A phase I study of carboplatin concurrent with radiation in FIGO stage IIIB cervix uteri carcinoma

Chemoradiotherapy treatment with gemcitabine improves renal function in locally advanced cervical cancer patients with renal dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Cervical cancer (CC) in Mexico is diagnosed mainly in locally advanced (LACC) and advanced (ACC) stages, where ureteral obstruction is more frequent. The standard treatment for this population is concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with cisplatin, which is nephrotoxic and could lead to further deterioration of renal function in LACC patients with renal function decline. We aimed to evaluate the effect of CCRT with Gemcitabine on renal function in LACC patients.

METHODS

This retrospective study included LACC patients treated with CCRT with Gemcitabine as a radiosensitizer from February 2003 to December 2018. Data were collected from medical archives and electronic records. We assessed renal function before and after CCRT treatment and analyzed the patient's response to treatment and survival.

RESULTS

351 LACC patients treated were included and stratified into two groups: 198 with Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) ≥60ml/min (group A) and 153 with GFR<60ml/min (group B). An improvement in GFR was observed after CCRT in patients in group B, from 33 ml/min to 57.5 ml/min (p<0.001). Complete response was observed in 64.1% of patients in Group A and 43.8% in Group B (p<0.0001). Factors associated with increased risk of death included having a GFR of 15-29 ml/min (HR: 2.17; 1.08-4.35), having GFR<15 ml/min (HR: 3.08; 1.63-5.79), and receiving Boost treatment (HR: 2.09; 1.18-3.69). On the other hand, receiving brachytherapy is a positive predictor for OS (HR:0.51; 0.31-0.84).

CONCLUSION

CCRT with gemcitabine is an appropriate treatment option for patients diagnosed with LACC who present impaired renal function due to the disease's obstructive nature or other comorbidities.

The efficacy of concurrent weekly carboplatin with radiotherapy in the treatment of cervical cancer: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate whether carboplatin has a comparable efficacy with cisplatin as part of weekly concurrent chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer (Car-RT vs. Cis-RT).

METHODS

A literature search was conducted and both prospective and retrospective studies that evaluated the efficacy of Car-RT for cervical cancer were included. The primary endpoints were complete response (CR) rate, progression-free survival (PFS)/disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), reported as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The estimated CR rate and survival of patients treated with Car-RT were pooled. Acute toxicity was also summarized.

RESULTS

Twelve studies consisting of 1698 patients were eligible for meta-analysis. A lower CR rate (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.34-0.82, I² = 0%) and a trend toward poorer 3-year PFS/DFS (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.49-1.02, I² = 0%) and 3-year OS (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.46-1.05, I² = 36%) were found in Car-RT compared with Cis-RT. For the Car-RT groups, the pooled overall CR rate was 81% (95% CI 0.74-0.89). The pooled 3-year PFS/DFS rate was 64% (95% CI 0.52-0.78). The pooled 3-year OS rate was 73% (95% CI 0.62-0.87). Acute toxic events ≥ grade 3 were infrequent in the Car-RT groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Car-RT showed a poorer tumor response and a trend toward inferior survival compared with Cis-RT in the treatment of cervical cancer. However, this evidence was limited by the imbalance among studies. Due to the encouraging efficacy and low toxicity, carboplatin is a suitable concurrent agent for patients with contraindications to cisplatin.

Comparison of Nedaplatin- and Cisplatin-Based Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Patients: A Propensity Score Analysis

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of using nedaplatin to replace cisplatin for concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in patients with newly diagnosed locally advanced cervical cancer.

Methods

The medical records of 155 patients with cervical cancer who had undergone CCRT with cisplatin (n = 85) or nedaplatin (n = 70) between January 2012 and January 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity score analysis with 1:1 matching with the nearest neighbor matching method was performed to assess response rates, progression-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity between 2 groups.

Results

Propensity score matching identified 63 patients in each group. After matching, compared with patients treated with cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CisRT), we found that patients treated with nedaplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (NedaRT) had a significant higher recurrence rate (25.4% vs 42.9%; P = 0.04). In addition, the 3-year progression-free survival rate for NedaRT group was also worse than that for the CisRT group (52.2% vs 63.4%, P = 0.03). There was no difference in the overall response rates between the CisRT and NedaRT groups (87.3% and 90.5%, respectively; P = 0.57). The rates of 3-year overall survival and grades 3 to 4 toxicities were similar between the 2 groups.

Conclusions

The clinical outcome of this cohort of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with CCRT did in no way provide support for the use of nedaplatin in place of cisplatin in chemoradiation and demonstrated no equivalence of the 2 drugs. Cautions should be taken for the replacement among platinum complexes in cancer treatment.

Combined chemoradiation of cisplatin versus carboplatin in cervical carcinoma: a single institution experience from Thailand

BACKGROUND

To report the results of combined chemoradiation (CCRT) with cisplatin versus carboplatin in locally advanced cervical carcinoma.

METHODS

From 2009 to 2013, 255 patients with stage IIB-IVA cervical carcinoma, according to FIGO staging were prospectively assigned to be treated with pelvic radiotherapy followed by brachytherapy given concurrently with cisplatin or carboplatin in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer. Treatment outcomes and toxicitiy were evaluated.

RESULTS

Two-hundred and thirteen patients could be evaluated. At a median follow-up time of 43 months (6-69 months), the 3-year local control, disease-free survival, metastasis-free survival and overall survival rates were 93, 80.8, 85.0 and 87.3 %, respectively. No statistical difference in terms of local control, disease-free survival, metastasis-free survival and overall survival rates between cisplatin and carboplatin treatments was observed in this study. Eighty-six percents of the patients in the carboplatin group could receive more than 4 cycles, while there were only 72 % in the cisplatin group who completed more than 4 cycles (p = 0. 02). In terms of acute toxicity, cisplatin caused significantly more anemia (p = 0.026), neutropenia (p = 0. 044) and nephrotoxicity (p = 0. 031) than carboplatin. No difference in late toxicity was observed in this study.

CONCLUSION

Carboplatin yielded comparable results to cisplatin in concurrent chemo-radiation for locally advanced cervical cancer. In addition, carboplatin was associated with a better compliance rate and was associated with less of anemia, neutropenia and nephrotoxicity.

Carboplatin-based chemoradiotherapy in advanced cervical cancer: an alternative to cisplatin-based regimen?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the results of treatment with cisplatin or carboplatin concomitant with radiotherapy (RT) in cases of locally advanced cervical cancer (CC).

METHODS

This study is a retrospective analysis of medical records of 184 patients with cervical cancer stage IIB-IVA who were treated at Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo from May 2008 to December 2012. All patients received complete pelvic region external-beam RT with weekly cisplatin (cis-RT, 40mg/m(2); n=159) or carboplatin (carbo-RT, AUC 2; n=25), followed by high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy (HDR-ICBT). Primary endpoint was progression free survival; secondary endpoints were overall survival and overall response rate, which includes complete and partial responses.

RESULTS

Five or more chemotherapy cycles were administered to 87.3% and 84% of the cis-RT- and carbo-RT- treated patients, respectively (p=0.749). Estimated 3-years progression free survival was 59% in the cis-RT group vs 40% in the carbo-RT group (p=0.249). Estimated 3-years overall survival was 70% in the cis-RT group vs 68% in the carbo-RT group (p=0.298). Overall response rate (95.3% cis-RT vs 95.4% carbo-RT; p=0.911) and grade ≥3 toxic effects (8.5% cis-RT vs 11.8% carbo-RT; p=0.757) were similar. In multivariate analysis, only the overall response rate was a significant predictor of survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with advanced cervical cancer who are treated with carbo-RT have similar 3-years overall survival, progression free survival, overall response rate, and toxic effects when compared to cis-RT-treated patients. Carbo-RT may be an alternative treatment in patients that cannot receive cisplatin.

Comparison of carboplatin- and cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer patients with morbidity risks

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess the activity and toxicity of primary carboplatin-based chemoradiotherapy (CarboRT) and to compare CarboRT with cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy (CisRT) in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer and poor general condition.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-one locally advanced cervical cancer patients with morbidity risks were prospectively enrolled between January 2007 and April 2010. Eligible patients received weekly intravenous CarboRT with carboplatin 100 mg/m2, and a comparison was made with a historical patient group that received weekly CisRT with cisplatin 40 mg/m2.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 36 months (range: 4-66 months) in the CarboRT group and 53 months (range: 4-121 months) in the CisRT group. Compared with the historical CisRT group, the CarboRT group showed no statistically significant differences in recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52-2.81) and survival (HR, 1.80; 95% CI, 0.49-6.54). The mean numbers of received cycles of CarboRT and CisRT were 7.5 ± 1.4 and 6.0 ± 1.8, respectively (p < .001). The rates of grade 3-4 toxicity were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

CarboRT was better tolerated than CisRT without compromising tumor response and survival in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer and poor general condition.

Treatment outcomes of concurrent weekly carboplatin with radiation therapy in locally advanced cervical cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate treatment outcomes of locally advanced cervical cancer patients who received concurrent weekly carboplatin with radiation therapy.

METHODS

Patients with locally advanced cervical cancer who had primary radiation treatment in concurrent with weekly carboplatin (100mg/m(2) or AUC 2) from 1997 to 2008 were identified. Demographic data, chemotherapy cycles, total treatment time, toxicities, and treatment outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-eight patients with stage IIB (50.7%), IIIB (48.0%) and IVA (1.3%) cervical cancer patients were included in the study. Median total treatment time was 53.5 days (range, 45-100 days). Carboplatin was given for a median number of 6 cycles (range, 3-6 cycles). Complete response was achieved in 142 patients (95.9%) while six (4.1%) had persistent diseases. Among the 142 responders, 36 experienced recurrences: pelvic recurrences in seven (4.7%), distant failure in 25 (16.9%), and both pelvic and distant in four (2.7%). The 2-year and 5-year progression-free survival rates were 75.1% and 63.0%, respectively with the corresponding 2-year and 5-year overall survival rates of 81.9% and 63.5%. No grade 3 or 4 hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities were observed during treatment in any patients. Late grade 3-4 gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicities were 10.1% and 0.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent weekly carboplatin with radiation therapy yields high response rate with modest progression-free and overall survivals in locally advanced cervical cancer. The regimen is feasible with minimal toxicities.

A phase II randomized trial comparing radiotherapy with concurrent weekly cisplatin or weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced cervical cancer

Purpose/Objective

This is a prospective comparison of weekly cisplatin to weekly paclitaxel as concurrent chemotherapy with standard radiotherapy for locally advanced cervical carcinoma.

Materials/Methods

Between May 2000 and May 2004, 31 women with FIGO stage IB2-IVA cervical cancer or with postsurgical pelvic recurrence were enrolled into this phase II study and randomized to receive on a weekly basis either 40 mg/m² Cisplatin (group I; 16 patients) or 50 mg/m² paclitaxel (group II; 15 patients) concurrently with radiotherapy. Median total dose to point A was 74 Gy (range: 66-92 Gy) for group I and 66 Gy (range: 40-98 Gy) for group II. Median follow-up time was 46 months.

Results

Patient and tumor characteristics were similar in both groups. The mean number of chemotherapy cycles was also comparable with 87% and 80% of patients receiving at least 4 doses in groups I and II, respectively. Seven patients (44%) of group I and 8 patients (53%) of group II developed tumor recurrence. The Median Survival time was not reached for Group I and 53 months for group II. The proportion of patients surviving at 2 and 5 years was 78% and 54% for group I and 73% and 43% for group II respectively.

Conclusions

This small prospective study shows that weekly paclitaxel does not provide any clinical advantage over weekly cisplatin for concurrent chemoradiation for advanced carcinoma of the cervix.

Pharmacotherapy options for locally advanced and advanced cervical cancer

Cervical cancer continues to be a significant health burden worldwide. Globally, the majority of cancers are locally advanced at diagnosis; hence, radiation remains the most frequently used therapeutic modality. Currently, the value of adding cisplatin or cisplatin-based chemotherapy to radiation for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer is strongly supported by randomized studies and meta-analyses. Nevertheless, despite these significant achievements, therapeutic results are far from optimal; thus, novel therapies need to be investigated. A recent, randomized, phase III trial has shown for the first time that combination chemotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine concurrently with radiation improves parameters of survival over cisplatin alone and establishes a new standard for the management of locally advanced cervical cancer. On the other hand, advanced disease, presenting either as an International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IVB or as persistent or recurrent to primary therapy without local curative options, remains a devastating group of diseases with no options other than palliative chemotherapy. Recent results from the GOG (Gynecologic and Oncologic Group)-204 study demonstrate that cisplatin-doublets with paclitaxel, vinorelbine, gemcitabine or topotecan only produce small improvements in survival, although with different toxicity patterns; hence, patient-related factors are important when choosing any one of these regimens. The role of targeted therapies both in locally advanced and advanced disease is promising, but still at an investigational stage.

Concurrent carboplatin and paclitaxel with pelvic radiation therapy in the primary treatment of cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to determine the feasibility of weekly carboplatin/paclitaxel with radiation therapy (RT) in the primary treatment of cervical cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

Women diagnosed with stage IB-1 to stage IVA untreated primary cervical cancer were eligible. Carboplatin (area under the curve = 2.0) and paclitaxel 40 mg/m2 were administered weekly for 6 weeks with pelvic RT. Brachytherapy was completed after pelvic RT. Acute toxicities and response to treatment were assessed.

RESULTS

Twenty-two evaluable patients were enrolled. The median duration of follow-up was 23 months. Carboplatin (mean dose 245 mg) and paclitaxel (mean dose 70 mg) were successfully administered in 97% and 90% of planned treatments, respectively. Median time to complete external radiation therapy was 36.6 days (25-57 days). Grade 3/4 hematologic or gastrointestinal toxicity was unusual. The complete response rate 3 months after completion of therapy was 91%. The estimated 3-year progression-free survival is 70% and overall survival is 65%.

CONCLUSION

Weekly carboplatin/paclitaxel and RT is a reasonable treatment regimen for cervical cancer.

Concurrent radiotherapy with paclitaxel/carboplatin chemotherapy as a definitive treatment for squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the toxicity and the efficacy of paclitaxel/carboplatin chemoradiotherapy as a definitive treatment for squamous cell cancer of the uterine cervix.

METHODS

From March 2000 to January 2004, 33 patients with squamous cell cancer of the uterine cervix were treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy including 2 cycles of paclitaxel (135 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (area under the time-concentration curve 4.5 mg min/ml) at 4-week interval. Seven patients received adjuvant chemotherapy with the same chemotherapeutic regimen. All patients received external beam radiotherapy with 41.4-51.4 Gy (median 50.4 Gy) to the whole pelvis. Twenty-eight patients received boost irradiation to the cervix by brachytherapy with 25.6-43.3 Gy (median 34.6 Gy) and 5 patients by external beam radiotherapy with 10.8-14.4 Gy (median 14.4 Gy).

RESULTS

A median follow-up period was 27 months (range: 6-53 months). Acute hematological toxicity of grade 3 or 4 developed in 20 patients (61%), and acute gastrointestinal toxicity of grade 3 developed in 1 patient (3%). Vesicovaginal fistula occurred in 2 patients (6%). All patients achieved objective response (CR 70%, PR 30%) in 2 months after termination of treatment. One patient had a local progression in cervix, and 4 patients developed distant metastases. The 3-year estimated disease-free survival rates for stages I-IIA, IIB, III and IV were 67%, 91%, 88% and 50%, respectively. The 3-year estimated survival rates for stages I-IIA, IIB, III and IV were 89%, 91%, 88% and 50%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin is effective to achieve an excellent pelvic control.

A randomized phase III trial of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: Preliminary results

OBJECTIVE

Concurrent chemoradiation is the standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer. This study was a preliminary result of a randomized two arms, prospective, open-label phase III trial comparing the activity and safety of the concurrent chemoradiation of Tegafur-Uracil and carboplatin or carboplatin alone in locally advanced cervical cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The stage IIB-IIIB cervical cancer patients were randomized to have Tegafur-Uracil 225 mg/m(2)/day orally, 5 days a week and carboplatin 100 mg/m(2) IV over 30-60 min, weekly on day 1 concurrent with standard radiotherapy (Group A) or carboplatin alone concurrent with standard radiotherapy (Group B).

RESULTS

Four hundred and sixty-nine patients were randomized to Group A (n=234) or Group B (n=235). The tumor response at 3-month follow-up time showed no significant difference. The only prognostic factor to improve the complete response rate was the hemoglobin level. The patients in Group A, who had Hb <10 gm/dL had the relatively better change to complete response of 1.48 compared to that in Group B (P 0.025, 95% CI 1.07, 2.04). No severe toxicity or adverse event had been reported. The median follow-up time for Group A and Group B was 12.6 and 11.8 months, respectively. There was no statistical difference in PFS and OS.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent chemoradiation by Tegafur-Uracil and carboplatin showed no difference in tumor response rate or treatment toxicity compared to carboplatin alone. The combination drugs might have benefit in poor prognostic patients such as the baseline Hb <10 gm/dL.

Surgery and radiotherapy in vulvar cancer

The majority of patients with vulvar cancer have squamous cell carcinomas (SCC). The cornerstone of the treatment is surgery. Radical vulvectomy with "en bloc" inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy has led to a favorable prognosis but with impressive morbidity. Nowadays, treatment is more individualized with wide local excision with uni- or bilateral inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy via separate incisions as the standard treatment for early stage patients with SCC of the vulva with depth of invasion >1 mm without suspicious groins. In case of more than one intranodal lymph node metastasis and/or extranodal growth, postoperative radiotherapy on the groins and pelvis is warranted. Until now there is a limited role for primary radiotherapy on the vulva and/or groins in early stage disease. The sentinel lymph node (SLN) procedure with the combined technique (preoperative lymphoscintigraphy with a radioactive tracer and intraoperative blue dye) is a promising staging technique for patients with early stage vulvar cancer. The safety of clinical implementation of the SLN procedure and the role of additional histopathological techniques of the SLNs need to be further investigated before its wide-scale application. Patients with advanced vulvar cancer are difficult to treat. One of the problems in patients with locally advanced vulvar cancer is the high incidence of concomitant bulky lymph nodes in the groin(s). Ultraradical surgery in case of resectable disease will lead to impressive morbidity because of the exenterative-type procedure. (Chemo)radiation with or without surgery should be regarded as the first choice for patients with locally advanced vulvar cancer only when primary surgery will necessitate performance of a stoma. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal combined modality treatment in these patients. Due to the fact that vulvar cancer is a rare disease, further clinical studies will only be possible, when international collaborative groups will join forces in order to perform clinical trials, in which different treatment options such as SLN procedure, primary radiotherapy on the groins and multimodality treatment for advanced disease will be investigated.

Preliminary outcome and toxicity report of extended-field, intensity-modulated radiation therapy for gynecologic malignancies

PURPOSE

The aim of this article is to report a preliminary analysis of our initial clinical experience with extended-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy for gynecologic malignancies.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between November 2002 and May 2005, 13 women with gynecologic malignancies were treated with extended-field radiation therapy. Of the women, 7 had endometrial cancer, 4 cervical cancer, 1 recurrent endometrial cancer, and 1 suspected cervical cancer. All women underwent computed tomography planning, with the upper vagina, parametria, and uterus (if present) contoured within the CTV. In addition, the clinical target volume contained the pelvic and presacral lymph nodes as well as the para-aortic lymph nodes. All acute toxicity was scored according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v 3.0). All late toxicity was scored using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group late toxicity score.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 11 months. Extended-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for gynecologic malignancies was well tolerated. Two patients experienced Grade 3 or higher toxicity. Both patients were treated with concurrent cisplatin based chemotherapy. Neither patient was planned with bone marrow sparing. Eleven patients had no evidence of late toxicity. One patient with multiple previous surgeries experienced a bowel obstruction. One patient with bilateral grossly involved and unresectable common iliac nodes experienced bilateral lymphedema. Extended-field-IMRT achieved good local control with only 1 patient, who was metastatic at presentation, and 1 patient not able to complete treatment, experiencing in-field failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Extended-field IMRT is safe and effective with a low incidence of acute toxicity. Longer follow-up is needed to assess chronic toxicity, although early results are promising.

Radiosensitizers in cervical cancer. Cisplatin and beyond

Cervical cancer continues to be a significant health burden worldwide. Globally, the majority of cancers are locally advanced at diagnosis; hence, radiation remains the most frequently used therapeutical modality. Currently, the value of adding cisplatin or cisplatin-based chemotherapy to radiation for treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer is strongly supported by randomized studies and meta-analyses. Nevertheless, despite these significant achievements, therapeutic results are far from optimal; thus, novel therapies need to be assayed. A strategy currently being investigated is the use of newer radiosensitizers alone or in combination with platinum compounds. In the present work, we present preclinical information on known and newer cytotoxic agents as radiosensitizers on cervical cancer models, as well as the clinical information emanating from early phase trials that incorporate them to the cervical cancer management. In addition, we present the perspectives on the combined approach of radiation therapy and molecular target-based drugs with proven radiosensitizing capacity.

Routine management of locally advanced cervical cancer with concurrent radiation and cisplatin. Five-year results

BACKGROUND

Globally, cervical cancer primarily affects socially disadvantaged women. Five randomized trials were the foundation for adopting cisplatin-based chemotherapy during radiation as the standard of care for high-risk patients after primary radical hysterectomy who require adjuvant radiation and for locally advanced patients treated with definitive radiation. These results were obtained in clinical trials performed in carefully prepared academic centers; hence, we sought to determine whether these results could be reproduced when patients were treated on an out-of-protocol basis.

METHODS

We reviewed the files of 294 patients with locally advanced cervical cancer who received radiation plus weekly cisplatin as routine management between 1999 to 2003, and analyzed treatment compliance, response rate, toxicity, and survival.

RESULTS

A total of 294 patients who received radiation and cisplatin were analyzed. Mean age was 43.8 years (range, 26-68 years). The majority of cases were squamous cell carcinoma (87.8%), and distribution according to International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage was as follows: IB2-IIA, 23%; IIB, 53.3%, and IIIB, 23%; there were only two IVA cases. Overall, 96% of patients completed external beam, and intracavitary therapy. The majority of patients (67%) received the planned six courses of weekly cisplatin. Complete responses were achieved in 243 (83%) patients, whereas 51 (17%) had either persistent (32 patients, 10.8%) or progressive (19 patients, 6.4%) disease. At median follow-up (28 months; range, 2-68 months), 36 patients (12.2%) have relapsed (locally 30.5, and systemically, 69.5%). The most common toxicities were hematologic and gastrointestinal, in the majority of cases considered mild-moderate. At median follow-up (28 months; range, 2-68 months), overall and progression-free survival are 76.5 and 67%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our results support use of chemoradiation with six weekly applications of cisplatin at 40 mg/m2 during external radiation for routine management of locally advanced cervical cancer.

Efficacy of paclitaxel and carboplatin as a regimen for postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy of high risk uterine cervix cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin after hysterectomy for early stage uterine cervical carcinoma with high risk factors.

METHODS

Between March 2000 and July 2002, 37 patients with stages IB-IIB uterine cervical carcinoma were treated with radical hysterectomy and bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (POCCRT) with two courses of paclitaxel (135 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (area under the time-concentration curve 4.5 mg min/ml) at 4-week interval. All the patients received external beam radiotherapy up to 50.4 Gy to the whole pelvis. Among these, 7 patients with close or involved resection margin received boost irradiation to the vaginal cuff (4 patients with low dose rate brachytherapy and 3 patients with external beam). Median dose of boost irradiation was 14.4 Gy (range: 14.4-34.6).

RESULTS

Toxicity to POCCRT was mainly hematological and gastrointestinal, mostly grades 1 and 2. At a median follow-up of 27 months (range; 10-46), all the patients achieved local control, and 4 patients experienced distant relapses. The failure sites were as follows: bone (2 patients), paraaortic lymph node (1 patient), and supraclavicular lymph node (1 patient).

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin after hysterectomy is well tolerated and produces excellent local control rate despite of short follow-up period. This regimen could be considered for a phase III trial.

Management of locally advanced cervical cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cervical cancer is a significant global public health problem. In underdeveloped countries where screening programs are not widely available and in underserved populations in developed countries, women commonly present with locally advanced disease that is not curable by any extent of radical hysterectomy. This review will critically evaluate the evidence supporting the available treatment modalities for locally advanced cancer of the uterine cervix.

RECENT FINDINGS

Concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy and radiation have demonstrated significant survival improvement for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Advances in imaging and radiotherapy technologies, the inclusion of newer agents to the chemoradiation regimens, the use of new hypoxic cell radiosensitizers and monoclonal antibodies that inhibit cell growth, with consequent increase in malignant cell kill fractions, are some of the new therapeutic options that may be used to improve the survival of these patients.

SUMMARY

Continued improvement in understanding the natural history of cervical cancer, the limitations of the current staging system, and these newer therapeutic options will increase the efficacy of chemoradiation and improved the survival of these patients.

Pathologic response and toxicity assessment of chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin versus cisplatin plus gemcitabine in cervical cancer: A randomized Phase II study

PURPOSE

To compare gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) with cisplatin (C) concurrent with radiotherapy in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage IB2, IIA, and IIB cervical carcinoma in a preoperative setting. The main endpoints were the pathologic response rate and toxicity.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 83 patients were randomized to either C or GC. Treatment consisted of six doses of cisplatin at 40 mg/m(2) every week for Arm 1 (C) and six doses of gemcitabine at 125 mg/m(2) plus cisplatin at 40 mg/m(2) every week for or Arm 2 (GC) Both regimens were administered concurrent with 50 Gy of external beam radiotherapy in 2-Gy fractions for 5 weeks. After chemoradiotherapy, patients underwent radical hysterectomy.

RESULTS

All 83 patients were studied for toxicity and 80 for response. The complete pathologic response rate in the C arm and GC arm was 55% (95% confidence interval, 35.5-73%) and 77.5% (95% confidence interval, 57-90%; p = 0.0201). Among those with a partial response, 7 patients each had high and intermediate-high risk factors for recurrence in their surgical specimens in the C arm vs. 2 and 3 patients, respectively, with these characteristics in the CG arm. The number of weekly doses and the dose intensity of GC were lower than for C. The time to complete external beam radiotherapy also favored the C arm. The CG combination produced greater GI and hematologic toxicity.

CONCLUSION

The radiosensitizing combination of GC achieved a greater pathologic response rate than C in the treatment of cervical cancer.

Phase I clinical trial of weekly paclitaxel, weekly carboplatin, and concurrent radiotherapy for primary cervical cancer

OBJECTIVES

Standard primary treatment for locally advanced cervix cancer is radiation (RT) with concomitant platinum-based chemotherapy (CT). Incomplete local control and the appearance of distant disease herald poor survival and warrant evaluation of new primary strategies. Paclitaxel and carboplatin are active agents in recurrent cervical carcinoma, have potent, synergistic in vitro radiosensitization, and are cytotoxic in weekly schedules. This study was done to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of weekly paclitaxel/carboplatin chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced cervix cancer.

METHODS

Women with primary, previously untreated, squamous cell or adenocarcinoma of the cervix, FIGO stage IB(2) to IVA, negative para-aortic lymph nodes, adequate organ function and performance status were eligible. Pelvic RT (45 Gy over 5 weeks--180 cGy/day, four-field) was followed by two brachytherapy applications (Point A low dose rate (LDR): 90 Gy, high dose rate (HDR): 75 Gy). Concurrent weekly CT was paclitaxel 50 mg/m(2) and carboplatin, starting at AUC 1.5 and escalating in three-patient cohorts by AUC 0.5 (Max AUC 3.5). Dose escalation followed a 4-week observation period for toxicity. A grade III-IV toxicity prompted up to three additional patients per dose level. A second event defined DLT. CT was administered concurrently throughout brachytherapy.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients were enrolled and treated over four dose levels until DLT was reached. Median age was 44 years (range, 23-70); stages: IB2: 1, IIB: 9, IIIA: 1, IIIB: 4. Median RT treatment time was 61 days (range, 55-79). Fourteen patients received brachytherapy (LDR: 8, HDR: 6), and one received external RT only due to cervical stenosis. The median number of weekly CT cycles was seven (range, 6-7). One CT dose was dropped in one patient for a grade II thrombocytopenia. One grade III ANC was observed at dose level II (AUC 2.0) but not seen in three additional patients. At dose level IV (AUC 3.0), two grade III-IV ANC toxicities were observed in two patients (DLT). Nine patients had grade II anemia. One patient had grade III anemia. Grade III/IV nonhematologic toxicity was rare (1/15 GI-nausea/vomiting, 1/15 pneumonia, 1/15 hypokalemia). The MTD of carboplatin is AUC 2.5 with paclitaxel 50 mg/m(2). Median follow-up is 17 months; three patients have recurred and two have died. The estimated 2-year PFS and OS are 80% and 86%.

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin chemoradiation is feasible and active. The MTD for a phase II trial is 50 mg/m(2) and AUC 2.5, respectively.

Phase I study of daily cisplatin and concurrent radiotherapy in patients with cervical carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Chemoradiation based on cisplatin is the standard treatment for locally advanced cervical carcinoma; however, the optimal scheduling and dosing have still not been established. This study was conducted to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of cisplatin for daily administration during pelvic radiotherapy (RT).

METHODS

Fourteen patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma and 13 who required postoperative RT were registered. A low dose of cisplatin was given daily concurrently with RT. Cisplatin dosing was started at 6.0 mg/m(2)/day, which was incremented by 0.5 mg/m(2)/day. RT was delivered at 2 Gy/day to a total dose of 50 Gy. The MTD was defined as the dose level immediately below that causing dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in over one-third of treated patients.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were treated with a maximum of six escalating dose levels. In 22/25 patients (88%), cisplatin was administered continuously as planned without interruption. The MTD was determined to be 8 mg/m(2) and the DLT was indicated by the onset of neutropenia.

CONCLUSION

Daily cisplatin, at 8 mg/m(2)/day, is a well-tolerated radiosensitizer in cervical carcinoma patients.

Chemoradiation with gemcitabine for cervical cancer in patients with renal failure

The prognosis of cervical cancer patients with renal failure secondary to obstructive uropathy is poor. Our objective was to analyze our experience in the management with chemoradiation of untreated cervical cancer patients complicated by obstructive nephropathy and kidney dysfunction. Untreated patients with cervical cancer and renal failure as manifested by raised serum creatinine were treated with pelvic radiotherapy concurrently with weekly gemcitabine at 300 mg/m2. Response, toxicity and renal function pre- and post-therapy were evaluated. Eight FIGO stage IIIB and one IVB patients were treated. Pre-treatment serum creatinine ranged from 1.6 to 18.5 mg/100 ml (median 3.3, mean 6.8) and creatinine clearance varied from 4 to 57 mg/ml/min (median 17, mean 22.1). Four patients had a percutaneous nephrostomy placed and four patients had symptoms from kidney failure. All patient completed chemoradiation. Most patients had grade 3 leukopenia and neutropenia. Dermatitis, colitis and proctitis were common. All patients had improvement in creatinine clearance (pre-therapy 22.78, post-therapy 54.3 mg/ml/min) (p=0.0058) and all but one normalized serum creatinine. Eight (89%) of nine patients achieved complete response and one patient had persistence. At a median follow-up of 11 months (range 6-14), all patients are alive, one with pelvic and another with systemic disease. Ureteral obstruction causing any degree of renal insufficiency should not be a contraindication to receive chemoradiation to attempt cure. In this setting where cisplatin-based therapy is contraindicated, the use of gemcitabine may be considered.

Evaluation of concurrent and adjuvant carboplatin with radiation therapy for locally advanced cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the toxicity profile and long-term outcomes of patients receiving carboplatin with concurrent radiation for locally advanced cervical cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed to identify patients treated with carboplatin and concurrent radiation therapy for locally advanced cervical cancer with a minimum follow-up period of 24 months. Records were reviewed for demographic data, chemotherapy doses, toxicities, and survival outcomes. Specifically reviewed were hematologic, gastrointestinal, and renal toxicities and the need for dose modification and treatment delays.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients with cervical carcinoma Stage IIB (7), III (13), or IVA (1) treated with carboplatin chemotherapy from 1993 to 2001 were identified. Carboplatin at a dose of 300 mg/m(2) administered every 3 weeks for an intended six courses was initiated at the start of radiation therapy. No grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia or renal toxicity was observed. Nine patients had delays in chemotherapy administration and/or received a 25% reduction in the dose of chemotherapy based on one or more of the following: thrombocytopenia (platelet count <100000 cells/mcl) (n = 3), granulocytopenia (ANC <1.0) (n = 4), or anemia (hemoglobin <10.0 g/dl) (n = 5). The median carboplatin AUC was 3.9 (range 3.0-5.0). Six patients developed recurrent disease (five local and one distant) with a pelvic control rate of 76% and an overall survival of 71%.

CONCLUSION

Carboplatin at a dose of 300 mg/m(2) (equivalent to an AUC of 3.9) on an every 3-week schedule is tolerable with concurrent pelvic radiation therapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. The efficacy of carboplatin, compared to cisplatin, as a radiation sensitizer can only be determined in a randomized clinical trial.

Association concomitante préopératoire de radiothérapie et de chimiothérapie dans les cancers du col utérin opérables de stades IB2, IIA et IIB proximal de gros volume

PURPOSE

To evaluate preliminary results in terms of toxicity, local tumour control, and survival after preoperative concomitant chemoradiation for operable bulky cervical carcinomas.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between December 1991 and October 2001, 42 patients (pts) with bulky cervical carcinomas stage IB2 (11 pts), IIA (15 pts), and IIB (16 pts) with 1/3 proximal parametrial invasion. Median age was 45 years (range: 24-75 years) and clinical median cervical tumour size was 5 cm (range: 4.1-8 cm). A clinical pelvic lymph node involvement has been observed in 10 pts. All patients underwent preoperative external beam pelvic radiation therapy (EBPRT) and concomitant chemotherapy during the first and the fourth radiation weeks combining 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin. The pelvic dose was 40.50 Gy over 4.5 weeks. EBPRT was followed by low-dose-rate uterovaginal brachytherapy with a total dose of 20 Gy in 17 pts. After a rest period of 5-6 weeks, all pts underwent class II modified radical hysterectomy with bilateral lymphadenectomy. Para-aortic lymphadenectomy was performed in eight pts without pathologic para-aortic lymph node involvement. Twenty-one of 25 pts who had not received preoperative uterovaginal brachytherapy underwent postoperative low-dose-rate vaginal brachytherapy of 20 Gy. The median follow-up was 31 months (range: 3-123 months).

RESULTS

Pathologic residual tumour or lymph node involvement was observed in 23 pts. Among the 22 pts with pathologic residual cervical tumour (<0.5 cm: nine pts; >or=0.5 to <or=1 cm: three pts; >1 cm: 10 pts), seven underwent preoperative EBRT followed by uterovaginal brachytherapy vs. 15 treated with preoperative EBRT alone (P = 0.23). Four pts had pathologic lymph node involvement, three pts had vaginal residual tumour, and four pts had pathologic parametrial invasion. The 2- and 5-year overall survival rates were 85% and 74%, respectively. The 2- and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 80% and 71%, respectively. After multivariate analysis, the pathologic residual cervical tumour size was the single independent factor decreasing the probability of DFS (P = 0.0054). The 5-year local control rate and metastatic failure rate were 90% and 83.5%, respectively. Haematological effects were moderate. However, six pts had grade 3 acute intestinal toxicity. Four severe late complications requiring surgical intervention were observed (one small bowel complication, three ureteral complications).

CONCLUSION

Primary concomitant chemoradiation followed surgery for bulky operable stage I-II cervical carcinomas can be employed with acceptable toxicity. However, systematic preoperative uterovaginal brachytherapy should increase local tumour control.