the MTD. Dose-limiting toxicities included esophageal bleeding, grade 4 neutropenia and neutropenic fever. Of the 34 patients evaluable for response in phase II (of 35 total), there were four (11.8%) partial responses (95% CI, 0.8% to 22.8%) and six (17.6%) minor responses; nine (26.5%) had stable disease and 15 (44.1%) progressed. Sixteen per cent of patients had a decline of >or=50% in alpha-fetoprotein levels after treatment. Median survival and progression-free survival were 4.6 months (range 0.3-19.2) and 2.5 months (range 0.2-7.8), respectively, for 35 patients. Grade 3/4 hematological toxicities included anemia (45.7%), neutropenia (51.4%), thrombocytopenia (25.7%); febrile neutropenia (11.8%) and non-hematological toxicities were mild to moderate.

CONCLUSIONS

Gemcitabine plus doxorubicin produces modest activity and moderate toxicity in this cohort of Chinese patients with advanced HCC.

Pemetrexed (Alimta) and gemcitabine in breast cancer patients previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes

Gemcitabine (2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine) is a pyrimidine antimetabolite with broad activity in a variety of solid tumors including breast cancer. Pemetrexed (Alimta) is a novel, multitargeted antifolate that inhibits 3 folate-dependent enzymes, and is also broadly active in a wide variety of solid tumors. In breast cancer, pemetrexed has activity in patients previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes, and pemetrexed demonstrates preclinical and clinical cytotoxic synergy with gemcitabine. This drug combination is being evaluated in a phase II study for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer patients who have previously received a taxane and an anthracycline.

Gemcitabine and pemetrexed disodium combinations in vitro and in vivo

Pemetrexed disodium (ALIMTA) is a novel antimetabolite that inhibits at least three folate-dependent enzymes, thymidylate synthase, dihydrofolate reductase, and glycinamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase. Pemetrexed disodium is broadly active in a wide variety of solid tumours, including non-small cell lung, breast, bladder, head and neck and ovarian cancers. Gemcitabine is a broadly active pyrimidine nucleoside antimetabolite, which is approved for the treatment of pancreatic and non-small cell lung cancers. Three preclinical studies have been reported that show cytotoxic synergy between gemcitabine and pemetrexed. Clinical activity with this combination has been observed in a phase I study, with partial responses in three of five patients previously treated for non-small cell lung cancer. An international phase II study of this combination in non-small cell lung cancer is ongoing.

Phase I trial of gemcitabine and CPT-11 given weekly for four weeks every six weeks

BACKGROUND

Our previous studies have shown that the in vitro cytotoxicity of gemcitabine and SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan (CPT-11), is synergistic in human tumor cell lines.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-four patients with solid tumors, refractory to standard chemotherapy or for whom no effective therapy existed (age range 31-74; 7 female, 17 male; ECOG PS 0 = 12, 1 = 11, 2 = 1), received gemcitabine and CPT-11 weekly for four weeks out of every six weeks. Fifty courses of treatment (median 2, range 1-8) were given through five dose levels of gemcitabine/CPT-11 (600/75, 800/75, 800/100, 1000/100, 1000/125 mg/m2).

RESULTS

Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in eight and two patients, respectively. Grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia occurred in one and three patients, respectively. Hematologic toxicity resulted in > or = 2 missed doses of treatment in two out of six patients and was therefore dose limiting at gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 and CPT-11 125 mg/m2. Grade 3 and 4 diarrhea occurred in two and one patients, respectively. Other moderate non-hematologic toxicities included alopecia, anorexia, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, and weight loss.

CONCLUSIONS

The maximum tolerated dose for this study recommended for phase II testing is gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 and CPT-11 100 mg/m2. A partial response was seen in transitional cell carcinoma.