Ultrasonographically assisted carpal tunnel release

Percutaneous ultrasound guided retrograde lacertus fibrosus release

The purpose of this technical note is to present a microinvasive percutaneous ultrasound-guided release of the lacertus fibrosus of the biceps brachii for lacertus syndrome, i.e., median nerve entrapment at the elbow. Using the Walant technique (wide awake local anesthesia and no tourniquet), the entry point is made with a 19G needle to introduce the hook distally from the distal border of the lacertus fibrosus. The hook is then slid along the pronator teres fascia to the proximal border of the lacertus fibrosus. The cut is ultrasound-guided from proximal to distal. The cut is effective when the back of the force is observed in the 3 targeted muscles (flexor carpi radialis, flexor pollicis longus and flexor digitorum profundus). This minimally invasive surgical procedure is efficient in terms of lacertus fibrosus sectioning. Real-time ultrasound monitoring may improve safety. The technique could be considered as a new ultrasound-guided alternative to open surgery. When performed superficially to the pronator teres muscle under WALANT anesthesia and percutaneously, ultrasound-guided lacertus fibrosus release may be an effective treatment for lacertus syndrome in the interventional ultrasound unit.

Ultrasound guided Carpal tunnel release: The retrograde technique

Ultrasound-guided surgery is a new trend resulting from the introduction of high-frequency linear probes and higher-quality screens. Surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome is increasingly being performed under ultrasound guidance. Knowledge of musculoskeletal ultrasound is, of course, essential. Several types of cutting instruments (miniature knife, Gigli saw or hook) and surgical approaches (wrist or palm) have been described. Ultrasonography allows the use of the wide awake and local anesthesia with no tourniquet (WALANT) technique in the outpatient setting. The purpose of this article is to report our experience with retrograde percutaneous ultrasound-guided techniques.

Ultrasound-guided release of carpal tunnel syndrome - Anterograde technique

Compression of the median nerve in the carpal tunnel is a frequent pathology with severe functional impact. An ultrasound-guided technique was developed to preserve structures, diminish scar fibrosis and enable fast return to full activity. Its advantages are safety and low additional cost. Ultrasound-guided carpal tunnel release is indicated in moderate and severe carpal tunnel syndrome persisting after conservative treatment. A preoperative ultrasound scan is recommended to evaluate anatomy. Recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome, secondary carpal tunnel syndrome and anatomic variants compromising the safety of transverse carpal ligament division are contraindications. The procedure is performed under local anesthesia without tourniquet. The entry point is a short transverse incision proximal to the wrist crease. The transverse carpal ligament is divided anterogradely, using a dedicated blade under ultrasound control, making sure no nerves, tendons or blood vessels are injured. The final step is to check that the division is complete. Early return to use of the hand is permitted. Reports of similar techniques demonstrated early symptomatic relieve, favorable patient-reported outcome measures from within 1 week after surgery to 2 years' follow-up, with early return to normal daily activity and work. The complications rate is low: many series showed no complications. Comparative studies between ultrasound-guided carpal tunnel release and the mini-open technique reported similar or greater and quicker symptom relief, less scar pain and better strength. Final functional results tend to be similar.

Real-world data on efficacy and safety of 1256 consecutive ultrasound-guided percutaneous carpal tunnel release

PURPOSE

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a prevalent condition requiring effective and safe treatment options. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided carpal tunnel release (UCTR) in routine clinical practice. Furthermore, we assessed UCTR outcomes in terms of symptom resolution, patient satisfaction, and complication rates using real-world data extracted via a natural language processing model.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 926 patients who underwent 1256 UCTR procedures between November 2018 and May 2024. Primary outcomes included the resolution of paresthesia and pain, and secondary outcomes involved strength restoration and patient satisfaction. Complication rates were assessed to evaluate safety. Data accuracy and precision were validated through standardized methods.

RESULTS

Post-UCTR, significant symptom improvement was observed, with paresthesia rates decreasing from 99% (620/626) to 8.5% (79/926) and pain rates from 96% (654/926) to 9% (83/926). Strength restoration was noted, and 95.8% (628/926) of patients reported positive results with the procedure. Safety was demonstrated by a low complication rate of 0.7% (10/1256). Validation demonstrated data accuracy of 96.3% and precision of 100%.

CONCLUSION

UCTR is a highly effective and safe intervention for CTS that delivers substantial symptom relief, high patient satisfaction, and minimal risk. These findings support the adoption of UCTR in clinical practice. Further prospective studies are recommended to confirm these results and investigate long-term outcomes.

Reliability of Hand-Held Dynamometer Measurement for Thumb Palmar Abduction Strength in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Background: In carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), pain and sensory disturbance are the main symptoms, but thumb palmar abduction (TPA) paralysis cannot be ignored as a concurrent symptom. The reliable quantitative measurement of TPA power was not established. The purpose of this study was to report on the reliability of TPA strength measurements by the hand-held dynamometry (HHD) in large samples of CTS and its superiority over other tests, including grip, pinch powers, TPA angles and manual muscle testing, in terms of clinical progress indicators. Methods: We examined the relative and absolute reliabilities of the perioperative TPA strength measured by HHD (HHD-TPA) in 566 participants with CTS and the correlation coefficient between the HHD-TPA and other clinical tests. Results: The reliability of the HHD-TPA was intraclass correlation coefficients: 97% or higher. The Bland-Altman absolute reliability showed a random pattern of bias, and the minimal detectable changes (MDC) of the inter-rater and intra-rater reliabilities indicated 9.0 N and 7.0 N individually. The HHD-TPA showed statistically significant recoveries between perioperative stages; however, the mean difference larger than the MDC was recognised only between the preoperative and 12-month postoperative stages by intra-rater comparison. More individual patients showed recovery of HHD-TPA beyond the MDC when the same examiner continuously measured HHD-TPA than when multiple examiners continuously measured HHD-TPA. Grip strength and pinch strength measurements showed a strong correlation with HHD-TPA and did not show statistically significant improvement during the perioperative period. Conclusions: HHD-TPA is the most reliable method for quantifying muscle strength in the perioperative course of TPA force in CTS. HHD-TPA is a more reliable assessment of CTS motor recovery when measured consistently for each patient by the same hand therapist. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Diagnostic).

Ultrasound-Guided Modified Thread Carpal Tunnel Release for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Pilot Study

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of modified thread carpal tunnel release (mTCTR) using Smartwire-01 in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with CTS who required CTR were enrolled. Symptom severity and functional status were assessed using the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire-Symptom Severity Scale (BCTQ-SSS) and Functional Status Scale (BCTQ-FSS), and pain was assessed using a numerical rating scale (NRS) at 4, 8, and 12 weeks after mTCTR. The scores were compared with the pre-procedural scores. The electrophysiologic study and median nerve cross-sectional area (CSA) measurements at the wrist before and 12 weeks after mTCTR were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 11 patients were included. No adverse effects were reported throughout the study period. The NRS, BCTQ-SSS, and BCTQ-FSS scores significantly improved at 4 weeks after mTCTR, and this improvement persisted throughout the follow-up period (NRS and BCTQ-SSS, P < 0.001; BCTQ-FSS, P = 0.012). After 12 weeks, the latency and velocity of the median sensory nerve action potential significantly improved, compared with those before mTCTR (latency, 5.4 ± 1.3 to 4.7 ± 1.1 ms, P = 0.01; velocity 27.8 ± 6.8 to 31.8 ± 7.4 m/s, P = 0.019). No significant change was observed in the median nerve CSA before and after mTCTR.

CONCLUSION

mTCTR using Smartwire-01 is a safe and effective procedure and a possible alternative to surgery.

Clinical Results of Carpal Tunnel Release Using Ultrasound Guidance in Over 100 Patients at Two to Six Years

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical results of carpal tunnel release using ultrasound guidance (CTR-US) at a minimum of 2 years postprocedure.

Methods

The study consisted of 102 patients (162 hands) treated with CTR-US by the same physician between June 2017 and October 2020 for whom minimum 2-year follow-up data were available. Questionnaires were sent to gather long-term information, with additional phone calls for clarification if needed. Outcomes included Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire symptom severity (BCTQ-SSS) and functional status (BCTQ-FSS) scores; Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) scores; global satisfaction scores; and subsequent surgeries.

Results

The 102 patients included 68 females and 34 males with a mean age of 56.9 years at the time of surgery. Fifty-five (53.9%) patients had simultaneous bilateral procedures, 42 (41.2%) had unilateral procedures, and 5 (4.9%) had staged bilateral procedures. Significant improvements in BCTQ-SSS, BCTQ-FSS, and QuickDASH scores persisted at a mean final follow-up of 46 months (range 2-6 years). At final follow-up, 91.2% of patients reported satisfaction with the procedure. No outcomes were significantly different between those treated with simultaneous bilateral versus unilateral procedures. No revision surgeries were reported.

Conclusions

CTR-US is a safe and effective procedure that results in significant improvements that persist up to 6 years postprocedure. Long-term results of simultaneous bilateral and unilateral procedures are similar.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic IV.

Long-Term Clinical Results of Carpal Tunnel Release Using Ultrasound Guidance: A Multicenter Pragmatic Study

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to report the 1-year clinical outcomes of carpal tunnel release using ultrasound guidance (CTR-US) performed in a large, real-world population of patients enrolled in a multicenter registry.

Methods

All patients who participated in a postmarket registry study of CTR-US outcomes and provided both preoperative and 1-year postoperative data were included. Main outcomes were the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (QDASH), Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire Symptom Severity Scale (BCTQ-SSS), and Boston Carpal Tunnel Functional Status Scale (BCTQ-FSS) scores at 1 year. Subgroup analysis was performed to assess the effect of patient and procedural factors on 1-year outcomes.

Results

A total of 300 patients (341 hands) were treated by 25 different physicians, including 41 (13.7%) treated with simultaneous bilateral procedures. Mean patient age was 54.2 years, 63% were women, 24% had ≥2 comorbidities, and 54% had symptoms for >2 years. Mean QDASH scores decreased from 40.6 ± 20.6 to 12.2 ± 18.3 at 1 year, BCTQ-SSS scores decreased from 3.0 ± 0.7 to 1.5 ± 0.7 at 1 year, and BCTQ-FSS scores decreased from 2.4 ± 0.8 to 1.4 ± 0.6 at 1 year. Women improved more than men at 1 year for QDASH, BCTQ-SSS, and BCTQ-FSS. Patients treated with simultaneous bilateral procedures had similar 1-year outcomes to those treated with unilateral procedures. Multiple other factors including high body mass index, diabetes status, current tobacco use, rheumatoid/inflammatory arthritis, operation in the dominant hand, higher comorbidity burden, and concurrent ipsilateral procedures did not significantly affect 1-year outcomes. Two patients had revision surgeries in addition to one patient with an infection, and one with a suspected small finger tendon injury.

Conclusions

Patients treated with CTR-US in real-world conditions report significant and clinically meaningful improvements in symptoms and function that are maintained at 1 year. The results are consistent across broad patient demographics and are not affected by performing simultaneous bilateral procedures.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic IV.

Understanding the Learning Curve of Carpal Tunnel Release With Ultrasound Guidance: A Review

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common compressive neuropathy and can be treated through carpal tunnel release (CTR) if nonoperative treatments fail. CTR can be performed through a variety of techniques, including traditional open, mini-open, endoscopic, and CTR with ultrasound guidance (CTR-US). The evidence on endoscopic CTR is mixed, due to a higher potential for nerve injury with endoscopic CTR compared to traditional open CTR. CTR-US offers the potential advantage of allowing the visualization of all key anatomical structures, combined with a very small incision and minimal soft tissue insult. As with any ultrasonographic technique or procedure, the learning curve needs to be considered for any provider considering adopting CTR-US. However, literature on ultrasound use around the wrist, including early evidence on the learning curve of CTR-US specifically, demonstrates this skill can be learned relatively quickly by providers with a wide range of prior experience in ultrasound and CTR. Overall, there is a need for high-quality studies comparing different CTR techniques, particularly CTR-US, as it offers the potential for considerable cost savings.

Early Postoperative Recovery after Modified Ultra-Minimally Invasive Sonography-Guided Thread Carpal Tunnel Release

Thread carpal tunnel release (TCTR) has been reported to be safe and effective for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. The aim of this study is to evaluate the modified TCTR for safety, efficacy, and postoperative recovery. Seventy-six extremities in 67 patients undergoing TCTR were analyzed pre- and postoperatively using clinical parameters and patient-reported outcome measures. Twenty-nine men and 38 women with a mean age of 59.9 ± 18.9 years underwent TCTR. The mean postoperative time to resume activities of daily living was 5.5 ± 5.5 days, analgesia was completed after 3.7 ± 4.6 days, and return to work was achieved after a mean of 32.6 ± 15.6 days for blue-collar workers and 4.6 ± 4.3 days for white-collar workers. The Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) and Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores were comparable with previous studies. Overall, two persistent compressions and one recurrence required open reoperation (3.9%). All three had been operated in the initial phase, and none required reoperation after an additional safety step was introduced. No other complications occurred. TCTR surgery appears to be a safe and reliable technique with almost no wound and scarring and a potentially faster recovery time than open techniques. Although our technical modifications may reduce the risk of incomplete release, TCTR requires both ultrasound and surgical skills and has a considerable learning curve.

Comparison efficacy of ultrasound-guided needle release plus corticosteroid injection and mini-open surgery in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome

This retrospective study was to compare clinical outcomes of ultrasound-guided needle release with corticosteroid injection vs. mini-open surgery in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). From January 2021 to December 2021, 40 patients (40 wrists) with CTS were analyzed in this study. The diagnosis was based on clinical symptoms, electrophysiological imaging, and ultrasound imaging. A total of 20 wrists were treated with ultrasound-guided needle release plus corticosteroid injection (Group A), and the other 20 wrists were treated with mini-open surgery (Group B). We evaluated the Boston carpal tunnel questionnaire, electrophysiological parameters (distal motor latency, sensory conduction velocity, and sensory nerve action potential of the median nerve), and ultrasound parameters (cross-sectional area, flattening ratio, and the thicknesses of transverse carpal ligament) both before and 3 months after treatment. Total treatment cost, duration of treatment, healing time, and complications were also recorded for the two groups. The Boston carpal tunnel questionnaire and electrophysiological and ultrasound outcomes at preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively had a significant difference for each group (each with P &lt; 0.05). There were no complications such as infection, hemorrhage, vascular, nerve, or tendon injuries in both groups. Ultrasound-guided needle release and mini-open surgery are both effective measures in treating CTS patients. Ultrasound-guided needle release plus corticosteroid injection provides smaller incision, less cost, less time of treatment, and faster recovery compared with mini-open surgery. Ultrasound-guided needle release plus corticosteroid injection is better for clinical application.

Utilidad de la ecografía en la cirugía de la mano: Parte II

En los últimos años, con los avances técnicos en la ecografía, aumentó la calidad de las imágenes, lo que ha permitido a los cirujanos mejorar su capacidad de evaluar la mano y la muñeca. Las infiltraciones ecoguiadas en cirugía de mano son más precisas y seguras en comparación con las infiltraciones sin el uso de ecografía. El desarrollo de la técnica de ecografía y de transductores de alta resolución nos ayuda a realizar procedimientos ecoguiados, como el tratamiento del dedo en gatillo, la liberación del síndrome del túnel carpiano, y la aponeurotomía en la enfermedad de Dupuytren. El objetivo de este trabajo es describir las técnicas ecográficas en el tratamiento de las patologías de la mano y el estado del arte de las cirugías ecoguiadas de la mano y sus resultados.

Long-term Clinical Results of Carpal Tunnel Release Using Ultrasound Guidance

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the long-term safety and efficacy of carpal tunnel release (CTR) using ultrasound guidance in a group of patients treated by a single physician.

METHODS

The study group consisted of 76 consecutive CTRs performed on 47 patients between June 2017 and April 2019 for whom 1-year follow-up was available. All procedures were performed by the same operator using a single CTR technique. Outcomes included complications; Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire symptom severity (BCTQ-SSS) and functional status (BCTQ-FSS) scores; Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QDASH) scores; and a 5-point global satisfaction score (4 = satisfied, 5 = very satisfied).

RESULTS

The 47 patients included 27 females and 20 males (ages 31-91 years). Twenty-five patients (50 hands) had simultaneous bilateral CTRs, 4 patients (8 hands) had staged bilateral CTRs, and 18 patients had unilateral CTRs. No complications occurred. Statistically and clinically significant reductions in BCTQ-SSS, BCTQ-FSS, and QDASH scores occurred by 1 to 2 weeks post-CTR and persisted at 1-year (mean 1-year changes vs. pre-CTR -2.11, -1.70, and -44.99, respectively; P < .001 for all). The mean global satisfaction score at 1-year was 4.63.

CONCLUSIONS

CTR using ultrasound (US) guidance is a safe and effective procedure that produces statistically and clinically significant improvements within 1 to 2 weeks postprocedure that persist to 1 year. Furthermore, simultaneous bilateral CTRs using US guidance are feasible and may be advantageous for patients who are candidates for bilateral CTR.

Trial of ultrasound guided carpal tunnel release versus traditional open release (TUTOR)

BACKGROUND

Carpal tunnel release (CTR) is a surgical treatment option for patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) symptoms that are unresponsive to conservative treatment. Most patients experience symptomatic relief after CTR regardless of the surgical technique. However, direct comparisons of the safety and effectiveness between CTR surgical techniques are limited. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the safety and effectiveness of CTR with ultrasound guidance (CTR-US) versus mini-open CTR (mOCTR) in subjects with symptomatic CTS.

DESIGN AND METHODS

TUTOR (Trial of Ultrasound guided CTR versus Traditional Open Release) is a randomized controlled trial in which 120 subjects at up to 12 sites in the United States will be randomized (2:1) to receive CTR-US or mOCTR. The primary endpoint of the study is the percentage of patients who return to normal daily activities within 3 days of the procedure. Secondary endpoints of the study are median time to return to normal daily activities, percentage of patients who return to work within 3 days of the procedure, median time to return to work, Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire Symptom Severity Scale (BCTQ-SSS) change score at 3 months, BCTQ Functional Status Scale (BCTQ-FSS) change score at 3 months, Numeric Pain Scale change score at 3 months, EuroQoL-5 Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) change score at 3 months, and the incidence of device- or procedure-related adverse events at 3 months. Patient follow-up in this trial will continue for 1 year.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study was approved by a central institutional review board and ongoing trial oversight will be provided by a data safety monitoring board (DSMB). The authors intend to report the results of this trial at medical conferences and peer-reviewed journals. The outcomes of TUTOR will have important clinical and economic implications for all stakeholders involved in treating patients with CTS.

STUDY REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov): NCT05405218.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

1.

Percutaneous Ultrasound-Guided Release of the Lacertus Fibrosus for Median Nerve Entrapment at the Elbow

PURPOSE

The aim of this technical note is to present a microinvasive percutaneous ultrasound-guided release of the lacertus fibrosus of the biceps brachii for pronator syndrome, i.e., entrapment of the median nerve at the elbow.

METHODS

Fifteen consecutive patients were included. Patients showed isolated pronator syndrome including pain plus reduced strength of specific median nerve innervated muscles. The release was performed in a non-operating interventional room under wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT). It was conducted superficial to the pronator teres with in-plane ultrasound guidance. The recovery of strength was first assessed peroperatively, and then systematic visits at postoperative weeks 1 and 4 included assessments of both strength and pain.

RESULTS

Procedures were comfortably completed with no immediate surgical or anesthetic complication. Muscle strength returned immediately and persisted at postoperative visits. Visual analog scores for pain reduced from 6.2 to 2.5 and 0.6 at weeks 1 and 4, respectively. All working patients were able to perform in their professional activities at week 1. The millimetric skin incision healed with no hypertrophic scar tissue. A small hematoma occurred at week 1 and resorbed spontaneously. No other delayed complication was observed. The procedure appeared effective with improved invasiveness compared to existing techniques. Real-time monitoring with ultrasound may improve the safety. The technique could be regarded as a new ultrasound-guided alternative to surgery.

CONCLUSION

Performed superficial to the pronator teres muscle under WALANT anesthesia, the microinvasive percutaneous ultrasound-guided release of the lacertus fibrosus may be an effective treatment of pronator syndrome.

Percutaneous Sonographically Guided Release of Carpal Tunnel and Trigger Finger: Biomechanics, Clinical Results, Technical Developments

The interventional use of sonography is growing fast, and percutaneous sonographically guided release is more and more used as minimally invasive treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome as well as trigger finger digit. The benefits of these procedures seem promising in clinical studies, but biomechanical studies comparing these procedures with open classical surgery are scarce. Minimally invasive releases of carpal tunnel and trigger finger could limit the phenomenon of tendon bowstringing observed after open surgery. A new model is presented to compare the biomechanical effects of open and sono-guided carpal tunnel and trigger finger releases.

Cost-Effectiveness of Sonography-Guided Surgery

Percutaneous carpal tunnel release (CTR) is a new surgical technique allowing to cut the transverse carpal ligament under sonography, without skin incision. The technique is safe, offers good functional results and early return to daily activities. This study investigates if percutaneous CTR is also cost-effective. Percutaneous CTR presents many advantages and may be safer than open and endoscopic CTR. This study could not demonstrate that it allows also cheaper surgery, at least as compared to open CTR. However, if it allows earlier return to work, percutaneous CTR could offer a major economic advantage over other techniques, particularly open surgery.

Sonography-Guided Carpal Tunnel Release

During the past 2 decades, increased powerful and quality ultrasound devices have contributed to developing ultrasound surgery more specifically for the hand. Carpal tunnel release under ultrasound now is available as a safe technique. The procedure uses a specific device. A detailed surgical technique is presented. The role of sonography is emphasized. This article discusses the results of the 150 first cases. The author's experience is compared with other ultrasound-guided carpal tunnel release procedures. Outcome quality optimized by the ultra-mini-invasive approach and ultrasound should increase its use.

Safe Zones for Percutaneous Carpal Tunnel Release

Carpal tunnel release (CTR) is an effective procedure used in open, endoscopic, or ultrasound-guided methods. The complications are rare but potentially devasting. Most complications come from errors related to intraoperative technique, especially in the minimally invasive approach. An understanding of the "safe zones" is essential to perform percutaneous CTR safely. This article reviews the anatomy of safe zones and the ultrasound-guided CTR (UCTR) techniques in an attempt to prevent intraoperative complications. In strict accordance with the concepts of safe zones, UCTR is an effective and reliable procedure. Substantial experience for ultrasound-guided injection and surgery is required.

Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Iliotibial Band Release for External Coxa Saltans: A Cadaveric Study

The surgical treatment of external coxa saltans is not standardized. Many techniques for iliotibial release have been described, both open and arthroscopic. No technique describes ultrasound release. In this cadaveric study, we describe a minimally invasive technique for percutaneous iliotibial release with ultrasound guidance, designed to be performed under local anesthesia. The future objective would be to perform an active intraoperative test of the snapping hip to confirm adequate release, thus reducing the risk of recurrence.

Minimally invasive ultrasound-guided vs open release for carpal tunnel syndrome in working population: A randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical effectiveness of minimally invasive ultrasound (US)-guided vs open release for carpal tunnel syndrome.

METHODS

In an open randomized controlled trial, 47 employed patients were allocated to US-guided carpal tunnel release (USCTR) and 42 to an open carpal tunnel release (OCTR) procedure. The main outcome was symptom severity measured by the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ-S). Secondary outcomes were hand functionality (BCTQ-F), nerve conduction, two-point discrimination, handgrip and pinch strength, pain (visual analog scale), work leave and complications. For BCTQ-S and BCTQ-F, minimal clinically important differences (MCID) were also considered. Follow-up duration was 12 months.

RESULTS

Mixed model analyses detected no significant differences between the two treatment arms in BCTQ-S (P = .098) while BCTQ-F scores were significantly better in the USCTR group (P = .007). This benefit was, however, not supported by the MCID data. Remaining variables were similar in the two groups except pain which was lower in USCTR at 3 months follow-up. All variables but two-point discrimination showed significant improvement after 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings reveal similar symptom relief benefits following OCTR or USCTR in these patients. The patients in our USCTR group, however, reported better hand functional status and less pain.

Clinical Results of Ultrasound-Guided Carpal Tunnel Release Performed by a Primary Care Sports Medicine Physician

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided carpal tunnel release (USCTR) in a consecutive group of patients treated by a single primary care sports medicine physician.

METHODS

The study group consisted of 35 USCTRs performed on 22 consecutive patients for whom clinical outcomes were available before USCTR and at 1 to 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months after USCTR. All procedures were performed by the same operator using a single USCTR technique. Outcomes included complications, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores, Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire symptom severity and functional status scores, and a 5-point global satisfaction score.

RESULTS

The 22 patients included 13 female and 9 male patients (ages 31-82 years). Eleven patients (22 wrists) had bilateral simultaneous USCTRs; 2 patients (4 wrists) had staged bilateral USCTRs; and 9 patients had unilateral USCTRs. No complications occurred in any patient. Statistically and clinically significant reductions in Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores and Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire symptom severity and functional status scores occurred by 1 to 2 weeks after USCTR (mean 1- to 2-week changes, -29.23, -1.74, and -1.18, respectively), and further improvements occurred during the 3-month follow-up period (mean 3-month changes, -51.11, -2.29, and -1.91; P < .0001 for all values versus before USCTR). Mean global satisfaction scores at 1 to 2 weeks and 3 months were 4.63 and 4.66.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound-guided CTR is a safe and effective procedure that can be performed by an experienced primary care sports medicine physician and typically results in significant improvements within the first 2 weeks after the procedure. Furthermore, bilateral simultaneous USCTRs are feasible and may provide significant advantages for patients who are candidates for bilateral CTRs.

Ultrasound-Guided Surgery for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A New Interventional Procedure

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) may be treated surgically if medical treatment fails. The classical approach involves release of the flexor retinaculum by endoscopic or open surgery. Meta-analyses have shown that the risk of nerve injury may be higher with endoscopic treatment. The recent contribution of ultrasound to the diagnosis and therapeutic management of CTS opens new perspectives. Ultrasound-guided carpal tunnel release via a minimally invasive approach enables the whole operation to be performed as a percutaneous radiological procedure. The advantages are a smaller incision compared with classical techniques; great safety during the procedure by visualization of anatomic structures, particularly variations in the median nerve; and realization of the procedure under local anesthesia. These advantages lead to a reduction in postsurgical sequelae and more rapid resumption of daily activities and work. Dressings are removed by the third day postsurgery. Recent studies seem to confirm the medical, economic, and aesthetic benefits of this new approach.

Minimally Invasive Ultrasound-Guided Carpal Tunnel Release: Preliminary Clinical Results

Ultrasound-guided carpal tunnel release was performed on 14 patients (18 wrists) using dynamic expansion of the transverse safe zone. Our patient population included able-bodied patients and those with impairments. The first 8 cases (12 wrists) underwent the procedure in an operating room, the remainder in an outpatient setting. No complications occurred, and all patients were able to immediately resume use of their hands without therapy. Improvements in the Quick Form of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Index and Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire at 3 months were comparable to results reported with mini-open and endoscopic release. Our results show that ultrasound-guided carpal tunnel release can be safely and effectively performed in an outpatient setting.

Ultrasound-Guided Microinvasive Carpal Tunnel Release Using a Novel Retractable Needle-Mounted Blade: A Cadaveric Study

Ultrasound (US)-guided microinvasive procedures are defined as those performed via needles without notable scarring. Ten cadaver hands underwent US-guided microinvasive carpal tunnel release using a novel needle-based tool, the micro i-Blade (Summit Medical Products, Inc, Sandy, UT). A US-imaged landmark, the inflexion point of the ligaments distal to the hook of the hamate, was used to position the distal extent of the cut. The transverse carpal ligament was successfully released in all hands without damage to nerves or arteries. In 3 specimens, the fascia between the thenar and hypothenar muscles was partly preserved, whereas the palmar aponeurosis was partly cut in 1 specimen. The micro i-Blade with the cutting knife retracted was also useful as a probe palpated through the palm of the cadaver hand, to test the release of the transverse carpal ligament and to guide the procedure.

Anatomic Relationship Between the Hook of the Hamate and the Distal Transverse Carpal Ligament: Implications for Ultrasound-Guided Carpal Tunnel Release

OBJECTIVE

During ultrasound-guided carpal tunnel release, osseous landmarks may supplement direct visualization of the distal transverse carpal ligament (dTCL) to ensure a complete release. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between the apex of the hook of the hamate (aHH) and the dTCL within the transverse safe zone (TSZ) of the carpal tunnel.

DESIGN

Twenty unembalmed cadaveric specimens were dissected to determine the aHH-dTCL distance and the aHH-SPA distance (the distance between the aHH and the superficial palmar arch) at the ulnar and radial limits of the TSZ (the distance between the hook of the hamate or ulnar artery to the median nerve).

RESULTS

The aHH-dTCL distance averaged 11-12 mm across the TSZ (maximum, 18.2 mm), whereas the aHH-SPA distance was significantly greater on the radial side of the TSZ compared with the ulnar side (22.6 ± 3.6 mm vs. 14.0 ± 4.0 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

The dTCL lies approximately 11-12 mm distal to the aHH across the TSZ, with an upper limit of 18.2 mm. Along with direct sonographic visualization of the dTCL, the aHH can be used with other osseous landmarks to estimate the position of the dTCL during ultrasound-guided carpal tunnel release.

Effectiveness of Surgical and Postsurgical Interventions for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome-A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To present an evidence-based overview of the effectiveness of surgical and postsurgical interventions for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).

DATA SOURCES

The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PEDro were searched for relevant systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to April 8, 2016.

STUDY SELECTION

Two reviewers independently applied the inclusion criteria to select potential studies.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two reviewers independently extracted the data and assessed the methodologic quality.

DATA SYNTHESIS

A best-evidence synthesis was performed to summarize the results. Four systematic reviews and 33 RCTs were included. Surgery versus nonsurgical interventions, timing of surgery, and various surgical techniques and postoperative interventions were studied. Corticosteroid injection was more effective than surgery (strong evidence, short-term). Surgery was more effective than splinting or anti-inflammatory drugs plus hand therapy (moderate evidence, midterm and long-term). Manual therapy was more effective than surgical treatment (moderate evidence, short-term and midterm). Within surgery, corticosteroid irrigation of the median nerve before skin closure as additive to CTS release or the direct vision plus tunneling technique was more effective than standard open CTS release (moderate evidence, short-term). Furthermore, short was more effective than long bulky dressings, and a sensory retraining program was more effective than no program after surgery (moderate evidence, short-term). For all other interventions only conflicting, limited, or no evidence was found.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical treatment seems to be more effective than splinting or anti-inflammatory drugs plus hand therapy in the short-term, midterm, and/or long-term to treat CTS. However there is strong evidence that a local corticosteroid injection is more effective than surgery in the short-term, and moderate evidence that manual therapy is more effective than surgery in the short-term and midterm. There is no unequivocal evidence that suggests one surgical treatment is more effective than the other. Postsurgical, a short- (2-3 days) favored a long-duration (9-14 days) bulky dressing and a sensory retraining program seems to be more effective than no program in short-term. More research regarding the optimal timing of surgery for CTS is needed.

A Comparison of Two Limited Open Techniques for Carpal Tunnel Release

Review of the literature shows the effectiveness of limited open carpal tunnel release to be comparable to that of endoscopic carpal tunnel release in respect of recovery of grip strength, time of return to work and complication rate. A randomised, controlled study was designed to compare the effectiveness of a single versus a double limited open technique of carpal tunnel release. Sixty-five patients (73 hands) with a mean age of 48 years were operated on, 40 hands by the single incision and 33 by the double incision method. Grip and pinch strengths, digital sensibility (Filament and 2PD tests) and Levine scores were evaluated throughout 12 months of follow-up. We found that the single incision method offers better results in respect of grip and pinch strengths: less weakness at 1 month after surgery and a faster improvement relative to pre-operative values which is statistically significant. This, however, did not translate directly into Levine functional and symptom scores which, at each assessment, did not differ significantly between the two methods.

Ultra-Minimally Invasive Ultrasound-Guided Carpal Tunnel Release: A Randomized Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of 1-mm ultra-minimally invasive ultrasound-guided carpal tunnel release and 2-cm blind mini-open carpal tunnel release.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center individual parallel-group controlled-superiority randomized control trial in an ambulatory office-based setting at a third-level referral hospital. Eligible participants had clinical signs of primary carpal tunnel syndrome and positive electrodiagnostic test results and were followed for 12 months. Independent outcome assessors were blinded. Patients were randomized by concealed allocation (1:1) by an independent blocked computer-generated list. The postoperative score on the Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire was the primary variable. Grip strength and time for discontinuation of oral analgesics, complete wrist flexion-extension, relief of paresthesia, and return to normal daily activities (including work) were assessed.

RESULTS

Ninety-two of 128 eligible patients were randomly allocated and analyzed. QuickDASH scores were 2.2 to 3.3 times significantly lower in the ultra-minimally invasive group for the first 6 months: 23.6 [95% confidence interval (CI), 20.5, 27.4] versus 52.6 [95% CI, 49.4, 57.0] at the first week and 4.09 [95% CI, 1.5, 7.1] versus 13.0 [95% CI, 9.4, 18.9] at 6 months. Return to normal daily activities occurred significantly sooner in the ultra-minimally invasive group: 4.9 [95% CI, 3.2, 6.5] versus 25.4 [95% CI, 18.2, 32.6] days.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultra-minimally invasive carpal tunnel release provides earlier functional return and less postoperative morbidity with the same neurologic recovery as mini-open carpal tunnel release for patients with symptomatic primary carpal tunnel syndrome.

Sonographic Visualization of Thenar Motor Branch of the Median Nerve: A Cadaveric Validation Study

BACKGROUND

The thenar motor branch (TMB) of the median nerve may be affected in carpal tunnel syndrome and can be injured during carpal tunnel surgery. Although ultrasound has been used to identify small nerves throughout the body, the sonographic evaluation of the TMB has not been investigated formally.

OBJECTIVE

To document the ability of ultrasound to visualize the TMB of the median nerve in an unembalmed cadaveric model.

DESIGN

Prospective laboratory investigation.

SETTING

Procedural skills laboratory at a tertiary medical center.

METHODS

On the basis of anatomical descriptions, dissection and clinical experience, a technique was developed to sonographically identify the presumed TMB of the median nerve at the distal carpal tunnel. A single, experienced examiner then identified the presumed TMB in 10 unembalmed, cadaveric upper limb specimens (4 right, 6 left) obtained from 9 donors (4 male, 5 female) ages 76-85 years with body mass indices of 18.2-29.5 kg/m² with both 12-3 MHZ and 16-7 MHz linear array transducers. The same examiner then injected 0.2-0.3 mL of diluted colored latex into and around the presumed TMB using direct ultrasound guidance. At a minimum of 24 hours postinjection, specimens were dissected under loupe magnification to determine the location of the latex injectate.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The location of latex injectate relative to the anatomically identified TMB.

RESULTS

A vertical, linear, hypoechogenic region was sonographically identified arising from the median nerve at the distal carpal tunnel in all 10 specimens and was hypothesized to represent the vertical segment of the TMB. Both transducers allowed identification of the TMB, although localization was subjectively facilitated by the higher frequency transducer. All 10 sonographically guided injections placed latex into and around the TMB of the median nerve, confirming that ultrasound had accurately identified the TMB.

CONCLUSIONS

Sonographic evaluation of the TMB of the median nerve is technically feasible and should be considered when clinically indicated. Further research and clinical experience is necessary to define the role of sonographic TMB imaging in the evaluation and management of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

A non-scalpel technique for minimally invasive surgery: percutaneously looped thread transection of the transverse carpal ligament

PURPOSE

This study aims to develop an alternate technique for improving the surgical procedure of carpal tunnel release.

METHOD

The transverse carpal ligament is transected by utilizing a piece of thread looped percutaneously under the visualization of ultrasound. The procedure, the thread carpal tunnel release (TCTR), was performed on 34 hands of 20 patients. Self-administrated Levine-Katz questionnaire was used for assessing the symptom severity and functional status of the outcomes.

RESULTS

TCTR was performed in each case with no unintended consequences. The average duration for a procedure was 7 min, excluding time of preparation. Significant improvements in subjective sensibility were reported within 24 h, and sleep quality improved for all cases. There were no postoperative complications. The scores of questionnaire 3 months postoperatively were comparable to the literature controls.

CONCLUSION

TCTR is a safe and effective minimally invasive surgery performed under local anesthesia in a clinic-based procedure room and results in only one-needle entrance point at the wrist and one-needle exit point in the palm. The feature of the procedure includes the potentials of reduced risk of iatrogenic injury, reduced surgical cost, and reduced patient recovery time. The study has shown encouraging promise for optimizing the technique of carpal tunnel release, and more clinical trials are necessary to confirm the findings.

Ultra minimally invasive sonographically guided carpal tunnel release: an external pilot study

BACKGROUND

Authors have reported better outcomes, by reducing surgical dissection for carpal tunnel syndromes requiring surgery. Recently, a new sonographically guided technique for ultra minimally invasive (Ultra-MIS) carpal tunnel release (CTR) through 1mm incision has been described.

HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesized that a clinical trial for comparing Ultra-MIS versus Mini-open Carpal Tunnel Release (Mini-OCTR) was feasible.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

To test our hypothesis, we conducted a pilot study for studying Ultra-MIS versus Mini-OCTR respectively performed through a 1mm or a 2 cm incision. We defined success if primary feasibility objectives (safety and efficacy) as well as secondary feasibility objectives (recruitment rates, compliance, completion, treatment blinding, personnel resources and sample size calculation for the clinical trial) could be matched. Score for Quick-DASH questionnaire at final follow-up was studied as the primary variable for the clinical trial. Turnover times were studied for assessing learning curve stability.

RESULTS

Forty patients were allotted. Primary and secondary feasibility objectives were matched with the following occurrences: 70.2% of eligible patients finally recruited; 4.2% of randomization refusals; 26.6 patients/month recruited; 100% patients receiving a blinded treatment; 97.5% compliance and 100% completion. A sample size of 91 patients was calculated for clinical trial validation. At final follow-up, preliminary results for Quick-Dash substantially favored Ultra-MIS over Mini-OCTR (average 14.54 versus 7.39) and complication rates were lower for Ultra-MIS (5% versus 20%). A stable learning curve was observed for both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical trial is feasible. There is currently no evidence to contraindicate nor withhold the use of Ultra-MIS for CTR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Coracoacromial ligament section under ultrasonographic control: a cadaveric study on 20 cases

INTRODUCTION

The coracoacromial ligament is a complex anatomical structure involved in the development of subacromial impingement; treatment is founded on sectioning the ligament, with or without associated arthroscopic acromioplasty and debridement.

HYPOTHESIS

Complete coracoacromial ligament section can be performed under ultrasound, without lesion to surrounding structures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The coracoacromial ligament was sectioned on the coracoid side, under ultrasound navigation, in 10 cadavers donated to science: i.e. 20 shoulders. After ultrasound location of the shoulder structures, sectioning was performed with a skin incision at the level of the deltopectoral sulcus. Secondary surgical control checked conservation of the acromial branch of the thoracoacromial artery, and the quality of the procedure.

RESULTS

Mean surgery duration was 18.5 minutes (±5 min). Seventeen sections were complete (85%). Artery location was hampered by the impossibility of using Doppler on these cadavers, yet even so there were only 2 vascular lesions. There were no accidental rotator cuff or cartilaginous lesions.

CONCLUSION

This relatively non-invasive technique is quick and less heavy than open surgery, opening up new treatment perspectives. It could be indicated in coracoid and subacromial impingement before opting for surgery, or as a complement to surgery. It does, however, involve a learning curve and requires solid ultrasound skills.

Ultrasound-guided carpal tunnel release using the manos CTR system

PURPOSE

Ultrasound (US) has been used in the management of carpal tunnel syndrome since the 1980s. The first report of US-guided carpal tunnel release (CTR) was published in 1997, with cadaver and clinical reports confirming the safe navigation of surgical tools with US for division of the transverse carpal ligament. The MANOS CTR device was recently reported as a minimally invasive tool for CTR, and may be well suited for use with US guidance.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The authors report three cases of US-guided CTR using the MANOS CTR device. The MANOS device was inserted in a blunt configuration into the safe zone, and the cutting surface was deployed with a thumb-activated trigger that simultaneously ejected a sharp through the palm. The transverse carpal ligament was divided safely and confirmed with US.

RESULTS

US allowed for clear identification of the median nerve, safe zones, transverse carpal ligament, and the MANOS CTR device in relation to all pertinent structures of the carpal tunnel. Complete division of the transverse carpal ligament was confirmed in all three cases. There were no median nerve, vessel, tendon injuries, or chronic regional pain syndrome in any of the three cases.

CONCLUSIONS

US-guided CTR with the MANOS CTR device appears to be a safe technique and successful in confirming complete release.

Minimally invasive ultrasound-guided carpal tunnel release: a cadaver study

BACKGROUND

Carpal tunnel syndrome is a common condition frequently requiring surgical intervention. We describe a new minimally invasive surgical technique for carpal tunnel release utilizing ultrasound (US) visualization.

METHODS

The technique was performed on 20 fresh frozen cadaver specimens. A surgical metallic probe with a "U"-shaped trough and upward curved distal tip was precisely positioned in the carpal tunnel with US guidance followed by division of the flexor retinaculum (FR) with a "V"-shaped scalpel.

RESULTS

Complete division of the FR was confirmed by US. Dissection performed on the specimens confirmed complete release of FR and absence of neurovascular injury. The distance from the division of the FR to these structures, the "safety margins," was measured.

CONCLUSIONS

This new technique for carpal tunnel release appears to combine the safety and efficacy of open carpal tunnel surgery with the advantages of the minimally invasive techniques.

Ultra-minimally invasive sonographically guided carpal tunnel release: anatomic study of a new technique

OBJECTIVES

The purposes of this study were to measure a safe zone and a path for ultra-minimally invasive sonographically guided carpal tunnel release with a 1-mm incision in healthy volunteers and then test the procedure in cadavers.

METHODS

First, a previously reported sonographic zone was defined as the space between the median nerve and the closest ulnar vascular structure. Axially, the safest theoretical cutting point for carpal tunnel release was set by bisecting this zone. Magnetic resonance imaging was used for axially determining the limits of the sectors (origin at the cutting point) that did not enclose structures at risk (arteries and nerves) and coronally for determining whether our release path could require directions that could potentially compromise safety (origin at the pisiform's proximal pole). Second, in cadavers, we performed ultra-minimally invasive sonographically guided carpal tunnel release from an intracarpal position through a 1-mm antebrachial approach. Efficacy (deepest fibrous layer release rate), safety (absence of neurovascular or tendon injury), and damage to any anatomy superficial to transverse carpal ligament were assessed by dissection.

RESULTS

All 11 of our volunteers (22 wrists) had safe axial sectors located volar and radially of at least 80.4º (considered safe). Release path directions were theoretically safe (almost parallel to the longitudinal axis of the forearm). In 10 cadaver wrists, ultra-minimally invasive sonographically guided carpal tunnel release was effective (100% release rate) and safe without signs of intrusion into the superficial anatomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultra-minimally invasive sonographically guided carpal tunnel release in a safe sonographic zone may be feasible The technique preserves the superficial anatomy and diminishes the damage of a surgical approach.

Carpal tunnel syndrome. Part II: effectiveness of surgical treatments--a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To present an evidence-based overview of the effectiveness of surgical and postsurgical interventions to treat carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).

DATA SOURCES

The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PEDro were searched for relevant systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

STUDY SELECTION

Two reviewers independently applied the inclusion criteria to select potential studies.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two reviewers independently extracted the data and assessed the methodologic quality.

DATA SYNTHESIS

A best-evidence synthesis was performed to summarize the results of the included studies. Two reviews and 25 RCTs were included. Moderate evidence was found in favor of surgical treatment compared with splinting or anti-inflammatory drugs plus hand therapy in the midterm and long term, and for the effectiveness of corticosteroid irrigation of the median nerve before skin closure as additive to carpal tunnel release in the short term. Limited evidence was found in favor of a double-incision technique compared with the standard incision technique. Also, limited evidence was found in favor of a mini-open technique assisted by a Knifelight instrument compared with a standard open release at 19 months of follow-up. However, in the short term and at 30 months of follow-up, no significant differences were found between the mini-open technique assisted by a Knifelight instrument compared with a standard open release. Many studies compared different surgical interventions, but no evidence was found in favor of any one of them. No RCTs explored the optimal timing strategy for surgery. No evidence was found for the efficacy of various presurgical or postsurgical treatment programs, including splinting.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical treatment seems to be more effective than splinting or anti-inflammatory drugs plus hand therapy in the midterm and long term to treat CTS. However, there is no unequivocal evidence that suggests one surgical treatment is more effective than the other. More research is needed to study conservative to surgical treatment in which also should be taken into account the optimal timing of surgery. Future research should also concentrate on optimal presurgical and postsurgical treatment programs.

Percutaneous carpal tunnel release compared with mini-open release using ultrasonographic guidance for both techniques

PURPOSE

To compare the outcomes of percutaneous carpal tunnel release (PCTR) and mini-open carpal tunnel release (mini-OCTR) using ultrasonographic guidance for both techniques.

METHODS

We included 74 hands of 65 women with idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome (age, 52-71 y; mean, 58 y). Thirty-five hands of 29 women had the PCTR (release with a device consisting of an angled blade, guide, and holder, along a line midway between the median nerve and ulnar artery (safe line) under ultrasonography (incision, 4 mm), and 39 hands of 36 women had the mini-OCTR (release along the safe line, distally under direct vision (incision, 1-1.5 cm) and proximally under ultrasonography, using a device consisting of a basket punch and outer tube.

RESULTS

Assessments at 3, 6, 13, 26, 52, and 104 weeks showed no significant differences in neurologic recovery between the groups (p > .05). The PCTR group had significantly less pain, greater grip and key-pinch strengths, and better satisfaction scores at 3 and 6 weeks (p < .05), and less scar sensitivity at 3, 6, and 13 weeks (p < .05). There were no complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The PCTR provides the same neurologic recovery as does the mini-OCTR. The former leads to less postoperative morbidity and earlier functional return and achievement of satisfaction.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic III.

Clinical outcomes of surgical release among diabetic patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: prospective follow-up with matched controls

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical outcome after carpal tunnel release in diabetic and nondiabetic patients.

METHODS

We evaluated a prospective, consecutive series of 35 diabetic patients (median age, 54 years; 15 with type 1 and 20 with type 2 diabetes) with carpal tunnel syndrome, who were age- and gender-matched with 31 nondiabetic patients (median age, 51 years) having idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. Exclusion criteria were other focal nerve entrapments, cervical radiculopathy, inflammatory joint disease, renal failure, thyroid disorders, previous wrist fracture, and long-term exposure to vibrating tools. Participants were examined independently at baseline (preoperatively) and 6, 12, and 52 weeks after surgery, including evaluating sensory function (Semmes-Weinstein), motor function (abductor pollicis brevis muscle strength and grip strength), pillar pain, cold intolerance, and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

The number of patients with normal sensory function (pulp of index finger) increased notably in both patient groups from baseline (diabetic patients, 7 of 35; nondiabetic patients, 10 of 31) compared with the 52-week follow-up (diabetic patients, 25 of 35; nondiabetic patients, 24 of 31). Grip strength decreased temporarily at 6 weeks but recovered completely after 12 weeks. At the 52-week follow-up, mean grip strength (95% confidence interval) had improved significantly in both patient groups (diabetic patients: 3.0 kg [-0.3 to 6.2], nondiabetic patients: 3.4 kg [0.2 to 6.6]). Pillar pain correlated significantly with grip strength at the 6-week follow-up (r(s) = -0.41 to -0.54 [p < .05]). The number of patients reporting cold intolerance decreased over time (diabetic patients, 22 of 35 to 19 of 35; nondiabetic patients, 18 of 31 to 8 of 31), but decreased markedly less for the diabetic patients. Level of patient satisfaction was equal between groups. Comparing type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients, no important difference was noted on any test variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with diabetes have the same beneficial outcome after carpal tunnel release as nondiabetic patients. Only cold intolerance demonstrated a lesser extent of relief for diabetic patients.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic I.

Power grip, pinch grip, manual muscle testing or thenar atrophy - which should be assessed as a motor outcome after carpal tunnel decompression? A systematic review

Background

Objective assessment of motor function is frequently used to evaluate outcome after surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). However a range of outcome measures are used and there appears to be no consensus on which measure of motor function effectively captures change. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify the methods used to assess motor function in randomized controlled trials of surgical interventions for CTS. A secondary aim was to evaluate which instruments reflect clinical change and are psychometrically robust.

Methods

The bibliographic databases Medline, AMED and CINAHL were searched for randomized controlled trials of surgical interventions for CTS. Data on instruments used, methods of assessment and results of tests of motor function was extracted by two independent reviewers.

Results

Twenty-two studies were retrieved which included performance based assessments of motor function. Nineteen studies assessed power grip dynamometry, fourteen studies used both power and pinch grip dynamometry, eight used manual muscle testing and five assessed the presence or absence of thenar atrophy. Several studies used multiple tests of motor function. Two studies included both power and pinch strength and reported descriptive statistics enabling calculation of effect sizes to compare the relative responsiveness of grip and pinch strength within study samples. The study findings suggest that tip pinch is more responsive than lateral pinch or power grip up to 12 weeks following surgery for CTS.

Conclusion

Although used most frequently and known to be reliable, power and key pinch dynamometry are not the most valid or responsive tools for assessing motor outcome up to 12 weeks following surgery for CTS. Tip pinch dynamometry more specifically targets the thenar musculature and appears to be more responsive. Manual muscle testing, which in theory is most specific to the thenar musculature, may be more sensitive if assessed using a hand held dynamometer – the Rotterdam Intrinsic Handheld Myometer. However further research is needed to evaluate its reliability and responsiveness and establish the most efficient and psychometrically robust method of evaluating motor function following surgery for CTS.

Surgical treatment options for carpal tunnel syndrome

BACKGROUND

Carpal tunnel syndrome is a common disorder for which several surgical treatment options are available.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy of the various surgical techniques in relieving symptoms and promoting return to work or activities of daily living and to compare the occurrence of side-effects and complications in patients suffering from carpal tunnel syndrome.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We updated the searches in 2006. We conducted computer-aided searches of the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Trials Register (searched in June 2006), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2006, Issue 2), MEDLINE (January 1966 to June 2006), EMBASE (January 1980 to June 2006) and also tracked references in bibliographies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing various surgical techniques for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors performed study selection, assessment of methodological quality and data extraction independently of each other.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirty-three studies were included in the review of which 10 were newly identified in this update. The methodological quality of the trials ranged from fair to good; however, the use of allocation concealment was mentioned explicitly in only seven trials. Many studies failed to present the results in sufficient detail to enable statistical pooling. Pooling was also impeded by the vast variety of outcome measures that were applied in the various studies. None of the existing alternatives to standard open carpal tunnel release offered significantly better relief from symptoms in the short- or long-term. In three studies with a total of 294 participants, endoscopic carpal tunnel release resulted in earlier return to work or activities of daily living than open carpal tunnel release, with a weighted mean difference of -6 days (95% CI -9 to -3 days).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no strong evidence supporting the need for replacement of standard open carpal tunnel release by existing alternative surgical procedures for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. The decision to apply endoscopic carpal tunnel release instead of open carpal tunnel release seems to be guided by the surgeon's and patient's preferences.

Use of quantitative abductor pollicis brevis strength testing in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome remains clinical, despite many objective clinical and electrophysiologic tests. There is also a need to objectively assess the severity of involvement and the need for surgery, and to document response to treatment. The authors evaluated a hand-held strength-testing device for assessment of abductor pollicis brevis strength in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome.

METHODS

Sixty-two hands in 50 patients (39 women and 11 men) aged 26 to 57 years were examined. All hands were evaluated before and 6 weeks after surgery. Nineteen hands were available for 7-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Abductor pollicis brevis strength following carpal tunnel release increased significantly from a mean of 2.3 kg to 3.1 kg. The strength further increased in all long-term follow-up patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Quantitative strength testing can be used to document changes in abductor pollicis brevis strength in response to treatment in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Further study is needed to assess the reliability of this testing method using multiple examiners in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome, and to evaluate the utility of using this device in tracking the long-term outcome of patients after carpal tunnel release.

Use of Sonography in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Surgery-A Prospective Study-

The diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is mainly based on the characteristic symptoms and confirmed with nerve conduction studies. Sonography can provide measurements of the increased cross-sectional area of median nerve. The use of sonography was evaluated for the diagnosis and postoperative follow up of 48 wrists in 26 consecutive patients with CTS. Clinical evaluation and sonography were effective for the diagnosis in 40 wrists. Nerve conduction studies were needed in eight wrists, because of the decrease in cross-sectional area of the nerve as a result of degenerative changes. After 3 months, sonography detected statistically significant decreases in the cross-sectional areas of the median nerves. The sonographic studies were well tolerated by all patients. Sonography was both time-saving and cost-effective.

A systematic review of outcomes assessed in randomized controlled trials of surgical interventions for carpal tunnel syndrome using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a reference tool

BACKGROUND

A wide range of outcomes have been assessed in trials of interventions for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), however there appears to be little consensus on what constitutes the most relevant outcomes. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify the outcomes assessed in randomized clinical trials of surgical interventions for CTS and to compare these to the concepts contained in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).

METHODS

The bibliographic databases Medline, AMED and CINAHL were searched for randomized controlled trials of surgical treatment for CTS. The outcomes assessed in these trials were identified, classified and linked to the different domains of the ICF.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies were retrieved which met the inclusion criteria. The most frequently assessed outcomes were self-reported symptom resolution, grip or pinch strength and return to work. The majority of outcome measures employed assessed impairment of body function and body structure and a small number of studies used measures of activity and participation.

CONCLUSION

The ICF provides a useful framework for identifying the concepts contained in outcome measures employed to date in trials of surgical intervention for CTS and may help in the selection of the most appropriate domains to be assessed, especially where studies are designed to capture the impact of the intervention at individual and societal level. Comparison of results from different studies and meta-analysis would be facilitated through the use of a core set of standardised outcome measures which cross all domains of the ICF. Further work on developing consensus on such a core set is needed.

Sonographically Guided Percutaneous Carpal Tunnel Release

Minimally invasive techniques have become the standard of care for multiple procedures. This paper demonstrates both the surgeons' capacity to perform an accurate anatomic evaluation of the hand and forearm (n=10) and the use of this anatomic information to accurately perform sonographically guided, percutaneous carpal tunnel release using a single-portal endoscope without direct or indirect visualization in a cadaver model (n=6). Open dissection was then performed to confirm complete ligament transection and to evaluate the surrounding structures for injury. In all 6 cadavers, the transverse carpal ligament was transected completely without injury to any surrounding structures. With further investigation, this novel technique may offer a less invasive, office-based method for the surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome that may offer patients an expedited recovery.