Early toxicity from preoperative radiotherapy with continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil for resectable adenocarcinoma of the rectum: a Phase II trial for the Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group

Efficacy and short-term outcomes of preoperative chemoradiotherapy with intermittent oral tegafur-uracil plus leucovorin in Japanese rectal cancer patients: a single center experience retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Various types of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) have been established for rectal cancer; thus, Physicians will need to refine the selection of appropriate preoperative CRT for different patients since there are various treatment regimens. Oral tegafur-uracil (UFT) plus leucovorin (LV) is commonly used to treat rectal cancer in Japan. Oral chemotherapy offers patients many potential advantages. Since 2008, we have been performing preoperative CRT with intermittent oral UFT plus LV in locally advanced rectal cancer patients to prevent postoperative local recurrence. Here, in a retrospective analysis, we evaluated the efficacy and short-term outcomes of preoperative CRT with intermittent oral UFT plus LV.

METHODS

We analyzed data from 62 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, including 31 patients who underwent preoperative CRT between 2009 and 2013 (the CRT group) and 31 patients who were treated with surgery alone between 2001 and 2008 (the non-CRT group). Clinicopathologically, both groups included patients with rectal cancer at clinical tumor stages III-IV or clinical node stages 0-III. In the CRT group, curative operations were performed ≥8 weeks after CRT. Patients were concomitantly treated with 2 cycles of oral UFT (300 mg/m²/day, days 1-14 and 29-42) plus LV (75 mg/day, days 1-14 and 29-42) and 45 Gy of radiotherapy. Chemotherapy was repeated every 28 days, followed by a 2-week break.

RESULTS

The completion rate of CRT was high at 94% (n = 29/31). The downstaging rate of CRT was 61% (n = 19/31). The pathological complete response rate was 6.5% (n = 2/31). Significant differences were observed in the 3-year local recurrence rate between the two groups (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative CRT with intermittent oral UFT plus LV appears to be a tolerable and effective treatment for Japanese patients with rectal cancer. A further investigation of a diversification of preoperative CRT for Japanese rectal cancer patients is required.

A phase II study of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with oxaliplatin and capecitabine for rectal cancer

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with the XELOX regimen in rectal cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-five patients with histopathologically confirmed and locally advanced rectal cancer (T3/T4 or N+) were enrolled in the study. Radiotherapy of 5000 cGy was delivered in 25 fractions of 200 cGy five times per week for a total of 5 weeks. During the first, second, fourth and fifth weeks of radiotherapy, the patients also received the following chemotherapy: 50 mg/m2 oxaliplatin on day one and 850 mg/m2 capecitabine bid for 5 days. Surgery was scheduled 5-6 weeks after the completion of the preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Four weeks after the surgery, four more cycles of chemotherapy were administered every 3 weeks. The postoperative chemotherapy consisted of 130 mg/m2 oxaliplatin on day 1 and 1000 mg/m2 capecitabine bid from day 1 to day 14. The end points were the downstage rate, R0 resection rate, and sphincter preservation rate.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients received the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The overall regression rate was 85%, with a Grade 3/4 regression rate of 30% and a pathological complete response rate of 12%. Among the 17 patients with lower rectal cancer, thirteen (76%) were originally indicated for abdominal-perineal resection (APR). However, after the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, the anus could be preserved in nine patients (53%). The most frequent toxicities of the chemoradiotherapy were diarrhea (64%) and hematological toxicity (60%), followed by nausea and vomiting (48%), urinary tract irritation (28%), and anal pain (24%). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were relatively infrequent and presented as diarrhea (12%), myelosuppression (8%), and elevated transaminase (4%). Six cases also experienced long-term anal exudates after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy using the XELOX regimen in rectal cancer patients obviously reduced the TNM staging and improved the pathological complete response rate. The therapy was well-tolerated and had mild adverse events and no serious perioperational complications.

A phase I study of bortezomib in combination with standard 5-fluorouracil and external-beam radiation therapy for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Standard therapy for stage II/III rectal cancer consists of a fluoropyrimidine and radiation therapy followed by surgery. Preclinical data demonstrated that bortezomib functions as a radiosensitizer in colorectal cancer models. The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of bortezomib in combination with chemotherapy and radiation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinomas, as staged by endoscopic ultrasound, were eligible. Bortezomib was administered on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 every 21 days for 2 cycles with 5-fluorouracil at 225 mg/m2/day continuously and 50.4 Gy of radiation. Dose escalation of bortezomib was conducted via a standard 3 + 3 dose escalation design. A subset of patients underwent serial tumor biopsies for correlative studies.

RESULTS

Nine patients in 2 dose cohorts were enrolled. Diarrhea was the principal dose-limiting toxicity and occurred at the 1.0-mg/m2 dose level. There was no clear evidence of suppression of nuclear factor-kappaB target gene expression in biopsy samples.

CONCLUSION

The MTD of bortezomib in combination with chemotherapy and radiation may be below a clinically relevant dose, limiting the clinical applicability of this combination. Performing biopsies before and during irradiation for determining gene expression in response to radiation therapy is feasible.

Postoperative complications following surgery for rectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review was designed to determine postoperative complication rates of radical surgery for rectal cancer (abdominal perineal resection and anterior resection).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Lack of accepted complication rates for rectal cancer surgery may hinder quality improvement efforts and may impede the conception of future studies because of uncertainty regarding the expected event rates.

METHODS

All prospective studies of rectal cancer receiving radical surgery published between 1990 and August 2008 were obtained by searching Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, as well as ASCO GI, CAGS, and ASCRS meeting abstracts between 2004 and 2008. There was no language restriction. The outcomes extracted were anastomotic leak, pelvic sepsis, postoperative death, wound infection, and fecal incontinence. Summary complication rates were obtained using a random effects model; the Z-test was used to test for study heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Fifty-three prospective cohort studies and 45 randomized controlled studies with 36,315 patients (24,845 patients had an anastomosis) were eligible for inclusion. Most of the studies found were based in continental Europe (58%), followed by Asia (25%), United Kingdom (10%), North America (5%), and Australia/New Zealand. The anastomotic leak rate, reported in 84 studies, was 11% (95% CI: 10, 12); the pelvic sepsis rate, in 29 studies, was 12% (9, 16); the postoperative death rate, in 75 studies, was 2% (2, 3); and the wound infection rate, in 50 studies, was 7% (5, 8). Fecal incontinence rates were reported in too few studies and so heterogeneously that numerical summarization was inappropriate. Year of publication, use of preoperative radiation, use of laparoscopy, and use of protecting stoma were not significant variables, but average age, median tumor height, and method of detection (clinical vs. radiologic) showed significance to explain heterogeneity in anastomotic leak rates. Year of publication, study origin, average age, and use of laparoscopy were significant, but median tumor height and preoperative radiation use were not significant in explaining heterogeneity among observed postoperative death rates. With multivariable analysis, only average age for anastomotic leak and year of publication for postoperative death remained significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Benchmark complication rates for radical rectal cancer surgery were obtained for use in sample size calculations in future studies and for quality control purposes. Postoperative death rates showed improvement in recent years.

Chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: an updated analysis of factors affecting pathological response

AIMS

With the aim of improving locoregional control, the use of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for rectal cancer has increased. A pathological complete response (pCR) is often used as a surrogate marker for the efficacy of different CRT schedules. By analysing factors affecting pCR, this analysis aims to guide the development of future trials.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Searches of Medline, EMBASE and the electronic American Society of Clinical Oncology abstract databases were carried out to identify prospective phase II and phase III trials using preoperative CRT to treat rectal cancer. Trials were eligible for inclusion if they defined: the CRT drugs, the radiation dose and the pCR rate. Phase I patients were excluded from the analysis. A multivariate analysis examined the effect of the above variables on the pCR rate and in addition the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the type of publication (peer reviewed vs abstract), the year of publication and whether the cancers were stated to be inoperable, fixed or threatening the circumferential resection margin were included. The method of analysis used was weighted linear modelling of the pCR rate.

RESULTS

Sixty-four phase II and seven phase III trials were identified including a total of 4732 patients. Statistically significant factors associated with pCR were the use of two drugs, the method of fluoropyrimidine administration (with continuous intravenous 5-fluorouracil being the most effective) and a higher radiotherapy dose. Although the use of two drugs was associated with a higher rate of pCR, no single schedule seemed to be more effective. None of the other factors analysed significantly influenced pCR.

CONCLUSIONS

A higher rate of pCR is seen in studies using two drugs, infusional 5-fluorouracil and a radiotherapy dose of 45 Gy and above.

Differences in toxicity across gender in patients treated with chemoradiation for rectal cancer

The primary objective was to prospectively investigate the efficacy and toxicity of bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy compared with the infusional 5-FU in combination with preoperative radiation in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Furthermore, in light of previous reports, toxicity profiles between men and women were also compared. Eighty-four consecutive patients with rectal adenocarcinoma were prospectively treated. There were no differences in tumour response, local recurrence or survival between bolus versus infusional groups or gender groups. In locally advanced rectal cancer, preoperative infusional chemotherapy combined with radiation was found to be less toxic than bolus chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Both regimens produced more toxic effects in women compared with men.

Preoperative tegafur suppositories for resectable rectal cancer: phase II trial

PURPOSE

Preoperative radiochemotherapy for rectal cancer causes a high rate of moderate-to-severe toxicities and is associated with only moderate survival benefits. A simpler, safer, and more convenient treatment would be preferable. Preoperative tegafur suppositories (1,500 mg/day) for at least 14 days were piloted.

METHODS

A total of 129 patients with resectable rectal cancer were enrolled. The primary end points were pathologic response, adverse events, rate of sphincter-sparing surgery, recurrence, and survival.

RESULTS

The total dose of tegafur ranged from 21 to 78 (mean, 32) g. The anal sphincter was preserved in 60.5 percent with microscopic no residual tumor (R0). The overall morbidity rate was 32 percent. Wound infection occurred in 13.2 percent of cases and anastomotic leakage in 9 percent of cases. Pathologic responses were observed in 70 percent of patients, with a complete necrosis occurring in 3.9 percent, two-thirds or more necrosis in 6.2 percent, one-third or more but less than two-thirds necrosis in 18.6 percent, and less than one-third necrosis in 41.9 percent. The mean total dose that patients showing complete or two-thirds or more necrosis received was 42.8 +/- 6.4 g (P = 0.01) compared with 31.6 +/- 1.2 g administered to patients showing less than two-thirds necrosis. Adverse events were observed in 15.6 percent of patients overall, and Grade III or IV events were observed in 2.3 percent of patients. During a median follow-up of 48 months, distant metastasis occurred in 14.7 percent of patients and local recurrence occurred in 6.2 percent of patients. The four-year, disease-free and overall survival rates were 67.6 and 80.1 percent, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative tegafur suppositories are associated with low toxicity and may lead to anal sphincter-sparing surgery with acceptable postoperative complications and favorable local and distal control.

CPT-11 and concomitant hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy induce efficient local control in rectal cancer patients: results from a phase II

Patients with rectal cancer are at high risk of disease recurrence despite neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy with 5-Fluorouracil (5FU), a regimen that is now widely applied. In order to develop a regimen with increased antitumour activity, we previously established the recommended dose of neoadjuvant CPT-11 (three times weekly 90 mg m⁻²) concomitant to hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (HART) followed by surgery within 1 week. Thirty-three patients (20 men) with a locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the rectum were enrolled in this prospective phase II trial (1 cT2, 29 cT3, 3 cT4 and 21 cN+). Median age was 60 years (range 43–75 years). All patients received all three injections of CPT-11 and all but two patients completed radiotherapy as planned. Surgery with total mesorectal excision (TME) was performed within 1 week (range 2–15 days). The preoperative chemoradiotherapy was overall well tolerated, 24% of the patients experienced grade 3 diarrhoea that was easily manageable. At a median follow-up of 2 years no local recurrence occurred, however, nine patients developed distant metastases. The 2-year disease-free survival was 66% (95% confidence interval 0.48–0.83). Neoadjuvant CPT-11 and HART allow for excellent local control; however, distant relapse remains a concern in this patient population.

Preoperative versus postoperative treatment for locally advanced rectal carcinoma

EPIDEMIOLOGY

Overall mortality of rectal cancer at 5 years is approximately 40%. This cancer is commonly diagnosed at an early stage, but because of local relapse and/or metastatic disease, only half of radically resected patients can be considered disease free.

COMMON TREATMENT

The value of adding radiotherapy to surgery in the treatment of patients with resectable rectal cancer has been assessed in trials using either preoperative or postoperative irradiation.

IMPROVEMENTS IN TREATMENT

Preoperative radiotherapy and complete resection are established modalities for Stage II and III rectal cancer whilst data reporting improvement of survival by preoperative chemoradiotherapy are still not available. At present, the improved results reported by Phase II trials in terms of local control, sphincter saving and tumor regression grade make neoadjuvant treatment the 'standard' therapy only in North America and some other countries, but the concept of preoperative combined modality treatment is not supported globally.

Pre-operative combined modality therapy in the management of locally advanced rectal cancer

AIMS

To review the use of pre-operative combined modality therapy (CMT, chemotherapy with radiotherapy) in the management of resectable rectal cancer.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed on pre-operative CMT and rectal cancer. Additional information was retrieved from hand searching the literature and from relevant congress proceedings. We addressed the following issues: Phase II studies of pre-operative CMT, pre-operative radiotherapy (RT) alone vs pre-operative CMT, pre-operative vs post-operative CMT, functional outcome and pathologic downstaging after CMT, prediction and importance of complete response to CMT.

RESULTS

Pre-operative CMT results in an average pathological complete response (pCR) rate of 18.5% in Phase II studies. Compared with pre-operative RT alone, the addition of CT significantly improves tumour response but not overall survival while acute toxicity increases and the effect on sphincter preservation is at present unclear. Pre-operative CMT has been proven to be superior to post-operative CMT in a German multicenter randomized trial. The scarce available data suggest that the addition of CT might worsen anorectal function compared to pre-operative RT alone. Although a significant pathological response is prognostically favourable, the clinical and imaging tools available at present do not allow to accurately predict pCR in clinical complete responders confirming the indication for surgery in this subgroup.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-operative CMT enhances tumour response and could therefore, have a role in patients with possibly invaded resection margins or low lying cancers, although both acute toxicity and anorectal function are worse compared to RT alone. The final results of ongoing randomized trials will more accurately establish the role of pre-operative CMT in resectable rectal cancer patients.

Pathological complete response following pre-operative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: analysis of phase II/III trials

Pathological complete response (pCR) has been used as a marker for the efficacy of pre-operative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) schedules in rectal cancer. To date there have been no randomized trials comparing CRT regimens in rectal cancer. Prospective phase II and CRT arms of randomized trials reported up to January 2004 were included, providing they defined the following minimum variables: drugs employed during CRT, radiotherapy dose and pCR rate. Multivariate analysis was used to examine the relationship of these variables on the pCR rate. In addition, the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the type of publication (peer reviewed vs meeting abstract) and whether the tumours were stated to be unresectable/clinically fixed or to have threatened circumferential margins were investigated. The method of analysis was weighted linear modelling of the pCR rate which was normalized by the arcsine transformation. Phase II and phase III trials were identified including a total of 3157 patients. On multivariate analysis only the use of continuous infusion 5FU (p = 0.01), the use of a second drug (p = 0.001) and radiation dose (p = 0.02) were associated with higher rates of pCR. The use of a two drug regimen, the mode of delivery of 5FU and the radiation dose appear to be related to the incidence of pCR following CRT for rectal cancer. These results may generate hypotheses for future randomized trials. Important factors not considered in this analysis include the variability in pathological examination and in the time interval between CRT and surgery. In addition, the toxicity of the CRT regimens requires further investigation.

Preoperative radiation with concurrent chemotherapy for resectable rectal cancer: effect of dose escalation on pathologic complete response, local recurrence-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival

PURPOSE

Three Phase II studies of preoperative radiotherapy and concurrent 5FU chemotherapy were undertaken. The primary endpoints were acute toxicity and pathologic complete response rate (pCR). Secondary endpoints were local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 134 patients with adenocarcinoma of the rectum (clinical T3/T4 or N1/N2) were treated. The initial cohort received 40 Gy in 20 fractions, the second 46 Gy in 23 fractions, and the third 50 Gy in 25 fractions. 5FU (225 mg/m2/day) was given continuously throughout radiotherapy. A total of 121 patients underwent surgical resection.

RESULTS

Treatment was well tolerated. Grade 3/4 acute toxicity was observed in 13%, 4%, and 14% of patients in the 40 Gy, 46 Gy, and 50 Gy cohorts, respectively (p = 0.20). pCR was documented in 15%, 23%, and 33% of patients, respectively (p = 0.07). The 2-year actuarial LRFS was 72%, 90%, and 89% (p = 0.02); DFS was 62%, 84%, and 78% (p = 0.02); and OS was 72%, 94%, and 92%, respectively (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

All treatment schedules were well tolerated. There was a trend toward increased pCR with higher doses. A statistically significant increase in LRFS, DFS, and OS was seen with radiation doses of 46 Gy and greater, but there was no difference between 46 Gy and 50 Gy.

Preoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The adjuvant treatment of rectal cancer is a rapidly evolving field. The standard approach is a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, with the optimal treatment combination and sequencing yet to be determined. Here, we report our early experience of preoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy (CRT) in locally advanced rectal cancer at Radiation Oncology Victoria to determine its efficacy and the rate of sphincter preservation.

METHODS

Sixty-nine patients (46 men and 23 women) with locally advanced rectal cancer (T3-4 or N1) were treated with preoperative CRT followed by surgical resection of disease. Chemotherapy consisted of either bolus or continuous venous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Radiotherapy to a dose of 45 Gy was delivered to the pelvis followed by a boost of 5.4-14.4 Gy in the majority of patients. Surgical resection was carried out 4-8 weeks following completion of preoperative CRT. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to examine variables that may influence local recurrence and overall survival rates.

RESULTS

All patients underwent a complete macroscopic resection, including the three patients that had unrecognized distant metastases discovered at the time of operation. Only two patients had microscopic residual disease. Sphincter preservation was achieved in 16 of 25 patients who were thought to require an abdominoperineal resection. Tumour and/or nodal downstaging were achieved in 47 patients (68%), with a pathological complete response in 12 (17%). At a median follow up of 29 months post-surgery, five patients (7.2%) have developed a local recurrence. Overall 21 patients (30%) have progressed and 12 (18%) have died. Treatment-related toxicity was acceptable and there was no treatment-related mortality. There was no significant relationship found between the pathological response to treatment and any clinical endpoint.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results confirm the high response rates and acceptable toxicity of preoperative treatment. Further studies are required to better define the impact of preoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy on long-term outcomes.

Feasibility of chemoradiation therapy with protracted infusion of5-fluorouracil for esophageal cancer patients not suitable for cisplatin

BACKGROUND

Chemoradiation therapy is the standard treatment for esophageal cancer in patients not fit for surgery. The regimen most commonly used includes cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil. Little data exists regarding alternative chemotherapy regimens in patients not suitable for cisplatin. We report on a regimen using protracted infusion 5-fluorouracil alone for both curative and palliative indications.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients with localized esophageal cancer suitable for curative chemoradiation therapy and 24 patients suitable for palliative therapy were enrolled. Chemotherapy consisted of 5-fluorouracil 225 mg/m(2) daily throughout the radiation therapy. The radiation dose was 56 to 60 Gy in 28 to 30 fractions (curative patients) and 30 to 35 Gy in 15 fractions (palliative patients).

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 75 years. The regimen was tolerable. Significant grade 3 toxicities experienced were esophagitis (11%) and venous catheter toxicity (9%). The median survival was 17 months for curative patients and 9 months for palliative patients. The complete response rate was 86% endoscopically and 45% radiologically for curative patients. Relief of dysphagia was experienced in 67% of palliative patients. Quality of life was satisfactory in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that continuous-infusion 5-fluorouracil given concurrently with radiation therapy is a useful alternative to platinum-based chemoradiation therapy in patients with esophageal carcinoma.

Promising results of a cooperative group phase II trial of preoperative chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer (TROG 9801)

PURPOSE

This article reports the overall survival, failure-free survival, local failure, and late radiation toxicity of a phase II trial of preoperative radiotherapy with continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil for rectal cancer after a minimum 3.5 years of follow-up.

METHODS

Eligible patients were those with newly diagnosed localized adenocarcinoma of the rectum, within 12 cm of the anal verge, staged T3-T4 and deemed suitable for curative resection. Radiotherapy (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions in five weeks and three days) was given with continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil throughout the course of radiotherapy.

RESULTS

A total of 82 patients were accrued in 13 months. The median follow-up time was 4.1 (range, 2.3-4.5) years. There were 55 males (67 percent) and the median age was 59 (range, 27-87) years. Patients were staged pretreatment as T3 (89 percent) and resectable T4 (11 percent). Endorectal ultrasound was performed in 70 percent and magnetic resonance imaging in another 5 percent. The four-year overall and failure-free survival rates were 82 percent (95 percent CI: 72-89) and 69 percent (95 percent CI: 58-78), respectively. The cumulative incidence of local failure at four years was 3.9 percent (95 percent CI: 1.3-11). Risk of failures, local and distant, has not reached a plateau phase.

CONCLUSION

This regimen can be delivered safely and without leading to a significant increase in late toxicity. It provides excellent local control and favorable overall survival. There is a need for longer follow-up than has commonly been used for the proper evaluation of failures after an effective regimen of preoperative chemoradiation.

Neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal carcinoma

Rectal cancer is one of the most common neoplasms of Western Countries. Overall mortality at 5 years is about 40%. This cancer is commonly diagnosed at a precocious stage, but because of local relapse and/or metastatic disease, only half of radically resected patients can be considered disease free. The value of adding radiotherapy to surgery in the treatment of patients with resectable rectal cancer has been assessed in trials using either preoperative or postoperative irradiation. Preoperative irradiation is more "dose-effective" than postoperative radiotherapy; that is, a higher dose is needed postoperatively to reduce rates of local recurrence to the same extent as preoperative radiation. Nevertheless, preoperative treatment has not been routinely recommended, mainly because it has not been shown to improve overall survival and because in some trials it has been associated with increased postoperative mortality. This paper critically reviews clinical trials of chemoradiotherapy on whether an optimal combination exists for locally advanced rectal cancer. Even if in the latest years, recent advances in surgery have improved the local control of disease, the next steps in rectal cancer care should aim at the improvement of local cure rates and the enhancement of systemic control. New approaches to CT treatment are necessary. Patient enrollment into rigorous and well-conducted clinical trials will generate new information regarding investigational therapies and it will offer improved therapies for patients with this disease.

Preoperative Concomitant Hyperfractionated Radiotherapy and Gemcitabine for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancers

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of gemcitabine when it was administered concomitantly with hyperfractionated radiotherapy before surgery in patients with locally advanced rectal cancers and to investigate the midterm efficacy of such a regimen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-seven patients with stage II-III tumors as assessed by computed tomography/echoendoscopy were enrolled. Radiotherapy consisted of 50 Gy given in two daily fractions of 1.25 Gy over 4 weeks. The starting dose of gemcitabine was 10 mg/m(2)/day (in a 30-minute i.v. perfusion) twice weekly with planned escalation steps of 5 mg/m(2)/day. Surgery was planned at 6 weeks after the end of radiotherapy. Main end-points of the study were complete pathological tumor response, the rate of clear margin resection, and actuarial locoregional control and disease-free survival. The median follow-up for all patients was 32 months (range: 10-51 months).

RESULTS

At the level of 45 mg/m(2), two of four patients presented with dose-limiting rectal toxicities (severe acute proctitis requiring hospitalization in the immediate postradiotherapy period). Thus, the gemcitabine biweekly dose of 40 mg/m(2) was considered to be the maximum tolerated dose. Among the 36 patients who underwent surgery, 17 (47%) had a marked pathological response, including six patients (17%) with a microscopically complete response and 11 (30%) with only microscopically residual carcinoma of less than 1 cm. All of them had clear surgical margins. At 3 years, actuarial overall survival rate was 85%, locoregional control was 94.5%, and disease-free survival was 67%.

DISCUSSION

The present study determined the recommended dose of gemcitabine to be 40 mg/m(2) when administered concurrently twice a week with 50 Gy hyperfractionated radiotherapy for the preoperative treatment of locally advanced rectal cancers. The encouraging pathological response rate and the very low locoregional recurrence rate suggest that this innovative approach merits further investigation.

A phase I trial of preoperative radiotherapy and capecitabine for locally advanced, potentially resectable rectal cancer

The purpose of the study was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of oral capecitabine, combined with concurrent, standard preoperative pelvic radiotherapy, when given twice daily, from Monday to Friday throughout the course of radiotherapy, for locally advanced potentially resectable rectal cancer. Maximum-tolerated dose was defined as the total (given in two equally divided doses) oral dose of capecitabine that caused treatment-related grade 3 or 4 toxicity in one-third or more of the patients treated. Radiotherapy involved 50.4 Gy given in 28 fractions in 5 weeks and 3 days. Eligible patients had a newly diagnosed clinical stage T3–4 N0–2 M0 rectal adenocarcinoma located within 12 cm of the anal verge suitable for curative resection. Surgery was performed 4–6 weeks from completion of preoperative chemoradiotherapy. In all, 28 patients were enrolled in the study at predefined dose levels: 850 mg m⁻² day⁻¹ (n=3), 1000 mg m⁻² day⁻¹ (n=6), 1250 mg m⁻² day⁻¹ (n=3), 1650 mg m⁻² day⁻¹ (n=3), 1800 mg m⁻² day⁻¹ (n=8) and 2000 mg m⁻² day⁻¹ (n=5). The mean age was 62.3 years (range: 33–80 years). Five patients were female and 23 male. The median distance of tumour from the anal verge was 6 cm (range: 1–11 cm). Endorectal ultrasound was performed in 93% of patients. A total of 26 patients (93%) had T3 disease and two patients had resectable T4 disease. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) developed in one patient at dose level 1000 mg m⁻² day⁻¹ (RTOG grade 3 cystitis). Two of the five patients at dose level 2000 mg m⁻² day⁻¹ had a total of three DLT (grade 3 perineal skin reaction, grade 3 diarrhoea and grade 3 dehydration). Dose escalation of capecitabine was ceased at 2000 mg m⁻² day⁻¹ after reaching MTD. None of the eight patients at dose level 1800 mg m⁻² day⁻¹ developed DLT. All except one patient underwent surgery. A total of 15 patients had the clinical T stage reduced by at least one stage in pathologic specimens. Five patients (19%) achieved a pathologic complete response. We conclude that the MTD of capecitabine was reached at a dose level of 2000 mg m⁻² day⁻¹, given as 1000 mg m⁻² twice daily, from Monday to Friday throughout the course of preoperative pelvic irradiation of 50.4 Gy. For patients with resectable rectal cancer receiving concurrent, full dose radiotherapy, the recommended dose of capecitabine for further study is 1800 mg m⁻² day⁻¹ when given in this schedule.

Four Decades of Continuing Innovation With Fluorouracil: Current and Future Approaches to Fluorouracil Chemoradiation Therapy

Purpose

Chemoradiotherapy, the combination of external radiation therapy and concurrent chemotherapy, has been the basis for the oncologic management of many patients since its development in the 1960s. Fluorouracil (FU) chemoradiotherapy has demonstrated success in several organ sites with multiple dosing schedules that now guide the selection of oral analogs of FU to provide new chemoradiotherapy options.

Methods

This article reviews the metabolism and pharmacology of FU and the advantages of administration of FU by continuous infusion or bolus. The potential role and impact of the oral fluorouracil prodrugs UFT, S-1, BOF-A2, and capecitabine as replacements for intravenous administration are discussed. The results of recent chemoradiotherapy studies with FU from 2000 to 2003 are summarized in rectal, head and neck, esophageal, gastric, pancreatic, biliary, anal, and cervical cancers.

Results

Chemoradiotherapy with FU has the potential to widen the therapeutic window by minimizing normal tissue toxicity while maintaining effective tumor toxicity. Overall, FU chemoradiotherapy maximizes local control and, for some tumor sites (such as head and neck, pancreatic, biliary, cervical, esophageal, and gastric cancers), improves survival rates. Moreover, FU chemoradiotherapy results in improved organ preservation with excellent functional outcome in several anatomic sites including head and neck cancer, anal, and rectal cancer, with improved sphincter preservation.

Conclusion

FU chemoradiotherapy continues to play an important role in the management of many cancer sites. During the last four decades, optimal dosing schedules have produced a therapeutic gain. The introduction of oral prodrug analogs will likely further improve the results of FU therapy in several organ systems, such as the rectum, head and neck, and esophagus.

Urinary tract involvement by colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

Involvement of the urinary tract by colorectal cancer is sufficiently rare to be encountered by an individual surgeon on an infrequent basis. The aim of this review is to highlight technical and oncologic issues that should be considered when dealing with complex colorectal cancer that involves the urinary tract.

METHODS

The relevant literature from 1975 to 2001 was identified using the MEDLINE database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine and reviewed. Because of the diversity of forms of presentation of urologic involvement, few randomized, controlled trials are available, with most evidence derived from retrospective studies.

RESULTS

Three distinct clinical situations in which the urinary tract may be affected by colorectal cancer were identified: involvement by primary colorectal cancer, involvement by recurrent cancer, and unexpected intraoperative findings of urinary tract involvement. Management strategies to identify and treat locally advanced primary or recurrent colorectal cancer involving the urinary tract improve survival with acceptable morbidity and mortality. Careful preoperative assessment of all patients with colorectal cancer will reduce unexpected identification of urinary tract invasion at the time of surgery. In patients in whom cure is not possible, endourologic techniques combined with judicious surgical resection can provide high-quality palliation. Optimal care of many of these conditions is facilitated by specialist urologic advice.

CONCLUSIONS

The wide spectrum of possible urinary tract involvement by colorectal cancer requires individual patient-specific and disease-specific consideration. The literature offers important guidelines that aid decision making and improve management of these challenging problems.

Phase I/II study of daily carboplatin, 5-fluorouracil and concurrent radiation therapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

A study was undertaken to determine the maximum tolerated dose, the dose-limiting toxicities and the response rate of carboplatin and 5-fluorouracil administered daily with concurrent thoracic radiation therapy in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. In a phase I/II clinical trial, patients with histologically documented, unresectable stage IIIA or IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were enrolled. Carboplatin (20-40 mg m(-2) 2-h infusion, daily) and 5-fluorouracil (200 mg m(-2) 24-h continuous infusion, daily) were administered concurrently with radiotherapy on days 1-33. Radiotherapy, with a total dose of 60 Gy, was delivered in 30 fractions on days 1-40. In the phase I portion, the daily dose of carboplatin was escalated from 20 to 40 mg m(-2). Once the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) of carboplatin was determined, the study entered the phase II portion. In the phase I portion, the daily MTD and RD of carboplatin were 40 and 35 mg m(-2), respectively. The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia. In the following phase II study, 30 patients were entered and the objective response rate was 76.7% (95% CI, 62-92%) and the local control rate was 85.7%. The median survival time was 19.8 months, with a survival rate of 70% at 1 year, 36.7% at 2 years. The major toxicities of treatment were neutropenia (>or=grade 3, 87.9%) and thrombocytopenia (>or=grade 3, 23.3%). This combined therapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer is promising and shows acceptable toxicity.

Preoperative hyperfractionated radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancers: a phase I-II trial

PURPOSE

To assess the toxicity, pathologic response rates, type of surgery, and oncologic results in a prospective Phase I-II trial using pure hyperfractionated radiotherapy (RT) preoperatively in locally advanced rectal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between September 1997 and April 2000, 50 patients with T3-T4 or N1 rectal cancers were treated preoperatively with 50 Gy (45 Gy to the pelvis and a 5-Gy tumor boost) in 40 fractions of 1.25 Gy during 4 weeks. The pretreatment tumor stage as determined by CT and endorectal ultrasonography (80% of patients) included 1 Stage T2 (2%), 45 T3 (90%), and 4 T4 (8%). Nodal involvement (N1) was documented in 26 patients (52%). Surgery was performed at a median interval of 45 days (range 26-114 days) after RT completion. Seventeen patients who presented with pT4 or pN1 and/or pM1 received 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy postoperatively.

RESULTS

All patients completed the RT schedule as planned. Severe acute toxicities included two Grade 3 skin reactions (4%) that did not require a break. The other acute toxicities were Grade 2 or less (skin, diarrhea, urinary, rectal tenesmus, and fatigue). A complete pathologic response was observed in 7 patients (14%), and microscopic residual cancer was found in 10 (20%). Of the 20 patients presenting with tumor located < or = 6 cm from the anal verge, sphincter-saving surgery was performed in 14 (70%). At 3 years, the actuarial locoregional control rate was 90.5%, and the disease-free survival rate was 74.6%. At a median follow-up of 32 months, 4 patients (8%) presented with severe late complications (Grade 3-4) that might have been RT related (one rectovaginal fistula, two chronic perineal fistulas, and one bilateral ureteral stenosis).

CONCLUSION

In locally advanced rectal cancer, preoperative hyperfractionated RT to a total dose of 50 Gy is feasible, with acceptable acute and late toxicity and an objective downstaging effect. In view of these results, this schedule might be used as a basis for additional investigation regarding RT dose escalation or the addition of concomitant chemotherapy.

Current evidence does not support routine adjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

There is widespread support in the published literature for routine adjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer.

METHODS

In the present paper, the current evidence regarding adjuvant radiotherapy is reviewed, particularly the most recent studies of preoperative radiotherapy (usually including patients with Stage I, II and III disease) and postoperative radiotherapy (usually for Stage II and III disease), and meta-analyses. Two questions in particular are addressed: Does radiotherapy improve survival when surgeons are able to achieve low local recurrence rates with surgery alone? Does radiotherapy improve patients' quality of life?

RESULTS

Radiotherapy has only been demonstrated to significantly improve survival in one individual study and one recent meta-analysis. The local recurrence rates in the no-radiotherapy arm of these studies were 27% and 21-36.5%, respectively. In more recent studies, with lower local recurrence rates reflecting modern surgical standards, no survival advantage has been found. It is currently unknown whether radiotherapy improves patients' quality of life. Studies have demonstrated that radiotherapy has acute and long-term detrimental effects on quality of life. While local recurrence can be very debilitating, it can also be asymptomatic, and the overall effect of the local recurrence statistics found in adjuvant therapy studies on quality of life has not been systematically investigated. The most recent studies demonstrate that 17-20 patients need to undergo adjuvant radiotherapy to prevent one local recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Current evidence does not support the widespread advocacy for routine adjuvant radiotherapy as used in the treatment arms of recent trials.

Radiation plus chemotherapy as adjuvant therapy for rectal cancer

The most common neo-adjuvant therapy for rectal cancer is chemotherapy and concurrent radiation therapy. In general, it is delivered pre-operatively for patients with clinical evidence of T(3-4) disease or post-operatively in patients who have undergone surgery and have T(3) and/or N(1-2) disease. This chapter reviews the rationale and results for neo-adjuvant therapy, the selection process for pre-operative versus post-operative treatment, and new approaches and controversies.