High-dose-rate intraoperative brachytherapy for recurrent colorectal cancer

Comparing Oncologic Outcomes and Toxicity for Combined Modality Therapy vs. Carbon-Ion Radiotherapy for Previously Irradiated Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer

No standard treatment paradigm exists for previously irradiated locally recurrent rectal cancer (PILRRC). Carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) may improve oncologic outcomes and reduce toxicity compared with combined modality therapy (CMT). Eighty-five patients treated at Institution A with CIRT alone (70.4 Gy/16 fx) and eighty-six at Institution B with CMT (30 Gy/15 fx chemoradiation, resection, intraoperative electron radiotherapy (IOERT)) between 2006 and 2019 were retrospectively compared. Overall survival (OS), pelvic re-recurrence (PR), distant metastasis (DM), or any disease progression (DP) were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier model, with outcomes compared using the Cox proportional hazards model. Acute and late toxicities were compared, as was the 2-year cost. The median time to follow-up or death was 6.5 years. Median OS in the CIRT and CMT cohorts were 4.5 and 2.6 years, respectively (p ≤ 0.01). No difference was seen in the cumulative incidence of PR (p = 0.17), DM (p = 0.39), or DP (p = 0.19). Lower acute grade ≥ 2 skin and GI/GU toxicity and lower late grade ≥ 2 GU toxicities were associated with CIRT. Higher 2-year cumulative costs were associated with CMT. Oncologic outcomes were similar for patients treated with CIRT or CMT, although patient morbidity and cost were lower with CIRT, and CIRT was associated with longer OS. Prospective comparative studies are needed.

A platelet-mimicking theranostic platform for cancer interstitial brachytherapy

Rational: Interstitial brachytherapy (BT) is a promising radiation therapy for cancer; however, the efficacy of BT is limited by tumor radioresistance. Recent advances in materials science and nanotechnology have offered many new opportunities for BT. Methods: In this work, we developed a biomimetic nanotheranostic platform for enhanced BT. Core-shell Au@AuPd nanospheres (CANS) were synthesized and then encapsulated in platelet (PLT)-derived plasma membranes. Results: The resulting PLT/CANS nanoparticles efficiently evaded immune clearance and specifically accumulated in tumor tissues due to the targeting capabilities of the PLT membrane coating. Under endoscopic guidance, a BT needle was manipulated to deliver appropriate radiation doses to orthotopic colon tumors while sparing surrounding organs. Accumulated PLT/CANS enhanced the irradiation dose deposition in tumor tissue while alleviating tumor hypoxia by catalyzing endogenous H2O2 to produce O2. After treatment with PLT/CANS and BT, 100% of mice survived for 30 days. Conclusions: Our work presents a safe, robust, and efficient strategy for enhancing BT outcomes when adapted to treatment of intracavitary and unresectable tumors.

Clinical selection strategy for and evaluation of intra-operative brachytherapy in patients with locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

A radical resection of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) or recurrent rectal cancer (RRC) can be challenging. In case of increased risk of an R1 resection, intra-operative brachytherapy (IOBT) can be applied. We evaluated the clinical selection strategy for IOBT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between February 2007 and May 2018, 132 LARC/RRC patients who were scheduled for surgery with IOBT standby, were evaluated. By intra-operative inspection of the resection margin and MR imaging, it was determined whether a resection was presumed to be radical. Frozen sections were taken on indication. In case of a suspected R1 resection, IOBT (1 × 10 Gy) was applied. Histopathologic evaluation, treatment and toxicity data were collected from medical records.

RESULTS

Tumour was resected in 122 patients. IOBT was given in 42 patients of whom 54.8% (n = 23) had a histopathologically proven R1 resection. Of the 76 IOBT-omitted R0 resected patients, 17.1% (n = 13) had a histopathologically proven R1 resection. In 4 IOBT-omitted patients, a clinical R1/2 resection was seen. In total, correct clinical judgement occurred in 72.6% (n = 88) of patients. In LARC, 58.3% (n = 14) of patients were overtreated (R0, with IOBT) and 10.9% (n = 5) were undertreated (R1, without IOBT). In RRC, 26.5% (n = 9) of patients were undertreated.

CONCLUSION

In total, correct clinical judgement occurred in 72.6% (n = 88). However, in 26.5% (n = 9) RRC patients, IOBT was unjustifiedly omitted. IOBT is accompanied by comparable and acceptable toxicity. Therefore, we recommend IOBT to all RRC patients at risk of an R1 resection as their salvage treatment.

ESTRO/ACROP IORT recommendations for intraoperative radiation therapy in locally recurrent rectal cancer

Multimodal strategies have been implemented for locally recurrent rectal cancer scheduled for complete surgical resection. Irradiation and systemic therapy have been added to improve the oncological outcome, as surgery alone was associated with a poor prognosis. Intraoperative irradiation (IORT) is a component of irradiation intensification. Long-term cancer control and a higher survival rate were consistently reported in patients who had IORT as a component of their multidisciplinary treatment. The experience reported by expert IORT groups is reviewed and recommendations to guide clinical practice are explained in detail.

Low-kilovolt x-ray intraoperative radiotherapy for pT3 locally advanced colon cancer: a single-institution retrospective analysis

Background

Patients with locally advanced colon cancer (LACC) treated with surgery had a high risk of local recurrence. The outcomes can vary significantly among patients with pT3 disease. This study was undertaken to assess whether low-kilovolt (kV) x-ray intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) can achieve promising results compared with electron beam IORT (IOERT) and whether specific subgroups of patients with pT3 colon cancer may benefit from low-kV x-ray IORT.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 44 patients with pT3 LACC treated with low-kV x-ray IORT. Clinicopathologic characteristics were analyzed to identify patients that could potentially benefit from low-kV x-ray IORT. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to assess overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Correlation analysis was used to discover the association of multiple factors to the results of treatment represented by the values of OS and PFS.

Results

The median follow-up of patients was 20.5 months (range, 6.1–38.8 months). At the time of analysis, 38 (86%) were alive and 6 (14%) had died of their disease. The 3-year Kaplan-Meier of PFS and OS for the entire cohort was 82.8% and 82.1%, respectively. At median follow-up, no in-field failure within the low-kV x-ray IORT field had occurred. Locoregional and distant failure had occurred in 2 (5%) patients each. The rate of perioperative 30-day mortality was 0%, and the morbidity rate was 11%. Five patients experienced 7 complications, including 4 early complications (30 days) and three late complications (> 30 days) leading early and late morbidity rates of 9% and 7%, respectively.

Conclusion

Patients with LACC who had undergone an additional low-kV x-ray IORT can achieve encouraging locoregional control, PFS, OS, and distant control without an increase in short-term or long-term complications. Low-kV x-ray IORT can be considered as part of management in pT3 LACC.

A Review on the Special Radiotherapy Techniques of Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer is one of the commonest cancers worldwide. Radiotherapy has been established as an indispensable component of treatment. Although conventional radiotherapy provides good local control, radiotherapy treatment side-effects, local recurrence and distant metastasis remain to be the concerns. With the recent technological advancements, various special radiotherapy treatment options have been offered. This review article discusses the recently-developed special radiotherapy treatment modalities for various conditions of colorectal cancer ranging from early stage, locally advanced stage, recurrent, and metastatic diseases. The discussion focuses on the areas of feasibility, local control, and survival benefits of the treatment modalities. This review also provides accounts of the future direction in radiotherapy of colorectal cancer with emphasis on the coming era of personalized radiotherapy.

Intraoperative radiation therapy for rectal cancer and recurrent intra-abdominal sarcomas

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of high-dose-rate intraoperative radiation therapy (HDR-IORT) in a multimodality treatment on the local control (LC) and the overall survival (OS) rate in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) and recurrent intra-abdominal sarcomas (RS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 27 patients who were treated with radical resection and HDR-IORT between April 2007 and January 2017. Patient, tumor and surgical characteristics were analyzed and the perioperative (<30 days) and long-term complications (>30 days) were assessed and graded.

RESULTS

None of the patients with LARC (n = 4) developed a local recurrence and all patients were still alive at the end of the follow-up. The LC rates of LRRC (n = 17) after one and three years were respectively 48% and 40% and the one, three and five years OS were respectively 93%, 62% and 44%. For RS (n = 6), the LC rates after one and three years were both 33% and the one and three years OS rate were respectively 83% and 46%.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our study show that HDR-IORT could be a valuable asset in the multimodality management of LARC, LRRC and RS.

Down-Regulated LncRNA-HOTAIR Suppressed Colorectal Cancer Cell Proliferation, Invasion, and Migration by Mediating p21

BACKGROUND AND AIM

HOX transcript antisense intergenic RNA (HOTAIR) is a relatively well-understood RNA, which plays a central role in the pathogenesis of various tumors. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect by which HOTAIR acts to influence the biological processes of colorectal cancer (CRC) through p21.

METHODS

Reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction and Western blot methods were employed to provide verification regarding the changes in HOTAIR, PCNA, Ki67, p21, cyclin E, and CDK2 among the CRC tissues and cells. The correlation between the clinicopathological characteristics of patients and expression of HOTAIR and p21 was subsequently evaluated, followed by an analysis into the effects of HOTAIR on the biological processes of M5 cells.

RESULTS

HOTAIR was found to be expressed at high levels, while p21 was determined to be at a low level among both the CRC tissues and the CRC cell lines. The expressions of HOTAIR and p21 were determined to be related to lymph node metastasis, tumor node metastasis, Dukes staging, distant metastases, histological types, and the degree of differentiation. Cells transfected with HOTAIR siRNA displayed inhibited rates of proliferation, invasion, and migration, as well as decreased cyclin E and CDK2, while apoptosis and p21 were increased.

CONCLUSION

The principal findings demonstrated that down-regulation of HOTAIR elicits an inhibitory effect on proliferation, invasion, and migration, while promoting the apoptosis of CRC cells through the up-regulation of p21. We believe that HOTAIR could represent a novel target for the treatment of CRC.

Intraoperative implantation of a mesh of directional palladium sources (CivaSheet): Dosimetry verification, clinical commissioning, dose specification, and preliminary experience

PURPOSE

To present the clinical commissioning of a novel ¹⁰³Pd directional brachytherapy device (CivaSheet) for intraoperative radiation therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Clinical commissioning for the CivaSheet consisted of establishing: (1) source strength calibration capabilities, (2) experimental verification of TG-43 dosimetry parameters, (3) treatment planning system validation, and (4) departmental practice for dose specification and source ordering. Experimental verification was performed in water with radiochromic film calibrated with a 37 kVp X-ray beam. Percentage difference ([measurements - calculation]/calculation) and distance to agreement (difference between film-to-source distance and distance that minimized the percentage difference) were calculated. Nomogram values (in U/100 Gy) for all configurations (up to 20 × 20 sources) were calculated for source ordering. Clinical commissioning was used on patients enrolled in an ongoing Institutional Review Board-approved protocol.

RESULTS

A source calibration procedure was established, and the treatment planning system was commissioned within standard clinical uncertainties. Percentage dose differences (distances to agreement) between measured and calculated doses were 8.6% (-0.12 mm), 0.6% (-0.01 mm), -6.4% (0.22 mm), and -10.0% (0.44 mm) at depths of 2.3, 5.1, 8.0, and 11.1 mm, respectively. All differences were within the experimental uncertainties. Nomogram values depended on sheet size and spatial extent. A value of 2.4U/100 Gy per CivaDot was found to satisfy most cases, ranging from 2.3 to 3.3U/100 Gy. Nomogram results depended on elongation of the treatment area with a higher variation observed for smaller treatment areas. Postimplantation dose evaluation was feasible.

CONCLUSIONS

Commissioning and clinical deployment of CivaSheet was feasible using BrachyVision for postoperative dose evaluation. Experimental verification confirmed that the available TG-43 dosimetry parameters are accurate for clinical use.

Correlations of ICAM-1 gene polymorphisms with susceptibility and multidrug resistance in colorectal cancer in a Chinese population

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a malignant gastrointestinal tumor with a high mortality rate, including both colon and rectal cancer. In order to provide clinical guidance for the treatment of CRC, this study is conducted to investigate the correlations of intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) gene polymorphisms with susceptibility and multidrug resistance (MDR) of colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

A total of 195 patients with CRC were selected as the observation group and 188 healthy people enrolled as the control group. Polymerase chain reaction restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) was used to test ICAM-1 A13848G and K469E polymorphisms. The expressions of MDR-associated protein topoisomerase II (Topo II) and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) in CRC tissues were detected by immunohistochemistry. The analysis on association of clinical indexes of CRC patients with ICAM-1 gene polymorphisms was performed.

RESULTS

The frequencies of KK genotype and K allele of K469E in the observation group were significantly higher than that in the control group. KE + EE genotype and E allele might be protective factors for CRC. The distribution of genotypes, K469E KK and KE+EE, was highly correlated with histologic grade of tumor differentiation. Compared with adjacent normal tissues, positive rates of Topo II and P-gp expression were significantly increased in CRC tissues. Topo II expression in CRC patients was positively associated with lymph node metastasis and depth of tumor invasion, whereas P-gp expression was only associated with depth of tumor invasion. Higher positive rates of Topo II and P-gp expression were observed in ICAM-1 K469E KK genotype carriers, indicating that ICAM-1 K469E KK genotype might be related to MDR in CRC.

CONCLUSION

These findings in the current study suggested that ICAM-1 K469E polymorphism is highly correlated with susceptibility and MDR in CRC.

Intraoperative radiotherapy: review of techniques and results

Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) is a technique that involves precise delivery of a large dose of ionising radiation to the tumour or tumour bed during surgery. Direct visualisation of the tumour bed and ability to space out the normal tissues from the tumour bed allows maximisation of the dose to the tumour while minimising the dose to normal tissues. This results in an improved therapeutic ratio with IORT. Although it was introduced in the 1960s, it has seen a resurgence of popularity with the introduction of self-shielding mobile linear accelerators and low-kV IORT devices, which by eliminating the logistical issues of transport of the patient during surgery for radiotherapy or building a shielded operating room, has enabled its wider use in the community.

Electrons, low-kV X-rays and HDR brachytherapy are all different methods of IORT in current clinical use. Each method has its own unique set of advantages and disadvantages, its own set of indications where one may be better suited than the other, and each requires a specific kind of expertise.

IORT has demonstrated its efficacy in a wide variety of intra-abdominal tumours, recurrent colorectal cancers, recurrent gynaecological cancers, and soft-tissue tumours. Recently, it has emerged as an attractive treatment option for selected, early-stage breast cancer, owing to the ability to complete the entire course of radiotherapy during surgery. IORT has been used in a multitude of roles across these sites, for dose escalation (retroperitoneal sarcoma), EBRT dose de-escalation (paediatric tumours), as sole radiation modality (early breast cancers) and as a re-irradiation modality (recurrent rectal and gynaecological cancers).

This article aims to provide a review of the rationale, techniques, and outcomes for IORT across different sites relevant to current clinical practice.

Standard fractionation external beam radiotherapy with and without intraoperative radiotherapy for locally recurrent rectal cancer: the role of local therapy in patients with a high competing risk of death from distant disease

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of utilizing radiotherapy (RT) with standard fractionation, with or without intraoperative RT (IORT), to treat locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC).

METHODS

Retrospective review of 25 patients with LRRC treated with standard fractionation RT from 2005 to 2011. 15 patients (60%) had prior pelvic RT and 10 (40%) had synchronous metastases. The median equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions was 30 and 49.6 Gy in patients with and without prior RT, respectively. 23 patients (92%) received concurrent chemotherapy and 16 (64%) underwent surgical resection. Eight patients (33.3%, four with and four without prior RT) received IORT. A competing risks model was developed to estimate the cumulative incidence of local failure with death treated as a competing event.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 36.9 months after the date of local recurrence. 3-year rates of overall survival (OS), local control (LC) and death with LC were 51.6%, 73.3% and 69.2%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, surgical resection was significantly predictive of improved OS (p < 0.05). If surgical resection were removed from the multivariable model, given the collinearity between IORT delivery and surgical resection, then IORT also became a significant predictor of OS (p < 0.05). Systemic disease at the time of local recurrence was not associated with either LC or OS. No patient had grade ≥3 acute or late toxicity.

CONCLUSION

RT with standard fractionation is safe and effective in the treatment of patients with LRRC, even in patients with significant risk of systemic disease and/or history of prior RT. Advances in knowledge: The utility of RT with standard fractionation, generally with chemotherapy, in the treatment of LRRC is demonstrated. In this high-risk cohort of patients with a 40% incidence of synchronous metastatic disease, surgical resection of the recurrence was the major predictor of OS, though a benefit to IORT was also suggested. No patients had grade ≥3 acute or late toxicity, though 40% had undergone prior RT, underscoring the tolerability of standard fractionation RT in this setting.

Intraoperative radiation therapy for colon and rectal cancers: a clinical review

Although there have been significant advances in the adjuvant therapy of colorectal cancer, results for patients have historically been poor when complete resection is unlikely or not possible. Similarly, locally recurrent colorectal cancer patients often experience significant tumor related morbidity and disease control and long term survival have historically been poor with standard therapies. Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) has been proposed as a possible tool for dose escalation in patients with locally advanced colorectal cancer.

For patients with locally advanced primary or recurrent colon cancer, the absence of prospective controlled trials limits the ability to draw definitive conclusions in completely resected patients. In subtotally resected patients, the available evidence is consistent with marked improvements in disease control and survival compared to historical controls. For patients with locally advanced primary or recurrent rectal cancer, a relatively large body of evidence suggests improved disease control and survival, especially in subtotally resected patients, with the addition of IORT to moderate dose external beam radiation (EBRT) and chemotherapy. The most important prognostic factor in nearly all series is the completeness of surgical resection. Many previously irradiated patients may be carefully re-treated with radiation and IORT in addition to chemotherapy resulting in long term survival in more than 25% of patients. Peripheral nerve is dose limiting for IORT and patients receiving 15 Gy or more are at higher risk.

IORT is a useful tool when dose escalation beyond EBRT tolerance limits is required for acceptable local control in patients with locally advanced primary or recurrent colorectal cancer. Previously irradiated patients should not be excluded from treatment consideration.

Clinical outcome of interstitial pulsed dose rate brachytherapy in multimodality treatment of locally advanced primary or recurrent rectal and sigmoid cancer with high risk of incomplete microscopic resection

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the role of interstitial pulsed dose rate brachytherapy (PDR-BT) in multimodality treatment of locally advanced primary or recurrent rectal and sigmoid cancer with high risk of microscopic incomplete resection (R1).

METHODS AND MATERIAL

A total of 73 consecutive patients (recurrent/primary: 40/33) were treated with PDR-BT between 2001 and 2010. Patients received preoperative external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and concomitant chemotherapy. Following resection of the tumor and the involved pelvic organs, a median of four (3-8) catheters were sutured to the tumor bed with a distance of approximately 1 cm between the catheters. A target respecting the catheters with a margin of 5 mm was contoured on computed tomography (CT) and three-dimensional (3D) dose planning with a planning aim for BT of D90 > 30 Gy, (0.6 Gy/pulse, 1 pulse/h) was performed. Previously irradiated patients (27%) underwent surgery that was directly followed by PDR-BT. Postoperative EBRT was then applied to the tumor bed 3-5 weeks after PDR-BT.

RESULTS

A total of 23 patients (31%) received a radical resection (R0) and 45 patients (62%) received an R1 resection. Five patients (7%) received a macroscopic incomplete resection (R2). The five-year overall survival was 33%. Local control at five years was 67% for patients who received a R0 resection and 32% for patients who received an R1 resection. The five-year actuarial risk of a grade 3-4 BT-related complication was 5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Meaningful disease control and survival can be obtained at an acceptable rate of late morbidity in selected patients with locally advanced primary and recurrent rectal or sigmoid cancer using (chemo) RT, extensive surgery and PDR-BT when a high risk of an R1 resection is expected.

Surgery for Locally Advanced T4 Rectal Cancer: Strategies and Techniques

Locally advanced T4 rectal cancer represents a complex clinical condition that requires a well thought-out treatment plan and expertise from multiple specialists. Paramount in the management of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer are accurate preoperative staging, appropriate application of neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments, and, above all, the provision of high-quality, complete surgical resection in potentially curable cases. Despite the advanced nature of this disease, extended and multivisceral resections with clear margins have been shown to result in good oncological outcomes and offer patients a real chance of cure. In this article, we describe the assessment, classification, and multimodality treatment of primary locally advanced T4 rectal cancer, with a focus on surgical planning, approaches, and outcomes.

Intraoperative radiotherapy with low energy photons in recurrent colorectal cancer: a single centre retrospective study

AIM OF THE STUDY

Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) may improve outcome of surgical treatment of recurrent colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of this study is to determine the feasibility, safety and long-term results of surgical treatment of recurrent CRC with orthovolt IORT.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fifty-nine consecutive CRC patients with local recurrence (LR), undergoing surgery, were included in the retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. The modified Wanebo classification was used to stage LR (Tr). Twenty-five (43%) patients received IORT using INTRABEAM(®) PRS 500. The complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.

RESULTS

There were 32 males and 27 females, with a median age of 63 years. Multi-visceral resections were performed in 37 (63%) patients. Median hospitalization time after surgery with IORT was 7 days. One (1.7%) in-hospital postoperative death was reported. Grade 3/4 postoperative complications were found in 11 (19%) patients. Intraoperative radiotherapy had no effect on the postoperative hospitalization time, morbidity and mortality. Median survival after R0 resection was 32 months. Complete resection (R0), no synchronous liver metastases (M0), and no lateral and posterior pelvic wall involvement, were significant predictors of improved survival. Stage of LR was found to be an independent prognostic factor in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.03); Cox regression model). In patients with LR stage < Tr5, a 3-year overall survival (OS) rate was 52%.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination of surgical resection and orthovolt IORT is a safe and feasible procedure that does not increase the risk of postoperative complications or prolongs the hospital stay. Despite aggressive surgery supported by IORT, the advanced stage of LR is a limiting factor of long-term survival.

Irradiation of Very Locally Advanced and Recurrent Rectal Cancer

Adjuvant therapy with chemoradiation or short-course radiation in addition to improvements in surgical technique has led to improved outcomes for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Local recurrence rates of less than 10% and 5-year survival rate of 60% or higher is expected. However, for patients with very locally advanced primary or locally recurrent disease in whom surgical resection is likely to be associated with incomplete resection, survival and disease control rates are poor and standard doses of adjuvant radiation or chemoradiation are relatively ineffective. Dose-escalation approaches with intraoperative radiation (IORT) have been explored in both the primary and recurrent setting. Although high-level evidence is lacking, available data suggest improvements in local and distant control leading to improved survival with IORT approaches. This review summarizes the evidence for dose-escalation approaches with IORT for patients with very locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer.

Techniques and Outcome of Surgery for Locally Advanced and Local Recurrent Rectal Cancer

Locally advanced primary rectal cancer is variably defined, but generally refers to T3 and T4 tumours. Radical surgery is the mainstay of treatment for these tumours but there is a high-risk for local recurrence. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2011) guidelines recommend that patients with these tumours be considered for preoperative chemoradiotherapy and this is the starting point for any discussion, as it is standard care. However, there are many refinements of this pathway and these are the subject of this overview. In surgical terms, there are two broad settings: (i) patients with tumours contained within the mesorectal envelope, or in the lower rectum, limited to invading the sphincter muscles (namely some T2 and most T3 tumours); and (ii) patients with tumours directly invading or adherent to pelvic organs or structures, mainly T4 tumours - here referred to as primary rectal cancer beyond total mesorectal excision (PRC-bTME). Major surgical resection using the principles of TME is the mainstay of treatment for the former. Where anal sphincter sacrifice is indicated for low rectal cancers, variations of abdominoperineal resection - referred to as tailored excision - including the extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE), are required. There is debate whether or not plastic reconstruction or mesh repair is required after these surgical procedures. To achieve cure in PRC-bTME tumours, most patients require extended multivisceral exenterative surgery, carried out within specialist multidisciplinary centres. The surgical principles governing the treatment of recurrent rectal cancer (RRC) parallel those for PRC-bTME, but typically only half of these patients are suitable for this type of major surgery. Peri-operative morbidity and mortality are considerable after surgery for PRC-bTME and RRC, but unacceptable levels of variation in clinical practice and outcome exist globally. To address this, there are now major efforts to standardise terminology and classifications, to allow appropriate comparisons in future studies.

Long-Term Survival After High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy for Locally Advanced or Recurrent Colorectal Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

We evaluated outcomes of intraoperative radiotherapy delivered with focal high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy [intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT)] in the management of locally recurrent (LR) and locally advanced (LA) primary T4 colorectal carcinoma (CRC). LR CRC or LA primary disease is a clinical challenge due to the difficulty in obtaining negative margins after radical surgery and the high risk of subsequent recurrence. Few data exist on long-term outcomes of patients treated with surgery and HDR-IORT for LR or LA primary CRC.

METHODS

Three hundred CRC patients underwent HDR-IORT to the pelvis with gross surgical resection during November 1992-December 2007. Median follow-up for surviving patients was 53 (range 5-216) months. Eighty-eight patients (29 %) were treated for LA primary and 212 (71 %) LR disease. HDR-IORT was delivered using an iridium-192 remote afterloader and a Harrison-Anderson-Mick applicator. Median IORT dose was 1,500 (range 1,000-2,000) cGy.

RESULTS

Five-year overall survival probability was 49 %. Positive margin status was associated with inferior overall survival and disease-free survival. Competing-risks analysis for time to local failure and distant metastases identified a 5-year cumulative incidence of local failure and distant metastases of 33 and 47 %, respectively. Five-year cumulative incidence of local failure was 22 % for the LA group and 38 % in the LR group. Five-year probability of disease-free survival was 48 and 31 % for LA and LR patients, respectively, and 5-year probability of overall survival was 56 and 45 % for LA and LR patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

HDR-IORT combined with resection results in encouraging local control rates with acceptable toxicity for patients with locally aggressive CRC.

Present status and future directions of intraoperative radiotherapy

In this Review, we summarise recent published work on the use of intraoperative radiotherapy to treat common tumour sites in the primary or recurrent setting. Techniques, radiobiology, and the physics of intraoperative radiotherapy are also explored. Disease sites discussed in this Review include head and neck cancer, breast cancer, sarcoma, gastrointestinal cancer, genitourinary cancer, gynaecological cancer, thoracic cancer, and palliative applications.

Consensus statement on the multidisciplinary management of patients with recurrent and primary rectal cancer beyond total mesorectal excision planes

BACKGROUND

The management of primary rectal cancer beyond total mesorectal excision planes (PRC-bTME) and recurrent rectal cancer (RRC) is challenging. There is global variation in standards and no guidelines exist. To achieve cure most patients require extended, multivisceral, exenterative surgery, beyond conventional total mesorectal excision planes. The aim of the Beyond TME Group was to achieve consensus on the definitions and principles of management, and to identify areas of research priority.

METHODS

Delphi methodology was used to achieve consensus. The Group consisted of invited experts from surgery, radiology, oncology and pathology. The process included two international dedicated discussion conferences, formal feedback, three rounds of editing and two rounds of anonymized web-based voting. Consensus was achieved with more than 80 per cent agreement; less than 80 per cent agreement indicated low consensus. During conferences held in September 2011 and March 2012, open discussion took place on areas in which there is a low level of consensus.

RESULTS

The final consensus document included 51 voted statements, making recommendations on ten key areas of PRC-bTME and RRC. Consensus agreement was achieved on the recommendations of 49 statements, with 34 achieving consensus in over 95 per cent. The lowest level of consensus obtained was 76 per cent. There was clear identification of the need for referral to a specialist multidisciplinary team for diagnosis, assessment and further management.

CONCLUSION

The consensus process has provided guidance for the management of patients with PRC-bTME or RRC, taking into account global variations in surgical techniques and technology. It has further identified areas of research priority.

Intraoperative Electron Radiation Therapy (IOERT) in the management of locally recurrent rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

To evaluate disease control, overall survival and prognostic factors in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer after IOERT-containing multimodal therapy.

METHODS

Between 1991 and 2006, 97 patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer have been treated with surgery and IOERT. IOERT was preceded or followed by external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in 54 previously untreated patients (median dose 41.4 Gy) usually combined with 5-Fluouracil-based chemotherapy (89%). IOERT was delivered via cylindric cones with doses of 10-20 Gy. Adjuvant CHT was given only in a minority of patients (34%). Median follow-up was 51 months.

RESULTS

Margin status was R0 in 37%, R1 in 33% and R2 in 30% of the patients. Neoadjuvant EBRT resulted in significantly increased rates of free margins (52% vs. 24%). Median overall survival was 39 months. Estimated 5-year rates for central control (inside the IOERT area), local control (inside the pelvis), distant control and overall survival were 54%, 41%, 40% and 30%. Resection margin was the strongest prognostic factor for overall survival (3-year OS of 80% (R0), 37% (R1), 35% (R2)) and LC (3-year LC 82% (R0), 41% (R1), 18% (R2)) in the multivariate model. OS was further significantly affected by clinical stage at first diagnosis and achievement of local control after treatment in the univariate model. Distant failures were found in 46 patients, predominantly in the lung. 90-day postoperative mortality was 3.1%.

CONCLUSION

Long term OS and LC can be achieved in a substantial proportion of patients with recurrent rectal cancer using a multimodality IOERT-containing approach, especially in case of clear margins. LC and OS remain limited in patients with incomplete resection. Preoperative re-irradiation and adjuvant chemotherapy may be considered to improve outcome.

Meta-analysis of survival based on resection margin status following surgery for recurrent rectal cancer

AIM

To determine the presence and duration of survival advantages was investigated for resection margin status (R0, R1 or R2) following surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC).

METHOD

A systematic review of the literature was performed for studies comparing resection margin status for LRRC. Weighted mean differences and meta-analysis of hazard ratios were used as a measure of median and overall cumulative survival.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies were included, providing outcome for 1460 patients undergoing surgery for LRRC. 57% underwent an R0 resection, 25% an R1 resection and 11% an R2 resection. The most commonly performed operations were abdominoperineal excision (35%), exenteration (23%) and anterior resection (21%). The range of median survival per resection margin was R0 28-92 months, R1 12-50 months, R2 6-17 months. Patients undergoing an R0 resection survived on average for 37.6 (95% confidence interval: 23.5-51.7) months longer than those undergoing R1 resection and 53.0 (31.2-74.8) months longer than those undergoing R2 resection. This correlated to a hazard ratio of 2.03 (1.73-2.38) for R0 vs R1 and 3.41 (2.21-5.25) for R0 vs R2. Patients undergoing R1 resection survived on average 13.3 (7.23-19.4) months longer than those undergoing R2 resection [hazard ratio of 1.68 (1.33-2.12)].

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing R0 resection have the greatest survival advantage following surgery for recurrent rectal cancer. There is a survival advantage for R1 over R2 resection, but there may be no benefit of R2 resection over palliative treatment.

Intraoperative pelvic brachytherapy for treatment of locally advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and morbidity of intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) for advanced colorectal cancer.

METHODS

All patients undergoing IORT for locally advanced rectal cancer from 2001-2009 were reviewed for cancer recurrence, survival, and procedure-related morbidity. Cumulative event rates were estimated using the method of Kaplan and Meier.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients with locally advanced (n = 8) or recurrent (n = 21) rectal cancers were treated with IORT and resection. Surgical interventions included low anterior resection, abdominoperineal resection, pelvic exenteration, and a variety of non-anatomic resections of pelvic recurrences. R(0) resections were achieved in 16 patients, while R(1) resections were achieved in 10, and margins were grossly positive in 3 patients. IORT was delivered to all patients over a median area of 48 (42-72) cm(2) at a median dose of 12 (12-15) Gy. Local and overall recurrence rates were 24 % (locally advanced group) and 45 % (recurrent group). Median disease-free and overall survival were 25 and 40 months respectively at a median follow-up of 26 (18-42) months. The short-term (≤30 days) complication rate was 45 %. Eight patients developed local wound complications, 5 of which required operative intervention. Four patients developed intra-abdominal abscesses requiring drainage. Long-term (>30 days) complications were identified in 11 patients (38 %) and included long-term wound complications (n = 3), ureteral obstruction requiring stenting (n = 1), neurogenic bladder (n = 3), enteric fistulae (n = 2), small bowel obstruction (n = 1), and neuropathic pain (n = 1).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative brachytherapy is a viable IORT option during pelvic surgery for locally advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer but is associated with high postoperative morbidity. Whether intraoperative brachytherapy can improve local recurrence rates for locally advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer will require further prospective investigation.

Orthovoltage intraoperative radiotherapy for locally advanced and recurrent colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Locally advanced and recurrent colorectal cancers pose a significant therapeutic challenge. Orthovoltage intraoperative radiotherapy provides one potential means of improving disease control at the time of surgery.

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to analyze outcomes and identify prognostic factors of patients treated with orthovoltage intraoperative radiotherapy for locally advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer.

DESIGN AND SETTING

This study is a retrospective chart review conducted at a tertiary medical center.

PATIENTS

Between January 1990 and July 2009, 55 patients underwent intraoperative radiotherapy to a total of 61 sites for locally advanced (n = 14) or recurrent (n = 41) cancers of colon (n = 18) or rectum/rectosigmoid junction (n = 37).

INTERVENTIONS

Median dose was 12 Gy (range, 7.5-20 Gy). Among locally advanced rectal/rectosigmoid cases, surgery included abdominoperineal resection (n = 3) or low anterior resection (n = 9). Seven treated sites had gross residual (R2) disease, 28 had pathologic or clinical microscopic residual disease (R1), and 15 were complete resections (R0). Treated sites included sacrum (n = 22), anterior pelvis/pelvic sidewall (19), sacrum and sidewall (n = 1), aortic bifurcation (n = 2), vaginal cuff (n = 2), psoas (n = 3), perivesicular region (n = 2), and other (n = 10).

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES

Outcomes measures included in-field local control, locoregional control, overall survival, and grade ≥3 toxicity.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 27 months (range, 4-237) among living patients, 2-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of in-field local control, locoregional control, and overall survival were 69%, 51%, and 59%. Margin status predicted for improved locoregional control (p = 0.01) and overall survival (p = 0.01). Seventeen patients (31%) developed a grade 3 to 5 toxicity following surgery with intraoperative radiotherapy.

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited by its retrospective nature and relatively small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

Local control with intraoperative radiotherapy for locally advanced and recurrent colorectal cancers is good despite the high risk of residual disease. Among carefully selected patients, multimodality regimens including intraoperative radiotherapy may permit long-term survival.

Surgery and high-dose-rate intraoperative radiation therapy for recurrent squamous-cell carcinoma of the anal canal

BACKGROUND

Locoregionally recurrent squamous-cell carcinoma of the anal canal is managed with salvage surgery. High-dose-rate intraoperative radiation therapy has been used in selected patients with this disease to reduce the risk of local recurrence.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this article is to present our institutional experience with this technique.

DESIGN

Medical records of 14 patients with locoregionally recurrent squamous-cell carcinoma of the anal canal who underwent this technique between 1992 and 2007 were reviewed.

SETTING

The study was conducted at an academic cancer center.

PATIENTS

The median age was 45 years (range, 36-77), and 13 of the patients were women. All had prior radiation with or without chemotherapy.

INTERVENTIONS

The surgical procedures included abdominoperineal resection with or without sacrectomy (n = 8), low anterior resection (n = 2), and pelvic exenteration (n = 4). The median radiation dose was 1500 cGy (range, 1500-1750). All cases of radiographic invasion of adjacent structures correctly predicted pathologic invasion. There was pathologic invasion into adjacent structures in 11 cases (79%), and adherence to the sacrum without invasion in 2 cases (14%). Surgical margins were positive (n = 6), close (<1 mm) (n = 3), and negative (n = 5).

RESULTS

The median follow-up from our technique was 17 months (range, 5-145). Subsequent recurrence occurred in 11 cases, at a median of 8 months from treatment. Two-year actuarial control was 7.1%, and the overall survival was 21.4%. Acute toxicities included wound-healing complications (n = 6); gastrointestinal obstruction (n = 5); neurogenic bladder (n = 1); ureteral stricture (n = 3); and peripheral neuropathy (n = 2).

LIMITATIONS

This is a small retrospective series in which the meaningful analysis of associations between clinical variables and outcomes was not possible.

CONCLUSION

Salvage surgery with high-dose-rate intraoperative radiation therapy did not appear to be associated with a locoregional control or survival benefit in this series. The addition of high-dose-rate intraoperative radiation therapy to salvage surgery is insufficient to compensate for positive surgical margins. Preoperative imaging should be used to aid in patient selection to identify those patients in whom negative margins can be obtained and to aid in the determination of appropriate salvage surgery.

Clinical algorithms for the surgical management of locally recurrent rectal cancer

PURPOSE

Advances in surgical practice have helped expand the options for patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer through improvements in reconstructive options, management of operative complications, addition of intraoperative adjuvant therapies, and postoperative care. This review outlines the presentation and management of patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer, and it describes easy-to-apply clinical algorithms to aid management.

METHODS

The electronic literature was searched for studies reporting outcomes for locally recurrent rectal cancer limited to the English language.

RESULTS

Prospective and retrospective case series and single-center experiences were identified. A total of 106 articles were selected for full-text review of which 82 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. No randomized studies were identified. We found that multimodality treatment of locally recurrent rectal cancer can improve 5-year survival from 0% to over 40%, and selected patients may survive up to 10 years. A mixture of imaging modalities is used in patient selection for surgery. An R0 resection is consistently a favorable prognostic factor. R1 resection and surgery in the setting of oligometastases compare favorably with nonoperative palliation. Although mortality figures remain low, morbidity is significant and mostly wound related.

CONCLUSIONS

Improvements in radiological imaging modalities and technical improvements in surgical and reconstructive options have facilitated more accurate staging, better selection of patients for surgery, reduced morbidity and mortality, and higher R0 resections. Optimal management is in specialist units with a multidisciplinary approach with the use of multimodal therapy.

Management of locally advanced primary and recurrent rectal cancer

Treatment for patients with locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer differs significantly from patients with rectal cancer restricted to the mesorectum. Adequate preoperative imaging of the pelvis is therefore important to identify those patients who are candidates for multimodality treatment, including preoperative chemoradiation protocols, intraoperative radiotherapy, and extended surgical resections. Much effort should be made to select patients with these advanced tumors for treatment in specialized referral centers. This has been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality and improve long-term survival rates. In this article, we review the best treatment options for patients with locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer. We also emphasize the necessity of a multidisciplinary team, including a radiologist, radiation oncologist, urologist, surgical oncologist, plastic surgeon, and gynecologist in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with these pelvic tumors.

Surgical management of locally advanced and locally recurrent colon cancer

Locally advanced and locally recurrent colon cancers pose a surgical challenge with tumors extending into surrounding structures and organs. Anticipation of the need for an extended surgical resection, often with multivisceral en bloc organ removal, is critical for surgical planning. For both primary and recurrent tumors, postsurgical long-term survival is achievable but only after complete resection. The role of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy continues to be redefined in this era of biologic chemotherapeutics, and multimodality therapy holds promise in aiding resection and improving postsalvage survival.

Combined modality therapy including intraoperative electron irradiation for locally recurrent colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate survival, relapse patterns, and prognostic factors in patients with colorectal cancer relapse treated with curative-intent therapy, including intraoperative electron radiation therapy (IOERT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From April 1981 through January 2008, 607 patients with recurrent colorectal cancer received IOERT as a component of treatment. IOERT was preceded or followed by external radiation (median dose, 45.5 Gy) in 583 patients (96%). Resection was classified as R0 in 227 (37%), R1 in 224 (37%), and R2 in 156 (26%). The median IOERT dose was 15 Gy (range, 7.5-30 Gy).

RESULTS

Median overall survival was 36 months. Five- and 10-year survival rates were 30% and 16%, respectively. Survival estimates at 5 years were 46%, 27%, and 16% for R0, R1, and R2 resection, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that R0 resection, no prior chemotherapy, and more recent treatment (in the second half of the series) were associated with improved survival. The 3-year cumulative incidence of central, local, and distant relapse was 12%, 23%, and 49%, respectively. Central and local relapse were more common in previously irradiated patients and in those with subtotal resection. Toxicity Grade 3 or higher partially attributable to IOERT was observed in 66 patients (11%). Neuropathy was observed in 94 patients (15%) and was more common with IOERT doses exceeding 12.5 Gy.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term survival and disease control was achievable in patients with locally recurrent colorectal cancer. Continued evaluation of curative-intent, combined-modality therapy that includes IOERT is warranted in this high-risk population.

Management of recurrent rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Here we present a concise review on the evaluation and management of locally recurrent rectal cancer, which despite marked reductions in the rate of recurrent rectal cancer remains an important problem.

METHODS

This educational review discusses the diagnosis, evaluation, and management of recurrent rectal cancer.

RESULTS

Despite improvements in both the neoadjuvant and surgical management of rectal cancer, local recurrence is still an important problem, with documented recurrence rates of 4% to 8%. The local management of recurrence requires a team of specialist. Accurate detection and diagnosis followed by chemoradiotherapy and surgical resection may result in 5-year survival rates of up to 35%.

CONCLUSIONS

We discuss the diagnosis, evaluation, and management of locally recurrent rectal cancer. Locally recurrent rectal cancer can be successfully managed with multimodal therapy leading to successful palliation and often cure.

The potential of proton beam radiation therapy in gastrointestinal cancer

A group of Swedish oncologists and hospital physicists have estimated the number of patients in Sweden suitable for proton beam therapy. The estimations have been based on current statistics of tumour incidence, number of patients potentially eligible for radiation treatment, scientific support from clinical trials and model dose planning studies and knowledge of the dose-response relations of different tumours and normal tissues. In gastrointestinal cancers, it is assessed that at least 345 patients, mainly non-resectable rectal cancers, oesophageal and liver cancers, are eligible. Great uncertainties do however exist both in the number of patients with gastrointestinal cancers suitable for radiation therapy, and in the proportion of those where proton beams may give sufficiently better results.

The role of intraoperative radiotherapy in solid tumors

BACKGROUND

Combined multimodality therapy is becoming standard treatment for many solid tumors, but the role of intraoperative radiotherapy in the management of solid tumors remains uncertain. The aim is to review the indication, application, and outcomes of intraoperative radiotherapy in the management of nongynecological solid tumors.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using Medline, Embase, Ovid, and Cochrane database for studies between 1965 and 2008 assessing intraoperative radiotherapy, using the keywords "intraoperative radiotherapy," "colorectal cancer," "breast cancer," "gastric cancer," "pancreatic cancer," "soft tissue tumor," and "surgery." Only publications in English with available abstracts and regarding adult humans were included, and the evidence was critically evaluated.

RESULTS

Our search retrieved 864 publications. After exclusion of nonclinical papers, duplicated papers and exclusion of brachytherapy papers, 77 papers were suitable to assess the current role of intraoperative radiotherapy. The clinical application and evidence base of intraoperative radiotherapy for each cancer is presented.

CONCLUSIONS

Current studies in all common cancers show an additional benefit in local recurrence rates when intraoperative radiotherapy is included in the multimodal treatment. However, intraoperative radiotherapy may not improve overall survival and has significant morbidity depending on the site of the tumor. Intraoperative radiotherapy does have a role in the multidisciplinary management of solid tumors, but further studies are required to more precisely determine the extent of benefit.

Perineal healing and survival after anal cancer salvage surgery: 10-year experience with primary perineal reconstruction using the vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flap

Salvage surgery of recurrent or persistent anal cancer following radiotherapy is often followed by perineal wound complications. We examined survival and perineal wound complications in anal cancer salvage surgery during a 10-year period with primary perineal reconstruction predominantly performed using vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flap. Between 1997 and 2006, 49 patients underwent anal cancer salvage surgery. Of these, 48 had primary reconstruction with VRAM. Overall survival was computed by the Kaplan-Meier method and mortality rate ratios (MRRs) by Cox regression. One patient (2%) died within 30 days postoperatively. Postoperative complications necessitated reoperation in eight (16%) patients. We found no major perineal wound infections. Major perineal wound breakdown occurred in the only patient in whom VRAM was not used. Five-year survival was 61% [95% confidence interval (CI) 43-75%]. Free resection margins (R0) were obtained in 78% of patients, with 5-year survival of 75% (95% CI 53-87%). Involved margins, microscopically only (R1) or macroscopically (R2), strongly predicted an adverse outcome [age-adjusted 2-year MRRs (95% CI) R1 vs. R0 = 4.1 (0.7-23.6), R2 vs. R0 = 10.9 (2.2-54.2)]. We conclude that anal cancer salvage surgery can yield long-time survival but obtaining free margins is critical. A low rate of perineal complications is achievable by primary perineal reconstruction using VRAM flap.

Evidence and research in rectal cancer

The main evidences of epidemiology, diagnostic imaging, pathology, surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy and follow-up are reviewed to optimize the routine treatment of rectal cancer according to a multidisciplinary approach. This paper reports on the knowledge shared between different specialists involved in the design and management of the multidisciplinary ESTRO Teaching Course on Rectal Cancer. The scenario of ongoing research is also addressed. In this time of changing treatments, it clearly appears that a common standard for large heterogeneous patient groups have to be substituted by more individualised therapies based on clinical-pathological features and very soon on molecular and genetic markers. Only trained multidisciplinary teams can face this new challenge and tailor the treatments according to the best scientific evidence for each patient.

Prognostic Factors Affecting Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer and Clinical Significance of Hemoglobin

PURPOSE

To investigate potential prognostic factors, including hemoglobin levels before and during radiotherapy, for associations with survival and local control in patients with unirradiated locally recurrent rectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ten potential prognostic factors were investigated in 94 patients receiving radiotherapy for recurrent rectal cancer: age (<or=68 vs. >or=69 years), gender, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0-1 vs. 2-3), American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage (<or=II vs. III vs. IV), grading (G1-2 vs. G3), surgery, administration of chemotherapy, radiation dose (equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions: <or=50 vs. >50 Gy), and hemoglobin levels before (<12 vs. >or=12 g/dL) and during (majority of levels: <12 vs. >or=12 g/dL) radiotherapy. Multivariate analyses were performed, including hemoglobin levels, either before or during radiotherapy (not both) because these are confounding variables.

RESULTS

Improved survival was associated with better performance status (p<0.001), lower AJCC stage (p=0.023), surgery (p=0.011), chemotherapy (p=0.003), and hemoglobin levels>or=12 g/dL both before (p=0.031) and during (p<0.001) radiotherapy. On multivariate analyses, performance status, AJCC stage, and hemoglobin levels during radiotherapy maintained significance. Improved local control was associated with better performance status (p=0.040), lower AJCC stage (p=0.010), lower grading (p=0.012), surgery (p<0.001), chemotherapy (p<0.001), and hemoglobin levels>or=12 g/dL before (p<0.001) and during (p<0.001) radiotherapy. On multivariate analyses, chemotherapy, grading, and hemoglobin levels before and during radiotherapy remained significant. Subgroup analyses of the patients having surgery demonstrated the extent of resection to be significantly associated with local control (p=0.011) but not with survival (p=0.45).

CONCLUSION

Predictors for outcome in patients who received radiotherapy for locally recurrent rectal cancer were performance status, AJCC stage, chemotherapy, surgery, extent of resection, histologic grading, and hemoglobin levels both before and during radiotherapy.

Surgical management of rectal cancer

Rectal cancer affects more than 40,000 people in the United States annually. Despite recent advances in radiation and chemotherapy, surgical resection remains an integral part of curative therapy for this disease. Although rectal cancer is thought to be biologically similar to colon cancer, the anatomic complexity of the pelvis makes therapy for this disease considerably more complicated. Local recurrence is also a greater concern in rectal cancer than in colon cancer. The choice of surgical therapy depends on the location of the tumor, depth of rectal wall invasion, and clinical stage. Surgical options include local excision (transanal excision and transanal endoscopic microsurgery) and radical resection (low anterior resection, extended low anterior resection with coloanal anastomosis, abdominoperineal resection [APR], and pelvic exenteration). Technical advances such as transanal endoscopic microsurgery and laparoscopy also are changing the surgical approach to rectal tumors. Finally, chemotherapy and radiation are now frequently recommended in conjunction with surgical therapy. This article reviews the current surgical approach to treating patients with rectal cancer.

Salvage rectal surgery--overview

Recurrence of the disease represents the major problem in patients who undergo "curative" resection for rectal cancer, with published rate ranging from 3 to 50%. Most relapses occur within first two years of follow-up. Depending on the site of the recurrence, it can be local or distant. It also can be solitary or diffuse. In terms of potential surgical cure the best results are achieved with solitary, localized metastases. The most common sites of the solitary metastases are pelvis, liver and lung, with a fairly even distribution among these three sites. Other sites of the localized metastases can be peritoneum, lymph nodes, brain, bone, abdominal wall, ureter and kidney. These sites are less common, but not so amenable to resection. Local recurrence varies depending on the original type of surgery. It can be stated that surgical technique directly influences local recurrence rate in patients with rectal cancer. According to the results from a number of different authors 5-year survival rate after reresection is 2-13% of all patients with locally recurrent cancer, both alone and associated with distant metastases. The most important moment in this problem is to decide when not to operate. The absolute contraindications for salvage surgery are: "frozen pelvis", aneuploid tumors and those with mucinous component, clinical or CT evidence of invasion of the pelvic nerves, lymphatics or veins, or ureter bilaterally. Also, evidence of involvement of the lateral pelvic sidewalls and/or upper sacral marrow, and/or S2 is an absolute contraindication for surgery. Thus, main goals of this type of surgery are respectively: palliation of symptoms, a good quality of life and, if possible, cure with low treatment-related complication rates.