Aspirin resistance: a new independent predictor of vascular events?

Pharmacogenomics in Stroke and Cardiovascular Disease: State of the Art

There is considerable interindividual variability in the response to antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies, and this variation may be attributable to genetic variants. There has been an increased understanding of the genetic architecture of stroke and cardiovascular disease, which has been driven by advancements in genomic technologies and this has raised the possibility of more targeted pharmaceutical treatments. Pharmacogenetics promises to use a patient's genetic profile to treat those who are more likely to benefit from a particular intervention by selecting the best possible therapy. Although there are numerous studies indicating strong evidence for the effect of specific genotypes on the outcomes of vascular drugs, the adoption of pharmacogenetic testing in clinical practice has been slow. This resistance may stem from sometimes conflicting findings among pharmacogenetic studies, a lack of stroke-specific randomized controlled trials to test the effectiveness of genetically-guided therapies, and the practical and cost-effective implementation of genetic testing within the clinic. Thus, this review provides an overview of the genetic variants that influence the individual responses to aspirin, clopidogrel, warfarin and statins and the different methods for pharmacogenetic testing and guidelines for clinical implementation for stroke patients.

Point-of-Care-Testing in Acute Stroke Management: An Unmet Need Ripe for Technological Harvest

Stroke, the second highest leading cause of death, is caused by an abrupt interruption of blood to the brain. Supply of blood needs to be promptly restored to salvage brain tissues from irreversible neuronal death. Existing assessment of stroke patients is based largely on detailed clinical evaluation that is complemented by neuroimaging methods. However, emerging data point to the potential use of blood-derived biomarkers in aiding clinical decision-making especially in the diagnosis of ischemic stroke, triaging patients for acute reperfusion therapies, and in informing stroke mechanisms and prognosis. The demand for newer techniques to deliver individualized information on-site for incorporation into a time-sensitive work-flow has become greater. In this review, we examine the roles of a portable and easy to use point-of-care-test (POCT) in shortening the time-to-treatment, classifying stroke subtypes and improving patient's outcome. We first examine the conventional stroke management workflow, then highlight situations where a bedside biomarker assessment might aid clinical decision-making. A novel stroke POCT approach is presented, which combines the use of quantitative and multiplex POCT platforms for the detection of specific stroke biomarkers, as well as data-mining tools to drive analytical processes. Further work is needed in the development of POCTs to fulfill an unmet need in acute stroke management.

Interactions among COX-2, GPIIIa and P2Y1 variants are associated with aspirin responsiveness and adverse events in patients with ischemic stroke

Background:

The effect of gene variants and their interactions on response to aspirin and clinical adverse outcomes after an acute ischemic stroke (IS) is not fully understood. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of aspirin-relevant gene variants and their interactions with clinical adverse outcomes in IS patients taking aspirin.

Methods:

A total of 14 variants from six genes encoding COX enzymes (COX-1, COX-2), platelet membrane receptors (TXAS1, P2Y1, P2Y12) and glycoprotein receptor (GPIIIa) were examined in 850 acute IS patients. Gene–gene interactions were analyzed using generalized multifactor dimensionality reduction (GMDR) analysis. All patients were followed up for 1 year after admission. Primary outcome was a composite of recurrent ischemic stroke (RIS), myocardial infarction (MI) and death.

Results:

The primary outcome occurred in 112 (13.5%) patients (81 RIS, 16 MI and 15 deaths). There were no significant differences in the frequencies of the genotypes of the 14 variants between the patients with and without primary outcome using single-locus analytical approach. However, there was significant gene–gene interaction among rs20417, rs1371097 and rs2317676. The high-risk interactive genotypes of rs20417, rs1371097 and rs2317676 were independently associated with primary adverse outcome of RIS, MI, and death after acute IS.

Conclusion:

The three-loci interactions are associated with sensitivity of IS patients to aspirin and aspirin-induced adverse clinical events. The combinatorial analysis used in this study may be helpful to elucidate complex genetic risk of aspirin resistance (AR).

Clinical trial registration:

The study described here is registered at http://www.chictr.org/ (unique identifier: ChiCTR-OCH-14004724).

[The forensic chemical investigation of acetylsalicylic acid]

The objective of the present study was to develop the universal approach to the quantitative determination of acetylsalicylic acid in biological tissues and fluids to be applied in the practice of forensic chemical expertise with the use of thin-layer chromatography, gas chromatography and mass spectrometry, low-pressure column chromatography, and spectrophotometry. A system of solvents consisting of acetone and ethyl acetate (7:3) was proposed as a universal agent for extracting acetylsalicylic acid from the cadaveric tissues and blood. It was shown that acetylsalicylic acid and its principal metabolite, salicylic acid, can be purified from the endogenous admixtures present in the biological materials by column chromatography on silica gel L 40/100 mcm. Salicylic acid in extracts from biological materials was identified and quantified with the use of thin-layer chromatography, gas chromatography/mass spectrometry, and electronic spectrophotometry. The method for forensic chemical investigation of acetylsalicylic acid has been developed and applied in the analysis of the material provided for expertise.

Is clopidogrel better than aspirin following breakthrough strokes while on aspirin? A retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

There is insufficient evidence on which to base a recommendation for optimal antiplatelet therapy following a stroke while on aspirin. The objective was to compare clopidogrel initiation vs aspirin reinitiation for vascular risk reduction among patients with ischaemic stroke on aspirin at the time of their index stroke.

DESIGN

Retrospective.

SETTING

We conducted a nationwide cohort study by retrieving all hospitalised patients (≥18 years) with a primary diagnosis of ischaemic stroke between 2003 and 2009 from Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database.

PARTICIPANTS

Among 3862 patients receiving aspirin before the index ischaemic stroke and receiving either aspirin or clopidogrel after index stroke during follow-up period, 1623 were excluded due to a medication possession ratio <80%. Also, 355 were excluded due to history of atrial fibrillation, valvular heart disease or coagulopathy. Therefore, 1884 patients were included in our final analysis.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were categorised into two groups based on whether clopidogrel or aspirin was prescribed during the follow-up period. Follow-up was from time of the index stroke to admission for recurrent stroke or myocardial infarction, death or the end of 2010.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary end point was hospitalisation due to a new-onset major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE: composite of any stroke or myocardial infarction). The leading secondary end point was any recurrent stroke.

RESULTS

Compared to aspirin, clopidogrel was associated with a lower occurrence of future MACE (HR=0.54, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.68, p<0.001, number needed to treat: 8) and recurrent stroke (HR=0.54, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.69, p<0.001, number needed to treat: 9) after adjustment of relevant covariates.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with an ischaemic stroke while taking aspirin, clopidogrel initiation was associated with fewer recurrent vascular events than aspirin reinitiation.

Microfluidic thrombosis under multiple shear rates and antiplatelet therapy doses

The mainstay of treatment for thrombosis, the formation of occlusive platelet aggregates that often lead to heart attack and stroke, is antiplatelet therapy. Antiplatelet therapy dosing and resistance are poorly understood, leading to potential incorrect and ineffective dosing. Shear rate is also suspected to play a major role in thrombosis, but instrumentation to measure its influence has been limited by flow conditions, agonist use, and non-systematic and/or non-quantitative studies. In this work we measured occlusion times and thrombus detachment for a range of initial shear rates (500, 1500, 4000, and 10000 s(-1)) and therapy concentrations (0-2.4 µM for eptifibatide, 0-2 mM for acetyl-salicylic acid (ASA), 3.5-40 Units/L for heparin) using a microfluidic device. We also measured complete blood counts (CBC) and platelet activity using whole blood impedance aggregometry. Effects of shear rate and dose were analyzed using general linear models, logistic regressions, and Cox proportional hazards models. Shear rates have significant effects on thrombosis/dose-response curves for all tested therapies. ASA has little effect on high shear occlusion times, even at very high doses (up to 20 times the recommended dose). Under ASA therapy, thrombi formed at high shear rates were 4 times more prone to detachment compared to those formed under control conditions. Eptifibatide reduced occlusion when controlling for shear rate and its efficacy increased with dose concentration. In contrast, the hazard of occlusion from ASA was several orders of magnitude higher than that of eptifibatide. Our results show similar dose efficacy to our low shear measurements using whole blood aggregometry. This quantitative and statistically validated study of the effects of a wide range of shear rate and antiplatelet therapy doses on occlusive thrombosis contributes to more accurate understanding of thrombosis and to models for optimizing patient treatment.

Aspirin Resistance in Chinese Stroke Patients Increased the Rate of Recurrent Stroke and other Vascular Events

Introduction

To investigate the prevalent of aspirin resistance (AR) in Chinese stroke patients and its association with recurrent stroke and other vascular events, including cardiovascular disease and death.

Methods

We prospectively enrolled 634 Chinese stroke patients. Aspirin was administrated to every patient from the first day of admission. Whole blood samples were collected for platelet aggregation testing after aspirin was administered for 7–10 days. A follow-up period of 12–24 months was performed to record vascular events and hemorrhagic side effects.

Results

Aspirin resistance (AR) was detected in 129 patients (20·4%), aspirin semi-resistance (ASR) in 28 patients (4·4%) and aspirin sensitivity (AS) in 477 patients (75·2%). Logistic regression analysis found that diabetes and high levels of low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) were independent risk factors for ASR and AR. During a median follow-up period of 19·4 months, the prevalence of recurrent stroke, death from all causes, myocardial infarction and vascular events overall were higher in patients with AR + ASR than in patients with AS. Cox regression analysis found that diabetes and AR were independent risk factors for vascular events.

Conclusion

Aspirin resistance is common in Chinese patient taking antiplatelet medications. Diabetes and high LDL may induce platelet activation and thrombosis and increase the occurrence of aspirin resistance. Patients who are detected to be aspirin resistant are at a greater risk of clinically important vascular events.

Drug resistance and pseudoresistance: an unintended consequence of enteric coating aspirin

BACKGROUND

Low dose aspirin reduces the secondary incidence of myocardial infarction and stroke. Drug resistance to aspirin might result in treatment failure. Despite this concern, no clear definition of aspirin resistance has emerged, and estimates of its incidence have varied remarkably. We aimed to determine the commonality of a mechanistically consistent, stable, and specific phenotype of true pharmacological resistance to aspirin-such as might be explained by genetic causes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Healthy volunteers (n=400) were screened for their response to a single oral dose of 325-mg immediate release or enteric coated aspirin. Response parameters reflected the activity of the molecular target of aspirin, cyclooxygenase-1. Individuals who appeared aspirin resistant on 1 occasion underwent repeat testing, and if still resistant were exposed to low-dose enteric coated aspirin (81 mg) and clopidogrel (75 mg) for 1 week each. Variable absorption caused a high frequency of apparent resistance to a single dose of 325-mg enteric coated aspirin (up to 49%) but not to immediate release aspirin (0%). All individuals responded to aspirin on repeated exposure, extension of the postdosing interval, or addition of aspirin to their platelets ex vivo.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacological resistance to aspirin is rare; this study failed to identify a single case of true drug resistance. Pseudoresistance, reflecting delayed and reduced drug absorption, complicates enteric coated but not immediate release aspirin administration.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00948987.

Platelet response to aspirin in Chinese stroke patients is independent of genetic polymorphisms of COX-1 C50T and COX-2 G765C

AIM

Aspirin resistance (AR) is common in Chinese stroke patients taking antiplatelet medications; however, few studies have documented the role of cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 C50T and COX-2 G765C polymorphisms in AR. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of AR in Chinese stroke patients and the relationships between AR and COX-1 C50T and COX-2 G765C polymorphisms, and to evaluate the effect of these polymorphisms on platelet response to aspirin.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 634 Chinese stroke patients. Platelet aggregation testing was performed before and after aspirin administration. The pre- and post-aspirin levels of 11-dehydrothromboxane B(2) (11-dTxB(2)) were determined in urine samples. COX-1 C50T and COX-2 G765C genotypes were determined by a polymerase chain reaction-allelic restriction assay.

RESULTS

AR was detected in 129 patients (20.4%), aspirin semi-resistance (ASR) was detected in 28 patients (4.4%), and aspirin sensitivity (AS) was detected in 477 patients (75.2%). There was no association between COX-1 C50T or COX-2 G765C polymorphisms and ASR+AR. Aspirin could efficiently reduce 11-dTxB(2) production by approximately 75%. In addition, platelet aggregation, both in response to arachidonic acid (AA) and adenosine 5'-diphosphate (ADP), was inhibited by more than 80% and 40%, respectively; however, the percentage reduction in platelet aggregation and 11-dTxB(2) levels was not significantly different between the COX-1 C50T and COX-2 G765C genotypes (p＞0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no association between COX-1 C50T and COX-2 G765C polymorphisms and AR in Chinese stroke patients. In addition, COX-1 C50T and COX-2 G765C polymorphisms had no effect on the platelet response to aspirin.

Antiplatelet therapy: aspirin resistance and all that jazz!

Platelets play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, thrombosis, and stroke. Aspirin used alone or in combination with other antiplatelet drugs has been shown to offer significant benefit to patients at high risk of vascular events. Resistance to the action of aspirin may decrease this benefit. Aspirin resistance has been defined by clinical and/or laboratory criteria; however, detection by laboratory methods prior to experiencing a clinical event will likely provide the greatest opportunity for intervention. Numerous laboratory methods with different cutoff points have been used to evaluate the resistance. Noncompliance with aspirin treatment has also confounded studies. A single assay is currently insufficient to establish resistance. Combinations of results to confirm compliance and platelet inhibition may identify "at-risk" individuals who truly have aspirin resistance. The most effective strategy for managing patients with aspirin resistance is unknown; however, studies are currently underway to address this issue.

Aspirin prophylaxis for the prevention of thrombosis: expectations and limitations

Platelets play a very important role in the pathogenesis of acute vascular events leading to thrombosis of the coronary and cerebral arteries. Blockage of these arteries leading to regional ischemia of heart and brain tissues precipitate heart attacks and stroke. Acetyl salicylic acid (Aspirin) has been the drug of choice for over half a century for the primary and secondary prophylaxis of thrombotic events. In spite of its extensive use as an antiplatelet drug for the prevention of vascular thrombosis, there is considerable concern about the degree of protection it offers, to patients under aspirin therapy. In this paper, we explain the phenomenon of aspirin resistance, discuss the limitations of aspirin therapy, and suggest methods to monitor "at-risk" individuals. Ability to monitor and determine at risk patients will provide opportunities for the clinicians to customize antiplatelet therapies.

Aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in diabetes mellitus

Aspirin is effective for the prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with a history of vascular disease, as so-called secondary prevention. In general populations with no history of previous myocardial infarction or stroke, aspirin also seems useful for primary prevention of cardiovascular events, although the absolute benefits are smaller than those seen in patients with previous cardiovascular disease. Patients with diabetes mellitus are at an increased risk of cardiovascular events, but new trials have raised questions about the benefit of aspirin for primary prevention in patients with this disorder. This Review comprehensively examines the basic pharmacology of aspirin and provides an overview of the randomized, controlled trials of aspirin therapy that have included patients with diabetes mellitus. On the basis of currently available evidence from primary prevention trials, aspirin is estimated to reduce the relative risk of myocardial infarction and stroke by about 10% in patients with diabetes mellitus; however, aspirin also increases the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding. As such, low-dose aspirin therapy (75-162 mg) is reasonable for patients with diabetes mellitus and a 10-year risk of cardiovascular events >10%. Results from upcoming large trials will help clarify the effects of aspirin with greater precision, including whether the benefits differ between men and women.

Assessment of platelet response to clopidogrel with multiple electrode aggregometry, the VerifyNow P2Y12 analyzer and platelet Vasodilator-Stimulated Phosphoprotein flow cytometry

Multiple electrode platelet aggregometry (MEA) adenosine diphosphate (ADP) test is able to detect the platelet response to clopidogrel. The values obtained with MEA ADPtest correlate with those obtained with light transmission aggregometry and peri-interventional MEA ADPtest measurements are highly associated with the risk of early stent thrombosis after percutaneous coronary intervention. The main purpose of the present study was to correlate MEA ADPtest with the VerifyNow P2Y12 analyzer, Platelet VASP flow cytometry and the MEA ADPtest HS in order to test if these assays can substitute for each other. Blood samples from 60 consecutive patients scheduled for coronary angiography before and after administration of 600 mg of clopidogrel were analyzed. The correlation of MEA ADPtest with the other whole blood tests was moderate. The following order for the degree of correlation with MEA ADPtest for postclopidogrel values was found: MEA ADPtest HS (R = 0.83) > VerifyNow P2Y12 (R = 0.47) > Platelet VASP (R = 0.35). Of the 12 patients in the upper quintile of postclopidogrel values according to MEA ADPtest, seven were in the upper quintile according to VerifyNow P2Y12 (P < 0.001), six were in the upper quintile according to MEA ADPtest HS (P = 0.004) and three were in the upper quintile according to VASP (P = 0.63). Therefore, the studied whole blood assays cannot substitute for each other. Each assay with prognostic significance will have to undergo the ultimate test for individualized antiplatelet therapy in form of an adequately powered randomized clinical trial that shows that adjustment of antiplatelet therapy is beneficial for the patient.

Aspirin resistance in coronary artery disease is correlated to elevated markers for oxidative stress but not to the expression of cyclooxygenase (COX) 1/2, a novel COX-1 polymorphism or the PlA1/2polymorphism

Aspirin resistance (AR) is estimated to be present in 5-75% of patients and is related to increased cardiovascular mortality. However, the underlying mechanisms are mostly unknown. In the present study, AR was detected in 14 out of 55 patients (25%) with coronary artery disease. The presence of concomitant anti-inflammatory drugs did not affect AR. Plasma levels of thromboxane B(2) as well as the markers for oxidative stress and known platelet activators 8-isoprostane and lipid peroxidation products were significantly higher in aspirin-resistant individuals (349.3 pg/ml, 53.9 pg/ml, and 538 micromol/l) compared to controls (113.7 pg/ml, 10.3 pg/ml, and 32.2 micromol/l; P < 0.05, respectively). Platelet cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) and COX-2 mRNA and protein expression were without significant differences between the two groups. DNA sequencing detected a novel platelet COX-1 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) resulting in amino acid exchange at position 8 (Arg8/Trp8). The wild-type as well as the heterozygous and homozygous SNP were present in both patient groups without significant differences. The aspirin binding (Arg120) and acetylation site (Ser529) were unaffected in the samples tested. Neither was AR related to the platelet integrin PlA(1)/A(2) polymorphism. In conclusion, AR appears to be unrelated to differences in platelet COX-1 and COX-2 expression or to a novel platelet COX-1 SNP and the PlA(1)/A(2) SNP. However, a correlation exists to elevated eicosanoids generated by oxidative stress indicating COX-1-independent pathways for the generation of platelet activating molecules represent a potential cause for AR.

Responsiveness to aspirin in patients with unstable angina pectoris by whole blood aggregometry

AIMS

To evaluate aspirin responsiveness in patients with unstable angina pectoris (UAP) by whole blood aggregometry. Another goal was to differentiate aspirin-resistant patients into pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic type.

METHODS

We measured platelet aggregation by determining impedance values in 70 normal volunteers and 104 UAP patients on aspirin (100 mg/day > or = 7 days) in four inducing conditions [1 microg/ml collagen, 2 microg/ml collagen, 5 micromol/l adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and 10 micromol/l ADP]. We calculated a cut-off value based on data from normal volunteers to define aspirin responsiveness in cases. Then, the correlation and agreement between the results in the four conditions was analysed to choose a preferred inducing condition for identification of aspirin resistance. Aliquots from all samples were incubated with 0.1 mmol/l aspirin and measured again for aspirin-resistant classification.

RESULTS

Aspirin resistance was observed in 38 patients (36.5%), 51 patients (49.0%), 67 patients (64.4%) and 67 patients (64.4%), respectively, for 1 microg/ml collagen, 2 microg/ml collagen, 5 micromol/l ADP and 10 micromol/l ADP among 104 patients. Collagen at low concentration was suggested as a preferred agent for detecting aspirin inhibitory effect according to the coefficient of sensitivity. After incubation, only three among 38 aspirin-resistant patients showed normal platelet aggregation and were classified into pharmacodynamic type.

CONCLUSIONS

In the presence of collagen at low concentration (1 microg/ml), the prevalence of aspirin resistance is about 36.5% in UAP patients, and according to a classification specific for resistant patients, most of the aspirin 'resistance' is just because of pharmacokinetic issues.

Monitoring of clopidogrel-related platelet inhibition: correlation of nonresponse with clinical outcome in supra-aortic stenting

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Clopidogrel and aspirin are antiplatelet medications used in patients intended for endovascular stent placement. Although various studies have investigated individual responsiveness to clopidogrel in patients undergoing coronary interventions, there are no studies regarding patients undergoing stent placement of supra-aortic arteries supplying the brain. We analyzed platelet function in a near-patient setting to determine the effects of antiplatelet treatment in neurologic patients and correlated the results with clinical outcome after stent placement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The platelet function of 50 consecutive patients scheduled for neuro-interventional stent placement procedures was assessed by using point-of-care testing. All of the patients had symptomatic arteriosclerotic lesions. Clopidogrel effects were tested by impedance aggregometry. Fifty healthy blood donors without clopidogrel medication served as the control group.

RESULTS

Reference values for responders and nonresponders were established from the results of the healthy control group. Fourteen (28%) of 50 neurologic patients were stratified as clopidogrel nonresponders. Adverse events were registered in 5 (10%) of 50 patients, 1 of them with a permanent neurologic deficit (1 of 50 [2%]). All 5 of the patients with adverse events were nonresponders. There was a statistically significant correlation between adverse events and clopidogrel nonresponse (Fisher exact test, P = .001).

CONCLUSION

A significant rate of clopidogrel nonresponders could be identified in the treated patients. Our data strongly suggest a correlation of insufficient clopidogrel-related platelet inhibition with an increased risk of thromboembolic events in supra-aortic stent placement.

Variable responsiveness to clopidogrel and aspirin among patients with acute coronary syndrome as assessed by platelet function tests

Unresponsiveness to clopidogrel or aspirin has been reported in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Platelet aggregometry (PA) and the Impact-R [Cone and Plate(let) Analyzer (CPA) technology, measuring whole blood platelet adhesion under flow conditions] were compared in detecting laboratory unresponsiveness to clopidogrel and aspirin among ACS patients. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) samples were evaluated in 404 patients by PA using adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and arachidonic acid (AA) and whole blood samples by the Impact-R ADP- and AA-response tests. The first cohort (n=114) was assayed by PA on days 1 and 4 of the onset of ACS. A patient with relative decrease of </=10% in ADP-induced maximal platelet aggregation after clopidogrel treatment was defined as laboratory non-responding (NR) patient to clopidogrel. This relative value correlated well with an absolute value of ADP-induced aggregation >/=70%. A patient with an absolute value of AA-induced maximal aggregation >/=60% was defined as laboratory NR patient to aspirin. The second cohort (n=290) was tested on day 4 by both systems and results analyzed by receiver operating characteristic curve. The following cut-off values of the Impact-R surface coverage were obtained: </=2.8% and </=3.4% for clopidogrel and aspirin NR patients, respectively. The incidence of NR patients to clopidogrel and aspirin, according to the two methods was 27% and 22%, respectively. Impact-R compared to PA in detecting clopidogrel and aspirin NR patients revealed: 79% and 82% agreement, 71% and 73% sensitivity, 83% and 86% specificity, respectively. In conclusion, the Impact-R and PA results demonstrated high degree of similarity.

Comparison of cationic propyl gallate and adenosine diphosphate for the measurement of aspirin effectivity with optical aggregometry

To compare the newer inductor of platelet aggregation cationic propyl gallate (CPG) with adenosine diphosphate (ADP) for the examination of aspirin (ASA) effectivity with optical aggregometry. In total,116 patients were prospectively enrolled with a stable cardiovascular disease, taking ASA 100 mg/day for >or=1 month. The control group consisted of 62 healthy volunteers. A platelet aggregation was investigated by optical aggregometry (aggregometer LASER 4x; BIO ART, Sint-Katelijne-Waver, Belgium). CPG and ADP were added as aggregating agents. The measured parameters were CPG-slope (%/min) and ADP max (%). Using the CPG-slope values from the control group, the CPG-slope cut-off value was determined to define a laboratory ASA-noneffectively treated patient. The values from control group followed a normal distribution (Shapiro-Wilk test). We calculated the cut-off value using the 1-tailed 95% confidence interval. The CPG-slope cut-off value was 79 %/min for an ASA-effectively treated patient. We marked the patients as laboratory ASA-noneffective treated when the CPG-slope was >79%/min. In the same way we defined the cut-off value for ADP-max. We identified the aspirin treatment as ineffective when the value of ADP-max was >62%. The values of CPG-slope and ADP-max were in close correlation in the group of patients treated with aspirin with a highly significant correlation index (r=0.671, P<0.001). By CPG-induced optical aggregation, 33,6% were ASA-noneffectively treated patients. When using both inductors, the proportion of ASA-noneffectively treated patients was 25%. Using both tests, 72.4% of patients were equally divided. ASA-noneffectively treated patients were commonly more obese (46.2%), had hypertension (94.9%) and hypercholesterolemia (73.7%), and were less commonly treated with statins (30.8%) than the aspirin effectively treated patients (42%, 88.2%, 59.2%, and 42.1%, respectively). The detected differences were not statistically significant. Cationic propyl gallate is an optimal inductor for optical aggregometry to monitor laboratory effectiveness of aspirin therapy in routine clinical pratice. The determined high prevalence of laboratory aspirin ineffectiveness highlights the clinical importance of the problem. This study brings attention to the importance of controlling cardiovascular risk factors.

The pharmacogenetics research network: from SNP discovery to clinical drug response

The NIH Pharmacogenetics Research Network (PGRN) is a collaborative group of investigators with a wide range of research interests, but all attempting to correlate drug response with genetic variation. Several research groups concentrate on drugs used to treat specific medical disorders (asthma, depression, cardiovascular disease, addiction of nicotine, and cancer), whereas others are focused on specific groups of proteins that interact with drugs (membrane transporters and phase II drug-metabolizing enzymes). The diverse scientific information is stored and annotated in a publicly accessible knowledge base, the Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics Knowledge base (PharmGKB). This report highlights selected achievements and scientific approaches as well as hypotheses about future directions of each of the groups within the PGRN. Seven major topics are included: informatics (PharmGKB), cardiovascular, pulmonary, addiction, cancer, transport, and metabolism.

Aspirin resistance

Aspirin resistance refers to less than expected suppression of thromboxane A(2) production by aspirin and has been reported to be independently associated with an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events. Possible causes of aspirin resistance include poor compliance, drug interaction, inadequate aspirin dose, increase turnover of platelets, genetic polymorphisms of cyclo-oxygenase-1, and upregulation of alternate (non-platelet) pathways of thromboxane production. Laboratory methods used to detect aspirin resistance include those that measure thromboxane A(2) production and thromboxane A(2)-dependent platelet function. However, since there is currently no standardised approach to the diagnosis and there are no proven effective treatments for aspirin resistance that improve outcome, patients with cardiovascular disease receiving aspirin should not be routinely tested for aspirin resistance. Instead physicians should be aware of the factors that may impair aspirin function, ensure that they use an appropriate dose of aspirin and optimise compliance with aspirin therapy. Further research exploring the mechanisms of aspirin resistance is needed in order to better define and develop a standardised test for aspirin resistance that is specific, reliable, can be readily applied in routine laboratories and correlate with an increased risk of cardiovascular events.

Coronary stent thrombosis related to aspirin resistance: what are the underlying mechanisms?

Acute coronary stent thrombosis represents a serious complication for which aspirin resistance could be a potential cause. The actual case is a myocardial infarction treated with immediate stenting of the right coronary artery followed by elective stenting of the left anterior descending artery 4 days later. Despite standard antiplatelet therapy, stents in both arteries occluded 2 days after the last procedure. The patient's blood samples were analyzed and revealed the presence of aspirin resistance as well as elevated thromboxane B(2) plasma levels. No thrombophilic disorder was detected. Today the mechanism of aspirin resistance is mostly unknown. Further research as well as recommendations for laboratory screening and for alternative pharmacological treatment options are required.

Aspirin failure course during exercise and its connection with soluble CD40L

INTRODUCTION

The aspirin failure (resistance) is a still discussed and highly studied problem. This phenomenon is observed in rest, but could be precipitated by an exercise. The aspirin resistance was also linked with the inflammatory process which is a key event for the atherosclerosis development. Platelets seem to play an important role also in that setting, probably by the CD40-CD40L axis. The aim of the study was to assess the frequency of the aspirin failure induced by the exercise and the role of sCD40L in that regard.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 40 patients with established coronary artery disease. The control group consisted of 10 patients without coronary artery disease matched for age. All patients and controls were on 75 mg of aspirin for at least 30 days and had treadmill testing and blood collected for measurement of sCD40L and optical platelet aggregation with ADP, collagen and arachidonic acid. Aspirin resistance was defined as a maximal aggregation with ADP and collagen exceeding 70%.

RESULTS

There were 15 aspirin-resistant patients in the studied group (37%). There were significantly higher concentration of sCD40L (ng/ml) in aspirin-resistant patients in comparison with aspirin-sensitive ones before testing (7,9 +/- 2,5 vs. 5,1 +/- 3,5, p < 0,05) and on the top of it (8,1 +/- 2,9 vs. 4,5 +/- 3,9, p < 0,05). There were 3 persons who become resistant on the top of the exercise which was connected with the significant increase of sCD40L concentration in that group (from 7,6 +/- 1,9 before exercise to 10,1 +/- 2,9 on the top of the exercise, p < 0,05). There was also a positive correlation between the sCD40L level before and on the top of the exercise in an aspirin-resistant group (r = 0,48 for both, p < 0,05). Patients who were aspirin-resistant at rest had also significant elevation of platelet aggregation on the top of the exercise (ADP (%) from 90,5 +/- 8,6 to 95,0 +/- 6,5, p < 0,05 and collagen (%) from 87,8 +/- 8,7 to 92,1 +/- 8,0, p < 0,05).

CONCLUSIONS

1. Aspirin resistance phenomenon is present in about 37% patients on 75 mg aspirin daily.2. Aspirin-resistant patients have higher platelet aggregation during the exercise.3. Moderate physical exercise provokes 12% increase in the aspirin resistance phenomenon occurrence.4. Aspirin resistance is connected with higher sCD40L level at rest and exercise provoked aspirin resistance is connected with the sCD40L concentration increase.

Measuring antiplatelet drug effects in the laboratory

This review discusses the advantages and disadvantages of currently available tests for the monitoring of antiplatelet therapy (especially aspirin and clopidogrel). Many tests of platelet function are now available for clinical use, and some of these tests have been shown to predict clinical outcomes after antiplatelet therapy. However, in most of these studies, the number of major adverse clinical events was low. No published studies address the clinical effectiveness of altering therapy based on the results of monitoring antiplatelet therapy. Therefore, the correct treatment, if any, of "resistance" to antiplatelet therapy is unknown and, other than in research trials, monitoring of antiplatelet therapy in patients is not generally recommended. A clinically meaningful definition of "resistance" to antiplatelet drugs needs to be developed, based on data linking drug-dependent laboratory tests to clinical outcomes in patients.

Partial inhibition of platelet thromboxane A2 synthesis by aspirin is associated with myonecrosis in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Heterogeneity in response to aspirin (ASA) treatment, or "aspirin resistance," could be of importance in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Decreased effects of ASA in platelets could be due to partial inhibition of cyclo-oxygenase-1 (COX-1) or to COX-1-independent mechanisms. We evaluated the effect of ASA treatment in patients with STEMI for (1) platelet thromboxane A(2) (TXA(2)) synthesis, (2) platelet recruitment elicited by TXA(2)-dependent and -independent mechanisms, and (3) a possible association of these aspects of platelet reactivity with serum markers of myonecrosis. We studied 62 ASA-treated patients within 48 hours of onset of the acute event and 69 ASA-free and 10 ASA-treated controls. TXA(2) synthesis and platelet recruitment (fluid-phase proaggregate activity of cell-free releasate) were assessed after collagen stimulation (1 micro g/ml) of whole blood. Partial inhibition of TXA(2) by ASA was found in 21 patients (34%). This was associated with significant increases in troponin T, creatine kinase-MB mass, creatine kinase, and recruiting activity versus 41 patients with blocked TXA(2) production. This was independent of fibrinolysis, and platelet COX-2 expression was not augmented. TXA(2) blockade was achieved after subsequent daily treatments or platelet incubation with ASA in vitro, suggesting lower sensitivity of COX-1 to ASA. In addition, 28 patients (45%) had an abnormally increased recruiting activity despite TXA(2) blockade, which was also associated with increased myonecrosis. In conclusion, ASA resistance, elicited by TXA(2)-dependent and TXA(2)-independent mechanisms, was prevalent in patients with STEMI. This study describes, for the first time, the association of partial platelet TXA(2) inhibition with myonecrosis.

POINT OF CARE TESTING OF ASPIRIN RESISTANCE IN PATIENTS WITH VASCULAR DISEASE

INTRODUCTION

The reported range in rates of aspirin resistance (5.5-60%) may reflect difficulties in studying platelet function and the variety of tests used. This study used a platelet function analyzer (PFA-100) to prospectively document aspirin resistance in a cohort of patients with arterial disease.

METHODS

Patients with internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis or intermittent claudication (IC) were recruited. Exclusion criteria were contraindications to aspirin, prescription of other medication with known antiplatelet effects or known platelet abnormalities. After prescription of 100 mg aspirin/day for 2 weeks an uncuffed venous blood sample was taken and analysed with the PFA-100. Aspirin resistance was defined as closure time (CT) less than the upper limit of normal (158 s collagen/epinephrine agonist; 118 s collagen/adenosine diphosphate (ADP) agonist).

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients with IC and 12 patients with ICA stenosis were recruited (n = 45). Median (range) age was 74 years (49-85) and the male to female ratio was 1.5:1. The median (range) CT was >300 (85 to >300) s with collagen/epinephrine and 100 (52 to >300) s with collagen/ADP agonist. Twelve patients (27%) in the collagen/epinephrine group had normal CT despite treatment with 100 mg aspirin, indicating resistance. Of the 33 patients with collagen/epinephrine CT prolonged by aspirin, 10 patients also had prolonged collagen/ADP CT, suggesting excessive platelet inhibition.

CONCLUSION

A significant proportion of patients taking aspirin do not show laboratory evidence of platelet inhibition and may not be protected from atherothrombotic events. The PFA-100 appears to be a useful tool to screen for both aspirin resistance and excessive aspirin mediated platelet inhibition.

Aspirin resistance, an emerging, often overlooked, factor in the management of patients with coronary artery disease

Aspirin is the most widely used medication in patients with cardiovascular disease. It has had a greater effect on patients with cardiovascular disease than any other drug. With the importance of aspirin now known for decades, it is recently becoming clearer that some patients do not derive as great a benefit from this "wonder drug" secondary to their resistance to its effects. Aspirin resistance, its prevalence, its identification, and how to overcome or avert it with other medications then becomes a central topic of discussion as important, if not more so, than the importance of aspirin itself as a cornerstone in the treatment of patients with cardiovascular disease. This review explores the current understanding of the mechanism of aspirin resistance with regard to its prevalence and the magnitude of its clinical significance. It also examines the therapeutic implications of a diagnosis of aspirin resistance.

Frequency of aspirin resistance in a community hospital

Aspirin resistance and its predictors were studied in community hospital patients who required antiplatelet therapy for thrombotic event prophylaxis. Demographic and antiplatelet medication data were collected and medication response followed. Aspirin resistance was assayed with the VerifyNow System with > or = 550 aspirin reaction units (ARUs) used as a dichotomous indicator of aspirin resistance. Patients (n = 123) were 21 to 95 years old; 49.6% were women, 77.2% were black, 95.1% were hypertensive, 85.4% had coronary disease, and 30.1% were smokers. ARU score for 325 versus 81 mg/day was 435.2 +/- 93.7 versus 401.9 +/- 83.9 ARU (p = 0.04), with a 12.1% (8 of 66 patients) nonresponse rate to 81 mg/day. Of the 8 patients who were unresponsive to 81 mg/day of aspirin, 7 responded to 325 mg/day. The 5.3% (3 of 57 patients) who were resistant to 325 mg/day received clopidogrel; 2 became responders. Multivariate analysis demonstrated significant associations of aspirin resistance with smoking (risk ratio 11.47, 95% confidence interval 6.69 to 18.63, p < 0.0001), including a significant interaction between smoking and aspirin resistance. In conclusion, this study estimates aspirin resistance prevalence and shows a strong association of smoking with platelet hyperactivity in a diverse community hospital population. Nonresponders to 81 mg/day frequently responded to 325 mg/day or to the addition of clopidogrel.

Prevalence of aspirin resistance in patients with an evolving acute myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVE

To study the prevalence and importance of aspirin resistance in patients with an evolving acute myocardial infarction (AMI) by use of the Platelet Function Analyzer-100.

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies have demonstrated the existence of aspirin resistance, but the clinical relevance of the phenomenon remains to be clarified. If aspirin resistant patients comprise a high-risk subgroup, it might be expected that the prevalence of aspirin resistance in patients with AMI would be higher than in patients without AMI. We hypothesized that the prevalence of aspirin resistance in patients with AMI was twice the prevalence in patients without AMI.

METHODS

We included 298 consecutive patients with known cardiovascular disease who were admitted to hospital with symptoms suggestive of an AMI. All had been taking aspirin 150 mg/day for at least 7 days prior to hospital admission. Platelet function was measured immediately at admission, and aspirin resistance was defined as a collagen/epinephrine Closure Time (CT(CEPI))<165 s.

RESULTS

We found that 70 (23.5%) patients were aspirin resistant, and 70 (23.5%) patients ended up with the diagnosis of an AMI. The prevalence of aspirin resistance was significantly higher in patients with AMI as compared to patients without (36% versus 20%, OR 2.26, CI 95% 1.19-4.22, p=0.0058). The CT(CEPI) measured at admission was an independent factor associated with an AMI.

CONCLUSIONS

Aspirin resistance is present in almost one fourth of patients admitted to hospital with symptoms suggestive of an AMI, and aspirin resistance is significantly associated with the diagnosis of a definite AMI.

Aspirin resistance: mechanisms and clinical implications

Acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) has been shown to irreversibly interfere with platelet function, an effect that is associated with a reduction in morbid and mortal arterial thrombotic events in multiple clinical studies. This clinical benefit appears to be attenuated by resistance to the antiplatelet effects of aspirin in up to 35% of patients. The mechanisms for aspirin resistance are multifactorial and include noncompliance with aspirin therapy, diabetes mellitus, cell-cell and drug-drug interactions, genetic polymorphisms, and coronary artery disease. It has not been determined what the best laboratory procedure is to screen for aspirin resistance. Those individuals at high risk for aspirin resistance might best be treated with an additional oral antiplatelet drug (eg, clopidogrel) to achieve maximal protection against arterial thrombotic events.

A new definition of aspirin non-responsiveness by platelet function analyzer-100 and its predictors

BACKGROUND

Aspirin non-responsiveness has been described as having a normal closure time (CT) by platelet function analyzer (PFA)-100 assay despite confirmed treatment with aspirin. There is no standard definition of aspirin non-responsiveness by PFA-100, with a variety of cut-off values having been used. We proposed an alternative definition of aspirin non-responsiveness by PFA-100 assay.

METHODS

One hundred eighty-four patients with diagnosis of stable coronary artery disease or diabetes mellitus were included in the study. Blood samples were drawn before and after the 7 days of aspirin therapy. An individual was labelled as aspirin non-responder if his/her post-aspirin CT was not 2SD above his/her baseline CT, where SD was calculated from the baseline CTs of the study population. Aspirin non-responsiveness was also defined as having a normal post-aspirin CT (< or =193 s) regardless of pre-aspirin CT.

RESULTS

The baseline CT ranged 82-187 s (mean 129.1 +/- 27.5, median 128 s) in the study population. At the end of 1 week of aspirin administration, CT increased to a mean of 260.7 +/- 63.6 s (range 102-301). According to our definition, 28 (15.2%) of 184 patients were aspirin non-responders. Univariate analysis indicated that aspirin non-responsiveness was closely associated with gender (P = 0.012) diabetes (P = 0.006), smoking (P = 0.0496) and hypertension (P = 0.021). Multivariate analysis identified diabetes (P = 0.016) as the only significant independent predictor for the presence of aspirin non-responsiveness. Thirty-four of 184 patients (18.5%) classified as aspirin non-responders according to the second criteria. Seven patients with prolongation of post-aspirin CT more than 2SD were classified as aspirin non-responders by the second criteria. Only 1 patient without prolongation of CT more than 2SD was classified as aspirin responsive by the second criteria.

CONCLUSION

Definition of aspirin non-responsiveness as post-aspirin CTs < or =193 s might overestimate the prevalence of aspirin non-responsiveness. Nevertheless, definition of aspirin non-responsiveness by PFA-100 must be standardized and its utility as a predictor of cardiovascular events needs to be further investigated.

Recent advance in antiplatelet therapy: the mechanisms, evidence and approach to the problems

Antiplatelet therapy has been established as a preventive medicine for ischemic cardiovascular diseases both at acute and chronic phases. This therapy is also crucial for the prevention of thrombotic events after coronary stent implantation. So far, many lines of clinical evidence have demonstrated the beneficial effects of aspirin (an irreversible cyclooxygenase inhibitor) and thienopyridine derivatives (adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-receptor P2Y12 inhibitors). Recently, it has been reported that the cardiovascular risk is elevated in patients with platelets resistant to these drugs, compared to the good responders. One of the current problems to be solved in antiplatelet therapy is to find out patients resistant to the antiplatelet therapy and improve its preventive effects. In addition to aspirin and thienopyridines, several types of drugs with antiplatelet effects are currently available in clinical practice. Clinical evidence has recently been accumulating for these drugs that can be potential alternatives in patients with aspirin or thienopyridine resistance. In this review, the mechanisms, evidence and approach to the present problems of drugs with antiplatelet effects are discussed.

Aspirin Resistance

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Recent studies have described the incidence (approximately one in eight high-risk patients will experience a further atherothrombotic event over a 2-year period) of aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) resistance and its possible background. The aim of this study was to compare the characteristics (risk profile, previous diseases, medications and haemorrheological variables) of patients in whom aspirin provided effective platelet inhibition with those in whom aspirin was not effective in providing platelet inhibition.

METHODS

599 patients with chronic cardio- and cerebrovascular diseases (355 men, mean age 64 +/- 11 years; 244 women, mean age 63 +/- 10 years) taking aspirin 100-325 mg/day were included in the study. Blood was collected between 8:00am and 9:00am from these patients after an overnight fast. The cardiovascular risk profiles, history of previous diseases, medication history and haemorrheological parameters of patients who responded to aspirin and those who did not were compared. Platelet and red blood cell (RBC) aggregation were measured by aggregometry, haematocrit by a microhaematocrit centrifuge, and plasma fibrinogen by Clauss' method. Plasma and whole blood viscosities were measured using a capillary viscosimeter.

RESULTS

Compared with aspirin-resistant patients, patients who demonstrated effective aspirin inhibition had a significantly lower plasma fibrinogen level (3.3 g/L vs 3.8 g/L; p < 0.05) and significantly lower RBC aggregation values (24.3 vs 28.2; p < 0.01). In addition, significantly more patients with effective aspirin inhibition were hypertensive (80% vs 62%; p < 0.05). Patients who had effective platelet aggregation were significantly more likely to be taking beta-adrenoceptor antagonists (75% vs 55%; p < 0.05) and ACE inhibitors (70% vs 50%; p < 0.05), whereas patients with ineffective platelet aggregation were significantly more likely to be taking HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) [52% vs 38%; p < 0.05]. Use of statins remained an independent predictor of aspirin resistance even after adjustment for risk factors and medication use (odds ratio 5.92; 95% CI 1.83, 16.9; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The mechanisms underlying aspirin resistance are multifactorial. Higher fibrinogen concentrations increase RBC aggregation and can also result in increased platelet aggregation. The higher rate of hypertension in patients with effective platelet aggregation on aspirin could explain the differences in beta-adrenoceptor antagonist and ACE inhibitor use between these patients and aspirin-resistant patients. Furthermore, an additive effect of these drugs may contribute to effective antiplatelet therapy. It is also possible that drug interactions with statins might reduce aspirin bioavailability and/or activity, thereby reducing platelet inhibition in aspirin-resistant patients.

Platelet activation predicts recurrent ischemic events after percutaneous coronary angioplasty: a 6 months prospective study

INTRODUCTION

An increasing amount of evidence indicates that platelet reactivity, despite a standard anti-thrombotic therapy, is a potential risk factor for recurrent myocardial ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease. We now hypothesize that this condition, measured by collagen-epinephrine (CEPI) or collagen-ADP (CADP) closure times (CT) by Platelet Function Analyzer (PFA-100), may predict the recurrence of coronary events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CEPI and CADP-CT were measured 30+/-8 h after PCI in 175 consecutive patients admitted with a diagnosis of stable angina (n=94) or acute coronary syndromes (n=81) and prospectively followed up for a mean period of 6 months. We stratified the patients in accordance to both the CEPI-CT (<or> 190 s), reflecting the intensity of cycloxygenase inhibition by aspirin and the distribution into quartiles for CADP-CT.

RESULTS

CEPI-CT<190 s as well as CADP-CT<82 s were associated with a higher rate of clinical recurrence (hazard ratio 8.5, p<0.001 and 22.9, p<0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis after adjustment for other risk factors confirmed that the lowest CADP-CT quartile significantly correlates with the risk of recurrent coronary events (hazard ratio 36.5, p<0.01), as well as CEPI-CT<190 s (hazard ratio 6.7, p=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

An enhanced platelet function after PCI when measured under high shear rates by PFA-100 is an independent predictor of a worst clinical outcome, even during a short term follow-up and may help in patients risk stratification.