Atypical atrioventricular node reciprocating tachycardia masquerading as tachycardia using a left-sided accessory pathway

Clinical profile and electrophysiological characteristics of atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: A decade's experience

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical features and inducibility characteristics of atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) and compare it with typical AVNRT.

BACKGROUND

AVNRT is the commonest form of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. The mechanism of AVNRT is very varied. Several classification systems evolved with better understanding but a simplified approach of classification into typical and atypical AVNRT is justifiable and clinically more relevant. In our study, we have assessed the epidemiological profile of atypical AVNRT in a single institute over 10 years and analysed pertinent electrophysiological characteristics.

METHOD

In this retrospective observational single center study we analysed data of all AVNRT cases from January 2011 to June 2021. In our study we classified atypical AVNRT and typical AVNRT based on the HA interval; HA≤70 ms in the His bundle region during tachycardia was considered as typical AVNRT. Other parameters were also analysed during tachycardia, such as: induction by atrial or ventricular pacing, AH/HA ratio, tachycardia cycle length and site of the earliest atrial activation. The demographic profile of the patients were also compared between 2 groups.

RESULTS

Atypical AVNRT was found in 75/1431 patients (5.2%) of all cases of AVNRT. The age of patients with atypical AVNRT was 52.4 ± 15.2 years (range 9-82 years) while that for typical AVNRT it was 48.2 ± 15.7 years (2-89 years), p = 0.023. There was no gender difference. Atypical AVNRT was induced by only ventricular extrastimuli (VES) in 17/75 (22.6%) while in typical AVNRT this was seen in only 12/1356 patients (0.9%, p < 0.001). Induction of atypical AVNRT was seen by both atrial extrastimuli (AES) and VES in 17/75 patients (22.6%) while in typical AVNRT this was seen in 64/1356 patients (4.8%, p < 0.001). Atypical AVNRT was induced by only AES in 40/75 patients (53.3%) while in typical AVNRT this was seen in 1280/1356 patients (94.3%, p < 0.001). An AH >200 ms during tachycardia was seen in all patients with typical AVNRT and in only 31/75 patients (41.3%) of atypical AVNRT (p < 0.00001). An interesting finding in atypical AVNRT was the earliest atrial activation at the His bundle region in 10/75 (13.3%) patients.

CONCLUSION

Atypical AVNRT prevalence depends on the way it is classified; this was 5.2% of all AVNRT cases in our study. Typical AVNRT was seen more frequently in comparatively younger age group and was more often induced by AES. Atypical AVNRT was much more commonly induced by only VES compared to typical AVNRT. It was not so unusual in atypical AVNRT to find the earliest atrial activation in the His bundle region.

Optimal method for ablation of atypical AVNRT

BACKGROUND

Considering that ablation of atypical AVNRT may be unsuccessful after ablation at the right posterior septum, in this study, we aimed to present an optimal method for ablation of atypical AVNRT. Also, we evaluated the efficacy of this technique for preventing recurrences.

METHODS

This is a prospective, double-center study. It was conducted on 62 patients with atypical AVNRT referred for radiofrequency ablation. The patients were randomly divided into two groups before ablation: 1-Group A (n = 30): treated with conventional ablation at the anatomic area of the slow pathway; 2-Group B (n = 32): ablation was done 2 mm higher in the septum during fluoroscopy.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients in groups A and B were 54 ± 11.7 and 55 ± 12.2, respectively (P = 0.43). In group A, ablation was successful in 24 (80%) patients following right-sided slow pathway ablation, and the remaining patients required further treatment with either a left-side approach (N = 4, 13.3%) or ablation of additional regions (N = 2, 6.7%). In group B, ablation was successful in all patients. After a 48-month follow-up, recurrence of symptomatic atypical AVNRT was detected in 4 (13.3%) patients of group A and none of group B patients (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In patients with atypical AVNRT, ablation 2 mm above the conventional area is more promising regarding success rate and recurrence of the arrhythmia.

Intra-atrial Conduction Block During Radiofrequency Ablation of Left-sided Accessory Pathways

Catheter ablation is currently the therapeutic approach of choice for many patients with accessory pathways. Despite the high success rate of radiofrequency ablation of the left lateral accessory pathways, a rather uncommon manifestation is intra-atrial conduction block at the level of the mitral isthmus. We report 2 cases of orthodromic atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia using a concealed left-sided accessory pathway with an abrupt change in the activation of the coronary sinus from an eccentric to concentric sequence after ablation delivery. The electrophysiological characteristics and the underlying mechanism of the intra-atrial conduction block are commented on. Careful mapping and assessment of relative conduction are helpful to document the diagnosis of intra-atrial conduction block. Familiarity with the likelihood of intra-atrial block during left lateral accessory pathway ablation is needed to avoid the erroneous elucidation that a second accessory pathway is present and to identify correctly the ablation site of interest.

Pacing site- and rate-dependent shortening of retrograde conduction time over the slow pathway after atrial entrainment of fast-slow atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

Introduction

We tested our hypothesis that atrial entrainment pacing (EP) of a) the common‐type (com‐) fast‐slow (F/S‐) atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) using a typical slow pathway (SP), or b) the superior‐type (sup‐) F/S‐AVNRT using a superior SP, both modify the retrograde conduction time across the SP immediately after termination of EP (retro‐SP‐time).

Methods

We measured the difference in the His‐atrial interval (HA difference) immediately after cessation of EP, performed at 2 ± 2 rates from the high right atrium (HA[1]‐HRA) versus from the proximal coronary sinus (HA[1]‐CS) in 17 patients with com‐F/S‐AVNRT and 11 patients with sup‐F/S‐AVNRT. We also measured the atrial‐His and HA intervals of the first and second cycles immediately after cessation of EP and during stable tachycardia.

Results

Unequal responses, defined as a ≥ 20‐ms HA difference at ≥1 EP rates, were observed in 16 patients (57%), including 7 with com‐ and 9 with sup‐F/S‐AVNRT. Irrespective of the EP rate, all unequal responses of com‐F/S‐AVNRT were due to a shorter HA[1]‐CS than HA[1]‐HRA, with a mean 34 ± 11 ms HA difference, whereas all unequal responses of sup‐F/S‐AVNRT were due to a longer HA[1]‐CS than HA[1]‐HRA, with a mean 49 ± 25 ms HA difference. The unequal responses resolved within two cycles after the cessation of EP.

Conclusions

We have identified a little‐known pacing site‐ and pacing rate‐dependent shortening of the retro‐SP‐time.

Limitations of ventricular pacing maneuvers to differentiate orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia from atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia

PURPOSE

Various ventricular pacing maneuvers have been developed to differentiate orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia (ORT) from atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT). We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of ventricular pacing maneuvers in patients undergoing catheter ablation for AVNRT/ORT.

METHODS

Sixty patients with supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) undergoing invasive EP study were included (ORT: 31, typical AVNRT: 18, atypical AVNRT: 11). Ventricular overdrive pacing (VOP) and resetting by premature ventricular stimulation (PVS) during SVT were analyzed by 3 independent observers blinded to the ultimate diagnosis. We determined intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for interobserver agreement and the diagnostic accuracy of consensual results.

RESULTS

Although specificity of all parameters was high (96-100%) for ORT, semi-quantitative parameters of VOP (requiring the recognition of specific ECG patterns) had lower interobserver reliability (ICC: 0.32-0.66) and sensitivity (16.1-77.4%). In contrast, most quantitative measurements of VOP and PVS showed good reproducibility (ICC: 0.93-0.95) and sensitivity (74.2-89.3%), but post-pacing interval after VOP needed correction with AV nodal conduction slowing. False negative results for diagnosing ORT were more common with left free wall vs. right free wall or septal, and slowly vs. fast-conducting septal APs. False positivity was only seen with a bystander, concealed nodo-fascicular/nodo-ventricular (NF/NV) AP in a case of AVNRT.

CONCLUSIONS

No single maneuver is 100% sensitive for ORT. Semi-quantitative features have limited reproducibility and all parameters can be misleading in the case of rate-dependent delay during VOP/PVS, ORT circuits remote from the pacing site, or a bystander, concealed NF/NV AP.

Left sided ablation for Atrioventricular Nodal Re-entrant Tachycardia: Frequency, Characteristics and Outcomes

Background

Left-sided ablation, targeting left inferior AV nodal extensions, is thought to be necessary for success in a small proportion of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) ablations; however Indian data are scarce in this regard.

Methods

Consecutive cases of AVNRT undergoing slow pathway ablation in a single centre over an 18-month period were retrospectively analyzed. Left-sided ablation at the posteroseptal mitral annulus was performed if right-sided ablation failed to abolish AVNRT.

Results

From January 2017 to June 2018, out of 215 consecutive supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) cases, 154 (71.6%) were AVNRT (47.1 ± 13.1 years, 46.1% male). Trans-septal ablation was required in 5 (3.2%) cases (mean age 48.8 ± 9.4 years; 4 female, 1 male); all with typical (slow-fast) form of AVNRT. Compared with cases needing only right-sided ablation, radiofrequency time (50.8 ± 16.9 vs. 9.9 ± 8.5 min; p = 0.005) and procedure time (166.0 ± 35.0 vs 79.6 ± 35.9 min; p = 0.004) were significantly longer for trans-septal cases, while baseline intervals and tachycardia cycle length were not significantly different. Junctional ectopy was seen in only 2 of the 5 cases during left-sided ablation, but acute success (non-inducibility) was obtained in 3 cases. There were no instances of AV block. Over mean follow-up of 12.2 ± 4.0 months, clinical recurrence of AVNRT occurred in one case, while others remained arrhythmia-free without medication.

Conclusion

Left-sided ablation was required in a small proportion of AVNRT ablations. Trans-septal approach targeting the posteroseptal mitral annulus was safe and yielded good mid-term clinical success.

A unified theory for the circuit of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia

Atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is the most common regular tachycardia in the human, but its exact circuit remains elusive. In this article, recent evidence about the electrophysiological characteristics of AVNRT and new data on the anatomy of the atrioventricular node, are discussed. Based on this information, a novel, unified theory for the nature of the circuit of the tachycardia is presented.

Multiple Shifts of the Earliest Retrograde Atrial Activation Site Along the Tricuspid Annulus During the Fast-Slow Form of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia by Radiofrequency Modification

A 70-year-old woman was admitted for treatment of supraventricular tachycardia. Ventriculoatrial conduction was revealed through programmed ventricular stimulation; the coronary sinus ostium (CSos) was the earliest atrial activation site. The fast-slow forms of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) were induced by ventricular extra-stimuli. During tachycardia, the earliest atrial activation site was located at the bottom of CSos. Radiofrequency (RF) energy application to this site resulted in the delay of local electrical potential, prolongation of tachycardia cycle length, and a shift of the earliest retrograde activation site to the roof of CSos. Subsequent ablation induced a similar shift to the inferior tricuspid annulus and to the right posterior septum. Finally, RF energy application to the right posterior septum resulted in the termination of tachycardia, which was not induced afterward. Multiple shifts in the earliest retrograde atrial activation site along the tricuspid annulus after each slow pathway ablation suggested that annular tissue plays a substantial role as a substrate for AVNRT.

Shift in the retrograde atrial activation sequence after radiofrequency catheter ablation in left variant atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

The role of left AV nodal (SVN) connections in the genesis of "left-variant" atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) and those with multiple retrograde pathways remain unclear. We describe an unusual case of "left-variant" atypical AVNRT, where change in the retrograde earliest atrial activation site (REAAS) at the coronary sinus (CS) following radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) was observed. Our observation suggests that the REAAS, that is, the left AVN connections, could participate in the formation of the reentrant circuit of "left-variant" atypical AVNRT. Furthermore, its atrial breakthroughs involved as a circuit of SVT could be (functionally) multiple.

Classification, Electrophysiological Features and Therapy of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) should be classified as typical or atypical. The term 'fast-slow AVNRT' is rather misleading. Retrograde atrial activation during tachycardia should not be relied upon as a diagnostic criterion. Both typical and atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia are compatible with varying retrograde atrial activation patterns. Attempts at establishing the presence of a 'lower common pathway' are probably of no practical significance. When the diagnosis of AVNRT is established, ablation should be only directed towards the anatomic position of the slow pathway. If right septal attempts are unsuccessful, the left septal side should be tried. Ablation targeting earliest atrial activation sites during typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia or the fast pathway in general for any kind of typical or atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia, are not justified. In this review we discuss current concepts about the tachycardia circuit, electrophysiologic diagnosis, and ablation of this arrhythmia.

Spontaneous Transition of Double Tachycardias with Atrial Fusion in a Patient with Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome

Among patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia (AVRT) and atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) can coexist in a single patient. Direct transition of both tachycardias is rare; however, it can occur after premature atrial or ventricular activity if the cycle lengths of the two tachycardias are similar. Furthermore, persistent atrial activation by an accessory pathway (AP) located outside of the AV node during ongoing AVNRT is also rare. This article describes a case of uncommon atrial activation by an AP during AVNRT and gradual transition of the two supraventricular tachycardias without any preceding atrial or ventricular activity in a patient with preexcitation syndrome.

Supraventricular Tachycardia: Where to Ablate?

This article presents a case of typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia with eccentric atrial activation where the successful ablation site was within the coronary sinus. Although most typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia, regardless of site of earliest retrograde activation, can be modified by traditional right-sided slow pathway modification, it is important to remember that ablation of left posterior nodal extensions within the coronary sinus or over the mitral annulus may afford the key to termination of tachycardia when standard approaches fail.

One tachycardia with two entrainment responses: what is the mechanism?

The patient presented for electrophysiology study and ablation for a history of narrow complex tachycardia. Both typical and atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) were induced. For the atypical AVNRT, two different entrainment responses were recorded owing to different timing in delivering the ventricular pacing train.

A technique for diagnosis of accessory pathway using the H-H and A-A intervals of the first entrained cycle during ventricular overdrive pacing

Although advancement of succeeding atrial activation by a ventricular extrastimulus (VES) on His refractoriness during supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) has been used as evidence of an accessory pathway (AP), the sensitivity of this method is suboptimal. This study was designed to compare the His-His (H-H) and atrial-atrial (A-A) intervals of the first entrained cycle during ventricular overdrive pacing (VOD) for the diagnosis of AP, in comparison to the conventional VES method. In 55 patients with SVT, a VES was elicited on His refractoriness during SVT. VOD was subsequently performed at cycle lengths 30 to 40 ms shorter than SVT cycle lengths. When the A-A interval became equal to the pacing cycle length after some beats of VOD, the cycle was considered the first entrained cycle and the H-H interval preceding the A-A interval was measured. VES advanced the next atrial activation in 16 patients (52%) with an AP, but in no patient without an AP. The H-H interval of the first entrained cycle was longer than the pacing cycle length by > or =15 ms in all patients with an AP, but was equal to the pacing cycle length in all patients without an AP. The criterion of H-H greater than A-A by > or =15 ms for the first entrained cycle provided higher diagnostic yield for AP compared with the VES method(100% vs 52%, p <0.001). In conclusion, this new criterion reliably diagnoses the presence of an AP in patients with SVT, with higher sensitivity compared with the VES method.

The atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia circuit: A proposal

Several models of the atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia circuit have been proposed. Recently, there has been experimental and clinical electrophysiology evidence that the right and left inferior extensions of the human atriventricular node and the atrionodal inputs they facilitate may provide the anatomic substrate of the slow pathway. Inferior nodal extensions appear to constitute a necessary limb of the tachycardia circuit in all forms of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia and represent the ablation target for all forms of this arrhythmia. Anatomic variations of multiple atrionodal inputs via atrial transitional cells may create the conditions for tachycardia inducibility and differing patterns of retrograde atrial activation. In the present article, we summarize the available evidence and propose a comprehensive model of the tachycardia circuit for all forms of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia based on the concept of atrionodal inputs.

The electrophysiologic characteristics of atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia with eccentric retrograde activation

BACKGROUND

The occurrence of eccentric retrograde atrial activation has been demonstrated to be from 6 to 8% in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) by several previous reports. However, most of those reports were limited by the absence of coronary sinus venography to confirm if the retrograde activation was truly left sided. The purposes of this study were to 1) determine the incidence of left sided retrograde atrial activation in our center, 2) determine the specific electrophysiologic characteristics of eccentric and concentric atrial activation and 3) determine the outcome of radiofrequency catheter ablation for AVNRT with eccentric retrograde atrial activation.

METHODS

From November 2001 to July 2004, 290 consecutive patients with AVNRT who underwent an electrophysiologic study and radiofrequency ablation were included. Group 1 consisted of AVNRT patients with eccentric retrograde atrial activation; group 2 consisted of AVNRT patients with concentric retrograde atrial activation. The electrophysiologic characteristics of the group 1 and group 2 patients were then compared.

RESULTS

The incidence of AVNRT with eccentric retrograde activation confirmed by CS venography was 6.5%. There were more females and atypical AVNRT in patients with retrograde eccentric conduction. There was more VA block after ablation and tachycardia induction by right ventricular pacing/extrastimuli in eccentric rather than concentric retrograde atrial activation. A shorter antegrade fast functional refractory period of the AV node was demonstrated in the atypical eccentric group as compared to the atypical concentric group.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated the different electrophysiologic characteristics between the AVNRT patients with eccentric and concentric retrograde atrial activation. Successful ablation sites were similar to the standard RA ablation sites in patients with retrograde eccentric conduction.

Electrophysiologic delineation of the tachycardia circuit in the slow-slow form of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the exact boundaries of the reentrant circuit in the slow-slow form of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT).

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to examine the tachycardia circuit in the slow-slow form of AVNRT.

METHODS

Single extrastimuli were delivered during the slow-slow form of AVNRT at 10 sites along the right interatrial septum: superior portion of the His-bundle (HB) site, the HB site, three equidistantly divided sites of the AV junction between HB site and coronary sinus ostium (CSOS; sites S, M, and I), and inferior, superior, posterior, posteroinferior, and internal portions of the CSOS in 13 patients. The longest coupling interval of a single extrastimulus that reset the tachycardia and the following return cycle were measured.

RESULTS

The tachycardia cycle length was 409 +/- 50 ms. The earliest atrial electrogram during tachycardia was observed at site I in all patients. The longest coupling intervals at superior-HB, HB site, sites S, M, and I, and inferior-CSOS, superior-CSOS, posterior-CSOS, posteroinferior-CSOS, and internal-CSOS were 340 +/- 52, 355 +/- 50, 367 +/- 50, 378 +/- 51, 398 +/- 49, 398 +/- 52, 355 +/- 60, 351 +/- 50, 371 +/- 48, and 363 +/- 54 ms, respectively. The following return cycles were 468 +/- 52, 453 +/- 52, 442 +/- 52, 431 +/- 50, 411 +/- 52, 410 +/- 49, 454 +/- 45, 457 +/- 57, 438 +/- 54, and 445 +/- 53 ms, respectively. The longest coupling intervals at site I and inferior-CSOS were significantly longer than those at the other sites (P <.0001). The return cycles at site I and inferior-CSOS did not differ from the tachycardia cycle length, whereas those at the other sites were significantly longer than the tachycardia cycle length (P <.0001).

CONCLUSION

Site I and inferior-CSOS are involved in the slow-slow form of AVNRT circuit, and the atrial tissue between those sites form an integral limb of the reentrant circuit.

The Specific Electrophysiologic Characteristics in Children with the Atypical Forms of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

BACKGROUND

Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is well known to be one of the most common supraventricular tachycardias in childhood. However, information about the atypical forms of AVNRT in childhood is limited. The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the clinical and electrophysiologic characteristics in pediatric patients with the atypical forms of AVNRT.

METHODS

One hundred and three pediatric patients with AVNRT were included (aged 8-18 years; 44 male, 59 female). There were 10 (9.7%) children with the atypical forms (group 1), 86 (83.4%) with the slow-fast form (group 2) and 7 (6.9%) with the fast-slow form of AVNRT (group 3). The electrophysiologic characteristics and results of the radiofrequency catheter ablation were compared among these 3 groups.

RESULTS

Group 2 patients were associated with an older age when compared with the other two groups. A significantly higher incidence of retrograde dual atrioventricular nodal pathways and a higher percentage of ventricular pacing- and extrastimulation-induced AVNRT were demonstrated in the children with the fast-slow form of AVNRT. The children with the atypical forms of AVNRT had a greater difference in the antegrade 1:1 conduction (100 +/- 73 vs. 52 +/- 41 vs. 35 +/- 26 ms, p = 0.003). Furthermore, the children with the slow-fast form of AVNRT had a greater difference in the retrograde 1:1 conduction (125 +/- 97 vs. 42 +/- 35 vs. 65 +/- 79 ms, p = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that the pediatric patients with the atypical forms of AVNRT had different electrophysiologic characteristics than those with the slow-fast or fast-slow forms of AVNRT. The results of radiofrequency catheter ablation were similar for all children with the slow-fast, fast-slow and atypical forms of AVNRT.