Binding of Sp1/Sp3 to the proximal promoter of the hMOR gene is enhanced by DAMGO

Regulation and Functional Implications of Opioid Receptor Splicing in Opioid Pharmacology and HIV Pathogenesis

Despite the identification and characterization of four opioid receptor subtypes and the genes from which they are encoded, pharmacological data does not conform to the predications of a four opioid receptor model. Instead, current studies of opioid pharmacology suggest the existence of additional receptor subtypes; however, no additional opioid receptor subtype has been identified to date. It is now understood that this discrepancy is due to the generation of multiple isoforms of opioid receptor subtypes. While several mechanisms are utilized to generate these isoforms, the primary mechanism involves alternative splicing of the pre-mRNA transcript. Extensive alternative splicing patterns for opioid receptors have since been identified and discrepancies in opioid pharmacology are now partially attributed to variable expression of these isoforms. Recent studies have been successful in characterizing the localization of these isoforms as well as their specificity in ligand binding; however, the regulation of opioid receptor splicing specificity is poorly characterized. Furthermore, the functional significance of individual receptor isoforms and the extent to which opioid- and/or HIV-mediated changes in the opioid receptor isoform profile contributes to altered opioid pharmacology or the well-known physiological role of opioids in the exacerbation of HIV neurocognitive dysfunction is unknown. As such, the current review details constitutive splicing mechanisms as well as the specific architecture of opioid receptor genes, transcripts, and receptors in order to highlight the current understanding of opioid receptor isoforms, potential mechanisms of their regulation and signaling, and their functional significance in both opioid pharmacology and HIV-associated neuropathology.

Epigenetics of µ-opioid receptors: intersection with HIV-1 infection of the central nervous system

The abuse of intravenous drugs, such as heroin, has become a major public health concern due to the increased risk of HIV-1 infection. Opioids such as heroin were originally identified and subsequently abused for their analgesic effects. However, many investigations have found additional effects of opioids, including regulation of the immune system. As such, chronic opioid abuse has been shown to promote HIV-1 pathogenesis and facilitate HIV-1-associated neurocognitive dysfunction. Clinical opioids, such as morphine and methadone, as well as illicit opioids, such as heroin, exert their effects primarily through interactions with the µ-opioid receptor (MOR). However, the mechanisms by which opioids enhance neurocognitive dysfunction through MOR-mediated signaling pathways are not completely understood. New findings in the regulation of MOR expression, particularly epigenetic and transcriptional regulation as well as alternative splicing, sheds new insights into possible mechanisms of HIV-1 and opiate synergy. In this review, we identify mechanisms regulating MOR expression and propose novel mechanisms by which opioids and HIV-1 may modulate this regulation. Additionally, we suggest that differential regulation of newly identified MOR isoforms by opioids and HIV-1 has functional consequence in enhancing HIV-1 neurocognitive dysfunction.

Regulation of opioid and cannabinoid receptor genes in human neuroblastoma and T cells by the epigenetic modifiers trichostatin A and 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the epigenetic modifiers trichostatin A and 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine on the expression of the cannabinoid receptors CB1 and CB2 and μ-opioid receptors in human SH SY5Y neuroblastoma cells and human Jurkat T lymphocytes.

METHODS

Using quantitative real-time RT-PCR, mRNA specific for the aforementioned receptors was determined. The functionality of the induced receptors was determined by analyzing the effect of the ligands to regulate intracellular cAMP.

RESULTS

We demonstrated that treatment of SH SY5Y cells, which endogenously express μ-opioid receptors and CB1, but not CB2, resulted in de novo induction of CB2, while mRNA levels of CB1 and μ-opioid receptors were not significantly altered. In contrast, treatment of Jurkat lymphocytes, which endogenously express CB2, but not CB1 and μ-opioid receptors, resulted in de novo induction of CB1 and μ-opioid receptors, while mRNA levels of CB2 were not significantly altered. Furthermore, the functionality of the induced μ-opioid receptors and CB1 in the Jurkat cells was demonstrated.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest an epigenetically regulated expression of cannabinoid receptors and μ-opioid receptors. Their induction by epigenetic modifiers in distinct cells of the nervous and immune system might result in increased effects of the cognate drugs on neuronal and immune functions. Such modifications might be useful for novel therapies for various disorders, e.g. multiple sclerosis, where the elevated transmission of cannabinoid or opioid signals is beneficial.

Transcriptional and epigenetic regulation of opioid receptor genes: present and future

Three opioid receptors (ORs) are known: μ opioid receptors (MORs), δ opioid receptors (DORs), and κ opioid receptors (KORs). Each is encoded by a distinct gene, and the three OR genes share a highly conserved genomic structure and promoter features, including an absence of TATA boxes and sensitivity to extracellular stimuli and epigenetic regulation. However, each of the genes is differentially expressed. Transcriptional regulation engages both basal and regulated transcriptional machineries and employs activating and silencing mechanisms. In retinoic acid-induced neuronal differentiation, the opioid receptor genes undergo drastically different chromatin remodeling processes and display varied patterns of epigenetic marks. Regulation of KOR expression is distinctly complex, and KOR exerts a unique function in neurite extension, indicating that KOR is not simply a pharmacological cousin of MOR and DOR. As the expression of OR proteins is ultimately controlled by extensive posttranscriptional processing, the pharmacological implication of OR gene regulation at the transcriptional level remains to be determined.

Dual regulation of mu opioid receptors in SK-N-SH neuroblastoma cells by morphine and interleukin-1β: evidence for opioid-immune crosstalk

Treatment of SK-N-SH cells with morphine and interleukin-1beta (IL-1β) produced dual regulation of the mRNA for the human mu opioid receptor (MOR) protein. Morphine produced a decrease in the MOR mRNA while IL-1β increased it, as assessed by real-time quantitative PCR. These data were consistent with immunocytochemical studies of treated and untreated cells. Morphine-mediated down-regulation of MOR was blocked by naltrexone and IL-1β-induced up-regulation of MOR was blocked by interleukin-1 receptor type 1 antagonist. Immune-opioid crosstalk was examined by IL-1β and morphine co-treatment. These data are the first to show dual regulation of MOR in neuroblastoma cells.

Transcription factor REST negatively influences the protein kinase C-dependent up-regulation of human mu-opioid receptor gene transcription

Mu-opioid receptor expression increases during neurogenesis, regulates the survival of maturing neurons and is implicated in ischemia-induced neuronal death. The repressor element 1 silencing transcription factor (REST), a regulator of a subset of genes in differentiating and post-mitotic neurons, is involved in its transcriptional repression. Extracellular signaling molecules and mechanisms that control the human mu-opioid receptor (hMOR) gene transcription are not clearly understood. We examined the role of protein kinase C (PKC) on hMOR transcription in a model of neuronal cells and in the context of the potential influence of REST. In native SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells, PKC activation with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA, 16 nM, 24h) down-regulated hMOR transcription and concomitantly elevated the REST binding activity to repressor element 1 of the hMOR promoter. In contrast, PMA activated hMOR gene transcription when REST expression was knocked down by an antisense strategy or by retinoic acid-induced cell differentiation. PMA acts through a PKC-dependent pathway requiring downstream MAP kinases and the transcription factor AP-1. In a series of hMOR-luciferase promoter/reporter constructs transfected into SH-SY5Y cells and PC12 cells, PMA up-regulated hMOR transcription in PC12 cells lacking REST, and in SH-SY5Y cells either transfected with constructs deficient in the REST DNA binding element or when REST was down-regulated in retinoic acid-differentiated cells. These findings help explain how hMOR transcription is regulated and may clarify its contribution to epigenetic modifications and reprogramming of differentiated neuronal cells exposed to PKC-activating agents.

Characterizing exons 11 and 1 promoters of the mu opioid receptor (Oprm) gene in transgenic mice

BACKGROUND

The complexity of the mouse mu opioid receptor (Oprm) gene was demonstrated by the identification of multiple alternatively spliced variants and promoters. Our previous studies have identified a novel promoter, exon 11 (E11) promoter, in the mouse Oprm gene. The E11 promoter is located approximately 10 kb upstream of the exon 1 (E1) promoter. The E11 promoter controls the expression of nine splice variants in the mouse Oprm gene. Distinguished from the TATA-less E1 promoter, the E11 promoter resembles a typical TATA-containing eukaryote class II promoter. The aim of this study is to further characterize the E11 and E1 promoters in vivo using a transgenic mouse model.

RESULTS

We constructed a approximately 20 kb transgenic construct in which a 3.7 kb E11 promoter region and an 8.9 kb E1 promoter region controlled expression of tau/LacZ and tau/GFP reporters, respectively. The construct was used to establish a transgenic mouse line. The expression of the reporter mRNAs, determined by a RT-PCR approach, in the transgenic mice during embryonic development displayed a temporal pattern similar to that of the endogenous promoters. X-gal staining for tau/LacZ reporter and GFP imaging for tau/GFP reporter showed that the transgenic E11 and E1 promoters were widely expressed in various regions of the central nervous system (CNS). The distribution of tau/GFP reporter in the CNS was similar to that of MOR-1-like immunoreactivity using an exon 4-specific antibody. However, differential expression of both promoters was observed in some CNS regions such as the hippocampus and substantia nigra, suggesting that the E11 and E1 promoters were regulated differently in these regions.

CONCLUSION

We have generated a transgenic mouse line to study the E11 and E1 promoters in vivo using tau/LacZ and tau/GFP reporters. The reasonable relevance of the transgenic model was demonstrated by the temporal and spatial expression of the transgenes as compared to those of the endogenous transcripts. We believe that these transgenic mice will provide a useful model for further characterizing the E11 and E1 promoter in vivo under different physiological and pathological circumstances such as chronic opioid treatment and chronic pain models.

Identification and functional significance of polymorphisms in the μ-opioid receptor gene (Oprm) promoter of C57BL/6 and DBA/2 mice

C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice demonstrate differences in morphine preference when tested in a two-bottle choice paradigm. Quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping suggested the proximal region of chromosome 10 was responsible for 41% of the observed genetic variance. The mu-opioid receptor (MOR) gene (Oprm) maps to this region and is a prime candidate for explaining the QTL. We hypothesized that variations in Oprm between these strains are responsible for differences in morphine preference. We identify five single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the Oprm promoter; three within or near putative transcription factor binding sites. Promoter fragments were amplified from genomic DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and subcloned into luciferase reporter vectors. A significant difference in basal Oprm promoter activity was seen with C57BL/6 and DBA/2 approximately 1675 constructs in MOR-positive BE(2)-C cells, but not in MOR-negative Neuro-2a cells. In BE(2)-C cells, average DBA/2 approximately 1675 construct activity was 1.3-2.0x greater than average C57BL/6 activity suggesting that the SNPs might alter MOR expression in these two mouse strains. Significant differences in promoter activities between the two cell lines suggest that cell-type-specific transcription factors are involved. No significant differences in construct activity were found between untreated and morphine-treated BE(2)-C or Neuro-2a cells, suggesting that morphine does not regulate transcription of Oprm.

Diversity and Complexity of the Mu Opioid Receptor Gene: Alternative Pre-mRNA Splicing and Promoters

Mu opioid receptors play an important role in mediating the actions of a class of opioids including morphine and heroin. Binding and pharmacological studies have proposed several mu opioid receptor subtypes: mu(1), mu(2), and morphine-6beta-glucuronide (M6G). The cloning of a mu opioid receptor, MOR-1, has provided an invaluable tool to explore pharmacological and physiological functions of mu opioid receptors at the molecular level. However, only one mu opioid receptor (Oprm) gene has been isolated. Alternative pre-mRNA splicing has been proposed as a molecular explanation for the existence of pharmacologically identified subtypes. In recent years, we have extensively investigated alternative splicing of the Oprm gene, particularly of the mouse Oprm gene. So far we have identified 25 splice variants from the mouse Oprm gene, which are controlled by two diverse promoters, eight splice variants from the rat Oprm gene, and 11 splice variants from the human Oprm gene. Diversity and complexity of the Oprm gene was further demonstrated by functional differences in agonist-induced G protein activation, adenylyl cyclase activity, and receptor internalization among carboxyl terminal variants. This review summarizes these recent results and provides a new perspective on understanding and exploring complex opioid actions in animals and humans.